Category: Uncategorized

We’re all coping all the time. We cope our way through life, lying like fools the whole time, and not caring a whit. Success in life is based on deception, mostly to oneself but also to others.

I like the attitude of the Japanese towards this. If you tell a Japanese men, preferably one over 40, that you never lie, he will laugh right in your face, call you an idiot, and walk away. To the Japanese, nothing is dumber than pathological honestly.

I think America, or Gentile America anyway (not so sure about (((America)))) seems to have a huge honestly fetish. I tell this vignette to Americans all the time, and all I get is cope. I also tell Americans that you have to lie sometimes in life. After that, I get a load more of cope. Usually of the “I cannot tell a lie” bullshit, which is obviously itself a lie. To lie is human. To be pathologically honest, I think one might have to be an actual computer. Sure a computer could be programmed to never lie. The thing’s as dumb as a rock. It only knows whatever we told it. It can’t know anything else.

Of course we could discuss Kant’s Categorical Imperative, but that’s more of a thought exercise than an actual possibility in life.

I think America’s pathological honestly fetish, which probably isn’t even as real as it claims to be because most if not all who claim to be pathologically honest are lying right there, must be down to our Christian heritage. Not Judeo-Christian heritage.

Who the Hell stuck that Judeo- in front of my great Christian religion anyway? Not trying to diss on Judaism here, but face it, it’s not much like Christianity even if one was birthed from the other, and Christianity at its absolutely core is nothing but Reform Judaism, sort of the ultimate in Reform Judaism, so reformed it’s barely even or not at all Jewish anymore.

People argue that Christianity is the Old Testament too, but that’s another feint because if you understand Christianity, you realize that when Jesus came, he replaced Judaism and the Old Testament at the same time. Jesus freed us from the Law. We no longer had to live under the Law. Hence, the Old Testament was essentially null and void, good as a historical document but for little else. Even the Old Testament and New Testament Gods are completely different. This is of course known as Replacement Theology.

(((Some people))) like to go on about how Replacement Theology is antisemitic doctrine, but the more you think about it, the more obvious it is that Christianity itself is Replacement Theology, so if the latter is antisemitic then the Christian religion itself is antisemitic. Which is what a lot of (((folks))) say anyway. Briefly, Jesus came, the Old Testament and the Law were replacement by the New Testament and what can only be called Mercy. At the same time, the Jewish birthright to Israel was cancelled, as the (Christian) Church was the new Israel.

The Catholics seem to understand this best of all. I attended Catholic Mass for a while when I lived in this new town. All of the lessons were about the New Testament. They never talked about anything else. If I had to describe Catholicism, I would call it “Jesusism” or “New Testamentism.” It’s the Protestants who regress to the Old Testament which doesn’t make much sense as they were supposed to be the reformers.

On the other hand, they were also back to the basics, and I suppose if you go back far enough, the Old Testament was important to the early Christians, especially since for the first 100 years, Christianity was little more than a very odd Jewish sect. In fact, one of the major religious debates of the time was whether a non-Jew could even be a Christian. For decades, one had to be a Jew in order to become a Christian in the first place. So in that sense perhaps Protestantism is like Sunnism, another back to the basics doctrine though not necessarily born of an Islamic reform movement against a staid and corrupt Islam.

On the other hand, Shia Islam always struck me as more like Catholicism, with the rule of the mullahs (the Pope and the Vatican) whose job it is to continuously reinterpret Islam to keep it updated to the current era. Which is exactly what Catholicism does and is also why the only true Christian fundamentalism is always Protestant as much as Catholic-hating Protestants love to holler that this is wrong. It’s hard to imagine what a Catholic fundamentalism would look like. Sure there are the orders and the pre-Vatican II (1964) Catholics, but even Vatican I was quite an advance. Show me any Catholics who want to go back to 60 AD. None do other than the Eastern Orthodox and they’re not so much fundamentalists as people who are practicing an ancient but rather progressive religion.

What I’m saying here is that Christian cultures seem to think that lying is a terrible sin and one should always or usually be honest.

In contrast, Hinduism says no such thing and in fact seems to venerate lying as a fine art or even a religious virtue.

The art of lying in Islam when there is a threat to the Muslims is well known.

Sects such as the Druze, the Yezidis, and the Alawi have long prescribed lying if doing so prevents harm to the believers. In general, those religions tend to pretend that they are Muslims. The Alawi actually are Muslims, but a lot of Sunnis don’t buy it. The Druze and Yezidis just say they’re Muslims so they don’t get killed. The Mandeans were much the same.

