Game/PUA: There Are Definitely Advantages to Having a Big Cock

SHI: Anyway, there’s no shame in admitting to a smaller dick. A beautiful Russian hooker once told me:

“It’s not your sword size that matter. It’s how you use it matter!”

Agree with that, Robert, LOL?

I have no idea the size of SHI’s wiener, no do I with to know. But I will add that the quoted section is what a lot of women say. On the other hand, pay attention to what women do, not what they say. And on this score, I am afraid that dick size is more important than people think.

I met a 23 year old woman recently who wanted to have an affair with me and cheat on her husband. One of her complaints was that his cock was small.

And I met a totally hot 20 year old Chinese woman recently who wanted me to “fuck a baby into her”, believe it or not. She had had two Chinese boyfriends before, and she said they both had small cocks.

I talked to a Russian woman in Russia who had an American guy come over there and stay with her for a few weeks. One of her complaints about not wanting to marry him, in addition to the perennial women’s complaint, “He didn’t listen!” was that his cock was small.

This woman and I were sending each other pics. I asked if she wanted to see with clothes or without clothes. I always ask this question very politely, and never get any bad feedback. Sending unsolicited dick pics is something almost all women really hate, and men do it all the time. It’s absolutely atrocious Game to do that.

Anyway, she said both. But she hadn’t understood the question because her English was shaky. I sent her some nudes and some cock pics. At first she was totally freaked out and asked why I did that, and I explained that she had agreed to let me send nudes, possibly because she didn’t understand my English.

She calmed down and then started repeating how big my cock was in apparent awe and definite excitement. Then started going on and on reiterating how she wanted a big cock, repeating it emphatically with exclamation points like a parrot: “I want a big cock! I want a big cock!”She was like a broken record.

I have met some women online who wanted to get together with me. They wanted cock pics before the first date, but also one of the things they asked was, “How big is your cock?”

For any of you perverts reading this, I’m 7 inches, or maybe 6 3/4. Average American man’s cock size is 5.6 inches. And yeah, a lot of women do like big cocks. A number of women were quite happy to see mine for the first time, and made remarks to that effect.

Even a Black woman once said, “You know, you’re pretty big!” with a bit of trepidation in her voice. A Black woman being taken aback by the size of a White man’s cock. That’s one of the best compliments I’ve ever received ha ha.

Men with Tiny Penises Are Often Not Happy Campers

Polar Bear: A lot of men take pride in their junk. Our joystick brings us so much joy. I’ve brought it up with guys at work, and they were proud of the way their dicks worded.

Have you ever talked to a man with a tiny dick, like a micropenis or something of that nature?

I knew a woman who had sex with a guy with a micropenis.

And I was doing free counseling for a while with a gay man who had a micropenis. He was also an absolute, 100% pedophile. He had never offended though and he was a very good person.

He was so worried that he might offend and “hurt a kid,” as he put it, that he was threatening to cut his dick off. The whole therapy of the guy was to keep him from cutting his cock off. That’s how good of a person he was. He was literally going to chop his dick off to protect kids from the possibility that he might molest them.

He did use child porn of some sort though, and that was why he was terrified of going to an actual clinician. He thought he was going to get turned in. I didn’t turn him in for possessing child porn. I’m not a cop.

His tiny dick was just one of the things he was depressed about. Men with tiny dicks are often not happy campers.

I believe eventually he went on some sort of sex-drive killing drugs, once again to protect kids from his possible actions.

The Made-Up Problems of Male Circumcision

Polar Bear: We’ll never know if we’d of liked foreskin more or less. Famous pornstar Rocco regrets getting cut.

There are absolutely a whole lot of risk factors associated with keeping a foreskin. #1 is you have the ugliest dick around. Even if I was a fag, I would not have anything to do with an ugly dick like that. I’d say gimme Rocco’s dick any day ha ha.

How women tolerate those ugly foreskin dicks, I have no idea. I met this Jewish woman and started dating her. One of the first things she asked me after she asked me I was impotent (I was 48 years old when I met her, and it’s already starting up at that age) was if I was cut. I said Hell no and she said, “Good, I don’t like cownecks.” Ha ha, funny word.

You have to clean the damn thing all the time which is a PITA. This disgusting stuff called smegma accumulates under it which is grosser than gay porn. You have to keep cleaning that pond scum off your dick. Also, it sets you up for being at risk of different things: getting HIV from a woman, penile cancer, and other things.

It’s cut off for health reasons, and you never remember the cut.

Men who say there is “trauma” associated with memories of your dick getting cut at age zero are just victimfags (Great new word I just made up!). Great big pussies who love to whine about how they’ve been victimized their whole lives. Oh boo hoo! Poor babies! Man up, who dontcha?

The stink that antisemites and MRA’s make about circumcision is completely irrational. For antisemites it’s yet another perfect reason to hate Jews, which they want to do anyway. For MRA’s it’s just another notch on their victim belt. One wants to hate Jews for a dumb reason, and the other wants to be a victim for a dumb reason.

I’ve had a circumcised dick my whole life and it’s been awful damn sensitive the whole time. I don’t even think I’d want a more sensitive dick. It might turn alive, become a penile serpent, and try to crawl out of my pants. Can you imagine the embarrassment?

Color me unimpressed.

PUA/Game: Statistical and Behavioral Alphas, Betas, and Omegas

Polar Bear: Some PUA guys on Youtube were triggering my gaydar. Not that big of a deal. Even in the most ideal European societies, there will be flamers and hillbillies. Even in the strict Middle Eastern countries, there are gays, as you detailed.

Think about it. PUA’s devote their entire lives to getting laid, getting pussy, seducing women, dating and fucking women. That’s all they live for. Exactly how many gay men would such a lifestyle appeal to? About zero. Don’t you realize that a lot of straight men set off people’s gaydar. If I had a dollar for every straight man I’ve known who many people thought was gay, I’d be a rich man. You can’t go on behavior.

Polar Bear: Geez, wonder how Omegas fare in a wolf pack.

I suppose there is room for Omegas in a wolf pack, if they even have Omegas. Maybe they don’t. Maybe they just have the Alpha and his Beta followers.

Polar Bear: Wonder if married men are Beta. By the time they have kids many seem whipped. In The Departed, the Alpha married man, Alec Baldwin, says, “A wedding ring lets women know your cock still works.” The Alpha single man, Jack Nicholson, responds, “You get your period yet?”

Statistical Betas and behavioral Betas are not the same thing.

Behaviorally, yes, a lot of married men are behavioral Betas as you describe. Once they are pussywhipped, they are behavioral Betas all the way.

And most men period are statistical Betas. Probably 65% of all men are statistical Betas. Most men are neither statistical Alphas nor statistical Omegas. There’s nothing wrong with being a statistical Beta. Your father, mine, your brothers, mine, yours and my uncles and male cousins are mostly statistical Betas. They used to do all right, but the sexual contract is fraying.

I am thinking there can never be more than 20% statistical Alphas in a society. Think about it. Will you ever have a society where more than 20% of the men are slayers trying to break Wilt Chamberlain’s record. Everybody can’t be a winner. Life is like a footrace. There’s winners and last place losers and a lot in between.  Every straight man cannot be a super-stud. It doesn’t work that way. Maybe in the gay community they can, but women are not so easy

Now we are getting to the point among young men where 30% are statistical Omegas. I doubt if more than half of those are behavioral Omegas though. Most are just normal guys getting shut out by increasingly picky women in the age of female hypergamy. It’s supposed to be only 15%. So that’s weird. That’s what the whole incel and PUA phenomena are all about – dealing with that reality of female hypergamy.

On the other hand, you have societies such as Latin America, the Arab World, North Africa, Iran, Turkey, the Mediterranean, Eastern Europe, Russia, maybe Africa where most of the men are behavioral Alphas. Those societies are not ideal but have you noticed that sexually they seem pretty good for men?

Personally, I think that most men could probably benefit from behaving in a more Alpha manner. Some are already doing it, so they don’t need help, but for a lot of men, it should help them with women.

Do you all follow me on the difference between statistical and behavioral Alphas, Betas, and Omegas?

Game/PUA: Pure Androgyne Game

I think Mystery has some gay outfits. All the PUA guys out there, some gays slip in through the cracks. I seen one on ROTK say he passed as a woman when made up to game guys he knew. The ones of note are straight though.

That gay man is almost a transvestite or tranny if he can pass as a woman. Maybe a drag queen.

I guess there are some gay PUA’s out there. Never heard of one though. Really I have been around the PUA scene forever and it is insanely homophobic. I’ve never even seen one bisexual guy in that scene. It’s toxic masculinity and that type of masculinity has as one of its components heavy duty homophobia.

Mystery is just an androgyne, a pure androgyne. He’s totally straight. A lot of women will go for straight pure androgynes.

Pure androgyne = strong-very strong masculinity, and then, well, there is a feminine side layered on top of that.

So he could have some pretty strong masculine and feminine vibes going on at the same time.  People don’t know how to react to men like this because they are confusing. I have known guys like that and people would say:

Are you gay or bi or straight or what?

You don’t make sense!

You’re too sexy to be straight!

Running Pure Androgyne Game

Personally I think it’s hot. I used to try to be a pure androgyne because it just came naturally, and women ate me up like candy back then. It’s not a turnoff at all for a lot of women.

The important thing is to run that strong masculine vibe because otherwise you are just being a feminine man, which definitely has some drawbacks. Notice I said feminine, not effeminate.

A lot of straight men are feminine and it’s no big deal, but women might react badly to it. Basically they will try to dom feminine men. Push them around, bully them, henpeck them, bitch them out, make them pussywhipped. He’s not really domming her, so she’s going to dom him.

I am convinced that one party has to dom the other. Unless you want to be dommed by your woman, you need to dom her at least a little bit. You can do it in a kind and gentle way though. You don’t have to be a cruel bastard.

However, effeminate (acts like a woman) straight men are rare indeed. A recent study found that 70% of gay men were effeminate and only 3% of straight men were.

Feminine men do not act gay. They are just soft, have soft voices, are gentle, sensitive, often pretty, maybe thin, don’t work out, like to read, write, play music, cook, etc. Maybe really into clothes. A lot of them feel very close to women because their brain is sort of like a woman’s brain. This enables them to understand women pretty well and connect with women in a strong way.

PUA/Game: What Is PUA? What Is Game? Nothing More Than the Skills of Seduction and Running a Relationship or Marriage

My view of PUA/Game or especially Game is that Game is simply all of the things that any man does to make himself attractive to women, to talk to women, to flirt with women, to get dates with women, to get sex with women, and even to have relationships and marriages with women.

It’s about how to get women and then do what you want with them, dump them or try to keep them around. Relationship Game is huge. It’s about how to keep a relationship going.

Seduction Game is simply all of the things and techniques a man does to try to get women, from the way he dresses, grooms himself, social skills, how he carries himself, conversational skills, on and on. That’s all it is. Therefore I hazard a guess to say that really most men run some sort of Game if they are trying to get women at all. It’s not cheap or sleazy or anything like that.

Sure, a lot of PUA’s are assholes, but PUA is just Game really. It’s about how to get and keep women if you wish to do that. PUA is the skills of seduction. Can someone explain to me why so many men are opposed to the skills of seducing women? Is there something wrong with perfecting the skills of attracting and seducing women?

Really most men need to run some sort of Game or use some sort of PUA just to get a woman in the first place. I mean that’s how you get them. They don’t exactly throw themselves into our laps, you know.

There is also Married Man’s Game. All it is is how to keep your marriage on the up and up, how to run your marriage so you are getting what you want out of it and hopefully she is getting what she wants out of it.

Why people are so opposed to this is beyond me. Please stop seeing this whole thing through the lenses of PUA morons and start seeing PUA and Game as helping guys (and ourselves) to get women. Phrasing it that way, would you be opposed to it?

Polar Bear: Honestly don’t respect it. The guys on Youtube I’ve seen go beyond acting gay for women. I suspect many are secretly gay. It’s abandoning or disconnecting from women in a way. Bro this, my man that.

“Forget the girls, my PUA bois in the Jacuzzi right now!” That’s what I pick up on them, more excited to meet other men. Not accusing anyone here but I wonder if the path leads to another man’s anus.

Few if any PUA’s are gay. There’s no homosexuality in the scene. Instead there is frightening misogyny, toxic masculinity (I hate the term but it applies here), and extreme homophobia. It’s like the ultimate anti-gay macho community.

Polar Bear: It’s also cheesy and childish to brag how much puss you get. “I smashed the whole club dude.” Ok Sitch, you dumb motherfucker.

It depends how you do it. Most of the guys I grew up with were slayers, and they definitely discussed their success stories. There is a bragging way to do it and a modest way to do it which could be called false modesty.

If you do it in the modest or false modest way, no one seems to care, and a lot of people get animated and praise you. If you do or did well with women, act embarrassed or even ashamed of it. Shrug your shoulders and look at the ground like it’s nothing. Talk about it like you talk about drinking a glass of water. Don’t act like you are better than other men. If you do it like that, it generally works pretty well.

I grew up with huge studs, players, and slayers, so I am used to guys talking about getting pussy, and it doesn’t really bother me unless they are actually trying to act like they are better than I am, which is not common.

Polar Bear: Chads are the easiest men to get along with. They get enough lady attention and are not threatened by other males, so they don’t have to compensate by being a dick.

This is absolutely perfect. This has been my experience too. Exactly.

Well, some Chads are assholes and are threatened by other men, but the best ones are not. Their attitude is “Male competition? What male competition LOL?”

They’re not thinking about the other guys and competing with them. To these Chads, when they are in a room, the only people in the room are Chad and all of the attractive women in the room. No matter how many men are in the room, none of them are really there. Any unattractive women are not in the room either. Since the other men are not even there, there’s nothing to compete with.

