Delphi Murders Update Fourth of July Special Celebratory Edition: Investigation Is “A Breath Away from An Arrest”

Our private Delphi sleuthing group is the best on the Internet by far and has been since it was founded five years ago in 2017.

Unlike any other sleuths, we have determined the main suspects in the case, have a good idea of what happened during the crime and what the crime scene looked like, and have recently figured out the motive. Best of all, much of our information is via solid sources such as search party members, official case documents, and LE sources close to the investigation who leak to us. No other group has come close to uncovering the amount and quality of information we have.

Why not join the 250+ members who have already signed up for the best Delphi sleuthing team of all? There is a small fee of $20 minimum (you can always give more) to join, which includes lifetime membership. The $20 fee was demanded by our members in order to safeguard the privacy of their conversations and it has worked very well.

Join the best Delphi sleuthing group of all!

Warning: Long, 69 pages.

Updated July 10, 10:01 PM

Initial Remarks

Please skip over the initial remarks as they are mostly me defending my group and responding to the various mudpies that get slung my way. If you wish to skip ahead, go to the Major Break in the Case and Possible Arrest Coming Soon header and start reading there.

First of all, in case you’ve been sleeping, you would know that this Delphi site is probably the most hated site of them all. There’s not much I can do about that, so I might as well just own it. There are literal bans on linking here in most of the Facebook groups. In some there are bans even on mentioning my name.

What’s hilarious about all of this is that, as a poster on the LibbyandAbby subreddit, tobor, noted in a recent post, we have released eight different facts that were known only to the police, as they had not been released publicly yet. He then listed these facts. We released most of these facts about a year before the police released them to the public.

Of course, we have also released many other statements that have not yet been corroborated by police, but so far we are the only sleuthing group with a known track record of releasing material known only to the police long before the police released it to the public. As we have case documents and actual police officers leaking to us, it makes sense that we would be on the ball. Bottom line is we are the only group with a track record. And everyone hates us and has a ban on linking to us. LOL! That’s just downright stupid.

Next I would like to take issue with a number of nasty comments making the rounds about me on the LibbyandAbby subreddit.

I don’t know who this person is or even whether it’s male or female or both or neither or whether that’s a scientific question anymore. They’re just a run of the mill hater.

RphWrites: You mean RL’s? He claims he has hundreds of paying members (200?) but…yeah. I know someone who coughed up the cash to access his private forum a couple of years ago ,and they said it was pretty quiet and that the people who did post sounded like him under sock puppets.

We have had over 250 people pay to join over the years, yes. However, I will admit that many are not active. The site got shut down for violating WordPress‘ TOS due to some incendiary comments I made about feminists (I really hate them), and that’s why we got shut down. I had not even read the TOS.

However, with the shutdown, many people went away. We came back up on our own free speech server that can never get shut down (they host The Daily Stormer LOL), but a lot of the old ones didn’t get the message that we opened back up. But quite a few trickled back in.

The private group can be quiet at times, however, there have been at least 10,000 and possibly many more comments on there over the years, so it’s not that quiet. However, I must say that I absolutely do not use socks when I post on there. These people paid real money to join my site, and I could not play them like that. It would be immoral.

Probably the worst poster is xanaxarita. With a name like that she ought to be a lot calmer than she is. She’s has Borderline Personality Disorder and she suffers from hysteroid tumors in her uterus which make her very unstable.

xanaxarita: The moderator here doesn’t allow posts that link to/contain info from Lindsay’s blog.

Lindsay has been permanently banned from Reddit.

OK, supposedly there are bans on linking directly to my website on the ridiculous grounds that somehow because I was banned from Reddit, therefore that means links to my site are also banned. Stupid, huh? I don’t think that’s even the case. She’s just looking for an excuse to ban linking to me because she hates my guts. Also she does allow information from my website, just not direct links.

But do you see what is happening again? We are the only Delphi group with a proven track record (see above). We’re the best Delphi sleuthing group of them all by far, yet everybody bans linking to us! That’s like closing the Library of Congress because it has too much stuff in it, or banning a group from baseball league because they keep winning the world series. It’s belligerent mediocrity or belligerent inferiority. That’s as bad as belligerent stupidity, something the Redditors have in abundance. If you’re mediocre, inferior, or mentally slow, fine, but don’t act belligerent about it.

Also xanaxarita has also falsely stated:

Robert Lindsey has publicly stated that [name redacted] is the murderer, and he further states that the police know it too and that he will eventually be arrested.

I have never named the man who we refer to as Mr. X. I haven’t named him one single time ever. I don’t do that. I believe people are innocent until proven guilty. In fact, I now use initials for all major players with a possible criminal or unsavory link. Exceptions are made for the currently incarcerated. Also it is only my opinion that Mr. X killed the girls, but my opinion is utterly irrelevant, and I have already said that if I were on the jury right now, I would vote to acquit Mr. X despite my opinion because a jury decides whether the state has proven its case or not.

A juror does not rule on whether he thinks the person is guilty or not. He rules on whether the state has proved it or not. And so far, we do not think they have, although that may change.a

I do not hold that the police “know” that Mr. X killed those girls. I believe that they are of the opinion that he killed them, but an opinion is one thing and a fact is another. Whatever I said in the past, my position at the moment is that it is a fact that Mr. X is LE’s main suspect in the Delphi Murders.

Also, I refuse to state for a fact that Mr. X will be arrested either soon or eventually. I have no idea if that is true or not. However, our police sources have informed us that police are very close to an arrest and as of now, it’s just a matter of time.

This woman xanaxarita is a monster. Most of the people on LibbyandAbby subreddit hate her too which is comforting to me and shows me I’m not alone. She so abrasive that she’s downright  incendiary. If she were a male, I’d suggest malignant narcissism, but in a female, that defaults to Borderline Personality Disorder.

Adrvirtual9933: R Lindsay was permanently banned from Websleuths on his first day just a month or two after the murders. The guy is a nut job for sure.

This man is one those annoying pests who just sit there and shoot down everything that’s not been verified with duplicates and notarized by LE. And LE has told us just about zero. So these clowns shoot down everything anyone says as “unproven.” That’s not how detective work goes. Detectives don’t shoot down everything that’s “unproven.” If they did they would not solve many cases. Also, this person is extremely belligerent and just yells and fights with everyone all day long. Their other handle is “Ultra MAGA,” so he’s also a fascist with a truth allergy.

I was not been banned from Websleuths on the first day. Not that I would have minded because that has to be one of the most  obnoxiously stupid websites I’ve ever posted on. No rumors allowed! You have to put MOO (My Opinion Only) on everything as if you are a cow! If you don’t, the hysterics all start screeching like seagulls. I would say it’s just a total waste of time except that it’s a most unpleasant waste of time, which is so much worse. The posters are very aggressive and spend most of their time battling like cocks in a cage. Posting on there is almost traumatic. Kind of like posting on Reddit.

Actually I lasted a few weeks. That site is absurd. No sleuthing is allowed! That’s literally one of their rules LOL. I’m sure they really solve a lot of crimes!

I was privy to a lot of rumors early on. Some of these described the crime as a sex crime, and there were some descriptions of the nature of this sex crime. The second source described the objects as sticks and twigs. I quoted from those rumors. In addition, there were many gruesome rumors floating around that dealt with various terrible things that supposedly had been done to these girls. I quoted from some of those rumors. It was for quoting from these sexual and gruesome rumors about the gruesome nature of these sex murders that I was banned!

Around this time, I was also banned from a number of Facebook groups for the very same thing. That’s what all the Facebook Delphi group bans are about. Really it should be an honor to get banned from most Facebook Delphi groups because they are about the most useless groups out there. Full of hysterical females shrieking at each other all the time. I’ve heard enough of that noise in my private life. Last thing I need is to heard when I’m relaxing on the Web.

If you think banning me was ok for reciting rumors of the sexual and gruesome nature of this crime, there’s not much I can say to you.

By the way, I take pride in my bans. I’m quite happy to be banned from Reddit because it’s hard to believe such an important corporation is run by pinheads with room temperature IQ’s. The people who run that place are SJW hysterics who understand neither science nor logic. My ban was ludicrous and absurd. I was banned for “promoting” a psychiatric disorder. How on Earth can you “promote” a medical disorder? Can you “promote” schizophrenia? Bipolar disorder? GAD? OCD? It’s absurd.

But if it wasn’t that, it would have been something else. I was already getting banned from most of the subreddits I was posting on for this or that violation of PC BS.

On sites like the LibbyandAbby subreddit, the women are hysterical shrews, and the men are incendiary vipers. If you look in the comments of these rabid critters, every comment is them screaming at someone for something or other. This is the equivalent of, for the women, going out into public and walking up to everyone you see and shrieking at them and slapping them in the face. For the men, it’s the same exact you yell at them and punch them in the face.

I would like to take issue with a LibbyandAbby poster, an execrable “man” named PrestoMagic who paid to come into our group and then turned on us and is bashing us on Reddit. “He” stated:

Lindsay says he never said Mr. “Someone” was Mr. X. This is not true! He has named him repeatedly.

Problem here is that we had two Mr. X’s. The first was a man named Mr. A, who, while a horrible person, most probably had nothing to do with the murders. However, he issued many false confessions and released a number of videos more or less confessing to the crimes, so perhaps you can give us a break for jumping the gun.

He’s still a suspicious person, but we have no good, hard evidence of his involvement. We never released this man’s name one single time in years. Sure, we talked about him in our private group, but that was all indoors, and no one could hear us. I’m pretty sure you can say anything you want about anyone behind the doors of your home where no one can hear.

More recently, we reported a new suspect as Mr. X. We will even not give him initials, but most have figured out who he is. And once again, we have never named this man even one single time. We don’t usually give names to major suspects. That’s up to the police to do. Also, we believe in protecting the innocent, and everyone is innocent until charged.

He also charged that we have made up a story about Mr. X living in the Evansdale area at the time of the Evansdale murders. He says we have no evidence of that.

But we have no evidence or proof of anything!

We have search party member interviews. We will not name these people, so that’s not evidence or proof. We have official case documents. We will not post those, so that’s not evidence or proof. We have statements from police sources who leak to us from time to time. We will not reveal who those people are, so that’s not evidence. We do have crime scene photos, and that’s evidence, but no one believes those are real. So even when we post evidence, no one believes us anyway, which makes us wonder why we even should.

Beyond that, we have unverified rumors and our own speculation and theories, which are obviously not evidence, as we never said they were. You either believe us or you don’t.

Our information that Mr. X was residing in Waterloo, Iowa at the time of the Evansdale Murders came to us directly from one of our police sources. So we think it’s pretty good info. Furthermore, we have just gained even more confirmatory evidence that Mr. X was living in the area at the time of those murders. See below for more on that.

Major Break in the Case and Possible Arrest Coming Soon

I rarely credit the Reddit or Facebook Delphi groups with much of anything. They are terrible sleuths except for a smattering few like Tobor or DDcups on one Reddit group. Also unlike most of the manginas on that group, DDcups is a real man. Most of the others are sissies and wusses.

The posters there believe in the “I support the current thing” mindset. Whoever is the “suspect du jour” is obviously the one who did it! Unfortunately, detective work doesn’t go like that.

The suspect du jour is likely to be innocent, and the only important suspect is the one who did it, which may be the one looked at five years ago, or yesterday, or today, or tomorrow, or five years from now. The topical nature of the suspect has nothing to do with their innocence or guilt.

First we had Daniel Nations. Sigh.

Then we had James Chadwell. Sigh.

Recently we have the Kleins, Kegan and Tony. Double sigh.

And even more recently, we have Ron Logan. RIP, sigh.

And there have been so many others in between. These were just the names that were released to the press or were named in some official document. Neither being mentioned by the investigation nor being named in some official document means the slightest thing regarding evidence of guilt. We know this because we are good sleuths. We also believe in the wisdom of crowds, and we have 250 members in our group. Keep in mind that we have retired LE homicide detectives working directly with us.

There are many belligerent and hysterical posters on social media.   Most refuse to believe in science and instead trust whatever moral panic or mass hysteria happens to be going around at the moment. That describes 9

What really bothers us is that so many posters are hostile, overemotional screamers who never seem to be right about anything. If you are going to be wrong, that’s fine. But to be belligerently, aggressively, menacingly, threateningly wrong as the social media sleuths are takes some real doing, but we see this in the groups all the time.

That’s sad because all it does is turn the debate into a lynch mob. This lynch mob mindset discourages participation, and the mobsters have already been shown to be false, as a number of the most shouted-down theories on those venues have later turned out to be true when LE released information later.

The names du jour are Ron Logan and Tony and Kegan Kline.

Ron Logan was cleared a few years ago.

Tony Kline has never been interviewed by the police a single time. I’m sure he must be the top suspect!

The only thing we have ever heard about Kegan Kline is that he’s only involved as far as distribution of a hypothetical snuff film that was made of the murders and then sold on the Internet. In his interrogation, police repeatedly say that they know he didn’t do it but that they think he knows who did. That shows right there that they don’t think he did it.

Turning either of the Klines into BG requires the massive placement of square pegs into round holes that these Reddit cranks and hysterics excel at. Just based on their heights and weights (6’3 and 275 pounds!), neither man could be the man on the bridge. Neither can be placed at the bridge on that day or for that matter on any other day. There’s no evidence that either man had ever been to the bridge a single time or even knew it existed. Kegan had maybe been to Delphi once in the last five years for a football game. They do live fairly close, but that means nothing.

I guess it’s better than Daniel Nations though, who could never be placed any closer than 50 miles from Delphi. But I’m sure he still really did it!

Even a blind squirrel catches a nut now and then, and one rumor tossed out recently on the Reddit groups appears to be true. There was a rumor of a major break in the case and that an arrest may be pending. This could be related to the moving of the investigation to the former CPS building near the crime scene. We believe there is a break coming and that moving the site to the new place is in fact related to the break.

We recently spoke to our police sources. Keep in mind that when I say we, I refer to any one of our 250 members. We had not spoken to our best source in five months, and the last time we talked, it was very hard to get information out of her. However, we were finally able to catch up to her again. Although she speaks in riddles and this time barely gave us any information at all, this is how we deciphered her brief cryptic comments:

  • They are a breath away from an arrest in the case. From now on it’s just a matter of time.
  • The Kline drama has been a miraculous tool.
  • The person who was the focus in the beginning is now the main player.

The source stated that she can’t or won’t say anything more than that.

So there we have three very nice leaks.

The first is that the team feels that they are close (“a breath away”) from an arrest in the case, and that from now on, it’s “only a matter of time” before that happens.

The second is that the Kline drama has been a miraculous tool in breaking the case open. We do not know how the Kline mess broke the case open, as our police sources have never mentioned Kegan’s name even one time. I’m really doubting if he’s a suspect in this crime if our police sources never mentioned him. And we don’t even know what what the Kline drama is even about in the first place. All we have are unverified rumors tying him to the possible distribution of a hypothetical snuff film of the murders.

The third is that the person who was the focus in the beginning is now the main player. This is an interesting comment, and the people on the wrong trails with the wrong guys on Reddit and Facebook are welcome to take this ball and run with it down whichever dead ends it leads them to, filling in any names they wish who were or were not mentioned early on. Let your overripe, concrete imaginations run wild!

However, the only suspect our police sources have talked about is Mr. X. Two separate police sources told us that he was the major suspect, including the source above. This source also told us that Mr. X has been the main suspect since very early on in the case.

So for us the person who was the suspect in the beginning means Mr. X.

And if they are now the main player, that means that Mr. X is the main suspect or player.

The wording is peculiar. The main player seems to imply that there was more than one person involved either directly or peripherally in the case. This source also told us earlier:

The theory that of more than one killer is still in the ballpark and has been since the first day of the investigation.

Contents of Delphi Murders Autopsy Report Revealed

One of our sources told us they had seen the autopsy report and leaked some of the information on it. His story about how he accessed the information in the autopsy has been challenged, so we are not sure where he got the information. I would urge you to take this with a grain of salt though, as this source has been be problematic at times in the past. However, as a general picture, it looks pretty good and jibes with what we had heard before.

The wording below was given to us by our source, and please note that any spelling errors are his, as I just copied his words. Also I think the source was summarizing the report instead of giving the exact wording, so that is why the language may not appear official. The text he gave me contained two spelling errors noted below which I did not notice. One word I had never heard of before, and I didn’t know the other word was misspelled, as I don’t use it much. In addition, note that the wording in brackets is my own:

[One girl died from] aortic transection causing exsanguination, asphyxia from hemorrhage, and several sharp force injuries. There was scant water in her lungs.

[Another girl died from] blunt force and sharp force injuries and possibly environmental causes too.

Time of death: 3:30

From this, we translate as follows:

A girl died from aortic transaction causing exsanguination, asphyxia from hemorrhage = a knife to the heart or to the aortic artery, but how does that fit in with reports that this girl was killed by a single grievous strike to the throat with a bladed weapon? A slit throat or cut throat? We know that one girl had her throat cut very badly, apparently by a single blow with a sword or machete.

I know this because I spoke to the girl’s mother who had seen the girl’s body postmortem. The mother was the one who tied the orange scarf around the girl’s neck that can be seen in photos of the funeral. The mother was breaking up and crying when she told me. It was sad as Hell.

Several sharp force injuries = We believe this girl had numerous cuts in her body with a knife. Sticks and twigs had been stuck in these cuts.

There was scant water in the lungs = We do not know the significance of this language.

The other girl died from blunt force and sharp force injuries = We believe this girl was struck on the head by a blunt object, knocking her out. She was probably out cold after that, but she was definitely still alive. This object was probably a gun butt. She also had several knife wounds in her body in which twigs and sticks had been placed.

We have been ripped to a thousand pieces over reports of sticks being placed in these girls’ bodies, however, the report of numerous shallow knife cuts in their bodies in which sticks and twigs were placed comes to us straight from a close contact of one of the police officers working on the investigation, so we believe it is fact.

Possibly environmental causes too = We believe that this refers to this girl’s body still being warm when found, which means that she died only a few hours before she was found, hence she may have passed at ~9 AM on February 14. She must have been out either all night or part of the night. If so, exposure contributed to her death. That she almost survived the attack upon discovery has to be one of the saddest things I’ve heard about this case.

Time of death: 3:30. This seemed to refer to February 13 in the PM although no date or half of the day was given, and it must only refer to the first girl. There is a serious problem with this 3:30 PM February 13 death time. It seems accurate for one girl but it is known that the other guy survived into the next day as her body was still warm when found. So the time given cannot possibly be true for both girls.

The other girl may well have been attacked on this time and date, but we are certain that she did not die then. Instead, she probably died ~9 AM on February 14. Hence the wild controversy about the different dates given in autopsies – February 13 for one girl and February 14 for another – widely derided as meaningless, in fact states the truth about the case, that the girls did indeed die on different dates. We believe the mother of the girl who died on the 14th has even confirmed this.

On the other hand, we really question whether the girl who almost survived the attack when discovered sat out there for 18 hours from 3:30 PM to 9:30 AM the next day. This stretches credulity, but perhaps this is what occurred.

Now that we have the 3:30 PM February 13 time of death on the autopsy report, we have had to revise our theories about the crime. We no longer believe that the girls were taken away from the scene to be brought back and killed later at 2 AM on February 14, although perhaps this is what occurred. As far as this girl goes, we are not sure if she was attacked at the same time as the other girl or if she was brought back later to be killed. As far as bringing her back to be killed, there are serious problems with that theory.

One reason we thought she was brought back later was because two search party members, both men, said they had searched the crime scene the night of February 13, and they said the bodies were not there. However, Mr. X was also conveniently searching that very same area. We believe he may have been steering the other two men away from the bodies if they were there.

There is also a report of heat-seeking drone being used in the search of the girls that night. This drone is said to have flown over the crime scene. It is very hard to explain how this drone would not have seen the bodies that evening. This is one reason we were certain that the girls had to have been removed and brought back later. However, now we are not so sure.

There is now a report that there was no drone that night. There was supposed to be one, but one never showed up. If this is true, then it easily explains why the drone did not pick up the girls – there was no drone.

In addition, Ron Logan describing the crime scene as “pristine” was also given as a reason that the murders did not happen at the crime scene. Instead they must have happened somewhere else. If they were killed at the scene, the crime scene would not be pristine, hence the crime scene was only a dump site. However, possibly the crime scene may only have been pristine because all of the blood and other evidence had been combed up by the crime scene techs.

In the Reddit group, a number of people were interpreting the Ron Logan search warrant to mean that there was a kill site and a dump site. The crime scene was referred to as the dump site. The reason for this was the statement in the warrant that the girls were moved. I looked through that warrant and could find no references to separate kill sites and dump sites. All it said was that the girls had been moved after death, but perhaps they had only been moved a short distance. We have no idea how or from where these girls bodies were moved.

There is another problem with the “removed from the scene” theory. This theory attempts to account for two searchers who swore they searched the crime scene area and the null finding from the heat-seeking drone. If the girls were removed, the crime scene would have been empty and and drone finding makes sense.

But what about the bizarre crime scene with all of the props that we have described so many times? If the bodies were gone, the searchers would have seen the weird crime scene because we know that was set up a day or two earlier. Obviously they didn’t find that. So the bodies, or at least one body, must have been there along with the weird props, with Mr. X possibly steering the searchers away from the crime scene to keep it from being discovered.

Otherwise we have to posit both girls being removed (one apparently while dead) and the freaky crime scene being set up after the men had searched the area, that is, after 7 PM that night. But the men who set up the scene thought they were only setting up a scary prank for a girl. Now they have to come back in the evening of the 13th or early morning of the 14th and set up the weird crime scene. With flashlights I guess? And no one sees them? While the girls have both been reported missing?

This would place them right smack in the middle of the murder plot. None of this makes sense. In addition, the staging, posing, weird props, etc. are a lot easier to set up in the daytime than they are at night with flashlights. Keep in mind that the whole crime scene was doused in toilet bowl cleaner. How do you do that at night with flashlights? Doesn’t sound very practical.

In order to place the three men in the murder plot, we have to come up with some odd notions. Mr. CP, a member of the extended family, was very close to one of the victims. In fact, the victim saw him as her hero. This guy gets in on a plot to murder his own relative to whom he is very close? We agree that this guy is no good, but he’s mostly a womanizing drunk with a taste for teenage girls. That’s a bunch of nothing. Not exactly Ted Bundy. We don’t think he had it in him to kill his own relative.

The other possible member of this group may be a former police officer, Mr. B. He also seems like a bit of a tool, and he was soon fired from his job shortly after the crime. They turned his apartment upside down searching it. Granted, he’s a doofus and a screw-up, but we don’t think he had it in him either to murder two teenage girls.

The third member of this group is Mr. BJ, still a boy at 17. It’s also been theorized that he may have been Mr. X’s accomplice. Granted he is quite close to Mr. X. But what little we have learned about this young man gives no indication of the capability of committing such an act. We don’t think he has it in him to do this. Still, his role in the crime is still uncertain. Our police source described him as “the catfish boy” and said police were uncertain if he played a larger role. But wait. I thought Anthony Shots was the catfish boy? This aspect of the case is quite confused.

All three of these guys are capable of setting up a scary prank to scare a girl, sure. A gruesome sexual homicide of two sweet young teens? Forget it.

There are other problems with the “brought back later” theory. One girl was already dead. Was she carted away and then brought back in the middle of the night? How exactly? She weighed 200 pounds. Who would carry her to the crime scene in treacherous terrain in the middle of the night? A person of that size is hard to carry.

If there was indeed a drone that evening, we simply have no answer to the question of why it did not find the bodies. It’s just another mystery in the case.

Information from Our New Member as a Result of a Four Year Investigation Including Many Trips to Delphi and Interviews with Locals

We have recently received some information that there may have been an accomplice in the case. They also provided us with much new information. This comes from a new member of our group who conducted a very deep investigation into the case over four years, including many trips to Delphi to interview locals.

We mentioned earlier that at the core of the case was a pregnant girl, one of the victims. That a girl was pregnant comes to us from two separate police sources. She had been impregnated by a 20 year old man, possibly at one of the bonfire parties she attended. The man and his friends had been pressuring the girl to get an abortion, but the girl was refusing to get one. According to our police source, this is heart of the case. She specifically referenced an Internet conversation between Cody Patty and Michael Brevard discussing so-called song lyrics (which were nothing of the kind) as being “the key to the whole crime.”

We have just now learned the name of the 20 year old man. We will call him Mr. M. We also have photographs of him and some biographical information. He is a local. Curiously, he is not a suspect in the crime! More on that below.

We stated earlier that a deceased police officer, Nate Miller, provided the alibi for Mr. X in this crime. The alibi placed Mr. X in another town at the time of the crime. We believe that police thought that Miller was lying about the alibi, but they were unable to crack it.

We have finally learned why Miller provided the apparent fake alibi for Mr. X. Turns out that Miller is a relative of Mr. M. and Mr. M was the father of the fetus that the girl refused to abort, which was in part a motive for the crime, hence Nate was covering for his relative.

