Epstein Was a Hebephile and Was Sexually Normal

Epstein wasn’t a pedophile. He liked teenage girls as all normal non-dead non-gay men do.

A lot of completely normal, healthy, moral, men with no sexual oddities will have sex with teenage girls, especially the older ones at 16 and 17. After all, it looks exactly like a woman. Once a girl gets secondary sex characteristics, all normal men will look at her and their caveman brain will say, “Breed it!” The only men who will not think like this are either gay or dead.

In a lot of ways, we haven’t advanced much from the Paleolithic, and we still have a lot of leftover heritage from that era. Consider this: In primitive tribes, the average age at first pregnancy was 16, and the father was typically an older man. For instance, among the Blackfoot, the typical marriage was between a 15 year old girl and a 35 year old man. These relationships have been going on since history was recorded, and no harm or damage to the girls was ever recorded.

Consider something else: in my area, a burial site for the local Indians from the mid-1700’s was discovered. They were all female and had all died between ages 27-33. So the average woman lived to be only 30 years old! In addition, all of their teeth were ground down to nothing. That is because the Indians ground acorns in holes in rocks and bits of stone always got in the acorn. I’ve eaten this acorn before. It’s rather tasteless, something like Hawaiian poi. The people I was eating it with didn’t like it, but I didn’t mind.

Looking at this local tribe, if all sex between adult males and 13-17 year old girls is inherently extremely harmful to the girls, how did this tribe survive for all this time? If this tribe waited until everyone was an adult before having kids, people would be dead before they were barely even parents.

Even in the case above, every child had a mother who died when they were 11-17 years old (average age 14). That sounds very traumatic but I suppose in a group like this, you just get used to such things. Can you imagine growing up in a society where you and all your friends lost their mothers when you were barely teenagers?

The fact that this attraction is so normal and utterly non-pathological is why it’s so easy to rope so many men in with these honeypots. If Epstein were setting them up with 12 year old girls, I imagine there would be few takers, and those folks wouldn’t be very normal sexually or morally.

Epstein was a hebephile, however, that’s for damn sure. This is how you can tell. Epstein denied being a pedophile. Most pedos will straight up admit it. I’ve worked with them in counseling before and that’s exactly what they all do. And he said,

Once the braces come off, I lose interest.

The thing is that that is precisely what a hebephile would say. A pedophile would never say such a thing.

Braces probably come off at age ~16, and preferential hebephiles do indeed have no interest in 16 year old girls. They call them grandmas LOL. I’ve been in their chatrooms out of curiosity and this is exactly how they act.

But that’s not disordered and it’s actually considered within the range of normal. Sexually speaking, Epstein was considered within the normal range according to the American Psychiatric Association*. The problem with Epstein was a moral problem of good and bad, right and wrong.** Those of us who work in mental health don’t deal with stuff like that. Leave it up to the legal system and the moral philosophers. All we care about is:

Are you crazy (disordered)?

Are you sane (nondisordered)?

Actually there is a movement afoot to take both pedophilia and Antisocial Personality Disorder (sociopathy, psychopathy) out of the DSM on the grounds that they aren’t mental disorders. Psychopaths aren’t nuts. Ever met one? They aren’t crazy at all. They’re simply evil!

*Actually I consider primary preferential hebephiles to be sexually disordered. But I’m glad they kept it out of the DSM because the pigs will just abuse it to lock schmucks who banged some teenage girl in a mental hospital for life.

Which is completely unconstitutional, by the way. There’s no crime called “dangerousness.” You can be as dangerous as you want, and if you break no laws in that sense, no one can do a damn thing to you. There are time bombs everywhere.

The “Free Press” of Most Countries during Wartime According to George Orwell

I’m not sure about everywhere but it’s certainly true here in the West. Oddly, we don’t see nearly as much of this in the Global South. The West owns the world’s media, so with a death grip on information, they can easily brainwash the world with fakes and lies. Also the proxies of the West – the Genocide Jews in Israel, Nazis in Ukraine, ISIS and Al Qaeda headchoppers in the Muslim World – are so utterly diabolical that it’s quite unnecessarily to make up lies about them.

Just telling the truth is generally horrible enough. Further, I haven’t noticed Pakistan, the Taliban, Armenia, Russia, Iran, the Palestinians, Hezbollah, the Houthis, or the Arab World in general doing this either. I don’t regard the faked Israeli death and wounded reports coming from the Palestinian resistance as part of this fakery. It’s common for each side to exaggerate their opponent’s losses in wartime.

At the moment the Genocide Jews in Israel and the Nazis in Ukraine seem to be the worst liars of all. That leads me to think that maybe they have something in common. What they have in common is fascism. If you understand fascism, you realize that fascism venerates the lie. In fact, the lie is promoted as the highest form of discourse in fascism, the very basis for the state and society and the behavior of each. Fascism is shameless and forthright about its lying. In fact, pathological lying seems to be at the very basis of the fascist construct.

I would not say every fascist or rightwing authoritarian group is like this, but the classic ones in the 1930’s surely were.

False flags and endless lying in wartime seems to be a favorite of the West at the moment. I would include Turkey, Azerbaijan, Ethiopia, Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE in the West. There is a lot of dubious reportage coming out of this latest civil war in Ethiopia, but most of it seemed to be coming from the state as usual. Basically anyone on board with the West or in the West’s pockets is lying like a rug. The Global South probably doesn’t lie that much because no one is going to run their lies with the world media in the West’s death grip.

Early in life I have noticed that no event is ever correctly reported in a newspaper, but in Spain, for the first time, I saw newspaper reports which did not bear any relation to the facts, not even the relationship which is implied in an ordinary lie.

I saw great battles reported where there had been no fighting, and complete silence where hundreds of men had been killed. I saw troops who had fought bravely denounced as cowards and traitors, and others who had never seen a shot fired hailed as heroes of imaginary victories; and I saw newspapers in London retailing these lies and eager intellectuals building emotional superstructures over events that never happened.

I saw, in fact, history being written not in terms of what happened but of what ought to have happened according to various ‘party lines.'”

– George Orwell, Homage to Catalonia

 

Israeli Death Tolls for the October 7, 2023 Palestinian Attack on Israel (Third Update)

The first post is here. Here is the second post. This is the third version of the death toll from that date. It indicates that slightly more than half of the Israeli civilians killed on that day were killed by the IDF, many due to the Hannibal Doctrine and others simply due to mass confusion by helicopter and drone pilots.

1,147 Israelis, soldiers and civilians, killed on 10-7.

Soldiers and Other Security Forces Killed on 10-7

340 Israeli soldiers killed on 10-17.

59 Israeli police killed on 10-7.

13 Israeli Shin Bet officers killed on 10-7.

12 Israeli first responders killed on 10-7.

Subtotal of 84 other Israeli security forces killed on 10-7.

Total of 424 Israeli security forces killed on 10-7

Israeli Civilians Killed on 10-7

723 Israeli civilians killed on 10-7.

Israeli Civilians Killed by Israel

159 Israeli civilians killed by IDF outside of the festival.*

248 Israeli civilians killed by IDF at the festival.**

407 Israeli civilians killed by Israel.

Israeli Civilians Killed by Palestinians

114 Israeli civilians killed by Palestinians at the festival.

201 Israeli civilians killed by Palestinians in other places, including 11 at Kfar Aza and 7 at Be’eri.

Total of 315 Israeli civilians killed by Palestinians.

Conclusion

Civilians Killed in October 7 Attack

315 or 4

407 or 5

Discussion

As you can see, Israel killed more civilians on October 7 than the Palestinians did.

Addendum

15+ Israeli soldier POWs and civilian hostages killed in Gaza by Israel.

183 Israeli soldiers killed since 10/7.

*88 in in Kibbutz Be’eri and in a vehicle (four in a vehicle) via Hannibal Doctrine. Also two more hostages killed via Hannibal Doctrine in a car heading back to Gaza .

97 killed in Be’eri. Preliminary investigation indicates that 9

63 killed in Kfar Aza with 52 killed by IDF and and 11 killed by Palestinians.. 5/6 killed by IDF. My estimate based on video below in which 5/6 buildings where deaths occurred were either shot up by heavy automatic weapons fire, rubbled via tank or artillery shells, or burned to the ground by tank shells. The buildings where Palestinians killed people showed few if any signs of internal damage.

**Estimate based on photos of burned out cars.

The Syrian War Is Not Completely a Sunni-Shia Conflict

Commenter 1: Bashar al-Assad won the last presidential election in Syria. Anyone who went into Syria to check found Assad hugely popular. Of course the vicious, murderous foreign enemies call every election outcome they don’t like a “sham”, but who cares?

The only democracy in the Middle East? Syria!

Commenter 2: If you went only to DC and deep Blue areas, I am sure you would find that Biden is popular as well.

So it is when you go to Damascus and to the old Ugaritic coast (majority Alawite) north of Lebanon, you find huge support for Assad.

You might hear something different if you try, oh, Aleppo, Hama, or Idlib. But if you went on a normal Syrian visa, you didn’t try those cities, did you?

This is not correct. The army is 7

Hama’s all right these days. The city of Aleppo and much of the province is all right.

You don’t understand. This is not about Sunni versus Alawite. The rebels are hardline Islamists who want to kill  the Alawites and throw out the Christians. Remember those vast crowds in Sunni cities in Hama, Aleppo, and Idlib chanting,

Christians to Lebanon, Alawites to the grave!

These chants were heard very early on in the uprising, only a month or two afterwards. The revolution quickly turned so bigoted, murderous, and Islamist that it alienated many of the more moderate supporters. There was even a Free Syrian Army Christian brigade at one point. Most of these moderates had gone back over to the government within the first year.

In the years since then, leaders of the rebels have reiterated that the chant above remains their project. They’ve stated as much on many occasions. These are your heroes in Idlib. You proud of yourself yet?

The highest support for the rebels was 1/3 of the population supporting even the hardline Sunnis like ISIS and Al Qaeda! That’s how bad it got at one point. However, it’s gone down a lot since then, The armed rebels probably have 1

Commenter 3 responding to me: Totally agree. The Assad family had a mandate from the various factions like Tito had for Yugoslavia. There were many factions and religions, and the Assads kept the balance of power so that none had hegemony of the other. They were in effect referees among several competing teams. This is simply the best that could be realized for Greater Syria. No other country could claim such coexistence among so much diversity.

When any one group – usually Muslim extremists – tried to increase or grab more power or resources at the expense of another stakeholder group, Assad Senior would swiftly and brutally punish that group for getting out of line and breaking consensus.

It worked so well that no other then Nancy “I’ll do anything for money” Pelosi was hawking publicly investing in Syria as an opportunity.

A New War for Israel! This Time in Yemen

Another war for the Israel*! Right now we are engaged in five different wars for Israel over there:

The Gaza War for Israel: US intelligence is helping the Genocide Jews’** genocide the Palestinians over there.

The Syrian War for Israel: This one started a long time ago, but it was mostly just providing aid to ISIS and Al Qaeda against Assad’s government. The US has established illegal bases all over Syria, and we are currently stealing 9

The Iraqi War for Israel: This one was also started a long time ago, and it’s never stopped. Right now we have bases in their country even though they have repeatedly ordered us to leave country. With incredible arrogance, we told them to go pound sand. Right now our bases and embassy in Iraq are being attacked by the Iraqi Army.

The sane and decent thing to do would be to evacuate all of our illegal bases in Syria and Iraq. We are truly “occupiers” over there the same way Israel is in the West Bank. But instead, Biden has ordered 1,500 more US troops to both Syria and Iraq! Good God, Democrats are far more militaristic and hawkish than Republicans nowadays.

Now a new one!

The Yemeni War for Israel: On the basis of a fake “protect shipping lines” lie (its a lie because only Israeli and ships going to Israel are being prevented from using the maritime waters), the US and UK have started yet another war for Israel. These two countries are now bombing Houthi targets because the Houthis tried to stop Israel from genociding the Arabs in Gaza.

The Lebanese War for Israel: This one hasn’t started yet, but we keep warning and threatening Lebanon and Hezbollah not to get too involved in attacking Israel. We even stationed an aircraft carrier off the coast to protect Israel from Lebanon.

*If you don’t mind being a bit more antisemitic about it, you can call these wars for the Jews instead of wars for Israel. But I’d rater play it safe for now.

They are truly both if you think about it, as the US Jews are the ones dragging us into all of these wars, let’s face it. However, they have the help of a majority of US Gentiles who support them. It’s not like the US government is full of antisemites who are only supporting Israel because the Jews are putting guns to their heads and saying do it or else. Nevertheless, no matter who is supporting it, all of these wars are being fought for Israel and their ethnic brethren in the US who feel such a passionate attachment to the state.

