Category: Uncategorized

Jason:

The whole “macho thing” depends on the occupation. @Robert Lindsay might disagree – but there’s a world of difference from James Taylor singing “Shower Me People” to an auto mechanic crying. One is permissible, the other isn’t.

Anyway, obviously, being sensitive doesn’t work in the teaching, correctional jobs, construction, auto repair – a host of other occupations.

Well, the thing is that apparently I am not macho at all, but I can fake it enough that I have worked in extremely macho workplaces, and those men all pretty much accepted me. You just look at how the other guys act and talk and try to imitate them. If you already have some masculine core from your youth, you can plug into it. It’s not that hard, guys.

Of course women pretty much didn’t accept me because women are far more demanding than men when it comes to masculinity. Toxic masculinity is 100% women’s fault. Men display toxic masculinity because women demand it and won’t accept anything even 1% less. As long as women demand it, men will do it.

At those workplaces, you talk the talk and walk the walk, and everyone will be ok with you. And go along with the general vibes. At this security guard job I had where the atmosphere was extremely macho, the subject of homosexuality came up, and I said, “Fuck fags,” in a sort of disgusted tone of voice. Most of the other guys said, “Yeah. Fuck fags.”

One man said, “Hey, you know in Laguna Beach, they got a fag mayor now! Can you believe that? A fag mayor!” I just shook my head as if to say, “That’s bullshit.” This was 1984, 35 years ago, and it was much more ok to talk like that then than it is now. I was also a lot more homophobic than I am now. I’m not sure I would say that now.

You don’t have to believe the things you say, but it helps to play the part. There aren’t any gay men around, so no one gets hurt. And that talk won’t get anyone hurt because any man who talks that way already is not keen on male homosexuality.

I remember at that same job, this Jamaican guy was walking with me, and I had tied my sweater around my waist. He said, “Damn! You’re embarrassing me!” So I tied it around my neck, and he said, “That’s better.” Apparently he thought tying your sweater around your waist was gay. Maybe it looks like a dress.

One time I was talking about sex with my girlfriend at the time, and I said she stuck her finger up my ass. This caused loud guffaws. One of the guys recoiled and said, “That’s gay! No woman is going to stick her finger up my ass!” I just laughed and said, “So what? I’m getting laid.” Then another guy made a huge smile and said, “Is that some good pussy, Bob?” I said, “Yep, real good pussy!” and they all started laughing and saying, “Good pussy,” and slapping each other on the back and giving thumbs up signs.

Of course all of this conversation is banned now as Nazism and evil hatred of women and gays, but the thing is, this is how real masculine man talk and have always talked. And if you go anywhere on Earth, you will find that masculine straight men act approximately this exact same way.

These insane SJW’s are coding what has been normal behavior for thousands of years as evil, hatred, fascism, bigotry, and Nazism. It isn’t any of those things. It’s just the way normal, straight, masculine men normally talk and act, always have and presumably always will.

I remember back in the wide open 1970’s when things were very liberal and wild. Almost all straight men acted exactly like this, and no one cared. There were a few SJW thought police around, but most of the hip, hip people hated them as the killjoys, party-poopers,  prudes, and churchladies that they are. SJW’s are like a dour-faced guy who raids your party and drops a turd in the punch bowl while yelling, “Party’s over!”

Back then, the world would have laughed if SJW’s said, “Mick Jagger said the word bitch. He’s a misogynist and we must boycott all his records!”

If they said, “Johnny Rotten said the words cunt and fag. He’s a misogynist and a homophobe. Everyone boycott his records,” everyone, including every punk on Earth would have laughed right in their faces.

Leftwing men have turned into the most pathetic bunch of sissified girlymen on Earth. SJW’s have declared war on people acting normal.

Jay:

Robert have you heard of shift in sexual identity.

I have been studying this issue for years now. Frankly there are hardly any people studying this issue and almost everything you hear about sexual orientation is nonsensical lie. Research into this matter is being held up by Gay Identity Politics. I am probably one of the few people in this country who is actually studying this issue.

