Black Admixture and Presence in North Africa

James Schipper: Many people believe that the Moors, that is Northern Africans, are black. Of course, the Moors are the Berbers and Arabs, who are definitely not black. Before the Arab conquest of all of Northern Africa, there were various people white peoples there and they were all Christianized.

The Romans possessed all of Northern Africa. They didn’t refer to that part of their Empire as black. Were the inhabitants of Carthage black? Was Cleopatra black?

If we look at the inhabitants of the 5 Northern African countries today, we will find that they vary between white and brown. Anwar Sadat could be described as brown, and el-Sisi could easily be Italian or Portuguese. This is surprising since the Arabs imported so many slaves from black Africa.

I believe moor just meant “dark.” And the Berbers were quite probably darker than the average Spaniard. They average 13% Black blood. They basically just look like Arabs.

Egypt has quite a bit of Black blood. 30% overall. 20% in the north and 40% in the South in Lower Egypt.

Libya also has a lot of Black blood, especially in the south. The south of Algeria is very Black, as is the south of Morocco. Most of those countries get a lot Blacker as you get into their southern regions.

The Sheltering Sky is an excellent movie by Bernardo Bertolucci, adopted from a novel by the great Paul Bowles.

In the movie, a European couple go to Tangier. The husband gets sick of some disease, maybe cholera, and dies. The wife becomes lost and takes up with a camel caravan heading south. They head down into lower Morocco, Algeria, and Niger. In the movie, that area is very Black. It’s also deeply Islamic. The photography and the movie in general is spectacular. Highly recommended.

Anyone here read Paul Bowles?

I read a book of his short stories. They’re too much! He was basically gay and his wife Jane Bowles was basically lesbian. Nonetheless they stayed married for a long time. Jane Bowles only wrote one novel and a book of short stories, but they are both said to be excellent. He spent his time picking up teenage Moroccan boys to have sex with.

William S. Burroughs lived in Tangier too for quite some time. In fact, that was where he wrote the famous Naked Lunch. Anybody read it? It’s bad, man!

Burroughs also spent his time smoking hashish and picking up teenage Moroccan boys to have sex with. This behavior is somewhat tolerated in Morocco because women are not accessible to most men, hence there is a lot of situational homosexuality. Nevertheless, the neighbors didn’t take kindly to Burroughs having sex with all those teenage boys, and they used to yell and throw things at him when he was out in the street.

There’s a lot of situational homosexuality in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Syria. Homosexuality is very much proscribed in the region, especially in the Shia parts of the Middle East. Nevertheless, in many Sunni countries, if you keep it on the “down low,” people look the other way.

Bowles spent a lot of time smoking hashish, or kif, as it is called. I had some kif for a while and I was selling it, of course. What else does a drug dealer do with any dope he gets? It was a light green powder, unlike most hashish which comes in blocks that have the consistency of extremely hard chocolate. You carve off pieces of the stuff with a knife and put it in a  “hash pipe.” I had a special hash pipe like the kind they use in Morocco.

The stuff’s practically legal in Morocco. If you go to the Atlas Mountains in the north where the Berbers grow the stuff, you will find it everywhere. Photos of Berbers in that part of Morocco show that they are very White.

The  Bowles’ both lived in Morocco, mostly in Tangier. This was during a time when Tangier was an “international city” under some sort of “international administration.” As such, there was not much police presence, and it was a haven for drug users and addicts, smugglers, and other low level criminals, street people, beatniks, fugitives, etc. It was a pretty shady place!

The Beats, including Ian Summerville, Jack Kerouac, Gregory Corso, Allen Ginsberg, and Burroughs, used to go to Tangier in the 1950’s to visit Paul Bowles. Most of those men were either gay or bisexual. Burroughs and Ginsberg were gay, Kerouac was definitely bisexual, and Ian Summerville looks suspect to me. The Beats were gay as Hell! Far gayer than the hippies, most of whom looked down on homosexuality.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: How GloboHomo Fits in With Dependency Theory, the Cultural Left, the US Empire and the Needs of US Corporations

Brian: Identity politics is a bulwark against socialism, even against mild social democracy. It works by preventing an awareness of common cause among those who aren’t near the top of society. It’s used domestically, in the U.S., to stymie any sort of labor movement, and abroad it serves to keep vassal states weak and dependent.

Yeah this is perfect. Why is the US pushing gay rights all over the world, especially in Ukraine, Russia, and Belarus, places where homophobia is at a high level? Why does the US push feminism and women’s rights so strongly in Afghanistan? Why is Soros pushing radical feminism and gay rights all over Eastern Europe, Ukraine, Belarus, and Russia?

And appallingly, why does Soros refuse to fund this same radical feminism in Israel, where his primary loyalty lies? Gosh, that’s straight out the Protocols! Weaken the Gentile states but keep the Jews strong so we can continue to lord it over the Gentiles, our economic and cultural competitors.

What’s the point? It’s clear the most Afghans do not like such things. Also we push the same Cultural Liberalism or Cultural Left crap.

I call it GloboHomo because of its emphasis on a strong push for gay rights in homophobic countries and the fact that the Cultural Left is part of the US Empire and the corporate-Empire-Deep State globalization project, which benefits elites, the rich, and corporations but doesn’t benefit your average person at all. Note that an essential aspect of globalization is anti-nationalism and neoliberalism.

The US has always hated nationalism because when nationalists come to power, they get tired of being exploited, raped and ravaged US colonies who get 10 cents on every dollar US corporations take out of their nations and instead advocate for a national economy where they manufacture their own things, grow crops for food instead of export, and nationalize large US corporate interests so the nation can use it’s national resources to help its own people instead of having them stolen by US corporate carpetbaggers.

The part about growing food for consumption not export is very important because the US Empire’s (also the project of the entire West) is to stop countries from making their own stuff and growing their own food. Why? Because we wish to keep them in a colonial dependency because that way we can exploit them maximally and extract the highest profit from their countries while giving them as few of the profits as possible.

The US typically makes alliance with a comprador elite, oligarchy, or ruling class along with an upper middle class sector attached to it. This class also represents most of the business interests of the nation. The US allows this top 20% to benefit from the crops for export model by owning the lands where the crops are grown and the companies which export the crops.

This allows them to benefit from not making their own stuff or growing their own food by allowing them to run the import and distribution models that import and distribute US food and manufactured products. The top 20% usually increases their income, often by quite a bit, under this model. However the  bottom 80% usually sees their incomes drop, often by a lot.

In fact, the US pushed neoliberalism all over the world, in particular in Latin America, in the 1980’s and 1990’s. These were referred to in Latin America as The Lost Decades for the negative economic growth during those times. The so-called Pink Tide that so enraged the US and led to fascist coup after fascist coup was the logical result of the disgust Latin Americans felt for The Lost Decades foisted on them by the US.

During this period when the US pushed neoliberalism, generally only the top 20% gained income while the bottom  80% lost income while seeing the costs of necessities skyrocket and having the social sector gutted.  It is estimated that this double whammy of neoliberal globalization killed millions of people in the 3rd World, mostly via lack of medical care, which was typically gutted and privatized under this model, often by World Bank and IMF dictate.

Why do we want nations to grow for export and not for internal consumption?

Because that way we can make money off the agricultural sector by profiting from the import of these foods from the nation. We don’t want them growing their own food because then they wouldn’t grow so much profit-rich crops for export and would instead grow for consumption, which US corporations can’t make a profit off of.

Also, if people grow for consumption, they would eat their own food instead of being forced to import most of their food from US farmers and food manufacturing corporations. I would also note that the US imported US manufactured food is usually not very good for you, being high in salt, sugar, simple carbohydrates and fat and low in protein and complex carbohydrates. Canned processed food usually isn’t’ particularly good for you for a variety of reasons.

Why do we not want nations to make their own stuff?

Because then they would not need to import all of their manufactured goods from US corporations!

Thing is, when nations grow their own food and make their own manufactured products it’s very difficult for the US to go in and exploit that country and make super-profits. Sure there are still a level of profits to be made – note the trade between the US and Europe – but the profits are not nearly at such a high level.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: Four Types of Transgender People

Interesting post from Claudius about transgenderism. I don’t completely agree with it, but it’s more right than wrong.

Transgenderism is mostly a fad because not all gay men who “transition” become hookers. In fact, many are too ugly and masculine for straight men. These I would call “fad trannies.” Not technically insane though the cult itself is suffering from collective insanity, mostly as a form of political and emotional rebellion against conservatives.

So there are four groups:

  • Gay hookers
  • SJW gay fags
  • Autogynephiliacs
  • The vanishingly small number of people truly suffering from gender dysphoria

The latter two groups are truly insane, but only the last one is deserving of our sympathy and collective medical and legal effort, to wit, they should be legally considered the gender they feel like and actually be encouraged to take hormones and chop off their dick. I doubt even 0.1% of the population would meet the criteria for real gender dysphoria.

Autogynephiliacs should not be legally considered their gender of choice under any circumstances. Why? Because they are straight and thus attracted to the opposite gender. These trannies are potential rapists of women, although I don’t think they pose an overall large threat to anybody save themselves. But you’re right about them having many comorbid paraphilias. These are truly sick fuckers. Look at ContraPoints’s YouTube channel..

“She” is a lesbian tranny. Lolz.

Also note that the first group, gay hookers, don’t chop off their dick. Almost all tranny prostitutes here, in Thailand, or wherever keep their dick because men like to play with it and sometimes be fucked by it. The economic incentive is quite strong, casting doubt as to whether these tranny hookers ever even had gender dysphoria in the first place.

From what I’ve read, men with gender dysphoria are appalled by their own penis and truly want to get rid of it. The prospect of keeping it to make a few bucks on the side by forming non-emotional relationships with straight men doesn’t add up.

RL: It seems to be an extreme form of homosexuality, and their brains are actually female-shifted. That is, they don’t have female brains or male brains.”

I didn’t know this. Interesting. It matches up with what I said. They are just super-duper gay. I like these trannies. They seem very nice, albeit a bit gold-diggerish, but whatever. I could be friends with these people.

Psychotic autogynephiliacs like ContraPoints or Caitlyn Jenner who killed someone with “her” SUV while escaping paparazzi, Hell no! BTW it was an accident, the SUV crash, but still.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

There Is Nothing Worse for a Man Than to Be Dominated and Humiliated by a Woman

Polar Bear: Certain women probably make the best torturers. I’ve never seen men more tortured, unhappy, and hopeless than when dominated by a mean old soul-sucking succubus.

That’s because they’re being dominated by a woman, and there is nothing more humiliating to a man than being dominated by some weak woman. It’s totally pathetic; the most pathetic thing in the universe.

I know I don’t like women insulting my masculinity. The fact that a lot of people used to think I was gay is no matter. I’ve never been an effeminate man.

And the odd thing is that even a guy like that (like me) has and had a strong sense of masculinity, it’s just that most people are too stupid to see it.

I finally realized late in life that most nerds are quite masculine. They’re certainly not effeminate! They act like men, for Chrissake! What does a nerd act like, a man or a woman? Of course he acts like a man. A nerdy, dorky, foolish, idiotic man, but a man nevertheless.

And even men who are not very masculine have a masculine core. I figured this out because I used to have some friends who were not particularly masculine. They were still men inside, they were very goodlooking and also they had high sex drives, so they tended to do very well with women, at least at times.

I remember I brought one guy over to meet my roommate in college. Actually he stayed a weekend once or twice. He spent most of his time hitting a bong, which he did too often. My roommate was a regular guy, and he was disgusted at my friend. At first he asked if he was gay. I laughed and said no. I don’t associate with gay men anyway, and I’ve never had a close gay friend, so he shouldn’t have bothered asking. If you’re a good friend of mine, you’re straight. Well, at least you’re not gay. And if you’re bisexual, you probably won’t be my friend much longer. That doesn’t work at all and it’s weird as Hell to boot.

He looked disgusted again. Then he said, “He’s a wimp!” with complete and utter disgust. I’d never heard anyone call D that, but I had to admit, yeah, he was pretty wimpy. And that was funny because I’d never thought of it before. Yep, now come to think of it, he actually is a wimp. Ha ha.

