Video Shock: I Neo Nazisti Russi Decapitano Un Prigioniero Caucasico

The video has been removed following discussions with WordPress staff. Try here instead.
Note: Repost from the old blog.
This is an Italian translation of the famous Russian Neo-Nazi Beheading Video post. French version (en Frances). Bulgarian version (Българска версия). Romanian version ( Versiunea română). Spanish version (en Espanol). Portuguese version (em Portugues). The translator added in some stuff about Mussolini, Italian fascism and especially Mussolini’s language policy.
The translator is “Paolo from Trieste”, and he speaks Italian, Venetian, French, German, Friulian, Slovenian, Croatian and English.
This post is extremely popular and gets huge traffic from Europe. If anyone wants to translate it into other European languages, let me know. I am looking for translators into Swedish, Norwegian, Danish, Dutch, German, Finnish, Russian, Estonian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Polish, Czech, Slovak, Hungarian, Slovenian, Serbo-Croatian, Greek, Turkish, Japanese, Mongolian and Bahasa Indonesia.
Premessa
Abbiamo già visto filmati di decapitazioni effettuate dai seguaci di Al Qaida e sappiamo cosa succede in Cecenia. Ma cosa conosciamo di quello che avviene in Russia? Del crescente insorgere del Nazismo in quella vasta regione?
Ed è per questo che il filmato che vi presento è veramente orribile, non solo per l’efferatezza dell’esecuzione, ma anche per la sua valenza politica.
AVVISO IMPORTANTE! Siete minorenni o persone sensibili? Vi è assolutamente VIETATA la visione del video!! Malgrado inizialmente sia stato definito un falso, questo video è vero, purtroppo.
Il prigioniero decapitato, Shamil Odamanov di 23 anni, originario del Daghestan, è stato riconosciuta sia dal fratello, Kistaman Odamanov, che dagli stessi suoi concittadini. Shamil è scomparso da Mosca, dove risiedeva dal 2005 in cerca di lavoro e moglie, nel mese di aprile del 2007.
Sebbene le autorità russe abbiano dichiarato di aver potuto identificare la zona delle uccisioni, (cittadina e lago che appaiono all’inizio del filmato), non si hanno ancora notizie di reperti trovati in zona. La polizia russa ha comunque arrestato un uomo con l’accusa di diffusione del video-shock. Ci sono indagini in corso anche in Germania, dove si sospetta un collegamento del famigerato gruppo russo con gruppi neonazisti tedeschi.
Questo è una vera esecuzione mediante decapitazione. Gli assassini sono Neonazisti Russi, le vittime (da loro definiti ‘Negri’, perchè originari del Caucaso) sono due uomini bianchi: uno dal Tagikistan e uno dal Daghestan. Il video, diffuso nella rete russa ai primi di agosto del 2007, ha provocato un enorme clamore ed è stato al top dei motori di ricerca e dei blog/forum.
Un aspro dibattito è iniziato in Russia subito dopo la sua diffusione. Un gruppo, sconosciuto alle Autorità russe, autodenominatosi Socialismo Nazionale/Potere Bianco (o nazionalsocialisti di Rus) si è attribuito la responsabilità delle uccisioni e la paternità del video.
Rus è il nome dell’antico stato Vichingo situato nella zona di Kiev (la Rus’ di Kiev). E’ il primo stato costituito nella regione russa. Il termine Rus è comunemente usato dai nazionalisti russi per definire la madre patria.
Per esempio, un altro nucleo di neonazisti, Il partito nazionalista russo, ha diffuso videos di propaganda su YouTube. Soliti saluti nazisti, svastiche, addestramento, etc. ma nessuna uccisione. Realizzato accuratamente, con con uno sguaiato rus-punk di sottofondo, ci dimostra comunque che questo cancro è ben presente in Russia.
Il filmato risale all’inizio dell’agosto 2007, poco prima della sua diffusione in Internet.
Originariamente apparso nell’edizione russa del ‘Live Journal’ e inserito da un mittente firmatosi ‘Anti-Zingari’, il video si è poi diffuso in vari siti neonazisti di lingua russa. Ove possibile, la censura russa ha rimosso questo video ed ha ‘censurato’ il sito ‘NazionalSocialismo/Potere bianco‘ (gli autori dell’assassinio).
Il filmato si apre con bandiera Nazista e colpi di mitragliatrice di sottofondo, poi una scritta ed una voce che esclama: ‘Gloria alla Rus’! Parte la musica (una specie di adagio solenne) e si vede il panorama di una cittadina rurale ed un lago circondato da boschi. Zoom dentro la foresta: due uomini legati ed imbavagliati sono sdraiati a terra.
Uno di essi ha gli occhi sbarrati ed è assolutamente terrorizzato! Cambio della scena: i nazi hanno teso i fili fra due alberi e hanno montato la loro infame bandiera e i due sono sotto ad essa, in ginocchio e legati. Dai loro bavagli si sentono delle parole in forte accento russo ‘siamo stati arrestati dai Nazionalsocialisti Russi’ !
L’esecuzione è affidata ad un boia in tuta mimetica, incappucciato. Al grido ‘Gloria alla Rus’ si avventa sulla vittima con un coltello…un grido prolungato, strozzato poi, il silenzio. La scena orribile si protrae per 90 secondi: l’assassino non è un ‘macellaio professionista’, fà fatica a tagliare la testa della vittima.
Qualcuno ha messo in discussione l’autore del grido? il boia che non conosce il suo ‘mestiere’, o la vittima? Cosa importa, dopo aver visto il seguito?
Il boia non ha certamente la ‘maestria’ dei seguaci di Al Qaida, specialisti dello sgozzamento e decapitazione, come si è visto anche per il povero Paul Johnsons (membro di un elicottero Apache caduto in Iraq)! Finito il macabro rituale, l’assassino depone la testa sul corpo dello sventurato, a mò di scherno e trofeo, ma la testa rotola a fianco del corpo.
Si vede poi Il secondo prigioniero in ginocchio che, dopo il solito delirante grido del boia, viene giustiziato con un colpo di pistola alla nuca.
La visione della fossa, i saluti nazisti dei due assassini incappucciati, le scritte sui muri, concludono il video. Fine.
Alcune considerazioni: come è possibile che in Russia ci sia un rigurgito nazista? Un paese che ha avuto c.ca 27 milioni di morti nella 2a guerra mondiale a seguito della spietata invasione dei Nazisti e Fascisti? Se pensiamo che l’Olocausto ha provocato ‘solo’ c.ca 6 milioni di morti (4 1/2 volte in meno) è un interrogativo inquietante!
Il progetto nazista è ben noto, da bravi burocrati è stato pianificato e messo per iscritto: gli Slavi (tranne Caucasians, Cosacchi, Turchi, Uzbeki, Kazaki, Turkmeni, Azeri, Tatari, Calmucchi, Carachi, Arabo, Armeni and Georgiani) erano esseri inferiori: dovevano essere deportati, uccisi, schiavizzati, sterminati e le loro terre ripopolate dagli Ariani (lebenraum).
Gli ebrei dovevano essere sterminati e gli Ariani dovevano prendere possesso dei loro cospicui beni.
Durante la 2a guerra mondiale sono morti: 6 milioni di Polacchi (ed il 50% era di razza ebrea) pari al 30% della popolazione. Anche in Bielorussia il 25% della popolazione è morto. In Russia, 27 milioni di morti, il 15% della popolazione. Tutti slavi, comunisti.
Sebbene avessero fatto prima un conveniente e cinico patto (e a farne le spese è stata la Polonia), Russia e Germania erano destinate a combattersi mortalmente.
Le spietate purghe staliniane, alla fine degli anno 30, oltre ad essere un evidente eliminazione dei ‘nemici’ interni, possono essere anche interpretate come la ferma intenzione di combattere i Nazisti. Per quanto inverosimile possa sembrare, I seguaci di Trotzischi e Buchariniani non solo erano simpatizzanti dei Nazisti, ma si auguravano anche l’invasione Tedesca in Russia.
Possiamo così anche inserire quelle stragi, per lo più di vittime innocenti, nel contesto che precede l’invasione Nazista della Russia.
Senza Stalin ed il popolo russo, abbiamo dubbi che l’America (gli Alleati) avrebbero potuto sconfiggere la Germania (l’Asse). La Germania ha perso l’89% delle proprie truppe combattendo contro i Russi.
Inizialmente, Stalin non poteva fare altro che attuare ritirate strategiche delle proprie truppe davanti ad una tale forza d’urto. Nei territori conquistati dai tedeschi (Lettonia, Lituania, Estonia, Ucraina a Bielorussia), in nome dell’ anticomunismo ed antisemitismo, una buona parte della popolazione appoggiava i Nazisti.
Si sono avuti molti casi di diserzione di interi reparti sovietici, come avvenne anche durante la battaglia di Stalingrado, dove ben 50.000 volontari russi combatterono a fianco del Moloch Germanico.
Il destino della nazione e dei suoi abitanti era in gioco, non lo dobbiamo dimenticare.
Non era il tempo di sterili discussioni sui diritti umani. I traditori russi, i collaborazionisti di altri paesi ed i criminali nazisti furono spietatamente eliminati, giustiziati sommariamente con un colpo in testa.
Parlate di diritti umani quanto volete, la guerra è la guerra. E questa era una guerra.
Il popolo russo non ha mai approvato, seguito il regime e lottato disperatamente come durante la 2a guerra mondiale.
Definire Stalin un antisemita durante la 2a guerra mondiale (come propagandato soprattutto da ebrei paronoici ed ultranazionalisti e da pazzoidi anticomunisti) lascia il tempo che trova il destino era in gioco.
Uno scrittore sovietico ha ben delineato il confine: ‘O sei antinazista o sei antisemita.’
All’inizio della guerra, la popolazione ebrea della Polonia orientale, accolse festosamente l’Armata Rossa. Un fatto che i nazionalisti polacchi non hanno mai perdonato a quei loro compatrioti. Ma gli ebrei non erano stupidi.
Sapevano chi era il loro nemico e non si chiamava Zio Giuseppe certamente. Aveva i baffetti, il passo rigido ed il braccio destro teso. L’URSS era il potenziale salvatore di quegli degli Ebrei, ed essi lo sapevano.
Al giorno d’oggi, qualsiasi Ebreo dotato di un minimo di cultura, ogni sa quanto deve a Napoleone. E’ un peccato che essi non abbiano anche gli stessi sentimenti per J.Stalin.
Senza Stalin forse non ci sarebbero più Ebrei nel mondo.
Senza Stalin forse il mondo sarebbe stato dominato dal Nazismo!
Esaminiamo ora i gruppi neo-Nazisti russi:
Con la caduta del comunismo e la conseguente catastrofe economica che ha creato un vasto disagio fra la popolazione, c’è stato un notevole proliferare di movimenti di chiaro stampo neonazista
La guerra cecena ha peggiorato la situazione: le crudeli decapitazioni di soldati russi ad opera dei ribelli ceceni, anche filmate (vedi video in questo blog), hanno probabilmente dato il pretesto all’orribile reazione dei Nazi. I continui attacchi dei mussulmani in Russia rendono la situazione ancora più esplosiva.
I ‘Negri’ o abitanti del Caucaso, sono odiati in Russia e sono continuamene vittime di barbare uccisioni. Più recentemente ci sono stati brutali atti di violenza anche su Negri Africani, Asiatici e popolazioni di sangue misto.
Le autorità russe fanno poco o niente per fermare gli omicidi, come se ci fosse una specie di tacita approvazione al loro operato.
Il razzismo neonazista è così diffuso in Russia che è difficile da comprendere, contestualizzare negli USA. Fino ad agosto 2007 ci sono stati più di 50 omicidi di stampo razzista: sia di Caucasici provenienti dalle Repubbliche dell’Asia Centrale, che antifascisti e stranieri. Un aumento del 25% rispetto all’anno precedente, che presentava già un numero notevole di morti.
Potreste immaginarvi una situazione del genere in America, con così tanti gruppi di Neonazisti e tali crimini?
I fascisti russi sono evidentemente utili a V.Putin, scuotono l’opinione pubblica che chiede ordine e sicurezza. Putin non è, come si pensa, un neo-comunista, noi gente di Sinistra lo abbiamo sempre sospettato! Putin è una specie di fascista russo (ed anche uno degli uomini più ricchi al mondo..)
Unitamente al video, è stato distribuito un Manifesto inneggiante all’espulsione dalla Russia di tutti gli Asiatici e Negri (così vengono definiti i Caucasici) dalla Russia e (curiosamente) per l’indipendenza delle Repubbliche Russe nel Caucaso come Inguscezia, Daghestan, Cecenia, Ossezia del Nord, Caracievo-Circassia.
Ecco il testo del manifesto (ricevuto dal Centro Caucaso dei ribelli Ceceni):

Manifesto del Partito Nazional-Socialista Russo

Il nostro partito è l’avanguardia militare della lotta Nazional-Socialista

 

1. Il nostro partito annuncia l’inizio della lotta armata contro i Negri colonizzatori e i loro collaborazionisti Russi.

2. Consideriamo necessaria l’espulsione di Caucasici e Asiatici dal territorio russo.

3. Riteniamo necessario garantire l’indipendenza a tutte le Republiche Caucasiche (inclusa Cecenia), unitamente all’espulsione di tutta la popolazione di razza Caucasica.

4. Chiediamo il rilascio di tutti i Nazionalsocialisti dalle carceri russe e la fine delle persecuzioni contro Maksim Martsinevich.

5. Chiediamo che il Presidente putin (nel manifesto scritto in minuscolo-KC) si dimetta e rimetta tutto il potere nelle mani del governo Nazional Socialista, che sarà guidato da Dmitry Germanovich Rumyantsev, leader della Società Nazional-Socialista di Russia

6. Riconosciamo la guida politica della NSS Società Nazional-Socialista. Noi siamo l’ala armata, operante con indipendenza.

7. Lotteremo fino alla costituzione del governo Nazional Socialista.

Martsinevich è il capo di un gruppo chiamato Format18 (18 è l’abbreviazione Nazista delle iniziali di Hitler – riflettete!) E’ in prigione da luglio con l’accusa di odio e violenza razziale.
La violenza neonazista in Russia è fuori controllo. E’ molto forte in Polonia, UK, Rep. Ceca, Slovacchia, Germania, Ungheria ed Estonia. C’è molta più violenza pro-capite in questi paesi che negli Stati Uniti.
L’aumento della violenza Nazista è una minaccia in molte parti d’Europa. Qualcuno deve fare qualcosa, e presto!
ALCUNE CONSIDERAZIONI FINALI
Nel 1938 a Trieste, Mussolini promulgò ufficialmente le leggi razziali in Italia: ebrei e slavi erano i principali destinatari di quelle leggi. Ma già negli anni ’20 i fascisti avevano attuato la ‘pulizia etnica’ nelle zona orientale dell’Italia e nei territori dell’Istria e della Dalmazia. Come?
Espellendo decine di migliaia di slavi dall’Italia peninsulare, confiscando le proprietà (zona Gorizia e Altopiano Carsico), infoibando (gettare nelle Foibe, sì. Il termine Foiba è stato usato per primo dai Fascisti!), obbligando gli slavi a italianizzare il cognome (a Trieste il problema è stato molto sentito, considerando i numerosi abitanti di origine slava), confiscando i beni e le proprietà degli ebrei.
Non dimentichiamo che il ‘maestro’ di Hitler era Mussolini.
Dopo il 2° conflitto mondiale, la guerra fredda ha cancellato i morti russi. Come se non esistessero. Il sangue versato dall’eroico popolo russo non contava più niente. La resistenza russa all’invasione Tedesco/Italiana ha probabilmente cambiato le sorti della guerra. Se Hitler avesse conquistato la Russia il mondo sarebbe stato veramente sull’orlo del baratro, con i soli Americani a combattere l’Asse.
Per fortuna Hitler ed i suoi alleati sono stati sconfitti, ma Stalin ed il comunismo, dopo il 1945 erano il nuovo nemico dell’Occidente. L’America è responsabile di questo oblio. Tutto il resto dell’Occidente si è adeguato a questa impostazione della Storia, alimentando solamente l’anti-comunismo.
Il fascismo ed il Nazismo, dopo Norimberga sono stati messi da parte, non sono più stati presi in considerazione. Erano morti, no? Il comunismo era vivo, ed era il nuovo nemico da combattere. Ed ecco che, dopo la caduta dell’Impero del Male (R.Reagan), il nazi/fascismo torna ad agitare il nostro sonno, le nostre coscienze.
Ovunque in Europa, dal 1989, i neo nazi/fascisti hanno ripreso coraggio, si stanno organizzando sempre di più. La globalizzazione, la crisi economica occidentale, i flussi di immigrazione legale o clandestina, stanno creando una mentalità di pura intolleranza, di ‘caccia’ al diverso, allo straniero. Il terreno è molto fertile, di questi tempi, per il rifiorire del Nazi-fascismo.
Le nuove generazioni, senza lavoro stabile, insicure per il proprio futuro, sono dei ‘pascoli’ perfetti per il reclutamento di nuovi adepti alle bande naziste.
Hanno campo libero: i vecchi comunisti sono in pensione o morti, i nuovi comunisti…?
Non sono più comunisti: sono ormai preda del materialismo capitalista e sono senza una guida ideologica credibile. Il fallimento del Socialismo reale è stato evidente. Quale modello potrebbero ora prendere in considerazione?
L’ideologia nazi/fascista non è (mai) morta. Ce ne sono ancora tanti, di fascisti e nazisti, anche in Italia. Sono mascherati, mimetizzati…Alcuni di essi sono al Governo del Paese.
Assolvono il Fascismo e la Repubblica Sociale Italiana in chiave nazionalistica e anticomunista. Disprezzano gli immigrati, gli ‘stranieri’ in nome della ‘razza’ padana. Non sono ancora degli assassini, ma…chissà?
State in guardia!
If you think this website is valuable to you, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site.

