Male and Female Psychopaths: Some Differences

SHI: Just as there are evil men, there are evil women, and it’s very hard for these creatures to disguise their intentions. They should not be shown any mercy or grace. It is usually safer to avoid them, but if you are forced to interact, make it very clear that you understood who they are and protect your boundaries.

In the Medieval Ages, such women were beheaded for sorcery or conspiracies. They are bad news and have no soul.

Basically evil bitches from Hell! I’ve been running into a lot of these lately. Mostly young women who are gold-diggers. To sum up, they are basically trying to steal money from me. They are worse than whores because at least whores give you something in return for your money. These monsters just steal your money and give you nothing in return. They are almost all young women. I think it is because I am an older man.

I lost $80 to one of these harridans not long ago. She was 1/2 Black, 1/4 Hispanic and 1/4 White. She was pretty ghetto, was basically a whore (prostitute), and had the personality of a The Whore (the worst female personality of them all).

I am convinced that she was a female psychopath. Indeed, 45% of female prostitutes are psychopaths! A lot of strippers, cam girls, porn stars, sex workers, etc. have this same personality and a lot of them are female psychopaths.

When a woman goes psychopathic, she basically turns into a whore and a thief. She can be very psychologically and spiritually violent, but not physically violent because women are just not like that. Physical violence is a trait of men only. These women are about as bad as a woman gets – a whore and a thief – typically both at the same time.

However, male psychopaths, while not usually whores (except for gay men, and yes, a lot of gay psychopaths are gay whores when young), are typically thieves, and they can get a lot worse than that. That is because the male psychopath is often physically violent, and that is downright menacing and dangerous as Hell.

Females, even female psychopaths, are just not violent. It’s simply not in the character or soul of the female to be like that. Women almost seem to have an inborn physical revulsion towards physical violence, like the very thought of it physically repulses them and makes them nauseaous.

The most evil women I have ever known definitely drew the line at physical violence. I have heard evil women discussing how they are going to get back at their enemies, and the subject of homicide came up, and every one of those women would draw back and put a line in the sand, “Well, wait. We can’t kill them. We just can’t do that.” Any other evil women within earshot would nod their heads.

If you think about it, it’s not adaptive for females to be physically violent. For one, she might kill her own kids! The trait’s not going to get passed down that way. For another, think back to caveman days to those Alpha Psychopathic Caveman who were monopolizing all the women with harems while making sure via terrorism that most men were not able to breed.

Picture one of these maniacal cavemen if you will. Now think of whether these caveman psychos would put up with any physical violence from the women they were lording it over. Hell no. Any physically violent women back then would probably be promptly murdered by those dangerous men.

And as SHI notes, physically violent or murderous women were killed as sorcerers, witches, or conspirators by men back in the Middle Ages when humans were not nearly so civilized and kind-hearted as they are now.

You can have society with murderous men, and we have exactly that all over the world. But you can’t have a society where 100% of the population is physically violent and murderous. That society’s probably not going last long before they all simply kill each other.

Women Who Live to Beat Up the Men in Their Lives

SHI writes: “Women respect integrity…”

There are douchey women with absolutely no integrity whatsoever. I think they share every bit of contempt for good honest men as their douchey male counterparts.

If you want to score with them, you have to be a sick perverted man and lie through your teeth. They absolutely hate a man with integrity because in a relationship, such men would not satisfy their whims. The pesky moral conscience gets in the way.

These asshole women are like gold-diggers but not all of them are after money. They simply gain pleasure out of controlling the men in their lives, through sex or whatever. It is important for them to be the abuser in the relationship while playing victim to the hilt. These bitches are promiscuous and easily get bored of their husbands.

Being an ASSHOLE is a choice, not restricted to any specific gender.

I’ve had some girlfriends like that! I swear some women are just sick. They look for men who they perceive as weak or soft so they can beat the Hell out of them, mostly verbally, in the relationship. They insult you and have a sadistic gleam in their eyes when they do it. They insult you in front of groups of people. They insult you when they first meet you.

When they first meet you, they will laugh in your face, insult you, and then basically proposition you by asking you to come stay with them for a couple of weeks! It’s a bit jarring, like “Does this crazy bitch like me or hate me or what?!”

I still meet women like this to this day on dating sites. I met one a while back. She was arguing with everything I said and shooting down all my comments as “inappropriate” or “immature.” I basically wasn’t allowed to talk about anything, as I guess everything I said was not proper somehow. She was almost laughing while she was talking to me.

These women are very condescending towards the men in their lives. I have a pretty soft voice and generally come across as a pretty soft-spoken, soft sort of man. I’m not a wimp at all, but I am not the most masculine guy in the room, and a lot of people mistake that for wimpiness.

However my Mom pointed out that wimpy means a man who won’t fight back, and I absolutely fight back. In fact, I fight back so hard that I am quite proud to call myself a psycho. I don’t attack, rape, rob, and kill innocent people, but you mess with me and you’re going to be awful sorry! You screw with me and I’ll kill you is my attitude.

These bitches make a beeline for me, and their eyes light up when they see me. When they talked to me, it seemed like they were almost laughing under their breath the whole time, making fun of me.

Unless you are some crazy masochist who likes to get beat up by his woman, you need to avoid these women at all costs. They’re sick. They’re basically sadists.

A Brief Look at Histrionic Personality Disorder

Rahul: Have you ever been acquainted with someone with Histrionic Personality Disorder. Is so, can you describe your experience?

I never known one of this particular variety of human monster, thank God for that.
Very, very bad. HPD is the personality of “the whore.” Pornstars, prostitutes, strippers, sexworkers of all types. One reason not to date or get involved with prostitute-type women is because this is the personality that most of them have. Get involved with a prostitute and you get involved with a monster, female version.
Mata Hari was the original HPD. The HPD woman is the “femme fatale.” She’s a black widow. She will draw you into her web and kill you one way or another. A lot of people think that HPD is how psychopathy manifests in the female or feminine character. Men become psychopaths; women (and effeminate men) become HPD’s. ~75% of male HPD’s are gay or bisexual. It’s basically a female disorder.
Basically, they’re monsters. Just another group of Cluster B psychos that will ruin your life like the Borderlines, Narcissists, Psychopaths, and the rest of the motley crew.
Similar to other Cluster B personality disorders, Histrionic Personality Disorder forums are often tumultuous and frequently have to be either policed or shut down due to HPD’s coming in, starting fights and making huge scenes.
And also similar to other Cluster B forums, HPD forums usually have few to no HPD’s (because they don’t think there is anything wrong with themselves) and instead are full of the victims of HPD’s, sort of like how Borderline and Narcissistic PD forums are mostly full of the victims of these particular type of monsters. Antisocial PD forums instead are full of psychopaths because psychopaths love being psychopaths and like to run around on stage shouting to the world how cool it is to be a psychopath. Psychopaths literally think being a psychopath is fun. Antisocial behavior is actually their idea of a good time, believe it or not.

Feminists Are Vile Scum Part 35,027


The thing is that all feminists react exactly as this woman is doing. I have some feminists close to me and I brought up the notion of crazed, out of control, psychobitch women which all of us men have to deal with, and I was met with this precise response: That the very idea of calling women out of control meant that women should be controlled by men. No, women should not be controlled by men. They should also be controlled by women, kids, society at large, the police, their employers, Hell, even God I suppose.
There is one of most persistent notions of feminism: That women have a right to be as evil and insane as possible, that this is good, it’s empowerment, it’s fighting back, and anyway, women have a right to blow up and go insane all the time! And if you try to stop them, you’re a misogynist. This is generally followed by a completely contradictory argument that women are no crazier or more emotionally unstable than men, or in fact, as many feminists insist, that men are more nuts and unstable than women.
At age 83, my feminist mother finally admitted to me that women are more emotional than men. Much more emotional. She looked completely deflated when she admitted that. She’d been upholding this lie her whole life, and finally now in old age when she’s got nothing left to lose, she can finally let go of it. And my Mom’s not even a crazy type feminist, at least not on the surface. God knows how she feels deep down inside. Actually I shudder to think about that, having some insight into her deep psyche.
Feminism is pure poison. It’s cancer. It’s mental illness. It’s brain rot. It’s blood poisoning in the very veins of human society.
It’s got to go.
Feminists are the enemy, pure and simple.

Libfems Versus Radfems

Interview with Gail Dines, radfem, about her anti-porn book Pornland. The interview was written up on the site of the New Left Project, so apparently both libfems (such as the author, Sarah Ditum) and radfems like Dines are both part of the Left.
I do not think men should blanketly oppose feminism as much of the reactionary Manosphere wants us to. However, choosing to support libfems and to oppose radfems seems to be a rational thing to do. In opposing radfems, we avoid the trap saying, “We oppose feminism,” or a cryptic, “We oppose some feminism.” We lay out exactly which feminism we oppose (radfems) and which we support critically (libfems).
Radfems strike me as mentally ill people. As someone who works in mental health, I do not see why I should support a movement full of mentally disturbed people who seek to impose their mental illnesses on society.

Female Prisoner Too Violent to Ever Be Let Out

Here.
She obviously gets some sort of a DSM diagnosis.
So what do we give her? Antisocial Personality Disorder (sociopath)? I am not so sure about that due to all the self-harm, although she is vicious. Since when do sociopaths display all this self harm? Sociopaths hurt others, not themselves, and they only kill themselves when the jig is up. They commit suicide to avoid arrest or in prison to avoid the pain of imprisonment, but only rarely in other cases, though some get alcoholic, depressed and suicidal in middle age as the sociopathy starts to burn itself out. I think she has some psychopathic traits though and would score fairly high on Hare PC-L test.
She mostly looks like a Borderline. Borderlines can be quite violent, even female borderlines. And borderlines are notorious for horrific self-harm, suicide threats and suicide attempts. They are not usually this violent though. This crazy bitch has murdered a fellow inmate and attacked guards several times, carving up one’s cheek.
Is there a syndrome called Borderline-Sociopath or Sociopathic Borderline? If there is, she might be something like that.
Whatever she is, she sure is awful evil for a female. Females are not usually this bad. Females can be evil, but their evil is more annoying and infuriating than dangerous. Male evil is much worse because it is menacing, violent, dangerous and homicidal. I have dealt with some evil females in my life and while I wanted to kill most of them at the time, obviously I never did it or even tried or plotted. On the other hand, none of them were really dangerous to me. They were just trying to be as infuriating as possible to provoke the maximum possible violent and crazed reaction from me. I call it “trying to get murdered.”
I will take female evil over male evil any day though. Evil men are terrifying. Evil men have tried to kill me, and I say that with all seriousness. I have had scenes with evil males where it was literally kill or be killed. “I either try to kill these guys, or do nothing and let them kill me.” Others have not tried to kill me but instead beat me very badly, even with heavy objects.
As long as humans are not physically dangerous, they can sort of be tolerated no matter how wicked they are. But violence and the threat of injury or death via attack is a whole other matter.
 

