Alt Left: How We Got Here: The Origins of Identity Politics and the Modern Cultural Left

There is a ready explanation for all this nonsense.

First is the tendency of Identity Politics to become more radicalized with time.

There has long been an argument on the Left against this BS. Sanders actually came out of that tradition.

The US White Left married with the radical Blacks. After they did that they started heading down this nutty race train track along with all the other IdPol madness.

Really the Left moved away from economics and foreign policy to go down this cultural road instead. Perhaps 1989 was a trigger. The Eastern Bloc collapsed and the US Left was in disarray and didn’t know what to think or even believe. The dictatorship of he proletariat, democratic centralism, it was all up in the air now. Further it seemed the Communist economics in the East Bloc had not kept pace with socialist social democracy economics on the rest of Europe. A lot of the US Left packed it in on economics and started to focus on this cultural BS instead.

The Left now is nothing but pure IdPol. Ever see BLM or these Antifa morons say one word about US foreign policy and US imperialism? Course not. Ever hear them say one word about neoliberal economics? Course not. That’s what drives me up the wall. Here is a movement ripe for radicalizing against the US ruling class program of neoliberalism at home and invite the world – invade the word neoconservatism abroad. Let’s call this combined package Neoliberalism-Neoconservatism.

That’s a rightwing project any way you slice it. But at the same time, the ruling class went full left on culture. Hence the Libertarian type fiscal conservative-social liberal of the upper middle class in the last 40 years. Neoliberalism-Neoconservatism plus the Cultural Left. What a project! It’s literally the worst of the Left combined with the worst of the Right! And the upper middle class is proud of this nightmare ideology. Which is one more reason that this class, which always sides with the ruling class against the workers, is no good.

Now that the Left bailed on anti-imperialism and left economics in favor of a pure Cultural Left, what are they doing with this new ideology? Why, they are rioting about nothing at all or at worst for an outright lie. Brilliant!

But if we get police reform out of these riots, it would be good. It’s an ill wind that blows no good.

Thing is the corporations, foundations, media, etc. and both political parties are down with this Neoliberalism-Neoconservatism project because they’re a bunch of businessmen and rich people, and Neoliberalism-Neoconservatism is good for them for reasons I won’t go into here but perhaps you can guess at.

This Neoliberalism-Neoconservatism project is how the rich, the corporations, and the U.S. ruling class make all their damned money. So they oppose Left efforts against Neoliberalism-Neoconservatism such as the 60’s revolutions with all out ferocity. If such a movement arises, they will sic their media attack dogs on it, smash it to bits, and brainwash the sheep with their media monopoly to go along with this destruction.

The thing is that this is a perfectly safe progressive project. It doesn’t cost them one nickel, and they get groovy hip woke points for jumping on the bandwagon.

How much of the US ruling class are going to lose out on an anti-White project? 0%.

How many of them will be replaced by an unqualified Black in affirmative action? 0%.

How many of them will be replaced by an illegal alien on their jobs? 0%. Illegals are great for them – cheap labor, more customers, a guy to mow the lawn, and a nanny to watch the kid. They don’t live with illegals so they don’t have to deal with the civilizational decline that they cause. Pro-immigration is risk-free progressivism for woke points, and what do you know? It stuffs their pocketbook too! Win-win!

Does the US ruling class have to live with the consequences of Black crime and civilizational collapse? Course not. They don’t have to deal with the downside of this crazy movement so they can support it all they want to. See?

Also the US ruling class has been socially liberal and Neoliberal-Neoconservative for a long time now.

The Left won the Culture War.

But so what?

We lost the war about economics and foreign policy (US imperialism). They even defeated the Vietnam War Syndrome, a bad thing because it posed a severe threat to US imperialism.

So shat did we win?

Our women have become insane, manhating harridans. Asking a woman for a date is now a firing offense. We overthrew Patriarchy but replaced it with something worse – Matriarchy or Female Rule (Feminist Rule) – with all the manhating, war on male sexuality, and horrific puritanism that always goes along with it every time it is ever done in time and space.

The latter is most painful to me as a 60’s child. One of the revolutions was the Sexual Revolution. Our attitude was “do it in the streets!” Now look. If I ask a woman for her #, I almost get the cops called on me. All sexuality has been sucked out of public space by #metoo so it feels like a sexual desert, which is apparently the way women want it! They actually like to live like this.

And at the same time as this crazy Victorianism, we also have a society drenched in porn. So my personal world is porn saturated, but if I look at a woman, she acts like she’s going to call the cops. How’s that for crazy cognitive dissonance. No wonder incels exist and go on killing sprees. Societies can’t handle grotesque cognitive dissonance. It literally drives people insane and often results in serious violence.

What else did we win? Modern anti-racism – a movement with great roots that has gone insane and is worse than useless.

What else? Depraved, disgusting, and lewd gay pride parades. Great! My favorite!

Mass movements towards bisexuality in both sexes. Gross!

“Pansexuals,” “queer” as a noun, “genderqueer,” “nonbinary” morons, and the insane and depraved transgender cult. It gets sicker and more perverted, weird, stupid, and insane every year. What’s next? Transsexual bathhouses for all ages? Probably. Back then, we fought for liberation, not weirdness, sickness, perversion, and deviancy.

Further, these Cultural Left boneheads have badly divided the working class. Check out this great plan they had!

Let’s have a revolution!

Cool! Yay!

But first lets get all the non-White workers to hate the White workers!

Cool! Yay! Oppressors and oppressed!

And while we’re at it, let’s get the woman workers to hate the man workers! Oppressors and oppressed!

Cool! Yay!

Now let’s have a revolution, boys and girls!

Whoops. Whoa! What happened?

No one showed up! That’s what happened.

Why? Because we got them all to hate each other!

Brilliant! You got to hand it to these guys with these genius ideas of theirs.

What I mean is this Cultural Left project is easy for the ruling class to swallow. Many are already decadent, depraved rich people, so this sicko stuff works for them. Rich men get all the sex they want. If a rich man asks a woman for her #, does she threaten to call the cops? Course not.

Homosexuality? The ruling class is always full of gay men and all manner of decadent bisexual libertines. Works for them.

Trannies? Cut into the bottom line? Course not. Support.

The ruling class has been left on social BS and right on economics (neoliberalism) and on foreign policy (US imperialism) for a long time now. It works for them and doesn’t cost them a nickel! Hell, it even makes them bank too!

And you see the outgrowth of this lousy ideology in this idiot, destructive BLM movement that makes the Black workers hate the White workers and vice versa.

Brilliant! Way to go, Lefties! Why didn’t I think of that?

The ruling class loves this because they benefit by dividing the workers and getting them all to hate each other so they won’t organize against the Neoliberalism-Neoconservatism bread and butter issues of the ruling class.

It also explains why BLM won’t dare touch economics or US imperialism.

See all those corporate and foundation millions flooding into BLM?

Kiss them all goodbye once BLM goes after neoliberal economics and neoconservative foreign policy, for this is what fills the bank vaults of the corporations and ruling class.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: Miserable? Find Your Gendered “Happy Place”

Femininity is Woman’s “happy place.”

I think women who act masculine do not seem very happy. That is why so many feminists seem so angry and miserable. And why ball-breaking dominatrices who deliberately seek out weak men to beat up(Talk to me about that!) don’t seem very happy. They are sadists who seek out weak male victims to beat up on because no real man will put up with their shit for one minute. Any real man would just kill the bitch.

Like so many misled folks, they think they are getting what they want but really they aren’t. First because they are mistaken about what they want. What they think they want and what makes them happy actually makes them miserable. They can’t see it because the defensive blinders go up and blind them to this truth.

But unlike male sadists, who are reveling in the ultimate Woodstock mud puddle of Masculinity because masculinity is normal for men, the ball-breaking harridan is not happy, probably because masculinity is just not normal for straight women and never will be. She hates her milquetoast husband. And I think she secretly hates having to be an emasculating harpy. The real men that she craves will smack her ass in a New York minute. She’s locked herself into a prison of her own making.

The only men who put up with them are, yeah, wimpy. To which I do throw my former self, sadly. But we’re also pussy-whipped.

For the flip side, ever seen a happy wimpy man who gets his balls busted all the time by his psychobitch wife? Me either.

I also think masculinity is Man’s “happy place.” When you get back into it after having been out of it for quite some time, damn it just feels so right.

Ever seen a cat curled up in some object like this pillows with the round holes in the middle that fit the cat’s body perfectly. That’s what these “happy places” are. They plug right in with our biology and both our minds and Nature Herself see it and think “two thumbs up.”

Just to be fair to the homosexuals out here, I will say that gay men and lesbians and their extreme forms called transsexuals probably do indeed have a similar happy place. For gay men, that happy place may indeed be femininity. I have no idea. For lesbians that happy place may indeed be masculinity. And that’s perfectly normal, natural, correct and maybe even biological with them. It’s obviously not normal, but in a way, if it’s biologically mediated, it’s certainly “normal for them,” and at the end of the day, that’s all that matters: what’s normal for you.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: Why the Treat Em Like Shit” Advice for Men to Deal with Women is Both True and Not True

I was once, long ago in another world, a pussy-whipped idiot. I put up with the occasional abuse to keep the Pussy River flowing. I figured as soon as I started fighting back,  she’d just leave (and some do just that), and then…no more pussy. The river runs dry and now you’re in the desert without a canteen. Good luck with that. Even for a Chad like me, pussy, like money, never grew on trees. It’s actually a lot harder to get than most people think. I mean a good-loooking, sane, halfway intelligent woman.

The line that Chad can get laid any time he wants has never been my experience. Yeah, we do all right, but that’s only because your AFC’s typical single life is nightmare in the desert.

It’s a relative thing, like most everything anyway. Success and failure are not pure concepts any more than any value judgement is. They’re both just continua and based on relative judgement, and hence tend to resist any good definition. What’s success? The opposite of failure. What’s failure? The opposite of success. And so the tautological circle chases its tail.

Funny thing is when I stopped being pussy-whipped and started ripping the Hell out of girlfriends who bitched me out and were totally out of line about it, a funny thing happened. They didn’t leave. They actually stuck around. Some shut up right away, became very feminine, and even started whimpering like whipped dogs and apologizing. Not a few became suddenly very horny.

And I had the wildest, most passionate love affairs of my  entire life. With women who called me “mean,” “a mean, cruel, asshole,” “psycho, scary, dangerous,” etc.

I don’t agree with the “just treat em like shit” philosophy of how to deal with women. Maybe it works, but it never did for me, plus I don’t have it in me to be that evil. I’d have to plug back into my “evil little boy self” again, and he’s safely locked up in maximum security in my gut where he belongs and only let out on extremely rare occasions where he’s absolutely needed.

I’ve thought about this a lot. It’s not that women like assholes or bad or evil men. Sure, maybe 1/3 do, as a former girlfriend said. But the rest don’t. But I think deep down inside, most women want a man who is pretty damned mean and scary now and then, or on occasion, or who shows he can at least be that way and he has it in him.

He can be nice most of the rest of the time, a stereotypical nice guy. But she has to know that he can get real scary real quick, and more importantly, that he’s willing to put some fences around her and not let her get away with murder.

I hate to quote Schopenhauer, but of course women are like children. In a sense.

Ever notice that a kid is always trying to see what he can get away with and he will delightfully get away with murder if you are stupid enough to let him? Well, of course. But ever also notice that at the same time, the kid who screams when you build a “do not cross” fence around him with severe penalties for breaches secretly seems to appreciate the fact that you put some limits on him.

I am convinced that women are the same. She actually wants you to put some limits on her. She expects it. And if you don’t, she may well just run wild for the same reason a child does. And when you throw her in a corral and threaten her if she breaches it, she might throw a fit, just like a child once again. But then again, like the child, she secretly appreciates and respects the fact that you were man enough to put some limits on her wayward ass.

Not only that, but putting limits on them turns them on. Much more than that, I think it triggers the love impulse – the wild, passionate, Hollywood movie, fireworks infatuation, “crazy love” initial phase of passionate love. Which then probably cements into a nice form of mature love 1-2 years later.

Women want to fall madly in love with caveman who may well be nice most of the time but are also willing to put some limits on them and even scare the Hell out of them or terrorize them if they push the limits. And this makes her horny because being ravished by a brute is the core nature of female sexuality.

Women came from cavewomen and 60% of cavemen never bred. The Alpha psychopaths terrorized those men like the Alpha elephant seal terrorizes any men who encroach on his harem. These psychopaths formed harems with the women. So most women come from a collective unconscious and genetic background of being part of a dangerous, scary psychopathic man’s harem – basically a serial killer’s harem. The residue of that, the weight of 40,000 years, echoes with us down through the canyons of time and resounds with us to this day.

Treat em like shit? All the time? I doubt it. It’s never worked for me but supposedly it works for others. As I don’t have it in me to be that evil, I can’t comment on that.

But treat em like shit? Some of the time, every now and then, once in a blue moon, show that you have the extreme capability to do so? At age 62, very late in the game, too late to matter, I conclude that this is indeed true.

Once again, YMMV. I’m not a guru you know. You do you. I’ll do me. I’m not here to tell you what to do. I’m here to throw out ideas and see if they resonate with you. Maybe they will. Maybe they won’t.

But mostly just want you to at least think about what I’m saying and decide what you might think of it. I’m here to give you new stuff to think about. Adopt it, reject it, neither, or anything ion between? It’s all up to you. As a free human with agency, the world is your oyster. Go forth and bake as nice a pearl as  you can out of it.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: A Look at the Kenosha Victims: Joseph Rosenbaum, Anthony Huber, and Gaige Grosskreutz

Now onto the justifiable victims of Kyle Rittenhouse’s justifiable homicide on the 3rd night of the Stupid BLM/Antifa Riots for No Good Reason in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

For background, see here.

First of all, all three of these men were absolutely antifa, but antifa is not a group. Instead it’s an idea. It’s like saying they were all Communists or anarchists. Are you going to make an organization called “Communism” or “anarchism” illegal? See how dumb it is to try to make antifa illegal? Antifa’s not an organization, and you can’t ban an idea. At least not yet. Don’t worry though, the SJW’s are working on it!

First, 37 (not 38 as everyone says) year old Joseph M. Rosenbaum, later Joseph Don Rosenbaum, after a name change. His race is often given as White, but prison records actually list it as Wigger.

I learned quite a bit about this fellow in doing in depth research into this charming fellow yesterday afternoon.

Born in Texas. At some point moves to Pima County, Arizona, where his father appears to be an attorney.

At age 16, he appears to have married in Arizona. He seems to have divorced afterwards, but there’s no record of it.

Around age 18, he enrolls at Pima County Community College, but his time there is short.

At age 18 in 1992, he is sentenced to 12 years in prison on what looks like two counts for Sexual Contact with a Minor, 10 years for one count and 2 years for the other count. I have revised my view of this crime, and I now think he raped a 15-17 year old girl with either force or drugs.

