Game/PUA: What’s Really Going on with Incel and Related Types of Men

I’ve spent quite a bit of time on incel boards studying these folks. I’ve also observed them on PurplePillDebate subreddit and the incel subs when they were still up. Actually I used to post on some of them. It sounds odd but there are lots of non-incels posting on incel boards. They do so for a variety of reasons.

Actually it’s fairly common to see Chads hanging out there. Chads like to bitch about women too, and incel boards are a great place for that. There are asshole Chads who go on there to insult the incels, but they get thrown off real fast. A lot of them are doling out advice. There are also a lot of just regular single guys who have more or less regular (for the population) success or failure with women. One of the most popular posters on one site was a man in his early 30’s who had had sex with 33 females (!), but he hadn’t had sex in three years, which is actually very common for young men these days.

And face it, a lot of regular men are “incel” for various periods in their lives, for weeks, months, or even years.

I usually got thrown out of the incel groups though, usually for stupid stuff like “advocating rape.” Turns out a lot of incels are great big pussies too, which surprised me. One guy posted that they were at a bar playing pool and this woman started grinding up against him for a while. Like an idiot, of course he didn’t do anything about it. I said,

Look if some chick is grinding up against you like that, you need to just grab and her start kissing her really hard. Just attack her.

I’ve dated over 200 girls and women in my life, so I’d say that counts me out as an incel right there. As one guy n an incel group said,

“Wait a minute. You just had an affair with a woman 40 years younger than you, right?”

“Well, yes,” I answered.

“Look!” he said. “You might as well be on another planet from these guys! You’re about as far away from these guys as one can get. Most of these guys can’t even talk to a woman!”

The term incel is much abused by liberals and progressive types (Globohomo Cultural Left crowd). This is unfortunate as these incel men are to be pitied, if anything. The word is tossed around promiscuously at anything these Globohomo cucks and faggots don’t like, in other words, real men. If you’re against feminism, an MRA, get called misogynist, sexist, etc. or complain about women as all sane men do, get prepared to get called an incel.

This is based on the mistaken notion that idiot feminists have that men who hate, are angry at, or even complain about women (in other words, all men) never get laid. I guess according to feminists, all men hate women too much to get laid! So I guess no man ever gets laid! You would think feminists would be smarter than that, but nope. I guess feminists are the women who, when God was handing out brains, they thought he said trains, and they said, “I’d l like a slow one.”

Now the women in my Mom’s generation were hip to this stuff. She got it.

The truth is that women deliberately seek out bad, abusive, toxic, Cluster B, narcissistic, psychopathic, Machiavellian and just plain evil men by preference. Then they sit back and bitch about how they got abused. Duh.

In addition, often the worst men described above get the most women. Men who rape, beat up, threaten, and abuse women are often drowning in pussy if they are Alpha enough to get away with it. And there are two types of womanizers, a kind who definitely hate women although they are surrounded by them all the time and another type who truly love women. Having known many womanizers in my life, trust me that they are at the very least cynical about women and a lot of them are remarkably misogynistic. You would think if women really hated woman-haters, these are first guys they’d throw out.

But nope, these are the guys whose beds they swarm onto. Obviously, hating women has little to do with whether you get laid or not. In fact, there is a whole misogyny kink in porn now where men openly admit to being misogynists and praise this mindset. And there is this whole cohort of women who actively seek out misogynistic men as the best men of them all. Unfortunately, I doubt if this is just a kink in most cases.

But women, especially feminists, persist in the delusion that misogynistic men cannot possibly get laid because they will turn off every woman in sight. This is the reason given for incels’ lack of success since many of them, quite logically, hate women with a passion. Can you blame them? You hit a man enough times and he might just hit you back.

Hence, according to male feminists, liberals, leftwingers and other Cultural Left retards, any man who complains about women (no matter how much he praises them to the skies in other contexts) obviously can’t get laid, and therefore…drum roll…he’s an incel!

Incel is the first insult that feminists toss out towards any man who stands up to their insanity. All of us Men’s Rights Activists get called incels all the time because, yeah, some of us complain about women a bit (while some of us also praise them to the skies at the same time). Actually, a lot of us complain about women way too much and a lot of us are way too misogynistic. But that’s another topic.

Anyway, these men are quite pathetic. Why is it an insult to call a man an incel? These poor guys! What is this, and episode of Hate the Loser? Why don’t we insult people by calling them cripples, saying they’re in wheelchairs, or saying they have Cystic Fibrosis or dwarfism. Those are all tragic conditions too. And if any group is oppressed, it’s these poor incels. I thought liberals were on the side of the oppressed. The truth is that male liberals and progressives really hate men because most of them are male feminists.

All male feminists hate men. They cannot not be so inclined. Hence, male liberals and lefties call other men incels because they’re male feminist homos, cucks, and girlymen. I don’t think real men would ridicule incels. Sure, maybe a few would, but those are insecure Cluster B asshole types. We’ve grown up with these incel guys all of our lives. Hell, most of us were incels at one time. I was until age 15 and for all intents and purposes until age 16. It’s pretty pathetic to kick a man when he’s down, but that’s what Globohomo does to these poor guys.

A good female friend of mine calls herself an asexual or a greysexual, but I think that’s ridiculous. There is something wrong with her. She’s never experienced love (or claims she hasn’t) and rarely finds men that she is physically attracted to enough to want to have sex with. Both of these conditions are quite unwanted. I guess I would call this an “Attraction Disorder.” Perhaps an unwanted inability to fall in love is a “Romantic Disorder.” I’m having a real hard time believing that this woman get a gene that make it so she couldn’t fall in love or hardly finds any men that she is sexually attracted to.

I should point out that in every other sexual sense, she’s just like you and me. I she spent a huge amount of time on asexual forums because they were interesting to me but I never found one person who looked like her. I think she has a different problem. I actually do think that many of the true or pure asexuals have an actual biological disorder, though a rare one affecting 1% of the population. It seems to be related to Assburgers Syndrome or Schizoid Personality Disorder. 51% of “pure” asexuals meet criteria for SPD, and many others may have traits.

Anyway, she was on a board for people not in relationships. 80% of the people in there were men, and they were basically all incels. She said the obvious, that 100% of them said they were unattractive or homely men. Quite logically, this is keeping them from getting laid and falling in love. The other 20% were women. She said she was the only attractive person in there. She also said she had nothing in common with those men.

This is a consistent theme you see with incel men. They are unattractive, homely, or ugly, choose your adjective.

It’s so obvious to anyone with a brain that hating women isn’t keeping these guys from getting laid. See above that that’s hardly a barrier to any man. Obviously, these guys aren’t getting laid because they’re ugly. Real simple. Duh.

Just to show you how most of these guys live their lives, many of them are in their 20’s or even 30’s, and they’ve never had much of a positive experience with a female in their lives. Females don’t like them. They’ve never had a girlfriend. Many have never held hands, hugged, or even kissed a female. Most females will barely give them the time of day, and many say that all or almost all of their dealings with females are negative.

Quite a few say they have never had a pleasant or warm conversation with a female. Females have been treating these guys like radioactive waste from Day One. It’s also very common for them to say that they basically can’t talk to women or that every time they try to talk to females, something seems to go wrong. Eventually they just give up. Quite a few of these guys have Assburgers (25% of incels are Aspies). Many others seem to have some pretty serious cases of Social Phobia, that is, they are dead shy. As the man above said, many of them can’t even talk to a woman.

Bottom line is walking up to female strangers in public and having a very pleasant, warm and extended conversation with one is something that not every man can do. I wonder how many married men can pull this off. Try it some time. I dare ya. Oh and make sure she’s young and attractive, too. Approach her in a public place. Let me know how it goes.

In addition, people don’t understand Tinder, Bumble, Hinge, and related dating applications. There’s this idea that if a guy goes on there, a lot of women will swipe on him. Many incels have gone on Tinder. Almost universally, they sit there for up to six months to a year without a single woman swiping right on them. Not even one! So this idea that every man can go jump on those applications and have women swiping right on him left and right is bullshit.

80% of men on Tinder never get laid off the site even one time. Those success stories you hear about are just the same 20% (80-20 rule – sound familiar?) guys getting laid over and over. Of course, 80% of women on Tinder get laid because that’s as easy as pie. If you are on Tinder and you are having women swipe on you at all, you’re doing well. If you are getting swiped on all the time, you’re kicking ass. For a while there, I was getting 4-5 swipes a day. Most men probably can’t dream of that.

If you can walk up to hot women in public and have a pleasant conversation, any kind of a pleasant conversation, for any length of time at all, or if you have any female friends at all, or if women act warm and friendly and call out your name in public when they see you you are doing way better than any incel.

Although some incels do approach women and ask them out, they don’t do very well. One incel make a thread called, I Will Approach 1,000 Women.

The others were all cheering him on. He approached them everywhere. A lot of the interactions were ok, but some were quite hostile and even threatening. He got some phone numbers somehow, and he managed to get four actual dates with women, which boiled down to lunch dates where absolutely nothing sexual whatsoever happened.

This is the typical experience of an incel in dating and in fact, it’s far better than most of them. If your dates turn sexual at any time at all, not to mention early on or God forbid on the first date, you’re kicking ass. No incel can even approach such successes. Hell, if you even get to hug, hold hands, kiss, or make out on dates with women or if you get their clothes partially or totally off (I usually manage to get them totally or at least partially naked on the first date somehow – don’t ask me how I do it), you’re kicking ass. No incel can even approach this sort of thing.

Hell, if you can meet women online and form online sexual relationships with them of any type at all or if you can have sexual conversations with them, you’re doing far better than an incel. I’m not convinced your average guy is all that great at even this. I’ve been in Kik chatrooms and the whole time I am thinking,

Good God! None of these idiots knows how to talk to a woman!

There might be 5-10 guys in there, and they’re all blowing it bad with the women in the room, mostly by escalating way too fast. If you can go into online chatrooms and quickly meet women, trade nudes and talk dirty with them or get propositioned by them or have them set up dates with you, or have them ask you to move in with them (all of these things happen to me fairly regularly), you’re doing great.

I’m not convinced your average guy knows his way around those rooms or even knows how to PM a woman. Just because you can talk to your wife doesn’t mean you can talk to strange women! Even DM’ing women on Twitter, Kik, porn blogs, and other places is extremely difficult. I struggle with it a lot myself. Talking to strange women and taking things sexual very fast is not something most men are good at.

Bottom line is a lot of young men out there don’t even know how to talk to women. I really think that these incels and probably a lot of other guys who don’t know how to talk to women all that well should maybe go into chatrooms sometimes. Try to talk to women in there. PM women. Go on porn blogs and talk to the women who run the blogs. Go on Tinder and if you get matches, see how well you can carry on a conversation. I found that conversations on Tinder were quite difficult and they leave and ghost you all the time. And I’m pretty good at this.

Women think your average guy can walk into a bar anytime he wants and get laid. My Mom used to say that all the time. A lot of incels and other unlucky men have gone to bars and nightclubs. Some went quite often. They had no luck at all. You could easily go to a bar or nightclub every night for a year and easily come up empty handed.

There’s absolutely no guarantee whatsoever that you will get laid in a bar or club. In fact, if that were the case, I can assure you that there would be block-long lines of men lining up every morning at 11 AM when the bars open and at 6 PM when the nightclubs open. Hey, it’s pretty much free prostitution, right? So the whore business might crash, except that never happens in any civilization.

First thing you need to learn how to do is talk to women. I’m convinced many men are not good at this. Sure, they can talk to their wives, but can they talk to a hot stranger? I’m not convinced. I don’t think it’s common at all for men to be able to approach hot stranger women in public and have pleasant interactions with them. If it were that easy, men would be doing it all the time. You see that happening?

On top of that, you also need to learn how to act around women. This is similar to talking but it’s also somewhat different.

Cut to the chase her, incel is a very lousy insult. True incels are remarkably unsuccessful with females. The vast majority of men who get called incels by Globohomo types are anything but. If you have any success at all with women, you’re far from an incel.

Game/PUA: How to Go in for the Kiss and What to Do If She Stiff-arms You on a Date

I read about those #metoo episodes and over and over again I thought,

“This guy doesn’t know how to act around women!”

I certainly would not have acted like that on a date, that’s for sure. A lot of them were escalating way, way too fast, and they typically wouldn’t take no for an answer. They basically jumped women in the men’s cars and homes and started kissing them, and the women freaked out hard.

Of course there’s nothing wrong with this, and I’ve been jumping them and attacking them my whole life with very little downside. But you need to have an excellent Theory of Mind to do this. You need to be the opposite of an Assburgers type. You have to be so good at reading people that you can almost read minds. You have to be very adept at social rules and know what to say and do and when, how, and why, something I am still learning at age 65!

Suffice to say that I’ll only jump them if the vibes feel right enough. If you’re not sure, just go in for the kiss real slow. Grab her chin and point it towards yours very aggressively but smile when you do it. Put the idea in your head,

You cannot resist me. I am the hottest man on Earth. Resistance is futile. It is not possible to turn down the hottest man alive.

This puts a good mindset in your head, and a lot of the time, they pretty much just go for it.

Then again, I’m a Chad, so maybe my experience only works for them. I have no idea. Also this stuff worked for me as a young Chad. Now I’m an old Chad, and I’m not sure if that is good for much of anything except maybe fucking old ladies, assuming they even want to in the first place.

If they’re not really into it, they will pull back after a bit, maybe after a minute or so, usually saying something like, “Let’s slow down. We’re going too fast here…Ok, ok.” They’re usually breathing quickly when they say it. It’s basically a peace treaty. If you do it right, she will end the kissing and push you away gently, and you really need to obey her wishes. Then an hour or two later, shove her up against the wall real hard and kiss her again! LOL.

If she seems hesitant, go in real slow. Or look her right in the eye and say with the utmost pure confidence, “Kiss me!” Say it like an order, but like an order she can’t resist. And smile when you say it. But also do it very aggressively and arrogantly with a sort of punk rocker snide challenge look on your face. They just go for it in my experience. I’m not sure if it is the aggression or the humor or the combination or none of the above, but if you read the vibes right and go in for the kiss when she seems ripe, it just seems to work.

If you’re on a date and you put your hand on her leg and she removes it, bad sign. You try to hold her hand and she wriggles free, bad sign. You try to put your arm around her and she shrugs it off, bad sign. You try to kiss her gently and she turns her cheek or puts her hand up, bad sign.

You really need to probably stop all such behaviors when they start doing that. I’m not sure what I would do in such cases because it’s been forever since this happened to me.

There a lot of strategies you can use. One is to basically shame her, call her a prude, and suggest she’s frigid or a virgin or scared of men. Make fun of her gently. If you go to kiss her and she turns her cheek, kiss her on the cheek and then sarcastically say, “Oh boy. That was real hot.” A lot of the time she will switch to a heavy make-out session right after you say that.

I guess if she won’t hold hands, you could try something else like putting your hand on her leg. Problem is if she didn’t do one, she won’t do the other either.

I would act put out and treat her like she’s a prude or a virgin. They get insulted by that and a lot of times you challenge them to where they will say, “Oh yeah! Put me on a nice bed, and I’ll show you just how frigid I am!” and then she totally goes for it. I’ve had women say that to me literally, word for word. Last one was an 18 year old girl.

Alt Left: Globohomo: The Real Definition

From the Net:

Somewhat more than 2 years ago, I decided to retire to Ecuador. At first the Ecuadorian people, who are mostly a mestizo mix of Spanish and various Andean ethnicities were a complete cipher to me, as I had never met any before and knew nothing of their culture.

But I soon noticed that they went jogging in the evenings, walked dogs, went to gyms, wore jeans with artificial holes in the legs, had tattoos, always had a cell phone in their hand, got all their news from Facebook, and so on.

After a couple of years Ecuadorian people seem to me just like the New Normal. Today the shopping malls have signs everywhere advertising Black Friday, and the markets are full of turkeys. The movie theater at my local mall is showing the latest Black Panther movie. The children are all wearing Ecuador soccer shirts.

The world has changed massively in my lifetime. Firstly, the invention of civilian jet travel has made it much easier for people to move long distances. And secondly, the Internet has had an even greater effect in homogenizing cultures.

Living in the Andes in Ecuador is now barely any different from living in the Pennines in England, except that the weather is better, and that you see fewer sheep and more llamas.

The whole world is one country now, and everywhere is Disneyland.

I’m not even sure this is a bad idea, but anything the corporate crowd wants is automatically a shitty idea, so I suspect this will be a plunge too at the end of the day. But the jury’s still out at any rate.

People like Putin and the lady in Italy are standing up to this or at least the denationalizing, deracinatization, radical secularism that borders on Satanism, and the explosion of the traditional family into a hundred shards that no one even recognizes anymore. What you see here is a homogenization.

There are no more men and women. There are just these fake things that shift back and forth between the two and increasingly there is no difference.

Sex? Same way. The modern way is pansexual: these people who literally fuck anything human that moves, especially including trannies, which makes them different from the bisexuals one sees everywhere these days.

All religions are elided in favor of no relition at all, or perhaps, as Putin noted, Satanism instead of traditional religion.

National cultures are to be homogenized in favor of consumer drone McWorld.

Nations themselves are to be erased via open borders and increasing calls for supranational governance.

No more 6,000 languages. English uber alles. No such thing as traditional families anymore.

All families are just mix and match and create your own family goulash.

Get it? What they are against is “difference.” They are say they are for diversity but really they want a world in which all binaries and differences are wiped clean.

Globohomo: get it? Homo, not gay but homogenization!

They are standing up for things like nation, and national cultures, religions, traditional morals marriage and family structures – you know, just the time-tested stuff that’s only worked for thousands of years. In the war against Globhomo, Putin’s Russia is a stark example:

One man is fighting back!

Well, there ya go. That’s Globohomo in its essence.

A one world corporate culture where all indigenous cultures, languages, ways of thinking and viewing the world, moral systems, and religions have all been elided in favor of a single corporatized, neoliberal, hyper-consumerist planet: a “McWorld” if you will.

The worst people on Earth, the true neoliberal open borders “woketard” globalists who pose as liberals and Lefties nowadays were openly promoting this in the early 1990’s. I took a trip over to San Fransisco with my sister and we watched a documentary on TV about it. It was the greatest thing since sliced bread I guess. I was already dubious especially as the corporate crowd was pushing it and they never want anything good for the rest of us.

My brother got a university degree in the 2000’s at a local California university. You had to take a “multicultural” set of courses which should have been called “White People Are Evil.” It was just standard Cultural Left Globohomo crap, all about how Whites are evil and how even hyphenated Whites are better than us non-hyphenated types, I guess because they are “ethnic” or something.

Then on an on about Blacks and especially Hispanics and about how they are the greatest thing since Kleenex. Actually, I beg to differ. I’m sorry minorities, but I actually have a higher opinion of Kleenex than Blacks and Hispanics. Kleenex is quite useful and has no downside. The others, not so much, though Hispanics are quite tolerable if you like to live in a somewhat degraded version of American culture that still more or less functions and is quite livable if not paradisical.

Oh yes, the Asians. How can we not forget the model minority?

The whole agenda was open borders, flood the US with minorities because without them, America will fall apart and suck, and we will have a worker shortage because Whites don’t make babies anymore, and how immigrants are essential for this thing called “innovation” (so had did the Japs do it then, anyway?), and how “diversity is our strength, except it isn’t, and it’s probably our weakness.

All of this fake Left “liberal” and “progressive” Cultural Left crap was doused with a huge dose of pure laissez faire capitalist neoliberal economics!

Because that’s the modern Left: neoliberal economics plus neoconservative foreign policy plus the Cultural Left! In other words, Globhomo! Good God. The modern Left is the worst of the left combined with the worst of the right. What could go wrong?