Crazy Women Ahoy, Pull Up the Anchor and Leave

Repost from the old site.
Ah, crazy women! I suppose if I were really nuts, I would not mind a crazy woman. After all, I would probably deserve her, right? Sad thing is, I am hopelessly prejudiced against crazy women. I don’t like em. I discriminate.
I also require that all females be no more than 10% overweight, and in my age bracket, that rules out most of the females. So I don’t really date that much these days, but hey, at least I have pride, dammit.
Women find out I am fat-prejudiced, and they go nuts, I mean ballistic. Beggars can’t be choosers and all that. Hey, look, I have to have sex with this creature, so I have to be able to tolerate your unclothed appearance enough to be able to do that, and at 50, it ain’t a walk in the park anymore, baby.
I have enough problems of my own to deal with without crazy women on top of everything else.
I remember this one crazy woman, I broke up with her, and she goes and punches a hole in the wall! Whoa, baby, hold onto your horses! I broke up with you? Hell, you should be happy!
She used to swallow handfuls of acid tabs (like five hits at once) when we went out on dates. She drank like a fish. She would smoke any kind of weed you gave her and probably take any kind of drug too. All her friends were fags, and she specialized in the sickest fags of them all, the ones in Hollywood who loved masochism.
She regaled me with their tales of how these guys require welts raised two or three inches before they were satisfied. Her idea of a good time was going to an LA fag bar. That was what she did most of the time, as she was almost a full-time fag hag. She also had straight boyfriends, apparently, as she did like men and sex. Going to an LA gay bar is not my idea of a good time.
One night she was drinking like a maniac, and she grabbed four or five tricyclic antidepressants and tossed them down. I protested, and she cried out that this was all of the misery that she was in. So she was deeply psychiatrically ill, as you can see. Diagnosis: borderline schizophrenia, which nowadays goes to Borderline Personality Disorder for the most part.
She had a weird way of talking, and when we would go out, it seemed that she would act so crazy and weird in public that I would be embarrassed to even be seen with her. She spoke in weird metaphors, and it really started annoying me. I’m kind of like neurotic, staring off into space like a weirdo nuts, but I’m not stark raving acting out bats like that. Forget it.
I told her, “Hey, look, you are just too nuts for me,” and she freaks. I wonder if she is still alive.
She was also quite a masochist as far as sex went, but I could not really get into that too much. Anyway, most females are like that to some degree or another, let’s face it. It goes hand in hand with being female.
She was always telling me about stories where she was meeting guys who would pull knives on her, rape her, threaten to kill her, torture her, etc. One time it was a whole group of guys and she gangbanged them all. Whopeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! Except they were all pulling knives on her and trying to torture her and threatening to kill her at the time.
She was quite proud of her gangbanging experience, but my best friends heard about it and were totally freaked out and appalled, saying she was a disgusting slut pig whore. That was true, but that’s not necessarily a bad thing in a female. In fact, one could knock on my door right now and even at age 50, I might not even mind too much.
She also liked women a little bit, but only a little. She really loved young boys, as she called them, and delighted in having sex with teenage boys, especially around 13 years old. Her Mom was schizophrenic and had tried to stab her to death in her sleep when she was a little girl, and I guess it was all downhill from then on.
She had all these weird seemingly different personalities that she would fade in and out of all the time. Now, I’m into channeling myself, but this sort of thing really ought to be controlled in order to work best, otherwise you just seem like a street person or a potential maniac.
Later she accused my best friend of hitting a baby in the EEG lab where he worked. According to everyone else, it never even happened, but she insisted and insisted. I think maybe they fired her, but I forget.
I saw her once later, she came over to my house in the daytime, and you know how that goes. I was 27 years old, graduated USC with post-BA degree, teaching school full-time, smoking lots of dope, going nuts.
The culmination of the sex act on my end left her all pissed off, but I thought it was funny that when I kissed her goodbye at the car, I swear some of the middle aged neighbor ladies were laughing and smiling and giving me the thumbs up?
One housewife even sneaked outside and gave me a great big beaming smile. Who says women don’t like guys who score?
Women ain’t all bad.

Just Kill Yourself and Get it Over With

Seriously, you sick bitch.
Borderline personality disorder, apparently. She’s a cutter.
I knew some cutters once. They actually formed a club called Oakhurst Cutters. Bunch of stupid, sick, fucked up young White women. She told us that at a table with a bunch of other people and started laughing. I stood up, pointed at her, told her she was a sick bitch, and walked away. In modern society, that’s considered impolite. I think it’s impolite to use your own living body as a med school cadaver, sorry.
Why don’t we just line these people up and shoot them and get it over with? I’m not serious, but that’s what I often think about these BPD types. Just line em up and shoot em!
 

He Said He Would Lend Her an Ear

But this not what he meant.

A truly bizarre story. What in the Hell is with this chick anyway? The White nationalists are going nuts over this story as proof of Black depravity. True, Blacks can be depraved, but this is not an example of such. If anything, this chick appears to be not right at all in the head. This is about a crazy person more than anything else.

She only got 60 days? Damn.

She apologized profusely? Well, that’s nice, but you still need to do the time. She’s apparently dangerous, and 60 days ain’t long enough to let her think it over.

She lost her junior high school teaching job? This chick was a teacher? Jeez.

Pretty nice looking chick though. Too bad she’s a fuckin cannibal.

Anti-Racist Idiot Goes to Haiti, Gets Raped, Is Thankful for the Experience

The White nationalists just love this stuff. They can’t get enough of it.

But it does seem to show the sheer idiocy of some White anti-racists.

Amanda Kijera, a White liberal anti-racist (Facebook page here), went to Haiti to volunteer to help the Haitian people. After a few months there, she was raped one night by a Black Haitian man on a rooftop. After the rape, she says she feels grateful for having had this experience (Huh?!) and blames Whites for so screwing up Black guys all over the world that they do fucked up stuff like raping women. It’s all Whitey’s fault. You know, we’re forcing all these Black guys to rape women by oppressing them and all.

As she was being raped on the rooftop, she pleaded with her “brother” to stop and told him she was a Malcolm X scholar. I doubt if the illiterate punk even knows who Malcolm X was. As you might expect, this had no effect on the rapist.

If this woman goes back to Haiti without an armed guard, I say she’s an idiot.

Amanda Kijera, silly White woman from the Tim Wise School of Anti-racism, goes to Haiti, gets raped by a Black guy, then blames Whites, like a good anti-racist should.

Haiti’s rape rate is off the charts. I recently heard on the radio that 70% of Haitian girls have been raped. I guess that means that 70% of Haitian females get raped before they are even adults. In adulthood, even more get raped no doubt. Looks like almost 100% of Haitian women probably get raped at some point in their lives.

After the earthquake, there were widespread reports of Haitian men raping Haitian women and girls, even in the temporary camps set up to house them. That Haitian men have about a 6% HIV-positive rate makes the rape epidemic even more terrifying.

This reminds me of the Amy Biehl case in South Africa during apartheid. This young liberal White woman went to South Africa to show her solidarity with the oppressed Blacks. At some point in her visit, she was surrounded by a mob of South Africans, including females, and stabbed to death. A radical group, the Azanian People’s Liberation Army, claimed responsibility for the murder. Apparently their revolutionary style was to murder any Whites in South Africa at random. They were responsible for a number of terrorist attacks on innocent South African Whites.

There was another fairly famous case of a young leftwing White woman who moved alone to a US ghetto to work with the oppressed. She was not there long when one night she was murdered by a crowd of young Black men by being set on fire in an apparent hate crime.

I’m not trying to make a case here that young Black males are so dangerous that all White females should avoid them. But there are some places a young White woman should not go to alone, like Haiti, a US ghetto at night and a South African Black township.

A lot of White liberals are actually secret race realists who are cynical about Blacks. They are non-racist to anti-racist in their views and politics, but nevertheless, they are frightened of Blacks and generally try to avoid them.

They live in White towns and send their kids to White schools. I admit I’ve been afraid of Blacks most of my life. That certainly doesn’t apply to all Black people, but it’s a general feeling. No doubt the standard anti-racist view is that this fear of mine makes me a racist. Well, fine, perhaps it does. OK, I’m a racist then. I’m comfortable with that, and I’m also still alive at 52.

Paranoid Schizophrenia: Exhibit A

From an incoming link to a Twitter page and then to a Myspace page. I will say that he is an excellent artist. At first he seems like a very smart, sane person who is putting you on or doing some kind of a parody. Either that or he has some really fancy and elaborated thinking process going that’s well thought-out and coherent, but most of us are not onto it. The more you read, the less that seems to be the case.

Preoccupation with religion (the Bible) and especially the Devil (you can see he has shaved his head and grown a Devil goatee so he looks like The Evil One himself).

He does look like Satan, doesn't he? He also looks seriously nuts. He's got that crazy stare in his eyes. I wasn't going to divulge the guy's name, but if you try to download his photo, the paranoid motherfucker sends you a virus! So fuck you, Steven Pyle. And get help.

There’s also some complex stuff going on about Black Israelites and how Whites are evil invaders in America and need to be expelled. It’s like he’s incorporated whack Black and Brown Nationalist cant into his delusional project. LOL.

So I guess he’s a Cultural Marxist Multicultural Paranoid Schizophrenic. I figured it would come to this. Cultural Marxism and multiculturalism is so nuts on its face that you often wonder how it is that so many White people buy it. Answer I guess is hardcore brainwashing. It’s funny that Radical Multiculturalism is so nutty that even the crazies are incorporating it into their delusional systems, where it fits quite nicely.

