Russia and China’s Moves Towards Ultranationalism

A commenter, John UK, attempted to defend the fascist and ultranationalist nature of the Chinese and Russian states on the grounds that they are fighting US imperialism. Whether they are or not is not particularly relevant. Anyway, why are Chinese ultra-sweatshops better than US imperialism?

These days both China and Russia are essentially fascist states. Putin smells like a fascist! He even has some fascist “youth league” where they go to these Hitler Youth type “summer camps” where they learn to attack Putin’s enemies – journalists, human rights groups, basically liberal society. He encourages his fascist youth group to “make lots of babies.” That’s natalism. Fascists are natalists. Natalism is not progressive. It’s fascist.

The youth group is even called Nashi. You know? Nashi? What does that sound like? Sounds like Nazi huh? There’s no way that’s an accident.

Putin’s shock troops serve the billionaire elite. The billionaires run their own private armies, like Mafias or death squads. They do whatever they want. When citizens protest their latest plans, like confiscating 10,000 acres for their development scheme, Putin calls his KGB style shock troops out to attack the people, Latin American style. Putin has his critics, like journalists, murdered on a regular basis. He shuts down opposition TV, radio and papers. He has committed genocide in the Caucasus for years now.

I support the armed secessionists in the Caucasus to the hilt. They certainly have a right to self-determination.

I appreciate that Putin is a nationalist and he stands up for his people and takes on US and NATO imperialism, but he’s a fascist nevertheless.

China seems to have abandoned socialism in favor of a form of 19th Century Industrial Revolution capitalism that kills at least 600,000 Chinese a year through overwork alone. It’s basically a murderous and even genocidal state, like a typical 3rd World capitalist state such as India. Mao was always a nationalist, and he always had fascist leanings. He treated the Tibetans horribly. Other minorities were terribly abused during the Cultural Revolution.

The Chinese have now replaced socialism with a particularly virulent type of Chinese ultranationalism with some really scary, fascist-like undertones. It’s sickening and downright frightening the way the PRC keeps threatening Taiwan. Isn’t it clear that they will never allow a free Taiwan to exist?

The Han invasions, riots and pogroms in Xinjiang recently reminded me of Kristallnact. The Han invasions and repression of the Tibetans are disgusting and ought to embarass any so-called progressive regime. Shame on them.

Good Video on the Taliban

A Western journalist embedded with them high in the mountains of Kunar Province. They have a very large gun, but I’m not sure what it is. We get to see them set ambushes for US convoys, avoid US planes, etc. We see them at home relaxing with their troops and their families.

One thing that is interesting is the phenotype of these Kunar Pashtuns. These are some of the Whitest looking Pashtuns I’ve ever seen. The Kunar Pashtuns are right next door to Nuristan. Nuristan and Chitral across the border has the Whitest looking people in the region. Lots of blond hair and blue and green eyes. As far as I’m concerned, these people are Whites. Anyone who says they’re not White ought to have their head examined.

Tim Wise, Tiresome Twit

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3Xe1kX7Wsc]

Well, I finally did it. I took the plunge and I watched a video of this asshole. I’ve never heard or seen him talk before. For some reason, that redneck Tennessee accent just makes him even funnier.

I don’t see why people are so wigged out about this guy. I’ve been reading this garbage forever. The whole worthless Left in the US has been talking like this idiot for as long as I can remember. Most of my leftwing websites and all the Left magazines and papers I’ve ever subscribed to were more or less channeling this idiot. So as far as the US Left goes, We Are All Tim Wise Now. And have been, for a long time now.

I don’t even know why I’m watching this. I usually can’t even be bothered to read him either. Why are we reading him and listening to him? Are we masochists? And it’s the same old same old anyway. The Western Left is Tim Wise, and has been for decades. And that’s a damn good reason why we have failed so spectacularly in our project, and why the Right has been running the show for 30 years now. Tim Wise is a diversion, and a silly one at that. But at the end of the day, I honestly think he’s irrelevant. I mean how many White people actually believe this crap. Screw the POC’s. Of course they’ll swallow it whole.