There is a type of Alpha called a Sigma that is like this. He is a sort of antisocial or artsy type, maybe a drug dealer. Whereas a lot of Alphas care a lot about what others think, Sigmas don’t give a damn what anyone thinks of them. They are the ultimate outsiders and rebels and that is their appeal.

Not saying I am Chad (though apparently I am lookswise), but this is how I have operated for a long time. I walk into a room full of people, and the only people there are me and any attractive women. Any men in the room, no matter how many, are not even present. Unattractive women are not there either. And I sort of treat each of them like they aren’t there.

However, any slayers or players in the room might be present and it’s good if you can find one and then you can be “the two slayers in the room checking out the babes,” and you work together as a team. I never or rarely compete with or get jealous of other men because I arrogantly don’t even think of them as competition. It’s not that I am better than they are, it’s more like they are not even in the room. I’m not insecure or worried that the other men are better than I am.

But this is correct. A lot of the best Chads don’t compete with other men at all. Why the Hell should they?

Polar Bear: How many of the big PUA’s are Chads? Likely none.

All of the big PUA’s were Chads. All goodlooking to very goodlooking men and all slayers. Mystery supposedly fucked 500 women and I believe him.

Chad is just a goodlooking man. Any man who is a 7-10 on a 1-10 scale is Chad, so up to 30% of men might be Chad. Chad or Alphas are the guys who is attractive to many or most of the women much of the time.

Normies or Betas are simply men of 4-6 on a 1-10 looks scale. Average. You know, like most people. Betas are attractive to some of the women some of the time. High tier Normies are men who are 6’s, and some women do find them attractive. With good Game they can do ok.

Omegas or subhumans (ha ha) are men who are 1-3 on a 1-10 scale. These are men who are unattractive, homely, or ugly, pick your adjective. They are attractive to almost none of the women almost all the time. They can get a woman on their same level though.

Hot women, 7-10’s, are called Staceys or Stacey.  Average women 4-6 are called Beckys or Becky. Unattractive, homely, etc. women are called unpleasant names like hambeasts (homely), ha ha, or landwhales or fatties (fat), ha ha.

Polar Bear: A Chad doesn’t talk about women, they talk about him. “Yeah, he can take his pick of any of us or all three,” A grandmother says to her daughter and granddaughter. That’s the power of a natural born Chad.

This is true in a sense, but Chads do tend to talk about women. They just don’t tend to brag about them. They will definitely discuss their conquests of successes with women, but it’s not a continuous subject. It’s more something that casually comes up now and then. There’s no need to brag because Chads already think they are hot shit, so there’s nothing to prove to anyone and nothing to be insecure about.

Alpha, Beta, and Omega can be statistical, as in Alphas are 20% of men, Betas are 65% of men and Omegas are 15% of men. That’s just a typical statistical breakdown and says nothing about behavior. It refers to how attractive they are to women.

However, there is also Alpha, Beta, and Omega behavior. We all know what Alpha behavior is. There are societies where most of them engage is behavior that is quite Alpha. Beta behavior is less masculine, more submissive, nice guy bullshit, wimpy, meek, passive, etc. Omega behavior is total or near-total fail with women.

Game/PUA: A Bit about the Finer Points of Social Rules and Communication

SHI: How’s it going nowadays with your rotten little SJW fruitcakes, the ones with a major entitlement acquired after a lifetime of feminist brainwashing?

Oh, I am going to a new Fagbucks now and everything is pretty much all right.

If People Act Shitty, Act Shitty Right Back to Them

If they’re shitty to me, I’m kind of shitty right back to them. I am doing this in other places too. Sometimes I even get aggressive with people. Some people totally back down and kiss my ass when I get aggro with them. So weird. I’m usually scared to fight back against people because I am afraid of a scene or a ban, so I don’t do it, but it really does work. You do need to fight back against people!

And I am learning new social rules bullshit. I mean you keep learning this stuff your whole life, really. I had blown off a lot of the rules that I thought were moronic (most of them) for most of my life, but I am finding that life really does go a lot smoother if you follow more of those rules.

The rules are extremely subtle and hard to figure out, but if you’re smart, you can do it. Now, I am quite socially aware, but I can see how an autist would go completely insane with this stuff. I mean they cannot even understand normal human communication, much less this weird, undercover, near-subliminal stuff.

Be Careful How You Talk to or Even Look at Young Women, Especially If You Are Older

One thing I am doing is being very careful about talking to young women.

How to Look at Hotties without Staring

Or even looking at them. I don’t even look at them all that much. And I am careful about looking at the baristas. If there’s one that’s hot, I look at her a bit, then I look away for a bit, then I look back for a bit. That’s the only way to do it. Otherwise you are staring. I learned this from a PUA site post on social communication. This actually works pretty well.

Or you can look above them or to the side of them. You can’t see them perfectly because you are not focusing on them, but you can see them fairly well.

You can actually look at a whole room this way by just looking at a spot on the wall over everyone’s heads. You can’t see anyone well but you can still actually see everyone in the whole room all at once in a panorama view, albeit a bit off-focused, so if anybody did anything odd, you would see it right away. I guess cops, soldiers, etc. need to monitor groups or crowds like this.

You can meditate or just let your mind go blank while you look at the spot on the wall. I guess some Normies might think it’s weird, but so what? Fuck em. People will throw you out of a store for looking at a spot on a wall and meditating? WTF. What, you hurt the wall’s feelings?

Wait for an IOI, Especially with Young Women

With young women, I don’t say one word to them unless they give me an IOI. They have to look at me and smile, maybe even more than once. If I say something and get a cold response, I don’t say anything more.

Punish People for Blatant Assholery

I was next to a hostile young woman who refused to look at me the other day. I was in front of her in line. I deliberately took my time in line putting my stuff away very slowly so the bitch would have to wait extra longer. She and the barista both gave me these very puzzled looks. I just smiled a bit to myself and thought, “Hey bitch! If you take that hate look off your stupid face, I’d put my stuff away a lot quicker!”

Don’t Even Look at Bitches Who Hate You No Matter How Hot They Are

The young women who hate me, I mostly refuse to look at them, or I look to the side of them with this really evil, mean look. I’m not looking at anything really – just a window or nothing at all a bit to the side of or over their heads. It looks like you are looking angrily at a window or wall, and no one really cares. But they seem to get the message.

Before, I kept looking at a chick if I thought she was hot even if she hated me, which many of them do. Now I don’t do that anymore.

Beware of the “Unconscious Cope” We Men Have about Women

Also, if I get what might be an IOI – like a stare – I think again and consider maybe it wasn’t done for a friendly reason, so I am not interpreting everything as an IOI anymore.

This is a good idea as we men have unconscious bias which is sort of an unconscious cope where we always tend to think positively in terms of “this chick likes me” no matter what she does. I think our minds just do this unconsciously as some unconscious cope or optimism bias, but it pays to be aware of it because it makes you think women like you even if they don’t, and it misconstrues innocuous or even unfriendly behavior as friendly. Which results in creep-shaming.

To Women, Every Comment, Remark, Question, or Joke said to Them by a Man Means “Want to Fuck?”

I complimented a barista on her makeup the other day as she had changed it. She took this as a come-on. We’ve known each other for years.

She’s fat and I wouldn’t fuck her with my worst enemy’s dick, but you say hi to a stupid woman, and to them that means, “Want to fuck?” It’s  narcissistic and self-centered of them to assume that all these guys want to fuck them when half of us wouldn’t touch their fat asses with a 10 foot pole and an 11 foot extension.

Now that she did that (interpreting my makeup comment as an inappropriate come-on), I am cold, often refuse to tip, and don’t look at her, and definitely won’t say anymore stuff about clothes or makeup.

Make a Point of Acting Particularly Friendly to People Who Are Nice to You, Especially in Front of Hostiles, to Send a Message to the Hostiles “Look What Happens When You Act Nice”

Baristas who are friendly get the tips I saved up from the hostiles, often with a compliment like, “This is for good service. You always give me good service” (with a pointed emphasis on the “you” and the “good service”). See how that works?

You Can’t Go Around Starting Questions with Everyone

Basically, you can’t start conversations with everyone. Especially if a woman is next to you and refusing to look at you with a cold look on her face, a conversation is probably not going to work out. Don’t try to talk to bitches who have cold, shut-down faces. Those faces mean “Don’t talk to me, asshole.”

Figure out When a Conversation Is Being Shut Down and End It

There’s a guy I know there who I have talked to a few times. He’s a fat pig and he’s quite unfriendly for some reason I never understood and never will. I tried to talk to him again recently, and he gave me the same thing. Now I am never going to talk to him again. You need to punish people for being assholes, not just keep coming back for more punches.

One thing I need to do is to shut down conversations that seem a bit hostile. If you say something, and you get a one-sentence answer, and they turn away, it’s a shut-down. They don’t like you or they don’t want to talk to you. Warm, friendly, two-way conversations don’t work like that.

We tend to keep talking to them because a  subconscious cope in favor of “thinking people like us versus thinking that they don’t” comes into play, and we keep thinking they will get nice if we just talk to them a bit more. Hate to say it but nope.

Also, it is quite insulting when you try to talk to someone, and they act like they don’t want to talk to you. It’s an insult and your mind does not want to believe this insulting, rude response is actually true because it’s hurtful to think this person dislikes you so much they won’t even talk to you. So this subconscious cope comes in where your mind simply refuses to see this as an insult, as it hurts your ego to be insulted. So your ego says it wasn’t an insult after all! See how it works?

If They Don’t Like You at First, They Won’t Change Their Minds Later on

In other words, haters never change. Once again, this is unconscious optimism – “She was a dick before, but this time, she’s going to like me because I really am a cool, good person.” Nope, if someone acts like doesn’t like you, they don’t like you. Period. You keep trying over and over to see if they will change their mind, and basically they just never do. So just stop. Recognize the subconscious cope here and nip it in the bud.

Figure out the Fake “I Didn’t Hear You” Message

I am also getting better about this weird subliminal communication where you say something, and the person hears you but pretends not to hear you. People do this crap a lot, and I always think they didn’t hear me, so I repeat myself, sometimes more than once. Apparently this is a social faux pas. A very tricky, high-level one but a social faux pas nonetheless.

Another thing they might do which is a bit easier to figure out is to respond to your speech with an angry, outraged and often rather loud, “What!?” that means, “Um, I didn’t hear that!” I don’t always get that either, and sometimes I repeat my words. It’s always a bad idea, as their response, if they have one, only gets worse.

They also might put up both arms up in the air and wave them back and forth while saying, “Ain’t gonna go there.” They might smile as they do that. End that line of talk right then and there. You’re not going to convince them to “go there” by continuing the line of conversation, which I tend to do sometimes.

It doesn’t really work to repeat the statement, as they just act annoyed and don’t answer or give some weird and also very subliminal response that is hard to figure out, as it’s all coded and masked. The response tends to say something like, “I didn’t hear that (but I really did)!” or, “I really don’t want to talk about this!”

If you say something and it seems like they should have heard you but act like they didn’t, figure out that they are playing this “I didn’t hear you” game and don’t ask again. In particular, think about what you said said or asked. Is it the sort of thing that might seem sensitive, and the person might not want to discuss it because they see it as inappropriate, insulting, or a come-on? Usually you can figure out how they might not want to answer due to the nature of the statement or question.

Certainly don’t say it again more than once. When people do this, by not answering, they are saying, “That question is annoying, inappropriate, or possibly racist/banned, etc.,  – i.e., something I don’t want to talk about, so I am pretending that I didn’t hear you.” In my 60’s, I am just figuring this out for the first time, though I have somehow known for a long time that people do this.

It’s a bit hostile and dicky. It’s better to say that you’d rather not discuss that or something along those lines with a smile, but people like to be dicky. I do this myself sometimes if someone asks me a retarded question that’s meaningless or silly, especially if asked in a hostile tone. I simply don’t respond. I never did that before but I am starting to do it now.

This is a real tough one from a social communication point of view because the automatic tendency is to assume that the person didn’t hear you and repeat the comment, except if you do that, it’s a social error.

I talked to my Mom and she said that if it seems like they are doing that, don’t say it a second time and don’t say it on another occasion, as it’s some sort of banned question or statement.

And anyway, we both agreed, even if they didn’t hear it, then obviously they were not too concerned about what you were saying as they weren’t listening to you, so why should you repeat it for someone who won’t even give you the dignity of listening to you? She also said that it’s a bit shitty and hostile (she called people who do this “jerks”) to do the “pretend I didn’t hear you” thing. She said it’s more polite just to say you’d rather not discuss it.

In case you all didn’t know about this weird social rule, here you go. I know all of you have experienced this before, so maybe you want to take notes.

Comments to Non-Native English Speakers about Their Linguistic History

I asked a barista recently if he spoke another language, as he definitely has an accent (I didn’t mention the accent, of course). He really did not want to answer that, as maybe he found it insulting or inappropriate or whatever.

Most people tend to answer that question if you ask it nicely enough. If someone has an accent or speaks broken English, and you wish to discuss it, it’s best to ask, “Do you speak another language?” other than bring up the fact of their accent or their broken English, which they might see as an insult.

If their English is nevertheless excellent, after they explain to you that they speak another language and English was not their first language, you can compliment them on their English to soften the blow a bit because in the US, it’s seen as a possible racist insult to imply someone doesn’t speak English as a first language.

You can also ask them how old they were when they came here, and most will answer. I usually throw in the bit where I am a linguist who is fascinated by languages, and they relax and stop thinking I might be a racist.

Sometimes I might notice that they have an accent, but I will shrug, smile, and downplay it and say that if you come after age 8, you just get an accent, and that’s all there is to it. Most people don’t mind this conversation, since you are asking them about their life as if it is interesting, and most people love to talk about themselves.