However, Mr. M is not a suspect! It also turns out that Mr. M was arrested eight months after the crime and charged with statutory rape for having sex with another 14 year old girl.

Sadly, Mr. M, a heterosexual, had been the victim of homosexual statutory rape in his early teens via a man in his 40’s who lived across the street, Mr. C. This man is a convicted child molester who spent time in prison. He is bisexual and had sex with both boys and girls from approximately 9-14. This man is now in a management position and Indiana Packers.

I’m not sure where that puts him on the age preference scale, perhaps a pedohebephile. This may also be the age orientation of Mr. X.

Gay men having sex with heterosexual teenage boys often causes harm to these boys simply because they are straight, and the gay sex traumatizes them. Curiously, gay teenage boys show zero effects from noncoercive sex with adult gay men, and in fact, typically describe it as positive. One-third of gay teenage boys are in a relationship with an adult gay man at any time.

The community is protective of them, the counselors the boys visit never turn them in, and the boys rarely if ever turn the men in. The chicken hawk pederast motif is straight-up part of gay male culture since Antiquity. Further, 7

Hi PrestoMagic. Stirring the pot.

Mr. M was a troubled teen at the time, which may be why Mr. C preyed on him. Recently, Mr. M and Mr. C had become quite close, and we think that the Mr. C was trying to get Mr. M to be a seduction partner for him; in other words, Mr. M, being young, could get young people (probably females) so Mr. C could have sex with them.

We have just been accused on the snakepit called AbbyandLibby subreddit of accusing LM, or Logan Maxwell, of impregnating the female victim. The Mr. M we are discussing here is not Logan Maxwell. Logan Maxwell did not impregnate the female victim in this crime.

A Local Sex Trafficking Ring and a Possible Link to the Case

One theme that kept coming up over and over in the investigation was sex trafficking. This dates back to the early stages of the investigation when the female FBI agent put in charge of the case had a background specializing in sex trafficking. This made no sense for a long time, as we could not see any sex trafficking in this crime, but perhaps we were wrong. Now it may be starting to make sense.

In fact, our latest theory is that sex trafficking may have something to do with this case.

There is a video on YouTube by an escort that describes a local sex club. One prominent member is a former jurist, Mr. F. His name kept getting tossed around in this case, but we never paid attention to it as it never seemed to be relevant. But maybe we were wrong.

Our investigation revealed that we believe this sex club was actually a full-blown sex trafficking organization. Mr. F appears to be the leader.

Mr. H., whose name has been tossed around a lot as a suspect, is also a member, and he is seen as the “muscle” for the group. I’m not aware that Mr. H has a criminal record, but he seems like a shady individual. He acted like the murders were unimportant and annoying, but someone close to him was extremely close to one of the girls. On the anniversaries of the murders, he posted creepy memes with hearts and blood. He seems very callous and creepy in general and in particular about the case.

His son J. played an important peripheral and noncriminal role in the case. A punk kid at the time, he took after his father. He also posted callous comments on social media about the murders. He went in the Marines and I guess they kicked his butt into shape because he’s now married to a young woman, has a young child, and seems to have calmed down and even turned into a decent person.

Mr. H. is a White Supremacist Odinist. He hates non-Whites. He leads and Odinist group of local White Supremacists. Gabe Ellis, the main suspect in the murder of Karenna McClerkin, is also a member of this Odinist group. Ellis has also been a top Delphi suspect for many because he’s a horrible person. Nevertheless, we do not believe he is involved in the Delphi case. But he was one of two major competing drug dealers who controlled the local methamphetamine trade for the last 10-15 years. More about this below.

Mr. H is also a misogynist who hates women, apparently due to a savage divorce. He is apparently a practicing Satanist. He was formerly in the service overseas in Afghanistan and may have PTSD. Mr. H was also spending the weekend at Ron Logan’s house after a fight with his girlfriend.

I must point out that although many people have tossed this guy’s name out there as the killer, we investigated him very deeply, and we do not believe he was involved. His alibi of being at the gym at the time of the murders appears to check out.

The following persons at minimum are known members of this “club”:

  • Mr. F, the apparent leader.
  • Mr. M, the father of the girl’s fetus.
  • Mr. X, the main suspect in the Delphi Murders.
  • Mr. H, the “muscle.”
  • James Chadwell, a local arrested and convicted for the rape and attempted murder of a nine year old girl.

We have no evidence that Mr. M, Mr. H, or James Chadwell played any role in the crime. We are uncertain whether Mr. F was involved in this crime, and at the moment there is no good evidence linking him to it. However, we would regard Mr. H and Mr. F as suspicious.

No doubt there are other members of this club, but we don’t know of any.

The club appears to have specialized in the literal sex trafficking of girls and young women aged 13-20. Club members typically preyed on runaways. They would drug them or get them hooked on drugs or somehow get them into their club, and then they would imprison them in locked rooms in guarded houses from which they could not escape.

This is literal sex trafficking. It means a literal sex slave who cannot escape from her pimp. If she can walk away, she’s not being trafficked.

The club members then passed these young females around amongst themselves.

We don’t know if the girls were prostituted out, however, we believe that the girls were used in the production of pornographic movies for sale. The movies with 13-17 year old girls in the club would be legally child porn. Possibly porn with 13-17 year old minor girls goes for a premium on the market. I have no idea about that. Typically 15-17 year old girls in porn movies are not distinguishable from an 18 year old woman (check out the Tracy Lords case), hence these movies are hard to spot in the first place. 13-14 year old girls are typically a lot more obvious.

We don’t know what crimes which members of the groups were committing.

Clearly whoever was in charge of the trafficking and imprisonment of these young women is guilty of Sex Trafficking.

Obviously sex with the 13-15 year old girls was Statutory Rape.

I’m not sure what the sex with the 16-20 year old girls could be classed as, and I’m not even sure it’s a crime. Is there a crime called “Having Sex with a Female Who Is Being Sex Trafficked?” I’m not aware of one.

Whoever was responsible for the filming and distributing of the CP would be guilty of Production and Distribution of Child Pornography.

As I noted, Mr. F is a former justice of the peace. He was regarded as corrupt when he was in that position. He gave his friends lighter sentences, which appears to be an ethical violation from which a disciplinary board could have disciplined him.

He was close to Mr. M. At age 16, Mr. M got a drunk driving arrest, and Mr. F let him off with a slap on the wrist because he knew him. Mr. M later shows up as a member of the sex club.

As you can see, Mr. X, the main suspect, and Mr. M, the father of the fetus at the heart of the case, are connected via membership in the sex club.

Mr. F is looking like a malign character. As a jurisprudent, he saw many young girls for all sorts of reasons in his court. This is not unusual. However, he often befriended them, took them places, etc. Although this sounds frightening, we felt that he simply befriended them in a fatherly way and there was nothing sexual about it whatsoever. That’s still legal. The sex fascists haven’t gotten around to banning it yet, but don’t worry, they’re working on it!

Anyway, this early friendship was not so innocent because he used it to groom (I hate the abuse of this verb nowadays, but it seems appropriate) these girls, as when they got to be teens, he used his early friendships with them to steer them into his sex club in order to be trafficked. Recall that the call girl said she had known Mr. F since she was 9.

We are starting to think that this man is quite dangerous.

In addition, we are starting to think that this sex trafficking group was also deeply involved in the meth trade which is omnipresent in the area.

There may also be some important and high-level locals in this club, so we may be looking at a Jeffrey Epstein scenario.

After the organization was done with the girls, they would discard them or “get rid of them,” as our member told us. This involved shipping them out of state, presumably to be trafficked somewhere else. This is starting to get into real across-borders sex trafficking of moving women from state to state for sexual purposes.

A Region Awash in Methamphetamine Drug Dealing

Swirling around in the background of everything we learned about this case is a huge amount of drug dealing, specifically methamphetamine dealing. Once you start researching criminal activity in this locale, you stumble upon this drug dealing which seems to be in the background of everything bad that goes on over there.

In this case, the main drug traffickers were Gabe Ellis (noted above) and two men named Palladino, a father and son or the Palladino family. Ellis is definitely bad news and we think he is a murderer. The Palladino family seem to be extremely dangerous.There is a deep and profound rivalry between the Ellis and Palladino family organizations that is menacing and possibly murderous. You don’t want to get involved in this feud.

In addition, while researching this crime, we ended up deep in the Garrett Kirts case. We think the cops did not learn the whole story in this case. In particular, and we believe that Kirts and his girlfriend are guilty of another homicide, that of a gay man who they used for money and shelter. We believe that the story that Kirts killed this gay man while having sex with him is false. Instead, Kirts and gang befriended this man because he is very nice – too nice.

They took advantage of him and got him to let them stay there and use it to cook up meth. While this was ongoing, they stole his TV set, a number of other items, and most of his money. We don’t know whether the man confronted them about this, but he may have. He was then murdered simply to keep him from going to the police over the crimes they had committed against him. We don’t know why Kirts is using the gay sex line because he’s very much heterosexual.

In addition, the Ellis versus P family feud ties in with Derrick German, Libby German’s biological father. He was a major meth dealer in the area. He was first arrested for stealing farm chemicals from local farmers. These chemicals are used to manufacture meth. He got arrested and for a lower sentence, he ratted out a large part of one of these drug trafficking groups.

There was a major bust in Lafayette a few years back, and 150 people were rolled up on meth charges. Most if not all of these arrests were due to information obtained from Derrick German. Derrick was working for one of the gangs, as he was a big dealer himself. However, after he turned state’s evidence, he had a falling out with this group and went to work for the rival group. However, he may now be on the outs with them too.

Derrick has become a recluse who almost never leaves his house. He has also not commented on the case at all, saying that no matter what he says, it will somehow be twisted against him. No reason has been given for his seclusion. However, we believe that one or both of these trafficking groups has threatened to kill him as a result cooperating with the police or other reasons. So he’s staying inside to keep from getting a bullet in the head.

Theories about drug trafficking have been rife in this case, and a theory that the girls were killed as some sort of a payback for Derrick working with the police is a common one. However, Derrick plays no role in the crime in any way, and there does not seem to be any drug connection to the murders.

The Motive for the Murders?

As far as the motive for the case, Mr. X was very close to Mr. M, the father of the fetus. In fact, they were both members of this sex club. Perhaps this was a motivation for him helping his friend to be rid of this problem girl. However, Mr. M is not a suspect, so he did not hire or convince Mr. X to commit this crime. But we have established a close connection between them, which is excellent for our theory.

Two Concurrent Plots – A Murder Plot and a Prank Plot, Layered on Top of Each Other

But is wanting to help a friend out of a pregnant minor bind reason enough to commit such a horrendous crime? It doesn’t seem to add up. We also think that both girls were targeted as we believe Mr. X may have committed the Evansdale Murders and the Delphi crimes were tied into that in a creepy way.

Evansdale involved the abduction and murder of two girls in a crowded park in the middle of the day. In addition, the dates of the two crimes are precise mirrors of each other, which is almost impossible to be a coincidence. The girls were abducted deliberately at 2:13 on February 13 or 2:13. We also have 2 girls killed on the 13th and 2 girls killed, both around 13 years old.

It seems obvious that if the same man is the author of both crimes, Delphi was meant to be a reenactment of Evansdale. If this is so, then the killer obviously plotted to kill two girls at once as was done in Evansdale.

The Prank Plot

Instead we feel that three of Mr. M’s friends, Mr. J, Mr. CP, and another man, possibly Mr. B, decided to set up a “prank” to lure the girl out to the site in order to frighten or terrorize her into getting an abortion. This is the reason for all of the creepy objects at the scene which we have described in other posts.

These three men are:

Mr. CP, a member of the extended family of one of the girls. Age 27.

Mr. BJ, a person close to Mr. X. Age 17.

Mr. B, a former police officer. Age 35. His role in setting up the prank is only suspected and not confirmed.

We believe that these three young men, all very close to Mr. M, concocted this plot, possibly with the assistance of Mr. M. It’s uncertain that this prank, even if carried out, would have been a crime. I doubt if it’s illegal to scare someone. People scare each other all the time, and people rarely go to jail for it. At any rate, the prank never even occurred as it was pre-empted by a murder plot.

So no one even scared any girl. Some men plotted to scare a girl, but the prank never even happened. It’s hard to see how it’s against the law to do something that never happened. These men do not appear to be guilty of any crime.

We do not know if they worked together with Mr. M on this prank, but they may have done so. But even if so, Mr. M is not guilty of a crime either.

We believe that these three young men set up this creepy prank at the crime scene the day before the crime. We think there was also a plot to lure a girl to the crime scene and men would meet her there and scare her into getting an abortion. This may have been set to go down at just about the time that the actual crime went down.

The Murder Plot Set to Run Concurrently

However, it may have been pre-empted by the killer, who learned of this prank and layered his murder plot on top of it in part to confuse everyone also to set up three young men for the fall. Obviously if these men set up a creepy prank in the woods to scare a girl and the girl ends up dead, the people who appeared to set up the crime beforehand would be prime suspects. Would you talk? I sure wouldn’t.

The three men and the father may indeed have been stunned and freaked out that the girls were murdered instead of pranked. And no doubt they aren’t saying a word to the police. Who in their right mind would? You’d be almost confessing to a murder. On the other hand, we do not believe that the three men knew about the murder plot scheduled to run concurrently with and pre-empting the prank. They probably have no idea who the killer is as they were kept out of the loop of that plot.

We believe that the killer found out about the prank plot and layered a second plot, a murder plot, on top of it to confuse everyone and set up three men for the fall.

Motive: A Sex Trafficking Link?

We are still not sure of the motive for the killer. To help a friend get rid of a seriously problematic girl? Sure, but is that motivation enough for a gruesome homicide. We are not so sure.

Instead, we feel that this is where the sex trafficking came in.

Our theory runs something like this: Suppose Mr. M was pressuring the girl to get an abortion and she was resisting. Eventually the girl gets tired of him pressuring her and says, “If you don’t stop bothering me, I’m going to blow the whistle on that creepy little illegal “club” of yours!” Mr. M goes back to the club and reports this to members. Then he walks away. Members if this sex trafficking club, including obviously Mr. X and possibly powerful locals, decide that this girl is a great big problem that needs to go away. We are not averse to a theory that sees high levels of this organization involved in the decision to rid themselves of this problem girl.

Hence a plot is hatched with one or more club members. Perhaps Mr. X volunteers to do the job. Perhaps other club members think Mr. X did Evansdale and think he’s just the man for the job. Perhaps they think he did Evansdale and they use this to blackmail him into taking the job, although he doesn’t seem to be the type who would need to be blackmailed into a homicide.

At any rate, the motive goes from “shutting down a girl who refused to get an abortion” to “shutting up a girl who was going to squeal on a sex trafficking organization. If this organization was busted, possibly some very powerful locals could be looking at prison time.

Statutory rape is one thing, but running a sex trafficking organization is a whole other ball of wax. The first is hardly worth killing over; the second would be grounds for a classic homicide to shut up someone threatening to go to the cops. We think “shutting up a girl who threatened to squeal on a sex trafficking organization” seems a more likely motive than eliminating a pregnant teenage girl impregnated by an adult man.

Statutory rape of a 14 year old girl by a 20 year old man barely even seems like a crime, mostly because they are so close in age. That said, I have no idea what the sentence would be for a 20 year old man and a 14 year old girl these days. Anyway, I still doubt if a 20 year old man gets 5-10 years for banging a 14 year old girl. He might get a lesser sentence than that, probably less than five years.

But if the sex trafficking group was taken down, a lot of possibly powerful people could see their lives and careers shot to Hell for all of time.

The Possibility of an Accomplice to Mr. X

Our member who conducted this four year investigation has concluded that Mr. X had an accomplice who helped him carry out this crime. We do not know if this is the case, but it is surely a possibility. Our police source was clear about this. She told us,

“The theory of two killers is still in the ballpark and has been since the first day of the investigation.”

Why did this theory show up on the first day of the investigation? What did they discover early on that made them suspect such a thing? Jumping to two killers so early in a case is odd. We have no answer to this question. Why has the theory lasted this long? Our source also told us:

The possibility of two killers was not brought up early on because police felt that the town was freaked out enough with the idea of one killer and throwing two killers out there would cause mass hysteria. The possible accomplice is much younger than Mr. X and is much more likely to run, so his possible involvement was left out for fear he might take off.

Our member feels that he has spotted the possible accomplice. This man’s name is Mr. Z. Mr. Z is 35 years old. He was 31 at the time of the crime. Keep in mind that this makes him almost exactly between ages 18-40. Old BG was intended to be a drawing of BG, the man on the bridge, but the witnesses could only see the top of his face, so it is a bad composite. We believe that Mr. Z is a suspect for being Young BG. Young BG was spotted at the south end of the bridge by a lady who chased him off her property. She described him as having dark and evil eyes.

To say he is a suspicious character is an understatement. Our member spent a very long time investigating this man.

First of all we should note that we believe that this man has been a very deep focus of the investigation, but they have kept his name out of lights, possibly for the reasons given by our police source above. For instance, we believe that he has recently been given his 6th or 7th lie detector test. They keep coming back “inconclusive.” But Mr. X’s test came back that way too, as did Tobe Lozenby’s.

We believe that this man is a suspect in the crime surpassed only by Mr. X, the main suspect. If Mr. X is the main suspect, then Mr. Z must definitely be a suspect who is surpassed only by Mr. X. Police have been looking at this man very closely for a long time now.

First of all, this man is a social media publicity hound who has inserted himself into the case in a dramatic way. Of course a lot of folks have done that, including supposedly yours truly. But his insertion seems more than bizarre. He uploads Youtube videos all the time and has quite a presence on other websites, where he is an expert on ADHD, among other things.

Suspiciously, he uploaded a video of himself flying a drone over the bridge the day before the murders. He was mapping it for Google as he was working for Google at the time. However, we feel that he may have been mapping out the crime scene for a crime that he and Mr. X were planning to commit the next day.

Mr. Z is extremely intelligent with an IQ of probably over 140, or genius level. Genius IQ’s are not so special as 3.3 million people in the US are this intelligent. However, they are still the top

Furthermore, our member has been attempting to get a “read” on him for years now, and he’s gotten nowhere. Our member has a decent background in psychology. He can’t figure out who the real Mr. Z is or if there even is one. You think you have a handle on him, and then that just looks like another facade or false self. It’s one false self after another.

Mr. Z is just a series of fake selves in an endless series of fake selves scrolling off into the horizon. As soon as you try to get a handle on one, a new one pops up, just as false.

I’ve known for some time now that sociopaths and psychopaths are very difficult if not impossible to read. I’ve known empaths who told me they could read a lot of people, but they could never get a read on a certain person, and that person turned out to be a psychopath. If you read The Mask of Sanity, the pre-eminent document on psychopathy, you will see why this is so. There’s no true self there. Instead there is only a series of masks.

As noted, this man has inserted himself in a deep way into the investigation for no apparent reason. Can we place him at the bridge? Well, we don’t need to. He places himself there! In fact, he places himself there at right around the time of the murders. He said he walked on the bridge a bit but then turned around and went back to his car, seeing nothing.

Police have said that they have accounted for everyone who was at the bridge that day except for the killer, but as they are keeping the two killers theory under wraps, perhaps they meant was “except for the killers.” Mr. Z says he drove his wife’s red car to the bridge that day, and there is a report of a similar red car at the bridge.

Our member feels that Mr. Z drove Mr. X to the bridge. Mr. X’s phone pings the bridge from 12-5 PM on February 13 because we believe that Mr. X placed his phone there when he went to commit the crime because otherwise the GPS would place him on the bridge and at the crime scene.

The member also feels that Mr. X arrived at the cemetery and parked his truck in the trees much earlier than 5:30 PM. He thinks it may have been there for hours earlier, perhaps since early afternoon. It is certainly possible that Mr. X’s truck was placed on Ron’s land earlier than 5:30 PM. He also thinks that Mr. X said he lost his keys because Mr. Z had his keys instead! If that was the case, then why not say, “Mr. Z has my keys”?

Mr. Z has made many videos about the Delphi Murders. In some of them he has homeless, living in a tent in the woods, as he has gone off his meds. In these videos he is ranting at the Delphi Killer, raging about what he is going to do to him if he finds him. This is all quite over the top.

Mr. Z has some odd religious beliefs to say the last. He has fashioned some weird “Jihadist Paganism” that uses a lot of Arabic writing and lettering for the jihadist element. The Paganist element  is a worship of the Earth. Obviously, you don’t have to be a student of religion to realize that an Islamist Jihadist Paganism is an oxymoron. His nouveau religion posits that those who harm the planet must be killed. This is where the jihadism comes him. So he believes in a jihad along the lines of an Islamic religious jihad in the name of paganism to deal with those who foul the Earth. To say it’s odd is an understatement.

What Is the Nature of the Bladed Weapon Used in the Crime?

In addition, the redacted text in the Ron Logan search warrant (we have seen the unredacted warrant) says that a “bladed weapon” was used in the crime. One of our police sources already told us and they also told us that the weapon was “either a sword or a machete.” There has been a rumor for some time about an odd curved weapon resembling a gut knife. Detectives were inquiring in local sporting goods stores in the weeks after the crime if anyone had bought a gut knife recently.

For some time, we thought the murder weapon which cut a girl’s throat was a hatchet. We thought this because the team was chasing hatchet criminals all over the Western US. Why else would they be chasing hatchet criminals unless a hatchet was used in the crime?

However, the single blow that struck the girl with her head positioned on a log while she was unconscious (we think she had to be unconscious when struck because you can’t hit a live, squirming, thrashing head on a log) could not have been done by a hatchet. We are being criticized for this theory but please note that the girl’s head was nearly severed in a single blow. That would require quite a powerful and large weapon. A hatchet would have had to hack away at a neck for some time before it cut it, and the attack was a single blow. It’s a girl’s throat, not a block of wood.

After thinking for a long time, we now think that the bladed weapon was a “long kukuri.” A kukuri is a curved Indonesian knife. It is usually a short blade as long as a switchblade, but apparently it also comes in a long version that looks like a sword.

On the other hand, a single blow of a long kukuri could have easily done the trick and nearly severed a girl’s neck with a single blow. It also fits with our police source’s description of the bladed weapon as “a sword or a machete.”

Oddly enough, Mr. Z has a vast collection of all sorts of knives and swords to the point where it’s almost creepy. He has taken many photos of his huge collection and posted them on the web. Among his big collection, believe it or not, is both a short and a long kukuri knife. So Mr. Z owns a knife of the very unusual type that was used in the crime! That doesn’t mean he did it, but we think it is interesting.

There is a very serious problem with the theory that Mr. Z was an accomplice in the murders, and that is that we have been unable to find any information tying him to Mr. X. Clearly this is a serious problem.

However it is quite clear to us that Mr. Z is a major suspect in the crime according to LE, second in importance only to Mr. X. This right there means he needs to be looked at very closely.

Incredibly enough, Mr. Z can be connected to Kegan Kline! In fact, Mr. Z was the tech who fixed Kline’s phones and PC’s. Did Mr. Z come upon Kline’s illicit material when he was fixing his PC? Even worse, if Mr. Z participated in the crime, did he have a deal with Kline to provide him with the murder tape afterwards?

Possibility That The Murders Were Recorded and That a Video of the Crime Exists

A serious problem has occurred with the local rumor that Kline was selling the murder tape for Bitcoin and he made a lot of Bitcoin on it. A woman has somehow been able to check out Kline’s Bitcoin account, and she found that it is empty. So this is a serious problem for the murder tape theory.

Our member thought that the planners of the murders felt, “As long as we are going to do these murders, we might as well make some money off of them.”

Leigh Kerr (Pastor Warmbler) has been proven correct or inconclusive on every one of his claims we have investigated. For many of his claims, we have found independent evidence that he was telling the truth. For a number of other claims, we have not been able to determine if his claims were true or false. However, we have not found him to be false about a single charge.

This man is trashed to Hell on the Reddit groups, but he is one of the finest sources of all for this crime. This just shows how foolish and vicious they are. Furthermore, the story with his wife handing over the court documents on her death bed as a last wish checks out. As does Warmbler’s character as a Pentecostal preacher. Both the member and I found that he is the most straight-up person you will ever meet.

Leigh Kerr verified a rumor that the crime was videotaped by the killer and that videos or photos of the murders were then sent to a girl’s phone afterwards. We are not sure which girl’s phone it was sent to. There are rumors it was sent to the younger girl’s phone, but we have gotten different information on whether she had a phone. Some say she had a burner phone, but others said she had a tablet. She has a backpack on her back at the bridge. A tablet could fit in there.

There are different stories about the older girl’s phone. One story is that the killer smashed it to bits at the scene and left it there. In this version, the video and audio was taken from the Cloud as it was uploaded immediately as it was being recorded. We still don’t know if the “smashed to bits at the scene” is true. However, there appears to be a good rumor of this girl’s phone turning on and pinging the bridge at 2 AM. It was reported by the police. If the phone is smashed to bits, how does it turn on at 2 AM? Or is it smashed to bits at the crime scene at 2 AM?