Thing was D was a player. I’m not sure why, but he was one hell of a goodlooking man, like so many of my male friends.

Anyway, if a guy is a player, I don’t care if he’s a wimp. The player-ness cancels out the wimpiness. If you’re a wimpy player, I’ll buy you a drink, Goddamn it.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

A Look at Transmen and “Lesbian” Transwomen

RL: It seems to be an extreme form of homosexuality, and their brains are actually female-shifted. That is, they don’t have female brains or male brains.”

Claudius: I didn’t know this. Interesting. It matches up with what I said. They are just super-duper gay. I like these trannies. They seem very nice, albeit a bit gold-diggerish, but whatever. I could be friends with these people.

I like the real, true, pure trannies too. I’ve heard this group makes up 11% of the tranny population. The other 89% are all autogynyphiliacs, and yes, they are statistically more dangerous to women than CIS men. In one cohort, I think over half of them had a record for sex crimes! I’m serious. They put them in women’s prisons, and a number of them have raped women in there. They go to women’s shelters when they are homeless and tend to make the real women really uncomfortable.

The lesbian trannies are a pretty large group because most of the autogynyphiliacs are straight or at least bisexual. So a lot of this group are attracted to women and call themselves lesbians, except real lesbians absolutely despise them and say they are creepy men pretending to be women. These real lesbians even lead movements against the lesbian trannies, for example, a number of the radical feminist TERF’s are like this.

The lesbian trannies has started to rail against the “cotton ceiling,” by which they mean the real female lesbians who refuse to date the fake female tranny lesbians. They’ve even held demonstrations against this ceiling, and they like to crash lesbian and ultra-feminist gatherings (same thing).

The Michigan Womyn’s Festival, for example, a radfem feminist gathering of mostly lesbian women, got invaded by lesbian trannies a while back. They cracked down hard on them a couple of years ago, and now all lesbian trannies are banned from the festival. I have no idea about how the women running the festival feel about transmen.

A lot of TERF’s feel sorry for transmen and say they are victims of patriarchy, which makes it so miserable to be a woman that a lot of women just say, “Screw it. I’m going over to the enemy. I’m going to be a man and cash in on all the male privilege.” Because of course any problems a woman has with anything on Earth are clearly the fault of us men, right?

Except most real men are probably not real fond of transmen. I’ve known a few of them and even talked to a couple and am even considering fucking one if she still has a womanly body.

A lot of transmen are straight women and when they go tranny, they call themselves gay men. The ones who become really masculine usually end up getting fucked by regular gay men, who don’t seem to care that transmen mostly still have vaginas. To gay men, it’s just a gay man with a vagina. Big deal. Gay guys will screw anything anyway, and this looks enough like a man for them, so they’re down.

The really masculine transmen often have their tits chopped off, which sickens me, and their faces develop a male appearance. They often get a lot of facial hair hair all over their bodies too. So it looks like a dude with a pussy basically.

A lot of them are horny as Hell and looking to get fucked by anyone, mostly guys I guess, but most men seem to be doing a hard pass on these freaks. I sure as Hell would. I wouldn’t fuck a guy with a pussy with a ten foot pole and an 11 foot extension. I’m homophobic as it is in the true sense of the word and that would feel so gay to me, I just could not handle it. It would feel like fucking a guy, and that would set off my homophobic alarm pretty bad.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

There Is a Strong Link Between Narcissism and Male Homosexuality

Polar Bear: I suspect some are just obsessed with themselves.

The link between male homosexuality and narcissism is as old as Time itself and has been remarked on endlessly. Perhaps many things have basic Characters or Principles, not just the main races or the (only) two genders but also, say, Gay Men and Lesbians. Anyway, there is classic Gay Male Personality that is stable over time. Go back and read the old psychoanalytic literature about Male Homosexuality. They thought it was a mental disorder at the time, in part because it actually does look like one. Instead of a disorder, I think it is a “syndrome.”

A syndrome with some predictable characteristics and a classic personality structure. But those old articles are amazing because they could have been written yesterday. I remember I talked to my paternal grandmother a few times about men. She was born in the 1890’s and died in  the 1990’s. How much does someone who grew up during World War 1 know about gay men. But the things she said about them would have been noted by a sociologist studying West Hollywood in 1984. There’s a basic Gay Male Personality, and it’s relatively timeless like so many things about us two-legged monkeys.

No one quite knows why gay men are so narcissistic. Hypothesis: Gay men have cocks and a male body. Gay men are turned on by cock and male bodies. So gay men are in love with themselves and in a sense, when they fuck, they are literally fucking themselves also?

Curiously, there’s no link between lesbianism and narcissism, possibly because females are just not that narcissistic. The correlate of narcissism in the Female Character is “solipsism.” Until you figure out that females are solipsistic at their core, raw, primal nature, you will always have an incomplete picture of them.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: More on Trannies, November 2020 Edition

Claudius: They (trannies) are gay hookers fighting for their libertarian right to transition so they can get straight male sugar daddies and clients. It’s a booming business. Just look at Thai ladyboys making a living off sex tourists.

That’s only 11% and it does look like some biological disorder. It seems to be an extreme form of homosexuality, and their brains are actually female-shifted. That is, they don’t have female brains or male brains.

Their male brains are shifted halfway towards the female brain structure, so in the areas where male and female brains differ, these men have brains halfway between male and female brains.

It’s absolutely a biological syndrome and I would give them the right to transition. There’s something clearly off with their brains. Also this type of tranny is very nice and even a lot of the TERF radical feminists don’t like them too much. They’re appalled by the belligerent and menacing behavior of the autogynophile kooks. Also, they love the word tranny. They call each other trannies all the time. They think it’s a funny word. It’s the autogynophile snowflakes that have decided that tranny is some evil bigoted slur that means you’re a Nazi.

But no one is born in the wrong body. No man is born with a female brain and stuck in the wrong male body and no woman is born with a male brain and stuck in the wrong female body. That’s just part of the crazy lying tranny propaganda, but a large percentage of the population actually believes this bullshit.

Claudius: The only crazy trannies are the straight males who are turned on by cross-dressing, the so called autogynephiliacs.

Yeah, but that’s 89% of them. Those are the nuttiest of all of them. They have more mental disorders than any other group we see clinically. They have very high levels of other paraphilias, and they commit sex crimes at a high rate. Many are on area sex offender lists. A fair number of them are actually dangerous.

They are also extremely loud, belligerent, and vindictive and even aggressive and menacing. They have taken over whole corporations. For instance, the Twitter moderation team has been infiltrated by this type of tranny and this person(s) uses their power to ban people from Twitter. We even know their names. This is the guy that got me banned from Twitter for life for telling the truth about trannies:

RL: There’s no such thing as transgender people. They’re all just mentally ill.

That’s what I said. For that crime, I now have a lifetime ban from Twitter thanks to some crazy autogynophile tranny piece of shit.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Do Very Handsome or “Pretty Boy” Men Elicit Odd Feelings From Straight Men?

I used to say men either acted like they wanted to beat me up or fuck me, or sometimes both at the same time.

I was said to be very handsome when young. Actually even young women say I still am (a 23 year old lesbian, of all things, was gushing wildly about my looks the other day), but lot of good it does me at this age.

So maybe this is what goodlooking men get from other men. John F. Kennedy, one Hell of a looker himself, complained that very handsome men are often thought to be homosexuals. And this was in 1960! I guess I’m not the first one who figured this out. None of us are, with anything. Think about it next time you feel like a Goddamned genius.

Perhaps they’re attracted to us a bit on some level and they either project that away: “I’m not gay. You’re gay. I’m not attracted to you. You’re attracted to me, fag! I’m going to kick your ass, faggot!” or they just feel it, “Damn, I’m not even 1% gay, but you sure are sexy! You’re as pretty as woman!” I can’t tell you how many straight men have hit on me. It’s so weird.

It’s like I bring the fag out of men. I still trying to figure out why that is. I don’t mind that much though. When I was young, all the women and girls wanted to fuck me. Unfortunately, all the gay men wanted to fuck me too (even more than the women did), and even some of the straight men wanted to fuck me! I could develop a complex about it, or I could just say, “Dammit, I’m so fucking  hot, everyone wants to fuck me. Women want to fuck me. Everyone wants to fuck me. The whole world wants to fuck me!”

Of course now I’m 63 and no one wants to fuck me. Unless I pay them first, that is, which is really insulting! A young gay man recently informed me that “hot older men like me,” as he put it, are a hot commodity in the gay community. He suggested that if women turned a cold shoulder, I could get a lot of affection from hot young gays looking for a Daddy. I was slightly tempted, but I think I’ll pass. Maybe next lifetime I’ll come back as a fag, and I can make their wishes come true.

I think pretty boy men who look like women and are often as pretty or beautiful as women maybe do elicit a lot of weird feelings from straight men.

After all, straight men aren’t exactly “Chicks turn me on and guys don’t.” They’re more like “things that look and act like women (feminine objects, if you will) turn me on, and things that look and act like men (masculine objects, let’s call ’em) don’t.” Pretty boys, trannys of all sorts, and even gay men join women in the former, and bull dykes join men in the latter.

No man is turned on by a bull dyke, but I’m shocked at how many straight men will have sex with a tranny of some sort. For a long time I thought it was weird, but now I get it. Guys don’t care about cocks. They don’t like cock, but they don’t hate it either. Hell, they even have a cock themselves, and I doubt if many guys hate their own dick!

A tranny is just a woman with a dick! But guys don’t care about dick, so they just pretend it’s not there. Fucking a tranny is about like fucking a woman! Just pretend that cock’s not there, ok? Maybe it’s really the biggest clit you’ve ever seen? Sure, why not. If you have to believe that do it, it makes sense.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: How We Got Here: The Origins of Identity Politics and the Modern Cultural Left

There is a ready explanation for all this nonsense.

First is the tendency of Identity Politics to become more radicalized with time.

There has long been an argument on the Left against this BS. Sanders actually came out of that tradition.

The US White Left married with the radical Blacks. After they did that they started heading down this nutty race train track along with all the other IdPol madness.

The entire Left moved away from economics and foreign policy to go down this cultural road instead. Perhaps 1989 was a trigger. The Eastern Bloc collapsed and the US Left was in disarray and didn’t know what to think or even believe. The dictatorship of he proletariat, democratic centralism, it was all up in the air now. Further, it seemed the Communist economics in the East Bloc had not kept pace with socialist social democracy economics on the rest of Europe. A lot of the US Left packed it in on economics and started to focus on cultural BS instead.

The Left now is nothing but pure IdPol. Ever see BLM or Antifa morons say one word about US foreign policy and US imperialism? Course not. Ever hear them say one word about neoliberal economics? Course not. That’s what drives me up the wall. Here is a movement ripe for radicalizing against the US ruling class program of neoliberalism at home and invite the world – invade the word neoconservatism abroad. Let’s call this combined package Neoliberalism-Neoconservatism. That’s a rightwing project any way you slice it.

But at the same time, the ruling class went full left on culture. Hence the Libertarian-type fiscal conservative-social liberal of the upper middle class in the last 40 years. Neoliberalism-Neoconservatism plus the Cultural Left. What a project! It’s literally the worst of the Left combined with the worst of the Right! And the upper middle class is proud of this nightmare ideology. Which is one more reason that this class, which always sides with the ruling class against the workers, is no good.

Now that the Left bailed on anti-imperialism and left economics in favor of a pure Cultural Left, what are they doing with this new ideology? Why, they are rioting about nothing at all or at worst for an outright lie. Brilliant!

But if we get police reform out of these riots, it would be good. It’s an ill wind that blows no good.

Thing is the corporations, foundations, media, etc. and both political parties are down with this Neoliberalism-Neoconservatism project because they’re businessmen and rich people, and Neoliberalism-Neoconservatism is good for them for reasons I won’t go into here but perhaps you can guess at.

This Neoliberalism-Neoconservatism project is how the rich, the corporations, and the U.S. ruling class make all their money. So they oppose Left efforts against Neoliberalism-Neoconservatism such as the 60’s revolutions with all-out ferocity. If such a movement arises, they will sic their media attack dogs on it, smash it to bits, and brainwash the sheep via their media monopoly to go along with this destruction.