Oh and by the way, due to global warming, 3 billion (yeah billion, you read that right) people from the Global South will “forced” to flee their homelands as they become “unlivable” (And how to people survive in Arabia, the Sahara, the tropics, and the Amazon, pray tell? And guess where they will all have to go? To the Global North, which actually means “White countries”! Where birth rates are collapsing, so we need to be flooded with folks from civilizational failures of countries who will enrich us and innovate us and breed out pesky White genes and diversify us (which has no downside except for FGM, cooking cats and dogs for dinner, and drive-by shootings).

There are actually articles being written on this very topic right now by well-funded “left” corporate outlets. The articles come right out and say that global warming means we must have Open Borders, except then they go on to say that the borders won’t really be totally open, just open for all intents and purposes, and how 3 million non-Whites flooding White countries and turning them all into Kinshasa and Calcutta won’t possibly have any downside, and how anyway if you do turn on your brain and realize it might not be a good idea, you’re a racist, and you need to be canceled!

So anyway, Globohomo isn’t all about about gender and sexual divershitty, mental disorder, and assorted depravity and degeneration, physical, psychological, and spiritual, although that’s sort of the “appetizer” served along with the rest of the McWorld bullshit.

Oh and don’t forget Nazis, fascists, and ISIS and Al Qaeda jihadists to enforce anyone who suggests that maybe this isn’t such a hot idea.

So basically Globohomo is low wages, gay bars, bicycles, homosexuals, transgender bathhouses for all ages, and union busting, with rightwing death squads, Nazis, fascist coups, and ISIS types sent in to terrorize anyone who pipes up a pipsqueak of protest.

I know it seems like Globhomo is all about gays, lesbians, pansexuals, trannies, genderqueer, nonbinaries, trans-speciesists and other forms of sexual and gender moral decay and mental disorder, but there’s actually much more to it than that. It’s not just an anti-gay slur! The LGBTQIAWTF aspect is just part of it, not the whole deal.

Color me dubious, to say the least.

Game/PUA: How Many Women Like Bad Men?

The truth is that women deliberately seek out bad, abusive, toxic, Cluster B, narcissistic, psychopathic, Machiavellian and just plain evil men by preference. Then they sit back and bitch about how they got abused. Duh.

What did you think was going to happen. Although male nice guy myth says that women only like assholes and hate nice guys, it’s more complex than that. I will defer to an ex-girlfriend who was sane, not a feminist at all. We talked about this and she said that ~1/3 of all women like bad men. Of course she was 51 years old when she told me that. And she had been through a harrowing 5 year relationship with a sociopathic sexual sadist that left her deeply scarred. But once again, she picked him, right? She claimed she had been Stockholmed, but they all say that.

I think it makes sense to say that 1/3 of women like bad or even evil men. This is a very base and primitive desire dating back to caveman days or even before. I think it may date to just before we left Africa and there is some recent evidence to back that up. Most of the males in the group were massacred and the remaining females are thought to have been taken prisoner as slaves by the conquering group.

The out of Africa people were terribly lopsided in terms of women to men, there were much more women than men. Of course, conquering tribes have been killing all the men and enslaving all the women ever since. It stands to reason that the only women who survive such events are those who are capable of deep love bonds with profoundly abusive men who have enslaved them and just murdered their husbands and male relatives.

So women have evolved to be, in effect, sex slaves or at least to have that sort of a mindset. With that in mind, the preference for bad boys makes sense.  This is a deep emotional need on women’s part and they often don’t even understand why they feel that way. In their 20’s or better yet, after age 30, a lot of women overcome the bad boy addiction by using their frontal lobes. Yes women do have working frontal lobes.

Alt Left: Another View of the Matrix or Fake Reality That We Are Currently Living In

Commenter Tamerlane offers an interesting view of this notion below.

RL: What do you think of this bizarre concept that a lot of what we think of as the real world, or reality itself, is not even real, as in “true”?

I’ll tell you what I think, but get ready for a mindfuck!

We live in a matrix (Maya/Samsara) within a matrix (Universe) within a matrix (Earth) within a matrix (the Internet) within a matrix (the Self).

1. The first matrix (Maya/Samsara) is everything that is possible within space and time. This includes all possible universes, parallel universes, and realms, including beings made out of light, gods, demons, demigods, ghosts, conscious entities that don’t have bodies, on and on. Basically Hindu Cosmology.

2. The second matrix (the universe) consists of our particular universe/realm with its specific laws of physics and spatial-temporal boundaries. Its mysteries are still in the process of being discovered, most recently by the JWST, because our current understanding of physics is incorrect and incomplete.

This includes all matter from the smallest particles (vibrating strings) to the biggest galaxies and black holes to dark matter and dark energy. Not to mention countless intelligent alien civilizations, some that are even millennia more advanced than we ares. This notion is based on UAP theory.

3. The third matrix (Earth) consists of our specific planet, its geological history, and the history of the evolution of life on it. Among its countless, diverse, and crazy lifeforms is Homo sapiens sapiens, a bipedal primate with exceptional cognitive abilities and countless other peculiarities and idiosyncrasies. These smart monkeys went from living in tribes to villages to city-states to kingdoms to nations to empires to a global civilization, all the while increasing their technological abilities to the point of rivaling the god-like beings from their myths.

4. The fourth matrix (the Internet) consists of a worldwide system of computer networks that this bipedal ape only recently invented, which has seemly made everyone lose their fucking minds. These smart apes at this point in history are constantly plugged in and hopelessly addicted to this network, independent of whether that addiction manifests itself as media, movies, music, books, blogs, sports, porn, social media, etc. They are hyperconnected yet have never been more lonely and anxious.

5. The fifth matrix (the Self) is the illusion of the Self, of being someone and of being a person. Every human is constantly and consciously engulfed in this illusion in due to evolutionary selection. It is an ever-present and inescapable part of the human condition, and its ontology is tremendously and ironically influenced by the  unconscious of that particular individual based on their mental attributes (IQ/personality) and subjective experiences (memories/samskaras).

The 4th matrix most resembles the matrix from the movie The Matrix (1999) due to sensory redirection of input. In the movie, humans were actually asleep in pods and plugged into the fake reality of what they called “The Matrix” via redirected sensory (sight, sound, taste, touch, smell) input straight into their brains through fabricated electronic signals, which were created with advanced technology.

The Internet is a good proxy for the Matrix because most everyone is “plugged in” to a certain degree. More importantly, their main sensory inputs: sight (via the eyes) and to a lesser degree sound (via the ears) have been hijacked by screens (TV, phone, computer). This hijacking of sensory input has been even further hijacked by the intelligence agencies through Operation Mockingbird and all of the other psychological operations and  government activities to program our collective subconscious.

The truth has been so wish-washed and drowned out by means of strategically manufactured misinformation and disinformation that the vast majority of people are propagandized, hypnotized, and gaslighted into the collective psychosis known as Globo-Homo-Schlomo, aka Western Civilization. Because seeing is believing, what they see on screens is for them reality. We are living in Orwell’s 1984. We are literally living in a Matrix of Lies!

Even an individual is miraculously not “plugged in” and living a relatively nomadic lifestyle is affected. Due to the fact that humans are social animals, this fabricated reality will even be imposed upon this nomadic individual, and he will be forced to conform and accept this fictional reality lest he is ostracized.

If he has the intellectual capacity and does his research and therefore starts waking up to the lies and deceits, at first he will be deplatformed, then he will be unpersoned, and if he continues to be a threat to the system, he will finally be gaslighted into insanity and institutionalized or suicided by “Agents”, as in fascist agents of the system: FBI goons, CIA spooks, NSA spies, police state thugs, and the media-industrial complex.

At this point, if you do not possess a high IQ along with independent-mindedness in terms of personality characteristics, you are just another NPC fucktard cow. Alternatively, if you do possess a high IQ along with independent-mindedness but are not a part of the System/Machine/Beast, you are ultimately surrounded by NPC fucktard cattle and are gaslighted into stupefaction on a daily basis. Time to bring out the vodka!

Pertaining to this post and current events, if you haven’t done so already, the following two books are invaluable resources in terms of acquiring a high level understanding of how, what, and why this stuff is, was, and will continue to happen.

Simulacra and Simulation by Jean Baudrillard

Propaganda: The Formation of Men’s Attitudes by Jacques Ellul

If you don’t have the time, the Wikipedia pages/Goodreads reviews do a great job of summarizing the contents anyways.

Cheers!

Alt Left: Fakeworld, or Put This Idea in Your Pipe and Smoke It: A Lot of What We Are Told Is Reality is Not Even True or Real!

Polar Bear: IQ, Race, and History are verifiable facts.

Doug: Really? And yet there is a great deal of disagreement on all of these.

For example, who won the Battle of Kadesh? Many historians think the Hittites won, and the Egyptian Pharaoh had to flee the battle, but the Egyptian claimed a great victory and built a monument to their alleged victory.s

There’s no debate about IQ at all, other than things we still don’t completely understand like the Flynn Effect and race and IQ. But these debates are theoretical, not political.

There’s some debate about race, but I think it’s pretty clear that race is real and exists beyond mere skin tone. Sure, the Crazy Left refuses to believe that, but the Left is as science-hating as the Right nowadays. Yet this notion that race is real is not yet consensus and there is still a lot of debate about how much say differential crime rates among races are products of racial biology or societal structures.

Sadly, I’m afraid that the dice fall on the racial biology angle. Well, fine. But what’s causing that? What causes these differential crime rates if they are biologically charged, which I think they are. You can’t just say “biology.” You have to start pointing to specific genes and what they code for. You have to start comparing brains and genetic frequencies on a racial basis. We are nowhere close to explaining the biology behind racial differences.

That’s going back a long ways.

There’s debate about Ancient History because not much was written down and probably a lot of the writers were as big of liars as the stenographers of power we joust with today. People lie maniacally about modern history, especially concerning geopolitics. This war is the ancient equivalent of geopolitics. Humans haven’t changed in 3,000 years. No doubt people were doing somersaults of lies in whatever version of war history they were writing about back then, just as nations go into lying frenzies in wars even at this late date. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

If you go back far enough in recent history and even going back a few centuries, historians are able to sort out the lies and bullshit from the truth pretty well, especially as We have a fairly decent history of the last couple of thousand years. Before that, things get a lot dicier because little was written down.

Historians are not supposed to be biased actors. They’re supposed to be social scientists with a rigorous commitment to the truth come Hell or high water.

Modern historical analysis is pretty good. The problem now is that intelligence agencies and state propaganda have so warped truth and facts and much of modern history as laid out in, say, Wikipedia is straight up lies. And truth is listed under some section called Conspiracy Theory. False flags, fake news, framed suspects, things happened that never happened, things didn’t happen that happened, Party X did something that Party Y actually did, on and on and on.

So much of modern reality is “constructed” by modern state propaganda here in the West that I almost think that we can be seen as living in a “Matrix.” There’s the truth about recent history – that is, what actually happened. In the West, much of this is referred to as conspiracy theory, enemy lies, and disinformation. Then there are the lies about modern history in which fully constructed fictions as fake as any movie, TV show or novel are presented as historical fact.

The implication is that a lot of what we think of as our modern reality is simply made-up bullshit. So we are living in a fake reality, or unreal reality, or a reality that didn’t even happen. Perhaps a “fictional reality” would be a better way to put it.

The idea that a lot of modern reality boils down to literally living in a Fake World or a Fake Reality (like a TV show, movie, or novel), and that the Real World is sold to us as a faked out lie made up by our enemies is quite mind-boggling if you can actually fit it into your mind. It’s almost like a weird movie plot like The Truman Show or The Matrix.

The longer you sit there with this idea in your head, the weirder it seems. Put it in your head and stir it around a bit:

A lot of what we consider to be “actually existing reality” is really fake!

The Latest Lies about Me

This is just the latest BS about me. It’s not really interesting to the people interested in the Delphi Murders case. If this sort of thing interests you, go ahead and read, but if it doesn’t, there are more pleasant things to read on here.

He claims to be an actual educated journalist by profession and nothing could be further from the truth.

Indeed, I obtained a BA in Journalism from Long Beach State University in California in 1981. You are welcome to go do your searches and find that out for yourself. I wrote for the underground (unofficial) newspaper on campus and I also wrote for the school magazine. I also worked as an editor of a computer magazine in  the 1980’s.

Lindsay’s blog is full of sexual paraphilia comments.

Do you even know what a paraphilia even is, retard? Here is an example of some paraphilias for the short bus Church Lady/Altar Boy crowd over at the LibbyandAbby Reddit. I don’t understand you people to understand the meaning of any of these words because I don’t think you’re even capable of using a dictionary.

  • Sadism
  • Masochism
  • Urolagnia
  • Coprophilia
  • Coprophagia
  • Partialism
  • Hibristophilia
  • Fetishism

And yes, some of them can result in illegal behavior:

  • Pedophilia
  • Hebephilia
  • Ephebophilia
  • Voyeurism
  • Exhibitionism

There are actually quite a few of these. I think there were 135 at last count. Consult Kraft-Ebbing if you want more, but you all are too stupid to even know who that is.

Obviously the study of paraphilias as unusual sexual interests is a completely normal and proper field of scientific inquiry for any sexologist. I’m an amateur sexologist and my posts about this subject have brought me untold grief because they drove the Church Ladies, Altar Boys, Victorians, and other Sex Fascists. Not that it matters, but I’m not aware of any paraphilias I might have. I don’t wish to be a paraphiliac. I have enough enough problems as it is without throwing that into the mix. Not that having a paraphilia is a bad thing.

I’ve worked with some people with paraphilias in my counseling practice though. I’ve worked with the following paraphilias: pedophilia, voyeurism (he had gotten in trouble with the law), fetishism (especially foot fetishism), and urolagnia. Those are just the ones that come to the top of my head. Human sexual variations, kinks, and perversions are very interesting!

Or an incel not by choice.

I hear this a lot. I’m retired. At my age, nobody has sex anymore (except me I guess). If you look at my life history, I’m about as far from an incel as you can get, not that there’s anything wrong with being an incel. Read my other articles to figure that out.

Lindsay is a hebephile. This makes me conclude he is a girl-attracted hebephile.

I’m a teleiophile. I know none of you pinheads know what that means, so I will tell you to look it up if you can figure out what a dictionary is. One of my best friends is a hebephile though, but he’s never broken the sex laws. And he’s a much better person than any of you sanctimonious, cop-loving twits.

Not only does he obsess about pedo vs. hebe., he said he went into chat rooms with little girls and also went on and on about how sexual 9 yr old girls were. It is NOT okay to be discussing little girls (9 freaking yrs old!) Sexuality. He admitted going into CHILDREN’S chat sites and discussing sexuality with them. When I left they were still trying to explain the problem wasn’t him being specific about age or development preferences in child sex offenders, it was his activities and methods of getting information.

Nope, never happened. Never been in a chatroom full of “little girls,” nor have I ever been in any “children’s chatroom.” Good God, why would I go to such a place? Also, I don’t think 9 year old girls are sexual at all! To me they are completely nonsexual beings, so I would never say such a thing. The only thing I would say about 9 year old girls’ sexuality is that they have none! I hope it’s ok to say that! Once again, I have never been to any “children’s” chatroom to discuss sexuality with them.

First of all, let’s just emphasize how much of a scumbag this blogger is. He constantly defends p**os and that type of behavior. Some of his posts are sickening. He legit admits to being in Facebook groups where he talks to teenagers and even worse. Absolute scum of the earth this guy(s).

I have never been in any Facebook groups where I “talked to teenagers,” at least not that I was aware of anyway. I did talk to a 14 year old girl from Indiana on there once because she ran into a guy on a trail in the woods who frightened her and I was interested in her story. I tried to keep the conversation as clean as possible, but like so many girls that age, after ~20 minutes, she started talking about sex! I couldn’t add much to her comments though and the conversation ended soon after that.

That’s one of the problems with talking to girls that age is that no matter how clean you try to keep the conversation, she’s probably going to bring up sex pretty quickly. It’s one more reason they are called jailbait, and it’s a great reason to avoid them for being a general menace.

I do talk to teenagers all the time though, and I usually talk to them about sex. But those are girls and they’re almost all over 18. I hope that’s ok with y’all!

and how attracted to him these children were.

Well, yeah. Teenage girls aren’t children! They’re “little adults, young adults, or junior adults,” and most of them are much closer to an adult than to a child.

Teenage girls have been after since I was 16. A few of them anyway. There are a lot fewer at my age, but even now, every now and then, one still is! And I am 65 years old! I’ve got some news for you clowns. Women like goodlooking men! Teenage girls are just like women. Whatever a woman likes, a teenage girl likes. And teenage girls like goodlooking men too!

A couple of months ago, a 14 year old girl and two 15 year old girls gushed over my looks. “You are so handsome!” they all said. One of the 15 year olds followed that up by openly propositioning me! She then tried a bunch of tricks to get me to change my mind (they do this) but I didn’t cave. Don’t worry. I turned her down.

Why am I an evil person for experiencing this? Isn’t it on the girls themselves?

I talk to women about sex all the time, often every day, and they’re often new ones. They’re mostly ~18-28 for whatever reason. I don’t usually talk to girls. They’re sort of a bust! If I do, I’m careful about what I say to them. I know the laws in my state very well! I’ll talk to a teenage girl anytime I want! If you don’t like, it, call the cops, you cop-loving prudes!

I just went on it and scrolled randomly and he’s taking about his mind diaphragm. He is just not normal.

What on Earth is a “mind diaphragm?” Jeez, these Church Ladies get upset about everything, don’t they? I was talking about female birth control and I mentioned how in the 1970’s, in my experience, most women used diaphragms and contraceptive foam or spermicide. I hope it’s ok to talk about that!

The guy is pathologically narcissistic and incredibly grandiose.

I hear this diagnosis all the time too. I heard this so many times that I contacted my best old therapist and asked him if I were a narcissist because I was quite worried. He said I did not have Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Instead, he said I had “high self-esteem” which most morons confuse with narcissism. Actually they are too different things, but that’s beyond your intelligence level.

I saw several self-confessed pedophiles comment on his blog, including one who graphically detailed his abuse of a little girl in Mexico. That slug Lindsay not only left the post up, but made a comment in response.

Wow, that was a very long time ago! Yes, we had a few folks on that article.

1. A 15 year old girl, not a pedophile at all, who had fallen in love with an actual pedophile and had taken to masturbating to videos of child porn (!).

2. A guy named Wayne, not a pedophile at all, who was all wrapped up in and obsessed with his 11 year old daughter (!).

He had installed hidden cameras in his bathroom so he could watch his daughter while she bathed. And when he talked to her, sometimes he pulled his pants down and put a blanket over himself and masturbated while he did so. He gave her backrubs all the time, which is just fine by me. But he had started asking her if it would be weird if he kissed her. She thought it would be weird. I thought he was violating his daughter’s privacy and I didn’t like what he was doing with that blanket over himself talking to his daughter. I also thought he had gotten way too wrapped up in his daughter, and he needed to step back a bit and get a grip.

3. And then, worst of all, we had an actual pedophile, an Hispanic guy who spoke Spanish, who had relocated to Mexico because I assume the pickings are easier down there. Being an expat is pretty typical with these types as most Third World countries don’t have strict laws against child molesting. He had molested two of his young neighbors, girls age five and six. He didn’t harm them physically. He basically convinced them to pleasure him with their hands. Both mothers found out about it and forbade the girls to go there.

This was a lower middle class neighborhood and he said this sort of thing went on all the time in such places, and apparently most women from these environments get molested as girls and it’s just seen as a normal thing females experience growing up there. No one makes much of a fuss about it, and I’m not sure how much damage is caused because it’s so normalized. The cops don’t seem to care much about it and barely prosecute it.

We let lots of people post here. I’d rather a pedophile or a Nazi post here than a Republican! They’re more dignified!

I don’t turn people in. I’m not a cop! I don’t even like cops very much, and I barely want to help them at all. Anyway, the guy was in Mexico. Let the Mexicans sort it out. I did set my commenters loose on him though, and they took him on pretty well. They beat him up pretty good in the comments section.