Anyway, he goes to prison for 12 years. In prison, he racks up a seemingly endless series of offenses and write-ups. He’s trying to win Worst Prisoner of the Year Award every year.

He ends up suing the state for prison conditions a couple of times, once because his toilet overflows. The toilets are terrible in those places, I must say. I think they are designed to overflow.

He gets out in 2014, now aged 30. But he hasn’t learned much as the first thing he does after he gets out is get arrested for absconding on parole. He’s sentenced in 2016 and apparently serves one year for this offense. He seems to act better this time in prison. I did find some documents on this case, but nothing much of interest.

I think for all of these cases, someone would need to go to Pima County Superior Court and do a record search.

He moves to Wisconsin at some point, and he ends up being the father of a two year old child. The girlfriend and child live in Waco, Texas, Rosenbaum’s hometown. When he moves to Wisconsin, he has to register on the Sex Offender Registry, but he’s listed as non-compliant.

To make matters worse, just a month ago, he’s charged twice only a month ago, once for domestic violence (battery and disturbing the peace) and ten days later, for jumping bail on the same charge. These cases had not yet gone to trial at the time of his death.

At age 36, Joseph Rosenbaum has now spent 13.5 of his 18 adult years, 72% of his adult life, in jail or prison.

At any rate, he’s dead and 13-14 year old girls across the land heave a sigh of relief.

Anthony Huber

Now for the next fine upstanding young man. Anthony Huber also seems to have a criminal record.

Huber had been arrested twice on domestic violence charges. He was convicted of false imprisonment and choking or strangling the woman he was fighting with in the first case in 2012. In a second domestic violence case in 2018, he was convicted of domestic violence with a repeater clause. Huber is also assumed to have been a White man, but court records also list his race as Wigger as in the case of Rosenbaum.

Gaige Grosskreutz

He has a conviction for Carrying a Firearm while Intoxicated. He also has a record for the minor crimes of Disobeying an Officer and Disturbing the Peace (Excessive Noise). He was affiliated with an antifa grouping called People’s Revolution. A member of this group has been accused of shooting at a police officer in Wawatosa, Wisconsin. He’s generally considered to be White. We tried to find information to see whether his race was White or Wigger, but we were unable to find any. Please comment with any updates on Grosskreutz’ race.

I find this quite shocking that so many of these White rioters have criminal records. It’s almost like antifa are a bunch of criminals!

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

PUA/Game: When a Woman Is Breaking Your Balls, Don’t Make Excuses for Her and Blame Yourself

Jason: She thinks I’m a coward. Really, all I have to do is show her I’m not – and I’m in.

I don’t think so. As soon as a woman starts disrespecting your masculinity like that, it’s over. She’s never going to change her mind. Women never change their minds about things like that.

Jason: The problem is backing down from confrontation.

Understandable, but she’s breaking your balls something awful. Any woman who talks to me like that is going to get thrown across the room. Actually, she won’t, but I like to talk like that, ha ha. Or at least I will threaten her. Hell, I might threaten to kill her! No woman talks to me like that.

She’s also openly stating that she’s going to cuck you and that she’s doing it for sexual reasons, which is as bad as it gets. She’s saying you suck in bed. You’re not a man in bed. I have no idea if that is true or not, and I doubt if it is, but that’s what she’s saying. And that’s another thing you don’t say to me, bitches. Be warned. Try it. I dare ya.

Jason: She’s a sweet girl and she loves sensitivity

I don’t think so. She has a schizophrenia dx, right?

Jason: but only AFTER you’ve shown her your a man, a protector.

I’m not sure if that is necessarily true. I’ve had women bitch me out bad even when I made it obvious when I’m definitely dangerous, which I am. It’s more like you don’t match up to her idea of what a man is. And once you fail that masculinity test for whatever reason, I haven’t had one come around yet.

Jason: But, actually, most women are really like that.

Sort of. Most won’t make a big deal about it. I’ve never had one woman tell me that she’s didn’t feel like I was capable of protecting her.

The real problem here is that this chick is an emasculating cunt from Hell, she’s breaking your balls something awful, and disrespecting your manhood right to your face. That’s the biggest insult of all if you ask me. I had a few girlfriends do to me, and I swear for decades after that, all I could think of was how much I wanted to murder them. That’s right. And I don’t desire to murder women very easily. Actually it’s a very hard thing for me to do. I finally got over it in late middle age, but it sure lasted a long time.

What’s bad here is that chick is being a diabolical cunt, literally chopping your dick off, and you are blaming yourself! Not ok! Not, not, not ok. Don’t blame yourself every time a bitch, I mean woman, cunts out like this. Especially here where she’s just picking on you for no good reason.

This is what a woman does. She blames herself for everything. I actually encourage this in women because I’d rather have them blame themselves for stuff than blame me. And I’ve successfully gotten some women who were rejecting me pretty badly to switch it around to where it was all their fault. I did that by fighting back hard.

Would you rather have her say it’s all her fault or all your fault? I much prefer women to say it’s all their fault. It’s very feminine behavior and once you turn her around like that, you’ve dommed her something serious and made her go seriously feminine and submissive, which means props to you for domming a woman. Domming a woman is usually a good thing as long as you don’t overdo it. Face it, women were meant and even made to be dommed. That’s why they’re on this Earth – so we men can dom them. They’re also nice to look at, but that’s a secondary feature.

That’s why it’s actually a good thing at times if you reduce her to tears because once again you’ve totally dommed her. This is how a feminine woman reacts to being hurt – she starts crying. The opposite is she bitches out, doms you, and gets aggressive, violent, and even emasculating. Which is better?

I don’t recommend reducing women to tears, but they’re going to do it anyway, and if they do, and you haven’t done much wrong to make her that way (You forgot her birthday or your anniversary – so what!), it’s sort of a good thing, and you can take some quiet masculine satisfaction from that. At least she still thinks you’re a man. That’s the message sees sending when you reduce her to tears.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: One Essential Rule in Relationships – You Have to Find a Woman Who Is Ok with Your Style of Masculinity

Jason: Well, my love loves her “other love” so much she smacked my head real hard while driving and called me a “punk ass bitch.”

@Jason has gotta leave this diabolical cunt. Any woman talks to me like that is likely to get knocked across the room. Or at the very least, I’ll threaten to do so.

@Jason: She’s cucking you. She’s breaking your balls and emasculating you. She doesn’t think you are masculine enough.

I’ve been through all this shit because even though I’m a Chad, I am a very passive, soft-voiced, even nice Chad. So I’ve had women beating up on me and kicking my ass exactly like this off and on all my life. I’ve also had 20 lifetimes worth of good times with them too, but I can’t deny the bad.

It wasn’t all bad. Some would emasculate me a bit, and then they’d never do it again and be pretty nice to me the rest of the time.

@Jason, you and I both, have to get women who are ok with our style of masculinity. I think you are a masculine guy on some level.

Most straight men are not truly effeminate. Even passive, quiet, soft men often have a “soft masculinity” about them that most people miss. Next time you see a man like that, study him and see if you can discern that “soft masculinity.” If you’re perceptive you can do it.

I thinking, well I’m hoping, that there are women out there who are ok with my and @Jason’s style of masculinity.

A recent girlfriend said, “You’re pretty masculine. Why do you think you’re not?” She had a dumbfounded look on her face. I  believe that’s the only time a woman has called me masculine before. They’ve said other things. I’d had a doc remove a cyst from my ear and I guess I handled it pretty stoically. The nurse looked at me and said, “He’s tough.”

And most women nowadays act completely baffled when I tell them people used to think I was gay. They shake their heads and say, “I just can’t see it.”

I think I’ve been trying to act more masculine for some years now. It’s hard to do and it would take another post to explain how to do it. The trick is you have to force it so much that it doesn’t feel weird anymore. Eventually it will just go on automatic most of the time, and you won’t have to force it at all, or you can force it and look even more masculine than normal.

Unfortunately, you really can’t get too masculine, unless you’ve gone so overboard that you are hurting your health. At that point I’d advise toning it down.

But I still have women dumping me for not being masculine enough. A 29 year old hottie had a date with me and told a friend of mine, “He’s not a tough guy.” Well, this was a Chicana deep into barrio culture. Don’t even try for women like that. You’ll never measure up to those Mexican guys.

A 20 year old gorgeous Chinese woman, a multimillionaire, was ready to start dating me when she dumped me for “not being dominant enough.” I think she wanted an BD/SM type relationship. She was always calling me “sir,” and I don’t really like that too much. She asked me once, “Could I ask you to do something. When I start talking in a group of people, come up to me and whisper in my ear and tell me what a fool I am acting like and to knock it off.” Ok, this chick literally wanted to get treated like shit, right?

Last thing she said was, “Let me know when you want to act like a man. Then come back and talk to me.” Apparently I acted quite dominant for several hours after I first met her. But then I couldn’t keep it up after that. It makes sense because that’s not really me. I can play that role but not for very long because it’s probably forced.

Women vary. They don’t all want hypermasculine men. I’d say most do, and women are way worse this way than they were in the 70’s and 80’s when it was perfectly acceptable to be soft or have a feminine side, hopefully if you balanced it out with a strong masculine side.

But women are retarded. A lot of them will see the feminine side and flip out. If women were sane and logical, they would see the feminine side but then they would also see the masculine side and how strong it was and decide that the man had both things going at the same time. But that’s too difficult for women’s tiny little pea brains. You’re asking them to think too much.

But nowadays things are very much worse. We’ve gone completely backwards. Why?!

If you’re not covered head to toe in tattoos, you’re not a man. Back then, everyone hated tattoos and only Marines, sailors, bikers and criminals had them. No decent man would get a tattoo and be a gross piece of shit lowlife criminal. And all women with tattoos were nothing but total whores, usually of the grossest, “biker chick” kind. At the very least they were complete sluts. That was like a repulsive, disgusting gutter slut. Like the women you see and say, “Ew!”

It seems to me that the requirements for masculinity have skyrocketed in the past decade or maybe 20 years. The stuff I got away with all the time back in the 70’s would immediately get me called faggot or gay nowadays. We hardly have any freedom or wiggle room at all anymore, and we had so much back then.

Things have shifted dramatically back to traditional, stupid masculinity at the same time as the lunatic SJW explosion when at least that part of society went wildly, blatantly faggy and lezzy, and that’s when they were not insisting that they actually were the damned opposite sex.

Isn’t that weird? While part of society is fagging out like maniacs, another part of society is manning up to the point of absurdity and throwing out all the progress we made in forming a broader view of masculinity so men could have some space to run free in it.

Someone needs to explain this to me.

Or is it because of the SJW explosion? The country is overrun with screaming SJW faggots, bull dykes and all sorts of other gender-bending freaks. Possibly the more gender-smashing deviants around, the more straight men have to crank up the masculine so as not to be called or considered gay.

Straight men really, really do not like people thinking they are gay, even if they are nice about it, and they often are. It’s especially painful coming from a woman. If I’m with a woman who thinks I’m really gay or even bi (that’s not 1% better), it would devastate me so much that I doubt if I could get it up. I can’t think of a worse way to be emasculated than to be called gay.

In that sense, I’ve always thought that masculinity was more of a negative identity than a positive one. When men act masculine, are they really yelling that they are something or instead are they yelling that they are not something? I think the latter, at least here in the US.

When men act masculine, are they really trying to out-masculine the other guys? A few dicks are, but most? Hell no. Stupid women think we are, but what the Hell do they know, anyway? In ManWorld, if you walk the walk and talk the talk, you’re masculine. The world of women demands so much more from us in terms of masculinity than our own gender does.

I’ve thought about it a long time, and I think when men act masculine, they are really screaming, “I’m not gay, dammit! I’m not a pussy! I’m not a wuss! I’m not a wimp!” The more masculine they act, the louder they are screaming that. Because if you act masculine enough, no sane person will call you any of those things. When I said sane people, obviously I didn’t include women because women aren’t sane. I have seen lunatic women “try to get murdered” by emasculating the most aggressive and dangerous men I’ve known.

Women break balls. They’ll break a sissy’s balls, sure. But they’ll also break the balls of the most masculine man on Earth, which I call “trying to get murdered.” Men know implicitly that attacking the masculine of most men, especially overtly masculine men, is insane, and if you do it, you’re either a huge badass or you have a death wish.

That’s one thing I never do. I never call guys gay either. I don’t want to get punched in the face because that’s what happens when you do that. Worse than that, plenty of men kill over insults like that. I’d prefer not to get murdered.

Apparently women, for some insane reason, don’t care whether they get murdered or not. I’m not sure how much sympathy I have for these women who doing the equivalent of jumping into tiger cages and pummeling the tiger. I’m supposed to feel sorry for her when she gets killed? Why? She tried to get murdered and guess what happened? She got murdered! I’d say she got what she wanted.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: Females Hate Nice, Decent Men and Love Angry, Mean, Aggressive, Violent, Criminal and Evil Men

Look at women. The angriest, meanest, ugliest, most criminal, antisocial, psychopathic, sociopathic get more women and girls than all the rest of us put together. Women love criminals. They love evil men. They love monsters. They love bad men.

However, I don’t think they all do. A girlfriend told me that 1/3 of women love bad or evil men. That’s probably about right.

This is why all of the PUA advice down through recent time has always been “act like an asshole,” “treat them like shit,” etc. This never made much sense to me, as it’s never really worked for me – they just yell about what a dick I am and take off. But I guess it works for a lot of guys.

That’s why nice guys get rejected. It’s not the stupid feminist lie that “they’re not really very nice after all.” That’s laughable. As if women hate guys who aren’t nice.

The real reason is that women think niceness is pussy. They think nice guys are unmasculine pussies. They’re just not mean and evil enough.

I had a date a few years back with a woman who lived 90 miles away. She dragged it out for six months before I got even one date, and even then I didn’t get laid. What’s the point? Why expend all that effort? Why do we go through all this trouble to get even one date?

Anyway, this woman had a long history of getting with violent men who pulled guns on her; broke into her house and pointed weapons at her; raped her (several times); kidnapped her, tied her up, and raped her over an 8 hour period; beat the shit out of her; and most recently, dating a former Marine who tried to strangle her in his sleep.

My Mom said, “You’re too nice. She only likes bad, aggressive, mean, especially violent men. You’re not like that, so she dumped you.”

She’s right. I just wasn’t psycho enough for this woman.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: Homosexual Behavior In Straight Men: How Common Is it and What Are the Reactions of Others to It?

Fact is that most straight women are wild, raging, fanatical homophobes when it comes to this sort of thing. Sure they love their gay male pets, but like Hell they want any man they date, live with or marry to be even .00001% gay himself.

Which is lame because it’s an absolute fact that 38% of men have some sort of homosexual attraction, usually at a minor level but present nevertheless. In fact, in that sense, homosexual attraction is nearly normal statistically for men, or at least minimal attraction is. What’s abnormal, at least statistically, is high levels of homosexual attraction, strong bisexual attraction, or homosexual orientation in men. So for your man to say, “I am a little bit attracted to other men” is, frankly, almost normal! But no woman will see it that way.

