Ludzkie Bestie – Masakra w Rosyjskim Lesie

[wpvideo kdhb8prx]
The video has been removed. Try here instead. This video is getting pulled all over the place all the time, so it’s location is often shifting.
This is a Polish (!) translation of Human Beasts – Massacre in a Russian Forest, otherwise known as 3 Men 1 Hammer. This is my first Polish translation. The translator is Bartłomiej Wiechnik. He definitely banged this out quickly. His email address is below if you need an English-Polish translations. He’s probably pretty cheap too. This video is seriously evil, and I really advise regular readers to not watch unless you really know what you are doing.
I am looking for translators to translate this post into German, Dutch, Danish, Norwegian, Swedish, Finnish, Estonian, Serbo-Croatian and Bulgarian. Email me if you are interested.
This post has been translated into other languages. In Italian, it goes under the name Video Shock: Pariolini Russi Massacrano Un Barbone. Italian translation here. The French translation, Massacre Dans Une Forêt Russe, is here. Spanish translation, Bestias Humanas – Masacre en un Bosque Ruso, here. Hungarian translation, Vadállati Ember Mészárlás Egy Orosz Erdőben, here.
Tłumaczenie
Bartłomiej Wiechnik
Tytuł Hammertime odnosi się do młotka użytego w nagranym mordzie.
We włoszech wideo znane jest pod nazwą Video Shock: Pariolini Russi Massacrano Un Barbone . Włoskie tłumaczenie. Francuskie tłumaczenie 3 Hommes 1 Marteau – Humain Betes – Massacre Dans Une Foret Russe.
Jest to najnowsze chore, prawdziwe nagranie, które obiega internetowe kanały.
W przeciwieństwie do poprzednich nagrań morderstw znajdujących się w internecie, które były zbrodniami popełnianymi podczas niedawnych wojen, to nagranie przedstawia czysto kryminalną zbrodnię popełnioną w czasie pokoju.
Ostrzegam moich stałych czytelników by nawet nie oglądali tego wideo. Jest to najgorsze, lub jedno z najgorszych nagrań znajdujących się w internecie. Oglądacie na własne ryzyko – jest to jedno z najbardziej popieprzonych jakie kiedykolwiek widziałem. Przez większość czasu płakałem, odwracałem się i jęczałem, ale przez nie przebrnąłem.
Następujące reakcje zostały zgłoszone po obejrzeniu tego nagrania: depresja, mdłości, wymioty i dysphoria. Wielu ludzi powiedziało, że jest to jedno z najgorszych wideo dostępnych w internecie.
Wideo pojawiło się na krótko na TheNYC.com 3 grudnia 2008 roku po raz pierwszy, najwidoczniej przeciekło do sieci, ale szybko zostało zdjęte. Następnego dnia znów wróciło.
Na tej stronie okazjonalnie przedstawiamy szokujące i krwawe filmy (adnotacja w profilu) wśród politycznych, śmiesznych i innych tekstów oraz zdjęć. Mamy zamiar hostować to nagranie.
Większość informacji o tej sprawie w sieci jest po rosyjsku, ale jest też nieco po angielsku. Trzech młodych Rosyjskich mężczyzn z Dniepropetrowska przybyło na Ukrainę, wszyscy w wieku 19 lat, gdzie rozpoczęli przerażającą, trwającą miesiąc serię morderstw latem 2007 roku.
Ta trójka, Igor Suprunyuck, Viktor Sayenko i Alexander Hanzha, a znana była jako Maniacy z Dniepropetrowska. Dla treningu zaczęli od zabijania kotów, jak tego typu psychopaci czynią, oczywiście przeszli wrescie na ludzi.
W przeciągu jednego miesiąca zabili 21 ludzi, młodych i starych, kobiet i mężczyzn, dorosłych i dzieci. Śledzili ofiary, szli za nimi lub proponowali im podwiezienie swoim samochodem, kiedy ofiary szły wzdłuż ulicy. Nie wybierali nikogo szczególnego, tylko ludzi, którzy wygłdali tak jakby nie byli w stanie siê broniæ . Wszyscy pochodzili z dobrych rodzin.
Z jakiegoś powodu tych dwóch idiotów nakręciło film z brutalnego morderstwa mężczyzny. Nie wiemy kto to jest i jakie były okoliczności zdarzenia. Mężczyzna zostaje zabity przy użyciu młotka i śrubokrętu, torturowany przez długi czas i w końcu pozbawiony przez nich życia. Przez pewien czas mężczyzna zachowuje świadomość, kiedy jest powoli zabijany.
Śmieją się i dobrze bawią kiedy to robią, spędzają razem miłe chwile. Jeden z morderców trzyma kamerę i nagrywa całe plugawe przedsięwzięcie.
Po wszystkim zmywają krew z rąk przy pomocy wody z rynsztoka. Nakręcili dwa spośród morderstw, więc będą mieli coś co będzie im je przypominać na stare lata. Jak miło!
Trzeciemu członkowi spośród 3 osobowego zespołu marzną stopy, więc wyrzuca narzędzie zbrodni, lecz dwóch pozostałych kontynuuje zabijanie. Zabójcy pojawiali się także na pogrzebach swoich ofiar i robili zdjęcia.
Śledczy powinni częściej chodzić na pogrzeby ofiar morderstw i robić zdjęcia. W ten sposób mogliby łapać kilku morderców więcej.
W pewnym momencie zostają areszstowani. Taśma zostaje skonfiskowana i użyta w procesie by skazać trzech młodych maniaków. Wszystkich trzech uznano winnymi. Obecnie przebywają w więzieniu, nie wiem na jak długo ich osadzono. Ostatnie zdjęcia z więzienia pokazują wszystkich trzech mężczyzn, jeden z nich wygląda jak upiór. Co za przerażający koleś.
Obejrzyj wideo z procesu tutaj.
Jest to nagranie z ich procesu pokazywane w ukraińskiej telewizji. Możecie zobaczyć fotografie trzech morderców w sądzie, a także kilka wstrząsających zdjęć, które zrobili podczas swojej podróży.
Znajdują się tam zdjęcia psów, które zabili, uwzględniając tego, którego rozciągnęli na drzewie. A także zdjęcia ich samych z pogrzebów ofiar oraz z ich grobów.
Często także zwracali palce ofiarom. Wkradali się do miejsc, w których ciała ofiar oczekiwały na pogrzebanie i kładli przy nich palec. Jeden z palców położyli na grobie ofiary, rozrzucając z kwiatami. Zrobili zdjęcie ciała opuszczanego do grobu w swej trumnie i tam także podrzucili palec.
Co za dupki! Dobry Boże, oni są kompletnie zdeprawowani.
Ci durnie, byli na tyle głupi, że nawet nie zakryli swoich twarzy na filmie, na którym zabijali człowieka. Jak głupim można być? Mimo dokumentacji dowodowej ich winy, rodzice oskarżonych ciągle nie wierzą, że ich dzieci są mordercami, a ich przyznanie się do winy zostało wymuszone siłą.
Oto tłumaczenie ukraińskich dialogów na filmie:
“Czekaj, czekaj. bądź dokładny, kurwa!” jakby mając na myśli by być ostrożnym o całą tę krew. *Śmiech*
“Czekaj, czekaj, czekaj, nie zabijaj go, nie zabijaj go. Patrz na niego…” reszta wypowiedzi jest niewyraźna, ale jakby mówił koledze, by zwrócił uwagę na krew, wtedy ten zoomuje i robi zbliżenie. Następująca część ścieżki dźwiękowej jest niewyraźna.
[Po dźganiu śrubokrętem]
“Co? Czym?” odpowiedź filmującego do chłopaka dźgającego ofiarę.
“Co? On ciągle żyje?” pyta chłopak dźgający ofiarę.
“Ciągle rusza ramionami, po tym jak rozprułem mu wnętrzności…” wtedy kamerzysta mruczy niewyraźnie.
“Ma popieprzony dzień.” mówi dźgający chłopak, po tym jak staje ofierze na brzuchu.
*Więcej niewyraźnej mowy podczas gdy kamerzysta zaczyna dźgać ofiarę śrubokrętem w oczy*
“Chodź tu szybko. Zabij go już.”
“Co?” pyta dźgający.
“Zabij go już.”
“Już odłożyłem młotek. On już jest martwy.”
“Wygrzebałem mu oczy i ciągle nie jest martwy.” mówi kamerzysta.
“Weż nóż.” kontynuuje kamerzysta.
*Kontynuują tłuczenie go i przerywają, mówiąć coś niewyraźnego*
“Więcej, więcej.” mówi kamerzysta drugiemu chłopakowi by tłukł go dalej by upewnić się, że jest martwy.
“Czekaj. Czekaj.”
*Zaczynają iść spowrotem do samochodu*
Więcej niewyraźnej mowy blond mordercy.
“Umyj ręce.” mówi kamerzysta do drugiego chłopaka i mówi by ten umył młotek.
“Ja go potrzymam.”
*Niewyraźna mowa chłopaka myjącego młotek*
*Więcej niewyraźnej mowy od chłopaka myjącego twarz i idącego spowrotem z samochodu*
“Wbiłem mu śrubokręt w mózg.” mówi kamerzysta.
*Niewyraźna mowa chłopaka myjącego ręcę*
“Dostałem się do jego nosa przez oko.” czy coś w tym sensie.
“Nie rozumiem jak on mógł żyć? Czułem jego mózg.” mówi kamerzysta.
“Trzymałem śrubokręt w ten sposób…” *Niewyraźne/nie rozumiem reszty*
Zanim nagranie się kończy blondyn mówi “Dobra, zróbmy sobie zdjęcie.”
Podobna sprawa miała miejsce we Włoszech. Czterech młodych mężczyzn zaatakowało bezdomnego, Andrea Severriego, 44 latka, podpalając go. W wyniku czego miał poparzone 50% ciała, ale przeżył. Obecnie przebywa w szpitalu w Padova i znajduje się w stanie ciężkim.
Byli Włoskimi faszystami w stlu Mussolinniego, z dobrych rodzin, w wieku 18 lat. Po prostu czterech znudzonych dzieciakiów, nie mających nic lepszego do roboty niż spalenie żywcem biednego bezdomnego mężczyzny dla zabawy.
Zostali aresztowani kilka dni temu, a sprawa opisywana jest szeroko we wszystkich włoskich mediach. Lewicowa antyfaszystowska strona o zabójstwach, ale w całości po włosku.
Ten typ faszyzmu jest ciągle popularny we Włoszech – neo-nazistowska odmiana już nie tak bardzo.
Istnieje błędne mniemanie o Mussolinizmie, że nie powinien być rasistowski lub antysemicki, lecz moi włoscy przyjaciele powiedzieli mi, że faszyzm to faszyzm. Powiedzieli także, że Mussolini był rasistą, antysemitą, nienawidził słowian. “Spowodował, że pociągi były na czas” to głupstwo także powinno zostać zakwestionowane.
W północnych Włoszech faszyzm jest dość popularny, ale anty-semityzm zdaje się, że wymarł. 2008 rok to nie lata ’30 ubiegłego wieku. Jest tam wielu ludzi pałających nienawiścią do Słowian. Warto zwrócić uwagę na nienawiść, faszystowską nienawiść. Wszyscy faszyści mają to w sobie. Faszystowscy ojcowie uczyli nienawiści swoich synów. Sadzili ją w nich, a następnie podlewali jak drzewo.
Włoski faszyzm narodził się z nacjonalizmu, ale jest całkiem powszechny wśród bogatych. Włoska klasa średnia tradycyjnie konserwatywna i zorientowana na różne rodzaje polityki katolickiej (chrześcijańska demokracja). Ale teraz wielu głosuje na quasi-faszystę Berlusconiego.
To ważne by zwrócić uwagę, że we Włoszech, są rasiści, którzy nie są faszystami. Lega Nord, północni autonomiści, są rasistami względem południowych Włoch, ale nie są faszystami. Faszystami są Włoscy ultranacjonaliści. Wierzą w centralizację włoskiej państwowości.
We Włoszech są również neo-naziści, lecz nei tak liczni jak faszyści. Wielu jest w centralnych Włoszech, w regionie Lazio (gdzie znaduje się Rzym i Watykan). Jest ich całkiem sporo w Veronie, Vicenzie i Padovie, w północnym regionie Veneto. Jest także trochę w Triestrze. Brak czynnych nazistów w południowych Włoszech.
Znana sprawa w Leopolda i Loeb’a Chicago w 1924 roku i znany film Complusion (1959) z Orsonem Wellsem i Deanem Stockwellem (Świetny film!), który opowiadał o słynnej i podobnej sprawie w USA.
Compluson oparty jest na powieści Meyera Levina z 1956 roku. Meyer Levin stał się sławny przez to że był jednym z pierwszych autorów, który zda³ sobie sprawê z potencja³u tragicznych pamiêtników Anny Frank. Był przekonany, że miał wyłączność w prawach do pamiętnika i stoczył 30 letnią sądową batalię o przedstawianie wydarzeń opartych o pamiętniki.
Książkę uznano za pierwszą nie fikcyjną powieść, która ustaliła standardy dla późniejszego stylu spopularyzowanego przez Trumana Capote’a w Z zimną krwią (In Cold Blood). Nigdy nie czytałem książki Capote’a, ale jest uznawana za jedną z najlepszych.
Hitchcock nakręcił film Lina (Rope) (1948), oparty na sprawie, ale nigdy go nie widziałem.
Anty-semici będą podnieceni, wiedząć, że obaj Leopold i Loeb byli Żydami. Ofiara Leopolda i Loeb’a, 14 letnia Bobby Franks rónież była Żydówką.
Naprawdę nie polecam, by moi stali czytelnicy oglądali nagranie, pod żadnym pozorem, chyba że jesteście przyzwyczajeni do podobnych rzeczy.