Not to mention continuous rants about age of consent laws.

This is not so. I have no issues with AOC laws in the US. I do have some issues with how they are enforced, which nowadays is excessively. I live in a state with an 18 AOC, which is high for the US. It’s fine with me as I ain’t touching those girls anyway. Actually I rarely talk about AOC laws, and I almost never criticize them except for lack of Romeo and Juliet laws (every state should have them with minimum three years difference) and putting minors in jail for breaking AOC laws. Knock it off right now! Hey! Cops! Leave those kids alone!

I used to read his writings and try to guess what his DSM-V personality orders were, for fun.

It’s none of anyone’s business, but I have never been diagnosed with anything on Axis 2, thank God. And that’s straight from 30 different psychiatrists and psychologists!

However something has popped out to me about him, I’m pretty certain that he is an Aspie (Aspergers syndrome) which is through lacks of a better term high functioning autism.

So many people online have been calling me that lately that I contacted my best old therapist above and asked him, and he said I definitely don’t have Assburgers. In fact, I have the opposite. I am acutely socially aware. I just don’t care about other people’s reactions to what I say. I’m not a conformist like all of you cowardly, cowering, play-by-the-rules sheep. I say what I want whenever I want! If you don’t like it, call the cops!

Lindsay also had a counseling business going on where he states on his blog that he counseled pedophiles.

This is correct. I worked with a couple of them, and I worked with both of them for free because they were very interesting to me.  One was very hard to work with! He was also one of the best human beings I’ve ever known. That damned pedophile was a far better person than any of my enemies. He had never offended either and I was proud of him for that. He also got a lot better when I worked with him.

But 99% of the people I worked with were not pedophiles. I’m not sure I would want to work with pedophiles all the time. It seems rather disturbing and I don’t think I would feel comfortable dealing with those people all the time. I deal with a ton of disturbing stuff in sessions anyway, but that’s pretty over the top.

Of course, he’s not a counselor anymore.

I’m a peer counselor for people with OCD, and I also work with problems in living, growth stuff (if you want to grow as a person) and deep stuff (if you want to explore your inner psyche). I have been told that I am very good. People come from all over the world to work with me! Put that in your pipe and smoke it, moralfags!

…apparently he dates almost very young models (in his dreams).

Well, not usually, but at age 59, I was dating a 27 year old model for a while. We were mostly just friends though. At age 57, I was dating a 48 year old woman who had been a model in her youth. She was still very beautiful too! As you get older, of course it gets harder to do such things.

And let’s add misogynist to the list of things he is.

I disagree that I am a misogynist unless telling the truth about women makes one such a person.

He can’t deal with a real grownup woman.

My last three major relationships were with:

  • 1. 1 1/2 years: A 48-49 year old woman who was madly in love with me wanted to marry me.
  • 2. 1 1/2 years: A 51-52 year old woman who was crazy in love with me wanted me to come live with her part-time in a foreign country.
  • 3. 5 1/2 years: A 55-61 year old woman who was deeply in love with me and very much wanted to marry me.

Alt Left: Ukraine Shows the Folly of Modern Neo-Nazism

Polar Bear: Ukraine displays the folly of neo-Nazism today.

It is bizarre. Most Ukrainian Jews are literal Nazis, including their leader, the Nazi Jew Zelensky.

Nazi Jews!? WTH is that? How is that even a thing? Once you get to that point, the words Nazi and Jew cease to have any meaning.

I do like that a lot of Jews are catching on to these Nazis. I saw a recent thread on Twitter, and about half the Jews (a lot of them were Israelis) were saying “Ukrainians are antisemites and Nazis.” Duh. The other half were defending the Ukrainians. I saw a TV spot out of Israel by a retired Israeli intelligence chief, and he was blasting Zelensky in the worst terms as being the worst sort of Jew of all, worse than a capo:

He’s supporting people who murdered hundreds of thousands of our people.

Hell, he’s like an actual SS member! By they way, there were many mischlings in the SS.

I criticize Jews on here, but I have no respect whatsoever for a Jew who supports Nazis! It’s sleazy situation ethics “what’s good for the Jews” run amok.

Basic Jewish “morality,” which to be fair is just tribal morality on steroids:

  • Is it “good for the Jews,” no matter how evil? Support it.
  • Is is “bad for the Jews,” no matter how good? Oppose it.

Pretty much amoral Realpolitik too, and of course that term was invented by a Jew. You don’t have to be Jewish to feel this way.

World geopolitics runs on this sleazy principle:

  • Nations don’t have morals. They have interests.

Last time I checked, Machiavelli wasn’t Jewish, and he wrote the book on this stuff. But I’m sure this was going on long before Machiavelli. Self-interest has always trumped morality in humans.

I am glad that some Jews are deciding to have some actual hard and fast morals that are not subject to sleazy contingency though. These Jews are saying,

Look, you can ally with a lot of sleazeballs (after all, we’re Jewish, right?), but one group you don’t ally with are Nazis. Jews don’t make alliance with Nazis. Jews kill Nazis.

You’ve got to stand up for your people, and siding with your worst enemies on some manipulative basis is as slimy as it gets. There’s no such thing as the “nice Nazis” or they “Nazis who are good for the Jews, at least for now.”

Any Jew has to consider all Nazis as their worst deadly enemies. I may disagree with their POV to the hilt, but I will always give at least a modicum of respect for any Jew who stands up to and fights the enemies of the Jews. You have to support your people, and that means fighting your enemies.

Any Jew who supports Nazis, and I don’t what kind of “super-special” Nazis these might be, loses all respect in my book. I don’t even want to talk to someone like that. For that reason, I even have a bit of respect Jews who regard Arabs as deadly enemies even though I often hate these Jews. Let’s face it. If you’re Israeli, the Arabs are your deadly enemies. For God’s sake, they’re trying to kill you, man!

I had a client who was a Libyan Jew and former Israeli. He had now moved to the US. He agreed with me that at least now Israeli behavior did not have to be on his conscience living in the Diaspora. You would be surprised at how many Jews agree with me when I say that!

Well, of course, we are on the Left, the Israeli Left. But on the other hand, the Arabs are tying to kill us!

– A former Israeli Libyan Jew expat relocated to the US.

Above all else, defend your people!

Alt Left: The Culture of the US (Pornographic Victorianism) Is a Reflection of Basic Female Nature in a Female-Run Society (Matriarchy)

Polar Bear: Antifa are so woke they are gay. I stumbled upon antifa gear and they specified genderfluid as a category and had what looked like a non-White female-to-male trans modeling an anti-racist Viking shirt.

Antifa is gay, bi, pan, poly, genderfluid, and tranny as Hell. Are there any straight Antifa men?

Bizarrely, they are also insanely feminist, so they are all #metoo at the same. I don’t see how any of the men there manage to have flirt with, date, or have sex with women because #metoo effectively bans that.

There was a case of a young Antifa Alpha, probably a Chad, who was slaying young Antifa chicks left and right in a local Antifa group in Oakland. Of course they said he was “preying” (LOL) on “naive girls” (LOL). Notice the feminist infantilization and denial of agency of grown women. They were calling him out and this and either demanding he be thrown out or threatening to beat him up for being an Alpha slayer stud, which according to Antifa feminism is probably some sort of misogynistic fascist.

The combination of Globohomo LGBTQIAWTF “queer” utter sexual license and depravity combined with #metoo deranged feminist ultra-Puritanism is bizarre.

Sometimes I think the culture of the US is “pornographic Puritanism” or “pornographic Victorianism.” On the one end, society is soaked top to bottom on totally porned-out madness which gets men all riled up. Then you go out into society and everyone’s clutching pearls and screaming about “creeps” (guys trying to get laid). You look at a woman in a store and you get banned from the location as a “creep” (a guy with an obvious sex drive.)

Of course this sort of insanity would be expected in a female-run society or Matriarchy because feminism is simply the female psyche reified, institutionalized, and set down into law and rule. Women are “puritanical nymphomaniacs” as part of the basic nature of the female psyche, so it’s logical that if you put women in charge of rules and laws about gender and sex, you end up with exactly this sort of madness. And women will never change it because to them this sort of irrationality is totally normal and rational since they experience it in their own minds every day.

Delphi Murders Update November 13, 2022: The Arrest of Richard Allen Raises More Questions Than Answers

Warning, long, 45 pages.

Our private Delphi sleuthing group is the best on the Internet by far and has been since it was founded five years ago in 2017.

Unlike any other sleuths, we have determined the main suspects in the case, have a good idea of what happened during the crime and what the crime scene looked like, and have recently figured out the motive.

Best of all, much of our information is via solid sources such as search party members, official case documents, and LE sources close to the investigation who leak to us. No other group has come close to uncovering the amount and quality of information we have.

Why not join the 275 members who have already signed up for the best Delphi sleuthing team of all? There is a small fee of $20 minimum (you can always give more) to join, which includes lifetime membership. The $20 fee was demanded by our members in order to safeguard the privacy of their conversations, and it has worked very well.

Join the best Delphi sleuthing group of all!

Note: This post has been substantially updated with the new information that the police think that Richard Allen is the man on  the bridge who killed Abby Williams and Libby German.

Let’s cut straight to the chase here. Normally I start off taking down whatever lies have been told about me since the last time I posted. These are interesting to read through even if you’re not interested in the subject because there is a tremendous amount of information about the crime and everything surrounding it, so it can be educational in that sense. But in this case, those will follow the main text.

The Big Break in the Case: Richard Allen, Arrested for the Delphi Murders, Raises More Questions Than Answers

Well, the Big Whopper happened. There was an arrest in the  Delphi Murders case, and yes, the man was arrested for Murder.

In our group, there are a few people who do a lot of the posting. I think most others just lurk. The group has been very busy lately since the arrest. We operate on a peer review principle that holds that everyone’s comments and opinions are up for grabs, and anyone can either agree with them or take them down. I think we are very nice about disagreeing with each other, but we do disagree in there a lot. After some time though we arrive at a consensus.

Origianlly, the consensus of the regular posters on our group, including me, was that Richard Allen is not the Delphi Killer. He was not Bridge Guy or BG, the man on the bridge. And he absolutely did not murder, help murder, or plan the murders of Abby Williams and Libby German. Neither his phone nor his vehicle can be placed in the area during the time of the crime.

However, recently our views have changed now that police have come out and said he is the Delphi Killer and this is no longer consensus. There are still some who think he is innocent, and there are indeed some who are convinced that he is indeed the killer. Consensus now is confusion with most uncertain of Allen’s role in this crime which seems to bring more questions than answers.

Some think he was at the bridge and played a role, which seems dubious given the Felony Murder charge being the only one leveled, others think he played some more peripheral role by committing some other crime and got caught up in the murders inadvertently. This is frankly still my position. Probably the main position is complete confusion as we do not understand Allen’s role in this crime at all and so many things do not seem to add up or make sense. So our consensus now would be that we are confused about this latest development and don’t know what to make of it.

First of all, I will go through the reasons some of us have a very hard time believing that this is him on the bridge. This article was originally written on the basis that Allen was innocent, but after police said he was the Bridge Man who murdered the girls, most group members have changed their minds.

Allen is 5’4 and BG is 5’8-5’9. This has been questioned, and the argument is that his height is really 5’7, but my information from his driver’s license and court records on the Internet is that his height is 5’4 on those records. An argument has also been made that the FBI had a large range for BG’s height, but that is not so. It was always 5’8-5’9. No, the FBI did not mess up their analysis. I’ve also seen very well-done re-enactments with precise measurement tools and video that also pegged BG at 5’8-5’9.

We were told very early on that whatever eye color BG had, he did not have blue eyes. The police were very confident about this fact provided by an eyewitness. The problem here is that Allen has eyes that are very blue. The square pegs in round holes solution to this is to say that the witness got the eye color wrong. Using Occam’s Razor, which is one of the tools that we use in our sleuthing group, the simplest explanation of these facts is that Allen is not BG, as he most definitely has blue eyes.

While Allen does not seem to have been a regular to the bridge area, there is evidence that he was there at least once. About a year after the murders, he accompanied his 28 year old daughter to the bridge. She walked out on it a few steps and sat down, and it was there that he took her picture. Beyond that though, we have no evidence that he ever walked the length of the bridge as BG must have, not to mention with the confident stride of BG, who walked that bridge as if he had done it many times.

The killer knew the lay of the land very well. At the very least he had spent a lot of time around that area. He was very familiar with the bridge and also with the private property in the area, in particular Ron Logan’s land. There is no evidence that Allen was intimately familiar with this area or that he was very familiar with Ron Logan’s land or had even ever set foot on it.

I had assumed that Allen is not an outdoorsman, but that may be incorrect. At any rate, does he own a camouflage cap like BG’s? I’ll tell you who does. Mr. X! Indeed, at the 2019 press conference, remember where the police acted so weird and flustered and then suggested that the killer may have been in the room? Of course the denier crowd has no explanation for that.

Using Occam’s and judging from the behavior of the police, the only possible conclusion is that the main suspect was in the audience, and they were surprised by this, and this is why the police acted so flustered and upset. From the police, we know that Mr. X was the main suspect from soon after the murders until at least a four months ago.

And as a matter of fact, Mr. X was indeed in the audience.

But what is more interesting than that is that, perhaps to taunt the police, the photograph of Mr. X wore the exact same camouflage cap that BG is wearing on the bridge to the press conference that day! That’s awfully brazen of him. He’s either the killer or he’s not, but he must have known he was the main suspect. In either case, he was taunting the police.

There are rumors that Allen is a hunter. If so, is he a deer hunter?  Is he an avid, nearly fanatical deer hunter like Mr. X? We don’t know this. Notice that BG has a deer kit around his waist. This along with the camouflage cap fits with the main suspect being an avid, nearly obsessive deer hunter.

BG is very strong. The heavier girl was dragged for quite some distance. Further, the terrain around the crime scene is very rugged, full of downed wood everywhere, and quite steep. One of our members went there and said you had to go straight up and then straight down three different 15-foot tall ravines.

They also said it was dangerous, at least in November with a foot of leaves on the ground. Some members of her party fell down while traversing the land. In Anthony Greeno’s re-enactment of the crime, when he gets to the crime scene, we can see that it is quite rugged and steep. Richard Allen does not appear to be a very strong man.

Richard Allen is not a man of action. Men are doers or watchers. Allen, along with Kegan Kline, is a watcher, basically a passive man. BG looks like he’s in pretty damn good shape. Allen looks flabby and out of it. I can’t see him hightailing across that bridge or even going near it. BG was confident, extroverted, action-oriented, and downright brazen. This is one of the most brazen crimes that I am aware of. To use a cliche, BG had balls of steel. Does Allen look brazen? Does he look like he has balls of steel? More like balls of jello to me. I hate to insult people, but he seems more the cowardly type than anything.

Just looking at Richard Allen and observing him and his behavior (including his writing as we analyzed that too), some of us do not believe that Richard Allen has it in him to commit a horrendous crime like this. He would not be able to do it. He wouldn’t even be able to plan it.

Richard Allen has probably committed a serious crime. On the other hand, he may not have hurt anyone when he did it. People who know him heading all the way back to high school say that Richard Allen is basically a real nice guy. “The nicest guy you’ve ever met.” This is commonly said about passive, watcher type men. They’re introverted and a bit shy and self-effacing. They don’t put on airs. They’re not arrogant. They’re humble.

I have been studying sex murderers for decades now, and in this case, we may have an actual serial killer, as the Evansdale and Delphi Murders may be connected. I’ve studied their personalities in depth. I’ve studied psychology and psychiatry for 40 years. And I work as a peer counselor for people with mental disorders in addition to more “coaching” type of counseling. In the course of doing this work, I have come to “read” people pretty well. Clients sometimes say, “It seems like you are crawling around in my head reading my thoughts.”

Anyway, I think I’m a pretty good judge of character and personality, even based on little information. And while it is true that depraved sex murderers and serial killers of women and girls come in a lot of different types, they are almost always psychopaths. Which brings up the question, “Is Richard Allen a psychopath? And one thing I’ve never heard anyone say about a  brutal sex murderer of multiple females is that he was a nice guy, much less the nicest guy you ever met. In fact, “nice guy” and “nicest guy you’ve ever met” pretty much rules out depraved sadistic sex murderer of multiple females.

These men, whatever else is wrong with them, are coldblooded. Narcissism is often prominent. They are often described as aggressive, mean, violent, ill-tempered, or even “evil.”

In some cases, they have split personalities, and the monster personality only comes out some of the time. But when it does, it looks like a totally different person. And the rest of the time, while they may be normal, they’re definitely not “nice.” You simply cannot be a “nice person” and commit crimes like this. It takes a certain coldheartedness.

Based on his personality alone, some of us doubt that Richard Allen could be the Delphi Killer.

About the section below, the group is still arguing about Indiana’s Felony Murder law (Murder 2) and what exactly it involves. As yet there is no consensus in the group about what this law means and asserts and how it relates to Allen’s case.

Now we get to perhaps the most important meat of this argument. Yes, Allen has been arrested for “murder,” but most people stop reading right there. If you read the Indiana statute for Murder 2, this is the state’s Felony Murder law. Felony Murder is defined below.

Felony murder is only applied when someone died in the commission of a felony. The person charged under the statute did not deliberately kill, attempt to, or plot to kill the person who died as a (possibly partial) result of the other crime committed.

In other words, based on this Felony Murder charge, Richard Allen absolutely did not kill intentionally kill Abby Williams and Libby German. Further, he did not help anyone else do so. Going even further, he was not even part of a plot to kill those girls.

The police think they can prove whatever charges they have on this guy. But if he deliberately killed the girls, was an accomplice to the killer, or was a part of a plot to kill them, he would absolutely be charged with Murder 1.

People are making arguments that Felony Murder just means that someone was killed in the commission of another felony. So in this case, it was a murder committed during the commission of kidnapping, another felony. The problem here is that if they can prove kidnapping, they can prove murder. Clearly the man on the bridge killed those girls. If they think he committed both kidnapping and murder, then he would be charged with both Kidnapping and Murder 1 and probably a number of other crimes too.

So what felony did Allen commit? Perhaps he helped get rid of evidence of the murders. However, if he had done that, police would have charged him with Accessory to Murder. That’s a completely different crime than Felony Murder and implies a deeper involvement. Basically you helped the killer get away with the crime by hiding him or getting rid of evidence after the case.

Some of us believe that Allen is peripherally connected to this crime. He’s simply the lowest branch. BG is up there in the crown of the tree. We think there are a number of people who are involved in this case, peripherally and otherwise. So far we have been told that the main police theory that was that there were two killers and five people who were peripherally involved who had nothing to do with those murders. Now they seem to have thrown all of that out. Paul Holes remarked that this case extremely complex, so complex he feared it would never be solved.

The question here though is what felony exactly did Richard Allen commit. Thinking back above to what sort of a person we know he is, violence seems to be ruled out. Psychologically, he’s more like Kegan Kline, passive. Kegan is up on child porn charges and charges of getting pornographic material from young teenage girls. In other words, he’s basically a creepy pervert. A lot of CP collectors are creepy perverts at least in terms of their interests. Not that you could spot them at the grocery store!

But if he’s a KK type in terms of interests, then it follows that he may be going down on a similar felony to Kegan’s: CP or possibly procuring pornographic materials from young teenage girls.

Also, we know that the break in the case that resulted in Allen’s arrest came as a result of interrogations of Kegan Kline. Allen is reportedly Friend #1 of Friends 1 and 2 who were also using the anthony_shots profile. So he’s somehow tied in with the anthony_shots profile. But he can’t be a part of the actual murder  plot because then he’s going down on Murder 1. What is his actual criminal connection (if any) to anthony_shots profile? We have no idea!

What is Kline’s actual connection to do with the crime itself? Sure, he was using anthony_shots to get pornographic material from young teenage girls. But what does that have to do with the case, even if Libby may have given some her material to him, which seems to be a possibility? We don’t know. Did either Kegan or Allen use the anthony_shots profile to lure the girls to the scene? He can’t have because that makes him part of the murder plot, and he’s going down on Murder 1.

