Game/PUA: Women Deal with Loneliness and Lack of Sex Better Than Men

Women can definitely deal with loneliness and lack of sex better than men can, and it’s all down to that unfathomable entity known as the female sex drive.

The thing is that while women have an extremely strong sex drive in a sense (provided someone turned it on in the first place – preferably Chad!), it differs from the male in that women can simply take sex or leave it if so desired. We are now starting to see some women say:

Damn, I need some cock!

You didn’t hear that so much in the past, but I had 18 year old girls telling me things along those lines back in 1975:

Damn I am getting so horny these days, I swear I’m going to have to shove a bottle up there.

But she had a very strong sex drive in addition to being an extreme slut, bless her whorish heart.

In men, sex is quite different. It’s like an itch that you can’t scratch when you do without it. Sure, we can always jerk off to deal with the physical problem, but that’s often not satisfactory, and it’s hard to do if you live with other people. Furthermore, masturbation doesn’t take care of the urge.

Of course, in the Current Year, women also masturbate like crazy, while it seems they didn’t so much back in the day – we have created a society of female masturbating maniacs! God bless my depraved generation!

They masturbate but they need sex too, just like men. I had a female best friend who used to tell me things like:

Damn, I am so horny these days, I’m just going to have to grab some guy and rape him!

And she masturbated all the time. I would be texting her and she would say:

Excuse me, I’m going to go masturbate.

Can you imagine a woman saying such a thing?!

She’d come back in 45 minutes and say:

Damn, that was good!

On a sex subreddit called Stupid Sluts Club (highly recommended!) a young woman described how she was horny as Hell. She was masturbating all the time, but that wasn’t cutting it, so she started having sex with her female roommate, though she was basically straight.

And while things are changing somewhat, women are sadly not turning into men. Women can still take sex or leave it without a lot of pain or damage.

The sex drive is not so much physical in men, though the physical aspect is undeniable. For instance, a young man who does not ejaculate for a few days starts to experience actual pain in his testicles (blue balls).

Women don’t seem to experience such a thing, though there have been reports of women feeling some sort of a “female blue balls” in their abdomen above the pubic area if they go without orgasm for too long.

But at least back in the day, many women were non-orgasmic or rarely orgasmic. Back then it was ~30% of women. I’d say it’s a lot less now, but there are probably still non-orgasmic women. That 30% of women at any time can be unable to reach orgasm while remaining that way for years on end implies that female blue balls is probably not a serious problem.

Almost no males are non-orgasmic. There’s virtually no such thing.

Much more important than the physical aspect of sex is the psychological one. A man without sex has a huge hole in his life psychologically and perhaps even more importantly socially. The longer it goes on, the more they deteriorate. We see the logical result of this in the incel phenomenon. The incels are not evil like the cucks and soyboys say. Incel behavior is simply the natural and normal consequence of what happens to large groups of men who are denied sex over a long period.

Many become depressed and withdrawn, quite a few become very angry in a seething sort of way, and a few of those become explosively violent, often resulting in serious massacres. To show it is not a unique Western problem, long-term incel Chinese men have been going on murderous rampages for a long time now, even massacring large numbers of kindergartners!

So, tl/dr: Women love sex but ultimately a lot can take it or leave it. Men have a much more insistent sex drive and cannot take or leave sex. They have to have it and if they don’t, serious psychopathology results.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: Just Because She’s Turned on by You Doesn’t Necessarily Mean She Wants to Have Sex with You

I get shut down pretty much all the time nowadays, especially by young women. I just got shut down a couple of times in the supermarket this evening. They don’t say no. Instead it’s nonverbal. I call it The Wall. It seems like I get the Wall all day every day sometimes. It’s really discouraging. The Wall is completely nonverbal and it says, “I am not interested in you that way, ok?” You can get a lot of different walls but they all mean the same thing.

There are places I go every day where some of the women are such cunts that they won’t even respond if I say hello and say their name. On the other hand, there are others who are pretty friendly, sometimes real friendly. But they’re all really young and I am 40 years older than they are, so I need a big green light to move on an age gap like that.

One acts flirtatious. She starts acting a lot more feminine when I start talking to her. That means either that she likes you or more probably that she’s attracted to you or turned on by you. But she is giving me The Wall as far as getting to know her in “that way.” And as I just learned the other day, at age 20, she already lives with her boyfriend.

I am sure that I turn on a fair number of women who nevertheless still don’t want to get involved with me, in this case due to age.

There was a woman in the bank who always gave me blank stares, the obvious blank stares you get from women who are turned on by you. I would come up to her window, and she would get pretty cold. I couldn’t make sense of it for the longest time. I finally decided she was fantasizing. I was 55 and she was 20 after all. She thought I looked good and she liked to look at me, but that’s as far as she wanted to take it.

It took me a while to figure out that she was just looking. I got that look in a few different ways from other young women too. Some of them actually thrust their bodies forward when they first interacted with me, obviously an involuntary purely physical turn-on. But then they would catch themselves a second or two later and correct it.

Think about it. A woman sees, what? Tens of thousands of hot men in her life. She’s going to fuck all of them? Women would fuck 100,000 men in a lifetime.

I met a 39 year old woman the other night. Literally picked her up in a corner market. I have no idea how the Hell I even did that. Got her in my car and drove to my place. Halfway there, she looks at me and says, “You know what? You’re fuckin HOT!” Well, that felt nice. I think I might have said, “Ok, let’s fuck then.” Then I got a Wall.

I got her to my place. A lot more flirtation.

I got her partly naked at different times because I’m often able to get women naked if I can at least get them in the door. I often use the “Don’t you think you need a shower?” ruse. I can’t believe how many women fall for that one or maybe they want to fall for it,if you catch my drift because it gives them an excuse: “I’m not getting naked in this guy’s house because I’m a slut. I’m getting naked in this man’s house because I need a shower!” But even then, they don’t necessarily want to fuck.

I even jump in the shower with them sometimes. I’m not sure how I do that either. They often protest in a meek way, but I just bulldoze in. They have to get  visibly angry to shut me down, otherwise “no means maybe” as far as I’m concerned.

I grabbed at her when she got part naked and she batted me away. “That’s going to cost you.” She was basically charging. Money or dope. So she was a whore.

But that’s not that unusual. An incredible number of women engage in “transactional sex.” It’s ubiquitous.

I had a naked woman wandering around my place for two hours a while back. I kept grabbing her. I figured if you don’t want me grabbing you, put some clothes on, baby! She batted me away for a couple of hours. So you can even have naked women wandering around your apartment for hours and refusing to fuck. Which is her right. But I’m also going to keep grabbing at her.

She can tell you flat to your face that you’re the hottest man alive, and she still might not want to fuck. See above. Just because you turn a woman on, doesn’t necessarily means she wants to have sex with you!

I finally figured out that sex is a pretty big deal for women, especially casual sex. So many things could go wrong and it is dangerous. Women only have a few sex partners in life. The GSS reports that the average American woman has three partners in her life. Sex is a heavy-duty decision for a woman, and it’s not taken lightly.

Unfortunately, I have to respect that. I’m no rapist.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: Nice Guy Problems with Women, with an Aside about Nice Guy Chad

I was certainly raised to be a nice guy. My Dad was in on this crap. They both taught us that happy couples never fight, which is the biggest lie on Earth. Anyway, women love fighting in relationships and they will often deliberately start fights with their men for absolutely no good reason at all other than “to test them,” which is moronic, or simply because they want to liven or spice things up, which is even dumber than that.

What does a woman want (paraphrasing Freud)? First of all, no one knows, least of all women themselves, who are remarkably self-blinded creatures. The woman at best is ultimately unfathomable, though we are starting to get some interesting reports from MTF transsexuals or transwomen who have been both men and women hormonally and hence can report from both sides of the war.

But still, the nature of the woman remains fiendishly complex for whatever reason.

Just as the nature of the man is to be rather stupidly simple. I mean give a man a six-pack, a couch, and a football game, and he’s good for the night, right?

Sure, but there are so simple formulas to satisfy to convoluted object known as the woman.

But a good analysis is: The woman lives for love. Another good analysis (somewhat similar) is: The woman lives for “peak emotional experiences.”

That sounds great in theory even if its terrifying to us stoic men. The problem is that those peak emotional experiences can include negative emotions. Exhilarating negative emotions such as wild fights are after all among the most emotionally peak experiences out there.

My mother and father often said, “Do you ever see us fighting?” Well, not really, but after age 9, they fought a lot, although of course they always lied and denied it. Anyway from this bullshit lie, I was taught that if you have a good relationship with a woman, you will never really fight. Every time a woman got angry at me, I felt it was my fault and I had failed as a man somehow. Consequently, I never really fought back. I just sat there and took it like a huge pussy.

I started fighting back against women ~10 years ago, and since then, I’ve had some of the wildest, most passionate love affairs of my life. So apparently it works to stand up to women and fight back against their shit. But men don’t want to fight back because most men are pussywhipped, that is, they are afraid that if they fight their woman, she will cut off the pussy supply. Pussy’s as good as oxygen for the male psyche or emotional body if not the actual physical body, in which its effects are more trivial than anybody realizes.

It’s generally agreed that being a nice guy, like a million other things, gets in the way of getting laid. Sure, nice guys can get laid and most eventually marry if only to beta bux, but being nice is a detraction when it comes to attracting women.

The exception, of course, is Chad, as Chad tends to be the exception to all of the rules of the Sexual Marketplace. Anytime you hear someone say, “Oh, don’t do that. That’s deadly when it comes to getting laid. Women hate that thing like no other!” you always have to put an asterisk by that statement that says “with the exception of Chad.” Chad breaks all the rules because Looks trumps all for women. And that’s the essence of Black Pill right there.

Nice Guy Chad still gets laid of course. I always did, if not sooner then later. Lots of women don’t care if Chad is a nice guy. Catfishing experiments made their Chads into huge pussies, and they still got bombarded by women. Nevertheless, Nice Guy Chad still suffers from the usual nice guy problems with women. One exception though is that even in the midst of these typical nice guy issues which probably see a lot of men cut off from sex after being labeled huge pussies, women keep fucking Nice Guy Chad like a human dildo machine even after they call him a pussy to his face, scream at him that he’s a faggot, etc.

It’s all down to that damned pretty face. That trumps all else, at least temporarily. I would say that the pretty face is a necessary and sufficient attribute to get laid, but it’s not good enough to sustain a relationship. Chad’s pretty face is like a drug. After a while the high wears off, and this is where you need other things – personality, money, faithfulness, love attachment, Red Pill,  masculinity – whatever. So Nice Guy Chad gets his brains fucked out for a while and is then unceremoniously and often cruelly dumped. In other words, story of my life, boyos.

The good thing about being Nice Guy Chad though is that a new woman will always come along. If not tomorrow than definitely at some point in the future. Which is more than the incels look forward to.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: The Primary Goal of a Woman’s Life: To Achieve Love and to Be in Love

Women always talk about wanting “commitment.” But women are hardly honest about a single thing they say in the Gender Wars. There’s too much at stake.