The thing is that this is a perfectly safe progressive project. It doesn’t cost them one nickel, and they get groovy hip woke points for jumping on the bandwagon.

How much of the US ruling class are going to lose out on an anti-White project? 0%.

How many of them will be replaced by an unqualified Black via affirmative action? 0%.

How many of them will be replaced by an illegal alien on their jobs? 0%. Illegals are great for them – cheap labor, more customers, a guy to mow the lawn, and a nanny to watch the kid. They don’t live with illegals so they don’t have to deal with the civilizational decline that they cause. Pro-immigration is risk-free progressivism for woke points, and what do you know? It stuffs their pocketbook too! Win-win!

Does the US ruling class have to live with the consequences of Black crime and civilizational collapse? Course not. They don’t have to deal with the downside of this crazy movement so they can support it all they want. See?

Also, the US ruling class has been socially liberal and Neoliberal-Neoconservative for a long time now.

The Left won the Culture War.

But so what?

We lost the Economics and Foreign Policy (US imperialism) War. They even defeated the Vietnam War Syndrome, a bad thing because it posed a severe threat to US imperialism.

So what did we win?

Our women have become insane, manhating harridans. If you ask a woman for a date now, it’s sexual harassment and you can be fired. We overthrew Patriarchy but replaced it with something worse – Matriarchy or Female Rule (Feminist Rule) – with all the manhating, war on male sexuality, and horrific puritanism that always goes along with it.

The latter is most painful to me as a 60’s child. One of the revolutions was the Sexual Revolution. Our attitude was “do it in the streets!” Now look. If I ask a woman for her #, it’s sexual harassment and you can get the police called on you. All sexuality has been sucked out of public space by #metoo, so it feels like a sexual desert, which is apparently the way women want it! They actually like to live like this.

And at the same time as this crazy Victorianism, we also have a society drenched in porn. So my personal world is porn saturated, but if you so much as look at a woman, she might act like she’s going to call the cops. How’s that for crazy cognitive dissonance? No wonder incels exist and go on killing sprees. Societies can’t handle grotesque cognitive dissonance. It literally drives people insane and often results in serious violence.

What else did we win? Modern anti-racism – a movement with great roots that has gone insane and is worse than useless.

What else? Depraved, disgusting, and lewd gay pride parades. Great! My favorite!

“Pansexuals,” “queer” as a noun, “genderqueer” and “nonbinary” nonsense, and the insane and depraved transgender cult. It gets sicker and more perverted, weird, and stupid every year. What’s next? Transsexual bathhouses for all ages? Back then, we fought for liberation, not weirdness, sickness, perversion, and deviancy.

Further, these Cultural Left boneheads have badly divided the working class. Check out this great plan they had!

Let’s have a revolution!

Cool! Yay!

But first lets get all the non-White workers to hate the White workers!

Cool! Yay! Oppressors and oppressed!

And while we’re at it, let’s get the woman workers to hate the man workers! Oppressors and oppressed!

Cool! Yay!

Now let’s have a revolution, boys and girls!

Whoops. Whoa! What happened?

No one showed up! That’s what happened.

Why? Because we got them all to hate each other!

Brilliant! You got to hand it to these guys with these genius ideas of theirs.

What I mean is this Cultural Left project is easy for the ruling class to swallow. Many are already decadent, depraved rich people, so the sicko stuff works for them. Rich men get all the sex they want. If a rich man asks a woman for her #, does she threaten to call the cops? Course not.

Homosexuality? The ruling class is always full of gay men and all manner of decadent bisexual libertines. Works for them.

Trannies? Cut into the bottom line? Course not. Support.

The ruling class has been left on social BS and right on economics (neoliberalism) and on foreign policy (US imperialism) for a long time now. It works for them and doesn’t cost them a nickel! Hell, it even makes them bank too!

And you see the outgrowth of this ideology in this destructive BLM movement that makes the Black workers hate the White workers and vice versa.

Brilliant! Way to go, Lefties! Why didn’t I think of that?

The ruling class loves this because they benefit by dividing the workers and getting them all to hate each other so they won’t organize against the Neoliberalism-Neoconservatism bread and butter issues of the ruling class.

It also explains why BLM won’t dare touch economics or US imperialism.

See all those corporate and foundation millions flooding into BLM?

Kiss them all goodbye once BLM goes after neoliberal economics and neoconservative foreign policy, for this is what fills the bank vaults of the corporations and ruling class.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: Miserable? Find Your Gendered “Happy Place”

Femininity is Woman’s “happy place.”

I think women who act masculine do not seem very happy. That is why so many feminists seem so angry and miserable. And why ball-breaking dominatrices who deliberately seek out weak men to beat up(Talk to me about that!) don’t seem very happy. They are sadists who seek out weak male victims to beat up on because no real man will put up with their shit for one minute. Any real man would just kill the bitch.

Like so many misled folks, they think they are getting what they want but really they aren’t. First because they are mistaken about what they want. What they think they want and what makes them happy actually makes them miserable. They can’t see it because the defensive blinders go up and blind them to this truth.

But unlike male sadists, who are reveling in the ultimate Woodstock mud puddle of Masculinity because masculinity is normal for men, the ball-breaking harridan is not happy, probably because masculinity is just not normal for straight women and never will be. She hates her milquetoast husband. And I think she secretly hates having to be an emasculating harpy. The real men that she craves will smack her ass in a New York minute. She’s locked herself into a prison of her own making.

The only men who put up with them are, yeah, wimpy. To which I do throw my former self, sadly. But we’re also pussy-whipped.

For the flip side, ever seen a happy wimpy man who gets his balls busted all the time by his psychobitch wife? Me either.

I also think masculinity is Man’s “happy place.” When you get back into it after having been out of it for quite some time, damn it just feels so right.

Ever seen a cat curled up in some object like this pillows with the round holes in the middle that fit the cat’s body perfectly. That’s what these “happy places” are. They plug right in with our biology and both our minds and Nature Herself see it and think “two thumbs up.”

Just to be fair to the homosexuals out here, I will say that gay men and lesbians and their extreme forms called transsexuals probably do indeed have a similar happy place. For gay men, that happy place may indeed be femininity. I have no idea. For lesbians that happy place may indeed be masculinity. And that’s perfectly normal, natural, correct and maybe even biological with them. It’s obviously not normal, but in a way, if it’s biologically mediated, it’s certainly “normal for them,” and at the end of the day, that’s all that matters: what’s normal for you.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: One Essential Rule in Relationships – You Have to Find a Woman Who Is Ok with Your Style of Masculinity

Jason: Well, my love loves her “other love” so much she smacked my head real hard while driving and called me a “punk ass bitch.”

@Jason has gotta leave this diabolical cunt. Any woman talks to me like that is likely to get knocked across the room. Or at the very least, I’ll threaten to do so.

@Jason: She’s cucking you. She’s breaking your balls and emasculating you. She doesn’t think you are masculine enough.

I’ve been through all this shit because even though I’m a Chad, I am a very passive, soft-voiced, even nice Chad. So I’ve had women beating up on me and kicking my ass exactly like this off and on all my life. I’ve also had 20 lifetimes worth of good times with them too, but I can’t deny the bad.

It wasn’t all bad. Some would emasculate me a bit, and then they’d never do it again and be pretty nice to me the rest of the time.

@Jason, you and I both, have to get women who are ok with our style of masculinity. I think you are a masculine guy on some level.

Most straight men are not truly effeminate. Even passive, quiet, soft men often have a “soft masculinity” about them that most people miss. Next time you see a man like that, study him and see if you can discern that “soft masculinity.” If you’re perceptive you can do it.

I thinking, well I’m hoping, that there are women out there who are ok with my and @Jason’s style of masculinity.

A recent girlfriend said, “You’re pretty masculine. Why do you think you’re not?” She had a dumbfounded look on her face. I  believe that’s the only time a woman has called me masculine before. They’ve said other things. I’d had a doc remove a cyst from my ear and I guess I handled it pretty stoically. The nurse looked at me and said, “He’s tough.”

And most women nowadays act completely baffled when I tell them people used to think I was gay. They shake their heads and say, “I just can’t see it.”

I think I’ve been trying to act more masculine for some years now. It’s hard to do and it would take another post to explain how to do it. The trick is you have to force it so much that it doesn’t feel weird anymore. Eventually it will just go on automatic most of the time, and you won’t have to force it at all, or you can force it and look even more masculine than normal.

Unfortunately, you really can’t get too masculine, unless you’ve gone so overboard that you are hurting your health. At that point I’d advise toning it down.

But I still have women dumping me for not being masculine enough. A 29 year old hottie had a date with me and told a friend of mine, “He’s not a tough guy.” Well, this was a Chicana deep into barrio culture. Don’t even try for women like that. You’ll never measure up to those Mexican guys.

A 20 year old gorgeous Chinese woman, a multimillionaire, was ready to start dating me when she dumped me for “not being dominant enough.” I think she wanted an BD/SM type relationship. She was always calling me “sir,” and I don’t really like that too much. She asked me once, “Could I ask you to do something. When I start talking in a group of people, come up to me and whisper in my ear and tell me what a fool I am acting like and to knock it off.” Ok, this chick literally wanted to get treated like shit, right?

Last thing she said was, “Let me know when you want to act like a man. Then come back and talk to me.” Apparently I acted quite dominant for several hours after I first met her. But then I couldn’t keep it up after that. It makes sense because that’s not really me. I can play that role but not for very long because it’s probably forced.

Women vary. They don’t all want hypermasculine men. I’d say most do, and women are way worse this way than they were in the 70’s and 80’s when it was perfectly acceptable to be soft or have a feminine side, hopefully if you balanced it out with a strong masculine side.

But women are retarded. A lot of them will see the feminine side and flip out. If women were sane and logical, they would see the feminine side but then they would also see the masculine side and how strong it was and decide that the man had both things going at the same time. But that’s too difficult for women’s tiny little pea brains. You’re asking them to think too much.

But nowadays things are very much worse. We’ve gone completely backwards. Why?!

If you’re not covered head to toe in tattoos, you’re not a man. Back then, everyone hated tattoos and only Marines, sailors, bikers and criminals had them. No decent man would get a tattoo and be a gross piece of shit lowlife criminal. And all women with tattoos were nothing but total whores, usually of the grossest, “biker chick” kind. At the very least they were complete sluts. That was like a repulsive, disgusting gutter slut. Like the women you see and say, “Ew!”

It seems to me that the requirements for masculinity have skyrocketed in the past decade or maybe 20 years. The stuff I got away with all the time back in the 70’s would immediately get me called faggot or gay nowadays. We hardly have any freedom or wiggle room at all anymore, and we had so much back then.

Things have shifted dramatically back to traditional, stupid masculinity at the same time as the lunatic SJW explosion when at least that part of society went wildly, blatantly faggy and lezzy, and that’s when they were not insisting that they actually were the damned opposite sex.

Isn’t that weird? While part of society is fagging out like maniacs, another part of society is manning up to the point of absurdity and throwing out all the progress we made in forming a broader view of masculinity so men could have some space to run free in it.

Someone needs to explain this to me.

Or is it because of the SJW explosion? The country is overrun with screaming SJW faggots, bull dykes and all sorts of other gender-bending freaks. Possibly the more gender-smashing deviants around, the more straight men have to crank up the masculine so as not to be called or considered gay.

Straight men really, really do not like people thinking they are gay, even if they are nice about it, and they often are. It’s especially painful coming from a woman. If I’m with a woman who thinks I’m really gay or even bi (that’s not 1% better), it would devastate me so much that I doubt if I could get it up. I can’t think of a worse way to be emasculated than to be called gay.

In that sense, I’ve always thought that masculinity was more of a negative identity than a positive one. When men act masculine, are they really yelling that they are something or instead are they yelling that they are not something? I think the latter, at least here in the US.

When men act masculine, are they really trying to out-masculine the other guys? A few dicks are, but most? Hell no. Stupid women think we are, but what the Hell do they know, anyway? In ManWorld, if you walk the walk and talk the talk, you’re masculine. The world of women demands so much more from us in terms of masculinity than our own gender does.