If I played this clip for the liberal to Left Whites I know, they would start shaking their heads and after a while, just walk out of the room. The guy’s a sideshow.

Bye Timmy.

Next!

The Truth About White Genocide in the USA

The terrifying reality of White genocide in the US is made painfully clear by this map. Whites are in green.

If you go to some of the more radical White nationalist sites like Majority Rights, you often hear that US Whites should be placed on the endangered species list by the US Fish and Wildlife Service. I agree, but the only question is whether Whites are Threatened or Endangered. I would say probably Threatened.

In the map above, Whites are in green. Those are the areas with a White majority in the US. Areas with an Hispanic majority are in orange. They include much of the Southwest and Texas, part of Washington state (!), part of Kansas (!), parts of Colorado, south Florida and an area around New York City.

Yellow are areas with a Native American majority. Those areas are mostly in Arizona, South Dakota and Alaska with smaller regions in North Dakota, New Mexico, Utah and Montana.

It is Blacks that White nationalists are most upset about. White nationalists are utterly terrified that Blacks are taking over the US. As you can see, they are only concentrated in the Black Belt, which closely follows the former cotton-growing region, and along the Lower Mississippi River. The Black Zone is in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina and Virginia with pockets in East Texas, North Florida, West Tennessee and around Washington DC, Detroit and Chicago. Truth is there are few large concentrations of Blacks in the US.

Louis CK – Being White

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TG4f9zR5yzY&feature=player_embedded]

By Louis CK, standup comic.

He exemplifies one of the main positions of the Liberal Race Realism platform, as described by observers – positive White racial identity. Liberal Race Realism is also open to non-Whites. In that case, we would advocate positive racial or ethnic identity for whichever group the person is a member of. Self-abasement and self-hatred is disreputable in most any race or ethnic group. Everyone should support their people.

I never cared much about being White other than the usual undercover “White pride” that almost all Whites have. I covered it up with BS PC White self-abnegation for a long time. I used to go around crowing about how Whites were inferior and laughing about it. Then I moved to an Hispanic city and I discovered that there are worse things than being White after all.

And like the guy in this video, ever since, I wake up every morning thinking, “Thank GOD for making me White!” I look in the mirror and think, “Yeah! White!” I would high-five the damned mirror except that it might hurt my hand. Why? Because I’m a Nazi? Of course not. Why then? Because I’m like the guy in this video.

Louis CK says any White person who doesn’t admit being White is great is an asshole. I agree. Almost all White nationalists fall into this category. Though they think White is the greatest thing since sliced bread (I agree), they also go on and on about how horrible it is to be White in the US. LOL, yeah right. That’s why they are so pitiful. Whites are being attacked! Oh Boo hoo! Waa waa! Mommy mommy! White nationalists seem like a bunch of pussies. What are they crying about? Whites are on top in the USA. Enjoy the scenery!

Say it loud! I’m White and I’m proud!*

*With apologies to the Godfather of Soul RIP.

Tea Party Blog

I believe a progressive commenter linked to this blog in the comments as some sort of a progressive blog.

It’s nothing of the sort. It only seems progressive in that it is populist. But this stuff is straight up rightwing populism by way of the Republican Party and the Tea Partiers.

The title, Revolt of the Plebes, has a working class feel about it, but this is all White middle class angst coming out of the Tea Parties. They complain and complain about the economy, but they don’t seem to have a clue about what caused it.

They think that the “elites” are trying to lower the standard of living of the middle class, but their main example of elites is Barack and Michelle Obama, who, while flawed, are on the liberal end of this project. One way that the elites are plotting to lower the middle class standard of living is by raising taxes! That’s not how it works though. Raising taxes typically results in government services in return for the taxation. It’s not exactly an elite project. It’s a progressive project, a form of wealth redistribution hopefully from the upper middle class and rich to the classes under them.