Dated a lot of women and I’ve hardly met one who cared about commitment. Don’t think it was ever mentioned to me once. But one thing I noticed over and over was that the most important thing in the relationship to the woman was love – that she was in love with me.

Beyond that and interacting with many women over the years, it’s obvious that the primary female drive is for love. They often idealize this is preposterous ways that never make any sense:

Woman: “That’s not true love…that’s not real love…that’s not love, that’s infatuation, etc.”

Me: “What’s not true love?”

Woman: 100 million completely arbitrary, idiotic, unfalsifiable, often tautological, and completely unscientific notions, such as, “True love is for life,” and other nonsense.

There’s a good reason for most of women’s ridiculous and irrational behavior, and the good reason behind this is that women dislike the idea of love being trivialized.

Why? Because several decades of studying women have shown me that the primary female drive is for love. In a sense, this is what their whole life is wrapped up in. Sure, they have all these other things, career and whatnot, going on, but all of that pales compared to the primary drive or goal of a woman’s life: to achieve love and to be in love.

Even with women (18-28) who say they don’t know what love is or they’ve never experienced love, the primary drive for love is there. These often young women are confused because they think they have not experienced real love yet.

Having been involved with some young women like that recently who were obviously crazy in love with me for a while (but then of course denied it later), it was clear that they simply had not developed a schema of what love was that they could plug their feelings into.

Also, I think they were looking for the fireworks, sparks, and “Hollywood love affair of the century” notion of love, and most love isn’t really that intense. They fall in love, but it’s not the explosions and fireworks kind they expect, so they say it’s not love. They’re wrong of course, but women are wrong about a million things.

Some seek refuge in a ridiculous concept called Aromanticism. I had a female best friend who insisted she was aromantic. Studying the concept, I decided she could not possibly be one, plus the whole concept was a bit silly they way it was laid out.
Supposedly there are all these folks out there who desperately want love, but they have a genetic or biological inability to fall in love which prevents them from doing so. That’s nonsense. There are no such people.

Real aromantics are just cold fish who have chosen to not experience love because, well, because they’re cold fish! It’s a disorder of choice like so of these stupid new Millennial identities, most of which don’t even exist in any real way.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: SJWism Is Based on Female Thinking

Really all SJWism is based on female thinking. I believe I read this somewhere else but I’m not sure how well it clicked with me at the time. But now that I understand women so much better, I finally get it. Of course SJWism is female thinking. Of course Identity Politics is female thinking.

Hence, all IP and of course all SJWism is pussy, and real men should not indulge in this pussy crap. That goes for Men’s Rights too. Men’s Rights is often based on female thinking, so it’s a pussy movement. The best Men’s Rights Movement would employ cold, hard logic and scientific thinking to promote the cause of men. This is no problem because logic is in our favor.

We are just too afraid to use it because once you go logical, you don’t get to play black and white, good and bad, good versus evil, the same splitting game that all IP movements play. In other words you have to play fair.

Ever tried to argue fairly with a typical fucktard human?

It’s based on emotional logic and it has the contempt for science and logic as tools the strong use against the weak, which is precisely how women see science and logic, neither of which they have much use for. SJW’s see themselves are completely weak and their enemies as completely strong. This is just the way female thinking works. According to female thinking, women are weak and men are strong and therefore, women get to break all the rules or follow no rules at all simply on account of being weak.

They are correct that the only way a weak party has a chance in a fight is if they fight dirty. Only the strong can afford to fight by the rules, which is why they always insist on rule-based fights. In a rule-based fight, the strong party always wins. Weak parties are smart enough to realize that if they play by the rules, they lose, so they all tend to fight dirty.

Women are weak and men are strong. Women realize that on a fair playing field, we will kick their asses in no time. So women don’t fall for the “let’s play by the rules” game that men set up for fights. And women believe that since they are weak, they have a right to fight dirty because all parties to a fight must appear to be on equal grounds. In  fact, according to women, men demanding rules for fighting is profoundly unfair itself because it will result in men always winning and women always losing.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: For the 800th Time, Why Women Hate Nice Guys and Love Abusive Assholes Who Treat Them Like Shit

As I mentioned previously, I’m a nice guy, and really there’s no reason on Earth I should have gotten laid even one time in my life, but nice guys never get laid, anyone knows that. Why? Because women refuse to fuck them. Why? Because women prefer extroverted Alpha assholes and pieces of shit who abuse the living Hell out of them to nice guys. Why? Because they find nice guys boring and wimpy. They think they’re pussies.

On a more fundamental level, it is absolutely essential that you dominate your woman. Female sexuality is such so that if you’re not dominating her, she won’t be turned on. You have to dominate her in order to turn her on at all. That’s why putting women on a pedestal, simping, etc. doesn’t work.

Women have 10,000 lies about why they don’t like nice guys and prefer assholes. The biggest lie of all is that most women say that’s just not true. So they deny it out the starting gate. Obviously we’re not getting anywhere here. After they deny it exists, they say why they do this. You see the fundamental flaw with this argument. As with so many female arguments, it contradicts itself laughable almost before it even starts, so we don’t even get to hypothesis. We are stuck with tautologies and unfalsifiable arguments, which makes up most of women’s thinking.

Ok, now that they get honest, they say that they hate nice guys because most of them are not even nice. Well, that’s obviously a huge lie, although it’s true of Nice Guy (TM) types. So they’re not nice. They’re really assholes in disguise. Except that women actually preferentially select assholes and no even that but they prefer the biggest assholes of all when they do so. Who are far worse than your average nice guy, I might add.

Next argument is entitlement. I get very tired of this argument. If women had to live like men, they’d blow their brains out in a year. There’s no way they could handle this. They’re too pampered. Male life is so awful that women wouldn’t be able to take it. They’d break down, flip out, go neurotic, suicide out, who knows? It’s women who are entitled. Entitled every single day from the day they are born. Women are addicted to entitlement because it’s all they’ve ever known. Take it away from them and  they’re gone.

Of course men are not entitled to sex. Everyone knows that. But women think that every man on Earth out to be perfectly happy or better yet ecstatic about the possibility that he might live his entire life without ever having sex.

Women to a one insist that this is no big deal and that every man ought to just prepare himself for this possibility and be ok with it. Well, most men are not going to be very happy about that to say the least.  A certain number of them are going to go ER (go Elliot Rodger). That’s terrible, but that’s just the way it is. If you deny men sex, a certain number of them will flip and go on massacre sprees. Incels in China have been doing this for some time now.

Women can bitch till the cows come home, but this is simply a law of nature. It’s the natural, normal, expected reaction when huge numbers of men are denied sex for much of their lives. Yeah, no one’s entitled to anything. But you women are therefore not entitled to live a life free of the fear of being massacred by maniacs that you created by the policies that you set up. Fair is fair.

Furthermore, ha ha. Alphas aren’t entitled? Players aren’t entitled?  Macho guys aren’t entitled? Don’t make me laugh.

The guys who have sex with the most women are the most entitled assholes of all. They commit 50 times more sexual harassment than nice guys. They are 50 times rapier than nice guys. But women don’t really mind because behavioral or better yet statistical Alphas get to be about as rapey and sexual harass-y as they like.

Women don’t mind being raped and harassed by Alphas. They mind it but they never go to the cops. They never try to get them fired. They let Alphas hit on them annoyingly all night long and try every sleazy trick in the book  and women just say, “Tee hee,” and let them get away with it because Alphas get away with everything forever. Until they don’t. But at least they get a nice long run.

Meanwhile the nice guy of behavioral Beta gets in trouble for looking at women. Literally looking at them! He’s not even allowed to look at them! For a woman, a Beta looking at them is exactly as bad as an Alpha date-raping them. It’s literally the same thing.

A Beta gets in trouble and gets fired for mildly flirting with a woman even one time, for asking a woman for her number or out on a date. Meanwhile, Mr. Alpha POS acts 100X worse and he gets away with it forever, drowning in pussy the whole time until life caves in. Even then he’s only out temporarily and you check back in a bit and he’s back on his feet again, doing the same dick moves as ever.

Another one: Nice guys are only being nice to us to try to get into our pants! Yeah and Alphas aren’t? Anyway, most men are only being nice to you to try to get in your pants. If you women didn’t have vaginas, most of us men wouldn’t even give you the time of day.

Yeah. This is the world, ladies. Most men are trying to fuck you. Terrible, isn’t it? Get used to it. It will this way until your looks go and you turn ugly and then you will brag and swoon every time a man flirts with you or checks you out. The same attention that made you suicidally depressed when you were pretty will be sorely missed and painfully missed when your looks are shot.

Also, Alphas are only being nice to you to get into your pants too, and they are much worse about it than nice guys. They do something called the Honeymoon phase. That’s when they don’t just callously pump and dump you by showering you with love until you give it up and then dumping you out with the trash afterwards.

If they bother to try to have a relationship with you, you get the Honeymoon phase, typical of all Cluster B scums. They shower you with love and devotion as part of a scam to wind their way into your heart. It’s all completely calculated in the most cold-blooded way. And then once they are in and have you nice and trapped and cut you off from all your friends and support and have no where to go and are at his mercy for a place to stay, the abuse begins. And gradually gets worse.

Because all Cluster B’s can do is abuse people, especially in sexual relationships. They literally cannot be any other way. Relationship = abuse for Cluster B’s. That’s how they play it.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: The Undefined and Undefinable Feminist Definition of Rape

As I noted in another post, my Mom brought me up right. She taught me that under no circumstances was I to rape girls or women. She drilled into my head over and over that rape was force or the threat of force. Her message was, “Don’t do it, dammit!” She pretty much said everything other than that was fair game, which is the only sane view of rape.

My Mom’s a feminist, and a pretty bad one at that, getting worse as she ages. But nowadays feminists (most women) would call my Mom a rape apologist and a handmaiden because of the way the feminists have blown up the definition of rape and the fact that feminism gets increasingly insane every year, as is the case with all Identity Politics.

Of course the feminists and their fag “male” allies have no expanded the definition of rape to about the size of the Indian Ocean. Not only that but apparently no one can even properly define it as it’s as vague and  undecipherable as the Linear B inscriptions.

As it is, if a woman thinks she got raped, she got raped. That’s now the definition of rape!

Women actually believe that crap. When you put women in power, the first thing they do is  make vague, unenforceable laws to bring about their desired utopia.

Of course this never works, therefore all through space and time, whenever women are put into power over men, the result is simply complete chaos. People tire of it after a bit, and pretty soon, the sane people say, “Let’s have some sense here. Let the men take over!

And then some sort of patriarchy, benevolent or otherwise (typically otherwise), is reimposed. Society’s not fair after that, but it wasn’t fair under Female Rule either. Pick your poison. You will either be ruled by women or men.