Quatre Animaux, Un Broyeur

[wpvideo Gv94o4L4]
I am looking for translators to translate this post into Spanish, Polish and Finnish. Email me if you are interested.
This post has been translated into Italian as Quattro Animali, Un Macinatore (traduzione in Italiano).
Hi folks, this is a French translation of 4 Animals, 1 Grinder , a post I made a while back. Regular readers feel free to watch it, unless you don’t like gross stuff. No bad reactions have been recorded so far other than temporary loss of appetite.
Translation by Natalie From France, one kickass translator. She also translates to Italian too, believe it or not. She was brought up by French-speaking parents in Trieste, Italy. There is an old French population there happens to include a lot of the city’s elite upper class. I’m not sure of their history.
Le premier animal est une vache, le second un cochon, le troisième une autre vache, et le dernier un cheval.
Je n’en crois pas mes yeux, ce n’est pas vraiment horrible ou catastrophique comme la majeure partie des autres vidéos ici. C’est assez brut, mais c’est la vie mec. Cela nous montre ce qui se passe dans un centre d’équarrissage. Tout le bétail mort est poussé vers un broyeur par un ascenseur puis broyé par cette machine incroyable : os, têtes, sabots et tout le reste.
Un tas d’articles sur le Net affirment que ces vaches sont vivantes. Ce n’est pas vrai. Elles paraissent vivantes seulement quand le broyeur se met en marche ; en fait, elles bougent dans tous les sens à cause de la puissance de l’appareil.
Une autre idée fausse est que les animaux sont mixés et destinés à l’alimentation humaine, comme les hot dogs par exemple. C’est faux.
Ce sont des animaux qui sont morts à la ferme, donc ils sont sûrement impropres à la consommation (humaine). Certaines personnes affirment que les produits de l’équarrissage pourraient être destinés à l’alimentation animale (en particulier pour les poulets) ou pour l’alimentation des animaux de compagnie, ce n’est pas une pensée agréable (en effet c’est la cause de la maladie de la vache folle)…L’idée que tout ceci finisse dans la gamelle de nos animaux de compagnie me fait de la peine. Si, c’est vrai. Je ne mangerai plus jamais de croquettes pour chien.
Je pense que d’habitude les animaux broyés finissent en engrais, ce qui est une façon inoffensive de les utiliser. On produit aussi de la graisse animale, pour les moteurs. On en fait même du savon de cette purée de cheval. (purée de Mr Ed dans le texte original ndt)
Les gens ne se rendent pas compte que le bétail meurt tous les jours, en particulier dans les exploitations modernes. Ils n’y pensent jamais mais…comment se débarrasser des chevaux, vaches et cochons morts ? Vous ne pouvez pas les déposer au coin de la rue pour les éboueurs. Et il n’est pas facile de les enterrer dans un trou. Nous n’avons pas de cimetière pour vaches et chevaux, et les incinérateurs ne les acceptent pas.
C’est là qu’intervient le centre d’équarrissage. J’imagine que l’on vend la carcasse à l’usine d’équarrissage, qui vous envoie du personnel pour emporter l’animal. Ils le ramènent à l’usine, le broient et en font du compost ou autre chose. Une chose que vous devriez savoir à propos de ces centres d’équarrissage est que l’odeur y est nauséabonde, comme l’affirment les riverains.
Le gars qui s’occupe du monte charge doit avoir le pire boulot de ce pays. Imaginez-vous à la place de ce gars qui doit nettoyer le broyeur. C’est un sacré désordre.
À la fin le monte charge jette un cheval dans l’appareil, regarder cet appareil en train de broyer est incroyable. Ce qui m’a soufflé, c’est le bruit de ce mixeur géant quand il hache les os et les crânes. Super !
Il y a un passage assez désagréable, lors de la deuxième vache (2’11 dans la vidéo) où la carcasse laisse échapper un énorme jet, pendant qu’elle est broyée. Cela signifie que l’animal est resté en décomposition pendant un certain temps et a gonflé. C’est une autre raison pour laquelle cette viande est impropre à la consommation humaine.
Cette vidéo était disponible depuis quelques années, mais depuis la mi-aoùt 2009 elle cartonne !
Il y a une incroyable quantité de choses que l’on peut regarder sur Internet. Avant Al Gore, combien d’entre nous avaient déjà vu une usine d’équarrissage en action ?
La société qui produit cet appareil se trouve au Danemark. Pensez à la technologie employée dans cet engin. Il s’appelle le PB 30/60 Crusher.
Quelques considérations:
Ça pourrait quand même être une super machine pour appliquer la peine de mort ! Fini cette connerie d’injection létale. Meurtre au premier degré? Je vous condamne au broyeur! On pourrait vendre des tickets pour une coquette somme, pour que les spectateurs viennent voir le meurtrier qui se fait mouliner vivant. On pourrait ensuite utiliser les bénéfices pour aider les caisses de l’état, ainsi l’état pourrait dépenser l’argent pour aider les gens.
Je veux une de ces machines ! Où est-ce que je peux en acheter une ? J’aimerais m’en servir pour quelques uns de mes ennemies. Je les ficellerais, je les jetterais sur la rampe de chargement et m’en débarrasserais dans le Broyeur. Puis j’encaisserais 1000 euros par spectateur, deviendrais riche et me barrerais avec la recette.
Nous devrions utiliser cet appareil sur les êtres humains pour les broyer. De cette façon nous pourrions sauver pas mal de place dans les cimetières et utiliser l’espace de futurs cimetières pour construire des épiceries, des supermarchés et autres choses indispensables.
À présent, je pense que quand je mourrai, je souhaiterais être broyé de cette façon. On pourrait le faire sous forme d’enterrement, et tous les invités pourraient regarder pendant que je suis haché, en grignotant du pop corn et d’autres trucs.
Après avoir été haché je souhaiterais être mis en boite de conserve sous le nom “Robert Lindsay Pâtée” et donné à mon chaton, en supposant que j’en ai un. Si je n’ai pas de chat je demanderais à devenir de la nourriture pour chat, parce que je les aime. De cette façon les chats feraient un festin avec quelqu’un qui les aime vraiment. Les chats m’ont donné tant d’amour dans ma vie que cela serait ma manière tout à fait spéciale de le leur rendre !
Il ont du avoir un sacré rock brutal, mortel et métallique joué en fond sonore, n’est-ce pas ?
Ça serait sympa de voir un éléphant mort ou une girafe jetés dans cette machine, juste pour rire…
Dans mes rêves, il y aurait 600 chaînes sur le câble. Une serait « la chaîne de la déchiqueteuse d’animaux ». Cette chaîne montrerait le broyeur en train d’hacher des animaux, toute la journée. Pour rendre les programmes plus intéressants, ils pourraient varier les sortes d’animaux à broyer. J’allumerai la télé durant des heures, en faisant mon travail, même en bruit de fond. Je changerai probablement de chaîne lors du repas.
Il existe plein de possibilités d’utilisation de cette machine.
Nous pourrions prendre un enfant Blanc obèse , élevé par une mère célibataire avec des Twinkies et des jeux vidéo, et le coller sous la machine. La viande du broyeur à bétail sortirait tout autours de lui et même sur lui. Elle atterrirait sur son visage tout en le recouvrant.
Nous aurions des ouvriers avec des pelles, pour lui enlever la viande ainsi il ne serait pas enterré. Il pourrait garder sa bouche ouverte, et un peu de la viande tomberait dedans. Puis il la mangerait. Nous le tiendrions là-dessous, il deviendrait de plus en plus gras. Après 10 ans de ce traitement, il serait si gras qu’il pourrait devenir le Roi d’Allemagne.
Nous pourrions mouliner les animaux et les donner à Disney. Disney pourrait les reconstituer en êtres humains, particulièrement en stars préférées des teen-agers Selena, Miley et Britney. En peu de temps les fans hystériques se rendront compte que leur idole était un cheval haché.
On pourrait utiliser cet appareil pour tenter de résoudre les conflits insolubles. En broyant des cochons et des vaches, en faisant des films de cela et en les distribuant dans les zones de conflit, peut-être que nous pourrions faire des progrès dans le conflit hindo musulman au Cachemire.
Les possibilités sont infinies !
If you think this website is valuable to you, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site.

New Erectus Skull in Georgia

Here.
Homo Erectus is not the name for guys with short hair and mustaches running around San Francisco as you might have guessed (Joke!), but actually it was an early member of the human line, Homo. We are Homo Sapiens sapiens, just the latest in a long line. Homo Erectus was an earlier model. He was a man, but not a modern man. Sort of like an earlier model. Going back further, you run into the Australopithecines in Africa, like the famous Lucy specimen. This is not yet a man, but it is not an ape either. It’s sort of an ape-man, or an ape turning into a human. That’s the best way to describe them.
Anti-evolutionist idiots like to yell that we have never found the missing link, but Lucy is pretty darn close. Further, going back even further to about 6 million YBP*, they have found what looks like the closest thing to a missing link so far, an ape that is starting to turn into a man-ape. Proconsul is a famous fellow. He is the first of the apes, living in Africa about 16 million YBP, apparently a split from the monkeys. Yes, monkeys and apes are completely different folks, and this is important to keep in mind. Don’t mix them up!
Erectus was always thought to have evolved in Africa out of a similar line of early Homo types, most of which just went extinct. Probably about 2 million YBP or so. He then is said to have to moved out into Eurasia, and Asia, particularly China and Indonesia. The famous Java Man and Peking Man are Homo Erectuses from Indonesia and China respectively. Java Man was around as early as 1.8 million YBP. And Erectus is living in the Caucasus around the same time.
What’s curious about this skull in Georgia in the Caucasus is that it is said to predate Erectus skulls in Africa. Further, his brain is 40% smaller than African Erectus’ brain. The smaller size implies that he was an earlier model that gave rise to the more advanced model in Africa. The fact that he is earlier also implies that Erectus arose in Eurasia and moved to Africa later on and then did a lot of evolution there, eventually giving rise to Homo Sapiens (Yes, we came directly from Erectus).
The White racists love this, because they really hate the Out of the Africa (OOA) model. Scratch a White person dissing the OOA model nowadays, and you often find a racist motivation. A while back, multiregionalism was a valid perspective, but now it’s been shot all to Hell with excellent models showing that all humans have come from an African Eve that lived in SW Africa (around Namibia and Angola) about 180,000 YBP.
The racists just can’t get over it. “Grandpa was a nigger”* is just too much for their silly weak egos to handle. In contrast, the Asians that I have told about this seem mostly to handle it well. One Chinese guy shrugged his shoulders and said, “Yeah? So what? So we came from Blacks? Big deal. If you go back far enough, we were frogs. Why should I get upset about this.” I told my Mom about this and she laughed and said, “See? Asians don’t get upset about it because they are smarter than us Whites.” I think she’s right.
It’s important to note that this latest find does not shoot OOA at all. All it suggests is that Erectus sprang up in Eurasia. Out of what? Obviously out of prior Homo types. Where did these prior Homo types in Eurasia come from? Africa, where they all came from. See what I mean? Does this find shoot the African Eve Theory? Nope. Even if Erectus rose in Eurasia, he moved back to Africa, evolved a great deal down there, and eventually gave rise to Sapiens in Africa, who gave rise to us. We still all came from one African woman 180,000 YBP. The Georgian find doesn’t change that one bit.
Homo Sapiens idaltu was an early Homo Sapiens that lived about 160,000 YBP in Ethiopia. Although he appears to have gone extinct, nevertheless, he seems to have given rise to Homo Sapiens sapiens. The date of H.S.s is not well known, but he dates back at least to the Khoisan genetic line, which dates to 110,000 YBP. Khoisan are Bushmen.
Nevertheless, the 110,000 YBP date is challenged by a recent find called the Omo Remains, which were also found in Ethiopia. Apparently Homo Sapiens sapiens (modern man), Omo dates all the way back to 195,000 YBP. Much remains to be sorted out.
Idaltu was quite robust, but he looked much more like a modern human than Neandertalis in Europe.
Despite a lot of yelling on the part of fans of the theory, there seems to be zero evidence of Neandertal genes in modern humans. This is also a fave theory of White racists – that White people came directly from Neandertalis, thereby avoiding the sticky OOA theory which claims White folks had some Negro ancestors. Even Paleothilically, that’s a hard sell to White racists.
Some of the hardcores take it a lot further and imply that the races of man actually go back 1-2 million YBP. Whites to some proto-White Erectus, Asians to some proto-Asian Erectus dude, Blacks to African Erectus. This theory seems to me to be quite silly.

Homo Sapiens Idaltu, an African ancestor of modern man who appears to have given rise to Homo Sapiens sapiens, who is that funny looking slightly Ape Man critter you see when you look in the mirror.
Homo Sapiens Idaltu, an African ancestor of modern man who appears to have given rise to Homo Sapiens sapiens, who is that funny looking slightly Ape Man critter you see when you look in the mirror.

Homo Rhodesiensis is a very interesting fellow. He lived from 125,000-300,000 YBP in Africa. The best skull was found in Rhodesia in 1921 and it’s an excellent specimen. The best theory seems to be that Rhodesia Man had branched off from Erectus proper into a more advanced line. It also looks like Rhodesia Man gave rise to Idaltu, and Idaltu gave rise to you and me.
Rhodesian Man from a 1932 newspaper. He's actually much more progressive than Neandertal Man in Europe.
Rhodesian Man from a 1932 newspaper. He's actually much more progressive than Neandertal Man in Europe.

The line looks something like this:
Erectus -> Rhodesia Man -> Homo Sapiens Idaltu -> Homo Sapiens sapiens (you, me, Mom and the kids).
Rhodesia Man is quite a robust fellow and has features that have led some to call him “The African Neandertal.” However, this analysis is not proper. Instead he seems to be about halfway in between a Neanderthal and a modern man = he is much more gracile and progressive than Neandertal, who’s a bit of a brute. Idaltu is yet more gracile and progressive than Rhodesia Man, and H.S.s. is yet more gracile and progressive than Idaltu. The evolution of man is a move from archaic robustness towards progressive gracility.
A model of Rhodesian Man, who gave rise to Homo Sapiens idaltu, who gave rise to you and me. As you can see, he is a robust fellow.
A model of Rhodesian Man, who gave rise to Homo Sapiens idaltu, who gave rise to you and me. As you can see, he is a robust fellow.

Homo Sapiens heidelbergensis (found in Heidelberg, Germany) just seems to be a European Rhodesia Man. Looks like Rhodesia Man rose in Africa, then moved out of Africa to Europe. H.s.h. is quite a confusing fellow, and I’m not going to go into him here because I don’t understand him well.
The comments after the article are somewhat interesting.
*Years before present.
**Used sardonically. Please don’t take offense.

The "Negro" – A Product of 300 Years in America

A commenter argues that American Blacks (Negroes*) were bred with brawn and not brains and this explains a lot of their problems:

The US only imports the top tier of, for instance, Indian and Chinese immigrants. So from an American perspective, Indians and Chinese seem very clever, even though in their home countries there is a broad variety of ability. It’s the same with Africans. Just look at Obama’s father.
But Africans descended from slaves had a different selection criteria – physical ability. Not only were they selected for this, but they were bred for this. The Atlantic passage weeded out the weak ones, the institution of slavery encouraged physicality over intellect. The results, in both culture and gene expression, are plain to see.
Robert Lindsay often claims that the mere presence of blacks degrades a society. However, would it not be better to import University-level Africans to raise the standard of American blacks? Any white would be happy to live in a suburb of Obamas.

This doesn’t make the tiniest bit of sense. Negroes have IQ’s vastly higher than the Blacks of the Caribbean or Africa, so your thesis doesn’t add up at all. Plus, I think they are a lot more civilized to boot.
I don’t think that Negroes are capable of the mass insanity of The Lord’s Army in Uganda, Charles Taylor’s rebels, the horrors of Zaire where 4 million have died and mass rapes often with extreme violence, are committed against women, where cannibalism is still common especially in the context of war where one’s enemies are eaten after being killed, where humans are murdered for being witches, where people are murdered to get body parts for witchcraft ceremonies!
Good God!
Whether they are less criminal in general is up for grabs, but South African Blacks seem to be much more criminal than Negroes, just looking at figures. Further, many African cities are virtual no-go zones for Whites. A friend used to work for the UN in Nairobi. They had high fences topped with razor wire and armed guards to keep the rabble at bay, plus strict rules about going outside.
I also think that Negroes are less corrupt than Africans. Africans do not seem to be capable of creating a non-corrupt society. Even in Equatorial Guinea, which is wealthy at $21,000 PCI, most of the people are horribly poor, malnourished, and the maternal mortality rate is insanely high.
Nigeria is a a very oil-rich nation. Any other country, especially an Arab country, should have made something decent of the place. Yet a tiny elite has stolen every other nickel and left the average Joe with pennies. The maternal mortality rate is ridiculous, the poverty and crime is horrible, and the place is basically a failed state.
The corruption experiment can be done by looking at the Obama Administration. He’s a Negro President, and he has lots of Negro staffers. Further, reporters on his campaign noted a “basic Black mindset” about the Obama campaign that differed from your typical White POTUS campaign. So, in many ways, the Obama Administration really is a Black administration. If Negroes were naturally corrupt, it should show through. Yet the Administration seems to have markedly low levels of corruption.
Along with corruption, we also find in Africa what seems to be a very low rate of altruistic behavior at the societal level. African states simply don’t do the slightest damned thing for their people. The leadership steals nearly everything, lives in gilded palaces with multiple wives and leaves the populace to sicken and die.
On the other hand, the Obama Administration seems to be quite altruistic. Many of their projects seem intended to provide for the betterment of all, in particular the workers, the low-income, the poor and the most vulnerable. The assumption is that Negroes have culturally evolved a higher level of altruism than their African brethren, possibly from a being discriminated minority that relied on mutual aid and self-help to get by, and the resulting sympathy for the underdog and the oppressed – the preterit as it were.
I have no doubt that Negroes used to act in these ways (see description of Africa above) when they were in Africa, and that they would still act like Africans if they were there. The 15% White genes in your average Negro are not enough to automatically create a much more civilized, altruistic and honest person.
A good argument can be made that Negro is a product of US civilization, which has always been a White civilization. 300 years of this have changed Negroes, probably culturally in the main, and apparently also in terms of intelligence. Living in the US has been great for the Negro’s brain. He is remarkably more intelligent than his Caribbean and African cousins.
An 87 IQ (average IQ of Negroes) is not particularly high, but it’s not that low either. It’s just a bit below the world average of 90. Further,many states with average IQ’s of 87 and even a bit lower have created quite nice and civilized countries. On an intelligence basis alone, Negroes are certainly intelligent enough to create a nice, civilized society. That they often do not is a bit of a mystery, but it’s not because they are stupid!
Give a basically decent Negro man a good job, a suit and a tie and a nice car, and he often acts pretty darn good. You see him walking down the sidewalk and he’s just another regular guy.
Negroes and Whites have co-evolved in the US whether we like it or not. Negroes are culturally part White, and surely we Whites are culturally part-Negro. We’re like an old married couple whether we like it or not. Old married couples sometimes fight a lot, but they’re stuck with each other and neither one is going anywhere, besides, they are sort of part of one another by now.
Race relations in the US cannot be properly analyzed until we realize the extent to which Negroes are part Whitened and US Whites are part-Negrified. Like the old married couple, we are now part of each other.
*I will use the often-racist term “Negro” here to distinguish US Blacks from African Blacks.