Let’s go to rumors about Kline’s involvement. First there is the nonsense and self-aggrandizing puffery from Murder Shits (Murder Sheets) podcasters, most if not all of which is probably not even true. Remember that their entire claim to fame and eternal greatness was their theory that Tony and Kegan Kline murdered those girls (despite Kegan not driving a car and either one of them being too fat to walk on that bridge).

That’s obviously not true at all, particularly now with the arrest of Allen. MS probably doesn’t even have any good LE sources at all. Why else print a bunch of BS? Good LE sources don’t tell you BS. Murder charges will not be filed against Kegan, and Tony was never even a serious suspect except in delirious people’s fevered imaginations.

What about other rumors? Our sources are better than theirs.  From them we have only heard that Kegan is connected somehow to the murder tape that was shot of the murders. We know this tape exists, but we don’t know that it was marketed on the Internet. That’s just a rumor.

The rumors say that Kegan was handling the murder tape, and his trip to Vegas soon after the murders to talk to his main source for the really bad CP of little girls was to deliver this tape. Kegan is said to have put it on CD to make it harder to copy, as then there is only one hard copy.

The tape may well have been put on the Internet, and that may be what the investigators’ trip to Paris to look at the Yello servers over there was all about. Yello is a livestreaming service. This would imply that the tape was livestreamed somehow at some point, perhaps after the fact.

Perhaps Allen obtained the tape. One of our top investigators who has worked on this case for four years, including many visits to Delphi itself, told us that Allen and Mr. X are said to be very close. If this is the case, then perhaps he got it from Mr. X. If he got it after the murders were committed, even if he knew Mr. X did it, that doesn’t make him part of a murder plot because it’s after the fact. He’s not an accessory either as he’s not helping to cover up a murder.

However, as the murder tape was the product of a double murder, the trafficking in it after the fact if the intention of the murders in part was the make a video of the crime to make money off of it could be seen as Felony Murder, as production of the tape was presumably one reason the girls were killed.

Perhaps Kegan was threatened with such a charge too if he also handled the tape, and this is why he made a deal with the cops to rat out Allen and save his ass. Kegan is cowardly, and cowardly people will often give up anyone to save themselves. It takes a strong man to refuse to rat people and take one for the team when you could save your ass any time just be fingering another person. People don’t realize that.

So, Allen obtained the tape directly from Mr. X, the proximity to the killer perhaps being the reason for the Felony Murder charge, as people further away from the killer are going to be harder to charge with this. He put it on some computer media that is not all that secure, say a USB drive. He gave it to Kegan who transferred it to the CD for better security.

Bottom line is some of us think Allen played a peripheral role. His role may have been in trafficking in the murder tape of the crime recorded by the killer. Perhaps he dealt directly with the killer to obtain the tape, hence the severity of the charges and the reason for Felony Murder as opposed to something else.

Concerns

At Beyond Highbrow, some of us are concerned that the police may be trying to frame Allen for the murders of these girls. However, the case has been so poisoned that everyone and their uncle thinks, or excuse me knows, that he’s guilty as Hell. The media all knows he did it. Any jury will obviously know that he did it. Of course he can’t get a fair trial in Indiana. It’s doubtful he could get one in the US. He’s being saddled with a Public Defender instead of a good criminal defense attorney. This does not bode well.

We do not think police are above framing people. In the Kline interrogations, police said at different times that they knew that Kegan and then his father committed killed those girls. They knew that that was not the case. So why tell innocent men that they know they committed horrible murders? Maybe to frame them?

There is a rumor that police all but waterboarded Garrett Kirts to try to get him to confess to the crime. I can assure you that at that time, they probably knew that he was innocent. In fact, Mr. X was  the main suspect at that time. So this looks like an attempt to frame Kirts for the murders.

One More Problem: Mr. X

First Leigh Kerr and then our main police source said that Mr. X was the main suspect in this case. They both said he had been the main suspect for since not long after the murders. The last we heard from our source was that he was still the main suspect, and he had been the main suspect for five years now. Suddenly Richard Allen is arrested. We know he has not been arrested for the murders because he’s obviously innocent of that crime.

Further, the evidence that Mr. X committed this crime is substantial though not confirmatory enough to file a charge against him. On the contrary, the evidence that Allen killed those girls is frankly absolutely zero. The sum total of the evidence that Allen is the killer is the fact that “murder” charges were filed against him. However, the specific murder charge is only filed where the person involved did not, was not an accomplice to and was not part of a plot to kill the victim(s). So the argument that Allen committed the crime is already on thin ice and seems fatal right out the starting gate.

What we acknowledge as fact is that Mr. X was the main suspect for five years up until at least four months ago. However, it is possible that Mr. X has been dumped as a suspect, all of the evidence against him trash binned, and it has turned out that this new guy, who seems to have literally fallen out of the sky, is the killer. Is it possible? Sure, anything’s possible. But if that were true they would have filed Murder 1 on him.

Are they waiting for more evidence to file Murder 1 on this guy? Well, maybe.

Can someone give us one reason why we should believe this guy is the killer when the sum total of evidence against him is a 330 Short Bus riders chanting, “Hurr durr they arrested him for murder duhh.”? “Some guy got arrested for murder (when the murder charge rules out that he had anything to do with the murder) is not evidence of anything whatsoever! It’s evidence that cops arrested some dude for some crime. Cops arrest the wrong people all the time. Cops frame people all the time. DA’s knowingly convict innocent people and withhold evidence that they are innocent all the time.

Can someone please come up with the tiniest bit of evidence in favor the theory that Allen killed these girls? How about maybe…one thing?

How about some more things? Motive? Of course there’s no motive. This totally passive and rather harmless man woke up one morning and decided to commit when of the most brilliantly planned and executed, complex, bizarre, and brazen double homicides of the 20th Century. Why? Because I guess he just felt like it and he’s eeeeevil, despite the fact that we have no history of this evil in his entire life history prior to this event.

We know from the police that the killer had an accomplice, a much younger man. Or this is what they told us four months ago. And it appears that they had someone in mind. Ok, what happened to this guy, who I assume they had some evidence against? Binned, just like Mr. X? Ok, we now have to excellent suspects with evidence piled up over five years binned in favor of the man who fell from the sky. Well, it’s possible I guess.

But what about the bizarre crime scene described to us by police, two search party ladies interviewed independently, and crime scene photos? And the police told us that three young men had set up that scene to scare a pregnant girl into an abortion. We have the names of two of them. At the moment, police have no evidence of involvement in the murder plot, although they are suspects nevertheless. So who set up this wacko crime scene and why? The other theory at least has explanatory adequacy. It explains why a scary scene like this was set up beforehand and how all this crazy stuff got to the scene without being carried there by BG.

How does the Allen theory account for all this weird stuff at the crime scene? I guess he set it up himself? He went to Logan’s property and trespassed to place this considerable list of items around, presumably before the crime? Has he ever been on Logan’s land even one time, trespassing or with permission? And why all the creepy props? I guess he scattered those about because he’s eeeeevil.

Separate police sources have told us that one of the girl victims was pregnant. Our best police source added that she was impregnated by an adult man who was pressuring her to get an abortion. She was balking, and this mess had something to do with the homicide, including a rumored disembowelment, evacuation of abdominal contents, and removal of the uterus to hide the pregnancy.

Ok so how does the pregnant girl figure into Mr. X? Not at all. And if the disembowelment and removal of the uterus rumor is true, why on Earth would Allen, the “nicest guy you met,” do such a thing? Did he know she was pregnant? How would he and why would he care? Why on Earth would he remove her uterus for God’s sake?

The charge is that we are “sticking to our guns” because we do not want to be proven wrong. First of all, we were not wrong on the  case of the Delphi Murders! For at least the last year and half, we have never stated that any particular person was the Delphi Killer even one single time.

All we have been saying during that period was what Leigh Kerr and our police sources told us, that Mr. X was the main suspect in the Delphi Murders. And we are sticking to our guns on that. We believe that Mr. X was the main suspect in the Delphi Murders for five years until at least four months ago. We don’t think this is true. We know that this is true. However, we have no information on whether he was the main suspect after four months ago because we lost our best police source. So since four months ago, we have no idea what is going on.

What appears to have happened is that at some time in the last four months, police dropped Mr. X, his suspected accomplice, and three men in a peripheral role from the crime altogether. They also dumped the main motive for the crime (the crime now has no motive) and theories about how the bizarre crime scene was set up. Now, there is no explanation for that.

We no longer have an explanation for how the suspect had a deep and intimate familiarity with the bridge itself and Ron Logan’s private property. This is now unexplained.

The unknown car at the CPS building from 12-5, which police think was the killers car and the period it was parked there for, is now completely unexplained or irrelevant. The square pegs in round holes brigade now says that the car was never part of the case in the first place. That seems odd as they were focused on it for so long.

The fact that Mr. X’s cellphone pinged the CPS building from 12-5 PM on 2/13 is now unexplained. Mr. X threw his cellphone into a car at the crime scene and then went to another town where he was seen in a bank by Nate Miller, except the camera at the bank never recorded him? Mr. X states that he has no explanation for why his cellphone pinged that building during that period. Why did Mr. X apparently lie about his alibi? He apparently wasn’t in that town at all. Why did Nate Miller provide a fake alibi for Mr. X? Why did Mr. X need one in the first place?

There remains no explanation for why Mr. X was searching for the girls at 6:30 PM on 2/13, one half hour before the search was announced. How did he figure that out? Does he have precognition?

Why did he make up a lie about losing his keys when it never happened? What was the point of lying about something like that?

Why on Earth did he park his truck directly above the girls’ bodies to search for them when everyone else was searching in the opposite direction? Why did he leave his truck directly above the girls for 18 hours?

How did he mysteriously find the girls? By sheer luck? Why did he contaminate the scene by touching both bodies if indeed he did?

Why did he need counseling for months after the murders? Even the families didn’t seek that out.

At the same time that the police dropped Mr. X and entourage, the motive, and all of the other evidence implicating these folks, they chose a new main suspect, Richard Allen. This is what appears to have happened. We’re not disputing that.

We don’t know who killed those girls. We don’t have the faintest idea who did it. But some of us think that Mr. X is a much better suspect than Allen.

Police are saying he’s the man on the bridge. Then why are they filing a charge against him that says he played no role in the murders? I guess they really must want this case solved.

Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime.

– Lavrentin Beria, Stalin’s right-hand man.

In a criminal case against me, the DA knew that I was innocent of the crime but he pressed charges anyway because he could not admit he did not understand the statute and he wanted to keep his batting average up. I ended up  paying $1,500 for a lawyer so I could pay a $10 fine.

But based on the new police belief, what is the likelihood that Mr. X,  an accomplice, and three peripherally involved people were the main suspects for the murders and other events for years along with a highly elaborate theory explaining motive and other aspects in the murders, and then suddenly the police binned all five men and all of the accumulated evidence against them and replaced them with a new suspect, the previous unknown named Richard Allen, who seems to have literally fallen from the sky like some lost forlorn meteorite searching for a home it never had?

Sure, it’s possible. Anything’s possible. Main suspects get replaced all the time, even after being suspected for years. It’s not unheard of. But what’s the likelihood that this occurred?

Loss of Our Main Police Source

This source has been slowly leaking bits and pieces of information to us for 1 1/2 years. I am certain that there is much that they are withholding from us. The detective in question is leaking to a co-worker of one of our members, a retired homicide detective. Our member gets the information from her co-worker and then gives it to me. So for those who care, yes, our information is 3rd hand. So what? The thing that we never revealed is the relationship between the co-worker and our source the detective.

In fact, she is his daughter. So for this woman to be lying to us and giving us bad data, she would have to be leaking to her very own father. To our critics who say we are being given bad information (Looking at you Delphi_Nut, I mean Delphi_Not, I mean Delphi_Dog Knot, I mean Delphi_Nit, I mean Delphi_Knot), they need to think about this. This working detective is making up fake stories and telling them directly to her very own father, who was also a detective just like she is. Really?

Unfortunately, the co-worker moved on to another job, and the detective source does not deal directly with our member. She was only comfortable leaking to her Dad. So we’re SOL now, without a good police source anymore. Before her, we got leaks from maybe four police officers, but in each case, it was just one statement, and then they went away.

Bottom line is we are now without any good police sources. Those sources are what made us the best Delphi group of all. We are trying very hard to get new sources, but as you might guess, it’s not so easy.

The problem here is that our last info drop from the source was cryptic as usual, but it was also very brief, with her saying that is all she can and will tell us. She had been clamming up lately, as she told us she was afraid of getting caught leaking.

Richard Allen was arrested after we lost our source. Hence we cannot bounce any of this Allen break off of her to get her take on it, and I’m sure she would have given us something. So this is one reason why we are as clueless as anyone else about Richard Allen. Pretty much the blind leading the blind here I’m afraid.

Other Material

We do have some more ideas on the murder itself that are not covered below or in the Richard Allen section above. I think it is best to leave those for another post. We are still trying to work out what exactly happened in these murders because let’s face it, neither we nor anyone but the police know these things!

Debunking Rumors and Lies and Expansion of Previously Discussed Issues

First of all, as usual, let’s go through the usual process of correcting all of the lies that have been spread about me lately.

He’s a smart guy but he’s got a screw loose and he apparently can’t admit when he’s wrong.

That’s not true at all. All I do my whole life is admit I’m wrong. It’s kind of a habit. And on this case, we have admitted that we were wrong so many times I can’t even count them. Of the things we said in our earlier posts based almost exclusively on rumors, ~85% of them went bad on us over time. If you read below, I will discuss other cases where we printed things that later turned out to be wrong.

Lindsay said all info came from “multiple sources” but non-confirmed. Such as: that raping Abby was the motive.

Some of our material is confirmed by police and interviews with search party ladies. We regard that as confirmed information. The motive for the murders was not to rape Abby Williams. In fact, neither girl was raped in the typical sense of the word.

Also for someone who admits to being immersed in rumors, Lindsay sure doesn’t do a whole lot by way of fact checking or attempting to. He literally couldn’t tell us whether his LE source was local or state based.

This is from tobor_rn. By the way, he can’t spell. A great sleuth who has collapsed and is now disastrous.

Fact checking is all we do here. And group members are encouraged to fact check each every member and particularly me. Can someone tell me why I should help this clown uncover one of our best police sources who could possibly get in a ton of trouble for leaking to us? And by the way, I do know the answer to that question of what job our source had.

And he also said “we were wrong about XYZ but NOW trust us.”

Right. We change our minds all the time on here about everything. You know, like REAL detectives do? Also we had much better sources lately, including people in law enforcement itself, so our theories got a lot better.

By the way, do any of you publish in academic journals? I do. I publish in peer reviewed academic journals. And trust me, this is how science works. Science is wrong all the time. People throw out hypotheses or even conclusions, they get torn up, and its back to the drawing board. Science is always getting things wrong and it’s always self-correcting.

He talks about Libby being badly beaten almost beyond recognition.

This was an early rumor that we no longer believe was true. Dated from very early on, as in the very first days after the bodies were found.

Ha ha I like how he says to stop calling the killer a paedophile.

Correct. Just because a killer murders two teenage girls in a sex murder, that does not indicate that he is a pedophile. Many sex killers kill teenage girls, and almost none of them are pedophiles. Pedophilic killers kill little children, not teenagers. Teenage girls look like grown women, not little children. So men who are attracted to grown women are also attracted to teenage girls, albeit at a slightly lower level. However, all normal men are attracted to 15-17 year old girls at a pretty high level, 82% of maximum. This is why killers who kill women may also kill teenage girls – because they look the same!

By the way, you might want to look up the definition of the word pedophile because 95% of the population don’t even know the meaning of the word.

Because he cleaned it with bowl cleaner which was found on Liberty.

The empty toilet bowl cleaner was supposedly found on the forest floor. Furthermore, you can clearly see a bottle of toilet bowl cleaner on BG in his left jeans pocket. We have no information that it was found on Libby’s body and I doubt if it was. Also the information that an empty bottle of toilet bowl cleaner at the scene came directly from the police.

Leigh Kerr got the idea of his main suspect from Lindsay.

Other way around. I read LK’s description of his main suspect and was convinced that he was correct. Then we went to work on a deep dive into Mr. X in which involved a former police detective making phone calls all over the country to retired and serving LE to see what we could find on him. It was via this retired officer’s work that we obtained our main police sources who have been leaking to us ever since, one female detective in particular.

Becky Patty has confirmed that the keys were never lost. Have you heard of Urban Myths? Well this is a Rural Myth about the lost keys. Some LE vehicles did have to move so that PB could get his truck outta there. All of this happened on the 14th. I don’t believe PB was parked in that cemetery spot on the 13th, just the 14th. But there are people who swear it was both days. (which doesn’t make sense IMO).

PB didn’t loose his keys. When they were contacted about moving the truck, the response was ” we will come over and move it, just let me find the keys.”

There is a police transcript talking about Mr. X’s wife coming to the crime scene to bring him his car keys because he lost them. So there was definitely a story about lost keys. Ron Logan said he found Mr. X on his land at 6:30 PM on the 13th. We believe that Mr. X was parked at that time in the same spot where his truck was seen on the 14th. Furthermore, Ron described it as, “I found Mr. X creeping around my land,” as in, he didn’t even ask permission to be on the land. In the comment above this one, Cheeky Yank is doing some good sleuthing. He’s one of the only decent sleuths left on that board, but even he’s probably lost it lately.

I can’t say Tina’s daughter Meaghan wasn’t raped when its likely she was, hanging with five men who are all criminals.

Tina’s daughter was not raped in a legal sense. She agreed to be there and to have sex with all those men at that time.

Also those who are crying ‘aha, gotcha!’ With his spelling mistake about the autopsy are being a bit disingenuous or are reaching. He’s probably looked at the report and recognized a word he’s seen a hundred times and assumed the unique spelling on the report was an error and he’s mistakenly tried to correct it, or it’s autocorrect.

Yes. The wording on the autopsy report that I wrote about was given to me by a 3rd party. This 3rd party simply gave me a few paragraphs describing what was on the report. I simply copied the wording verbatim from this person’s information. I don’t know medical terminology so I had no idea that those words were misspelled.

I didn’t read it as he was accusing LM of the crime. in his theory, LM was part of the prank plot gone wrong.

This person is named Logan Maxwell. No, I am not accusing him of this crime and he is not involved. Also LM was not involved in a secondary plot by three young men to terrorize a girl into getting an abortion. Those men were Mr. P, Mr. J, and Mr. B.

Is Logan Maxwell the Mr M in his blog? The 20 year old kid.

No, Mr. M is a man who was 20 years old at the time. He is related to Nate Miller, the officer who supposedly killed himself in December 2020. He impregnated one of the girl victims several weeks before the murders, possibly at a bonfire party. He and his friends were pressuring her to get an abortion. She was refusing to do so. This is the prominent backstory and possible motive for the murders. We get into trouble for suggesting that this girl was not virginal and especially that she had sex with an adult man.

About the first charge, you are wrong, and it’s normal behavior for a teenage girl to have sex with boys and even men anyway. About the latter, but I would urge naysayers to check out this girl victim’s social media accounts which were full of adult men on her friends list. All of those men were on that girl’s friends list because she added them. We don’t know how old those men were. But where there’s smoke, there’s fire.

This POS you’re referring to been kicked off so many sites I can’t count for plagiarism and harassment. My FB was PRIVATE.

It’s not my fault that the world is full of morons. I didn’t set it up that way. It’s true that people like to ban me from their sites. That’s their problem, not mine because I’m not doing anything wrong.

However, I have never been banned from any site due to plagiarism, nor have I been banned for harassment, nor do I engage in harassment. This female is a turbot with Borderline Personality Disorder claims I “stalked” her because I looked at her very public Facebook profile and mentioned a person in her photos section.