Look around you at the Anglosphere, the UK, and Scandinavia to see the dystopian chaos of idiocy that ensues under Female Rule.

I’ll pick men any day. Women are incapable of ruling societies.  Women can do a lot of things,  but that’s not one of them. It’s fine really. Hey, women can’t do everything. Sometimes the ladies just need to step aside and let the boys take over.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: After Menopause, All Women Are Born-Again Virgins

As she ages, my Mom is turning into a worse and worse feminist every year. I hardly even knew she was one before.

This is happening in tandem with her increasing puritanism. Same thing: every year, she gets more and more puritanical and weird about sex. She was always like that a bit, but at least you could talk to her about it, and to some extent she was always proud of me in a sort of “my son, the stud” sort of way. She always thought my playboy ways were hilarious and she would almost fall on the floor laughing at my latest exploits. That makes sense as most women, and humans in general (even some little kids) think players are funny as Hell for some reason.

And of course, feminism is intimately tied in with puritanism and has been from day one. It makes sense as feminism is simply female thinking empowered, reified and increasingly legislated to become the ruling force in society. Feminist Rule is nothing but Female Thought in Power. And puritanism, along with, oddly enough, nymphomania, is part of the Female Character.

Her increasing puritanism got me to thinking. Menopause nukes your sex drive. Women with no or low sex drives tend to become puritanical anyway,  and the longer they stay that way, the worse they get. So my theory now is that increasing puritanism is something all postmenopausal women experience. It may well get worse with time too, as so many miserable things do.

Postmenopausal women for all intents and purposes turn into complete prudes and born-again virgins. I’ve seen complete whore to nun conversions, just like that! Snap of the fingers.

Postmenopausal women a few years out of menopause (they stay horny for a couple of years for some reason) are basically insufferable, and I don’t want anything to do with them. I’ve been battling puritanical shitwads my whole life. I’m sick and tired of them and their crap.

Postmenopausal women don’t fuck anyway, so what’s the point? Why even be with a woman if she doesn’t fuck? That’s pretty much the only reason to be with her anyway, right?

I’ve got my porn and my hand, and neither one ever turns me down.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

PUA/Game: The Primary Goal of a Woman’s Life Is To Achieve and Be in Love

Good point. Women always talk about wanting “commitment.” But women are hardly honest about a single thing they say in the Gender Wars. There’s too much at stake. Dated a lot of women and I’ve hardly met one who cared about commitment. Don’t think it was ever mentioned to me once. But one thing I noticed over and over was that the most important thing in the relationship to the woman was love – that she was in love with me.

Beyond that and interacting with many women over the years, it’s obvious that the primary female drive is for love. They often idealize this is preposterous ways that make any sense but boil down to them not liking it being trivialized.

Woman: “That’s not true love…that’s not real love…that’s not love, that’s infatuation, etc.”

Me: “What’s not true love?”

Woman: 100 million completely arbitrary, idiotic and completely unscientific notions. “True love is for life,” and other nonsense.

There’s a good reason for most of women’s ridiculous and irrational behavior, and the good reason behind this is that they dislike the idea of love being trivialized.

Why? Because several decades of studying women have shown me that the primary female drive is for love. In a sense, this is what their whole life is wrapped up in. Sure, they have all these other things, career and whatnot going on, but all of that pales compared to the primary drive or goal of a woman’s life: to achieve love and to be in love.

Even with women who say they don’t know what love is or they’ve never experienced love, the primary drive for love is there. These often young women are confused because they think they have not experienced real love yet.

Having been involved with some young women like that who were obviously crazy in love with me for a while (but then of course denied it later), it was clear that they simply had not developed a schema of what love was that they could plug their feelings into.

Also, I think they were looking for the fireworks, sparks, and “Hollywood love affair of the century” notion of love, and most love isn’t really that intense. They fall in love, but it’s not the explosions and fireworks kind they expect, so they say it’s not love. Or if they are a young woman, they fall in love, are ashamed of it, so they deny it later on.

I had a couple of young women do this but it was obviously that they fell out of love with me at some point, and then felt terribly ashamed of themselves for falling in love with a man 30-40 years older than they were, so they denied it.  In one case, I was 58 and she was 27 (31 year age gap),  and in the other case, I was 59 and she was 18 (41 year age gap).

These women were wrong of course, but women are wrong about a million things, and this bothers them not.

Some seek refuge in a ridiculous concept called Aromanticism. I had a female best friend who insisted she was aromantic. Studying the concept, I decided she could not possibly be one, plus they whole concept was a bit silly they way it was laid out.

Supposedly there are all these folks out there who desperately want love, but they have a genetic or biological inability to fall in love which prevents them from doing so. That’s nonsense. There are no such people. Real aromantics are just cold fish who have chosen to not experience love because, well, because they’re cold fish! It’s a disorder of choice like so of these stupid new Millennial identities, most of which don’t even exist in any real way.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

PUA/Game: Women Are Not Irrational – They Are Just Employing a Different Kind of Logic

To women, being wrong or right is not important. What is important is that they feel that certain things are right or wrong. Whether they really are or not is of no consequence. She’s not trying to be right at all costs. She’s trying to feel good, avoid painful confusion and cognitive dissonance and probably to keep from falling into depression or killing herself. If women do this to keep from killing themselves and to keep on trucking in life with a happy smile, I’m not going to fault them.

Female Emotional Logic:

Is this idea true or false?

Does it make me feel good,  calm, comfortable and at ease? Does it line up with the way I think the world should be, not how it is? It is true.

Does it make me feel bad, depressed, confused, suicidal, or anxious? Does it conflict with the way I think the world should be (not how it actually is, as this is of little importance to women)? It is false.

In other words, to women, there’s no such thing as the ugly truth. If it’s ugly, it’s untrue. Real simple.

And to some extent, there are no such thing as pretty lies, though they definitely grow more cynical and less utopian as they grow older. If it’s pretty, it’s true.

Women are utopians. If you understand one thing about women, understand this. And pretty lies are the very definition of utopia.

It’s not that it’s irrational logic so much as it’s what I call emotional logic – the logic is emotionally driven and it is logical in an emotional sense. When men say women are irrational what they are really saying is that women are using emotional logic instead of the logic of pure, cold, objective thought.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: I Regret to Inform You That I Am Now a Rapist

I’ve just been informed that I’m a rapist. I’ve also been told I’ve been raping women my whole life. Well I admit I’m a bit befuddled. Never got accused of that but once. Never been arrested for it.

But no matter! Rape they said, and rape it was! Believe women! I know I sure do! If she said she got raped, she got raped. How do we know it was rape? Because she said it was.

Because words have no definitions now that Semantic Entropy has taken over, and we all get to make up our own meanings of every word! What’s wrong with you, you doubt the word of woman?  Women never lie! Believe women! I believe women!

I did get accused of rape. Well, she was 14 years old. I usually leave it at that just to troll the world, but I’ll let you guys in on the punchline. Come on: I was 16.

But that’s rape too, I got told. Because we were both underage! Well, she lied, like women do a documented 46% of the time they cry rape. We were drunk, both of us. Off our asses. She accused me of rape afterwards to keep from being a slut, I guess. Can’t think of any other reason.

I just got told by a bunch of women that I raped that girl. Because, they said, if you ever got accused of rape, that means you raped someone. An accusal is a fact! Well, damn. Why bother with trials then? Waste of time.

Anyway I had no idea I’d been raping these ladies my whole life, but I don’t plan to stop doing it. Because it’s the only way I know how to have sex. Because it’s fun. Because at the end of the day, when all’s said and done, and they’re ready to rest, every woman wants to be ravished. Asking permission is for pussies. Just jump her, rip her clothes off, and pound her. They all want it like that anyway.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

PUA/Game: Latest Sexual Adventures: The Knockout Gorgeous Thieving Meth Head Bitch

An update to my latest sexual adventures, or should I say unadventures the way things are going these days.

I had a methhead chick over at my place recently. She was smokin hot and not fucked up by meth yet. 39 years old, 5 kids, divorced. Basically a complete airhead which I don’t mind because airheaded women can act extremely feminine. Idiotic and childlike, sure, but oh so feminine. Anyway, raw femininity does have an idiotic and childlike quality to it, but I love it anyway because I even love women when they are being idiotic.

I got her in my car and she said, “Damn! You’re fucking hot! You know that?”

I said, “Cool, let’s fuck then.”

She said, “Nope, I don’t give it away for free. Either dope (meth) or money, one or the other.”

Guys, once a woman says she doesn’t give it away for free, just get rid of her. She’s a whore. A pure, 100%, real deal, no lie, fucking whore. Not even in the typical way that most all women are whores. Chicks like this are on the level of a streetwalker.A nasty, lowdown, sleazy, streetwalking, thieving, criminal fucking prostitute of the lowest variety.

You never do anything but lose money or stuff with real deal whores, and a lot of the times, you don’t even get laid. They just take your money or stuff, withhold the pussy, and take off. You have no idea how many cunts like this there are. They’re literally everywhere, mostly young women aged 23-29. This one at 39 was a bit old for this crap, but being an addict, it made sense.

45% of real deal whores are female psychopaths. Real deal whores are pretty much the worst women of all. That’s what female psychopaths do – thieve and whore, whore and thieve. Male psychopaths of course are so much worse as they are vastly more destructive and often extremely aggressive and even violent.

I did manage to get her naked. I often get women naked once I get them in the door. I’m not even sure how I do it. I just somehow get their damn clothes off. Ladies, if any of you dare to tread into my Lion’s Den (otherwise known as Enemy Territory), keep in  mind that there’s a pretty good chance you will lose your clothes, at least for a bit. Plus my place is sort of a free fire zone. If I get you in here, I’m probably going to be grabbing at you and steering you towards the bedroom. Because that’s what we do with hot lady visitors here at Bob’s Hotel for Wayward Gals.

I grabbed at her a few times but she knocked me away with a “That’ll cost ya.” I gave her a bunch of stuff like toiletries because she was poor. To add insult to injury the bitch stole some of my stuff. Actually my roommates stuff but still…And she gaslit me real bad too.

She took my roommates’ jacket. I saw her with it and told her that’s ours and she was stealing it. She gaslit me and said she’d been wearing since I met her. I’m going back over my memory and I can’t think straight. She walks out the door with my roommates sandals and jacket while I’m still doubting my damned memory.

I didn’t  really get anything other than getting her naked. But that’s got to count for something, right? Just getting a hot woman over to your place and getting her damned clothes off is pretty awesome. I give myself a Bronze Star for that achievement.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: Of Course I’m Not a Misogynist

Polar Bear: He’s pro-woman at his core but is suffering a bit of racial ageism.

Of course. I’ve always liked women better than men. If I had my way, I’d just be around women all the time or as much of the time as possible. I love being around guys too, but women are better in a way.As you can see, if I like women better than men, I’m obviously a misogynist, right? Feminists are so full of shit.