Of course if you read the Jewish books, this lying for self-preservation is endlessly repeated almost as if it were a ritual in its own right. Jews have always seemed to me to be much more prone to dishonestly than Christians. I’ve long thought that Judaism must allow them to lie with little guilt. If you read Jews Must Live!* (1936) about an Orthodox Jewish family, the entire family engages in such pervasive lying that it causes very serious problems to the point where they could hardly tell when someone was telling the truth or lying and the household is in chaos with much drama, hollering, arguing, fighting, and kvetching most of time.

The latter state simply describes the typical Jewish family. The pathological lying I’m not so sure about. In any case, when you are in a household where people lie so freely and loosely that you can hardly tell when someone is lying or telling the truth, you are truly in an Existential Hell, I would argue. But it’s not that different 2020 Late Capitalist USA, come to think of it, so maybe it’s more livable than I thought.

*Like most all books written by Jews that tell the truth about Jews, of course Jews really hate this book and insist that this man, who wrote a book in part about pathologically lying Jews, is, natch, a pathological liar himself! But you saw that one coming, didn’t you, dear readers?

The Red Pill and PUA sites deny this, but I think it is true nonetheless. They claim that women can tell if a man is faking it or not, and there is a difference between, say, faking confidence and actually being confident.

That strikes me mostly as an affectation, a defense, and of course ultimately a cope, as so many things in life are when you get right down to it. I think they may have a bit of a point, but I think the effect size is probably pretty small.

For instance, I think of myself as a confident guy, but when I examine myself when I am in that situation, it’s clear that a lot of the time, I really don’t believe it and I’m covering up for some pretty massive insecurity way back there somewhere. So I try to get my head into a place where I don’t feel like I’m faking it. I feel like I’m just doing it and believing all the crazy lies that I tell myself about myself. If I don’t fully believe it, it does feel a bit off, at least to me. I’m not sure if anyone can tell, but it bothers me on some level, so I try not to feel that way.

My view:

If you think you’re confident, you’re confident. This one is a bit up in the air but perhaps not as much as we think it is. No insecure person thinks they’re confident. Of course we may have different definitions of confident. A long time ago, I thought I was fairly confident, but then extroverts would make friends with me and tell me that I lacked confidence.

I think they were just commenting on my introversion. Introversion and lack of confidence are not necessarily the same thing but of course extroverts confuse the two horribly because, well, because they’re extroverts and that’s what extroverts do. Some introverts are fairly confident in their odd way, often surprisingly confident for their introversion.

If you think you’re masculine, you’re masculine. This one seems like it is absolutely true. If you put the idea in your head that you’re a masculine guy, you simply automatically start acting more masculine right then and there. There’s no way that an effeminate, faggoty man is going to tell anyone that he’s masculine. I don’t think even wimpy men think they are masculine.

There are straight men who are “soft” but not effeminate. I call these men feminine rather than effeminate (acting like a woman). I’ve known a number of men like this. Some were good friends. As a general rule, they freely admitted that they were not particularly masculine, often laughing softly when they said it. And of course it caused problems in their relationships with women. I remember one friend who told me that a girlfriend used to hit him in a rather playfully but nevertheless in a frustrated way, telling him to act more like a man. He always laughed nervously and told her, “I can’t.”

But getting down to brass tacks, if you’re trying to do it, you’re doing it. I’m not sure anyone cares if you are “really doing it for reals” or “just faking it lol.”

Fake it til you make it, that’s the motto of life.

Who the Hell says women can even tell the difference? Women like Alpha behavior. I doubt if they have the slightest clue about what’s “real” Alpha behavior and what’s “fake” Alpha behavior, and I doubt if they even give a damn. No one cares what you are “really” like deep down inside. All they care about is that shiny exterior with all those fancy bells and whistles.

Life is all about surface appearances, bullshit, and lies and not about inner truths, deeper structures, or the ugly truth.

Women always talk about wanting “commitment.” But women are hardly honest about a single thing they say in the Gender Wars. There’s too much at stake.

Dated a lot of women and I’ve hardly met one who cared about commitment. Don’t think it was ever mentioned to me once. But one thing I noticed over and over was that the most important thing in the relationship to the woman was love – that she was in love with me.

Beyond that and interacting with many women over the years, it’s obvious that the primary female drive is for love. They often idealize this is preposterous ways that never make any sense:

Woman: “That’s not true love…that’s not real love…that’s not love, that’s infatuation, etc.”