As it’s been verified by Leigh Kerr, that’s pretty good evidence that the crime was videotaped. There is also a reference in the search warrant to the notion that the crime may have been recorded, as they are looking for photos, videos, cameras, videocameras, film, developed and undeveloped. This also seems to imply that the crime was filmed. And a lot of people think BG has a GoPro on his head.

Ashley Garth said she had seen the video of the murders. We don’t know how credible she is, and she’s a convicted murderer. However, two other people also said that they saw the murder tape, so perhaps it exists.

The Shoe at the Bottom of the Hill

Our member also had some new theories about the crime. He felt that one girl had accidentally fallen off the bridge. This would be the girl whose shoe was found at the bottom on the hill. The two others then went down the hill, found her, decided they need to get her to a doctor, carried her across the creek, and then the crime occurred. This theory runs into serious problems such as the necessity of carrying a heavy girl some distance and then carting her across a creek and up a steep slope. With all due respect, we don’t think this is what happened.

Nevertheless, the shoe at the bottom of the hill needs to be explained. How did this girl lose her shoe?! One theory is she “ran out of her shoe.” People who have played sports have described running out of shoes when playing running sports. OK, but how do you run out of your sock too? Her sock was also found down there. How did this girl lose both her shoe and her sock at the bottom of the hill? To this day we have no good answer to this question.

New Personality Information on Mr. X

Our member also learned new information about Mr. X. One curious thing about him is that we were finding it hard to find good psychological portraits of him that could imply a capability to do commit such a crime. However, the member talked to a number of people who knew him who said he’s a real Jeckyl and Hyde. He is said to have a “split personality or multiple personalities.” There’s no such thing as the former, and the latter is rare.

I’m pretty sure he has neither, but laypeople use this for someone who has a serious split in the self and appear to have completely different aspects of the Self that come out at odd times. F

or instance, Ted Bundy described an aspect of his Self known as “The Entity” that was split off from him most of the time. It was this split-off part of the Self that was taking over and going out and committing crimes, not Ted himself. This part of the Self was so split-off and compartmentalized that Ted may not have even been aware of it most of the time. These people are experts at compartmentalizing aspects of the Self, and while this can look like MPD, it’s different in some important ways.

Anyway, what we were told is that Mr. X has these multiple selves, including a normal self who is quite ordinary and another self that is extremely dark, dangerous, and terrifying. They say when this self is out, it’s as if he is possessed. We also have reports that he abused both of his wives and his daughter. With the wives it may have been physical abuse, but with the daughter it was psychological abuse. She reported that he could get very mean at times.

The member said that the word among locals is that Mr. X “fried his brain from too many drugs and now he’s gone. First of all, I don’t think it’s possible to fry your brain too many drugs and I’ve never met such a person in my life, this after being deep in the drug culture for many years. So this is nonsense. But he does seem to have been a hard drug user in the past. The only drug referenced is heroin. Heroin doesn’t fry your brain.

Weird Posts by Mrs. X Only One Week after the Crime

We just now discovered that Mr. X’s wife, Mrs. X posted her posts on Facebook about “How you’ve known someone your whole life and then you discover that they’re this completely different person, this monster, this entity of pure evil,” a mere week after the murders! That’s very important.

To us that means that Mrs. X felt that Mr. X had committed these murders within a week of the crime. How on Earth could she have arrived at that conclusion? By putting two and two together? Few details of Mr. X’s very strange antics around the location and duration of his truck parked on Ron Logan’s land, his mysterious and confounding comments about keys, his discovery of the bodies and flight in shock had been revealed at this time.

But perhaps she did simply figure it out on her own. After all, we do not know the whereabouts of Mr. X from 8 PM February 13 to 8:30 AM February 14. He is last seen searching Logan’s land at 8 PM on the 13th and then shows up again at the fire station to join the search party on the morning of the 14th. There’s no information that he went home that night. So it looks like he stayed out there by his truck all night long. Perhaps Mrs. X figured out that he stayed out all night the night of the murders with no explanation and this made her think he did it.

Our member has another theory. While many think that Mr. X’s panic and flight in terror on finding the bodies and subsequent psychotherapy was staged, our member thinks that he actually panicked upon seeing the condition of the bodies. If Mr. X himself left those bodies in that shape, it seems odd for him to panic over it the next time.

Besides, he seems a bit of a cold fish. He was completely calm in that press conference when the police were freaking out because of his presence in the room. And the person who commits this sort of a crime, particularly with posing, is usually at the far end of psychopathy because only

After panicking, our member thinks Mr. X actually had a nervous breakdown. And due to this breakdown, he sought four months of therapy. Adding weight to this theory are reports that he is still distraught and broken up over what he saw at the crime scene. This doesn’t make a lot of sense as others who found the bodies did not react in such an extreme way, although a longtime police officer did leave the force and retire as he was investigating the case. He said it was too much for him.

Our member thinks that in the week after the murders, Mr. X had a breakdown and confessed to his wife. This resulted in the wife’s cryptic posts to Facebook. This theory has the advantage of explaining the wife’s weird posts, but perhaps she simply added up two and two and got four. On the other hand, people on the far end of psychopathy don’t fall apart when they see the results of the crimes. They don’t have nervous breaks as a result of what they did, and they certainty don’t have breaks that last for five years.

We have no good explanation for Mr. X’s behavior after finding the bodies, running away, and then seeking therapy other than we think his behavior was staged to make it seem like if he was so upset, he could not possibly have done it. Perhaps he did confess to his wife. These types are known to confess to people. But we don’t know that either.

Anyway, we think Mrs. X making those bizarre remarks possibly pointing to her husband a mere week after the murders is quite important. We would point out that if he did confess to the wife, she has since closed ranks with him and now insists that he’s innocent. But wives covering for husbands in homicide cases is nothing new, and it’s not even against the law.

Mr. X Finally Conclusively Placed Near Evansdale, Iowa during the Time of the Evansdale Murders!

Our critics have savaged us for reporting that Mr. X was living in the area of the Evansdale murders at the time those girls were killed. However, our information came us straight from our best police source, so we think it is good.

However, due to our member’s investigation, we have now uncovered good evidence that Mr. X was indeed living in that area at the time of the murders. After searching for years, our member finally found a local who knew Mr. X well. This local said that Mr. X had indeed been living in Waterloo, Iowa at the time those girls were killed. He said that Mr. X had been working for both Indiana Packers and Tyson Foods.

We’re not sure if he was working for both at the time, which seems unlikely, or he was working for one during one period and another during another period. At any rate, Mr. X was working for Tyson Foods at the time, and they transferred a lot of employees over to Waterloo, Iowa to work in their other plant for a period of time, obviously at least months. A previous suspect, Mr. A, told us that he had been transferred as part of this same group.

Mr. X has no record of an address over there because he had no address. He and the rest of the Tyson workers were being put up at an extended stay motel. He definitely had a roommate at the time, and it is this roommate who turned Mr. X in as the man on the bridge. Try as we might, we have not been able to find the name of the roommate, but we are working on it. This is great news for the Evansdale case that we are finally able to place Mr. X in the vicinity of that crime when it was committed!

Our Initial Theory that BG Worked or Had Worked at Indiana Packers Shown Correct!

Remember very early in the case when we suggested that BG had a connection with Indiana Packers? We thought that because to us it was obvious that he was wearing Indiana Packers boots on the bridge, as his boots were a perfect match for the boots seized by LE when they raided Indiana Packers shortly after the crime.

A pair of boots later was shown in an evidence bag with a message from police saying, “Don’t mind this. It’s nothing.” Well, we didn’t believe that. Of course, we’ve been trashed to Kingdom Come for saying BG is wearing Indiana Packers boots, but now that we have established a work connection between the main suspect and Indiana Packers, it is looking like BG is actually wearing boots from that plant.

So what happens at the plant? Do you have to buy your own uniform? Do they give you a uniform to keep? At any rate, it looks like after people leave Packers, at the very least former workers retain their boots.

It would also be very interesting to see what sort of a job Mr. X had at Indiana Packers. We theorized early on that if BG worked at Packers, he might have had one of the jobs where he cuts the throats of pigs because one girl was sadly slaughtered in a very similar way. We still have no information on the nature of Mr. X’s work at either Packers or Tyson.

What’s up with Kelsi German?

We don’t normally use full names in these posts, but this young woman is innocent, so we figure we might as well. Unfortunately, for whatever reasons, her stories about all sorts of things about this crime are all over place. In other words, she can’t keep her story straight. The FBI suspected her of involvement and they interviewed her several times. Once they interviewed her at her school because they thought they might get a different result due to a different interview locale.

After a couple of years, we learned that Kelsi German has been officially cleared of involvement in the case. That should have been easy enough to prove since if you are familiar with this young lady at all, you know she doesn’t have it in her to kill her own sister!

Nevertheless, Kelsi’s contradictory statements and inability to keep her story straight have led to a lot of Youtube videos speculating her involvement in the case.

However, our member learned quite a bit about Kelsi in the course of his investigation, and we think we can now account for some of her behavior.

For instance, Kelsi has been going to her sister’s grave and yelling and cursing at it. Supposedly she blames her sister for being so stupid as to fall victim to a social media catfish killer. However, we believe it goes deeper than this. You see, Kelsi was well aware that Libby was talking to Anthony Shots, the catfish. In fact, Kelsi was talking to him too! As his photo was a male model, both easily became quite smitten with him. However, Kelsi was jealous of her sister because she thought Shots paid more attention to her than to Kelsi, so this was a source of tension.

Kelsi also talked to “Shots” the night of the 13th, the day her sister went missing. The contents of the conversation are not known. Kelsi then went into her sister’s account and deleted many people from her friends list. We don’t know why she did that.

It also appears that Kelsi had been keeping her and her sister’s talks with Shots secret from their guardians. In addition, it also seems that Kelsi knew that her sister and the other girl were going to the bridge to secretly meet Shots on the day they disappeared. In fact, Kelsi even secretly drove her sister to the bridge without telling her parents. As you can see, Kelsi has a lot to feel guilty about, though she did nothing wrong.

She hid and even participated in a relationship between Shots and her and her sister. She never informed her parents that her sister was talking to Shots. And she basically drove her sister to her death on the day in the question. Kelsi had no idea of the terrors that would await her sister at the bridge. She bears no blame for any of this. But guilt is a funny thing, and I believe Kelsi is a very good person who is the type to feel a lot of guilt. Bottom line is the way she sees it is that she drove her sister to her death that day, and hence bears responsibility for her sister’s murder.

As far as the anger towards her sister at the grave site, perhaps she is still angry because Shots paid more attention to her sister. However, what is more likely is that Kelsi is projecting guilt away from herself. Instead of saying, “I drove my sister to her death, but it wasn’t my fault,” she blames her sister for being so stupid as to fall for an online catfish. Kelsi is projecting away her guilt onto her sister as rage and displacing her own guilt onto her sister as her sister’s guilt. Pretty much Psychology 100.

There is also a possibility that Kelsi knows that a relative of her and her sister helped set up the creepy crime scene beforehand which then turned into a homicide. We believe these young men are innocent and merely intended to prank a girl and scare her into getting an abortion. We do not think they committed a crime. But boy, it sure does look bad, and if I had done that, I’d never say a word.

Her statements about this relative who participated in the prank are all over the place as far as where he was at what times. Simply put, her time and place statements about this man make no sense. We feel that she may be trying to cover for her relative, although we believe he committed no crime. When you try to give a false alibi for someone, it’s pretty easy to trip up and mix your statements up. We think this is what is happening here.

Anyway, Kelsi German is innocent in either case, no matter that she can’t keep her story straight. Yes, she may be providing a false alibi, but good luck proving it, and she’s providing an alibi for something that wasn’t even a crime in the first place and worse, it never even happened! Perhaps Kelsi should seek therapy to soothe her hurting heart.

A Possible Solution to the Karenna McClerkin Murder

In the course of his four year investigation into the Delphi Murders, our member also dug very deep into the methamphetamine dealing underworld. The meth dealing in the area for the last 10-15 years has been controlled by two rival groups, one centered around Gabe Ellis and another centered around a father-son family operation, Mr. Palladino, father, and Mr. Palladino, son, or the the Palladino Family operation.

They are bitter rivals and there are frequent threats against people working for the other side, all the way up to death threats. A number of folks, including Derrick German, father of one of the murdered Delphi girls, have worked for both groups and hence incurred the wrath or one or both of the organizations.

You remember how we mentioned a sex trafficking group that may have played a role in the Delphi Murders?

The Main Theme of This Whole Case Is about a Taboo Subject Which Can Never Be Discussed without Causing a Huge Shitstorm

Well, here we go again, and once again as in the Delphi case, it’s a case centered around sex and teenage girls, particularly teenage girls having sex with adult men.

One thing we’ve noted since the very start of this case is how many people go absolutely hysterical over any mention of a sexual motive in the case. This was the reason I was thrown out of so many groups in the beginning – I mentioned the rumors about a sexual angle to the crime and in addition, I described some of the gruesome rumors about what was done to the girls. What seems to drive these “grownups” into particular conniptions is the outrageous notion that these teenage girls had sex lives had sex lives as many normal, healthy teens their age too. Supposedly this slanders their eternal purity!

One would think these girls were being nominated for sainthood. Neither girl was a saint. Instead, they were ordinary teenage girls doing what ordinary teenage girls do when no one is looking, which is often to get into a whole Hell of a lot of trouble. I nearby caused Mt. Vesuvius to erupt and a lynch mob to storm my door by  suggesting that one girl had kissed a boy at least one time. That was called “sexualizing minors.”

Look, this Puritanical, prudish, sex-hating insanity has gone too far. We can’t point to the teenage girl across the street and note that you saw her kissing a boy without being reported to the FBI as a sex criminal? Get a grip, people.

This Delphi Murders is about one subject, and it is drenched from top to bottom, from right to left, from up to  down, from north to south, and from east to west with this taboo subject: Teenage girls having sex. Even worse is the source of the current sex panic: Teenage girls having sex with adults, typically grown men.

All I have to say is that if you are so uptight and hung up that you can’t talk about subjects like this without causing a five alarm fire, why don’t you just quit talking about the case? Leave the groups. Leave all the Reddit groups. Leave all the Facebook groups. Shut up about the case. Quit reading about it.

Because I assure you that the key to the whole case is the matter which has driven you to hysteria: teenage girls having sex with adult men. If you can’t discuss it like a grownup, just get lost!

Back to Gabe Ellis Again

It turns out that Gabe Ellis may have had some sort of a “club” of his own similar to Mr. F’s “club” (actually a sex trafficking group) around Delphi. Ellis and his friends befriended teenage girls and young women, got them hooked on drugs, and then passed them around amongst themselves. This is all quite legal for the most part (except for the dope) if the girls are over 16.

However, it also appears that they may have been prostituting some of the girls and keeping them as sex slaves, that is, sex trafficking them. If they are prostituting minors whether the minors are prisoners or not, it’s idiotically considered “sex trafficking.”

The murder of Karenna McClerkin in Kokomo, Indiana occurred a few years ago. An 18 year old mixed race woman, she vanished in the middle of the night. She was last seen with a known woman, Paige Turley, in Turley’s vehicle around midnight, and she was supposedly being taken to Ellis’ place.

There are stories that she was being held as a sex slave by Ellis and trafficked as a prostitute to men. Supposedly the reason was that Karenna stole $25,000 from Ellis. For this, she had to work as a prostitute for him to work the money she stole off. There were different theories about her death, including that Gabe and his friends gave her a “hot shot” or a deliberate overdose of intravenous drugs. This version is still the most popular version of the murder.

Another version has her being sold to a black firefighter who liked very rough sex who got carried away during sex and strangled her, accidentally or simply because he got too excited. This version does not appear to have good legs.

Anyway, however she died, Ellis and friends realized that they had a dead body on their hands and they had to get rid of it. They took her body to a nearby town, chopped it into pieces, and then set the pieces on fire and threw them in a cornfield. People are now looking for remains under a bridge. This version of the body disposal also remains the most popular.

At any rate, Karenna was an IV drug user. At the very least, she shot heroin. Gabe also shot heroin and used cocaine, methamphetamine, and marijuana.

One night there was a party at Ellis’ house. Late at night at this party, Karenna confronted Ellis yelling and screaming and making a huge scene. Ellis had recently been dating Karenna’s younger cousin, CS, who was only 15 years old. The girl had run away from home to be with Ellis because she was in love with him. Ellis had been putting her up at a hotel. Her mother kept tracking her down, but she kept running away again.

Apparently word leaked out that Ellis had plans for this girl along the same lines as with Karenna, that is, getting her hooked on drugs and then passing her around amongst his friends or possibly pimping her out, which is technically sex trafficking because she was underage. And Karenna was also apparently a sex slave, so she was literally being trafficked even though she was an adult.

Perhaps there were plans to make a sex slave of CS too. Karenna was not happy as the fact that she had been trafficked by Ellis, as I suppose it was not an optimal experience. Karenna was furious when she found out about these plans. She cared about her cousin and also may have thought CS was too young for such things. She probably also had protective feelings towards her due to CS being only 15 years old.

She charged Ellis and got him against a wall. “If you do to my cousin what you did to me, I’m going to the police to report you.”

We are not sure what she was going to bust Ellis to the police on. Herself being trafficked to men as a prostitute and sex slave? Ellis’ extensive meth dealing operation? A possible sex trafficking ring that Ellis and his friends were running (although we are uncertain that this was actually a ring with multiple victims)? Karenna left that night but Ellis and his friends apparently decided that this girl was a problem that needed to go away fast. So they plotted to get rid of her.

At this point, we are going to get cryptic with the story.

It appears that Ellis had a female relative who was a butch lesbian. This woman has a name, PT, but we are not going to reveal it as we are implicating her in a crime here. She wore men’s clothes and walked and talked like a man. She had a girlfriend who was a bit more lipstick as such things usually go, as homosexual relationships mirror heterosexual ones. Ellis apparently handed off the homicide to his female relative.

At some point on the night in question, Karenna got into a car driven by the relative and her lesbian girlfriend. Wherever they were supposed to be headed, possibly to Gabe’s house, they ended up at the apartment of Gabe’s lesbian relative and her girlfriend. They then went to shoot heroin, except that Karenna was given a hotshot, that is, a deliberately lethal dose. She was soon dead of a heroin overdose.

The two women then went to work chopping up Karenna’s body in the relative’s apartment until it was in small enough pieces that it could be carried in bags to their truck. The truck was then driven a ways north to an area where there were extensive and poorly-guarded pig farms in huge outdoor pens. The parts of the woman’s body were thrown over the fence to the hungry swarming pigs. Her body was quickly eaten by the pigs, as pigs are wont to do.

We don’t know if anything would be left of the body in the pig pen or whether there would still be bones. But surely a search of the relative’s apartment might come up with DNA or blood evidence of a body that had been cut up with knives.

 

Gabe Ellis, Confidential Informant

I have called the Kokomo police a couple of times about this case. One detective was quite helpful but the most recent one was a nightmare, the worst detective I have ever spoken with. I read off a version of the firefighter killed the girl in rough sex followed by Ellis and his friends chopping up the body in the field story and he stopped me short and abruptly.

Let me tell you that I can prove that everything you have told me is false! I know who she was with and how she was killed.

And then the conversation abruptly ended.

According to our new member, this is the typical run-around that anyone gets whenever they bring up the name of Gabe Ellis in connection with this crime. All cops just shut down the conversation right away when his name comes up.

This struck the member as curious, so he did some digging. He now believes that Ellis is a confidential informant for the police and has been one for quite some time now. He researched Ellis’ record dating back to 2009. Ellis got arrested over and over and he always gets the charges for the most part or entirely dropped.  It appears that the police are protecting Ellis because he is a CI.

In his most recent arrest, in which he was found in a vehicle with Karenna’s sister, now 16 and legal, along with drugs including cocaine, marijuana, cocaine, heroin, baggies, scales, etc. He was arrested for possession of all of these items. The girl was perfectly legal but the problem is that Ellis likes to take videos of his sex life, and he had been videotaping himself and this girl having sex. Unfortunately, legally, that is child porn. So he went down on that charge.

When it came time for trial, almost all of the charges were dropped except for the CP. He went into the prison system. Our member searched for him for a long time and could not find him anywhere in the system. He appears to have dropped off the face of the earth. Our member thinks he is in the witness protection program, hiding somewhere. As the police are protecting this man, it is unlikely the murder or Karenna McClerkin, in which Gabe Ellis almost certainly plays a large role, will ever be solved.

The Curious Case of Nate Miller

As we noted, Nate Miller, a police officer who killed himself in December 2020, was related to Mr. M, the man who impregnated the girl victim. Mr. X was also very close to Mr. M. Although a girl who refused to get an abortion seems to be one of the motives of the crime, Mr. M is not a suspect. But now we can see why Nate Miller provided the fake alibi for Mr. X. He was protecting his relative, Mr. M!

Nate Miller had worked for a nearby police department for 20 years. He specialized in CSI or crime scene investigations. He appears to have worked long enough to get a pension. After 20 years on the job, he abruptly quit and took a large pay cut to go work as a beat officer in Delphi. We do not understand why he took this large pay cut to do this. We think that Tobe Lozenby wanted Nate to work for his force to try to infiltrate the sex trafficking group that appears to be at the heart of the crime. But it’s unclear why he took the pay cut.

Police thought he was lying in his alibi for Mr. X. Perhaps he was forced out of his prior CSI job for this reason. At any rate, he quit to take a quite dangerous job working for Lozenby. About 10 months after he took this new assignment, he was found dead in the early morning hours in his car next to a park. The cause of death was a gunshot wound to the head. The death was ruled a homicide.

However, everyone our new member talked to about this case thought it was a homicide disguised as a suicide. In other words, he was “suicided.” We know of no good, hard evidence that the case was a homicide instead of a suicide, but that’s the local rumor.  It is interesting that he died of suicide not long after taking a very dangerous assignment to infiltrate a sex trafficking ring.

Our member thought Miller was a “dirty cop.” What he means by this was that he was a cop who liked to beat up suspects and arrestees. Miller had many a number of social media posts opposing mandatory body cams for police officers. Presumably he opposed these cams because he would not be able to beat up arrestees anymore. The case and death of Nate Miller are at the heart of this crime, but we still don’t know exactly what happened.

“Are Blue State People Elitist?,” by Jason

Of course, I’m speaking in generalities.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/news/america-s-divides-are-only-growing/ar-AAZaOul?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=104b70f508004178bf2ffa3e51814f34

From an economic and social development standpoint, these widening cleavages have long been evident. People in blue-state America live longer than their red-state counterparts. They are less likely to live in poverty, more likely to have access to health care, less likely to die from gun violence, more likely to be members of a union, and more likely to be vaccinated against Covid-19. In red-state America, family income is lower, and so too is economic productivity.

Then why is everyone leaving blue states? Blue states also include urban enclaves like Chicago where surely everything isn’t going so great. The trend has been toward moving toward the Sunbelt for as long as I can remember, lol.

Blue metro areas that are the engines of economic growth for their states are increasingly at odds with the poorer, more culturally conservative red counties that surround them.

Hmmm. This is funny.

It’s worth asking: How much longer will economically vibrant and culturally diverse blue-state America be willing to subsidize its red-state brethren, particularly as the latter try to impose their extremist views on guns and religion to women’s rights?

You just can’t get MORE SNOBBY than this, lol. O.K., we don’t want to SUBSIDIZE those darn poor Blacks, White trash, rednecks, ha ha. What is this? THE JERRY SPRINGER SHOW? 😆

It’s in the recent abortion decision that we can best see the outlines of a true national crack-up. There are many ways to think about the Supreme Court’s reckless and legally dubious decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, but at its core, the Dobbs case and abortion in general is an issue of human rights.

It’s about bodily autonomy and whether women have the right to make their own decisions about when or whether they have children. Women who have the misfortune of living in red-state America are now in effect second-class citizens stripped of their most basic reproductive freedoms.

The freedom to be HOES and then make offspring pay by KILLING THEM? How much is REALLY stuff threatening the mom’s life?

How many pro-choice blue-state parents will decide against sending their daughters to universities in red-state America? Parents of trans or LGBTQ children are already asking these questions.

And how much of the population are they a percentage of even in just the blue states? Is it wrong to say this stuff is freakish? That’s the core problem.

I won’t deny the rightwing can be full of shit also. I grew up in the South. You’re telling me there was no Jim Crow and slavery, or at least it wasn’t that bad? Come on? You gotta be kidding me!

As unimaginable as it might have seemed then, on this Fourth of July, America is in even worse shape: more divided and more polarized, and there is little reason to expect that we will come together any time soon.