The Digital TV Scam

Soon we all have to upgrade to digital TV here in the US. This is one of the most evil scams ever perpetrated on the ever-suffering American consumer.
There’s a real problem here in the US. Too many losers like me refuse to fork over $50 a month for TV that I hardly ever even watch. A while back, TV was free. It still should be free. TV was free for the same reason radio was and is free. It was supported by ads.
Then something evil happened. The cable companies, some of the most diabolical capitalist monstrosities of our age, were born. TV was going to go cable. At the beginning, it was about $30/month and you got Showtime, HBO and all sorts of other goodies.
After a while, I got tired of paying $30/month to some capitalist cable TV scum, so I turned into a “criminal”. My friends dug up the cable TV box and jerry-rigged it somehow (don’t ask me how) so I got the cable for free. I got free cable for years that way. I don’t consider it a crime because it ought to be legal for ordinary citizens to steal from criminals (cable companies).
One day the cable TV repairmen came out and at some point they dug up that box. The worker looked at me and gave me a funny look like, “Boy, you sure are smart,” and then put the box back in. I kept on getting cable for free.
Sometime in the 1990’s, the price went up. Now, if you want even the most very basic, sucky cable, you have to pay like $50/month. That’s got to be one of the biggest ripoffs around. I bought some rabbit ears instead and demanded some free TV, as one of my rights as a US citizen. Most stations come in poorly, but I don’t really care, as I hardly watch to idiot box anyway (I might watch more with clear signal).
What particularly infuriating is that those are the public airwaves. We own them. I own them. Those are my airwaves, dammit! The government took my damned airwaves, auctioned them off for pennies on the dollar to the lowest capitalist garbage on Earth (the cable companies) and didn’t give me one nickel of the proceeds.
My property was given away to criminals who then turned around and charged me out the wazoo to access my very own property again. It’s like a criminal steals your car and then forces you to lease it in order to drive it to work and back, and if you complain, the cops take you to jail.
People need to know that the cable companies are all monopolies, legal monopolies. There is nothing worse than a legal, unregulated monopoly. The local phone companies and electric companies are also legal monopolies, but they are regulated, so in general, they behave halfway decently. If they were not regulated, they would quickly degenerate into rats too.
It’s amazing that the Chicago School defends monopolies are economically rational. They are surely not rational for the consumer. It must be an economic maxim by now that as monopolization increases, the consumer is increasingly shafted. The only way out of that argument is through lying, which I assume must be the Friedmanite position on monopolies.
Anyway, here it is in the year 2000’s, and it’s $50/month for the most basic, sucky array of cable channels.
Keep in mind that when the government first auctioned off the cable spectrum, there were a lot of worries about screwing the consumer. The cable companies were adamant that they were going to charge bigtime for the service.
Well, in return, consumer advocates asked, I assume we get few to no ads, right? If consumers are paying for cable, there’s not much reason anymore for ads, and if cable is full of ads, it may as well be free or nearly free like the only ad-supported TV. The cable company scum assured us that there would be few to no ads on cable. This was touted as one of the awesome benefits of the New Cable World. Hurrahs went up across the land.
Here it is 2009. Turn on most cable channels, and you will quickly be hit by a nearly-fatal mudslide of ads. There’s at least as many ads on cable as there are on my free rabbit ears TV. Somebody’s making a Godddamn killing.
Now comes the forced upgrade to digital TV. For the life of me, I cannot understand why we need to do this. The only thing that I can think of is that American capitalism has become so sick and evil that one of the only ways it can figure out how to continuously grow is through endless forced and unnecessary upgrades.
Everything that worked just fine 30 or 40 years ago, or, Hell, 10 years ago, has to go, no matter how useful it was or still is. We have to force everyone to get rid of their working-fine “outdated” stuff and replace it with new technology that is frankly unnecessary.
Hence, after we spent a fortune on LP’s and the finest turntables, we were told they were out and we needed to move on to CD’s. Our vast 8-track collections and 8-track players were useless, and we had to upgrade them to cassettes and fancy cassette players. Then our mountains of cassettes and top of the line cassette players became useless, and we needed to move on up to CD’s. I still haven’t bought a CD player.
After the 8-track player, the turntable and the cassette player I threw up my hands, sold all my media and players to my friends and my brother and switched to FM radio. My videotapes are useless and so is my VCR. I did upgrade to a DVD player (bought from some Norteno gang members, probably stolen, for $45), but I don’t have any DVD’s to play on it.
So now we all need to move on up to digital TV. Why? Too many idiots like me are still on rabbit ears. So the forced upgrade is coming. But lots of jerks like me are going to refuse to fork the $300 for the digital TV.
Not that the digital TV itself would be good enough anyway. Ever noticed that so many of the movies now are coming out in HD-only format? Try to play that DVD on a non-HD digital TV and you have a funny picture with big black spaces at the top and bottom of the screen. Those big black spaces are US capitalism’s way of screaming at you, “You loser! Why can’t you afford $800 for an HD-TV?!” That must be painful.
Well, the government will sell you a box for about nothing that enables you to get a digital signal on an analog TV.
But here’s the catch! It won’t work very well. Wink wink. The analog signal would work way better. If for some reason, the signal is weak, on an old analog box it just comes in fuzzy. But it’s watchable.
Remember all the fuzzy signals you watched as a kid? Well, with the analog box and digital signal, it won’t work that way. It will either gome in great or it won’t come in at all. If it doesn’t come in all the way, you get a blank screen and a message that says, “Poor signal.”
Or you will get pixellated blocks of nothing on the screen, blowing out whatever was there, and leaving some signal intact. But that  signal will be frozen, so the people on the TV show will be frozen in whatever position they were in when the signal went fuzzy. And when the signal goes a little bit bad, you might still get a decent video, but the audio is going to go clean out. No sound. Frozen screen with no audio. Hell, that’s not watchable at all, not on any drug. That’s not even watchable on PCP.
One of the advantages of the new digital BS is that there is going to be something like 1,600 channels. I can see it now. 1,600 channels and nothing good on any of them. Anyway, I own all those 1,600 channels, you, me and the rest of the schmucks (I mean ordinary citizens) in the US.
Well, once again, the government kindly took my property and sold it to the highest bidder. Turns out that the cable companies, and only like 2 or 3 or them at that – I think Comcast, Verizon and ATT – bought almost all of those 1,600 channels. So don’t expect to be picking them up on your rabbit ears anytime soon.
So if you want to watch anything decent on any of those new 1,600 channels, you need to shell out for cable at $50/month for the minimum crap, and lots more for anything more.
Not only that, but if you stick with the rabbit ears TV, you will have a terminally screwed reception. Solution? Fork over $300 for a digital TV. Once you buy the digital TV, you will be endlessly frustrated trying to watch the HD-only DVD’s you keep renting. Solution? Buy the $800 HD TV. See how American capitalism grows the economy?
One more evil via the cable companies. The cable companies now have a very interesting power. Monopoly consumer power, or monopoly distributor power. This is a very interesting power.
In general, consumers simply do not have monopoly power. If I walk into a store and see an item priced at $50 and say, “Screw that! $50? I’ll give you $20, take it or leave it!” The store help will just wave and say goodbye. There will always be some guy after me who says, “$50? No problem! Give me three!” As long as that next guy exists, I have no monopoly power as a consumer.
Monopoly power of consumers only exists in rare situations where there are a limited number of consumers, buyers or distributors for products. Hence the buyer is in the unusual position of dictating sales terms to the seller. The seller can’t really go elsewhere to find new consumers or buyers because there aren’t any. This is the position the cable scum are in.
The cable scum buys its product from the producers of video content. So far, thank God, the producers and distributors are separate. God help us when they merge! So, the cable scum have been paying say Disney Channel, say $5/per time unit X for Disney Channel content.
Well, just recently, all of the cable companies got together (Legal? Dubious.) and dictated terms to the content producers. Instead of paying Disney Channel $5/per time unit X, they would pay Disney Channel $2/per time unit X. They content producers could not say, “Fine, bye,” because there are only a tiny number of consumers or buyers for their product.
A large number of buyers (free competition among buyers) is essential so that capitalists can get a fair price for their products and not be collectively driven out of business. This area of economics, buyer monopolies, seems little explored.
Monopolies are just crap all around. Buyer monopolies, seller monopolies, distributor monopolies, they’re not good for anyone but the monopoly.

Russian Neo-Nazi Beheading Video

The video has been removed following discussions with WordPress staff. Try here instead.
Repost from the old blog.
I am looking for translators to translate this post into Dutch, German, Danish, Norwegian, Swedish, Finnish, Russian, Estonian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Polish, Czech, Slovak, Hungarian, Slovenian, Serbo-Croatian, Greek, Turkish, Japanese, Mongolian and Bahasa Indonesia.
This post has been translated into other languages. Italian version (traduzione in italiano). French version (en Français). Bulgarian version (Българска версия). Romanian version ( Versiunea română). Spanish version (en Español ). Portuguese version (em Português).
Bad reactions have been reported by those watching this video.
They are:
Vomiting, loss of appetite, rage, sadness, nausea, dry heaves, stomach pains, nightmares, feeling suicidal, fear, shaking, trembling, rapid heartbeat, dizziness, chills, headaches , inability to move, spinal chills, churning stomach, anorexia (weight loss due to not eating), flashbacks, insomnia, crying, laughing and crying simultaneously, agoraphobia (inability to go outside), anxiety, depression , loss of consciousness (passing out), urinating on oneself or feeling one is about to urinate on oneself and inability to stop thinking of the video.
Many viewers have said that they were sorry they watched it in the first place and are warning everyone else not to watch it. Be careful if you email the video link to others – people have reported angering their friends by sending this to them.
Other fears were more spiritual: some feared that watching this had permanently harmed their souls. More commonly, people said that they would never be able to forget this video as long as they lived. One person has said that they will never be the same after watching this video. Another said they will be frightened for the rest of their life. Others are saying that they will be scarred for life.

A few long-lasting reactions, including reactions that look like anxiety, depression or a combination, lasting rarely for months but generally for a much shorter duration.
One hospitalization has occurred due to this video. A worker watched the video in his office, was so upset that he went outside to have a cigarette, and was shaking so hard, he could hardly smoke it. He then fainted and hit his head on the sidewalk, knocking out some teeth. If you faint easily, do not watch this video!
If you think you may react in any of these ways, please reconsider whether you really want to watch the video.
This horrible video seems to be a Russian Nazi reaction, in part, to horrible videos made by Chechen rebels recently in which they behead Russian soldiers.
One of the worst of those videos ever made is Six Russian ConscriptsItalian translation (E’ disponibile la traduzione italiana di questo articolo, intitolato Nessuna Pietà per i Russi!). French translation (en Français). Portuguese translation (em Português). In my opinion, it is much worse than this video.
New information has just come out proving that this video is real and not a fake. Kistaman Odamanov, a Dagestani, saw the video on the Internet and identified the man who was beheaded as her brother, Shamil Odamanov, 23. Furthermore, the rest of Shamil’s family and many acquaintances in his village also recognized him in the video.
Shamil went to Moscow to find work and possibly a wife in 2005. He disappeared in mid-April 2007 and has not been seen since. This implies that he was kept alive for three months somewhere before he was killed in mid-August.
Kistaman recognized Shamil by his face and the clothes he was wearing. Russian law enforcement has found where the opening scenes of the video were shot, but they have not found where the executions took place, nor have they found any bodies, blood or other forensic evidence.
Nevertheless, authorities are now treating this case as a homicide. German law enforcement is also involved, implying a German neo-Nazi angle. The Tajik in the video, who appears to have been executed by shooting, has yet to be identified.
Much more on the story that the video is real and not fake on my blog here.
Many have asked the name of the song in the video. The song is “Rus” by the Russian folk-pagan metal band Arkona.
This is the Russian neo-Nazi decapitation execution video that took the Russian Internet by storm in early August 2007 (the video topped search engine and blog hits for Russian sites). The video is titled The Execution of a Tajik and a Dagestani. It’s a video of Russian neo-Nazis executing two “Blacks” – that is, two White men – one from Dagestan and one from Tajikistan .
For an inquiry into whether or not reasonable people would consider Dagestanis and Tajiks to be White, see my meditation on the subject here.
This video aroused tremendous controversy on the Net for a short while after it appeared. A group called either National Socialism/White Power or National Socialists of Rus claimed responsibility for the video, but authorities said they had never heard of either group.
Rus is the name of the ancient Viking state centered around Kiev – the Kievan Rus. This was the first Russian state, and the name Rus is widely used by nationalists instead of Russia.
A similar neo-Nazi group, the Russian Nationalist Party, can be seen in Youtube videos here and here . The latter video at least has some great music.
This video is well done at least, with some great heavy metal music playing in the background. It was shot in early August 2007, soon before it was released on the Internet.
The video was originally posted on the Russian version of the Live Journal website by a user named vik23. Western news reports say it was originally posted there by a user named “anti-Gypsy,” but he was just one of the ones who reposted it later. It subsequently appeared on many Russian-language neo-Nazi internet sites.
It was quickly removed from most of the sites where it was found, and the National Socialism/White Power site (the name of the group that committed the murders) was overwhelmed with hits.
The video opens first with a Nazi flag and a machine gun sound in the background, then a shout in Russian of “Glory to Rus!”. Then it shows a pan of a Russian town in the countryside. Next it shows a lake surrounded by a forest.
The camera zooms in on the forest and shows two men bound, gagged and hogtied on the ground.
One man is clearly terrified. Next it shows the two frightened men apparently saying, unprompted, in heavily accented Russian, through their gags, “Russian National Socialists arrested us,” as they are bound by hands and legs, kneeling, in the forest. There is a large Nazi flag in the background.
The video then shows an extremely unskilled executioner – a masked man in combat fatigues – coming up behind one of the captives and grabbing him to the same shout of “Glory to Rus!” He then starts sawing the poor guy’s head off, but does a lousy job of it.
The poor guy screams a bit at first. Yet the incompetent executioner spends far too long – 90 seconds – sawing the guy’s head off.
There is controversy about the grunting and gasping sounds you hear as the guy’s head is being sawed off. Some say it is the executioner panting in frustration as he tries to saw off the poor guy’s head. Others say it is the victim himself inhaling blood through his throat or lungs. I’m not competent to judge who is making those horrible sounds.
Finally he chops the poor sod’s head off and then tries to put the head on the decapitated body, but the head keeps rolling off the body. He needs to take lessons from Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, who did an excellent job of balancing US Apache helicopter engineer Paul Johnson’s decapitated head on the rest of his body.
Finally, we are shown the other hostage bound and gagged. There is the same shout, “Glory to Rus!,” and he is quickly dispatched from behind with a shot to the head, whereupon he topples into a freshly-dug grave. The video then shows two Nazi bastards, completely covered from head to toe, giving the obvious salute in front of a Nazi flag.
Originally, Russian law enforcement was divided on whether or not this video was real, then they decided it was fake, but recently there is proof that it is real, and Russian LE is now treating the video as evidence in a homicide case.
I never thought it was fake because you can’t fake a video like this unless perhaps you are a major motion picture company with a large budget.
One man was arrested for distributing this video. For more on him, see my post here.
Some wonder how any Russian could possibly support Nazis, given that they invaded the Soviet Union, an action that resulted in 27 million Soviet deaths, 4½ times more than were killed in the Jewish Holocaust© that gets drilled into our heads day and night.
To understand how a Russian could be a Nazi, one needs to understand the nature of the bloody fascist-Communist struggle in the 20th Century, a history covered up by anti-Communist cant for the simple reason that the fact that no one fought fascism like the Communists would make Commies look good.
Study the history of the 20th Century from a real historian, not a professional hack like so many nowadays, and you will see that Communists and Nazis had one of the worst hate-fests of the past century.
Those 27 million Soviets did not die in WW2 because the USSR so loved the Nazis that they gave the world 27 million of their only sons and daughters. The same tapestry was played out everywhere in Europe during WW2 – every time the Communists and Nazis faced on the war-field, the bodies piled to the sky and the atrocities – on both sides – were too numerous to count. This was no lovers’ quarrel.
The mad, lunatic Nazi invasion of Russia was genocidal in intent and praxis, especially towards the Slavs, whom Hitler considered to be untermenschen.
They were seen as an inferior race, a weak “slave race” unable to defend themselves. In particular, Hitler, in his manic and crazed anti-Semitism, felt that (Russian) Slavs had allowed themselves to be enslaved by Jews. He meant the “Communist Bolshevik Jews” who Hitler felt ran the USSR.
Since only a bunch of no-good Commie human beings were being genocided during the Nazi invasion of the USSR, this episode has been widely ignored by Western history books. Would Stalin have lost, probably 10’s of millions more people would have died in the USSR and elsewhere, Nazism would have been much more successful, would have menaced the world, and may well have conquered it.
The Nazi project was clear; as bureaucrats, they wrote it down. The Slavs (yet not the Estonians, the Caucasians, Cossacks, various types of Turks, Uzbeks, Kazakhs, Turkmen, Azeris, Tatars, Kalmyks, Karachays, Arabs, Armenians and Georgians) were inferior, to be replaced by Germans through starvation, murder, enslavement and deportation, with the resulting depopulated lands to be given to the Germans for their lebensraum.
During World War 2, 6 million dead Poles (only 50% of whom were Jewish), or 30% of the population, were killed. Similarly, in Belorussia, 25% of the population was dead by the end of the war. In Russia, 27 million were dead, 15% of the population. All of these were “Slav” nations to the Nazis.
Stalin’s mad purges of the late 1930’s were to some degree wild attempts to stave off the emerging Nazi threat by purging and even executing Trotskyites and Bukharinites who were not only openly sympathizing with the Nazis but were also advocating a Nazi invasion of the USSR, if you can believe that.
So the Stalinist purges, criminal and insane as they were, must be seen in the context of the looming Nazi invasion. Yet most of the victims of these purges were innocent people.
Without Stalin, it is dubious whether or not we could have defeated Germany. For instance, 89% of Germany’s casualties in WW2 were at the hands of the Soviets.
Stalin’s initial retreats were completely sensible.
Behind Russian lines, in occupied Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Ukraine and White Russia, a good number of people supported the Nazis. They gleefully joined in the Jew-killing and Commie-killing and fought alongside the Nazi beast. Entire Soviet units went over to the Nazis, especially during the Stalingrad siege, where 50,000 Soviet volunteers fought alongside the German monster.
The fate of the nation and many of its residents was at stake. This was no time for namby-pamby talk of human rights. Justice was swift for Soviets who defected to the Nazi enemy, just as it was for the collaborators from other lands, and as the Soviets pushed the Nazi criminals back in the East, many a traitor and collaborator got a swift bullet to the head. Wail about human rights all you want. This was a war. A war to the death.
Yet never had the Soviet people supported the regime in greater numbers and with greater passion than during WW2.
The notion that Stalin during WW2 was an anti-Semite (parroted mostly by paranoid ultranationalist Jews and crazed anti-Communists) may be laid to rest. As one Soviet author put it bluntly at this time, “You are either an anti-Nazi or an anti-Semite.” The line was drawn.
When the Red Army came into Eastern Poland early in the war, they were wildly embraced by the Polish Jews, an action that Polish nationalists have forever condemned them for. But these Jews were not stupid. They knew their enemy, and he was not named Uncle Joe. He had a little mustache, a jerky walk and an outstretched right arm. The USSR was a potential savior of these Jews, and they knew it.
Every educated Jew nowadays knows how indebted he is to Napoleon. It’s too bad they don’t feel that way about Joseph Stalin too.
Joseph Stalin may have saved all of today’s Jews from Nazism.
Joseph Stalin may have saved all of today’s world from Nazism.
On to Russian neo-Nazis. With the fall of Communism, the Russian neo-Nazi movement came into full bloom as the economy collapsed, and the search for scapegoats began.
The Chechen War made this worse, and the cruelties of the madder Chechen rebels probably drove this incident – they have beheaded some Russians on and off-camera. And Muslim terrorist attacks continue in Russia.
“Blacks,” or people from the Caucasus, are hated throughout Russia, and there are regular murders of them. More recently, there have been attacks on African Blacks, Asians and mixed-race people. The authorities do little or nothing to stop the killings, since they support the mindset behind them.
Neo-Nazi racism is so big in Russia that it is hard to comprehend in a US context. Already by August 2007, the time of the video above, in Russia there were over 50 racist murders of Caucasians – people from the Central Asian Republics , anti-fascist activists and foreigners – 25% more than the previous year’s – which was already way too high.
Can you imagine such a huge Nazi movement and attendant crimes in the US?
The Russian fascists serve as shock troops for Vladimir Putin, giving the lie to the notion that he is a neo-Communist, and proving, as we Leftists long suspected, that he is just some species of Russian fascist.
Distributed along with the video was a manifesto calling for the expulsion of all “Asians” and “Blacks” (people from the Caucasus) from Russia, and then, curiously, for the independence of all of the Russian republics in the Caucasus such as Ingushetia, Dagestan, Chechnya, North Ossetia, Cherkyo-Kabardino, etc. Here is the full text of the manifesto (from the Chechen rebel Kavkaz Center):

Statement of the National Socialist Party of Rus

We Are Part of an Armed Faction of the Party

1. Our party announces the beginning of armed struggle against the Black colonists and those Russian officials who support them.
2. We consider the expulsion of Caucasians and Asians from the territory of Russia to be a necessity.
3. We feel it is a necessity to grant independence to all the republics of the Caucasus (including Chechnya), along with the expulsion of the entire Caucasian population there.
4. We demand the release of all National Socialists from Russian prisons and a halt to the persecution of Maksim Martsinevich.
5. We demand that President putin (in the statement the name was written with lowercase – KC) resign and hand over all power to the National Socialist government, which should be led by Dmitry Germanovich Rumyantsev, the leader of the National Socialist Society of Russia.
6. We recognize the political leadership of a National Socialist Society (NSS). We are the armed wing, operating independently.
7. We will not stop struggling until power is handed over to the National Socialist government.