Me: “What’s not true love?”

Woman: 100 million completely arbitrary, idiotic, unfalsifiable, often tautological, and completely unscientific notions, such as, “True love is for life,” and other nonsense.

There’s a good reason for most of women’s ridiculous and irrational behavior, and the good reason behind this is that women dislike the idea of love being trivialized.

Why? Because several decades of studying women have shown me that the primary female drive is for love. In a sense, this is what their whole life is wrapped up in. Sure, they have all these other things, career and whatnot, going on, but all of that pales compared to the primary drive or goal of a woman’s life: to achieve love and to be in love.

Even with women (18-28) who say they don’t know what love is or they’ve never experienced love, the primary drive for love is there. These often young women are confused because they think they have not experienced real love yet.

Having been involved with some young women like that recently who were obviously crazy in love with me for a while (but then of course denied it later), it was clear that they simply had not developed a schema of what love was that they could plug their feelings into.

Also, I think they were looking for the fireworks, sparks, and “Hollywood love affair of the century” notion of love, and most love isn’t really that intense. They fall in love, but it’s not the explosions and fireworks kind they expect, so they say it’s not love. They’re wrong of course, but women are wrong about a million things.

Some seek refuge in a ridiculous concept called Aromanticism. I had a female best friend who insisted she was aromantic. Studying the concept, I decided she could not possibly be one, plus the whole concept was a bit silly they way it was laid out.
Supposedly there are all these folks out there who desperately want love, but they have a genetic or biological inability to fall in love which prevents them from doing so. That’s nonsense. There are no such people.

Real aromantics are just cold fish who have chosen to not experience love because, well, because they’re cold fish! It’s a disorder of choice like so of these stupid new Millennial identities, most of which don’t even exist in any real way.

The Germans nailed him. I wonder how they got him? And yes, this guy is definitely a pedophile. His sex drive is all wrapped up in sex with and torture of little girls. Looks like he killed Madeline for sure as her actual murder or dead body is probably on those tapes. And it looks like he killed another little girl in Germany. And who knows if he killed any more than that? What’s with the little girls’ swimsuits in his van?!

The fact that he brutally beat and raped a 72 year old woman doesn’t mean he’s not a pedophile. Most pedophiles are certainly capable of having sex with adults. It’s just not what they prefer.

Christian Bruckerman is what is known as a misophile. Misophiles are Sadistic Child Molesters, typically also pedophiles, and they make up 5% of the pedophile population. Obviously they are the most dangerous pedophiles of all and are particularly prone to the abduction of child strangers.

And they can absolutely commit homicide in addition to rape, beating, and torture, either as part of the general sadistic fantasy cumulating in death or as a way of getting rid of evidence by eliminating the victim of the crime. If they don’t kill the kid, the kid is obviously going to talk, and they don’t want that.

There are several different types of child molesters, 83% of whom are not pedophiles at all. Instead they’re just criminals. These men typically molest in the family and the molestation often goes along with verbal and physical abuse. These types are no more aroused by children than any of the rest of us are. They simply pick on their child female relatives as easy targets for their power and control games. I am not sure what the name for this type of child molester is or if they even have a name.

The true Pedophile or Pedophilic Child Molester with a strong attraction to children but little or none to mature persons is only one of four types of child molester and they are not the most common type at all. However, they do tend to rack up a high number of victims whereas with the type above, they are limited to female children in their families, and there are usually not many of those.

This type will never seek out strangers to molest while the pedophile prefers this method. Not all pedophiles molest children, but if you follow convicted pedophiles over a 25 year period, 50% of them will molest another child.

Some pedophiles, an unknown percentage, restrict themselves to porn and masturbation to meet their sexual needs. There are probably more pedophiles like this than we think. All pedophiles probably need to be under the care of an understanding therapist in order to keep themselves from offending and molesting kids.

The worse you treat pedophiles, the more you shower them with hatred, harassment, threats, and abuse, the more likely they are to regress and offend. Therefore, non-offending pedophiles should be treated with kindness, though you might want to keep them away from your kids.

Their homes are often decorated with children’s toys and games and they tend to have kids over at their house a lot due to all the fun things he provides for them to play with. They move around a lot and if you study their residence history, they often moved out under a cloud of suspicion of molesting local children. When the heat gets too hot, they simply leave town. They commonly move overseas, often because it is easy to molest children over there. Many seek out jobs where they will have contact with children.