That sent her through the roof. This spiny dogfish even filed a complaint against me for “stalking” with the FBI. The FBI knows me so I doubt if they will investigate. Her Facebook was public or was at least public to her friends, and she may have added me. Anyway, it was fully accessible to me without any hacking, which I don’t know how to do anyway.

Omg in his one post he asked if there was a word or a crime for having sex with someone who was being sex trafficked.

Sadly, men have sex with women who are being trafficked all the time. They probably don’t even know what’s going on with the woman. The person at fault in sex trafficker is the pimp or trafficker themselves. The men who patronize the prostitutes are not at fault. I guess their crime is “having sex with a prostitute.” Is that even against the law? How many men ever go down on a crime like that? Link me to an article about a man arrested for this fake crime.

…and no legitimate or reputable LEO would give this hack any legitimate or reputable information…

They don’t have to give me any information. Our LE sources communicate with group members, not me. Some of my members obtained access to people in LE. These LE leak to my members. My members then communicate to me what the source said. I don’t talk to any cops, nor do I wish to.

It’s actually one of the many unpopular rumors produced by Robert Lindsay. Supposedly there was a sheet or something with R U UP painted on it, displayed somewhere at the scene. Lol, along with the Teddy bears and dolls.

We never said there was a sheet with R U UP written on it at the scene. We reported that a physicist’s interpretation of crime scene photos (which are indeed real photos from the crime scene) of the blown up helicopter photos. He thought it was possibly arranged in sticks or logs at the scene.

A sheet was indeed at the scene, but that refers to something else. Of course there were dolls at the scene. We have that from three different LE sources now including leak directly from someone inside the investigation itself who leaked it to one of our members!

The giant plush bear can be clearly seen on the blown up photos by the physicist. My graphics woman added some filters and whatnot to bring out the contrast better. The photo was not altered in any way.

I don’t know about the rest of you, but that sure looks like a gigantic bear to me. Other than that, the presence of that bear is still a rumor. However, one of the search party ladies we interviewed told us that “there was an object at the scene that was so large that BG could not have had it with him that day.” That could indeed refer to that giant bear, which actually looks like the Valentine’s Day bears they sell in the stores. Keep in mind that we obtained interviews with two separate search party ladies. We are the only Delphi sleuthing group that obtained interviews with search party members.

…and the thing about a K carved into trees or flesh.

No letters were carved into either girl’s flesh, thank God. There either is no K at the scene or there is and it’s not important. The latest rumor is that there were “runes” carved into a tree near the crime scene. Those are popular with White Supremacists. This may be one of the non-secular items found at the scene.

Robert Lindsay’s blog (don’t bother) referenced a knife and a giant teddy bear, a bottle of Clorox, and a bunch of other weird nonsense. This was based on a closeup photo of the crime scene taken from the news chopper on the afternoon of 2/14. The photo is in the right place but there was no dimensional scale, so objects are misinterpreted. Libby would have to be 20’ tall for that to be correct.

The giant bear was addressed above.

The toilet bowl cleaner being used to clean up the crime scene came to us from a police source.

The knife is clearly visible in our crime scene photo, which shows a knife in a girl victim’s hand which appears to be shoved into a tree next to her. Furthermore, that photo lines up perfectly with testimony from both search party ladies about a knife in a girl’s hand stuck into her shoulder or into a tree next to her. We think it’s in the tree. A bottle of toilet bowl cleaner at the scene was referenced by one of our police sources. The physicist said he saw it in his photos, but I never saw it.

We do not agree with the interpretation above about the scale of the photographs. Further, these “fake” photos line up perfectly with search party lady testimony.

he started the knife story and somehow the location changed 3 or 4 times to shoulder then stomach then…

We never said a knife was left embedded in a girl’s stomach, thank God. And we didn’t really change the location of the knife. In fact, we never referenced a knife left behind at the scene until our search party lady interviews mentioned one. At first we were not sure if the knife was in a girl’s shoulder or in a tree in back of her because the search party ladies were not sure. We now think it is stuck into a tree her head is resting on.

It was RL who put this out there and at some point also suggested there was something similar found near the Evansdale murders as well.

No, we heard about the knife in the girl’s hand from the search party ladies. Then we saw the crime scene photo that lined up with testimony perfectly. We still did not know if the knife was in a girl’s shoulder or in a tree until we heard that there is a rumor of a knife in a tree at the Evansdale crime scene too.

One of our police sources told us that the police believe the cases may be linked. After I heard that, I decided the knife was probably in the tree. And yes, that would connect the two cases. One of our police sources told us, “There were odd objects left at the crime scene in both cases,” and this is one reason they think the cases may be connected.

The conclusion was there was a knife stuck in a tree or log near the bodies and one of the girls’ hand had been manipulated to look like she had stuck it in the tree.

This is correct. The knife was placed in the girl’s hand postmortem and then shoved into the tree, making her appear to be stabbing a tree with the knife in her hand.

“Robert Lindsay” is actually two college friends whose “creation” has been successfully sued by a Delphi family for calling the POIs I know that Robert Lindsay (not a real person btw) was and guess what? Reported it.

I don’t comment on my identity, real or otherwise.

This is from Xanaxarita, another woman with Borderline Personality Disorder. She also has many benign uterine tumors which effect her behavior adversely. I, Robert Lindsay, have never been sued by anyone. In particular, I have never been sued by any Delphi family member for calling a family member a POI, and I don’t usually name suspects anyway. Which family member successfully sued (and what does that mean?) and when? I’d like to look up the documents. Good luck looking it up because there are no case documents for that lawsuit.

I just typed into Google Mr X Delphi murders, hope this helps. It’s interesting. A woman is claiming her ex is the person responsible for Evansdale and Delphi.

There is no such woman. A woman claimed her ex was the Evansdale killer, but that’s not been proven. As a matter of fact, I know her very well. No woman claimed her ex was both killers.

Yes I’ve heard about him, there is a Mr X he’s a truck driver and makes trips to Delphi regularly.

The Mr. X we discuss is a very local resident of the area. He is not a truck driver. He does not need to make regular trips to Delphi because he lives right around there.

Lindsay’s obsessed with Mr. X.

Yeah. Because he’s the main suspect? Do you know how many times the police have told us this guy is the main suspect? Based on that, I hope I’m obsessed with him! You all just wait and see. You will all end up with egg on your faces.

You’d be surprised. A lot of bullshit rumors start with the likes of Lindsay and even Greeno. Faked police radio transcripts, puppies, teddy bears, knives made of ice, midgets, mini submarines, zip wires, moles, welders, carpet fitters, white dodge darts.

I cannot speak for Mr. Greeno.

The plush bear story has been addressed. The white Dodge Dart was a car that I earlier thought was involved, but that was a gigantic red herring false trail that we followed. I did not report any of the other rumors.

But the idea that there were dolls all over the place or whatever is kinda silly. Nothing like that appears in the crime scene chopper footage.

The chopper footage is far too far away to reveal if there were dolls at the crime scene.

How does Mr. X theory accommodate Young Sketch, and how does Mr. X theory explain why it wasn’t released when they had it in 2017? I know Robert Lindsay suggests catfishing or something like that but I don’t agree that catfishing explains why the sketch wasn’t released until a change in direction in 2019.

The Mr. X theory does not explain the young sketch. The Young BG sketch is of the catfish boy used to lure the girls to the bridge. In that case, catfishing does indeed explain the release of that sketch later on.

Ryan Van Slooten and partner Corey Ahlm, together aka Robert Lindsay, are adept at grabbing sensational details from historical cases, movie plots, and news events, and applying them to their “rumor” machine. Libby being pregnant, something vulgar about tree branches, ritualistic crime scenes

A girl being pregnant, dolls at the crime scene, and the girls being sexually penetrated with foreign objects were all reported to us directly from the police. About whether I am one person or two people or not a person at all or whether I live in Minnesota or California, I normally refuse to comment on such speculations. I suppose you should make up your own mind about that.

The pregnancy rumor was local before it belonged to RL. I also believe there is something to the rumors of sticks and branches. It’s just a rumor. But it’s a rumor I have heard from multiple places over 4 years. I also have family in White and Cass counties and there are local rumors of a similar nature. They are all rumors, but when the same one keeps popping up, I think it’s worthy of discussion.

We didn’t start it. Correct, I first heard that rumor a week or two after the crime from a 55 year old woman. The story about the girls being sexually penetrated with sticks and branches came to us from another one of our police sources, a detective. And apparently the sticks and branches story that has apparently been around for four years and is even a local rumor in the area of the crime.

A story about a girl being impaled with a branch was an early rumor stemming from a local young man who somehow had crime scene photos. He posted these photos for several hours but then took them down. The story is that the photos showed a girl impaled with a tree branch. We are not sure if that rumor is true as our other sources have not corroborated it.

He was correct about the abduction time and the video length though. But everything else is just -_o. He claims he has access to some document that is official and signed saying they are looking for a gun that went off during the crime, blood soaked clothing, and videos of the crime taking place. He also said something about BG sending a video of the murder to Abby’s phone but Abby didn’t have a phone so who the hell knows.

We certainly were correct about the abduction time and the audio length and we released that a year before it came out in the media. I might as well confess. We obtained a copy of a search warrant. Not Ron Logan’s but someone else’s. We had a search warrant on this case a good year and a half before anyone else did when Ron’s search warrant got leaked. So we did have access to confidential documents like I have always claimed.

Yes, a gun was used in the crime and a shot was fired at the crime scene. We even know the model of the gun they are looking for. Indeed they are looking for clothing soaked in blood because the blow to one of the girls was so severe that the killer would have been covered in blood. We definitely believe that the killer videotaped his crime. We now think that the photos or videos were sent to Libby’s phone several hours after the crime, not Abby’s.

At first the story was that they were sent to Abby’s phone and the story was that Abby had a phone that she hid from her mother. But Abby never had a phone. She had an Ipad, which is pretty large, almost like a very small computer screen. She didn’t have it with her that day. Once we ruled out Abby’s phone, the only place the video could have been sent was to Libby’s phone, which she obviously had with her.

What about Lindsay’s statement that JP (I assume that’s who Mr. Z is) had access to KAK’s devices? If Anthony Shots deliberately arranged a meet up to murder Libby and KAK wasn’t the one using the Anthony Shots profile to do that, then JP accessing his devices at some point and potentially stealing or changing his passwords is a huge bit of info, something I’m surprised he pretty much glossed over in that blog post.

Exactly. That is just what we are looking into right now, whether Mr. Z, as Kegan’s computer and phone tech, could have accessed KK’s devices to get his login and passwords and even to conduct a man-in-the-middle attack to cover his tracks in the crime and frame KK to boot. We know that Kegan’s computer had a mysterious dongle put on it after he gave it to Mr. Z for repairs. It simply came back with a dongle. KK never questioned it and forgot about it. However, that dongle could have been used by Mr. Z to hijack Kegan’s computer via a man-in-the-middle attack. R

Recall that there are two voices talking in the anthony_shots material. One is clearly Kegan, but another is absolutely not. They were able to tell by the different style of writing. Sometimes the other person would log on, and Kegan would seem to be booted off his profile. This is what happens in a man-in-the-middle attack. If you are logged in somewhere, you will keep getting logged off mysteriously. That’s the mans-in-the-middle butting in and kicking you off.

I don’t believe the same person leaking the case info as Leigh is tied to RL.

I know who Leigh Kerr is, and I have spoken to him before. I know he is real and his back story matches up well. He and I do not have a good relationship right now.

There is a zero percent chance there was any gunfire or gunshots at the scene. Did not occur. Anyone espousing that as inside information is absolutely not in touch with anyone in LE and knows nothing about LE incident protocol.

From an official case document we obtained, we inferred that a gun was discharged at the scene. We know this because police are looking for a particular gun to do ballistics tests on it, a Sig Sauer 229 in fact, an older gun from 1991 that is popular with various LE departments. If they are looking for a gun to do ballistics tests, then they must have a cartridge from the gun, and it must have been found at the crime scene. We don’t have any more information about this gun discharge.

I don’t believe there was gunfire, either. I could see someone dropping a shell (I don’t know guns but I just mean an unused bullet), or the rumor that a gun was heard being cocked is where this came from. Guns were also on the search warrant for Maxwell so perhaps one being used as a threat but not fired in the abduction is possible.

If they only found an unused bullet, they would not be looking for a gun to do ballistics tests on. BG’s gun can be clearly seen in his right hand jacket pocket. The story about the gun being cocked comes from family members who listened to police playing a tape of the crime. They said that after you hear, “Down the hill,” there is the sound of a gun cocking.

Guns or any other weapons are standard language on any SW’s granted by the court for any criminal matter but definitely a violent homicide.

Indeed, but if they were looking for a specific model, then a gun was definitely discharged at the scene.

Basically he was correct in saying the abduction happened at 2:13 and that the video was 43 seconds long or whatever. Those were stated in a few other places as well and no one knew for sure if it was correct.

People keep saying this but I had never heard either of these times mentioned before I wrote them up in my post, nor had any of my many members. And we have the busiest ears on this case of anyone. I’m doubtful that these ideas were floating around before we reported them.

Lindsay purchased a photo of Libby in her casket from Julie Melvin and then distributed it on the Internet.

Indeed, such a photo exists and was taken by Julie’s cousin at the funeral. The photo had been floating around a while when I asked about it. Somehow or other I obtained a copy. I forget who I got it from. I certainly didn’t buy one. Yes, I did distribute it to my private group, but that’s just a private group. It’s not the Internet. It’s like you invite a bunch of people over to your house and you show them the photo. I think I told them not to put it up on the Web.

If you do a web search on this photo, you won’t find it, so it’s not like it’s floating all over the Net. If it’s on the Net at all, it’s very hard to find. As this case goes on over the years, this photo and even worse ones may well turn up on the web. That’s the nature of famous homicides. I was certainly not the first person to obtain this photo, and I did not put it up on the Internet. Many people have seen this photo, and they were not shown it by me.

Whoever took the photos did so with the intent of selling them. That makes them even more disgusting than RL. IMO. Edit: And anyone who goes to RL to see the pics is disgusting.

I certainly never paid a nickel for such a photo. You cannot see a photo of Libby in her casket by going to my website. There is no such photo on the public portion of my site.

I think the family debunked it, was not Libby.

The family never debunked the funeral photo and said it was not her. In fact, this family is said to hate me because they blame me for the circulation of this photo, but it’s been around since soon after the funeral, and I only obtained it later on. Further, lots of people have seen or have copies of that photo. It was released by me, but only to a very private, paid-only group with instructions not to post it on the Net.

But what was Leigh Kerr’s motive? Not sure. Most of the so-called special info they received was already circulating rumor from early on. Some of the most graphic details came from Robert Lindsay aka Ryan Van Slooten and Corey Ahlm, not trustworthy sources.

I never met Leigh Kerr before he posted. LK obtained his information from official case documents run off by his wife at her work. On her deathbed she asked that they be released. If some of LK’s information had already been revealed by us, it means that we are onto these facts about the case before LK was. It also means we were right about those facts because everything stated as fact by LK was true.

How he hasn’t been sued and found guilty of defamation is beyond me. Hopefully when the killer is arrested and the man whose life he ruined is proven innocent Lindsay will be publicly outed and humiliated. He deserves to be punished for what he’s done.

We never mentioned one person by name as being suspected of committing this crime. I did have one man in mind for a long time, but he turned out to be innocent. His name and details were only discussed on a private paid-only server for an exclusive audience. That would be like a bunch of people getting together behind closed doors and saying something bad about someone. It’s not actionable for defamation.

Further, this charming man discussed here posted many videos in which all but came out and admitted to being the killer of these girls, so maybe you can excuse our suspicion. He turned out to be just one more false confessor. He’s a felon who has shot people with guns and beat his wife’s head into a hard floor. His children had to be taken away and put into “horse therapy” for abused children because of all the trauma they suffered from being in such a violent household. He has done years in state prison and is a member of the Aryan Brotherhood prison gang. Excuse me if I don’t feel real sorry for him.

I’m surprised he didn’t get a knock on the door from law enforcement after that day.

In fact, I was interviewed as one of the hundreds of suspects in this crime. However, I was 2,000 miles away when those girls were killed. If you don’t believe me, ask the FBI because that’s what they told a friend of mine.

Cops are a lot smarter than my enemies, that’s why. The Delphi detectives I worked with on this case were very nice to me as a matter of fact. I guess they figured out I’m harmless.

Alt Left: A Look at the Current Status of the Western Left

Here.

I’ve been talking about this a lot on here with regard to shitlibs and the absolutely disastrous Western Left.

Keep in mind that most of the Western Anglosphere Left opposed every single Communist government that ever as except the USSR until 1927! That’s because most of them are Twats, I mean Trots! The Western Anglosphere Left has always been Trotskyist and to some extent Maoist. It has been worst of all in the US, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, and the UK.

There is also a Maoist tendency in the Anglosphere Left that is pretty significant. Of course most existing Communist governments are no good because they’re not called China.

Nothing’s good enough for either of these types. Of course they hate North Korea, but they also hate Cuba and China for not being real Communists. The Chinese are supposedly not even Communists. Instead, they are just capitalists. The war in Ukraine is seen as capitalist imperialists (!) versus capitalist imperialists (!), and they don’t think they should take sides. This mirror’s Trotsky’s disgusting neutral stance on WW2 where he said that both sides were just capitalists, so he was sitting it out. I’m not sure he deserved an icepick for that though.

The Left in the West has also been very nutty – anti-men, anti-White (especially), pro-gay, pro-tranny – the whole nine yards. Which is weird because they are typical puritanical Commies who want to ban prostitution and porn. Then how can they be pro-gay when gay men are the sleaziest group of humans on Earth? And trannies are also completely twisted, perverted, and sleazed out. Excuse me for trying to make their contradictions add up here.

Communists in most of the rest of the world with a few exceptions do not hate men or Whites, and most don’t talk much about gays or especially trannies. Those things are not seen as important because of course they’re not important. Class isn’t the main thing; it’s the only thing! Yeah, I’m a class reductionist.

In the 1960’s, the US Left openly hated Whites and called for out and out White extinction. Recall Weatherman Bernardine Dohrn’s speech praising Manson and white extinction. They have gotten hooked on racism and the Blacks to the extent that they even see White workers as the enemies. J. Sakai’s book, “Settlers” (1980) makes it clear that White workers are the enemy. This book is now considered canon in most of the US Left.

By seeing class warfare in the US exclusively through the lens of racial troubles between Whites and Blacks, they missed the boat. Further, most of them idiotically got on board with Black and Hispanic nationalism and have long supported Black and Hispanic homelands in the South and the West respectively. So they’re racial separatists too just like the White nationalists. Except I guess they are good the kind.

However, outside the Anglosphere, the Western Left has not been  bad.

The Left in Ireland has been excellent.

The Left in Portugal and Spain is good but in Portugal they have no power. The Left in Spain recently gained a lot of popularity with Podemos. There is also a significant Maoist party in Galicia in Spain.

The French and Italian Left did well with Eurocommunism, in which they actually held power in many cities and did a bang-up job too, especially in Northern Italy. Unfortunately, in Italy we also see the spectre of the ultra-SJW Left who wants to import the whole world into Italy in a Maoist party. But I’m not sure how big they are.

Unfortunately, Eurocommunism appears played out and the French working class in the banlieus who voted Communist are mostly voting National Front (Marine LePen’s party) nowadays! The Socialist Party under Melanchon has been very good and has even been restrictionist on immigration! The Danish Socialist Party went in a similar direction. And I wonder how many people who voted Communist in Italy voted for this fascist woman?

The German Left in Die Linke has been good. There are Maoists in Germany and many of them are quite militant, staging riots and fighting Nazis in the streets every year. It’s heavily associated with anarchism and the squatter movement. I don’t mind them. The German Green Party has been disastrous. They’re not even on the Left anymore. They are rapacious pro-NATO super-imperialists. But hey, they support recycling! So let’s all vote for them! Don’t mind that they are going to blow up the world fighting Russia!