Always try to shrug, smile, or downplay any comment or question that could possibly be taken as an insult especially if the other person act a a bit taken aback by it. I find that this generally calms them down, and they stop feeling possibly insulted.

Alt Left: Most Adults Have Mixed Feelings about the Opposite Sex

@Jason, responding to this post, says:

Jason: Are the guys saying this watching porn (hint: hypocrite – LOL!)?

Anyway, often the women have good reason to be angry because they’re with men with “no honor.” In other words, they cheat, they don’t do things on time – they just don’t act like “real men.”

Ha ha. Real men don’t cheat? I don’t think so. Cheating is normal for men. And the more masculine the man is, the more he’s going to do it.

You like manhating bitches? Ever dated one? Would you? Are you with one now? Ever even spoken to one? It’s easy to say that until you meet these women.

And most women have some normal anger or even hatred towards on those things @Jason mentioned. Even women who love men have a bit of hatred towards them about that stuff.

Other than a few young people who haven’t had enough life experience yet, few people purely love or hate the opposite sex. Most of us have complex feelings ranging from love (or something positive) to hate (or something negative) and everything in between. That’s not a problem. What’s important is the ratio of those feelings to the other feelings.

Alt Left: Permanent Ban from r/Communism

On Reddit. Oh well. I am starting to think I am not much of a Commie anyway. Western Commies are the most insane feminists and SJW’s of them all. They’re almost all full-blown radical feminists of the worst kind, and most Western Communist groups are flooded with non-heterosexuals and nonbinary gender types, and they have the worst of those two also.

I was reading one forum and ~half of the posters were non-heterosexual and gender nonbinary. Recommended reading was some radical feminist lesbian manhating psycho on “mandatory heterosexuality,” or some crap. I said I’m out and quit reading and let them have their pervert misandrist jerk-off session.

The group I got banned from recently posted saying that all Communist countries had banned porn and that porn would be banned in their future dream society. Every Communist guerrilla group that forms local rule puts the women in charge. It causes the usual chaos that Female Rule always does anywhere. Guess what the first thing they do is? Ban booze, gambling, and porn. The three things that keep most of us guys from blowing our brains out. Brilliant!

I made ~two posts there and then I was banned. I didn’t say anything bad at all. I asked why I got banned and got a response:

No misogynists.

I guess he read through my posting history. I told my partial roommate about this, and he gave me this puzzled look like:

You? A misogynist? WTF! That’s total bullshit LOL!

I said I know and we laughed about it. Then we talked about how Western Communists sucked. He said:

It’s nothing but a bunch of niggers and Mexicans and fags. They hate Whites and men. That’s why I never wanted any part of it.

I basically agreed with him, without the slurs that is.

I also find it laughable that I am a misogynist. When I see hardcore misogyny online, a lot of times, it makes me throw my head back in shock and disgust. I dislike it on a visceral level. Obviously with reactions like that, I must be a horrible misogynist, huh?

My feelings towards women do range from love all the way to hate and everything in between though, I agree. But they’re mostly on the positive side. I don’t want to be a woman-hater. It doesn’t feel good.

Also women were so good to me when I was young that I really can’t hate them. I will love them forever for the kindness that they showed to me then. And yes, kindness is the right word. They treated me like a was a prince or a cool new toy to play with and pass around to their friends for them to play with. But that’s ok. I didn’t mind being a meat puppet. That was obviously for a completely shallow reason called Looks, but hey, humans are shallow.

Women from 18-55 pretty much treat me like dirt now (but not always). I must say that if they had treated me my whole life they way they treat me now, I would definitely hate women. I mean you hit a man enough times, he might start hitting back. Those poor incels have been treated like human garbage by females their whole pitiful lives. I don’t blame them for hating women. Who wouldn’t?

Alt Left: We Men in the West Lost Control of Our Women and Let Them Run Wild

Pantheist: What if you convince women to stop acting like children the same way we convinced some Blacks to “Whiten up”. Transcend their nature.

Sure, they did it in my Mom’s time, but that time is over. All women are feminists now, and most of them are feral.

We’ve let our women run loose by not controlling them like we should have. The results are not pretty and are all around us.

The new generations of women do not want to transcend their nature. Feminism has told them that it’s cool to act crazy and attack, fight, scream at, hate, humiliate, and emasculate men.

Modern women like to do all of these things, and feminism has even encouraged them to act crazy because when they act crazy, it’s never their fault. It’s all the fault of men. So women have permission to go completely crazy, fall apart, act wild, and wage war on men. Modern women actually enjoy doing all of these things because female nature wants to act like this.

Women in my Mom’s generation were taught that you didn’t do these things unless you had a damned good reason.

In answer to the commenter’s question about women acting like children, women wish to act like children because this is their nature. Also, feminism completely infantalizes women and treats them like children who lack agency and can be convinced by evil men to do just about anything.

How many times have we heard “that’s not consent?” We say that teenage girls are too young to consent to sex because they are not mature enough (which is bullshit), but we treat grown women in the exact same way.

Feminism says women lack agency and are just puppets or marionettes that can be manipulted by evil men into doing things they don’t want to do even though they say they do because these nonhuman muppets are incapable of saying no or stopping sexual advances.

That’s why we have crazy new cases where

  • where we men have to read woman’s minds to figure out if she wants to have sex or not
  • where women consent but they didn’t really “mean it,” so it’s not consent
  • where women can be talked or pressured into sex despite their consent which means that they lack agency and it’s not consent
  • where drunk or loaded women are not responsible for anything they do, so any sexual decisions they make are not consent
  • where women consent to sex but then regret it the next morning so that’s not consent retroactively
  • where women get to decide 10-20 after they consented to a sex act whether they really and truly and for real consented and they can decide that it wasn’t really consent

and all sort of other crazy nonsense.

In all of these cases, women are being treated like children who are too immature to consent to sex and hence lack agency.

Alt Left: The Values of My Mother’s Greatest Generation of Middle to Upper Class White Women

Jason: No offense, but often women into “higher values” are snobs. Also, of course, not all minority women are sluts and whores. Give me a break!

Now what’s better? A clean snob or a dirty person with a good heart?

Also, finally, how did they become sluts and whores? More than not, it was victimization by the dad or others.

My response:

Jason: Also, of course, not all minority women are sluts and whores. Give me a break!

Oh of course. It was not so much about being a sexual slut, although none of my Mom’s friends were like that. Nevertheless, one of her sisters was and my Mom acted like she didn’t care. I imagine you could be wild in bed with your husband but you weren’t supposed to be promiscuous. Anyway this “woman of the street” thing was more about behavior than sex.

Jason: No offense, but often women into “higher values” are snobs.

I am not aware that my Mom’s friends were like that. At least I don’t remember any of them being like that. Some were really into money and status like graduating  from a top school, but they never married rich men so it was a bit of a pathetic joke.

One of my Mom’s friends thought a woman should marry only a Harvard or Yale man who made at least six figures. None of the men she married were rich. None graduated from Harvard. Then she started demanding that her daughter marry such a man. Her daughter is a homely nerd. Now a fat homely nerd. She could never get such a man either.  So her snobbishness was just stupid.

Jason: Now what’s better? A clean snob or a dirty person with a good heart?

Most of my Mom’s friends were “clean” because was just how a proper woman was supposed to be. And back then, most women of her class and race were like that. My Mom didn’t associate with dirty or promiscuous women. She didn’t necessarily hate them. She doesn’t like prostitutes though. I will tell you that. She considers that the lowest a woman can go.  I suppose they could leave the business and reform but one of my Mom’s sayings was:

Jason: You can take the girl out of the whorehouse but you can’t take the whorehouse out of the girl.

She’s sort of right of right.

Also my Mom’s group were both clean and goodhearted for the most part. Women were not supposed to be evil-minded or vicious. That was the world of men. Women did not inhabit that vicious world.

Also, finally, how did they become sluts and whores? More than not, it was victimization by the dad or others.

Like I said she didn’t really care about sluts. She’s been told about some of my girlfriends and she basically doesn’t give a fuck. It’s more that her and her friends did not act that way and they did not associate with women who did.  My Mom doesn’t like whores, but I don’t think she  gives a damn about whores. My Mom knows a lot of women, especially younger women, are horny as Hell. She has acknowledged that.

It’s just that my Mom associated Black and Brown women along with poor and working class women with “women of the street”. That meant not so much that they were sluts but more that they fought with their men, screamed at them, insulted them and put them down, attacked their masculinity, and even got into physical fights with them.

To my Mom’s women, a proper White woman of her class simply did not treat her husband that way. You had to respect your husband and in return he was more or less decent to you. That was the trade-off.

Also basically the women in my Mom’s generation were not Forever Children, golddiggers, borderlines or drama queens. The typical female scenario of chaos and drama was not there. I’m sure my Mom’s crowd would have loved to have been that way, but back then, a proper White woman of a certain class was supposed to be “mature” and to “control herself.”

That meant sublimating, suppressing, or repressing a lot of typical female emo and stupid behavior BS. These were “controlled women.” You were supposed to control yourself. An out of control woman was very much looked down on by my Mom’s crowd. That would be a feral woman.

My Mom’s crowd of women were supposed to be proper, decent, civilized, sane, and controlled. The opposite of all of those things was “woman of the street” – a woman with no class or especially self-control. Women like that were literally disgusting to my Mom’s crowd of women. Almost viscerally so.

Alt Left: Geniuses, Male/Female and White/Black

Geniuses, in addition to being brilliant, are often either weird (Einstein) or nuts (Sam Peckinpah, Hemingway, Phil Spector).

Because in order to take the creative process to its ultimate heights, you really have to leave this earthly world and ascend up beyond that to the world of Gods, as the Greeks used to say.

And when you truly leave the Earth, you enter the world of the sky, Gods and spiritual beings good and bad, madness, strangeness, and otherworldly-ness. In a sense, you sort of have to go nuts to produce truly great art. If you’re not nuts enough, you’re just to normie to ascend like that.

Sanity, in addition to all the great things it is, is, after all, also mediocrity, the quotidian world or work, home, strict social rules, and complete suppression of dreams, feelings, and really anything wild. The 9-5 world of rush hour and cubicles doesn’t tolerate wildness very well. One reason I usually get fired after a year or so, I suppose.

Check out Otto Weininger on genius and Nietzsche on the ubermensch.

Traditionally from the Greeks on it was thought that only men could access this sort of perfect Platonic concept of genius because men were of the sky, beyond the earth to the airy world of pure ideas which most women, even those with genius IQ’s hate like the plague.

The world of the woman is the world of people, babies, children, friends, lovers, husbands, sons, daughters, and parents. In order words, the world of the earth.

The Greeks said that women were “of the earth” and that men were “of the sky” or at least could try to be. Which one is closer to God? Get it?

This is often thought to be a misogynistic attitude, but I think it’s just true. Of course there are many brilliant women, including geniuses, but have you ever noticed how many of the female pure geniuses in the above sense (the airy world of pure ideas) are rather mannish, masculine, or even full-blown lesbians? Start with genius Laurie Anderson, and she’s not even a dyke. Female philosophers? Try Anita Rondell. Lesbian.

Weininger actually said that women were simply incapable of genius. He thought that if there ever to were to be a female genius, she would probably be a lesbian. Bang on.

Now I am not saying that being of the sky is better than being of the Earth or any of that. Women surely don’t feel that way. They think the world of the sky is the world of men. They also think it is unsufferably boring and find it incomprehensible how and why men would even endeavor to live in such a world. I’ve had brilliant women ask me this?

Why would you even do something like that?

About my crazy herculean projects like cataloguing all of the German and Chinese dialects or languages? To her it was incomprehensible. Why would anyone waste their time doing such a stupid and boring thing. Makes no sense.

This is why most women, even those with IQ’s over 140, are not pure intellectuals in the male sense of the world meaning the airy world of ideas and pure concepts torn loose from all of their Earthly moorings.

But who cares about geniuses anyway? What’s a genius?

There are plenty of brilliant women out there, and the female genius tends to a performer of pure emotion. I listed Marianne Faithful as a teenager and then in her 40’s as an example of “the female genius.” So it’s not that female geniuses do not exist, but it’s more that they take a different form of “pure emotional (feelings)” genius rather than “pure intellectual (thought) genius.”

I also think that Black people have a certain type of genius that I call “the Black genius.” It’s also quite different from the “White male genius.” It’s not inferior, it’s just different, and there are few if any male geniuses who seem to think and behave like the Black male genius.

A shocking number of brilliant Blacks, usually men, embody this rather strange type of genius. Few if any Black women do so this is really the Black male genius.” But to search for the “Black female genius,” perhaps once again we have to look into the world of pure emotion, like Ronnie Spector above, Billie Holiday, Tina Turner, or Pam Grier, the actress.

Catch my drift?

Alt Left: Elvis Presley, “Can’t Help Falling in Love”

Wise men say
Only fools rush in
But I can’t help falling in love with you

Shall I stay?
Would it be a sin
If I can’t help falling in love with you?

Like a river flows
Surely to the sea
Darling, so it goes
Some things are meant to be

Take my hand
Take my whole life, too
For I can’t help falling in love with you

Like a river flows
Surely to the sea
Darling, so it goes
Some things are meant to be

Take my hand,
Take my whole life, too
For I can’t help falling in love with you
For I can’t help falling in love with you

I can’t believe how perfect this song is. They didn’t call him The King for nothing. I also can’t believe this song is from all the way back in 1961! I was four years old then. My Mom was 39 when this song came out. She always hated Elvis and all rock and roll for that matter. His first music was in 1954, so she would have been 22 then. It’s odd that she didn’t find popular music good at age 22.