But on the other hand, he has also seriously got into Tea Party “Obama is Evil” stuff and he parrots all the latest conspiracy theories about Obama. Once again this is risible because it just shows just how insane the Tea Partiers really are. When the schizophrenics start using your theory as material for their delusions, you’ve got to start wondering about the soundness of your theory.

I kept trying to go easy on the guy. He went to good schools, he went to art school in the US and Paris, and he’s a kickass artist, but he’s got to be out of his mind.

He’s also apparently a heavy cannabis user. As I make clear in the next post, in many cases, heavy cannabis use dramatically worsens the course of schizophrenia. I figure it’s probably making this guy a whole lot crazier.

You can also see that the personality is pretty well preserved in the paranoid subtype of schizophrenia, which tends to come on later in life, often in the late 20’s to early 30’s. But that’s just when they get dx’d. Typically, there is a 5-10 prodromal phase that precedes the dx. This guy is 31 years old, right around the age for full-blown paranoid schizophrenia to hit. You can also see that he’s got it together enough to produce a fancy webpage, along with some really cool artwork.

This is because paranoid schizophrenics, even when unmedicated, can often function at a fairly high level. The preservation of personality may be due to it hitting later in life. That is, the illness hits after the person has already developed a substantial personality. Other types that hit earlier in adolescence are worse because they hit while the personality is not yet well-formed. Many of these folks are said later to be “41 years old going on 16.” This is because the illness hit so early and their personality basically stopped developing after the illness hit.

Just the writing itself gives it away. If you study this stuff long enough, you can diagnose based on a writing sample alone. In this case there is no other possible diagnosis but Chronic Paranoid Schizophrenia. After 5 years, it goes chronic and the delusional system gets very well systematized and laid out. Yet the person has deteriorated quite a bit, and you can see the deterioration in the writing – you read it and you think it sort of makes sense, then you think again and say, “Huh?” That’s characteristic of schizophrenia.

We Get Fan Mail

Well, now I know what rock stars and movie stars must go through. I got one of my first star-struck fan mails the other day, of course from a young woman. Or, to be more precisely, a teenage girl. I’d been communicating with her a bit because she was trying to get to my other site, which is censored by her South Korean government. At one point, she sent a mail that went something like, “You are handsome! I love you!” On and on like that for a while.

She was 16 years old.

It could be someone playing a practical joke on me, but I doubt it. For one thing, it came from halfway around the world, and English is not her first language.

What I think is funny about this is that we recently had a big shitfit on the blog where some idiot teenage girl-children and some of their fool older woman buddies showed up here and called me names, pedophile among them. One of the things that they insisted was that no teenage girl could possibly be interested in a guy my age, which is 52. It’s true, most of them aren’t, and most guys my age ain’t got it going on anyway. But some are and some do.

And if you get to be my age and still attract teenage girls, thank someone above for that. It’s a tribute to looks, charisma, health, or something.

Sean Connery is regularly voted in the Top 10 Sexiest Men in polls of US teenage girls. I’m not sure when the last survey was done, but Connery is 78 years old! Another couple of famous actors, now around 45, also rank high.

This should not surprise anyone. Sophia Loren and Raquel Welch still look great to me at age 72-74. I imagine they look damn good to a lot of teenage boys too. And surely there are plenty of women in their 40’s and 50’s who have lots of teenage boys lusting after them. Sure, we all get old, if we are lucky enough, but if you’ve got it, you’ve got it, and some can keep dealing good hands far past age 40.

What’s funny is that if I write this girl back and play games with her, verbally that is, I guess I can go to jail. There are now new laws on the books called “sexual communication with a minor” (That one scares the shit out of me.) and “grooming a minor,” in addition to the old standby “annoying a child,” – child in this case even being a girl age 17 and 11 months. The same girl, yet a moon away from full womanhood, can also be “groomed,” I guess if you talk to her the wrong way.

“Grooming” is a phrase that creepy child molesters use for molesting little children. It involves winning the child’s trust through friendship before you move to the next stage, sex. It’s insane to conflate their sicko behavior with teen-adult sexuality, which is a whole other ball of wax.

Really, any of these laws ought to be thrown out on grounds of vagueness. I am talking to a teenage girl. At what point am I “grooming her”, “annoying her” or “communication sexually with her?” WTH man? Probably best never to say two words to the little hotties. Even if she asks directions, just walk away.

Oh well, we can still look. No wait, the Femcunt Scum and their White Knight Mangina buddies are about to make that illegal too. What’s the punishment? Teetering on a secondary ledge in Purgatory with the other pervs, eyes sewn shut with a falconer’s steel lids for decades of penance?

Makes you wonder what rock stars and movie stars have to deal with. They probably get bombed with out and out propositions, probably nude photos, you name it, all the time. Surely some of them are teenage girls. What do you do? Burn them in the fireplace? Call the cops? What if you write her back? You’re now going on a Sex Offender List for life?

Fuck this shit, man. This has gone way too far.

Tom Leykis

Continuing on with our Game/PUA theme these days (LOL, is this turning into a Game/PUA blog?) check out these three videos by Tom Leykis. He’s a radio shock jock here in the US with an explicitly pro-male POV.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVE6B1-tOPM]

This first video is somewhat disturbing. It’s called Tom Leykis Talks About Women Over the Hill. In it, he says some smart things, but also some disturbing things. Like a lot of these Game/PUA guys, Leykis promotes Asshole Game and comes off rather misogynistic.

I don’t see the point. The whole male critique of feminism is that these bitches hate us, they hate us guys. We are understandably upset about that. So our response is, what? To be misogynists and hate all women? Forget it. If hating us men is wrong (and we say it is) then hating all women is wrong too.

The truth is that the best of us really love women, or we should anyway. That’s where I’m coming from. Sure women are sort of nuts, but I love em anyway. They’re lovable nuts, well, most of the time anyway. Anyway, who says guys are better. We guys are psycho and dangerous. That’s better than being nutty? Why? At least a wacky woman won’t try to kill me.

And what kind of woman do we like? The feminists who hate us? No. Or the women like Alpha Unit who unabashedly states, “I love men!” Sure, she slams us in some of her pieces. She makes it clear that we are congenitally dangerous and as a class, have rape tendencies. So we’re brutes. But we’re lovable brutes, AU would say.

So AU and I are coming from the same place. I love women, and she loves men. We both tell it like it is about the opposite sex and have no illusions about the other, but we love em anyway.

Leykis is Greek, and may be coming from a Greek POV. A commenter notes that his Greek parents ordered him never to go down on a woman. “Don’t you ever get on your knees and do that for any woman!” “No vasectomy…Make her get surgery!” His aunts were emphatic that all women were skanks and trash and never stopped warning him about women. An interesting culture. The misogyny has been accepted as fact by both sexes!

Leykis gives some disturbing advice.

Don’t ever compliment her, not on her looks, not on her intelligence, not on anything. Wow…Don’t ever sleep over at her place. Pretty soon she’ll start asking you to move in. Get off the phone! Quit calling her all the time, quit texting her all the time.

This is more or less Asshole Game. It’s depressing that this crap works at all with women. You mean the less I call her and the less I text her, the more she likes me? How depressing. My opinion of women just fell another 99%. I’m not so sure it’s even true. So if I feel like calling this woman I’m involved with, I should hold off because she’s so nuts, she’ll disrespect me for falling all over her.

The real womanizers I’ve known did not ignore women. They chased women fulltime. It was almost a fulltime job for them. They didn’t get success with women by ignoring them. Sexmaniacman told me that he used to call women all the time, and it never bothered them. But mostly for dates, not just to talk. And here we may have the crux. Women despise weakness. The player is goal-oriented. He’s calling her all the time with a goal in mind. A guy who calls her all the time just to talk about nothing seems sort of, well, wimpy?

AU says that women don’t mind guys who fall all over themselves for women, complimenting them, praising them, calling them, giving them gifts. Just not at the start of the relationship. Deep into the relationship, it feels great. But at the start, it seems like the guy is trying too hard or being self-abasing.

He also says to stop taking women’s calls. I don’t agree with that at all, but hey, maybe I’m wrong? Sexmaniacman regularly answers the phone for women, and he’s done all right.

He is right in a way that women like a guy who seems to be wanted by other women. If no women want the guy, he’s a loser and no women want him. Once you get a woman, now all the others want to take her away from you. Even a steady girlfriend often wants to feel like you are desired by other women, but you are not going for them out of duty to her. Basically, everyone loves a winner. This stuff applies more to younger women and not to older women. For us older folks, it’s not uncommon at all that we have nothing going on Friday night.

Not complimenting the woman is Asshole Game. They’re against it because it builds up her self-esteem. The Asshole Gamers want a woman with low self-esteem.

I don’t know, man. I’m going to disagree. Sexmaniacman usually tries to build up women’s self-esteem. That’s what they use him for, and that’s what they love him for. Women often lack self-esteem, but they like a strong man to encourage them and give them the self-esteem that they lack, to build them up. That’s what makes her secure and less nutty. A secure woman is a mellow woman, as AU says.

Anyway, Sexmaniacman has had great results complimenting women. It works great! It fact, it makes them melt in your hand, and maybe even in your mouth. You just have to say it right. The reason showering her with compliments often doesn’t work is that too many guys are too liberal with the compliments, so a lot of females just think it’s stupid or a line.

Thing is, be honest. If she doesn’t look that great, Sexdude would not say much. But if she’s hot or even beautiful, he would say so. But he would say so clearly, honestly and shamelessly, with no hint of dishonesty or charlatanism. Say it like you mean it, and do mean it. Then it works. Women love compliments properly done, and compliments have led Sexman to lots of sexual situations, including with some really beautiful women.

Another issue is more humanistic. If I have high self-esteem, don’t I want to be with a woman who has high self-esteem too? Why not? Self-esteem feels good, in men and in those who associate with me.

He also says not to have women over at your place, because then you can’t get rid of them. That’s not necessarily so. Women are independent actors these days, and Sexmaniacman said it was pretty common for them to take off in the morning, often a little ashamed at what they had done. Some took off in the afternoon. What’s wrong with sleeping with a woman anyway? Is it really so bad?