You mean sexual orientation, right? It doesn’t happen in men, except maybe in prepubertal boys. Men don’t change at all. Sexual orientation in men is frozen at age 15, if not sooner. We know this because many males have tried to change their sexual orientation in lab over many decades. All efforts to increase heterosexual attraction and decrease homosexual attraction failed. So not only could gays not be turned straight, but a 10-90 couldn’t even turn into a 20-80.

We don’t know if straight men can turn gay  because no one ever shows up in the lab wanting to do that, but it doesn’t seem like it. There was a case in the Archives of Sexual Behavior about a college man who desperately wanted to turn gay but was utterly failing to do so. He had tried everything and was at his wit’s end when he showed up for therapy.

It would seem that heterosexual attraction cannot be decreased, and homosexual attraction cannot be increased. We men are SOL. Whatever you are, you are. Be happy with your orientation. You probably didn’t create it, and you can’t change it. And let’s quit beating up on men for things they can’t change!

I’m not sure about women. Women seem to be able to add on a new attraction. Many straight women add on a bi attraction. Many lesbians cannot seem to change at all for some reason. There are women who claim that they change from lesbian to straight. No one really knows what is going on with them, but in one case I am aware of, Bill DiBlasio’s wife, her sexual orientation did not change. There are straight women who claim to go lesbian, often due to feminism, but many lesbian feminists do not have sex, which implies that their true orientation did not change.

It looks like once an attraction is acquired in a certain strength by a certain age, it cannot be reduced or eliminated. It’s just stuck for life. The question revolves around whether new attractions can be created on increased or eliminated if they already exist. The jury is open on that, but in men it looks like it’s not possible.

Probably straight women cannot turn lesbian because a hard attraction to men will be for life. Probably a lesbian cannot turn straight because a hard attraction to women is for life. I have talked to a few lesbians who were having sex with men, and they told me that their orientations had not changed (10-90’s) in the few years they had been having sex with men. One told me, “I can’t help it.” It’s time we show kindness to true biological homosexuals.

Sexual activity, identification and orientation are not the same. 95% of all gay men are biologically gay and cannot be changed. However, I am aware of a few cases of straight men living a gay lifestyle simply because women did not like them. I am also aware of cases where men with an apparent bisexual orientation and a lot of experience with women until college decided to live a gay lifestyle.

So most gay men are biologically gay, but a few are straight or bisexual men who have simply chosen to live a gay lifestyle.

Well, I’m not the most religious person.  However, I can attest to the fact traditional Christianity is basically false – basically meaning people who rebel against it are highly justified.  I mean, why shouldn’t music artists worship the devil or favor other non-conformist attitudes?

Why is it not justified? Well, it all seems subjective, but really think about it:

• The traditional idea of hell is against God’s loving nature.  I mean, the world sucks enough as it is – but then torture someone from eternity – not even a billion years – LOL?  And this even being done – not only to child rapists, but also just bearded hipsters (just kidding).
• Eternal Hell provides no real correction.  I mean, even prison government agencies are called “Departments of Correction”.
• Why should anyone love and worship such a being?  And notice how FAKE Christians are – it’s not surprising – look at the theology.
• A lot of people had never heard of the gospel message.  However, according to traditional Christians, their ignorance – justifies ETERNAL DAMNATION. 😆
• Babies and Mentally Disabled People in Hell?  Apparently, old-school Christians would justify this.  For instance, Catholics demanded babies be baptized or else – ETERNAL DAMNATION
• No consistency in Protestant thinking.  I mean, if Catholics were wrong about the Pope according to them – why wouldn’t also THE WHOLE CATHOLIC THING – be wrong?  The Hell idea came from the Catholics!
• No eternal security for many denominations including Catholic – the largest one.   This basically means – committing any mortal sin – which is any fun one – when dying – commits you to ETERNAL HELL
• Some people actually believe in Double Predestination – which basically says “God chooses who goes to heaven and hell – and those who complain are – guess this – being whiny!
• Hell has actual flames – that are never-ending, when simple boredom experienced in a prison (in real life) is verified torture.