**This refers to Israeli Jews, not Jews in the Diaspora who aren’t harming a soul, much less genociding anyone.

For the Hundredth Time, Iran Has No Nuclear Weapons Program

One thing everyone needs to know:

Iran has no nuclear weapons program! Both the CIA and Mossad have certified that there is no nuclear weapons program. But on the other hand, the message these agencies put out to the masses is that Iran does have a nuclear weapons program. Everything you know about Iran is wrong!

This is truly a case of The Emperor Has No Clothes. The naked emperor is the lack of a nuclear weapons program. His nonexistent clothes are part of the null and void nuclear weapons program. Anyone who points out that the emperor has no clothes (Iran does not have a nuclear weapons program) will be gaslighted to Hell and back. Because everybody knows Iran has a nuclear weapons program. Except they don’t.

They’re gaslighting the living Hell out of the whole world with this fake BS.

Jewish “Control” over the US Government Is a Consensual Affair

The problem here is that way too many Americans support Israel. US support for Israel is not all down to ZOG and Jewish money controlling the US government, etc. Anyway, if it’s Jewish control, it’s consensual because the people in government like it just fine that way. And consensual control isn’t control at all. If you want the person to control you, he’s not really controlling you or if is, it’s no big deal.

A lot of the US government have a personal investment in Israel. Joe Biden is one of them. A lot of people around Biden have doubts about all these wars for Israel that we are fighting right now, but they all say “no one can control Biden or get through to him on this question.” It’s like talking to a wall and he doesn’t seem to see the humanity of Israel’s enemies over there.

A lot of the reason we are so wrapped up in Israel’s wars right now is because of Biden’s deep personal commitment to Israel that dates all the way back to the 1970’s. He said at that time he had a long conversation with Henry “Scoop” Jackson, the Washington “Senator from Boeing.” Jackson was a super-hawk advocate of the military-industrial complex that gets us into all of these militarist fiascos overseas. He was also more Zionist than a lot of Jews at the time.

It is from a group of Jews around Jackson’s office in the 1970’s that the neoconservatives themselves were actually birthed via Jews who had turned against the Democratic Party over Vietnam and especially the 1967 War in Israel.

So Biden’s been an ardent Zionist for probably 45-50 years!

6

A recent poll found that 5

A poll found that 5

Americans supported the Iraqi War for Israel to the hilt. There never were large demos against it. Even now, the Iraqi government has ordered us to get the Hell out two times. Both times we told them to go pound sand. The American people could care less! The Iraqi Army is now attacking us for refusing to leave their land and even 2/3 of 18-24 year olds support the US attacking back! So the public is still on board with this insane occupation.

Americans support the Syrian War for Israel to the hilt too. There has been nary a peep of protest against it. We are illegally occupying their land we have basically annexed 1/3 of the country and given it to the Kurds. We are stealing 9

There is not even one single peep of protest from any American about this outrage. In fact, Ilhan Omar supports our war on Syria, I’m guessing because she hates the Shia. 2/3 of 18-24 year olds think we should fight back against the Iraqi Army that is attacking us for our illegal bases on Syrian land.

Now we have started another war for the Jews. This is the Yemeni War for Israel. I haven’t seen any polls, but I’d gather that most Americans support what we are doing over there.

Perhaps fighting all of these wars for Israel is the right thing to do. A lot of Americans seem to think so. So does Joe Biden. Perhaps Israel is this great country that deserves all of this treasure and risk. Perhaps Jews are the best minority in the US whose value far exceeds their

The thing is that no one ever gets told that these are wars for the Jews or more properly wars for Israel since they are not being fought for Diaspora Jews because they have no literal skin in the game. I think they should be told that we are fighting all these wars for Israel, as Americans don’t seem to be aware of that. Then they can make up their own mind about what to do.

What Do Middle Eastern Christians Think of Israel?

I dated an Iranian Assyrian Christian woman a while back. While she definitely didn’t like Muslims (she said they would not let them touch the bread at markets because the Christians would “contaminate” it), I was surprised that she absolutely did not like Israel either one bit, and I also got the impression that she didn’t think a whole lot of Jews to boot.

I said the US is a Christian country and she laughed at me:

This is not a Christian country. This is a Jewish country. All you care about here is money!

Shades of Marx, n’est pas?:

Money is the jealous god of Israel, in face of which no other god may exist

Karl Marx, On the Jewish Question, 1845.

Some Syrian Christians were running the local corner market here for a while. They were fanatical supporters of Assad like most Syrian Christians. I was stunned by their utter contempt for Israel, as great as that of their Muslim counterparts.

They were supplanted by Maronite Christians from Lebanon, who are noted for their pro-Western, pro-Israel and anti-Muslim and even anti-Arab (they absurdly deny that they are Arabs and insist instead that they are “Phoenicians”) sentiments. He was talking to my brother, and even this guy regaled my brother with proud tales of serving as a sniper in the Lebanese Army and fighting against Israel.

Some Republican idiot politician was talking to a group of Arab-American Christians and he said something about American Christians needing to support Israel. He was stunned when the crowd roundly booed him.

Most Arab Christians are some form of Orthodox. The Orthodox have been less yielding on the Jewish Question than the Western Catholic Church. Greece and Armenia are Orthodox and both countries are very antisemitic. Russian Orthodox antisemitism has been well-known forever. Solzhenitsyn is a typical Russian Orthodox monarchist and he was not crazy about Jews at all. Check out 200 Years Together.

Alexander Solzhenitsyn, “200 Years Together”

Solzhenitsyn’s last book, 200 Years Together, about the relationship between Jews and Russians in Russia, is actually an excellent and largely factual book. The Jews, who have no money and power at all (and if you say they do, you’re an antisemite), somehow managed to to huge their vast nonexistent money and power to completely prevent this book from being published in English.

An English translation appeared pretty quickly, but it was almost impossible to get a publisher in the US due to pressure from helpless and immiserated Jews. They finally found one, but then no bookstore would carry it due to pressure from powerless impoverished Jews. I believe you can somehow get it online now though if you look around enough.

While it is true technically that Jews go back in Russia all the way to the 1000 AD, they didn’t arrive in any significant numbers until they built up a community in Odessa. A strong Jewish presence has been noted in Odessa for a very long time. I’m sure a lot of them stayed during the USSR, which was a very Jew-friendly country. After after Ukraine went independent, a lot of Jews stayed, especially in the antisemitic Western Ukraine where many of them traditionally lived.

This area is the home of the former Pale of Settlement which had gone back and forth between Poland and Russia for a long time. I’d always heard what is apparently the typical Jewish “gloom and doom” history of the Pale which was that the Czar threw all the Jews in the Pale to keep them away from everybody else, but with some modern readings, I’ve come to believe that he actually put them there for their own protection.

People have it all wrong. The pogroms were not set up by the Czars in most cases. As in Europe, the Jews typically had a tight relationship with the royal ruling class. The Jews were an elite or elite-adjacent group. Even during the era of expulsions, Jews lived better, healthier and longer lives and had more money and better material resources than most Gentiles who after all were groaning under the   back weight of serfdom thrust upon them.

It was similiar in Russia. Sure there were some antisemitic Czars, but most of them were pro-Jewish. The people leading the pogroms were often poor peasants.

Jews loaned money at exorbitant interest rates (in case I heard it was 4

However right around that time, the Jews who had taverns all over the Pale sold them vodka to get through the cold winter. As you might imagine, the peasants drank up all of the profits from their harvest and now they were in even deeper to the Jews. The Jews walked away with the loot both times.

I’m not defending pogroms, which were horrible, and most Jews were not money-lenders. I’m just providing some cultural context here.

MAGA Against For Israel and Against Antisemitism!

Ezra Pound: Antisemitism and Personality

Ezra Pound, Venice, 1960’s

First commenter: Ezra Pound is an outstanding poet and does not get the literary credit he deserves.

Second commenter: First commenter: NO he deserves NOTHING he was a damn Nazi.

Third commenter: He was more a sympathizer of Italian Fascism; they are distinct, I believe. And Mussolini refused to meet Pound after Pound wrote a half dozen letters offering his ideas about usury and social credit. Mussolini also thought Pound was mad.

Of course. He was one of the greatest poets of the 20th century. The Cantos are awesome.

He’s also known as an antisemite, but guess who else was? TS Eliot. George Orwell. And Voltaire. It only became proscribed here in the West very recently, and it’s reportedly back in the ring for another round as we speak. But at the same time antisemitism was much more common in Europe circa 1920 then it is today. In certain places like Germany or Austria it was basically normal to be an antisemite. You were odd if you were not one.

He is said to have recanted his antisemitism late in life. He met Allen Ginsberg in Venice in 1967 and told Ginsberg,

The one thing I regret was falling prey to that middle class vice, antisemitism.

This has been questioned by a Nazi who met him at St. Elizabeth’s and said he was completely unrepentant, but he left St. Elizabeth’s in 1958, so perhaps he did change.

I don’t care about his politics. They were deplorable, but so what? I’m not aware that he killed anyone.

Celine was an antisemite and a Nazi who also produced Nazi propaganda. Celine was also a great writer but a rather deplorable man. But he continued to treat his poor patients for free until he died. And he never killed anyone either.

Face it, a lot of writers are lousy people!

Shakespeare was a miser, a rich man who refused to help his neighbors during a famine winter when many of them died. He was a tightwad who hounded his poor neighbors for the smallest debts. Shall we stop reading him too?

Pound was already a morally dubious person back in 1922 in Paris. He already an antisemite as he came to antisemitism quite early in life. He was a womanizer who like to run 2-3 women at once at any given time. He was incapable of monogamy. Not that I consider those bad qualities because I lived like that myself for a while.

And to the feminists reading this, he was indeed a misogynist like Henry Miller, another misogynistic womanizer. He was quite intemperate, an elitist snob who hated the average man. He had an ego the size of a small planet, and I believe he could also be a bit of an asshole.

Official psychiatric diagnosis: Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

He also got very depressed toward the end of his life. Diagnosis late in life, near death: Bipolar Disorder.

Support for Israel in the US Continues to Decline

I look over these polls about Americans’ support for Israel all the time nowadays.

Prior to October 7, 7

Even more striking is the decline in Americans who support Israel as opposed to supporting other choices.

After October 7, US support for Israel had dropped to 4

But two months into the war, this figure had already crashed. It went from 4

A poll after October 7 found 5

The question about supporting the way the war was fought was not asked again, but the military aid question was. And incredibly, support for US military aid to Israel has fallen from 5

After October 7, 6

Two months later, support for a ceasefire had fallen to 5

Presumably if he did this, the Jewish Lobby and wealthy Jews would fail to contribute to Democrats or might even give money to Republicans instead. As Ilhan Omar said, “It’s all about the Benjamins, baby.” She was called antisemite over that statement and forced to apologize, but she was right. She told the straight up truth. There’s nothing antisemitic about it as truth is a defense against antisemitism.

Instead, Biden is trying to have it both ways, shoveling weapons at Israel and at the same time claiming to be pressuring Israel to minimize civilian casualties. As far as the latter request goes, Israel has said,

Sure, we’ll do it. Right-o!

Then they went ahead and kept on doing it anyway. In other words, they lied again. I could have told you they would act that way because I know what these people are like. They don’t listen much to anyone.

The problem as in so many cases where one is trying to have it both ways, is that you end up getting no one’s support and instead you anger both sides. Biden’s playing a game here, a con, a scam. He thinks he call fool his base with this, but it’s not working.

Israel is hemorrhaging support in the US and a majority of Americans are now in support of cutting off military aid to the Jews’ little hate state in the Levant. However, 2/3 of Americans have a positive opinion of Israel and only 1

As you might guess, the youngest cohort, 18-25, is where Israel is hemorrhaging support in the worst way. However, the 26-34 age group doesn’t support Israel a whole lot either and in some cases, neither does the 35-44 age group. The 45-64 and 65+ age groups quite reliably support Israel, with support being particularly dramatic in the oldest cohort. In general support for Israel climbs with age in the US.

 

 

 

Comments Were Broken Since Christmas! They’re Fixed Now. Comment Away!

I noticed the comments stopped at December 25 and there hasn’t been a single one since. I finally thought that was odd and I went to check by leaving my own comment. It gave me an error message! It smelled like my Jetpack plugin, so I went and deactivated it and got a new error message.

Tried it again and the comments all vanished along with the ability to even leave one in the first place! So I deleted Jetpack. Same problem. Then I got an idea and closed out the site and logged onto my site again. The login screen looked like it used to before Jetpack “upgraded” it (really a downgrade). I went and tried to leave a comment and it took.