He also says not to sleep with a woman at her place either. Well, it can be a bit difficult sometimes in a new bed or place that you’re not used to, but it’s not so bad.

Leykis also says not to cuddle or spoon with women. Come on! That’s what they love more than anything; some say they like it more than sex. Sexmaniacman has been cuddling with women his whole life and they love it.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=caLNFgAF5jw]

The next videos are downright disturbing. Leykis notes that he went to some seminar with pro NBA players where they revealed that women were taking the sperm out of condoms after the NBA guys had sex with them and then using it to impregnate themselves. Some guys were being hit with paternity suits afterward. This seems to hard to believe, but I guess it’s true. I always thought it was an urban legend.

So Leykis gave advice to his listeners to put Tabasco sauce in the condom after they threw it in the trash in the bathroom afterwards. Sure enough, the bitch took the sperm out of the condom and put it up her and got burned in her pussy. Then she sued the guy for damage to her pussy! I don’t think Tabasco sauce would actually injure a vagina though. Anyway, the judge apparently laughed it out of court.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WA6tP_DV-Oc]

The next one is similar. Another guy listening to the show did the same thing, but this time he put horseysauce from some restaurant in the condom. Same thing, bitch went in the bathroom afterwards, used to turkey baster thing to shoot it up her, and started screaming like a banshee. Same thing again, the crazy bitch sued the guy for damage to her vagina (GMAB! There’s not going to be any permanent injury down there.) The case is slated to go to trial soon, but it will probably be thrown out soon.

Is this a new thing, females tricking guys into getting them pregnant? Or has it always been going on? Good Lord. It’s really appalling. Makes you almost want to swear off sex. I think we need to change the laws to where this is fraud and at the least, the guy’s not responsible for the ensuing kid.

Feminazi Rape Laws Gone Berserk

Here. From 2008.

Two boys, 15 and 16 years old, were with an 18 year old woman and another young woman. The second woman sees the bad vibes surrounding the situation and gets the Hell out of there fast. The 18 year old sticks around, but things get ugly.

First boy apparently date-rapes the girl. Second boy asks, “Me next?” Woman says fine, but you need to stop when I tell you. As soon as he’s in, she says, “Stop!” Guy pounds a few more pile-drivers for five more seconds, then pulls out.

Later the ditzy broad goes out to MacDonald’s with the two guys. She makes out in the restaurant with the first “rapist” and gives the second “rapist” her phone number. Later she files rape charges against both boys.

*The facts around this case are quite a bit murkier than the site I linked to made out. Please see the comments for details. However, the fact remains that under the Female Rule that the feminist crazies want, men will go down on rape for continuing with initially consensual sex for five seconds after she tells you to stop. That’s the take home point here.

The Latest Salvo From the Feminist Enemy

I don’t know what it is with radical feminists. They just seem to get nuttier and nuttier.

Denise Romano, M.A., Applied Lunacy, M.A. Advanced Feminist Batshittery, is out of control. Not satisfied trying to redefine seduction as rape, she is now apparently trying to have Roissy in DC arrested! For what, pray tell? For inciting physical and sexual assaults against women, which, according to Denise, is illegal. I doubt if it is. You can incite just about anything in the US from a blog or wherever. A few like Tom Metzger have gone down civilly, but no one ever goes down criminally. It’s not possible. Only in Feminazi Fantasy Land.

This points up another disturbing point about Female Rule which I touched on earlier. Females have always been censors. Males tend to be civil libertarians. A society based on Female Rule will not be a civil libertarian one, because at their core, most females simply do not believe in basic civil liberties.

They love to censor and ban speech, especially hate speech (whatever that is), pornography and God knows what else. Females are just natural born censors; that’s all there is to it. Which is one more reason that Female Rule must be opposed with all of our might.

Crazy feminazis like Denise Romano claim that any sex with a “drugged or drunk” female is rape. Well, maybe so, but maybe one guy in 500 billion cases goes down on this charge, if that. In general, all of these charges are laughed out of court, when they are even filed. Women “raped” in this way never even bother to file.

Truth is, lots of women like to drink. Plenty of women are heavy drinkers, and many of those are alcoholics. It’s reasonable to assume that many bar-hopping, heavy drinking and alcoholic women can never consent to sex, since they are probably loaded most of the time they are in bed.

Many females nowadays like to take drugs, especially cannabis, cocaine and methamphetamine. Ecstacy, LSD and other hallucinogens are very popular. Quite a few women use heroin. Female users of all of these drugs very commonly have sex when they are flying on this or that illicit substance. Many find this drugged sex experience quite rewarding. I’ve never in my life heard of a guy going down on rape for having sex with a stoned female.

Recently, the UK, which has recently started to come under some serious Female Rule, has decided that any sex with any “drunk” female is rape. There have been a few charges here and there, but most have been laughed out of court, as should be the case. In one recent case, a judge said that just because a woman was drunk, it doesn’t mean she was raped. Well, of course.

Now it’s another thing to see some chick who is falling down drunk at a bar or a party and hone in on her and take advantage of her just because she is wasted. That’s a dishonorable thing to do for any man.

If she’s so wasted she is on the verge of passing out, why are you targeting her? To get laid? Sleazy.

I must say, I’ve never been seduced in my life. I’ve been drunk off my ass more times than I can count, and I’ve been blasted out of my skull on just about every drug known to mankind more times than I can count.

Plenty of women have made plays for me when I was totalled, and a lot of the time I said no. Sometimes I agreed, but it was something I wanted to do at the time. I had buyer’s remorse in the morning, but that’s not a crime on her part. Gay men have made plays for me many times too, often when I was pretty wasted. Of course I never let them seduce me. Why are women so stupid that they allow themselves, like children, to be seduced?

Denise and Raine complain that PUA is teaching men how to hypnotize and brainwash women into sleeping with guys. They say this is rape. No it isn’t. It’s seduction. I’ve been trying to brainwash and hypnotize women and girls my whole life into getting sexual with me, although I never thought of it that way before. “Hypnotism” and “brainwashing” is just Seduction 101, always has been. What of it?

I’ll make you an offer. Any woman I find unattractive or even any man can try to brainwash me or hypnotize me all they want to to try to get me into bed. It’s not going to work, especially for the guys. No guy can use mentalism to get me into bed, and if I don’t like the woman, it’s going to be hard for her too.

I’m having a hard time understanding the feminist hysteria about rape.

I’ve been beaten over the head with a baseball bat so bad I had to go to the neurology ward.

I got my lights punched out repeatedly.

I got jumped and pummeled by five guys in a nightclub.

I got assaulted at a party, fought back, picked the guy up and threw him onto a table, smashing the table to bits.

After a party, another vehicle accused me of cutting them off. They chased us in their car, drunk, throwing loaded cans of beer at us. Somehow they cornered us on a street and I was lugging the gears. They were out of their car and attacking us on foot, kicking the car, beating it with their fists, trying to pull the doors open. If they would have gotten the doors open, we would have been seriously beaten or maybe even killed.

I finally put the car in first gear and floored it. A maniac was running headlong at my car from the side. “Watch out!” my friend yelled. I didn’t care. I floored it. The car hit the guy and he went flying like in the movies, maybe 5-10 feet. I hit him with my car. On purpose. I don’t know if I killed him, but I hope I did.

This is normal Growing Up 101 for guys. How many guys have been pummeled, robbed, mugged, assaulted, etc in their lifetimes? Most of us. Is rape really worse than this? Why? Prove that it’s worse than the typical life-threatening or life-terrorizing beatings, attacks and tortures many or most of us males experienced when we were young men.

Even more, I’ve been raped (or sexually assaulted), by feminist definitions. I picked up a sociopathic hitchhiker, he commandeered my vehicle, tried to destroy the engine, sexually fondled me, pummeled me and poured beer over me, all while I was driving on a freeway. I was a psychological wreck for 3 1/2 weeks, then I said, “Screw it, I’m moving on.” Isn’t that as bad as what a lot of female rape victims experienced? Was what they experienced worse? Why? Prove it.

Hey, come on. Life’s tough for everyone. Women get raped. So do some guys. And lots of guys get kidnapped, pummeled, gang-beaten, beaten with objects, often over the head, robbed, mugged, threatened with death and, by the cops, arrested, brutalized, beaten, threatened with death and imprisoned in the Hell of incarceration, on and on. Who says females have a Pain Monopoly anyway?

No one gets out of this shit called life unscathed. No one. Females have not patented Victim Status.

"Are All Men Rapists?" by Alpha Unit

New Alpha Unit. Good stuff. I agree with her though, we men are basically dogs, it’s true. But that’s the way we are supposed to be. It’s natural, normal.
By my own reasonable definition of the word, I’ve never raped a woman. Yet I’ve been accused of rape by a woman, actually a girl, Hell, a 14 year old girl at that! It didn’t happen. I had sex with her all right, but I sure didn’t rape her. She was drunk, but so was I. So what?
By the daffynitions of Lady Raine and Denise Romano, I’ve been raping women all my life. I don’t agree with that daffynition, but hey, if that’s the newfangled Feminazi daffynition of rape, so be it. In that case, I’m a rapist. And much worse than that. As far as their redaffyning seduction as rape goes, in that case, speaking of seduction-rape only, I also say that rape is fun! Put that in your pipe and smoke it, feminists.
I’ll have more to say about this in a bit.