Like other rightwing populists, he excoriates Obama’s stimulus bill as useless. He also attacks Obama’s recent $26 billion for teaching jobs and Medicaid as a payoff to “fiscally irresponsible” state governments to powerful unions. The states were not spendthrifts. They are broke due to the Depression. Teachers are being laid off. They need to be rehired.

The contempt for schoolteachers and especially their unions is typical of American rightwing populism, which has always hated schoolteachers for some odd reason (anti-intellectualism?) and has always hated unions, because many middle class Americans are not members of unions. Since they are not in unions, they resent fellow middle class Americans who are in unions as getting undeservedly high wages and benefits. This is nothing but sour grapes.

Hatred of schoolteachers is not progressive. Contempt for unions, the organizations of the working class, in particular teacher unions, in many parts of the world (Latin America) some of the most radical unions around, is not progressive. Opposition to government spending on stimulus funds to get a dead economy going again is not progressive.

So we have these endless complaints about the dead economy, with no explanation on who killed the golden goose. The blame, if any, is opportioned out to mysterious “elites,” most of whom are liberals! It’s implied that taxation caused the slump. That’s certainly not the case.

Another hallmark of this stuff is opposition to the TARP bailouts. Though many Americans were angry about these bailouts, and I opposed them in the form they were ladled out, it was necessary to do that. A number of those firms are even paying us back. AIG may well pay us back in full. My objection was only that the TARP bailouts had to come with many strings attached to them re-regulating these bankster criminals back to the way they were in the 1930’s to rein in their fraud and make sure this doesn’t happen again.

But to simply refuse to bail out those huge banks would have been madness. It would have resulted in a slump much worse than the one we are experiencing right now. These are pure free marketeers who want no state intervention in their glorious free market economy. That’s nuttiness. You’re going back to the 1870’s and wild booms and busts. It’s irresponsible and senseless.

Do these clowns have any suggestions for how to get us out of this slump? None whatsoever. Other than gutting government spending. Gutting state spending in the midst of a Depression is sheer insanity. It means the Depression will go much deeper and continue much longer than before.

I’ve noticed that this stuff is becoming extremely popular. Too bad. It’s not progressive, offers no solutions and peddles only bad medicine. Further, in its attacks on working people, their unions, state spending, taxation and state intervention in the economy, it serves the project of the very elites and corporations that it claims to be attacking.

Very confused and ridiculous politics.

The PC Crowd’s War on Male Sexuality

Repost from the old site.

In the comments section, Lafayette Sennacherib opines that the PC Crowd just doesn’t seem to want men to have sex at all. I really think that the PC crowd is all about replacing male sexuality with female sexuality. Female sexuality is to be normalized and even enforced via laws and regulations.

A man is trying to pick up a woman. Obviously, he’s sexually harassing her. At the very least, he’s treating her like a sex object.

A man is looking at a beautiful woman. He is objectifying her and reducing her to a sex object.

A man is looking at a beauty pageant. He is objectifying females and disrespecting them.

A man is trying to get laid. He is evil because he is out to use and abuse women.

A man is having sex with a drunk woman (About the only way a lot of them will do it!). He is raping her.

A man is interested in group sex. He is a sick, evil pervert typical of males.

An older man looks at teenage girls, some of whom are 16-17. HE IS A PEDOPHILE! Huh?

A man is looking at porn and jerking off. First, he is first a loser for jerking off, and second, he is a sexist dog for looking at evil pornography which is hate propaganda against women.

A man buys a prostitute. He is assisting in the subjugation of women, little more than a pimp.

I do not think that society should favor male or female sexuality by law or regulation. Males and females want different things, so there is a War of the Sexes. As the French say, Vive le differance! This War is eternal and present in all normal human societies. Sexual equality is probably not possible, and some leading feminists are now admitting to this.

I enjoy Hispanic culture in the US as far as sex goes. The women seem to think that all men are just dogs when it comes to sex, so they don’t worry about it. Men look at women, and women look at men. It’s all normal. Women like men, and men like women, in spite of it all. Hispanic women have not yet been feminist-wrecked.

In other parts of the world, such as Latin America, the Arab World, Iran, and SE Asia, one finds much the same thing.