I’ve thought about it a long time, and I think when men act masculine, they are really screaming, “I’m not gay, dammit! I’m not a pussy! I’m not a wuss! I’m not a wimp!” The more masculine they act, the louder they are screaming that. Because if you act masculine enough, no sane person will call you any of those things. When I said sane people, obviously I didn’t include women because women aren’t sane. I have seen lunatic women “try to get murdered” by emasculating the most aggressive and dangerous men I’ve known.

Women break balls. They’ll break a sissy’s balls, sure. But they’ll also break the balls of the most masculine man on Earth, which I call “trying to get murdered.” Men know implicitly that attacking the masculine of most men, especially overtly masculine men, is insane, and if you do it, you’re either a huge badass or you have a death wish.

That’s one thing I never do. I never call guys gay either. I don’t want to get punched in the face because that’s what happens when you do that. Worse than that, plenty of men kill over insults like that. I’d prefer not to get murdered.

Apparently women, for some insane reason, don’t care whether they get murdered or not. I’m not sure how much sympathy I have for these women who doing the equivalent of jumping into tiger cages and pummeling the tiger. I’m supposed to feel sorry for her when she gets killed? Why? She tried to get murdered and guess what happened? She got murdered! I’d say she got what she wanted.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: Homosexual Behavior In Straight Men: How Common Is it and What Are the Reactions of Others to It?

Fact is that most straight women are wild, raging, fanatical homophobes when it comes to this sort of thing. Sure they love their gay male pets, but like Hell they want any man they date, live with or marry to be even .00001% gay himself.

Which is lame because it’s an absolute fact that 38% of men have some sort of homosexual attraction, usually at a minor level but present nevertheless. In fact, in that sense, homosexual attraction is nearly normal statistically for men, or at least minimal attraction is. What’s abnormal, at least statistically, is high levels of homosexual attraction, strong bisexual attraction, or homosexual orientation in men. So for your man to say, “I am a little bit attracted to other men” is, frankly, almost normal! But no woman will see it that way.

Now thoughts and actions are two different things. But by age 18, 25% of men have had some sort of a homosexual experience, typically in adolescence. A number of others will have a first experience after age 18. The vast majority of men who do this are straight men who are “experimenting” which is so common it is almost ridiculous.

True bisexual men are much less common and gay men are unlikely to be dating a woman. But the number of straight men who have had sex with men one or two or a limited number of times on an experimental basis is very large. Most try it and see it’s not for them and give it up, but some continue on. Quite a few straight men have sex with guys for all sorts of reasons.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

PUA/Game: Women Necessarily Don’t Fall in Love with a Man as a Whole Person: They Often Just Fall in Love with a Pretty Face

I have a very pretty, “pretty boy”, feminine, even girly face. I don’t work out but it’s not necessary.

I used to get me called gay or assumed to be gay a lot. Perhaps it’s down to that pretty boy face. I’ve even had people say, “You look like a fag.” A  SE Asian women once insisted that I was gay because “I looked gay.” I guess I have Gay Face.

I had a gay reader who talked about Gay Face a lot. He said I didn’t have Gay Face but he did think I was Jewish. Ok maybe I have Jew Face too. Who knows? Fine, I have a Jew face. I don’t care about that. Just give me the money, that’s all I want. It does seem like a lot of gay men have Gay Face. They are pretty feminized as far as men go, even down to hip ratio, and a man with a feminized body may well have a feminized face. But a lot of us straight men are “pretty boys” too. I still get called “pretty boy,” even as recently as two years ago. I was 60 years old and this woman was calling me a pretty boy!

Frankly, I never understood why people ever thought I was gay. Never made any sense to me.

Some people said it’s because of the way I walk, talk, sit, stand, hold a coffee cup, etc. So they are describing an effeminate man. But I see effeminate men and I think that behavior is horrible. I try very hard to not act that way because I think it’s horrible. It makes me pretty angry that people think I act like those guys.

I have been told though that I’m not effeminate at all. Instead it’s just that I’m “not macho.” I’ve had a lot of pretty boy friends who were not effeminate at all, but they were definitely “not macho,” and people assumed they were gay all the time. It was very annoying as when we were out together, people would assume that we were gay lovers. And they weren’t very nice about it either. It was either ridicule or outraged contempt. This was 40 years ago. This is how people reacted to male homosexuality 40 years ago, and  these people were hipsters and scenesters.

I attracted whole armies of gay men. I’m the biggest queerbait that ever lived.

But women and girls have been going crazy for me since age 18, and it’s mostly about my Looks.

I have always thought that it was my great Game skills that got me all those women, but one day I talked to a “Looks Theorist.” He was pushing a theory that Looks was the most important factor in attracting women. He told me that he’s read me and he knows that I think it’s my personality and Game that got women, but he thinks it was all just down to Looks.

At first I thought, “Oh, this is nonsense. Everyone knows women don’t care anything about Looks.” Idiotically, I have spent most of my life believing that silly lie. I think if I would have incorporated that “women place Looks first” mindset when young, I would have done better. I still did great but you know, no matter how well you did anything, you always think you could have done better. Or at least a competitive bastard who wants it all like me thinks that.

I was also insulted as this implied that it was luck of the genes and not my skill at creating killer personality and Game that got women. So I didn’t deserve the success. I just lucked out in the genetic lottery. But the more I thought about it, the more I thought that he may well just be right. Now I subscribe to the Black Pill, which says Looks > Everything Else when it comes to getting women.

Game does help in getting women, but Game alone ain’t worth a hill of beans. I know think most of the women who fucked me in the past fucked a pretty face, and even most of the ones who fell in love with me fell in love with a pretty face. That’s bit hard to swallow as once again, it implies there was no skill on my part, just the luck of the genes.

As long as you are not a complete autist, the pretty boy look – assuming you are in the top 10-20% of men – can potentially kick ass. You can easily end with a 3-figure laycount if you work at it. Sure, you look like a fag, but if you have some basic skills, you can start racking up the women pretty quickly, and once every sane person sees that they forget all about the “he looks like a fag” BS and make friends with Chad Thundercock. Pretty boy Chad Thundercock, sure, but at the end of the day, all Chads are still named Chad and nothing else, and that’s all that matters.

On the other hand, many very goodlooking men do not do particularly well, mostly down to shyness, anxiety disorders, etc. Shyness is a killer for any man, even Chad. I’ve known total Chads who were literally 40 year old virgins. Psychologically, they were wrecked. So nervous that it was painfully obvious and they were essentially nonfunctional.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

The Dangerous Myth That All Pedophiles Believe

As I mentioned in a previous post, most if not all pedophiles believe that kids are horny as Hell, want to have sex all the time and especially want  to have sex with adults. They claim all sorts of evidence in favor of this notion. Obviously, considering their orientation, this is a convenient thing for them to believe, right?

I read this a while back and was very dubious about it, so I did a lot of research to see if what  the pedos were saying was true – mostly, do little girls really have a sex drive and come onto men?

I didn’t have any personal data of my own. There was none from my childhood, but girls didn’t like me then anyway, not that I cared since most of them had cooties anyway.

After age 13 and into adulthood, I had lots of contacts with kids. I worked in schools for over a decade. I taught school for six years, all grades. I’ve spent a lot more time around kids than most people have. In that time, some teenage girls definitely came onto me. Some even openly propositioned me right in front of the whole class. But those were teenage girls with the full-blown sex drives of women, as different from little girls as lions are from tigers.

Once a 12 year old girl who I had befriended the previous year in my job at an elementary school literally propositioned me for sex in a park. I turned her down of course. But based on a few things I gathered from our conversation, she was also pubertal and past menarche, so she doesn’t count.

I would think that if little girl children really wanted to have sex with us men, I would have experienced it by now. I’ve experienced more than enough teenage girls and grown women who acted horny around me. If girls did this regularly too, I should have gotten it from them. Also, I’ve been around far more kids than 95% of men.

So based on my own life, I was thinking this is pedophile bullshit. But I had to find out. So I did some work.

It was very hard to find the data (probably due to pedo hysteria), but what little I came up with said no, little girls have no sex drive whatsoever, and nor do little boys for that matter, and neither should they, either of them.

And I don’t have any data, but I don’t even think little girls get wet, although it’s an interesting question but I’m terrified to ask anyone about it. Imagine trying to ask someone a question about that! Better yet, try getting funding for research into that question! Good luck!

Four months before menarche, there is a massive increase in the capacity of the vagina for lubrication. This is an essential part of the female physical sex drive along with admoninal tingles, hardened nipples, flushed cheeks, rapid breathing, and the rest of the ill-defined soup that no one understands, not even women themselves.

I’m sure little girls have discharge. All females do. Chafing is a thing. To prevent that, the vagina likes to be bit wet. To test it, sometime when you are with a naked woman (if you ever get lucky enough to get with one), sneak your finger into her vagina for as long as she lets you.

Don’t be soy and ask permission. Be a man, dammit! Just fucking do it! If she doesn’t like it, she’ll stop you. You will find that even if she is not turned on at all, it is a bit wet. That’s its natural state. I just figured this out for the first time a couple of years ago, believe it or not. The vagina likes to keep itself a bit wet, and it also engages in constant self-cleaning processes, and both are related. But discharge isn’t lubrication. They’re two completely different things.

I think this delusion – that little kids are horny as Hell and are just dying to have sex with adults, no doubt especially with pedophiles themselves, must be one of the main delusions that go along with pedophilia. I guess it’s hard to be a pedophile if you realize, correctly, that little kids have no interest at all in having sex with you. Gay pedophiles believe the same thing. They insist that little boys are horny as Hell and get erections all the time. I sure wasn’t and I sure didn’t. Some even say that little  boys can ejaculate. There’s no way that’s true.

I suppose the truism here is that people believe whatever they need to believe to make their view of the world (which includes their sexual orientation) work and be logical. It’s not much fun to realize that your basic view of the world, your ontology, your whole set-up and outward orientation towards reality, is a Goddamned gigantic lie. It’s such a miserable thought that it’s almost enough to make you go down and purchase a gun and buy it that very day. We simply can’t live with such utter futility. So we make up whatever lies we have to make up to make it seem like our existence is rational and not doomed and senseless.

Perhaps it’s how we get through the day. Perhaps if we don’t do that, we simply don’t get through the day. And when it’s all said and done, the one thing that remains about all the rest is blown to dust is that whatever we need to do to make it to another day is about the most precious possession we have.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: Just Banned from Reddit Again

I got banned from Reddit, so I went and got a new name and signed up under that one. I got banned almost immediately. So now I’ve been banned twice. But now I have a new name, ha ha. A Satanic feminist sub reported me to Mommy Reddit because I wrote a comment asking why it was wrong for adult men to fantasize about teenage girls. After all, 100% of all straight men are attracted, typically maximally, to teenage girls. There is some other data suggesting that attraction declines with each declining year, but all men are maximally aroused by 16 and 17 year old girls.

One study found that for 15 year old girls, it was 90%, for 14 year old girls, it was 80%, and for 13 year old girls, it was 70%. Fairly high levels of attraction from 10-60% remained even in the pedophilic range – for 12 year old girls, it was 60%, for 11 year old girls, it was 50%, for 10 year old girls, it was 40%, for 9 year old girls, it was 30%, for 8 year old girls, it was 20%, and for 7 year old girls, it was 10%. Below that there was no attraction, thank God.

When females are lumped into a group called 13+, 100% of
normal straight men react maximally to this group.

Since men generally react maximally to teenage girls, what would be wrong with men fantasizing about the things that maximally arouse them? Isn’t that normal human behavior to fantasize about things that maximally arouse you?

For this the feminists banned me, wrote me a scathing email with orders not to contact them, and reported me to Mommy Reddit. The cucks and faggots at Reddit then banned me for something gay called “child sexualization” for stating some basic scientific facts along with a scientifically uncontroversial opinion.

Today I just banned again from another gay subreddit. I attacked feminists in the thread, and I accused people in the thread of being carceral liberals and police state liberals, which is exactly what almost every liberal in the US is. I’d argue that that’s what almost all US Communists are too. US Communists are so cucked and gay it’s pathetic. I doubt if there’s no real man among them.