So comment away people! Comment all you want! I love all of you, I really do. Especially Polar Beat and Claudius – there’s a special little place in my heart for both of you guys. I have some other favorite commenters and some of them are absolutely superb, but they don’t comment nearly as much as those two.

The comments, especially the more erudite and fascinating ones by some commenters with very interesting intellects, are what really make this site go round. I actually missed some of you.

Qualities of a Narcissistic Psychopath or Malignant Narcissist

A commenter said all Jews were narcissistic psychopaths. Clinically of course, that’s not true, although a lot of the Jews in academia and business do have a thuggish quality about them that one could call sociopathic.

But they aren’t diagnosed sociopaths. They may indeed have elevated scores in the PCL Psychopathy checklist. The scale is 0-40. 20+ means you are a psychopath. Most people score between 0-5.

But as you can see, anyone scoring 6-19 would have an elevated score and would be more sociopathic than average but would still be within the normal range. Even a score of one implies that one has at least a hint of psychopathy. So psychopathy may be on spectrum and not Manichean like so many qualities. It’s an odd implication that most of us are even slightly sociopathic, but maybe you have to be to survive. I have no idea.

I’ve also noticed that a lot of Jewish men can be quite narcissistic. In fact, Judaism itself is almost a Narcissistic Personality Disorder with claims of specialness or chosenness, disdain for persons not part of the self – in this case the group – and a permission to exploit other people – in this case, those outside the group as the group substitutes for the self in this analogy.

I believe that elevated narcissism and psychopathy levels in Jewish men, though in most cases within the norms, are caused by their upbringing which forces them to succeed at all costs and burdens them with a terror of failure that follows them though life.

Narcissistic psychopath isn’t a diagnosis, but malignant narcissism is a known disorder. Trump definitely has this dangerous mental disorder, described by one of its early theoreticians as being “close to pure evil.” Ted Bundy was a malignant narcissist, so they can definitely be dangerous. Another famous serial killer was one too. I think he was German but he committed crimes in the US.

It’s also been described as “the personality disorder of the dictator.” Once again, note Donald Trump, would-be dictator.

The following list of symptoms was given:

  • They are wound collectors, constantly ruminating over grievances they never forget.
  • They believe that others are always seeking to exploit or harm them in some way.
  • They use psychological projection to justify their immoral behavior.
  • They are adept at character assassination and ritual humiliation.
  • They feel what is acceptable for them is intolerable in others.
  • They will try to make their victims look crazy and aggressive.
  • They are prone to envy and sudden bouts of intense rage.
  • They will never take responsibility for their actions.
  • They believe all interactions are zero-sum games.
  • They expect special privileges and protections.
  • They will use blackmail to get what they want.
  • They have an extreme sense of entitlement.
  • They think rules don’t apply to them.
  • They are drawn to positions of power.
  • They are master social manipulators.
  • They always have an ulterior motive.
  • They are unable to take criticism.
  • They see themselves as victims.
  • They are natural chameleons.
  • They are never at fault.

I will go over most of these above in a minute.

Also found on the Net:

Right out of the narcissist’s handbook: lies, lies by omission, half-truths, projection, baiting, gaslighting, manipulating, triangulation, creating chaos and confusion, corruption, bribery, blackmail, threats, smearing a person’s reputation. Devoid of empathy and remorse, they will stop at nothing.

Motive: power and control.

The above was found in the same place. Hopefully I will go over these in a minute. Some qualities are repeated, but others are not.

It’s going to be hard but you really need to try to not do any of these things too much. You’re probably going to do some of them anyway. After all, I feel that we are all “personality disordered” in some way. No one gets out of this unscathed. We probably all project, but the less you do it, the better. I don’t have anything against acting like a chameleon, but it’s definitely a suit you can put on to fool people in a malicious way.

Really most things on that list are pretty terrible. Those aren’t just ordinary personality flaws. Those are some seriously messed up traits.

“They believe that others are always seeking to exploit or harm them in some way.”

Note the paranoia. Paranoia is a quality of malignant narcissists that neither narcissists of psychopaths alone have. Another quality is sadism, which isn’t listed here. Notice how obsessed Trump is with his enemies? That’s the paranoia. Ever noted his tendency towards sadistic attacks on others?

“They will try to make their victims look crazy and aggressive.”

This quality is the same thing as gaslighting. I’ve noticed more and more that people do this a lot, especially in arguments and fights. How many times have you had an argument or fight with someone and the person called you crazy?

“They always have an ulterior motive.”

This was an interesting one too. It implies that they are never genuine, sincere, or even playful and carefree.

“They believe all interactions are zero-sum games.”

This was also interesting. Zero-sum game means either I get everything and you get nothing or you get everything and I get nothing. This means there is no sense of compromise with these people and they will always have to win it all and make you lose it all. I tend to get this impression with Trump too. Everything is win or lose. Nothing is win-win or lose-lose.

“They are natural chameleons.” This is simply the psychopath. The psychopath blends in, wears new suits and hats, so to speak. The can play roles like an actor in a movie and it’s hard to get a good read on them.

“They believe that others are always seeking to exploit or harm them in some way.”

There’s the paranoia. This means there are no innocent or good-hearted people. Everyone’s a conniving psychopath just like you.

“They are prone to envy and sudden bouts of intense rage.”

This is known as narcissistic rage. They also use this to control others and in this sense, they are what I call “emotional terrorists.” I suppose Trump does throw rage attacks in his social media posts. I believe aides said he blew up all the time in his office too.

If you criticize me, I will throw a rage attack.

They terrorize people in that way. They’re waving a sword over your head. It’s like hostage-taking.

Give me what I want or I will do something terrible.

It works very well to stop people from criticizing you, but that’s not necessarily a good thing. My youngest brother did this all the time, but he constantly criticized me. But could I even suggest a mild criticism of him? Of course not.

First of all, you shouldn’t terrorize others into not criticizing you. It’s emotional blackmail. This is especially true if you’re acting like an asshole, and these people are always doing that.

I’ll add one thing and that’s that they get to criticize you all they want to, often in a pretty aggressive way, but you don’t get to criticize them back. I’ve seen this in so many people, it’s ridiculous.

My father and the younger brother I had living with me until recently were like this. My depressive sister was like this for a long time too, though lately she seems to have finally grown out of it, especially after my mother died. I’m not sure how that helped her mature, but maybe she finally realized that she’s on her own in life and not a child anymore and she needs to take some responsibility.

Likewise my aunt also has this “I can attack you but you can’t attack me” quality. I’d also like to add that just about everyone like this is not a very nice person. They’re usually assholes or bitches and they’re generally pretty damn mean.

My other brother, who obviously has full-blown Narcissistic Personality Disorder, also has this quality, but he doesn’t throw a rage attack, even a mini one, if you criticize him. Instead he rather blows it off in an odd way as if it doesn’t effect him but you can tell it does. Sort of a phony indifference. But he definitely dismisses the critique, that’s for sure.

As you might expect, he’s a pretty big asshole, but he can be nice on occasion.

But if he’s visiting you, he always has to “get his burns in.” He has to burn you or attack you in an unpleasant way at least once. I’m not sure why that is, but it happens every time he visits. I think he’s showing you what he really thinks of you and that the pleasantness was all for show. It’s also a way of one-upping you or  better yet, getting one last Parthian thrust in before he departs.

Sort of like someone punches you in the face and then says, “Ok, fight’s over,” and walks out the door. It’s also a show of superiority and pointing out that you are inferior because everything is a superiority-inferiority contest with these people. Nothing’s on the level. No one’s equal. Everyone’s either above you or below you, and yes, narcissists do think there are people above them, and they either worship them like gods or they envy and hate them passionately.

The envy is a classic symptom of narcissism. I suppose we are all envious but it’s a very bad quality and the less envious you are, the better.

“They think rules don’t apply to them. We say this above with the”

“I get to criticize and attack you all I want to, but you can’t criticize or attack me back”

game. One set of rules for them, another set of rules for everybody else. Obviously this is a very shitty way to live your life.

“They are prone to envy and sudden bouts of intense rage.”

Of course, all narcissists are envious. This has led to such things as narcissists beating me over the head with baseball bats. As you can see, narcissistic envy is a serious thing. When I got a Master’s Degree, my brother very quickly started telling everyone that he had a Master’s Degree too (he doesn’t). I said that anyone who is envious of me is pretty pathetic because there’s not a lot to envy about me. But once again, it’s an obsession with the idea that everything in life is on a hierarchy scale.

“They are drawn to positions of power.”

Ever noticed how many assholes like this there are in positions of power? Like moths to a flame.

“They are never at fault.”

My younger brother who just moved out had this quality. My mother pointed it out. I also had a cousin who was like this. My father was like this and so is my aunt. The thing is, most people like this are assholes in other ways, and they are typically aggressive or hostile people. I suppose there are nice people who are never at fault but I’m not aware of any offhand. Ever noticed that Trump never admits to any failures or wrongdoings? Everything is someone else’s fault.

“They will never take responsibility for their actions.”

This goes along with never being at fault, of course. You really need to be able to take some criticism without flipping out, blowing up, or even, I would say, getting devastatingly hurt, which is what used to happen to me. It doesn’t happen anymore though. I’m not sure if that’s a good thing because I feel like I lost some part of myself.

“They see themselves as victims.”

Same thing. Never wrong, take no responsibility for their actions goes right along with always being a victim of other people. The latter follows right from the former.

“They are adept at character assassination and ritual humiliation.”

Notice how often Trump does this, or should I say feels the need to do this? All the time.

“They use psychological projection to justify their immoral behavior.”

Trump does this all the time. I think my brother did it too. Usually aggressive, unpleasant, hostile, or mean people act outraged if you point out that they’re aggressive. There is something about aggression that blinds the person to the fact that they are aggressive. I’m not sure why that is. I think in a lot of cases, they know they’re being aggressive but they just don’t want to admit. It’s a rare asshole who acknowledges that he’s acting like a dick. I almost respect those types more. Want to know what Trump is like? Look at what he accuses others of being like or doing. That’s really what Trump is acting like or doing!

It’s Tempting for Adults to Act Like Children Their Whole Lives

It’s very tempting for adults to act like children their whole lives. Adulthood is pretty much of a drag if you ask me. I had a lot more fun when I was a kid. But then I have a silly, frivolous, fun-loving, “everything’s a joke” personality. I really can’t stand the extreme seriousness that is demanded of us as adults. I feel like I’m in a cage.

On the other hand, you do have to be fairly serious as an adult so as not to break social rules. You’ll follow social rules better if you have a seriousness about you. Other adults may respect you more if you act serious than if you don’t. You certainly won’t be accused of being immature or childish.

Let’s face it: the adult world is serious. You say or do one wrong thing and you’re fired and out on the curb. If you can’t find another job, you’re homeless. That’s some serious shit.

However, if you keep acting like a kid or a teenager your whole life, psychically you negate this serious terror of adulthood and you can pretend it’s not there.

But a lot of adults take this way too seriously, especially members of both sexes but especially mean from their late 20’s to early 30’s, especially if they are married and have a kid or two. A lot of them got married very young and had kids in their early to mid-20’s. I had a boss like like that. He told us he was living on a houseboat in the Netherlands and married by the time he was 19. Apparently anyone not showing this level of maturity at that age was an immature baby.

These people are just overcompensating. They’re trying to differentiate themselves “the mature ones” from “the immature ones.” They’ve divided the world in two in a superior-inferior way, which is a pretty shitty thing to do right there if you ask me. And if you do that, you might want to think about maybe changing it. You’ll be a better person. Life’s not a footrace.

The way I realized that they were overcompensating was that these people act far more seriously and are far more obsessed with being “mature” and “adult” then older adults are! You would think that if this was really an important quality for us to have, as we get older we should become more and more obsessed with acting mature and adult.

But I noticed that older adults slow down a lot and don’t seem to be obsessed with this at all. And as people get older, they tend to have a less serious, not a more serious attitude, about them.

This implies that seriousness isn’t a marker for adulthood either because if it were, we would get more serious as we age. Sure, you are supposed to obtain a certain level of seriousness as an adult, but once  you get there, you’re supposed to stop and if you get obsessed with it, you’re just acting like an ass. But we don’t get more serious as we age. We get more casual and carefree.

These people I mentioned are simply insecure about being mature adults, so they overcompensate for going overboard. Every time you see someone who is overcompensating for any quality, there’s a good bet that they are insecure about it. If you’re secure, you don’t need to overcompensate!

Why do people become less serious as they get older? I’m not sure. Notice I said less serious, not less childish.

Childishness is pretty much out if you’re an adult, though lovers often act this way or at least that has been the case with my girlfriends. The more in love with each other you are, the more silly and childish you act with each other at least when you’re alone. Being in love is fun. It’s not just this wonderful, fulfilling experience. It’s also a blast. It’s like a wild party every day, at least while the “wild love” phase lasts for at most a couple of years at the beginning.