But in a way it’s a circular argument because no matter what, you will be around men.

You don’t like women much? Ok, you will be around men.

You like women as much as men? Ok, you will be around men half the time at least.

You like women better than men? The weird thing is that even there you will have men around a lot because if you are around women all the time, pretty soon you will have guys hanging around because “I want to hang out with the guy who has all the chicks around him.” Get the picture?

I’m almost like a gay man in that sense. In fact, I used to think I was like “one of women’s gay friends, except I’m straight.”

I agree that I am “one of the girls” in a sense. But I’m not really. I’m just pretending to be one of the girls. I’m really an evil spy pretending to be one of the girls except I’m secretly a guy infiltrating them in order to deviously trick, fool, and scam them into having sex with me.

Part of my brain is like a woman’s brain, so in a way, I think like a woman. That’s why I understand women pretty well. Most women’s conversation seems insipid to us men – hot guys, makeup, clothes, gossip, bla bla, lot of silly giggling and verbal hugging. It’s just pure idiocy. They seem like children.

But I’ve heard that women think the same of us when we get together with fart jokes, sports, and arguing politics. Men are insipid to them.

So I can sit around with a bunch of women being women and doing their girl chat, completely idiotic and senseless, like chirping birds fighting for no reason at your feeder, and I’m right at home amidst all this silliness and idiocy. Sure it is silly and idiotic, but I love it because I even love women when they are being idiotic. Because I’m sort of one myself.

Now mind you I am not a tranny at all. I love being a man and I respect any man, especially a gay man, who loves being a man. I’m also as masculine as any man that ever lived in a sense, and that’s my primary self-image. So I don’t hate being a man and wish I was a woman.

Women weren’t being very nice to me a while ago, but I completely changed my looks. I have long hair now, look like a 1970’s glam rock star, and now women are being way, way nicer. See how shallow women are? Pathetic, isn’t it?

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: Libertarian Topics It’s Ok to Discuss On Here

If you want to talk about Libertarians on metoo, custody courts, affirmative action, and reparations, ok.

These are all areas of government (and corporate) overreach. I would particularly like to see critiques of the carceral system and carceral state, everybody calling the cops for every little problem, and the fact that about half of the things we want to do in life are now actually or effectively illegal. Every year I look at the new laws, and more things I have been doing my whole life are illegal.

Look at speech codes and hate speech codes. Every week I wake up and another word I’ve been using my whole life is banned. Every other sentence is now some sort of bigotry, offense, or insult needing an apology else your career is over.

It’s not the state that’s doing this. It’s our Sanctimonious Nanny State (a word I hate) Culture or Nanny State Culture that’s firing all these guys. Our culture is now run by Church Ladies (Church Lady Culture) and Stern Nuns with Rulers. No fun allowed! Fun is bigotry! Fun is hate! If you’re having fun, you must be hating, preying up, exploiting or hurting some poor vulnerable soul.

How about the increasingly Puritan Left, Comstock Left, Victorian  Left, or Sex-hating Left. Of course all of this is coming right out  of Sex-Negative Feminism. I came out of the revolutions of the 1960’s. One of our mottoes was, “Do it in the streets!” So my whole life, I’ve been a Do it in the streets type guy. A Hugh Hefner liberal.

The Left is now as sex-hating as the Christian Right. Hell, the only sex-positive politics these days is on the Right! Pathetic! I didn’t sign up for this shit, this prudery. The Left is now championing everything we were opposed and fought against.

The whole carceral state (Mommy Cop) is out of control. I want to see it reigned in. Probably half of our laws should be flushed down the toilet. People can pretty easily solve most of their problems themselves without getting Mommy Cop (the Police State).

Any problem nowadays, snowflakes go yelling for Mommy Cop to come rescue them. “Mommy Cop! He hurt me! He called me a name!” Mommy Cop whips out her ticket book and writes a ticket for yet another of a growing list of citation offenses.

If you want to talk any of these things, go for it:

    • Our invasion of privacy or the fact that we have no privacy at all anymore.
    • #metoo, sexual assault and raaaaaaaaape bullshit.
    • The travesty of custody courts.
    • Affirmative action.
    • Reparations.
    • The carceral system or carceral state (Mommy
      Cop).
    • Legal reform, eliminating many stupid, intrusive, anti-freedom, and sanctimonious laws about personal behavior.
    • The fact that people can probably solve a lot of issues now dealt with by Mommy Cop amongst themselves without crying for Mommy Cop.
    • Hate speech and speech codes.
    • Cancel Culture or the Left’s war on free speech and increasingly even free thought.
    • Various sanctimonious party-pooper, no fun, turd in the punchbowl modern Left cultures that could be called such things as Nanny State Culture, Church Lady Culture, or Nuns with Rulers Culture, in other words the punitive aspects of the Cultural Left.
    • The prudish, anti-sex Left cultures variously described the Puritan Left, Comstock Left, Victorian Left, or Sex-hating Left. Also Sex-Negative Feminism.
    • Anti-freedom, Carceral State Feminism.
    • Pedophile Mass Hysteria, the insane abuse of age of consent and statutory rape laws, and the moral panic around the sexuality of teenage girls.
    • The increasing infantilization of society where childhood is dragged out to the day before the 18th birthday and beyond.
    • Females demanding to be permanent infants when it benefits them and then permanent adults when that benefits them.
    • The notion that females are Forever Children who lack agency their entire lives.

Libertarians have excellent views on all this, which is really civil libertarianism. I am a civil libertarian, as in an ACLU-type liberal. Libertarians are with the old ACLU on civil liberties.

The ACLU is now a cucked, fagged-out Cultural Left Shitshow characterized by dishonest legal theory and the abandonment of (male) reason and logic in favor of (female) emotion and bias when it comes to legal matters. But the old ACLU was great, and the Libertarians line right up with the old liberal civil libertarians. So that’s a great commonality with Libertarians that we can talk about.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

PUA/Game: How Many Attractive Women Aged 18-30 Are Not Whores?

I don’t want to know how many of them are whores*. That would be almost all of them. I want to know how many of them are not whores? Is there even one out there anywhere in the US?

If Tinder cleaned out the scammers, porn seller whores, onlyfans whores, camwhores, real whores, and just out and out beggar whores, it would be a lot better. Nothing but whores on there when it comes down to it. Many different types of whores, but all whores nonetheless.

Just about every attractive young 18-30 year old woman on there is some sort of a whore. They’re all selling pussy. Come to think of it, how many attractive women aged 18-30 are not selling pussy? 1%? Is it even that high?

Have goodlooking young women always been such a bunch of whores, or is this some new thing?

* Keep in mind that I’m not talking about sluts. I luvs sluts. Sluts make the world go round. Let’s hear it for sluts!

I am talking about actual fucking whores. That means women who are quite literally selling pussy. They’re charging cold, hard cash for pussy. Any woman who is doing that is a fucking whore, sorry.

I really dislike whores. To me that’s as low as a woman gets. In fact, 45% of arrested prostitutes (the hardcores) are diagnosed psychopaths. I’ve had some experience with whores, even recently. I didn’t bring them over as whores. I brought them over as dates, more or less.

And then when it got down “Hey are you gonna put out or what?” Lo and behold! They were whores! One thing I heard over and over from these women, who ranged in age from 23-43, was “I don’t give it away for free. If I’m going to give it up, I want to get something out of it.”

One was a meth addict and she gave me the choice of money or meth if I wanted her to give it up. She got naked in my house too at various points. I made a grab for her tits, but she got angry and said, “Hey, you have to pay for that!”

I’m tired of this shit. When I was young I never had to pay for it. No woman ever actually charged me like this. Sure, I had to take them out to lunch or dinner or this or that at times, but there wasn’t this actual whorish shakedown. I wonder if it’s because of my age.

Seems like just about any woman who wants to have sex with me these days thinks I ought to pay for it. That’s damned insulting. The only way women will have sex with me is if I pay them! What an insult. That makes me feel so ugly and unattractive.

My Mom said that was actually the typical attitude most women had when she was growing up. Not to be a whore of course, but to not give it up unless you get something in return. My Mom said, “We were taught that if you were going to give it up, you better get something out of it – like a wedding ring!”

I don’t mind this mindset and I don’t consider women who think this way to be whores.

And @AlphaUnit has agreed with me that this seems to be a general attitude among women – that you don’t give it up for free and if you’re going to give it up, you need to get something out of it.

Whores are not very nice women. And the bigger of a whore she is – like actually getting arrested for it – the more likely it is that she is psychopathic.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: If Women Practice Hypergamy, Do They Actually Fall in Love with Men?

Of course they do.

There have been a number of women (and girls for that matter) who were quite madly in love with me in my life. More after I turned 40. Been a couple of years though and I really miss it. Last one was an 18 year old girl!

It was real love, too. Not fake. And some of it was wild Hollywood love affair of the century Romeo and Juliet sparks and fireworks “crazy love.” That’s the high of a lifetime, but it’s pretty exhausting because the woman veers from extreme love to extreme hate very quickly.

I really don’t think they were faking it. Not only that, but I can spot a woman in love a mile away at night blindfolded. Basically they all act the same. Over the years you learn to spot the signals, and yep, there it is again!

I wonder how much of this falling in love women do has to do with Looks though. I’ve been said to be goodlooking since age 18 and even to this day, incredibly. After the Blackpill, I’m starting to wonder if all those women fell in love with that pretty face. Or was the pretty face the trigger, the necessary but not sufficient element to set off the love cascade that followed?

Women’s endless obsession with true love and real love and fake love and not real love and love and infatuation and all of their insane solipsism around their weird reification of love is all nonsense. Women mystify love to the point where they don’t even know what it is anymore. I mean they do, but they hide it from themselves, like they do with so many things.

They create some weird ideal standard that’s the real, true, pure love, and all the rest are some weird “fake love.” Got news for you, women. You’re wrong. Love ranges from a slight feeling where one is a little bit in love or on the verge of falling in love all the way to head over heels insanity. Women’s endless parsing of this basic human feature, possibly rooted in chemicals like oxytocin, is just silly navel-gazing on the part of women.

One thing, though. The most important thing in most any woman’s life is love and being in love. Way more important than sex. They literally live for that feeling. In a way, the entire purpose of women’s existence from the view of the female psyche is to fall in love. Since this seems to be the very reason women exist in the first place, it makes sense that they go nuts over-defining it and chopping it up into idiotic pieces of nonsense. Women don’t want to believe that this very thing they live for is quite commonplace.

If we use my definition of love above:

Love ranges from a slight feeling where one is a little bit in love or on the verge of falling in love all the way to head over heels insanity.

Most women will be in love, one way or another, especially in those early phases, quite a few times in her life if she dates a lot of men.

The best definition I have found for love is “fondness.” I get this feeling of overwhelming “fondness” for me from a woman who is truly in love with me. We think this is commonplace, but honestly I almost never really get that sort of true, pure fondness of the heart in my day to day life. You really only get that from a woman in love. Maybe a male friend, once in a while. Perhaps a close relative. But those are a bit different, though closely related.