Anyway, I got banned for “hate speech” for attacking feminists. According to Reddit homos, hate speech is:

No racist or sexist speech in comments or submissions. Also no abusive speech based on religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. These are not rules against swearing; they’re not rules against expressing political opinions.

I went back and looked at my comment. Nothing in there was racist or sexist at all or attacked any of their pet protected groups. In fact, I didn’t even mention anything having to do with race or sex and their protected groups anywhere in the post. The only thing I could figure out is that I attacked feminists.

Somehow feminists, a political formation in the form of a hate movement against men, is somehow in the category of race, sex, gender, religion, or sexual orientation. Obviously feminism is none of these things. The only thing I could figure out is that the mods on his sub are such faggots that they think attacking feminists is the same as attacking women.

Which brings me to another question. All liberal and left women  are feminists. 100%. No exceptions ever for any reason. And worse, close to 100% of liberal and Left men are utterly cucked male feminists. Face it boys, there’s nothing more pathetic than a male feminist. The only real men and real women are found on the Right, which is disgusting. If you’re on the left and you’re a real man, you will get tossed off just like that, with extreme prejudice too. They will order to go over to the conservatives.

Which makes me think: How many rightwing men are conservatives mostly because they are sick and tired of faggotized and pussified left and liberal politics? How many of them are Republicans because the Republican Party is the party of the real men? That’s a dumb reason to vote Republican (What have Republicans ever done for us men?) but most people vote based on the most retarded reasons imaginable that have little or nothing to do with their lives.

How many women have gone rightwing because they like to act feminine? They’re girly girls who love being girly, feminine, and womanish? I’ve talked to many women who told me that the main thing they hate about feminism is how much feminists hate femininity.

It’s true. Feminists do hate femininity.  Of course they do.
They’re dykes and manhaters or both, and they love nothing more than women with short hair wearing pants who are nearly indistinguishable from men. This is how women are supposed to look according to feminists. Like a goddamned butch bull dyke. I’m thinking maybe quite a few real women are voting right simply because they’re disgusted that leftwing women have turned into a bunch of man-hating dykes. They won’t throw you out of the left for being a feminine woman. But you better believe they will throw you out for not being a feminist.

By the way, what in the Hell’s the matter with straight men nowadays? I can’t believe how gay they are. If you’re going to be that gay, why don’t you just quit lying, move to Frisco, and stick a cock in your mouth? Are there any real men at all amongst these Millennials and Gen Z’ers? Almost all of them seem like complete faggots.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: Almost No One is “Questioning” Their Sexual Orientation

The Gay Politics branch of Identity Politics has a dirty little secret. Homosexuals are trying to increase their numbers. It makes sense. Hell, if were gay, I’d probably want to convert as many straight men as possible to bisexuality and this is exactly what the majority of gay men want to do. In my experience, this is why friendships between gay and straight men are not possible, even if you think it might be a good idea. They simply never stop trying to hit on you.

One of their lies is the “questioning” lie. There are gay, bisexual, pansexual, queer, and a score other micro-categories of deviates. And in this group they also put the “questioning.” These are people who are questioning whether they are gay or  bi or not.

I think Gay Politics wants to encourage as many straight men as possible to “question” their sexual orientation. No straight man will conclude he is gay, but quite a few might conclude that they are some type of bisexual or that they like the idea of sex with men. I’ve already met some men like this, and it seems to be getting more common all the time. Mostly they seem to be interested in oral sex. In other words, I am seeing more straight men who like to suck cocks. Whatever.

Men who are into anal sex tend to be pretty damn bi or simply gay. That’s a bridge too far for most predominantly straight men. It’s the ultimate in emasculation.

I don’t think anyone goes round and round about their sexual orientation. Any gay man will tell you that all gay men know they are gay. The ones that don’t know are simply in denial. Period.

I work in mental health. I give a scale to my clients, and they instantly pick a number. It’s a great scale, better than the Kinsey scale.

I met three males who were not sure if they were gay.

One was a 15 year old boy, a client. He had strong attraction to men and zero to women, though he was attracted to one girl who looked like a boy. But that doesn’t count. I told him he was absolutely gay, to quit worrying and feel good about it, it was biological and unchangeable, and to go out and live the greatest gay life he can.

One was a 33 year old man. He was simply in denial about being gay, and he was trying to be with women. I listened to him tell me about what turned him on, and I flat out told him he was gay, and he needed to accept it, be happy, and go out and live the greatest gay life ever. He was a 25-75 on my scale, but nevertheless he had no real attraction to women at all.

The 25-75 score is not very instructive. This man told me:

  • He never looked at woman. Not even one time.
  • He never fantasized about having sex with women. Not even once.
  • He never masturbated to fantasies of having sex with women. Never had either.

He had been closeted his whole life, so he had been hanging around with straight men all this time and pretending to be straight. But he told me hat when the other men talked about sex, he never joined in. Not even once. By the way, that’s a dead giveaway that a man is probably gay.

Another was a 35 year old man claiming to be bisexual. I figured him out real quick and told him he was hiding behind a bisexual label and in fact he was gay. For instance, his gay identity was progressing (this is how it works; it tends to grow greater with time), and now the only way he could have sex with his girlfriend was by looking at gay porn to get hard. Any man who has to do that is gay. Period.

He wanted to be a husband and father, and his family would disown him if they found out he was gay. That made me feel very sad.

He was with girlfriends but they were very angry about his “bisexuality”. I mean furious, crazy homophobic. This goes along with my experience.

Most straight women do not wish to date bisexual men, let alone gay men. I saw one forum with all young women, and 19 out of 20 said they would never date a bisexual man. And you can see on the Internet many bisexual men complaining that women refuse to go out with them on account of their orientation.

This may be changing somewhat in this newer generation of women, Millennials and Gen Z’ers. I have a 31 year old female friend who has a crush on a famous bisexual man at the moment. She’s dated other bisexual men, and she doesn’t mind at all.

I think women dating bisexual men is a health hazard, sorry. They’re much more likely than straight men to have all sorts of STD’s, and many bisexual men have transmitted HIV to the women in their lives. This is particularly the case in the Black community where most gay and bisexual men are closeted and the “down low” phenomenon is huge.

I flat out told him he was gay, not bi, his relationships with women will never work, and he needs to quit dating women (it’s bad for both him and the women). He needed to accept being gay and and be happy.

I also told him:

 “You know what? You being gay is the greatest thing in the whole world!”

“Why?” he asked.

“Because it’s you being you. You’re not trying to be something that you’re not. And you being you is the greatest thing in the whole world.”

You can see here what a horrific homophobe I am, huh? I swear my critics are morons.

I sent him to a site perfect for people like him called Empty Closets, and he seemed to start coming out a bit. I saw his first couple of posts there, and I felt very happy for him.

As I said, all these men who “can’t figure out if they are gay” are just in denial. Real simple. I don’t blame them, but closets are for clothes.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Your Personal Views on Race, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, Etc. Do Not Necessarily Have Anything to Do with Your Politics

People compared me to this guy for years. He may have started out on the Left but like all such types, he drifted Right after a while. He’s now come out as a full-blown Libertarian. So he’s gone completely rightwing and his cultural views match up with his economic and cultural views, as they do in almost everyone in this retard country.

Sometimes I think I’m the only person in this damned country who is conservative on culture but liberal on economics and everything else. I’m on Reddit all the time, and I see people making political opinions all the time, and I’ve never seen one person like me. Ever. Sure Alt Left/Realist Left types line up with me, but where are they? They must be quite rare.

This is so sad.

If you are leftwing on culture, you generally but not always are leftwing on economics. There are a few odd Libertarians who are very leftwing on culture but rightwing on economics, but they are not common. Anyway they are basically conservatives. They despise the Left and liberals and always vote rightwing or Republican, no exceptions. So their left cultural views do not put them on the Left.

If you are rightwing on culture, you are always and automatically rightwing on economics and everything else in all cases.  The few that are not are Nazbols, Strasserites, and Third Positionists, and I am seriously turned off by all of those Right/Left mixed movements. Even if they are left on economics and everything else, if they have rightwing cultural views, they vote rightwing. Always. No exceptions. They all vote Republican.

I guess economics is just not all that important. It seems utterly asinine but apparently when the vast majority of Moronicans go into the voting booth, they vote on culture, not economics.

If they’re right on culture, they vote Republican.

If they’re Left on culture, they vote Democrat.

I can’t believe how dumb this is. Really? Really? Culture is really the most important thing in your silly little life? Oh you silly person. Mr. Marx would like a talk with you.

Culture is nothing, it’s crap, it’s bullshit. Ultimately it’s not even a politics. It’s more a matter of personal preference or even personality.

A White liberal Democratic man who votes straight Dem (preferably liberal), never votes Republican, supports (preferably liberal) Democratic candidates, and even contributes to (preferably liberal) Democratic campaigns and candidates is simply a liberal Democrat.

Period. That’s his politics. Your politics is who you vote for at the end of the day.  It’s how you devote your time politically by writing, contributing or working for candidates and causes.

Your goddamned personal views about culture don’t mean a hill of beans to anyone but you, your conscience, your pastor, and your God. They don’t necessarily have anything to do with your politics at all.

These are your personal views about social matters.

Now suppose the White liberal Democrat quoted above has some racist views, which, trust me, many liberal Democrats do. In particular they are racist in the SJW sense where every other particle on the universe is apparently racist or evidence of racism.

Hell, he could even be worse than that! I know a Centrist Democrat who is pretty damned racist. He routinely refers to most all Blacks as niggers and has a very low opinion of them,  He also dislikes Hispanics or Mexicans as he calls them. I’m not sure how he feels about Asians. He’s very pro-White, supports White Supremacist views and defends them.

Although if you Black folks met him, I’m sure he would be perfectly nice to you. Furthermore he is a brutally partisan Democrat who despises Republicans and votes straight Democrat. He often supports pro-Black political projects so as you can see, his personal racism doesn’t even extend to his political racism. This is the case with a lot of these people. The personal is not necessarily the political at all. That’s one fat lie.It’s an intellectual racism, not a personal one.

Our commenter from New York recently noted that most of the liberal Democrats in his building harbored out and out racist views, certainly in the SJW sense, mostly aversive racism, but still. This stuff is probably a lot more common than we think.

However it’s perfectly acceptable in the Democratic Party to be racist against Whites.

This White male Democrat may have some sexist views against women. He may even be a misogynist, especially in the insane feminist sense where any sane person can hardly help but not be a misogynist, especially if you believe in facts and truth. I know Centrist Democrats who are out and out misogynists and openly admit to being so. They also say that most men are misogynists. I’m not sure if he’s right or not. He has a girlfriend and he acts like a teddy bear around her, so this is an intellectual sexism or misogyny, not a personal one.

This same White liberal Democratic man have homophobic views. I know people who wouldn’t vote Republican if you paid them who definitely have what are considered to be homophobic views nowadays, which frankly is about half of life according to SJW’s. I know a liberal Democrat who quite regularly refers to gay men as fags and lesbians as dykes. I don’t think he hates them. He’s just a normal heterosexual man.

Most if not all straight men have a dim view of male homosexuality and most are literally homophobic in the sense of being completely phobic about the whole subject. What the Hell do you think keeps straight men from putting a cock in their mouth? It’s their homophobia, dammit. If not for that they’d probably do it. After all most men will fuck anything if you let them.

The degree of revulsion that straight men feel towards male homosexuality is off the charts. A recent study found that straight men showed more disgust towards photos of gay sex than towards actual maggots. Maggots. Gay sex is more disgusting than maggots. Think about that.

What I am saying is that the White liberal Democrat man italicized above is absolutely a liberal Democrat. After all, that’s his politics. Contrary to SJW clowns, your politics does not encompass every second of your life, especially your personal life. A lot of people live lives that are completely outside of politics. They may not even vote. If they don’t vote their politics are irrelevant. Who cares what they think about anything! It’s literally not important!

If this White liberal Democratic man has racist, sexist, misogynist, or homophobic views, that certainly doesn’t make him a conservative for God’s sake. He goes into the voting booth and votes straight Dem for Chrissake! Those are his personal, completely nonpolitical views. Now you may say that him having those views makes him a bad person. Perhaps it does. Maybe it doesn’t. It’s a matter of opinion. But even if he’s a bad person, he’s still a liberal Democrat, dammit. A lot of liberal Democrats are awful people. They’re human after all.