And if the South leaves, will the North try to STOP THEM AGAIN? Nah, JUST KIDDING, 😆

If You Are Still An Arrogant Jerk after Age 40, Something Is Terribly Wrong

Or, to put it another way: You’re supposed to develop some (even shamed) humility after age 40.

And it’s ok to be a bit ashamed. Shame is at the core of humility. Just don’t take shame too far because you can get toxic and screwed up from that emotion. Too much shame is very bad.

Shi: As per my last post, I have turned into a mini-version of Trash himself. As Polar Bear just noted, I was sounding just like Trash when I mocked the Polish people for eating with their hands.

I haven’t really noticed this. Are you being hard on yourself?

Shi: I am only being my toxic Trash-self at the workplace (as you know I work for freelance companies) but pretty much anywhere else to get my way.

Not sure I want to tell you how to live, but do you think this is ok? It sounds like you are attacking innocent people. Does that seem proper or just? Imagine you were one of the people you are treating like this? Would you enjoy that?

You used to bully some commenters though like Manuel. Granted he was a bit of a geek, but that was just the way he was. He was also annoying, but there was probably no cure for that either. You were younger then. I think you were mid-30’s.

But bullying is not a good look after 40. It’s not acting like a woman. It’s quite masculine or macho. It’s just being an asshole. I’ve been dealing with assholes my whole life, and I’m not wild about people who act that way. It reminds me of the assholes in my life.

Instead, bullying after age 40 is looked down on because

You’re too old for that…Why don’t you settle down?…Why don’t you relax and quit being such a dick? Grow up, man. That’s not cool, man!

Etc.

Really, when someone does this in middle age, they are are acting like a young man. Or a boy, a teenage boy! Boys are simply evil and teenage boys can be Hell on wheels too.

You were a bully as a boy somewhat like I was as a boy, and I was a bit of one myself, but I knocked it off around 20 when one of my victims threatened to beat me up when I bullied him one time.

When a man does bullies people after age 40, he’s acting like a kid! A punk kid, a teenage punk jerk who needs a punch in the face.

Or an assholey young man. Young men are supposed to be assholes. No one likes it but that’s just the way they are. Basically, young men just they haven’t had enough bad things happen to them yet in life! By the time you hit 40, you’ve had a million really bad things happen to you, a lot of your dreams are shattered on the floor in shards, and overall, most people just don’t feel like such hot shit anymore.

There’s a humbling and even a sadness which comes with middle age for most normal people.

If you’re still an arrogant dick after age 40, something’s terribly wrong.

This person who is still an arrogant ass after age 40 might be a narcissist. This is what happened to Trash.

Most people make compromises after age 40, where no matter where someone ended up in life, they accept it whether they are at the top, middle, or bottom. And they accept the place of others, too. Anyway, they doubt if much will change now. Some made it and some didn’t it, and it’s all ok. There’s a sort of “settling in.”

See, Trash never did that and he never will. That’s why he’s messed up and why he’ll never get better.

He’s still fighting a young man’s war. He never settled down and become a calmer middle aged man and accepted his station in life. He continued to feel like an angry, cheated failure and loser, and his self-esteem was so fragile that he couldn’t take that so he had to do all that frenzied behavior to ward off the feeling. But among other things, that wild attempt to escape his feelings of failure didn’t even work. So he had to keep doing it again with each new day.

Among other things, I suppose it’s exhausting being Trash.

Alt Left: I Guess It’s Illegal to Look at Women Now

I figured this was coming. California’s sexual harassment law already says it’s illegal (or actually a tort) to look at women in a sexual manner. As moral panics, of which MeToo is a classic example, only worsen with time until people wake up and blow the whistle on the nonsense, I figured this was just a matter of time. The commenter Polar Bear below notes that older men are now being arrested in his city for “Illegal Looking,” which apparently means looking at a woman in a sexual manner. Details would be nice but I’m not surprised at all.

I’m seeing more old ageist women among the Woke. “An OLD man hit on me, eww.”

It’s especially old White men who are targeted. Going against tradition is a package deal. These women support BLM, trannies r’ us, anti-Russian/pro-Ukraine, etc. while wearing a pussy hat, but are viciously ageist towards White men. The biggest crime in their eyes is an old White man looking at a woman over 18.

They’re mostly Woke, yes. But I had some of these woketard SJW’s who asked me to date them, in one case as a sugar daddy.

She was a full-blown feminist who had this insane modern idea that “co-workers should never date.” This is a toxic byproduct of the MeToo bullshit. Problem is that probably half the couples out there met at work. And now when people are multiple jobs and almost living at work, excuse me, but how the Hell are we supposed to meet people? How are we supposed to date? How the Hell do we get laid?

So she was a full-blown feminist idiot, but then on the other hand, she wanted to be a sugar baby which for all intents and purposes, is nothing but a Goddamned whore. She was trying to be a prostitute!

See the combination of deranged, shrieking puritanism (for men) and the most extreme pornographic sexual license (for women)? That’s Woke Culture in a nutshell.

Of course this is part of the whole fucktarded woke crap, which is an insane mix of out of control pornographic and polygamous sexuality including omnisexuality and every type of group sex you can imagine (except that straight men are not allowed any of this freedom and license), while on the other hand, there’s this other wave that says that straight men are evil for even having sex drives, never mind them trying to get laid because MeToo’s made that illegal by now.

It’s a mixture of ultimate sexual license with a ridiculous, extreme Victorian culture of sex hatred and Puritanism, granted that all of the sex hatred is generated towards straight men because according to feminism, if we try to get laid, it means we are evil.

Women have always hated the sexuality of straight men, but under patriarchy we force them to shut up. Most of them just do it and then incorporate sane patriarchal views of sex and repress all their lunatic female ideas of sexual utopia which is actually a dystopia for men.

Because feminism is simply the politicization, inculturation and legal codification of normative female thinking patterns, of course feminists have always had an unhinged hatred for the sexual drives of heterosexual men. Note that women can do whatever they want, including being total whores or pornstars. Gay men get to fuck thousands of men in a lifetime and lesbians have total sex license which the feminists cheer on ecstatically like kids at a parade.

But once this wildly Puritanical budding whore found out I had all these backwards views, she dumped me.

I was dating a 19 year old girl for a while, and she was great, but she dumped me for hating feminism and being a Men’s Rights Activist, which to her was akin to be an actual Nazi.

I’ve had others around that age (30) who wanted to date me but got rid of me for being “a homophobe.” I just told her I wasn’t into other guys touching me too much, and she said, “I don’t date homophobes!” She was bisexual and she wanted me to screw guys so we could both be bisexual. LOL dodged an arrow.

It is mostly the Woke because all woketards are feminists, and one thing feminists hate more than anything else in the universe is straight men. In fact, feminism is best described as a Hate Movement Against Straight Men.

Even all young men now are woketard feminists and they hate us older men with a passion as they have adopted the feminist attitude that heterosexual male sexuality is evil. So the younger men are as bad as the women. I’ve had a number of them call me pedophile simply for dating very young women. I’ve been called the same thing for pointing out, scientifically, that teenage girls have a strong, adult-level sex drive. I guess that’s a hanging offense.

“An OLD man hit on me, eww.”

This is a young woman thing. It’s one reason that young women are as bad as The Plague. They’re idiots. Any sensible traditional woman knows that all men from 13-90 love hot women. Even my Mom said:

If a beautiful woman walks into the room, all the males from 9-90 turn around and look at her. The old men look at her even if they can’t get it up anymore. But the gay man acts like she’s a ghost.

This didn’t upset her at all. If you pointed out to my Mom that all males from 9-90 like to look at pretty women in a sexual way, she would say:

Yeah? And fish swim and birds fly. What’s wrong with that? One’s as normal as the other.

We never stop being attracted to hot females. That’s what these fucktard young women can’t figure out.

On the other hand, I would be very careful about flirting or hitting on young women. I do it a little bit in an exploratory, nonsexual way, but they often start to shut it down by acting very uncomfortable, which I pick up on, at least after a bit. Basically, they start acting nervous or anxious. It took me a bit to figure out why.

Next time I see them, I figure I’m shut down and I try to never act that way again. I have to be extremely careful of what I say to young women because ever single thing I say, including:

Hey nice day today, isn’t it?

Or

Hello.

Is somehow a secret message where I am really saying:

I want to fuck you, Goddamn it!

A lot of these young women around here really, really hate me, especially at establishments I go to a lot. And I don’t even look at them much. Not only that, but when I interact with them at the counter, I never say much of anything at all.

One gets mad if I ever look at her a bit too long. In that case, she asks if there is anything wrong. Problem is she is about 20 and flat out, knockout, drop dead gorgeous, so there’s almost no way to not look at her.

This is how young women are the worst fucktards on Earth. They think middle aged and older men looking at them (granted in a sexual way, but so what) are evil and need to be killed.

This is straight from insane feminism. It is 10

They just can’t figure out that men of that age looking at a pretty female of any age are simply acting like 10

I don’t know what happens, but after age 30, most women seem to grow a brain somehow where there wasn’t one before. Don’t ask me how that works. From 30 to old age, women seem to come to terms with men and simply accept their biological nature as normal albeit perhaps annoying creatures. They just start ignoring any middle aged or older man who looks at them, but they don’t hold it against them.

Young women literally demand that we stop acting human!

About Narcissistic Abuse

The previous post is a fascinating story of commenter Shi’s experiences with the former commenter Trash. Trash was one of the most hated commenters who has ever appeared on this site. He hogged the comments section and wrote very lengthy comments every single day. This is actually sort of abusive as I have to go through all the comments every day and if you are flooding my comments section with novellas, I have to go through all of that, and I hardly have time for anything else. I guess I could ignore the comments, but I just don’t do that.

It took me a while to figure Trash out as at first, he was very charming and disarming, very likeable. Funny, intelligent, the whole nine yards. But after a while you somehow get a feeling that there is something terribly, terribly wrong with him.

Once again you can’t quite put a finger on it, but there is something about him that just makes the hairs on the back of your neck stand out. Your body is telling you, “This guy is off in a very bad way. I don’t know what’s wrong with him, but you need to stay away.”

It took me quite some time to figure out that he was a terrible case of Narcissistic Personality Disorder. A very, very bad case, and probably untreatable at that. But he had a way of getting under your skin. It was almost like he wore a mask like psychopaths do. The “mask of sanity.” After I figured it out, it hit me like a ton of bricks and everything came flooding in. I figured out his pathology and I even started figuring out the story behind his vulnerable narcissism. See that name “Trash.” That’s him at his ultimate core, but he can’t say that. It just comes out in these weird unconscious ways. Obviously, though he had done well in life, he hadn’t done quite well enough. He had left Michigan at 18 or 19 and he had nothing but disdain for people who stayed in the US and never left when young like he did. See what he did? Only his experience is the valuable one. Everyone who did the opposite of him is a loser and failure. The problem is that even though Trash spent most of his life overseas, I got the feeling that he still felt like a failure. He had been screenwriter on a movie or two. He had owned a bar in the Philippines. Now he was in China running a Chinese restaurant with his wife. He went into great detail about his sexual experiences, but as Alpha noted once, he never once talked about the experiences from the woman’s end? Did she enjoy it? Did she get off? Did he even get her off? It’s was all about him and his dick. Those women may as well have been greased holes in walls and that was probably all they were to him. I kind of got the impression that he tended to destroy all of his female relationships and male friendships, though he never went into much detail about this. He reluctantly admitted that in middle age, he was getting fat around the belly and was no longer the male beauty king of his youth.

Bottom line is Trash had to prove to himself that he did the right thing by leaving the US and going to live his life in Asia. But he suspected that he had made a huge mistake. So he had to put down everyone who stayed in the US as “losers” because he was afraid that they had made the right decision, not him, and their decision was the opposite of his. He had this sneaky feeling that if he stayed in the US, he would have been better off. Obviously he was dead jealous of almost anyone who had anything at all because they threatened to show him up and make him look bad. Very status conscious guy. He had to prove to himself that leaving the US at 18 and spending his life in Asia was a successful way to live your life. Hell, everyone should do it. Everyone who didn’t do it was a loser and a failure! His life had been a smashing success! Except on one level, he felt that it had actually been a total failure. He probably falls into the covert narcissist category even though he was quite extroverted. Trash was the ultimate misunderstood genius, ripped off and shunned by a world of idiots who never took notice of his brilliance. “The misunderstood genius who fails in life because he’s unrecognized” is the classic covert narcissist narrative. In order to convince himself that his life had not been a complete failure, he had to go on the Net every day and blast out what a smashing success his life had been in order to prove that he had actually made the right decision. But it didn’t work very well. He’d get up in the morning the next day and still have the nagging sense of failure. Then he would go online again all day in an effort to reclaim his self-worth. He goes to bed satisfied. But it’s like a drug and it doesn’t last. He’s insecure. So he has to keep doing it over and over.

Trash was also incredibly selfish as Shi notes. We went to a pay model for a while, and everyone had to cough up $10. A lot of people, including Shi (who perhaps may have some self-centered issues himself as I do), threatened to quit over it. Shi had been nickel and diming me for a while, but the effort was nice. Over time, he had surely given over $10. A lot of others just flat out quit. Many others, like Tulio, handed over the 10 bucks but only very reluctantly. A lot of these people have stayed away even thought the pay-to-comment feature has been lifted. They’re welcome back but they took off. Really any regular commenters who were irked at having to fork over 10 bucks when they’d been commenting forever will not be missed. Do they realize how much of my own time I spent dealing with their comments over time? Probably hours. Here in California wages are $14/hour. Looking at it from that point of view, they should have paid me for my time.

Trash went on and on about how rich he was or how he had been rich several times and then lost it all only to gain it all back again. His stories never made much sense. But now he owned a Chinese restaurant and maybe still the Filipino bar and he lived in dirt cheap China with a second income. You telling me that Chinese restaurant brings in such little money that this guy couldn’t fork over 10 bucks. And that with him going on and on about being fabulously rich. He had one excuse after another after another. I didn’t think too much of prodigious commenters who high incomes who wouldn’t fork over 10 bucks, and he was about the worst case.

If you remember Trash, you can see what a bad case of NPD looks like. You can see why it is considered a serious mental disorder. You can see that they are clearly not right in the head. And you can also see how mean, vicious, aggressive, and abusive they can be. In fact this is a core feature of the disorder, and I’d wager that nice narcissists don’t even exist. They sort of can’t exist.

I won’t go on here about narcissistic abuse, but there are articles all over the Net and videos all over Youtube on this topic, as it’s an extremely popular topic. There are many forums out there for victims of narcissistic abuse where they go to commiserate, counsel and support each other, learn about the disorder and themselves, and attempt to heal from the damage.

I’d say that Shi might want to stop by one of those forums and share his story with the others if he so wished.

So here you have it. A classic case of narcissistic abuse!

A Case of Narcissistic Abuse

This piece by commenter Shi relates a case of narcissistic abuse by a former commenter here who had Narcissistic Personality Disorder and Shi the commenter. What’s odd is I watched these guys post for years and I had no idea that Trash was beating up on Shi. Look, I don’t doubt that he was, as Shi wouldn’t make that up. He’s no pussy professional victim imagining abuse where there is none. But I think it goes to show just how sneaky these guys are. I couldn’t see it because I wasn’t Shi. Maybe the only way to see it was to be Shi. But you see how they get away with their abuse as they make it so subtle you can hardly see it.

RL: Maybe I should not desire to be hated so much. That puts me in Trash Territory where I do not want to be.

There’s nothing you could ever do that will put you in Trash territory. No Internet personality can sink as low as Trash. I’ll come to that in a second. I never understood your deal with the Delphi murders audience (nor do I wish), but they don’t represent the Internet in its entirety. No matter how hard you try, you’ll never be the most hated man on the Internet.

RL: That’s interesting. Why do you hate him?

Where do I begin? I blame Trash for messing with my impressionable mind at a young age, which has led to some disastrous consequences in my personal life and career. My life is messed up in a way I couldn’t have done it myself.

Please note I can’t directly connect the dots here because all the bad decisions I made were my own fault. I am aware of this and I take full responsibility for my actions. But without Trash, it wouldn’t have probably been as bad as now. I wish I never knew this guy in the first place. There are no U-turns in life.

Basically Trash is a professional TROLL. He’s highly manipulative and a dangerous emotional bully. Somewhat like Donald Trump, he has a way of getting you wrapped in his web of lies. You would never know what hit you, but it feels real.

Trash is a pro at getting under your skin and making you feel entirely worthless. And that’s just on the Internet. God knows how much more damage he can pull in the real world. This man is toxic, like a vial of sulfuric acid. Trash is the most selfish person I’ve ever met online. All his conversations revolve only around him. He thinks he’s the center of the universe, and wants you to be part of it. This man is just not capable of empathy.

It was around August 2014. I just came back from my first trip to Europe. I was very happy then. I had a steady job. Not that well-paying but I had good career prospects. Anyway I decided to share my experiences online, and that includes your website.

Trash introduced himself to me and started narrating tales of his own road trips in India, Thailand, and many other countries. He’s an American but he knows Asia very well. But that wasn’t what he wanted. He was only there to mock me, write off my travel experiences as trivial, and make me feel as if I’d never be able to accomplish anything of worth in my whole life. He did that slowly and in a recurring manner.

Let us remember I was only 32 then. It was difficult for my impressionable mind to dismiss his subliminal messaging. If you remember one of Trash’s commenting patterns is that he can be quite unrelenting and repetitive. He probably had said it was something to do with his autism, but no, it was well-planned. He really likes to mess with people’s minds. To do this, he will re-package the same negative message in different ways.

Unfortunately I fell into his pattern of harmful TROLLING. It made me question my goals and purpose in life. I spent at least a few months wrangling with Trash almost on a daily basis. I suddenly quit my job and threw away a desirable career. It was one of the best jobs in my life and I regret leaving that company.

I went off to Europe for another extended trip and burned all my savings in the process. Well, I traveled a lot. Saw so much and it did help me improve my life experiences. But it came at a huge personal cost. I was broke. And I was OK with that, as falling from grace is a part of life.

I found another job at another company. It wasn’t as good as the previous one, but I was still determined to rebuild my life. Now I’m 35.

But Trash decides to mess with me ONE more time. It was around 2017. He was following the same pattern. He made me feel worthless and like a nobody. I hadn’t learned enough the first time, and I just had to repeat the mistakes. While last time I went broke, this time I went into debt. And I am still repaying those bad loans.

I wasn’t commenting here for the last 2-3 years because I was in a really bad place – and it’s somewhat Trash’s fault. Fortunately you banned him from commenting here. He still might be lurking around here. I am recovering from all the damage that’s been done. But my beautiful career is over. I cannot be hired again as my name is bad news for the corporations where I worked before.

I let Trash do me over TWICE. “Fool me twice, shame on me” as the adage goes. His TROLLING can cause real world damage, and I have first-hand evidence. Internet trolling is no laughing matter; I am a victim.

The Person Who Argues with Everything You Say But at the Same Time, Insists That They are Never Wrong

I have found that most professor types I meet on Academia (average IQ 145) never accuse me of asking too many questions and always seem fascinated when I come up with some question that neither of us knows the answer to. Their reaction seems to be:

Cool! Now I have a new problem to figure out!

Also, these professor types are some of the only people I have ever known who don’t get pissed off when you tell them they are wrong. A lot of times they say:

Thank you for correcting me. I never knew that.

That’s what I say when someone corrects me with some new information:

Hey, thanks for that! So I was wrong (thinking: and that’s ok)! Thanks for the new information!

Funny thing is these people are usually assholes who have an attitude of:

I can tell you you’re wrong anytime, in fact, I will disagree with everything you say. But at the same time, I am never wrong.

These people never say thank or congratulate or compliment anyone for anything, are very selfish, are takers and not givers, and often have a strong sense of entitlement that they don’t have to play by the same rules everyone else does. They deserve a break on everything because they’re special. They’re basically huge assholes. Problem is that people like this are literally everywhere you look. I have several in my own extended family.

These are insufferable pricks who argue with everything you say. These people are truly toxic and I advise all of you to get the Hell away from anyone like that. Also they’re unreformable. And I guarantee that even though they tell you that you are wrong with every utterance, you can never tell them that they are wrong and if you do, they throw a psycho hissy shit fit.

Basically these are people who are never wrong. Please, whatever you do in life, folks, do not end up like that.

Please don’t become a piece of shit who argues with everything people say and at the same time feels that they are never wrong. You are acting like one of my brothers and my father, two of the worst people I have ever known.

People who are like this are some of the worst people on Earth, and in my fantasy world I would put them all against walls and shoot them. They’re Goddamned monsters!

There are obvious psychological reasons why they do this, but they are rather complex and they are the subject of another post.

Most people are either women, who are too insecure to stand being corrected because they’re generally weak and insecure people, or men that I call faggots, girls, sissies, wussies, women, queers, gaishas.

I call them that because to me an insecure man is a big Goddamned wuss! A man is supposed to be strong and being strong means being secure. Unfortunately, most men are quite insecure, but I do think this is a pussy and gay way to live as a man and I wish they would man up and become more secure and quit being such an insecure little wuss.

But like I said, some professors love to be corrected if they are truly wrong and you can set them right. I think this is because, like me, they don’t want to believe anything that’s not true (except for some ego stuff about myself and maybe others).

But as far as raw, impersonal facts like you read in books or see on the news, all I want to know is what’s true. I don’t care if my side is wrong. Maybe I need to change sides then. I don’t care if my side acts bad. Typically I figure the other side acts worse or maybe I need to change my mind. I’m also always ready to change my mind and switch sides about most anything.

Actually, I have met professors who actually loved it when you disagreed with them or told them they were wrong! They saw it as a challenge. Their attitude was:

Cool! Show me how my theory is wrong! I know my theory is right and this is a nice challenge for me. I’m also confident that you are wrong and I am right.

Game/PUA: The Problem of the Older Never-Married Man

The Problem of the Middle Aged and Older Never-Married Man

I usually relate something like this to new women because especially being a never-married man at my age is rather suspicious and makes me seem like a low value man or an Omega. I’m so lame that even by age 64 I haven’t found a single woman who would marry me! I must be an incel or even a lifelong virgin!

First of all, many women think such men are just gay and probably quite a few of them are, especially closet cases who want a beard wife although this was more common in days past.

Even if he’s heterosexual, being never-married doesn’t look good.

This is normally the type of man who has never married by late in the game, which boils down even to over 30-35 – in many cases he is so sexually and romantically inept that he literally cannot get a woman.

Other men are married to their jobs, and I suppose this might be ok if you’ve accomplished good things professionally.

Another type would be a hardcore woman-hater or misogynist. I’ve seen some of them unmarried far into middle age. This guy was also a 50 year old virgin, so you can see it tied into the other type too.

Another type might just be so weird or crazy that no woman has ever wanted him.

Perhaps he has a long-term disease or deformity.

Perhaps he’s been poor his whole life and has never made a nickel and hence never attracted a woman.

I remember my aunt dating at age 40 and complaining that single men at that age who were straight, sane, and solvent (her requirements) were quite rare.

Most if not all of these things are huge minuses in the minds of women. If you’re single past 30-35, I don’t know what to say. It depends on how you lived your life. Try out saying different things to different women and see how they react. You are under no obligation to tell the truth about your prior love life. You’re free to make up any lies you want about your romantic past. The problem is that if you come off as one of the low value men above, bragging about your romantic success will seem absurd and ridiculous.

There is one type of unmarried man who gets a pass. Perhaps you have one or more long-term relationships with a woman. Maybe even the fewer the better. Maybe you have a kid or two with one or more of these long-term partners. To women, these guys just seem like “divorced men with exes and kids who simply never bothered to tie the knot.” A lot of women might want to snap them up as “husband material.”

Of course the other type of long-term bachelor who gets a mostly but not always complete pass is the Player or Womanizer. The problem with lying about this is if you don’t have the looks or game to back it up and make it seem credible, everyone will see through it.

It’s a cliche that men lie about their love lives and all claim to be players even when they are not. It’s also always said that if you really have a high lay count, you don’t need to brag about so you must be lying.

But the thing is I’ve never met a man who pretended to be more of a player than he was or pretended to be one when he wasn’t. I’ve also never known a guy to lie about his lay count. In fact, lay counts are not much discussed among men due to the potential to make most men feel insecure if one guy has a higher count than the other.

The only men I’ve ever met who even told me their lay counts all had had sex with over 100 women and girls.

You can talk about such things if you are a lucky enough fellow, but you should use the “humble brag.” There is an Internet lie that humble bragging is horrible, but I’ve been doing it my whole life and it usually goes over quite well.

If you have nice accomplishments, simply recite them with a shrug of your shoulders that says they are not important to you. And discuss them in the same tone you would use to say, “I drank a glass of water.” The effect is that your accomplishments will come off as no more important than downing a glass of water.