I haven’t read the replies yet, but I assure you that below you will see many silly women talking about the real love, the pure love, the true love, and how rare it is, and give some stupid definition of it like “true love lasts for life” or something. It’s all bullshit. Women delude themselves. It is their nature to do just that.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: Do Women Practice Hypergamy or Not?

Answer is complicated as with most things.

Everyone knows women practice hypergamy. Everyone knows that. The evidence is overwhelming. But do they practice it exclusively? No.

Women practice hypergamy and then they don’t practice hypergamy, that is they practice monogamy. I’ve had women in love with me, and I gave them freedom to date other men and they said, “I don’t want to date other men! I only want you!” And that wasn’t just once, either. That were a number of women who said that.

Pretty sure my Mom was faithful to my Dad for 50 years.

Women are completely contradictory creatures. Are women nymphos or prudes? Good question. The truth, oddly enough, is that they are both, often at the same time! Being prudish and being nymphomaniacs are both essential aspects of the Female Character. I know it doesn’t make sense but that’s just how they are. And once you figure out this ambivalent weirdness, a lot of things about women will start to click and make sense.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

The Sexual Desert Called Sex in Your 60’s

Rishi Ji: On another note I understand that you are a psychologist so you’d think on those lines but physical attributes matter a lot. Your comment on this post and many before leave me intrigued when you write “they don’t give me second glance anymore”.

What has changed in you physically? Is it the hair? Or a paunch? Or is it just society’s shitty theory of the creepy old man that you have come to embody?

Well I am in my 60’s. I was still getting laid in my  50’s for sure, but 60’s are like the dead zone at the mouth of the Mississippi River in the Gulf of Mexico. No (sex) life to be seen. Or maybe it’s more like the Great Pacific Garbage Patch.

I have long grey-white hair. I look like a glam rocker from the 1970’s. No paunch. Yeah, I am seen as a creepy old man.

I think mostly once a guy gets into his 60’s, no one wants to fuck him anymore. And every single damned woman who expresses interest in fucking me wants to charge me. And a lot of young women do express interest in fucking me. They approach me all the time. Lately just about every day.

Young woman: Hi, handsome! You married? You got a girlfriend?

Me: Nope.

Young woman: Damn you’re hot. I’d go out with you for sure.

Me: Hell yeah let’s go for it.

Young woman: Yeah but not for free. I want you to be my sugar daddy.

Me: Bye.

So all the young women try to charge me, and even some of the older women do.

I had a 38 year old woman, total knockout, over the other night. I managed to get her naked somehow. Not sure exactly how I pulled that off but I can often get their clothes off if I can get them in my front door, and I’m not sure how I do that either.

But she wouldn’t even let me touch her tits. Believe me, I tried. Just forget about her pussy. She should have put a No Trespassing sign on her pubis. Basically she said she doesn’t fuck for free and only fucks for cash or dope. Yeah, she was a meth head. I don’t have any meth and I ain’t paying anyone for sex nowadays.

A 44 year old woman recently tried to charge me for sex too. She was from Wyoming and she was in the area, as she comes through here selling her j jewelry. She wanted me to give her $400 worth of Itunes, and she would get the hotel room, the whole thing. I couldn’t believe a 44 year old woman tried to scam me and thought her aging pussy was worth $400 a night. That’s laughable.

Who do these older women think they are, still charging us for sex?

I mean, yeah, young women charge. They all do, pretty much. How many young women do not sell pussy? That’s what I’d like to know. I know how many do because I already see that all the time. I want to know how many don’t because a young woman not selling her pussy seems weird to me.

So anyway, all women from 18-44 are trying to charge me.

I haven’t even been dealing with women my age because ~0.00000% of them want to fuck and a lot of them don’t look good anymore, though some do, especially if they are in their 50’s.

They all think they are huge prizes who need to have lots of men fighting over them. They all think they are princesses with 14 karat gold pussies. These are women from 55-63 years old, mind you. When do women stop thinking their princess prizes with diamond studded pussies? Do they stop ever? I swear, women’s vanity knows no bounds.

On the other hand, maybe gay men want to fuck me. A gay friend of mine said, “Too bad you aren’t gay. Handsome older men like you are a hot commodity in the gay community. A lot of young guys want a “Daddy.” Alas, I am not gay.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: More Terrible Advice from Women

On Reddit, women are making posts saying that if a man just wants sex from a woman and nothing else, he should simply make his feelings clear along those lines, and then everything will be groovy. What’s wrong is men lying and stringing women along and using them for sex. As usual with most advice from women, this is completely wrong, and you will only fail if you follow this advice.

This is the stupidest nonsense I’ve heard in a while. If I told women that I just wanted sex, I guarantee I will never get laid again, even one time. And I think if I had walked through life being up front about just wanting sex, I would have had little sex. Possibly none at all.

I was a Chad and even then, being up front about my intentions never worked for me either. Want to get laid? Lie to women. That’s how you do it, boyos. Or at least that’s how it was done back in the day in the 70s and 80s. Maybe things are different now? But I doubt it.

An honest seducer is an oxymoron. You’re either honest or you are seducer. Pick one. You can’t be both. If you wish to lead a lifetime of seduction, prepare to lie with nearly sociopathic intensity with as little guilt as possible. If your morals won’t allow you to debase yourself to this level, fine. Believe me, I understand. Just get yourself a girlfriend or a wife and play it that way.

It’s insane advice like this that shows that women don’t live in reality. I’ll throw pathetic male feminist soys into the mix. Male feminists are men who have adopted the insane worldview of women and claim that delusional worldview is actual reality. They are men who have adopted female thinking. They no longer think like men. That’s if they ever did in the first place.

Never take advice from women about any of this stuff. Why would you take advice from someone who doesn’t live in reality?

At the end of the day this is just more female solipsism. How can a woman best get sex? Be up front with her intentions! So obviously it must be true for men too. Women can’t see the world through any eyes not their own.

Solipsism is the curse of womanhood.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Blondie, “Dreaming”

Blondie, “Dreaming” from the album “Dreaming,” 1979.

My God, isn’t this a great song. I can’t believe I was around when this music first came out. Let me tell you, it was a special time.

Isn’t she sexy as Hell, too? Damn I can’t believe how sexy this chick is. She’s raw, pure, 100% sex, animal and flesh, rutting in the mud like pigs in the setting sun without a care.

When I met you in the restaurant
You could tell I was no debutante
You asked me what’s my pleasure
“A movie or a measure”?
I’ll have a cup of tea and tell you of my dreamin’
Dreamin’ is free
Dreamin’, dreaming is free

I don’t want to live on charity
Pleasure’s real or is it fantasy?
Reel to reel is living verite
People stop and stare at me
We just walk on by
We just keep on dreamin’

Beat feet, walking a two-mile
Meet me, meet me at the turnstile
I never met him, I’ll never forget him
Dream dream, even for a little while
Dream dream, filling up an idle hour
Fade away, radiate

I sit by and watch the river flow
I sit by and watch the traffic go
Imagine something of your very own,
something you can have and hold
I’d build a road in gold just to have some dreamin’
Dreamin’ is free

Dreamin’, dreamin’ is free
Dreamin’, dreamin’ is free
Dreamin’, dreamin’ is free

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

PUA/Game: I Literally Have Hot Young Women Approaching Me and Asking If I Want to Go Out with Them on a Near-daily Basis

Reality check for all women: Newsflash – Young pussy likes old cock! Obviously the other way around is true, but it often works both ways.
I hear this nonsense all the time from silly young women grossed out that older men are turned on by them, saying how sick this is and how weird and gross these men are.
First of all, it’s not weird. Lab studies indicate that 100% of straight men of any age are maximally attracted to females all the way down to 16 and sometimes below. That’s maximal attraction. As big as a hard-on gets. Yes they are measuring these men’s erections.
So every single one of these men displaying this attraction is engaging in 100% normal human male behavior. Why silly young women think that normal men acting like male human beings are weird, gross, or sick is something I will never understand. Except maybe that young women don’t know shit. Just like the stereotype.
We also hear constantly from outraged older women that no girls this age want older men for any reason, including money. This shows that most women don’t learn much as they get older. They just stay irrational You would think these women would know better, but nope, they are silly old fools. And there’s no fool like and old fool, right? Of either gender.
I literally have hot young women, 18-27, approaching me all the time, even as often as once a day. They approach me, exchange names and pleasantries, and soon they say how handsome I am or something along those lines. I thank them and then they ask me if I am married or have a girlfriend.
I say no to both but add that I had many girlfriends and dated many women in the past. They seem to have expected this, so they don’t act surprised, nor do they seem worried that I am some schmuck who can’t get laid. Whether I am one or not, I am told that I give off vibes of “player” or “bad boy,” so no one seems to think I am some incel who can’t get a date.
Then they ask me, in one way or another, if I want to go out with them.
There may some time within those two events, which are often filled with flirtation, overtly sexual come-ons, comments, etc. They often start calling me “Daddy.” Why are all young women who are flirting with me call me Daddy lately? Is it some sexual fad for women to call men they are attracted to Daddy? I don’t get it.
They sometimes emphasize how young they are, I guess to make then more attractive, assuming I think younger = hotter. They are sweetening the pot.
In the last couple of weeks, one emphasized that she was still in high school (18). She asked, “You want a high school girl?”, as if that were some super-attractive add-on. The other day, one said, “18 years old!” as if that were a big selling point.
They seem to think that men believe younger = better, so they emphasize in an almost pedo way how young they are. They don’t think this is abnormal and seem to just think that all older men like young women, that the younger they are the better, and that’s natural and normal.
This is why I don’t believe silly women who say older men are pedophiles for going after young women and how creepy and gross it is to do that. I mean these women seem to think that of course I like young women, that’s obvious, all older men do, etc. and they act like their youth is some sort of prized asset on the SMV.
There’s more talk and flirtation, and soon it becomes obvious that they want money out of this, as they ask me to be their sugar daddy. Unfortunately, these sugar babies want at least $400-2,000/month! Which is way too much for me to afford.
I say no but say I would be interested in dating her and would spend the money every time we go out, etc. Nope. Hard shut down. They typically leave very quickly when they find out I am not made of money and are often quite rude about it, leaving in a flash without even saying goodbye. A whoosk, and she’s gone so fast you wonder if she  even there talking to you in the first place.
Only rarely do I find one who will date me without the money. These tend to have a huge older man fetish and a poor relationship with their father – father left when she was 13, hates her father’s guts, etc. They can be down to 18 or 19 even.
The kicker? I am literally 62 fucking years old. Late middle age, heading towards elderly. If they act that way to me, imagine how they act to attractive older men who are quite a bit younger than I am!
There are a lot of hot young women down to 18-19 who will definitely date and fuck an older man, even much older – if there’s money involved, that is.
It probably really helps if the older guy is named Chad because otherwise the sight of an unattractive man 40 years older than the woman would be hard to stomach, and she probably couldn’t bear the sex part.
I imagine if he’s an older guy but he’s still named Chad, this makes it bearable or who knows, maybe even fun. I don’t keep them guessing because I always wear a name-tag with Chad on it when I go out. I attract more women  that way for some reason. No idea why.
And incidentally, I’ve been named Chad most of my life ever since age 18 when I changed my name to Chad. Before that my name was Robert. I still use Robert in most formal contexts because Chad seems too informal, you know?
The judge let me keep two names because he said many men who change their names to Chad change them back to the old name after 40 in the interest in truth in advertising and not want to be accused of LARPing. I  mean look, you either look like your name is Chad or don’t, you know? If your looks are shot and your name is still Chad, everyone will laugh at you.
I mean Chad’s only your name if you are an attractive man, 8-10. Those are the only guys who change their names. Women wanted  to make it a law that no sub-7 man could change his name to Chad, but the bill didn’t pass as it was seen to violate the 1st Amendment. It’s not a real problem. Women just think it is.
I mean think about it, if you’re a woman and you think you’re going out with a guy named Chad and you find out his real name is Seymour or Piercy or something, wouldn’t you be pissed?  They don’t like to be fooled by Chad imposters.
No guy who is 1-6 in looks is going to change his name to Chad because everyone would laugh at him, and it would seem absurd, like he was pretending to be something he was not.
Guys named Chad get older like the rest of us – people don’t seem to realize that. But guess what? If he keeps his looks up, he keeps the Chad name into his 40’s, 50’s, and maybe even 60’s. There are guys named Chad in most age groups!
Hell, there are probably some guys in their 70’s who are still named Chad. For instance, Anthony Fauci, head of the CDC and the man who is running the government’s response to the COVID19 virus, is actually named Chad! I mean look at him. At 78, he’s still smokin’ hot.
He just uses Anthony instead in order to look professional because if  he called himself Chad people might not take him seriously, you know? There’s a petition being run by women up now to declare Fauci the Sexiest Man on Earth, so you know right he’s also named Chad, right?
It’s stunning how many women of all ages have no concept whatsoever of the nature of reality and instead believe that Fantasyland is reality. If you want to know why men ignore women so much, there you go.
Consequently every time you women open your cute little mouths to say something, we men often sigh to ourselves and figure probably going to spout off some nonsense that isn’t even true. You wonder why we think you are flaky and irrational and don’t listen to you half the time.
Well, there’s a reason for everything, often a good one.
Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: One Great Thing About Being a Woman: The Right to Complain