5% of rapists are classed as Sadistic Rapists. These rapists, like the misophiles, are the most dangerous of all. Like the misophiles, they are absolutely capable of murder either as part of the general sadistic fantasy or to kill the victim in order to get rid of evidence (a victim). Probably most of the homicides are sadistic in nature. Most if not all rapist-murderer serial killers fit into this type.

The 95% are believe it or not not sadists, though they can certainly be violent.

This includes the Rage Rapist who has serious anger and hatred towards women as a motivation for rape. The Power Reassurance Rapist or “Gentleman Rapist” is another type. He is often nonviolent, may apologize to the woman afterwards and may even feel guilty in the period after the time. He rapes to reassure himself that he is a man as he has serious issues with his own masculinity and manhood.

The Power Reassurance Rapist is typically nonviolent and never kills. The Rage Rapist usually does not kill his victims but he may beat them due to his anger. Homicide does occur sometimes if the beating goes too far or more commonly if they victim fights back, stimulating his rage even further.

There is another Power-type Rapist whose name eludes me at the moment. Unlike the Power Reassurance Rapist, he does not suffer from issues with his manhood. Instead he is typically a hypermasculine or “macho” man. The motivation is power nonetheless.

Rapist type     Rape motivations 

Power-type      Power, Reassurance of Masculinity,
                Hypermasculinity/Machismo

Rage            Rage, Anger, and Hatred of Women

Sadistic        Erotic Sadism, Aroused by Sexual 
                Violence

This guy was a pilot in the Canadian Air Force, a family man wit a wife and kids. But he had his kinks or his paraphilias. He liked to dress up in women’s clothes. He stole women’s panties. And he was a prolific voyeur who specialized in spying on women in their hotel rooms.

He was also a serial killer who murdered at least three women. Interesting video shows a superb interrogator who got this man to confess somehow.

Polar Bear: Blacks on the other hand will steal your cheap plastic lawn chair. Blacks are always up to no good on my block.

I have a feeling this is more universal than we think. I was talking to a Brazilian woman I knew well. I told her,

“You don’t want to be racist against Blacks, but it’s hard.”

Meaning it’s hard for obvious reasons. She immediately commiserated and said,

Yes, it’s hard. Here in Brazil, we have a saying about Blacks. “If they don’t steal from you when they’re coming, they steal from you when they’re going.” (obviously in Portuguese).

In other words, “If they don’t steal from you when they come in, they steal from you when they leave.”

They don’t really act all that bad around here in my city except that they are ghetto as Hell. I made friends with one older Black man though. He hated Whites but I was able to get through to him. Later he saw me with a hot 23 year old part-Black woman, so now he probably likes me even more.

We just don’t have many Blacks in this town, period. Hence they cause few problems, and they tend to keep their heads down because they don’t have any numbers, which is what they ought to do anyway. When you only have a small % of Blacks in a city, they tend to act pretty good, mostly because they simply don’t have any numbers. They still cause problems. Blacks like that always cause problems. But they don’t cause mayhem like they do when they have larger numbers, and the difference between problems and mayhem is all the difference in the world.

Further, they are surrounded by Whites and Hispanics who almost always act better than they do. To their credit, these typically ghetto Blacks imitate the Whites and Hispanics around them and act a lot better.

A lot of them still act like shit but still act a lot less shitty than they ordinarily would. They’re still antisocial but they are antisocial in petty, neighborly ways and not in serious criminal ways. Like always asking to borrow money and then you never see the money again. They see you with an expensive object and they “request” that you give it to them. Just typical ghetto nig shit, but they won’t menace you if you don’t fork over your property, and you can always quit loaning them money.

All the young women in their 20’s have at least one kid, obviously with no man in sight. However, these basically ghetto women are quite well behaved.

Also around here the better behaved Blacks dislike the more ghetto ones like I just described. So there are varying degrees of morality even among a hardcore Black population.

In addition, the Whites and Hispanics simply will not put up with any shit at all from these ghetto Blacks. They call these Blacks on their tiniest antisocial bullshit, so that tends to nip the usually mandatory escalation in the bud. I have often thought that if these ghetto Blacks around here were living in a Black ghetto, they would act a lot worse.

It’s so obvious to me that even ghetto Blacks are not doomed to any particular behavior level. It’s also painfully clear to me that their own kind not only serve as horrific role models but also don’t call these Blacks on much of any of their antisocial bullshit. They don’t call them on the little stuff, and they probably don’t call them on the bigger stuff.

