Polar Bear: I thought the stab in the back was real. The British offered Jews Israel to turn on Germany and the scorpion stung the frog.
The British offered which Jews Israel if they turned on Germany? You mean the Balfour Declaration?
This is not correct.
Yes, Jews were involved in turning public opinion against Germany, but it was not in Germany. Balfour had no effect on German Jews, most of whom disliked Zionism. You must realize that Zionism was very unpopular among European Jews at that time and all through the 1920’s. I’m not sure about the 30’s. I think Jewish immigration to Palestine really picked up then.
Look, this is what happened.
The US Jews said, “You Brits give us Israel and we will get the Americans into the war with our money and media power.” So the Brits gave the Jews Palestine. And the Jews with their money and media power launched a vast campaign all over the US to paint Germans as otherworldly, bloodthirsty aliens. The papers ran endless atrocity stories of “the Hun” or the German. Most of them were made up out of whole cloth. Things like bayoneting babies for kicks, that sort of thing.
Well, the American people got so stirred up with anti-German sentiment that they finally acquiesced to our getting into the war. This was the era of isolationism, remember?
So did “the Jews” stab Germany in the back? Not really. A stab in the back would only apply to nationals who turned against the homeland and that was not the case. American Jews could not stab Germany in the back simply because they were not Germans. Only German Jews could do that. Furthermore, as Americans, US Jews were probably more inclined to support our close ally the UK instead of Germany. So we were backing the Allies in World War 1 the whole time, but it was mostly just moral support. US Jews could have surely been expected to wage a propaganda campaign against Germany. After all, the US was on the side of the Allies.
Instead, US Jews turned the US against Germany. US Jews had nothing to do with German Jews, although many of them had come from Germany. German Jews and US Jews nevertheless had very tenuous connections. A Jewish snake of a banker named Warburg (think he had something to do with the Federal Reserve sleaze) played a significant role in funding both sides of the war.
In Henry Ford’s Dearborn Independent, there were many articles about this character and I could not make sense of him. He was literally funding all sides in World War 1 all of the time. He would pull support for Germany and fund the allies and then pull support for the allies and fund the Germans. His shenanigans seem to know no bounds. I came away thinking that this guy was an amoral slimeball.
I’ve read issues of Henry Ford’s paper Dearborn Independent in the 1910’s. It’s not particularly antisemitic. It’s more that US Jews were acting pretty horribly back then.
They tried to take over the US Stock Exchange and almost succeeded until antisemitic Gentiles blew whistle on the scam and stopped it.
They had already grabbed Hollywood. Four or five Jews from Galicia somehow managed to take over Hollywood from 1900-1920. This was around the time of Birth of a Nation and other extremely racist films coming out. Jews didn’t like that sort of racism because as a general rule, it tends to circle back around to the Jews sooner or later. So the Jews took over Hollywood not necessarily out of greed but to control the narrative and protect the Jews from racist and antisemitic White Christians.
Similarly, wealthy Jews funded takeovers of many US newspapers from 1880-1920. The Ochs and Sulzberger families were among this group. They took over the New York Times and continue to run it to this day (talk about slimeballs – check out Sulzberger).
In the late 1800’s all papers were run by White Christians and racist stories were the order of the day, as casual racism was normal in US society back then. The Jews became very alarmed at this and once again figured it would circle back around to the Jews at some point. Once again, the newspapers were taken over to the protect the Jews, not to make them a fortune. So many things the Jews do are for self-protection. You can’t understand Jews until you understand this fact. Jews are not so much wicked as they are paranoid, and they have a right to be somewhat paranoid.
The Jews also hatched a conspiracy to take over finance banking, and they managed to take over most of these banks before antisemitic Gentiles got together and fought back.
They then made a run at commercial banking and only made some headway before word went out and antisemitic Gentiles blew the whistle and stopped the Jews dead in their tracks. To this day, Jews do not have much presence in US commercial banking, but they continue to have significant presence in finance banking and they are quite important to the New York Stock Exchange.
Ford’s paper was blowing the whistle on all of these Jewish shenanigans, and good for him! This was a very important thing for a Gentile to do at that time. The Jews had to be stopped before they took over the whole damn country, which seems to have been their plan.
You can also see here that when Jews wage ethnic warfare on other ethnicities as they are wont to do, Gentiles absolutely must become antisemitic and hatch antisemitic conspiracies to stop the Jewish conspiracies. So at times, a certain amount of antisemitism is absolutely necessary and to fail to be antisemitic is basically suicidal.
As you can see, Jewish ethnic warfare is a direct cause of compensatory antisemitism in Gentiles. So Jews create antisemitism, to some extent anyway. This makes me angry. They go out of their way to directly cause anti-Jewish sentiment and then they scream and kvetch about it and play the victim. What a bunch of lowlifes.