I was in an auto parts store a while back. A teenage Hispanic girl was in there with her Mom, Dad and siblings. I figure she was 15. I was 50. Well, she started looking at me. She was looking at me the whole time, giving me the eye. At first I was afraid to look back at her because her parents were there, but they made it clear that they did not give a damn, so I started looking back at her just for fun.

I can’t touch a 15-yr old, of course, but at this age, it feels great to know I can still attract such a young girl.

The weird thing was the attitude of the parents. They were like, “Hey, she’s 15, she’s a woman now, of course she’s looking at men.”

Now I’m not saying that middle aged men should go running around with underage girls. It’s against the law here, and the law may be reasonable, even if the sentences are not. But this is probably what goes on in normal societies. Young girls come of age and find all sorts of males interesting, from boys to distinguished, confident older men. It’s part of the embroidery of human existence for most of our time on Earth.

This may be backwards, sexist or reactionary, but I find it much preferable to this suffocating feminist-wrecked world of White Western culture.

Thoughts on Etnocentrism and “Race-Mixing”

Repost from the old site.

White nationalists tend to say that any White person who dates or marries outside the White race is a “race traitor” who is engaging in “race mixing” and is fostering “racial suicide”. They also say that any such person must be a “White self-hater” with no love or pride on their own people.

This post will examine whether or not that is so. It will also examine ethnocentrism cross-culturally, with a view towards whether or not it is normal. It will also examine the tendency among human groups to simultaneously guard their women from outsiders while the males also attempt to mate with outsiders.

I argue that all of these things are cultural norms in human beings and may have biological or genetic origins.

I’ve been talking to some of my smart friends about this stuff, and here’s what we came up with.

I noted that I have met persons from all over the world. One tendency that I noted among most, but not all, persons, was ethnocentrism, often of an extreme type. They all had a lot of pride in their race, nation, ethnic group, religion, or whatever. In particular, they did not like to hear criticism of it from outsiders.

At the same time, many were not particularly racist. They certainly were friendly enough towards me. These same people, if they were young and unmarried, often combined a profound ethnocentrism with a desire to marry outside their group. In this case, many of them wanted to marry an American, especially a White American.

This would seem to strongly contradict White nationalist theory that everyone who desires to marry outside their race, nation or ethnicity is race-traitor who is full of hatred for their own kind. That just doesn’t seem to be true. White nationalists are flat out wrong. It’s perfectly possible to love your people and marry outside of them.

Oddly enough, people seem to be able to combine an often profound ethnocentrism with a desire to marry out and commit “race-treason” or “racial suicide”.

I talked to one of my friends, and while he is not a White nationalist (he despises them), he admitted that he thinks Whites, specifically Northern Europeans, are superior to all other groups. He also said that he had been in love with a number of non-White women, and he would have gladly married them.

He said that even after he married them, he would probably still have felt that Northern Europeans were superior, even though he loved his wife. He suggested that many people of other races who marry non-group members probably feel the same way.

How can we make sense of these findings?

First of all ethnocentrism does seem to be a norm in human societies. As an example, let us look at a tribe in the Brazilian Amazon called the Pirahã.

This tribe has been the subject of a lot of research lately because they appear to lack recursion in their language. As recursion is said to be a human linguistic universal (or part of universal grammar in the Chomsky-Pinker paradigm) that is genetically coded into our brain, its absence in the Pirahã implies either that they are genetically distinct (dubious) or that the Chomsky-Pinker theory of universal grammar needs a lot of work.

Leaving aside the Pirahã’s lack of recursion for a moment, let us look at their extreme ethnocentrism. The Pirahã have been in contact with Europeans for a good 200 years. During that time, many a missionary has tried to convert them to Christianity. However, for a primitive people, the Pirahã are very scientific-minded, so they have never accepted Christianity.

Anthropologist/linguist Daniel Everett has worked with the Pirahã for 30 years. He originally started out as an evangelical minister to them, but their rejection of his preaching caused him to question his own religion, and he is now an atheist.