You need to have a certain level of maturity though. One gag I do is a put a pen in my mouth and make it hang down vertically from my lips. It looks completely idiotic. However a woman I knew to told me to stop doing it and implied it was childish. This chick wanted to marry me! She was 27 and I was in my 50’s. Later I did it in front of my father and he gave me the same attitude of:

“Hey that’s childish.”

There’s also a good feeling when, as an adult, you start feeling like one and trying to act the part. It’s like you’ve accomplished something, and in a way you have. You’re now on a higher level and you’re trying to take care of yourself so you don’t make bad mistakes and get fired, arrested, or have other very bad things happen to you.

I do feel that a lot of adults take life way too seriously and get upset, annoyed, or offended at the tiniest little things. C’mon people! Life’s not that big of a deal! We’re all dead in the end anyway, so why the long face and the ultra-serious bullshit? Why get offended at every other thing someone says? Is it really necessary?

What they’re doing is overcompensating. They’re trying to prove their adults by going completely overboard on the “adult” thing. Everything you do is “immature” and “not grown up.” They demand that everyone around them act like an adult at all times. You better be moved out of your parents’ house too, even if you’re at university.

Why Conservatism Is Barbarism (Law of the Jungle, Social Darwinism, Survival of the Fittest)

Commenter: First, let me say I take issue with your definition of conservatives as being barbaric retards.

Thanks, I changed that. I still think conservatism is backwards and barbarous. But it’s definitely not retarded.

Not only that but conservatism and conservatives will never go away. It and they will always be with us. My brother told me that and that’s one of the smartest things he ever said to me. I think we Lefties have to reckon ourselves to that.

First of all, conservatism is always and only rule by aristocracy or rule by the rich. It used to mean “the divine right of kings. Read Leviathan for more on that. Locke was one of the first people to call bullshit on that obviously ridiculous notion.

After royalty vanished, conservatives simply substituted money, power and stuff for the aristocracy, so conservatism in our modern age is never anything but the rule of the rich over everyone who’s not rich (although the upper middle class does benefit). It’s always the rule of the top 2

Liberalism, by contrast, has never been anything but the rule by the people themselves as opposed to the rule by the aristocracy. Why anyone would oppose rule by the people, a group they are a part of, in favor of the rule by a top 2

I understand intellectually when people are conservatives, but on an emotional level, I just don’t get it. Unless they’re rich and the only reason they’re conservatives boils down to money and a desire to keep more of it for themselves and not share a nickel of it with any other soul. I get that. I see why corporate types are conservatives.

If I were rich, upper middle class, or corporate, I like to think I’d be the liberal outlier.

I see why warmongering psycho assholes are conservatives.

I see why science-hating idiots are conservatives.

Conservatism is the ostrich response to life. It’s the monkey response: See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil, so therefore, somehow…there’s no evil! LOL. If the emperor’s walking naked down the street, the conservatives are the ones who are ranting about how great his outfit is. Conservatism seems to boil down to self-delusion and denial of reality to me, usually because reality threatens to make their lives less comfortable or gets in the way of their pocketbook.

Conservatives seem to be saying:

LOL yeah life is shitty and sucks but so what! Just be a winner and beat everyone else and it’s all good! But please, God forbid, don’t ever try to make anything better because that’s called “interfering with the natural order of life,”

which, to conservatives, is never anything but the Law of the Jungle, which they think is the greatest thing since  radical tires. Conservatism is social Darwinism. It always has been and it always will be. There’s no way it can be anything but.

Why on Earth they love this horrorshow notion of human life as the literal jungle writ large and all of us are simply greater or lesser mammals either being preyed on or predating others is something I will never understand. Except I suppose conservatives think they’re winners. They think they’re the winner predators killing and eating all the weak, lame, and stupid (all self-inflicted of course) lesser mammals and delighting in their mass homicide and cannibalism.

Like I said: Barbarism.

One More Reminder That You’re Being Gaslit All the Time If You Make the Mistake of Believing in Science

Examples:

Why are women more emotional than men?

Feminist Woke answer: They’re not! It’s a misogynistic lie about women!

Of course given an answer like that feels a lot like gaslighting, so you end up being gaslit.

Are Whites as a group smarter than Blacks?

Antiracist woke answer: No, they’re not! Blacks are just as smart but it’s just that the tests are biased against them. Which tests? All the tests of course.

Ok, that answer smells wrong to me. I’d say all of these tests are biased, of course. I agree. Except I’d say they’re biased against dumb people, hence the answers come out the way they do. Once again, you’re being gaslit hard.

Yes, John Travolta is Bisexual

This has been known in Hollywood for a very long time now. The rumor that he is gay is hitting the press now, but it’s been known for a very long time. He got in on it as a teenage boy as part of the LA Gay Mafia’s casting couch for young male movie stars. This has been a notorious problem for many years now in LA. A lot of these men have high positions at the studios and they’re virtually untouchable.

Who Are These Famous American Writers?

Name these famous American writers. Click to enlarge.

They all wrote in the 20th Century save two of them. One was still publishing in the 1980’s. I only got three of them if you can believe that. In the 4th from the top, that photo of him is a lot younger than what we usually see. He looks a bit like young Joseph Stalin! 3rd from the bottom, that picture is also younger than we are used to seeing. I thought he looked like Hitler!

I’m Published on The Unz Review Now

Ron Unz is letting me post stuff on his website, The Unz Review, now. It’s one of the biggest sites on the Internet. Well, he let me post one article, the one on the 10-7 death toll. We will see if he lets me post anything else. I do correspond with him fairly regularly.

There were comments on here that he’s maladjusted. I don’t get any sense of that at all. Socially he’s very appropriate. He’s extremely intelligent. His IQ was supposedly tested at 190 earlier in his life. For what it’s worth, Thomas Pynchon and Elon Musk are also said to have 190 IQ’s. He’s a pretty nice guy too. He never fights you if you are decent to him.

I also don’t get the idea that he’s an antisemite at all. Sure, he’s critical of a lot of Jewish behavior and he engages in a lot of hyperbole, but he doesn’t act like a self-hater. If anything else, he is a “completely logical” person in the sense that he wants to know the hard truth about just about everything. There’s a lot of good material critical of US foreign policy on there, so there’s a lot for a Leftist or at least an Alt Leftist like me, to chew on.

Of course the place is chock full of obsessive and conspiratorial antisemites, including a number of the authors. But this is good in a sense because if you read their stuff with an open mind, you can see just how nutty this “Jews control everything so we need to inflict harm on them” nonsense is. I’ve said before that if this type of antisemitism were true, I would just believe it. Problem is it just isn’t.

The place is also now swarming with White nationalists who of course often tie the Jewish Question in with their White nationalism with the theory that Jews are the enemy of the White race. Just as Unz is not an antisemite, he’s also not a White nationalist at all. Why he gives these folks a forum is beyond me.

Not everyone on there is a rightwinger, an antisemite, or a White nationalist. In fact, there are a number of what I might call “Alt Left” writers on there, or more properly anti-imperialists. These people are coming from the place where the Far Right meets the Far Left so to speak. Horseshoe theory is correct.

Sure most of the commenters are rightwing idiots, but so what? I’d like to see if he lets me post more stuff on there, preferably some Left stuff.

I’m not ashamed to be published on The Unz Review. Hell, I need to get published somewhere and I’ll take anything at this point. Earlier, American Renaissance wanted me to write an article for them, but they rejected it after I criticized White nationalism. And they told me I could go ahead and do that, too.

Why Is the Arab and Muslim World Doing So Little to Help the Palestinians?

From the Net:

On the Israel/Gaza conflict; it looks like the Muslim nations have done ZERO to actually help Gaza. They haven’t even broken off financial or diplomatic ties. Seems likely that a significant percentage of the Gaza and West Bank people will be killed off this year. Life continues to be without hope for the Palestinians.

Muslim nations = Sunni Muslim nations, ok?

And that makes all of the difference.

Lebanon is supporting Hezbollah (Shia government, Sunni and Shia people but mostly Shia).

Syria is supporting Gaza and Hezbollah (Shia government, Sunni people).

Iran is supporting Gaza and the rest of the Resistance (Shia).

Iraq is supporting Gaza because the Iraqi military itself (!) is the group that is shooting at our bases on Syria and Iraq. They never tell you that, do they? And the government doesn’t try to stop them, either. Those are all battalions of the official Iraqi military! The Iraqi military has battalions and brigades inside of it that are mostly Shia and are very pro-Iran (Shia government, Sunni/Shia mixed people).

Yemen is poorly understood. Ansar Allah is actually real government of Yemen. They won a civil war and took over the state. The existing very unpopular state fled to Saudi Arabia where they continue to administer their fake state from afar. Most of the Yemeni military (~8

Malaysia has banned all Israeli ships from landing at its ports (Sunni).

Algeria is on board as its Parliament has declared war on Israel (Sunni).

Egypt (Sunni), Jordan (Sunni), Saudi Arabia (Sunni with Shia minority), and UAE (Sunni) are actually supporting Israel in this war. The first three are shooting down missiles heading for Israel. Saudi Arabia and the UAE have made an overland route so goods can go overland to Israel to avoid the Red Sea.

Bahrain (Sunni with Shia minority) has joined the US flotilla to protect Israeli ships and ships going to Israel.

Tunisia, Morocco, Libya, Sudan, Mauritania, Oman, and Qatar have said nothing (Sunni).

Kuwait and Turkey had some harsh words (Sunni with Shia minorities).

Muslim Africa has said nothing (Mostly Sunni, small Shia minority in Nigeria) .

Pakistan (Sunni with Shia minority), Bangladesh, and the Stans (both Sunni) have done nothing.

Azerbaijan is allied with Israel (Shia)!

Look what is really going on here is a lesson in just how deranged the Sunni hatred of the Shia really is. It needs to be seen to believed. These Sunni governments would rather fight and kill the Shia then fight Israel. In fact they will literally ally themselves with Israel so they can fight and kill Shia alongside the bloodthirsty Jews.

That is literally how insane and stupid Sunni Muslims are.

Now it’s true that as you get towards the outlying areas away from Arabia it calms down a lot. Tunisia, Libya, Sudan, Somalia, Morocco, Algeria, Morocco, Oman, Qatar, Bangladesh, Malaysia, and Indonesia care nothing at all about the Shia, mostly because they don’t have any of them anywhere near them.

But Saudi Arabia, Yemen, UAE, Bahrain, Lebanese Sunnis, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Egypt, Jordan, many Syrian Sunnis, Iraqi Sunnis, Turkey, and Egypt really hate the Shia. I honestly think this is going to tear Islam apart because the Sunnis will not get over this Shia hatred in my lifetime. I know these people. I’ve met them and talked to them.

I don’t think I will miss Islam when it’s gone, if it goes out, that is. It’s nice that it makes people fight so hard for their rights, but I don’t think all the rest of the baggage is worth it. Furthermore, it will never reform in my lifetime and it is probably incapable of reform.

Nice Equation

Nice equation.

I’m afraid that’s about right. And I don’t necessarily mind Soros’ open societies except for his hatred of Russia. Ethnic nationalism, another word for politicized national heritage, often is fascistic! It’s hard to have an ethnic nationalist government without it being at least a little bit fascist.

Diversity is probably not good for the economy. Why on Earth would “diversity” benefit the economy? That doesn’t even make sense. What’s the mechanism for how exactly diversity benefits the economy? I’m not seeing it.

As far as replacement of Whites goes, well, we are being replaced. Is it deliberate? I have no idea. But I’ll tell you what. The whole SJW/woke crowd is absolutely ecstatic that Whites will be a minority at some certain date. They all sound like they’re going to have a huge party on that day. I don’t see what’s so good about. We may as well have a day or mourning as much as block party.

That this whole mess starts with capitalism, which logically only feeds into individualism and atomization as opposed to any sort of collectivism or even duty to society, is obvious. In fact, neoliberals hate society. Remember Margaret Thatcher’s famous words?

There is no such thing as society.

Margaret Thatcher.

Those may as well have been Reagan’s words too because he was a precise mirror image of Thatcher. Why do capitalists hate collectivism and any notion of duty to society so much? Because not only does it lead to some form of socialism but it also tends to break down the glue that holds capitalism together, namely radical individualism.

And Marxists have made a superb argument that capitalism is in fact not morally right at all. In fact, it is quite immoral! The main problem with Marxists is not their critique of capitalism, which is yet unequaled but instead in their proposing any viable alternatives to capitalism. In this sense they have been much less successful in part because they treat Marxism like a science that has to be correct.