However, Elvis was an immensely divisive character when he first came out. He swung his hips in a sexual way. They said he was making “Black music” or I guess more appropriately “nigger music.” Black music was seen as immoral, base, vulgar, obscene and obsessed with sex. Whites were supposed to be above all of that.

And in that sense, Elvis was probably one of the first true wiggers. Well God bless him.

I assume my Mom was on the side of the good White girls” who were upset by Elvis rude and dirty music. Probably only a slut or a poor or working class person would like a song like that.

My Mom actually grew up rich. She literally lived in a mansion! Her class of upper, upper middle, and middle class White women very much looked down on Black and Hispanic women and working class and poor White women, as they were thought to not be able to control themselves and they basically acted like disgusting women and whores.

  • No woman in my Mom’s circle would pick a fight with her husband.
  • None would attack his masculinity.
  • It was quite rare that my mother raised her voice at my father.

Good, White, classy wives didn’t do that low class, niggerish stuff. The worst thing you could act like in my Mom’s generation was a “woman of the streets.” And that’s how my Mom’s circle of women saw loudmouthed, obnoxious, combative, screechy, rude, disrespectful, husband-fighting Black, Brown and low and working class White women.

A proper woman was supposed to control herself and in general these types of women were “out of control” and “women of the streets (whores).” Somewhat disgusting, low class women (no matter their income) who couldn’t control themselves and respect their husbands like decent and proper classy White wives.

Alt Left: Face It, Men: Your Girlfriend or Wife Is Your Surrogate Mother

Sometimes if you want to role-play with your girlfriend, you can go into “little boy” mode where you’re the little boy, and your gf is your Mom. You talk like a little boy and to some extent act like one but not too much. It’s not serious or real. It’s just a big joke.

I’ve done that with a few childless girlfriends aged 29 to 49, and they all loved it. I was their son! You would think they would make fun of and ridicule me, but they really got into it. Some women hate it though, think it’s stupid, and won’t play the game.

Anyway, your girlfriend really is your mother. Face it, your girlfriend or your wife replaces your Mom. We men go from Mom to girlfriend or wife, and really nothing changes.

A few men are ridiculous about it. I could give you examples, but the wife actually didn’t mind and still loved the guy to death, though frankly he was a huge pussy.

Men are too macho to admit that their girlfriends or wives become not only our lovers, yes, but also our Moms. When men become elderly, this idea of the wife turning into the Mom becomes much more obvious, often glaringly so. Some men don’t even try to hide it much.

We men are not good at taking care of ourselves. A lot of divorced men can’t even fend for their own. They fall apart quickly when they live alone, and quite a few get sick or die fairly quickly. These guys are like little boys without a Mom living on their own. How long would a boy last in the woods without Mom? These men literally need a wife or girlfriend to stay alive. We men like to think we are self-reliant, but we need to think about that.

Actually bachelors fend a lot better on their own than divorced men. And the longer they have been bachelors, the better they get at it. Most of the long-term bachelors I know are fairly decent cooks. Most can do their own laundry. Most are good about going to the doctor, and they are almost female about it.

And I know bachelors who keep in contact with their mothers regularly, so even though they don’t have the surrogate mother in terms of wife or girlfriend, they still keep the real thing around on some level anyway.

Some even talk to Mom almost every day. They usually live away from her, but they’re on the phone to her a lot, or she’s on the phone to them. The mother doesn’t usually run the guy’s life if he’s a real man – he’ll tell her to piss off if she does, and most mothers will back off because instinctively they know that being party to a Momma’s boy is not cool.

So most bachelors more or less do whatever they want, especially sexually with regard to women, and their mothers have no say in the matter. My Mom’s been my playboy cheerleader most of her life. She’s like:

Go get em, stud! I’m so proud of my playboy son ha ha.

She even used to fix me up with her friends.

Mom: Hey Bob, you know my friend XXXXX?

Me: Yeah?

Mom: She wants to go out with you.

Now she’s turning into a prude in her old age (80’s), and I have been told she does not want to hear about my exploits anymore. In particular, she doesn’t want to hear about me being with teenage girls and young women. That pisses her off.

But these bachelors are still in a way being mothered by their Moms. Some still bring their clothing over to do laundry if they live close. Others have Moms that give them food or help them out with money if they need it. More typically, they have their Moms call them and remind them of stuff they need to do, like doctor’s appointments or important affairs that they tend to blow off.

I actually do all of these things, and I am not embarrassed to say so. Why should I be? She doesn’t tell me what to do. I live my own life. She’s not my Mommy anymore in that sense.

PUA/Game: The Lowdown on Dating Much Younger Women If You Are a Middle Aged Man

Even though I am over 60, I still date young women at times, all the way down to their 20’s or even 18 or 19. But it’s is extremely hard, with like a 98+% rejection rate. It’s like climbing a mountain. Yeah, you can do it, but most guys won’t bother because it’s so hard. It also gets harder every year, and most guys definitely cannot pull this off. Vast majority of young women are not into men 20-40 years older, but there are a few, that’s for sure.

I have to fight a tsunami of rejection and even anger and hatred to get those few with Daddy issues who will go out with me for free. I’ve been banned from establishments for merely talking to young women, not even flirting with them or asking them out.

Nevertheless, I have young women age 18-29 coming to me almost every day asking to be my sugar baby. They want me to be their sugar daddy. I’m as broke as they are though.

Woman on the Net who is opposed to these relationships: You can maybe get away with it if you are already very attractive or you have a lot of money.

Supposedly, when I was young I was very handsome. I lived Chad’s life for many years. People kept saying this about me into my 50’s, and even at my age, I hear it all the time.
Even women age 18-23 tell me all the time that I am handsome, very handsome, cute, sexy, or hot. I don’t get it, as I think my looks are shot. So I guess in my case it’s looks.

How to Pull It Off

It helps to be in the top 10-20% of looks for your age, not be overweight, be well-spoken, well-groomed, hygienic, and very polite or even classy, and dress halfway decently. It absolutely helps to have any kind of status at all, be it Power, Fame, Money, or Status, in any dose at all but the more the better.

It also helps to be wise and intelligent, as these young women are looking for a mentor to be “the adult in my life” as a 20 year old hottie with model good looks recently told me.

You definitely need great Game, helpfully honed over a lifetime. And you need to not be creepy in the rational sense of the word that even most men would agree is creeptastic. Anyway if you are that creepy, you automatically have shit Game anyway.

Woman on the Net who is opposed to these relationships: Women are not attracted to receding hairlines, wrinkles, or a flat tire around the waist.

I don’t have a receding hairline. Not even 1%.

I have few wrinkles, some around my belly that you never see.

I do not have a beer belly or at least not much of one. I was in bed with a 19 year old recently and I complained that I had a belly and she said, “No way! Most men your age are overweight, some by a lot!”

Problems

There are problems.

Potency and sexual ability issues. At my age, tragically, there are potency problems. I’m not impotent but it’s touch and go if you catch my drift. Yes, you don’t need a cock to please a woman, but a lot of young women want to be fucked and even get creampies. They’re disappointed if it’s not working. Also a lot of young women are cumsluts nowadays (ha ha), and they want huge loads. Loads that we cannot supply.

We can’t fuck as long as when we were young. I used to be able to keep it up for 3-4 hours at a time. Not nowadays and I often get off quick too.

Sex drive mismatch. Most young women have raging sex drives, especially nowadays with all this online porn. They’re almost all masturbating, often every day. Some watch a lot of porn or even have their own porn blogs! Her sex drive will be way stronger than yours. That’s a problem.

The relationships are highly unstable, characterized by a lot of wild love/hate fluctuation. She’s basically a huge drama queen. The relationships tend to blow up, often very quickly, and  after that, she’s just about your worst enemy.

The young women who go for older men are often not right in the head. 75% of the ones I have been with were actively suicidal, at least at times.

Peer pressure is a problem. I was with an 18 year old girl who fell crazy in love with me at age 59 (believe it not), but her friends saw her with me and openly ridiculed her. Relationship over.

Prepare to get called “pedophile” a lot, especially by young men. Of course you’re not, as you are adults, but still, steel yourself for a lot of name-calling.

Prepare to lose friends. I had a good friend, a physician, dump me when I told him I was dating a 19 year old girl at 60.

Prepare for hate from older women. And it will be really bad too. They really hate us cradle robbers.

You will never meet her parents because her Dad might punch you or try to kill you.

You will never meet her siblings because she will be too embarrassed to introduce them to you.

Prepare for possible legal consequences. A 19 year old girl I was dating had a 17 year old friend (total knockout) who also wanted me and kept trying to send me dirty pics I had to delete. She  kept bugging me:

I want you to eat my pussy! Pleeeease!

It was rather hard to keep turning her down. Part of me really wanted to do it. They both wanted a threeway. That’s probably every man’s dream: to have a threeway with two hotties, one 19 and the other 17, when you are 60 fucking years old!  How many guys  get to do that?

I said no and the 19 year old really pestered me about it. A weak man would have given in.

You have to be strong not to mess with an underage girl. You can be friends with them, but you can’t do anything sexual. I met an 18 year old girl two weeks shy of her 18th birthday and she wanted in. We hung out a lot, held hands, hugged, put our arms around each other, and kissed on the cheek.

She had never been kissed and of course was a virgin. Both of these things are way more common at that age than you think. She kept pestering me for a makeout session or at least a tongue kiss, and it took all I could muster not to cave and do it.

The Good Side

As you can see there are a mountain of problems with these relationships.

But there is a great bright side. Most middle aged men will never fuck a teenage girl or woman in their 20’s again. Maybe 10% can pull it off. And all men that age want to do it. So if you pull it off, you are living the life of Riley that most men only ever dream about.

Other men will treat you like a hero. If you are not arrogant about it, the praise feels damn good.

Quite a few women are turned on by the fact that you can pull this off.

Quite a few women are turned on by the fact that you can pull this off. Of all ages. Even older men. I’ve had women in their 40’s hear that I do this and start addressing me as “hey stud.” You get a lot of this.

You can be her father and her lover. Get over it. You’re her Daddy figure. She will call you Daddy in bed all the time, and this time she means it.

A lot want to do weird age-play where they are younger than they are – teenage girls down to 12-17. If you are creeped out by incest play this is not for you.

You are her mentor if you are a good man. You can teach her all about life! She doesn’t know shit really so you will be teaching her basic life skills every single day.

If you are highly intelligent, that’s good because now you are her teacher, and her head is getting filled with new facts all the time.

You can be her counselor and play therapist with her if that’s your thing. She’ll need it anyway. So a lot of psychological self-help.

You are imparting a lot of wisdom to her. Like every day, more wisdom and aphorisms. She may fall in love with your mind if you are intelligent, and tell you she’s fucking you for your mind. She will also saw in awe that you are very wise.

I used to be a teacher, so I love this. You will never see a young person learn more than this. Every day she gets her head full of all these new things and it’s cool because you can watch another human learn at a monumental pace.

If you are good, she will actually end up smarter and will be life and social skills than most of her peers so it’s good for her in that sense. You are teaching her all about sex too. Most are pretty inexperienced.

You are her cheerleader. She has a ton of insecurities and typically with the Daddy issues comes serious low self esteem. So you are always trying to boost her up and get her to feel better about herself.

Is it worth it? Do you like to live dangerously? If you like to live dangerously and have all sorts of bad things happen to get the good things (like a hike in the jungle), then it’s worth it. But a lot of older men probably don’t want all the typical drama and chaos that comes with your typical young women. They probably get enough of that crap with women their own age, and it’s way worse with young women because so many are quite unstable.

I still date women my age and women in their 30’s-50’s, and honestly they are superior to young things in a lot of ways!

President of Ecuador Drops a Truth Bomb about Why #Metoo Is Mostly Nonsense

Here.

Ha ha. He’s guilty of one thing. Saying the quiet part out loud.

The rest of us have been saying this forever now and all anyone does is scream misogynist and woman-hater every time we say it. If the truth is misogynist, then, Hell, I guess I hate women, right? I mean I believe in the truth, not lies.

This is why this bullshit was going to fail from the start. Women are weak and they make decisions based on emotions, not logic and reason like us men. The latter is fine as that’s just the way they are, but to put inherently irrational and over the top emo human beings in charge? Bad, bad, bad idea. But that’s what we geniuses in the West did.

Then we gave weapon this huge weapon and said, “Hey gals, here’s an awesome deadly weapon you can use against any man you dislike for any reason. You can really hurt them with this. But don’t worry. Unlike most assault with a deadly weapon charges, you can use this weapon on any man you don’t like and no cop will ever arrest you! Ha ha. What about it, ladies.

Women are weak so like all weak people, in fighting and wars, they will fight dirty. They have to. If weak parties play by the rules, they’re obliterated. The only way they can even stand a chance of surviving is to fight dirty. It’s fight dirty or die, literally.

That’s fine too but it basically turns weak parties in conflicts into maniacal terrorists who don’t play by any rules of war. Which is ok. That’s the way it is. But we geniuses in the West decided to put women, who are weak, maniacal terrorists who attack people for no good reason and can’t think rationally, in charge of society. I can’t overemphasize how brilliant that was! sarc/>

Give a woman a weapon and she will abuse it, like any weak party in any conflict. That’s why we have to be careful what weapons we give women and not give them carte blanche to use them at will.

Chad walks into a room, engages in a behavior, and says a few things to a female stranger. He’s a charming, handsome, wonderful guy. All the women love him.

A man with low SMV (sexual market value), an unattractive man, an Omega or typical incel if you will, walks into the same room and walks up to a female stranger and engages in the same behavior and says the same things  that Chad did. The woman is furious, screams #metoo, and threatens to call the police. She screams at the man, calling him a creep. The woman in the store go to management to try to get the guy banned.