Martsinevich is the head of a group called Format 18. He has been jailed since July on charges of fomenting ethnic hatred and threatening violence.
Neo-Nazi violence in Russia is out of control. It’s also very high in Poland, the UK, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Germany, Hungary and Estonia. There is much more neo-Nazi violence per capita in these places than in the US.
Growing neo-Nazi violence is a menace to parts of Europe, and especially to Russia.
If you think this website is valuable to you, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site.

Руснак Neo – Нацист Обезглавявам Виж

The video has been removed following discussions with WordPress staff. Try here instead.
Note: Repost from the old blog.
Note: To regular readers: This is a Bulgarian translation of the famous Russian Neo-Nazi Beheading Video post. Italian version (traduzione in italiano). French version (en Frances). Romanian translation (Versiunea română). Spanish version (en Espanol). Portuguese version (em Portugues).
Shout out to Alexander Sokolov from Bulgaria for this excellent translation.
We are still looking for translators to translate this post into into Swedish, Norwegian, Danish, Dutch, German, Finnish, Russian, Estonian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Polish, Czech, Slovak, Hungarian, Slovenian, Serbo-Croatian, Portuguese, Greek, Turkish, Japanese, Mongolian and Bahasa Indonesia.
Regular readers, you really do not want to watch this video. It’s really horrible.
Броят на умрелите лица от урагана Катрина може да бъде видян на сайта тук.
ВНИМАНИЕ! Този клип е с много страшно съдържание! Екстремни гледки самостоятелна преценка е препоръчително! Ако мислите, че ще се разстроите или по-лошо от това видео, НЕ, НЕ, НЕ, НЕ го гледайте!
Ако сте непълнолетни, НЕ гледайте това видео! Ако сте родител и сте загрижени за децата си, не разглеждайте този пост, моля родителски надзор и / или да ограничите вашата детска интернет употреба или инвестирайте в блокиране на програмата.
Лоши реакции са били съобщени от тези гледам това видео.
Те са:
Повръщане, загуба на апетит, гняв, тъга, гадене, стомашни болки, кошмари, усещане за самоубийство, разклащане, треперене, бърз пулс, световъртеж, студени тръпки, главоболие, неспособност да се движи, тръпки по-гърба, стомаха разтройство, ретроспекции, безсъние, плач, смях и плач едновременно, agoraphobia (неспособност да излезем навън), тревожност, ретроспекции, депресия, загуба на съзнание (преминаване изход), уриниране върху себе си или чувство е на път да уринират върху себе си и неспособност да спра да мисля за видео.
Тези реакции са били забелязани от геодезични коментари за бюлетин табла и YouTube, където филма и реакциите към нея са публикувани.
Мнозина наблюдатели смятат, че те са били причинени от гледания на първо място и са предупреждение всеки друг да не го гледате. Бъдете внимателни, ако сте пратили имейл видео връзка към други хора ,те могат да се чувстват гневни на човека изпратил им това.
Други опасения са по-духовни: някои опасения, че им се налага постоянно да гледат клипа и това води до трайно увреждане на техните души. По-често, хора, казват, че никога няма да можете да забравите този видеоклип, доколкото сте живи.
Един човек е казал, че той никога няма да бъде същият след като е гледал това видео. Друг каза, че ще бъде уплашен до края на живота си. Други казват, че те ще бъдат помрачени за живот от това видео.
Нежеланите реакции обикновено са продължила няколко часа, но някои може да продължат един ден или повече. Двама души докладвали кошмари за седмица, още един човек припаднал от гледането и трябваше да си остане вкъщи един ден от работа, но освен това все още не е имало трайни, сериозни или фатални нежелани лекарствени реакции.
Ако смятате, че може да реагира във всеки от тези начини, моля преразгледайте дали наистина искате да гледате видеото.
Този видеоклип вече е бил забранен достъп до огромен брой интернет форуми. Има силен призив да го махна от Интернет или не и да го обявят за незаконен. В крайна сметка, това е реален филм, и хората са тези, които да преценят.
Това е почти толкова зло като детска порнография, защо хората тайно копнеят да видят такива ужасни неща ,те мразят толкова много. Гледай сега, ако си посмял, преди ченгетата във вашия регион да забранят клипа сега и завинаги.
Тази публикация е преведен на различни езици. Италианската версия (traduzione в Italiano). Френската версия (EN Франсис).
Това ужасно видео изглежда е руска нацистка реакция, в отговор на д ужасните клипове, направени от чеченски бунтовници наскоро, в които те обезглавяват руски войници.
Един от най-лошите от тези видеоклипове, направени някога, шест руски наборни, може да се види в този блог тук (италиански превод, озаглавен Без милост за руснаците (Е “disponibile ла traduzione Italiana Di questo articolo, intitolato “Nessuna Пиета на I Руси“!),  френски превод (EN Франсис). По мое мнение, е много по-лошо от това видео.
току що излезе нова информация, доказваща, че този клип е реален и не е фалшив. Kistaman Odamanov, A Dagestani, видях видеото в Интернет и идентифициран човекът, който е бил обезглавен, както моят брат, Shamil Odamanov, 23. Освен това, до края на Shamil семейството и много познати в селото също признават смърта му във видеоклипа.
Shamil отиде в Москва да си намери работа и евентуално за жена през 2005 година. Той изчезна в средата на април 2007 г. и не е виждан от тогава. Това предполага, че той е бил жив, отглеждан в продължение на три месеца някъде, преди да е убит в средата на август.
Kistaman познава Shamil с лицето му и дрехите, с които той е бил облечен. Руските правоохранителни органи са уведомени , когато когато са показани сцени от видеото. Не бяха открити съдебномедицински доказателства, нито са намерени всички органи, кръв и други .
Въпреки това, властите приемат този случай като убийство. Немски правоприлагащите също участват, което означава,че има немски нео-нацистки връзки. Таджиките във видеоклипа, който изглежда, че са били убити от снимките, все още предстои да бъдат идентифицирани.
Много повече за историята,за това че видеото е реално, а не имитация на моя блог тук.
Много хора искат името на песента във видеото. Песента е “Rus” от руската народно-езическа метъл банда Arkona. Можете да гледате видео на песента в този блог тук.
Имате нужда от широколентова връзка за видео да го гледате добре.
Това е руско нео-нацистко изпълнение на видео обезглавяване, което поде бури из руския Интернет в началото на август 2007 г. (видео гарнирани търсачката и блог хитове за руските сайтове). Клипът е озаглавен изпълнението на таджикски и Dagestani. Това е видео на руския нео-нацистите изпълняващата две убийства на мъже – един от Дагестан и един от Таджикистан.
За проверка на това дали разумни хора биха помислили ,че дагестанците и таджиките са бели хора виж ми размишленията по този въпрос тук.
Това видео направи огромни противоречия в мрежата за кратко време, след като се появи. А група, наречена Национална бяло социализма / Бяла мощност или национален социалисти на Рус твърдеше, че има отговорност за видеото, но властите казват, че никога не са чували за тази група.
Рус е името на древно Viking състояние центрирано около Киев – на Киевска Рус. Това е първото име на Русия, както и името Rus е широко използван от националисти, вместо на Русия.
Подобна нео-нацистката група, руски националистическата партия, може да се види в YouTube видеоклипове, тук и тук. Последните видео поне има някои много музика.
Този видеозапис е добре направено най-малко с някои много тежки метъл музиката свири във фонов режим. Той е заснет в началото на август 2007 г., скоро преди това клипа да ее пуснат в Интернет.
Видеото беше първоначално афиш на руската версия на живо вестник сайт от потребител на име vik23. Western новини доклади казват, че първоначално е бил там, публикувани от потребител на име “анти-цигански”, но той е само един от тези, които reposted по-късно. Той в последствие се появили много руски език нео-нацистки интернет сайтове.
Тя бързо се отстранява от по-голямата част от местата, където е установено, и Националната социализма / Бяла Power сайт (името на групата, която извършени убийствата) бе претоварени с хитове.
Видеото се отваря първо с нацистки флаг и картечница звук във фонов режим, след това възклицание на руски на “Слава на Русия”. Тогава той показва план на руския град в провинцията. Напред той показва езеро заобиколено от гора.
Камерата увеличава в по гората и показва двама мъже.
Един човек е ясно ужасен. Напред той показва двете уплашени мъже, очевидно казва с силен руски акцент, “Руски национал -социалисти ни арестуваха”, те са с обвързани ръце и крака, на колене, в гората. Налице е голям нацистки флаг във фонов режим.
Видеото след което показва изключително неквалифицирани палач – маскиран мъж в идва зад един от пленниците и сграбчвайки го казва същия възглас “Слава на Русия!” След това започва да му реже главата.
Горкото момче издава крясъци малко по-рано. Но некомпетентният палач муй реже главата прекалено дълго 90 секунди.
Има спор относно някои звуци, които се чуват според едни е от палача мъчейки се да му отреже глава, според други от самата жертва.
Накрая той се опитва да сложи главата на мъртвото тяло, но държи главата подвижния от тялото. Той трябва да се вземат поуки от Ал Кайда на Арабския полуостров, които не отлична работа на балансирането САЩ Apache хеликоптер инженер Пол Джонсън на decapitated главата на останалата част от тялото му.
И накрая, се показват останалите заложници обвързани. В съшото време се извиква, “Слава на Русия!”, и обвързаният е застрелян и пада в изкопан гроб. Видеото след това показва две нацистки копелета, напълно покрити от главата до петите, които очевидно поздравяват пред нацистки флаг.
Първоначално, руските правоприлагащи са разделени по въпроса дали, това видео е истинско или не, тогава те решават, че е фалшиво, но напоследък има доказателства, че е истина. Никога не съм си представял, че е фалшиво, защото вие не можете да снимате фалшиво видео така, освен ако може би ако не сте кино компания с голям бюджет.
Един човек е бил задържан за разпространение на това видео. За повече информация за него, виж моя пост тук.
Чудно е как всички руснаци евентуално биха могли да подкрепят нацистите, като се има предвид, че те навлизат в Съветския съюз, действие, което води до 27 млн. съветски смъртни случаи, 4 ? пъти повече, отколкото са били убити в еврейския Холокост.
За да разберете как руснак би могъл да бъде нацист,първо трябва да разберете естеството на кървавата фашистка-комунистическа борба в 20-ия век, история, обхванати от анти-комунистическа невъзможен за проста причина, че фактът, че никой няма да воюва като фашизъм на комунистите ще направи да изглеждат добре.
Изследване на историята на 20-ти век от историка реална, а не професионални рязка рана като мнозина наши дни, а вие ще видите, че комунистите и нацистите бяха едни най-мразените на миналия век.
Тези 27 милиона руснаците не умряха в WW2, защото СССР толкова възлюби нацистите, които те дадоха на света 27 милиона само от техните синове и дъщери.
Същото гоблен е фалирал навсякъде в Европа по време на WW2 – всеки път, когато комунистите и нацистите са изправени на войната-област, на органите, прибрана към небето и жестокости – и от двете страни – са твърде много да се разчита. Това не е любовна кавга.
The Mad, лунатични нацистката инвазия на Русия бе genocidal при намерение и практика, особено по отношение на славяните, които Хитлер счита за untermenschen.
Те се разглеждат като лоши раса, слаб “славянски раса” не може да се защитават сами. В частност, Хитлер, в неговото маниакално луд и анти-семитизма, почувствах, че (руски) славяни имали право сами да бъде поробен от евреи. Той разбира “комунистическа болшевик евреи”, които Хитлер почувствах се завтече СССР.
Тъй като само няколко от не-добри Commie човешките същества са били genocided по време на нацистката инвазия на СССР, този епизод е бил широко пренебрегвани от Западните история книги. Бихте Сталин са изгубени, може би 10 години на милиони повече хора ще са умрели в СССР и на други места, нацизма би била много по-успешно, ще имат menaced света, и може добре да го завладява.
В нацистка проект беше ясно, както бюрократи, те написах го.
Славяни (още не е естонци, на бялата раса, Cossacks, различните видове турци, Uzbeks, Kazakhs, туркменски, Azeris, татари, Kalmyks, Karachays, араби, арменци и грузинци), са били лоши, да се замени с германците чрез гладуване, убийство , поробването и депортиране, получената обезлюдени земи да се обърне внимание на германците за тяхното lebensraum.
По време на Втората световна война 2, 6 милиона мъртви поляците (само 50% от които са евреи), или 30% от населението, са били убити. По същия начин, в Белорусия, 25% от населението е бил мъртъв до края на войната. В Русия, 27 милиона са били мъртви, 15% от населението. Всички те са “славянски” народи с нацистите.
Сталин на луд purges на късното на 1930 бяха до известна степен див опити да отклонявам очертаващия нацистка заплаха от прочистване и дори изпълняващата Trotskyites и Bukharinites, които бяха не само открито sympathizing с нацистите, но също бяха застъпничество в нацистка инвазията на СССР, ако Вярвам, че мога.
Така Stalinist purges, наказателни и луди, тъй като те са, трябва да се разглежда в контекста на looming нацистката инвазия. Но по-голямата част от жертвите на тези purges са невинни хора.
Без Сталин, е съмнително дали не бихме могли да имат победена Германия. Така например, 89% от германските жертви в WW2 бяха в ръцете на руснаците.
Сталин първоначалното retreats бяха напълно разумен.
Зад руските линии, заети в Латвия, Литва, Естония, Украйна и Русия на бялото, добра броят на хората, подкрепени нацистите. Те се присъединиха gleefully в юдеина-убиване и Commie-убийството и воюва заедно с нацистки звяр. Цяло Съветския единици преминаха на нацистите, особено по време на обсадата Stalingrad, където 50000 съветски доброволци воюва заедно с германския чудовище.
Съдбата на нацията, и много от неговите жители бе поставено на карта. Това не беше време за лигав говорим за човешки права.
Правосъдие е бързото за руснаците, които defected с нацисткия враг, както беше за сътрудници от други земи, както и на руснаците избута на нацистки престъпници обратно в Изток, много предател на родината и трябва бързо куршум в главата. Лелекайте за правата на човека всичко, което искаш. Това е война. А войната до смърт.
Но никога не са имали съветски хора поддържат режима с по-големи номера, както и с голяма страст, отколкото по време на WW2.
Идеята, че Сталин през WW2 е анти-семит (parroted най-вече от параноидна ultranationalist евреи и луд анти-комунисти), могат да бъдат предвидени за отдих. Като един съветски автор да я тури bluntly в този момент, “Вие сте или анти-нацистки или анти-семит.” Линията е изготвена.
Когато Червената армия влезе в Източна Полша в началото на войната, са били wildly прегърна от полски евреи, за действие, че полските националисти са завинаги осъден за тях. Но тези евреи не са глупави. Те знаеха си враг, и той не беше наречена Чичо Джо. Той имаше малко мустак, A цвърчащо пеша и простряната дясната ръка. В СССР е потенциален спасител на тези евреи, и те са знаели това.
Всеки образован евреин днес знае как той е задължен да Наполеон. Това е твърде лошо те не се чувстват по този начин за Йосиф Сталин също.
Йосиф Сталин може да са записани всички от днешните евреи от нацизма.
Йосиф Сталин може да са записани всички днешната света от нацизма.
На към руския нео-нацистите. С падането на комунизма, Руската нео-нацистки движение влезе в пълен разцвет на икономиката срива, както и търсенето на scapegoats започна.
В чеченския война направи това лошо, а cruelties на ализарин чеченски бунтовници, които вероятно изпъди този инцидент – те са обезглавени някои руснаци и изключване-камера. Вижте една от най-ужасни от тези видеоклипове, ако можете да го носят, за този блог тук. И мюсюлмански терористични нападения продължи и в Русия.
“Черни”, или хора от Кавказ, са мразени цяла Русия, и там са редовни убийства от тях. По-скоро е имало нападения срещу африканската Черни, азиатци и смесена раса хора. Властите направя малко или нищо за спиране на убийствата, тъй като те поддържат нагласи зад тях.
Нео-нацистки расизъм е толкова голям, че в Русия, че е трудно да разберат в САЩ контекст. Още от август 2007 година в Русия е имало над 50 расистки убийствата на бялата раса – хора от Централна Азия републики, анти-фашистка активисти и чужденци – 25% повече от миналата година – което вече е прекалено висока.
Можеш ли да си представиш такъв огромен нацистки движението и съпътстващи престъпления в САЩ?
Руските фашисти служи като шок войски за Владимир Путин, като в лъжа схващането, че той е нео-комунистическа и доказване, тъй като ние Leftists дълго подозира, че той е просто някакъв вид руски фашист.
Разпределени заедно с видеото е манифест призовава за експулсирането на всички “азиатци” и “Черни” (хора от Кавказ) от Русия, а след това, с любопитство, за независимост на всички от руски републики в Кавказ като Ингушетия , Дагестан, Чечения, Северна Осетия, Кабардино-Cherkyo и др Ето пълният текст на Манифеста (от чеченски бунтовник Kavkaz Център):

Декларация на Народното Социалистическата партия на Rus

Ние сме част от въоръжено крило на партията

1. Нашата страна, обявява началото на въоръжена борба срещу Черно colonists и тези руски служители, които ги подкрепят.
2. Ние считаме за експулсиране на бялата раса и азиатци от територията на Русия, че е необходимост.
3. Смятаме, че е необходимо да се предостави независимост на всички републики от Кавказ (включително Чечня), заедно с експулсирането на целия кавказки населението там.
4. Настояваме за освобождаването на всички Национален социалисти от руските затвори и да се спре преследването на Maksim Martsinevich.
5. Настояваме, че президентът Путин (в изявлението на име написани с малки букви – KC) подаде оставка и власт над цялата страна до Народното социалистите правителство, който трябва да бъде водена от Дмитрий Germanovich Rumyantsev, лидер на Национално дружество на социалистите Русия.
6. Ние признаваме, на политическото ръководство на Национална Социалистическа общество (НЗК). Ние сме въоръжени крило, работещи независимо една от друга.
7. Ние няма да спрем, докато се борят мощност не е предоставен на Народното социалистите правителство.
Martsinevich е начело на група, наречена Формат 18. Той бе арестуван след юли по обвинение в fomenting етническата омраза и насилие, застрашаващи.
Нео-нацистки насилие в Русия е извън контрол. То също е много високо в Полша, Обединеното кралство, Чешката република, Словакия, Германия, Унгария и Естония. Има много по-нео-нацистки насилието на глава от населението в тези места, отколкото в САЩ.
Нарастваща нео-нацистки насилие е заплаха за части на Европа.