On the Mathematicians of the African Diaspora Page

That post and the page it refers to is quite interesting and has caused some interesting reactions.
One thing nice about that page is it should disabuse racists (Though it won’t) of this notion that all Blacks are stupid. It’s dumb, but racists actually believe this. Barack Obama is dumb. The guy was an Ivy League Law Professor, for Chrissake! But he’s dumb because he’s Black. Michelle Obama is an attorney! She graduated from Law School and passed the bar! How can could you be and still pass the bar?
These math programs, I assume, are rigorous, or at least they ought to be. Even at the BA level. In math, you can do the work or you can’t. You either solve the problems or you don’t. So grading should be quite simple. I assume any Black with even a BA in Math is intelligent. I know one very dark skinned Black woman with a BA in Math and she is quite smart. At the MA and of course at the PhD levels, you know these Black math brains are smart as all get out.
In a way it’s a bit sad that only 1% of mathematicians are Black, or that only 2% of MIT faculty are Black, but if that 1-2% are really super-qualified (And I know they are!) then in a way, that’s just fine. I’d rather have it like than to have those numbers upped to say 5-10% with a bunch of lower-quality Blacks who are not cutting it like the rest. Agree?
One excellent argument against Affirmative Action is that it allows lower-quality minorities into the workplace and schools where they rub shoulders with Whites and Asians who are superior students and workers. An AA POV to the African Mathematicians page above would be to strive to have 13% of all mathematicians in the US Blacks, and 13% of the faculty at MIT Blacks. But there is no way you could do that without hiring obviously inferior Black mathematicians and Black faculty at MIT.
The result might make Blacks feel better, but surely it would degrade the quality of MIT and our other institutions of higher learning. So, while those 1% and 2% figures are sad, I’m very happy when I think that those small numbers of Black scholars are super-duper ultra brains who deserve every centimeter of their status and every nickel of their income. They made it on their own, competed on a quality basis, and cut the mustard, even despite some racist bullshit they probably put up with.
I also enjoy the non-whining tone and quiet dignity of that site, written by Scott W. Williams PhD. Even when he writes about racism these folks faced, he doesn’t whine about it. The tone is one of, “Hey, we sucked it up and handled it, and we aren’t bitter. Yeah, we put up with a bunch of stupid racist crap, but we weathered on anyway, and look at what we accomplished despite all the speed bumps. And by the way, screw you racists. We’re better than you anyway, and we know it. And whatever obstacles you put in our way, we’re going to try to roll right over them.”
It’s an interesting tone, and I wish more Blacks would adopt it. This endless whining gets really tiresome. A lot of other mathematicians on there have a similar dispassionate (“We did it anyway, screw you racists.”) tone. I wonder what’s going on. Mathematicians are pretty logical and non-emotional folks, so they’re unlikely to do a Professor Gates Amos n Andy routine on their front doorsteps for applause and a new book contract.
What I get out of these mathematicians is a quiet sense of dignity, possibly derived from the extreme level of accomplishment they attained. Very high levels of accomplishment are good for humans, and few of us attain them. But at the end, they really should prove to us our worth, despite whatever anyone else is saying. A Black with a very high level of achievement and the stars and medals to prove it is possibly less likely to whine and bitch. “I did it on my own dammit. My achievements are beyond debate. And by the way, screw you racists. I’ll bulldoze right past you.”
I also like that that entire page is scrupulously edited, with excellent writing, perfect grammar, no misspellings, etc. So many Black geniuses are sloppy for some reason, but Williams is not. These is one of those things that separate Blacks and Whites. Even bright Blacks often have a “let’s wing it,” or “whatever works” mindset.
Bright Whites are often the “uptight” Black stereotype of the White person who dots every i and crosses every t and freaks out when you don’t. I’m not saying one mindset is better than the other, but as a neurotic, uptight White who’s compulsive about dotting i’s and crossing t’s, the Black mindset really irks me. I bet it bugs other Whites too.
This is a place where Liberal Race Realism could come in. If we realize that this “wing it”, “whatever works” mindset is part and parcel of an essential Black Intelligence or Black Outlook and maybe they can’t really help it, then maybe we Whites won’t get so mad at them. Maybe we can just accept that this is the way they are, and work around it somehow. Or better yet, use this “Black intelligence” to device teaching methods and workplace politics that play into Black strengths and de-emphasize Black weaknesses.
I’d love to be at a meeting full of those Black math geniuses. You see, there’s a part of me that’s racist. Deep down inside, I think Blacks are dumb. Even really smart Blacks, sometimes I wonder about them. I know I’m not supposed to feel that way, and I fight it, but I can’t help it, it’s still there anyway. Hanging out in a room full of folks that did dissertations on Multiple Integral Problems in Parametric Form in the Calculus of Variations and The Transfinite Cardinal Covering Dimension ought to disabuse me of that real quick.

New Top Visitor Record on Robert Lindsay September 8

Despite the complaints, I am going to continue making these posts, since the PT Barnum atmosphere is part and parcel of Robert Lindsay. However, following the advice of the great (sic) Scandinavian anti-Semite and all-around comedian heg, I will keep them short and sweet.
There was a new highest traffic record set yesterday, September 8, with 5,546 hits, breaking the old record set only four days before of 5,113, set on September 4.
A favorite post was Liberals Ruined American Blacks, and Other Lies.
When’s this gonna end, anyway?

Oil Speculators Account For 50% of Oil Trades

New study here.
I don’t understand economics very well, but this seems ridiculous. What is the point of this? Why are 50% of all oil trades made by people who are not even buying or selling oil, but instead are just betting on futures, that is whether or not the price will go up or down? Ridiculous. That’s not buying and selling, that’s just gambling. So capitalism requires gambling in order to run its economy? Good Lord, what next?
This seems absurd to me. People who are rewarded in society are people who are producing or distributing a product.
Even artists selling schlock are producing something that someone wants to buy. Overpriced pituitary cases on basketball courts seem silly with their multi-million $ salaries, but they are producing a product, professional sports, which millions want to pay for in various ways. All of these strike me as socially useful types of production.
Hell, even dope and porn are products that folks are willing to fork over bucks for. Production need not be socially beneficial, but I would suggest that production or distribution itself ought to be a requirement for any socially useful type of economic activity.
I have no beef with folks who are either buying or selling oil, or any other commodity for that matter. That’s a product. Buying and selling is part of the function of the market in a market society.
But sheer gambling seems to be completely extraneous to any social benefit. No product is produced, no product is purchased, no product is sold. This seems to me very much a useless, leech, “parasitic” type of economic function. Just gamblers in a casino called a Commodities Market. Well, it turns out that these gamblers blew up the cost of gas to $4.50/gallon last year. Similar gamblers serving no useful social function whatsoever blew up the housing market and screwed the economy of the whole damn world.
Various arguments are offered. The typical one is, “They will make money and invest it.” First of all, that’s not really true, and second of all, that’s trickle down economics, which can be used to justify the most outrageous kind of economic inequality on the basis that the rich will somehow share the wealth in some funny and hard to see way.
Various other neoliberal arguments were offered that I did not understand, with these capitalists suggesting that speculation plays an essential role in markets and in the economy. The assumption being that if you get rid of the speculators, the whole economy collapses, but no one cries “Chicken Little” like a capitalist. Anyway the speculators themselves are already collapsing the damned economy. How could things get worse if you reign the leeches in?
These arguments were found on a liberal site I go to. It’s amazing how many “liberals” are hardcore, radical, neoliberal free market capitalists. One wonders, since economics is out of the question, what exactly their liberalism is all about? Clicking on their profiles reveals guys, some Jewish, always with lots of money, who are members of groups called “Progressives,”Left This”, “Left That”, “Fight the Right”, “Stop Rush”, “Obama Supporters”, etc. They’re main concern is “world peace,” which will never occur in my lifetime. I guess some of them want to save the whales or the fucking baby seals.
As commenter Lafayette Sennacherib suggests, when you take Economics out of the Left, there’s nothing left. You have a bunch of greedy capitalist bastards living in mansions yelling about gay rights or feminism or baby seals or snail darters or “White racists.” What about the workers? What about economics? What about a fair and just system? Silence from these guys, as they try to count their uncountable piles of cash and write a check to the Democratic Central Committee.
If this is “Obama liberalism”, Hell, just take it out and shoot it in the field in the back and put it out of its misery. I want no part.
One final note on the oil commodities market: a reasonable regulation would be to require these speculators to at least take possession of the oil they are buying. Hardly any will do that, so that will kill the parasites right there. Reasonable, right?

Interesting Video on Racism in America

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIVgMvuCM_k]
Interesting video from ABC 20/20. They set up a couple of gags in a park in a middle income mostly-White neighborhood in New Jersey. Then they have some White boys vandalize a car in full view of everyone. Some time goes by, and only one guy calls the cops. Most passerby don’t know what to think. But during this time, there were two calls about “Blacks planning a robbery” in the park. They were 20/20 actors sleeping in a car, young Black males in ghetto attire.
Then they set up three Black kids with ghetto attire and appearance who go to work on a car, vandalizing it and apparently trying to break into it. This quickly generates many calls to the cops, plus some non-Blacks in the area try to intervene.
The skit ends with commentary about racism in America.
I don’t know what to think here. Truth is that Blacks as a group commit tons of crime. That’s people follow them around in stores, grab their purses and move away, etc. It’s also probably the reasoning behind the behavior of bystanders in this skit. Suppose Blacks committed about as much crime as Whites, but nevertheless, they were suspected much, much more? That would truly be an outrage.
What’s strange is that no one calls the cops on the White boys vandalizing the car. I don’t understand that.
Black apologists like to imply that Blacks commit just as much crime as Whites, but they just get caught more because they are targeted so much more, searched, pulled over, etc.
This is an interesting theory, but the problem is that when a neighborhood changes from mostly-White towards mostly-Black, one thing one notices is skyrocketing crime. Not just more Black guys getting caught. Actual increased rates of victimization. Victimization surveys where victims could identify the attackers do show that Blacks commit about 8 times more violent crime than Whites.
Another argument is that Blacks commit just as much crime as anyone else, but they just get the book thrown at them when they get caught, while Whites get a slap on the wrist. We’ve already disposed of the notion that Blacks and Whites commit equal amounts of crime.
Careful studies do seem to show that Blacks get a harsher sentence than Whites even when the crimes are the same.
Blacks seem to use as much dope as Whites, but Blacks go down on drug laws more. There does seem to be some discrimination in sentencing, but it seems to be lessening over the years. Nevertheless, discrimination alone is not sufficient to explain high Black incarceration rates.
Speaking of dope, as a former street dealer (mostly pot and psychedelics) for over a decade who never got caught, I assume that Black dealers are simply idiots, and this may be why they get caught.
I can’t prove it, but I have experience with Hispanic dealers in my town, and these are the stupidest dealers I have ever met. When people go to score, the dealer walks out of his house and does the deal right there on his front porch for everyone to see. There’s constant traffic coming and going, people stay 1 minute and leave.
Doesn’t take an Einstein to figure out what’s going on. Or they walk over to the parked car and do the deal right through the window, in broad daylight. There’s a shamelessness about Hispanic dealers that I don’t get. It’s like they get off doing deals right out in the open where any idiot can see what’s going on.
Compared to them, my friends and I were very smart. We grew up in a White suburb in California, and many of us were dealers. We watched traffic very carefully and designed all kinds of routines to keep traffic down. We would meet the person at a neutral place a ways away, do the deal inside a car where people can’t see so well, stretch the deals out a bit so it’s not wham bam thank you Ma’am.
We had strict rules about who we would meet, and many of us had a “no new people” rule. That is, we only dealt with people that we knew. If a friend was scoring for a friend of his, we refused to meet the new person no matter how much they insisted. Instead we conducted the deal solely through the trusted person.
We did all sorts of other things. When we went to buy large quantities of mushrooms or pot, we would dress up like businessmen and carry briefcases, or dress up like we were going to the gym and carry gym bags. The dope would be in the gym bag or the briefcase. We spoke in code on the phone, and if someone was listening in, they probably could not make sense of what we were saying.
We were very paranoid all the time, which is really the way you have to be. Many times I drove by cop after cop with a briefcase  or gym bag full of pot in my car. We were also cautious about using. We didn’t use in public like dumbasses. We used behind closed doors.
So, based on that, I figure many of these Black dealers and dopers are just morons, and that may be why they are getting caught so much.
Many of the commenters on the video are really upset about what happened in the show and are carrying on about racism in America.
I’ll let commenters go to work on the video. Any comments about it?

The Traffic Posts

People are complaining about the traffic posts. I have thought about this, and considered stopping them, but I am going to continue to make them. Why? Because it’s one of the gimmicks of the site. One of the raisons de etre of this site is ridiculous, over-the-top, shameless, PT Barnum style self-promotion. Actually, like so many things on the site, the traffic posts are kind of a running gag, like Muhammad Ali’s endless showboating. They aren’t really serious posts.
So with that in mind, those posts are what you get when you read Robert Lindsay. I realize I’m pissing some people off, but all I really care about is traffic. As long as the numbers are still high and going higher, I guess I don’t care that much about alienating a few readers.All that matters is the numbers.
So, sorry if they bother you. If they bug you, don’t read.
Maybe if traffic ever dies down, I can knock off making these silly posts.

Mathematicians of the African Diaspora

Fascinating website. If you look inside, a very large number of them are not African-Americans, but instead they are actual Africans. Although it is true that Blacks are only 1% of all mathematicians, a disproportionate number of Black mathematicians are engaged in high-end mathematics research. Lots of good stuff inside, including the racist BS a lot of these fine scholars had to go through. Black mathematicians were pretty much kept out of the academy until around 1970, but they have been making up for lost time ever since.

New Record Set on Robert Lindsay on Labor Day

This is weird. You aren’t supposed to get high traffic on holidays. On holidays, most people are doing various things, generally not including going online. I don’t know why that is, but it’s true.
Yet on Labor Day we just set a new record for 2nd highest visitors in a day*, 4,812, breaking the previous record of 4,674 set on July 6 during the Patrick Burris killings in South Carolina. I thought this was going to end, but it looks like the record-breaking may well continue all this week. 4,812 is about 200 an hour. I’m no expert on web traffic, but that sounds pretty good to me. Four of the five highest traffic days were recorded in the past four days, from September 4-September 7, which pretty much boils down to this past Labor Day weekend.
*I keep records for 1st-5th highest days, weeks and months on here.