Why do people hold on to traditional religion? Well, apparently Christians think God has to be this hyper-masculine monster who tortures people  in hell FOR ETERNITY.

Also, they hold to doctrines where – thinking is discouraged, so nobody questions what they say – even if, taken logically, to come to pure bullshit.

What is the truth?

I think hell is of a temporary nature – humane and just – until someone is cleansed of sin.  The Bible – taken in it’s true translation backs this.  No time for specifics, you can look it up!  However, I don’t think “all ways to God” are right – but I think there is some mercy in finding “the one true way”.

This is unbelievable!

Anyway, I know this is a pro-hyper-masculine blog – but, honestly, so much of this stuff is “bandwagon”.  It’s just as dumb as disco suits or sporting a Chicago Bulls hat (in the 90s).

Well, one problem I have with these bozos – is that they really haven’t deserved the honor of a beard – even if they can do manly things.  I mean, did they lose their legs like Lieutenant Dan (in Forrest Gump)?

Come on!  These guys look like Eddie Munster with a beard.  You can’t even tell who the 18 year old guys are these days!  Oh, whose the professor, is he sitting in the class or on the podium?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prison_sexuality

Who would truly be strong enough to resist “punking out” in a prison?  Well, actually the dominant ones aren’t considered punk – but they’re – just as gay.

From 1931 research:

These are families women create in prison that provide them support, bonds and relationships, like a traditional family would. Typically, only the main couple in the family has sexual relations. The women take on masculine and feminine roles to mimic a real family. “Mammy” or “mumsy” is given to the older, maternal woman in the family, while “Popsy” is given to the dominant woman, who is least feminine. These “parents” are typically older and are seen as mentors to younger inmates. Roles within pseudofamilies are flexible and can change with time.^[6]

Modern:

In homosexual relationships, sexual types for women include: “butch” or “daddy” refers to the masculine female who is dominant. The “femme” or “mommy” is the submissive one. A “trick” is a girl who allows herself to be used by others. A “commissary hustler” is manipulative. “Cherries” have never had lesbian experiences and a “square” will not take part in homosexual acts.^[4]

Modern:

Heterosexual men in prison view their homosexual acts as being “situation specific” and may not consider themselves bisexual. These men often describe how they imagine being with a woman while taking part in sexual activity with a male inmate. During masturbation, they picture past sexual experiences with women.^[9] They take part in homosexual activity due to having no “heterosexual outlets”.^[6]

A dominant sexual partner in prison is called “daddy” while their submissive partner is called “kid” or “girl”. The dominant partner has their mate take on the feminine role in order to feel more masculine and powerful.^[10]

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/travel/spotlight/how-the-elegant-city-of-charleston-is-facing-up-to-its-troubling-past/ar-AABfEnv

My meanderings are punctuated by churches. Charleston’s picturesque peninsula was a refuge for nonconformist Christians, as well as Jews, and “The Holy City” still hosts a multitude of Christian buildings of diverse architecture and denomination, as well as a historic synagogue.

Certainly the WNs will focus on the synagogue – LOL.

Non-conformist Christian as in what? Satanist? 😆

Yeah, all the “southern-ish” bearded hipsters now in coffee shops – but slave shops back in the day!   Well, I’m not shocked!

But it’s the innocent-looking information boards on the ground floor that lodge in my brain: they describe the busy auctions that took place in the now-quiet square – auctions of enslaved people. “Some 40 per cent of the estimated 388,000 Africans brought to America as slaves came through this city,” says historian Ruth Miller, my knowledgeable guide. “Odds are, almost every African American can trace blood lines back to Charleston”.

Also, oddly enough, the Civil War started there.