Humans aren’t stupid. They’ll get away with just about whatever the Hell you let them get away with. White people act quite good, but we aren’t angels, and every White community has its scumfucks. We are only human after all. Living in White communities my whole life, I was told and learned the hard way that (White) people will get away with just about whatever you let them get away with. So this isn’t a ghetto Black thing. It’s a human thing.

The behavior of even ghetto Blacks can be markedly improved.

First of all, they need to be a minority, preferably under 25%. 25% Black seems to be a tipping point in many cities, after which things start to go seriously to Hell in a handbasket. Below 25% Black, you can look at the statistics of various pathologies, and they don’t rise that much from 5 – 10 – 15 – 20% Black. The city remains more or less livable.

But somewhere between 20-30%, most cities tip over. What follows is probably White flight, usually slow rather than fast, and worse than that is that the decently behaved Blacks (of which there are many – many millions!) start taking off too. Well-behaved Blacks aren’t stupid. They’re not going to sit around in some ghettoizing shithole due to racial solidarity. Sanity and safety trumps racial consciousness any day of the week.

This does not apply to wealthy Black areas like Ladera Heights in Los Angeles, and it probably doesn’t apply to small Black towns in the South where a remarkably decent authentic Black culture is often present.

Second of all, the small population of Blacks needs to be a part of a better behaved larger population, preferably White, Hispanic, or Asian. Ghetto Blacks act remarkably better even in majority-Hispanic cities because Hispanic pathologies are much exaggerated and they act better than most people think.

Third, the larger population needs to call these ghetto Blacks on their antisocial shit, starting with the most petty neighborly BS. Just shut it down before it even starts. Either due to this or due to the general environment, the better behaved Blacks start shutting down the bad actors too. People, even supposedly irredeemable ghetto Blacks, do respond to harsh correction at the societal level.

It’s because they’ve pushed the mean element present in everyone who isn’t trying to be holy to the max. Plenty of people are not goody two shoes, but they aren’t serial killers. But that’s only because they haven’t peered into their “bad self” enough. But the scary thing is, Who knows when somebody will go deeper into their “bad self?”

Being mean to the max involves domination and self-worship among other things – basic Cluster B personality stuff. However, who’s to say we don’t all have some Cluster B in us? Why should we toss all these behaviors onto, say, White Supremacists for instance, when we all have some of it?

Sex is fine, even polygamy, but you can’t hurt your partner. Yet so much porn is about calling women sluts, choking them, BDSM – you name it. It’s sinfully fun to be bad, but it’s still, well, a sin.

I think many get the wrong idea that being morally pure is square when it’s not that but instead that someone good simply doesn’t want to hurt their partner.

The society of evil is obsessed with domination and being mean. It’s just natural and the dedicated like those into satanic ritual sacrifices are getting the biggest high from it.

Much of society associates religion with virginity, but that’s great propaganda for keeping people out of churches. Also, the true nature of sex is probably not going to be discussed in church because it’s weird, and it makes the pastor uncomfortable, and maybe they haven’t thought that deeply about it to begin with. But no doubt sexual addiction is a real problem, even among the religious.

Making a Mockery of Sex

So much sex in our society is about doing that, and that would be a “no-no” also. That means public displays of sexuality, but if someone wants a private strip club in their basement with only their married harem, I suppose that’s not wrong.

Honestly, public schools aren’t so great in rural counties either, minus the fact there are no gangs, etc..

The leftwing argument is no money has been spent on education, while the rightwing claims money has simply not spent wisely. That’s why they’re advocating for school vouchers, which are basically saying, “Public schools aren’t worth the time – here’s public money to go to a private one.” However, if public schools aren’t worth the time, then why build them to begin with?

Some are cynical about the public school system because so many slackers and un-reformable bad boys are in it.

This idea is applied to our cities now. If they don’t want police, then let the place rot just as long no problems reach outside the zone. The US has already practiced this somewhat with inner-city ghettos, surprisingly, for many decades before any of this rioting. There are a lot of cops there, but what else has really been done to improve the place? The schools are garbage; there’s no opportunity.

Whatever is done in the short-term, no matter how seemingly terrible, is justified to prevent long-term evil. Who’s to say which group using this philosophy is correct? It would depend on your political orientation.