American Vice: Mapping the 7 Deadly Sins

Here, a fascinating series of maps.
Your assignment, just to piss PC Idiots off, is to analyze the maps in terms of demographics and race.
Greed is highest on the East Coast, in California, in Washington State and Oregon, in Arizona, in Texas and around Chicago, in lower Michigan, in Florida and in the Rust Belt. These are all places where there are concentrations of wealth. The measure was based on “Average income compared with number of people living below the poverty line.” What this means is that this is where extremes of wealth and poverty exist.
They exist in Arizona, California and Florida because of mass Hispanic immigration. Hispanics can probably only create societies with extremes of wealth and poverty, and the Hispanic elite which has settled in Florida has created the most outrageous and reactionary mirror of a Latin American banana republic shithole you could imagine. Why? Because that’s what they do. That’s what they create in Latin America, so that’s what they are going to create when you import them to the US.
In California and Arizona, there are still a lot of rich people, mostly rich White people. This has recently been combined with the insanity of importing millions of Mesoamerican urban poor and peasants with an average 5th grade education. Predictably, they have created mass poverty and slums wherever they have settled. Combine this with the rich Whites you get greed on the map.
I have no explanations for the high greed coefficients around Chicago, lower Michigan and the Rust Belt, but there is a lot of Black poverty and there are a lot of wrecked cities in this region. I can’t understand the high readings on the liberal White East Coast or in Washington State/Oregon either. Interestingly, the South, including the Black Belt, scores low on greed. Maybe there is not much money to go around?
The next map is Envy, or the Ripoff Map. It’s a map of theft. Predictably, it’s high in Arizona, central California and Washington State. Extremes of inequality cause tons of crime, especially theft, but you can never get a conservative to admit this basic fact of human nature.
The South, including the Black Belt, has tons of theft. Presumably, Blacks are doing a lot of this stealing, but I am curious to what extent Southern Whites are thieves too. I have always heard that Southern Whites also have a high crime rate. In that respect, Southern crime may be more of a regionalism than a race thing per se.
Also lots of ripoff in lower Michigan and Rust Belt. We do have lots of Blacks there, lots of wrecked cities and abandoned industry, along with extremes of wealth and poverty. That sounds like a recipe for Ripoff Central. Also quite a bit of ripoff in eastern Oklahoma and NE Texas, which I cannot explain.
The Wrath Map, or violent crime map, is most interesting. Once again, high rates in Central California which are not explainable. Arizona has lots of violent crime, possibly due to Hispanics. So does New Mexico, and I cannot explain that.
So does Southern Missouri, East Texas, Eastern Oklahoma, Tennessee, Louisiana, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina and  Southern North Carolina. Yet Mississippi has little and Alabama has much less than the rest. One is tempted to say “Black Belt”, except that I have always heard that those wonderful Southern White folks have always had a very high violent crime rate. In particular a high homicide rate. And it’s been that way for 200 years or so. I chalk it up to culture.
Southern Michigan has some violent crime, but the Rust Belt does not. Go figure? There’s also quite a bit of violent crime being committed those White redneck mountain men in far Western Montana. Huh? So much on these maps hardly makes sense.
Next up we have Sloth, and this map doesn’t tell us much except that Americans are not particularly sloth-like, nor are they all that workaholic. In the Yellowstone region, we find the laziest folks of all, what with all that elk hunting and flyfishing in the rivers. That includes Western Montana, where the homicidal herds of Whites roam. I guess when they are not shooting each other, they are practicing on elk and deer?
The Gluttony map tells us little except that Texas is full of fatties, steer-shaped guys and gals wearing outsized beltbuckles and deep fat-frying anything no longer moving. Appalachia is full of unhealthy eaters and so is the Washington DC area, except for Michelle’s organic garden I guess.
Now for my favorite subject: Lust! This is a VD map, unfortunately, not a Get Laid Map. One would think that wherever you have lots of queers you have tons of  VD, but it doesn’t show on the map.
Instead we get the South. And indeed, it does look something like the Black Belt. I know Blacks like to screw a lot, but how about Southern Whites? Are they all prim and proper, going to Church every Sunday and Bible Study during the week? One wonders.
There are some strange anomalies on there – the Black Hills, NE Arizona, until one realizes that these are Indian reservations. Indians like to screw a lot? I never knew. I thought Indian maidens were all shy and reserved and proper. We also have tons of uncontrollable sex maniacs in East Central New Mexico and across the border in West Texas (Bible Belt). I don’t understand this one at all. Once again, we have lots of evil, this time Sex Evil, in NE Texas, which I don’t understand. Lot of Black folks there? Lot of screwing in southern Michigan, once again a lot of Blacks.
Thaaat’s all, folks!

Yet Another Weekly Visitor For Highest Visitors on Robert Lindsay August 31-September 6

No sooner was a new record for highest visitors in a week set two weeks ago than the new record was immediately broken the following week, last week, August 31-September 6. 22,563 hits were recorded for the week of August 24-20. Last week that record was broken by 5, 977 hits. 28,540 hits were recorded last week, or 4,077 hits/day. So for the first time, we are averaging over 4000 hits a day. It will be interesting to see how long this fascinating trend continues, if it continues at all.

Only WE Can Talk About Ourselves!

You are as white as rice. What exactly is your preoccupation with ‘race’ in the first place? What do know about living Black? Anti-natist (sic)? You are also an anoying (sic) little turd. So do us all a favor — hurl yourself off an extremely tall precipice. Take your Xxit for brains blog with you.
Thanks Whitey

This is a rather typical comment from a Black commenter to this site, this one from Liberal Race Realism Starting to Grow. The comment was deleted, and the commenter has been banned.
However, this shows the perils of Liberal Race Realism. Even my version. I’ve sampled all of the varieties of race realism on sale around the Net, and I must say that mine is the most pro-Black and pro-non-Whites in general of them all. There is a reason for this. I like Black folks, or, at least, I don’t dislike them. So most things that I write, I imagine that a close Black friend were reading it and edit accordingly.
If even the most pro-Black version of race realism provokes such extreme responses in most Blacks, how will they react to the rest of it? Further, most liberals are sensitive folks. White liberals either like Blacks, or don’t dislike them, or at any rate, don’t like to hurt their feelings. Further, White liberals hate being called racists, because they really try hard not to be racists.
Crafty Blacks and their PC White buddies know this and deviously exploit this vulnerability by shrieking RACIST at White liberals whenever they take the most tentative steps off the PC Plantation. This makes White liberals very hesitant about embracing anything other than the most insane PC nonsense on race. As long you spout the orthodox line, you can escape being called racist.
This really is simple thuggery on the part of Blacks and PC Whites, but no one ever calls them on it. They are shutting down debate like the finest Stalinists. Furthermore, they are setting the terms of the conversation about race. But liberal “conversations about race” are just monologues.
Anyway, they don’t do the slightest thing to ameliorate the problem. All they do is make Blacks feel better by trying not to hurt their feelings too much.
The line, “Only we can talk about ourselves” (really, “Only we can talk shit about ourselves”) is not peculiar to Blacks. It is standard ethnic nationalism. All ethnic nationalists get on this kick. Only the Jew can talk about Jews. Only the Arab can talk about the Arabs. On and on.
The problem with this is similar to the line a narcissist takes with his critics. What do you think of a guy who screams, “Only I can talk about my problems! You have no right to talk about my problems!” He’s a narcissistic shit with his face stuck in a mirror, right? Further, he’s never going to solve anything, because the only decent criticism comes from outside, and all internatl criticism is heavily censored and neutered by the ego.
Bottom line is ethnic nationalists, like narcissists, never ameliorate any problems. Problems just fester because in general they won’t discuss them.
Jews are probably the worst humans on Earth about this. Super-Jews are always screaming, “Why are you so interested in us anyway!?” While at the same time, if you listen to them talk, the Jews are the most fascinating people on Earth. Well, if that’s so, why wouldn’t we be interested in the most fascinating folks on Earth?
Truth is?
If you don’t cause any problems, nice, Western, White folks nowadays tend to leave you alone. Look at African immigrants to the US. Who cares about them? No one.
Blacks say we hate them for the color of their skin and due to their facial features. Then we should hate Africans most of all, since they are Black as night, and with no White admixture, they have the most exaggerated Black features of all. But as the most accomplished immigrant group in the US, no one bothers with Africans. Do a good job, don’t start shit, and nice people will tend to leave you alone, right?
Problem with US Blacks is that as a group they are causing problems.
Let’s use the analogy of inviting a guy and his buddies into your house. Pretty soon they start causing a bunch of shit. Mean people, and even most normal people, would just throw them all out on their asses. Nice people (here the analogy is with White Liberal Race Realists) sit them down and say, “Hey, you guys are causing problems in my house. I like you and I don’t want to throw you out, so how can we sit down and work this out so you can stay here?” Pretty nice gesture, huh?
Not according to the commenter. The commenter is like a guy who when you invite him and his buddies into your house, they start causing all kinds of trouble, and when you sit them down and see if you can work it out with them since you don’t want to toss them out, he and his buddies start screaming that only he and his friends can talk about their problems. You can’t, ‘cuz you’re not them.
The arrogance and egocentrism is appalling, no?
I am wondering, given the behavior of so many US Blacks, why would anyone let any significant number of them into their country? If you let them in to your country, they’re going to start causing trouble (almost guaranteed). If the guests are mean (I’m thinking Japan, China or most Arab countries) they will just toss them out on their asses. If the guests are nice, they will say, “Hey, you guys are causing trouble, man. Let’s sit down and try to work this out.”
The US Blacks will then all stand up and scream that only they can discuss their shit, furthermore, they will blame the nice guests who let them into the country for the Blacks causing problems. “You made us cause problems with your evil racism! It’s all your fault, you assholes!”
Fine.
Ingrates.
Now given a mindset like that, why would any country in their right mind let US Blacks immigrate in any significant number?

A Reworking of the Classification of Philippine Language Group

Here.
I really don’t know much about the classification of the Phillipine languages, other than that they are all Austronesian, and they are fairly close to one another. How close, I haven’t the faintest idea. The ones listed as different languages are certainly not intelligible though.
The Austronesian family outside of Taiwan is also huge, and it is also fairly close-knit, in fact, it is probably one of the closest large collections of related languages on Earth.
These include all of the languages of the Philippines, most of the languages of Indonesia and Malaysia, some New Guinea languages (on the coast), most Melanesian languages (some appear to speak Papuan languages), and all Polynesian and Melanesian languages. Yes, indeed. Hawaiian, Samoan and Maori are all related Tagalog, Bahasa Indonesia and Bahasa Malaysia. Even more shocking is that there are quite a few cognates. You might be surprised looking through a list of basic words in Tagalog and Hawaiian.
I don’t enough about Philippine languages to figure out if the author is onto something here.
He has also has a couple of maps of what the Philippines languages would have looked like without Spanish colonization and what they look like with Spanish colonization (actually existing situation), but I don’t know enough about that to make sense of it either. But it’s interesting.

Black Immigration to Europe and Other Musings

One of my Liberal Race Realist commenters notes on the Liberals Ruined American Blacks, and Other Republican Lies post:

Isn’t this why Lincoln wanted separation – he realised that different average abilities meant there would be large inequalities & that would create problems?
What is incredible is that European countries allow in large number of Blacks naively assuming that they will perform differently to those in the US.

Letting in Blacks is just fine, I have no problems with it. However, a Liberal Race Realist position notes that, say, African Blacks have very low IQ’s and probably are going to fail in advanced European society. They will also probably commit lots of crime.
That doesn’t mean don’t let any of them in! It means be very picky. The US immigration program for African Blacks is one of the great world immigration success stories. Any nation would want to emulate it.
Wisely, we put no quotas on Africans in 1965. Instead, we let in only those we really think can make it. As is, we generally only take the cream of the African crop here in the US. African immigrants to the US have been a smashing success – they have the highest IQ’s of any immigrants – about 107.5. They also have the highest educational attainment.
Some racists have argued that a degree from a Sub Saharan university is no good, but that does not seem to be the case. I understand that these universities are actually quite rigorous despite what you might think. Anyway, once they get in here, African immigrants usually need to pass their boards.
I have known two African immigrants, both Physician’s Assistants. PA is a very rigorous job. Both obtained their PA degrees in rigorous programs in the US, since we don’t accept PA grads (assuming there are any) from other countries. Both were very good at what they did, especially the man, a very intelligent Nigerian guy.
People look at the African IQ and conclude that all Africans must be morons. They even produce complex equations showing that the number of bright folks must be very small. Yet that does not seem to be the case. I’m not sure how it works, and I don’t understand the math behind it, but there are quite a few smart Black Africans. How do I know? I’ve met some of them.
I knew a fellow from Benin, Black as night. He used to work for my company as a programmer. He went to Morocco, got a degree, then on to France, where he is working in IT. The guy is just a flat out genius. He’s got to be smarter than I am, and I have a genius IQ (>140).
He’s so brilliant in IT* that last I heard he was working with some ultra-geniuses at MIT on some super advanced academic style cutting edge IT theory stuff. I read it over, but I could not make heads or tails out of it. You know the IT brains at MIT must be some of the smartest around.
He’s now living in France and he’s a fine addition to the French nation (further, he speaks fluent French from Benin). He’s not only an IT brain; he’s smart about just about anything. You start talking politics, history, you name it, and he starts rattling away.
He’s also, like many Blacks, extremely sociable (spends a lot of time in bars), has a taste for White women and is quite skillful in acquiring them. One of the last times I talked to him, he said he had to go because he had a 2 AM “date” with two White French girls. Haha!
He was also overconfident, somewhat irresponsible and a little sloppy (I am going to go out on a limb and argue that this is part of “Black intelligence” and possibly “Black personality”) like many Black geniuses. He worked for me for a while as a programmer, and I had to fix up his code sometimes because he banged it out so fast. It was kind of hard, especially since I’m not even a programmer myself!
What I mean by “sloppy” is that a lot of Blacks have a “don’t sweat the small stuff” type attitude towards work and life in general. That’s fine, but it gets in the way in “uptight” White society.
A friend is now at the university. He had a Black girl in his group with this typical mindset. She had a “just bang it out and forget about it” mindset. My friend kept arguing that such and such a presentation was a bad idea, or that they should clean up the misspellings, poor sentence construction, etc. but her attitude was “wing it” and “as long as it gets a good grade, who cares.” My friend said she was actually bright, but she did have this “quick and dirty” attitude.
Obviously, this is just stereotypical Black personality. As a counterexample, Alpha Unit, my Black guest poster on this site, is diligent, perfectionistic and self-correcting nearly to the point of excess. Black personality and Black intelligence are merely generalizations, and many Blacks are not going to fit into that neat box.
*It is quite interesting that Africa is starting to produce a lot of mathematics geniuses, usually men of course. If Africans really do have elevated testosterone, this should excessively masculinize the male African brain. One upside to this is a possible tendency of a few of the brightest male Africans to do very well in math (a heavily masculinized brain is math-superior).