This small museum of personal testimonies and evocative objects (including manacles) occupies the site of the indoor slave market that replaced the one at the Old Exchange. Christine holds a poster for a sale here in 1860. A 12-year-old boy was sold (alone) for $940 (about $24,000 today), a 15-year-old girl for $1,275. “I honour my ancestors by talking about them as people, not property,” she says. “My great-grandparents were enslaved… they survived this for me.”

It’s amazing how African-Americans fell in value to from a new car each (an average new car in today’s terms – to being utter pests – so despised by conservatives, WNs etc..)

“You see, it isn’t just history,” sighs Christine Mitchell, welcoming me to Charleston’s Old Slave Mart Museum. Whitewashing is still a big problem, she says, and (though legally ended in 1968) segregation is alive and kicking. Certainly, I have seen a minuscule number of the black people who make up 40 per cent of the city’s population.

It’s certainly not a culturally integrated city – unofficially.  But – I think it’s due to the blacks – not the whites (to a large degree).

In more of the “blame game”, racists now want to say Jews owned slaves – to deflect criticism – much as they also want to do the same with The Holly-Hoax – lol.

However,the fact remains that the Southern Whites were not dupes in a Jewish scheme. They fought whole-heartily for the preservation of slavery and also highly supported future African-American oppression.

Now as for other lies – some white nationalists want to present the image that skid-row whites or white racist elitists have views – that represent those of current working class whites.  Nope!  Not the case, homey!!

Well, I have mentioned them a few times.  They range from David Duke – to stupid punks at a community college.  Anyhow, these people – are without excuse. It’s not like with certain skid-row whites – where bad experiences/poverty allow for justifiable hate/racism.

Beats me as to why they (white racist elitists) are they way they are. I take it that it’s mostly culture (privileged culture) combined with ignorance – and well, they’ve just never experienced what it’s like being fucked – as opposed to fucking.

Well, at least not for poor blacks.  However, this is the “wet dream” of white nationalists and others.  And, of course, they criticize – even race realist liberals, as “bourgeois liberals” – a polite term for “liberal elitists” or “mini-Mr. Drummonds” from Different Strokes (the TV show) – lol.

However, the fact is that poor blacks cannot succeed on their own. In fact, the slaveholders of past centuries were totally right about it.   So the fact of the matter is that typical white racists have no working solution for poor blacks – and also, of course, traditional liberals don’t.  The right is totally correct in showing how Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society failed – how “poor blacks given money” has only destroyed poor Black America.

Well, one alternate solution given by white racists – is to put the poor blacks under the care of richer blacks in a segregated state (black-a-block among blacks).  But would that really work?  Well, there is simply too many poor blacks for the small black middle/upper class.   In that case, you’d just have a repeat of Haiti – with a large black underclass – and a heartless mulatto elite.

Anyway of course, the real reason that racists hate @Robert Lindsay’s Black a Block theory- is because they HATE black people.  They deny it, but it’s obvious.  They cannot even tolerate a place like Appalachia or Portugal – where the blacks are spread out to where – they’re practically invisible!

But this figures for skid-row whites or white racist elitists.

Why are autistic people – some of them – drawn toward misogyny, racism etc.?  Well, I suspect this hate comes from bad experiences – and I especially think it comes from anti-disabled prejudice.  In other words, certain women and blacks etc.. are not understanding of the disabled.  They bully the disabled.  An autistic person, whose behavior triggers it (gawking) or maybe not, gets on the bad side of people.

I mean, come on!  People don’t hate for no reason.  More than not, there was bad experiences.  However, though, I do admit I’ve seen some elitist jerks (at colleges, military etc..) who are simply are in a hyper-right-wing culture – and the way to fit in is to be bigoted.

@Robert Lindsay is hung up on bitches at work etc. and I can’t blame him.  Nonetheless, some behavior triggers these women – and that behavior is not acceptable.  For instance, I used to stare at women.  In fact, it probably triggered a lot of the hate I experienced.  Now don’t get me wrong.  The environments I was in were full of injustice.  I mean, these women were racist, anti-American, anti-disabled.  However, it took my gawking to trigger their bad side.