One might also see this as being instead of personal views as personality flaws. You might argue that a racist, sexist, misogynist, or homophobic person has a personality problem. They’ve got a lousy personality, a personality defect. Like being a bad person but not the same thing. They’re not healthy. They’re too full of hate to be healthy. Perhaps they don’t have a personality defect. Perhaps they’re not unhealthy. It’s a matter of opinion.

Your personality type or health or your personal views, moral or immoral, are not necessarily evidence that you are a liberal or conservative. The only way we can figure that out is by how you vote, etc. or which political candidates you support.

You support Democrats, you’re a liberal whether you pull the lever or not.

You support Republicans, you’re a conservative whether you vote or not.

Generally speaking your views on culture are your own views whether they are bigoted or not. They are only political if you politicize them by say voting for, contributing to and working for bigoted candidates. These would probably all be Republicans. If you vote like that, you’re a conservative.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

The Buddha Said, “All of Life Is Sadness”

Why did so many bad things happen to me? Well a lot of good things were always happening to me too, so I don’t think it was anything I was doing. I’ve thought myself to Timbuktu and back trying to figure out what the Hell I did to cause all of this and I’ve never been able to figure out. I think I provoke strong emotions in people somehow, like or dislike, love or hate. People are passionate about me. They’re not indifferent.

I used to say that all men wanted acted like they either wanted to beat me up or fuck me and sometimes both at once! I’m not quite sure why that is either. Though I’m not effeminate, I’m not the most masculine guy on Earth and I’ve always been said to be very good looking. Perhaps this is a normal way men react to a goodlooking man who has a feminine side.

When I say how men react to a goodlooking man, I don’t mean homosexually. After all, 38% of all men show some reaction to naked males in the lab, so a bit of homosexual attraction in men is virtually normal. Perhaps men also see a very goodlooking man as a threat of competition, especially for women. John F. Kennedy, a very handsome man, said that people always think very handsome men are gay. I guess it had been said about him. We do tend to associate very goodlooking men with homosexuals, especially if they are goodlooking in that pretty boy way, which I was.

A lot of people liked me, but I kept running into people who hated me, especially people my father’s age. Other people were just mostly jealous, like my younger brother. Others, like my father, who the Hell knows? I defied him like a motherfucker, got right up in his face and gave him the finger, just like that. We actually had physical fistfights. It boiled down to a difference of opinion about a variety of things, mostly moral issues around my hippie lifestyle, which he found profoundly immoral.

Also I was the apple of his eye. He adored me more than any of his other children. Then his favorite son, the one he nearly staked his life on, was in his face, flipping him off, screaming, “Fuck you!” at him.

I think it was a blow that he never quite recovered from until the last two years of his life when we spent a lot of time together and we eventually made peace. I think he knew that in some way he was headed out soon, though there wasn’t much  medical evidence of that. I think he wanted to smoke a peace pipe with me in the last couple years of his life.

It was ultimately sad but on the other hand it was the right thing to do. I’m getting choked up as I write this, and I think of myself as a rock. Apparently this rock has a few leaks in it.

It’s ok to get choked up though. Life is sad. This is the nature of life. It’s also beautiful and wonderful but just as much, it’s sad. This is the way life is, and you ought to just accept it and be ok with it as the Buddhists do.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

How Straight Men Use the Words Fag and Faggot

Any of you snowflakes out there who might get triggered by this post and need another three months of therapy and hugs, please bail out right now. I don’t want your trauma on my conscience.

Faggot. This is a mean word. It’s said with this savage bite. You could almost feel the hate. Faggot is still used that way, but you don’t hear it much because it’s seen as a slur.  But now it has a new meaning. Faggots are just (male) idiots, fucktards, dumbasses, dumbshits, fools, morons, and other pinheads. It has nothing to do with gay men!

Fag. Often simply a descriptive tern for gay men. It could be negative, neutral, or positive depending on tone. People want one word for gay men, and “gay men” is two words. Fag is not used this way so much anymore because now it’s now a slur. Fag is mostly used by straight men towards other straight men! Fag means pussy, wussy, girlyman, cuck, soyboy, etc. It’s used towards male feminists, men who have declared war on the men. We call them those names to insult them to get them back on our side. Because calling a straight man unmasculine is the ultimate insult. We ain’t talking about you!

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: The Teenage Boy Bullshit: The Fake Catholic Priest Pedophile/Child Molesting Epidemic

In short, it never even happened! There were no priests molesting kids*. There was no “kidfucking*.” There was no “child rape.” There were no pedophile priests*. There were not priest child molesters*.

*To be fair, 5% of the cases did involve actual child molesting. And a few of the priests, surely less than 5%, were pedophiles.

We are now in the midst of an idiotic mass hysteria and moral panic about the sexuality of teenage girls. I call it the Teenage Girl Bullshit. In contrast, in the cases of the fake pedophile priests, we are dealing with what I call the Teenage Boy Bullshit.

As noted above, there was either no child molesting or only very little. 95% of it was straight statutory rape, or as I prefer, illegal intercourse.

Kidfucking or child molestation: sex with children under 13.

Statutory rape or illegal intercourse: sex with teenagers 13-Age of Consent.

As it turns out the illegal intercourse in the case of the priest scandal was a particularly ugly kind because it was creepy and coercive. It had to be creepy and coercive because almost of the boys were straight boys seduced into gay sex. In general, straight teenage boys do not want to have gay sex, and thank God for that! Thank you very much, teenage boys! However, they can be manipulated into gay sex via creepy and coercive means.

There’s a problem here: Being seduced into gay sex can be very traumatic for a teenage straight boy and it may indeed cause problems extending into adulthood. Not because a straight teenage boy had sex (God forbid!) as the hysterics say. Instead it was because the sex was gay sex and not straight sex.

If the boys were gay, this scandal would not even exist. No one except the sex hysterics would give a damn because a majority of gay teenage boys are either fucking adult men already or they want to. Most if not all gay men who had sex with adult men when they were teenage boys look back on the experience with fond nostalgia.

Also there was no “kid rape.” There was illegal intercourse and child molestation. Statutory rape per se isn’t really rape. It’s really illegal intercourse. Child molesting per se isn’t rape either. Child molesting and child rape are two completely different things and the latter is a lot worse and more dangerous than the former.

As it is, it doesn’t look like anyone forced anyone to do anything. Rape is forced sex. As my mother pounded into my head a million times as a teenage boy and young man, rape involves force or the threat of force.

I have no idea of the sexual orientation of the boys. Most I heard of were straight. I have no idea if some were gay. I’m quite certain that any gay ones weren’t the ones complaining because gay boys never complain about consensual sex with adult men. They always say they like it.

But most of the sex in this scandal was bad it involved straight boys and not gay boys. The straight boys were tricked into gay sex and this is often bad for their psychological development.

Of course the 5% of cases involving little boys getting molested was very bad. I certainly don’t approve of adult men molesting little boy-children. I don’t know how harmful it is, but I doubt if it’s a good thing. It’s certainly bad for little girls under 13 to get molested by adults, and in quite a few cases the harm lasts into adulthood.

Probably none of the complaints involved gay boys.

The question was posed to me, Would I care if any of those boys the priests had sex with were gay? Of course I wouldn’t care! Other than possibly an abuse of a power dynamic and something a priest should not be doing as part of his job description, it’d be fine with me, and I’m sure it would be fine with the boys too! It’s not rape if they love it. Gay boys almost universally love their teen-adult sex, so I don’t understand what the problem is.*

*They like it if it’s consensual. There was some #metooing of gay men in the movie business by gay teenage boys, but that’s because those men were rapey and coercive towards teenage gay boys, not because they had sex. In a number of cases, those boys were actually raped. On the other hand, some of those gay boys #metooing those Hollywood adult men were teenage male prostitutes. I’m sorry they got coerced into rapey sex but they weren’t exactly paragons of moral value.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Trash’s Journeys to Return of Kings and Unz

Trashman Returns: Roosh V readers and even Roosh himself read this site.

What? Roosh V and even Roosh himself read my site?

Trashman Returns: But I was often called a “cuck” and “a shill”.

You’re not a cuck.

Trashman Returns: I moved on to an Alt Right site. But here I was called a Leftwing Libertarian-and I’m not Libertarian.

Unz. You’re not a Libertarian. I actually think you are Alternative Left! Maybe the liberal version and not the Leftist one.

Trashman Returns: When I pointed out the harm of neoliberal markets I was accused of being a shill and cuck and all the usual tedious Gen Z tags.

You’re a cuck if you’re against turbo-capitalism? How many times does capitalism have fall on its face before people wise up? Some people never learn.

Trashman Returns: Back came the response from one Unz Poster “Do you realize how f***ing gay that sounds, boss?”

Oh, you were on Unz. So many terrible rightwingers on there. We certainly don’t think being against neoliberalism is gay! We are conservative liberals and leftists, if that makes any sense. We are the Conservative Left! Rather conservative on social issues, but more left on economics and most everything else. In between the Cultural Left and the Republican social conservatives on social stuff.

Trashman Returns: Meanwhile, on RETURN OF KINGS, commentator’s wanted to tell me how “Alpha” they were and what a “Soyboy” I was.

Toxic masculinity. I hate that phrase, but that’s Roosh’s sites, sorry. Hell that’s all PUA sites. I am trying to get away from that here and create a PUA site for ordinary guys.

You’re not a soyboy? You’re for the men, right? Bros before hos! You’re against the manhating Feminist Enemy and you are with your brothers in solidarity against them. Ok, you’re not a soy or a cuck then. The soys and cucks are the male feminists and other fags who have taken up arms against their brothers by lining up with the feminists who wish our destruction.

PS I’m not against gay men here. Gay men are for the men! I usually call straight men gay. Almost all straight men nowadays are male feminists fags. The male feminists who are working against the men to ruin our jobs and careers and put most of us in jail or prison (the goal of modern feminism) – those are the guys that I call cucks, soyboys, fags, wussies, girlymen, etc. I just call them that to humiliate them and attack their masculinity for lining up with the enemy against their brothers. I do this to shame them away from their gay anti-male tactics. Also, if you’re with the women and against the men, you’re not much of a man. You’re a pathetic wuss, a girlyman.

No real man is for the women and against the men. If that’s you, then you’re a fag.

People like Jason think I am against feminine men but I’m really not. I don’t care how masculine or feminine any man is. Hell, a lot of people used to think I was gay! And I’m a pretty soft guy myself and it’s caused me problems with women my whole damned life. I don’t care how masculine you are! You want to be a wimp, knock yourself out, man! I think straight effeminate men are bizarre. Why don’t you just go gay if you’re going to act like that? I’m not against effeminate gay men either. Cats meow, dogs bark, and gay men are effeminate. I dislike effeminate behavior in men, but I understand that it’s normal for gay men to be this way.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: Semantic Entropy Is Here: We Are All Lexicographers Now

Definitions of crimes, thoughtcrimes, or offenses against this, that, or whatever social norm creep steadily upward ever year.

Rape? It’s as big as the Atlantic Ocean now.

Assault? What is that? You looked at someone wrong. That’s assault.

Sexual assault? The definition spreads every year like a kudzu vine. In my opinion, sexual assault is simply another word for dating. It didn’t used to be, but that’s how the ladies have it set up now boys, and the girls make the rules now in this world, and don’t you ever forget it.

Battery? What’s that? I tapped a woman on the shoulder. That’s literally battery nowadays.

Sexual battery? What’s is that? Can someone explain to me what it is so I don’t do it because it sounds kind of fun, and I might try it. They want to get pounded anyway, and that’s kind of right battery now that I think of it.

Sexual abuse? What does it even mean? It means any time an adult human had sex with an adolescent human ages 13-17, the poor teenager got abused. Oh boo hoo. Not only that, but the little lass now needs 20 years of therapy for that time she got sexually abused by seducing that 25 year old man at that party and grabbing his cock. She seduced the guy, so I guess she abused herself. Oh well, self abuse is fun. I prefer to do it with some porn though.