Now thoughts and actions are two different things. But by age 18, 25% of men have had some sort of a homosexual experience, typically in adolescence. A number of others will have a first experience after age 18. The vast majority of men who do this are straight men who are “experimenting” which is so common it is almost ridiculous.

True bisexual men are much less common and gay men are unlikely to be dating a woman. But the number of straight men who have had sex with men one or two or a limited number of times on an experimental basis is very large. Most try it and see it’s not for them and give it up, but some continue on. Quite a few straight men have sex with guys for all sorts of reasons.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

PUA/Game: Women Necessarily Don’t Fall in Love with a Man as a Whole Person: They Often Just Fall in Love with a Pretty Face

I have a very pretty, “pretty boy”, feminine, even girly face. I don’t work out but it’s not necessary.

I used to get me called gay or assumed to be gay a lot. Perhaps it’s down to that pretty boy face. I’ve even had people say, “You look like a fag.” A  SE Asian women once insisted that I was gay because “I looked gay.” I guess I have Gay Face.

I had a gay reader who talked about Gay Face a lot. He said I didn’t have Gay Face but he did think I was Jewish. Ok maybe I have Jew Face too. Who knows? Fine, I have a Jew face. I don’t care about that. Just give me the money, that’s all I want. It does seem like a lot of gay men have Gay Face. They are pretty feminized as far as men go, even down to hip ratio, and a man with a feminized body may well have a feminized face. But a lot of us straight men are “pretty boys” too. I still get called “pretty boy,” even as recently as two years ago. I was 60 years old and this woman was calling me a pretty boy!

Frankly, I never understood why people ever thought I was gay. Never made any sense to me.

Some people said it’s because of the way I walk, talk, sit, stand, hold a coffee cup, etc. So they are describing an effeminate man. But I see effeminate men and I think that behavior is horrible. I try very hard to not act that way because I think it’s horrible. It makes me pretty angry that people think I act like those guys.

I have been told though that I’m not effeminate at all. Instead it’s just that I’m “not macho.” I’ve had a lot of pretty boy friends who were not effeminate at all, but they were definitely “not macho,” and people assumed they were gay all the time. It was very annoying as when we were out together, people would assume that we were gay lovers. And they weren’t very nice about it either. It was either ridicule or outraged contempt. This was 40 years ago. This is how people reacted to male homosexuality 40 years ago, and  these people were hipsters and scenesters.

I attracted whole armies of gay men. I’m the biggest queerbait that ever lived.

But women and girls have been going crazy for me since age 18, and it’s mostly about my Looks.

I have always thought that it was my great Game skills that got me all those women, but one day I talked to a “Looks Theorist.” He was pushing a theory that Looks was the most important factor in attracting women. He told me that he’s read me and he knows that I think it’s my personality and Game that got women, but he thinks it was all just down to Looks.

At first I thought, “Oh, this is nonsense. Everyone knows women don’t care anything about Looks.” Idiotically, I have spent most of my life believing that silly lie. I think if I would have incorporated that “women place Looks first” mindset when young, I would have done better. I still did great but you know, no matter how well you did anything, you always think you could have done better. Or at least a competitive bastard who wants it all like me thinks that.

I was also insulted as this implied that it was luck of the genes and not my skill at creating killer personality and Game that got women. So I didn’t deserve the success. I just lucked out in the genetic lottery. But the more I thought about it, the more I thought that he may well just be right. Now I subscribe to the Black Pill, which says Looks > Everything Else when it comes to getting women.

Game does help in getting women, but Game alone ain’t worth a hill of beans. I know think most of the women who fucked me in the past fucked a pretty face, and even most of the ones who fell in love with me fell in love with a pretty face. That’s bit hard to swallow as once again, it implies there was no skill on my part, just the luck of the genes.

As long as you are not a complete autist, the pretty boy look – assuming you are in the top 10-20% of men – can potentially kick ass. You can easily end with a 3-figure laycount if you work at it. Sure, you look like a fag, but if you have some basic skills, you can start racking up the women pretty quickly, and once every sane person sees that they forget all about the “he looks like a fag” BS and make friends with Chad Thundercock. Pretty boy Chad Thundercock, sure, but at the end of the day, all Chads are still named Chad and nothing else, and that’s all that matters.

On the other hand, many very goodlooking men do not do particularly well, mostly down to shyness, anxiety disorders, etc. Shyness is a killer for any man, even Chad. I’ve known total Chads who were literally 40 year old virgins. Psychologically, they were wrecked. So nervous that it was painfully obvious and they were essentially nonfunctional.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: A Men’s Rights View of Pedo Hysteria: It Was Created by Feminists To Demonize Normal Male Sexuality

This is so perfect. I found this on a men’s rights site. It’s brilliant and I think it explains this latest moral panic about pedophilia and child molesting (and more importantly, the sexuality of teenage girls, which is what it is really all about).

The “popular usage” of the term pedophilia is basically the pedo-scare created by feminists to criminalize healthy and normal male sexuality as many boys who are either in jail or on sex offender lists have now discovered. How many? We don’t know since there are no federal stats on who is actually on those lists, but some local studies point to a very significant percentage of “sex offenders” being kids just fooling around.

Just like the definitions of “rape,” “assault,” “domestic violence” that have been redefined to include pretty much anything a female finds convenient, “pedophile” now effectively means “any guy who is attracted to a woman younger than me.”

Then why have we suddenly felt the need to protect young females from sex more now that feminists are in charge?

Why has there been a sudden ramping up of the legislation ‘protecting’ teenage girls from “abuse” since feminists started gaining real power at governmental level, particularly since 2000? Isn’t a simple EP explanation that it is in feminists selfish gene reproductive interests to limit sexual competition from younger girls by raising the age of consent and creating pedohysteria memes?

And it was 19th century feminists who largely determined that 14 year olds are children – something that would have been considered ridiculous in most of human history and even in much of Europe before 2000.

Pedophilia got hijacked by feminists, expanded well beyond its clinical definition or even basic common sense (like jailing consenting kids or guys who had no reasonable way of suspecting the age of their partners), criminalized to the point of absurdity (sex offender lists for consenting kids having sex with each other? Really?) and used as a “scarlet letter” that needs no proof (RL: And hence is not falsifiable and is also tautological).

It’s the same strategy that led to do the absurdly broad definitions, lack of due process, and blatantly sexist criminalization of “domestic violence,” “sexual assaults,” or “sexual harassment.” They not only smear an entire gender but also keep individual men in a permanent state of subjugation to women. Note that most men would think twice before arguing against an abusive female because they can easily get expelled from school, or lose their job, or get evicted from their home.

The root is deeper in my opinion: the “men only want one thing” is just a special case of “male sexuality is bad” which itself is coming from “men are evil”.

The decades-old smear campaign of lies spearheaded by feminists has basically left the general public with an appalling opinion of men:

Men are considered as pedophiles. Never mind that being attracted to a healthy fertile female is a perfectly normal behavior, and Romeo and Juliet were 14 yrs old or so.

Men are considered as perverts guilty of sexual harassment for looking at a girl with her tits and ass hanging out, but having your tits and ass hanging out in the workplace is somehow not considered perverted or sexual harassment.

Men are considered dangerous to children. Never mind that biological fathers are protectors of their children and have an absolutely incredibly positive influence on them.

If you redefine male sexuality as evil and perverted, then it becomes a rhetorical question. (RL: Absolutely perfect and immaculate.)

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

PUA/Game: Welcome to Hell: Sex and Love in Your 60’s

Jason: Well, honestly @Robert Lindsay, women are not going to touch men “they don’t like”. In other to get them to like you, you have to show confidence. What these romantic misfits think – is that women “owe them something”. Well, nothing is going to change for these men.

RL: Ok, I am 62 years old. At this point, it seems like when I go out into the world, 0% of the population of women want anything to do with me in any romantic or sexual sense.

I’m banned from flirting with any woman. Any woman I flirt with, I assure you I will get called creep, and I might even get in trouble and get banned from the establishment.

I’m not allowed to touch any women ever anywhere for any reason. If I do, same thing. She will act like she’s going to call the cops.

I’m a goddamned incel for all intents and purposes at this point.

Now you tell me, if I just show some confidence, this is all going to go away, and some women are going to get interested in me?

Jason: Being too negative. Also, a lot of older women are highly sexy. We shouldn’t be so closed-minded. Anyway, they would be attracted by confidence, of course.

Anyway, this gets me to thinking about those older East Asian women that are so hot.

Women my age and up look like shit! Yeah, they look at me but most look like grandmas who belong in a nursing home! Most of them don’t even look human. They look like goddamn wild animals. I look at them and I see hippos, rhinos, water buffaloes, Sasquatches, bison, and wildebeests. I see them and I wonder, “What happened? Was there a zoo breakout? Did the animals break out of the zoo somehow? Why are these wild animals running around in the streets? Isn’t that hazardous? Why don’t the zookeepers come catch them?”

Sorry, I only fuck humans. I don’t do bestiality.

Women my age are on a 1-10 scale just like us men. 8-10 women my age seem to still look fairly good. But they are increasingly rare.

And this is how many of them want to fuck: 0.00000000000%. This is how many of them don’t want to fuck: 100.0000000%. They’re all born-again virgins and prudes. If you start talking sexual with them, they pretty much call you a creep, but they often do it in an adult, polite way like someone who’s dealt with this their whole lives, is used to it, and doesn’t get hysterical about it. They’re basically all #metoo’ers.

Most act like they have no interest in any men and are perfectly happy to be alone. Further, most have horrendous, angry, griping, mean, cold, bitter, cynical personalities. They’re nasty and insulting bitches. What’s crazy is most of them look like complete shit. Everyone knows that the ugly girl has to act really nice if she wants to get a chance of a date. If an ugly girl has an ugly personality, she’s doomed. She has zero positive features. She’s useless for any sort of companionship. So these women are not only ugly but they also have horrible personalities! They literally have nothing whatsoever to offer!

But trust me, even after menopause when 95% of them have their sex drives hit by a nuclear bomb, older women continue to believe they have diamond-studded, gold-plated pussies. They don’t. I’d like to tell them, “You think your pussy is made out of solid gold? Look at it in the mirror sometime. It’s so thrashed most of us barely want to even stick a dick in that monstrosity. At the very least, it’s nothing special anymore.”

On dating sites, older women act like princesses. “All you older men have to fall all over yourselves fighting for my pretty pussy (which you won’t even get to use) because I am just that good. I might respond to you. Maybe. Once I get through this barrage of likes and messages. Fight over me boys! I’m special! I’m a prize! I’m entitled X10!”

And the sad fact is that the best looking ones my age are getting bombarded by men. I was talking to a smoking hot 62 year old. We would message when we got up in the morning and when we went to sleep at night. It was that good. We were almost with each other all day in that sense.

And she acted like she was starting to fall in love of course, which is nearly always the case when you are greeting each other on waking and saying goodnight on nodding. That’s what a married or cohabiting couple does, right? So you’re like a cohabiting or married couple in a sense. And once it gets like that, 95% of the time, she’s falling in love with you, guaranteed. Women can’t get that close to a man without starting to fall in love unless there’s something really wrong with them.

She told me I was one of 30 men fighting for her, and I was in close to first place. Then a couple of weeks later she met some other guy, and he was going to move in in three weeks,and it got cold on my end. Yeah, men my age actually do this. All the time. They meet some woman and in two or three weeks, they want to move in or they are moving in. It almost seems pathetic to me. It certainly seems desperate.

But notice. A 62 year old woman had such a diamond-studded, gold-plated pussy that literally 30 older men with nothing to offer were fighting like little boys over her for her affection. Being pussybeggars. Pretty pathetic ones at that.

So you see, it never ends. Dating sites are 3-1 women to men, and that’s on the best sites. On Adultfriendfinder, it’s 20 women to every man. Good luck ever getting laid on there.

Anyway, yeah. Women my age. Fuck them. I’m a goodlooking man. I am an 8-10 Chad for a man my age. I’ll take an 8-10 woman my age. But none of them want me. And women 18-50 don’t want to touch me. Even a lot of 50’s women don’t want me because I’m too old.

I’m not even allowed to have a sex drive. If I act like I have a sex drive, I’m evil. I’m an evil creep scumbag who needs the cops called on him for even looking at them! That’s how pissed a lot them are that I even dare to look at them.

I’m not allowed to say I’m dating someone. That’s gross, sickening, and repulsive I guess because the idea of me fucking another human at my age is gross, sickening, and repulsive.

Some young women at a store asked what I had been doing, and I laughed and told them the truth. “I’ve been chasing women.” It was true. I wasn’t doing much else. They both immediately said I was coming onto them, that was sexual harassment, and they could report me!

Can you believe that? Telling them that I have a sex drive, date, and have romantic and sexual interests means is sexual harassment! If I do those things, that means I’m human. But at my age pointing out that I am human is sexual harassment.

If I even mention that I might have a date sometime in the future, that’s gross and disgusting, and the conversation is shut down. If I say I recently met a woman who liked me, I get a negative reaction and a conversation shutdown, even from older women. I’m trying to think if there is even one woman out there who would smile and be happy if someone told her I got laid or I had a date or a girlfriend. Most would probably act physically disgusted. Which is weird.

I go out into the world every day looking to get laid, and the whole universe of women rejects me all day long. The best I get is this cold businesslike attitude, but if I try to probe deeper, I get  “That’s personal, I can’t tell you that”. So no women is interested in even having a personal friendship with me. They want an acquaintanceship only and even then only with a cold, businesslike where a Wall whenever the relation starts threatening to get a little bit warmer.

What I don’t get about this is that older women tell me I’m goodlooking, “very handsome,” etc. A 40 year old woman recently said, “You’re fucking hot!” A lot of young women I meet online keep telling me I’m handsome, cute, etc. Mostly they say I’m handsome. They range in age from 18-30.

A few underage girls even say it. A 17 year old girl recently told me I was handsome. We were in a chatroom and she said, “Well, I went into the Members to see who was in that room, and I saw you, and I said, ‘Damn! He’s handsome! I think I want to go talk to him!'” But those are in specialized “Younger Women for Older Men” chatrooms. And those are pretty much the only place I can meet women who want me.

On Tinder I was getting young women coming to me all day long, opening with “Hi handsome!”, “You’re cute!”, “Hi cutie!”, etc. At one point, I was getting 4-5 hot young women a day who came to me and quickly told me I was hot and they wanted to go out with me. But then it came down that they would only go out with me if I paid them. Sugar babies. Looking for a sugar daddy.

So at my age, even if I’m hot, nobody really wants to fuck me, and the only people who want to fuck me say I have to pay them to do it. That’s insulting! But it felt good to at least get all those strokes.

So I am at the age where good looks are absolutely useless. Looks are at their sell-by, expiration date. Even if you look great, still nobody wants you. It feels weird as Hell. I’m “totally hot” but you don’t want to fuck, date, or make friends with me? WTF. I think even the best looking man in my age bracket would be ignored by almost all women.