Clint Eastwood, whose name I brought up the other day in one of the comments threads, has always been one of my favorite actors – at least in his Westerns. He played a number of roles in which he is this stranger who rides into town and sets things straight. He’s tall, lean, rugged, laconic – his entire demeanor says, “I don’t know you. And I don’t need to know you.”
His name? What do you care?
In 1973 he appeared in a film called High Plains Drifter. Critics praised it; audiences enjoy it to this day. But as you might expect, some people have a problem with a particular scene that occurs at the beginning of the movie. The Stranger drags a woman into the stables and rapes her.
What’s even more appalling is that after a while, she seems to enjoy it.
What?
What is this scene doing in this film? Were the writers misogynists? Was Clint Eastwood a misogynist?
Some people who comment on this scene call it “disturbing.” I think people find it disturbing not because of what it suggests about men but what it suggests about women.
In another scene, he grabs the hotelkeeper’s wife to force her into bed with him – in the presence of the hotelkeeper! She fights and resists and calls out to her husband to stop what’s happening. But later she is seen lazing about in the bed in which she has been raped, quite contented.
There is no doubt about it. The Stranger is a rapist.
The first woman he raped is the stereotypical Bad Woman – the town tramp. In fact, it’s clear from the beginning of the scene that she sets her sights on The Stranger and deliberately makes a play for his attention. She runs into him on purpose and proceeds to insult him. He tries, in fact, to walk away from her, more than once. But she won’t let him.
The second woman is the Good Woman. The only person who tried to intervene in a lynching – a pivotal incident that is shown in flashbacks.
Both women get raped. Both apparently derive enjoyment from it. And the rapist is presented as The Good Guy.
Do good guys rape women? Or is that something only done by bad guys?
This is a difficult question, only because there are men out there who consider themselves good guys, in spite of the fact that they have raped. There are ostensibly good guys out there who feel that it’s okay to rape under certain circumstances. Some male college students who have been surveyed in the United States and elsewhere report not only that in some situations a woman is “asking for it,” but if there were no chance of getting caught, they would definitely rape!
Many of these young men are “good” guys. With good upbringings in good homes. But if they could get away with rape, they’d go for it. Are we to believe that there’s something abnormal about them?
As I’ve mentioned previously, armies throughout history have engaged in the systematic rape of female civilians during war. Military commanders have at times encouraged it. Aren’t some of the soldiers who succumb to this pressure “good” guys?
There are many men who report that under no circumstances is it okay to rape. If some wholesome-looking young man were to say to me, “I’d never do something like that,” I’d admire his sincerity. But I’d probably be thinking to myself, “Never say never.”

“Are All Men Rapists?” by Alpha Unit

New Alpha Unit. Good stuff. I agree with her though, we men are basically dogs, it’s true. But that’s the way we are supposed to be. It’s natural, normal.

By my own reasonable definition of the word, I’ve never raped a woman. Yet I’ve been accused of rape by a woman, actually a girl, Hell, a 14 year old girl at that! It didn’t happen. I had sex with her all right, but I sure didn’t rape her. She was drunk, but so was I. So what?

By the daffynitions of Lady Raine and Denise Romano, I’ve been raping women all my life. I don’t agree with that daffynition, but hey, if that’s the newfangled Feminazi daffynition of rape, so be it. In that case, I’m a rapist. And much worse than that. As far as their redaffyning seduction as rape goes, in that case, speaking of seduction-rape only, I also say that rape is fun! Put that in your pipe and smoke it, feminists.

I’ll have more to say about this in a bit.

Clint Eastwood, whose name I brought up the other day in one of the comments threads, has always been one of my favorite actors – at least in his Westerns. He played a number of roles in which he is this stranger who rides into town and sets things straight. He’s tall, lean, rugged, laconic – his entire demeanor says, “I don’t know you. And I don’t need to know you.”

His name? What do you care?

In 1973 he appeared in a film called High Plains Drifter. Critics praised it; audiences enjoy it to this day. But as you might expect, some people have a problem with a particular scene that occurs at the beginning of the movie. The Stranger drags a woman into the stables and rapes her.

What’s even more appalling is that after a while, she seems to enjoy it.

What?

What is this scene doing in this film? Were the writers misogynists? Was Clint Eastwood a misogynist?

Some people who comment on this scene call it “disturbing.” I think people find it disturbing not because of what it suggests about men but what it suggests about women.

In another scene, he grabs the hotelkeeper’s wife to force her into bed with him – in the presence of the hotelkeeper! She fights and resists and calls out to her husband to stop what’s happening. But later she is seen lazing about in the bed in which she has been raped, quite contented.

There is no doubt about it. The Stranger is a rapist.

The first woman he raped is the stereotypical Bad Woman – the town tramp. In fact, it’s clear from the beginning of the scene that she sets her sights on The Stranger and deliberately makes a play for his attention. She runs into him on purpose and proceeds to insult him. He tries, in fact, to walk away from her, more than once. But she won’t let him.

The second woman is the Good Woman. The only person who tried to intervene in a lynching – a pivotal incident that is shown in flashbacks.

Both women get raped. Both apparently derive enjoyment from it. And the rapist is presented as The Good Guy.

Do good guys rape women? Or is that something only done by bad guys?

This is a difficult question, only because there are men out there who consider themselves good guys, in spite of the fact that they have raped. There are ostensibly good guys out there who feel that it’s okay to rape under certain circumstances. Some male college students who have been surveyed in the United States and elsewhere report not only that in some situations a woman is “asking for it,” but if there were no chance of getting caught, they would definitely rape!

Many of these young men are “good” guys. With good upbringings in good homes. But if they could get away with rape, they’d go for it. Are we to believe that there’s something abnormal about them?

As I’ve mentioned previously, armies throughout history have engaged in the systematic rape of female civilians during war. Military commanders have at times encouraged it. Aren’t some of the soldiers who succumb to this pressure “good” guys?

There are many men who report that under no circumstances is it okay to rape. If some wholesome-looking young man were to say to me, “I’d never do something like that,” I’d admire his sincerity. But I’d probably be thinking to myself, “Never say never.”

Statement on Game/PUA Community

The “Game” and PUA (Pickup Artist Community) guys is a movement of guys who are trying to teach other guys how to get women. More crudely, you can say they are teaching them how to get laid. However, some married men with no interest in cheating are just using game to try to control their out of control wives, or as one man put it, “to deal with the insanity of the typical American wife.”

Game teaches you how to manipulate and control women in order to get them to do what you want them to do. Women use Game on us all the time. They constantly try to manipulate and control us to try to get us to do what they want us to do. Each sex is entitled to use Game or any other legal techniques to try to get their partners and love interests to do what they want them to do, assuming everything is legal.

There are no moral issues here, because all’s fair in love and war. Tell you what, women? You first. You stop fighting dirty first (Women are the ultimate champions at fighting dirty; men are just cheap penny pikers), then we’ll follow suit.

What the PUA community does and the techniques it uses go for beyond the scope of this post.

Some of their techniques involve phrases like ASD, LMR and bitch shield. When a woman is not giving you sex or physical affection, she is said to have her bitch shield up. Ok, that’s kind of funny. Me? I just might not call her back unless I have a chance soon. I go to work real soon, and I am manhandling and getting physical by the first date. I get slapped down a lot, and it doesn’t always get me into bed, but in general, it works great. You have to get physical with these women!

ASD and LMR stand for anti-slut defense and last-minute resistance. This is when the woman is holding out on you. Ok, that’s kind of funny too. Usually in my case she has already gotten really physical with me but is now holding out on the best part of the game. Of course I have utilized all sorts of psychological techniques to wear down these common defenses. I recommend other guys do too.

These PUA guys also do stuff called “negs,” and “refusing to validate.” I don’t see the point. Negs is where you insult her, often openly and in front of others. It’s testament to the extremely low moral quality of the female in general that this disgusting technique makes them want to mate with us.

“Refusing to validate” is similar. To some extent, this makes sense, but I’m not going to do it in that callous PUA way. Problem is that most guys fall all over themselves like puppy dogs or babies when they are with women, kissing women’s feet, showering them with stupid lines, gifts, compliments and adoring, puppy-like affection. Reasonably enough, many women find such self-abasing behavior disgusting.

My technique is to act like, “Hey look, I’m too busy to chase women! What the Hell do you want anyway?”

Another one is to act like you have women after you all the time.

“Oh boy, here’s one more, just what I need? So impress me babe. Realize you’re competing with hundreds of other females for my overwhelmingly desired attention? How are you going to show me you’re better than the rest? How are you going to beat all these other women.”

Another thing is to never let a woman know you’re not dating anyone. Traditional women don’t mind hearing it, but American women are psycho. He not dating anyone means, “He’s a loser.” Women only want what others want or better yet have. Never let them know at the beginning that they are the only one. Never let them know that you aren’t getting any. Always give them the impression that you have an easy return no questions asked policy and she can be replaced with a better model anytime.

Never let a woman know you’re lacking in sexual experience. Never let a woman know you’ve been celibate for any length of time at the present. A history of many women works better than a history of few to none. Women say they hate studs, but they can’t stop sleeping with them.

As soon as women figure out you haven’t been getting any, or you lack sexual experience, or haven’t had many women in your life, they will start running their own Game on you, and boy! You think the PUA guys’ Game is evil! Wait til you see this Game she’s about to run on you! The only way to deal with women is from a position of strength. Women see weakness, grab the ball and make a 90-yard dash to make a touchdown in your territory, then throw the ball to the ground and dance a little jig right on your balls.

It’s sad that we have to act this way, but really, these somewhat shitty techniques work great.

Anyway, that’s my version of Game. It’s worked quite well for me in life.

I don’t like the PUA or game community all that much. They say to get women you need to act like an asshole and treat women like shit to some extent. They’ve tested these theories as scientifically as you can, and they’ve proven that they’ve worked. They throw out theory that doesn’t work and try new things all time. It’s a very science-based approach.

This just reaffirms my increasingly low opinion of women. I see. So…the way for me to get women is to be mean to them, do “negs” on them, treat them like shit, “refuse to validate them,” on and on.

Well, nothing new here. I’ve noticed for 35 years that the assholes get most of the women, and the rest of the guys don’t get crap, or get evil carping bitches. Worse, the women are nice to the assholes, and seem to enjoy being treated like shit by a bunch of near sociopaths.

Well, that’s just wonderful, isn’t it? Want to be successful with women? Just act like a quasi-psychopath, treat ’em like crap, insult them, cheat on them, psychologically abuse them, because the damned bitches are masochistic freaks and get off on being treated like shit by a modern day Caveman with a club. And the nice guys get kicked in the balls and then kicked to the curb.

Wonderful, just wonderful. Game isn’t telling me anything new. If mentally ill masochistic females reward the most callous, cruel and sociopathic males with the most love, sex and obedient behavior, while the nice guys always lose, who can blame guys for giving some of these crazy biatches what they want? I won’t.

But it’s not for me. If I have to “invalidate,” “neg,” treat like shit, insult and abuse women in order to get laid, Hell, I’ll just stay home. I have a hard drive full of porn, and that’s all I need, but at least my conscience will be clear.