Both men did the exact same things. They engaged in the exact same behavior and said the exact same things, but they were punished completely differently. According to US law, all such punishments are invalid due to the Equal Protection Amendment (Amendment 14) in the Constitution. Instead this is somehow completely appropriate.

Most women defend this bullshit and say that men should realize that high SMV men can get away with the same shit that gets a low SMV man #metoo’d. It’s all  perfectly logical and we men need to do quadratic equations in our heads every time we walk into a room full of women to figure out the obvious!

I’m not saying that there are no legit cases of #metoo but the fact that women enforce the rule with extremely prejudiced unfairness and unequal treatment means that the whole #metoo thing more or less needs to be trashed in favor of a new standard. You can’t enforce laws and rules one way against someone you like and another way against someone you don’t like. US democracy doesn’t work that way.

That’s why I have been saying this #metoo crap is toxic garbage since it started. Come up with a new standard or trash it altogether and live with the damage.

So I’m Rightwing, Eh? LOL

Well, I’m just not. All of these people who keep screaming at me and insisting that I’m on the Right, I have a question for you. Please point out one single rightwing movement anywhere in the US that I would be ok in. One, just one. All I ask is one. Throw up some and I will go check them out.

Because frankly, I hate, hate, hate, hate conservatives and conservatism, especially the US branch. I don’t mind pure social conservatives that much, but I dislike the US Republican social conservatives. They’re horrible.

If you can’t find one single rightwing movement that I don’t absolutely hate, how can you say that I am a Rightist? Am I part of some movement of one or something?

I’ve never been a part of conservatism. I go to the site of any strand of US conservatism, and I scrunch up my face in disgust. That’s if I’m not pounding the screen. Because I’m liberal/Left on most things. Probably 80-85% of issues. I’d rather eat a bullet than vote Republican or for any US rightwing party. I can’t stand to go to any conservative website because I get angry so  quickly that I have to leave.

On the other hand, the liberal/Left have always been my people. I mean like my whole life. And they still are. I go to Left/liberal websites, and I think “these are my people.” It gets a bit weird with Western Communists and anarchists because they are so radical and so far left and especially so ultra-SJW.

But still a lot of what Communists and some of the anarchists say resonates with me. It’s like we are on the spectrum, but they are just going further on the spectrum than I am. Nevertheless, they all hate my guts, and I get immediately banned from any anarchist or Communist group that I try to post in. Like, instantly. After like two posts.

And I’m telling you: I haven’t changed one bit. The world changed, not me. My social values are exactly the same now as they were in the 1970’s and 1980’s – in fact, I am more culturally liberal than I was back then! I’ve gone further to the left on culture in the last 30 years or so.

But while I stand still, the crazy train called Clown World keeps racing by me at the station, refusing to pick me up. I wouldn’t get on anyway. I’m still waiting for the 1990’s PC Version. But that train never comes. I sit at the station waiting for it forever and ever as the days turn into nights, and the train never shows up. But like a fool, I keep waiting. Waiting for nothing. Waiting for Godot.

You see, there were really a couple of waves of PC or Political Correctness. The first big wave was in the 1990’s with gay marriage and whatnot.  That’s the wave that I am still a part of!

But the problem is that the world has shifted so much that if you are a 1996 Cultural Left type, you’re now a Nazi! They move the goalposts every year, and you have to go a little bit more insane every year to keep up with them. Well, I don’t feel like going crazy. Or getting more crazy than I already am.

There was another huge wave of Political Correctness, more properly called SJWism. It probably started sometime in the 2010’s, but I am not completely sure. I know that we had a lot of them in the 2000’s, too. It is this new wave and this new wave only that I am opposed to. I’m not against the Cultural Left. I’m just against this new radical Cultural Left. Instead I want to go back to the PC culture of the 1990’s. But if I want to do that, I’m a Nazi.

And most people don’t realize it, but these SJW fucktards were around even in the 1970’s and 1980’s. Only difference was that back then almost everyone hated their guts. There were more in the 1980’s, but not much more. Most were self-described Marxists.

The ones in the 1970’s were just radicals, often sexual radicals. They were “ultra-groovy.” A lot of them were into weird sex stuff like threeways, group sex, orgies, and especially male bisexuality. Even among most liberals, we were seriously turned off by these people who were “too cool for school.”

Sure, Women Go With Conquerors but Usually Not with Genocidal Conquerors

Polar Bear: Women like the “winners,” from slave owners to invading NS Germans. We can’t un-close those legs. My point is being on top matters to women. This is a universal truth. When White women are invaded or conquered, it’s the same. To the victor go the spoils.

That may be so, PB, but the latest thinking is that for a variety of reasons, there was not a whole lot of slavemaster-slave sex going on, and what was going on was mostly with the house slaves. Even radical antiracist Black ultra-SJW’s are saying this, and if they’re saying it, it’s probably true because they’d be the last people on Earth to say that.

In truth, after the First Liberation (1865), 80% of Blacks were pure Black. No White genes at all. And the latest thinking is that a lot of the White genes that they did have went in during the last 20-30 years prior to the Civil War. You see, around 1830-1840, the plantation owners basically ran out of slaves. The slave trade itself was illegal and had ended ~1810, so they couldn’t import new ones.

What’s a slave owner to do? Simple, hire a bunch of those idle poor White men over there to work in the fields alongside the Blacks. And from 1835-1861, there were many Whites, almost all men, working in the fields alongside Blacks of both sexes.

A lot of these men were not married, and being dirt poor, they were not particularly racist. They got along quite well with the Black slaves. There was probably this attitude of, “Hey, we’re all fucked. We White men are fucked, and these Blacks slaves are fucked. None of us has a thing. Screw it.” There was a considerable amount of interracial sex between White men and Black women during this period.

If you consider that 80% of Blacks had no White in them in 1865, and almost 100% of true US Blacks now have an average of ~25% White in them, it’s quite obvious that there was a Hell of a lot of interracial sex going on from 1865  to the  present day.

In fact, Blacks were already heavily Whitened by the Second Liberation in 1964. And this was a period in which Blacks in the South lived under Jim Crow, and even Blacks  and West in the north lived under a lot of racial restrictions such as housing covenants, more or less legal if not mandatory discrimination in all sorts of ways, and sundown towns.

We had many sundown towns here in California. There are reportedly still a few sundown towns in the South. They are all-White towns of ~3,000 people in rural Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, etc. Apparently not a whole lot of Blacks are even keen on moving into those towns, so the sundown feature is not challenged.

Considering the extreme oppression that Blacks lived under in the South and to some extent elsewhere, it is quite amazing how much interracial sex went on in the century after the Civil War. And keep in mind that much of this sex was illegal, as miscegenation was against the law in many states.

Getting back to the original question, honestly, those slaves probably saw the slavemaster as more of an oppressor than a winner.

How many Jewish women got with Nazis? How many Palestinian women fuck Jewish men and vice versa? How many Kurdish women screw Turkish men? How many Hutu women got with Tutsi men? How many Carib women got with Columbus’ men? How many German women got with Russian men after 1945? How many Russian women got with German men after 1942?

People don’t dig genocide. They’re not into getting genocided. Sure, women get with conquerors in the modern era if the conquerors are relatively nice, especially if the war ends and the hostilities are all over. Most conquered women don’t get with genocidal killers of the other race.

Yes, a lot of German and Japanese women got with American men after the war, but we were not genocidal against Germans and Japanese. Especially after the war was over, there was not a whole lot of killing going on. There was some in Germany all right, in the camps where we put German POW’s, but those were soldiers, not everyday civilians.

Yes, some Frenchwomen got with Nazis, but the Nazis were not genocidal towards the French.

Indian women got with White men, but we were actually not genocidal towards their people, despite what you read. Most of the Indians died of disease, like at least 95% of them. The number of Indians killed by Whites was something like 7,000 in the whole history of the Indian wars.

Many Indian women in Latin America got with Spanish and Portuguese men, but the Spaniards were typically not genocidal. There was prejudice and discrimination but there was none at first when a lot of the genes went in.

Are Black Women Angry?

Polar Bear: With Black women, I don’t believe there’s method to the mayhem. They are frustrated and will lash out at anyone. The guy with an olive branch might get it the worst if she’s used to hard-knocking pimps.

Some are angry. My experience is simply that a Hell of a lot of Black women are somewhat psychopathic. Most are not actual psychopaths. Instead they are simply normal non-psychopathic people who nevertheless have a rather elevated psychopathy level. Keep in mind that the PCL goes from 0-19 before you get to psychopath level.

What were they like? Low on morals and empathy. Takers, not givers. Treat others like objects. A lot of them seemed to have some seething, deep-rooted anger in them. Or perhaps I was just seeing some psychopathy. Of course these were all more or less ghetto types, but it’s not that easy to distinguish between a ghetto Black and the middle class Blacks we have on this site, sadly.

The line between a middle class Black and a ghetto Black is fuzzy indeed, and a lot of the ghetto ones appear quite middle class at first. A lot of Blacks are “floaters.” They’re hard to put in one category, and there seem to be a lot of Blacks who sort of move back and forth between ghetto and middle class behaviors. It’s not like these are fixed qualities.

I’ve had a ton of dealings with middle class Blacks who more or less just acted like White people, and I had no problems with them whatsoever. Especially with the men. The women can be more difficult but they don’t degenerate into ghetto behavior. Something stops them, like they think that’s the lowest of the low.

Some middle class Black women are angry. The anger looks more like resentment more than anything else. Others are quite calm. They vary a lot. I got to know quite a few middle class Black women teachers when I taught school, and some of them seemed pretty pissed off.

The deeper you go into the heart of the ghetto, the more pissed off and resentful the female teachers look. In the deep ghetto, you get the feeling that a lot of middle class Black women hate Whites.

The middle class Black men, even in the heart of the ghetto, not so much. I’ve always gotten along pretty well with Black men for some reason.

I’m sort of a nigger myself (wigger) ha ha, so maybe we sort of hit it off on that basis. I’m not characterizing middle class Black men that way, trust me. I’m using that word more in the playful bad boy sense. I’m just saying that most Black men seem to like White bad boys because even middle class Black men often have a bit of bad boy in them. And apparently I come across as a bad boy.

Middle class Black men are pretty easy-going and relaxed people. They live to have fun. Plus they are not moralfags at all, more like the opposite. I don’t really deal with ghetto Black men. I don’t really like them and frankly I just avoid them. My feeling is that if you hang around with them even for a day or so, you’re probably going to lose something, particularly a bit of money at least. That’s just how it goes with such people.

One middle class Black teacher I knew always looked angry. She was really beautiful too. Dark-skinned but gorgeous and yet she always looked pissed. I felt sorry for her and I wondered why she felt so angry.

But one time I went into her room and approached her for the first time and she stopped her anger, looked very serious and became very submissive, ducked her head down, and addressed me as”Sir” in a very soft, submissive voice. I was too dumb back then to figure out that when a woman goes submissive in front you, she either wants to fuck or she’s horny. Because that’s how women act when they are horny. They simply go submissive.

I should have asked her out, but I was too chicken. Her third grade class was all Black, and they acted really bad. She was always screaming at them. Maybe that was why she was so angry, no idea.

But her submissive behavior is quite typical, believe it or not, especially the less ghetto they are. I’ve had sex with maybe 5-10 Black women, and they pretty much go totally submissive when you have sex with them, like any woman. They’re not angry or bossy in bed at all except maybe for some of the ultra-ghetto ones, and yes, I’ve been with them too ha ha.

Permanent Ban from Twit (Twitter)

Well, I was on Twit (Twitter) only a short time before I started getting warning after warning after warning. These are all short-term bans of say three days. Then they went up to seven days.

I very quickly tried to start policing my posts to make them SJW-friendly. But every time I do that anywhere, I get banned anyway for some reason. I am starting to think that there is no appeasing these people unless you are one of them, in which case, I guess you know the drill, or you already speak the language.

The first time was a post in which I talked about how I had been doing a lot of reading, and I was shocked at how writers, especially poets, were gay or lesbian and how many were suicides.  After a while, I started asking myself how many poets are not gay, lesbian, or eventual suicides? It’s like they all kill themselves. I guess after a lifetime of faggotry and rug-munching.

I doubt if the gay behavior causes the suicides, but it’s well known that gay people have a very high suicide rate.

They talk a lot of a the rate of suicide attempts by gay and lesbian teens being high, but their rate of actual suicides is actually normal. Yet we hear endlessly of the suicide epidemic among gay and lesbian teens. I suggested this on Daily Kos and got blistering responses from fellow straight liberals.

One was a psychologist. I thought I was going to get banned. It was really scary. The psychologist was extremely hostile, basically called me a Nazi, and said that all the statistics were wrong, and the gay teen suicide rate was actually elevated and furthermore, I was an evil bigot for suggesting otherwise.

I wrote about how disappointing this was to me. I mean I don’t mind if a  poet here and there is gay or lesbian. Some gay writers are among my favorites, especially William Burroughs, and he’s practically the most fagged out of them all! But I had no idea that there were so many of them. I was reading a lot of biographies of writers I liked or had heard of, and over and over, it was gay gay gay gay gay gay, lesbian lesbian lesbian lesbian lesbian lesbian bisexual bisexual bisexual bisexual bisexual.

I would go the biography page and see that say Vita Sackville-West or whoever was actually a lez. There would be her picture. She looked like a man! Total disappointment. Women who look like men are a complete turnoff to me. I twist up my face into a scowl every time I see one. There’s something terribly wrong with a woman looking and acting almost exactly like a man. It just seems so wrong and fucked up.

Amy Lowell? Lesbian. Virginia Woolf? Bisexual. Suicide. Her husband? Bisexual. The whole damned famous Bloomsbury Group? A bunch of gays and lesbians! Mary McCarthy? Lesbian! Oh no, say it ain’t so! I really liked her. It was so discouraging.