How To Drive In Rain, Snow and Sleet

I visit and used to live in a part of California that gets lots of all three. For the past several days up here, it has been raining (mostly), sleeting (a lot less) and snowing (just some). Go up the hill a bit, and it starts sleeting and then snowing a lot more. I have front wheel drive (really necessary for driving in that crap) but I hate putting on chains. Here, we don’t salt the roads and no one has snow tires.
People put on snow chains or snow cables instead. I think that’s a royal PITA, so generally I refuse to do it. I’ll just stay home and wait until the snow melts. At this elevation, the snow never lasts long anyway.
I had to drive a bit in the snow on Friday in order to get home. They had a sign saying “Chains Required” at around 1,900 feet, but there were no cops around, so I kept going. The snow was very wet and slushy, you could pretty much drive in it, and there were road tracks cleared in the snow by car tires. I drove very slowly though, and I was pretty scared.
Later, driving into the housing development, you were driving on pure snow, and that was more of a mess. One thing I noticed was that 15 mph was about the proper speed for driving in pure snow with no chains. When I slowed down to 10 mph, I started to bog down in the snow. Heading up more towards 15 mph was better because then I could sort of smash through the stuff. So it looks like it is possible to drive too slow in the snow.
A similar theory must hold for driving in mud, which I do as little of as possible, as it is very easy to get stuck in mud. Drive too slow, and you may just get mud-stuck. You may need to speed up a bit in the mud to smash right through it.
I’ve already run my car off the road three times in the snow in Oakhurst over 15 years. You get hit with a sudden snowstorm out of the blue and you are just stuck in the mess. Or it starts snowing and you think you can make it to where you want to go but you can’t. Both times caused me some monetary damage to my vehicle.
I meet folks down in the Central Valley who say, “Wow, you were up in the snow! That must be so cool!” The Hell it’s cool. I lived in the snow for 16 years. I’ve had enough of the snow for a lifetime. Snow means I can’t drive my car. Snow means I have to be careful walking around or I might slip and fall on my ass. And around here, snow usually means the power goes out, over and over. Snow has caused me $100’s in car repairs. Who needs the snow? What’s so good about it?
Around here, sleet is nothing. You just drive slower than in the rain but not as slow as in the snow. I haven’t crashed yet in sleet. It’s scary, but it’s drivable.
I also drove in some hail the other day. That was pretty weird. After it hails for a while, the road and scenery starts looking white like it just snowed. I slid on a hail-slicked road once, but I didn’t crash. I’ve never crashed in hail either. Hail means really slow down. On Monday, I was driving about 35-40 mph in that messy hail, and the speed limit was 55 mph. Still I got idiot after idiot piling up behind me.
What about ice? Ice is truly horrible. I crashed once on ice, in January 1976 in Snoqualmie Pass in the state of Washington. You couldn’t even see it, and there wasn’t any snow along the road. I guess the road looked sort of shiny, but it wasn’t obvious. The car just turned into an amusement park ride, and next thing I knew, my buddy and I were in a ditch. We were really stoned on Thai weed, so we thought it was hilarious.
Truthfully, it wasn’t all that funny. On the other side of the road, there wasn’t any ditch. There was a mountain slope. We would have headed down that thing and probably run into a tree. Ever run into a tree in a car? You don’t want to do that. No matter how fast you’re going, you’re going zero miles an hour after you hit that tree. No fun.
Rain is interesting. A friend of mine said the other day, “It’s really not possible to drive too slow in the (hard) rain.” That was one of the smartest things I’ve heard in a while! How can you drive too slow in the rain? You can’t. If it’s raining, slow down, idiots!
Here in California, no one knows how to drive in the rain. Californians always speed in the rain. If you drive slow and sensibly in the hard rain (that means driving about 35-40 mph), you get endless trains of clowns piling up behind you, and you have to keep pulling over to let them pass.
I’ve never crashed a car in the rain, and I’ve been driving in the rain my whole life. How do you crash a car in the rain? By being an idiot. Almost everyone who crashes in the rain is driving too fast. That’s all there is to it.
What if there is a puddle or a pool in the road? Shouldn’t you speed up to go through the water so you won’t get stuck in it? If it’s not that deep, probably not. Why not? Because if you drive fast through puddles, the water can splash all over your windshield,  blinding you. Much worse, it can splash all over your engine and get in your distributor cap, stalling your car. And if it’s not that deep, you won’t get stuck anyway.
What if the pool is really deep? Hey, if it’s that deep, you probably shouldn’t even try to drive through it!

Neo-Naziste Decapitare Video

The video has been removed following discussions with WordPress staff. Try here instead.
Note: Repost from the old blog.
This is a Romanian translation of the Neo-Nazi Beheading Video post that was so popular on the old blog. This excellent translation was done by Loghin Alexandru from Romania. This post has been translated into other languages. Italian version (traduzione in italiano). French version (en Frances). Bulgarian version (Българска версия). Spanish version (en Espanol).
I am looking for translators to translate this post into Swedish, Norwegian, Danish, Dutch, German, Finnish, Russian, Estonian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Polish, Czech, Slovak, Hungarian, Slovenian, Serbo-Croatian, Portuguese, Greek, Turkish, Japanese, Mongolian and Bahasa Indonesia. If you are interested, email me via the Contact page at the top.
Regular readers, you really do not want to watch this video. It’s really horrible.
ATENŢIE! Acest video conţine imagini foarte oribile!! Dacă esti minor, nu te uita la acest video! Daca sunteti un parinte preocupat de vizualizarea acestui post de catre copilul dumneavoastra va rugam sa-l supravegheati sau sa-i restrictionati accesul la internet.
Reactii adverse au fost semnalate de catre cei care au vizualizat acest video.
Acestea sunt: vărsături, pierderea poftei de mâncare, furie, tristeţe, greaţă, dureri de stomac, cosmaruri, sentiment de sinucidere, tremuraturi, ameţeli, frisoane, dureri de cap, incapacitatea de a se misca ,insomnie, plâns, râs şi plâns în acelaşi timp, agorafobie (teama de se afla in spatii aglomerate, de a se afla departe de casa,), anxietate, depresie, pierderea conştienţei (lesina), incapacitatea de a se opri gandindu-se la acest video.
Un numar mare de spectatori au spus ca le pare rau ca au vizionat acest video de la inceput si ca-i avertizeaza pe ceilalti sa nu-l vizioneze.
Alte temeri: unii se temeau ca vizionand acest clip le va schimba viata definitiv. Majoritatea oamenilor au spus ca nu vor uita acest video cat timp vor trai. O persoana a spus ca nu va mai fi acelasi om dupa ce a vizionat acest video.
Aceste reactii adverse dureaza in mod normal ore, dar unele au durat si zile. Doua persoane au spus ca aveau cosmaruri saptamani intregi, alta persoana lesinase de la vizualiazarea acestui video dar in afara de acestea reactii nu a fost nimic serios sau de lunga durata.
Daca crezi ca ai putea reactiona in aceste feluri te rog sa te gandesti inaintea de a vizualiza acest video. Acest video a fost interzis in multe dintre site-uri de pe internet.
Postul a fost tradus si in alte limbi. Versiunea Italiana (traduzione in italiano). Versiuna franceza (en Frances).
Acest video oribil pare sa fie o reactie a nazistilor rusi catre filmarile groaznice facute recent de catre rebelii ceceni in care decapitau soldati rusi.
Una dintre cele mai oribile inregistrari facute vreodata Six Russian Conscripts poate fi vazut aici.In opinia mea e mult mai grav decat acest video.
Noi informatii tocmai au fost au iesit la iveala demonstrand ca acest video este REAL si nu un fals.
Kistaman Odamanov un Dagestan a vazut acest video pe Internet si l-a identificat pe acel om care a fost deapitat, ca fiind fratele ei, Shamil Odamanov, 23. Mai mult , restul familiei si multe cunostinte din sat l-au recunoscut in aceasta inregistrare.
Shamil a plecat in Moscova pentru a gasi ceva de munca si posibil o sotie in 2005. A disparut in aprilie 2007 si nu a mai fost vazut de atunci. Acest lucru implica faptul ca a fost tinut undeva timp de 3 luni inainte de a fi omorat in milocul lunii august.
Kistman l-a recunoscut pe Shamil dupa faţa si dupa imbracamintea pe care o purta. Politia rusa a descoperit locul in care s-a filmat scena , dar nu a aflat locul unde s-au desfasurat executiile si nici nu a gasit sange, trupurile barbatilor sau alte dovezi.
Cu toate acestea autoritatile trateaza acest caz ca homicid. Politia germana este de asemena incurcata in acest caz, implicand o legatura neo-Nazista. Barbatul persan din acest video, care a fost executat prin impuscare inca nu a fost identificat.
Numele melodiei din acest video este “Rus” si este compusa de grupul de muzica metal folk Arkona.
Acesta este video-ul neo-Nazist rus al executiei ce a luat cu asalt Internetul rusesc. Acest video este intitulat The Execution of a Tajik and a Dagestani. Este un video in care sunt executati doi “negri” adica doi oameni albi unul din Dagestan si unul din Tajikistan.
Pentru mai multe detalii despre etniile din Dagestan si Tajikistan click aici.
Acest video a starnit controverse enorme pe net pentru o scurta perioada de timp dupa ce a aparut. Un grup numit fie National Socialism/White Power fie National Socialists of Rus au revendicat responsabilitatea pentru acest video, dar autoritatile au spus ca nu au auzit niciodata de aceste grupari.
Rus este numele vechiului stat viking localizat in jurul Kievului – Rusia Kieveană. Acesta a fost primul stat rus si numele Rus este utilizat pe scara larga de catre nationalisti in loc de Rusia. Un grup neo-Nasist similar “Russian Nationalist Party ” poate fi vazut pe Youtube aici si aici.
Video-ul a fost postat prima data pe un website rus (gen Live Journal) de un user numit vik23. Rapoartele de stiri din vest spun ca initial video-ul a fost postat de un user numit “anti-Gipsy” dar el era doar unul din cei care au repostat mai tarziu. Ulterior a aparut pe mai multe site-uri in limba rusa neo-Naziste.
A fost repede eliminat de pe site-urile unde a fost postat initial, si site-ul grupului National Socialism/White Power (cei care au comis crimele) a fost destul de vizitat.
Video-ul incepe cu un steag nazist si un sunet de mitraliera pe fundal, apoi un strigat in rusă “Glory to Rus!”. Apoi arata o portiune de tara dintr-un oras rus. Camera schimba unghiul de vedere si arata doi oameni legati la picioare si la maini . Un barbat este in mod clar ingrozit , apoi ii arata pe amandoi speriati ce spun aparent cu un accent rus : “Socialistii Nationali Rusi ne-au arestat”, unde sunt ingenuncheati si legati la picioare si la maini. In fundal se vede un steag mare nazist.
Video-ul arata apoi un “călău” extrem de prost calificat – un om mascat in haine de lupta – venind din spatele unui prizonier, apucandu-l si in acelasi timp urland : “Glory to Rus”. Apoi incepe taierea capului saracului om, dar face o treaba destul de proasta. Bietul om tipa un pic la inceput. Cu toate acestea călăul incompetent petrece prea mult timp – 90 seconds – pentru ai taia capul omului.
In cele din urma reuseste sa-i taie capul si incearca sa-l puna pe corpul decapitat. Dar capul cade in repetate randuri de pe corp nefind fixat intr-un fel. Ar trebui sa ia lectii de la Al Qaeda din Peninsula Arabica care au facut o treaba excelenta in decapitarea lui Paul Johnson , un inginer de elicopter.
In cele din urma ne este aratat celalalt ostatic legat . Acelasi salut “Glory to Rus” apoi este impuscat din spate si aruncat intr-o groapa proaspat sapata. Video-ul ii arata apoi pe cei doi nazisti salutand in fata unui steag nazist.
Initial autoritatile ruse nu stiau daca acest video era real sau nu, apoi au decis ca este fals, dar recent exista dovezi ca este foarte real. N-am crezut niciodata ca acest video este fals pt ca nu poti falsifica asa ceva poate in exceptia cazului in care esti o companie de filme cu buget mare.
Un om a fost arestat pentru distribuirea acestui material. Pentru mai multe detalii aici.
Unii s-ar intreba cum ar putea rusii sai suporte pe nazisti, dat fiind faptul ca au invadata Uniunea Sovietica, o actiune ce a dus la 27 de milioane decese, mai multi decat in Holocaustul Evreiesc.
Incearca sa studiezi istoria sec. al 20-lea de la un adevarat istoric, nu de la un nestiutor, si o sa vezi ca nazistii si comunistii au avut una din cele mai sangeroase lupte din ultimul secol.
Acei 27 de milioane de sovietici nu au murit in Al Doilea Razboi Mondial pt ca URSS îi iubea asa mult pe nazisti incat le-au dat 27 de milioane de oameni. Acelasi exemplu a fost folosit in Europa in timpul celui De Al Doilea Razboi Mondial , de fiecare data cand comunistii si nazistii se confruntau pe terenul de lupta, cadavrele erau infinite si atrocitatile-din ambele tabere- erau prea numeroase pt a fi numarate.
Invazia nebuna a nazistilor din Rusia a fost necrutatoare in special fata de slavi, pe care Hitler îi considera a fi untermenschen (oameni inferiori).
Ei erau vazuti ca o rasa inferioara, o rasa slaba de sclavi care nu se putea apara singura. In special, Hitler în a sa lupta nebuna nebuneasca impotriva evreilor, a fost de parere ca slavi rusi si-au permis singuri sa fie inrobiti de evrei. El s-a referit la evreii comunisti bolşevici.
Proiectul nazist era clar : ca birocrati, ei l-au scris pe hartie. Slavii ( caucazieni, cazaci, turci, uzbekistani, tătari, arabi, armeni, georgieni) erau inferiori, si aveau sa fie inlocuiti de germani prin infometare, ucideri, deportari; pamanturile depopulate urmand sa fie cedate Germaniei pt lebensraum (in germana inseamnă habitat sau spatiu de locuit).
In timpul celui De Al Doilea Razboi Mondial, 6 milioane de polonezi (50% fiind evrei) sau 30% din populatie, au fost ucisi. Similar in Belarusia 25% din populatie era ucisa la sfarsitul razboiului. In Rusia , 27 mil. de oameni erau morti, 15% din populatie. Toate acestea erau natiuni slave pentru nazisti.
Inlaturarile nebune ale lui Stalin din anii 1930 erau la un anumit grad incercari salbatice de a intarzia amenintarea nazista prin inlaturarea su chiar executarea lui Trotskyites and Bukharinites care nu numai simpatizau cu nazistii dar si sustineau o invaziei a URSS.
Asa ca inlaturarile lui Stalin, criminale si nebune cum sunt ele, trebuie vazute in contextul procesului de aparitie a invaziei naziste.Totusi cele mai multe victime ale acestor inlaturari au fost oameni nevinovati.
Fara Stalin este nesigur daca am fi putut sau nu invinge Germania. De exemplu 89% din accidentele Germaniei din Al Doilea Razboi Mondial au fost la mâna sovieticilor.
Retragerile lui Stalin erau destul de sensibile. In spatele linilor ruse ocupate in Letonia, Lituania, Estonia, Ucraina si Rusia Alba nazismul a fost sprijinit de un numar mare de oameni. Ei s-au alaturat cu bucurie in uciderea comunistilor si a evreilor si au luptat alaturi de nazisti. Toate unitatile sovietice au napustit asupra nazistilor, in special in timpul asediului din Stalingrad, unde 50.000 de voluntari rusi au luptat alaturi de Germania.
Soarta natiunii si a multor din rezidentii ei era in joc. Nu era timpul pt o conversatie lacrimogena despre drepturile omului. Justitia a fost rapida pentru sovietici care s-au alaturat nazistilor, asa cum a fost si pentru colaboratori din alte tari. Si cum sovietici îi alungau pe criminalii nazisti inapoi in est, multi dintre tradatori au fost impuscati.
Cand Armata Rosie a sosit in Polonia de Est, erau primit cu bratele deschise de catre evreii polonezi, o actiune in care nationalistii polonezi au fost condamnati mereu. Dar evreii nu erau prosti. Ei isi stiau inamicul. URSS era un potential salvator pt ei si stiau asta.
Fiecare evreu stie acum cat de indatorat îi este lui Napoleon. Pacat ca nu simt asta si pentru Stalin.
Joseph Stalin probabil i-a salvat pe evreii de azi de nazism.
Inapoi la rusi neo-nazisti. Odata cu caderea comunismului miscarea neo-nazista a intrat in forta odata ce economia s-a prabusit si cautarea caprelor ratacite a inceput.
“Negrii” sau oamenii caucazieni sunt detestati in Rusia si exista crime regulate. Mai recent au fost atacuri asupra negrilor africani, asiatici. Autoritatile fac nimic sau deloc pentru a oprii aceste asasinate.
Neo nazismul rusesc este asa de mare in Rusia incat este greu de inteles intr-un context american. In august 2007 au fost peste 50 de crime rasiste , 25% mai multe ca anul trecut.
Iti poti imagina o miscare nazista asa de mare si asa de multe crime in SUA?
Fascistii rusi servesc ca trupe de soc pentru Vladimir Putin, ideea fiind ca el e un neocommunist, si demonstreaza ca el este doar o specie de fascist rus.
Alaturi de video era si un manifest ce facea apel la expulzarea tuturor “asiaticilor” si “negrilor” din Rusia si independenta tuturor republicilor rusesti din Caucaz precum: Ingushetia, Dagestan, Chechnya, North Ossetia, Cherkyo-Kabardino. Acesta este intreg manifestul (de la centrul rebel cecen Kavkaz):

Declaratia de la Partidul National Socialist din Rus

Suntem parte a unei factiuni armate a partidului

  1. Partidul nostru anunta inceperea unei lupte impotriva colonistilor negri si a tuturor oficialilor rusi care îi suporta.
  2. Consideram ca este necesara expulzarea caucazienilor si asiaticilor de pe teritoriul rus.
  3. Credem ca e o necesitate sa acordam independenta tuturor republicilor din Caucaz (incluzand si Chechnya) si expulzarea intregii populatii din Caucaz.
  4. Cerem eliberarea tuturor natinalistilor socialisti din inchisori si oprirea executiei lui Maksim Martsinevich.
  5. Cerem ca presedintele Putin sa demisioneze si sa cedeze toata puterea guvernului national socialist care ar trebui condus de Dmitry Germanovich Rumyantsev liderul Societatii Nationale Socialiste din Rusia.
  6. Recunoastem conducerea politica a Societatii Nationale Socialiste.Suntem o putere armata ce opereaza independent.
  7. Nu ne vom opri pana ce puterea nu va fi preluata de guvernul National Socialist.