This is usually how it is. People are shit, but they don’t reveal themselves until they’re triggered and the starting-off point is often something truly justifiable to the asshole/bitch.

Yes, @Robert Lindsay has a point when he says that cool, in-crowd people can do whatever they want, but others cannot do the same.  In other words, if he says, “Spread the blacks outside the ghetto.”, he’s a NAZI monster, but if Obama says it, it’s all groovy.

I’ve also seen this in life – where the most vile people weasel their way in – by simply being a normie.  In fact, it seems to be more the case – that being normie is valued – above being just.

 

I suppose it’s also the same Indians.  I mean, how do they get to own everything – sheesh?

Anyway, you don’t see this thing with white Americans – apart from the recent Kickstarter/Indegogo thing.

O.K. the Korean crowdfunding thing basically means that immigrants come in, all the family and some others chip in and buy a business.  Of course, there is a string attached of “paying back with interest” – but apparently they have more faith in the borrowers than banks do.

In the articles about “putting blacks on every corner” as a means of charity – my comments seemed to suggest poor white Americans were dysfunctional. Well, actually, I was talking about skid-row whites – and possibly also their psychotic white rich supporters.   Those people are definitely dysfunctional – either cause of poverty and/or (in the case of the rich) mental issues.

Now, lower working class whites actually don’t hate blacks as much as you’d think.  For instance, I know of women with decent manager jobs at restaurants – and they have married blacks – and they’re case examples of how the “black on every block” thing works.

Now, note these relationships aren’t perfect – and often the black men take off – but the benefit to the children is off-the-charts.

They’re great!  You should own one!  😆

This joke is popular among skid row whites – and they fucking HATE black people – to a comic degree!

Probably also the racist rich white supporters also like that.

Man, talk about empathy-less humor – but a dark side of me has to chuckle.

We have too many black Americans, trapped in the US to help (in that fashion).  Anyway, if the Filipinos want white genes, there are a host of other white nations to get them from.

Also, the Philippines needs restructuring at home – and just bringing in mail-order money – or more immigrant money (Filipinos working in other nations) isn’t the solution.

 

Well, among whites with a steady good job or better yet, Mr. Drummond on Different Strokes – it works wonders.  Well, I don’t mean necessarily adoption, but rather marrying a black, letting some blacks in the neighborhood etc..

Well, anyway, the premise operates like the “mail-order” bride thing.  Note, when some American marries a Filipina – the effect in the Philippines is off-the-charts.  Everything back home improves!

Anyway, in my home town, there are ladies who have married black men – maybe they were even dumped by them – normally, lol.  However, these women have been a massive positive effect for the kids.  The kids are not only  richer – but usually, because of genetics, they have a higher IQ.  Also, these kids go on to create, at the least, decent families (my guess).  It’s an end to the dead-end cycle of “being poor black”.

O.K. who hates these race-mixers?  Poor whites do – possibly cause their culture has taught them to hate other races from fear and also they’re probably jealous.  Well, typically they view race-mixers as whores, people wanting non-white pets, people who live in a shell (Yes, having money beyond a ghetto existence is a shell of sorts!), effeminate pansies, poor losers (in the case of poor whites wanting to be with blacks).

Anyway, the white racist movement has a steady supply of poor people with the backers often being richer white bigots.  Yes, a good number of richer Americans – for whatever reason, also hate non-whites.  I take the reason to be machismo, conservative politics, military experience, a recent background in being poor in the past etc..

Well, unless anyone’s not noticed – Trump is pretty much just copying word for word Thorton Mellon (Rodney Dangerfield) :

The commentator Jason wrote:

I Think this whole subject is too focused on 20th century race relations paradigms. Hispanic and immigrant migrations over the late 20th and into the 21st century have really altered the demographic framework of 21st Century America. Latinos surpassed blacks as the largest minority population by the late 1990s. Note the focus on immigration and obsession that the current Trump supporters have on the issues. Focusing on purely Black-White relations in race relations is increasingly anachronistic thinking.