You can also look at the ground or duck your head shyly and lower your voice. You can even act like you are embarrassed or even humiliated to admit such a thing. This has the effect of making your achievement seem like a failure! People, especially other men, react very well if you discuss achievements of all kinds this way, including date counts and lay counts. You come off the exact opposite of a braggart, very humble and modest. People like a successful but modest man because they are rather rare. They have the best of two opposite qualities!

Anyway, with new women, I generally tell them my date count (with the proviso that dating a woman is not necessarily the same as fucking her) in a humble or embarrassed or ashamed way. Then I say, “Well I never married, so I had a lot of time to build up a high count.” I also say, “I’ve had many long-term relationships over the years, so I lived like a married man much of the time.” Or, “I dated a lot of women. I just never married any of them is all.” All said with an embarrassed shrug of the shoulders in a quiet or even ashamed voice. It works great.

I also say that my Player days were in the past, which is sadly true. I add that now that I am older, I want a long-term relationship and don’t have the energy to run around anymore. That’s not really true because I’m intellectually incapable of monogamy and I will probably always at least leave the door open to infidelity.

I was using the “reformed Player” line from very early in adulthood. “I used to date a lot of women, but it got old and now I just want to be with one woman.”

I say this because in general, women want monogamy. I don’t care what anyone else. People ask my why I don’t identify as Poly, but that’s stupid. I put Poly on my profile on any dating site, and I guarantee no woman is going to talk to me. It’ll scare them all off.

Of course, I’ve been lying my whole life, always telling women that I am reformed and a good boy now and want to settle down with just one woman when all that time, I at least left open the possibility of cheating, which I am notorious for anyway. It’s amazing how easy it is to fool women with this line. I’ve been fooling them for over 40 years, and it still works great. I suppose it depends on your game and approach. It also helps if you have the good looks that make a Player lifestyle seem credible.

Alt Left: The Cyclical and Hegelian/Marxist Views of History

Shi: Wow, that’s some highbrow stuff right there. I’m going to have to go look that up.

Of course it is! History repeats itself. Study the Cyclic View of History as enumerated by Giambattista Vico and later and most famously by James Joyce. Read the first sentence of Finnegans Wake. That’s all about the Cyclical View of History.

Here is the first line of Finnegans Wake:

Riverrun, past Eve and Adam’s, from swerve of shore to bend of bay, brings us by a commodius vicus of recirculation back to Howth Castle and Environs.

That’s a reference to the cyclical view of history, which is seen as a flowing river. History is often seen as a flowing river. Face it, it’s more of a river than a lake, right?

“Commodius vicus” is Latin and I am not sure what it means, but that Latin word “vicus” is a nod to Giambattista Vico, the great Italian philosopher of the 1500’s who came up with the idea of the cyclical view of history. His most famous book is called The New Science. And no, I’ve never read him. Joyce is hard enough without getting into the real big boys, the philosophers.

Marx also discussed this by referring to Hegel in The Eighteenth Brumiere of Louis the Fourteenth that begins with the famous line,

History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce.

And I’m not even sure what that means!

Oddly enough, Hegel and consequently Marx and Marxists didn’t adopt a cyclical view of history (and perhaps the quote above is meant to mean that it’s a bad idea). Instead, they adopted the view of history as a progressive thing in which people advance in every way possible and old ideas, reaction, and barbarism are slowly discarded. In that sense, it is important to note that all Marxism and all Leftism or even liberalism is basically Hegelian and works according to the Dialectic View of History. Although I doubt most liberals would call themselves Hegelians because they suck too much to do that.

If you study history of the West or US in the last 200 years, you can see that we have gradually been moving forwards, not backwards. Of course this Supreme Court now is trying to make clocks run backwards and go back to the 19th Century. But no one ever said that the forward movement of progressive history won’t be fraught with reaction in response to this forward movement.

Generally speaking, most forward movements in society are met with either conservatism (“Don’t change or go forward! Leave it just the way it is!”) or Reaction (“Stopping things in place isn’t good enough because we’ve already gone too far! We need to go backwards, back the old days!”

This means something like

Hey, looks go back and live in the 1950’s!

of the White Nationalists all the way to the US Republican Party under Karl Rove which wants to go all the way back to the Gilded Age in the late 1800’s. In my opinion they literally want to turn the clock back 150 years.

In general I like the idea of history as a continuous forward movement and in general, I think Reaction is a bad thing. My view is:

Clocks run forwards, not backwards!

I also like to say that reactionaries are:

Literally fighting a war against Time itself

There are times when the old ways are better and reorganizing society actually goes way too far and even makes things worse. Too many liberals and Lefties are like, “Let’s change things! Why? Because the present always sucks! So why change? Just because! Change for change sake! The old ways are always wrong and we must continually move forwards!”

I think at some point you’ve gone as forwards as you can go and wen you start going beyond that, you just get into insanity, as with modern Identity Politics, SJWism, and PC culture. My response to that is they’ve gone too far:

Your grandmother was right (about some things)!

And

I signed up for revolution, not insanity!

with the latter referring to my embrace of the great cultural revolutions of the 1960’s which then didn’t know when to stop and kept moving forwards into insanity, mental illness, and non-adaptive behavior that in a way is as anti-civilizational as the Right’s dream state.

I also figure that all this new stuff we want to try has probably already been tried at some point by our ancestors or by someone’s ancestors anyway.

The reason traditions exist is probably because they tried everything else, including the kooky stuff the Left wants to do, figured out it didn’t work, and quit doing it. It also probably left them with some elder wisdom along the lines of, “That doesn’t work and here’s why.” They might not recall that they had tried it in the past, but how else would they know it doesn’t work?

And why do traditions exist? Like I said, I figure they tried everything else it either flopped or didn’t work real well, and eventually the tried the civlizational style of this tradition and found that not only did it work but it worked better than all the other nonsense.

In that sense, I am a bit of a social conservative. Liberals and Lefties often want change for change sake.

Me: Hey, why are we changing this thing anyway? It seems to work pretty good as it is, isn’t it?

Liberals and Lefties: Just because! Because we can! For no reason! Because all progressive change is good! Because the present mode is always backwards and barbaric! Because we must always go forwards!

My reaction to that is a cool type of conservatism that says:

Hey, look. A lot of these changes you are proposing don’t seem like good ideas and seem like they won’t work. You seem to proposing change for the sake of change. Be that as it may, tell you what, Lefties. You guys go over there out of sight and do all your wild societal experiments, but just keep me out of it, ok? Oh, and by the way, let me know how it goes!

Wink wink.

As with so many things, it’s often a bad idea to have too much of a good thing, in this case progress, an idea which might surprise a lot of people. The Chinese Taoist view of “All things in moderation” sounds boring to young people and rebellious types, but as I got older, I’ve found that this is the wisest way to live.

I basically hate conservatism but this is a type of “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” conservatism that I think is quite sensible and even wise.

Game/PUA: The Conundrum and Cognitive Dissonance of Female Reproductive Strategies

Manuel Rodriguez: Whenever I see a woman voicing the notion “I can change him” with regard to her male partner, my explanation is that the reason they do this is because female brain recognizes one or more traits in a desirable male that would make him unsuitable as a long term partner. The solution her brain would suggest would be to begin a domestication process.

The problem is that this works poorly or not at all if the man has either Dark Triad personality traits or has had very positive early experiences with females. Both situations will drive him to desire sex with multiple women. The problem here is that all the men they find the most desirable fit in either of these two categories.

There is also the irony that if they domesticate a wild man too much, she will find him undesirable, sort of like a Beta of sorts!

I don’t know how to explain it. Is like you admire a wild animal and would like to have it as a pet, so you try to tame him. But, if you tame it too much and it ends up being too obedient and hence boring, you throw it out on the street!

I guess it all comes down to the complex reproductive strategies and needs of females.

They want a dominant man, but such men are not very fond about the idea of sticking with just with one woman. Women will only pick a Beta if they are forced too, but on the other hand they both need and desire their loyal traits as husbands and fathers, especially if the woman is over 30.

This is so perfect. In fact, I started thinking like this as young as age 19. At the time I thought the perfect man for a hot woman was a guy was a “reformed Player” who had already screwed a number of other females. This “Player” personality and history is what attracted her to him in the first place!

But this leads to a conundrum. Women usually want to keep a hot man for themselves. They also like to get jealous and fight off other women who try to poach their man because women are always trying to steal each others men and in fact delight in doing this.

So she wants a former player who now agrees to be only with her. And why is this? Because she is so hot, so much of a high value woman, that he will give up all of his womanizing ways to be with her and only her because monogamy with her is so much better than trying to screw half the women in town.

Problem is this doesn’t work. Hardcore Players often never reform or get better, although there are many exceptions I’m sure. So the woman has trapped herself in a contradiction. She wants a “reformed Player,” but many Players either never reform or are unreformable. She wants something that either doesn’t exist or is not common.

In fact, I saw young men playing this very game.

I’ve never married, so I’ve racked up a lot of dates. I’ve probably dated ~200 girls and women, but it’s not so great if you realize that boils down to only 4-5 a year. I won’t discuss my lay count, but you are free to let your imaginations run wild.

I’ve seen a lot of women grab an Alpha or a Chad and just figure “He’s going to cheat anyway because he’s so high value, so I have to leave that option open for him.”

My current girlfriend, out of the blue, offered to bring a woman over to join in so they could put on a show and I could fuck them both. I was shocked.

She caught me flirting with other women one time and asked me if I wanted her to find a girlfriend for me. I was like, “What? I though you were my girlfriend!”

This chick is 65 years old too! And still masturbates to orgasm every single day too. It’s amazing how many women in their 60’s are still masturbating up a storm. I also met a woman who did the same thing on a daily basis, but she used a dildo to keep her vagina from closing up. This is sadly what happens after menopause if you don’t go on estrogen or get a local estrogen supply via a device in your cervix. This chick was 65 too. It wasn’t far into the conversation when she asked me how big my cock was. A 65 year old woman asking a question like that right off! Old ladies are hornier than you think!

Some women think, “He’s going to cheat anyway, so I might as well control it.”

They bring women around for him and watch or join in. Perhaps they get into the swinging scene.

Or perhaps they just figure he’s going to cheat but say they will keep him anyway.

I had a girlfriend recently who thought I was a hopeless case incapable of monogamy. I asked her what she would do if I cheated, and she said, “Probably fuck one of your friends to get back at you.”

Later she ended up bringing her girlfriends around and asking them if they wanted to make out with me. They all said yes and I got to make out with them for 10 minutes while she cheered us on. We weren’t supposed to go further than that. She did it because she thought I was Chad. “You’re hot! I want to see you make out with my friends!”

Later she started jumping up and down saying, “I want to see you fuck a chick! I want to see you fuck a chick!” I asked why and she said, “Because you’re hot.” We did find a young woman one night and brought her over. The young woman was ok with it being a performance. I had sex with her on the bed while my girlfriend sat in the corner, rubbed her clit like a maniac and shouted out instructions to both of us, which only got dirtier and dirtier as the sex went on.

So you cans see there are advantages to being an Alpha, or in my case, apparently a Chad (I’m not sure I’m all that Alpha). Life is a beauty contest and some of us lucked out from the start. What can I say?

So you see some women make compromises with Player or Dark Triad types. They get to have an Alpha or Chad partner and keep him around by satisfying his straying ways. They figure, “Guys that hot are always going to cheat anyway. If I want to Alpha or Chad, I’m going to have to put up with infidelity. So be it. I want my Alpha/Chad.”

There really is so much more to write about this but I will stop for now.

Alt Left: Women and Soaps and the Addictiveness and Increased Extremism of Commercial Mass Media

From Manuel Rodriguez in the comments section:

Women and Soaps

Robert, your hypothesis that what women seek more than anything else in life are “peak emotional experiences.” For some time, I was trying to figure out why women seem to like soap operas and dramas soo much.

My mother never was one for telenovelas.

But a few months ago, one of the state channels aired a 18-episode South Korean show, a comedy called The Coffee Prince, on TV. She and my aunt started watching every episode on a daily basis. The channel soon aired a second South Korean telenovela series made by a different company. At first, my mother and aunt didn’t think they would like this new series as much as the South Korean one.

After watching the first two episodes, they started to gain interest in it. They missed one of the episodes, so we they searched around on the Net where they could watch it there instead. After that episode finished, they found that they couldn’t stop watching, and they really wanted to see the next episode. They started watching three or four episodes a day. After the series ended, they were binge-watching South Korean telenovelas on internet. They were hooked!

How Mass Media Acts Like a Drug in Being Addicting and Continuously Becoming More Extreme over Time

This is a good comment here. The commenter is pointing out how mass media acts like an addictive drug in that it seems to be deliberately designed to hook you to it in the same way an addictive drug does. Mass media also resembles addicting drugs in the sense that you need to increase the dose over time to get the same effect. Mass media does this by becoming more extreme over time as viewers build up “tolerance” to the narratives

Mass consumption media seems to be scientifically designed to be as addictive as possible. It is also designed for specific target audiences.

Take porn for example. It’s based around the male’s generally high libido and desire for variety in women and the focus is mostly on the sex itself. There is an emphasis on the physical traits of the actresses, and there is a general lack of context. Sure, women can watch and enjoy it too, but is mostly geared for men, and they are the biggest consumers.

Sure, men can also find dramas interesting, but it seems to act like cocaine with women if they are not careful.

Dramas and soap operas seems to hold certain general characteristics. We have the constant negative scenes and “downer” moments, but there are other moments of comedy and happiness. There are different “flavors.” Comedy shows focus more on the “happy” moments rather than the negative ones. Having two protagonists trying to establish a romance as the central aspect is not always necessary.

The series can start like a standard show, focusing on interesting plots, but sooner or later, there seems to be a couple that become the central theme of the show. The series ends in the same episode where the problems/villains that are preventing the couple from committing to each other disappear.

Depending on the subtlety of the show, you might get the couple re-encountering each other after some time away, giving the viewer only the implication that they are back together or you might get a full blown marriage. The female fantasy brain seems to be more focused on the chase and does not so much take into account whether the marriages and relationships on these shows will actually work out with time. This also reflects the choices women make in real life to some extent.

Dramas seems to share certain things with porn. Just as porn seems to get more hardcore and rough over time, dramas seems to get more extreme over time and have more absurd tragic aspects such as multiple characters all dying in different accidents over the course of a show or series.

Feminists who are opposed in how the hardcorization of porn can teach young men increasingly more dangerous notions about sex with women, which is something I agree with.

There is a similar phenomenon in the Rambo movies with each sequel having double the body count of the previous one.

For instance, here is the plot of a hypothetical new Rambo movie.

Rambo has won a Nobel prize for his exploits in the previous movies. Rambo is initially working with an NGO in Africa to help children, vowing never to go to war again. He watches the news in a TV announcing the start of the Russian operation in Ukraine. He is contacted by a character called The Colonel, who offers to send him on a mission to Ukraine, either to save a friend or for blackmail purposes. Upon arriving, the volunteer training center gets destroyed with a missile in front of him, wiping out all the volunteers and mercenaries.

This leaves Rambo to take the whole Russian army on his own. He ends up getting partnered with a female who is a Black lesbian Azov militant with dyed air. Let’s not forget that wokism is the latest fashion with the neocons and Western imperialism. In the final scene, Rambo ends up in a showdown between himself alone against the entire Russian navy, and he ends up destroying the whole fleet with a single pistol. The end credits state that the movie is in honor of the brave Neo-Nazi Ukrainians in their just struggle against the Russians.

Alt Left: About Venezuelan Immigrants in Latin America

This is a comment from Manuel Rodriguez in the comments section:

There is a detail that neither the leftwing nor the rightwing media tells you about the Venezuelan immigrants now swarming Latin America having left due to the economic situation in Venezuela. Their typical depiction in the media depicts is of immigrants who left their country only to end up abused and struggling in less than ideal conditions in their new lands and living in poverty.

The rightwing media does this because they want to portray the Venezuelan government as a dictatorship that purposely starves his people for sheer kicks, trying to convince the reader/watcher that is necessary and justified to overthrow the government by any means.

The leftwing media does this to show how inhumane the rightwing governments of the immigrants host countries are while also implying that they would be better off staying in Venezuela. The immigrants choice to leave their country is portrayed as due to the mass media putting a campaign to encourage people to leave the country. The Left portrayal is not incorrect, but it doesn’t give the whole picture.

One type of Venezuelan immigrant are the pendejos. They sell their homes and cars to get money to travel without a clearly defined plan to some random rightwing country .

The other type of immigrants referred to as the “smart” ones belong to two categories:

  1. They are workers, which includes unskilled workers who, while making more than in their homeland, would end up working for somewhat cheaper than a worker native to the host country. Comparatively speaking, they would make even more in the host country than they would in a 1st World country due to differential costs and prices. Many of them already had had extensive contacts or even online work via an multinational corporation online before they immigrated. In these cases, the corporation may offer them not only a guaranteed good job but might even throw in housing and a vehicle.
  2. They travel to a specific country where they already have relatives. Their relatives either already run their own business or work for a multinational corporation (see Number 1).

The relatives I have abroad belong to either one of these categories.

We might also want to discuss here the phenomenon of unskilled labor from a Marxist-left wing perspective.

We are seeing a trend where “First World” countries are not just filling their countries with immigrant cheap manual labor to drive the wages of the native workforce to the bottom, while at the same time acquiring a convenient immigrant scapegoat to blame if and when things go south. Recently, this same phenomenon has migrated up the pay scale to the professional or intellectual workforce, like programmers and such, who are also being replaced by cheap Third World “brainy” labor.

Alt Left: The Biggest Cold War Lie of All – The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact

Perhaps the most despicable aspect of this retarded Cold War we lived through is that the disgusting US government, and possibly the rest of the West too, lied to us continually, every single day, all day long, during the Cold War. The Cold War was all about the lies. The lies, the lies, and nothing but the lies. Granted, there were some issues with Communism or even socialism for that matter, but the detractions of these systems were completely exaggerated.

You did not ever, ever, ever hear one positive thing about Communism, socialism, or even labor, workers or the Left for that matter during this period. They were all considered “Commies.” And liberal Democrats were some of the worst offenders, to their eternal shame.

And you never heard one single bad thing about the murderous Nazis, fascists, and other mass murdering maniacs who were fighting Communism. They were all as wholesome as Dick and Jane. Indeed in this respect, the 1950’s US was probably one of the stupidest decades in the past century. I was only three at the time, the early 60’s were not much better. It was truly stupid time to be alive.

Furthermore, US and NATO faggots used the Cold War to attack socialism and every left, worker, and union movement all over the world. The attitude of the Amerifaggots was that anything to the left of center was “Communism.” If not, Communism itself that creeping Communism.

One of the worst ones of all was the Stalin-Hitler Pact or the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. Almost all nonbiased historians now view this episode as simply an opportunistic pact between two nations who absolutely hated each other. Stalin thought correctly that that Hitler was going to invade the USSR as far back as the early 1930’s.

This was the reason for the rapid industrialization and collectivization of the 1930’s. Bottom line, agriculture had to be collectivized to feed the workers. The workers had to be fed because the army and nation had to be built up to defeat Germany in the war that Stalin knew was coming in a decade. Hitler had never made secret his intention to defeat and destroy the USSR.

In the decade between 1932-42, agriculture was completely collectivized which enabled the complete industrialization of the USSR, one of the most rapid and complete industrializations of a large country that the world had ever seen, only surpassed later by Mao in the 1950’s.

In addition, to building up a massive army of over 20 million men, Stalin moved all of Russian industry east of the Urals. Almost all industry was west of the Urals and the USSR had to dismantle all of its industry and move it west of the Urals. What a monumental feat! Unfortunately, it was during this period that the Great Terror took place in which the USSR pretty much went inside and executed 800,000 people or 8

Some of them were guilty but most were just nationalists. Stalin did not trust any nationalist intellectuals and he thought they were all traitors. There was indeed a Trotskyite plot inside the USSR during the 1930’s. There were mysterious explosions and sabotages all over the USSR during this decade. Most of the people executed were hardcore Communists, so I’m curious why the anti-Communist West is so upset about it.

Didn’t he do you all a favor by getting rid of all those Commies? Stalin’s responsibility for the executions is still in doubt, though for sure he is responsible for many of them. On the other hand, Stalin himself was appalled in 1939 when he realized the scope of what had taken place and he panicked and blew the whistle on the Great Terror. His idea was that this had gotten completely out of hand. Whether he was responsible for it getting out of hand in the first place is another matter.

One good thing that came out of this was that when war broke out in 1942 with the Nazi invasion, all of the officer corps was 10

In 1939, Hitler invaded Poland. Keep in mind that up to and even after the invasion of the USSR, most of the West had been quietly cheering on Hitler and trying to get him to attack the USSR. The idea was to turn his attention from conquering non-Russian Europe to the conquest of the USSR. The UK was particularly important in this regard and Churchill went to great lengths to try to get Hitler to refocus his war efforts.

Stalin knew that the entire rest of Europe were nothing but capitalist traitors who wanted him and his country dead. He also knew that Hitler was a deadly enemy. The USSR was Hitler’s main enemy, and he mostly hated Jews for being “Communists.” According to him, all Jews were Judeo-Bolsheviks and “Communism itself was Jewish.” So the Holocaust was really anti-Communism of the Cold War type of steroids. Cold Warriors should have been proud of Hitler. Look at all those Jewish Communists he killed!

As Hitler swept across Europe, the Red Army swept into Eastern Poland. This was actually a good thing in many ways as the people in the German occupied West suffered far more than those in the Soviet occupied East.

The whole idea of this creepy agreement was to buy time. Everyone with half a brain knew that Stalin and Hitler were deadly enemies, but the agreement, which no one expected to last, bought Stalin another 2.5 years in which he built up his army to such a massive size that it was able to defeat Nazism. And it was the Soviets who defeated Nazism, not the West. 8

A word about anti-Communists. A famous Russian said recently that the only he hated worse than Communists were anti-Communists. He’s got a point. It’s perfectly reasonable to be a democratic, preferably progressive or liberal, opponent of Communism on all sorts of grounds, humanitarian among them.

But when it comes down the nitty gritty, almost all fanatical anti-Communist extremists were and are Nazis and fascists. All wars against Communist countries were led by fascists, Nazis, or religious fundamentalists, feudal Buddhists in Tibet or Al Qaeda types in Afghanistan.

Anti-Communist armies have never been good guys anywhere on Earth. They’ve always been fascist genocidal monsters, and that includes the US in the Korean and Vietnam Wars, although we were not fascist, but we were surely genocidal. Furthermore, the US funded mass murder campaigns and genocides all over the world all through the Cold War. Most people who were massacred were civilians.

I don’t know why it is, but there doesn’t seem to be any decent way to be an anti-Communist. They all turn into fascists, Nazis, and mass murderers on a dime. I’ve always said, “Scratch a liberal, find a fascist,” and this seems more true now than ever.

Back to the pact. Sure, the Soviets killed some Poles, but the Germans killed 30-35 times as many Poles! Stalin killed 300,000 Poles, which is lamentable, but Germany killed 10 million Poles. For thirty years now, Polish Russophobia has verged on homicidal if not genocidal vibes and the hatred of Russians is so extreme that you can taste it on your tongue in the air. But there is not one word said about Nazis. The real enemy are the Russians. In this sense, Polish Russophobia is completely deranged.

Yet Polish Russophobia is so insane that nary a word is mentioned about Nazi Germany nowadays and in fact, the new government is fascist, albeit not Nazi. But they have a profound alliance with an openly Nazi government in Ukraine who celebrates Nazi collaborators who murdered 100,000 Poles as its national heroes. The Polish government simply winks at this.

The fascist NATO snipers from Lithuania and Georgia who shot both cops and protestors at the Maidan CIA coup were trained in NATO camps in Poland. So Poland very recently was training openly fascist and Nazi killers who murdered scores of innocent people to trigger a CIA coup.

Poland’s new government seems quite fascist. The Polish government at the time of the Nazi invasion was indeed a fascist government led by a man named Pikulski of a particularly nasty sort. Stalin did the Poles a favor.

The new government under this new fascist sleazeball makes constant references to the fascist Pikulski regime. Large, creepy, blood and soil ultranationalist rallies complete with torchlights, chants, and the whole nine yards have rocked Poland since this creep took over. Poland nowadays looks a lot like Nazi Ukraine. On the other hand, the Poles are not actual Nazis and probably never will be. The Nazis just killed too many Poles for that.

In fact as soon as the war was over, NATO was formed and former Nazis and fascists all over Europe filled its ranks. A large number of NATO officers were former Nazis and other Nazi collaborators. The CIA immediately went to work funding Nazis and Nazi collaborators to wage guerrilla war inside the USSR. And the US hired most of the best German Nazi scientists to work on its own space program.

As you can see, all sensible historians now view the Stalin-Hitler pact as a pact between the deadliest of enemies that Stalin hatched in desperation to try to buy 2-3 years before the inevitable Nazi invasion. My mother told me that she had seen a cartoon at age seven of Hitler and Stalin shaking hands. Each had a knife in his other hand hidden behind her back. Her father had told her that Hitler and Stalin hated each other’s guts and wanted each other dead but the pact was just done for some obscure geopolitical reasons.