I went to read James Merrill’s biography. Jesus Christ, he was a fag! What a downer. I still like his poetry but it was so disappointing to be hit with this gay club over and over. I thought, “Are any of these poets and writers…like…normal? You know…like…heterosexual?”

Then I closed out my post by saying that if I have deal with a bunch of fags, dykes, suicidals and crazies to read the greatest writers that ever lived, that’s a deal I’ll take.

It was humor. That’s funny, right? And ultimately it’s not even really homophobic if you think about it and get past the shock words.

Well, I got a temporary ban from Twit.

Then there was a case in Venezuela of two opposition politicians who went to Colombia and partied with Colombian prostitutes. The whores spiked their drinks with scopalamine, knocking  them unconscious. Then they robbed them. One man died and another nearly did. This happens all the time down there, just to warn you.

There was all this discussion of what happened. Everyone was saying that the guys were taking drugs with the whores and then they overdosed. I kept correcting them saying that the women were “murdering whores” who had poisoned the men, murdering one and almost murdering another, and then robbing them.

Well, Twit gave me a ban for describing prostitutes as whores. Not only that but for describing robbing, poisoning, murdering prostitutes as whores. I was exasperated. Since when is it illegal to call a whore a whore, I mean to call a prostitute a whore? I mean, that’s…like…literally what a prostitute is. A prostitute is literally a whore and vice versa. That’s not even controversial.

And I had no idea that calling prostitutes whores was the new “nigger.” But everything’s the new “nigger.” Every week I wake up and there’s another word that’s been designated as the new “nigger.” Another banned word. Another word I’ve been using my whole damn life with no problems, and now all of a sudden, it’s illegal. I swear if they keep banning my words like this, after a while, I will barely be able to talk at all!

I get unbanned. Then I get another ban for the exact same thing! Banned for calling murdering prostitutes “murderous whores.” Which is exactly what they were. Are we worried about offending the precious feelings of murderous prostitutes now? I’m sure they have very sensitive feelings. Let’s please make sure we don’t hurt them.

So I gathered my wits about me and tried to be a good boy. But then there was some post about transsexuals, and I said, “There’s no such thing as trans people. They don’t exist. Instead, they’re all just mentally ill.”

Permanent ban from Twit for pointing out the obvious – that 90% of trannies are mentally ill! That there’s hardly any such thing as trans people. That it’s just a made up word for people with a mental disorder.

So yeah, permaban. It’s pretty bad because I am on Twit a lot, and I would love to comment or like things, but I can’t.

By the way, lots of people are getting banned on Twit for saying innocuous things about transsexuals. There is a very obnoxious and vicious male tranny or transwoman who works in the department that polices and bans posts and posters. He’s reportedly the brains behind a lot of these bans on people telling the truth about trans people.

Alt Left: Primitive Peoples Understood Teen Sexuality Far Better Than Modern Ones

If you study primitive peoples, you find that their traditional knowledge says this or that about whatever aspect of human biology or behavior. It’s based on their observations over centuries, knowledge of which traditionally rested with the elders. Hence why elders are so respected in these cultures.

And you will notice over and over that their traditional knowledge lines right up with what modern science, psychology, or medical science has discovered, except these folks figured this out way before science did. We think those people are stupid, but they’re not as dumb as you think.

An interesting sidelight. Many to most modern cultures have pretty insane attitudes about teenage sexuality or even the sexuality of young adults. Basically, it’s banned in most human cultures, and it’s even banned to a great extent in our own culture. My mother is still opposed to premarital sex to this very day. I’ve always been resentful of that, but that’s how she was brought up, so hey.

But if you study primitive cultures, you often find that they have very sane attitudes towards sex and young people. Typically, girls may start having sex at age 13-14 in most of these societies, and they often choose boys that age to have sex with.

However, they can choose older men, usually younger men but sometimes quite a bit older. In traditional Blackfoot culture, the typical initial marriage was between a 15 year old girl and a 35 year old man. I believe the world’s oldest man in the Current Year is a Somali man who is over 115 and recently acquired yet another wife, a 15 year old girl! Three cheers for the old dog!

In prior eras, no teenage girl or boy in the history of mankind was ever harmed by having sex with an adult. The notion that such things are harmful or damaging to young people is a new idea, and frankly it’s a conceit because it goes against thousands of years of human knowledge.

Coming of age ceremonies in many of these cultures take place around age 15. You complete the rituals of your gender, and then at age 15, you are either a man or a woman and are expected to behave like one. Our notion of adulthood at 18 or 21 or whenever is obviously completely arbitrary.

In the Middle Ages, children were seen as “little adults” and treated as such. They often did adult work and chores. I’m not sure if they acted any more mature than they do now, but if you expect a kid to act like an adult, he might act a lot more mature. Hence we had strange things like boy kings and whatnot. Romeo and Juliet were both only 13 years old.

Getting back to the Hmong, these people, unlike most modern civilized people, figured out that young people are horny as Hell and are not going to be satisfied with mere masturbation. They realized that young people desire independence and wish to be away from the parents. Modern societies continue to resist this notion.

Hence the Hmong allow young unmarried people aged 18-20+ to go off away from the village in the evenings. They have little places in the jungle where they gather and have whatever fun they wish to have among themselves.

The Hmong realize that at least some of these young people will be having sex in their evening hangouts, but unlike many modern cultures, they’re ok with that. Sex is completely allowed in these circumstances, but if a pregnancy occurs, the couple must get married.

Newsflash! Human Heads Are Too Big for Women’s Vaginas!

Here.

Newsflash! Human heads are too big for women’s vaginas! This is a known problem and is why childbirth is so painful in humans. On the other hand, these huge heads of ours are what make us so damned smart. For some reason, women’s pelvises didn’t widen along with the enlarged heads. On the other hand, women with pelvises that large would probably not be real attractive to us modern men.

Alt Left: Can Race Play/Racial Humiliation Can Ease Racial Tensions?

Pantheist: Perhaps race play/racial humiliation can ease racial tensions?

Yeah I don’t know about that, man. Consider that in a form of Black/White raceplay, the Black woman gets off on being called a nigger, monkey, coon, ape, jig, all that stuff. I have met a number of Black women into that stuff, and they specifically asked me to call them all those names during sex.

I wasn’t really into it honestly. If I’m in bed with a Black woman, I don’t really feel like calling her a nigger, for Chrissake. Although maybe this is just normal sex in the Current Year. I guess I’m just too much of a nice guy for this porned out world we live in now.

Back to the question. For some reason I don’t think that calling Black women niggers isn’t exactly going to ease racial tensions, ya know? Ha ha.

Alt Left: Are Jews Really Behind Race-Mixing and Cucking Porn?

PB: Jason, I’m all for a Cum Bang but it’s insane how into black cock Jewish pornographers are. Interracial in porn is Black on White. The most infamous HD Black on White site is owned by a Jew who sits around eating haute cuisine and drinking champagne in France. He also films White men but the focus is on anal then. It’s a passive-aggressive Kosher slight but as the Sicilians say, it’s always personal.

Is that really true though? I’ve been following that sort of porn for some time now. I really don’t have any particular interest in White women fucking Black guys and I want nothing to do with this insane “cuck and bull” interracial sex culture. I just like to see women getting fucked by men.

There is a huge scene around this. There are all these White women who are “Black cock only,” and they have spade tattoos on their bodies in various places. There are all sorts of idiot White men who are into giving their women to Black “bulls” and watching and getting cucked while the bull fucks his wife.

Some of them hardly even fuck their wives anymore ha ha. The really twisted ones suck the cocks of the Black bulls even though these White guys are not even gay. Instead they’re just cuckholded fucktards. They’re also really into “cleanups,” as in eating the creampie out of their woman’s pussy after the Bull comes in it. As I said, they’re not gay, so eating other guy’s cum is a weird thing for a straight guy to do, right?

They suck Black cocks and eat Black men’s cum out of pussies because they are into getting humiliated, the same reason as why they are into the cuckolding in the first place.

This is a huge culture and there are all sorts of White people involved in this. I haven’t noticed any preponderance of Jews. The White woman are just typical sluts going for the big Black cock (which is not a myth by the way). The men are simply extreme fucktards, actual literal cucks if you can fathom that, and the whole thing is being driven by groovy faddism.

As is, if I get a girlfriend in the Current Year, if I’m really groovy and cool and hip, I pimp out my lady for free to some mean Black dude who fucks her while laughing at me, calling me a pussy and making fun of my smalldick (It’s a new noun!). I stand in the corner and enjoy being humiliated by this more masculine guy because I’m a pathetic pussy and an idiot to boot.

Then of course to be truly hip and right-on and cool, I would have the Black bull force me to suck his cock while laughing and calling me a pathetic faggot. Then I would eat the bull’s cum out of my wife’s pussy while this guy laughs at me some more and not only that but my wife berates me for being a pathetic homo who can’t even get it up.

If I’m truly bitchin’ and awesome, I totally get off on all of this because I’m a pathetic wimpy excuse for a man.

Apparently this is the model for a normal White couple in the Current Year. Color me uninterested and nauseated.

There doesn’t seem to be any presence of Jews in any of this scene. Of course there are a lot of Black men who are more than happy to be bulls and fuck pathetic White guys’ wives. Well, who could blame them, right?

The website Blacked is big on this stuff, but there’s also a fair amount of White men with Black women and White women with Black women lesbian stuff. I’m not aware that it’s a bunch of Jews behind Blacked. I figured it was always some Black guys laughing in the background and high-fiving each other, and who could blame them?

The White nationalists have pushed this argument that this cuck and bull story is a big evil Jew plot to race-mix Whites, get White women to fuck Black guys, and get White men cucked by Black guys and their own women. The Whites in this scenario are either slutty whores or pathetic wimps, depending on the gender, neither of which is very flattering.

The Black guys are studs who are lording it over pathetic White men, cuckolding them, and fucking their women right in front of their faces, so obviously they come out on top. The viewers are all sitting back eating popcorn watching the trainwreck or jerking off to the sex, or probably both actually. The producers sit back and count the money and laugh at it all.

Obviously this would be an excellent anti-White scheme for White-hating Jews. There’s the race-mixing stuff and even the added topping of White genocide when the women decide to get “thoroughly Blacked” by having a Black man’s baby. Yeah, that’s actually a thing, believe it or not. Any Jew who thought up a  propaganda scam like this ought to get a Nobel Prize in Anti-White and White Genocide Sciences, assuming there is such a category.

Except I’ve never seen any good evidence that this is some evil Jew plot to screw over the White man. I looked around and couldn’t find it. Instead, this seems to be is just a case of White people voluntarily joining in on some pathetic fad whereby White men get off on getting cucked by their women by Black guys like a bunch of pathetic morons. This isn’t White Genocide. It’s White Suicide and a lot of White people bought a round trip ticket for some unfathomable reason.

Alt Left: Standard Antisemitism Is Rightwing and Has Nothing to Offer Me or Any Other Liberal or Progressive Person

Other than the role of Israel in US politics and foreign policy, which is truly malign, as far as any other beefs against Jews that antisemites have, I’m not really into them. Those arguments just don’t resonate with me. I don’t particularly care what Jews do in my country outside of the Israel thing. Who cares!

Antisemitism is rightwing anyway. I get annoyed at Jews’ bullshit, and I like to talk about how they annoy me, but that’s not a matter of hatred. I don’t hate annoying people. They’re not contemptible; they’re just annoying. Two different things.

But as far as the Jews’ bullshit, games, and scams, that’s just them being silly.  All of the rest of us are morons for falling for these silly ethnic games they are playing on us. And if we are falling for their crap, oh well. We deserve whatever we get.

I’m not into Jews’ Endless Victim trip, which is really just Jewish Identity Politics. And I’ll bash Jewish IP on here like I bash any other IP. But I bash all retarded IP’s. Jewish IP isn’t anymore idiotic and nonsensical than all the others. All the IP’s are really the same at the end of the day.

Anyway I don’t hate professional victims. I just think they are complete idiots, and I laugh at them. What sort of a moron spends his whole life wailing about what a victim he is? I hate to use the word, but that’s what a loser does. So all the victim addicts are losers in a sense. They lack the basic pride needed to love themselves enough to not fall into the pathetic victim trap.

Now if your people really are getting fucked over, ok, well, you don’t have much choice. The victim role has been shoved upon you, and owning it is just facing facts.

The classic antisemitic beef has always been rightwing.

I will go over the standard anti-Semitic line as it has been forged for the last 150 years or so, but first I will discuss other things. Prior to that, antisemitism was based on other things.

Some were silly things like Jews killed Jesus. Except Jesus himself was a Jew, and Christians are literally worshiping this Jewish dude as their hero, but never mind that. It’s really sad how many Jews were probably killed for this BS.

Another silly reason was that Jews refused to convert to Christianity. I don’t understand why that’s important at all much, less a reason to kill a man. Obviously this doesn’t resonate with me.

Others were tragic lies like Jews being accused of poisoning village wells during the plague. That’s just made-up BS; it’s not even true. Sadly, many Jews were murdered for this nasty lie.

In the Middle Ages, Jews were often persecuted due to being the visible face of feudal rule. No one saw the feudal lords. The only face of feudal rule your average serf saw were Jewish tax collectors.

Logically, Jews tended to get killed when the usual peasant rebellions took place, except they pretty much deserved it for collecting taxes for the lords, although the Jewish women, children,  old men, and those who were not working for the lords should have been spared. Anti-Jewish pogroms were very ugly things. You don’t even want to know the details.