He used to talk to them about religion and the Pirahã would say, “Well, who is this Jesus guy? Have you ever seen him? Have you ever met him? Do you know anyone who has seen him or met him?” He would have to answer no to all of these questions. The Pirahã would then say, “So why should we believe this stuff?”

According to their culture, one can only believe things that one has experienced with their own senses, or that someone you know has experienced sensually.

Anyway, this is why the Pirahã have been rejecting missionaries for 200 years now. Not only have they rejected missionaries, but they have also rejected the Portuguese language and modern living, which they have also been exposed to for 200 years. They know what the Portuguese language is, and they know what modern living is, but they want no part of either.

Portuguese language classes have often been offered to the Pirahã, and they attend the classes and pretend to be engaged, but actually refuse to learn any of the language. Some of the children start to learn Portuguese, but as soon as they show signs of learning the language, the parents pull them out of class and refuse to let them return. They don’t want to learn Portuguese! Period!

Further, they want no part of modern culture. They have been told over and over the advantages of modern culture, but they’re not buying.

These refusals are rooted in the Pirahã’s profound sense of ethnocentrism. The Pirahã see themselves as superior to all other races, and they are even superior to all of the Indian tribes around them, whom they want nothing to do with. I’ve seen pictures of the Pirahã, and they just look like Amazonian Indians to me. In my ethnocentric mind, I can’t see how they have anything to feel superior about. But they do feel this way.

From this interesting post in Majority Rights, a White Supremacist site that is nevertheless intelligent, interesting and relatively easy to tolerate, we can see that this feeling is not limited to the Pirahã. It’s a discussion of racism in China. One commenter, who is Chinese, notes that most NE Asian groups see their race, nation or ethnic group as superior to all others, including surrounding Asians.

A White commenter who met Vietnamese students in Europe noted that these Vietnamese felt the same way. Furthermore, he noted that the Vietnamese place strong restrictions of their women marrying out.

The commenter said that a female member of the group that married out to a White man would be considered a whore who was lower than dirt who had just married into a subhuman race, the Whites. But if she married into an Asian group not her own, that would be even worse. She was now worse than a whore for marrying into a group that was even lower than Whites. The commenter noted that the Chinese felt much the same way.

I would imagine many other East Asians, especially the ethnocentric Koreans and Japanese, feel the same.

We really could go on and on here, but ethnocentrism, even profound ethnocentrism, seems to be a human norm. We can certainly get away from it as individuals, but it’s probably always going to be with us. It also implies that the thorough deracination of Western Whites, to the point of deliberate self-abnegation, is simply not normal. Much as I dislike them, the White nationalists are correct on this point.

Another commenter linked to this article, reported in the press as racist anti-African riots by Chinese students in China against African students. To the extent this stuff was written up at all in the Western press, it was as irrational racist riots against innocent Africans by racist Chinese.

The truth seems to be more complicated. A White American who was a student in China at the time noted that the African students were throwing wild parties in their dorms. Non-African males were allowed in, but not Chinese males. Chinese females were very much invited. He attended one of these parties and “rescued” two Chinese women by getting them out of there.

It was common knowledge at the time that the Africans were getting Chinese women drunk and then “raping” them. Whether that meant date rape or actual physical rape is uncertain, but after a while, Chinese students (probably mostly young males ) had had enough and there were days of anti-African riots.

Among the regulations that followed was that African male students were forbidden from consorting with Chinese females in their dorms.

In the examples above we see another essential part of ethnocentrism – “Don’t any of you outsiders dare to fuck with our women. We will defend the honor of our women with our lives and we will kill any outsider males who take liberties with our females.”

You don’t have to study a lot of anthropology or history to see how this line seems to be written all through human history. The horrible stoning of Dua Khalil Aswad, a 17 year old Yezidi girl who eloped with a non-Yezidi man, is an example. She was stoned to death by a crowd of 10,000 Yezidi men for “marrying an outsider”.