Martsinevich este liderul grupului numit Format 18 (18 este o prescurtare nazista a initialelor lui Hitler).A fost inchis din iulie pentru incurajarea uri etnice si pentru amenintari cu violenta.
Violenta neo nazista in Rusia este scapata de sub control. De asemenea este foarte mare si in Polonia, Anglia, Republica Ceha, Slovacia, Germania, Ungaria, Estonia. Este mai multa violenta neo nazista pe capitala decat in SUA.
Violenta neo nazista care creste este o amenintare pentru unele parti din Europa. Ceva trebuie facut si repede.

Is This Galician?

I assume this is Galician? Here it is, from a Maoist list that I am a member of:

Ben-queridos camaradas:
Co motivo da celebracion do decimo tercer aniversario do Inicio da Guerra Popular no Nepal queremos felicitar ao PCN (m) ao heroico Exercito Popular de Liberación e ao povo do Nepal.
A Guerra Popular e o proceso revolucionario no Nepal son fonte de inspiración para os povos do mundo e centro dun importante debate para o desenrrolo da ideoloxia proletria.
A aplicación das teses da Guerra Popular do camarada Mao Tse-Tung a revolución no Nepal permitiu derrubar unha monarquia feudal e avanzar a actual fase da Revolución Democratica e suas tarefas. Tarefas que teñen que ser levadas adiante baixo a dirección do proletariado e seu Partido en alianza co campesiñado e as capas da pequena burguesia patriotica. Apartarse do maoísmo seria avandoar o vermello sendeiro da revolucion e adentrarse no negro pantano do revisionismo e do reformismo burgues.
Avanzar decididamente en prol da Republica Popular e do Socialismo coidandose das balas almibaradas da burguesia e do imperialsimo, que tratara de mercar a dirixentes e cadros con dadivas, sorrisos e prevendas tal é a grande tarefa que enfretan os comunistas no Nepal.
Estamos seguros que seguindo polo mesmo senderio vermello da guerra popular o PCN-U (m) lograra a victoria definitiva sobre as forzas que oprimen a os povos do Nepal.
Dende Galiza, unha nacionalidade sen estado que forma parte do Estado español os comunistas maoístas les desexamos os millores exitos pois a vosa revolución forma parte tamen da nosa.
VIVA A REVOLUCION NO NEPAL E SEU PARTIDO !
VIVA O MAOÍSMO, TERCEIRA E SUPERIOR ETAPA DO MARXISMO-LENISNISMO !
VIVAN AS MASAS POPULARES, ELAS FAN A HISTORIA !
VIVA A REVOLUCIÓN PROLETARIA MUNDIAL !
VIVA EL M.R.I.
Galiza Febreiro do 2009.
COMITÉ DE LOITA POPULAR “MANOLO BELLO”
COMITE GALEGO DE SOLIDARIEDADE CO NEPAL
CORREO VERMELLO

Obviously this is a Romance language, but it looked really weird to me. I ran some of it through Google but I wasn’t getting any hits for Portuguese sites. Plus, though I’m not an expert on Portuguese, that does not look like Portuguese to me. I got hits for sites in Spain, but no way is that Spanish. At first I thought it was Catalan, but the “Comite Galego” line strongly implies that this is in the Galician language.

Mao Messed Up

I think an assessment of Mao ought to be made on a scientific basis, beyond politics. Anti-Communists and rightwingers have an extremely poor record as far documenting this sort of thing, so I almost want to dismiss everything they say.
Probably the best sources would be leftwingers or even Communists who also happen to be some sort of China scholars. To the detriment of Mao, a number of Leftists, socialists and Communists who are also China scholars are starting to contribute some very negative things about Mao.
The good side is quite clear. Life expectancy doubled under Mao, from 35 to 70, from 1949 to 1976, in only 27 years. Supporters of fascism and Hitler are challenged to provide evidence that Hitler’s rule benefited anyone. Nazism was at core a death cult. Life expectancy collapsed in Germany under Hitler and in all of the regions that were occupied by Nazis. Nazism wasn’t about improving life for the common man at all; it was about war and endless war and endless extermination of the less fit.
Communism, with the exception of Pol Pot’s rule, where life expectancy collapsed in Cambodia and 1.7 million died, has been quite a bit different. Most Communist regimes have killed people, but at the same time seem to have saved many lives, often millions of lives. So it gets hard to tally things up.
I suppose pro-Communists would say that the many deaths were necessary in order to save so many lives. That’s an interesting argument and ought to be taken up. Was there a way to save so many lives without killing millions of people? I hope there would be, but I’m not sure.
Pre-China Mao was vastly deadlier than China under Mao. The life expectancy figures make this clear. Czarist Russia was 3 times deadlier than the USSR under Lenin and Stalin. This is where this “greatest killers of all time” crap runs into the mud. If the death rate was 3 times higher per year under the Czar than under Stalin, just how was Stalin the worst killer of all time?
Same with Mao. I don’t have good figures, but once again, it looks like Nationalist China in the 1920’s, 30’s and 40’s was 3 times deadlier per year, or maybe more, than Maoist China. If the death rate collapsed under Mao, how was he the worst killer ever?
The truth is there are plenty of ways to kill a man. You can kill him with a bullet or by sending him to a camp, or you can kill him by disease and lack of food, the silent and uncounted method that the capitalists prefer.
Nevertheless, an accounting of deaths under Mao needs to be done. Just glancing at the data here, it’s already looking like Mao was way worse than Stalin. Way worse.
The initial consolidation of power in China was brutal. Whether the landlords were killed by the party or by the peasants is not that relevant. Mao said that 700,000 landlords were killed, and even he thought that was too many. China scholars think it is higher, from 1-4 million. I would dismiss the 4 million figure, but anywhere from 700,000-3 million is possible. Further research is needed here.
The Anti-Counterrevolutionary Drive of 1950 followed, an attempt to uncover supporters of the Nationalists and counterrevolutionaries. Tens of thousands were killed, or possibly up to a million, let’s call it 20,000-1 million. Further research is needed.
Anti-Christian Campaigns of the 1950’s. These were launched against mostly Christians, but also other religions. “Many thousands” are said to have died. Definitely some further work is necessary here.
Anti-Counterrevolutionary Campaign of 1953. Mao said, “95% of the people are good.” The Party assumed that this meant 5% were bad. Hundreds of thousands died.
The Great Leap Forward Famine happened between 1959-1961. Unlike the fake Holodomor of 1932-33, it’s looking more and more like most of the blame for this horrible catastrophe can be laid at the feet of Mao himself. The man was a fanatic. He was told that there was a famine, and in early 1959, he backtracked on some of his crazy ideas, while he blamed subordinates for the famine.
Then there was the Lushan Conference in May 1959. Mao accused Peng Dehuai, a critic of the Great Leap, of conspiring against him. Peng was purged, and the Great Leap went was ordered to go ahead full speed. If there had been no Lushan Conference, there would have been no famine. There followed two years of catastrophe, in which there was overprovisioning of grain from the peasants which was then stored in warehouses in cities, where it rotted or was exported for scarce foreign currency.
Much of the problem was that local officials were wildly exaggerating harvests, hence the overprovisioning at the state level. They thought that with bumper harvests, they could take grain from the countryside to the cities without problems. But there were no bumper harvests. Harvests had collapsed.
Finally in 1961, the state figured out that it had screwed up royally and started mass importing grain. Caravans of grain trucks flowed to the countryside, and the famine was over. But many were too weak to even walk to the trucks to get the food.
Mao is blamed for an atmosphere of terror that led underlings to fake bumper crops where none had occurred. With no democracy in the party, no one wanted to contradict Mao. Mao himself had some utterly idiotic ideas, which he was allowed to implement due to lack of party democracy. After the Great Leap, the party realized it had screwed up bad. Even Mao knew that. The Cultural Revolution was in a lot of ways Mao’s attempt to regain face after getting egg on his face in the Great Leap.
As far as deaths during the Great Leap, this is still up in the air. Even Maoists admit that there were 15 million excess deaths in the period. Some of the higher figures use preposterous accounting techniques whereby people who had never even been born were counted as “deaths.” Tell me how that works. Nevertheless, the figure may be higher than 15 million. At any rate, it’s the worst famine in modern world history, and it’s a permanent blot on Mao’s record.
The Cultural Revolution was sheer insanity. Many received poor educations as schools were shut down. Many cultural relics and buildings were destroyed, and a good part of China’s cultural heritage was smashed up.
People were killed and hounded all over China for little or no reason. Red Guards rampaged all over China, torturing, humiliating, imprisoning and murdering all sorts of people, including local party officials, teachers and even university professors. When someone was hounded, the humiliation went on every day and there was no escape. No one would dare to come to your side, not even your spouse. Deng Xiaoping’s son was tossed out of a window and paralyzed from the waist down.
Red Guard factions battled each other in cities across China with weapons looted from local Army depots. Sometimes Army units joined in. Red Guards in one city would attack Red Guards in another city. Women and children were murdered and kids were even buried alive. Enemies were cannibalized in one area. Ridiculous, insane and anarchic, right? Sure.
In some parts of China, victims of the Red Guards are still angry. The Red Guards are still around, older now, but still living in the villages alongside their victims. Their former victims hate them. Lawsuits have been brought against former Red Guards, but the courts have thrown them out.
From a Communist POV, one of the most tragic things about all of these persecutions and killings, when one reads the details of the individual cases, is that many of the victims were not even counterrevolutionaries. Many were dedicated, hard-working Communists and revolutionaries, often devoted Maoists. Lord knows why they were purged and victimized.
The insanity and anarchy of the Cultural Revolution is one reason why the Party wants to keep a tight reign on power. China descends pretty quickly into wild and deadly anarchy.
Lately, I’ve been reading a lot of Chinese Communist Party publications and the theses and dissertations by students at Chinese universities, which tend to toe the party line. As a rule, the Cultural Revolution is regarded as a big mistake by ultra-Left forces, and the Party definitely wants to avoid such messes in the future. I’ve even some some Party critiques of the Great Leap, though not much is said about that. It’s clear that the high ranks of the Party regard the Great Leap as a disaster.
There continue to be some very serious human rights abuses in China, as this 89 page report from Human Rights Watch reports. Even from the POV of a Communist, some of the abuses of these petitioners seem just flat out wrong. There doesn’t seem to be any legitimate Communist reason to be attacking a lot of these poor petitioners.
Surely in a Communist system, petitioners should have the right to protest uranium pollution of rivers, corrupt officials abusing their posts and stealing land, etc. In what way are these folks counterrevolutionaries?
But it’s not true that everyone who protests in China goes to jail. There are around 100 public protests every single day in China, often involving large groups. Only a few of them get arrested, harassed, beaten, tortured or jailed. But I guess you never know when your card will come up.
The fact that some of the harshest critiques of Mao’s crimes, excesses and stupidities are coming out of the Chinese Communist Party itself shows that slamming Mao can be done within a socialist, Leftist or Communist framework.
Can it be done in a Maoist framework? This I’m not so sure of.
The Party will not come out and make public its findings on Mao as the USSR did with Stalin because the party continues to wave the banner of Mao and practically rules under his name and visage. It’s possible that slamming Mao would so delegitimize the party that it might be fatal for the CCP. It’s a tough call.
For the anti-Semites, I have a homework assignment for you. Since Mao was a Communist and Communism is Jewish, obviously Mao was a Jew. Please uncover the secret Jewish connections of Mao and his closest supporters in the CCP.

Hitler's Vienna Years

Was Young Hitler An Anti-Semite?* is the 5th chapter in a great book, Hitler’s Vienna: A Dictator’s Apprenticeship, by Brigette Harmon. Hitler arrived in Vienna at age 17 in 1906. He became homeless and lived in men’s shelters, trying to sell his paintings.
This fascinating chapter reveals that despite the virulently anti-Semitic character of much of Viennese society at the time, Hitler seems to have successfully resisted the prevalent anti-Semitism of the era. In fact, he had many Jewish friends, and Jewish art merchants sold most of his work. His worst enemy was a virulent anti-Semite, and one of Hitler’s Jewish friends had the man arrested for cheating Hitler. Hitler’s only statements on the Jews were ones of admiration. However, he already hated the Social Democrats.
In Mein Kampf, Hitler rewrites his Vienna years as a time of his anti-Semitic awakening. But many autobiographies are dishonest. No one who knew Hitler at the time noticed the slightest anti-Semitism in him. Those who knew him at the time and then recognized him later as an anti-Semitic politician in the 1930’s were flabbergasted – they could not believe their eyes.
There have been many silly theories of the genesis Hitler’s anti-Semitism – the Vienna years, an encounter with a syphilitic Jewish prostitute, run-ins with Jewish professors at the Arts Academy, a Jewish grandfather, a Jewish junk dealer who cheated him in Munich, but none of it makes much sense. People are just grasping at straws.
Harmon logically decides that Hitler’s anti-Semitism developed during the war and then afterward. Lying in the hospital for three months, nearly blinded from a gas attack, he read about the November Revolution that brought the hated Social Democrats to power. In Russia, the Bolsheviks had seized power in their October revolution. At Versailles, the Allies were were setting about to destroy Germany once and for all – in league with the Jews, the anti-Semitic press charged.
Hitler had an epiphany – it was all the Jews’ fault! And he resolved to get into politics. One sure-fire road to political success in those days was to promote anti-Semitism as a politician, because it was very popular with voters. So Hitler’s anti-Semitism was based both on his experiences during and after the war and on the cynicism of a political animal.
Later, his anti-Semitism became more and more crazed and rabid to where even his fellow Nazi authors worried that it was his sole, driving and gnawing passion. Towards the end of the war, he sacrificed the war effort to kill more Jews. His suicide note warns of the Jewish peril to mankind.
*From the website of the Porges family, a Viennese Jewish family who lost many members in the Holocaust.

References

Harmon, Brigette. 1999. Hitler’s Vienna: A Dictator’s Apprenticeship. New York: Oxford University Press.

Commies Killed More Than Hitler Redux

We went over this quite a few times on the old blog, but since this crap keeps recrudescing on the Right, we may as well continue to hammer away at it.
From an interesting, but disgusting, article by Steve Sailer, effectively ruined, as are most of his posts, by his inability to turn off the rightwing talking points no matter what he is writing about. Sailer is like the Christian kooks, who, no matter what the conversation is about, always manage to return the conversation to their evangelical bullshit within 10 minutes. Steve just can’t shut the rightwing trap.
Here is the poop:

Lenin, Stalin, and Mao slaughtered even more tens of millions in the name of equality than Hitler murdered in the name of inequality. And, as Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn has pointed out, the doctrine of “class origins” transformed “egalitarian” mass murder into ethnic genocide since there is no sharp line between family and race.

Boy, rightwingers just can’t shut up about this, can they? Never mind that he’s quoting the fascist Solzhenitsyn (and he spelled his name wrong), but this whole line has a particularly nasty genesis.
After the war, in trying to prove that Hitler was no big deal and Stalin was way worse, Ukrainian Nazis (Excuse me! Ukrainian nationalists! Wait. Is there a difference?) developed a lie called The Holodomor, a lie that was originally started by the Nazi Randolf Hearst and his Nazi buddies in Germany in the early 1930’s.
The lie stated that Stalin deliberately killed 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, no wait, 7, 8, oh forget it, God knows how many Ukrainians by deliberate starvation. It’s not true. Nobody was deliberately starved to death. There was indeed a famine in all of the USSR, especially the Ukraine, in 1932 and 1933. The number of dead is not known. The state made many errors, including initially denying that it was happening, to a chaotic response to the tragedy.
The Ukrainians were rebelling against the state. They destroyed 50% of the livestock in the USSR and a large part of the grain crop in the Ukraine. They refused to harvest the crop, piling it in the fields and letting it rot in the rains, or set fire to their fields. The Ukrainians were trying to starve the whole country.
The USSR did seize the grain crop, because the country needed to eat and the Ukrainians were destroying everything in sight. Ukrainians were mass deported to Siberia, and 390,000 died. It was a bad time.
The people were weakened by hunger and there were disease epidemics due to primitive sanitation and lack of effective drugs. This is what killed most of the people, not starvation. Most of the pictures of “starving Ukrainians” were faked, and those photos were actually from a famine in 1921. Mark Tauger has also presented good forensic evidence of a wheat rust epidemic.
There was also a terrible famine in China during the Great Leap Forward that may have killed 15 million people, mostly due to disease once again. Once again, this was not intentional, unless idiocy is intentionality. The primary cause of the famine was overprocurement by the state.
Capitalism kills 14 million people ever year by direct starvation and attendant illnesses all over the globe. Shall we tally up these body piles and compare them to Hitler, Stain, Mao and whatnot? The chips are down, capitalist punks. That means you, Sailer.
Leaving aside famines, we really need to look at direct killings.

Leader         Deaths     Period      Years
Hitler          52M*      1933-1945   12
Lenin/Stalin    2.5M**    1921-1953   32
Mao             2.4M?***  1949-1976   27

*Figure from here. Hitler also started a war for no reason that ended up killing ~45 million people. Whether you want to count that or not is up to you. I count 12 million dead in camps and 40 million dead in a war that he started.
**See Getty 1993 for the most accurate estimate to date of deaths under Stalin. In 1990, the USSR archives were opened up. The Soviets had kept track of everyone who died due to executions, population transfers and in the camps, year by year. The deaths in the camps include 900,000 common criminals, but I guess the anti-Communists want to throw those in too. There is no academic consensus whatsoever for 20, 30, 40, 43, or 110 million deaths under Stalin. Furthermore, these figures usually include “10 million” for the fake “Ukraine intentional famine” that never happened. As noted below, capitalism starves 14 million people to death every year. If we can’t tally these against the capitalists, we can’t tally them against Stalin. The Sovietologists are currently fighting it out in the academic journals. Those arguing for a higher figure are basically saying, “Commies lie.” There never was any rational basis for the figures of tens of millions killed under Stalin. Those figures were produced by Nazis and Nazi sympathizers, the CIA and the MI6. They were just pulling figures out of thin air. By the way, that wonderful 110 million figure comes from the fascist Solzhenitsyn, a man lionized by the West.
Peacetime figures for political deaths in the USSR 1921-1953 are:

Executions:                 900,000
Deaths in the gulag:        1.2M
Dekulakization Ukraine:     390,000
Totals:                     2.5M

***2.4 million is my estimate for Mao, and those are just known deaths. The Chinese have not yet opened up their archives, and unfortunately it is possible that deaths under Mao were a lot higher. Mao himself admitted that 700,000 landlords were killed in the early years. The Party allowed the local peasants to put them on trial and the people sentenced many of them to death. Many were horrible criminals who had been abusing the peasants for many years, but one can argue whether they needed to die. There were 1 million excess deaths in the Cultural Revolution. We have no accurate figures for deaths under Mao from 1953-1966, although 700,000 is a good minimum. We also have no accurate figures for deaths in the Chinese gulags. We will have to wait until the Chinese open their books in order to find out the real number who died under Mao. The 77 million figure tossed around lately, the product of a lunatic new book, has absolutely no basis in reality whatsoever. Furthermore, it includes famine deaths in the Great Leap Forward, listed as an incredible 39 million. As I note below, capitalism starves 14 million people to death every year. Shall we count these deaths against the capitalists?
Ok, as you can see, the evil Commies absolutely did not kill tens of millions of people. Who did? No one, unless you count the European War that Hitler started that killed ~45 million or so.
Hitler killed 42 million in 12 years or 3.5 million/year. Mao, Lenin and Stalin combined killed 4.9 million over 59 years, or 83,000/yr. Ok, now who is the worse killer? Who killed more? Hitler. Mao, Stalin and Lenin combined were not able to exceed Hitler’s totals, and they had 10 times more years to do it again. Hitler was 42 times worse of a killer than Mao, Stalin and Lenin combined.
The crap like Steve’s above is usually followed by some jibe about “more being killed in the name of equality than were killed in the name of inequality.” Of course, rightwingers, lovable and cuddly folks that they are, just can’t get enough inequality. They consume inequality for breakfast, lunch and dinner and they’re still hungry.
What they hate more than anything else is anyone trying to even the score just a tiny bit. Making the world a little more fair than the cruel hand of fate fetishized by the Right supposedly “goes against human nature.” That’s dubious right there, and Adam Smith himself disagreed.
In his book, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Smith noted that capitalism was incapable of providing for essential aspects of human society, such as compassion towards one’s fellow man, sympathy, mutual sympathy , and any type of fairness or justice in society. Since the market could not provide these things, their provision was left up to politics, or the state.
Politics is only unnatural; it’s deadly, genocidally deadly. Any attempts to create a little justice or fairness in the human jungle are apparently doomed to end up in mass murder. So don’t you dare mess with that invisible hand of the market.
If it’s market versus politics, the market wins hands down. The same market that starves 14 million people every year. The same market that kills 10 million kids a year. The same market that blew up the US economy and is threatening to take the world economy down with it. The blind faith of the Right boggles the mind.