There’s also Maoism in Sweden where a lot of the Shining Path supporters ended up. There is also a Maoist party in Norway. None of these groups have much power. Other than that, there’s not much of a Left in Scandinavia.

The Left in Greece has been very good with Syriza, however, they had to completely sell out to EU neoliberalism, so they ended up being basically useless. The moral to the story is that revolutions must be complete, that is, they must make a complete break with the past as the Sandinistas and Bolivarians did. As long as you are still wedded to imperialist structures, there’s only so much room to maneuver.

There is not much of any Left to speak of in the Balkans, but I don’t understand the politics there much.

The Left there was probably wiped out by the spread of ultranationalist fascism that spread through the area in the 90’s. These fascists still seem to be power in most of these countries at least in terms of language planning. Tudjman in Croatia was an out and out fascist, and Milosevic the former Communist of the Socialist Party also went full fascist. There was a strong fascist movement in Macedonia. Serbia is pro-Russia but those are more Serbian nationalists than Left types. Plus they have a nasty history. I know nothing of the Left in Albania.

In Eastern Europe, the Left is great but it barely exists and in most countries, it’s outlawed.

Lukashenko in Belarus is doing great. He is regularly elected with 80% of the vote and there’s no fraud whatsoever in the ballot counting. He really does get that much. The opposition as in Ukraine are Nazis and neoliberals and the only people who want them are some rich kids in the cities. Those were the idiots who were rioting last time. The schoolteacher who ran against Lukashenko, the darling of the West, who is now trying to pull a Guiado (“I’m the real president”) scam, is an out and out Nazi. As in Ukraine, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Croatia, Belarussian nationalism has deep Nazi roots.

There’s no Left to speak of in any of these places.

The Left in the democracy called Ukraine has been made illegal and all Left parties are now banned. A number of Left legislators were murdered and there were attempts to kill others. During this war, Left politicians and activists have continued to be rounded up, arrested, beaten, tortured, and even murdered. Most of the Left seems to have fled the country or gone to ground. Three cheers for democracy.

The Left is illegal in the Baltic states and possibly in Poland too. I think it’s also illegal in Slovakia. At any rate, the Left is very weak in all of these countries to the extent that it even exists at all. It’s very weak in Czechia though they have a long tradition of “Catholic Communism” believe it or not. It must be quite weak in Hungary as Orban is a bit of a fascist, let’s face facts here, folks. There’s also an out and out ethnonationalist fascist Right in Hungary that got 16% of the vote. Their motto may as well be “Kill the Gypsies.”

There doesn’t seem to be much of a Left in Romania or Bulgaria. The Communists in those places were some of the stupidest Commies of all and that left a bad taste in people’s mouths.

Alt Left: Jews and Feminism

Pantheist: Is the feminism the Jews favorite weapon to destroy the west?

I don’t really believe in those Jewish conspiracies that say the Jews use these Identity Politics movements to destroy the West.

Some Jewish women started 2nd Wave feminism because Jews are “natural revolutionaries,” and Jews in the Diaspora grow up with a rebellious, angry spirit, raised to believe that they are better than the Gentiles and that the Gentiles hate them. This makes Jewish children come to resent Gentile society and wish to rebel against it.

But a lot of these were just women conscious of the disadvantages and discrimination women faced at the time and possibly still do. They were an oppressed group who wanted to be liberated. Yes, some of the early Second Wave feminists were Jewish, but the First Wave Suffragette Feminists were Gentiles! A lot of these 2nd wavers were radical Leftie types who were barely even Jewish. This was not one of those self-consciously Jewish movements like neoconservatism. They were women first and Jews second. But a lot of the Second Wave leaders were Gentiles too. And almost all 2nd Wave feminists were Gentile women.

Jews don’t like societies with traditional family-based values because these tend to rise up and attack Jews from time to time. They think that if they can break down some of these conservative bonds make Gentile societies nationalistic, then it will prevent discrimination against Jews.

So say if Jews are Ruritanians, then they would want to break Ruritanian society down to there the men, women, different races, gays, transsexuals, etc. were that identity first and Ruritanians second. So they would want Ruritanian men to split from men to some extent and pursue their primary identity as their gender rather than putting it in the backseat by identifying as Ruritanian first and their gender second as nationalists do. That’s why nationalists don’t like Identity movements – to some extent they tend to loosen the bonds that forms the nation. It gets hard to create a nationalistic state when many groups don’t have bonds with each other and are instead pursuing separate identities.

Like so many things they did, Jewish behavior here is based on self-interest. As I said, many Jewish feminists (except Dworkin and Abzug) were not self-consciously Jewish and were not operating based on a tribal mission. Even Dworkin was a woman and a lesbian first and a Jew second. Judith Butler, another Second Wave Jew, has pretty much left the Jews, turned hard on Israel, and even supports Hamas!

3rd Wave leaders don’t seem to be particularly Jewish at all. They’re mostly Gentiles and quite a few are non-Whites, especially Blacks and Hispanics. See bell hooks. I’ve been on radfem websites and while some of the radfems were Jewish, the vast majority were not, and the Jewish ones never talked about being Jewish. They were on the Left and so assimilated that they had almost left the Jews, sort of like Marx, Stanley Kubrik, the two brothers in the band Sparks – Russell and Ron Mael, Lenin, and Trotsky. Asked if he were Jewish, Trotsky said he didn’t identify as Jewish and instead described his ethnicity as “working class.” Frankly, a lot of the early Bolsheviks were just like this and they attacked synagogues as much as they attacked churches.

An Antisemite Is Someone Who Jews Hate

An antisemite is someone who Jews hate.

– Sam Francis

I suppose that’s true to some extent, but let’s face it, a lot of people called antisemites are not exactly real fond of Jewish people. Nor would I say that they are good for the Jews either.

Of course I’m critical-Semitic. I don’t consider myself an anti-Semite unless it means somehow Jews hate – if Jews even hate me, that is. There are only a few of them who do. One is an anarchist named Alexander Reid-Ross on a Jewish tribal mission to attack a lot of the Left and accuse them of being Brown-Red fascist-Communist (3rd Positionist). In other words, these are socialists and communists who are also basically fascists.

We had a Jewish commenter here for a while who was a good friend. Another Jewish blogger invited me out to drink wine with him. They were both Jewish Lefties. And my Jewish ex-girlfriend used to read some of my articles. She was a secular Jew and not one to go around accusing everyone of being an antisemite. She even read some articles of mine that some thought were antisemitic and said they were not. She insisted through the whole relationship that I was not an antisemite and on the contrary, I was a Gentile wannabe-Jew.

Not a lot of people have called me anti-Semite and most who did were Gentiles. I get called anti-Black racist, homophobe, and sexist a lot more. None of those things are true. Anyway, most calling me anti-Black racist were non-Blacks. As you know, we had an antiracist Black woman on this site for many years. The only woman who have called me sexist and misogynist are hardline feminists, often radfems.

One Jewish Israeli on FSTD said, “Hey, look, I’m on the Left and I hate to call this guy an antisemite, but frankly, that’s what he is.” I had written on how Jews love to be victims (they do). We even had some pro-Israel Jews and even Israeli Jews on here for a while back in the day. One was named andyboy. Most of the other commenters hated him. But even they didn’t call me antisemite much. I also got thrown off of Daily Kos by libtards for “extreme antisemitism” for posting that (((US involvement in Syria))) had Jewish roots.

Anyway, I wish people would call me antisemite more because even though I’m not, sadly, it’s a badge of honor in a lot of places these days. I’d love to get on one of those ADL antisemite lists. That would be really hot.

Alt Left: Anarchist-Communist Infighting

A previous post about Alexander Reid-Ross described him as an anarchist waging a war on much of the Left to call them Brown-Red, or communists who are also fascists (3rd Positionists). He also told me in an ambush interview that the Alt Left was an antisemitic movement. That’s not something I’ve heard much, but I almost wish people would say it more because it’s practically an honor to be called an antisemite in our Philosemitic Era.

It’s also part of an anarchist war on communists, who they call Stalinists and Statists. But in Reid-Ross’ case it has tribal components as he also attacks Hezbollah, Syria, and Iran for being brown-red and hence the enemies of antifascist anarchists. I’m not sure how well his campaign is working even in anarchist circles because he’s widely hated on the Left. In fact, the latest charge is that he’s basically a fed infiltrator. I think there is something to this. Reid-Ross sees those groups and their allies as the enemies of the Jewish people, hence he’s calling them fascists to get antifa to attack them.

To some extent it’s occurring without him as some antifa hate Syria and Iran as “fascists.” Anarchists are part of the color revolution those CIA-Zionist rioters are trying to stage against revolutionary Iran while a lot of communists are with Iran, though many Iranian communists are still angry at the regime.

I was involved with an older Iranian woman like that for a while. Her comrades had smuggled her out of Iran on the back of a donkey in the desert in the middle of the night in 1979 after Khomeini started killing communists. Communists and the Islamists who took power were previously part of a revolutionary coalition perhaps doomed to failure that took down the Shah.

A few anarchists called me Statist, Stalinist, and tankie back in the day. It’s true that I am absolutely a tankie, 100%.

However, a lot of insurrectionay anarchists are aligning themselves with Left revolutionary or communist movements like the FARC, ELN, PFLP, PKK, the armed Papuan groups. Some have been criticized for aligning with “armed Stalinists” but these anarchists say that these groups are basically our people. So there’s a communist-anarchist alliance going on to some extent.

This is particularly noticeable in Eastern Syria where a Kurdish anarchist group has taken power and is fighting against Turkish fascism. They’re also trying to break with Assad, but Kurds mostly hate Turks and they say that although Syria didn’t treat them all that well, it still treated them far better than Iraq, Turkey, or Iran. Anyway this armed Syrian PKK group has a number of communists fighting in it, including Turkish armed communist groups who fight right alongside the anarchists.

Also both communists and anarchists have a strong anti-fascist mindset so there’s a commonality there. Ukrainian antifascists have all been arrested, beaten, tortured, or murdered. There are none left. They’re all either in jail, dead, or in Russia where they sought refuge. The fact that antifascists were persecuted by fascist Ukraine and sought refuge in Russia indicates that for me Russia is not a fascist country.

Social Distortion, “Making Believe”

“Making Believe” by George Jones, country singer. For some reason, he was very popular with early LA punks. Social Distortion was an Orange County band. I saw them for the first time in Summer 1992 somewhere in northern Orange County. I think it was some sort of “ballroom,” weird place for a concert. But it was a huge venue.

There was this hot little punk chick all dressed in black standing next to me for most of the show staring at me with that zombie, dead-eyed stare. Of course, being an idiot, I blew it with her. There’s a procedure for picking up women at concerts.

Here they are at CBGB’s in New York in 1992, the same year this song came out.

 

Social Distortion, “Under My Thumb”

This version has a very mean edge, which I suppose is appropriate for this “getting back at the mean bitch who fucked me over and bringing her back under my control” song. Speaking of which, I’m not sure if this ever happens. Maybe it does, but it hasn’t to me. But it’s a nice fantasy to get back at all the bitches who fucked you over all these decades.

Game/PUA: How to Pick up Women At Rock Shows in Clubs and Venues

What you have to do in a case like that is just look at her, smile with a very cocky, assholey, extremely confident and super-aggressive look on your face.

Put into your head, “I am King of the World! No woman can turn me down!” Then just put your arm around her side and yank her towards you. And yank her pretty hard too. They like that. Then give a great big huge smile like it’s all a big joke. But it’s a harmless smile, like you’re not going to hurt her, like there’s a secret between you and her.

90% of the time if they’ve been staring at you like a robot like that, they just go for it. You can probably just kiss her too. Grab her chin, pull it towards you, or yank it really, in a pretty aggressive manner, then give her a million dollar smile like you’re the Hero of the World and everyone wants you. It’s important to have that totally confident, super-cocky attitude like you don’t lack one shred of confidence. I think if you feel unconfident, I might not work as well or it might flop.

I’m not sure if this has ever failed with me, but perhaps it has a few times. I just don’t recall them. On the other hand, in my youth when I was doing this, I was supposedly very handsome. People were always gushing with stunned stares over my looks. So perhaps I was a goodlooking guy? Anyway, if you’re a sub-7, I’m not sure it’s going to work. I’m not sure it will work with Normies with average looks or particularly with homely men who are not attractive. I have a feeling it might flop. But those guys are never going to get those dead stares and have women grinding their hips against them at concerts anyway, so perhaps it’s a moot question.

I have no idea how to run Game for men with average looks (which is just fine – after all, most of us are average) or for men who are homely or unattractive (which in a lot of cases is fine too if they were born this way). These guys ought to get together with men on their Looks level and see what they kind of options they have. My experiences only apply to guys who are 7+ because that’s been my experiences. And believe me, Chad does something and the women swoon and flirt, and an unattractive man does the exact same damned thing and gets called creep and gets the cops called on him. The world’s not fair.

One thing! Unless you are getting those very strong signals like that, I would say do not do this! I think that’s where most of this Metoo is coming from. These guys just can’t read a woman. If she doesn’t green-light me, I simply don’t proceed. Of course I get called creep anyway even when I’m not the slightest bit interested in the women at all because they still think I’m flirtatious even when I’m not.

Also I may have a naturally seductive manner now from practicing Inner Game for decades. I’m afraid it’s just gone native by now and there’s nothing I can do about it. I get women accusing me of coming onto them or flirting with them or acting seductive, and I was doing no such thing!

I had written her off as a no-go – that she didn’t want to go out with me. When I write them off like that, I don’t flirt with or come onto them or hit on or flirt with them in any way. The vast majority of the women I meet, I write them off as no-go’s that don’t want to go out with me. Then I just stop pursuing things in that direction.

Friendship is still ok, but a lot of women still mistake, “Hey I just want to be friends with you” as “I want to fuck you.” They’re not as good at reading people as they think. They’re too paranoid. They always think we’re trying to fuck them even when we’re not. Calm down, ladies! We’re not that horny. And don’t flatter yourselves!

A lot of you are so unattractive that I have no interest in you at all. Curiously, these are the uglies who seem to keep thinking that I’m hitting on them. I’m thinking, “This chick is so ugly I feel like beating her with an ugly stick just because” and “I would fuck you with my worst enemy’s dick,” and she’s thinking, “Ew this creepy guy is trying to fuck me!” Gets old, ladies.

People mistaken my natural manner for flirtation. Hey baby! You’ll know when I’m flirting with you, ok?

But I always do it with that assholey mindset. One woman described the look to me as, “You know what? I see your face and you’re so damned arrogant that I just want to walk up to you and slap your face! Then I think, ‘Hey, I like that’.”

A better description would be super-cocky but still friendly. There’s no need to be a dick. People don’t mind cocky men as long as they are nice guys, friendly, and not assholes. In fact, it’s rather appealing and your confidence starts to spread to other men who engage with you.

I think you are bringing it out of them or they are grabbing some of your energy for themselves. The attitude is, “I’m great, but so are you.” After all, if you’re really great, it’s obvious to anyone and you don’t have to go around proving it all the time. You can be nicest guy around. High self-esteem and arrogance and looking down on others need not follow. If you’re not worried about your position, there’s no reason to put others down. Arrogant men are insecure.

She’ll start kissing you really hard, most of the time. She might break away after a while, but she’s going to lose control when you put your arm around her and when you kiss her for sure. I suppose it’s possible that she might not like you grabbing her around the waist and pulling her into your grasp, but I’m not sure if I’ve ever encountered that.

I suppose she might smile and break away in a giggly and bashful voice and say, “Calm down,” or something. I guess with a lot of men they might get a bad reaction but if you only go for the ones with the blank, dead stares or who are literally grinding their bodies into you (that used to happen to me at concerts a lot too), she’ll pretty much like it.

From then on, you just have to keep her with you and make sure she doesn’t take off. Get to know her, name, where she lives, phone number, what she’s doing after the show, on and on. If you do it right, you can have sex with her that very night, or whatever sort of sexual thing she has in mind. With women, it’s all about losing control. They literally lose control over themselves and their body starts screaming at them to have sex or else. It’s not something you can stop with your prefrontal cortex or your superego.

Once you get them to lose control, their animal sexual nature just takes over and they’re ravenous and insatiable. She gets to use the excuse of, “I was out of control.” When women get really horny they often go into another element, call it cumdrunk or subspace. The next morning they often remember only bits and pieces of what happened. I had a 23 year old woman tell me recently that sometimes she gets so horny in sex that she doesn’t even know her own name anymore.

If you asked her, she wouldn’t be able to tell you. I was with this 18 year old girl once, one of the horniest women I’ve ever been with (!) and she kept calling out these other guys’ names all night. There were 3-4 other guys she was having sex with. I kept correcting her, “Hey. I’m not Craig. I’m Bob.” “Oh yeah, that’s right. You’re Bob.”

She’s also the only women I’ve ever been with who kept asking for more fingers in her pussy. One was fine, but then it was, “Two fingers! Two fingers!” Well, ok. But then it went to, “Three fingers! Three fingers!” Just how flexible is that little hole anyway? Well it accommodates a baby so I guess it can really stretch out. I’m not sure if we went to four fingers. At that point, it’s almost a fist. There are women who want you to shove your fist into their pussies. I met one recently, 29 year old. I’m not sure if I’m into it. It’s sort of creepy.

There is an explanation for this. When women get really turned on, their brains become flooded with very high levels of oxytocin. This gives them the “out of control, in another world, altered state of consciousness, cum-drunk, subspace mindset. And yes, they will remember only bits and pieces the next morning because all that oxytocin makes them almost literally delirious out of their minds.

Alt Left: Black and Hispanic Men are Much More Dangerous to Women Than White Men Are

And how many nonracist women have figured this out? Zero percent! On the other hand, racist White women have looked carefully at the crime stats and realize that White men are safer. Oddly enough, this seems to imply that there is some benefit to White women in being racist. At the very least, being racist forces White women to think logically, while if they are nonracist, they seem to just roll in the emotional mud their whole lives. It’s sad that it takes racism to sharpen one’s eyes and direct one’s attention, lazer-like, in the right direction.

Polar Bear: I’ve seen vids of Blacks knocking girls out after they reject them. They have a different view on hitting women, that’s for sure.

See? Black and Hispanic women hit women way more than we do. They harass, assault, rape, and murder them a lot more than we do too. By a very large margin. Women are at much greater risk dating a Black or Hispanic man than a White man. But what is Western feminism all up in arms about? White men flirting with, asking women for their numbers or out, looking at women, etc. The popular culture says the White man is a creep that is inherently dangerous to all women. In fact, next to Asians, we White men are some of the safest men a women could engage with on any level, whether casual conversation all the way to long-term relationships.

How many women have figured this out? How many White women who are not racists have figured out that we White men are much less dangerous than Black or Brown men. I’d say almost zero. That would require women to think logically and way the odds in a scientific way, and they’re not really capable of either. Society tells them to fear White men as all of us are serial killers in disguise, so that’s what they believe. Examine their beliefs in the light of logic. Get out of here. Women don’t use logic. They can’t.

Alt Left: Men Can’t Win: The Sheer Lunacy and Idiocy of the Modern Feminist Conception of Sexual Harassment

The definition of sexual harassment is when you won’t leave women alone. You keep bothering them, flirting with them, hitting on them and coming onto them over and over and over. She keeps telling you no and you don’t know the meaning of the word no and keep asking anyway! That is harassment! The US government definition of sexual harassment is “extreme, ongoing, and persistent.” This is clearly to be used in only the worst cases.

But nowadays, feminists have trashed this definition so badly any man making any woman uncomfortable ever for any reason is harassing her!

Looking at women, if they don’t like it, is sexual harassment!

Flirting with women, if they don’t like it, is sexual harassment!

Asking women out, if they don’t like it, is sexual harassment!