Yet Another Traffic Record on Robert Lindsay September 6

I guess we are going to be setting new records and breaking old ones for a while on here, as long as traffic keeps exploding like this, but one would think that it has to end at some point, right?
A new record for 4th highest hits in a day* was set on Sunday, September 6 of 4,509, breaking the old one set only three days before of 4,127.
This is great stuff. Now four out of the five top records have been set in the last four days, from September 3-September 6.
To tell the truth, I think even 4000/day isn’t really enough when it comes to selling ads. 4000/day was good in 2004, but five years later, I don’t think so. Advertisers are such pikers anyway (buyer’s market – always bad for business) and too many idiots with high traffic are practically giving their adspace away (vicious price competition and price-cutting – always bad for business), that you probably need 10,000/day before you can even think about making anything.
The reason that online advertising is taking out newspapers and magazines is that print media had a good thing going. They had a good product – print media – and they charged a good, fair “wage” for the product that they produced – adspace on media. Ad rates in print media were pretty high, but they are high on TV and radio too. You either pay it or you don’t advertise.
But then things shifted to online. I can’t prove it, but it seems to me that online advertisers don’t pay shit compared to what they used to for space in print media and what they presently pay on TV and radio media. I’m trying to keep in mind readership, so things get a bit confusing.
So really what we have here is the buyers (really businesses themselves) paying shit wages or slave wages to online media producers. It’s kind of like construction contractors hiring illegals for $9/hour to cut out the union White boys for $33/hour.
Online media producers are workers in a sense. The product they sell is their adspace. The high-wage “workers” are being taken out (the print media producers) and they are being replaced by online slave labor web media producers. If you don’t want to see the print media as “workers”, ok, but they provided a lot of nice, high-paying jobs with good benefits for print media journalists. In contrast, in general, online media doesn’t pay journalists shit, if and when they pay us at all.
Qui bono? Ordinary people? Not really. Who buys ads? Businesses. As usual in capitalism, anytime anyone benefits for anything in any way, it’s usually the capitalists, and the rest of us just get fucked.
*I keep records for the 1st-5th highest traffic for days, weeks and months on here. It’s ridiculous to keep them beyond that if you think about it. If you had unlimited records, you would be setting a new record every day, right?

Liberals Ruined American Blacks, and Other Republican Lies

This comment was posted on the Liberal Race Realism Starting To Grow post by a conservative who blames liberals for the problems of Black folks in the US:

As what passes for a conservative in Massachusetts, I have to find this article amusing. You think that now that you’ve applied rational thought to one issue, you know it all? There’s a lot more coming.The fact is, the whole mess was made by liberals, starting with Kennedy and LBJ. Liberals were the ones that concluded that blacks weren’t smart enough to be helped to stand on their own two feet, and so created affirmative action to get them results without effort.
When Blacks took the philosophy behind affirmative action to heart, and themselves concluded they couldn’t make it on their own, liberals were the ones who set up a welfare system that perpetuated the Black cycle of poverty. And it’s liberals who set up a taxation system that provides major disincentives to work harder for Blacks who manage to break that cycle, just as it does for Whites and everyone else.
Don’t blame the Blacks, blame yourself.
If you ever understand what’s really going on, you’ll finally understand why the conservative agenda – the tough love of workfare and further limitations on welfare, lower taxation and uncapped child care deductions to let actual working people keep what they earn and have kids as easily as welfare families, and elimination of affirmative action and the racist prejudice that underlies it – is necessary if the problems of race in the U.S. are ever to be solved.
But you’ll never be able to do anything about it by voting for Democrats. We’ll see if you are smart enough to allow your brain to vote, instead of your liberal reactions.

This bit of Republican nastiness is particularly vicious because it masquerades as anti-racism when in reality, it’s going to have some real bad effects for Blacks once it’s put into practice. In this reworking of the world, reality is turned on its head, anti-racist liberals like Johnson and Kennedy (and me) are now the Liberal KKK, and racist Republicans like Reagan are the Republican MLK. This allows Republicans to peddle an objectively anti-Black under the guise of anti-racists while painting the opponents of the project, who work for Black interests, to actually be nasty racists like Bull Connor.
This is sort of the Starr Parker – Clarence Thomas line about Blacks. Many Whites have cynically latched onto this, and a few Black idiots have too. Parker and Thomas are two of those morons. Thomas and Parker are cynically used by frankly racist White conservatives to further the rightwing project which has nothing to do with helping Blacks and is all about conservative ideology and helping out the wealthier classes, which all conservatism is ever about really.
Conservatives, even Republicans, are racists because every time a Republican President gets in office, he defunds the Civil Rights Department. Prosecutions for discrimination in housing and employment plummeted under Reagan and Bush Sr. There’s no reason for any self-respecting, non-masochistic  Black person who cares anything about their people to be a Republican.
This won’t solve anything. It will just make things worse. Blacks do best under a socialist system. The more socialism, the better they do. The more free market pure capitalist with wide variables in wealth, the worse Blacks do.
Lower taxes always hurts workers. It doesn’t help them. Because you have to cut services when you cut taxes, and workers are the ones who use all the services. The only people helped by lowering taxes are people who make lots of money and have no need for government services, so taxation is a ripoff for them. If you make that much money, taxes are no disincentive to having kids. In my entire life, I have never heard one family say, “We want kids, but we can’t afford it due to taxes.”
As far as workfare, it’s Republicans who always killed that. Liberals wanted it. Republican “workfare” is some kind of a sick joke. Go find yourself a job, if you’re lucky with 9.5% unemployment. That’s it. That’s “workfare.”
OTOH, we liberals supported a workfare whereby you would get some government make-work type job (could be anything really) and then along with it, medical care for you and your kid and daycare for your kid. You can stay on it as long as you like, as long as you have dependent kids.
As is, the jobs that welfare recipients are likely to find will not pay enough for daycare for the kids, and will not have medical care for the kids or for the Mom. It’s just a disaster. Welfare “reform” has completely failed. We need to get rid of it and put back in some real workfare proposition.
Getting rid of “racist” affirmative action won’t help Blacks. What’s hilarious about Republicans characterizing AA as racism is that this is the only time they ever use the word “racism.” When it hurts White people. To Republicans, the only kind of racism that exists is anti-White racism. All the other kinds are illusions.
This is the rightwing lie: affirmative action told Blacks that they were helpless and incompetent, so they acted the part. Yeah right! So, we get rid of affirmative action, and Blacks will no longer believe that they are lame and incompetent, and will rise to the top like baking yeast! I would laugh except so many rightwing idiots actually believe this idiocy. It’s sort of understandable that idiots would fall for this crap, since it does have a nice ring to it, that is, until you actually sit down and think.
It’s true that affirmative action is at times unfair, but no way will getting rid of it help Blacks. Bottom line is getting rid of it is going to be bad for Blacks. How bad is a matter of debate. In this nasty Republican lie, we liberals who set up AA are racists because we think, in a racist manner, that Blacks can’t cut it, so they need quotas to compete. Well, the truth is that if you look at test scores in schools and on tests to get into various occupations, Blacks can’t cut it. They don’t do as well. So, getting rid of AA will mean not as many Blacks will get hired. Some will, sure, but many others won’t.
I suspect that the Republican liars who made up this lie actually know this and know that Blacks can’t compete on a level playing field, but they just say this because it feels so good. All right-thinking people want to believe that Blacks really can compete. Problem is, they can’t. Level the playing field, and many fewer Blacks will get in.
So…Blacks (in actuality, hardworking Blacks who have been enervated by liberalism) are just dying to get off welfare and get a real job and stand on their own two feet for once, but once they consult the local tax attorney and learn about the US tax code, they say, “Screw this! I’m staying on $400 a month welfare!”?
Yeah!
It’s so much more profitable than working for a living, what with the 10% tax rate at the typical $8/hour job they will get ($1,600/month), with the whole thing refundable at the end of the year probably, and then an EITC to boot for a negative income tax. Wow! With disincentives like that, it’s amazing we all aren’t on welfare living like Camelot on $400 a month!
This line is “Liberals made Black people poor!” LOL, come on man, please. Good God, conservatives are stupid. Either they are stupid, or they are just vicious cynical evil, and don’t believe a word of this obvious nonsense that they just feed to their Glen Beck cattle.
Seriously, I don’t even think that Jared Taylor believes this crap, but I haven’t asked him yet. He may be conservative, but Jared’s not stupid.

Yet Another Traffic Record on Robert Lindsay

The day after a new record for highest traffic in a day was set on Friday, a new record for 3rd highest traffic in a day of 4,622 hits was set on Saturday, September 5, breaking the old record of 4,127 set only two days before on September 3. So now 4 out of the 5 top visitor records on this site were set in the past four days, from Wednesday, September 2 through Saturday, September 5. Pretty great news! Thanks to all of our visitors!
I realize some people hate these P.T. Barnum type posts, but there is a certain logic to them in that they tend to drive even more traffic. Hey, capitalism is sleazy, what can I say?

New Top Visitor Record On Robert Lindsay

This site received 5,013 hits on Friday, September 4, breaking the old record for most hits in a day of 4,674 set two months before on July 6 by 339 hits. Is There a Black Intelligence? was one of the popular posts Friday.
As I said, we seem to be setting new records just about every day now. I don’t quite understand it, but it’s great news anyway.

Catholic Anti-Semitism

Check out this site, if you dare.
There are many varieties of anti-Semitism. It is an error to conflate all of them.
One very common variety is Catholic anti-Semitism. It is a particular type, and is quite virulent. Let’s face it, not only have these folks persecuted a lot of Jews, but they also killed a lot of Jews. Some of the most ferocious of the uber-Catholic Jew-killers were the Croatian Ustashe regime in Croatia in WW2. Operating out of the Janesovac concentration camp, they may well have killed 400,000 people there. Mostly they killed Serbs, but they also killed tens of thousands of Jews and some Gypsies.
Traditional Catholicism generally doesn’t have much against Protestants. The Ustashe were just Catholic loons from the Balkans, and their Serb-killing was based on ancient tribal feuds in the Balkans. Since they were considered Slavs under Nazi race theory, the Croatians (racially probably more Med and Dinaric than Slav anyway) invented a weird theory whereby the Croats were actually some lost Germanic tribe stuck south of the Dinaric Alps. Whatever.
The ferocity and insanity of the genocide in Croatia shocked even the Nazis, who looked dimly on the genocide of Serbs by Croats, which they could not see any reason for. Incredibly, the Nazis themselves even told the Croats to knock it off or at least calm down, but all such imploring fell on death ears.
The Ustashe genocide played a large role in the Balkan Wars 50 years later, especially as Serbs were terrified of resurgent Croatian nationalism and the terrors that lay behind it. For some weird reason, Ustashe type Croatian ultranationalism is still popular in Croatia among ultranationalists.
The crazed Ustashe Catholics gave non-Catholics a jihadi-style choice: Either convert to Catholicism or die. Apparently a lot of Serbs refused to convert.
Damn, these guys were some hardcore Catholics, man! Right up there with those Iberian dudes during the Inquisition!
Catholic anti-Semitism has a heavily religious focus, as you might gather. The main beef against the Jews is that they are or were Christ-killers. The age-old anti-Semitism of Rome, delineated carefully by historians, provides them with an historical basis for their anti-Semitism. Their heroes are some of the nastier anti-Semitic popes from the old days.
In 1965, the Mass was rewritten to take out of the nastier anti-Semitic bits. The Pope also ruled it was ok to say the Mass in local vernacular as opposed to Latin. In addition, a Circular was issued that attempted to see the Jews as part of some common tradition with Catholics. This attempt at the creation of a monster called “Judeo-Chritianity has never made sense to me theologically. I believe that the Church also made some sort of statement in favor of the poor, while stopping short of the Liberation Theology that AK-47 toting priests in the jungles of Latin America and the Philippines preach.
For these sins, Trad Catholics continue to simmer. Some parishes continue to defy the Vatican and recite the traditional Mass with all the nasty anti-Semitic bits. Trad Catholics flock to these churches to partake of the Real anti-Semitic Deal.
Pat Buchanan seems to be a bit of a Trad, and the journal Human Events is sort of a Trad type magazine. There are some big names out there in Trad Catholicism, guys who also double as anti-Semites, but their names escape me at the moment.
If you want to know where Mel Gibson was coming from with his great movie (The Passion of the Christ) that the Jews hated so much, it’s from a position of Trad Catholicism. His elderly father, now living in Australia (since the US is “Jew-controlled”) is even worse. Gibson Senior is said to have been a big influence in Gibson Junior. The movie isn’t really anti-Semitic. Or if it’s anti-Semitic, then so is Christianity, which is a position many Jews take anyway (Chew on that, “Christian” Zionists).
Polish and Latin American anti-Semitism has always been heavily based on Catholic anti-Semitism.
Catholic anti-Semitism has always struck me as particularly retarded. Of all the reasons to hate Jews, “Jesus said so,” “the Bible says so” and even worse, some fag in a dress in Rome says so (sorry Catholics) seem like some of the stupider reasons.
There’s more to say about this subject, but I’ll save it for later.

Dutch Left Grows a Brain

Incredible, a Western Leftwing party with the sense to oppose mass immigration on non-racist and purely economic  and pro-worker grounds. Mass immigration of labor from low wage countries to high wage countries is a disaster for the workers of the high wage country. Duh. Yet the entire Western Left is still screaming for Open Borders.
Suppose I am a member of a Left party in a low wage country. Why should I support Open Borders there? On the one hand, my best workers take off to high wage countries for higher wages. I guess they send some money home if we are lucky, but how does this help develop the economy of my low wage country.
Further, I bet even low wage countries have to deal with lots of immigrants from even lower wage countries flooding in. Sure, Romanians get to go to the UK and make big bucks, but how does the mass emigration our best and brightest help grown the Romanian economy? Besides, there are always workers from Ukraine or Africa or wherever trying to flood into Romania to make what to them is big bucks.
I understand that India has a huge problem with illegal immigrants. From where? From Bangladesh. I guess things are so horrible in Bangladesh that workers pour across the border to head to the paradise called India, where I suppose they can undercut Indian workers. That’s a scary thought. You mean Bangladeshi workers work for 5 cents an hour and that undercuts Indian workers at 10 cents an hour. Good God.
There’s no end to the nightmare of this “free movement of labor” crap and it’s hard to see how anyone but the capitalist businessmen benefit.
If anything, this shows that we need to drive a stake through the heart of Marxist “internationalism.” It’s based on some future borderless socialist Kumbaya utopia that’s not on the horizon. When I die in 30 years, this utopia won’t be one step closer. So why base current policy in the capitalist world on the whimsical fancies of a Dreamworld?