One of the best ways to rile up a population against an invader or an enemy is to suggest that “they are taking liberties with our women.” Countless male armies have been roused to defend the honor of the nation’s or group’s females.

We also see this in the Jim Crow laws of the South where Black males were lynched for looking at, whistling at, talking to, having sex with, or raping White women. The image of pure Southern womanhood was to be upheld with blood.

What’s up with this? Kevin MacDonald argues that there are probably dual imperatives operating here. The first is protection of the females of the tribe from mating with outsiders. This is probably done in the furtherance of “ethnic genetic interests.” That is, most tribes probably want to survive for as long as possible as an entity. The best way to do this is to keep outsiders away from your women.

At the same time, MacDonald argues that there is an opposite genetic imperative at work, that the males seek to mate with outsiders, while protecting their females from doing so. MacDonald sees this as attempting to add genetic diversity to the group to make it more fit, but I see it as more base than that.

Probably many of these mating occurred during raids in which the outsider females were raped. In many cases, they were captured as some sort of slaves, brought back to the group, and forced into marriages with males of the group.

In this way, the tribe poaches the women (probably the best, or most attractive women were favored), removes them from the competing group, and brings them into one’s own group. Though White nationalists would argue that this is genetic contamination, it surely was not seen that way. The tribe simply wishes to perpetuate itself, and the genes it utilizes in that goal are not relevant.

In older times, a woman who mated out probably was carted off by invading outsiders or went off with the outsider willingly, and hence was simply lost to the group. If all the women did this, the tribe would go extinct.

Yet males could mate out and still live with the group, since they would bring any captured women back to reside with the tribe of the man who captured her.

Further, by capturing the best females of competing outsiders, you deplete them of their best resource. If you rape them and run off, you force the outsiders to bear the children of your tribe (assuming they raise the child and don’t kill it), interjecting the genes of your own tribe into theirs against their will. It’s a form of domination and aggression of a very base sort.

Racists typically use these facts to try to justify racism by saying that everyone is a racist and that anti-racism is abnormal. This is to be condemned. At least here in the modern West, there seem to be an awful lot of folks that are significantly free of racist feelings, so it would seem we are not genetically doomed to racism.

Modern political correctness argues that the tendencies above, ethnocentrism and protection of one’s women from outsiders, are examples of the most horrible and evil racism.

The Left would simply argue that these are reactionary archaisms that must be swept away via revolution. They would probably throw in something stupid and say that these backwards tendencies are all related to economics.

But it seems so much deeper than that.

Though civilized man is capable of transcending most of his base instincts much of the time, the fact remains that at the end of the day, we are just long-legged bipedal apes.

Any sensible analysis of human behavior needs to recognize that.

I Actually Don’t Mind This Guy

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vYJ6d9VPOo]

Tom Metzger, Third Positionist and White nationalist racist, interviews John Jewel, a former IWW representative.

I’m not really wild about Metzger. He urged his followers to beat up random non-Whites, and they beat a poor Ethiopian immigrant to death in Portland. On the other hand, Metzger’s always been a socialist. He wants socialism for Whites, which sucks, but it’s better than neoliberalism for all.

I drove by his home in Fallbrook once 20 years ago when I was in my anti-racist mode. There were elaborate security protections all around the large two story home in a nice White housing tract. Fallbrook was still a nice place 20 years ago, heavily rural. Not sure what it’s like now.

They grew a lot of pot out there in the late 70’s-80’s. They grew the pot in the avocado ranches and irrigated it from the avocado irrigation lines. You buy an avocado ranch as a cover, grow avocados, and grow pot too.

Jewel is an interesting guy. He’s clearly a socialist, and I like his basic direction. In the entire 7-minute interview, he only mentions his “racism” once. He says he learned White racism from his father, an LA police officer in the South Central Division. However, this same racist cop also admired the Black Muslims for trying better their people, and he refused to arrest Black kids who stole food because they were hungry. Some racist cop.

Anyway, I’ve known a lot of White cops in my time. Most White cops are racist against Blacks. Trust me on that one. Blacks commit tons of crime, cops see it up close and personal, and they put two and two together. I’m not sure if I blame them.