I can’t put into words how painful this is to me. To matters  worse, I am an extremely sexual person, a total sex maniac, and a sex addict. I regularly go for 1-2 week periods where it feels like I am masturbating in some way and looking at porn every waking minute. Yeah, I practically jerk off 12-16 hours a day. At 62 fucking years old! Can you believe it? All for nothing.

I am also a friendly person who needs people, but no one wants to be my friend. I am very romantic and almost need to be in love to get up in the morning, but no one wants to fall in love with me. I am a very touchy, tactile person who almost needs touch as much as water to live, and I’m not really allowed to touch anyone, especially any woman, and if I do, it’s #metoo and time to call the cops.

It is true that if I go to those special older man fetish I can definitely meet women in there, women who want to talk dirty, have cybersex,, trade nudes and videos, fall in love, date me, have sex, have a relationship, or come live with them as a partner to her and a stepfather to her kids. So let’s face it. That’s pretty nice. I’m much better off than the typical poor incel. But the whole rest of the world is nothing but a bunch of cold fish.

But outside of those specific fetish rooms, it’s zero.

I have to admit that women are not giving me very good reasons to like them very much. I have a question for you women: Why should I like you all these days? Give me one reason why I should keep on liking you. Give me on reason why I shouldn’t start hating you. Gimme a reason.

Of course they’ve loved me and vice versa for most of my life, so that right there makes me want to like them for the rest of my life anyway no matter how shitty they treat me now.

On the other hand, the world of men is friendly and warm. Especially older men but a lot of younger men are quite friendly too.

So the world of men still likes me (though not as much as before), but the whole world of women either hates, dislikes, ignores, acts merely businesslike and doesn’t want to be friends or even acquaintances, and of course doesn’t want to date or have sex with me. And if I try to so much as talk to them, they act like they’re going to call the police. There’s anything wrong with me. If there were, the whole world of men would be rejecting me too just like the women.

I guess most women really hate us men who are this age.

And @Jason says I’m too negative.

He just won’t swallow the Black Pill. He’s cope, cope, cope, cope, cope. Any lie to keep him from believing the ugly, wicked, and brutal truth.

I don’t blame him, but he’s not talking about reality. He’s talking about a dreamworld that doesn’t even exist and claiming that’s reality. If you disagree it’s gaslighting.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: Women Have Decided That Men Touching Other Humans Is Evil

This insane New Prudery has gotten so awful that the very fact that a man has a sex drive is seen as de facto evidence of being creepy (in other words, evil). We have become deeply phobic of touch with this #metoo idiocy. Much of male touching of women is now de facto evidence of the worst creepiness or sexual harassment. Many women are screaming assault any time a man touches a woman without any good reason.

This is truly sick and evil, but it’s women who came up with this, and Prudery, a truly vicious and malign prudery, is an essential part of the Feminine Character.

This is what happens when you let women run your society. You end up with extremely antisocial, touch-phobic, and interpersonally hostile societies with mass loneliness, fear, suspicion and hatred of the sexes, extreme sex hatred at a Victorian level, and all sorts of idiocy.

Touch is good. Humans need to be touched. This has actually been proven in endless experiments in the lab. It even works with monkeys. Monkeys that don’t get touched as babies end up profoundly disturbed as adults, which I guess is what women want all us men to end up like.

I really don’t care what all these stupid cunts think about that statement. I’m wondering why we men worry so much about what these silly creatures  called women think about much of anything. Women  have now decided that human touch is evil, at least when men do it. Men touch kids and it’s pedophilia and  child molesting because all men are pedophiles and molesters.

Men touch women and it’s creepy, evil, rape, violence (!!), assault, sexual harassment, dangerous, frightening and all manner of pearl clutching stupidity. Why? Because men are creeps, molesters, killers, beaters, rapists, assaulters, sexual harassers, violent creatures, evil, dangerous, and scary, so when men touch women, it’s automatically all of those things.

Thanks a lot, bitches. Thanks for destroying society, you fools.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

What About You Is Biologically “Real”? Not Much. What about You Is Made Up and “Fake”? Maybe Most Everything.

My most recent revelation is that most everything about our psyches, personalities and identities is “made up,” and in that sense, not even real. I mean most of our psyche, personality, identity itself is not biologically based and therefore some real thing that can be identified. Instead all of things things are created or made up if you will. Now sexual orientation, gender identity and some of these things seem to have a biological element.

The hardcore parts of personality – introversion, extroversion, etc. seem to be pretty hardwired in. I’ll simply never be an extreme extrovert as hard as I try. I assume most of the rest of me is more or less made up. I’m heterosexual. I guess that got wired in. I’m relatively masculine or about as masculine as most straight men are.

I have a normal gender identity as a man. Even when I had a strong feminine component, I always felt I was pure man. Yes, I’m intellectual, and the IQ was pretty much wired in. Most of the rest is probably just created by me or frankly “made up.” Yep, I’m making it all up and so are you, him, and everybody else.

Sometimes I think that my dick, my supersonic brain, my aching back and the goddamned hemorrhoid in my ass are the only real and true biological aspects of myself. Hell, maybe my kidneys are created. I’ve never seen them. How do I even know they are there? Says who?

I’ll have more about this in a later post because this is a cool concept I am on here, I think.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

The Dangerous Myth That All Pedophiles Believe

As I mentioned in a previous post, most if not all pedophiles believe that kids are horny as Hell, want to have sex all the time and especially want  to have sex with adults. They claim all sorts of evidence in favor of this notion. Obviously, considering their orientation, this is a convenient thing for them to believe, right?

I read this a while back and was very dubious about it, so I did a lot of research to see if what  the pedos were saying was true – mostly, do little girls really have a sex drive and come onto men?

I didn’t have any personal data of my own. There was none from my childhood, but girls didn’t like me then anyway, not that I cared since most of them had cooties anyway.

After age 13 and into adulthood, I had lots of contacts with kids. I worked in schools for over a decade. I taught school for six years, all grades. I’ve spent a lot more time around kids than most people have. In that time, some teenage girls definitely came onto me. Some even openly propositioned me right in front of the whole class. But those were teenage girls with the full-blown sex drives of women, as different from little girls as lions are from tigers.

Once a 12 year old girl who I had befriended the previous year in my job at an elementary school literally propositioned me for sex in a park. I turned her down of course. But based on a few things I gathered from our conversation, she was also pubertal and past menarche, so she doesn’t count.

I would think that if little girl children really wanted to have sex with us men, I would have experienced it by now. I’ve experienced more than enough teenage girls and grown women who acted horny around me. If girls did this regularly too, I should have gotten it from them. Also, I’ve been around far more kids than 95% of men.

So based on my own life, I was thinking this is pedophile bullshit. But I had to find out. So I did some work.

It was very hard to find the data (probably due to pedo hysteria), but what little I came up with said no, little girls have no sex drive whatsoever, and nor do little boys for that matter, and neither should they, either of them.

And I don’t have any data, but I don’t even think little girls get wet, although it’s an interesting question but I’m terrified to ask anyone about it. Imagine trying to ask someone a question about that! Better yet, try getting funding for research into that question! Good luck!

Four months before menarche, there is a massive increase in the capacity of the vagina for lubrication. This is an essential part of the female physical sex drive along with admoninal tingles, hardened nipples, flushed cheeks, rapid breathing, and the rest of the ill-defined soup that no one understands, not even women themselves.

I’m sure little girls have discharge. All females do. Chafing is a thing. To prevent that, the vagina likes to be bit wet. To test it, sometime when you are with a naked woman (if you ever get lucky enough to get with one), sneak your finger into her vagina for as long as she lets you.

Don’t be soy and ask permission. Be a man, dammit! Just fucking do it! If she doesn’t like it, she’ll stop you. You will find that even if she is not turned on at all, it is a bit wet. That’s its natural state. I just figured this out for the first time a couple of years ago, believe it or not. The vagina likes to keep itself a bit wet, and it also engages in constant self-cleaning processes, and both are related. But discharge isn’t lubrication. They’re two completely different things.

I think this delusion – that little kids are horny as Hell and are just dying to have sex with adults, no doubt especially with pedophiles themselves, must be one of the main delusions that go along with pedophilia. I guess it’s hard to be a pedophile if you realize, correctly, that little kids have no interest at all in having sex with you. Gay pedophiles believe the same thing. They insist that little boys are horny as Hell and get erections all the time. I sure wasn’t and I sure didn’t. Some even say that little  boys can ejaculate. There’s no way that’s true.

I suppose the truism here is that people believe whatever they need to believe to make their view of the world (which includes their sexual orientation) work and be logical. It’s not much fun to realize that your basic view of the world, your ontology, your whole set-up and outward orientation towards reality, is a Goddamned gigantic lie. It’s such a miserable thought that it’s almost enough to make you go down and purchase a gun and buy it that very day. We simply can’t live with such utter futility. So we make up whatever lies we have to make up to make it seem like our existence is rational and not doomed and senseless.

Perhaps it’s how we get through the day. Perhaps if we don’t do that, we simply don’t get through the day. And when it’s all said and done, the one thing that remains about all the rest is blown to dust is that whatever we need to do to make it to another day is about the most precious possession we have.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

A Good Deed Never Goes Unpunished

Greg Rambo: Has Highbrow ever taken on the subject of Scientology? They seem to think that whatever you accuse them of, that means you’re guilty of the accusation yourself.

I don’t know much about it.I would like to look into it. I have a book on it and I dipped into it, but you know me. I’m reading like 200 books at any given time probably.

I’m running into this “What you accuse other people of, that’s what you are.” It’s really upsetting to me.

I stumbled across a child porn pic the other day on Queera I mean Quora of all places.

Ok, the pic was this little girl on a bed. Who knows, maybe she’s five years old? Bare-ass naked. Not necessarily a big deal. Humans are animals and when we take off our clothes, we are naked. That’s called our natural state. There’s nothing obscene or evil about some kid with their clothes off. It’s a perfectly natural state for a young human being to be in. Not evil at all. You think it’s evil every time some kid takes their clothes off to take a bath or a shower? What’s in God’s name is wrong with you?

Anyway, she’s on all fours. With her ass to the camera. Peering over her shoulder and looking at the camera. And, yeah, her legs are spread a bit. So it was pretty gross and it hit me like a kick in the stomach. That pic is illegal because it is probably posed, somewhat uncomfortable, pretty unnatural, an unlikely position for her to have gotten into on her own, and, yeah, involves lascivious display of the genitalia. Dost test. Bingo. Illegal as all Hell.

Below that he had two posts which are instructive for showing us how these guys really think.

The first post is a fantasy of his that I doubt took place. He describes graphically how when he was 12 years old, he had sex with his eight year old sister. It was pretty explicit and I could reprint that here legally, but I won’t because it’s gross. Most 12 year old boys have not reached semenarche yet, so I doubt if the story is true. More likely a fantasy. Then he says something about how he wants to do this to an eight year old girl right now. This is typical thinking for these guys.

Next was a comment about how lots of men want to have sex with teenage girls (no shit), and then he adds that lots of men even want to have sex with pre-pubertal little girls (probably not a whole lot, but also probably way more than you want to think). He then added that a lot of little girls are horny as Hell, get very wet, and are dying to have sex with adults. If you spend any time around these guys, you hear this over and over. Fantasies about wanting a little girl to come onto them. Endless testimonies about how little girls are horny as Hell and come onto men all the time.

I got so mad that I called up the hotline and reported the sonofabitch. No good deed goes unpunished. My brother heard about and called up my Mom and told her, “Bob looks at child porn.” My Mom was and is absolutely hysterical about this. “Don’t go to those websites!” Except Queera is a just a regular website like Facebook. Is Facebook a child porn site? Queera doesn’t even allow real porn or even erotica.

Some sick fuck pedophile (the real kind) put that pic on his profile along with two other completely pro-pedophilia (the real kind) posts. I’m sure that all of my enemies who read this are going to run around shouting that Lindsay admitted that he looks at child porn.

Look what happens when you try to do the right thing. You run across some sick shit on the Net, so, like a good citizen, you report it to the authorities. The fact that you did this makes you a proven pedophile and a consumer of child porn.

I swear every day I hate people a little bit more than the day before.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: What Crime Did Prince Andrew Commit?

In the Epstein/Maxwell affair, the accusation from Virginia Giuffre (VG) is that she was ordered by Epstein to have sex with Prince Andrew a couple of times in order to gain blackmail material on him.

The faggots and cucks on Reddit are all screaming that Andrew committed “child rape.” “He raped a child!” they scream. What a bunch of homos. A recent post on Reddit ordered everyone to stop calling the “victims” of the “abuse” young women. “They were little girls!” the gays all screamed. Really? A 17 year old girl is a “little girl?” Have any of these dickwads ever met, spoken to, and spent time with an actual 17 year old girl? I have. They’re virtually adults. Hell, a lot of 16 year old girls and even a few 15 year old girls are practically adults for all intents and purposes.

Especially past 17 1/2, there’s not a whole lot of difference between them and an 18 year old adults. They’re inexperienced, they don’t know what they are doing, they’re awkward and clumsy when it comes to flirting and sex, but they’re very enthusiastic. Getting down to brass tacks, they are often quite immature, but I would call them more “very immature women” than girls. It’s far more of a woman than a girl, that’s for sure.

Next we look at the rape allegation. Supposedly Prince Andrew “raped” this girl! These Reddit “men” actually believe this feminist shit where half of all normal sex is rape. Good God, they’re queers.

She never tells us how the sex started with Epstein and Maxwell. Was she raped? Was she talked into it? There are allegations of “sex trafficking.” Sex trafficking means you are being held prisoner, you can’t really leave, or they are making it hard for you to leave by coercing you into staying somehow and threatening you with consequences, often violence, if you try to leave. Sex trafficking is sex slavery. You’re being held prisoner. It’s very much tied in with pimping, and Epstein was mostly a pimp before he was anything else. Maxwell was a madam, in effect a female pimp.

Was VG really a sex slave? How? That means she was being held prisoner? She was? How was she a prisoner? Giuffre was coerced into staying? How? Giuffre was threatened if she tried to leave? How?

I’ve been over this story for a long time. Giuffre never states that she was raped one time. She just says Epstein told me to have sex with this guy, so I did it. That’s perfectly legal because she was legal when he was doing that. Apparently this girl likes to follow orders. She’s a grown woman now, right? She still likes to follow orders? Tell her to come over and I will give her some sexual orders to obey, ok?

It’s not enough to say “I was Epstein’s sex slave.” She was legal. How exactly did Epstein make her his sex slave? He said, “You are my sex slave. You shalt obey me, miss.” And this fool girl believed that? Well, that’s legal.