Neonazis Rusos: Video de la Decapitacion

The video has been removed following discussions with WordPress staff. Try here instead.
I am looking for translators to translate this post into Dutch, German, Danish, Norwegian, Swedish, Finnish, Russian, Estonian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Polish, Czech, Slovak, Hungarian, Slovenian, Serbo-Croatian, Greek, Turkish, Japanese, Mongolian and Bahasa Indonesia. Email me if you are interested.
This post has been translated into other languages. Italian version (traduzione in italiano). French version (en Frances). Bulgarian version (Българска версия). Romanian version (Versiunea română). Portuguese version (em Portugues).
This is a new Spanish translation of the famous Neo Nazi Beheading Video post. It took me a very long time to find a Spanish translator. Lots of folks volunteer, but the vast majority flake out. A few produce about 10% of a translation and then flake out. The site brings in maybe $30/month, so we can’t pay and have to rely on volunteers and that’s always hard to do.
The translator is Santiago Forte, a Psychology student at Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina. My Spanish is not totally fluent, but I can read it pretty well. Looking this over, I think he did a bang-up job of translation! Shout out to Santiago. Santiago intends to use this video for the super-edifying purpose of making a documentary movie about violence on the Internet.
As Santiago put it to me, as long as kids are looking at all this horrible stuff on online forums and trying to out-shock each other, someone might as well try to do something socially productive with these horrible videos, such as making a documentary attempting to explicate the phenomenon in psychological terms.
Regular readers, if you have not yet watched this video, be careful. A lot of people get seriously freaked out by this video, although it’s got some awesome background music. There have been lots of bad reactions, including one long-lasting bad reaction (depression, anorexia and weight loss) and one hospitalization – a man was hospitalized and lost a tooth after fainting on the sidewalk after watching this video. Exercise caution!
Nota del traductor: Si algun error ortografico es detectado,haganlo saber, muchos acentos fueron suprimidos para favorecer a los motores de busqueda, sin embargo es posible encontrar algun minusculo error.
Intente hacer la traduccion lo menos literal posible, no obstante respetando el contexto narrativo de Robert Lindsay. Algunas terminos en aleman, que no tenian aclaracion de su significado, fueron traducidos directamente al español. Saluda Atte.
Santiago Forte.
Este post fue traducido en otros idiomas. Version italiana (traduzione in italiano). Version en Frances. Version Bulgara (Българска версия), version en idioma Rumano (versiunea română).
ADVERTENCIA:
Este video contiene imágenes extremadamente violentas que pueden afectar tu sensibilidad. La persona que decide mirar este video esta advertida de antemano.
Si este video es capaz de generarte resentimiento, rabia o algo peor.
Por favor no lo mires.
Si eres menor de edad por favor no mires este este video.
Si eres un padre de familia y sabes que tu hijo esta mirando este video, por favor.
Te pido que lo supervises, restrinjas la conexión a Internet o trates de conseguir un programa para impedir el acceso a este sitio.
Cabe destacar que algunas reacciones adversas fueron reportadas despues de ver este video.
Aquí abajo enumerare las siguientes:
Vomitos, Perdida del apetito, Rabia, Tristeza, Nauseas, Convulsiones, Dolores de Estomago, Pesadillas, Sentimientos Suicidas, Temblores, Taquicardia, Mareos, Dolores de Cabeza, Entumeciento, Indigestion, Taquicardia, Inanicion (perdida del apetito por no comer), Retrospectivas, imsomnio, llanto, llanto y Risa combinadas, Agorafobia (Miedo a los espacios abiertos), Ansiedad, Depresion, Perdida de la consciencia, Incontinencia urinaria o sensacion de incontinencia e incapacidad de dejar de pensar en este video.
Estas reacciones fueron anotadas en la revision de comentarios en Boletines y en el canal de Youtube, se pudo observar en los comentarios, las sensaciones desagradables provocadas por el contenido shockeante de esta grabacion.
Muchos espectadores lamentaron haber visto el video y recomendaron a otras personas no mirarlo. Ten mucho cuidado de enviar este video a otras personas, por que muchos han reportado brotes de ira causada por el material explicito.
Otros miedos fueron un poco mas espirituales, algunos temieron que al ver este video dañaron permanentemente su alma. Comunmente, la gente admitio no poder ser capaces de olvidar este video por el resto de sus vidas. Una persona reporto que nunca seria la misma despues de haber sido testigo de este material. Otras dijeron que se sentiran atemorizadas por el resto de sus vidas.
Las reacciones adversas han durado generalmente algunas horas, pero en algunos casos han tenido un alcanze temporal de un dia o dos.
Reacciones de Ansiedad, Depresion o una combinacion de ambas han durado en algunos casos una semana y raramente mas de un mes.
Si las reacciones continuan, te recomiendo que busques asistencia profesional.
Por mi parte he visitado muchas clinicas y no es algo por lo que uno deberia avergonzarse.
Si crees que podrias tener algunas de estas reacciones de forma duradera reconsidera no mirar el video.
Este video fue baneado en muchos sitios de Internet. Ha habido una gran cantidad de llamados para removerlo permanentemente de Internet y hacerlo ilegal.
Despues de todo, es un Film Snuff, igual de malintencionada que la pornografia infatil, esa es la razon por la cual las personas se esmeran por ver estas cosas horribles que odian tanto.
Miralo ahora, si te atreves, antes de que la policia en tu region lo prohiba ahora y para siempre.
Este Horrible video parece ser una respuestas Rusa hacia los tambien espeluznantes video grabados por los Chechenos decapitando soldados Rusos.
Uno de los mas videos mas horribles es el de Los 6 Rusos Concrpitos.
E’ disponibile la traduzione italiana di questo articolo, intitolato “Nessuna Pietà per i Russi.” Traduccion al Italiano, titulada No Mercy For Russians! aqui.
Traduccion al Frances tambien.
En mi opinion esta grabacion es incluso peor de lo que pueden ver arriba.
Éstoy buscando traductores que puedan traducir este post, hacia el Sueco, Noruego, Danes, Holandes, Aleman, Finlandes, Ruso, Estonio, Leton, Polaco, Checo, Eslovaco, Hungaro, Esloveno, Serbo croata, Portugues, Griego, Turco, Japones, Mongol, Indonesio.
Nueva informacion ha aparecido probando que este video no es una farsa.
Kistaman Odamanov,una dagestani, vio el video en internet e indentifico al hombre que estaba siendo cruelmente decapitado como su hermano, Shamil Odamanov de tan solo 23 años.
Ademas, el resto de la familia Shamili y muchos conocidos en su aldea natal lo han identificado mirando el video.
Shamil fue a Moscu en busca de trabajo y posiblemente de esposa en el 2005.
Desaparecio a mediados de Abril del 2007 y nadie lo ha visto desde esa fecha.
Eso implica que ha sido mantenido cautivo con vida durante mas de 3 meses antes de ser asesinado a mediados de Agosto.
La hermana de la victima, Kistaman reconocio su rostro y las ropas que estaba vistiendo en el momento de la ejecucion.
La Policia Rusa ha encontrado el lugar donde las escenas del comienzo del video fueron filmadas, pero todavia no han encontrado el lugar donde la ejecucion fue llevada a cabo, ni tampoco encontraron algun cuerpo, sangre o evidencia forense.
Sin embargo, las autoridades estan tratando el crimen como un homocidio.
La Fuerza Policial Alemana esta involucrada sugiriendo el accionar de un grupo Neo Nazi Aleman.
El tajik que aparece a punto de ser ejecutado en el video todavia no ha sido identificado.
Mas informacion que demuestra la veracidad de este video esta disponible en mi blog aquí.
Muchos han preguntado el nombre de la cancion en el video.
La cancion se llama “Rus” una banda de Folk Pagan Metal llamada “Arkona”.
Puedes tambien ver un video de la banda tocando la cancion en este blog.
Vas a necesitar una conexión de Banda Ancha para ver este video de forma adecuada.
Este es el video de decapitacion que tomo a la Internet Rusa como un Tormenta en los principios de agosto del 2007 (alcanzo la supremacía en los motores de busqueda y records de visitas en Paginas Rusas). El video es tituladoLa ejecucion de un Dagestani y Taijistani”.
Es un video de Rusos Neo Nazis decapitando dos “Negros”, es decir en base a su nacionalidad se considera para muchos Activistas de estos grupos o el pensamiento popular, como minorias etnicas despreciables, sin embargo se trata de dos hombres blancos.
Uno de Dagestan y otro de Tajikistan.
Para debatir la idea acerca de si es razonable considerar Dagestanies y tajiks como blancos según el contexto, vean mi meditacion aquí.
Esta grabacion genero una gran controversia en el Internet un tiempo despues de su aparicion publica. Un grupo llamado “Nacionalsocialistas de Rus” claman por la responsablidad del video, pero las autoridades atestiguan que nunca han oido hablar de este grupo.
Rus es el nombre de un antiguo estado Vikingo localizado alrededor de Kiev – El Kevian Rus.
Este fue el primer estado ruso y el nombres de “Rus” es ampliamente usado por los nacionalsocialistas rusos como sinonimo de Rusia
Un Grupo Neo Nazi similar, El Partido Nacionalista Ruso, puede ser visto en Youtube.
Aquí y aquí.
El segundo video de los nombrados por lo menos tiene buena musica.
El video de ejecucion esta bien preparado con musica Heavy Metal en el fondo y fue lanzado a principios de Agosto.
El material fue originalmente posteado en la version Rusa del sitio del LiveJournal por un usuario apodado vick23. Noticias del Ocicidente han reportado que fue posteado originalmente por un nombre de usuario llamado “Anti Gypsy”(“Antigitano”) simplemente fue uno de los que lo reposteo mas tarde. Tambien fue publicado consecuentemente en muchos Sitios Neo nazis de habla Rusa.
No obstante fue rapidamente removido de la mayoria de los sitios donde fue posteado y el sitio de la agrupacion Neo Nazi que cometio los asesinatos, fue arrasado por visitas.
El video abre con una Bandera nazi y un estruendo de una Ametralladora en el fondo y luego un grito en idioma Ruso que dice “Gloria a Rus”.
Luego muestran una toma de un Pueblo Ruso Campestre y luego un lago rodeado de un bosque.
La camara hace un zoom en el bosque y muestran a dos hombres atados de manos y piernas y amordazados en el suelo.
Uno de los hombres esta claramente aterrorizado. Luego muestran a los dos hombres atados que dicen en pesado acento ruso a traves de sus mordazas “Nos arrestaron Grupos Neo Nazis.”
Mientras estan atados de manos y piernas arodillados en el bosque.
Hay una extensa bandera Nazi en el fondo.
El video muestra la “Poca habilidad de ejecucion” de los captores, un hombre enmascarado con vestiduras militares, viene detrás de unos de los cautivos, tomandolo detrás y mientras grita “Gloria a Rus”, comienza a serruchar la cabeza del pobre chico, aunque por lo que se ve, se torna un trabajo algo complicado.
El Chico grita un poco al principio, pero el incompetente verdugo tarda 90 secundos en cortarle la cabeza.
Hay una gran controversia acerca de los sonidos guturales fueron emitidos por la victima misma inhalando sangre mientras la cortaban el cuello, otros dicen fueron productos de la frustracion del verdugo que no podia separarle la cabeza con eficacia.
No soy competente de juzgar quien hacia esos terribles sonidos.
Finalmente le corta la cabeza y trata de poner la cabeza sobre el cuerpo decapitado, pero la cabeza queda pegada al cuerpo.
Seguramente necesita una leccion de Al Quaeda en la Peninsula Arabe, quienes hicieron un excelente trabajo cortandole la cabeza y retirandola fuera del cuerpo, al Ingeniero en Helicopteros Paul Johnson.
Finalmente se muestra al otro rehen atado y amordazado.
Pega el mismo grito “Gloria a Rus” y lo despacha rapidamente con un disparo en le cabeza, mientras cae hacia una tumba recien cavada.
El video muestra a los Neo Nazis completamente camuflados desde pies a cabezas dando el clasico saludo que Hitler le robo a Mussolini en frente a la Bandera Nazi.
Al principio, las fuerzas policiales rusas estaban algo confundidas, por que no sabian si el video si era Real, asi que decretaron que era falso, pero recientemente hay una prueba de que no es una farsa.
Yo personalmente nunca pense que era falso, ya que para hacer una grabacion de tonos tan realistas deberias ser un especialista en efectos especiales en una compania de Cinematografica y tener un gran presupuesto.
Un hombre fue arrestado por distribuir este video, si quieres saber mas acerca de el, cliquea aquí.
Algunos se preguntan como un ruso podria apoyar una ideologia Nazi dado que ellos invadieron a la Union Sovietica provocando un total de 27 millones de rusos muertos.
4 veces y medio mas que los judios que perecieron en el Holocausto, acontecimiento que sigue pesando en nuestra conciencia dia y noche.
Para entender como un ruso podria ser nazi, se necesita comprender la naturaleza de la sangrienta batalla facista que acontecio en el Siglo XX.
Estudiando historia como un real Historiador y no como un profesional Oportunismo, como muchos hacen hoy en dia, veras que los comunistas y los Nazis tuvieron los peores festivales de odio y sangre del Siglo Pasado.
Esos 27 millones de Sovieticos que murieron en la segunda guerra mundial no murieron por que Los rusos amaban tanto a los nazis que les entregaron 27 millones de sus Hijos.
Cada vez que los rusos y los nazis se enfrentaban en los campos de batalla, los cuerpos se apilaban hasta el cielo y las atrocidades cometidas en ambos bandos eran numerosas.
Esta no era una disputa de amantes.
La maniatica invasion Nazi a Rusia fue una practica genocida, especialmente hacia los eslavos a quienes Hitler consideraba “Inhumanos”.
Los veian como una raza inferior, una debil “Raza eslava” incapaz de defenderse a si misma..
En particular Hitler en su Maniaco antisemitismo, penso que los eslavos se habian permitido a ellos mismos esclavizarse por los judios. Se referia asi, al Partido Judio Bolchevique.
La crueldad de la invasion Nazi a la Union Sovietica fue claramente ignorada por los libros de historia occidentales. Stalin pudo haber perdido 10 millones mas de ciudadanos y ademas la hazaña nazi se pudo haber logrado y habrian conquistado al mundo.
El proyecto Nazi de exterminacion fue claro, como burocratas que eran, lo especificaron.
Los eslavos, los Estonios, los Caucasicos, los Cosacos, varios tipos de Turcos, Uzbekistanies, Tartaros, Kazajas, Turkmenistanies, Azerbaijanies, Kalmyks, Karachais, Arabes, Armenios y Georgianos eran inferiores y requerian ser reemplazados por Alemanes, matandolos de hambre, asesinandolos, convirtiendolos en esclavos y deportandolos, dejando regiones despobladas para hacer carne el proyecto “Lebensraum”, termino acuñado por el Geografo Friedrich Ratzel, que sostenia que la existencia de un estado competente necesitaba de un espacio vital para su construccion, en el caso de la alemania nazi, los botines en territorio de las naciones conquistadas.
Durante la Segunda Guerra Mundial Murieron 2,6 millones de Polacos (Solo el 50 por ciento era de origen judio) es decir el 30 por ciento de la poblacion.
Lo mismo sucedió en Bielorrusia, el 25 por ciento de la poblacion fue exterminada al final de la guerra. En Rusia 27 millones de personas murieron, que consistia en esa epoca el 15 por ciento de la poblacion.
Todas esas naciones eran “eslavas” para los nazis.
Las purgas asesinas de Stalin a fines de la decada del 30, fueron un intento salvaje de destruir Tratado Bilateral Entre Rusia y Alemania, ejecutando Trotskianos y Bukharinites, que no solo simpatizaban abiertamente con los nazis, sino que tambien abogaban por una invasion Nazi a la Union Sovietica.
Las persecuciones Stalinistas fueron producto de una amenaza de invasion Nazi latente aunque muchos de los que fueron juzgados y ejecutados eran inocentes.
Sin Stalin hubieramos perdido la guerra, una prueba de ello es que el 89 por ciento del territorio aleman cuando el conflicto armado finalizo, estaba en manos sovieticas.
Detrás de las lineas Rusas, en las ocupadas Latvia, Lituania, Estonia, Ucrania y Rusia Blanca un gran numero de personas estaban a favor de los nazis.
Muchas de ellas se unieron alegremente a la matanza de Judios y Comunistas, colgados del ala de la Bestia Alemana.
Durante el Asalto de Stalin, alrededor de 50.000 Sovieticos pelearon voluntariamente a favor de los nazis.
El Destino de Rusia y los sovieticos estaba dificil. No habia tiempo para hablar acerca de los derechos humanos.
Los rusos empujaron a los alemanes hacia el este y los que habian colaborado con la invasion Alemana fueron ejecutados.
En una guerra, la misma palabra lo menciona, no se trata de justicia o derechos humanos, sino de muerte. Los rusos no podian ser blandos ante la traicion o la desercion.
La nocion de Stalin durante la segunda guerra mundial fue antisemita (Dirigida hacia Judios Ultranacionalistas y Anticomunistas extremistas).
Como un autor sovietico en la epoca escribio “Tu eres anti nazi o anti semita, alguna de las dos.”
Cuando el ejercito rojo llego al este de Polonia, los polacos recibieron con jolgorio a los rusos, accion que imperdonable hasta hoy por los Polacos Ultranacionalistas.
Los judios no eran estupidos, sabian cual era su enemigo y en ese momento no era necesariamente el “Tio Joseph.” Los Sovieticos era los potenciales salvadores de los judios y ellos lo sabian.
Todo judio educado sabe cuan adeudado esta con Napoleon, es una lastima que no sientan lo mismo por Stalin.
Joseph Stalin probablemente salvo a los judios del nazismo.
Joseph Stalin probablemente salvo al mundo del nazismo.
Acerca de los rusos Neo Nazis, con la caida del comunismo, floriecieron al mismo ritmo que el colapso economico y la busqueda de Chivos expiatorios comenzo.
La guerra chechena empeoro la situacion, debido a las crueldades grabadas en camara acerca de soldados chechenos decapitando rusos y el terrorismo musulman atacando Rusia.
“Negros” o gente del Caucaso padecen un odio generalizado a traves de Rusia.
Recientemente ha habido ataques hacia Africanos, Asiaticos y mestizos.
Las autoridades hacen poco y nada por impedir los asesinatos, ya que soportan el ideal detrás de estos hechos.
El Neo nazismo es tan grande en Rusia que es dificil compararlo con el contexto de los Estados Unidos.
En Agosto del 2007 ha habido alrededor de 50 asesinatos racistas de caucasicos, gente de Republicas de Asia Central, Activistas antifascistas y Extranjeros, 25 por ciento mas que el año pasado, que indica un aumento de ese tipo de violencia ideologica.
¿Podrias hacerte la idea de un movimiento Nazi tan grande y crimen organizado en Estados Unidos?
Los facistas rusos sirven como “tropas de choque” para Vladimir Putin, echando a bajo la nocion de que el es un “Neo comunista” y probando lo que se ha sospechado que Putin es una de las formas del Fascismo Ruso.
Distribuido junto con el video, hay un manifiesto clamando por la expulsion de todos los “asiaticos y negros” (Gente del Caucaso) de Rusia y curiosamente la expulsion de todas las republicas en el Caucaso como Ingushetia, Dagestan, Chechenia, Osetia del Norte, Cherkyo Kabardino, etc.
Aquí se puede leer el manifiesto completo extraido del Centro Kavkaz de los Rebeldes Chechenos.