From a conversation on Reddit:

Other Man: Part of the gift of being a woman is always finding something to complain about. No matter how good a day is for them they always find something without fail. Its almost a niche at this point.

RL: I envy women for that though. They get to complain. We men don’t. It’s basically illegal for us men to complain about anything, and women enforce this deal way more than our fellow men do.

How would women like it every time they complained, someone called them a whiner, told the they’re not real women, called them dykes, and told them to shut up? They would not like it one bit.

Women like to go on about how easy it is to be a man and how we men have life dicked, but if they had to live their lives as we men do, they would not be able to handle it. You would see mass female suicide epidemics. I’m serious.

Other man: Nah, they couldn’t handle it. When people have been validating your hateful opinions and actions since your teenage years primarily because they want to sleep with you, there’s no incentive for you to be a decent person. And yes, people need incentive. Why do you think religions and laws were created?

Also have women ever considered (this is where the empathy comes in) that at least some of the violence men commit is because we’re expected to shut up and take action. Instead of talking it out, we’re expected to just do it. Make it happen. You’re asking a person to make a hasty decision when they’re not in an optimal state of mind. Nothing good is going to come of that.

But I digress, man bad and woman good. It’s almost primitive how arguments like this are not viewed with more nuance.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

PUA/Game: What Men Think When They Hear Women Complaining about Men Being after Them All the Time

Ok, women: just imagine what it is like to be a man. If women had to live the sort of lives that men do, they wouldn’t be able to handle it. Most of them would blow their brains out.

Women take it for granted that they can basically have sex with an attractive man anytime they want . Just snap your fingers and there he is. With men it’s just not like that.

I’ve dated ~200 females, and still, I could never just snap my fingers and get a date or have sex like a woman can. I also had many long dry spells. Women don’t have to deal with incel periods like we men do. There’s literally no such thing as a female incel. They wouldn’t be able to cope with this.

Women don’t realize how good they have it in so many ways. Women bitch about the fact that dozens of scores of men act horny around them every day. A woman has her pick of dozens of attractive men who would like to date or fuck her every single day. If it were the other way around, we men would be living in paradise.

The life of a woman is like being a kid in a candy store where all the candy is free, and they call this perfect world names like hate, oppression, discrimination, humiliation, misery, and violence. Can you imagine a kid in a candy store where all the candy is free describing that situation as hate, oppression, discrimination, humiliation, misery, and violence?

The stuff women bitch about is laughable to us me. We can’t stop laughing at how ridiculous and absurd women are when they complain about this. Every women is literally a walking slapstick comedy routine whenever they start talking like this.

“Every day scores of the opposite sex act like they want to fuck me! I’m so oppwessed! This viowence! It’s hatez! It’s disquimination!”

Ha ha! Oh, poor babies! You expect us men to take you seriously when you bitch about that? You women literally live in the ultimate paradise every day, and all you do is cry about it. You’re all a huge fucking joke when you complain about this sort of thing.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

PUA/Game: Women Always Want the Best

“Women always want the best.”

– Oscar Wilde

There it is, hypergamy in a nutshell.

Female hypergamy will always exist, as it is simply female nature biologically to be hypergamous. Only societies that seriously restrict it in the form of more or less mandatory marriage (Arabs, Muslims, Russia and Eastern Europe, Latin America, tribal groups, etc.) escape this doomed path.

Women are basically “cavewomen” once you unleash them, just as men are pretty much “cavemen” once women stop controlling us. It is to the advantage of each gender to put in some serious controls over the other gender. Otherwise each gender simply pursues the zero-sum game dictated by its biology.

If you somehow had a hypothetical society where all of the men were named Chad and 8-10’s on the looks scale, I don’t think women would act much different.

Granted most men would be a lot better to look at from a woman’s point of view than most men are nowadays, so at least for women the scenery would improve a lot.

And women might be a lot less likely to freak out and creep-shame the lesser Chads for giving them attention because after all, they are named Chad, and women do give goodlooking women a break when it comes to flirting, making passes, and asking for numbers and dates. They tend to be a lot more gracious about it. I’ve experienced this myself endless times although that era seems to be over for me now.

But let’s think about this seriously for a moment. In a society of Chads, women would constantly be meeting men who are hot enough to turn them on. So women would be seeing tens or hundreds of thousands of men who turn them on in an average lifetime.

What’s a girl to do? Now do you honestly think that your average women is going to end up with lifetime N-counts in the Wilt Chamberlain territory? Would your average women really fuck 10’s or 100’s of thousands of men in a lifetime? Are you kidding?

I am certain that in a society like this, women would simply put the top 20-25% of Chads (the 10’s) in the Alpha Chad category and try to monopolize them.

They would resign the 65% average Chads (9’s on the Looks scale) to the Beta Chad category and treat them as women always treat Betas.

And for the least goodlooking of the Chads who would nevertheless be 8’s on the looks scale, women would simply designate these Chads as Omega Chads and treat them the way women always treat Omegas.

*********

Let me tell you a story. This is a true story, but I made up the part about all the rock stars being named Chad for obvious reasons. A friend of mine knew a lot of rock stars and used to hang out backstage and a lot of events with big name groups. Once he was backstage with a band.

All of the men in this band were hot, sexy, very goodlooking, and also had Fame, Power, Money, and Status. Furthermore their Game was spectacular, having been honed by countless interactions with literal swarms of groupies.

There were four guys in the band backstage (all named Chad), and the groupies had arranged themselves so that ~1/4 or 3-4 of the groupies were surrounding each man. So the women had arranged themselves equally around these extremely high-value Alpha rock stars, all coincidentally named Chad.

Yet one man was missing. He was the lead singer. By a strange trick of fate, he was also named Chad. He entered the room. He was more famous and well-known than any of the other men, and women (and men) everywhere swooned over him and talked about how much they wanted to fuck him. He was a huge sex symbol, much more of one than any of the rest of the band.

Then a remarkable thing happened.

The 3-4 women who had equally distributed themselves among the four super-stud rock stars quickly left the rock star they were arranged around and all migrated over to the biggest stud of the rock star super-studs, the lead singer. Why? Because he was an ultra super-stud rock star and the rest were just mere super-stud rock stars. See the Wilde quote above for an explanation of this phenomenon.

Nevertheless, I still think that in such a dream world, the bottom 80% of these Chads would be getting more sex than the bottom 80% of men in our present setup simply because these are so attractive. After all, remember that every man in this new society is named Chad. And I definitely think that despite the depressing scenario above, most men nowadays would benefit from acting more “Alpha.”

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: A Bit about the Finer Points of Social Rules and Communication

SHI: How’s it going nowadays with your rotten little SJW fruitcakes, the ones with a major entitlement acquired after a lifetime of feminist brainwashing?

Oh, I am going to a new Fagbucks now and everything is pretty much all right.

If People Act Shitty, Act Shitty Right Back to Them

If they’re shitty to me, I’m kind of shitty right back to them. I am doing this in other places too. Sometimes I even get aggressive with people. Some people totally back down and kiss my ass when I get aggro with them. So weird. I’m usually scared to fight back against people because I am afraid of a scene or a ban, so I don’t do it, but it really does work. You do need to fight back against people!

And I am learning new social rules bullshit. I mean you keep learning this stuff your whole life, really. I had blown off a lot of the rules that I thought were moronic (most of them) for most of my life, but I am finding that life really does go a lot smoother if you follow more of those rules.

The rules are extremely subtle and hard to figure out, but if you’re smart, you can do it. Now, I am quite socially aware, but I can see how an autist would go completely insane with this stuff. I mean they cannot even understand normal human communication, much less this weird, undercover, near-subliminal stuff.

Be Careful How You Talk to or Even Look at Young Women, Especially If You Are Older

One thing I am doing is being very careful about talking to young women.

How to Look at Hotties without Staring

Or even looking at them. I don’t even look at them all that much. And I am careful about looking at the baristas. If there’s one that’s hot, I look at her a bit, then I look away for a bit, then I look back for a bit. That’s the only way to do it. Otherwise you are staring. I learned this from a PUA site post on social communication. This actually works pretty well.

Or you can look above them or to the side of them. You can’t see them perfectly because you are not focusing on them, but you can see them fairly well.