Asking women for phone numbers, if they don’t like it, is sexual harassment!

Of course coming onto and hitting on women, if they don’t like it, is sexual harassment. It’s utter madness.

The “unwanted sexual advances” definition is completely insane! Notice how it is at odds with the government’s sane official definition?

The thing is you never know if flirting, coming onto or hitting on women is unwanted until you try! And if she does give you the message that it is unwanted, you need to stop doing it. Permanently!

But the point is that every time you are flirting with, coming onto or hitting on a woman, you are risking being accused of harassment. And there’s no way to avoid this!

Truthfully, none of this is illegal yet. It might get you fired from a job or banned from a store, but it’s not against the law. Everybody thinks it is but it isn’t. There’s no such law as Illegal Talking or Illegal Talking to Other Humans or Illegal Asking Personal Questions. Have no fear though, the feminists are busy drawing up all of these laws right now!

You never know if looking at a woman is unwanted unless you try! And really, you ought to be able to keep on looking at her anyway. We don’t have an Illegal Looking law yet, but the feminists and the cucks are working on it! Really though, if a woman hates me, I’m unlikely to keep looking at her too much. Sometimes they are so hot that you just cannot not look at them. At least I can’t. I find myself asking myself, “How can I not look at her?” If she’s that hot, it’s like you have to look at her. Your mind keeps forcing you to do it.

But the point is that every single time you look at a woman nowadays, you are risking a sexual harassment accusation! It’s sheer madness.

You don’t know if asking women for their numbers or asking them out is unwanted until you try! So every time you ask a woman for her number or ask her out, you are risking being accused of sexual harassment! We don’t have laws against this yet, but don’t worry, the feminists are busy drawing one up as you read this!

So you try, she doesn’t like it, and now you just harassed her. There’s obviously no way to interact with women at all nowadays without risking a sexual harassment charge.

As you can see, we men cannot win. We have to change the definition of this sexual harassment madness or get society off this kick. It’s catastrophic for us men. And a lot of women don’t like it either. Typical woman. Put in some crazy, emotion-based law, and then get mad when it starts harming women as well as the men it was intended to harm. They still won’t change it though. They’re too stubborn.

Game/PUA: Asked Out Two Women Yesterday

I can’t believe I actually did that. I haven’t done that in forever. In the next post, you can maybe see why that is.

I was at a large mall in a nearby city recently to return some shoes and I wandered through the mall a bit while doing so.

I went to this one stand where they were selling I think pretzels and started to talking to a guy who worked there who was outside. I am extremely friendly, and I talk to all sorts of people in public quite often. Not always but I’m definitely known to do it sometimes. He was from Bangladesh. I was talking to him about his country, and I looked over at his store and there was this really hot Indian-looking woman working there. I’m not sure if she was looking at me or not.

Anyway, not sure what came over me, but I asked him to go ask that woman if she liked me. He kept saying, “Go talk to her, go talk to her,” but I kept saying I was too shy. I don’t really like to go up to women and ask them if they’re into me. It’s too forward. He tells me she’s 30. I ask him if she’s single and he says, “Yes!”

Later on, I was walking in the store and I saw this booth manned by this one hot young chick. For some reason, I wanted to go over to the booth to talk to her, not sure why. She was dealing with customers so I had to wait ~20 minutes until she was free. I just sort of hung out in the background trying not to be too conspicuous. You should try to be inconspicuous when you do this because otherwise you give off “creeper” vibes. Look away a lot of the time and pretend you are looking at other things. Put this idea in your head, “I don’t want to come off as a creeper,” and act accordingly.

She finally got free and I went over to talk to her. Somehow I ended up talking to her for maybe half an hour. She was extremely friendly and even shared a lot of personal information with me. She seemed like a typical unsure-of-herself young woman. She was 21. At some point, I left on good terms.

So anyway, I went away and came back to the same mall to return some more shoes.

I went by the shoe booth and walked over and see that another young woman is working there. I asked if she is the only one, and she said, “No, there’s another woman who works here.” I asked around about her name and she said it’s Lolly. I asked if she was Indian, and she said, “No, she’s Mexican.”

She gave me the same “not interested” vibe I get from young women all the time, which, honestly, I don’t necessarily mind at all as long as they are polite. Except a lot of them aren’t. I get it. Because the reason I went back there was because I was going to ask the 21 year old out. If you don’t want me to ask you out, you might as well be curt with me or however you want to put that message across. I am very good at getting that message.

Then I walked past the pretzel place and the Bangladeshi guy called me over in an excited way. He said, “Hey, I asked that woman, and she said she likes you!” I was like, “Damn, this is my lucky day!” Then I thought I will definitely ask her out next time I see her at this mall. Of course, people have told me, “Hey, that woman/girl likes you!” quite a few times in my life, though it was never something I heard all the time. But I’m used to it. Only thing is, I haven’t heard, “Hey that woman likes you,” in just about forever! Like, decades! It was music.

So I went back to the same mall again with the intention of asking out both women if they were at work.

I’ve asked out women and girls hundreds of times, so it’s no great shakes to do it. Plus, I know how to do it very well. And lately I only do it if I get a serious “green light.”

I had to return some slippers this time.

Before I went there, I bought some pens and a pad of paper because I had neither. I needed the pens and paper in case they were going to give me their numbers and they didn’t have paper or pen. You can always find paper but it’s much better if you have prepared paper. Often neither one has a pen so you have to go looking to borrow one. This way I’m prepared. Before I go in, I write my name, address and phone number on two sheets of paper. I figure I will trade this for her number. Neither will probably ever call me because women just don’t call men, but it’s always nice to give her your number anyway.

I walked down to the end and I saw the 21 year old. She greeted me and was extremely friendly. I cut right to the chase and more or less asked her out, but not in those explicit terms. In a sentence or two, I described the advantages she might get by dating me. I’m pretty good at selling myself and there’s nothing wrong with pitching yourself.

She said, “Wow, that sounds like a really appealing idea, but I have a boyfriend.” She’s had the same boyfriend for four years. I smile and say, “Darn!” Then she thanked me for asking her out! And she had said the idea of going out with me was a “really appealing idea!” What the Hell? We are 44 years apart! She had a big smile on her face as I walked away. She acted like she was flattered that I asked her out!

I went back by the pretzel place and I saw the Indian woman. I walked to the side of the place and she was just a few feet away. I motioned her to come over. She did and I said, “I want your phone number,” with a huge smile. She quickly said, “I’m sorry. I’m “taken.” She was smiling while she said it. She also acted like she was flattered that I asked her out!

Ok, this woman makes no sense. Her coworker asks her if she likes me, and she says yes. That pretty much means she wants to go out with you. Then I go back and it turns out she’s got a boyfriend. Her behavior doesn’t make sense but women do this all the time. By the way, any time you get a message that some female likes you, you absolutely have every right in the book to ask her out or for her phone number!

Game/PUA: About Giving Women Your Personal Information before You Go out with Them

About giving them my personal information, I would almost like to give them more. How about my driver’s license number? Glad to. Social Security number is stupid. I’d be happy if she took a photo of me.

I’m giving them all of my information in order to make them feel safe. If they want to date me, they can write it down or make a note of it and give it to a friend or pin it on their wall or whatever. This way if anything goes wrong, she will be making it totally obvious that I’m the number one suspect. This doesn’t bother me at all.

I’d even be happy if she gave my information to her friend, made a note of it, left it on her desk, pinned it on the wall. I would even encourage her to do all of these things because I want her to feel safe and I’m pretty sure I’m not going to do something violent and creepy to her. She can even take a photo of me and keep it in her phone. I don’t care what information she needs. I’ll give her whatever it takes to make her feel safe.

I’ve never done anything violent or crazy to a woman on a date in my entire life, so I doubt if I will start now. I just don’t do stuff like that. Like, ever.

Game/PUA: Getting Shut Down Vibes from Women

I get why so many women blow me off. If a young woman acts like she’s really interested in me and talks to me in a very friendly way to half an hour, especially if she reveals some vulnerabilities, then, yeah, next time I see her, I might just ask her out! So I can see why they shut me down and act businesslike or unfriendly in order to not lead me on. It makes sense. They’re trying not to give me any ideas.

By the way, if they are acting unfriendly or deliberately businesslike to give me an “I don’t want to go out with you” message, which I seem to get all the time, I definitely don’t ask them out! They get filed in this “not interested” category, and I don’t even try anymore unless they change their attitude, which it seems like they never do.

Turns out most of the women in the mall have to act friendly to customers (unlike Starbucks, the meanest store in the US!), so you don’t get many seriously unfriendly vibes. And nowadays, I am on alert for that vibe all the time, any time I interact with any woman.

As soon as I get that vibe, I tone it down and just act businesslike towards them. I might talk a little bit about this or that, but no way am I going to flirt with, or hit on or come onto her! And I can read messages very well, perfectly really. At the same time as you get the “I don’t want to go out with you” line, you often also also get this, “I don’t even want to talk to you!” message. I get this a fair amount of the time if I try to make conversations, and I’m always watching out for it. I especially get that at Starbucks, but it’s not limited to there.

It’s hard to describe this attitude. They might cut you off as soon as you start to say something.

They can act excessively “cold” or “too businesslike.” This sort of translates into “icy.”

A lot of the time they pretend that they don’t hear you even when they do. That is very hard to figure out and one is tempted to think she didn’t hear and repeat it, but a lot of the time, I just assume she is pretending she didn’t hear, and I just shut down. I used to always think they didn’t hear me and repeat what I said, but several years ago, I figured out that they were just pretending that they didn’t hear me. I now see that I get this a fair amount of the time from people.

Sometimes simply return her shutdown with my own shutdown. I stop being friendly and I just act businesslike or maybe even worse, a bit sullen, which is totally called for if she’s being unfriendly. Another message you might get is, say, she finished with your order and she’s moved away a bit, and then you ask her something else. She looks at you with disappointment and often fear. The look says, “Why the Hell are you even talking to me?!…It’s frightening to me when you talk to me!…I’m shocked that you are even talking to me at all!” on and on.

I pick up on that right away and I label her as “hostile” and I try to have as little conversation with her as possible. I put her in the “does not want any conversations” category and have as few words with her as possible. Plus I’m pretty unfriendly because anyone who sees me regularly and gives me this, “I do not want to talk to you, ever!” I label, quite correctly, as hostile, and you have a right to return hostility with hostility. I get that quite a bit nowadays too.

Sometimes I’m not sure if some woman likes me or not. If she was super friendly the last time I talked to her, maybe I look at her while she’s working the second time. If she likes you, next time you go in, you just start looking at her. It’s ok to keep your gaze. I don’t call that staring. It’s more like looking. If she still likes you, she will wave to you in this very friendly way, often with a little flutter of her hand. This often means she really likes you, like maybe she even might go out with you or have sex with you. That fluttery, feminine wave seems to be flirtatious or seductive. I haven’t seem them to it that much when they are just being friendly.

On the other hand, if you are watching her the next time you come in, it’s not unusual for them to completely ignore me when I am doing that! So she was super friendly at first, but then when I was looking at her, she treated me like I wasn’t there. That means she was just being friendly, and she doesn’t want to date me at all. It might also be risky to even try to talk to her because Starbucks got me in trouble for “asking personal questions” and threatened me with a ban. Everyone does that to everyone all the time anyway, and there’s no way that should be reason for a ban.

And no worker or customer should ever complain about such a thing. I would never try to bust any customer at work or say they made me uncomfortable. People don’t “make me uncomfortable.” That’s a woman thing because women are children. Young women are notorious for this.

After age 30, they get somewhat immune from “being made to feel uncomfortable” and if they don’t like the vibes they get from some guy, they just ignore him and go about their business. A lot of them seem to think that men are going to look at them, flirt with them, come onto them, and hit on them all the time anyway, and they just put most guys on ignore and move on.

It’s young women who are the great big crybabies. I can’t believe that there are “men” who would say, “That guy makes me uncomfortable.” I’d say you’re not much of a man if you say that unless some guy is being menacing towards you. If you’re not a pussy or a fag, you should be allowing other people to “make you feel uncomfortable.” That means you’re acting like a woman!

This whole “no man can ever make any woman feel ‘uncomfortable’ at any time for any reason, no matter who he is and who she is” is simply insane. I have a right to make people feel uncomfortable, as does anyone. Anyone has a right to make me feel as uncomfortable as they want. Knock yourself out! You have no way of knowing if you are making people uncomfortable when you are looking at them and possibly even when you are talking to them. You might not know until the end of the conversation.

Game/PUA: Ever Hit a Woman?

I’ve hit a couple of women, but they hit me first, and plus, I didn’t hit them all that hard. I figure if I don’t cause serious or permanent damage, it’s ok. If a woman, hits me, I’m gonna hit the bitch back! A few of the times I did this, the bitches threatened to call the police on me but other people got them to calm down. In one case she kept threatening but never did it.

One time a woman was chasing me through an airport waiting area swinging at me and hitting me and yelling at me. I was just retreating backwards and trying not to get hit. Some older Black man saw it and started laughing. I love those older Black guys! No White man would do that but some Black men definitely would. That’s one thing that I really love about Black people. Anyway, at one point, I got tired of retreating and I punched her in the face just to stop her from chasing me and swinging and kicking at me. She freaked out and she got a bloody lip.

I do admit that one time, and so far only one time, I threatened to kill a girlfriend over the phone but she was so out of line, it was just insane. She wasn’t just trying to start a fight. She was taking nuclear weapons and deliberately shooting them right at my Achilles Heels in order to deliberately push me past my limits. She was “trying to get murdered.” I had no intention of doing it of course. I was just trying to scare her and plus, she deserved it.

If you do it over the phone, deny it and there’s no recording, they won’t arrest you. Hell, they won’t arrest you for that a lot of the time. Women have called police to the house over and over saying their men threatened to kill them, and the police kept saying, “We didn’t hear it.” Everybody threatens everybody all the time anyway. I don’t see the point of the law.

Game/PUA: Women Have a Hypocritical Bias against Homosexual Male Behavior

Reddit post in Purple Pill Debate.

Women have a hypocritical bias against homosexual male behavior

CMV

Insert “but I’m not like that’ useless comment here.

Most women that I know have a strong aversion/disgust to homosexual behavior or past actions in their romantic partners. It doesn’t even really need to be proven, it can just be an assumption and that is enough for women to look at men differently. I asked multiple women if they would take a man seriously if he had photos of himself cross-dressing online, or pictures of himself at gay clubs dancing and they also said this would immediately disqualify him as boyfriend material.

Yet most women I know also have no problem doing homoerotic things with their girlfriends, including kissing, grinding/dancing, spanking and teasing, etc. There are even full out songs like ‘I Kissed a Girl’ that are literally a bi anthem, and when it comes on in clubs are the girls sing it. These are the SAME women who will unequivocally judge men harshly for doing similar behavior once. A man dancing sexually with other men would get no pussy.

This is enormously hypocritical, yet happens all the time. Why is this hypocrisy not called out more?

I’m not sure what to say here, but we all know this is true. If any men have any done any gay stuff (and a significant number of men have), I’d advise them to shut up about it with their girlfriends and wives. They just don’t want to hear about it. More important than that is to not tell other straight men about it.

The truth is that the number of straight men who have experimented just a bit with gay sex is quite large. I’ve had 5-10 male friends who told me they had sex with guys once or twice. They all said:

I wanted to try it to see what it was like and whether I would like it or not. I did it and decided I didn’t like it. Turns out I like pussy, not dick.

Surveys have shown that up to 25% of men have had gay sex at least once. Another survey showed that by age 18, 25% of men had done some sort of gay act. So it looks like a lot of this happens among teenage boys. And I’d imagine a lot of the men in the first sentence just did it a few times and then quit. I’d say that for straight men to have experimental gay sex is almost normal. On the other hand, women flip out about it, so I wouldn’t talk about it.

By I had a few Chad friends who did this once or twice and they often told women:

Hey, tried it a couple of times and didn’t like it. And I played the male role. Just let a couple of queers suck me off.

The weird thing is that many women were quite accepting of Chad having some experimental gay sex. One said:

This is the type of man I want! A man who is daring enough to do something like that.

A number of the others should shrugged their shoulders and tee-heed.

On the other hand, I’d imagine that for normies and homely men, such an admission might be deadly.

Another interesting thing is that they all played the male role. Most of them just lay back and as one put it, “let some fag suck my cock.” Playing the male role in gay sex, in many parts of the world, isn’t even gay. In fact, it’s considered straight. The only thing that is gay is playing the female role in gay sex.

Those men are the “fags” and they are basically used as surrogate women for men who don’t have access to real women. This is quite common in the Arab World, especially in Morocco, Egypt, Syria, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia for starters. I think this is what the bacha bazi in Afghanistan is all about. Those men who use the bacha bazis (teenage boys that they dress up as women to be surrogate women) obviously only play the male role.

If you think about:

Lay back on the bed, let the fag go to work, and fantasize it’s Seka.

as one friend told me is probably something a lot of straight men could do fairly easily.

Anyway, if you read the article, you will see that many folks report that while most women don’t seem to care about lesbian sex and a fair number have done it, almost all of them were extremely opposed to the idea of their boyfriends having gay sex to the point of rejecting men if they had even done it once experimentally. But as noted above, perhaps they let Chad fag off a bit and it’s no bother.

Unanimously, women across the country avoid men with a sexual history with other men. I actually have male bi friends, and while some places are certainly more accepting than others, women by and large are still extremely homophobic.

100% agree. I offer, anecdotal evidence. My fiancé is the same. Progressive. Yet she would never date a man who has done homosexual stuff.

Well, I think we all know how the average men reacts to their gf/future gf saying that she did lesbian stuff back in the day.

We also know the reaction of the average women will have when they hear their bf/future bf tell them they did gay stuff back in the day. On a more simple level I would argue that a large percentage of women would not be happy with even the thought of their partner enjoying pegging, which is physically very similar to gay sex.

Plenty of women read mangas about homosexual men stories yet they despise that in their mate. That’s what OP is questioning: the homophobic reaction of women when it concerns their male partner’s sexual history and the hypocrisy of shrugging it away.

The vast majority of women wouldn’t be comfortable dating a man who also sucks dick

This is widely known in Sociology circles. People do speak out against it, but that kind of acceptance just isn’t mainstream yet. It is, however, perfectly normal in more leftwing, queer and hipster social circles.

Men and women are different. How does sticking a dick up another man’s ass really fit into the heroic romantic ideal for a man, either women’s version of that or men’s? It just doesn’t.

Women are accepting of gay friends. They are much less commonly accepting of bi boyfriends

Women are accepting of gay men, absolutely. Many women will not date men who have engaged it homoerotic behavior, even if they themselves have delved into such behavior with other women.

Most non-liberal men also have a aversion to men making love. A man relieving anal sex is seen as something horrid.

Heterosexual men see lesbians as hot. But they see gay men as disgusting. Heterosexual women see lesbians as hot. But they see gay men as disgusting.

A lot, maybe most, self-identified male bisexuals are submissives bottoms with other men and that’s what women are put off by. It’s basically the same way gay guys relate to bi guys, the masculine tops are desired.

We are more liberal than ever yet women are the one’s who hold onto their homophobia the most. Why is that?

No, women just like gay men as friends. They are extremely homophobic when it comes to their partner selection. This is common knowledge. It’s not just that it isn’t sexy, it’s that women are disgusted by it. It’s straight-up homophobic and hypocritical, period. Most women would not date a man that has had gay sex or entertains other men sexually. It’s socially unacceptable because women are disgusted by it. That’s the homophobia.

Women secretly are disgusted by homosexuality or else they would have no problem with it in potential partners.

You’re missing OP’s point which is the vast majority of cishet women see bisexual men or men who have ever done anything sexual with another man as a turn off/repulsive as romantic partners.

Nah I’m 25 and most of my female friends still make fun of bisexuality men, discredit their masculinity, and refuse to date them. Meanwhile dudes care way less about dating a bisexual woman.