References

Coplon, Jeff. January 12, 1988. In Search of a Soviet Holocaust. The Village Voice. Grover Furr’s website.
Coplon, Jeff. March 1988. Rewriting History – How Ukrainian Nationalists Imposed Their Doctored History on High School Students CAPITAL Region. Douglas Furr’s website.
Davies, R. W. and Wheatcroft, Steven G. 2004. The Years of Hunger: Soviet Agriculture, 1931-1933. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Getty, J. Arch, Ritterspoon, Gabor T. and Zemskov, Viktor N. 1993. Victims of the Soviet Penal System in the Pre-war Years: A First Approach on the Basis of Archival Evidence American Historical Review 98:4, 1048-49.
Souza, Mario. Lies Concerning the History of the Soviet Union. North Star Compass website.
Tauger, Mark B. 1991. The 1932 Harvest and the Famine of 1933. Slavic Review 50:1, pp. 70-89.
Tottle, Douglas. 1987. Fraud, Famine, and Fascism: the Ukrainian Genocide Myth from Hitler to Harvard. Toronto: Progress Books.

Do I Have Jewish Blood?

I am republishing this post with quite a bit of new information on Henry the Second, King of England, Eleanor of Aquitaine, Queen Consort of France, and the Lombard tribe and later royalty of Germany, Austria, Hungary and finally Italy.
The question has come up because some of the charming local anti-Semites are convinced that I must be part Jewish. They say that I look Jewish too. As far where I got the curly hair, I really have no idea. I think from my Mom’s side.
No, I am not Jewish at all, sadly. Though I wish I was;  in a way, I want to be a Jew. I’m just a Judeophilic Gentile. My parents are both extreme Judeophiles who grew up with Jews and went to mostly Jewish schools. A lot of my Dad’s best friends were Jews, and those were some of the family friends that I grew up with. I even went to some kid’s bar mitzvah when I was a kid, and I thought it was really cool.
Later I hung around Hollywood and LA for years with the music crowd, the artist crowd, the movie crowd and the writer crowd. All those scenes are swarming with Jews, and Hollywood in general has Jews everywhere. I worked in Beverly Hills for a while, and that place is full of Jews too. What’s weird is that even though I’m a Judeophilic Gentile, lots of folks keeping calling me an anti-Semite. So really, I’m a self-hating Judeophilic Gentile.
We have done our genealogy going back a very very long time, and there is not the slightest trace of Jewish blood. I am 5/8 British (English, Scottish, Welsh and Scots Irish), 1/4 German (Swiss German and Bavarian) and 1/8 French. Some of my relatives came over on the 2nd Mayflower boat and others came over from Bavaria in the early 1700’s and became Pennsylvania Dutch. Others were the early French in Canada. The Scottish side comes from the Isle of Uist in the far North.
Going way back, I am related to some royalty named Eleanor of Aquitaine who was related to Charlemagne. Eleanor was Queen of the Franks, and her son was Richard the Lionhearted. The Franks were originally a Germanic tribe in far western Germany,  but the Western branch, West Francia, later became the Kingdom of France.
She was a Capetian (Capetian Dynasty, Direct Capetians, otherwise known as the House of France), a large French family similar to the Carolingians, and was a Queen Consort of the King of France, in this case, Louis The Seventh, or Louis The Young. Queen Consort is not the same as Queen. The French did not allow Queens, so the high-ranking women had to be called Queen Consorts.
He later divorced Eleanor because they fought a lot, and she only gave him two lousy daughters and no sons. He had to divorce the biatch in order to keep the throne, so dump her he did.
Eleanor later married Henry II, King of England. This was a good marriage from his POV, since he gained 1/4 of France by marrying her. Henry is known in some English histories as “Good King Henry”, but this is controversial. Henry was a ferocious and hot-headed redhead, who was armed at all times with multiple weapons, moved continuously  and exercised maniacally.
Henry had a great sense of humor and did not put on airs. He mingled well with the ordinary people and never acted like he was better than they were. An early proto-socialist, he ordered that 10% of the foods delivered to the royal palace be given to the poor.
Later he conquered Ireland, initiating an 800 year period of English rule over Ireland, so to the Irish, I am sure this guy is evil incarnate. He also conquered all of the forts in southern Scotland, so the Scots probably hate him too.
This was during a 200-300 year period (around 1100-1400) in which the Scottish were engaged in continuous wars of rebellion against the English. Robert the Bruce is possibly the best known of the rebels. By around 1300-1400, the Scottish had pretty much secured their independence. The first thing they did was destroy all their southern forts so the English could not reoccupy them.
Henry II tried to get rid of trial by ordeal and trial by combat, the standard ways of trying accused criminals, which were not exactly fair trials. He initiated something similar to a Grand Jury as early as the 1100’s.
His intemperate language incited his friends to kill Thomas Becket, a priest who had been constantly thwarting Henry’s efforts to reduce the influence of the Church in the affairs of the state. This murder outraged Eleanor and most of Europe, and most people blamed Henry. This famous event was fictionalized in a play and later a movie called Becket, which I have not seen.
Late in life, his own son made an alliance with his worst rival and overthrew him. Henry was forced to pay homage to this rival, Philip Augustus. All of his kids except his illegitimate son abandoned him late in life when he was in poor health. Lying in bed, ill, at this time, attended only by his illegitimate son, he noted that his legitimate kids “were the real bastards.” He died in 1189.
Eleanor always fought with Henry, but she bore him 8 kids. She  encouraged her sons to rebel against her husband (What a bitch!) early on, and Henry appropriately sentenced her to house arrest for 15 years. Eleanor later assumed the throne after his death and pronounced herself Queen of England, and she expanded on Henry’s “grand jury” trials towards a more “ordinary citizens” type of trials.
At her court in exile in France, she reportedly held “love trials” presided over by juries composed of 12 peers, for couples in love. Eleanor was very beautiful, probably a redhead. At one time, a single heir to royalty with an extensive land claim in France, she was said to be the most eligible woman in Europe.
Henry and Eleanor were also portrayed in the Lion In Winter, a play and later a movie which I have also not seen. Peter O’Toole played Henry in both movies.
Before the Normans and Franks, we trace one of our lines all the way back to the Post Roman Empire to a royal family called the Lombards in northern Italy. This is another Germanic group that left southern Sweden about 2,500 years ago, moved to Germany, then moved down to northern Italy.
Initially, the Lombards settled in the Lower Elbe River Valley in northern German near Hamburg. They were pagans, initially having a fertility cult religion (the cult of Vanir), but later becoming worshipers of Odin (the cult of Æsir). Vanir was a typical agricultural society religion, while Æsir was a typical religion of a warrior society.
They grew their beards very long, which is where their name “Longbeards”, from Langobards, or Lombards,  is derived, according to Paul the Deacon in his Historia Langobardorum or History of the Lombards. The long beards were apparently a consequence of their Odin-worship, since the God Odin has a very long beard. They were also ferocious and fought with many of the surrounding tribes.
The first Lombard migration, from 489 to 493, was probably due to bad harvests. It took them south to the Danube, probably around Austria and western Czechoslovakia, place called Vergundaib (probably the ancient home of the Burgundes or Burgundy tribe). They stayed there for 33 years until they undertook another migration, this time taking them to Western Hungary, to a place called Pannonia. Map of Lombard migrations.
In Pannonia, the Lombards came into contact with the Sarmatians, an Iranian people (more probably related to Ossetians). From them, they added an element of religious symbolism, particularly a statue of a bird on the end of a long pole. When a warrior fell in battle and his body could not be returned for burial, his family would put this bird-pole in the ground near their home, with the bird’s head pointing towards the direction where the warrior was presumed to have fallen.
In 568, they moved again, this time over to northern Italy, where they quickly conquered most of northern Italy from the Byzantines. When they arrived in Italy, some Lombards were still pagans, while others had adopted Arian Christianity (see post on Arianism).
In the next 150 years, most Lombards had converted to Orthodoxy (Catholicism) and had taken Roman names, titles and traditions. Note that even after the Fall of the Roman Empire, it continued to exert influence both culturally and theologically through the Catholic Church.
The Lombards were completely converted to Christianity by around 650. Before then, in Italy they had practiced a nominal Christianity with many pagan elements.
The Lombards remained in northern Italy until 776, when they were conquered by Charlemagne.
In the 700’s, two Lombard kings, Aistulf and Desiderius, conquered almost all of Italy. Fullest extent of Lombard rule under Aistulf. Later the Lombards ruled a territory called the Principality of Benevento, in southern Italy. This lasted from 774-879. Benevento is now a town in southern Italy in Campania, 25 miles northwest of Naples.
In Beneveto, Lombard Catholicism reached its apex, shown by the archetype monastery of the period, the Monte Cassino. This abbey was destroyed during World War 2 where it was the site of a huge battle, the 5-month long Battle of Monte Cassino, between Nazis and Allied troops in the Allied invasion of Italy in 1944. The Allied forces thought incorrectly the the monastery had been turned into a fortress by the Nazis.
During this time Charlemagne (the Frankish Carolingians) was conquering much of Italy, but he was not able to conquer Benevento. At this time, Benevento was stuck in between two empires, Charlemagne’s to the north and the Byzantines to the east. During the 800’s, Benevento fought a series of wars against Byzantine-allied Duchys in southern Italy, eventually conquering much of Southern Italy.
In some of these wars, both sides hired Arab mercenaries called Saracens to fight for them. The Saracens soon went viral, splitting off from the men who hired them and attacking infidels all over Southern Italy. Islam eventually conquered all the way up to Capua, 16 miles north of Naples.
In 915, the Pope forged an alliance between all of the Christian forces of Southern Italy and Islam was defeated at the Garigliano River in Southern Italy. The Arabs,  and Islam,  were thrown out of Italy by the forces of the Cross.
Once again, mercenaries were to prove deadly. The Lombard states had called in Norman mercenaries to help them fight the Byzantines in Apulia. But soon the mercenaries had gone feral, just like the Arabs before them.  By 1058, the Normans had conquered the Lombard state of Capua. In 1078, the Salerno Lombard state fell. The Capuans rebelled in 1091 and formed their own state that lasted for 7 years until the Normans reconquered it in 1098.
The Normans were not very good rulers, and their states were largely independent and tended to decline under their lackadaisical rule. The Lombards regarded the Byzantines as oppressors and the Normans as Northern Barbarians. At around 1100, the saga of the Lombards seems to fade into history.
As you can see, with the Norman conquest of southern and central Italy in 1050-1100, a linkage between Normans and Lombard royals becomes possible. Hence, this may be the historical linkage of my Norman line via Eleanor and the royal Lombards of Italy.
I believe there is some linkage between the Franks and the Lombards.
The Lombards would be considered Dinarics, racially, and so would the Bavarians on the other side, so if you go back 1,500 years, my stock is Dinaric or possibly Noric (in between Dinaric and Nordic). Later on, the Norman branch is Nordic.
If you are talking about non-Whites such as Black, Indian or Asian, there is none of that in me either, although there is a 50% chance that I am related to Pocahontas, since we trace our ancestry back to the First Families of Virginia (pre-1700), and if you can do that, there’s a 50% chance you are related to Pocahontas. She had one kid, Thomas Rolfe, and that kid had like 14 kids, and they married into lots of the few White families of Virginia.

What is Arianism?

Arian Christianity is also known as Early German Christianity, because it went over best with ancient German tribes (Gregory of Tours) . Arianism was based on the notion that Jesus and God had not been eternally co-existent for all time. That is, according to the First Council of Nicea in 325, the Church held that when God created the world, Jesus was already there with him, alongside him, “uncreated”. Arianism was officially declared a heresy at this council.
The Arians, rationally in my opinion, held that Jesus was actually created by God at some later point. In other words, there was some period, probably a long time, when God alone existed and there was no Jesus. At some point, God created Jesus and probably soon sent him down to Earth. It’s hard to believe that this was one of the worst religious fights in the Catholic Church around the 300’s and that to this day, Arianism is considered a heresy in the Church.
However, there is a small Arian Catholic Church in England, with some home churches here and there around the world (website here).
Arians also reject the virgin birth, holding that it is a misunderstanding of prophecy. The prophets had merely held that Jesus would be born to a “virgin”, but that word really meant just “young girl.” Due to a misunderstanding of prophecy, “young girl” was mistranslated to “virgin”, hence the Cult of the Virgin and other nonsense. The Arians hold that indeed God can sometimes commit miracles,  but he cannot violate the very physical laws that He Himself has laid down.
Seems like a reasonable split in Catholicism. Too bad there isn’t an Arian Catholic Church near me. I might want to attend services.

References

Gregory of Tours. 539-564. Decem Libri Historiarum (Ten Books of Histories), or Historia Francorum (The History of the Franks). Translated by Earnest Brehaut. 1916. New York: Colombia University Press.

The Failure of White Nationalist Theory: The Case of California

White Nationalists (WNs’) like to throw around figures showing that nationwide, few Whites breed outside their race. But those figures are only for one generation. 8% outbreeding, over generation upon generation, is going to have some significant effects.
In addition, WN’s counter with various theories like Philippe Rushton’s Genetic Similarity Theory, which posits that humans mostly want to breed with their own like kind. There may be some genetic imperative to breed with your own kind, but it is easily swamped by other desires, genetic, cultural or otherwise.
Let us take the case of my home state, California. Let us look at the the Amerindian.
After 150, there are few pure- bred California Indians left in this state. They bred in very heavily with Mexicans at first (often Spaniards) and then very heavily with Whites. In most cases, it was a Mexican or White male breeding with an Amerindian female. If Genetic Similarity Theory is really all that, why didn’t these California Indians seek out their fellow Indians and only breed with them?
Presently, up to 50% of Asian females in the US are breeding out, mostly to White males. What’s up with that? What happened to Genetic Similarity Theory here? Is it lying down on the job?
Genetic Similarity Theory is interesting, but in the real world, so many other things are operating. Sure, people prefer to breed with their own kind, but on the other hand, the story of the human race has been one of endless outbreeding and miscegenation between races, ethnic groups and tribes. We want to breed with our own kind, yet we often breed out. Go figure!
One of the most notable cases of interbreeding in this state is the White and the Mexican. First of all, it is not really true that Mexicans are “non-Whites”. It’s more the case, from a White POV, that they are part of our White family. Most Mexicans have Mediterranean Spaniard blood.
This includes many Mexican Indian tribes. My research on Mexican Indians indicated that among the tribes studied, there were few pure-bloods. The tribe in question had about 18% White blood on average. It’s similar with “White Mexicans”. Most of them seem to have some Indian in them, usually a small amount, but they are often not pure White by any means.
After 100 years of White-Mexican interbreeding in this state, the number of Whites marrying out, in particular with varying types of Mestizos, is quite high. Keep in mind that although Mexicans are proud of their ethnicity like everyone, they are perfectly willing to miscegenate with Whites, as it is not seen as race suicide.
The reason it’s not race suicide is because there is no Mexican race. Mexicans are genetic mystery casserole, most of them have at least some White in them, and the ones in California have traditionally been about 70% White on average. So a Mexican marrying White is not committing race suicide in any way, shape or form. Hence they are more than willing to do so.
After 100 years here, the number of Californians with some Mexican ancestry (including many “Whites”) is quite high.
The truth is that once a state gets as mixed as California is, everyone is just going to start mixing, outbreeding and miscegenating like crazy. There’s no denying it. You can talk Genetic Similarity Theory until you are blue in the face, but on the ground, it’s quite a different story. From a WN perspective, the only way to keep Whites from miscegenating out is probably separation.

Thoughts on the Stimulus Package

Some thoughts on the stimulus package. First of all, it is a proven maxim of mainstream economics that government spending must go up in a recession. If not, you run the risk of a depression. During a depression, the state for sure needs to spend more money. Otherwise the depression never ends.
I assume that these Chicago School freemarketeer morons have thrown all this out, and believe insane things like in a recession or a depression, you should slash government spending. That’s simply madness. The Friedmanites are the equivalent of religious fundamentalists. I would say that what they are preaching is unscientific, except that the dismal science is not much of a science in the first place.
So the stimulus is a great idea. That the Republicans oppose it on the grounds of excess spending just shows how insane they are. All sane economists agree that a stimulus package is needed right now, and most think that this package is too small, if anything.
As far as the tax cuts are concerned, I am getting really tired of all this tax cut crap. According to Republicans, tax cuts are always necessary. In good economic times, we need to slash taxes. We can’t possibly raise taxes in an economic boom! That would ruin the expansion. Truth is that all sane economists agree that an expansion is the one time that you can successfully raise taxes without causing problems.
The Republicans are right that raising taxes in the middle of a recession or depression is a bad idea. So you don’t do it. Liberal economists agree with this too. So how to you increase government spending in bad economic times? Well, the state is supposed to borrow the money.
The tax cuts in this plan are ridiculous. As a socialist, I have little interest in tax cuts. if you defund the state, there will be little money for the socialist programs that we socialists love so much. It’s impossible to promote any kind of reasonable socialist project while one is continuously cutting taxes willy-nilly. There won’t be any funds to pay for the project. Defunding the state via tax cuts is a de facto anti-socialist project.
My main beef with this stimulus thing is that there needs to be a massive debt write-down. That’s all there is to it. This debt, in all of its forms, is simply unpayable.
Some readers may not understand what a debt write-down is. Say you bought a home for $500,000. With the collapse of housing prices, it is now worth $300,000. Ballooning mortgage payments mean you can’t pay your mortgage and you are going to lose your home. In a debt write-down, the amount you owe on your home would be written down from $500,000 to $300,000. True, the bank loses money, or at least does not get as much money in the future as it would have otherwise. So the banks take a hit on any write-down of debt.
So the debt now afflicting our society, in all of its multiple and nefarious forms, needs to be written down, particularly the mortgage debt. The banks hate writing down debt. They fight it with tooth and nail and never quit.
They lose money in debt write-downs and banks have corporate charters that demand that they function as profit-maximizing organisms. Failure to do so can lead to stockholder revolts and replacement of the bank’s top management.
So this stimulus, in not writing down debt, lets the banks off the hook. And unless a debt write down occurs, I’m afraid that the economy is going to go down hard. And take the world economy with it. So really, these bankers are maybe going to take down the US economy and after that, the world economy.
And no, I don’t believe bankers = “Jews”. On the old blog we went over the notion of whether or not the Jews run the banks anymore. They no longer run the banks in Europe, where they ran them for 100 years or so. The Holocaust, horrible as it was, insured that the Jews no longer ran the banks of Europe. European banks are now run by a deracinated corporate class of European citizens, with no ethnic group predominating.
Asian banks, also big players, are run by Asians. The Jews in the US did make a run for commercial banking in the 1920’s, but Gentile solidarity (anti-Semitism) stopped that plot in its tracks. Gentile bankers simply got together and decided to refuse to sell their banks to Jews. When Jews practice ethnic warfare in a society, the only way to fight back is Gentile solidarity, or anti-Semitism.
I do not think that the anti-Semitism should go beyond the ethnic warfare of the Jews. If the Jews are not killing or physically harming Gentiles, Gentiles may not kill or physically harm Jews.
So US banks are now a deracinated corporate mishmash of ethnic groups, with no group predominating.
Why does the debt need to be written down? Because it is unpayable. And when people are busy paying down frankly unpayable debt, there’s no money left over to buy things, invest, etc.