Lunatic, Psycho Feminists Say Seduction is Rape

And of course, demand prison time and civil liability for men who succeed in talking silly or drunk women into bed. I don’t have time to go into it in depth here, feel free to read on at the site, although it’s very long.

Denise Romano is some kind of academic, and a therapist to boot.

Therapists area always trying to get us to act too nice to succeed in American society. I’ve had quite a few therapists openly call me a scumbag. I usually assume that means they are just calling me a man, so it’s a compliment. I openly refuse any and all female therapists anymore and am regularly raked over the coals in their “community” for being sane in this regard.

Therapy is a kick, and it’s really helpful, even for quite sane people. If you can get it for free, go for it, assuming you have problems in living, which all humans do. I’ve had years of it, and I’m about through. I learned all about myself (Cool!) and all about most everyone in my past, especially the assholes (Mega-cool!) and now there’s not a whole lot left to learn. But it was a very neat experience, and I’m much healthier and happier as a result.

No man should ever do therapy with any female therapist. Your therapy probably involves sex, and all female therapists are insane about sex, since they are females, and come from the Female Paradigm.

There’s nothing inherently wrong with radical feminism. It’s the enemy of all men, but so are women in a way, so that’s right in tune with the circle of life.

Radical feminism is simply the logical anarchy and madness that occurs when males of any society lose control of their women. The women go insane and try to institute Female Rule. Radical feminism is what happens when you give women the power to institute Female Rule over society. It sucks for men, and really for most women too, but it’s what most women want deep down inside. Which is why we need to control these biatches!

I repeat that neither Male Rule or Female Rule should be legally coded. The state is a neutral party in the War Between Men and Women. The War is natural and normal; it is remarked upon in all ethnographies of all primitive societies. It exists because males and females want different things in many respects. Each gender has a right to pursue their own interests to the detriment of the other within the framework of law and society.

The state needs to stay out of this mudfest and be as neutral as possible. Like at a party, where the strong guys hold everyone back and say, “Let em fight it out!” hoping the cool guy kicks the despised idiot’s ass.

In a previous post, I remarked that Male Rule at least functions, though it sucks for women. This is because it is concordant with Natural Law. Female Rule doesn’t even work at all. It causes anarchy and confusion, because it violates Nature.

Anyway, this is the natural result of Female Rule. Everywhere on Earth it’s been tried, the same chaos and idiocy resulted. What was the first thing they did when we granted these silly dames suffrage? They banned booze! Probably one of the stupidest things thing country’s ever done, except invading Iraq. Mega-stupid X10.

But everyone on Earth Female Rule is instituted, this is what they do. In Maoist ruled-India, the fool Maoists put women in charge. What happened? Guess. They banned booze, prostitution, gambling and porn. The four things that keep most guys halfway sane and prevent them from shooting up the fuckin post office. Way to go, chicks!

Everywhere you allow Female Rule, this is what they do: ban booze or dope, prostitution, porn and gambling. Females are a bunch of party-poopers, and they need to be kept in line and not allowed too much power or we’re all living grey Puritan lives.

Even worse, they may even ban adultery.

The Shining Path instituted Female Rule in areas of Peru, and in addition to the death penalty for whiffing coke (Please!) they instituted corporal punishment, up to public execution, for men who sampled the greener grass of their female neighbors. This is what these bitches will do if we let them rule us: they’ll execute you for cheating on your wife.

There are also references in the link to some crazy attention whore named Lady Raine. Whatever she is, she represents how far our Western White women have gotten out of line since we let them off the leash. She’s a former stripper who lectures men about morality. As if this whore has a leg to stand on. She’s furious at men, and she’s raising a son all alone, because she prefers it that way.

Anyway, the less said about Lady Cumstain the better, and if she comes here, I will probably have to ban her.

Guys! This is what happens if you let women rule you! The crazy bitches will make seduction illegal! Damn!

Women must be controlled!

Just How Many Poets Are NOT Queer, Anyway?

I’m going back through a lot of poetry these days for some reason, mostly native English language stuff. I find it annoying that so many of these guys were queer! It seems like just about all of my favorite poets were a bunch of queers, or often bisexuals. I mean, I still love these guys and all, but it’s sort of deflating to my image of these dudes.

It’s rather distressing because I like poetry. I went back reading the poets of centuries past and this same fagginess seems to creep up yet, even though back in those days this was a definite no-no. Novelists seem to be less queer, but there’s a fair amount of fagginess there too. Being a novelist is definitely a straighter occupation.

I don’t even want to go into playrights. When I was living in Los Angeles in the early 1980’s, I got into the theater scene a bit, and it was gay as Hell. The guys of course, but quite a few of the women too. You can actually do all right in these scenes if you’re a good-looking, masculine straight guy. The women are a bunch of frustrated fag hag types, often sort of bi, but you know how women are, they say they hate macho guys, but they just can’t resist the bad boy in the scruffed up leather jacket even though they sort of hate him, macho pig that he is.

Anyway, in these scenes, and in Hollywood and places like that in general, you can clean up in you have good game, good looks, or some combination. There are all sorts of single women there who are pretty frustrated. Most of the guys are either married or queer, and there aren’t many single guys to go around. You’re hot property, if you don’t mind being surrounded by hungry queers and bi guys (these latter are everywhere in those gay neighborhoods) lusting after you all the time. Actually, that is pretty annoying right there!

Anyway, brings me back to my original question. What is it about literary writing that turns guys queer, or seems fit mostly for queers? One could argue that writing poems is a pretty faggy thing to do, and that makes sense. It’s not exactly tackle football. But that begs the question of why so many of these literary women, especially the poets, are a bunch of lesbians! I mean, if poetry is feminizing, why aren’t female poets these swaying, coquettish Southern belle types afraid to get their hands dirty?

Either that or just being a poet attracts weirdos and misfits in general, sexual and otherwise. That’s about the only sense I could make of it.

Another thing I noticed is that most all of these guys are depressed. Many were manic-depressive, and alcoholism seems to be epidemic among poets in the last century anyway. Pretty similar with novelists. Lots of depressives, lots of boozers. Many were suicides in one way or another. It’s starting to make me depressed just reading about all these guys.

Why? Is writing depressing? Is depression good for the creative spirit? How could it be, as it’s so enfeebling?

One reason I got into journalism is that journalists are fairly sane types. They had a reputation, at least at city papers, for being squares. Some were sort of eccentrics, but they worked hard, often all night. They drank, but they also worked. They were sort of these hard-bitten types. They were either family men or straight bachelors, but city room journalism isn’t a very faggy job. It’s kind of macho, actually. Check out any old Hollywood movie where they show the newsroom guys.

I still don’t see why you practically have to be queer to be a poet. Poetry is kind of cool. Anyway, it’s a good way to get chicks, cuz a lot of women are romantic, and a lot of them love writers and even poets. At least that’s been my experience anyway. C’mon guys! Crank out those poems! Chicks dig em!

Sexmaniacman is a Rapist

Repost from the old site. Sexmaniacman returns for another update in the Sex Wars. Bros before hos, guys!

I thought this definition of a the crime of sexual violence was interesting:

Regarding the “incapable of giving consent” hypothetical you posited, my response is, violence and/or a crime occurs when anyone’s body is touched beyond incidental contact or for more than a brief instant unless the person being touched affirmatively gives permission for such contact.It is not the “responsibility” of the person being touched to give permission. It is the responsibility of the person doing the touching to ensure that the other person has voluntarily given permission. If the other person is “incapable” of giving permission, for whatever reason, that means no permission has been given, and a crime has been committed.

Along the same lines, the feminazis says every time you have sex with a drunk woman, you are raping her. I decided to ask Sexmaniacman his opinion on this definition of rape.

Sexmaniacman:

According to that definition, I’ve been raping women and girls all my life! I’ve always touched women, I’ve reached around and jumped them and started kissing them, I’ve grabbed them, thrown them up against walls in public and kissed them, I’ve done all these things. I always grabbed women or touched them, and I never asked permission first.In general, most of the time, permission was granted, though sometimes, when I tried to go beyond kissing, she stopped me.

I picked up a hot 20 yr old woman at a Hollywood nightclub, the Anticlub, two minutes after walking in the door, then had sex with her in my car while driving around Hollywood at 1 AM (to the extent you can have sex with someone while driving a vehicle) then after the show, she tried to weasel out of coming home with me.

I pointed to her, pointed to the car, and said, “You are going home with me. Now get in the car.” It was an order, but she was free to refuse, and I was laughing. I sneered at her like Johnny Rotten. She smiled, sneered back, and said, “Says who?” I said, “Says me.” Women love guys who give them orders and they love to follow orders. So she got in the car. Quite willingly.

I drove her home and we had sex on the 5 Freeway in Downtown LA at 3 AM while going 55 miles an hour, to the extent one can do such a thing. Good thing I didn’t crash the car. I deny that this was either kidnapping or rape, but it was pretty fun.

Another time I had sex with a drunk 14 yr old (I was 16) on the rooftop of an apartment building at 2 AM, and later she went around telling everyone I raped her. I didn’t rape her; she was drunk. I deny that this was rape.

Another time I went to a punk rock show with this beautiful 20 year old named Linda and we both came back, drunk, to my house. I got her on my couch, pulled up her top and started feeling her breasts. “Pleease let me go home,” she whined unconvincingly in her best little girl voice.

“No!” I said. “You’re staying right here!” I was pissed that I went to all this damn trouble and she was trying to weasel out of the dicking, like they always do.

Plus, earlier in the evening, both of us drunk, she had put me in a shopping cart and raced me up and down some 2 AM streets. She kept “dropping her lighter” on my groin in the cart, and then “having to fish around to find it”. Now she was trying to get out of the boning. Well fuck that. The Hell you are, woman.

She was free to leave at any time, as the cops say. “Now get over on that bed right now!” I said, half-smiling and not really threatening. I’m not sure what happened later. Finally I just said, “Fine, you don’t want to have sex, I’ll just sleep on the couch. You take the bed. See you in the morning.”