Furthermore, now that the Soviet archives have been opened up, we can see all of the correspondence during the period of the pact and afterwards. This leads to the obvious conclusion that Stalin hated Hitler’s guts, knew he was going to attack, and was just trying to buy a little time.

But we were lied to all through the Cold War that Stain and Hitler were the best of buddies and Stalin was an ally of of the author of the Holocaust, Adolf Hitler. Now that the Cold War has been revived by NATO dogs, we are back to this retard argument all over again. I see it every day about how Stalin was Hitler’s best friend. The implication is that Stalin was a Nazi collaborator and hence was partly responsible for the Holocaust.

In addition, all sorts of other despicable Cold War lies have resurfaced due to the revival of the fascist NATO beast, a plague on all of mankind. It would take me days to go through the lies. The lies go nonstop all day every day. It takes up all of your time just to refute you, which is probably by NATOfags do it in the first place.

They probably know they are all lies but they just want to make you waste all of your time running around the web refuting. Jewish ultranationalists and super-Jews and Libertarians on the Web engage in similar sleazeball tactics. They all deserve each other and can go wallow in the same mud heap together. And the Cold War NATOfags can join those pigs in the mud.

In future post, we will go into a bunch of lies from Cold War faggots that we thought were dead and buried long ago that have been gleefully dredged up and returned to life like zombies from the graveyard hungry for flesh by these NATOfags.

Alt Left: What Is Rape Anyway?

What Is Rape Anyway?

I had an ex who told me that she was “raped” every day by her boyfriend for five years. I’m sorry, but that’s a bunch of crap! She never once said no or fought back against him. She said, “Well, if I did that, he would just go ahead and do it anyway, so there was no point.” Sorry but that ain’t rape. Granted this guy sounds like a huge tool and from what I know of him, he was a real Cluster B monster. I think he was either a sociopath or he had sociopath traits. He also had some prominent narcissistic traits. He was incredibly manipulative.

Also, it seemed like she rather liked these “rapes,” although she would probably hit you if you said that. We got in a huge fight because she said I was “having sexual fantasies about her rapes.” Well, they didn’t seem like rapes to me. It just seemed like really dirty porn-type sex which she seemed to be quite enthusiastic about. At least that’s how I imagined it in my mind.

If I thought of them as actual rapes, it wouldn’t be hot because I don’t find rape fantasies hot.

Not that there’s anything wrong with men fantasizing about raping women. You can fantasize about whatever you want to. I just don’t want you doing it. On the other hand, I might argue that there are many more wholesome sexual fantasies to have than raping women, and you might want to switch to those instead.

Before you go on about how evil it is for men to fantasize about rape, do you have any idea how many women have rape fantasies? You don’t even want to know. I’ve met them, and there are many of them. Not just women but girls. I’ve had 15 year old girls tell me that they had extremely strong rape fantasies, so it’s not just a woman thing. It’s more a female thing.

That’s what I was fantasizing about – a consensual but pretty rough and dirty type of porny sex that she seemed to be having. I wasn’t fantasizing about any rape because in my opinion there wasn’t any rape. How on Earth does your own boyfriend “rape” you every single day for five years? Why don’t you move out? Why don’t you call the cops?

Granted, the guy was a completely scumbag and she referred to him as “The Psycho” but she seemed to still be oddly fond of him, which made no sense at to me. And she liked the dirtiest, rapiest, roughest sex you could possibly imagine, sex that could only be described as “consensual rape.” She had developed a taste for very rapey sex.

This makes sense to me because I’ve seen over and over that women tend to eroticize their abuse. Women get molested? They develop a taste for older men and often become huge sluts.* They get raped and from then on they develop a taste or even demand for rapey sex and this often becomes the only kind of sex that gets them off. And they often because gigantic sluts* too.

But look. It’s not rape if you are not trying to fight him off or resisting and saying no or stop. We men are not mindreaders. If you’re agreeing to sex but not consenting in your mind, sorry, but that’s just not rape.

Rape is the following:

  • Force or the threat of force. Thank you Mom for drilling that into my head!
  • Fraud or impersonation. Hardly ever happens though.
  • Sex via drugging a woman with a rape drug.
  • Sex with a woman who is so intoxicated that she is passing in and out of consciousness. This usually only applies to alcohol. Women can be high on most anything else but it’s not rape. Feminists keep screaming that if a woman has one single drink, it’s illegal to have sex with her, but feminists are loons, and no DA takes a case like that. Stranger rape cases are hard enough without venturing into the minefield of acquaintance rape.

“Coercion” is pretty much bullshit. Everybody “coerces” or tries to coerce everybody into doing everything all the time. So what.

You can certainly argue or debate women into bed. I’ve done it many times. In fact, I’ve earned international awards for such things. That’s how good I am at this. The point is that once you get her into bed, she ought to be ready, happy, and willing. That’s all that matters. It doesn’t matter so much how you got her there as long as you didn’t violate 1-4 above.

On the other hand, it’s a drag to have to argue or debate women into bed. Sex works so much better when it’s completely free of that BS.

As long as the “coercion” does not involve force or the threat of force, it’s 10

He’ll fire you from your job if you don’t do it? Not illegal, but you can sue him in court and win if you can prove it.

Do it or I’ll arrest or deport you? Wow, that’s getting pretty bad.

Do it or I won’t love you anymore? LOL not illegal at all.

Sleazy? Sure, all that stuff is sleazy, but seduction at its core is pretty sleazy stuff. It’s basically a con, a trick, a scam. Women just don’t give it up that easily. If they did, I could go get some sex right now, and I sure can’t do that. It’s not like you can go to the Girlfriend Store and buy a date for the night for $10. As long as women make it hard for men to have sex with them (which is part of their programming) men will resort to sleazy ways of seduction.

*Not that there’s anything wrong with being a slut of course, as I’ve had some of the best times of my life with sluts, but let’s face it, some women are simply sluts. Furthermore, I’ve had girlfriends who literally requested or even demanded to be called sluts in bed. These same ones would not take slut as an insult.

We had huge fights and of course I would call her a slut and a whore during the fights because she was being an evil bitch and that’s the least she deserved. But she would always respond that being called a slut or a whore was not an insult, and in fact, it was a compliment. There are more women out there than you think, trust me. I’ve met quite a few of them.

Alt Left: The Ghislaine Maxwell Sentence

She got 20 years.

On the other hand, it looks like they really screwed over some women pretty bad. Sarah Ransome was absolutely trafficked for sex. I even have a problem with her though. She was living in an all-expense paid apartment, paid for by Epstein.

Her initial recruitment, which was pretty much seduction in a very sleazy way, looks illegal. She was taken to Pedo Island on a plane and then she was literally raped by Epstein when she was there. Maxwell was totally in on the rape. They wouldn’t let her go when she tried to flee the island. She even tried to swim away in shark-infested waters. They put her on a starvation diet to force her to lose weight.

She then claimed she was “raped” over and over by Epstein so many times she could not count them. Doesn’t she have to fight him or say no or something? If she’s just agreeing but but disagreeing in her mind, I’d say it’s not rape. Saying “no” in your head doesn’t count.

Here’s the part I don’t get. She went back to Pedo Island several more times of her own free will. Why on Earth did she do that? That hardly sounds criminal. If it was so awful, why keep going back? Did they threaten her if she didn’t go? And when she got to the island, supposedly she got “raped” over and over. OK, so did she protest or fight every time? Something about this doesn’t smell right.

However, she was threatened and one time when she tried to get away, they sent a car and grabbed her off the street and threw her in the car. I believe she was being sold to men by Epstein and Maxwell.

I would say that this woman was definitely being trafficked into prostitution then. I agree with that charge.

Ransome was a grown woman at 22 when this all started, so there was no “sexual abuse.” Sexual abuse just means child molestation. You can only sexually abuse little kids. You can’t sexually abuse teenagers or grown adults. You can commit sexual crimes against them, but it’s not abuse. There are other names for it.

Furthermore, all of this treatment totally messed her up psychologically, and I feel terrible for her.

The other case is a woman named Elizabeth Stein. Her case is even more curious. She looks even older than Ransome, so she must have been an adult when she was recruited. Maxwell and Epstein both seduced her into sex the night they met her, so I guess she had sex with both of them? She calls this “rape” but the details are hazy. She says, “They’re hard to say no to.”

Hey baby, that doesn’t count! “Hard to say no to” doesn’t mean “rape.” Sure, it’s not very cool behavior, but it’s hardly criminal.

Anyway, she kept getting “raped” all the time by these two, and then was pimped out to other men. It’s hard to say if she was being trafficked. She kept trying to move away to escape them, but they kept tracking her down and convincing her to get back with them.

She claims they “brainwashed her” into agreeing to get gangbanged on the stated theory that no woman in her right mind would agree to such a thing. I’ve got some news for you, hun. There are women out there who freely agree to such things. I’ve actually met a couple of them. Apparently these gangbangs were “rapes” too. I guess every time she got whored out, it was a “rape.”

They did threaten her that if she talked to anyone, they would kill her. That’s called Criminal Threat and it’s a crime if she can prove it, which might be hard.

I’m wondering exactly what crimes were committed against this poor gal, not that she didn’t get screwed over by these maniacs. She also ended up a mess psychologically. She ended up with Borderline Personality Disorder, though she might have already had it. She also ended up with a weird physical ailment that is psychogenic. All in all, they screwed her up pretty bad. But that’s not illegal last time I checked.

On the other end, I have a lot of sympathy for this woman and I’m sorry these creeps messed her up.

I wouldn’t want a woman to leave me and end up a psychological and physical wreck due to the way I treated her if I treated her terribly. That would be on my conscience forever. On the other hand, if I didn’t act bad and she still ended up a physical or psychological wreck due to being with me, there would not be much I could do, and I would not feel bad.

This has already happened to me, but she was a complete mess when I met her, so I wash my hands of this. For you men out there, women have a habit of doing this – taking completely non-abusive relationships and somehow turning them into “horribly abusive” ones. Don’t get fooled by these gaslighting types. They’re all nuts anyway and most of them have Borderline Personality Disorder or Borderline traits.

Alt Left: Lie: Russia Deliberately Targeted a Shopping Mall Full of 1,000 Shoppers with a $90 Missile

In Kremenchug, a Ukrainian mall was attacked by a Russian missile and caught fire. Lie.

Why did Russia waste a $90 million missile just to blow up a stupid shopping mall full of 1,000 customers? Apparently Russia did it just to be evil! Keep in mind that none of those “customers” was a woman or a child, and all of them were healthy, beefy military aged men or soldiers in uniform. I’m kind of thinking that wasn’t a shopping mall full of 1,000 shoppers. Furthermore, an important Ukrainian journalist obliquely stated that the shopping mall was full of soldiers.

We get to put our soldiers anywhere we want to, in shopping malls, schools, hospitals, anywhere, and it doesn’t mean you get to attack them!

Alt Left: The Biggest NATO Lie of Them All – Ukraine is a Democracy and the War Is a Fight for the Democratic World

Ukraine is a democracy. The war is a fight for democracy and the democratic world. Lie. Ukraine is not a democracy at all. In fact, Russia is far more democratic than Ukraine. Ukraine is a “death squad democracy” of the kind that the US, Israel, and now NATO run in Latin America where anyone in the left opposition can be arrested, beaten, tortured, jailed, or murdered at any time. Somehow the US calls this “democracy.”

As soon as the coup took place in 2014, Ukraine started attacking members of the former government. The newly elected president, mostly neutral but who had tilted towards Russia because they offered a better deal, barely escaped with his life as the putschists were trying to kill him.

The coup itself involved NATO snipers from Georgia and Lithuania. They were trained at a NATO base in Poland. They were smuggled into Ukraine as musicians and they took up residence in a high rise. They had guns in their music cases. When the coup was going on, snipers from this building fired on the police and protestors alike, killing both sides. The killings were all blamed on the police, although they killed no one.

The NATO provocation was then used to overthrow the government. The “musicians” were then hustled out of the country on planes. I have seen videos of them leaving. Some were women. They all had their instrument cases. Later videos of these snipers appeared in Georgia. The snipers related the whole plot and said they were put up to it by NATO. They said they were sorry for what they had done because they did not realize what they were doing. All of these videos were ignored by the West, and the line about cops shooting protestors is still the narrative.

A phone call between the German and Estonian governments was intercepted in which the German man said that the snipers had been from NATO. It was played on the news but news in NATO countries refused to play it. The Ukrainian government did an investigation. A female surgeon said that the bullets had all come from a certain type of gun that the Ukrainian police did not have. The investigation revealed that all of the bullets came from guns that the Ukrainian police did not have. Then the investigation ended.

This is typical NATO tactic. Everywhere you find NATO, you find mysterious snipers shooting at both sides. They showed up in Venezuela, Egypt, Thailand, Ukraine, Syria, and Iraq. In the case of Egypt, Thailand, and Ukraine, the snipers were NATO. In Syria, the snipers were Saudis but the operation was run by NATO. In Venezuela, the snipers were rightwing fascists, however, the coup was done in coordination with the US, so the snipers were partly being run by the US.

In Iraq, the snipers were US Marines firing from the embassy and rooftops. Trump threatened the president with riots if he did not do what Trump ordered. He refused and soon Iraq was convulsed in riots started by the CIA. The riots started killing lots of people. Many cops were targeted and killed.

The riots had anti-Iranian overtones because they were partly run by the CIA. Then Trump said if you don’t do what I say, I will tell the snipers to start shooting at people in the crowds. The president refused. Soon US Marine snipers started shooting cops and protestors alike. The president still would not bend. Trump then said he would have the president killed, however, this never took place.

You can see here that America is a gangster state and the president of the US is simply the head gangster. It’s not so much a state and something akin to a Mafia or Organized Crime Gang. It’s a lawless state that obeys no rules and commits all manner of crimes due to a sense of impunity. It spits on international law because it is said that it does not apply to the US, as the US is above it.

As soon as the coup took place, killings began. Fascist Nazi gangs started attacking gays, feminists, transsexuals, labor union leaders and members, members of leftwing parties and organizations, communists, socialists, and anti-fascists. Dozens of members of a labor union were chained to a heater by Nazis in Kiev. They then set the building on fire.

Half the members of Parliament were members of the party of Russian speakers, the Party of Regions. Parliamentarians from this party began to be murdered by Nazis. Most of the rest of the members from this party resigned. Then party leaders began to be murdered. Soon the party was in a shambles. Nazis attacked the home of the leader of the party and tried to burn it down but they burned down his neighbor’s house instead. He fled to Russia.

Dozens of communists were chased into a labor union building in Odessa. Once inside, Nazis, including teenage girl Nazis, starting throwing Molotov cocktails inside. The building was then invaded. A secretary was raped and strangled with piano wire. Many communists were murdered with guns. The whole place was then set on fire. About 40 people were burned alive to the cheers of the Nazis outside.

All of Ukraine erupted in a roar over these murders and it was cheered from one end of the country to another. They made jokes about fried Colorado beetles, Colorado beetle being a name for Russians. Most of the Ukrainians in the country cheered wildly while these people were burned alive. A fake story was put out by NATO media that the Communists had set themselves on fire, and this is now the reigning narrative.

You can see by how most Ukrainians cheered when Russians were burned alive how widespread Nazism had become in Ukraine. The president at this time was another lousy crooked Jew named Yatsenuk. He favored saving, “Slava Ukraini!” a Nazi slogan of Ukrainian nationalists. He gave the Heil Hitler salute while he did this. As you can see, even Ukrainian Jews have become Nazis of a sort.

Before the invasion, there were no pro-Russian politicians left in the Ukraine. They had all fled the country. Those who had not fled or went into hiding had been murdered. As soon as Zelensky came into power, the first thing he did was ban all of the opposition media. His Cabinet was full of Nazis. There were also many Nazis in Parliament. Ukrainian media is full of overt Nazis.

As soon as the invasion started, a crackdown began on the newly reformed Party of Regions. Members were kidnapped and tortured to death by Nazis in Kharkiv. Their mangled faces were then put on social media.

There were roundups of socialists, leftwingers, and anti-fascists all over the country. Many were not even pro-Russia. All antifascists in Ukraine have now fled for Russia, supposedly a “fascist” country! They were welcomed there.

Many of the people above were badly beaten or tortured. Many were disappeared. We still do not know where many of them are. Many may have been killed.

From 2014-2022, the SBU was very active in Kharkiv. They rounded up many members of the opposition, jailing, beating, and torturing them. 300 people were tortured to death over the years in a torture center run by the SBU.

After the war went on for a while, Zelensky, who had already banned all opposition media, now banned all opposition parties. Mere statements in favor of Russia can get you arrested or worst. There’s no free speech in Ukraine at all. The leader of the opposition party, now outlawed, was arrested and beaten.

Described as pro-Russian, he was in fact anything but because even in the opposition, all of the pro-Russian people had left. Those that remained were not pro-Russian at all. Instead they may have wanted a peace settlement to the conflict in the East. Zelensky now runs a Nazi “death squad democracy” in Ukraine that has now morphed into a complete one party dictatorship with all opposition parties and media banned.

Alt Left: Ukraine War Lies June 27, 2022 Edition

Russia is blocking grain ships from leaving Odessa. In this way they are trying to starve a lot of the world to get what they want. Lie. The truth is that Ukraine has mined the harbor and hence no ships are going in or out. Russia has repeatedly stated that if Ukraine clears the mines, Russia will create a corridor from which to let the grain ships go through. NATO liars are saying that they need to form a navy blockade to get the ships out of the harbor. That’s fake. There’s no need for a naval blockade as Russia is not blocking any ships. More fake BS.

The sanctions against Russia do not cover food. Lie. Maybe so, but they cover a lot of ways to buy the food and get the food to other countries. Many countries in Latin America are facing economic catastrophe because they are no longer allowed to export their crops to Russia due to sanctions.

Russia is trying to starve the world as blackmail. Lie. Many countries in Africa are trying to import Russian food, especially wheat, but sanctions have made it difficult if not impossible. The US is pressuring all African countries to not buy Russian wheat, with consequences if they do.

The world is voting against Russia in the UN. Lie. There have been some votes in the UN against Russia. Many of the countries who voted against Russia said that the US had basically forced them to vote that way by threats. America is a gangster state.

Russia has defaulted on its debt. Lie. More fakery. Apparently the sanctions opposed by the NATO faggots have prevented Russia from paying their debts. Russia has been trying to pay their debts, but the American snakes are refusing to accept Russia’s money. So if you are trying to pay your debts but your creditor won’t accept your cash, you can be forced into a “technical” default. That seems crooked and wrong but everything satanic NATO does is crooked and wrong.

Russian artillery hit a line for water in Lisichansk. Unknown. We are still looking into this one. The lie is that Russia is deliberately targeting civilians anywhere in the Donbass. In the Donbass, 85-9

On Snake Island, Ukrainian defenders said, “Russian ships, fuck you!” when told to surrender. All 13 of them were then killed. Lie. This fake attack has been denounced forever. There were 90 defenders on Snake Island, and all surrendered without firing a shot. There was no attack, or response to an attack, or dead soldiers. It was all a big fake. Apparently NATO dogs never got the message, and NATO networks continue to insist that the fake attack occurred. NATO citizens have to be the dumbest people on the planet. A Bushman is smarter than your average Canadian tard.

Russia attacked a train station at Kramatorsk, killing 40 people. flag. Lie. This was a very bad false flag conducted by the Ukrainians. First they told everyone to get on trains to leave the city, then they shot a missile at the crowd, killing up to 40 people! Ukraine hates the people of that city, as probably 85-9

Analysis of the trajectory of the missile based on its direction, flight path, and direction of bomblets shows that the missile came from Ukrainian occupied territory. The Russian Army even pointed to the exact force who fired the missile. Everyone in the area said the missile came from the southwest. Everything to the southwest is Ukrainian territory. Of course NATO media continues to lie about this fake to their tard listeners.

Russia fired artillery at Bucha, killing scores of civilians with flechettes embedded in shells. Lie. Problem: Everyone was killed right in Bucha. Russia was occupying Bucha. Russia didn’t shoot at their own city. Any artillery deaths in Bucha were killed by Ukraine. Also only Ukraine uses shells with flechettes.

Bodies in Bucha showed signs of torture. This means Russia tortured people to death. Lie. I would like to see an unbiased witness report on that. Most people were Terror Defense people killed resisting Russia or they were civilians killed by Ukrainian artillery.

In addition, many people were murdered by the SBU. Based on footage and examination of the bodies, these have been proven to be people who cooperated with the Russians, who Ukraine refers to as collaborators. I have not seen evidence that even one civilian was murdered by Russian troops in Bucha. It’s all fake. Were some of these collaborators killed by Ukraine tortured? We have no idea.

Just to show you evil that wicked little Jew Zelensky is, after the Bucha massacre when many “collaborators with Russia” were murdered by the SBU and Azov Battalion, this diabolical little snake went on TV and said, referring to Bucha, “We told you not to collaborate with the Russians. This is what happens when you collaborate. This same dog was also repeating the lies that all of those killed, who all showed signs of cooperating with the Russians, were murdered by Russia!

Why would Russia kill only the very people who helped them? However, this little monster knows exactly what happened – that the SBU and Azov went in there and murdered a lot of people for “collaborating.” So he’s lying through his teeth. First he is saying Russia did it, and then he saying we did it, but they were all collaborators and this is what happens if you collaborate.

Zelensky also repeatedly gives off Nazi signals. True. On Victory Day, the celebration of Russia’s victory over German in WW2, Zelensky, who is Jewish, tweeted a photo of a Ukrainian soldier wearing a Wolfsangel patch used by the Nazi Army. This little snake knew exactly what he was doing. On the day when Russia celebrates their victory over the Nazis, this creepy little Jew tweets a photo of a Ukrainian soldier wearing a Nazi patch! Just to say, “Screw you.”

Apparently Germans never stopped being Nazis or perhaps they are just getting back in the habit again. True. On June 22, which is the anniversary of the Nazis’ launch of the invasion of the USSR called Operation Barbarossa, Germany stated that it was delivering some important weapons to Ukraine. Ukraine also highlighted the date and crowed about the new weapons systems. But the Germans and Ukrainians did this to taunt Russia and celebrate Operation Barbarossa, which both countries still apparently support.

Russia has serious problems with manpower, morale, supplies, leadership, and equipment. Lie. I’ve been studying all of these forever and I’ve never seen any evidence of any of this.

Russia has lost 15-35,000 men in this war. Lie. This is a straight up lie by the NATO dogs. In fact, Russia has lost 3,250 men, or 30-35/day. The separatist armies between them lost 5,250 men and ~15,000 wounded. All together, Russia and its allies have lost 8-9,000 men and 25,000 wounded. This amounts to less than

Russian troops loot washing machines. Lie. The photo of soldiers stealing a washing machine shows a group of Ukrainian soldiers stealing the machine. There’s no evidence of Russian soldiers looting household equipment. However, I am aware of one case where Russians stole some food from a store. However, the store had already been almost completely looted by the townspeople. Most of the looting is being done by Ukrainian civilians. There has also been quite a bit of looting by the Ukrainian Army. Why this is so is not known. Very little is being done by the Russians. The stories of mass Russian looting are just NATO lies.

A journalist was executed by Russian troops. Lie. Sadly, Reporters without Borders concluded this “based on an investigation.” Even Ukrainian reports indicated that he was killed by shrapnel from shelling, apparently Russian shelling. He was in a forest when they were hit by shelling.

Ukraine prosecutes its troops for war crimes. Lie. Many crimes have been discussed during this war and during the eight year war against Russian speakers in Donbass. Only one soldier was arrested and tried for any of these crimes and that was a few years ago. None of the people involved in the documented atrocities committed against captive Russian troops by Ukrainian soldiers have been prosecuted.

Russia bombed an apartment complex in Kiev just to kill a bunch of civilians. Lie. Well, if they did that, they sure wasted a $90 million missile for no reason. Truth is there was a factory that made military vehicles right next to this high rise. Ukrainian forces shot a Buk and S-300 surface to air missiles at Russian cruise missiles.

The Buks missed the cruise missiles and hit their own S-300 missiles instead! One of these hits occurred over an apartment building and ended up damaging the building. Ukraine is completely responsible for the attack. Furthermore, there were no residents in the building. The building had been evacuated months ago and there were no civilians inside. Apparently it was empty.

Putin has a very serious illness and will be dead within two years. Lie. This is just not so. No evidence has been provided for this, and there is much evidence against it.

Putin has stolen every election he won in Russia. Lie. Nope. Apparently in every election, Putin has received by far the largest number of votes. Not to say that Russian elections are completely clean. But look at Putin’s approval numbers. They closely mirror his margins elections.