New Flynn Effect Study

There is an interesting new study out about the Flynn Effect (abstract here), which I have written about on the old blog. The Flynn Effect shows that IQ’s in the West have risen by 15-20 points in the past 80 years. In a new study by James Flynn, who the FE is named after, he has discovered that since 1979, British teens have suffered a 2 point drop in IQ’s, while British kids aged 5-10 have seen their IQ’s go up as much as 15 points over the same period.
White nationalists are ecstatic over this very depressing news, since they hate the Flynn Effect with a passion.
If ever there was a reason not be a WN or even a hardcore hereditarian, this is a great one. It has to be one of the most atavistic, depressing, misanthropic and pessimistic movements around. They’re overjoyed that people are getting stupider and furious that humans might be getting smarter.
This is because WN’s, like all racialists, are all about genes = destiny,  however much they lie and deny it. They hate the idea that the environment can have any positive effect on anything, but I guess they accept that the environment can have a negative effect. Whatever!
Nevertheless, it should be pointed out that the IQ’s of British teens are apparently 14 points higher than they were in 1942. They’re also higher than the Brits of the 1950’s, 1960’s and even 1970’s. After 1979, there seems to have been a 2 point drop at the high end of age range of the sample. So there must have been a 16 pt. rise from 1942-1979. From 29-66 years ago, British IQ’s rose at a very high rate. The British of today have higher IQ’s than the Brits of 29-66 years ago.
Now, since 1979, there has been a very modest drop of less than 1 pt per decade in the very oldest teens.
And! In the last 30 years, IQ’s of 5-10 yr old Brits have risen 15 full points!
The WN’s are going on and on about how the reason for this is because the UK is increasingly Black. Forget it. Britain is 2% Black. British Blacks are only 12% White. So much for the “Britain is turning Black” nonsense. Racial factors cannot possibly explain this slight decline, nor can miscegenation.
Nor can increasing Black % in the population explain rising IQ’s among 5-10 yr old’s due to early maturation, since Black IQ is lower than Whites at all ages. Furthermore, increasing % of Blacks cannot explain a 15 point rise in IQ’s of 5-10 yr olds and a corresponding decline of 2 points in 14 yr olds. Is there something about being Black that makes your IQ rise while you’re a kid but drop as soon as you hit high school?
This leaves us with Flynn’s explanation, which seems to explain things well. British teen culture is dumbing down, and race has nothing to do with it.
WN’s always says that Flynn refuses to admit that Blacks have lower IQ’s than Whites. Although he is a Leftist, Flynn readily acknowledges that Blacks have lower IQ’s than Whites.
Flynn has titled the study Requiem For Nutrition As The Cause Of IQ Gains Raven’s Gains In Britain 1938 To 2008. WN’s are chortling that this means that the entire Flynn Effect is nonexistent, since Flynn supposedly predicated it on increased nutrition.
Wrong again, racists. Flynn never stated that nutrition was the sole effect of the FE, and he has always been dubious about that. The Flynn Effect of a secular rise in IQ is a fact. What it means and what is causing it are what is up for grabs.

References

Flynn, James. 2009. Requiem For Nutrition As The Cause Of IQ Gains Raven’s Gains In Britain 1938 To 2008. Economics & Human Biology. In Press.

This research takes a lot of time, and I do not get paid anything for it. If you think this website is valuable to you, please consider a a contribution to support more of this valuable research.

Lots of Black Gay Men

I had heard that the rate of HIV is very high among Blacks and it is especially high among Black gay men. Some reports are saying that it is higher among Black gays or bisexuals than among some AIDS-wrecked African countries. I never really knew there were lots of Black gays. I used to hang around Hollywood all the time when I lived in LA because I was into the music and club scene. There is a huge gay community there, and it’s true, it was rather surprising how many Black gays you ran across.
It seems odd because the Black community is said to be very homophobic, and they especially hate homosexuality among males. So you get this phenomenon called the down-low where lots of Black guys who would otherwise be out and gay or bi have girlfriends or are even married and then have sex with guys on the “down low” or on the secret. Then they go home and give HIV to their women. This is apparently the source of the high HIV rates in the Black community, plus probably some IV drug use too.
I just got an incoming hit to the old site from Thugsforsex.com. Well, most of you probably do not want to go that site, but I decided to go it anyway, though I sort of figured what it was. The whole site is done up in gangster. There’s gangster talk all over the site, gangster graphics, gangster everything. You can search or browse and a lot of the categories are in gangster talk too. I browsed around and saw a profile or two, with tons of comments after them, then I left; after all, it’s not my thing.
The site’s pornographic and it’s gay pornography, so you’ve been warned. Most Black guys showing off their big Black dicks, which to me is about as sexy as a trip to the zoo looking at the elephant trunks.* Anyway, you look down at all the comments and a lot of these guys don’t even look or seem gay at all. Their photos look exactly like gangsta style Blacks from the ghetto, or Blacks who are trying to look that way. There were also some gangster looking Latinos on there too.
I started wondering…how many of these guys are really gay? How many of them are real ghetto types, except they will just screw anything that moves? And how much gay sex is there really in the Black community? It’s well known that there is tons of gay sex in prison, and the Black guys go in for it in a big way. The truth is that prison sex is mostly Black males raping White males, but you can’t say that because if you do, you’re an evil racist.
Seems like there might be a Hell of a lot more gay sex in the Black community than we think, no?
I’m also wondering if this is some kind of a gay trend? Some kind of “thug sex” thing, like the leather boys and drag queens and whatnot? Weird trend; gay guys are so effeminate and gangsters are so macho.
In case you type in thugsex.com by accident (More porn, warning!), don’t worry, that’s a straight porn site of White women taking on groups of Black guys. Let the fun begin! I put that link in there especially for you White nationalists. You guys just love seeing White women exploring their darker sides like that, huh? Teehee.
*Robert Lindsay is straight

Go Maoists Go

Well-armed Maoist rebels are rapidly expanding their insurgency in India. It has to be stopped now, or in two years, it will get out of hand, says the state. 22,000 fighters under arms. They mostly operate in the East, especially Chattisargh and Jharkand, but they are expanding all over. They are even starting to form cells in big cities. Good for them. Indian capitalism has failed. Time to try something new.
The Indian Maoists have deep links to the Nepalese Maoists, a very forward-looking group of Leftists who are now pretty much running the Nepalese government. Would be great to see a similar-looking group running India. The Indian Left makes sense on Kashmir and even supports separatism in India’s Northeast. I think they could make peace with Pakistan too.

Letter From Mexifornia

Well, the local wannabe Nortenos* just pulled a gun on the local wannabe Surenos* about 30 yards outside my front door, and someone called the cops. Now the complex is swarming with cops. I wish they would haul some of these idiots away. They’re all about 17-21 years old. When a town in California turns from White to non-White, things sure get a lot more exciting. Diversity is our strength!
*They are wannabes because none of them have actually “earned their stripes.” There are a couple of levels of gangs here, the wannabe kids and the real hardcores, who are often older.

Who Watches More Porn?

Great post from the very interesting Congenial Times blog on porn and who in the Hell watches that horrible stuff anyway. The author is gay, and he notes that gay men always have a big porn collection and are known to follow the careers of porn stars like others follow baseball. Hey, good for them! But he points out that the straight men* he knows usually don’t have any porn collections.
Reason for that is, IMHO, that straight culture, namely women, won’t let us collect that stuff. Our straight male friends look down on it too. They come over, see porn on the computer or VCR and right away, they make some snide remark about spanking the salami. Well, yeah? I guess this doesn’t happen in gay male culture because apparently slamming the salmon is viewed positively in that culture. Good for them.
It’s not really viewed positively in straight culture, even though polls show that 97% of all males prime the pump, and the other 3% are liars. The whole implication in straight culture is that strangling the monkey is a shameful act, and the implication is that you are not getting any sex, and that’s why you can’t stop choking the poultry.
Women think whacking the weasel is stupid, unless they are watching us do it on cam, which seems to be an increasingly popular pastime with straight women. Straight women also hate porn, pretty much. They don’t like it themselves and they don’t like that we like it. They steal our collections and delete them from our computers. They find it insulting that we look at chicks who are not them, which means they compete with the porn chicks and think they lost the race.
The whole flogging the log enterprise is regarded in straight culture with snickers and overtones of, “Boy, you sure are a loser, huh?”
There seems to be an age thing here, as young women 19-30 or so seem to be a lot more into porn than those my age or my Mom’s age, who pretty much hate it. I think the reason is that young women are free to watch the stuff, and it’s easily available on the Internet. Since they are free to watch it, a lot of them have, and  lots of them found that they like it.
I notice that most of these young women don’t watch lots of porn though. Just sometimes. I haven’t heard of many straight female porn addicts, but it would be interesting to find one if they exist.
Female sex addicts definitely exist. They’re usually about age 20-34 or so in my experience, but I guess there might be older and younger ones. My neighbor complains that he doesn’t mind having sex up to 5 times a day with his 20 yr old girlfriend, but dammit, she wants it 6-9 times a day. Poor guy. All of us guys should have such misfortunes.
Congenial Times finds that in a survey, bi men watch porn the most of all, then gay men close behind, and straight men way behind the others. This figures, as most of the bisexual men I have known are really extreme sex addicts of the worst kind who won’t take no for an answer. They’re often quite conflicted, lie a lot, deny the male sex part of their game, and have all sorts of issues with the women in their lives. Gay men always struck me as happier than these guys.
And yeah, they do try to seduce straight men. So much so, that friendships with them are essentially impossible.
On to the women. Straight women watch porn the least of all, and lesbians are 40% more likely to watch it. That’s really interesting, and Congenial Times discusses this a bit. Bisexual women watch about 2.5 times as much porn as straight women. This is not surprising, as bi women seem to be seriously oversexed for some reason. Maybe bisexuals in general are oversexed, males and females.
Anyway, it’s nice to see that gay guys are so positive about porn and apparently the attendant yanking and cranking. As a 1960’s style sexual liberationist “do it in the streets” type, I’m opposed to all forms of antisexual behavior. All forms of sexual expression, all the way from monogamy to as many partners as you want with whoever you want to swinging to celibacy, should be fully accepted, no questions asked.
Obviously there are risks with promiscuity, but it’s not a moral issue. Masturbation, like most kinds of sex, is lots of fun for both sexes and all ages, and condemning it is de facto antisexual.
As for me, well, I’m 51, and not only that, I’m on a drug that hammers my sex drive. It’s actually a good thing, because I’m such a sex addict that without those sexual speed bumps, I’d probably be surfing porn 12 hours a day and not getting a whole lot else done. Even fun addictions are a millstone, and it’s better to be free.
*Robert Lindsay is a straight male who couldn’t be gay if he wanted to.

Fastest Growing Religion

Muslims love to lie and say it’s Islam.
Forget that.
It’s Baha’i by a long shot.
Christianity is growing very fast too, but not as fast as Islam. And in Black Africa, Islam is probably losing millions every single year, all because Gulf Arabs are so racist they won’t spend money to keep up the mosques. Most of the loss is converts to Christianity. Probably 15% of Muslims who move to the UK leave Islam. Islam is not growing due to conversions. It’s mostly due to a very high Muslim birthrate.
Baha’i is supposed to be a pretty cool religion, but I doubt if “the Bob” or whoever he was really got shot to death in the mid-1800’s in Persia and then miraculously came back to life. That’s one of their beliefs.
Baha’is are mercilessly persecuted in Iran. The Shia just out and out kill them. They are considered the lowest scum on Earth because they are seen as Muslim heretics. You think Muslims hate infidels? Polytheists are worse, and the most hated of all are the schismatic Muslims who preach what mainstream Islam regard as overt heresies.
The Ahmadiya in Pakistan and India are similarly despised and mistreated. The fundamentalists hate the Alawi in Syria too as de facto heretics, but the Asad ruling elite has gone to great lengths to say that Alawis are just regular Muslims.
The Druze are also hated by fundamentalists, but they are so hardass, gun-crazy and suicidally homicidal in Lebanon that everyone pretty much leaves them alone. They believe in reincarnation, so they are not afraid to die. They were some of the most insane fighters of all in the Civil War.
The Sunni fundamentalist beef against the Shia is that the Shia are heretics. That’s a really hard to case to make, seeing as the Shia are practically the original Muslims. It’s like these idiot Protestant fundamentalists who say that Catholics are not Christians. Hell, they are the original Christians, come on. Them and the Othodox. One church, two branches, East and West, and they healed their schism long ago.

Typical Muslim Behavior

The Taiba, West Bank, pogrom in September 2005.
The Muslims always do this to us Christians, especially when we are small minorities.
It’s probably not that bad to be a Christian in Morocco, Tunisia or Libya. I had a Black African friend from Togo, a Catholic, who was living in Morocco for a while, and there were no problems. And I knew some Nigerian Christians who were in Libya. There were no real problems, but they said that the Libyan Arabs were openly racist towards Blacks (typical Arab behavior)  and they really hated Christians.
In places where Christian minorities are tiny, the Muslims just leave them alone as unimportant.
In places like Lebanon, the Muslims leave the Christians alone too, since the Christians are very well-armed and have lots of political power and numbers. The Maronites, for all their faults, have the reputation for being some of the baddest-ass Christians in the Middle East, and the one group of Christians who successfully fought off the Muslims for centuries.
It seems to be ok to be a Christian in Syria and Jordan too. Egypt is definitely not ok. It’s not a nightmare, but there are a lot of problems for Christians. Turkey and Pakistan are not secure for Christians at all, but Iran seems to be ok.
The Christians have been ethnically cleansed from Chechnya, and there is ongoing ethnic cleansing in Iraq. In Southern Philippines and the Moluccas, it’s “kill the Christians.” Anywhere you have a jihad against the Christian “occupiers” or “colonists” (Chechnya, Philippines and Iraq) the local Christians really get pounded. There’s typically ethnic cleansing and genocidal behavior of some sort.
There are real problems in places like Palestine where the Christians have more than tiny numbers, but not big enough numbers or power to be tough like the Maronites.

The Motto of the Holocaust Deniers

Contradictory agendas are pretty common with humans, conflicted critters that we are.
Back in my doper days I used to run across dopers who were adamant about how much they hated dope, but yet there was a punch line at the end. Their song went: “I hate dope! Dope sucks! Only losers do dope! You do dope? You’re a loser! You’re a scum!…Speaking of which … Dope … Hey! … Got any?
The Holocaust Denier sings a similar darkly humorous tune: “The Holocaust never happened, but let’s do it again, and this time let’s finish the job!”
Yeah right. You guys expect us to fall for that? How dumb do you think we are? You don’t even believe in Holocaust Denial yourselves. That’s just for the consumption of others, huh? You’re lying and you know it. SMH.

Mutual Intelligibility in the Romance Languages

Whether or not I am a reliable source for the question of mutual intelligibility has been questioned in a debate on Wikipedia. It’s been suggested that I am an amateur linguist – that is, I am not a real linguist. This is not true. I am in fact a real linguist. My credentials are that have an MA in Linguistics and have worked in the past as a professional linguist for an Indian tribe in a paid position.
Here is an excellent link on the question of mutual intelligibility between Spanish and Portuguese, the subject of a prior post.  If you Google the question, you get all sorts of hits for the question, so it is obviously something that people are very interested in.
But here’s a guy who actually tested it out experimentally. In the test, which used Spanish speakers from South America and Portuguese speakers from Brazil, Spanish had 58% intelligibility for Portuguese speakers, and Portuguese had 50% intelligibility for Spanish speakers (Jensen 1989). This stands to reason, given popular stories about Spanish speakers being able to ask directions of Portuguese speakers but not being able to understand the response. Portuguese is harder for Spanish speakers than vice versa. Combining the two gives us a figure of 54% intelligibility between Spanish and Portuguese in real life situations in South America today (Jensen 1989).
The test attempted to factor out exposure to the other language and decided that Spanish and Portuguese have about 45% inherent intelligibility or comprehension of those speakers not previously exposed to the other language (Jensen 1989). That sounds about right.
So Spanish and Portuguese have 45% inherent intelligibility and 54% in real life situations in South America involving some bilingual learning.
Keep in mind that Spanish and Portuguese have 89% lexical similarity. Based on that, you would think that they can understand each other or that they are dialects of a single language. But lexical similarity is almost always going to be higher than intelligibility, so that 89% figure is quite misleading. For instance, Frisian and English have 61% lexical similarity, but in the Frisian video in the prior post, I could not make out a single word in five minutes. It appears that 60% lexical similarity and $1.89 will get you a Slurpee at a 7-11 but little in the way of understanding another language.
We also learn, here, that no one can understand French except the French. Spanish, Portuguese, Italians, Romanians, no one can understand the darned French. This makes sense to me. I can’t understand a word of the local French-speaking tourists, and I had a semester of French. They always talk like they are holding their noses.
This is interesting in light of the fact that Italian, Spanish, Portuguese and Romanian have 89%, 75%, 75% and 75% lexical similarity with French. But all those similar words aren’t worth a hill of beans when it comes to understanding a Frenchman.
Spanish speakers have a better understanding of Italian. Italian and Spanish have 85% lexical similarity, and that is worse than the 89% for Spanish and Portuguese.
That’s for spoken communication. For written communication, French and Italian can understand each other a lot more. The same is true with Spanish and Portuguese. They can understand the other language when written much better than when spoken.
What is interesting is that everyone accepts that Spanish, Portuguese and Italian are separate languages, despite 54% intelligibility for Spanish and Portuguese.
However, in the cases of Austrian/Bavarian, Swabian (spoken around Stuttgart) and Mainfränkisch (Moselle Franconian, close to Luxembourgeois), these three languages are only 40% intelligible with Standard German. Their status as separate languages has infuriated lots of Germans who just consider them to be merely dialects of German, or “cheap slangs” of some type or other. Yet they have a better case for being separate languages than Spanish and Portuguese do.
Romanian also seems to have some understanding of both Spanish and Italian. Romanian speakers say that they moved to Italy, could immediately pick up a fair amount of the conversation, and picked up Italian very fast. Romanians have ~65% intelligibility of Italian when spoken and possibly 85-90% when written. They can understand written Catalan better than Spanish and spoken South American Spanish better than Castillian Spanish.
Vice versa, Italians living in Italy run into Romanians regularly and say that they can understand Romanian quite well. Spanish speakers say that they can understand a fair amount of Romanian, and Romanians can understand even more of their Spanish. Spanish and Italian have 71% and 77% lexical similarity with Romanian.
Catalan may be about 60-70% intelligible to a Spanish speaker, and that is with 85% lexical similarity. Oddly enough, Spanish speakers seem to understand Galician better than Portuguese speakers do. Spanish speakers can probably understand 85% of Galician. That doesn’t make much sense, but that’s how it is. Standard Galician is said to be pretty Hispanicized these days.
Looking for a nice dialect continuum across Europe where you can keep on understanding people everywhere you go? Try this, starting at Portugal:
Portuguese, Mirandese, Fala, Galician, Asturian, Aragonese, Spanish, Catalan, Gascon, Occitan, Auvergnat, Provençal, Franco-Provençal, French, Gallo, Picard, Jersey, Guernsey, Walloon, Romansch, Friulian, Ladin, Lombard, Ligurian, Piedmontese, Emiliano-Romagnolo, Venetian, Italian, Neapolitan, Corsican, Sicilian, Sardinian Gallurese, Sardinian Logudorese, Sardinian Sassarese, Sardinian Campidanese, Latin, Moldovan, Romanian, Megleno-Romanian, Istro-Romanian, Macedo-Romanian.