Declaracion del Partido Nacional Socialista de Rus

Nosotros Somos Parte de una Faccion Armada del Partido

1. Nuestro partido anuncia el comienzo de una lucha armada en contra de los colonizadores negros y todos los rusos oficiales que los soportan.
2. Consideramos la expulsion de los Caucasicos y los asiaticos del territorio Ruso como una necesidad primaria.
3. Sentimos que es necesario garantizarles la independencia a todas las republicas del Caucaso (Incluyendo Chechenia), junto con la expulsion de todas la poblacion caucasica que reside alli.
4. Demandamos la liberacion de todos los Neo Nazis Rusos que estan en prision y que frenen la persecucion de Maksim Martsinevich.
5. Demandamos al Vladmir putin que renuncie y entregue el poder al gobierno Nacional Socialista que debe ser liderado por Dmitry Germanovich, el lider de la Sociedad Nacional Socialista de Rusia.
6. Reconocemos el liderazgo politico de la Sociedad Nacional Socialista de Rusia, nosotros somos una celula armada operando independientemente.
7. No pararemos de luchar hasta que el poder este en manos del Gobierno Nacional Socialista.

Martsinevich es la cabeza de un grupo llamado Format 18, que fue encarcelado por generar Odio Etnico y Predicar la violencia.
La violencia Nacional Socialista en Rusia esta fuera de control.
Esta propagada en grandes proporciones en, Polonia, Reino Unido, Republica Checa, Eslovaquia, Hungria y Estonia.
Hay mas violencia Per capita en todos esos lugares que en Estados Unidos.
El crecimiento de la violencia Nacional Socialista esta amenazando Europa y es necesario hacer algo lo mas rapido posible.

New Visitor Record On Robert Lindsay Immediately Broken

People are complaining about these posts*, but the truth is that these posts bring in even more traffic. I don’t know how that works, but I guess it has something to do with human psychology. Everyone loves a winner, and no one wants to admit they bought a lemon, stuff like that. If these posts piss you off, don’t read.
The new record for 2nd highest hits** in a day set on September 2 – 4,020 – was immediately broken the next day, September 3, when a new 2nd highest hits/day record of 4,127 was set, surpassing the old record by 107 hits.
This is pretty amazing. We are breaking records almost every other day on here now.
*On the other hand, they are pissing off the right people sometimes, so maybe they are worthwhile. There’s nothing more delicious than being hated by raving White Supremacists. No wait! Maybe there is. How about being hated by raving Afrocentrists?
*I keep records for 1st-5th highest traffic for days, weeks and months on here.

Is There a Black Intelligence?

Richard Hoste, a White nationalist commenter, takes issue with my comments about a <70 IQ in Blacks just not being the same as a <70 IQ in a White. He repeats the standard line from Jensen and Rushton that a White with <70 IQ usually is genetically diseased in some way that effects the way they walk and talk. The Black with the same IQ is not. That’s why they seem different.
This is the typical line that I keep hearing, but it still doesn’t make sense. In the US, Whites with IQ’s <70 are generally living in group homes, are not allowed to have kids or marry, have poor social skills, poor judgment, generally do not work or work only at specialized jobs, have their finances monitored by someone, and are not allowed to drive cars.
In other words, they just can’t live on their own and make it. And it’s not just because they walk and talk funny. It’s because in many important ways, they are dumb as doorknobs, and we don’t trust them to make sensible decisions.
Nevertheless, in Africa, Blacks with <70 IQ’s drive vehicles, work at regular jobs, live on their own, have excellent social skills, marry and raise children, live on their own or own a home, pay their bills and manage their finances, etc. They don’t need supervision. They can do it on their own. I imagine something similar is going on with Papuans (IQ 64), Aborigines (IQ 62), Bushmen (IQ 54) and Pygmies (IQ 60?). All these folks can live quite well on their own with little or no supervision.
In addition, we have first hand reports. I spoke with an anthropologist who works in Africa. He told me that the Africans he works with do not seem stupid. A similar statement was made by Jared Diamond about the Papuans he worked with and by a man who worked with Bushmen.
Yet if you meet an American White with an IQ <70 like these native peoples, they will appear to be dumb as a rock, and not just because they can’t walk or talk right. I know, I have spent a lot of time with the local retarded adults, and I made friends with quite a few of them.
Further, we have the examples of the 67 IQ Nigerian scammers who ran circles around the American scam victims I worked with who had IQ’s of 65-73. One of these women walked and talked normally, but these Nigerian foxes just had her running around like a chicken with her head cut off with all their endless tricks and games.
When it came to “con artist IQ,” these guys had genius IQ’s, over 140. They were expert manipulators, experts at human psychology, and they knew how to mimic and play-act emotions and push people’s emotional buttons like few people do. They were like expert actors, except they were evil. In some very important ways, these Nigerians were much smarter than the Americans who had the same or even slightly higher IQ’s.
Further, Hoste notes that 16% of US Blacks are retarded = IQ <70. I find this very hard to believe. Most US Whites with IQ’s <70 are on SSI and can’t really work. Are 16% of US Blacks on SSI due to their low IQ’s? Forget it. I assume that many of these low IQ Blacks are working, paying bills, dating, married, raising kids, maintaining a household, driving vehicles, etc. They may not be doing these things well, but they are doing them.
I’ve also met some very smart Blacks who seemed kind of “dumb” in some ways. One guy says he has an IQ of 185. He has a PhD and is a professor at a university. Yet he misspells words and is sloppy with his sentences. It’s like he doesn’t give a damn about things like that.
I recently found the blog of a famous Black scholar, and the same thing was going on. Great mind, brilliant thinker, very creative, very nice sentences in an artsy way, but often sloppy. Misspellings, poor sentence construction, poor punctuation. I sent him a mail telling him he needed an editor but he never wrote back.
Once again, there was a brilliant sloppiness about him and a feeling that about certain things, he didn’t care and was just going to blow it off. The end result was that to me his writing looked sort of stupid due to his errors, but I’m sure he doesn’t see it that way.
I’m going to tie together these examples of very high and very low IQ Blacks by suggesting that maybe there is a “Black intelligence” that differs from “White intelligence” and that these tests may not be measuring properly. I realize that’s a subjective judgment, and I don’t have much to back it up except intuitive hunches and “general feeling,” but that’s what I’m concluding after thinking hard about this stuff for a couple of years now.
By the way, this conclusion is also consistent with race realism. If Blacks and Whites are different racially in more than obvious ways, a specific “Black intelligence” that differs from the White kind is a possibility.

Some IQ Conundrums

On the post IQ Is a Meaningful Construct, two commenters make some interesting comments. First cursed and then tulio comment, then my comments follow:

cursed: I have no problems believing that Blacks are stupid, but one thing that puzzles me is how a guy like Mohamed Ali (before he got punch drunk) summoned forth dazzlingly quick witted rhetoric, yet on his armed forces enlistment test he registered an 80 IQ.

White guys with an 80 IQ can in no way shape or form talk like Ali could. I’m not trying to let blacks off the hook for performing poorly on standardized test, but I think those guys brains work a little differently.

tulio: What cursed said is why I think we aren’t even close to conclusions about race and intelligence. I can think of many instances where a Black person who scored low on an IQ test didn’t necessarily come across as unintelligent. Also tests show IQ’s of 70 for Black Africa and I’ve even seen some groups with scores in the 60s, I think the Australian Aborigines score 62.
Now think about it, someone with an IQ in the 60s would be functionally retarded. They wouldn’t even be capable of normal activities like driving a car.
Yet the average African or Aborigine can operate a vehicle just fine and they are perfectly functional. So I do think there are some questions to be asked of how useful these tests are in gauging one’s intelligence, or at least the intelligence of groups that grossly-underperform on them.
I’m sorry, I have a seriously hard time believing that the average African or Aborigine is functionally retarded. Also, IQ is only one component of intelligence. And I think its importance in society and good desirable behavior is very overrated.
A person with a high IQ will probably be good at things like math, winning chess matches and solving computer programming bugs.
However, IQ doesn’t measure more esoteric but possibly more crucial survival skills such as “common sense” or just general “life wisdom”. I’m willing to bet that the people who run the flat earth society are intelligent and probably would do well on an IQ test, yet they have no common sense if they believe in such nonsense.
Look at Bobby Fischer, the late chess champion, guy’s IQ was probably off the charts, yet if you read any of his social commentary after 9/11 the dude was a complete moron.
The Mohammed Ali bit is interesting. It reminds of some of the freestyle rappers that I’ve heard. If you’re not familiar with that, “freestyle rap” is when a rapper has no pre-written lyrics but is making up rhyming verses on the fly that not only rhyme and make sense but can also be quite witty.
I’ve tried it myself once just to see if I could do it, and found it extremely difficult. It takes intelligence.
But who knows, if you gave these same guys an IQ test, they may not do too well. Maybe there is something to the multiple intelligences theory. Maybe we don’t know enough about the nature of intelligence to draw any conclusions of this time.
On the original post, Robert Lindsay wrote: The lower the IQ, the more likely the person is to do stupid things – go to jail or prison, commit crimes or lots of crimes, have kids out of wedlock or as a teenager, parent multiple children by multiple partners, be a lousy parent to your child if you’re female or refuse to support the kid if you’re male, go on welfare, engage in domestic violence, have poor to low morals, join a street gang, shoot someone or get shot, refuse to plan for the future, drink or take drugs, die young, never go to the doctor, engage in extremely risky behaviors, fall victim to injurious or life-threatening accidents, refuse to engage in healthy behaviors such as eating properly and exercising, etc.
I’m not convinced at all that low IQ leads to pathological behavior. I think this is a values issue, not an intelligence/genetic one. For example, yes people in jail will probably have lower IQ’s, but I think a more accurate way of reading this is that people with low IQ’s are simply more likely to get caught because they commit more petty crimes.
The leaders of crime rings are quite intelligent, they are the least likely to end up in prison. They are smart enough to cover their tracks, use lower IQ pawns to do their dirty work, work the system to their advantage and evade capture. I really don’t like assigning low-intelligence rationales to behaviors that could better be explained by low VALUES.

The commenters raise some interesting questions for which there are no good answers. It doesn’t really make sense.
The Black Africans with IQ’s of 70 or 65 or so are not retarded in the same way that a White person with an IQ that low would be. So in a way, those scores don’t make sense.
I have a Yahoo group where we fight scammers in Nigeria.
These guys probably have IQ’s of ~67 . Yet we had some White victims who were low IQ (I figure maybe ~72 IQ) and these Nigerians just danced circles around them for months on end and cleaned them out for $10,000’s. They were so much smarter than these women it was not even funny.
Your average African or Aborigine is not functionally retarded in the same way that a White with a below 70 IQ is. However, we spent a lot of time dealing with these African scammers, talking to them, etc. In some ways, these guys were dumb as rocks.
They can’t spell or construct a meaningful sentence, and their intellectual processes are just stupid in a lot of ways. Nevertheless, they were able to survive, and they were brilliant at reading people psychologically and manipulating them. They had a genius “Con Artist IQ.” They also often had excellent social skills. They are able to work and function in their societies, they have friends, they date, marry, and raise kids, all the things that below 70 IQ Whites often cannot do.
I have not dealt much with Aborigines, but I suspect that a similar thing is going on. I have seen some of them commenting on Youtube videos, and their writing reminded me of the Africans. They can’t spell to save their lives, can’t construct a sentence, and their writing comes across as stupid. Yet they can function in that they are sociable, can make friends, date, marry, raise families, etc. and even work at jobs concordant with their culture.
The White nationalists and scientific racist types have some argument that tries to explain this, but it never made sense to me. They argue that a 65 IQ in a Black is not the same as a 65 IQ in a White. Well, ok, but if not, why not? Nevertheless, they still argue that the 65 IQ Black is still retarded.
I suppose the point is that in our modern society, IQ tests do indeed measure all sorts of important things, such as ability to succeed in the workplace of a modern society. Societies with low IQ’s don’t do very well. Those with high IQ’s do better. IQ tests also predict very well how one does in school, and even how one does on the job.
They also predict all sorts of other things. The list of pathological behaviors that tulio is saying have no basis in IQ in fact do have such a basis.
The lower the IQ, the more likely people are to do what I call above stupid things. The higher the IQ, the less likely they are to do those stupid things. The notion that high-IQ types lack common sense is also not true. It’s hard to imagine a more commonsensical behavior than keeping healthy or living a long time. The higher the IQ, the longer you live and the healthier you are.
There just flat out are not a whole lot of ways in which high IQ people act stupid. It’s said that some of them have poor social skills, but I think that this is often due to neurosis, shyness, introversion, etc. They come across as strange because their heads are in the clouds all the time.
I don’t think that neurotics, shy people, introverts, etc. are social retards or lack social skills. A neurotic is ill, and in many cases, I think they can’t help it. Introverts and shy people are not social idiots; they’re just introverts.
If you subtract that stuff, I’ve found that most high IQ people have pretty good social skills. They are often very careful about what they say, they monitor conversational attributes, verbal and nonverbal, very well, and are constantly adjusting their verbal and nonverbal behaviors based on those cues.
Some of them are “deliberately eccentric” in that they just don’t give a damn about social rules that much and seem to delight in breaking them on purpose just to thumb their noses at society. The notion of the high-IQ social retard is dubious.
Much has been made of “emotional intelligence,” and some books have even been written on it. People love this stuff because everyone hates IQ, mostly because they don’t have a very high one, and they are jealous. EQ was a way to get back at all those uppity brainiac nerds. The problem is that EQ is highly correlated with IQ, so the argument starts going round in circles.
So you can go on all you want about how IQ doesn’t matter, but bottom line is that low-IQ folks in modern societies tend to not do so well. That’s just all there is to it. So right there, that implies that the tests are indeed measuring something meaningful, or at least something meaningful in our modern societies.