Then I lay back on the couch and closed my eyes. Next thing I remember, she was saying, “Come on over to the bed.” And so it went. I deny that this was false imprisonment or rape, but it was pretty fun, except when she started to puke in bed while we were having sex, grabbed her mouth, and ran to the bathroom and puked for a while.

Basically, with women, you have to read their minds. At some point, via telepathy, you figure you can make your move. At that point you just grab her and start kissing her. You can do it really aggressively or you can do it real soft and nice. Most of the time, it goes just fine. Having to ask permission for everything you do sexually is insane. If we had to do that, no one would ever get laid.

I’ve been having sex with drunken women most of my life, and I hope to continue doing so. A lot of women are way less inhibited when they’re drunk.

I’m embarrassed to admit that there have been quite a few times when I grabbed at women and they did not want to do go along, so they pushed me off or said no in some way or another, along the lines of, “Hey! Knock it off, asshole! Get your hands off me!” Most of the time, I did just knock it off right then, though sometimes I kept trying my luck, and she kept knocking my hands away, raising her voice.

I deny that this is rape or attempted rape or any crime at all. It’s actually something called “dating”, and I never got any sex any of those times anyway. Once they brush you off once, you might as well give up, because you aren’t getting any.

I don’t believe I’ve ever raped a woman according to the legal definition of the word. If she’s not interested, no problem. She has ownership of her body and the right to decide not to do this or that with me. As far as the feminist version of rape law above, well, they can just fuck off.

Sexmaniacman On Borderline and Schizotypal PD

Repost from the old site. The following posts will figure a fellow named Sexmaniacman, who is a friend of mine. He either wrote these posts himself and sent them to me via emails or else I am transcribing them based on conversations he had with me.

A commenter notes on the Personality Disorders

Schizotypal was always the odd-man-out personality disorder — both literally and figuratively.

Sexmaniacman thinks he had a gf once who was both a Borderline and a Schizotypal:

Hi Bob, this chick was so nuts, man, oh man oh man. She had a dx of “Borderline Schizophrenia” and was a serious acidhead.

She proudly said, “I’ve always been crazy.” Her Mom was schizophrenic and had tried to stab her in the back and kill her when she was 4 years old. Her life was desolate, and she would move back and forth between all these different personalities that you could not keep track of.

She lived in Hollywood, was a fag hag and was always getting picked up by guys and abused. She let groups of guys gangbang her and all sorts of crazy shit. She was always telling stories about guys or groups of guys picking her up, tying her up, torturing her, having sex with her, and threatening to murder her.

The stories seemed almost too weird to be true, but she was an extreme submissive who obviously was giving off “hurt me” vibes that a lot of sicko dudes might have picked up on and acted on.

She was also a bit bi and had sex with women sometimes. But she liked young girls, like 14 years old! Whoa! She also liked young boys, like 13 years old, and she loved to entertain me with stories about breaking in 8th graders. She was an old pro at this. I thought it was just plain weird.

We were going to go a lesbian bar in Hollywood and try to pick up a girl to take home with us (that was real easy to do in LA, which is full of all kinds of gays, bis and swingers), but she was so weird, I figured we would never be able to pick up any decent women.

Her idea of a good time was going to a gay bar and hanging out there all nite. I said pass.

She literally ate acid by the handful, five or eight hits at a time.

I took her to a Cure concert and for some weird reason, all these Goth chicks were grabbing me and trying to molest me the whole time at the concert, even when I was with her. While we were walking around, while we were sitting at the concert, the women just wouldn’t leave me alone. The whole thing seems like a hallucination now. It was 1983. She was flying on a handful of acid.

I took her to see Pink Flamingos, we watched Divine eat dog shit off sidewalk, and she thought that was hilarious. We went to see The Story of O, which I thought was weird, but she insisted was the story of her life.

She kept wanting me to inflict pain on her in all these different ways (A LOT of women are into pain! Is that weird or what?) but I wasn’t really into being a sadist too much. I did inflict some pain on her, but I didn’t really enjoy it. She sure did! Damn right! But it was the weirdest joy, a joy in a bottomless sadness. I couldn’t relate.

We went at forever, and she was a real screamer. One night she turned me in the middle and said, “You know what, Sexman?”

“What?”

“You’re a good fuck.” She repeated that a few times.

I’d just been turned into a complete sex object by a woman, and I didn’t even care.

I’d leave her place at the end of the weekend. Her Hollywood apartment complex was full of all these Guatemalan and Mexican illegal aliens. It was 1984 and the invasion was well under way. I guess the guys had been listening to her sexual opera performance all weekend because as I walked out, the Hispanic guys would all stand up and start clapping for me and raising their beers.

Cheers to the Master Fucker! She would drink, take acid, smoke pot, do speed, and then grab a bottle of antidepressants and start taking pills and downing them with a glass of booze.

“Whoa!” I said. “What do you think you’re doing!”

“You don’t know the pain I’m in Sexguy,” she whimpered and started crying. “You have no idea what it’s like. I need this, Sexdude.”

I shrugged and hoped she didn’t die on my watch. Who wants to deal with a dead chick and cops?

She was schizotypal in that she used language in really weird ways, and even though she insisted she had all these friends, she seemed really isolated. Plus she was just flat-out fucking weird in a way that Borderlines simply are not. Like she was on another planet, an alien. Invariably, she accused me of being a fag too for some reason like all of her faggot friends, and that pissed me off.

I will say she had more insight into my personality at the time than most other women have ever had.

She used to regale me with stories about her gay friends. Her gay friends were all these seriously weird masochist dudes into the leather scene.

Her eyes got really wide.

“My friend Jim, he’s not satisfied until the welts are this big.”

That’s one of her sicko masochist gay friends. Every time she talked about them, I told her to shut up as she was grossing me out.

She stretched her fingers to make about a one inch measurement. In her eyes, she was trying to shock me and I know it turns her on. She wanted one-inch welts too. Obviously. Like Hell you’re getting ’em from me, you sick bitch, I thought.

She called me one time but I wasn’t home. A woman I knew was over at my place in my absence and answered the phone. “Tell Sexman it’s just me,” she sighed wearily into the phone. “It’s just me. Just V.” Her self-esteem was 80,000 leagues under the sea under an anchor. The woman hung up the phone.

Later the woman said: “That’s the woman you’re dating, Sexguy?”

“Yeah,” I sigh.

“Wow, she seems like she thinks she’s the biggest zero on the face of the Earth. How sad.” The woman shook her head, and an incredible sadness came over her face too, a hundred years’ worth.

“I know.”

I broke up with her.

“Can…you…at least…give me a reason, Sexcat?” V. whimpered into the phone.

“You’re just too nuts for me. I mean, I’m nuts, but I’m neurotic. You’re way more crazy than I am, and I just can’t deal with you. It’s like dealing with someone from another planet. I can’t handle you. Good luck in the rest of your life.”

She called me a few days later, crying.

“After you broke up with me, Sexbro, I put my fist through a wall, I was so mad. Now I have a hole in my wall.”

“Over me? You did this over me? Why? Don’t bother, V. Don’t smash walls over me. I’m not worth it. Smash walls over someone else…Look, I can’t handle this, this is way too nuts.”

I got a new girlfriend, K., pretty soon, and V. had given me VD like most sluts do, something called Trichomonas with no symptoms in the male. I immediately gave it to the new girl, and it causes four days of misery in the female. The new woman was pissed.

I said the only thing you can say when you give your girlfriend VD.

“Hey, don’t ever say I never gave you anything.”

I thought that was pretty funny.

She sure didn’t. Icy eyes shone at my across the room.

“That’s not funny, Sexman.”

“Yeah it is.”

“No it isn’t.”

I saw V. again two years later. She came down to visit me, an hour’s drive. I saw her on my porch like a lost poppy, the most forlorn thing you ever saw. We went inside and had some wild sex for a couple of hours. She got pissed at the way it ended and left in a huff.

I never saw her again.

I assume she’s dead, probably long ago. The way she was, she couldn’t have lasted long.

“Perverts” Are Adaptive

Since the evil feminist Cunts and their wussy mangina counterparts say that any older man (over 47 or so) going after a much younger woman is automatically a “pervert,” not to mention a “pedophile”, a “creep” and a “weirdo”, I would like to point out a new study showing that older men (over 50) who reproduce with young women are actually good for humanity.

As the researchers put it, “It turns out that older men chasing younger women contributes to human longevity and the survival of the species.”

I just met a guy, homeless guy, hiking in the national forest. He had been hiking all the way through Yosemite at age 57. He’s in good shape. Although he’s a working class guy (works every day when he can), he’s still homeless. I gave him a ride and dropped him off at the mission.

He told me that two years ago in Carson City, Nevada (he travels all over the West), he had a 22 year old girlfriend. She was surrounded by all these guys her age, all hardass and tough, but she thought they were all a bunch of morons, so she wanted a guy who was a little more mature. I had always heard that teenage girls think the guys their age are idiots, but I didn’t know it extended up into the 20’s.

I met a 20 year old college girl a few years back (no dating, just friendship, but she used to send me risque pics of herself). She said, “All men are boys up until age 40.” Well, it’s probably true, right? I mean, I was, sort of, anyway.

Anyway, this 55 year old guy, with nothing going whatsoever, got a 22 year old chick! Hear hear! Don’t listen to the bitches or these punk kids. Go for it, my Brothers! If you want a young woman and you can get one, go ahead and go for it, even if you have to grab a gang of hardened criminals (Joke!) and rob a trainfull of Viagra to keep it going.

As a result, Puleston said, older male fertility helps to select against damaging cell mutations in humans who have passed the age of female menopause, consequently eliminating the “wall of death.”

I don’t really understand this, but the authors felt that theory helped to explain why human survive past the age of female menopause (We do.). There’s never been a good explanation of why.

One theory, the Grandmother Hypothesis, suggests that we need to keep older women around to show everyone else the ropes. It’s interesting, but I never liked it all that much. This theory seems to make a lot more sense, though I don’t completely understand it either.

There are a lot of cool comments at the end. The usual stuff about young women being repulsed and sickened by older guys who commit the horrible crime (worse than serial homicide for sure) of looking at them. And then some cool comments from the Brothers trashing these silly young bitches for being the mean, vicious, selfish, vain, empty-headed vessels of extreme fertility that they are.