Marxism will inevitably lead utopia. There’s no way it can’t. But says who? You can’t just write down a theory and say this is science and it works. You have to test it out first. I think Marxists lock themselves in a prison when they stick to standard Marxist doctrine. There have to be some different ways to be a communist. There are already many different ways to be a socialist.

His point is also correct. If capitalism is indeed morally superior, then its necessary ingredient – radical individualism – must also be superior to the other ways you can live your life. And radical individualism leads to a desire for freedom across the board in rights and economics, so Soros’ rights uber alles “open societies” follows quite logically from individualism. Collectivist societies are not so big on individual rights.

And yes, if we don’t want to be fascists, we have to worship at the church of diversity. And when we do that of course, we must open the border as closing the border or even limiting entry through it must be fascist. So you end up with this fake dichotomy called “fascism versus open borders,” and those are your only two choices.

And yes, diversity worship logically leading to mass immigration does lead to the end of a White majority in America. What I like about his neat little equation is that he makes a perfect case that neoliberal capitalism and radical individualism lead logically to diversity worship, open borders, and an end to a White majority. So why are all these White nationalists or pro-White groups all voting for the ultra-capitalist Republicans? Why do they all swoon when you mention capitalism and recoil when you suggest anything mildly socialistic? It’s really a case of:

The capitalist will sell you the very rope that is used to hang him.

Joseph Stalin

So, we have:

  • Capitalism is morally right. Really dubious and I’d go so far as to say it’s false.
  • The individual is everything. That there are serious problems with this should be obvious.
  • Soros open societies. I’m starting to wonder if these are always such a good thing. Notice that Soros refuses to push his rights uber alles in Israel? That’s because this kind of stuff leads to Identity Politics and tears society apart by ripping it into competing tribes. And in Israel of course, ethnic nationalism is good. Jews think ethnic nationalism in White countries is evil, but it’s fine for them. Hypocrites.
  • National heritages are fascist. This needn’t be so broad. A little nationalism goes a long way and it’s necessarily a bad thing nor does it always lead to fascism. For instance left nationalism absolutely does not lead to fascism. And there are issues with tearing apart your own society and the masochistic hating of one’s own nation that results. Look at Germany.
  • Diversity is good for the economy. They haven’t presented any evidence that this is true, nor do they have a theory on how it even might work. Color me dubious to say the least.
  • Whites become a minority in the US. As with everything else on this list, who says this is a good thing? What are you going to replace Whites with? Inferior people, people on their level, or superior people. It matters.

A Review of Hemingway’s Novels

From the Net:

His three full-length novels are hardly masterpieces; his crowning achievement is still the short story.

The Sun Also Rises

A Farewell to Arms

For Whom the Bell Tolls

To Have and Have Not

The Garden of Eden

Across the River and into the Trees

Islands in the Stream

Torrents of Spring

I get eight full length novels. For sure The Sun Also Rises, A Farewell to Arms, and For Whom the Bell Tolls are regarded as masterpieces, and they are all full-length novels.

Across the River and into the Trees was panned when it first came out, but it has since been regarded as a great book on a par with those three.

Same with The Garden of Eden. It was also panned mostly for the posthumous edit job, but it’s now regarded as one of the greats too.

And Islands in the Stream is also now regarded as on a part with the best.

So there are six great full-length novels.

Torrents in the Spring is no doubt a minor novel.

To Have and Have Not is generally seen as a minor work.

Some Male Writers Were Definitely Misogynists – And Assholes, Narcissists, and Misers Too

From the Net:

It seems Hemingway speaks after a life of unresolved trauma himself resulting in major identity challenges, misogyny, and his eventual suicide.

Hemingway was not a misogynist at all. This is a huge misconception.

However, some male writers were – Henry Miller, Charles Bukowski, Norman Mailer, John Updike at the end, and of course, the postwar Philip Wylie. But some of those guys like Miller and Bukowski were also drowning in women.

Others lived misogynistic lives.

Norman Mailer tried to kill his wife.

David Foster Wallace stalked and tried to kill his girlfriend.

Of course there are the woman-hating homosexual men like William Burroughs, Brian Gyson, and Bret Easton Ellis. There are a lot more misogynistic gay men than most people realize. However, Oscar Wilde wrote beautifully about women, and I think he liked them a lot in some ways. He definitely loved his mother. He nailed the female psyche perfectly.

Women always want the best

he wrote, nailing female hypergamy perfectly.

John Rechy is very narcissistic but in a much less toxic way than most narcissists. That said, many gay men are narcissistic. lt’s almost a “type.”

Philip Roth gets accused of misogyny a lot. I’m not sure how accurate the charge is, but he was definitely an asshole and narcissist.

You can say the same about V.S. Naipaul.

Jerzy Kozinski was a horrible pathological narcissist and a plagiarist to boot.

Vonnegut was just an asshole who hated everyone.

Philip Larkin was similar.

Shakespeare was the same. He didn’t hate women; he hated everyone. He was also a cruel miser who let his neighbors starve in a famine and hounded them for petty debts. But that’s not why read Shakespeare!

Then again, Marx wasn’t very nice either.

A lot of great man were assholes, but they’re still great, and we still need to read them.

If you want to go all the way back, Plato, Socrates and the rest of the Greeks were notorious misogynists, but that was the culture then.

Was Ernest Hemingway a Misogynist?

From the Net:

It seems Hemingway speaks after a life of unresolved trauma himself resulting in major identity challenges, misogyny, and his eventual suicide.

Hard disagree on the misogyny. That’s just stupid feminists. They call all sorts of male writers misogynists.

Hemingway loved women and he was actually rather passive with his wives who nearly mothered him instead of being the macho asshole you would assume.

And some of his female characters are the finest female characters I have ever read! He really got inside of the pure, actual female mind that many do not wish to know exists, and he laid it out masterfully.

  • The short attention span
  • tendency to digress
  • tiny emotional eruptions of all sorts
  • pinball-like changes in micro-emotions
  • pettiness in both good and bad ways
  • preference for intuitive as opposed to logical thinking
  • basic goodhearted and kindheartedness and incredible capacity for nurturing at their core
  • chatty talkativeness about not much of anything (talking just to be talking) or what I call thinking out loud
  • dream-like state of mind
  • importance of dreams as in fantasy
  • use of fantasy and denial as defenses
  • calculating mindset of young women with short biological clocks and a lot to do in only as bit of time
  • child-like (not childish!) behavior
  • tendency towards adultery
  • preference for masculine successful men and contempt for failed men seen as less masculine
  • capability of immense cruelty, though profoundly dwarfed by male cruelty and sadism

For the last three check out The Short and Happy Life of Francis Macomber for these three),

It’s all there. How the Hell does a man get into a woman’s head like that?

Is American Literature the Best Literature of All?

From the Net:

American literature is perhaps the most developed literature in the post-colonial era. Though it owes its origin to British literature, after independence it has gone a long way in establishing its own significance in international forums and conveying the message that American literature is not dwarfed or smothered in any way.

It has rather achieved global acclaim in various fields such as poetry, prose, novels, drama, biographical and autobiographical sketches by a host of eminent literary luminaries like Ernest Hemingway, F Scott-Fitzgerald, William Faulkner, Walt Whitman, H.W. Longfellow, Emily Dickinson, E.A. Poe, Harriet Beecher Stowe, Mark Twain, J.D. Salinger, R.W. Emerson and many others.

These literary giants have widened our outlook and broadened our vision by virtue of their copious writings.

Uncle Tom’s Cabin by H. B. Stowe, Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau, All My Sons by Arthur Miller, Leaves of Grass by Walt Whitman, A Farewell to Arms and The Old Man at the Sea by Ernest Hemingway, etc. are treated as great American classics. To tell the truth, American literature is ever widening and marching forward with long strides to attain perfection.

I suppose I beg to differ. American literature was barely developed at all before Melville and then it was only in the form of Nathaniel Hawthorne. And the novel did not become popular in the US until the early 1900’s. Before that they sold poorly and most people didn’t own a single book other than the Bible. How many great works of US literature were produced between Melville and 1900? Other than Henry James of course. I’m wondering. And no, Howells doesn’t count.

If we look at other literature around the world, we can see that many countries have a literature that goes back far further than American literature, which has barely started by the 1830’s and Hawthorne.

French, German, Russian and British literature were far more developed during this period than US literature was and have an excellent pedigree extending back much further.

Just off the top of my head, without doing any extensive literature, I came up with the following works:

English literature goes all the way back to Beowulf, which is almost written in German. Before that we have King Arthur, The Search for the Holy Grail, Gesta Stephani: Deeds of King Stephen (Acts of Stephen), Pearl Poet’s works, and Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales, which is almost unreadable nowadays as it is so so archaic. Then onto Shakespeare and the playwrights, a period that went on for over a century.

Irish literature also goes way back beyond Synge and Lady Gregory so lauded by Yeats to The History of Abbot Ceolfrith, Líadan Tells of Her Love for Cuirithir, The History of Abbot Ceolfrith, and Togail Bruidne Dá Derga (The Destruction of Da Derga’s Hostel).

We can say the same for the long history of Spanish literature in Spain all the way back to Cervantes and the playwrights.

Italian literature goes all the back to The Decameron and The Divine Comedy. We can go even further back to Roman times and Cicero and Virgil if you want with Latin classics continuing into the modern era with The Carmina Burana.

German literature goes back to Baron von Munchausen and before that to The Ruodlieb.

And of course Greek literature goes back to Homer and The Iliad and The Odyssey and along with the great lyric poets and the playwrights.

Icelandic literature goes all the way back to the Norse sagas, the Hávamál, the Völuspá, and later to the Landnamabok or The Book of Settlements.

In the same vein a sort of Scottish Norse can go back to the Orkneyinga Saga.

In Arabic, we have the Book of a Thousand Nights.

In Persian, the Shahnameh or The Book of Kings, The Ghazals, Rumi, and much before that, the Book of Avesta.

French literature goes back to The Book of Roland, Raoul de Cambrai, and Charlemagne’s Voyage to Jerusalem and Constantinople.

Japanese literature also goes way back to Kagerō Nikki (The Mayfly Diary, The Gossamer Years), The Tale of the Heike, The Japanese No Dramas, Sei Shonagon’s Pillow Book, and The Tale of the Genji.

Chinese literature also goes way back to Master Incapable: A Medieval Daoist on the Liberation of the Mind, the Zhuang Zi (Chuang Tzu), and The Yuan plays.

Even Tamil literature goes back to The Eight Anthologies and The Ten Long Poems.

Indian literature goes back to The Lotus Sutra, The Panchatantra, and The Vimalakirti Sutra.

Even places you would never expect like Georgia have ancient classics like The Amiran-Darejaniani.

Finnish literature goes back to The Kalevala.

We can even get creative and call The Mayan Popul Vuh: The Mayan Book of the Dawn of Life literature if we want.

In the 20th Century, Irish, British, French, German, Austrian, Dutch, Italian, Greek, Mexican, and Russian literature had great traditions.

In the last 50 years, Japanese, Chinese, Czech, Hungarian, Korean, Swedish, Brazilian, Peruvian, Argentine, Caribbean, Canadian, Australian, Israeli, Swiss, Belgian, Norwegian, Portuguese, Colombian, Afghan, Palestinian, Egyptian, and South African literature have truly come into their own.

If you can think of any others, folks, please chime in. I’m sure this is not comprehensive.

All of the US Wars in the Middle East Are Wars for the Jews

US bases are in Syria occupying their land, stealing all their oil and setting all their wheat on fire. These illegal bases are now getting hit by rockets and drones fired by the Iraqi Army (see below) every day, and I support to the hilt! We have no business setting up bases on their territory.

Does Syria have a right to come over here, set up bases, declare that 1/3 of the country is under Syrian occupation and any attempts by the US to move into that region will be met by deadly force? Ok, they don’t. Then why do we have a right to be in Syria. A shitlib, my lousy Democrat brother who supports everything US foreign policy does and I mean everything, said, “Who cares? Syria is a failed state.”

So if some country is a failed state, the US has a right to go in there and set up bases? I don’t think so! You can’t set up bases in a foreign country unless you are at war with them.

The US has bases in Syria because the US War on Syria is a War for the Jews. We are getting attacked there as part of our Syrian War for the Jews.

The US has bases in Iraq. The Legislature voted to tell us to pack up all of our bases and leave, but we refused to do it! Trump said if they did it, he would freeze all $6 million of their money held in the US – basically steal it in other words. Why on Earth does any sane country that is not deeply allied to the US keep even one nickel in US banks? Is there something special about those banks.

The Taliban had $6 billion in our banks and we stole every penny of it.

Russia had $300 billion in our banks and we stole all of that too.

Venezuela has $20 billion in US and UK banks and both countries stole every dime of it. US banks are just not safe places to put your money.