There is no opposition in Russia, and all of the opposition is under attack. Lie. This is not so. First of all, Putin only won 7

Putin imprisons or murders all of the opposition in his country. Lie. Before the war, even the pro-West opposition was on state TV a few times a week on talk shows. They put them on all the time to let them say their ideas while the moderators took them on. So Russians are exposed to the opposition all the time. They just hate them, that’s all. Very few if any of the opposition have been murdered on Putin’s orders. I can think of maybe one or two opposition murders that might have been ordered by Putin.

Putin murders any journalist who writes against him. Lie. I used to read a website by some former CIA dog who was hysterically anti-Russian. He had quotes from Russian opposition intellectuals every single day. The quotes were from opposition TV, radio, newspapers, and journals. There didn’t seem to be a shortage of any of these. Two opposition radio and TV stations were shut down at the start of the war, to the cheers of most Russians.

They just moved to Europe and now post on the Internet from there. It’s true that there have been a lot of journalists murdered under Putin, but many more were murdered under Yeltsin. Murders went down when Putin came in. Most of the murders with the exception of possibly when were caused by common criminals, were related to organized crime, or seemed to have been authored by local authorities. I saw only one that may have had Putin’s hand in it. There have also been a few beatings of journalists that could have been traced back to Putin.

In Russia, you are not allowed to criticize the government or Putin. Lie. If you do, you will be arrested, beaten, imprisoned, or even killed. This is just not so. An interviewer went around Moscow interviewing people about how they felt about the war. A recent survey showed 1

Many of the young people openly told the interviewer that they were against the war. Nothing happened to any of them. 8,000 professors signed a petition against the war. Nothing happened to any of these people. The Duma recently outlawed the treasonous pro-West opposition consisting of a couple of TV and radio stations. I read an article about this on a Russian website and half of the commenters, all patriots, said they opposed making these stations illegal. Nothing happened to any of these commenters.

Putin kills those who go against him, especially journalists. Lie. There have been some attacks on prominent critics of Putin and his administration. Most of these people are associated with the pro-Western opposition. I am opposed to all of these attacks. It has not been shown who is behind these attacks in most cases. Some of them appear to have been done by radical Russian patriots. I doubt if the government put them up to it. There has been only one case of a journalist who might have been killed by Putin. The vast majority of even the traitor opposition blathers on all it wants to every single day and nothing happens to them.

The pro-West Opposition is not allowed to rally in Russia. Lie. This is just false. They let them rally all the time. It’s just that nobody goes to their stupid rallies because everyone hates them so much. However, these idiots get a permit for a rally and then they deliberately hold it a few miles away from where it was permitted simply as a provocation. They also go out into traffic and deliberately hold up traffic as a provocation to force cops to arrest them. Then they fight the cops like crazy when they come to arrest them. The lying Western media then reports this as “Russia attacked an opposition rally.”

Putin is a dictator. Lie. How is he a dictator if he only got 7

Russians are not exposed to the Russian opposition. Lie. As I noted, they won 3

Russians are banned from Twitter. Lie. Well, that’s interesting because I read Russians on Twitter every single day! Incidentally, Russians on Twitter read Western media all the time as they are always commenting on it. It’s just that they don’t believe it, that’s all.

Putin is the richest man in the world. Lie. Truth is no one knows how much he is worth. He gets a modest salary and has some modest possessions. Allegations about his worth claim that almost all of it is hidden. However, they have not presented any evidence that this is so.

The separatists are controlled by Russia. Lie. They never have been from the very start, in fact, Russia opposed them for the longest time. Even now they don’t support them much and the separatist armies are poorly armed and equipped. Russia simply doesn’t give them much stuff. Russia’s attitude is that they are separate countries and they can do what they want.

Russia is stealing grain and iron from Ukraine. Lie. Russia conquered those areas fair and square and the vast majority of people there support Russia and wish to separate from Ukraine. This is self-determination. People ought to be allowed to split off from one country and go join another. Anyway, Ukraine has been arresting, beating, torturing, and murdering Russian speakers in those areas since they day they got in in 2014. They have a right to secede based on that right there.

Russia is paying the farmers for the grain it buys from them. It is also paying all of the other farmers for whatever it buys from them. A lot of farmers are taking their stuff to Russia to sell it over there. Nobody’s ripping off anyone and it’s not Ukraine’s land anymore. They lost moral authority to rule when they started massacring Russians. Bye bye!

Russia sentenced two foreign fighters to death. Lie. These fighters were captured by the separatists. The Donestk separatists have the death penalty and these men were convicted in a court of law. The Lugansk separatists do not have the death penalty. Russia does not have a death penalty.

Russia does not like that the Donetsk people have sentenced these men to death, but there is nothing they do because Donetsk is a separate country and Russia can’t tell them what to do. After the war is over, Donetsk plans to get rid of the death penalty. If they join Russia as they plan to, they will have to get rid of the death penalty. I do not agree with this penalty for those men and I do not agree with Russia that any of these men are mercenaries. For one thing, they are all contract soldiers with the Ukrainian army.

Russian troops raped large numbers of Russian women, girls, and even boys. The husbands were forced to watch and then murdered afterwards. Lie. Apparently all of these stories are made up. The Russian Army is about as likely to rape civilians as the US Army is. Ukraine itself has admitted that there is no evidence for any of these rapes, especially the rapes of children. A Ukrainian official, a woman, has been fired by Ukraine, apparently for making up all of these rape stories which even Ukraine admits are lies. She just bought an $8 million mansion in Switzerland, so I guess lying pays.

Most Russian soldiers are draftees. Lie. Actually, all of the Russian soldiers are contract soldiers who signed up on their own as volunteers. A few conscripts were sent at the start of the war, but when this was publicized, they were immediately pulled out.

Many of most Russian soldiers are reserves as Russia has had severe losses in volunteers. Lie. In fact, Russia has 1.4 million reserves in their army. They are only using 1/3 of their standing army. They have not used any reserves yet.

There is an ongoing cholera epidemic in Mariupol. Lie. This is not so. Not a single case has been reported.

Russia forces Mariupol residents to dig graves in order to get food and water. Lie. Many people work cleaning stuff up, digging graves, or whatnot. They are all paid regular wages. As paid work is hard to come by, many people take these jobs.

Russia looted paintings and artifacts from a museum in Mariupol. Lie. The head of the hospital moved out as much of the painting and artifacts to Russia for safekeeping that she could. However, it had already been used as a base by Ukrainians, so much material was damaged.

If you say Russia is waging a war in Ukraine, you can go to jail or prison. Lie. I read Russian websites every day, and they use the noun war to refer to this conflict all the time. No one has gone to jail yet.

People are being sentenced to long jail terms for reporting on the war or participating in antiwar demonstrations. Lie. A few people have been arrested for “spreading lies about the Russian army” by repeating some of the lies above. A few people have been prosecuted for demonstrating but quite a few have been arrested. Sentences have been light, such as 20 days community service. A reporter who ran onto state TV with a sign saying “Stop the War” received a $300 fine. Obviously this people are only getting very light sentences.

Most Russians agree with arresting people who participate in antiwar demonstrations. Russians aren’t like us. They don’t like our version of democracy. They are perfectly happy to live in a fairly authoritarian state. The leader of this authoritarian state, Putin, has an 8

There are mass graves in Mariupol. Lie. A reporter went to one of these mass graves and it was just a regular graveyard. Another photo of bodies strewn for burial was of dead Ukrainian soldiers. A number of regular graveyards have been created for the casualties, which are in the thousands.

25,000 civilians were killed in Mariupol. Lie. Actually, the number is 5,000. Residents blame Ukraine for most if not all of the killings, many of which were deliberate assassinations of civilians just walking down the street or standing around.

Russia destroyed Mariupol. Lie. Residents blame Ukraine for 8

A medic at Mariupol is a heroine. Lie. Truth is that she is a full blown Nazi, all the way, tattoos and everything. These are their heroines. Nazis!

Russia is attacking its own people in the occupied areas of Donetsk. Lie. Those are their own people. Why would they shoot at their own people. However, Ukraine has engaged in terror bombing of these towns and cities for eight years now. Lately it has picked up and is worse than ever.

They don’t even aim. They just shoot at the cities. There are no military targets in these cities. The NATO MSM has refused to report it except to say that Russians are shooting at themselves and that Ukrainians are shooting at military targets. One time they did shoot at a base. These terror bombardments are meant simply to kill and wound as many civilians as possible. The reasoning is simple.

Ukraine hates those Russian speakers in Donetsk and considers them all traitors and terrorists. So they have no qualms about firing on them and trying to kill and wound as many as possible. Even in the pro-Ukraine areas, when Russia took over a city, Ukraine considered that everyone who stayed and did not flee was a traitor and a collaborator. Hence they bombarded these cities mercilessly and killed and wounded hundreds of civilians.

A mayor, her husband, and her two children were murdered by Russians in a town northwest of Kiev. Lie. Their bodies were found in a shallow grave. Indeed, it is true that their bodies were found in a grave. However, the Russians had left that town four days before. The bodies in the grave had been there no more than one day.

Someone arrested the mayor and her family on March 23, probably the SBU. Twelve days later, her family turned up in this shallow grave. They were probably killed by Ukraine as collaborators because the mayor and her family helped arrange the distribution of humanitarian aid in the town. Why on Earth would Russia murder the mayor’s family who cooperated to help deliver humanitarian aid? It makes no sense at all.

Alt Left: The Kremenchuk Shopping Mall Attack

Of course I was shocked when I read about Russian missiles hitting a shopping mall where 1,000 people were shopping. There were two dead and 20 wounded at last count. Why in God’s name would Russia attack a shopping mall? They simply do not attack civilian structures at all, ever. It’s not what they do. They exclusively attack military targets and their missiles are very accurate. It makes no sense to waste a missile at $90 million on a damned shopping mall! Why?

Well, I did some digging. Turns out there were no 1,000 people in the mall. There were probably zero people in the mall. Why? Because that mall has been shut down for a very long time, that’s why! Notice the parking lot. Zero cars in the parking lot. Zero! Zero cars in a shopping mall full 1,000 shoppers! I guess they all took an Uber to the mall? Ever seen a shopping mall with 1,000 people in it and no cars in the parking lot? No such thing, huh?

The parking lot of the shopping mall is full of men, half of them soldiers. The men don’t look like shoppers. They look like officials. So where are all the female shoppers? Nowhere to be seen.

OK, so why would Russia waste $90 million to blow up a shopping center that has been closed forever? No reason, right?

As you can see, the shopping center was permanently closed in March. There’s no way it could have been full of 1,000 shoppers!

If the mall was closed, how could 1,000 people be inside? How did anyone die? Where were the people who died? In the mall? They could not have been.

It has now come out that three ammunition depots next to the mall were hit in addition to a factory that fixed military vehicles only 90 yards away. The explosion at the depot set off a secondary explosion at the mall, setting it on fire. There’s no way a missile hit that mall. The mall still has intact windows. None would have been left. And videos from inside the mall show shelves lined with wine bottles. All of those would have been smashed. The entire mall would have been flattened, not set on fire. That said, I think they should have attacked it at night as people were indeed walking around the area in daytime.

The reports of 20 and many more wounded are interesting. The mall was obviously empty of civilians. It had been closed to shoppers since March. The parking lot was empty. There are no female shoppers in the photos and in fact the only photos immediately afterwards show many soldiers and young men of military age. No one in the photo looked like a “shopper.” However,  a Ukrainian poster with regime connections obliquely stated that the mall had soldiers in it. If indeed there were casualties at the mall, they were all military and military-aged men.

Alt Left: Anatomy of a Rightwing Lie: The Failure of Land Reform in Mexico

A “Centrist Democrat” just told me that land reform failed in Mexico after the Revolution. I was shocked because no land reform in history or at least modern history has ever failed. So I had to go look it up. Well, like everything right-wingers say, it was basically a lie. Surprise surprise! I know, you’re shocked, huh?

Turns out that land reform failed in the first 15 years after the Revolution because it was never even implemented! In short, there simply was no land reform. Only

After Cardenas came in, a great deal of land was distributed and the ejido system was set up. It’s worked great ever since. There were some efforts later on by right-wingers to unravel the ejido system, but they have always been reversed. Yet when I Googled the question, I came up with a list of sites talking about the lie of “the failed land reform in Mexico.” And there were a slew of recent articles from the US press about how the present ejido system was a complete failure and had to be dismantled.

Capitalists will always oppose land reforms everywhere and at all times because the only thing the capitalists care about is concentrating as much land in their hands as possible. I did some research on that too and it was all just wishful thinking. Turns out the ejido system is working great. There’s plenty of food in Mexico.

How do you know a capitalist is lying? His lips are moving!

Why would a land reform fail in the first place? Because a system of haciendas where

This is the argument of White Nationalists to the land reforms in Zimbabwe: “Niggers are too dumb to grow food!” I have been to their websites and argued with them over this, and everyone there told me flat out that “niggers are too dumb to grow food!” Well, that’s pretty stupid. How did these Blacks survive in Africa for the last 12,000 years since they had agriculture if they’re too stupid to grow food? Obviously they know how to grow food otherwise they wouldn’t have been doing it for millennia. And by the way agriculture appeared first in Africa before anywhere else in the world.

This was echoed by the press all across the imperialist world, especially in the US and UK. So the message of the US and UK imperialist press (which is all of it) was: “Niggers are too dumb to grow food!” So we see that the West can turn viciously racist on a dime if the imperatives of its capitalists compel it to. All of this antiracist woke stuff is just nonsense and lies. Capitalists could give a toss about race.

The reforms had failed forever because the UK was protecting 2,000 British farmers who owned 6

Incidentally, going back to the first paragraph, have you noticed how often “Centrists” and “moderates” parrot the most disgusting right-wing lies? What’s so moderate about that? Most Centrists are just right-wingers, perhaps a bit more compassionate but right-wingers nonetheless. And they’re all completely brainwashed by the Western media too. They literally believe every word the government says about domestic and foreign policy when a Democrat is in. When a Republican is in, they support an imperialist foreign policy again, but they oppose the domestic agenda. They’re pretty much just liberal right-wingers.

What is a Centrist anyway? It’s an invertebrate. Here in the US, it’s literally someone who believes the Republicans are right half the time and the Democrats are right the other half of the time. Given how far apart the parties are on domestic policy, that’s a completely incoherent politics. And what’s so moderate about someone who says Republicans are right half the time. Hell, Republicans are right

Game/PUA: A Bit on the Sigma Male Type or the “Aloof Alpha”

The difference between Alphas and Sigmas to to me is that Alphas are acutely aware of status and hierarchy and a lot of them are dicks. After all the basic male agenda is

  1. Kill, eliminate, defeat, or sideline all the other men.
  2. Fuck all the women*.

*A sexually mature female is basically regarded as a woman in this primitive construct.

That’s the male drive on Earth, and that’s what it is for many higher mammals too. Alphas are dicks! If they see you as a male threat, they will often insult you right to your face to establish dominance over you and eliminate you as a threat. They might do it to men who are not a threat, too. They’re dicks to other men.

In a bar, an Alpha might be looking around at the other men. If he talks to another man, he quickly sizes him up as far as where he is on the hierarchy scale – if he is below, on the level with or above the Alpha. He might be friendly to the lower guy because he’s not a threat. Anyway, his response to those other men is going to be based on wherever they are on that hierarchy scale.

Now the Sigma, he simply doesn’t care. I used to say that when I am in a bar or a club, there are this many people in the club:

  1. All of the attractive women. The unattractive ones are not really in the room.
  2. Me! None of the other men even exist! There could be 20-30 guys in that room, but they’re not even there to me at all. They may as well be invisible. Now, they can talk to me, no problem. But I don’t really size them up as above, on the level, or below me. They’re still sort of not even in the room!

If someone asked me whether I was threatened by those other hot guys in the club, I would look around the room and say, “Competition? What competition? I don’t see any competition.” Then I would laugh. It’s not that I have measured myself and bested all of them, and now I look down on them. It’s more that they are not even there are at all to me!

Even if some guy seems like he is besting me, I will write it off and still say he’s not competition. So I don’t bother with social heirarchies and all of that.

I think I’m hot shit and I don’t know or care if it’s true or not. I think this way because it feels good to feel this way. The Sigma is an egotistical loner. In a way he’s above everyone else, but in another way, he’s not even in the same room or maybe on the same planet with them.

I’ve found that when you get yourself out of the competing with other guys realm, it is so freeing. Competition? What competition? I don’t even know if that’s true. It’s probably not even true. But it’s such a pleasant lie that I’m going to go ahead and think it anyway.

The Sigma has literally dropped out of the game altogether because it doesn’t interest him.

Repost: The Sexual Sadist

Older post still getting comments.

In the Delphi Murders case, one of the early suspects who has since been completely cleared was rumored to like to drink and beat women when he had sex with them. Reportedly he beat one woman so badly that she had to go to the hospital. In the Karenna McClerkin disappearance in the same area of Indiana, one of the suspects was a Black firefighter who reportedly likes to beat his women when he had sex with them.

Although this behavior sounds horrific, it’s more common than one thinks. And even more bizarrely, there a quite a few women who actually like to get treated like this. Yep, they actually like guys to beat them up when they have sex with them. I’d like to avoid women like this as much as I can in life, although I once had a girlfriend like this who wanted me to inflict pain on her, like squeezing her nipples very hard. It didn’t do anything for me, and I didn’t understand how this was supposed to be exciting. It just seemed sick to me.

Of course all of us men have a sadist buried inside of us from boyhood days. Not a sexual sadist because boys have no sex drive but an ordinary sadist? Of course. It’s the natural state of the Boy in Nature. Nevertheless, part of the process of honing a steel boy from the brittle iron of primitive mammalian boyhood via the fire of the cruel boot camp of youth where rough and dirty boys are minted into shiny new men is to progressively stomp out this primitive mammalian sadist in the boy. It gets drummed into our heads as we move through boyhood more and more that this sort of thing is not acceptable in a man.

Young men still have a lot of sadism in them. This is part of the reason why they’re such assholes, and I say this as a former ill-behaved young man myself. As a man moves beyond 30, even this casual sort of social sadism, often written out as a male bonding practice via ribbing, teasing, etc., becomes increasingly “uncool.” At my age, late middle age, you’re just not supposed to act like this. Ever. With any man. No matter what. It seen as “uncool” and immature behavior.

Besides, it marks you as a huge dick. Feminists think we are monsters, and a lot of red-pilled men seem to enthusiastically agree with them! This isn’t really true. But on the Manosphere range where the boors and the reprobates play, the guys are not pleasant all day. I find it ugly. I don’t like to fight with guys. I don’t even like to compete with them. I’m a Sigma Male. I don’t even have to compete. I look out and other men and think, “Competition? You call that competition LOL?” and never think of it anymore.

Anyway, the feminists need to know that it’s perfectly acceptable to be a real nice guy even in Man World, the world of masculine heterosexual men. You don’t have to be a dick. Honest.

Back to sexual sadism. Sadly, there are probably lots of guys who like to beat and hurt women during sex, but just because some guy is screwed up like that doesn’t make him a murderer. And most guys like that probably never kill. They can definitely hurt women pretty badly though, that’s for sure.

The problem is it’s a bit hard to beat someone up “just a little bit.” Once you start beating people up, it tends to get out of hand pretty quickly.

Also this type, the sexual sadist, tends to get more excited as he hurts people, and hence he might feel his behavior escalating during the act. It’s not unusual for these people, almost always men, to show up in therapist’s offices as their sexual sadism escalates concerned that the last time they did it they felt themselves escalating and had to stop themselves. They show up afraid they may kill someone next.

This disorder, like many mental disorders (at least to a point), tends to be progressive and worsen with time, at least without treatment.

I’m not sure why that is, but if I’ve learned one thing in life it’s that bad things if left alone to fester tend to worsen, not get better, over time. We like to think that time wounds all heels, but it’s just not so. The untreated bad get worse, not better. Whether this is due to life sucking in general, Pynchonian entropy, the Spenglerian life process itself, or simply God Himself being a Sadean son-of-a-bitch is not known. After all, our bodies themselves are entropic. Over time, they tend to worsen until they fall apart and dissolve themselves.

I recall a woman on the Net had some sick fetish where she wanted men to pretend to murder her during sex. So she had this sort of sex with ~10 different guys, and she said in a lot of the cases, the men got more and more excited as it escalated, and a number of the men said they had to stop themselves or they would have killed her.

These men may not have ever been full-blown sexual sadists. Instead, it is more than the case that sadistic sexual violence in both sexual sadists and normals tends to cause excitement in the male as the violence unfolds. As the excitement goes up, so does the violence in tandem. The end result can be seen in the crime pages of the big papers every morning. You remember that feeling as a boy when you got more excited as your psychological or physical sadism progressed against your victim? I do. If you don’t I wonder what’s wrong with you.

This type of sexual paraphilia is rather dangerous. Most never kill but it’s like handing someone a stick of dynamite, telling them to play with it, and walking out of the room to leave them alone to their fun and games.

A lot of people like to play around the edges with this sort of thing in sex, but they’re not seriously wrapped up in it as in the BD/SM lifestyle, which I regard as completely sick in its full-blown manifestation.

As long as it’s just a game that confines itself to the bedroom, it’s seems to be OK.

But in my opinion, most if not all serious sexual sadists and even sexual masochists are not very healthy people, and I’ve been studying this from a rather appalled distance for some time now. Women who come out of relationships with sexual sadists that have lasted over five years often if not always appear to return to society damaged, and the damage often looks like a battered woman. The relationships themselves, when viewed from a distance, look precisely like the abusive male-female relationships you hear so much about albeit in these cases, the abuse is completely consensual on the part of the woman.

It’s always consensual on the man’s part. He’s the one dishing it out after all. Most people who dish out abuse are quite happy to do so, and guilt is not commonly experienced because the man most likely to feel guilt is the least likely to be abusive, so they factor themselves out before it even starts. As usual, the worst men feel the best and the best men feel the worst, and this applies to women too.

I’m not sure if there’s any safe or healthy way to do this sort of thing. And in case you’re wondering, not that it matters, but this is not exactly my bag. I prefer to like and love the women I’m with, not hate them. I think if you truly hate your girlfriend and enjoy feeling that way, you’ve got a problem. I think if your girlfriend truly loves to be hated, she’s got a problem. You’re both sick and both of you deserve each other.

I’ve studied serial killers forever as a hobby, and this is a major part of their pathology. Also, I work in mental health and a lot of the people I work with are dealing with antisocial thoughts – molesting children, committing homicide, etc. As I specialize in this stuff, I end up having a relationship with this sort of thing whether I want to or not.

Repost: Alt Left: There Is a Strong Link Between Narcissism and Male Homosexuality

Older post still getting comments.

Very good article. I am a straight female who had many many gay male friends. Many were entertaining and fun but the amount of narcissistic abuse I have experienced has been overwhelming. I finally cut them off and reading this makes sense to me. They are all the same person. They are all predictable, pompous, and self indulgent. Now that I see the truth, it is hard to see how much of the world they have manipulated as narcissists would.

I recently received the comment above on this older article about gay men and narcissism. This woman agrees with me. I’m sorry she had such a negative experience with gay men, as I wish gay men all the best.

The article below asks an odd question. Is there something inherently narcissistic about male homosexuality. That is there is some basic about the nature of male homosexuality that Nature simply decides to pair it up with narcissism for whatever reason?

There Is a Strong Link Between Narcissism and Male Homosexuality

Polar Bear: I suspect some gay men are just obsessed with themselves.

The link between male homosexuality and narcissism is as old as Time itself and has been remarked on endlessly. Perhaps many things have basic Characters or Principles, not just the main races or the (only) two genders but also, say, gay men and lesbians. Anyway, there is classic Gay Male Personality that is stable over time. Go back and read the old psychoanalytic literature about male homosexuality. They thought it was a mental disorder at the time, in part because it actually does look like one. Instead of a disorder, I think it is a “syndrome.” A syndrome with some predictable characteristics and a classic personality structure.

But those old articles are amazing because they could have been written yesterday. I remember I talked to my paternal grandmother a few times about gay men. She was born in the 1890’s and died in the 1990’s. How much does someone who grew up during World War 1 know about gay men? But the things she said about them would have been noted by a sociologist studying West Hollywood in 1984. There’s a basic Gay Male Personality, and it’s relatively timeless like so many things about us two-legged monkeys.

No one quite knows why gay men are so narcissistic. Hypothesis: Gay men have cocks and a male body. Gay men are turned on by cock and male bodies. So gay men are in love with themselves, and in a sense, when they fuck, are they literally fucking themselves also?

Curiously, there’s no link between lesbianism and narcissism, possibly because females are just not that narcissistic. The correlate of narcissism in the Female Character is “solipsism.” Until you figure out that females are solipsistic at their core, raw, primal nature, you will always have an incomplete picture of them.

Alt Left: Is HIV Nature’s Punishment for Sodomy?

Well, sort of.