Anyone who thinks bisexuality in a partner isn’t a bigger turnoff for women vs men is delusional.

Women aren’t generally attracted to effeminate men who give off feminine signals, it’s really as simple as that.

Women are not disgusted by homosexuality. Women don’t want to end up with a guy who is actually more into men than women, or may be only pretending he’s into women to appease family or to have children, and might wake up one day and think ‘actually, I am gay, not bi’. Women also think that guys can easily cheat, and they don’t want to double their competition. Basically, women want to reduce their chances of being used or cheated upon. (With this I do not mean that bisexual people lie more than straight people or that they cheat more, but only that their options are double, and they may be more open to be fluid than strictly heterosexual people

A.) Men are more likely to be, all else equal, more disgusted by homosexual behavior in men.

No, I’m implying he’s hot, rich, successful, and famous which overrides the bisexuality, which is the same for Kim K. Harry Styles could probably murder someone and women still go crazy for him. Using a top .001% man as your defense of anything is moronic.

Women have a strange relationship with homosexual male behavior. On the one hand they’re repulsed by it but on the other hand they like to pretend that being gay is the most fantastical thing in the world just to poke at the insecurities of certain heterosexual men…and then on the third hand they use homosexual slurs to insult straight men. It’s hilarious to watch them cycle through all three of these personalities like Sybil.

Personally I think the aversion towards gay men is a natural response if you are wanting to procreate. Looking for security and a strong father for your children. Homosexual men are looked as a weaker male species in comparison to a straight man.

Because women kissing women is still feminine. Men kissing men becomes feminine. And cis women don’t want a fem man.

I agree with your point though, that is why I think one of the first insults thrown out by a female after she is rejected is “WHAT? ARE YOU GAY?!?!”, it is also why females are threatened by “bromances”, they fear that two men caring about each other, possible more that about the random females around them, threatens their access to those men’s resources and time.

Bisexual men have complained about this forever. In fact, I hear that most bisexual men simply have sex with men most of the time because there are so few women willing to put up with their gay stuff. I saw one little survey where 19 out of 20 young women said they would not date a bisexual man.

Many such cases. Bisexuality does seem to turn off a large percentage of women regardless of whether they’re progressive or conservative. It’s heard some bisexual men talk about how they pretty much only date men, but not because they prefer them, but because women oftentimes lose interest in them as soon as they find out they’re bi. I find that very interesting.

Search “bisexual men” on Reddit and you’ll find dozens of discussions on this and how even some bisexual women won’t date bisexual men. First post that comes up in the Bisexual sub with >1K upvotes.

Op has a bit of a point though. As a bi man it’s irritating how even “liberal” girls switch up once they learn I’ve been with guys. Many bi men can attest to this, it’s not made up.

I would hate to be a bisexual man on a dating site. If I put bisexual in my profile, it would be deadly. It’s hard enough on those sites anyway.

But maybe Chad can be bi too! I’ve met a few bi women recently. One was 30 and another was 27. The 30 year old got rid of me because she said I was a homophobe. She was of the “I don’t date homophobes” persuasion. Pretty common amongst millennial women around age 27-33. Both of them were disappointed that I didn’t fuck guys. They were both bisexual and they sort of wanted a bisexual guy.

And I met a 17 year old girl while back. I talked to her a bit but of course I didn’t touch her or trade pics, and I was careful what I said. She said I was hot as Hell and in fact, I was so fucking hot that I really needed to fuck guys too, whatever the Hell that means! She was another bisexual woman quite happy with a bi man.

So it’s ok if Chad’s bi maybe, but it’s deadly for any other guys! Damn, Chad just gets to do whatever he wants and women just put up with it, huh?

“Poly” would be just as bad as “bi” in a dating profile. If I put that I was “poly” on there, that would kill it all. I probably am poly, as I try to cheat on girlfriends as a habit because I’m a bit of an asshole (just a bit), most women absolutely want a guy for themselves and quite a few demand monogamy from men. I go on dating sites and every woman I meet on there wants a monogamous relationship with a man, hopefully a long-term one.

So what I do a lot of the time is lie to women by assuring them that I am completely monogamous, and then I go ahead and try to cheat anyway. I might add that sometimes I am not successful at cheating, so I might go years being monogamous not by choice but by circumstance. Women on here have said I’m an asshole for promising monogamy and then cheating, but I would say that I’m just a man. And I’m afraid that a lot of men do exactly what I am doing. They all said,

Why don’t you just tell women you’re poly?

LOL because then I’d probably never get a date?

On the other hand though, maybe Chad is an exception. I don’t say I’m poly, but I often ask for open relationships.

Look I don’t care what you do or if you go out with other guys, I just don’t want to hear about it, ok? What I don’t know can’t hurt me. And I want the same freedom for myself.

What’s odd is given the opportunity, a lot of the women I’ve been with didn’t want to take me up on it.

But I don’t want to date anyone else! I only want you!

Well, that’s flattering. Is that another Chad thing? I also hear:

I don’t want to share you with anyone! I want you all for myself!

Is that another Chad thing? Women don’t want to share Chad?

What’s weird is how many women and even girls have been going for this notion my whole life.

Me: I want an open relationship.

Girls and women: Sure, thing.

and she nods her head. A lot thought they were “modern”
or “groovy” or “hip” and went around bragging that they were in open relationships with me. I guess they thought it made them cool.

So I guess women demand monogamy for Normies and homely guys, but Chad can cheat all he wants.

After all, he’s Chad! No matter what Chad does, women put up with it anyway!

Game/PUA: Women Are Actually Quite Poor Judges of Dangerousness in Men

Polar Bear: Ted Bundy struck me as a very primal straight man in some ways. On instinct, many of us are likely to think and even act like he did, but we suppress it.

He proved women intuition is wrong in a way. They have no clue what’s inside of a man. Though it may be more down to specifically White women’s naiveté, as non-Whites are often less trusting of men.

Obviously. Women always say,

Ladies, go with your gut! Your gut is never wrong!

LOL it’s wrong all the damned time. The main way I see it as wrong is when they see the most harmless men of all as the most dangerous men of all. Women do this all the time.

For instance, in my town there are a few guys who I have been told that many women think are really creepy and dangerous. I’ve been told to watch out for them as possible molesters, rapists, predators, and killers. Of course, me being me, I just had to find out who these guys were. So I did.

And then, me being my somewhat fearless and definitely insane self, went up to those men and talked to them. First I told them what people said about them. They said they knew in exasperated voices. And they all told me they were harmless and had never done anything dangerous with women. I spent some time around these guys and as I am good judge of people (much better than most women) I figured out quite quickly that these guys were utterly harmless, so harmless it was almost comical, especially after what people were saying about them.

But here’s the thing. A few of the men were very unattractive, ugly even. And a couple of the guys were simply these extremely shy introverts who barely even talked to people. They probably couldn’t even talk to a woman, much less rape and kill her.

Then I put it together. Women think ugly man = dangerous man. Unattractive men are dangerous! They might kill you! Why they feel this crazy way, I have no idea!

And another thing is that women think that very shy and quiet men are dangerous as Hell. I have no idea why they think this because those guys are almost always harmless unless they are angry.

But mostly they are the nicest people in the whole world because shyness correlates with niceness. Usually the more shy someone is, the nicer they are. This holds true for both sexes.

Shy, introverted women are pretty cool. And I finally realized that I really hit it off big with women like that.

I dated a 19 year old girl recently, and on the first date, we were talking about how much we needed to exercise. She was complaining about her belly fat. As I had already seen very explicit nudes her even before the first date, I knew what she was talking about. I said you can do sit-ups to get rid of that. She said, “Maybe we can do them together.” Then she suggested that we do them naked. This is a few hours into a date and there hasn’t been any sex yet! And she’s already talking about doing naked sit-ups with me on my floor! WTH. But it was weird that she was that comfortable with me to say something like that.

And at the end of the date, at 5 PM that afternoon, she very shyly asked me if she could move into my apartment! WTH. End of the first date and she already wants to move in? No way. That’s a dream. I said sure, because having a hot 19 year old girl living with me who wants sex all the time is a dream at my age. Anyway, we hit it off amazingly and especially she warmed to me very quickly. Then I realized she was a super introvert. I think she warmed to me so quickly because she was an introvert. And sadly, I’m probably more introverted than I think I am.

Some of my readers have come to my town to meet me in public. A group of three of them even came to town to have dinner with me. They wanted to have dinner with the legendary Robert Lindsay! One guy said,

One thing that really shocked me was how introverted you are. I didn’t expect you to be that way at all as you don’t come off that way when you write.

I had another introverted girlfriend and she was also extremely nice. Sure, they can be bitches sometimes, but even then, they are not that bad.

And women who are more extroverted than that can be serious bitches. Some can be unholy bitches from Hell. It’s almost like the more extroverted they are, the worse monsters they can be. Which actually makes sense if you understand about extroverts and introverts. Anyway, shyness does no harm to a woman. At least men don’t think there’s anything wrong with it. Shyness is deadly for men.

On the other hand, I’ve noted that Chads can be shy. Women just think it’s cute as shyness can be rather touching, especially to women.

Woman: Can you believe it. Chad’s shy!

Her girlfriends: Awwwwwwwwww, that’s so cute! Maybe you can bring him out of his shell teehee wink wink.

In my 20’s, supposedly I was very handsome. And women would remark sometimes about how quiet I was. One time on the first date we had wild sex that when on for hours. I kept it up the whole time and was a sexual acrobat. The next morning she was rather amazed. She shook her head and said:

I guess still waters run deep.

Another was the girlfriend of a friend, but she would have probably had sex with me if I wasn’t such an idiot. She looked at me and said:

Ahhhh. The quiet one.

She was acting pretty horny when she said that.

Get it? Shy Chad is cute! He’s adorable! He’s touching! Everyone says, “Awwwwwwwwwwwww,” when you mention it. Women get these little half-smiles around him.

But if a man is unattractive, it’s twice as deadly for him to be shy. A shy, unattractive men is literally going to wear your skin!

Why do women think ugly and shy men are going to murder them? I have no idea. But they often think goodlooking men are harmless. See Bundy above. And they go for actually dangerous men all the time, in fact, they prefer them over nicer men. Knowing all of this, allow me to be just a bit cynical about women’s “radar that spots the dangerous men.” If it works so well, why do they keep picking psychos and felons over decent men? Why do they keep thinking that the most harmless men of all are the most dangerous of all?

Look, I’m not saying women should not use these tools. Go ahead and use them all you want. I’m just saying that they don’t seem to work a lot of the time. I’ve been accused of being dangerous myself. And I’ve never done anything dangerous to women in my life. I think women are just paranoid.

Younger ones are the worst at this. They are notorious for doing the unattractive man = creepy, dangerous man thing. It’s almost as if women think that unattractiveness or ugliness in and of itself is somehow creepy or scary. Which I don’t get.

Young women are also awful about figuring out men. Older ones screw this ugly = dangerous thing  too, though they get better at sorting it out as they age.

I heard a couple of 40 year old women talking, and they were talking about some guy, saying he was good weird, not bad weird. And they frowned when they said bad weird. The fact that they could even make that distinction at all is amazing, and it shows that women do learn and get smarter as they get older, especially after 30.

Women can judge your character in a lot of other ways though. Even young women can be scary good at this. Maybe even teenage girls! They’re almost scary good at this. I just think they get the dangerous thing wrong. Like they get way too many false positives.

Young women are just idiots. They don’t understand people or especially men. They believe in this idea of a utopian society, and they are all in collective rage that men are the way that they are instead of how young women think they should be. But they’re  fighting a war with a wall or trying to bail out the ocean. Raging at men for acting like men and demanding that they act different and trying to force us to act different is folly.

I think young women believe in “just world” theory. They think the world should be this “just” utopian place that women think it ought to be. But it isn’t and this drives them to rage.

This is what feminism is all about. It’s about trying to get men to stop acting like men and start acting like this “new man” thing that women demand we become. But it’s never going to happen. Men are never going to stop being men, and most importantly, they are never going to stop being real men. What feminists hate is not so much men per se as real men. They like cucks, fags, and wimps just fine. Most male feminists are really wimpy. They’re pathetic idiots.

Alt Left: Jews and Blacks Since 1960 in the US

Polar Bear: I’ve heard Jews had a hierarchy of Gentiles. and Slavs ranked low, Germans ranked high. This may be just Western Jews.

I’ve never heard of this. I’ve never heard that they ranked us at all. I don’t think Jews care much about us Gentiles, sorry. Most of them are all wrapped up in thinking about themselves all the time. That’s what it means to be a Jew, bottom line. LOL how well do you know these people called Jews? What makes you think that they think much about us at all?

Jews do care about White Gentiles, especially Christians, but mostly it’s hostility and resentment because face it, we don’t have a great record of being nice to them. Rather the opposite.

They don’t seem to care anything about Hispanics or Asians. Obviously they don’t like Arabs at all, but can you blame them? The Arabs are trying to kill them. I wouldn’t like them either if I were a Jew.

To the extent that they do care about Gentiles, a lot of Jews are really anti-Black. The way so many Blacks act is so contrary to the ultra-civilized view Jews have of themselves! To a lot of Jews, Blacks are just gross.

The Jews don’t mind that Blacks are thieves; after all, many Jews are too. But Jews think you should steal with a pen, not a gun. Stealing with a gun is rude, uncouth, and almost evil. Something goes wrong and someone is hurt or dead.

Steal with a pen and nothing happens. No one gets hurt. You get away with it, and you live in a nice house. You don’t and you go to Club Fed Prison which is full of other Jewish white collar crooks. You get to sit around and bitch all day about how you did nothing wrong and the only reason you got caught is anti-Semitism. No, seriously, this is what Jewish white-collar crooks do. They go to federal prison and become obsessed with this idea that evil antisemitic prejudice put them in prison, instead of, you know, maybe just them being criminals?

Also, in the big cities back East, the Jews tended to live in the inner cities and had lived there a long time. After the 1960’s, ghetto Blacks moved into these Jewish neighborhoods in large numbers, and things were not real cool. Young Jews grew up around a lot of ghetto Blacks and often turned very racist.

One of the most virulent anti-Black racists I have ever met was a Jewish guy from Detroit. He was totally unashamed of his racism, too. No guilt at all. A lot of Jews from Detroit don’t like Blacks much. My old girlfriend was a Jew from Detroit. She wasn’t wild about Blacks. She called them svartzes. One time this Black man was flirting with her in line at the grocery store, and she told me about it, “Yuck. Why would I go out with a svartze? Ew.” Then later she moved to Atlanta and had a Black boyfriend. Who of course was cheating on her the whole time with another woman, a friend of hers.

Many of the younger Jews moved out of these inner cities, but often their parents or grandparents stayed. These people were older Jews, and they were easy prey for young ghetto Blacks. Many older Jewish parents and grandparents were badly victimized by ghetto Blacks. Younger Jews heard about their parents getting preyed on by Blacks and were not happy about that.

Most Jews don’t like Blacks very much. They just harp on this “White racism against Blacks” thing as a club to beat White Gentiles over the head with because they don’t like White Gentiles getting racist. The reason is because it eventually tends to boomerang back around on the Jews. And historically speaking, that hasn’t been good for the Jews. So they want us to be completely nonracist against Blacks, while they get to be as racist as they want against them. Typical Jewish hypocrisy, but all ethnocentric groups are very hypocritical. And the more ethnocentric you are, the worse the hypocrisy.

In fact, this is the major problem with Identity Politics because all IP types end up turning into the worst hypocrites. The other day it dawned on me that Jews practically invented Identity Politics. Jewishness and Judaism were the original Identity Politics movement.

For a while there, most of the leadership of the NAACP was Jewish. I wish I could say their motives were pure, but I think there was something underhanded about it. It was always “smash White Gentile racism to protect the Jews.” I’m not sure they cared about Blacks very much.

However, during the Civil Rights Era, a lot of those idealistic young Jews who went down to the South, some of whom got murdered, had very pure motives. Likewise, a number of the antiracist Jews in the hippie movement of the 1960’s had pure motives.

But Jews fighting anti-Black racism among White Gentiles has always been a lot more about bashing racist White Gentiles than about helping Blacks, sorry.

Incidentally, there are Black Jews, mostly converts, and they face a lot of discrimination in the Jewish community. Like bigtime. In Israel also there are Black Ethiopian Jews, and they have been treated terribly by White Jews. In fact, there has been a major effort on the part of the state of Israel to deny that they are Jewish so they can ship them back or not allow any more in. Ethiopian Jews often find the racism in Israel to be bald, naked, and obvious, while such things in the US are much more undercover and hidden.

Lowbrow, Middlebrow, Highbrow and the Nonsense Called Beyond Highbrow All (Sort of) Explained

The “brows” – highbrow, middlebrow, and lowbrow refer to culture, entertainment, recreation, leisure, etc.

Lowbrow is lower class or working class culture.

Lowbrow culture is stuff like pro wrestling, NASCAR, car shows, drinking beer and watching football, meth, rap music, Danielle Steel, tailgate parties, barbecues, and other dumb stuff.

Middlebrow is middle class culture.

It sees itself snobbiliy above lowbrow which they look down on as working class (which it is). I’m having a hard time figuring out what middlebrow culture is, but it’s in between lowbrow and highbrow. Basically the culture of suburbia and white picket fences.

It’s not idiotic at all but it is pretty damn provincial and especially it is insanely conformist, kiss-ass, climb the corporate ladder, don’t rock the boat, the 500,000 things we don’t talk about and the 200,000 things we don’t do although there’s nothing wrong with any of those things. I haven’t the foggiest idea what middlebrow people do for fun but I think they would go to the movies that the critics recommend instead of the idiotic popular entertainment action flick. Camping trips. Expensive pot. Wine. John Irving. On the other hand, very highbrow stuff like dubbed European movies are too much.

Highbrow is elite culture.

Opera, obviously, the theater, poetry readings, academic conferences, literature, classical music, philosophy, and perhaps Parisian or European cafe culture, European movies with subtitles, literary, art and film magazines and criticism that no one understands, cult movies, books, and culture in general, jazz music (“jazzholes”), home decoration with expensive objects, often from overseas, psychoanalysis, birdwatching, LSD, expensive wines or especially hard liquor, James Joyce, overseas travel, retreats, especially people sitting around talking eruditely about history, culture, religion, politics, sociology, psychology, anthropology, linguistics, and better yet, WHERE THEY ALL INTERSECT.

Beyond highbrow is made up bullshit, some name I made up for my blog just to piss off as many people as possible.

But to me it means thinking like a Jew, arguing with your father, studying the Talmud and questioning and arguing about everything in it, pretty much just not taking anything at face value, questioning everything, not being afraid to question the status quo, the mainstream media, taking unpopular stances on sociology, politics, and geopolitics.

Pynchon, Umberto Eco, Heidegger, Hegel, Nietzsche, Marx and other writers of stuff that its authors themselves don’t even understand. Philip Glass and Lori Anderson. Bergman, Fellini, Truffaut, Resnais, Godard, Wim Wenders, Fassbinder, Cassavetes, Warhol, Welles, Kurosawa. Last Tango in Paris, Blow-up, Last Year at Marienbad, Death in Venice and other movies no one understands. Outsider art. and DMT. Absinthe. High IQ, top 1% minimum. Feeling like an alien in a society full of morons and retards.

Where everyone in society is supposed to think one particular way, and you stick your finger in the air and say, “I’m not going along with the crowd,” and then all your friends leave you for being a nonconformist but at least you are alone with your pride. Talking about things you’re not supposed to talk about. Bravely or idiotically smashing taboos and pissing off everyone around you.

It’s an Ubermensch! I hate to quote Nietzsche but it’s someone who rises above “slave mentality” to “rise above” and become his own man intellectually and in a societal sense. Thinks for himself. Makes up his own mind. Doesn’t follow trends. Isn’t a sheep like everyone else.

Just spitballin’ here. I hope this sort of explains it!