The modern form of antisemitism is a racial antisemitism which was founded by a German man named Marr in the 1870’s  who founded the Anti-Semitic League. Yep, that’s where we get the term that everyone likes to take apart as being irrational.

Except words and phrases get to be irrational in terms of etymology. Does “You’re pulling my leg literally mean that?” No? Ok, then why say it? In Spanish, you say, “You’re pulling my hair?” Does that make any more sense? Of course not. See what I mean? Words and phrases don’t have to literally make sense. They only have to mean whatever the people who use them say that they mean. #1 rule of a subfield of Linguistics called Semantics.

Oddly enough, Marr had previously married and divorced three separate wives, all Jewish. Hell, that’s probably why he hated Jews right there, ha ha. The general argument of these “new antisemites” or “modern antisemites” was that Jews are anti-nationalists and basically traitors to the homeland. I’m not sure how valid that argument was or is. The Dreyfus Affair is a case in point of this argument.

A lot of Jews fought nobly in World War 1. During Kristallnacht, many Jews put on their WW1 uniforms and went out and stood in front of their shops to try to protect them on the grounds that people would respect the fact that they were patriots. It didn’t work. They got beat up and their stores got burned down anyway. That’s so sad.

There was an argument that a lot of Jews tried to get out of World War 2, but I’m not sure how valid that is. That’s rather low if they did considering that in Europe anyway, we fought on their behalf.

But my father had two close Jewish friends who he met during World War 2.

One man served in the Pacific with my father in Okinawa and then went to China with him after the war. That trip to China was one of the peaks of my father’s life. He talked about it a lot. It was like this wild adventure.

Another served on the European front in Italy and then in Germany with the Liberation. He was there when the death camps were liberated. The US military said that Jewish soldiers didn’t have to go see the death camps if they didn’t want to, but my father’s friend went anyway. It was bad, real bad. No words to describe how bad it was. So two of my father’s Jewish friends served in the war. Doesn’t sound like a lot of them got out of it.

Later, other forms of rightwing antisemitism formed in the 20th Century with these basic arguments.

  1. Jews are Communists and Jews led the Bolshevik Revolution that killed 90 million billion zillion gazillion Russian Christians!!

This one is funny. I supported the Bolshevik Revolution. I’m practically a Goddamned Commie. Jews led the Bolshevik Revolution? Ha ha, thank you very much, Jews! Jews are a bunch of Commies? It’s not true anyway but if it’s true, thank you very much, Jews!

2. Jews push racemixing and are trying to genocide the White race. There’s actually some truth to this. Jews in the US have indeed been trying to make Whites a minority in the US,  or at least some of them have. Some of them have anyway. As one Jew said, “When we get Whites down below 50%, a Nazi government can never come to rise in the US.” See what they are doing? It’s all about self-preservation. They’re not just doing it be evil.

I don’t particularly care about this either than to note that the Jews are engaging in sleazy double standards as usual.

1. Jews all have to marry other Jews and no mixing is allowed or they go extinct.

2. But Whites need panmixia!

So promote racial fidelity for your own group while promoting racial suicide and mixture for  your enemies. Sleazy. But hey, that’s the way they are.

I figure that if Whites are so stupid as to be conned by this by pissant little tribe of humans called Jews (who are no more important than any other pissant tribe like Chechens, Burushaski, Dinka, Tuareg, or what have you) then we deserve whatever they con us into. I have no sympathy for morons. And if we Whites want to mix away and go extinct out of own own free will, which is apparently the case, well then, that’s own choice.

3. Jews promote racial hatred against Whites,  make Whites out to be the bad guys, and promote non-Whites as glorious, perfect people while promoting Whites as devils. Well, that’s awful rich of the Jews to do that considering that they’re obviously White themselves, except they lie as usual and say they’re not.

This is just a stupid Jewish game:

We’re not White (though we are), and we are non-Whites (except we’re not) along with the glorious Browns, Blacks, and Yellows, all fighting the evil White oppressor (which is actually us because we’re White). Except that Jews won’t date or marry these glorious non-Whites they throw themselves in with. Hell, they won’t even live in the same neighborhood with them.

It doesn’t even make sense logically, but a lot of Jewish arguments are like that.

So, more Jewish scamming, double standards, tribal thinking  – the usual crap. But this game is so stupid. I mean if we Whites really cared, we could probably raise a fuss about all this anti-White hatred, except the Jews and their non-White pals call us Nazis when we Whites ask people to please, pretty please not be racist against us.

Well, the Jews are definitely playing a real low game here all right, but I don’t particularly care about White-bashing and anti-White racism. I hardly deal with it, and I just laugh at any non-White who acts racist towards me because, I hate to say it, I actually do feel superior to them deep down inside at that point when they are bashing my race.

But I can see why any racially aware White person, certainly a White nationalist, would have a huge beef against Jews. They have a right to that beef because from these Whites’ POV, Jews are definitely screwing over their people.

Except I’m not a racially aware White or a White nationalist, so I don’t care.

4. Jews promote civil rights, feminism, gay rights, tranny rights, and all sorts of other civil rights stuff to weaken the moral fiber of White society so the Jews can take over and out-compete the Whites. Well, all of those movements were good ideas at least in  theory, so good on the Jews. And I doubt if they did it to weaken us. They probably just did it out of a strong sense of social justice, which Jews have had for a long time now, and that is very noble of them.

The argument also says that Jews promote these divide and conquer movements among Whites while sparing their own kind. Well, that’s not true. Jewish society is full of some of the worst feminists of them all. And it didn’t use to be, but gay and lesbian Jews are on just about every corner. I assume there are plenty of Jewish trannies too, as Jews seem to go in for anything sexually perverse for some reason.

But then you have (((George Soros))) who goes around to White Gentile countries promoting all of these rights moments, including a truly insane feminist group called Femen, which is his baby. Femen is raising the usual Hell that femikooks anywhere raise, mostly in Eastern Europe. On the other hand, when Femen tried to set up a chapter in Israel, (((Soros))) refused to fund it.

Now I am very suspicious of this man!

His game:

White Gentile societies need the most divisive radical feminism to turn the men and women against each other (Why do they need this?), while we Jews wouldn’t dare subject our own people to this divisive bullshit.

Ok, this is the sort of thing that the Elders of Zion do in The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Promote all this junk for their enemies to divide them while sparing their own kind.

So congratulations Mr. (((Soros)))! You succeeded in being a living example of the worst anti-Jewish stereotypes of all! In fact, you appear to have walked right out of the pages of the Protocols, one of the most anti-Jewish books ever written! Brilliant!

Jews act out the worst anti-Jewish stereotypes and then they are shocked! Shocked! When antisemitism logically follows that. They create antisemitism, then they scream and yell about it. That’s dumb, but that’s not a reason to hate them. That’s just these foolish Jews bringing in down on themselves. Why should I hate someone for being self-destructive?

In general, I don’t care that Jews push all these SJW movements, but Mr. (((Soros)))’ behavior is extremely uncool. At any rate, (((Soros))) is not even good for the Jews. The guy’s a one man Antisemitism Manufacturing Plant in the form of a human.

Another thing I want to point out is that the SJW’s are on autopilot now. I doubt if feminism, gay rights, civil rights, tranny rights, and whatever else rights need Jews to push their causes anymore. All the US Jews could take off for Israel or the moon tomorrow, and I am pretty sure that these movements would charge right ahead. That’s because the leadership and bases of these movements is swarming with Gentiles.

5. Jews own the media. Yeah, they do, sort of. And they took it over on purpose. Not to be evil but to protect themselves. And the consequence of this Jewish media is…? What? Other than the Israel-firster stuff, not much.

Further, I do not think the media needs Jews anymore either. The other day, I saw a Canadian paper formerly owned by (((Izzy Asper))), an Israel-firster billionaire who was also a real ratfuck, as you might expect. The paper, The  National Post, is now run by Gentiles.

Well, if you go read that paper, you would think that (((Asper))) never left because the paper reads exactly like it did when (((Asper))) ran it. Still a full-blown Israel-firster paper, but now the Israel-firster articles are all written by Gentiles!

I have seen other papers go from Jewish to Gentile ownership, and not one single thing changes. So I think there is just a “media elite” politics in North America which is shared by all owners, editors, and writers for the MSM, Jews and  Gentiles both. They both push wild SJWism, bash Whites, uphold non-Whites as glorious, and are fanatical Israel-firsters.

6. Jews own Hollywood. Yes, and? Granted, it’s not very democratic, but Hollywood is not nearly as Jewish as it used to be. Many directors and producers now are Gentiles. The Jews still own a lot of the studios, but Gentiles have been forming their own studios lately – Coppola is an excellent example.

Supposedly Jews use Hollywood movies and TV (which is still very Jewish, granted) to push the same stuff – SJWism, anti-White propaganda, reverence for glorious non-Whites, etc. Except Hollywood doesn’t really go along with the Israel-firster stuff, and a number of directors don’t even go along with US imperialism.

And once again, the Gentile directors and producers push all the same themes that the Jewish ones do.  There is a Hollywood elite that has a similar politics shared by both  Jews and Gentiles.

7. Jews make porn. They do. But there are an awful lot of Gentiles making porn now too, right? The industry used to be extremely Jewish in the 1970’s and 80’s – now it is much less so.

But let’s try a thought experiment. All the  US Jews take off for Israel, the moon, Atlantis, wherever. No more Jews. You think the porn industry will go under? Hell no. All the outlets owned by sleazy Jews will be immediately taken over by sleazy Gentiles. Isn’t that obvious? And the Gentiles in porn push all the same sleazy crap: racemixing, Blacks cucking Whites, or whatever.

7. Jews are aggressive, rude, tight, and don’t like non-Jews. A lot of them are. This is particularly the case with the Orthodox and Super Jews like you find in Israel. The more “Jewish” the person is, the more they act in this “Jewy” way. The more assimilated the Jew is, the less they act that way. A lot of Jewish men can definitely be pretty aggressive. The women seem to be less so. After all, they are females.

But that’s not really important. Anyway, exactly how many people actually hate Jews because they are like this? Hell, I know wild Judeophiles who laugh and openly admit that the Jews are obnoxious. And these are people who love Jews.

I’ve also read thousands of antisemites on the web over the years. I haven’t found one yet who actually hated Jews because a lot of them are not real nice. So few if any people are actual antisemites for that reason. I’m sure Jews will call these people antisemites, but they all everyone that.

As far as my opinion goes, at the end of the day, this is just not important. That’s just the petty sociological behavior of a single ethnic group.

Lots of ethnic groups have funny ways of behaving, both good and bad. In many cases, ethnic behavior isn’t important as long as they don’t break the law or seriously disrupt society. Being annoying is nothing. I’m not going to hate some whole race of humans because a lot of them act annoying. That’s a petty issue. It’s hardly a reason to hate a whole ethnic group or race. I imagine most people who feel that Jews act this way feel the same way.

It should be clear now that standard antisemitism is rightwing and has always been rightwing. There’s nothing here for liberals, Leftists, or progressive people.

Alt Left: Nope, Sexual Harassment Was Not a Big Deal from 1975-2005, Sorry

In Jason’s recent article, he says that gawking and crudeness (sexual come-ons) have never been acceptable at school or at work at any time going all the way back to the 1950’s. Well, I was around in the 1970’s, 80’s, and 90’s. I do not remember even one case of a woman complaining of sexual harassment back then.

I do not remember one case of a woman complaining that a man was staring at her. I do not remember one case of a woman complaining that a man made a crude remark to her. Certainly I cannot remember one case when I was ever seriously accused of any of these things.

I didn’t start hearing about it until 2005, when I was 48 years old. I was told that I was staring at the baristas and making them uncomfortable. But I was doing the same thing I’ve done my whole life, not even 1% different.

It’s just that I had gotten older, and as you get older, suddenly the behavior that they tolerate without batting an eye when a young man does it is somehow illegal when an older man does it. It took me a while to figure out the new rules of middle aged man and young women, which is something I am still figuring out by the way.

Wasn’t SJWism getting going pretty good around 2005? Anyway, it is only in the past 14 years from 2005-2019 that I have heard one thing about staring, sexual harassment, harassment period, illegal talking to other humans, or any of this insane bullshit.

My conclusion is that this is a modern phenomenon of the Current Year being brought on by Peak Modern Feminism, which gets nuttier and nuttier every year like all forms of Identity Politics. So in any given Current Year, modern feminism will be a bit more insane, weird, and demanding in the previous year.

It seems like I have been looking at women my whole life. I never gave any thought to whether I was staring or not, so I have no idea if I was doing it! But women and girls have been staring at me most of my life since age 17 or so. Often I stared at them and they stared back at me. Or they stared at me and I didn’t stare back. Or I stared at them and they didn’t stare back at me. It wall no matter because no one cared.

I remember in college, one friend of mine said, “I know you like to rape women with your eyes, Bob.” He said it as a joke. This was before feminists made it illegal for most men to look at women at all, much less stare at them.

So all through my whole life, I looked at women with absolutely zero problems. And they stared at me a lot, I mean a lot.

Once I was in a library at Santa Ana College in 1985 (age 27), and I looked up and every single woman in the whole damned library in front of me was looking right at me with those weird blank zombie robot stares.

Once I walked into the Roxy nightclub in 1982 (age 24). As soon as I stepped in the door, I swear to God, every single woman in that club stared at me. It actually frightened me a bit, and I sort of shuddered. I don’t know why I found it frightening, but it is a bit unnerving. Try it sometime. Walk into a nightclub and if every woman in the club looks right at you, see how it makes you feel. You might find it if not unnerving, at least somewhat frightening.

I worked at all sorts of jobs all over the place, and I never heard one complaint of me staring at women or being creepy or any of that crap. I was at college and university for many years, including advanced degree study, from 1975-1984, then 1991-1994. That’s 12 years post-secondary education. No one complained one time that I stared at women or acted creepy around women. Not even one time, ever.