But no matter. Abused she was, and abused she will be! The inevitable damage is already there. We can’t see it or measure it, but women tell us it’s there, so we have to take their word for it. Damaged how long? Forever more. Because of the scars that won’t heal.

All women are not only Permanent Children but they are also Permanent Victims.

The victimization starts on the first day when any men around, if there even are any that is, start misogynisting the newborn girl. Because that’s what males do to little girl babies. They misogynist them in all sorts of microaggressive ways. The microaggressions are hard to see or measure, but if you get an electron microscope, you can make them out all right. Wicked men. Turning their misogynist abuse into nanotech!

Because that’s what we men to do females. We misogynist them. Every day. All day long. Like a rocket barrage that never ends. Poor women! Poor babies! Women are crying! Women are babies!

Quick, someone get that lady a handkerchief to wipe her tears. That man over there walking away just misogynisted her, and now she’s going to cry for half an hour!

The misogynisting goes on all through the wretchedness we call the Life of Woman, even in those retirement villages where those evil old men who can’t even get a hardon anymore still misogynist those little old ladies all the doggone day. What’s a lass to do?

Grooming? What’s that? I guess you can groom anyone now. Men can groom 40 year old women. Who knew? Turns out I’ve been grooming females my whole life. And I had no idea! I heard lower primates like to groom each other as a show of affection, but I had no idea I had so much chimp in me!

Illegal looking! Watch those eyes! It’s illegal to look at women now in California! Stamp out that male gaze! We’ll put out your eyes and send you to Purgatory to stand on a cliff for half of eternity till you work it off!

Pedophilia? That’s probably 90% of all sex now, especially now that all women are shaved as bare as 12 year olds. It’s mass hysteria and a moral panic. So half the population are effectively psychotic at least on the issue being hysterisized.

Hitch a ride on the moral panic train! It’s a fun ride, folks. Full of thrills and spills and an outrage around every bend. You’ll be scared from the moment you hop on til the moment you disembark, if you ever do. But that’s the whole idea.

Pedophiles? Well that’s 100% of us men for sure because if you get turned on by 17 year old girls, nowadays you’re literally a pedophile. Well not all men. Dead men and gay men don’t count, but the rest are disgusting pedos!

Trespassing? What’s that? I don’t even know what that is anymore.

Breaking and entering? That includes reaching inside someone’s door to knock on their door now. You broke into their house with your hand to knock on the door. I got the cops called on me the other day for that. A cop came to my door and threatened to arrest me for putting my hand into someone else’s doorway, and thereby breaking and entering their residence. I tell ya, we got one Hell of a serious crime wave in this country!

Sexism? What’s that? Define it. Another word with either no definition or any definition, whichever you prefer. Take your pick! Or just make up your own definition. DIY!

Misogyny? It’s everywhere. How do we know it’s everywhere? Because it’s misogyny. How do we know it’s misogyny? Because it’s everywhere.It’s a great theory because it’s not even wrong. There! I just saw some misogyny crawl under the bed! Get a broom and stop it before it kills again!

Racism? What’s that? Define it. Ever notice that no one can even define that word? It’s literally a word with no meaning at all or a meaning that encompasses half of life, so it’s everything and nothing both at once.

Nazi? That’s 42% of the population now. Didn’t I know that? Silly me!

Hater? That’s half the population. Well, now you can feel better as you stew. Know you’re not alone.

Homophobia? Nowadays we are at the point where if you won’t suck another guy’s cock, you’re a homophobe. Another word with no meaning. Define it. If you’re going to accuse half of society of it, the least you could do is define it. Nope. No one knows what it means, or worse, it means whatever the person uttering the word thinks it means. Everyone gets to define their own words now. Fun, huh? We are all lexicographers now!

Sexual harassment? If a woman was made to feel uncomfortable, she got harassed. That’s literally the definition. Crazy, huh? How to avoid giving the crazy the lovely lass a wild hair up her ass? Easy, just read her mind. Easy as pie. Anyone can do that, come on!

Sexual harassment means whatever the woman who says it thinks it means. If the little lady thinks she got harassed, she did.

Rape? It’s all rape, baby! What is? Sex! All of it? Well, not all of it, sure.The vanilla stuff isn’t rape at the moment, but don’t worry, the feminists are hard at work on it. Inventing new crimes every year!

But most of the fun kind of sex is rape, or rapey, or grey rape, or acquaintance rape, or spousal rape, or rape by deception rape (otherwise known as “seduction”), or rape by handing her a beer before you  have sex with her rape, or regret rape the next morning or 20 years later rape, or coercive rape by talking or better yet arguing her into it rape (my specialty).

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: Of Course I’m Not a Misogynist

Polar Bear: He’s pro-woman at his core but is suffering a bit of racial ageism.

Of course. I’ve always liked women better than men. If I had my way, I’d just be around women all the time or as much of the time as possible. I love being around guys too, but women are better in a way.As you can see, if I like women better than men, I’m obviously a misogynist, right? Feminists are so full of shit.

But in a way it’s a circular argument because no matter what, you will be around men.

You don’t like women much? Ok, you will be around men.

You like women as much as men? Ok, you will be around men half the time at least.

You like women better than men? The weird thing is that even there you will have men around a lot because if you are around women all the time, pretty soon you will have guys hanging around because “I want to hang out with the guy who has all the chicks around him.” Get the picture?

I’m almost like a gay man in that sense. In fact, I used to think I was like “one of women’s gay friends, except I’m straight.”

I agree that I am “one of the girls” in a sense. But I’m not really. I’m just pretending to be one of the girls. I’m really an evil spy pretending to be one of the girls except I’m secretly a guy infiltrating them in order to deviously trick, fool, and scam them into having sex with me.

Part of my brain is like a woman’s brain, so in a way, I think like a woman. That’s why I understand women pretty well. Most women’s conversation seems insipid to us men – hot guys, makeup, clothes, gossip, bla bla, lot of silly giggling and verbal hugging. It’s just pure idiocy. They seem like children.

But I’ve heard that women think the same of us when we get together with fart jokes, sports, and arguing politics. Men are insipid to them.

So I can sit around with a bunch of women being women and doing their girl chat, completely idiotic and senseless, like chirping birds fighting for no reason at your feeder, and I’m right at home amidst all this silliness and idiocy. Sure it is silly and idiotic, but I love it because I even love women when they are being idiotic. Because I’m sort of one myself.

Now mind you I am not a tranny at all. I love being a man and I respect any man, especially a gay man, who loves being a man. I’m also as masculine as any man that ever lived in a sense, and that’s my primary self-image. So I don’t hate being a man and wish I was a woman.

Women weren’t being very nice to me a while ago, but I completely changed my looks. I have long hair now, look like a 1970’s glam rock star, and now women are being way, way nicer. See how shallow women are? Pathetic, isn’t it?

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: Complete Deterioration of Literary Criticism in the Last 40 Years

I like to read literary criticism sometimes because it’s some of the hardest stuff out there to understand, at least for me. Forget philosophy. Don’t even go there. Lit Crit is different. With Lit Crit it’s hard as hell to understand and it’s incredibly smart and dense, but you can pretty much understand most if not all of it, so it’s worth it. I call it giving my brain a workout, and to me it’s similar to going to the gym for your body.

I recently read a couple of Hemingway’s best short stories. Then I found and read two Lit Crit articles about them. Lit Crit is very useful this way. If you haven’t already read the work, I’m not quite sure how useful it is or how much you would get out it. But if you’ve read it, Crit is often great for explicating the work and explaining deeper meanings, themes, etc. hidden in the text.

One was in a journal called Journal of College Literature from 1980. It was remarkably down to earth for a Lit Crit journal, especially the issues around published around that time. So I started going through a few decades worth of the journal.

I noticed that the Lit Crit from ~40 years ago was much different and frankly much superior to the gobbledygook out nowadays. It then focused on individual books and was fairly straightforward, simply looking for explications of the events, characters, plots, and themes in the book.

As I moved forward a couple of decades, everything changed. Now it was all postmodernism. Lit Crit about individual works were less common. The crit became ridiculously politicized with SJW and PC Leftist slants towards everything. Now I am a Leftist myself (albeit a weird one) but for the life of me, I do not understand why we need to litter our Lit Crit with Leftist political theory.

In addition to Marxism, there was also inordinate focus on women (feminism, mostly a joke field called Women’s Studies), gays and lesbians (from the lens of a ridiculous and bizarre field called Queer Studies), Blacks, Hispanics, Asians and other non-Whites (same thing- focus on non-fields like Black and Hispanic Studies), on and on.

Pretty much all they wrote about were these “oppressed minorities.” Cringey Queer Studies essays searched for and discovering non-existing homosexuality in perfectly straight stories (Did you know Moby Dick is a gay novel?) and secret homosexuality in completely straight authors (Did you know Shakespeare was gay?). It’s weird and stupid.

There was also a strange attempt to find some silly “woman angle” in novels where women were not particularly important to the story.
There was also a focus on older books written by women and minorities which are apparently good books merely because they were written by a minority or woman and not for any other reason.

Why Lit Crit has to be all about oppressed minorities is beyond me. Fine, some minorities are oppressed. We need a politics to address that. But why trash up Lit Crit with leftwing obsessions with minority groups? Last time I checked, straights, Whites, and men also existed. Can we maybe keep the politics out of our Crit and just talk about the books without turning everything into a political rally?

Another worse problem went along with this. The essays became dominated by postmodernism and were much harder to understand. There were references to philosophy scattered all through everything (particularly unintelligible Continentals like Sartre, Derrida, Lacan, Cixous, Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Foucalt, Frankfurt School, DeLueze and Guattari).

That’s all fine and dandy but why can’t we keep unintelligible philosophers out of our Lit Crit? What do incomprehensible Frenchmen spouting nonsense have to do with the novels we read?

It is true that the essays became much more demanding, but there was also a lot of silly talk about things like the Body (?), the Male Gaze (!?), the Text, the Author, the Reader (Barthes), on and on with weird, silly postmodern concepts.

In addition, somehow they became strangely repetitive in that they obsessed over the same postmodernist tropes and views in essay after essay. After a while, it seemed like I was reading the same essay again and again and learning little about the actual books being discussed.
Finally, it became quite boring as a result of this repetition.

tl/dr: Lit Crit has completely deteriorated over the past 40 years. It’s now a swamp of barely comprehensible postmodernism and obsessions with women, gays and minorities. Leftist politics and incoherent Continental philosophers litter every essay, turning it from a brain workout into muddy slow trod up a mountain in the rain without boots or a poncho.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Is It Gay to Say Another Man is “Hot?”

I say it myself. But then I add, “And I’m straight,” or “No homo!”

Hey, some men are hot. And I’m completely straight.

As a young man, I had many other young straight men tell me that I was very goodlooking. There is a way to say that without sounding or looking gay. None of the men who did that appeared gay to me when they said that. They were simply stating an obvious fact.

It’s not so much that you want to fuck the guy or even do anything remotely sexual with him. It’s more you want to be that guy.

A Universal “Law of Attraction?”

I even feel “attracted to” or “drawn towards” some of these guys. It’s like a force field sucking towards the man. It freaks me out because it seems gay as Hell, and I don’t like to feel gay. But then I think, “Would you kiss that guy or do anything remotely sexual with him?” and the thought of doing that makes me want to jump 10 feet backwards.

But I think attractive people of both sexes do have this sort of “force field” effect that almost physically sucks you into their orbit. I wouldn’t be surprised if it were biological. Attractive people make you feel good. It feels good for you to even be around them. It’s almost as if some of their attractiveness leaks out of them and onto you.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Still Watchin’ That Gay Porn?

They say if you look at gay porn, then you’re gay, but that’s a bad argument.

I assure you that all straight men who look at porn have seen some gay porn, obviously photo stills, but a lot of them have seen some videos. Sometimes that stuff just sneaks up on you while you are trying to watch straight porn.

You load the video, and “Oh no oh my fucking God get that fag shit out of here gross!” and you can’t close out the video soon enough. Other times you’re watching some, uh, straight porn, except it’s not completely straight. Two men on one woman, fine, we’ve all seen that a million times. But whoa, one guy’s fucking the woman, while the other guy…

“Whoa! Wait a second there buddy! Hooold your horses, pal! WTF have we here? The other guy…is…sucking the first guy’s cock! Queers! Faggots! Oh gross! Oh noes! I mean I love threeways but not this fag shit get outa here no way ew gross faggots faggots fags fags fucking fags I hate fags I swear dammit!”