Well, in Latin America, as @Robert Lindsay has mentioned, there’s pretty much no middle ground between fascists and communists. We see the “under-siege” mentality. It’s obvious that right-wing freedom in Cuba would lead to a government overthrow. It’s obvious that left-wing freedom would lead to the current Brazilian government being overthrown. Maybe Brazil has less of the “under-siege” thing going on, but it’s still there.

Look at how society is gamed. There’s no push for marriage because our society frowns on it until you’re about 40 – LOL.  Also, there’s no polygamy. It never even occurs to people! So you’d get a bunch of players looking at porn and banging chicks and a lot of nerds banging porn.

It’s simply anti-sexual world we live in. In other words, there’s not any morally acceptable way for a man to express his real sexuality. However, that’s not reality but rather some type of corruption of the actual truth.

There is such a thing as morally weak men, as in sexually so. Of course, there are taboos in sex that are justified. However, Western society demonizes all sex outside of monogamous marriage, and it also wants people to wait along time for monogamous marriage.

Then are we surprised that nerds gawk at SJW women, who then call the cops? Is it surprising that nerds get unjustified rape accusations?

Who Are the players?

These are bad boys practicing illegal polygamy. They’re happy in a sense because at least they’re expressing their true male nature.

Yeah, they can’t but they could if they married and better yet married many women. But now we have a society where polygamy is illegal, so the most horny guys who can attract fortification simply have illegal polygamy. However, imagine a society where all men can simply find many wives. Look at all the problems that would solve.

Again, our society hates polygamy because much of its morality flows from Judeo-Christian teaching which is corrupted, not true to its roots. There’s nothing in the Bible saying polygamy is wrong, which implies that Western civilization shouldn’t hold it in contempt.

Where can nice guys find wives? Maybe these types can’t get so-called laid, but they might find it easier to get a wife/wives and if they can’t even do that, beautiful Filipinas, etc. would gladly marry them for money.

https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/scotty-smith/article-is-there-sex-in-heaven/

Much of Christianity has an anti-sex obsession just like it has an obsession with torturing people in Hell eternally. However, have people really examined the Bible to see what it really says?

Everything on earth is analogous to something in Heaven. Heaven neither simply removes nor simply continues earthly things. If we apply this principle to sexual intercourse, we get the conclusion that intercourse on earth is a shadow or symbol of intercourse in Heaven. Could we speculate about what that could be?

It could certainly be spiritual intercourse–and, remember, that includes sexual intercourse because sex is spiritual. This spiritual intercourse would mean something more specific than universal charity. It would be special communion with the sexually complementary; something a man can have only with a woman and a woman only with a man. We are made complete by such union: “It is not good that the man should be alone.”[25] And God does not simply rip up His design for human fulfillment.

The relationship need not be confined to one in Heaven. Monogamy is for Earth. On Earth, our bodies are private.[26] In Heaven, we share each other’s secrets without shame, and voluntarily.[27] In the Communion of Saints, promiscuity of spirit is a virtue.

The relationship may not extend to all persons of the opposite sex, at least not in the same way or degree. If it did extend to all, it would treat each differently simply because each is different-sexually as well as in other ways. I think there must be some special “kindred souls” in Heaven that we are designed to feel a special sexual love for. That would be the Heavenly solution to the earthly riddle of why in the world John falls for Mary, of all people, and not for Jane, and why romantic lovers feel their love is fated, “in the stars”, “made in Heaven”.[28]

http://www.isawthelightministries.com/polygamy.html

The Bible is full of God-approved polygamy. Why might it be a good thing:

Men are Naturally Polygamous

We know that when men are stuck in a traditional western marriage of only one woman, that many times he will cheat behind his wife’s back. To be realistic, most men would cheat on their wife if given the opportunity, if he felt very confident that his wife would never find out. God created men with very intense, natural sexual desires that are very difficult to control, especially with all of these women walking around in very short skirts/shorts and showing much of their breasts.

74% of men say they would have an affair if they knew they would never get caught. Source: Associated Press, Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. Date research was conducted: September 7, 2016. The same study said 57% of men admit to have already committed infidelity in a relationship. But the truth is, the same study said that 74% of men would cheat if they knew they would never be caught, therefore the other 17% are lying. This is confirmed by a study conducted in India, which says that 75% of all men cheat on their wife. Source

Of course, just because 75% of men are having sex with multiple women doesn’t prove that it’s the will of God. But nevertheless, it does prove the natural instinct of men. Most men desire to be with more than one woman. That’s not because of the devil but rather because God created men to have a very powerful sex drive. But most women want to be with only one man. These natural differences were created by God.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hX_Dv4WvWHg

This woman is saying believers will be taken on September 18th, 2020, held in limbo, and finally totally taken out on September 28th.