When a woman stares at you, generally speaking, it means she likes you. If a woman doesn’t like you, she simply ignores you. Women who hate you usually do not stare at you.

Now and again a woman who hates you may stare at you. In that case, the stare would look hostile or like “What the Hell is the matter with you anyway?” This doesn’t happen very often.

Generally speaking, the blank dead robot stare means she likes you, like really likes you, like wants to do something sexual or romantic with you. A woman in love with you often stares at you for long periods of time with an utterly blank look on her face. Often a little Mona Lisa mystery smile, almost on the edge of bare laughter, appears.

I remember having staring contests with girlfriends.

We would be in the front room of a house she was house-sitting at. For 15 minutes we just sat there and stared at each other with funny little smiles on our faces. Neither or us said one damned word and the room was quiet as a mouse.

It was actually a nice experience, rather pure in the way that religious novitiates try for silence, work, and prayer. Life bared down to meagerest sensory output. Silent and looking. Praying and meditating into each other’s eyes. And not one word. Pure as a monastery.

So staring is quite helpful for men. It tells us when a woman is interested in us. I hate to think that women would stop staring at us because then it would be hard to tell if they liked us or not.

Gay men are extremely creepy and they stare at each other in very creepy ways constantly. And they stare at straight men they like in that same creepy, unnerving way. They also harass each other constantly with rude, crude, sexual remarks and often a lot of out and out grabbing of other men’s bodies in various ways.

In other words, gay men treat other men exactly the way straight men treat women, except 5-10X worse. This gives the lie to the insane feminist idea that sexual harassment is based on sexism, misogyny, aggression, hostility and even violence against women. Yes, these lunatics actually say that sexual harassment (guys trying to get laid or get a date) is a form of violence against women. It’s as bad as hitting her over the head.

Obviously then gay men’s sexual harassment of other gay men is based on hatred of men (misandry), hostility, aggression, and even violence against other gay men. Gay men harass each other because they hate other gay men, or they hate men, or something, or this or that, or whatnot, or whatever. Does that even make any sense at all? Of course not. Yet this is the only logical conclusion we can draw from feminism’s lunatic definition of sexual harassment.

Obviously all of this is complete nonsense. Men sexually harass women for the same reason that men consensually flirt with women and for the same reason that gay men sexually harass each other in epidemic fashion. Men do these things because they’re horny. They do them because they’re horny and they’re trying to get laid. They’re trying to attract a woman for dating, sexual activities, or romance.

Alt Left: Why Identity Politics Gets Crazier Every Year, and Why It Has To

Every year things get a little bit better for all of these groups, so they are less oppressed. Instead of throwing a party like they should, they jump up and down even harder and yell that they are oppressed more than ever.

And all the while the move the Oppression Goalposts a bit further away and declare a number of behaviors and  speech forms which were previously harmless now forms of hate and hate speech. The need to continually be oppressed even while their lives get better and better is the reason that IP gets a little bit more insane every year.

Do you follow?

Obviously feminism in the Current Year is more insane than it’s ever been. Black IP is nuttier and more extremist than it’s ever been. Gay IP has never been crazier. Pretty soon we will be homophobes if we refuse to put a cock in our mouths.

I’m already seeing a few signs of this mindset here and there with Gay IP people saying that being a heterosexual man is inherently homophobic in and of itself. The only way to stop being a mean homophobe gay hating Nazi and be nice to teh geyz is to go find yourself a nearby penis and put it between your lips, I guess. That way you’re bisexual which is now the only way not to be a homophobic bigot, I suppose.

Of course the trannies are more nuts than ever. Their particular form of IP is new, so the goalposts are flying away faster than you can run. This is typical of any newly created IP which needs to go into overproduction mode to catch up to all of the more advanced forms of oppression who have gathering grudges and insults for decades.

It’s true that the older fave oppressions don’t grow nearly as quickly because they’ve already concluded that half of daily life by the oppressive Other somehow oppresses them in some way or other. In other words, they’re running out of things to complain about. The only solution is to start complaining about nuttier and nuttier things, to get even more sensitive, and to increase the crazy demands on the evil oppressor Other a bit more.

Alt Left: All of the MSM and all of Silicon Valley Is Deep State

It’s painfully obvious that there is no free press at all anywhere in the West. There is only Fake News MSM completely controlled by the US government and NATO.

There is some real news on the Internet but the Deep State is now going after all of that too. Twitter and (((Facebook))) are mass-banning any pages or users that publish anything that goes against the Deep State/CIA line.

Twitter and (((Facebook))) are both absolutely part of the Deep State now.

So is (((Google))). (((Google))) partnered with the Atlantic Council (NATO Deep State) to downgrade most leftwing outlets critical of US foreign policy as “fake news.” The Atlantic Council issued reports showing all the “fake news” or “Russian” sites.

Any site critical of US foreign policy is not only fake news but it is also always Russian. Hundreds of Americans were banned from Twitter when Jack Dorsey (Deep State) said they were “Russian propaganda bots.” (((Mark Zuckerberg))) (Deep State) also banned many pages from (((Facebook))) as either “fake news” or “controlled by Russia.”

The leadership of (((Google))) is absolutely Deep State. Not only did they bury most leftwing sites on their search engine, they have also removed many videos from (((Youtube))) on the grounds that they are “fake news” or “Russian propaganda.” Quite a few of these accounts were left up, but (((Youtube))) required them to carry warning messages saying that the creators of the video had links to Russia.

I’ve been telling people for a long time that there is nothing groovy or cool about these bitchin’ new capitalists in Silicon Valley. They’re the same old capitalist ratfucks, except possibly they’re even worse than the old kind we sort of got used to. Like any corporation on Earth, the Silicon Valley corporations are not progressive in any serious way and are in fact conservatives and reactionaries like all corporations are.

These corporations are said to be “progressive” because in addition to being rightwing corporations on anything important, they have also adopted leftwing SJWism as it’s no threat to their bottom line.

And in answer to the question I assume you are getting ready to ask me, no, supporting degenerate nonsense like Drag Queen Story Hour at your local library, perverted gay pride parades, and transsexual bathhouses for all ages does not make you a progressive because those are not progressive issues.

They fall into another category called Moral/Traditional versus Immoral/Degenerate. Supporting sick nonsense like the above doesn’t make you left wing at all. It just makes you a degenerate. You SJW degenerates proud of yourselves?

 

Alt Left: Some (((Background))) to the (((Jeffrey Epstein Sexual Blackmail Spy Agency Case)))

This is the audio version of Whitney Webb’s excellent article on Mintpress about the (((Jeffrey Epstein))) case. 45 pages if you want to read it instead. A lot of great photos though if you only want to listen to the podcast. The link is worthwhile if only for the photos.

This sort of thing has been going on a long time in the US, and it’s mostly been run by a certain type of (((person))). It started with the elder (((Bronfman))) of the spirits and later airline (Virgin Airlines) fortune in Canada. While the current (((Bronfman))) seems pretty above water, his father was not.

And the spirits fortune got its start with mass bootlegging in Prohibition by the elder (((Bronfman))). Elder (((Bronfman))) was in deep with (((organized crime))) his entire life, in part the Mafia but early on mostly the (((Meyer Lansky crime family))), later of much prominence in Las Vegas.

Early on these people got deeply involved in sexual blackmail of important politicians.

It is little known but the US government made extensive use of the Mafia in World War 2 to help defeat the Axis Powers. After the war, the Mafia exploded in size and influence. For ~10 years after the war, almost all criminal cases against the Mafia were dismissed at the behest of the US government.

Later we move on to an awful man named (((Rosensteil))), another extremely rich man and major (((Organized Crime))) figure. This man later got in deep with J. Edgar Hoover. Both men were gay. (((Rosensteil))) perfected the art of sexual blackmail, specializing in teenage boys.

He threw parties at his house with many VIP’s and politicians in attendance. There were always plenty of teenage boys there. The men in attendance there were all gay or bisexual and made use of these teenage boy prostitutes. The encounters were then recorded and used to blackmail VIP’s and politicians.

(((Rosensteil))) later formed a very close friendship with J. Edgar Hoover. He blackmailed Hoover via these same teenage boy parties, which Hoover often attended, usually dressed in a woman’s dress and introduced to others as “Mary.” Hoover’s homosexuality was a dirty little secret for decades. My grandfather used to say that Hoover was a “fruit,” which was what homosexuals were called back then.

Hoover himself via the FBI also used sexual blackmail to blackmail many VIP’s and politicians, so the FBI was in on this too. Hoover said he was doing it as part of the US government’s war on Communism.

Later during the McCarthy era, a horrible man named (((Roy Cohn))) became Joseph McCarthy’s right hand man. He was even more malicious than McCarthy during the hearings, and his behavior was so awful that he eventually had to be removed from his position. But (((Cohn))) also had deep relations with Hoover and later with Ronald and Nancy Reagan and Donald Trump.

(((Cohn))) was Trump’s mentor and it was via (((Cohn))) that Trump perfected the art of being, well, Donald Trump. (((Cohn))) was also friends with (((Alan Dershowitz))) and other awful human beings. (((Cohn’s father))) was a prominent New York judge who was high up in the local Democratic Party. At that time, the Democratic Party in New York was virtually an annex of Organized Crime.

(((Cohn))) later perfected the art of sexual blackmail via parties at a special light blue painted room in a large well known hotel.

These parties were well-stocked with teenage boys, who were utilized by (((Cohn))), Hoover and many other VIP’s and politicians, including, believe it or not, Cardinal Spellman of the local Catholic Church, one of the most famous Catholic Cardinals in the US. Spellman was also very gay and he protected many homosexual priests who liked teenage boys during his tenure.

Keep in mind that (((Cohn))) was also friends with people like (((Barbara Walters))), Bill Clinton, Roger Stone (another protege of (((Cohn)))), and (((Cohn’s cousin))), a monster named (((Dick Morris))).

As the podcast ends, we learn that (((Jeffrey Epstein))) was simply one of the successors to (((Roy Cohn))) after (((Cohn’s))) death of AIDS in 1986.

As we can see, sexual blackmail has a long history in the US and it has mostly been used by a (((certain group of highly amoral people))). Another shocker that comes through loud and clear with this broadcast the US government’s (and even the FBI’s!) close relationship with Organized Crime spanning decades.

It’s also been very well-known that the CIA has worked closely with Organized Crime groups all over the world since World War 2 as part of its fight against Communism. Yes, the Mafia were an important of the CIA’s effort, but the CIA also infiltrated Organized Crime networks all over the world to enlist them in the war on Communism.

Quite a shocker of a podcast!

N.B. Wow, look at all those (((parenthesis marks))). Never seen so many in my life. Must be a gigantic (((coincidence))).

To Know Thine Own Self Is the Rule

To know thine own is the rule – always know yourself. This is an ancient Greek aphorism, but it may be one of the most important lessons one ever learns about this journey called life. But how many of us ever get there?

SHI: I’d rather have you as a strutting narcissist than a wannabe Incel.

I’m still a strutting narcissist, no wait, someone with high self-esteem. I’m not a wannabe incel. Why would anyone want to be an incel? That would be a volcel anyway. I get the incels though, I get it. All of us men are incel at various times anyway or at least most of us are. Especially bachelor life is notoriously feast or famine.

I’ve been on both sides of this thing, from Alpha all the way down to Omega (which is about where I am nowadays lol), and I can see the whole sexual landscape from here. So it gives you a very nice perspective having seen the whole map and hiked all of the land yourself. Your understand the terrain a lot better.

SHI: Fuck them, you’re not what they are. Don’t have to internalize their problems as your own.

No, they are mostly correct, at least on those things. I have thought about it forever, and yep, they’ve got it down. But really I have known all these things about myself on some level or other for forever now. I know myself pretty well. It’s just that I hide the bad parts of me from myself most of the time because I don’t want to think about that stuff.

You don’t like that I went over the bad parts of me. Hey, that’s ok. But I embrace all of myself, pretty much, and those parts that I think are bad and I want to change I work on all the time. There are other supposedly bad parts of myself that I don’t feel like changing because they’re too much fun.

You are into total self-confidence and always thinking of yourself positively. You don’t want to think negative things about yourself because you think that messes up your Game. Actually it doesn’t if you integrate them well into your psyche and you get ok with your flaws.

I am beyond the age where I need false optimism and denial of my bad side anymore. I wish to know my whole self, good and bad, right and wrong. And I hope to accept it, well, most of it anyway. That way I am a whole person.

SHI: I can understand that you might be having a bit of bad luck phase. It happens to everyone but it’s never forever.

That’s not really true. I’m afraid that this is just the way it is at this age of life. It’s not a real great age, I have to tell you, folks. I mean I like myself just fine still, but apparently that view isn’t widely shared.

I don’t get along with women much at all these days. They pretty much treat me like crap. The young ones almost all do, and a lot of the older ones are not real nice either, or they’ve given up on men altogether. It’s all part of the age and sex dynamic. I guess men my age are simply not very well-liked by women. The best I could hope for would probably be a woman my age. Some of them still like me.

*****

The women who loved me also said many wonderful things about me. The critiques in the other post are some of the things that they told me about myself, some of which shocked me because I didn’t realize I was that way. All of the things I’ve listed were valid judgements at least at the time they were made. I left the BS judgements out.  There have always been some of those from different women.

At different times of my life, girlfriends have criticized other parts of me or more properly ways that I was behaving at that time. I was in a huge rut for a while there, and I am afraid they were correct. But I’ve moved beyond those dark moods of my early adulthood. My 20’s were wild, but they were also rocky. I didn’t list those critiques in my post because I’m not like that anymore, though unfortunately I was like that at the time.