Prince Andrew had sex with this girl in Virgin Islands. She was legal, 17. AOC is 16 in Virgin Islands. Someone explain to me how it is rape and sexual abuse to have consensual sex with a perfectly legal girl. I’m dying to know. VG was legal everywhere she had sex with Andrew. She was legal in New York. She was legal in New Mexico. She was legal in the UK. Please explain how consensual sex with a perfectly legal girl is rape in any of these places.

VG was a “sex slave” from 17-23, apparently, so most of this was when she was a grown woman. Why all the focus on the one year when she was a girl, albeit a legal one? Between ages of 18-25, was she being “raped” or “abused” the whole time? Most gay media stories on this subject say she was “abused” from ages of 18-23. How in God’s name can a grown woman be “sexually abused?” She can’t. Even teenage girls can’t be “sexually abused.””

Sexual abuse only refers to child molestation, generally but not always sex with a child under 13. The media also says that VG was “abused” when she was 17. Every time she went off to have sex with some guy Epstein told her to, she got “abused.” How in the Hell did she get “abused” by having consensual sex with all of these men? Keep in mind she was completely legal.

I’m not feeling a lot for this silly woman. She got paid $15,000 for getting “raped” and “abused” by Andrew, and apparently she got paid big money every time she had sex with someone Epstein told her too. Sounds like she’s making pretty good money for a girl working on her back. I never knew getting “raped” and “abused” paid so well. Hell, at rates like that, I might even let myself get “raped” and “abused.”

But really, I’m feeling terribly sorry for this woman. I’m sure that must have been horribly traumatic to get all that money for one consensual sex act! If some hot chick gave me $15K for sleeping with her, I’d be traumatized for years! I’d have PTSD for the rest of my life!

People are saying that Andrew may have bought this girl. No one knows if Andrew bought her. Epstein was probably just giving this girl away to his friends. I doubt he was charging anyone. This seems to be about the worst they have on Andrew. If he bought her, Andrew is guilty of the crime of – gasp – buying a prostitute. Like this doesn’t happen millions of times every day in the US. Like rich men don’t buy prostitutes all over the world all the time.

On the other hand, she was a minor. It was legal to have sex with her but not to pay her for it. So if he knew she was underage, he’s guilty of the crime of buying an underage prostitute, which apparently some sort of a crime, even if it’s not called that. We now know that he knew she was 17.

Fine, but did he pay her or not? That’s the important part here. Even if he did, frankly, men who buy underage prostitutes are almost never convicted. You have to prove they knew she was underage, and that’s hard to do. Generally they go after the pimps who are pimping these girls out, not the customers. Men probably buy underage prostitutes tens of thousands of times a day in this country.

They are also saying that he committed some crime called “Buying a Trafficked Prostitute.” But that’s only if he bought her. There’s no such crime as “Having Sex with a Trafficked Prostitute.” You can have all the sex you want with these trafficked women. You just can’t pay them for it.

Neither of these are even crimes. Show me where there are crimes called that. As I said, cops don’t worry about the buyers. They have a hard enough time keeping up with the pimps and the traffickers.

Ok, VG’s a prostitute. She’s a whore. Nothing but a little teenie whore, and a well-paid one at that. Epstein is pimping out an underage prostitute, and he may also be trafficking her. And pimping out an underage prostitute is indeed a crime. I forget what it is called, maybe something like “Profiting from Underage Prostitution.” I recently looked over the sex laws in some European countries and a number of them had crimes along those lines, phrased in different ways.

The problem with the trafficking laws is the way they were written. As noted above, the trafficking laws are designed to prevent human slavery of various kinds. The sex trafficking laws are designed to fight what is better known as sex slavery. These women are imprisoned. They can’t leave. They’re being forced to prostitute themselves or forced to work for some particular pimp.

But the law was abused by the pigs at the same time it was written. It applied to not only the sex slavery, as was proper, but it threw in  the notion that anyone pimping underage prostitutes was automatically engaging in sex slavery. So the law is designed to prevent trafficking in prostituted sex slaves and also underage prostitutes.

The problem is that the addition of “and also if they are underage” part to the law is that this goes against the spirit of the law – that it was designed to prevent sex slavery. There’s no proof that all underage prostitutes being pimped out are sex slaves, though tragically quite a few probably are exactly that. It’s just more pigs abusing laws and writing laws based on emotional hysteria rather than clear-eyed, cold, legal logic.

But anyway, Andrew just had sex with some legal girl, probably for free. He may have had no idea she was a prostitute or not, and if he didn’t pay her, it doesn’t matter. He knew her age but she  was legal. He probably had no idea she was being “trafficked,” and it wouldn’t matter if he did unless he bought her and even then, nobody gets prosecuted for such a crime.

Precisely what crime did Andrew commit here?

Inquiring minds wish to know.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: Just Banned from Reddit Again

I got banned from Reddit, so I went and got a new name and signed up under that one. I got banned almost immediately. So now I’ve been banned twice. But now I have a new name, ha ha. A Satanic feminist sub reported me to Mommy Reddit because I wrote a comment asking why it was wrong for adult men to fantasize about teenage girls. After all, 100% of all straight men are attracted, typically maximally, to teenage girls. There is some other data suggesting that attraction declines with each declining year, but all men are maximally aroused by 16 and 17 year old girls.

One study found that for 15 year old girls, it was 90%, for 14 year old girls, it was 80%, and for 13 year old girls, it was 70%. Fairly high levels of attraction from 10-60% remained even in the pedophilic range – for 12 year old girls, it was 60%, for 11 year old girls, it was 50%, for 10 year old girls, it was 40%, for 9 year old girls, it was 30%, for 8 year old girls, it was 20%, and for 7 year old girls, it was 10%. Below that there was no attraction, thank God.

When females are lumped into a group called 13+, 100% of
normal straight men react maximally to this group.

Since men generally react maximally to teenage girls, what would be wrong with men fantasizing about the things that maximally arouse them? Isn’t that normal human behavior to fantasize about things that maximally arouse you?

For this the feminists banned me, wrote me a scathing email with orders not to contact them, and reported me to Mommy Reddit. The cucks and faggots at Reddit then banned me for something gay called “child sexualization” for stating some basic scientific facts along with a scientifically uncontroversial opinion.

Today I just banned again from another gay subreddit. I attacked feminists in the thread, and I accused people in the thread of being carceral liberals and police state liberals, which is exactly what almost every liberal in the US is. I’d argue that that’s what almost all US Communists are too. US Communists are so cucked and gay it’s pathetic. I doubt if there’s no real man among them.

Anyway, I got banned for “hate speech” for attacking feminists. According to Reddit homos, hate speech is:

No racist or sexist speech in comments or submissions. Also no abusive speech based on religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. These are not rules against swearing; they’re not rules against expressing political opinions.

I went back and looked at my comment. Nothing in there was racist or sexist at all or attacked any of their pet protected groups. In fact, I didn’t even mention anything having to do with race or sex and their protected groups anywhere in the post. The only thing I could figure out is that I attacked feminists.

Somehow feminists, a political formation in the form of a hate movement against men, is somehow in the category of race, sex, gender, religion, or sexual orientation. Obviously feminism is none of these things. The only thing I could figure out is that the mods on his sub are such faggots that they think attacking feminists is the same as attacking women.

Which brings me to another question. All liberal and left women  are feminists. 100%. No exceptions ever for any reason. And worse, close to 100% of liberal and Left men are utterly cucked male feminists. Face it boys, there’s nothing more pathetic than a male feminist. The only real men and real women are found on the Right, which is disgusting. If you’re on the left and you’re a real man, you will get tossed off just like that, with extreme prejudice too. They will order to go over to the conservatives.

Which makes me think: How many rightwing men are conservatives mostly because they are sick and tired of faggotized and pussified left and liberal politics? How many of them are Republicans because the Republican Party is the party of the real men? That’s a dumb reason to vote Republican (What have Republicans ever done for us men?) but most people vote based on the most retarded reasons imaginable that have little or nothing to do with their lives.

How many women have gone rightwing because they like to act feminine? They’re girly girls who love being girly, feminine, and womanish? I’ve talked to many women who told me that the main thing they hate about feminism is how much feminists hate femininity.

It’s true. Feminists do hate femininity.  Of course they do.
They’re dykes and manhaters or both, and they love nothing more than women with short hair wearing pants who are nearly indistinguishable from men. This is how women are supposed to look according to feminists. Like a goddamned butch bull dyke. I’m thinking maybe quite a few real women are voting right simply because they’re disgusted that leftwing women have turned into a bunch of man-hating dykes. They won’t throw you out of the left for being a feminine woman. But you better believe they will throw you out for not being a feminist.

By the way, what in the Hell’s the matter with straight men nowadays? I can’t believe how gay they are. If you’re going to be that gay, why don’t you just quit lying, move to Frisco, and stick a cock in your mouth? Are there any real men at all amongst these Millennials and Gen Z’ers? Almost all of them seem like complete faggots.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Why 16-19 Year Old Girls Have Some of the Most Awesome Yet Nonfunctional Bodies of all Women

I’m not much into younger teenage girls because although they look hot, at my age it’s just too much of a kid or a girl. They almost seem like children to me now. Sometimes I stop and talk to them but I think, “My God, she’s soooooo young!”

I’ve started noticing that I really like teenage girls when they get to ~17-18. Of course I l ike all women after that too. I’m turned on by maturity and “woman-ness”,  not immaturity and “child-ness.” Right there I can’t possibly be a pedophile or even a hebephile or ephebophile for that matter (although the last two are completely normal orientations) because all of those chronological preferences have a preference for youth and immaturity and a lack of “woman-ness.” “Woman-ness is a turnoff for these men, and “child-ness” is a turn-on.

Now that is finally starting to look like a woman and a 17 year old girl is shockingly sensible and many act like adult women. Also their bodies change a bit from a 16 year old. From ~17-19, females have these incredible bodies, but they are immature and non-adaptive.

What happens is that they get the curves of a woman, which we love of course, but their hips have not widened yet because the hip widening does not occur until 19-20. That’s why it’s better to wait until 19-20 to have that first kid when your hips finally widen enough to allow an easy birth.

But from  17-19, you see these girls who are very thin but they have these awesome, insane curves! It’s almost the hottest woman of all but it’s not an adaptive human – it’s an immature body because you just don’t see “thin with awesome curves” much in mature women.

If females stayed like that their whole lives they would have all sorts of problems delivering babies like a lot of teenage girls. Pregnancy below 19-20 in the teen years is associated with all sorts of negative outcomes because the body is not ready to birth a child. After 19-20,  the hips widen and the skinny with awesome curves thing  goes away. Mature women are either thin, in which case they don’t have a lot of curves, or curvaceous, in which case they need to put on some weight and become more full-bodied and run the risk of getting fat. You either get a thin woman or a curvy woman, one or the other. You don’t get both.

It is interesting that women’s hips, even after the widening, are still not really wide enough to deliver a baby easily. If you compare human female hips with our nearest ancestor apes’ female hips, the ape gals have much wider hips than our lasses do.

Why didn’t we evolved wider hips? It’s a damned good question.

It’s also said that a human baby’s head is almost too wide to be birthed out a vagina. If you have ever seen a human birth you are amazed at how that huge object comes out of that tiny little hole. I think the human head evolved to be larger to accommodate a rapidly growing brain that massively enlarged out head size. At the same time, women’s hips did not evolve enough to easily accommodate the huge head, but enough women survived that the thin hips did not go out.

You would think we would start evolving smaller heads to get through those thin hips easier, but that never happened. It is thought that the massively enlarging head that occurred in human evolution was such a beneficial thing for the species that it stuck around and was not selected out despite the fact that it caused all sorts of problems. In other words, the benefits outweighed the drawbacks.

This also implies that the hottest, sexiest, most beautiful things on Earth might be completely nonfunctional.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

At What Age Are Females Most Attractive?

Bumface: Have you read this paper about female attractiveness and reproductive value?

Basically the idea is that a small waist and a low BMI (which men find highly attractive) are signs of youth and nulliparity. The authors analyzed bodily measurements by age and found that the 15-19 age group scored the highest for these features.

Now, what I don’t like about this study is that it analyzed the ages in groups of 5 years instead of year by year. The 10-14 age group scored higher than 20-24, so the absolute peak could be anywhere between 12.5 and 17.5, maybe 14. This would match up with the age of peak female facial attractiveness and the age girls were typically married off in ancestral times.

This is the graph I mean.

And this is what it may look like if they analyzed the data year by year.

I’ve seen numerous other studies that showed that the women men found most attractive were ~21. That seems about right to me.

The other study is too young. 12-14 yr old girls are just not hot to me anymore. It’s too much of a young girl. I’m not really into them. How many adult men actually think 12-14 year old girls are among the hottest females out there? That’s so weird.

I don’t even look at the junior high girls when they are coming home from school. I see the high school girls walking home from school and they do look good but then I look closely at their faces and I’m turned off because it’s too much of a girl. I don’t think they are kids or children like our fucktard culture says, but at my age, when I get right up close to them, even 16 yr old girls seem insanely young. They seem like “kids.”

13 year old girls totally seem like kids and almost like children. There’s not much difference between them and an 8 year old behavior-wise. They act about the same.

I like some of the more mature 12 year old girls because they can be really cool when they try to act like adults.

Still though, I am looking down there at her, and to me, she’s a kid. 12 year old girls are a bit cute, but that is a girl and it’s even a little girl in a sense. Plus they are absolutely terrified of us men for some reason.How any adult man could have sex with such a creature without feeling like a complete pedophile is beyond me. I wouldn’t be able to do it even if it was legal. It would make me too uncomfortable.

Once they get to 13 and their sex drive hits full-blown, they’re not scared of us men anymore, possibly because they find us attractive (most 12 year old girls have zero sex drive). That’s a lot more appealing than a terrified 12 year old girl who looks at me suspiciously like I’m some kind of a monster. It feels creepy and makes me feel like a pedo when they look at me like that, and I definitely do not like to feel like a pedophile.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

How to Brag without Making It Seem Like You Are Bragging

On the stupid Net, humblebragging is one of the worst sins. In the real world where things are actually real and not fake and make sense instead of being lies, humblebragging is the way to go.

When you do this, you are so humble about your achievements that you almost act like you are ashamed or embarrassed of them. Or you talk about your achievements, shrug, and discuss them inn the same tone as, “I just drank a glass of water,” like they were nothing. This enables you to brag and get away with it because most others won’t be offended by your behavior. There’s nothing wrong with humblebragging! It’s actually the way to do it.

Why brag in the first place? If you have achieved things that are exemplary or above the achievements of most people or if you were gifted with superior attributes, you have a right to talk about it. Especially your accomplishments. But a lot of us have achieved some pretty impressive stuff, so even discussing our accomplishments makes it seem like we are bragging.

That’s not fair! We have a right to discuss our legitimate accomplishments in life! But if you don’t want to get accused of bragging, humblebragging is a way to talk about superior attributes or accomplishments without seeming like you are bragging. People won’t feel angry, insulted, or humiliated when you discuss your positive attributes or achievements. Actually a lot of them will warm up to you and sympathize with your accomplishments, and you will even see a rise in their own self-esteem because they are reflecting yours and mirroring it.