Now, before you dismiss it as nuts, look at all the research that went into it.

They’re obsessed with it because they don’t like the common people. It’s as plain as the nose on Pinnochio. Elites like Ted Turner, etc. are sick creeps, and their narcissism, vanity, and arrogance has pushed them toward wanting a final solution, ultimately.

Much is made about how many Cluster-B psychos there are in White Nationalism, but honestly SJW’s or any other elitists aren’t any different.

Does IQ matter?

I don’t think it means much. Again, this is elites expressing their hate for real people.

The problem with the Philippines, a place I lived for a time, is that it is full of beggars, and you don’t find that in the US due to the vast safety net.

What is the dark side of a social net? The US is over-medicated, over-obese (no offense to the decently fat), and inhibited toward supporting a family, all leading to family breakdown.

The end scheme of a safety net by the elites is slaughter because they don’t like the common people anyway.

In this case, pick your poison. A place like the Philippines is full of no love from the government, while the US has a government that loves its people, but it’s all a scheme/trap.

https://beyondhighbrow.com/2020/06/23/i-admit-im-a-misanthrope-and-its-one-of-my-worst-flaws/

I mean elites of any type – Left, Right, etc. In the end, they just want to slaughter them. How is this different from a God promising annihilation, or worse – everlasting torment? I don’t believe in either, preferring a purgatory. It’s more in line with God’s character.

You can despise God, the Bible, whatever, but no doubt, the elites don’t like you. Now they might toy around with you like Jeff Epstein before a Satanic ritual murder, but in the end, you get it!

They sure do! That’s probably why African-descended areas are plagued with the worst demonic oppression. Haven’t you ever noticed Blacks are either angelic and holy or quite the opposite!

It makes me wonder even if Blacks are chosen people like the Jews. That would explain a lot! I don’t believe that but certainly the Devil wants his teeth in African people.

It’s because socialism is attempting to control everyone –  to be their daddy/friend, when actually, it’s just creating a world where people can be led to slaughter. Look at UN Agenda 21. It wants 90 percent population reduction.

Who is supporting Agenda 21? None other than progressive minds.

They’re defacing and tearing down statutes in big cities. Big deal! Would they do that in the rural South? No chance! They’d get mowed down with shotguns! So where’s the bravery? If they’re the tough heroes they think they are, then why not go to where there’s real opposition?

It would be like Klan people picking on everybody locally but not willing to do it in Harlem.

What else is all this rioting and looting? Gun sales are through the roof, and that’s not shocking!

I never liked the original movie because of its Klan anti-miscegenation propaganda. Nonetheless, its portrayal of societal breakdown at the least is dead on. It’s what’s happening now!

Sinister forces have brainwashed lots of people – mostly non-Black – to terrorize our cities with anarchy. My dad’s head would be spinning (he was a Fox News conservative)!

Final Thought

I never dreamed society breakdown would happen like in that movie. It seemed to be U.S. rightwing propaganda. You know, Red Scare stuff. It was a joke. Come on. I didn’t think hippies/college radicals could bring on the stuff Richard Nixon wet-dreamed about. But look at what’s going on now.

I don’t want to be self-righteous and racist and say they’re the only places like that. Nonetheless, this provides an understandable reason why African/African-descended areas are full of poverty, violence, and crime.

I’m making generalizations as I can’t say all US Blacks are in a nightmare situation. Many are doing quite well and are normal.

Rap Music

Listening to this as a Christian, one needs the power of exorcism. It’s that evil! With music this evil, is it no wonder demons have an enslaved the African race?

What is it telling Africans and others? Be a ho, a pimp, indulge in outrageous sexuality. Probably that’s just the tip of the iceberg.

Christian Africa

Great strides have been done in Africa, but it’s not been enough.  It’s because as mentioned in the Liberation Theology article, either God provides or he doesn’t. If a place is this Hellish, then there’s some disconnect to the Almighty.

Therefore, I take it that a great many Africans are still pagan, or they simply embrace very weak Christian beliefs.

The African-American Church

There are dedicated holy members, but the faith simply hasn’t taken a hold on enough African-Americans to make Stormfront shut up, or even Fox News.

What About IQ?

Either God provides an abundant  living or he doesn’t.