There are so many other places to park your money that are not subject to seizure like money in the US and it’s puppet the UK is.

The Legislature backed down. They left the law in but refused to enforce it. I told my shitlib brother and I believe he simply disbelieved me. He does this all the time. Whenever I say anything that makes US foreign policy look bad, he either defends it or says it didn’t happen. My dear departed shitlib mother was exactly the same way and so was my late shitlib father. People really need to start looking into the extent to which Democrats, moderates and liberals both, support US foreign policy to the utter hilt. I don’t most people know about this.

Iraqi military has fired missiles and drones at US bases many times. Don’t buy this lie that those Iraqi groups are Iranian militias or pro-Iranian militias. All of those “militias” attacking US in Iraq and Syria are nothing other than the Iraqi Army itself.

Yes, there are a number of brigades within the Iraqi Army that are mostly Shia and are very pro-Iran. They used to be separate but the government thought they were too destabilizing so they wrapped them into the army.  Notice the MSM or the US government never tells you one single time that those “militias” are simply the Iraqi Army?

However things have gotten so bad that the spineless president of Iraq just ordered the US to pack up all of its military bases and leave! Let’s see if we obey the other or not.

In response to these attacks in Iraq and Syria, the US is bombing the Iraqi military bases where the attackers come from.

Why are we in Iraq? Because our presence there is part of the wars for the Jews. Why are we being attacked there? Because our illegal presence there is part of our Iraqi War for the Jews.

The US is now threatening Lebanon. We stationed a huge carrier group off the coast of Lebanon to threaten Hezbollah in case they upped the war against Israel too much. A while back, the US engaged in a regime change operation in Lebanon in order to throw Hezbollah out of the government.

Hezbollah has 6

But the US and France (a former colonial power) put so many sanctions on Lebanon that most of the banks failed. Lebanon is an extremely corrupt society and the bank failures made that obvious. The government had been robbing the people blind for decades and this is what caused the bank failures. The business class is just as corrupt and they are weaved right into the state. No one knows quite what to do about this but Hezbollah is probably the least corrupt group in Lebanon.

People have no idea what Hezbollah is. I’ve talked to Lebanese from that part of Lebanon and they told me that “Hezbollah” and “the people” are both one thing. Hezbollah are the people and the people are Hezbollah. It’s that simple. And they have a lot of support outside of South Lebanon too, especially in Southern Beirut and the Bekaa Valley. So all the US machinations in Lebanon are part of the Lebanon War for the Jews.

The US is now involved in combat with the Houthis of Yemen. This mostly-Shia group has pledged to help the Palestinians by stopping all Israeli ships or ships going to Israel. They are attacking all Israeli ships or ships going to Israel. Any ship that is not Israeli or not going to Israel is free to traverse the Red Sea in peace.

Many countries are consulting with the Houthis to tell them about their ships so that they might go through easily. The ships of these countries are going through with no problems. The most recent ship to be attacked refused to turn on its transponder and refused to answer Houthi warning calls.

Hence the Houthis fired on it and swarmed with small boats. A US ship nearby intervened and fired on the Houthi ships, killing 10 Houthis. So the US is now officially involved in the another war for the Jews, this one in Lebanon. Let’s call this the Lebanese War for the Jews.

The US is also involved directly in the war in Gaza by shooting down Houthi missiles heading for Israel. So the US is involved in another war for the Jews, this one in Gaza. Let’s call this the Gaza War for the Jews.

Most US hostility towards Iran substantially though not exclusively about Israel, so this is a cold war for the Jews. Let’s call this the Iranian War for the Jews.

The US has no interests in any of these places and all of our involvement there is primarily to protect the interests of Israel. Were Israel not an apartheid Jewish state, we would not be involved in any of these conflicts.

*Note: If you don’t like the phrase War for the Jews, then substitute War for Israel. The wars are really all about protecting Israel, not protecting US Jews, as they are doing just fine. So more properly instead of Wars for the Jews, a rather provocative term, we should use Wars for Israel instead.

We aren’t fighting all of these wars for the Jews of the US, though they definitely helped drag us into the wars via the money power of the Jewish Lobby. But even there, why target your average Jew on the street because of the machinations of Jewish Lobby? He’s probably not one of the uber-wealthy Jews that is driving this policy and he probably doesn’t even donate to the Jewish Lobby, mainly AIPAC. He’s just some regular guy. Leave him out of it.

I don’t want to see US Jews targeted for creating our involvement in these wars. I suppose you could target one of the ultra-rich Jews who is funding this mess. I guess you could yell at him. Maybe throw some harmless object at him. Heckle him. Make his life unpleasant. I see nothing wrong with that. We can treat the major Trumpsters like that if we see them on the street, right? Well why not give the movers and shakers in the Jewish Lobby the same way?

But I don’t want him to be seriously harmed or killed. We are a free country and you can donate your money however you wish.

Besides, you don’t know how they feel about this matter. Some US Jews are opposed to all of these stupid wars for Israel.

The Jews of Saudi Arabia, Yemen, and Lebanon

This is an old piece written some time ago, but I decided to update it. Hope you enjoy it. Note: Long, 20 pages.

The Jews of Saudi Arabia, Yemen and Lebanon

By Robert Lindsay

Please note: This piece is from some time ago. In the meantime, the Houthis have ethically cleansed all of the remaining Jews in Yemen. I’m not sure how many were left. Maybe 20? This is just terrible and I will never support it! The Houthis, otherwise known as Ansar Allah, are antisemites. Their chant is

Allahu Akbar (God is greatest!)! Death to America! Death to Israel! A curse on the Jews! Victory to Islam!

The standard Zionist line is that there are no Jews in “Arabia,” or certainly none in Saudi Arabia. However, as of 2016, there are still Jews living in Yemen, which is a part of Arabia.

As a sign of changing times, although there are only 2,000 Jews left in Yemen, the ruling party recently nominated a Yemeni Jew to run on its platform as a parliamentarian representing the northern region. This was a very controversial move in Yemen and unfortunately ran up against the stumbling block of a regressive law that says that everyone running for office must be a Muslim.

Since one of the religious laws of the Yemeni Jews was that they were not allowed to serve in the army or government of the state (How is that for a dual loyalty problem?), this law meant nothing to the Yemeni Jews, and neither was it an issue under traditional Islamic rule when non-Muslims were kept out of the military and probably discouraged from government office too.

The fact that a Yemeni Jew considered running for office shows that the remaining Jews were giving up some of their strict traditional religious rules. Some rules, however, remained. For instance, the Yemeni Jews refused to eat with non-Jews, and intermarriage was strictly forbidden. The rule about eating was actually a normal practice for all pious European Jews up until about 1800 or so, a little-known fact.

Also, many Yemeni Jews both inside and outside Yemen continued the ancient Jewish practice of prostrating themselves for daily prayer, similar to what Muslims do in a mosque. European Jews generally only do this nowadays, if at all, during portions of certain prayers during the Jewish High Holidays. So in some ways, the remaining Yemeni Jews were stuck in time.

The Yemeni Jews that remained were banned from certain occupations (probably more by traditional Muslim prejudice than by state law), allowed to live only in certain parts of towns, forbidden to serve in the military or government, and had little interaction with their Muslim neighbors, but unfortunately, it has always been that way in Yemen.

On the ban on serving in government or military, note above how this was possibly changing in the government aspect, and how this was a traditional Yemeni Jewish law for themselves anyway.

The Yemeni Jews are some of the most religious Jews in the whole world, and have always been deeply religious.

For instance, on the daily prostration for prayer still practiced by Yemeni Jews.

Here are some of the religious laws that the Yemeni Jews lived under:

  • Men and women may not bathe together.
  • Women may not bathe in the sea, even in a woman-only area, if there is a male lifeguard.
  • Women may not bring boys older than 3 to the women’s bathing beach.
  • Women may not bathe in the sea where there are men and women present together.
  • One must not look at a picture of a woman.
  • A woman may not look into the home of an unmarried man.
  • Women and girls over six years old may not ride bicycles because parts of their bodies that should be covered get exposed.
  • All married women must wear head coverings.
  • Married women must wear a head covering even when alone in their own homes.

Sometimes the Mizrachi are subsumed into the category of Sephardic, though Sephardic traditionally refers to the Jews of Spain and Portugal, who later moved to Italy, Greece, the Balkans, Turkey and Latin America, with some moving to North Africa.

Nowadays, it is quite common for militant Israeli Arab Jews to demand to be called Mizrachis and to say that if anyone called them an Arab Jew, they might hit the person. This is clearly an outgrowth of the Israel-Palestinian conflict.

The Arab Jews were mostly forced out of their lands by the creation of the state of Israel. Riots erupted across the Arab World, and hundreds of Jews were killed amidst a general atmosphere of terror. Many left with little but the shirts on their backs.

Quite a few had most of their money confiscated upon leaving and were allowed to take few possessions. Their homes, properties and money were in many cases confiscated by Arab governments. This is clearly an injustice, but the Palestinians experienced a similar injustice, and the Arab Jews at least have the right to go back to their home countries, but almost none of them seem to be interested in doing so.

Some years ago the son of Moammar Qaddafi asked the Libyan Jews to return to Libya. None of them took him up on his offer. This is a typical mindset of the Arab Jews, and this is the crucial difference between the Jewish and Palestinian refugees that lies at the core of the conflict.

The notion of “population transfers” – actually sickening, Nazi-like, super-racist episodes of ethnic cleansing – is frequently brought to the table during Middle East discussions, especially by liberal Zionist Jews.

Pakistan/India and Turkey/Greece are mentioned along with Israel and Palestine. The ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians is equated with the largely voluntary flight of the Arab Jews.

The notion is that both populations fled, so the circle is squared and the conflict is over. Yet the Arab Jews do not wish to go home! And those that do, just pack up and do so, as we shall see later on in this post. But the Palestinians, virtually alone amongst the world’s refugees, are not allowed to return to their lands!

This is at the very root and heart of the conflict, and until there is resolution of this issue, I do not think that peace is possible. In a larger sense, it is deeply disturbing that liberal Zionist Jews, the most progressive of Zionists, casually and glibly equate Zionism with some of the worst horrors of the 20th Century, such as the mass slaughters that accompanied the creations of Turkey and Pakistan.

The flight of 800,000 Arab Jews from their lands was accomplished in part by Zionist terrorists, who, disguised as Arabs, killed Jews in Iraq with hand grenades and bombs in order to terrorize them into fleeing to Israel. The government of Israel cut a deal with the pro-British government of Iraq to deprive Iraqi Jews of their rights and property, throw them out of their jobs, and ultimately to confiscate their wealth.

All of this was cleverly done to facilitate the flight of Iraqi Jews to Israel. Upon arrival in Israel, 5

In fact, getting the Arab Jews into Israel was a necessity for the newfound Israeli state. 800,000 Arabs had been thrown off the land, and there were not enough workers to work the fields and do manual work, despite decades of working class and back-to-the-land propagandizing by socialist Ashkenazi Zionists.

Even the terrible riots that swept the Arab World were complex. In many cases, especially in Iraq, local Arabs fought off Arabs who attacked the Jews and helped to hide the Jews from the mobs. In most cases, the number of Jews killed was in the scores. The usual Zionist transcription of this madness as “Arabs try to do Holocaust II on the Arabs” is false, as reality was more nuanced than that.

This article by Dr. Ella Habiba Shohat, a Professor of Cultural Studies and Women’s Studies at CUNY-City University of New York, Reflections of an Arab Jew is typical of the identity issues that many Arab Jews face. She says that when her Iraqi Jewish parents came to Israel in the 1950’s, they thought that the Ashkenazi European Jews were actually European Christians – this is how alien the Ashkenazi seemed to her Mizrachi parents.

In Israel nowadays, the political delineation, a line drawn with blood and guns, is “Arab versus Jew”. For many Arab Jews, this makes no sense as they see themselves as both. For centuries in the Arab World, despite Ashkenazi Zionist revisionist nonsense, there had been no such distinction. The only delineation was religious. People were either Jews, Muslims, or Christians.

Modern Israel and the Diaspora Jewish community are hostile, to say the least, to the very notion of Arabness or Middle-Easternness outside of their Zionist primordialist cant.

This is in spite of the fact that Israeli Jews now have adopted many Arabic words into their Hebrew, have added many Arabic dishes to their national cuisine (falafel is a national dish) and have adopted Arabic architecture to their homes and buildings. All while adopting a discourse of hatred for the very Arabs whose lands and homes they stole to make their gangster state.

All of the above is difficult for the Arab Jew. I remember reading a piece by a Yemeni Jew who went to Israel and never felt at home. At one point, he was living in a home in Israel and hired an Arab gardener who told him up front that he had used to own the home that the Yemeni Jew was now living in. The Yemeni Jew was so upset that he moved.