This is a beautiful thing. You are sharing your high self-esteem with people. People will complement you without feeling insulted. They will sympathize with you. They will treat you like a hero but not in a groveling way. Instead they will get close to you and share your accomplishments with you. You will get a comradely admiration. If you do it right, you will trigger the same thing in them too, and then you will get “Yeah, we are a couple of winners, huh? You should be my wingman,” type thing.

When two people feel that they are both winners, things go smoothly, so there’s nothing wrong with thinking you’re a winner. The problem is when you think you’re a winner but other people are losers! The problem comes from your denigration of others, not your elevation of yourself, which is not mentally disordered, nor is it even abnormal!

Polar Bear: I consider myself handsome too.

We’re nothing but a bunch of hot guys here!

I actually believe you. Most men who are not goodlooking  don’t go around saying that they are.

That’s fine, but what do other people say? That’s how you know if you are handsome or not. Screw your own opinions. Those are subjective. It’s fine to phrase it that way too, but I end up saying it a lot so I always put it on other people. I say “apparently I was handsome,” or “supposedly I was handsome,” when talking about the past. “Apparently I was handsome. People would not stop talking about it.” With regard to my looks now, I say, “I think my looks are shot, but women keep telling me I’m handsome. Whatever!”

Because I say this a lot, when you put it on other people, it doesn’t sound so much like bragging. When you say, “supposedly I was handsome,” or “apparently I was handsome,” it makes it seem like you have no idea whether you were goodlooking or not, but maybe you were because other people kept saying so. When I say I think my looks are shot, yet women say I’m not, but I think they’re crazy, it hardly sounds like bragging.

I also add in that this doesn’t make me better than one person on Earth because I did nothing to deserve this. It was simply given to me as a gift by God or genes or whatever. This makes me seem less arrogant.

I’m not saying you guys should do this. I am just saying why I do it the way I do. I’m very sensitive to being told I am bragging or narcissistic. Of course I am narcissistic but not to pathological degrees.

Narcissism, after all, is another word for self-esteem. High narcissism means you have high self-esteem. It’s generally seen as a sign of good mental health. It’s only when you get too much of a good thing and go over into Narcissistic Personality Disorder pathology that it’s a problem. Narcissism is something that needs to be roped in and controlled in my case. I am always doing things to lower my self-esteem and make me seem less arrogant. I don’t like to be arrogant because it makes other people feel like shit, and then I feel horribly guilty.

I actually thought I was handsome at the same time everyone else said I was. For some years there, I was shocked and stunned when I looked in the mirror. I could not believe how goodlooking I was! It was almost like it wasn’t me because I hadn’t been that way my whole life. Of course that everyone else was saying it too added weight to my views.

I wish I had figured out earlier in life how important looks are to women. Looks are really the main factor in whether a woman goes for you or not.

Goodlooking men have life dicked. Women pretty much throw themselves in your lap. Things happen to you that people think, “No way. That never happens to any man!” Or they think, “That only happens in pornos!” Reading the incel blogs and learning how lousy life is for unattractive men, I’ve grown more sensitive to this. I should have been a lot more aggressive back then based on the confidence my looks should have given me.

But back then people kept saying that Looks didn’t matter that much to women. They mattered to men of course, but to women, not so much. Personality, Money, Status, Power, Fame, and Game were what really mattered. I believed this too. Little did I know we were believing a big fat lie.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: Almost No One is “Questioning” Their Sexual Orientation

The Gay Politics branch of Identity Politics has a dirty little secret. Homosexuals are trying to increase their numbers. It makes sense. Hell, if were gay, I’d probably want to convert as many straight men as possible to bisexuality and this is exactly what the majority of gay men want to do. In my experience, this is why friendships between gay and straight men are not possible, even if you think it might be a good idea. They simply never stop trying to hit on you.

One of their lies is the “questioning” lie. There are gay, bisexual, pansexual, queer, and a score other micro-categories of deviates. And in this group they also put the “questioning.” These are people who are questioning whether they are gay or  bi or not.

I think Gay Politics wants to encourage as many straight men as possible to “question” their sexual orientation. No straight man will conclude he is gay, but quite a few might conclude that they are some type of bisexual or that they like the idea of sex with men. I’ve already met some men like this, and it seems to be getting more common all the time. Mostly they seem to be interested in oral sex. In other words, I am seeing more straight men who like to suck cocks. Whatever.

Men who are into anal sex tend to be pretty damn bi or simply gay. That’s a bridge too far for most predominantly straight men. It’s the ultimate in emasculation.

I don’t think anyone goes round and round about their sexual orientation. Any gay man will tell you that all gay men know they are gay. The ones that don’t know are simply in denial. Period.

I work in mental health. I give a scale to my clients, and they instantly pick a number. It’s a great scale, better than the Kinsey scale.

I met three males who were not sure if they were gay.

One was a 15 year old boy, a client. He had strong attraction to men and zero to women, though he was attracted to one girl who looked like a boy. But that doesn’t count. I told him he was absolutely gay, to quit worrying and feel good about it, it was biological and unchangeable, and to go out and live the greatest gay life he can.

One was a 33 year old man. He was simply in denial about being gay, and he was trying to be with women. I listened to him tell me about what turned him on, and I flat out told him he was gay, and he needed to accept it, be happy, and go out and live the greatest gay life ever. He was a 25-75 on my scale, but nevertheless he had no real attraction to women at all.

The 25-75 score is not very instructive. This man told me:

  • He never looked at woman. Not even one time.
  • He never fantasized about having sex with women. Not even once.
  • He never masturbated to fantasies of having sex with women. Never had either.

He had been closeted his whole life, so he had been hanging around with straight men all this time and pretending to be straight. But he told me hat when the other men talked about sex, he never joined in. Not even once. By the way, that’s a dead giveaway that a man is probably gay.

Another was a 35 year old man claiming to be bisexual. I figured him out real quick and told him he was hiding behind a bisexual label and in fact he was gay. For instance, his gay identity was progressing (this is how it works; it tends to grow greater with time), and now the only way he could have sex with his girlfriend was by looking at gay porn to get hard. Any man who has to do that is gay. Period.

He wanted to be a husband and father, and his family would disown him if they found out he was gay. That made me feel very sad.

He was with girlfriends but they were very angry about his “bisexuality”. I mean furious, crazy homophobic. This goes along with my experience.

Most straight women do not wish to date bisexual men, let alone gay men. I saw one forum with all young women, and 19 out of 20 said they would never date a bisexual man. And you can see on the Internet many bisexual men complaining that women refuse to go out with them on account of their orientation.

This may be changing somewhat in this newer generation of women, Millennials and Gen Z’ers. I have a 31 year old female friend who has a crush on a famous bisexual man at the moment. She’s dated other bisexual men, and she doesn’t mind at all.

I think women dating bisexual men is a health hazard, sorry. They’re much more likely than straight men to have all sorts of STD’s, and many bisexual men have transmitted HIV to the women in their lives. This is particularly the case in the Black community where most gay and bisexual men are closeted and the “down low” phenomenon is huge.

I flat out told him he was gay, not bi, his relationships with women will never work, and he needs to quit dating women (it’s bad for both him and the women). He needed to accept being gay and and be happy.

I also told him:

 “You know what? You being gay is the greatest thing in the whole world!”

“Why?” he asked.

“Because it’s you being you. You’re not trying to be something that you’re not. And you being you is the greatest thing in the whole world.”

You can see here what a horrific homophobe I am, huh? I swear my critics are morons.

I sent him to a site perfect for people like him called Empty Closets, and he seemed to start coming out a bit. I saw his first couple of posts there, and I felt very happy for him.

As I said, all these men who “can’t figure out if they are gay” are just in denial. Real simple. I don’t blame them, but closets are for clothes.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: Young Women Are Dumping Me for Not Being Woke Enough on Feminism, Homosexuality, and Transsexualism

First, I’m 62 years old, so I’m even sure why this happens to me at all. But 15, 16, and 17 year old girls (JB’s) all came to me on the Net just recently. And they approached me in every case. I don’t go chasing JB’s. It’s a bit sleazy. If they come to you, fine, obviously they’re doing  what they want to do, but chasing JB’s as an older man leaves me cold. It does seem a bit predatory.

The 16 year old came to me with the  usual line, “Hi Daddy! Wanna fuck  me?” All young women and teenage girls call me Daddy nowadays. WTF is it with this Daddy shit? She didn’t respond back. She was a Black girl from Michigan.

The 15 year old came to talk and told me she liked it really dirty. I was scared to talk to her because I don’t even know if this is legal! We talked a bit, but really she had no personality at all, didn’t know how to flirt or even talk, and she turned me off. This is typical of JB’s.

I haven’t touched one since age 21, but I’ve talked to many of them on the Net. Back in the 1990’s the scene was wide open and there were all these Yahoo chatrooms like “Younger Women for Older Men.” Full of young women of course, but they also had so many JB’s in them you would not even believe it. JB’s like men! Back then nobody cared about any of that.

Most are awkward, don’t know how to talk to me, don’t know how to talk dirty, act robotic during sex games, or just seem extremely naive. For me, that’s a turnoff. I was glad she went away because I’m not sure if this is legal. This Sex Panic gets worse every year. Are these gay cop cucks going to go after us for talking to JB’s now? You can’t talk to other humans? I can’t believe what fags cops are nowadays. You’re going to arrest me for talking to a 16 year old girl? You call yourself a man?  Take off that uniform.

The totally hot 17 year old sent me some pics, but there was nothing illegal in there. She just wanted to talk dirty and talk about sex. I guess that’s legal! She was 7,000 miles away anyway. Come get me, FBI, you penny ante trivial pikers. Why don’t you feds focus on real crime instead of teenage girl bullshit?

But she was dominant and so am I, so we didn’t connect. She wanted to peg me in the ass with a dildo. She also really wanted me to turn bisexual and fuck guys. Those are both pretty gay things, but she probably liked submissive men, and the more submissive the guy is, the more he’s into getting pegged and fucking dudes.

A 30 hot year old woman came to talk to me recently, and she was along the same lines. She said she was bi-curious and she would not mind if I was too. I told her that if a man even touched me in a weird way, I would probably jump backwards. She said correctly that I was a homophobe (after all, I am afraid of that stuff like most straight men) and left me.

I have young women leaving me all the time nowadays because I’m not woke enough. They hate that I’m an MRA and an anti-feminist, or they think I’m a homophobe, or they think I’m a transphobe. They get furious and say, “You’re really closed-minded!” They range in age from 19-30. Two women, age 28 and 30, told me, “I don’t date homophobes.” This is so weird. Growing up you would never have heard of such a thing.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

PUA/Game: Some Great PUA Wisdom from a Commenter

Excellent comment here

Claudius: I learned this lesson the hard way. Saying or even slightly acting desperate will get you cock-blocked. However, I too am handsome, so maybe that’s why when I play chill, it works. I’ve learned that if I, the man, think and set up the logistics of the hunt, I get laid. If I choose a date spot that’s fun, has booze, and is convenient located near a place where we can comfortably fuck, and the weather is good, all I have to do is bring her to that place.

If I let her, the woman, feel things out, I don’t necessarily get laid. 50/50 shot.

This is interesting. If you think it out, it works. If you let her feel it out, it doesn’t work. Maybe I am wrong letting the woman take charge or at least say so explicitly. I used to not say so explicitly. Instead I did something called “leaving the door open.” That’s an invitation for her to go for it and especially an invitation for her to be a slut. Slut-shaming is disastrous. I don’t know why men hope to have sex by slut-shaming women.

Claudius: Now, if she does fuck you, and you later ignore her, she will get offended, hurt, and then pull away for good. If a non-slut or a trying-to-reform slut fucks you, and you leave her, she wants to validate her thinking and believe  she hasn’t been duped by a player. Hence the annoying calls and clinginess. Now, the smarter the girl, the less annoying she’ll be because she’s aware men don’t like this.

If she has gotten to the point where she is calling you all the time and not the other way around, she’s hooked. I hate to say it but you need to get to the point where you don’t call her that much. You need to get to the point where she asks, “Why don’t you call me?” in her plaintive voice and then sadly calls you a male chauvinist pig.

It sounds insane but women actually want you to ignore them and not call them and be a bit of a bastard in that sense. Perhaps it gives off an abundance mentality. All I know is you calling her day and night as a devoted madly in love man might do probably doesn’t work. She might even leave you! You’re being too nice!

And then when she calls all the time, every now and then insult her and call her a “cling-on” or a “remora” (it’s a fish; look it up). She will get insulted and hurt but then she will back off. Once again you are being a dick, but bizarrely, she actually wants you to be a dick. She wants you to tell her she’s being too clingy and then feel sad afterwards.

Women are crazy. In some ways, they sort of want you to mistreat them somewhat. Not mistreat them a lot or too much, just enough. Perhaps it shows her you are a badass Alpha bastard and not a clingy little Beta bitch. I have no idea. Female psychology is opaque on the best of days. At worst, any roadmap you try to her psyche fails and you are stranded with your hands in the air frustrated at her unfathomable behavior.

I have learned that there is actually a method to women’s madness. People think that people do things for no reason. I used to think this. Actually almost everything people do is for a reason. Put that idea into your head and walk around and see how the world lights up for you now. They might do things for bad reasons, yes. If they’re crazy, they seem to do senseless things. But even crazy people are usually doing their crazy stuff for a reason. It’s just that they’re doing it for a crazy reason, that’s all!

Women aren’t actually insane, even if they seem to be so. The average “crazy” woman often has no diagnosable DSM disorder, so she’s not mentally ill or crazy. And most women’s craziness is not even abnormal! It’s simply completely normal for women to be a little nutty like this. They are wired up this way. Perhaps if we men had that infernal hormonal stew boiling in our bodies, we might act pretty nutty too.

I have heard of MtF transsexuals, some of them hard stoics, who turned into complete basket cases on female hormones. They were emotionally out of control most of the  time, had crying jags for no reason, and felt nonfunctional.

Considering that this is probably what’s going on in most women’s minds, I think women do a commendable job of keeping their shit together most of the time. Apparently they have learned to navigate this emotional hurricane and probably even control it most of the time.

The only reason they do this is because society and especially we men demand that they do. Where women are told that it is unladylike, dirty, slutty, or acting like “a woman of the streets” to be a basket case, women are quite stable. My Mom’s generation and class was very stable. Society simply demanded that they be this way. In return, their husbands were quite kind to them and supported them. It was a deal. You act sane and turn off your hurricane in your head and I support you, love you, and treat you well. Plus you get some self-respect for keeping your shit together.

Claudius: This has happened to me all the time. I screw girl once or twice. Then don’t talk to her for over a month because I really don’t give a fuck, and then crickets. There’s some maintenance work that has to be done in any relationship with a woman, even if all you want is a fuck buddy. Why? Because non-hooker women don’t have fuck buddies, only men do.