Plenty of Unbelievers Exist in White/East Asian Nations Too, but Those Places Are Fairly Stable

There could be real differences in African IQ, and rest assured, demonic forces exploit them.

The Bible does speak of economic oppression, but Liberation Theology throws it into hyper-drive. Seriously, if God truly provided, then wouldn’t prayers, etc. make Liberation Theology unnecessary? Well, either God is lying or he isn’t. He said he would provide our needs.

If a whole Latin American nation truly did pray to God, I’d figure all their problems would be gone. Well, the people might not become rich, but they would be happy and content.

Now as for individuals stuck in a Hellish Third World situation surrounded by many that don’t believe, I think they can be pulled out to something better.

Am I Supporting Capitalism?

Nah, no way. I don’t think the Bible espouses Communism, fascism or  anti-people capitalism, and they all have the high potential for evil.

Anyway, there has been a trend in churches known as Prosperity Theology – endorsed by Joel Osteen and the like – but it’s a heresy because considering The Book of Revelations, there isn’t much a future anyhow.

https://banned.video/watch?id=5ef0bcf7c7a607002f1f4ce6

This is because Covid-19 cannot outright kill everyone. But I have read that the virus also sterilizes people, and that’s not surprising.

https://www.plenglish.com/index.php?o=rn&id=53270&SEO=covid-19-can-damage-testicles-and-cause-infertility-in-men

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/are-conservative-blowhards-to-blame-for-christianitys-decline

Churches are empty in part because “for some young people, Christianity is associated less with love than with hate,” writes columnist Nicholas Kristof. Their unwillingness to address political issues such as climate change and racism, their stubborn refusal to work with the social justice movement, and their eager acceptance of Trump and his policies have all contributed to the growing unpopularity of Christianity – specifically Evangelical Christianity – among the younger generations, Kristof claims.

I’m distrustful of those sects also. But how can conservatives communicate about why they distrust these sects without rubbing people the wrong way?

Political hypocrisy is certainly a problem, but it’s not the reason young adults are fleeing the church. Kristof and many others on the Left would like to think so because then, finally, the narrative that Christianity is incompatible with conservatism would be true.

Christianity, just like any other religion, is full of hypocrites and blowhards. Some of them are politically liberal; others are politically conservative. Political affiliation in the church isn’t that important. What does matter is genuine faith, theological soundness, and personal ministry. A church that lacks these things will act as a repellent to believers in search of a faith that matters, regardless of whether the pastor is a Republican or Democrat.

For Kristof’s sake, perhaps we should add one little caveat to Jesus’s teaching in Matthew 7:16: “You will know them by their fruits” — not by their voter registration.

What people see via the media does affect their views.  If the media portrays the bad apples over and over, people get the idea that religion is about the bad apples.

Even my conservative father saw hypocrisy in the church when he was young and it seemed to have stayed with him for the rest of his life. Therefore, to his dying day, he preferred drinking a six-pack to religion – LOL.

https://beyondhighbrow.com/2020/06/22/tons-of-cultural-left-drones-created-because-they-werent-given-an-alternative/

As Eminem said, “Where are the parents?” An interesting video series on YouTube called They Sold Their Souls for Rock and Roll is right on the money about this, other than the fact that they fail to discuss the parent question. They simply blame everything on society but not the church. They don’t blame parents either.

Who can blame dark forces for taking advantage of the enemy’s weakness in a war? That’s just War 101.

I see these people, many of them young, making a raucous in Seattle or other large cities lately, and it shocks me how many of these lives have gone down the toilet. Nonetheless, I realize this didn’t come out of nowhere.

Every action has a counter-reaction. Since churches especially haven’t been on the forefront of portraying a message of sane diversity and acceptance, the Cultural Left has taken over.

There is more to it than that. For instance, if some woman becomes a lesbian because of an alcoholic wife-beating father, that wasn’t the fault of the church directly, but it could have made more of an effort.

Now the Cultural Right anti-government types are in an orgy because things have hit the fan. Nonetheless, they’re still massively arrogant, blind to the fact that conservative institutions have promoted the very alienation causing the Cultural Left.

The pride projected from “the superior,” obviously irritates the Other. How can you communicate a message of sane tolerance without being a jerk about it? Why are the conservatives that way? It’s because they get off on being superior.

The Snowflake Thing

While understandable, it’s mostly a distraction from the fact that arrogant conservatives have failed to promote sane tolerance.