The Yemeni Jews never spoke Yiddish and know nothing of it. The women never wore wigs either, and the Yemeni Jews continue to disdain this common Ashkenazi Orthodox practice as heretical. If you go to their synagogue even now, the music sounds like it is coming from a mosque.

In opposition to what we call the Judeo-Christian tradition, the experience of the Arab Jews can only honestly be described, painful as it is for Zionists, as a Judeo-Muslim tradition.

In Israel, Arab Jewish women dye their hair blond to hide their hated Arabness. The men, suspected of being “Arabs”, are arrested and beaten. The profound racism of the past has significantly diminished, but as recently as the 1970’s, the racism of Ashkenazis towards Mizrachis in Israel was as bald-faced and unselfconscious as one found in the US South in the 1960’s.

The history of this naked racism has been systematically hidden from Americans by the Zionist Ashkenazi Jews who dominate our media. Their Gentile colleagues do not dare to run such an article, as they live in terror that the US Zionist (Jewish) Lobby would bombard them with hostile phone calls and letters to the editor, drown them with calls for resignation, stage demonstrations in front of the office, threaten advertiser boycotts, and plot media campaigns of character assassination.

Wherever their minds are at, media Gentiles know who signs the checks.

This situation of an ethnic lobby dominating a nation’s media, then terrorizing the same media into de facto censorship, is profoundly undemocratic and hostile to (so-called) basic American values. Whether or not it is an innate value for US Jews with “zero-sum game” Middle Eastern tribal values of ethnic warfare and hyperethnocentrism is not important.

In the late 1800’s, Karl Marx said that in 100 years, he predicted that America will be a Jewish country. And so it has come to pass, for better and for worse.

European Jews term their movement from the Diaspora to Israel (in a gratuitous insult to the Palestinian natives) as an aliya or an ascent. For the Arab Jews, it has always been a yerida or descent.

In Shohat’s excellent piece, she notes a common Mizrachi complaint – that what they see as their rich, wonderful history has been co-opted and revisionized by Ashkenazi Jews into the party line Ashkenazi “pogrom and persecution” history of the Jews.

Interestingly, many Mizrachis vociferously object to this and see it as an invalidation of their culture. As Shohat protests:

The Jewish experience in the Muslim world has often been portrayed as an unending nightmare of oppression and humiliation. Although I in no way want to idealize that experience–there were occasional tensions, discriminations, even violence–on the whole, we lived quite comfortably within Muslim societies.

Our history simply cannot be discussed in European Jewish terminology. As Iraqi Jews, while retaining a communal identity, we were generally well integrated and indigenous to the country, forming an inseparable part of its social and cultural life. Thoroughly Arabized, we used Arabic even in hymns and religious ceremonies.

The liberal and secular trends of the 20th-century engendered an even stronger association of Iraqi Jews and Arab culture, which brought Jews into an extremely active arena in public and cultural life. Prominent Jewish writers, poets and scholars played a vital role in Arab culture, distinguishing themselves in Arabic-speaking theater and in music as singers, composers, and players of traditional instruments.

In Egypt, Morocco, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, and Tunisia, Jews became members of legislatures, municipal councils, the judiciary, and even occupied high economic positions. The finance minister of Iraq in the ’40’s was Ishak Sassoon, and in Egypt, Jamas Sanua–higher positions, ironically, than those our community had generally achieved within the Jewish state until the 1990’s.

Note that Shohat speaks positively of the tremendous achievements Mizrachi Jews made in the 20th Century Arab World before the creation of Israel. In typical Ashkenazi Zionist histories of Arab Jews one finds on the Internet, the entire 20th century histories of the Arab Jews of each Arab land is described only as a litany of woes, crimes, persecutions, killings, and general unpleasantness.

As Shohat notes, there is another proud history there, when in the 20th Century, Arab Jews reached the peak of power and influence in their societies, and more importantly, played profound roles in the modernization of their backward societies.

As I noted above, Zionists love to talk about the fact that “there are no Jews in Saudi Arabia”. At times, they also sometimes wallow in primordialism by talking about how Mohammad supposedly killed and ethnically cleansed all of the Jews of Arabia in the 700’s.

The Zionists who talk like this actually say that, as a response to these supposed crimes by Mohammad against the Arabian Jews, Zionists had a right to steal Arab Palestine from Arab Muslims in revenge.

The fact is that standard history says that there have been no Jews in Arabia proper for centuries. It is true that Mohammad did fight wars against three tribes of Arabian Jews (who apparently had come to Arabia after the destruction of temples by the Romans 500-600 years before).

In one of these battles, the battle against the Banu Nadir and Banu Qurayza at the Battle of Kaybar, he executed hundreds of Jews after they surrendered, stole their lands and possessions and enslaved their women. In another war against the Banu Qaynuqa, Mohammad took their possessions and banished the tribe.

In the Battle of Kaybar, Mohammad took a Jewish slave woman, Safiyya bint Huyayy, as a bride. One Muslim tradition has it that a Banu Nadir woman, angry at what he did to her tribe, slowly poisoned Mohammad, from which he apparently died. This hadith is not very well attested but is a favorite of Muslim anti-Semites.

The truth, as usual, is so much more complicated. It turns out that there were nine separate Jewish tribes in Arabia. Mohammad only had conflicts with three of these nine tribes. With the other six, the Banu Auf, Banu Harif, Banu Jusham, Banu Najjar, Banu Shutayba, Banu Sa’ida, Mohammad made peace and signed the Constitution of Medina with them, in which they were allowed to retain their Jewish religion.

Clearly, the ultranationalist Zionist notion that Mohammad killed all the Arabian Jewish men, enslaved all their women, stole all their possessions and ethnically cleansed them is simply false.

After the recordings in the Koran, the trail of the Arabian Jews grows dim. We find one clue in the controversy over the apparently false hadith, in which Mohammad supposedly said on his deathbed, “There shall no other religion in Arabia”.

This fake hadith is used by the Saudi ultrareactionaries to disallow the open practice of any non-Muslim religion in Arabia, to forbid the building of non-Muslim houses of worship, to mandate that all Saudi citizens must be Muslims, and to allow only Muslims to visit Mecca.

The hadith, probably written long after Mohammad died, is dubious for several reasons. For one, history tells us that Christians, and possibly Jews, lived in Arabia for at least 200 years after Mohammad. If Mohammad actually said this, why were non-Muslims allowed to reside in Arabia for 200 years after his death?

Furthermore, are we to believe that non-Muslims lived in Arabia the whole time during Mohammad’s rule with his permission, yet Mohammad suddenly changed his mind on his deathbed and decided they had to leave, yet this was not enforced until 200 years later? What we do know is that 200 years later, under the influence of this dubious hadith, apparently all Christians, and possibly any remaining Jews, were thrown out of Arabia.

Yet the history of Arabian Jews is more mysterious than even this poorly attested history.

Saudi society is virulently anti-Semitic these days for various reasons. An example of this nasty anti-Semitism is a fad in Saudi society to accuse various Saudis one does not like, especially members of the Saudi royal family whose commitment to Islam is suspect, of having Jewish ancestors.

Saudi history (mostly oral) is insistent that a number of Saudi tribes supposedly have Jewish origins. They all apparently converted long ago. Therefore, at the very least, a fair number of the ultra-Muslims of Saudi Arabia are actually converted Jews, as hard as it may be for either group to accept.

Now we find a shocking obscure gem of a web page on the Jews of Iraq from August 2001 that suggests that thousands of Saudi crypto-Jews exist to this very day. From the page:

Wow! What a fantastically historical site you have!! My name is Joseph ElHadef, and I live in NY. I am Greek, Hungarian, Egyptian, and Iraqi. In the article from Montefiore Hall, the lecturer mentions that Mr. Dangoor spoke to a crypto-Jew in Saudi Arabia, tell me more about this incident? I had two Kuwaiti friends at Hofstra University in NY, and they both told me that there are STILL Jews in Kuwait? As well as Bahrain? Tell me more about the Saudi Jews!

Joseph ElHadef

The Scribe responded:

A crypto-Jewish couple from Saudi Arabia with their twelve children came to London a few years ago and visited the offices of the Exilarch’s Foundation, asking for help to obtain a Visa to enable them to emigrate to Israel. However, the Israel Embassy in London turned down their application, and they decided to travel to Jordan and move over to Israel clandestinely.

According to their evidence, there are thousands of crypto-Jews in Saudi Arabia who lead a separate existence from the main population. To our knowledge, there are no Jews living in Kuwait, but a number of Jewish families still live in Bahrain, mainly of Iraqi origin.

It looks like the Zionists who talk about “no Jews in Saudi Arabia” may need to reform that line in light of this suggestive new evidence that there at least 2,000 crypto-Jews still living in Saudi Arabia! At the least, I think these possible crypto-Jews of Saudi Arabia ought to be investigated by an intrepid, discreet reporter.

One more Zionist lie about Saudi Arabia ought to be disposed of, while we are at it. Zionists love to rail about how no Jews are allowed in Saudi Arabia. Along the same lines, some acknowledge that Jews and Christians are allowed in Saudi Arabia, but are not allowed to practice their religion, according to such august sources as the New York Times. These falsifications really need to be dealt with.

Without defending the fundamentalists in the House of Saud, the fact is that there are quite a few Christians and even some Jews living in Saudi Arabia. None are citizens. All are immigrants working there for foreign companies. Prior to March 1, 2005, the Saudi Tourist Office website had a notice that Jews were not allowed to enter Saudi Arabia. Never mind that many did anyway.

On March 1 of last year, that notice was removed along with a statement apologizing for any inconvenience it may have caused. And there are both observant Jews and observant Christians amongst the expat community, and both are permitted to practice their religions. They are not permitted to proselytize or hold public religious services.

However, foreign business and government offices have facilities that they use to hold religious services for their non-Muslim workers. Furthermore, many of these organizations have what are called “dual-use” employees – workers who also serve to lead these non-Muslim services.

The loss of the Arab Jews is used by Zionist super-racists to continuously bash the Arab World over the head. What is truly disturbing about this line, though, is the way in which many of these Jews left the Arab World. For instance, in Operation Magic Carpet in the early 1950’s, virtually the entire 40,000-strong Yemeni Jewish community was airlifted out of Yemen.

Many of the Yemeni Jews claim that they were taken out virtually against their wills, that children were separated from parents, that they were rudely sprayed with disinfectant as soon as they landed in Israel and that they have been treated poorly in Israel ever since. This has been a pattern. In the late 1980’s, a Jewish community, the Chabani Jews, was discovered in the mountains on the disputed border of Yemen and Saudi Arabia. Although they were actually living in Saudi Arabia (I thought there were no Jews in Arabia!?), they were not citizens.

In contrast to the stereotype of the Jew as “rootless cosmopolitan”, these Jews were living the life of the noble savage. They went barefoot in the desert, and the men all carried long guns on their backs at all times to defend themselves in this dangerous tribal region. Upon learning of the existence of these Saudi Jews, Israel immediately demanded that this small group of Jews had to go to Israel “for safety” right now.

Never mind that they had been residing in the desert without significant incident, living lives as normal as anyone else in the region lived, for as long as anyone could remember. They were promptly airlifted out to Israel.

By 1990, towards the end of the Afghan-Soviet War, it was discovered that there were still a few Jews left in that forlorn land, mostly in Kabul, but a few in Herat. This was for the most part a community of Iranian Jews that moved to Afghanistan long ago and developed its own customs. They had weathered the war about as well as anyone and apparently did not want to leave.

Israel immediately demanded that all of these Jews had to leave Afghanistan and go to Israel right now. An airlift was organized and most of the baffled Jews took the bait and left. Only one Jew, Zebulon Simontev, remained.

It is important to note that when Israel “rescues” these communities that are usually not even in danger, they bribe them to come to Israel. They are often offered large cash payments, a free house, a free income for five years or more, etc. It is not surprising that many take the bait. In this manner the entire remaining Afghan Jewish community was decimated – by Israel!

Even after the Taliban took over, there were still two Jews remaining in Kabul, Zebulon Simontev and Isaac Levy. They had stayed to take care of the crumbling synagogue and the scrolls. What was interesting was that the Taliban, who we are continuously told are “Islamofascists” dedicated to exterminating all the Jews on Earth, did not even bother to kill these two Jews, although it would have been a trivial exercise.

In fact, they were allowed to live freely with no restrictions. They did get into problems with the Taliban because they engaged in fortune telling, which was illegal under the Taliban. Both of these Jews were jailed for a few weeks for this offense. These two Jews got on great with the Muslim neighbors, who were truly fond of them.