This is perfect. I’ve been meaning to say this for a long time. I don’t think women can really have sex without love. My Mom says they can’t or at least it’s very hard to. These new generations of women think they can act like men and do this, but they seem to be fooling themselves. I know a woman in her 30’s who’s had sex without love her whole life. She’s now over 100 men. She told me the other day that she’s never enjoyed sex one time. Masturbation is more fun. Why? Because for women, sex without love is often unfulfilling.

I believe that women may be able to handle a FWB thing for 2-3 months. Most sources say that after that, she’s simply going to start falling in love with you. Sugar daddies warn other men not to get too close to their sugar babies because they often fall in love with you when you do so.

And in my life, I’ve been shocked at how many times women I am dating seem to be falling in love with me. I think women fall in love all the time, but it ranges from falling a bit in love to falling crazy in love. “Love” as a word has no definition anyway.

I thought I must be some Alpha, but maybe it’s down to my purported good looks. Maybe women have a hard time fucking Chad without falling at least a bit in love. In fact, I have had women who had short relationships and broke it off with me apparently to keep from falling in love with me. I think this is what a lot of women’s one night stands are all about.

On the other hand, maybe it’s not down to looks, and it’s just a female tendency with most any man.

Claudius: If a woman fucks you more than once, she’s trying to marry you even if he’s not consciously aware of it. Hookers and one-night-stand girls have high sex drives. Don’t go looking for a wife there.

Yes. I am amazed at how quickly women fall in love with me. Often within a week or two of talking or even a day or even 15 minutes (!), they are asking me to come stay with them or move in with them.

So yes, a lot of women do act like they want to marry me in a sense. That’s what a woman in love looks and talks like. She acts like she wants to marry you. She usually wants to move in or for you to move in with her. I have no idea why they do this “I want to marry you” thing so quickly with me. It may be down supposed handsome looks once again. Maybe a lot of women want to marry Chad. That’s the idea, right? Prince in shining armor. The theme of most romance novels. I don’t know if women fall in love this fast with average or unattractive men.

Claudius: But the average chick has to go through a long self-brainwashing process to be willing to jump in the sack with a man.

Like Robert said in an earlier post, even if they want to fuck you, it doesn’t mean they will. They have to submit a 300-page long document to their Internal Statue Bureaucracy in their minds and get a dozen stamps of approval before those panties come off. Hence the need for men to ignore all soft “No”s from a woman. That’s just some low-level bureaucrat in her mind trying to disqualify you.

Well, of course, but we men also don’t understand. Don’t you men realize that women like to fantasize too, just like men? A woman might meet 10,000 guys who turn her on like Hell in a lifetime. Her horny brain probably fantasizes about having sex with them or at least wonders what it would be like. Now how many women fuck 10,000 men in a lifetime? And even if she thinks you’re hot as Hell, she might not want to have sex. I have had young women recently gushing over how handsome I am. Did they want to have sex? Not really. Or only for money. Money or dope. They were basically whores and meth addicts.

I learned long ago while still a teenager that the trick of getting women into bed is to shut off that damned brain of hers. The bureaucracy above is the Hamster Wheel. And boy, that does wheel spin and spin when a woman is thinking whether or not to have sex with a new person. Once you shut off her brain, she will go into purely emotional mode, and her body will probably get horny as Hell and tell her to have sex. With her brain shut off, she’s more likely to have sex. The more she thinks about it, the less likely she is to do it.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

PUA/Game: Don’t Be a Pussy Beggar – Instead Act Like You Could Care Less Whether You Have Sex with Her or Not

Claudius: I’ll tell you who, conservatives who have always viewed thinking and intellectualism with suspicion and beta males begging women for sex.

Otherwise known as “pussy beggars.” I really need to write about this. I don’t act like this at all. I act like I could care less if I fuck this woman or not! This is the mindset:

I don’t even care if you fuck me or not! I don’t care if I get laid!

A lot of times I leave it up to them. I just say:

You’re the woman. You’re in charge here. You’re running the show. We do what you want.

And I shrug my shoulders. I think they are intrigued by that. Women are probably tired of fending off desperate pussy-begging horny guys all day and night. They’re probably thinking:

Here’s this goodlooking guy, and he literally doesn’t even care if he fucks me or not! What a relief to be free of aggressive, desperate, creepy guys over-escalating on me all the time. I’m in charge of the sex? Wow. I think I like that. Gives me a feeling of agency. I feel powerful!

It’s probably true that women appreciate some agency in the sexual realm. Mostly they are fighting off aggressors or caving in to them. Whether they have sex or not seems more due to the man’s beliefs than the woman’s. Women are way hornier than anybody thinks. But maybe that is my perspective from a gifted  point of view (see below). Women don’t feel in charge much of their lives. I think women like to feel like they are in charge and like the idea of them deciding whether or not to have sex. The weird thing is you would be surprised at how many times when you leave it up to them, women decide they want to have sex!

What’s weird is how many times they agree to have sex with me when I act like IDGAF. It’s amazing. Perhaps it is an abundance mentality. I will tell you what women really hate is a guy overeager to get laid. Otherwise known as acting desperate. And escalating too fast is part of this.

The weird thing I just sit back and don’t say much of anything except throw out some “lures” or “baits” that are not even all that sexual. Tell her how beautiful she looks. Tell her what a great body she has. Very light low level flirtation. I call it “opening the door” and “leaving the door open.”Also don’t slut-shame at all. It doesn’t work. You want to encourage her to be horny, not discourage it.

If the door is open she is free to get sexual with little guilt. You are not slut-shaming her, you are accepting of her sexuality no matter how slutty it is, and she feels a sense of relief that she can be her ravenously horny self without feeling guilty about it.

What I find endlessly is that women get annoyed and impatient with me, and it’s usually them who starts escalating, typically by talking about sex. I’ve literally had some say to me:

Are you going to kiss me or what!?

and

Are you going to fuck me or what!?

I don’t start the sex talk. I sit back and let them start it! And it works! Then once she gets going I get dirty, but I often start off a bit slow. But I quickly up the pace and soon I am talking to them very aggressively using degrading language:

You like that you horny fucking bitch?

I say it very aggressive in what could be seen as a scary tone with an tone that is escalating in aggressiveness towards the end of the  sentence. The weird thing is they usually respond to this degrading talk by getting insanely horny.

When I have women over, I act like I could care less whether I have sex or not. I say,

Well, there’s a bed in a bedroom and a pull-out couch in the living room. You can sleep wherever you want. Your decision. It’s up to you.

What I don’t tell them is that the bed in the bedroom is my bed! LOL. And they usually end up saying that they want to sleep with me, but sometimes they say it in “shy” terms.

Well, I will take the pullout couch, but I think I might want you to come visit me in the night.

That’s an anti-slut defense but no matter, I’m still getting laid! If they say they are sleeping on the couch and don’t say anything else, I laugh in their faces and tell them:

They all say that. I bet you’re going to come knocking on my door at night. They usually do and you won’t be any different.

Then I go off to sleep in my room and say good night. Guess what happens? A majority of the time, a knock comes at my door, and the woman, often shyly, invites herself in. It works!

Incidentally, I laugh in women’s faces all the time. I don’t know why but I am an arrogant shit, so maybe that has something to do with it. Plus I am sort of an asshole. The weird thing is that when I laugh right in their faces and basically make fun of them (I’m humiliating them, by the way), it seems like they often like it! They like it when I act like a bit of arrogant dick and a bit of an asshole.

No idea why that is but PUA’s have been saying from time immemorial that women like assholes, so maybe it has something to do with that. But why like assholes? Why hate nice guys? Does it go back to caveman days? I’ve got some theories on that, but I’m not sure.

On the other hand, I was said to get very handsome when younger, and supposedly I still look great now, so maybe this is a luxury for goodlooking men. Perhaps when men who are less attractive sit back and wait for the woman to go first, she never does.

See, my PUA is all based on my experiences. And that’s of a purportedly handsome man. But just because it worked for some goodlooking guy, is it really going to work for guys with average looks (which is perfectly normal; handsome men being outliers) or unattractive men (possibly outliers too as the norm may be average looks)? I have no idea! I haven’t the faintest idea whether this stuff works well for handsome and average men, or for handsome, average, and unattractive men, or just for goodlooking guys.

I can’t see what other people’s lives are like. Might be nice to get some feedback on that.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Your Personal Views on Race, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, Etc. Do Not Necessarily Have Anything to Do with Your Politics

People compared me to this guy for years. He may have started out on the Left but like all such types, he drifted Right after a while. He’s now come out as a full-blown Libertarian. So he’s gone completely rightwing and his cultural views match up with his economic and cultural views, as they do in almost everyone in this retard country.

Sometimes I think I’m the only person in this damned country who is conservative on culture but liberal on economics and everything else. I’m on Reddit all the time, and I see people making political opinions all the time, and I’ve never seen one person like me. Ever. Sure Alt Left/Realist Left types line up with me, but where are they? They must be quite rare.

This is so sad.

If you are leftwing on culture, you generally but not always are leftwing on economics. There are a few odd Libertarians who are very leftwing on culture but rightwing on economics, but they are not common. Anyway they are basically conservatives. They despise the Left and liberals and always vote rightwing or Republican, no exceptions. So their left cultural views do not put them on the Left.

If you are rightwing on culture, you are always and automatically rightwing on economics and everything else in all cases.  The few that are not are Nazbols, Strasserites, and Third Positionists, and I am seriously turned off by all of those Right/Left mixed movements. Even if they are left on economics and everything else, if they have rightwing cultural views, they vote rightwing. Always. No exceptions. They all vote Republican.

I guess economics is just not all that important. It seems utterly asinine but apparently when the vast majority of Moronicans go into the voting booth, they vote on culture, not economics.

If they’re right on culture, they vote Republican.

If they’re Left on culture, they vote Democrat.

I can’t believe how dumb this is. Really? Really? Culture is really the most important thing in your silly little life? Oh you silly person. Mr. Marx would like a talk with you.

Culture is nothing, it’s crap, it’s bullshit. Ultimately it’s not even a politics. It’s more a matter of personal preference or even personality.

A White liberal Democratic man who votes straight Dem (preferably liberal), never votes Republican, supports (preferably liberal) Democratic candidates, and even contributes to (preferably liberal) Democratic campaigns and candidates is simply a liberal Democrat.

Period. That’s his politics. Your politics is who you vote for at the end of the day.  It’s how you devote your time politically by writing, contributing or working for candidates and causes.

Your goddamned personal views about culture don’t mean a hill of beans to anyone but you, your conscience, your pastor, and your God. They don’t necessarily have anything to do with your politics at all.

These are your personal views about social matters.

Now suppose the White liberal Democrat quoted above has some racist views, which, trust me, many liberal Democrats do. In particular they are racist in the SJW sense where every other particle on the universe is apparently racist or evidence of racism.

Hell, he could even be worse than that! I know a Centrist Democrat who is pretty damned racist. He routinely refers to most all Blacks as niggers and has a very low opinion of them,  He also dislikes Hispanics or Mexicans as he calls them. I’m not sure how he feels about Asians. He’s very pro-White, supports White Supremacist views and defends them.

Although if you Black folks met him, I’m sure he would be perfectly nice to you. Furthermore he is a brutally partisan Democrat who despises Republicans and votes straight Democrat. He often supports pro-Black political projects so as you can see, his personal racism doesn’t even extend to his political racism. This is the case with a lot of these people. The personal is not necessarily the political at all. That’s one fat lie.It’s an intellectual racism, not a personal one.

Our commenter from New York recently noted that most of the liberal Democrats in his building harbored out and out racist views, certainly in the SJW sense, mostly aversive racism, but still. This stuff is probably a lot more common than we think.

However it’s perfectly acceptable in the Democratic Party to be racist against Whites.

This White male Democrat may have some sexist views against women. He may even be a misogynist, especially in the insane feminist sense where any sane person can hardly help but not be a misogynist, especially if you believe in facts and truth. I know Centrist Democrats who are out and out misogynists and openly admit to being so. They also say that most men are misogynists. I’m not sure if he’s right or not. He has a girlfriend and he acts like a teddy bear around her, so this is an intellectual sexism or misogyny, not a personal one.

This same White liberal Democratic man have homophobic views. I know people who wouldn’t vote Republican if you paid them who definitely have what are considered to be homophobic views nowadays, which frankly is about half of life according to SJW’s. I know a liberal Democrat who quite regularly refers to gay men as fags and lesbians as dykes. I don’t think he hates them. He’s just a normal heterosexual man.

Most if not all straight men have a dim view of male homosexuality and most are literally homophobic in the sense of being completely phobic about the whole subject. What the Hell do you think keeps straight men from putting a cock in their mouth? It’s their homophobia, dammit. If not for that they’d probably do it. After all most men will fuck anything if you let them.

The degree of revulsion that straight men feel towards male homosexuality is off the charts. A recent study found that straight men showed more disgust towards photos of gay sex than towards actual maggots. Maggots. Gay sex is more disgusting than maggots. Think about that.

What I am saying is that the White liberal Democrat man italicized above is absolutely a liberal Democrat. After all, that’s his politics. Contrary to SJW clowns, your politics does not encompass every second of your life, especially your personal life. A lot of people live lives that are completely outside of politics. They may not even vote. If they don’t vote their politics are irrelevant. Who cares what they think about anything! It’s literally not important!

If this White liberal Democratic man has racist, sexist, misogynist, or homophobic views, that certainly doesn’t make him a conservative for God’s sake. He goes into the voting booth and votes straight Dem for Chrissake! Those are his personal, completely nonpolitical views. Now you may say that him having those views makes him a bad person. Perhaps it does. Maybe it doesn’t. It’s a matter of opinion. But even if he’s a bad person, he’s still a liberal Democrat, dammit. A lot of liberal Democrats are awful people. They’re human after all.

One might also see this as being instead of personal views as personality flaws. You might argue that a racist, sexist, misogynist, or homophobic person has a personality problem. They’ve got a lousy personality, a personality defect. Like being a bad person but not the same thing. They’re not healthy. They’re too full of hate to be healthy. Perhaps they don’t have a personality defect. Perhaps they’re not unhealthy. It’s a matter of opinion.

Your personality type or health or your personal views, moral or immoral, are not necessarily evidence that you are a liberal or conservative. The only way we can figure that out is by how you vote, etc. or which political candidates you support.

You support Democrats, you’re a liberal whether you pull the lever or not.

You support Republicans, you’re a conservative whether you vote or not.

Generally speaking your views on culture are your own views whether they are bigoted or not. They are only political if you politicize them by say voting for, contributing to and working for bigoted candidates. These would probably all be Republicans. If you vote like that, you’re a conservative.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: Women Deal with Loneliness and Lack of Sex Better Than Men

Women can definitely deal with loneliness and lack of sex better than men can, and it’s all down to that unfathomable entity known as the female sex drive.