You can actually look at a whole room this way by just looking at a spot on the wall over everyone’s heads. You can’t see anyone well but you can still actually see everyone in the whole room all at once in a panorama view, albeit a bit off-focused, so if anybody did anything odd, you would see it right away. I guess cops, soldiers, etc. need to monitor groups or crowds like this.

You can meditate or just let your mind go blank while you look at the spot on the wall. I guess some Normies might think it’s weird, but so what? Fuck em. People will throw you out of a store for looking at a spot on a wall and meditating? WTF. What, you hurt the wall’s feelings?

Wait for an IOI, Especially with Young Women

With young women, I don’t say one word to them unless they give me an IOI. They have to look at me and smile, maybe even more than once. If I say something and get a cold response, I don’t say anything more.

Punish People for Blatant Assholery

I was next to a hostile young woman who refused to look at me the other day. I was in front of her in line. I deliberately took my time in line putting my stuff away very slowly so the bitch would have to wait extra longer. She and the barista both gave me these very puzzled looks. I just smiled a bit to myself and thought, “Hey bitch! If you take that hate look off your stupid face, I’d put my stuff away a lot quicker!”

Don’t Even Look at Bitches Who Hate You No Matter How Hot They Are

The young women who hate me, I mostly refuse to look at them, or I look to the side of them with this really evil, mean look. I’m not looking at anything really – just a window or nothing at all a bit to the side of or over their heads. It looks like you are looking angrily at a window or wall, and no one really cares. But they seem to get the message.

Before, I kept looking at a chick if I thought she was hot even if she hated me, which many of them do. Now I don’t do that anymore.

Beware of the “Unconscious Cope” We Men Have about Women

Also, if I get what might be an IOI – like a stare – I think again and consider maybe it wasn’t done for a friendly reason, so I am not interpreting everything as an IOI anymore.

This is a good idea as we men have unconscious bias which is sort of an unconscious cope where we always tend to think positively in terms of “this chick likes me” no matter what she does. I think our minds just do this unconsciously as some unconscious cope or optimism bias, but it pays to be aware of it because it makes you think women like you even if they don’t, and it misconstrues innocuous or even unfriendly behavior as friendly. Which results in creep-shaming.

To Women, Every Comment, Remark, Question, or Joke said to Them by a Man Means “Want to Fuck?”

I complimented a barista on her makeup the other day as she had changed it. She took this as a come-on. We’ve known each other for years.

She’s fat and I wouldn’t fuck her with my worst enemy’s dick, but you say hi to a stupid woman, and to them that means, “Want to fuck?” It’s  narcissistic and self-centered of them to assume that all these guys want to fuck them when half of us wouldn’t touch their fat asses with a 10 foot pole and an 11 foot extension.

Now that she did that (interpreting my makeup comment as an inappropriate come-on), I am cold, often refuse to tip, and don’t look at her, and definitely won’t say anymore stuff about clothes or makeup.

Make a Point of Acting Particularly Friendly to People Who Are Nice to You, Especially in Front of Hostiles, to Send a Message to the Hostiles “Look What Happens When You Act Nice”

Baristas who are friendly get the tips I saved up from the hostiles, often with a compliment like, “This is for good service. You always give me good service” (with a pointed emphasis on the “you” and the “good service”). See how that works?

You Can’t Go Around Starting Questions with Everyone

Basically, you can’t start conversations with everyone. Especially if a woman is next to you and refusing to look at you with a cold look on her face, a conversation is probably not going to work out. Don’t try to talk to bitches who have cold, shut-down faces. Those faces mean “Don’t talk to me, asshole.”

Figure out When a Conversation Is Being Shut Down and End It

There’s a guy I know there who I have talked to a few times. He’s a fat pig and he’s quite unfriendly for some reason I never understood and never will. I tried to talk to him again recently, and he gave me the same thing. Now I am never going to talk to him again. You need to punish people for being assholes, not just keep coming back for more punches.

One thing I need to do is to shut down conversations that seem a bit hostile. If you say something, and you get a one-sentence answer, and they turn away, it’s a shut-down. They don’t like you or they don’t want to talk to you. Warm, friendly, two-way conversations don’t work like that.

We tend to keep talking to them because a  subconscious cope in favor of “thinking people like us versus thinking that they don’t” comes into play, and we keep thinking they will get nice if we just talk to them a bit more. Hate to say it but nope.

Also, it is quite insulting when you try to talk to someone, and they act like they don’t want to talk to you. It’s an insult and your mind does not want to believe this insulting, rude response is actually true because it’s hurtful to think this person dislikes you so much they won’t even talk to you. So this subconscious cope comes in where your mind simply refuses to see this as an insult, as it hurts your ego to be insulted. So your ego says it wasn’t an insult after all! See how it works?

If They Don’t Like You at First, They Won’t Change Their Minds Later on

In other words, haters never change. Once again, this is unconscious optimism – “She was a dick before, but this time, she’s going to like me because I really am a cool, good person.” Nope, if someone acts like doesn’t like you, they don’t like you. Period. You keep trying over and over to see if they will change their mind, and basically they just never do. So just stop. Recognize the subconscious cope here and nip it in the bud.

Figure out the Fake “I Didn’t Hear You” Message

I am also getting better about this weird subliminal communication where you say something, and the person hears you but pretends not to hear you. People do this crap a lot, and I always think they didn’t hear me, so I repeat myself, sometimes more than once. Apparently this is a social faux pas. A very tricky, high-level one but a social faux pas nonetheless.

Another thing they might do which is a bit easier to figure out is to respond to your speech with an angry, outraged and often rather loud, “What!?” that means, “Um, I didn’t hear that!” I don’t always get that either, and sometimes I repeat my words. It’s always a bad idea, as their response, if they have one, only gets worse.

They also might put up both arms up in the air and wave them back and forth while saying, “Ain’t gonna go there.” They might smile as they do that. End that line of talk right then and there. You’re not going to convince them to “go there” by continuing the line of conversation, which I tend to do sometimes.

It doesn’t really work to repeat the statement, as they just act annoyed and don’t answer or give some weird and also very subliminal response that is hard to figure out, as it’s all coded and masked. The response tends to say something like, “I didn’t hear that (but I really did)!” or, “I really don’t want to talk about this!”

If you say something and it seems like they should have heard you but act like they didn’t, figure out that they are playing this “I didn’t hear you” game and don’t ask again. In particular, think about what you said said or asked. Is it the sort of thing that might seem sensitive, and the person might not want to discuss it because they see it as inappropriate, insulting, or a come-on? Usually you can figure out how they might not want to answer due to the nature of the statement or question.

Certainly don’t say it again more than once. When people do this, by not answering, they are saying, “That question is annoying, inappropriate, or possibly racist/banned, etc.,  – i.e., something I don’t want to talk about, so I am pretending that I didn’t hear you.” In my 60’s, I am just figuring this out for the first time, though I have somehow known for a long time that people do this.

It’s a bit hostile and dicky. It’s better to say that you’d rather not discuss that or something along those lines with a smile, but people like to be dicky. I do this myself sometimes if someone asks me a retarded question that’s meaningless or silly, especially if asked in a hostile tone. I simply don’t respond. I never did that before but I am starting to do it now.

This is a real tough one from a social communication point of view because the automatic tendency is to assume that the person didn’t hear you and repeat the comment, except if you do that, it’s a social error.

I talked to my Mom and she said that if it seems like they are doing that, don’t say it a second time and don’t say it on another occasion, as it’s some sort of banned question or statement.

And anyway, we both agreed, even if they didn’t hear it, then obviously they were not too concerned about what you were saying as they weren’t listening to you, so why should you repeat it for someone who won’t even give you the dignity of listening to you? She also said that it’s a bit shitty and hostile (she called people who do this “jerks”) to do the “pretend I didn’t hear you” thing. She said it’s more polite just to say you’d rather not discuss it.

In case you all didn’t know about this weird social rule, here you go. I know all of you have experienced this before, so maybe you want to take notes.

Comments to Non-Native English Speakers about Their Linguistic History

I asked a barista recently if he spoke another language, as he definitely has an accent (I didn’t mention the accent, of course). He really did not want to answer that, as maybe he found it insulting or inappropriate or whatever.

Most people tend to answer that question if you ask it nicely enough. If someone has an accent or speaks broken English, and you wish to discuss it, it’s best to ask, “Do you speak another language?” other than bring up the fact of their accent or their broken English, which they might see as an insult.

If their English is nevertheless excellent, after they explain to you that they speak another language and English was not their first language, you can compliment them on their English to soften the blow a bit because in the US, it’s seen as a possible racist insult to imply someone doesn’t speak English as a first language.

You can also ask them how old they were when they came here, and most will answer. I usually throw in the bit where I am a linguist who is fascinated by languages, and they relax and stop thinking I might be a racist.

Sometimes I might notice that they have an accent, but I will shrug, smile, and downplay it and say that if you come after age 8, you just get an accent, and that’s all there is to it. Most people don’t mind this conversation, since you are asking them about their life as if it is interesting, and most people love to talk about themselves.

Always try to shrug, smile, or downplay any comment or question that could possibly be taken as an insult especially if the other person act a a bit taken aback by it. I find that this generally calms them down, and they stop feeling possibly insulted.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: Most Adults Have Mixed Feelings about the Opposite Sex

@Jason, responding to this post, says:

Jason: Are the guys saying this watching porn (hint: hypocrite – LOL!)?

Anyway, often the women have good reason to be angry because they’re with men with “no honor.” In other words, they cheat, they don’t do things on time – they just don’t act like “real men.”

Ha ha. Real men don’t cheat? I don’t think so. Cheating is normal for men. And the more masculine the man is, the more he’s going to do it.

You like manhating bitches? Ever dated one? Would you? Are you with one now? Ever even spoken to one? It’s easy to say that until you meet these women.

And most women have some normal anger or even hatred towards on those things @Jason mentioned. Even women who love men have a bit of hatred towards them about that stuff.

Other than a few young people who haven’t had enough life experience yet, few people purely love or hate the opposite sex. Most of us have complex feelings ranging from love (or something positive) to hate (or something negative) and everything in between. That’s not a problem. What’s important is the ratio of those feelings to the other feelings.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: Permanent Ban from r/Communism

On Reddit. Oh well. I am starting to think I am not much of a Commie anyway. Western Commies are the most insane feminists and SJW’s of them all. They’re almost all full-blown radical feminists of the worst kind, and most Western Communist groups are flooded with non-heterosexuals and nonbinary gender types, and they have the worst of those two also.

I was reading one forum and ~half of the posters were non-heterosexual and gender nonbinary. Recommended reading was some radical feminist lesbian manhating psycho on “mandatory heterosexuality,” or some crap. I said I’m out and quit reading and let them have their pervert misandrist jerk-off session.

The group I got banned from recently posted saying that all Communist countries had banned porn and that porn would be banned in their future dream society. Every Communist guerrilla group that forms local rule puts the women in charge. It causes the usual chaos that Female Rule always does anywhere. Guess what the first thing they do is? Ban booze, gambling, and porn. The three things that keep most of us guys from blowing our brains out. Brilliant!