Well, this is “a little true”. I guess it really depends on the area. I mean, Tennessee (my state) isn’t Star Trek – and my actual neighborhood is light-years behind – even Johnson City, Tennessee (home of a local university).

With such emphasis on starving third world children and Black Lives Matter – what about the pre-fame Axl Rose/Ozzy Osbourne – wallowing in some Indiana trailer? 😆

Well, this “sympathy thing” is often used by white nationalists to paint the “only assholes” as being liberals – not themselves etc..

However, the truth of the matter is that all the poor deserve pity.   However, identity politics has played different groups against each other – making blacks, liberals etc. have no pity for poor whites – assuming they’re supposed to be richer.  But isn’t that racist- against blacks and browns?  Yes, it is – because it’s assuming whites are superior – ironically!

Also, of course, I’ve already mentioned the thing where WNs constantly bring up “meh po white bros” whenever poor blacks, browns are brought up – people they have zero empathy for!

Something in human nature is inherently snobby. I suppose religious people  (some of them) would claim it’s the “fallen nature”.  Anyway, this snobby-ness IS such a problem – that as recently as the 1950s – it was considered normal – in America – to shun interracial marriage or association.

However, though, it’s this “shunning” which has driven groups into isolation – and they simply cannot function isolated.  However, though, racists are always claiming: “Let them stay among their own kind and they can build their own wonderful civilization.”.  Well, outside of Northeast Asians – frankly – I’ve never seen it!

Well, the commentator EPGAH (a past one who has disappeared) said “Let Lord Darwin take care of the mess.”.   Well, that’s pretty much a recipe for no – or worse change.  I mean, who said we had to operate according to Darwin?  I mean, look at Cuba and how simply removing snooty assholes has made such a difference.  But then again, why did they need Communism to create that?  Well, maybe because the Latin American rich are such snobby bastards that simply will never give an inch!

Whose seen the movie?  Well, no doubt, from a movie POV, it’s a good one.  I mean, Spike Lee makes good movies.  Look at “Do the Right Thing”,

However, though, from a progressive POV – his movies are NOT making progress.  The fact remains that, the more people “talk about racism – the more racism doesn’t go away!”.  In fact, it seems to be a linear distribution.

I mean, come on, no better way to get angry white males on the path – then another “bitchy” Spike Lee movie!

Well, I have been accused of it, even called a Yid – ha ha.  However – the fact remains that a lot of poor whites are simply thieves and swindlers.  But I can’t really blame them.  It’s just a tempting option to the poor – considering they’re pretty much locked out of the richer “white normie world”.

Anyway, I never advocate the harshness on poor whites that the former commenter Trash (now using another name) engaged in.  For one thing, it was massive over-generalization and also – what if you need the help of a poor white – like say, your car breaks down in nowhere?  I mean, even if you hired a normal auto mechanic (normally fairly middle class), they still have the spirit and culture of poor whites.

Anyhow, poor whites are indeed somewhat racist to varying degrees – but it’s not without justification – but that’s not supporting or encouraging it.

Lousy Arguments the Left Uses to Counter “Racist Facts”

Even though, whites are rapidly becoming a minority in the world – it simply doesn’t change the fact – that the past was racist – and it was mean.   And I’m not talking about Care Bear mean  (modern cultural left’s high-end definition), lol – I mean, really mean.  No non-white person wants to go back to the days of Jim Crow, or how about slavery??

So anyhow, @Robert Lindsay listed why he thought he could not “speak the truth about race”.

Well, there’s another reason above why.  O.K. so if blacks, especially, piss in their panties about racism, why are we shocked here?

Now the disabled are labeled as perverts – along with being “smoochers off the government tit” and lazy:

Man shunned on Facebook for supposedly sticking his hand up women’s leggings – as the caption says.

Now, I realize some are into meaningful projects that require massive work.  However, even in those cases, it’s often a “mouse on a treadmill” – as they simply don’t have enough capital to do anything beyond “a hobby website”.