New Record For 2nd Highest Hits Set On Robert Lindsay

This is pretty unusual. We just seem to keep on setting records here on this site. Just when I think things are slowing down, we set new records. For instance, yesterday, September 2, we set a new record for 2nd highest* hits in a day, 4,020, barely beating the previous record of 4,018 set on July 7 two months prior.
Good news, let’s keep the records coming!
*I keep records for 1st-5th highest days, weeks and months.

Philip Garrido's Blog

Here is the very strange blog of Philip Garrido, titled Voices Revealed.
Philip Garrido is the California pedophile, rapist, kidnapper and sex offender who abducted Jaycee Lee Dugard off the street in 1991 when she was 11 years old and kept her in a tent in his backyard in Antioch, California until she was finally discovered this year at age 29. She had had two children by him, both girls, named Angel and Starlite, one 11, the other 15.

Angel (left), 11 and Starlite (right), 15, at a neighborhood party several days before Garrido's arrest. After his arrest, they were set free.
Angel (left), 11 and Starlite (right), 15, at a neighborhood birthday party thrown by Cheyvonne Molino for her 16 yr old daughter several days before Garrido's arrest. After his arrest, they were set free. This is the only known photo of the girls on the Web that I could find.

Garrido was apprehended when he appeared at UC Berkeley to try to make some bizarre public demonstration. He was passing out strange flyers and had two young girls with him. The girls appeared “robotic” and the officer become suspicious.
The cop ran Garrido’s name and found out he was a registered sex offender. She contacted his parole officer and it turned out he was violating parole. An investigation of his home revealed Dugard, whom everyone had assumed was dead, and the two girls she had had, now 11 and 15, both by Garrido. Garrido’s wife was in on the whole mess as an accomplice (she was in the car when he abducted Jaycee 18 years ago.
Curiously, cops had been called to the house several times in the past by suspicious neighbors, but they had never bothered to look in the backyard. Over the years, Dugard came to see Garrido as her husband and fell in love with him.
Garrido got a record when he was 25 years old when he abducted a casino worker, Catharine Calloway Hall, in the parking lot of the casino where she worked in South Lake Tahoe. He took four hits of acid and her to a warehouse which he had set up as specifically for his sexual fantasies . There was wine, porn, sex aids and stage lights. He kept her in their for some time, raping her, until a cop making a routine check noticed lights on in a warehouse.
The cop drove up, knocked on the door and Garrido appeared. A naked woman then ran out screaming. Garrido was arrested and sentenced to 50 years in prison but he was released early.
He married his second wife, Nancy, in Leavenworth Prison in 1981. Commenters have speculated on her ethnicity. She is a Chicana, a Mexican-American born to an old-time, assimilated Mexican-American family in Texas in the 1950’s. She was a Jehova’s Witness and he was a handsome prisoner who was already claiming that he had found God and put his criminal past behind him.
She was 26 and he was 30. She moved to Leavenworth to be near him, working as a nurse. Later when they moved to Antioch, she continued to work as a nurse in nursing homes and for physical therapists. Her colleagues at work said she was well-liked and were shocked at news of her arrest. Nancy’s family in Denver is distraught over news of her arrest. In an interview, a brother said she was a good, normal person until she met Phil Garrido.
Phil Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra at the wedding in 1981. Nancy was born in the Bexar, Texas, to a Mexican-American family in 1955.
Phil Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra at the wedding in 1981. Nancy was born in the Bexar, Texas, to a Mexican-American family in 1955..

Three years after his release, he abducted Dugard.
After his release in 1988, he stalked his former victim at her casino job, freaking her out .
Rapists come in all varieties, but Garrido was particularly creepy. Abducting a victim and transporting her somewhere in your car, especially to weird warehouse set up for sex crimes, is a particularly dangerous escalation beyond the usual rapist stuff. Keep in mind that lots of guys rape women, in this country and all over the world.
We can’t kill all convicted rapists (We’d be executing 1000’s or over 10,000 guys every year) and we can’t even keep them up all locked up forever. I’m no expert on rape, but I assume that most rapists don’t re-offend, since if they did, the statistics would be much higher. For instance, I’m familiar with the guys on the local sex offender list (and I know a few of them). In all the time I’ve lived here, I’m not aware that any of them re-offended.
However, serial rapists and certain rapist subtypes are particularly dangerous. The type that abducts women and takes them off to strange places is particularly dangerous – these guys can turn killer. Setting up a place especially for your weird sex games in a serious escalation – once again, these guys can go killer too.
Phil Garrido was born in 1951 in Contra Costa County, California. Commenters have speculated about his ethnicity, suggesting that he is a Hispanic.
Actually, Garrido is very much a Spaniard surname, and sometimes it is Portuguese. It is found sparingly in Latin America, and even there, most having it are White Latin Americans. Garrido is clearly White, and there are many Portuguese in Contra Costa County. His first wife, Christine Marie Perreira, had a Portuguese last name. She describes him now as a monster. There are also quite a few Spaniards in this part of California.
Garrido's mugshot from his 1976 arrest in Lake Tahoe. He's definitely a White man, not an Hispanic like commenters are saying. I think he's Portuguese.
Garrido's mugshot from his 1976 arrest in Lake Tahoe. He's definitely a White man, not an Hispanic like commenters are saying. I think he's Portuguese.

At age 7, Garrido was exposing himself to neighbor girls, so he got an early start in the sex offending game. By high school, he had already been accused of raping a teenage girl.
Phil Garrido in high school. He was already a rapist at this time.
Phil Garrido in high school. He was already a rapist at this time.

This is a pretty typical childhood for these guys. They start young – kids or certainly adolescents. By his teenage years, he had a bad motorcycle accident and suffered a serious head injury.
Philip Garrido as a handsome young man.
Philip Garrido as a handsome young man.

He had to have brain surgery, and afterward, he was completely changed . After that, he began using LSD very heavily, every day for a long time. At some point, he become psychotic and said he was hearing voices. He continued to hear voices for the rest of his life. Although articles and his family are blaming the acid, I’m dubious. It appears that the acid just triggered schizophrenia in Garrido.
It’s dubious that LSD causes long term or permanent mental illness in anyone due to damage to the brain for the simple reason that 60 years of testing have yet to find any damage to the brain from LSD, either in humans or any other animals. It does appear hypotoxic to the visual system, and HPPD seems to be the only proven long-term effect from LSD (I have it myself, and I only took LSD 9 times, which isn’t very much).
If LSD doesn’t damage the brain, how can it give you permanent schizophrenia or any other mental illness? It can’t.
On the other hand, some individuals who have taken LSD many, many times seem to be mentally ill. In some cases, the mental illness was permanent.
If Garrido took acid every day for 5 years as he says, that’s a lot of acid – 1,825 trips. For the next couple of years, he took lots of acid, but not every day. It looks like Garrido took acid maybe 2,200 time or more. Further, he often took multiple hits when he fried – up to 4-10 hits at once.
Timothy Leary probably took LSD over 2,000 times in addition to using many other drugs. In interviews with him in the 1980’s, I felt that he appeared damaged. A woman who took LSD over 4,000 times is still chronically mentally ill 30 years later.
A man who took acid every day or nearly every day for a couple of years became mentally ill and had to be hospitalized. He recovered, but soon began very heavy LSD use again and had to be rehospitalized. We still lack a proper theory or explanation for these bad reactions, as the drug does not appear to damage the brain, as noted above. Until we know more, very heavy LSD use seems like a very bad idea.
Looking at Garrido’s blog, there is only one possible diagnosis based on an examination of his writing: chronic paranoid schizophrenia. Garrido functioned very well, running a printing business, marrying, owning a home, but he’s clearly ill.
From 1969-1975, Garrido was often dropping acid every day. It’s said you can’t do this since the effect wears off, but actually you can. The high is different, but it’s still there, just much more subtle. By 1976, he had been drinking, smoking dope, sniffing coke and dropping acid every day for several years.
He was also jerking off compulsively (often in public – in restaurants, bars, drive-in movies and outside windows of homes) and spending lots of time hanging out in front of schools watching the schoolgirls. He specialized in girls aged 7-10. Once again, this is pretty much classic behavior for a quite dangerous type of sex offender.
It looks like he’s a pedophile, and 7-11 or so is AoA (age of attraction) but it also looks like he’s non-preferential in that he also loves sex with older girls and grown women.
The guy’s just a first-class weirdo. His neighbors in Antioch called him “Creepy Phil” because he was also ranting about what a drag it was to be a registered sex offender and talking about the voices that he heard. Police now suspect that Garrido threw wild orgy parties in which he offered up Dugard to his drunken buddies. At one time he tried to gouge out his first wife’s eyeball with a safety pin.

Revealed Unemployment Versus Revealed Death

Note: Repost from the old blog.
Our very smart Leftist Brit commenter Lafayette Sennacherib notes in the comments section:

Among the buzzwords on the collapse of the Soviet bloc was ‘revealed unemployment’, meaning that Communist industries were employing people to do nothing useful apart from living and breeding.
The capitalists are bit by bit feeling their way to getting us to accept the idea of ‘revealed death’ i.e. the idea that it’s ok for lots of people to starve to death because there isn’t really a place in the economy for them.
We already accept that the 3rd World is used to starving to death, so it’s no big deal for them; and I’ve even seen the starvation in Korea in the 90’s (though there’s some doubt about whether that actually happened – see Bruce Cummings) described as a ‘leveling of the population to what is its natural optimum level (loosely)’; the next thing is to get Europeans and N. Americans to accept that ‘we can’t carry passengers, if we show too much compassion for the weak then they’ll drag us down with them…etc’.
America has always been pretty close to that anyway, but Europe’s heading that way with ample help from the capitalist propaganda machine – we can’t afford welfare anymore, etc.
You know – capitalism works because we’re all much better off than they used to be, but we’ll all have to work harder and longer with fewer benefits because of globalisation…So are we better off or worse off?
Even supposed Leftists like George Galloway come out with this stuff – “immigration is a good thing; that’s why the US is the richest country in the world…” He really says that, while also arguing that the capitalists are screwing us harder and harder.
But I think there’s room for hope; I get the feeling that even the most indoctrinated and unreflective among our poor are now finding the contradictions in the media bullshit just too blatant, and the hard realities just too hard to ignore.
It really is ‘socialism or barbarism’; just because it hasn’t worked perfectly so far is no reason to give up.
There just isn’t enough discussion of this, anywhere; there is obviously the problem that under capitalism private accumulation of wealth makes excluding corruption impossible…
Discussions of how an effective democracy could work should take up about 50% of the discourse on ‘the left’, but they take up effectively zero, though there are isolated academics and think-tanks I occasionally hear of who do some interesting work.
“I think the free market, if galvanized by the government and the media, can solve problems like global warming far better than a Soviet style socialist economy.” huy
Come on, huy! What’s the solution likely to be – the ‘revealed deaths’ of 4 to 5 billion people. The ‘free market’ will starve them, and the media will put a positive spin on it.
Anyway, there is no ‘free market’; capitalism operates like a vacuum cleaner, sucking all wealth and power to the top – it is a mechanism, which is effectively self-perpetuating – mammon, money reified and deified, which can only create despots, slaves, death and destruction of the environment.

This was an excellent comment by LS, a very smart guy. Let me translate a bit:
Above, LS compares the revealed (hidden) unemployment in Communism to the revealed (hidden) death in capitalism. He also notes that conditions in the capitalist world are getting observably worse and worse for workers in recent years. The capitalists don’t even deny it, but they say that things have to get worse due to globalization.
At the same time, capitalism is the best system on Earth and is making us better all the time. Except that we’re getting worse. Or something. Or whatever.
LS notes the idiocy of a Leftist like George Galloway singing the praises of US super-capitalism, while attributing it’s success to the very immigrant flood that has devastated US workers. This Leftist offers more of the same tidal wave for British workers.
“The US success model.”
But the US is a rich country (not nearly the richest on Earth – check Luxembourg – beating us for years now) on paper only. The bottom 80% has been getting screwed off and on for the last 30 years, just like everywhere on Earth radical neoliberalism has been implemented.
The immigrant hurricane surge will devastate British workers the same way it did America’s.
Failure is success. Getting worse is getting better. The cognitive dissonance is Earth-shattering.
LS also notes that terrible corruption is always going to be a problem in any capitalist society due to wealth accumulation. In the 3rd World, it’s nearly set in stone. Note the horrible corruption and mass theft that accompanied the moves from socialism to capitalism in Russia and China.
If capitalism is the greatest engine on Earth for making money – and it is – it’s also the greatest engine on Earth for theft from petty to grand. Wherever you find capitalism, you will find an orgy of thievery. It’s nearly built into the system.
LS’ last paragraph has some good points. Huy is a British social democrat who is much enamored of whatever snake oil New Labour is pushing these days. He thinks that the market can definitely fix global warming.
Clearly, the market alone is incapable of resolving the global warming problem. By standard market economics, it’s economically rational to devastate the planet with global warming (with unknown consequences), and it’s economically irrational to try to stop global warming with mass government intervention.
There’s tons of money in global warming, and tons of red ink in stopping it. Knowing that, the market is going to take the biggest write-off in history and fix this problem? Get real!
Yet the last 30 years of the rap song blasting, “Market! Market!” in our ears nonstop has mutated Americans. There can be no solutions to anything outside of the market.
The government, or state, is dead, except for blowing stuff up, conquering tinpot dictators, putting cuffs on every other American and throwing millions in the hole. The state’s for killing people and busting your ass. Soldiers and cops, and there’s little else. No wonder Americans hate the government so much.
Even Mother Jones, a “liberal” US magazine, stated in a recent issue on global warming that any solution would have to be a market solution. Why? Because that’s just the way it is nowadays. The state is dead; the market rules. The libertarians won the Culture (of Economics) War.
Yet the market is incapable of fixing global warming because there’s no money it, and it involves massive losses. So the magic hand is essentially on track to blow up the planet, using weather and Mother Nature as the thermonuclear device.

Brainwashing, Mind Control and Biowarfare in Korea

Note: Repost from the old blog.
All my life, I’ve been told by the US Liesmedia, and by my society in general, that some people called “Red Chinese” subjected US Korean War POW’s to some kind of a horrible “brainwashing and mind control” program. I’ve believed this all my life. It never happened. It’s all a great big lie. There was about as much brainwashing and mind control as you get from reading this blog.
I was also told that US POW’s got tortured. Never happened, at least not by the Chinese. There was some terrible treatment by the North Koreans, but as soon as the Chinese took over, thing quickly got better.
Turns out that a number of US POW’s admitted that the US used biological weapons against the North Koreans. The Chinese made videotapes of these confessions and released them for propaganda purposes. The only way for the US government to make sense of these statements was to say that the POW’s were tortured and subjected to mind control and brainwashing.
After the war, the POW’s who made those statements were released, and came home to a hostile America, where they were threatened with court martial. They quickly recanted and made up a bunch of crap about brainwashing, mind control and torture to explain why they made those tapes.
A new book proves that the US did use biological warfare on North Korea. Evidence includes:

…Reports of sudden deaths from plague, anthrax and encephalitis (brain inflammation resulting from a viral infection), and eyewitness accounts of US aircraft dropping strange objects, including soybean stalks, feathers and cardboard packages containing live insects, rotten fish, decaying pork, frogs and rodents.
Fleas from these airdrops tested positive for plague, which had not been reported in Korea since 1912. And insects, spiders and feathers were found to be carrying anthrax.

Turns out our “free press” never got around to telling me about any of this either. Isn’t it great living in a country with “freedom of the press”?