Wait! I thought all Afghans were “Islamofascist” exterminationists? Tragicomically, these two Jews, though the last remaining of their community, utterly despised each other and spent most of their time fighting each other in various ways. Their constant fighting seems to have landed them a couple of Taliban jail terms too.

My point here is that whenever a Jewish community turns up in the Arab or Muslim World, Israel immediately races to “rescue” them with an airlift and massive bribes. In this manner have many of these Jewish communities been decimated in recent years.

Then, at the same time, Zionists have the chutzpah to say, “There are no Jews left in the region!”, and blame the poor Muslims and Arabs, when Israel is, nowadays anyway, one of the major reasons for that dearth.

Now, on to the Jews of Lebanon. As recently as 2006, there were 250 Jews who had just returned from the Diaspora to Beirut on July 6, 2006, as they felt that the atmosphere was finally safe enough for them to return.

It fascinating to note that only six days later, Israel launched a massive invasion of Lebanon nearly destroyed Lebanon. Although it seems crazy to suggest such a thing, it is perfectly possible that one reason for the Israeli invasion was the return of the 250 Jews to Beirut. I realize that sounds crazy, but Israel is a very crazy country.

Bear with me.

Israel is completely hostile to the notion that Jews can live peacefully anywhere in the Arab World and has engaged in repeated provocative behaviors seemingly intended to frighten Jews into leaving Arab lands. See above about the murderous Israeli attacks on the Jews of Iraq and see below for a reference to the Israeli attacks on the Beirut synagogue during 1982.

Soon after Israel attacked Lebanon in July, the Jews of Lebanon blog posted a statement strongly condemning the attack. For this, apparently, they were attacked by a Zionist Jews who attacked them for being “traitors”. The authors of the blog were so shocked by this assault that they made a post called Enough is Enough, telling the Zionists to go away.

There were some sad and awful cases where Hezbollah, in the insanity of the Lebanese Civil War, killed some Lebanese Jews simply for being Jewish. It is also interesting to note that during that war, Israel seemed to have deliberately bombed one of the main synagogues in Beirut, apparently in order to help push the Lebanese Jews into fleeing, hopefully to Israel.

This is in line with standard Zionist practice.

Zionism assumes, adopting the line from the Jewish religious Haggadah,

Every generation, they rise up to kill us.

that no Jew in the Diaspora is ever safe, that Gentiles (even the most Judeophilic) are permanently afflicted with anti-Semitism, that anti-Semitism is not understandable  except as some sort of bizarre infection of pure evil or utter insanity, and that the only safe place for any Jew is Israel.

Therefore, all Jews in the Diaspora must move to Israel as soon as possible. This is a bizarre formulation for a couple of reasons.

First, Zionism is a poor way to go about protecting the Jews. Is it really intelligent, if the Jews are always in danger of imminent extermination, to gather such a huge percentage of them into one tiny country, where they can be wiped out all the easier?

Second, Israel is now probably one of the most dangerous places on Earth to be a Jew. If we take extreme liberties with the truth and refer to every attack on Israelis as a murderous or at least violent “anti-Semitic assault”, there are probably about 13 violent anti-Semitic attempted homicides in and around Israel every single day as far back as 2008. A number of these end up killing or hurting Jews or at least damaging or destroying their property.

Comparing this to the latest out-of-breath report by the ADL about anti-Semitic incidents in America is an exercise in comedy. If one Jew is killed in an anti-Semitic assault in the US in a given year, that is a notable year.

Prior the Israeli invasion of Lebanon, during the 1950’s and 1960’s, the Lebanese Jews had good relations with the other sects in Lebanon (to the extent any ethnic group has good relations with others in such a fractious land).

What is particularly interesting are claims by Lebanese Jews that they had superb relations in particular with the Shiites of Lebanon.

As Israel bombarded and invaded Lebanon repeatedly through the 1970’s and finally invaded en masse in 1982, all of that ended, the Shia radicalized, and Hezbollah was born. All of which portended ill for the Jews of Lebanon. The lesson here is clear. The more Israel attacked Lebanon, the worse things got for the Lebanese Jews.

And the line that pounds our ears night and day these days, with Iran and Lebanon ricocheting off the news, that the Shia Muslims have always harbored, continue to harbor, and will always harbor genocidal hatred for Jews, based on the immutable texts of the Islamic religion, is exposed as the hate speech that it is.

Why Are the Houthis Attacking Shipping in the Red Sea?

From the Net:

This is the ship that was attacked by the Houthis the other day:

Commenter: The Denmark owned, Singapore flagged, 10

— Loaded with cargo at Chinese ports. — Stopped at Singapore

It was going to Israel! So far, 10

Commenter: IIRC the vessel was was headed to a Greek port, but if someone has more detail on the non-Israeli destination it would be appreciated. The currently shown route is to an Egyptian port, but that is probably an inspection stop.

Nope it was headed to Israel, and that’s why it got attacked. That’s what the Houthis said in their statement afterwards.

Lots of shipping companies from all sorts of countries are going through problem-free. They are all just negotiating safe passage with the Houthis. Real simple! Also, these ships going to Israel turn their transponders off and do not respond to warnings by the Houthis.

Solution: Keep your transponder on and go talk to the Houthis when they give you a warning shot.

The Houthis have stated repeatedly that if you are not going to Israel or you’re not an Israeli ship, then you have nothing to worry about.

Commenter: Xi’s strategy (via his puppet Not-The-President Biden) is not working. CCP containers must continue to go around the long way delaying deliveries for more than a week. Europe has little reason to attempt intervention. The delays and extra shipping costs are effectively an EU “tariff” on CCP goods. If this continues, European producers will displace Asian ones.

Biden isn’t Xi’s pet. See how insane Republicans are? They’re lunatics. They think Biden is in with Xi and does whatever he wants. Actually is as bad as Trump on China and worse he is itching for a war on the contrary. What the Hell are you talking about CCP containers must continue to go the long way to get to Europe? Chinese and Russian ships transit the Red Sea all the time.

Commenter: Xi’s only hope is curtailing Khamenei’s unhinged aggression towards global commerce. Iran is quite weak, so eventually their Houthi proxies should capitulate

So you consider Jewish ships and ships going to the Jewish state as “global commerce.” I guess the Jews control the world a lot more than I thought they did. It’s not Khamenei’s plan anyway.

My sources in the resistance have told me this:

Commenter: The Houthis don’t take orders from Iran and Iran doesn’t give them orders. All the Resistance is like that. The Houthis submit their plans to Iran and either get a thumbs up or thumbs down. If Iran approves, it may help with planning and even execution.

But I’m not sure Iran is on the ground helping the Houthis carry out these attacks.

Iran is very strong. The US wargamed a war with Iran and we lost! Have the Houthis capitulated in this long war against the Saudis and UAE?

It’s just another War for the Jews. Biden is fighting this whole war 10

The Ahmad Arbery Case

I’m not sure if I have written about this case before, but in case I haven’t, this pretty much sums up my views about the case precisely. I feel that these good White men got railroaded. I watched the entire video and these White men were playing it by the book the whole time. They almost seemed like police officers in how closely they were following procedure.

The man in the back of the pickup truck had his gun pointed down at the ground. They simply said that they wanted to question him as he obviously had been caught in the midst of a crime.

If someone has a gun pointed at me and wants to question me, I think I’m going to stop and answer his questions lest he murder me! You have to obey the man with the gun! Otherwise you are a dead man. Arbery turned around, backtracked in a completely unnecessary way. He had been running past the truck and the White men didn’t do anything to stop him. They would have just followed him some more in their truck. So what?

Instead he backtracks, runs back to where he was before, and then confronts the man with the shotgun, who is playing it by the book entirely. He has his shotgun pointed at the ground the whole time! He never once lifts it up and points it at Arbery. Arbery charges the man with the shotgun and tries to wrestle the gun away from him. Look if I have a gun and you try to take that gun away from me, I believe I have a right to fire that gun in order to protect myself. If you take my gun away from me, you can murder me with it. No thanks.

But the White man didn’t even do that! Instead as Arbery was trying to wrestle the gun away from him, the White man was trying to keep it pointed at the ground the whole time. They got into a wrestling match over the gun and the gun discharged.

It looks like an accidental discharge but even if it were intentional, it would still be legal as the White man had a right to protect his life from the man taking his gun away from him which Arbery can then use to murder the White man. So it doesn’t matter if the White man killed him intentionally or not. When two people wrestle over a gun, the gun often goes off for one reason or another and the person trying to wrestle the gun away from the man with the gun often gets shot.

The other man was simply following in the car. They weren’t following this Black criminal to murder him with their guns as the media made it out.

Anyway, for all the rest of my views, just read below. If I were President, I would pardon all three of those White man. They got badly railroaded and the judge was totally prejudiced against the defendants and the trial was quite unfair as a result.

The whole idea of shopping around for prosecutors outside of you jurisdiction because the  one in your jurisdiction won’t take the case seems very dubious to me! If the prosecutor in your district won’t take the case, then you’re SOL. I guess maybe the state can take the case? Yes or no? The federal government may be able to take the case if they think it’s a civil rights violation, but I doubt it. Generally speaking, retrying a case under any new venue is double jeopardy and prosecutor shopping ought to be illegal.

The only thing I disagree with is the part where he says Whites should avoid Blacks as much as possible. I would say to avoid ghetto Blacks because nothing good ever happens once you get involved with them. I’ve gotten involved with them a number of times and in general, within one or two days, they stole from me in some way or other. You’re just going to get harmed if you get involved with those people.

From the Net:

Actually the case of the Satilla (Brunswick) Three is more deserving of not only intense scrutiny, but outright outrage over the selective prosecution, kangaroo court, compromised jury and race-baiting sideshow atmosphere with “civil-rights” types threatening violence if the Satilla (Brunswick) Three were not convicted.

The case of Amhad Arbery and the three (white) Satilla residents who are presently doing “hard time” for defending themselves is a prime example of prosecutorial misconduct and double jeopardy, which MUST be addressed and outlawed.

Arbery was a criminal POS who was casing construction sites for tools and other materials that he could steal and sell. He was observed at the same site previously on video as well. As there were break-ins and increased criminal activity, the three men were merely defending their neighborhood.

Arbery refused to be questioned which was within his right.

Arbery felt “disrespected” by being questioned and “doubled backed”, attacking the man with the shotgun.

Arbery attacked the man by pulling on the barrel of the shotgun causing it to fire. Anyone familiar with firearms knows that pulling on a barrel of a shotgun can cause it to fire. Arbery has that one fatal “flaw” that is present in all black DNA, the misperceived “shame” of being “disrespected” (even if no “disrespect” occurred) and the need to immediately “do something about it” (instant gratification).

The Satilla (Brunswick) Three did not pursue Arbery…Arbery pursued the Satilla (Brunswick) Three. In fact, they videoed the entire confrontation, proving that Arbery was the aggressor.

Arbery could (and should) have run off in any other direction, would not have been pursued, and would still be alive today. He chose to confront the man with the shotgun. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

The original prosecutor refused to indict. The powers-that-be had to “shop” for a prosecutor who would take the case. It took three tries before they found one who would indict.

This is prosecutorial “double jeopardy” which must be addressed and outlawed nationwide. The way it stands now, what is stopping a prosecutor from one jurisdiction from indicting someone from another jurisdiction when a local prosecutor having legal jurisdiction refuses to indict? We are all in trouble if this is allowed to stand.

Also, the court was stacked against the White men just because they are White.

So-called “civil-rights icons”, Antifa and BLM types were in the courtroom, threatening violence if the “correct verdict” was not rendered.

The jury was also warned that there would be violence if they did not convict.

The “judge” was weak, went along with the threats and refused to run a proper court proceeding.

The judge would not allow Arbery’s past extensive criminal record or more recent trespassing at the same site into evidence. The mainstream media fanned the flames of racial hatred against whites, making Arbery out to be a mere “jogger”, (yeah, right). Who in their right mind jogs 20 miles from home in work boots?

The “mainstream media” stated that Arbery “was studying to be an electrician” and was merely observing construction sites…yeah, right. Arbery was looking for tools, copper wire or anything else of value to steal, that being his stock in trade as an “electrician”.

I pray that any appeals that the Satilla (Brunswick) Three place will be successful. Their prosecutorial double jeopardy and kangaroo court “trial” were both shitshow railroad jobs from the outset.

This is one case that is truly deserving of real “justice”.

I don’t blame ANY White person for not wanting to be around or deal with blacks.

As far as I am concerned, the Satilla (Brunswick) Three did society a favor by “taking out the garbage”. It’s a god-damned shame that they are paying for their self-defense with long prison sentences.

Summed it up very nicely.

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)