References

Jensen, John B. 1989. On the Mutual Intelligibility of Spanish and Portuguese. Hispania 72: 848-852.

If you think this website is valuable to you, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site.

Hard Tests Are So Damned Racist

Black firefighters are suing the city of Houston because they do so poorly on a test required to be elevated to the level of captain. It’s a multiple choice test, and the Black spokesman said that Blacks don’t so as well on high-stakes tests. So the Blacks are suing that the tests are discriminatory. This shows the utter insanity of Cultural Marxism. Any test that Blacks or whoever else do worse on must be racist or biased. Yeah, it’s biased because it’s hard. Whites do better on hard tests than Blacks do.
That’s racist right there. We need to get rid of all of these hard tests and requirements, all through our lives and society. We need to make all tests and requirements for every damned thing under the sun easy, because making stuff difficult is racist and KKK-like.
Later, they interview an “educational anthropologist” who acknowledges that Blacks do worse on high-stakes tests. No one quite knows why, says the article. Huh? What else don’t we know? That the Earth is round? One theory is that Blacks get inferior educations than Whites.
That’s possibly true (that they get a worse education) but the main reason for that is because when you have large numbers of Blacks in any school, typically just about everyone gets a lousy education, because the Blacks destroy the school. How do I know this? Direct observation and unfortunately experience. I taught in the LA schools for many years.
Another theory tossed is that Blacks get nervous before tough tests and screw up. This is the legendary “stereotype threat” that has been tossed out as a reason for all sorts of low Black test scores. We Leftists would love to believe in cool theories like this, or even, Hell, the eduction one, but they are both wrong.
Stereotype threat has actually been proven to be wrong in quite a few studies if you ask me, though it’s hard to test for. For one thing, Blacks don’t experience much anxiety period. I bet the Whites and Asians are probably more nervous before hard tests than the Blacks. I bet the Whites and Asians who get the highest scores (the nerds) are the most nervous of all. So much for that theory. Considering that stereotype threat has been disproven for about a decade now, it’s amazing that they are throwing it out there as a hot theory.
I believed in all this leftwing BS for most of my life. At one point, I started studying the issue. I wanted to believe all the leftwing BS, so I spent years testing it out. I think I studied this for around a decade or so, testing out all my crazy theories, and then I finally threw up my hands. None of my theories was working.
The reason that Blacks score worse on high stakes tests (or probably just about any test not involving a football, basketball or microphone) is that they are simply, as a group, less intelligent than Whites. Always less smart? Not necessarily. But they are at this point in time. We know this because IQ tests conclusively prove that Blacks are on average less intelligent than Whites right now.
I’m acquainted with one of the top IQ researchers in the world (in his case, a Leftist) and I assure you that the tests are not biased in any way, shape or form. Might Blacks at some point be just as smart as Whites, or surpass them? It’s possible; all we can say is what the scores are right now, but I would not bet on it. I do believe that Blacks have in the past and can in the future close the gap to some extent.
Are they born that way, is it biological or genetic? It’s possible, but I’m not willing to say that. Keep in mind that environment effects IQ also. IQ would not have been rising by 3 points per decade in both Blacks and Whites for the last 80 years if that were not true.
In the article, a Black firefighter compares a being a captain of a firefighting team to playing football. Forget it. I don’t necessarily support high stakes tests just to be a firefighter in the first place, but this is the test for captain. I understand that captain commands a team of men. You need to be smarter than your average firefighter to do that. He needs to make all sorts of snap, on the spot decisions and he holds the lives of his men in his hands. Damn right they need a hard test for that.
One final comment. It’s a multiple guess, excuse me,  multiple choice, test for Chrissake. How hard could it be? It’s not essay, problem solve or fill in the blanks. Come on, man.
This stuff is embarrassing for Black people. With so many fine examples of intelligent and accomplished Blacks in our land, like the President and First Lady, there’s no reason to dumb everything down. When you dumb everything down, everyone gets hurt, because you end up with unqualified clowns littering the responsible positions and holding the certificates of achievement in society. Certificates and positions which become increasingly meaningless.
Black IQ’s have risen 20 points over 80 years in the US. US Blacks today are smarter than the Whites of 1950. Black folks are getting smarter and smarter. There’s no reason to dumb everything down. What’s next on the dumb down agenda? Attorneys and physicians?
If I were going to be rude, I would say that the firefighter tests are biased all right, biased against dumb people, but I won’t say that.

"You Can't Be An Anthropologist Without a PhD"

When I was working as a linguist – anthropologist for an Indian tribe, my silly boss told me that a professor told her that you can’t be a linguist or an anthropologist without a PhD. At the time, I was working on salary as a linguist – anthropologist. That was my job description, and I received a check for doing that. Working as a cultural anthropologist meant working with Indian informants, surveying literature, etc.
It’s true, I didn’t have a degree in anthropology, but I had done lots of reading in the field and taken a course. I bought a book on how to do field anthropology and all the rest was what you call on the job learning. As far as being a linguist, I was doing that too. I had an MA in Linguistics, but had never taken a course in field methods.
No problem. I just got a hold of a bunch of books, called up a bunch of professors and field linguists, and figured it out on my own. I was annoyed at the guy’s remark (he was some kind of a PhD somewhere), but it was no big deal. The world is full of idiots, and some of them even have PhD’s.
My uncle had a PhD and he was one of the most arrogant people you have ever met. One time, he got into it with the department secretary and the department chair called him and read him the riot act. “Look!” the chair said. “Around here, PhD’s are a dime a dozen, but a really good secretary is damned hard to find! Now knock it off!”
My uncle was furious that he was considered less than a lowly secretary and was constantly repeating this story to everyone who would hear, expecting them to share his outrage. Mostly I think the listeners just agreed with the department chair.
Anyway, it wasn’t until recently that I caught on to what the professor with PhD fetish was all about. There are autodidacts all over the world, and I’ve been quite impressed by some of them. The ones who do best are the ones who follow academic consensus.
Let me elaborate. In any field, consensus is more or less arrived at by the experts in the field, and most of them have degrees or even advanced degrees. An academic consensus about a variety of issues and theories related to the field develops over a period of time. In other areas, disagreement persists. And if the consensus is theoretically weak, eventually it starts getting challenged by a few renegades.
One thing you notice about a lot of autodidacts is that they have a real scattershot education. They more or less gave themselves a degree or advanced degree, and they didn’t necessarily take the required courses. Upshot is that they are great at some stuff and terrible at other stuff.  Worse, they often lack the essential basic background that those with a degree have. The field has been set for a crank.
A scattershot education means the autodidact is often going off half-cocked and saying some really stupid things that no one with a real education would ever say. Really, if you want a seat at the table of debate, you need to prove to us that you deserve one. If you’re an autodidact, no problem, but shows that you’ve got the necessary background, either through formal or informal education, to get a seat at the table. If you can’t show us that, give us a reason why we should listen to you at all.
That may sound cruel, but autodidacts do tons of damage to good theory, mostly by contaminating it in the public square. In the field of history, broad consensus has been reached about the Holocaust, the Armenian Genocide and many other things.
Yet the world is full of amateur historians who set out to prove that proven history never even happened. Sure, they are shut out of the academy. For damned good reason. So they contaminate the public sphere with very well-crafted nonsense designed to fool the gullible. I
It’s no secret why nearly all Holocaust Deniers couldn’t get a history professorship even with millions of dollars. In academia, we don’t tolerate nuts, loons and cranks. You either back up your stuff with some sort of facts, or we don’t even let you in in the first place. Sure there are Creationists running around. Some even have Biology degrees. Do you think they can get a Biology Professorship somewhere? Not on your life. Their views are going to land them on their ass before they even have a foot in the door.
There is consensus in meteorology about global warming. Outside the academy, the world is full of meteorological autodidacts whose great calculations show us that global warming cannot possibly be occurring.
There is consensus in biology about which animals are species, subspecies and whatnot. There’s even an organization to stick names on critters. Outside the academy, there are all sorts of amateur field biologists, many receiving large paychecks, who know more than the standards bodies.
Consensus in academia is criticized, but it’s not the bugaboo it seems. If it’s theoretically weak, some maverick will show up and start knocking over the furniture. He might make some folks mad, but they will generally keep it civil.
A requirement in academia is to keep your differences with other scholars respectful and civil. If you notice the autodidacts, they don’t seem to be capable of doing that. They’re often screaming and yelling in various public forums,  leaving nasty snail trails all over that are going to follow them wherever they go. Professors are not supposed to do that. If you do, you might get investigated, if not fired.
Bottom line is that when some egghead makes an arrogant comment like the one you see in the headline above, unfortunately, there is some basis for saying that.

English and Its Closest Relatives

In the last post, we looked at Scots, the closest language actually related to English outside of English creoles. That’s according to Ethnologue anyway. There are only three languages in the Macro-English section, English, Scots and Yinglish, which is Yiddish English.
From Ethnologue (note Fishman is Jewish):

Professor Joshua A. Fishman says, “‘Yinglish’ is a variety of English influenced by Yiddish (lexically, particularly, but also grammatically and phonetically). Any good English dictionary will now include 50–100 (or more) ‘borrowings from Yiddish’ (Yinglish)….
These forms are now used not only by Jews but by others, inversely proportionally to their distance from NYC. In the case of non-Jews the original Yiddish meaning may no longer be known and a related metaphoric or contextual meaning is intended….
Since the variety is only used… (by speakers who can always speak ‘proper English’) Yinglish is never a first language acquired by the usual process of intergenerational transmission. French, Spanish, and Russian counterparts (also a Hebrew counterpart) also exist, but are more restricted in nature, both in size as well as in availability to non-Jews”. Jewish. Second language only.

At first I thought this was a preposterous, but a commenter notes that “it is English with a heavy Brooklyn accent spoken by older Jews and peppered with Yiddish words and phrases.”  Ok, maybe that makes sense then.
Still, I don’t see how that gets in and Geordie (an extremely diverse English dialect) or Scouse (Liverpudlian, likewise), Scottish English or even AAVE (Ebonics) doesn’t make it. Hell, I’ll take Queens New York English before Yinglish.
We looked at Scots earlier. Listening to some Scots tracks, you can pick up a bit of it here and there. It’s hard to say how much you can get. 25%? Less? Who knows. Those of you who listened to the Scots audios in the previous posts, how much were you able to understand? At any rate, for all intents and purposes, Scots is utterly unintelligible to US English speakers.
There’s a lot of silly talk around about mutual intelligibility.
German and English are said to be slightly intelligible, and if German is, you know Dutch must be. It’s frequently said that the language Frisian, spoken in the northern part of Holland, is somewhat intelligible to English speakers.
Frisian is doing ok; it’s relatively secure at the moment. According to commenters at the end of the post, it even has some monolingual speakers. Wow, I never would have expected that.
Frisian been separated from English for possibly up to 1000 years, and if you listen to Frisian, this is what languages sound like after they drift apart for 1000 years. That massive dose of Latinate that went into English did not help matters.
Nevertheless, English and German share 60% lexical similarity, and it’s 80% for the most commonly used vocabulary. In a Swadesh list of 200 words, I think there are only 6 or 7 that lack German cognates. Frisian is even higher. Besides Scots, Frisian is the closest related language to English on Earth, with 61% cognates. So it ought to be interesting to listen to some Dutch and some Frisian to see how much of it we can pick up.
Here is an interview with a top Dutch model, Doutzen Kroes, for a promotional campaign promoting the use of the Frisian language. I believe it is all in Dutch. I could barely make out of a single word out of this 5 minute Dutch language tape. I got a few words, but that is only because I happen to know some Dutch words here and there. Obviously, that doesn’t count. I got about 2%, but that’s only because I know a bit of Dutch.
I will say that Dutch has a bit of a familiar rhythm to it, does it not? It’s not Spanish, French or Italian. The prosody has that English feel to it somehow.
The next video is an interview with the same top model in which she responds in Frisian to questions directed at her in Dutch and English. Don’t look at the Dutch subtitles, because you’ll pick up a lot more words that way. I got the word for “no” in Frisian and that’s pretty much it. But there was a lot of background noise. Comprehension was around 2%.
Let’s try another one. In this one two Frisian poets, Tsead Bruinja and Albertina Soepboer, are interviewed about their upcoming books of poetry. All dialect is in Frisian, clear of background noise, crisp and clear diction. Later Bruinja reads some of his poems in a playground. It was shot in Groningen by Omrop Fryslân, a group that produces Frisian shows on Frisian TV. They have Frisian TV! Cool!
In the comments there are some English speakers claiming that they could pick out enough of it to get the basic understanding. As for me, I could not make out a single damned word. Comprehension was 0%. However, I will allow that Frisian, in prosody, sounds a lot more like English than Dutch does. In fact, it sounds somewhat close to those Scots tapes.
If Frisian and Dutch are this bad, I’m not even going to bother listening to a tape of German. This bit about English and German having some intelligibility seems ridiculous.
A lot of language is about prosody and rhythm. Even if you can’t get a word of that Frisian or Dutch, the rhythm is there. If you have ever heard Old English or try to make it through Beowolf, you will hear that sound in Frisian also. This goes to show you what 61% lexical similarity in two languages gives you comprehension wise – often not a damned thing.
Keep in mind that Japanese and Korean supposedly have 65% or so of their vocabulary derived from Chinese via borrowings. Do you think speakers of Japanese or Korean can make out a word of Chinese, or the other way around? Forget it.
I got a weird and creepy sensation in my body as I watched that Frisian tape. Frisian is a look into our past as English speakers, back to the days before the Angles, Saxons and Jutes got on boats and took off for England long, long ago.
There was a fascinating show on the Discovery Channel a while ago in which the journalist takes a crash course in Old English and then tries to use Old English to buy a cow from a Frisian farmer. The Frisian farmer can actually sort of understand the Old English! Weird…

On the Scots Language

The notion that there is a language called Scots, separate from the English language, instead of just a Scottish dialect of English, makes a lot of folks hopping mad. There is a regular reader who is Scottish who refuses to accept this. The reason is that if you listen to Scots carefully, it does sound like they are speaking a grotesquely distorted and bizarre form of English.
But the thing we linguists keep hammering away at is that if you can’t understand people, they are speaking a different language. People just can’t seem to accept that.
It’s true that Scots is very close to English. Some say that Scots must be more than 90% intelligible with English. This is not the case at all. I don’t have any figures, but a look around the Net showed that the consensus is that Scots is simply not intelligible to many or most speakers of even “Southern English” in the UK (the English spoken in the southern half of the UK). I would gather that even a lot of Northern English speakers can’t make heads or tails of it either. Let’s just forget about American English speakers.
So, bottom line is that Scots is just flat out unintelligible to the vast majority of English speakers.
What does unintelligible mean? According to SIL, unintelligible means you understand less than 70% of what someone is saying. SIL says partially intelligible is 70-89%, and intelligible is 90-100%.
If you ever tried to watch Trainspotting, you know what I am talking about. I think it had subtitles when released her, and it sure needed them, because I could scarcely make out a single word they were saying. Keep in mind that intelligibility differs by individual. A good friend of mine said he watched that movie and figured out the lect about 1 hour into the movie and then was able to make sense out of it, but I never got it.
He’s also a musician, so that may have something to do with it. There’s increasing evidence that musicians are better at language than others. Polyglots are often musically talented. In a lot of ways, language is all about the ear.
To make matters worse, the lect in Trainspotting was not even the real deal, hardcore Scots. It’s just basic Scottish English, not even real Scots at all. It gets pretty hard to figure out where true Scots, Scottish English with heavy Scots interference, and Scottish English proper begin and end.
There are five main dialects of Scots: Insular Scots (Orcadian/Shetlandic),  Northern Scots, Central Scots, Southern Scots and Ulster. As the commenter below notes, intelligibility is quite difficult among dialects of Scots, and it looks like we are looking at more than one language here.
Lafayette Sennacherib,  a Scotsman, writes:

In Scotland, if you go five miles in any direction you encounter a dialect that no one else understands, roughly based on English, but as if there has been little population movement in or out of each little region for 500 years, which is quite possible. There is actually no broad Scots; the poems of Burns are in the dialect of the county of Ayrshire, spoken only there and then.
These days, I as a Glaswegian (from Glasgow, though living in London) find it really hard to understand Ayrshire people when they lapse into dialect, even though it’s little more than 20 miles away. The Edinburgh dialect in Trainspotting is also completely foreign to me, again from only 30 miles away.
As for Shetland or Aberdeen…I worked with a guy from Aberdeen for a year, and only picked out about half a dozen words in that time – if he spoke to me I’d just look philosophical and utter, “Ay mate.”
Funny that although there are lots of accents in the USA, the language is so uniform when there are so many people from so many places. But maybe that’s why – they have to learn a standard dialect to communicate with each other.

Here are some audio samples of Scots from a village called Rosehearty. Here is some more Scots, a 2 minute recitation of a New Testament story. Here are some samples of Ulster Scots, which is pretty much the same language as Scots. This is Philip Robinson reading from a novel called Fergus An The Stane O Destinie. This is clearly a foreign language! This is nothing like Scottish English at all. It’s simply another language altogether.