So, anyhow, these autistic people (maybe this could be expanded to other disabled folks) have loads of time for video games and for farting around web development forums.    They have plenty of time, as noted, to develop hobby web projects.

Well, the cultural right – assholes as they are, are probably quick to condemn them as babies, but the attitude isn’t totally without justification, though.

In fact, the disabled do very little toward meaningful progress and some literally play on cell phones and chat with mom all day!

It seems to me to be a case of “One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest”.  It’s a bunch of people – not living up to their full potential – trapped in a “disabled ghetto”.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/ted-nugents-jailbait-problem_b_4840060

😆

Would governors and congressmen hit the campaign trail with that guy? Would they send their children to his “Kamp for Kids” — and professional snipers? What would they say about almost any other man? They wouldn’t call him a creep or a redneck. They’d call him a pedophile.

Ha ha!!  Take that white identity politics! 😆

https://www.foxnews.com/us/former-louisiana-cop-arrested-for-animal-sex-abuse-now-charged-with-child-porn

http://www.thepinkswastika.com/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pink_Swastika

Lively and Abrams also take up the subject of Nazism in America and discuss the Boy Scouts. They state that many leaders in the German Nazi regime, including Adolf Hitler himself, were homosexual and that eight of the top ten serial killers in the US were homosexuals.^[4][5] They claim that persecution of homosexuals was only directed towards feminine homosexuals.^[6] One significant source for The Pink Swastika was Samuel Igra‘s Germany’s National Vice, which Lively refers to as “the 1945 version of The Pink Swastika.”^[7]

Well, you have to be plumb blind – to not see the extreme homo-eroticism in Nazi propaganda.  Who are we kidding here?  😆

Some opposing thoughts:

Erik N. Jensen regards the authors’ linkage of homosexuality and Nazism as the recurrence of a “pernicious myth”, originating in 1930s attacks on Nazism by Socialists and Communists and “long since dispelled” by “serious scholarship”.^[8] Jensen sees the book as coming about in “the aftermath of an Oregon measure to repeal gay rights“.^[8] Dorthe Seifert cites it as a response to increasing awareness of Nazi persecution of homosexuals.^[9] Christine L. Mueller argues that the historical record does not support Abrams’ assertions.^[10] Bob Moser, writing for the Southern Poverty Law Center, says the book was promoted by anti-gay groups and that historians agree its premise is “utterly false”.^[11]

Jonathan Zimmerman, a historian at New York University, wrote that the claim that gay people helped bring Nazism to Germany “is a flat-out lie.”^[12] Zimmerman, points out that “Between 1933 and 1945, the Nazis arrested roughly 100,000 men as homosexuals. Most convicted gays were sent to prison; between 5,000 and 15,000 were interned in concentration camps, where they wore pink triangles to signify their supposed crime.”^[12] He further notes, “To win their release from the camps, some gays were forced to undergo castration. Others were mutilated or murdered in so-called medical experiments by Nazi doctors, who insisted that homosexuality was a disease that could be ‘cured’.”^[12] In addition, “Hitler authorized an edict in 1941 prescribing the death penalty […] for SS and police members found guilty of gay activity.”^[12][13]

But could that have been a cover-up?  OK, this sounds like a dumb stereotype – but wasn’t Hitler an artist?

 

http://www.unz.com/jman/the-behavioral-genetics-page

The Five Laws of Behavioral Genetics

The five laws of behavioral genetics are:

1. All human behavioral traits are heritable

2. The effect of being raised in the same family is smaller than the effect of the genes.

3. A substantial portion of the variation in complex human behavioral traits is not accounted for by the effects of genes or families.

4. A typical human behavioral trait is associated with very many genetic variants, each of which accounts for a very small percentage of the behavioral variability.All phenotypic relationships are to some degree genetically mediated or confounded.

If so, then why did the fall of the family, starting in the 60s and 70s, destroy black America so much?  This seems like some scheme to say – “Well he’s just a nigger,” 😆

 

\