I made ~two posts there and then I was banned. I didn’t say anything bad at all. I asked why I got banned and got a response:

No misogynists.

I guess he read through my posting history. I told my partial roommate about this, and he gave me this puzzled look like:

You? A misogynist? WTF! That’s total bullshit LOL!

I said I know and we laughed about it. Then we talked about how Western Communists sucked. He said:

It’s nothing but a bunch of niggers and Mexicans and fags. They hate Whites and men. That’s why I never wanted any part of it.

I basically agreed with him, without the slurs that is.

I also find it laughable that I am a misogynist. When I see hardcore misogyny online, a lot of times, it makes me throw my head back in shock and disgust. I dislike it on a visceral level. Obviously with reactions like that, I must be a horrible misogynist, huh?

My feelings towards women do range from love all the way to hate and everything in between though, I agree. But they’re mostly on the positive side. I don’t want to be a woman-hater. It doesn’t feel good.

Also women were so good to me when I was young that I really can’t hate them. I will love them forever for the kindness that they showed to me then. And yes, kindness is the right word. They treated me like a was a prince or a cool new toy to play with and pass around to their friends for them to play with. But that’s ok. I didn’t mind being a meat puppet. That was obviously for a completely shallow reason called Looks, but hey, humans are shallow.

Women from 18-55 pretty much treat me like dirt now (but not always). I must say that if they had treated me my whole life they way they treat me now, I would definitely hate women. I mean you hit a man enough times, he might start hitting back. Those poor incels have been treated like human garbage by females their whole pitiful lives. I don’t blame them for hating women. Who wouldn’t?

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: We Men in the West Lost Control of Our Women and Let Them Run Wild

Pantheist: What if you convince women to stop acting like children the same way we convinced some Blacks to “Whiten up”. Transcend their nature.

Sure, they did it in my Mom’s time, but that time is over. All women are feminists now, and most of them are feral.

We’ve let our women run loose by not controlling them like we should have. The results are not pretty and are all around us.

The new generations of women do not want to transcend their nature. Feminism has told them that it’s cool to act crazy and attack, fight, scream at, hate, humiliate, and emasculate men.

Modern women like to do all of these things, and feminism has even encouraged them to act crazy because when they act crazy, it’s never their fault. It’s all the fault of men. So women have permission to go completely crazy, fall apart, act wild, and wage war on men. Modern women actually enjoy doing all of these things because female nature wants to act like this.

Women in my Mom’s generation were taught that you didn’t do these things unless you had a damned good reason.

In answer to the commenter’s question about women acting like children, women wish to act like children because this is their nature. Also, feminism completely infantalizes women and treats them like children who lack agency and can be convinced by evil men to do just about anything.

How many times have we heard “that’s not consent?” We say that teenage girls are too young to consent to sex because they are not mature enough (which is bullshit), but we treat grown women in the exact same way.

Feminism says women lack agency and are just puppets or marionettes that can be manipulted by evil men into doing things they don’t want to do even though they say they do because these nonhuman muppets are incapable of saying no or stopping sexual advances.

That’s why we have crazy new cases where

  • where we men have to read woman’s minds to figure out if she wants to have sex or not
  • where women consent but they didn’t really “mean it,” so it’s not consent
  • where women can be talked or pressured into sex despite their consent which means that they lack agency and it’s not consent
  • where drunk or loaded women are not responsible for anything they do, so any sexual decisions they make are not consent
  • where women consent to sex but then regret it the next morning so that’s not consent retroactively
  • where women get to decide 10-20 after they consented to a sex act whether they really and truly and for real consented and they can decide that it wasn’t really consent

and all sort of other crazy nonsense.

In all of these cases, women are being treated like children who are too immature to consent to sex and hence lack agency.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: The Values of My Mother’s Greatest Generation of Middle to Upper Class White Women

Jason: No offense, but often women into “higher values” are snobs. Also, of course, not all minority women are sluts and whores. Give me a break!

Now what’s better? A clean snob or a dirty person with a good heart?

Also, finally, how did they become sluts and whores? More than not, it was victimization by the dad or others.

My response:

Jason: Also, of course, not all minority women are sluts and whores. Give me a break!

Oh of course. It was not so much about being a sexual slut, although none of my Mom’s friends were like that. Nevertheless, one of her sisters was and my Mom acted like she didn’t care. I imagine you could be wild in bed with your husband, but you weren’t supposed to be promiscuous. Anyway this “woman of the street” thing was more about behavior than sex.

Jason: No offense, but often women into “higher values” are snobs.

I am not aware that my Mom’s friends were like that. At least I don’t remember any of them being like that. Some were really into money and status like graduating  from a top school, but they never married rich men, so it was a bit of a pathetic joke.

One of my Mom’s friends thought a woman should marry only a Harvard or Yale man who made at least six figures. None of the men she married were rich. None graduated from Harvard. Then she started demanding that her daughter marry such a man. Her daughter was a homely nerd. Now a fat homely nerd. She could never get such a man either. So her snobbishness was just stupid.

Jason: Now what’s better? A clean snob or a dirty person with a good heart?

Most of my Mom’s friends were “clean” because was just how a proper woman was supposed to be. And back then, most women of her class and race were like that. My Mom didn’t associate with dirty or promiscuous women. She didn’t necessarily hate them.

She doesn’t like prostitutes though. I will tell you that. She considers that the lowest a woman can go. I suppose they could leave the business and reform, but one of my Mom’s sayings was:

Jason: You can take the girl out of the whorehouse but you can’t take the whorehouse out of the girl.

She’s sort of right of right.

Also my Mom’s group were both clean and goodhearted for the most part. Women were not supposed to be evil-minded or vicious. That was the world of men. Women did not inhabit that vicious world.

Jason: Also, finally, how did they become sluts and whores? More than not, it was victimization by the dad or others.

Like I said she didn’t really care about sluts. She’s been told about some of my girlfriends, and she basically doesn’t give a fuck. It’s more that her and her friends did not act that way, and they did not associate with women who did.

My Mom doesn’t like whores, but I don’t think she gives a damn about sluts. She just doesn’t like the idea of selling your pussy to men. That is considered to be extremely low, dirty, improper behavior.My Mom knows that a lot of women, especially younger women, are horny as Hell. She has acknowledged that.

My Mom associated Black and Brown women along with poor and working class White women with “women of the street”. That meant not so much that they were sluts but more that they fought with their men, screamed at them, insulted them and put them down, attacked their masculinity, and even got into physical fights with them.

To my Mom’s women, a proper White woman of her class simply did not treat her husband that way. You had to respect your husband, and in return he was more or less decent to you. That was the trade-off.

Also basically the women in my Mom’s generation were not Forever Children, golddiggers, Borderlines or drama queens. The typical female scenario of chaos and drama was not there. I’m sure my Mom’s crowd would have loved to have been that way because that’s female nature, but back then, a proper White woman of a certain class was supposed to be mature and to control herself.

That meant sublimating, suppressing, or repressing a lot of typical female emo behavior. My Mom’s class were “controlled women.” You were supposed to control yourself. An out of control woman was very much looked down on by my Mom’s crowd. She calls them crazy women and she really hates them. They can’t control themselves.

My Mom’s crowd of women were supposed to be proper, decent, civilized, sane, and controlled. The opposite of all of those things was “woman of the street” – a woman with no class or especially self-control. Women like that were literally disgusting to my Mom’s crowd of women. Almost viscerally so.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: Geniuses, Male/Female and White/Black

Geniuses, in addition to being brilliant, are often either weird (Einstein) or nuts (Sam Peckinpah, Hemingway, Phil Spector).

Because in order to take the creative process to its ultimate heights, you really have to leave this earthly world and ascend up beyond that to the world of Gods, as the Greeks used to say.

And when you truly leave the Earth, you enter the world of the sky, Gods and spiritual beings good and bad, madness, strangeness, and otherworldly-ness. In a sense, you sort of have to go nuts to produce truly great art. If you’re not nuts enough, you’re just to normie to ascend like that.

Sanity, in addition to all the great things it is, is, after all, also mediocrity, the quotidian world or work, home, strict social rules, and complete suppression of dreams, feelings, and really anything wild. The 9-5 world of rush hour and cubicles doesn’t tolerate wildness very well. One reason I usually get fired after a year or so, I suppose.

Check out Otto Weininger on genius and Nietzsche on the ubermensch.

Traditionally from the Greeks on it was thought that only men could access this sort of perfect Platonic concept of genius because men were of the sky, beyond the earth to the airy world of pure ideas which most women, even those with genius IQ’s hate like the plague.

The world of the woman is the world of people, babies, children, friends, lovers, husbands, sons, daughters, and parents. In order words, the world of the earth.

The Greeks said that women were “of the earth” and that men were “of the sky” or at least could try to be. Which one is closer to God? Get it?

This is often thought to be a misogynistic attitude, but I think it’s just true. Of course there are many brilliant women, including geniuses, but have you ever noticed how many of the female pure geniuses in the above sense (the airy world of pure ideas) are rather mannish, masculine, or even full-blown lesbians? Start with genius Laurie Anderson, and she’s not even a dyke. Female philosophers? Try Anita Rondell. Lesbian.

Weininger actually said that women were simply incapable of genius. He thought that if there ever to were to be a female genius, she would probably be a lesbian. Bang on.

Now I am not saying that being of the sky is better than being of the Earth or any of that. Women surely don’t feel that way. They think the world of the sky is the world of men. They also think it is unsufferably boring and find it incomprehensible how and why men would even endeavor to live in such a world. I’ve had brilliant women ask me this?

Why would you even do something like that?

About my crazy herculean projects like cataloguing all of the German and Chinese dialects or languages? To her it was incomprehensible. Why would anyone waste their time doing such a stupid and boring thing. Makes no sense.

This is why most women, even those with IQ’s over 140, are not pure intellectuals in the male sense of the world meaning the airy world of ideas and pure concepts torn loose from all of their Earthly moorings.

But who cares about geniuses anyway? What’s a genius?

There are plenty of brilliant women out there, and the female genius tends to a performer of pure emotion. I listed Marianne Faithful as a teenager and then in her 40’s as an example of “the female genius.” So it’s not that female geniuses do not exist, but it’s more that they take a different form of “pure emotional (feelings)” genius rather than “pure intellectual (thought) genius.”

I also think that Black people have a certain type of genius that I call “the Black genius.” It’s also quite different from the “White male genius.” It’s not inferior, it’s just different, and there are few if any male geniuses who seem to think and behave like the Black male genius.

A shocking number of brilliant Blacks, usually men, embody this rather strange type of genius. Few if any Black women do so this is really the Black male genius.” But to search for the “Black female genius,” perhaps once again we have to look into the world of pure emotion, like Ronnie Spector above, Billie Holiday, Tina Turner, or Pam Grier, the actress.

Catch my drift?

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20