It’s interesting that most of the commenters can’t punctuate, spell or write a coherent sentence. This seems to be true whatever the age or sex. I guess they are just typical American dumbfucks.

It’s really sad that we live in a society that allows males and females to become successful, acquire good jobs, buy nice homes, get good high paying jobs, pile up a lot of nice possessions, etc., when they are so fucking stupid and uneducated that they barely write better than a hillbilly in a shack. What a sick society.

You can accumulate all the money and fancy shit you want, while having the education and skills of a fucking backwoods Moonshine maker. I have more respect for the hillbilly. He lives in a shack, has no car, and barely gets by. He doesn’t pretend to be what he isn’t. But I wouldn’t give him a $50,000/year job.

Only in America. We need to seriously consider that a lot of high-paid Americans are dumber than a bag of hammers or a box of brick shit. It’s pretty common that you meet a person from another country who makes far, far less than their American counterpart yet who has education, class, style and erudition. They keep up on current events and are proud of the skill with which they write in their cultivated native tongue.

America is a land of rich, fat, overpaid ignoramuses and dumbfucks with no class, no taste and no youth style other than shaved pussies, nipple rings and more tattoos than a cannibal.

What a disgrace. I hope at least the stylish Europeans kick our fucking asses. I just met a few busloads of French tourists in town. A fine example of what White people could be if they weren’t aspiring to be backwoods hillbillies with $50 haircuts and new model cars. They put these fat, stupid, ignorant American slobs to shame. I was embarrassed for my people.

George Sodini's Webpage

George Sodini’s Webpage.
Sodini, of course, is the guy who shot up the gym club, specifically targeting young women. He killed 3 women and wounded another 9. He felt rejected by women in his life, and indeed, it appears that women had been rejecting him. I think for most of his life he was not a bad person, but he was a sad person. At the end of his life, he became a sad, bad man, and he committed an act of unspeakable cruelty. Then he took his own life.
He said that for most of his life, people had always been saying what a nice guy he was. That’s because he was a nice guy. He acted nice towards others, even towards women. The reason women said he was a nice guy is because he was one. Women don’t think you’re a nice guy unless you are one. A lot of the comments about Sodini are saying that this guy was a weirdo, filled with hate towards women for most of his life, and a social bastard.
I doubt it, if he was a social bastard, he would have had to climb over the naked women in his bed every morning to go to work. Social bastards often don’t lack for sex, and women love a meanie. What do women hate? They hate nice guys. Nice guys and wimps. Sodini was a nice guy, and he came off like a wimp. Women hate that, so they rejected him.
In his online diary, he notes that he went to a social function, and a woman asked him out of the blue if he had been picked on a lot in school. She asked him that because those are the vibes he gave off – victim, loser, wimp. He hadn’t been laid in 19 years, and he hadn’t had much sex in his whole life. Comments from females about that aspect are deriding him. All he wanted off women was sex, they bitch.
Guess what, ladies? That is what we want off you. We also fall in love, sure, sometimes, but mostly men want and need sex from women. The comments are saying, “These guys are evil. Their whole goal in getting to know a woman is to have sex with her.” You got it, babes. That is our goal. If we fall in love along the way, nice, but it’s not a necessity.
We are after sex. That’s perfectly normal. When we want to eat, we head to the fridge. When we want to sleep, we flop down on the sack. When we need to go, we plump ourselves down on the can. When we want sex, we try to screw a woman. We are mammals, after all, and sex is one of the highest drives in man, up there with food.
Western females, driven insane by feminism, have issues with this fact of nature. No one faults a human for heading for the fridge, so why do we fault a hungry guy for trying to get laid? It’s all the same.
In Third World countries not yet wrecked by feminism, females understand this, and no one thinks men are evil. Everyone knows men are sex-crazy bastards who will do anything for pussy, and women are guarded around men accordingly. They like us, but they know what we are all about. They guard their jewels, as Mohammad ordered. When appropriate, they trade their jewels for stuff, marriage, love, whatnot.
Feminism has told Western women that males acting like the male mammals they are is evil, sick, twisted and even woman-hating behavior. So Western women are all pissed off at guys. By acting like normal males, they say we sick, evil, and insane woman-haters.
The George Sodini’s don’t do this in the Third World. Most guys get married, and a woman doesn’t expect much from a man. What’s he there for, anyway? He’s a good provider, doesn’t drink, gamble, chase women or beat her. In the Third World, that’s called a “good man.” Most guys like Sodini probably get married. Those that don’t aren’t furious about their lack of sex.
I’ve talked to male virgins in India and Egypt, aged 23-38. They were not bitter at all. They’d never married; of course they’d never been laid. Over there, women don’t give it up unless you marry one, pretty much. What’s to be bitter about?
Sometimes I think this is a better arrangement. In that world, the Sodinis get married, if not young, then sooner or later. In marriage, the guy gets plenty of sex. Who knows if the woman likes it or not? For my Mom’s generation, it was a “marital duty” to be tolerated, and it was assumed you would not like it much. Husbands knew this, figured she didn’t dig it much, but didn’t give a damn. As long as he’s getting his head wet, who cares whether she digs it or not? That’s her problem, right?
So the guys mostly marry, and mostly get all the sex they want in marriage. Women put up with the sex, or like it, or whatever, at any rate get supported, and everyone’s more or less happy.
In the West, we expect unmarried guys like Sodini to get tons of sex. But why should he? In the Third World, most people would assume he’s never getting laid. I mean, he’s not married, right? You want sex, go get yourself a wife.
We’ve also given single women sexual freedom, but they don’t want to use it like guys do. Human females are as picky, cruel and fickle as any other females in the animal kingdom. They select the best, dump the rest, and don’t worry their pretty little heads about any of it.
Single women in the West don’t want to be giving it up all the time, and they want something coherent out of the deal. Money, commitment, marriage, a job, a passport, stuff, support, whatever. So the Western single females are having all the sex they want, for the most part, but their male counterparts probably are not. A few are, but most single guys are having dry spells at best. A few guys are cleaning up, just like in an elephant seal harem.
I’m a sexual liberationist, but something is wrong with this picture. Why do we expect the single Sodinis of the West to all be screwing like Hefners and deride them as losers if they are not? That doesn’t make sense.
Like with so many modern things, we have thrown out the old way, honed through tens of millenia. Not perfect, yet time-tested and definitely workable. The “modern and progressive” counterpart frankly goes against human nature and the history of our species, so of course it doesn’t work that great, yet everyone assumes it’s newer and better.
What makes us assume newer is better? I have an old corkscrew, the kind they don’t sell anymore. I’ve bought several new ones, some rather costly, and none of them work worth a flying fuck.
When it comes to sex, love and marriage, is newer better? George Sodini said no, guns blazing, and now four people are dead.

"Playing Hard To Get"

For some obscure and totally bizarre reason, a lot of females think it is really cool to “play hard to get.”. That means, if you like a guy, you don’t show it. You ignore him, walk away from him, act like he bothers you, etc. Only when he pesters, bothers, harasses and bugs you in the most extreme way do you bother you give him your number and maybe if he’s lucky, go out with him.
These are the same destroyed by feminism beings that pass for females all over the US. The same idiots that are screaming and yelling about sexual harassment at the top of their lungs. The hallmark of the Puritanical sexual harassment feminist jihad against men is, “No means no!”
Except that, clearly, when psycho females are “playing hard to get”, no doesn’t mean no. No means yes. Sometimes. Sort of. Well maybe. Um, I’m not sure. Can you come back and ask me again tomorrow? No means yes, except when it doesn’t. In which case, you’re a sexual harasser, and you’re going away in cuffs to the Feminazi Police Station.
I got news for you, crazy Western women. One or the other. Both can’t be ok. As long as you think playing hard to get is cool, you need STFU about sexual harassment. Most sane males think avoidance is a bad sign. In the playing hard to get world, it means harass her that much more. If sexual harassment is wrong, then quit the playing hard to get bullshit.
Sexual harassment has always been a crock of shit anyway. How do you get laid? Well, you “sexually harass” her in some way or another.
You ask her for her number. Yes, in the feminist-destroyed mind, asking a woman for her fucking phone number is often sexual harassment! I remember once an entire workplace freaked out because this guy I knew gave a woman a business card with his number on it. He didn’t even ask her for  her number. They acted like he was going to murder her.
I guess he was! I mean, giving a pretty young thing your phone number! That’s so…Ted Bundy!
You ask her out. I remember once I worked at a place with about 80 workers. One time, this guy asked out a female co-worker. I guess he thought he had reason to do so. The whole office was up in arms. The evil pig!
I guess he was! Trying to get laid or something, are you? How dare you, you pig! Off to the Feminist Gulags! We can’t have guys, like, trying to get laid or anything like that.
The guy was a little weird, but I always thought he was harmless. What was saddest about it all was that the guy seemed like he hadn’t had a date in months.
If a poor man looks at a good looking young woman or (God forbid!) asks her out, that’s probably sexual harassment in our modern Feminist Dictatorship. If a rich man does the same thing, the same pretty young thing is probably going to compete in the Slut Olympics for this guy and see how much cash she can walk away with. That’s always been the farce about sexual harassment.
It’s always just been a class crime against poorer and low-income guys, while rich guys can always say whatever the fuck they want and no one cares, or even if they do, the girl at the next booth will be the slut that this one won’t. The Feminist Left needs to get a fucking clue and figure out that the whole War on Men and the Sexual Harassment Game is just a class fraud to keep low income and working class guys from getting laid and having fun.
It’s the same as drug laws. The rich have always been decadent. I’m not into the swinging scene, but I’ve checked it out on the Internet and I had some friends who were into it. Guess what? Guess who the swingers are? A bunch of rich people! The swingers are not the poor festering in their steaming ghettos; the organizers of the gangbangs and orgies are the globe-trotting upper middle class and rich.
The rich have always loved drinking and doping, and no one has ever cared. The rich get to get high all they want, and mostly they never do time, nor do they get the cuffs. What was the Drug War always all about? The poor, low income and working class folks daring to get high. How dare they! How dare they have some fun! The rich have always done this shit. They’re the most decadent people on Earth, but they preach the most dreadful, no-fun Puritanical crap to the lowly hoi-polloi.