The thing is that while women have an extremely strong sex drive in a sense (provided someone turned it on in the first place – preferably Chad!), it differs from the male in that women can simply take sex or leave it if so desired. We are now starting to see some women say:

Damn, I need some cock!

You didn’t hear that so much in the past, but I had 18 year old girls telling me things along those lines back in 1975:

Damn I am getting so horny these days, I swear I’m going to have to shove a bottle up there.

But she had a very strong sex drive in addition to being an extreme slut, bless her whorish heart.

In men, sex is quite different. It’s like an itch that you can’t scratch when you do without it. Sure, we can always jerk off to deal with the physical problem, but that’s often not satisfactory, and it’s hard to do if you live with other people. Furthermore, masturbation doesn’t take care of the urge.

Of course, in the Current Year, women also masturbate like crazy, while it seems they didn’t so much back in the day – we have created a society of female masturbating maniacs! God bless my depraved generation!

They masturbate but they need sex too, just like men. I had a female best friend who used to tell me things like:

Damn, I am so horny these days, I’m just going to have to grab some guy and rape him!

And she masturbated all the time. I would be texting her and she would say:

Excuse me, I’m going to go masturbate.

Can you imagine a woman saying such a thing?!

She’d come back in 45 minutes and say:

Damn, that was good!

On a sex subreddit called Stupid Sluts Club (highly recommended!) a young woman described how she was horny as Hell. She was masturbating all the time, but that wasn’t cutting it, so she started having sex with her female roommate, though she was basically straight.

And while things are changing somewhat, women are sadly not turning into men. Women can still take sex or leave it without a lot of pain or damage.

The sex drive is not so much physical in men, though the physical aspect is undeniable. For instance, a young man who does not ejaculate for a few days starts to experience actual pain in his testicles (blue balls).

Women don’t seem to experience such a thing, though there have been reports of women feeling some sort of a “female blue balls” in their abdomen above the pubic area if they go without orgasm for too long.

But at least back in the day, many women were non-orgasmic or rarely orgasmic. Back then it was ~30% of women. I’d say it’s a lot less now, but there are probably still non-orgasmic women. That 30% of women at any time can be unable to reach orgasm while remaining that way for years on end implies that female blue balls is probably not a serious problem.

Almost no males are non-orgasmic. There’s virtually no such thing.

Much more important than the physical aspect of sex is the psychological one. A man without sex has a huge hole in his life psychologically and perhaps even more importantly socially. The longer it goes on, the more they deteriorate. We see the logical result of this in the incel phenomenon. The incels are not evil like the cucks and soyboys say. Incel behavior is simply the natural and normal consequence of what happens to large groups of men who are denied sex over a long period.

Many become depressed and withdrawn, quite a few become very angry in a seething sort of way, and a few of those become explosively violent, often resulting in serious massacres. To show it is not a unique Western problem, long-term incel Chinese men have been going on murderous rampages for a long time now, even massacring large numbers of kindergartners!

So, tl/dr: Women love sex but ultimately a lot can take it or leave it. Men have a much more insistent sex drive and cannot take or leave sex. They have to have it and if they don’t, serious psychopathology results.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: Just Because She’s Turned on by You Doesn’t Necessarily Mean She Wants to Have Sex with You

I get shut down pretty much all the time nowadays, especially by young women. I just got shut down a couple of times in the supermarket this evening. They don’t say no. Instead it’s nonverbal. I call it The Wall. It seems like I get the Wall all day every day sometimes. It’s really discouraging. The Wall is completely nonverbal and it says, “I am not interested in you that way, ok?” You can get a lot of different walls but they all mean the same thing.

There are places I go every day where some of the women are such cunts that they won’t even respond if I say hello and say their name. On the other hand, there are others who are pretty friendly, sometimes real friendly. But they’re all really young and I am 40 years older than they are, so I need a big green light to move on an age gap like that.

One acts flirtatious. She starts acting a lot more feminine when I start talking to her. That means either that she likes you or more probably that she’s attracted to you or turned on by you. But she is giving me The Wall as far as getting to know her in “that way.” And as I just learned the other day, at age 20, she already lives with her boyfriend.

I am sure that I turn on a fair number of women who nevertheless still don’t want to get involved with me, in this case due to age.

There was a woman in the bank who always gave me blank stares, the obvious blank stares you get from women who are turned on by you. I would come up to her window, and she would get pretty cold. I couldn’t make sense of it for the longest time. I finally decided she was fantasizing. I was 55 and she was 20 after all. She thought I looked good and she liked to look at me, but that’s as far as she wanted to take it.

It took me a while to figure out that she was just looking. I got that look in a few different ways from other young women too. Some of them actually thrust their bodies forward when they first interacted with me, obviously an involuntary purely physical turn-on. But then they would catch themselves a second or two later and correct it.

Think about it. A woman sees, what? Tens of thousands of hot men in her life. She’s going to fuck all of them? Women would fuck 100,000 men in a lifetime.

I met a 39 year old woman the other night. Literally picked her up in a corner market. I have no idea how the Hell I even did that. Got her in my car and drove to my place. Halfway there, she looks at me and says, “You know what? You’re fuckin HOT!” Well, that felt nice. I think I might have said, “Ok, let’s fuck then.” Then I got a Wall.

I got her to my place. A lot more flirtation.

I got her partly naked at different times because I’m often able to get women naked if I can at least get them in the door. I often use the “Don’t you think you need a shower?” ruse. I can’t believe how many women fall for that one or maybe they want to fall for it,if you catch my drift because it gives them an excuse: “I’m not getting naked in this guy’s house because I’m a slut. I’m getting naked in this man’s house because I need a shower!” But even then, they don’t necessarily want to fuck.

I even jump in the shower with them sometimes. I’m not sure how I do that either. They often protest in a meek way, but I just bulldoze in. They have to get  visibly angry to shut me down, otherwise “no means maybe” as far as I’m concerned.

I grabbed at her when she got part naked and she batted me away. “That’s going to cost you.” She was basically charging. Money or dope. So she was a whore.

But that’s not that unusual. An incredible number of women engage in “transactional sex.” It’s ubiquitous.

I had a naked woman wandering around my place for two hours a while back. I kept grabbing her. I figured if you don’t want me grabbing you, put some clothes on, baby! She batted me away for a couple of hours. So you can even have naked women wandering around your apartment for hours and refusing to fuck. Which is her right. But I’m also going to keep grabbing at her.

She can tell you flat to your face that you’re the hottest man alive, and she still might not want to fuck. See above. Just because you turn a woman on, doesn’t necessarily means she wants to have sex with you!

I finally figured out that sex is a pretty big deal for women, especially casual sex. So many things could go wrong and it is dangerous. Women only have a few sex partners in life. The GSS reports that the average American woman has three partners in her life. Sex is a heavy-duty decision for a woman, and it’s not taken lightly.

Unfortunately, I have to respect that. I’m no rapist.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: Some Very Creepy Truths about Adult-Minor Sex

I work in mental health and I specialize in people who have issues around thoughts about sex with children, etc. I’m an expert and I have people coming to me from all over the world.

First of all, no one is going to believe the facts I state are true. Trust me though: I’m right. All studies were done in the lab and have been repeatedly replicated. In fact, they’ve been replicated so many times that it seems stupid to do them again except morons keep demanding it. I guess we’ll be replicating them until the end of time then.

  1. Men are attracted to teenage girls. 100% of straight men react at very high levels, typically maximum, to females 13+. That should not be surprising to any sane person, except that in our Feminist Clown World, those men would be called pedophiles. We can call them any name we want, but we now have to call all straight men pedophiles. Are we comfortable with that?
  2. So much worse than that is the fact is that not only are straight men turned on by teenage girls who look like women, which is not surprising, but that 90-100% of straight men are even turned on by little girls under 13. More on that below.
  3. Yep, that’s right. Straight men are even turned on by little girls under 13. In general, most straight men are attracted to them at a fairly low level, less than they are to mature females, but a measurable attraction is definitely there.
  4. So much, much worse than that even is that 23% (in three studies – 21%, 23%, and 26%) of straight men test “pedophilic.” That means that 1/4 of straight men are pedophiles by our typical understanding of the term, which probably even includes DSM-5 Pedophilia, a garbage diagnosis if there ever was one. What this means is that 23% of all straight men are as attracted or more attracted to little girls under 13 as they are to mature females 13+. Crazy statistic, huh? The question arises why these men don’t run around molesting little girls. Penalties are very harsh if you get caught doing this, and almost all these men have very strong attractions to mature females, so I assume they focus on the prosocial urge and suppress or repress the antisocial pedophilic feelings. In the Current Year, tens of millions of Americans say they want to kill all the pedophiles. Well, that’s just fine. Are they prepared to execute 1/4 of the men in the US, or 25 million men? Let me know when they get those gas chambers running.
  5. Not sure if this is shocking, but .1-1% of straight men are actual, true pedophiles. They are strongly attracted to girl children and have little or no attraction to mature females, which is the only definition of pedophilia that makes sense. Nevertheless, this means there are 110,000-1.1 million full blown, real deal, scary pedophiles in the US. Once again, we say we are going to execute them. Fine. We are going to execute 100,000-1 million American men? Let me know how that goes.
Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: The 80/20 Rule: Anything to It?

There is a rule among Black Pillers called the 80-20 rule. Briefly, that 80% of the women are chasing the top 20% of the men. In the hard version of the rule, 20% of the men are having sex with 80% of the women.

There does seem to be something to the 80/20 rule. Let me say that I actually don’t mind the 80/20 rule because it has worked to my benefit all through my life.

First of all, the 80/20o rule, like most things in our social lives, is nothing new. It’s always been this way. When I was in high school, I decided that 10% of the guys were having sex with 90% of the girls. I didn’t do a study to confirm that. That was just my intuitive (female thinking) observation. Once again, it wasn’t true in the hard sense but it did seem to be true in some soft sense.

Later, on dating sites, studies repeatedly found that 80% of the women were chasing 20% of the men, whereas men were much less discriminate, with 100% of the men chasing 100% of the men. Typically men seemed to be chasing their looksmatches. However, 20% of the women were chasing the remaining 80% of the men. This means that women from 3-10 scale were all chasing 9-10 scale men and women from 1-2 on the scale were chasing the men from 1-8.

These studies also showed that women only found 20% of men attractive. The women in these studies said 80% of men were unattractive. Hypergamy, in other words.

I read an STD study done in a ghetto Black community. There they found that 80% of the women coming to the clinic had been infected by only 20% of the men. Most of the women were sleeping with only a small number of men, and that’s where all the STD’s were coming from. Even there, the women were monopolizing the best men.

As with the Sapir-Whorf theory, obviously there’s a lot of evidence against a hard 80-20 rule theory. On an incel site, an incel said that all of the men he knew were married. They were all 4-6 scale average looks men. I assume they got their looksmatches. So it’s not as if everyone but the Chads is screwed.

Once again pace Sapir-Whorf, a soft 80-20 rule theory makes a lot of sense if you plug it in as one more way, among so many others, to try to make sense of the Sexual Marketplace. In other words, in some odd, vague way, there is some certain degree of truth to the 80-20 rule at some level in Sexual Marketplace Theory. This theory is useful as a tool in conjunction with many other theories. If you plug them all in at once, the Sexual Marketplace will start making a lot more sense.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: Nice Guy Problems with Women, with an Aside about Nice Guy Chad

I was certainly raised to be a nice guy. My Dad was in on this crap. They both taught us that happy couples never fight, which is the biggest lie on Earth. Anyway, women love fighting in relationships and they will often deliberately start fights with their men for absolutely no good reason at all other than “to test them,” which is moronic, or simply because they want to liven or spice things up, which is even dumber than that.

What does a woman want (paraphrasing Freud)? First of all, no one knows, least of all women themselves, who are remarkably self-blinded creatures. The woman at best is ultimately unfathomable, though we are starting to get some interesting reports from MTF transsexuals or transwomen who have been both men and women hormonally and hence can report from both sides of the war.

But still, the nature of the woman remains fiendishly complex for whatever reason.

Just as the nature of the man is to be rather stupidly simple. I mean give a man a six-pack, a couch, and a football game, and he’s good for the night, right?

Sure, but there are so simple formulas to satisfy to convoluted object known as the woman.

But a good analysis is: The woman lives for love. Another good analysis (somewhat similar) is: The woman lives for “peak emotional experiences.”

That sounds great in theory even if its terrifying to us stoic men. The problem is that those peak emotional experiences can include negative emotions. Exhilarating negative emotions such as wild fights are after all among the most emotionally peak experiences out there.

My mother and father often said, “Do you ever see us fighting?” Well, not really, but after age 9, they fought a lot, although of course they always lied and denied it. Anyway from this bullshit lie, I was taught that if you have a good relationship with a woman, you will never really fight. Every time a woman got angry at me, I felt it was my fault and I had failed as a man somehow. Consequently, I never really fought back. I just sat there and took it like a huge pussy.

I started fighting back against women ~10 years ago, and since then, I’ve had some of the wildest, most passionate love affairs of my life. So apparently it works to stand up to women and fight back against their shit. But men don’t want to fight back because most men are pussywhipped, that is, they are afraid that if they fight their woman, she will cut off the pussy supply. Pussy’s as good as oxygen for the male psyche or emotional body if not the actual physical body, in which its effects are more trivial than anybody realizes.

It’s generally agreed that being a nice guy, like a million other things, gets in the way of getting laid. Sure, nice guys can get laid and most eventually marry if only to beta bux, but being nice is a detraction when it comes to attracting women.

The exception, of course, is Chad, as Chad tends to be the exception to all of the rules of the Sexual Marketplace. Anytime you hear someone say, “Oh, don’t do that. That’s deadly when it comes to getting laid. Women hate that thing like no other!” you always have to put an asterisk by that statement that says “with the exception of Chad.” Chad breaks all the rules because Looks trumps all for women. And that’s the essence of Black Pill right there.

Nice Guy Chad still gets laid of course. I always did, if not sooner then later. Lots of women don’t care if Chad is a nice guy. Catfishing experiments made their Chads into huge pussies, and they still got bombarded by women. Nevertheless, Nice Guy Chad still suffers from the usual nice guy problems with women. One exception though is that even in the midst of these typical nice guy issues which probably see a lot of men cut off from sex after being labeled huge pussies, women keep fucking Nice Guy Chad like a human dildo machine even after they call him a pussy to his face, scream at him that he’s a faggot, etc.

It’s all down to that damned pretty face. That trumps all else, at least temporarily. I would say that the pretty face is a necessary and sufficient attribute to get laid, but it’s not good enough to sustain a relationship. Chad’s pretty face is like a drug. After a while the high wears off, and this is where you need other things – personality, money, faithfulness, love attachment, Red Pill,  masculinity – whatever. So Nice Guy Chad gets his brains fucked out for a while and is then unceremoniously and often cruelly dumped. In other words, story of my life, boyos.

The good thing about being Nice Guy Chad though is that a new woman will always come along. If not tomorrow than definitely at some point in the future. Which is more than the incels look forward to.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20