That’s your thought process. So my thoughts are un-PC. So fuckin what?

Fire me, if I even have a job. Ban me, if there’s even a site I haven’t been banned from yet. Destroy my career. No whoops I don’t have one! Dox me! Whoops we can’t find Robert Lindsay anywhere because he’s not in any public records! What is he, a ghost? Nope, he’s a mere man who has mastered the art of disappearance in this all so Big Brotherly modern wired up Internet digitalized you’re being watched, listened to, recorded and monitored everywhere dystopia we call Late Capitalism.

I refuse to watch that stuff because to me it’s horrible, however I do like to watch incredibly fucked up shit like a gay man shitting on another gay man’s face and mouth while the other guy eats the shit.

That’s so fucking gross and sick that I just have to watch it.. Why? Because I’m a sick fuck, that’s why! Not because I’m gay. Those are the only gay videos I can handle – the ones where gay men are being disgustingly sick fucks. Even then, I’m watching it because it’s gross, not because they’re gay.

I admit to being a bit of a homophobe too, so I like to make fun, mock, laugh at, and insult the gay men in these videos and call them insulting names. It’s not PC, but it’s my private thoughts, so so what? The SJW’s haven’t made having certain thoughts illegal. Not yet anyway. I’m sure they’re working on it.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Ever Been Accused of Something When You Were Completely Innocent?

1. Being a flasher and/or voyeur. Long story but I was innocent of both. I was only guilty of doing something real stupid. The two detectives were furious that I insisted on my innocence and threatened to beat a confession out of me.

“If you don’t quit saying you’re innocent, we’re going to beat the shit out of you.”

I already hated cops but I started hating them a lot more after that incident.

2. Fifty different people turned me in to the police for the sadistic rape/murder/mutilations of two young teenage girls because I wrote articles about the case. You know, “If you write about it, that means you did it.” A detective actually interviewed me about this bullshit. I swear people are retarded.

3. The same people turned me in ~50 times to police as a “pedophile” (not a crime) saying I had child porn on my drive (I don’t) because I wrote that it is perfectly normal for grown men to be sexually aroused by teenage girls, a fact that has been proven in every study of the matter ever done. There was no investigation. Also when I moved into a new apartment I was told that everyone in the place thought I was a sex criminal or predator because I was older, not married, and living alone. I was even reported to the police. I swear people are retarded.

4. I was also accused of having sexual fantasies of rape, murder, and mutilation of young teenage girls because I wrote about details of the case. Obviously if I wrote about it then that meant I liked it. For the record, I don’t have fantasies like that. I don’t care if you do but it’s not my bag. I swear people are retarded.

5. Been accused of being gay many times although I’m 100% straight. I Also accused of having gay sex with many of my friends when I had sex with none of them. Those are both very bad things to say about me. For the record, I’m 100% straight. Homophobes suck.

6. Accused of having excessive attachment to my mother. No idea why but maybe related to the above. For the record, I’m not a momma’s boy. I hate Momma’s boys. Homophobes suck.

7. Was banned from a Starbucks for “harassment” for the crime of talking to human beings. I talk to everyone, including young women. I never talked sexually to any of them. But it’s “harassment” nowadays to open a conversation with a woman who doesn’t want to talk to you even if she never lets you know. For the record, I was staring conversations with young women about completely innocent matters like the weather. Never once did I get sexual with any of them. I swear SJW’s and feminists are scum.

8. Fired from a bartenders job for stealing money from the restaurant safe. For the record, I never stole any money. I didn’t even know where the safe was or even if there was one. I swear people are retarded.

9. Accused by SJW retards of being racist, sexist, misogynistic, homophobic, conservative, reactionary, Republican, Rightist, fascist, and Nazi more times than I can count. For the record, I’m not any of those things in my opinion.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: How About Voluntary Gay and Lesbian High Schools for Gay and Lesbian Teens?

Oli S: It’s interesting how often they make claims about pederasty/pedophilia from two angles. First they claim that gay people are more likely to be ‘molested’ into homosexuality and next that homosexuals themselves are more likely to engage in relationships with young people.

The critical flaw is that all the research on this shows higher rates, but it’s quite clearly attributed to the fact that gay teenagers don’t have many options their own age. They don’t want to risk being outed to their peers, so they turn to the Internet to find a sexual experience where they can be targeted by a predator.

Oli is apparently a new commenter here.

I have no idea his orientation and it’s probably not important, but how readers would feel about voluntary separate gay and lesbian high schools? They would not have to worry about peer pressure and being outed. You could even staff Administration ion with mostly gay and lesbian administrators and the teaching staff with gay and lesbian teachers, of which there are no shortages, trust me as I spent years working in the field.

Gay and lesbian teens could no longer complain about lack of sex partners and having to resort to sex with adults, particularly in the case of the boys.

However, I can see the sex scandals starting already.The gay teachers and admins will not keep their hands off the gay boys and girls. So this is the huge roadblock in favor of this plan.

They call me a homophobe. Fine. Now what sort of homophobe would support the idea of separate gay/lesbian schools – voluntary of course – to protect, nurture, and grow healthier gay and lesbian teens who hopefully transit into healthier gay and lesbian adults, which is something I very much support?

Because God knows the GLBT community definitely needs a dose of mental health. Gays and lesbians in general in the US and worldwide are not particularly mentally healthy. This does translate into societal problems, possibly feeding disease epidemics.

The suicide rate for gay and lesbian teens is not elevated, but the rate for adult gays and lesbians is off the charts. Up to 1/3 of suicides in some younger decadal cohorts (such as 30’s and 40’s) occur in gays and lesbians.

Only 2% of gay men are over 65. The % for straight men much be much higher. Where did all the rest of the elderly gays go? They never showed up at the Elderly Gate for check-in because they were already dead.

Gay men and lesbians see their lifespans shortened by an incredible 20 years. I don’t think being homosexual per se is a death cult, but the gay and lesbian lifestyle (especially the former) sure seems that way. Heck, it’s more of a deathstyle than a lifestyle.

The anti-gay Religious Right is actually correct in a lot of the charges they make about homosexuality. The critique is largely fact-based. The problem with these folks is not that they lie about gays and lesbians because for the most part they tell the sorry truth.

The problem instead is that they are haters. I agree with most of the charges the social conservatives level against homosexuality, but I don’t hate gays and lesbians because of it. That’s a choice the Religious Right makes, and yeah, they do hate gays and lesbians for the most part, though if a gay or lesbian gets into one of their fake conversion programs, no doubt Religious Right folks might be very kind to them. Love the sinner, hate the sin, and all that.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

The Sexual Desert Called Sex in Your 60’s

Rishi Ji: On another note I understand that you are a psychologist so you’d think on those lines but physical attributes matter a lot. Your comment on this post and many before leave me intrigued when you write “they don’t give me second glance anymore”.

What has changed in you physically? Is it the hair? Or a paunch? Or is it just society’s shitty theory of the creepy old man that you have come to embody?

Well I am in my 60’s. I was still getting laid in my  50’s for sure, but 60’s are like the dead zone at the mouth of the Mississippi River in the Gulf of Mexico. No (sex) life to be seen. Or maybe it’s more like the Great Pacific Garbage Patch.

I have long grey-white hair. I look like a glam rocker from the 1970’s. No paunch. Yeah, I am seen as a creepy old man.

I think mostly once a guy gets into his 60’s, no one wants to fuck him anymore. And every single damned woman who expresses interest in fucking me wants to charge me. And a lot of young women do express interest in fucking me. They approach me all the time. Lately just about every day.

Young woman: Hi, handsome! You married? You got a girlfriend?

Me: Nope.

Young woman: Damn you’re hot. I’d go out with you for sure.

Me: Hell yeah let’s go for it.

Young woman: Yeah but not for free. I want you to be my sugar daddy.

Me: Bye.

So all the young women try to charge me, and even some of the older women do.

I had a 38 year old woman, total knockout, over the other night. I managed to get her naked somehow. Not sure exactly how I pulled that off but I can often get their clothes off if I can get them in my front door, and I’m not sure how I do that either.

But she wouldn’t even let me touch her tits. Believe me, I tried. Just forget about her pussy. She should have put a No Trespassing sign on her pubis. Basically she said she doesn’t fuck for free and only fucks for cash or dope. Yeah, she was a meth head. I don’t have any meth and I ain’t paying anyone for sex nowadays.

A 44 year old woman recently tried to charge me for sex too. She was from Wyoming and she was in the area, as she comes through here selling her j jewelry. She wanted me to give her $400 worth of Itunes, and she would get the hotel room, the whole thing. I couldn’t believe a 44 year old woman tried to scam me and thought her aging pussy was worth $400 a night. That’s laughable.

Who do these older women think they are, still charging us for sex?

I mean, yeah, young women charge. They all do, pretty much. How many young women do not sell pussy? That’s what I’d like to know. I know how many do because I already see that all the time. I want to know how many don’t because a young woman not selling her pussy seems weird to me.

So anyway, all women from 18-44 are trying to charge me.

I haven’t even been dealing with women my age because ~0.00000% of them want to fuck and a lot of them don’t look good anymore, though some do, especially if they are in their 50’s.

They all think they are huge prizes who need to have lots of men fighting over them. They all think they are princesses with 14 karat gold pussies. These are women from 55-63 years old, mind you. When do women stop thinking their princess prizes with diamond studded pussies? Do they stop ever? I swear, women’s vanity knows no bounds.

On the other hand, maybe gay men want to fuck me. A gay friend of mine said, “Too bad you aren’t gay. Handsome older men like you are a hot commodity in the gay community. A lot of young guys want a “Daddy.” Alas, I am not gay.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Dana Rohrabacher Is Gay

Dana is in the news a lot lately.

Just thought I would tell you. My Mom used to work for a clinical psychologist, Dr. R., who knew both Dana and Dana’s brother Kim well. Kim died in 2007 at age 62. Dr. R. once told her that Kim loved women, unlike Dana, is how he put it.
Kim was a notorious womanizer who rampaged through small armies of women.

Dr. R’s implication in saying Dana didn’t like women was that he liked men instead, i.e., he was gay. My mother called me up on the phone and told me about the conversation and that the implication was that Dana was gay.

I suppose it could mean that he was simply a celibate heterosexual, but people usually don’t talk that way about such straights.

He married in 1998 soon after gay rumors about him got going in a strong way. Word on the street at the time was that the wife was a beard. He did have triplets with her recently though, but a lot of gay men marry and have kids.

Turns out I am not alone in this speculation. Dana said, apropos of nothing and out of the blue, that he was not gay, to a reporter interviewing him. The reporter was taken aback as there was no reason for Dana to say that.

Dana said that the DA, Mike Capizzi, in a case against Dana’s friend Scott Baugh, a California Republican Assemblyman, had been spreading a rumor that Dana was gay. Dana denied it.

However, Baugh is almost certainly gay. Soon after these rumors went a-swirling, Baugh married a woman. So did Dana.

Capizzi beat around the bush about whether Dana was gay or not, but he did say that he didn’t spread any rumors. Nevertheless, he appears to have lied about that. A prominent member of the Republican Party in Newport Beach told reporters that Dana was gay.

The local paper The Orange County Register tried to help Dana counter the rumors by running a story about his antics in straight bars. The story never showed up, probably because Dana does not go to such places. In Dana’s first election, several people who knew Dana reported to the local media that he was gay.

Dana shared a house with another man for many years. Rumor is that the man was his boyfriend. A gay activist who specializes in outing homophobic gay politicians has listed Dana as one of the ones he wants to out.

I’m not sure if we will ever be able to prove this about Dana until people come forward saying they had sex with him, especially now that he’s married up.

Incidentally, Dana’s legislative record is wildly anti-gay. I know that the “homophobes are gay” argument is pure nonsense. A few homophobes are gay men engaging in reaction formation, but most are not. They’re just assholes who hate your guts. Nevertheless it is common for closeted gay politicians to be stridently anti-gay.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20