Pantheist: Would you say HIV/AIDS is a prime example of Nature’s punishment? It’s peculiar how sodomy is what drove the AIDS epidemic.

It’s not so much sodomy that is being punished as sodomy between men. Nature is much calmer about sodomy between men and women.

HIV is driven by: People who get fucked in the ass (gay men) are fucking other people in the ass (other gay men), who are then fucking other people in the ass (other gay men), and on and on.

With straight sodomy, it’s: People who don’t get fucked in the ass (straight men) are fucking other people in the ass (women).

The distinction is crucial. You get these diseases by getting fucked in the ass. Then you fuck someone else in the ass. Straight men don’t get fucked in the ass, so they hardly have any sodomy-related diseases to give to women in the first place. The only real risk from straight sodomy is HIV. Nothing else seems to be much of a risk beyond PIV sex.

Eating Shit, Figuratively and Literally

The notion that sodomy itself somehow uniquely spreads all these different diseases is pretty much bullshit. It only spreads blood-borne diseases and those are very few. This scare documents also list a lot of diseases as being spread by sodomy that are spread by oral-anal contact (basically eating tiny bits of shit). Sodomy does not involve eating shit.

Anyway, for it to spread diseases, the man who is fucking the woman in the ass would have to be eating bits of the woman’s shit in the process. That’s not something that happens.

For all intents and purposes, sodomy does not spread oral-anal diseases. Those are spread by oral-anal contact like licking anuses, which gay men do with a gusto that has to be seen to be believed.

Oral-anal diseases are quite rare in the straight community, so they can engage in oral-anal contact (licking anuses) all they want and nothing happens.

It’s all about the disease pool. Gay men are dealing with an extremely infected pool for these oral-anal diseases so the chance of getting one is high.

Straights are dealing with a pool where these diseases almost don’t exist, so the chances of getting one of these diseases is low.

Oral-anal contact is only dangerous if someone has a disease. You can eat another person’s shit and nothing will happen if the person doesn’t have a disease. You might vomit because it’s so disgusting, but it’s rather harmless. It also does stress your liver because your putting waste back in your system in pure form to be processed right out again.

Obviously you can eat your own shit all you want. Once again, it stresses your liver, and it might make you vomit, but it’s not really harmful, and you cannot get a disease by eating your own shit because you can’t catch a disease that you already have! If your shit has a disease in it, well guess what? You already have that disease! Not that I recommend eating your own shit.

On the other hand, I’ve pretty much been eating shit figuratively my whole life, and I’m healthy as a horse and have none of the typical oral-anal diseases except now and again when I’m feeling particularly dishonest, I open up my mouth, and I’m simply completely full of shit.

Alt Left: Verdict: There Was No “Bucha Massacre”

SHI: Robert, where do you stand on the massacre at Bucha? This is what Wikipedia says

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bucha_massacre

It says that around 1000 bodies were recovered from the town. Summary executions, civilians shot at point-blank range. Looks like the Russians did a number on the Ukies.

Of course the Russian side of the story is that the Ukies staged a false flag. But I find it difficult to believe that they would kill their own women and children so mercilessly.

Surely Russian troops are capable of mini-genocides like this, just like the troops of any other country are.

Number one, Wikipedia, like everything else in the West, is run by the CIA or the US Deep State or better yet, NATO, NATO intelligence and the NATO Deep State. All of the West is 10

They aren’t capable of mini-genocides like that, especially not in this war. The Russian Army is one of the most professional armies on Earth. They’re about as capable of doing this stuff as the US Army is, and the US army doesn’t do things like this either. See the end of the piece for more.

There were not 1,000 bodies recovered from that town. 1,000 civilians MAY have died in that entire area north of Kiev. In Bucha, a mass grave was found with 76 bodies in it. There is video of townspeople who were burying them and they are saying that they are all territorial defense who were killed fighting the Russians.

An investigation was done of many of the bodies found in Bucha and it found that most of the civilians were killed by flechettes. Flechettes are used in Ukrainian artillery and Ukraine pounded the living crap out of that town and after the Russians left they leveled it, probably for punishing people for sticking around. Ukraine thinks anyone who stays in those towns is a collaborator.

All artillery deaths in Bucha were due to Ukrainian artillery as Russian troops were in town and they didn’t shell their own city. And Russia absolutely does not use ammunition containing flechettes. Only Ukraine does. So many of those killed were killed by Ukrainian artillery by flechettes. 76 were territorial defense who were killed fighting the Russians.

Everyone else was killed in an MI6/SBU psyop on April 2-3, days after the Russians left town. We know that those people were all killed after the Russians left because they were all alive when Russia left. Russia warned the people in the town that they might be targeted and asked them to leave, but only a few took them up on the offer.

There is footage of Boatman and his Azov Battalion entering into the town for a cleanup of saboteurs and collaborators. In one video, we see a soldier asking if it is OK to kill people who are not wearing a blue armband, and the other man says, “Fuck yeah!” Then we hear a man’s voice screaming, “No! No! Please don’t!” followed by a gunshot ringing out and a dog barking. This video is on the Net.

After this operation, dead people appeared strewn along the street in a regular pattern that makes no sense. The media claimed those bodies had been there for weeks but it is obvious that they had been dead no more than a day. Also we have videos of Ukrainian troops pulling those bodies on pulleys and arranging them on the streets. Every one of those bodies was wearing a white armband.

There is video of executions in a cellar. Everyone there is wearing a white armband too. There is also video of people killed in an alley. All wear white armbands. Many of them have Russian MRE meals next to their bodies. Some civilians wore white armbands to show the Russians that they were friendly so they didn’t get shot accidentally.

A lot of these people helped with the distribution of humanitarian aid and medical aid, a huge amount of which was distributed in town. So a white armband showed to the Ukrainians that you were a collaborator. Indeed they brought a dead man to the cemetery when the cameras were on. He had a white armband on. All of the dead with white armbands had been there no more than a day.

Let’s say the Russians killed all of these people. First of all, those bodies have not been there for 3-4 days. Second, why on Earth does Russia only kill people with white armbands and Russian MRE humanitarian aid. Those are the nice people who cooperated with Russian forces. So just before you leave, you murder all the nice people who collaborated with you, wore friendly armbands, took humanitarian aid, and helped distribute the humanitarian aid? Get out of here! No way!

One more thing. Testimony from a Russian journalist who was in the area north of Kiev the whole month said that not one civilian had been harmed the whole time he was there. A Ukrainian reporter who had been in Bucha the whole month said that there had been no killings by the Russians the whole month he was there.

If the Russians are killing people the whole month they were there, why do the bodies on show up after they leave? Why don’t we have any horror stories of murders during the period when the Russians occupied the site. Russians are murdering people like crazy and no one says a word? Get outa here!

Also, people who were in Bucha said that originally the residents were very wary of the Russians but the Russians were friendly, not hurting anyone, and distributing lots of aid, so during the month that the Russians were there, the people gradually opened up to the Russians.

Over time, the residents got more and more friendly with the Russians, with peak friendliness just as they were leaving. Wait. The Russians are murdering people the whole time, but the residents are getting progressively warmer to the Russians with time? Get outa here! No way!

Also, we have footage of the mayor arriving in town on March 31. Residents come out to greet him and say that the Russians were not that bad. One guy said they took him in for questioning but then they let him go. In this footage, there are no dead bodies to be seen anywhere in town and not one person mentions that whole city is strewn with dead bodies.

Keep in mind that according to the narrative, dead bodies are strewn all over the city when the mayor comes back and chats to cheerful residents. He tours the whole town and is smiling and happy. How come he didn’t see all these dead bodies all over the place? How come these happy residents don’t mention that there are dead bodies all over the city? There are dead bodies all over town but no one sees or mentions them and they are all happy and cheerful? The mayor neither sees nor mentions them and he’s all happy and cheery too.

Then we footage over the next couple of days of Azov coming in to “cleanup the city of collaborators.” All of a sudden, all of these dead bodies turn up all over town, all wearing or carrying signs of collaboration with Russia. Also we can hear the Azov people saying to kill all the people not wearing blue armbands, which means they are wearing white armbands.

Then we hear a man screaming for mercy and a gunshot. It all adds up. The Ukrainians massacred all of their own people with white armbands an MRE’s to make an example of them as “collaborators.” At the same time, they do a false flag blaming Russia for the whole thing.

I would like to point out that one of the highest ranking members of the Ukrainian Rada explicitly accused Ukraine and the UK of carrying out this massacre, specifically the Ukrainian SBU spy agency and the MI6 British intelligence agency.

Based on the available evidence, everyone dead in Bucha were either:

  1. Territorial defense killed fighting Russians.
  2. Civilians killed by flechettes which could only have been fired by Ukrainian artillery.
  3. “Collaborators” murdered by the SBU, Azov, and MI6 as a lesson for cooperating with Russia by wearing friendly armbands and taking MRE’s.

Further, the Russian Army is one of the most professional armies on Earth. Do you have any idea of what the punishment is in the Russian army for murdering civilians like that? It’s a very serious offense and they prosecute these cases all the time. Many Russian soldiers have been courtmartialed and imprisoned on these charges in Afghanistan. Someone would have talked.

There would have been leaks from Russian soldiers or Russian journalists about a war crime committed by the Russians. Some of the Russian prisoners would have confessed. We have a huge number of Ukrainian prisoners who have confessed to participating in or witnessing war crimes. We also have many videos that the Ukrainians took of them committing war crimes or admitting to committing them. There has not been one single prosecution of any Ukrainian soldier or militia member for any war crime during this war or during the Donbass War from 1914 – February 23, 2022.

In addition, to all of the above, Putin intervened in the General Staff’s decision to run the war by issuing a directive to all troops that Ukrainian civilians must be preserved at all costs. This was later modified to “preserve all Ukrainian civilian life except where doing so threatens the lives of Russian soldiers.” He did this, he said, because “after the war, we will live with the Ukrainians.”

So he’s laying the groundwork for relatively friendly relations with Ukraine after the war which would not be possible if Russia massacred civilians. In the beginning, the Russian military even said that they were trying not to kill too many UKrainian soldiers. They were even saving the lives of enemy troops. Incredible!

A statement like this is absolutely remarkable! I have been studying modern wars and I cannot remember a commander in chief ever issuing such an extreme directive to preserve enemy civilian life at all costs. It simply doesn’t happen! Almost all armies now all over the world do horrible things when they fight wars. The US, British, French armies are more civilized, but the US leveled Raqqah, Syria with artillery, killing 4-5,000 people. Then we levelled Mosul in Iraq with artillery and bombs (mostly artillery).

Mostly it was not aimed at all. Instead the intent was to level the city and kill everyone in it. 40,000 civilians were killed by the US and the Iraqis in the conquest of Mosul, Iraq. I told American liberal Democrats about this and they said it was justified because those civilians were supporting ISIS. Problem is once you legalize killing enemy civilians, you have to allow it all the time in every war. You have to allow the Russians to massacre Ukrainian civilians because they’re supporting the army. On and on.

I cannot find one single case of a dead person in Bucha who was killed by the Russians. I have studied this case more than most people you will ever meet and my conclusion is there is not one proven murder of a civilian by Russian troops in Bucha during this war. Perhaps there were some cases elsewhere. There does appear to have been a case north of Kharkiv where a Russian soldier was sentenced to life for the murder of a Ukrainian civilian. He confessed, so I am assume he was guilty. These things are done by most armies in wartime. There’s not unusual about a few cases.

Alt Left: No, Masculinity and Femininity Are Not Made-Up Concepts Social Constructs

Anonymous: Well if mistakes occur in Nature and by nature, then that means that Nature is flawed.

Of course Nature is flawed! Why is that even a question?

Anonymous: But that doesn’t make sense to me.

Why not?

Anonymous: Does that mean that Nature doesn’t have free will of its own?

Of course it doesn’t. It’s a process. It’s not like a creature that’s alive.

Anonymous: Since it recognises these occurrences as flaws then why does it allow them to appear over and over again?

Because it’s a process, and Nature is a system, not something with a mind and free will. It gets set in one way of doing things and then it just keeps on doing them. And Nature is amoral, completely. It could wipe us all off the face of the Earth if we allowed it to. It could care less about us or about much of anything really.

Anonymous: Maybe these flaws are Nature’s way of containing (depopulating) itself.

Not so sure about that part.

Anonymous: One thing is for sure is that Nature does seem to favour diversity. Progress only occurs when attributes are evenly spread. Suppose every single human only wanted to be a bodybuilder. We would get nowhere technologically but Nature has selected diverse people to have different interests.

OK, sure, but that’s just Evolution. Yet Evolution is another way of saying Nature. Nature is Evolution and vice versa. I fail to see any benefit of male or female homosexuality. As it’s apparently not genetic and only occurs when things go wrong in the womb, it’s not being selected for at all and it occurs at a low enough level that women with more stable hormonal flows in the womb are not selected for and the ones with less stable flows selected against.

Apparently the prenatal environment is pretty stable and doesn’t go off a Hell of a lot. Maybe 1

Anonymous: But why are those necessarily “masculine” characteristics? Just because on an average that males tend to have more of them than females?

Yep.

Anonymous: But doesn’t Nature also allows women with similar potential to get muscular, big, and strong?

Yep.

If they were strictly masculine traits, then there would be no girls with muscles.

That’s not so! Didn’t you read the fine print. Weininger says that the Masculine and Feminine Character are present in both sexes. All men have some feminine characteristics and that’s not necessarily a bad thing and vice versa. Some women have some masculine characteristics like being strong, well-built, muscular, and athletic and that’s not generally a problem except when women are at the extreme end of that spectrum, it seems like a lot of them are lesbians, and that’s not adaptive.

For the most part those things in a woman are not pathological, but there was no reason to select for them, hence women ended up much weaker than men. Furthermore, the strongest female bodybuilder is no match for even a middling male bodybuilder.

Anonymous: I like strong women.

Hmmm.

Anonymous: I don’t like chubby women

Understandable.

Anonymous: or the very girly girls.

Bad idea.

Anonymous: Strong women like Sandahl Bergman in Conan The Barbarian. The warrior female type of spirit. I find that sexy.

Change your mind. I understand the appeal of a badass chick, but the problem with those violent women who fight people who do them wrong is that sooner or later, all of that righteous anger is going to get turned on you. “Warrior” women are nothing but trouble. They’re bitches. They will fight you!

Alt Left: Controversial Idea: Nature Punishes Those Who Violate Natural Law

Anonymous: I don’t get the Nature part. If a man a acting effeminate is against Nature and nature punishes them for it then why did Nature create them in the first place. I don’t think it is Nature punishing them either but society.

We can’t be objective about these things especially on a deeper philosophical scale. I think everyone should just mind their own business.

Even this whole masculine-feminine thing seems arbitrary. Why is masculine representing everything strong and the feminine everything weak? When without either of them conception would not be possible. So in a way, both need to be strong for a good family.

Women of the Stone Age may also be considered “masculine” by today’s standards because they were stronger, well-built, muscular and athletic.

Are you a heterosexual man? Go ahead and walk around in the world saying there’s no such thing as masculinity an femininity, and you’re going to flaunt the rules and say the Hell with this masculine crap. You see just how far that gets you. Try to be a feminine or effeminate man. You say it’s just fine. So try it and see. Do it for a few years and get back to me. I guarantee you won’t have a fun ride.

It’s against Nature because the only reason effeminate men and masculine women happen in the first place is because something went terribly wrong! Things go terribly wrong in Nature all the time. Nature doesn’t like mistakes and any mistakes that occur get punished by Nature because they go against Natural Law.

The old “society punishes gay people” is an old chestnut. The problem is that we have now found societies that are about as tolerant of gay people as possible, and gay men and lesbians are just as messed up in this places as they are in homophobic places. They also lose 18-20 years off their lifespan just like such folks do in homophobic places.

This got me to thinking that there is something about gay people that is going to cause them to be messed up no matter what. Now I don’t want to believe this because I want them to be just as happy as we are. But I keep getting beaten with the Reality Stick. I’m starting to think that there is just something inherently messed up about them.

Then I realized that wimpy men are typically very unhappy. And if you get them to act more masculine, they get a lot more happy.

Mean, angry, miserable, masculine-acting women (not all of whom are gay – some are just horrendous bitches who haven’t been laid in forever) seem absolutely wretched. And I’ve noticed that when a woman starts acting extremely feminine, it usually means 1. She wants to get fucked right now. 2. She’s a lot happier than when she was not acting so feminine.

So I started thinking that masculinity is the “happy place” for men, and femininity is the “happy place” for women.

Everyone minding their own business is just fine, but there are unanswered questions that demand to be answered whether it pisses off PC types or not. And the purpose of this website is to ask all those questions you are not supposed to ask and to talk about all those things you are not supposed to talk about. And that is what we are going to do no matter how much it pisses off PC fucktards.

Even this whole masculine-feminine thing seems arbitrary.

You’re young, aren’t you? I got some news for you. Stick around this planet for a while, and this time open your eyes and ears instead of shutting them down like you’ve been doing. You will realize that masculinity is a thing, defined in a rather specific way at least in most Western societies and in a lot of other societies too. It’s called the Masculine Principle and it’s one of the universal principles governing the universe or at least our part of it.

If you look around you will notice that femininity is also a “thing” – very similar across most societies. This is because it is something called the Feminine Principleone of the governing principles of the universe.

The Feminine Principle is weaker. The Masculine Principle is stronger.

Some woman wants to be a strong woman, however defined? All the power to her! Good for her! A woman can do anything a man can do in terms of jobs, with a few obvious limitations. Women should reach for the sky! They already hold up half of it.

Look around at the higher mammals, even those dogs and cats running around your house. Notice how the male cats act like human men and the female cats act like human women. There’s a reason for that. Now study elk and elephant seals.

Notice how one alpha elk gets a harem of five elk chicks? Notice how the other four male Beta elk are standing around in the woods jerking off their elk dicks with their hooves?

Notice how that Alpha elephant Seal as fat as Marlon Brando and a pure psychopath as bad as Ted Bundy, has a harem of 50 fat elephant seal chicks and he’s somehow banging all of them? I don’t know how his seal dick doesn’t fall off. Notice offshore towards those offshore rocks called haulouts? See those 49 Beta bachelor male seals hanging out on those rocks with their seal dicks in their flippers because they aren’t getting any seal pussy?

That’s human nature on a smaller scale. When you get rid of enforced marriage, things go back to the jungle. Women form harems with Alphas, most of whom are scumbags on a level of that Alpha elephant seal. Notice how there are now huge numbers of young men getting no sex at all, like 3

I will also tell you right now that if you ever meet a woman who proudly calls herself a “strong woman” to get the Hell away from her as quickly as possible because she’ll be nothing but trouble and she’s capable of being one of the worst, most psycho bitches you’ve ever hooked up with. I think it’s OK to be a strong woman in whatever sense. But once they starting owning that title, they turn into the worst bitches you’ve met.

Yes, there are strengths in the Feminine Principle, but it is more yielding and submissive. You know, just like those female cats in your house that sit back and take it when a tomcat humps them?

We don’t know that Stone Age women were stronger, well-built, muscular, and athletic, but what we have learned of women 12,000 years ago in Mexico is that they were under the rule of a horrible Patriarchy that was utterly brutal. The one skeleton they found had been repeatedly beaten with big sticks and rocks. They are thinking that the men of her tribe were vicious maniacs who beat the Hell out of their women all the time. So compared to the men, it looks like the women were not so strong.

Indeed there are strong, well-built, muscular, and athletic women, but how many of them are like that? And incidentally those are masculine characteristics. If you follow Otto Weininger as I do (Otto Weininger is God) you will realize that all males have both Masculine and Feminine Principles. and it’s the same for women. Everyone is a mixture of the two. Pure masculine men and pure feminine women are probably not very common.

Alt Left: Masculinity, Femininity, Natural Law, and “Universal Culture”

SHI: It’s all right to be a soft-spoken man with no hypermasculine aggressive characteristics.

But it was NEVER acceptable to be effeminate.

Yes, effeminacy in straight men just doesn’t work at all. Any man who is like that, I’d suggest he work on it if he could. If I see a man like that, I want to ask him why on Earth, if he is a straight man, he’s acting effeminate. There’s nothing wrong with effeminacy in men as long as it’s a gay man acting that way.

But for a straight man to act that way is weird and ridiculous. It’s like a cat barking. It’s just weird and wrong and messed up. Barking is just fine for dogs, but cats aren’t supposed to bark, and if one does, I’d wager there’s something seriously wrong with it. You want to walk up to the cat and yell at it, “Hey, you’re a cat, dammit! You’re not supposed to bark. That’s what dogs do, dammit! If you’re going to be a cat, you have to meow like the rest of the felines.” Otherwise you’re just a freak, albeit one that might get you record Youtube views if you put it on the web.

You really can’t be too masculine, and a lot of wimpy guys like acting masculine if you give them permission to and bring it out of them. I’ve done this many times and it’s amazing how delightfully they seem to get into it. It’s like they are in their secret happy place that they have denied to themselves for so long. I’m convinced that most wimpy men actually want to be normal and masculine, but something – maybe a psychological issue – is preventing that.

Masculinity is our happy place. Remember how wildly and even cruelly masculine we were as boys? That’s the natural state of a male in nature.

For women, I really think that femininity is their happy place. They seem to feel so good when they are free to act feminine. Plus femininity is all tied into the sex drive. When a woman starts acting like a frilly Southern belle and flipping her wrist like a gay man around you all of a sudden, I can pretty much guarantee she is turned on by you, and in a lot of cases, it means she wants to fuck right now. It means she’s horny! Look how feminine and submissive they often turn into in bed. That’s the natural state of a woman, like a little girl in a way.

Also, I have found that wimpy or feminine men are often not very happy. I don’t know what it is. I think they are violating Nature or Natural Law. They’re supposed to act masculine and they’re not, so Nature is punishing them by making them miserable.

Have you ever noticed how miserable angry, masculine women are? They’re not happy at all, are they? Perhaps Nature is punishing them too. They’re supposed to be feminine and they’re not, so Nature is punishing them for going against Her. And that is a capital H by the way. Nature is God!

By the same token, gay men seem to have some essential unhappiness about them that goes beyond the harm caused by discrimination. And it’s completely analogous with lesbians.

A man is supposed to be masculine and attracted to women. With gay men, it’s the opposite. They are feminine and attracted to men. A woman is supposed to be feminine and attracted to men. Lesbians are masculine and attracted to other women. Both conditions are frankly abnormal in the sense that they go against the default for society, and if everyone were like that, society would collapse and mankind would go extinct.

By the same mechanism that punishes wimpy straight man and angry, masculine straight women, perhaps Nature also punishes effeminate gay men and masculine butch lesbians. Nature is telling them, “You’re doing it wrong!”

Natural Law is a theory popular in Catholic circles, and while I’m not a Catholic, I find Catholicism fascinating, and I think they may be onto something with their Natural Law. Certain things just seem to be flat out wrong across the board with humans. Molesting prepubescent children (say, under age ~13 or before puberty) is one. Almost no society, primitive or modern, accepts that other than the Sambia in New Guinea where it’s actually a manhood ritual to create men out of boys, hence Nature tolerates it. Even back in Roman days, molesting children was completely taboo. Check out Suetonius. He talks about this.

Hence, molesting kids is, in Catholic Natural Law terms, “inherently disordered.” There’s something about humans that, as an almost-perfect general rule, makes us dislike this sort of thing. Incest also seems to be “inherently disordered.” Every tribe they’ve ever found has an incest taboo for obvious reasons.

The fact that certain things are inherently disordered across the board for humans across space and time also implies that there is something called Universal Culture or maybe in Jungian terms, the Collective Unconscious Culture.

I doubt if homosexuality is inherently disordered. Societies seem to dislike it but tolerate in a few oddballs here and there.

In many societies, effeminate men are often given a term that something like “not-men.” That’s the Persian word for a gay man – gay men are “not-men.” In many places, they are allowed to wear women’s clothes, and they stay in the village with the women during the day doing women’s work. They don’t have to go out and hunt with the men. I’m not sure what they are like sexually, but in a number of tribes, they are treated as a substitute for a woman, and it’s perfectly natural for a normal straight man to take one of these effeminate men as a sexual partner, especially if no female available.

Masculine women or lesbians were also tolerated in small numbers by many groups. They wore men’s clothes and went out and hunted with the men, who accepted them as just another man, albeit one with some funny biology. I believe they were allowed to take another such woman as a partner.

It seems to be normal background variation for ~

Most of that is people who are wired up gay – “biological homosexuals” – from birth. I think it is caused by hormonal levels going off during pregnancy, so it’s basically a developmental disorder like lefthandedness, abnormal fingerprints, etc. And indeed those two things are found at much higher levels in gay men. Once again though, all of those both conditions including lefthandedness are caused by something going wrong, in this case in the womb.

I’m absolutely opposed to treating biological homosexuals any different than we treat our fellow straights. But no one should be under the illusion that this is a natural, normal phenomenon.

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)