5 seconds of racism amidst a 7-minute talk. Whoop dee fuckin doo. The rest of the talk is straight up IWW socialism channeling Joe Hill’s ghost itself straight from the gallows.

It’s Metzger who seems more racially oriented. He honestly doesn’t seem that interested in the socialist stuff, and he keeps trying to steer the subject back to race, either White power exhortations or jabs against non-Whites. I think Metzger is a racist first and a socialist second, possibly opportunistically with the latter, but who knows?

But the Jewel types are salvageable. I’ll take their “racist” Wobbly socialism over SWPL Critical Race Theory Multicultural Curriculum corporate neoliberal globalist “Leftists” any day of the week. The racism is rather problematic, but we can work that out later, or we won’t, but we’ll support them anway. I’ve never supported the divisive line of excluding or shunning racist White workers. So they’re racist? So what. If they’re workers and they’re on the Left, they’re our people. We’ll deal with the racism later if it becomes a problem, or we’ll just ignore it if it doesn’t.

Fencing With the Race Deniers

I made a huge mistake and went over to Hell – Abagond’s Black racist and PC Critical Race Theory site, and posted some comments. My comments were attacking some White racist who said “niggers aren’t human,” but even that wasn’t good enough. You can never win with PC types. It’s like the middle class White Protestantism that I was brought up with. No matter how hard you try, you’re always messing up.

I got into an argument with a rude race denier and so-called White person named “Thaddeus.” The guy teaches biology at a community college, and he’s a race denier. That shows me that biology is going to PC Hell along with most of the rest of the “sciences.” When the sciences are flushing down and away, swirling into the PC obscurantism bowl, what do we have left of critical thought?

Thaddeus is a self-hating White who’s married to a Black woman. I guess both he and wifey think White people suck.

I can’t take apart his race-denying arguments (that there essentially are no significant differences at all between the races) but in my heart I know that this is wrong.

The races differ genetically. Yes, the environment can deal with the genetic clay and mold it in various ways, but I’m convinced that a lot of racially discrepant behavior is in part genetically driven. The thorny question is what can we do about it, and how can we manipulate the environment to modify genetic predispositions.

There’s a problem with race denial. When you say there’s no difference between the races, well, some races are not exactly measuring up in a lot of ways. Then we need to ask why, since there are no differences in the genes, right? Either their cultures are different (weird when racial groups act similarly across oceans and continents) or racism and colonialism is making one group screw up and the other prosper at their expense.

So race denial leads to one and only one explanation for Black people’s issues – it’s all White people’s fault. We done it with our evil racism and colonialism juju spells. Poor things, it’s not their fault.

So you have all these Blacks who are taught that their difficult state can only have been caused by evil White racism and colonialism. Hence a good part of the wild Black rage, hatred and racism towards Whites derives from this ridiculous mental space.

If it were true it would be one thing, but I don’t think it is.

Why sell the world a lie and beat up Whites just to make Blacks feel good?

From Trotskyites to Neoconservatives (Short Version)

A commenter asks if there is something about Trotskyism that turned them into neocons:

Do you think there is something fundamentally sinister about Trotskyism that makes such transformation inevitable?

Not really, but they are super-revolutionaries. They believe in worldwide revolution. Spontaneous worldwide revolution. They don’t believe in socialism in one country, remember? They want the whole world in revolt.

The Trots used to just be a bunch of Jews. They liked Trotsky because he was a Jew and supposedly Stalin sacked Trotsky due to anti-Semitism. Trotsky was running around telling everyone that Stalin was an anti-Semite. Also, Stalin was a conservative and a nationalist and he undid a lot of the radical changes that the Trot types had done before 1927. So anyway, if you were a Commie and a Jew in the West, you were supposed to be a Trot.

Then with Khrushchev’s secret speech, the full weight of Stalin’s atrocities, 3.2 people just murdered in peacetime, came out. Actually they were throwing around numbers like 20-110 million. Lot of Commies in the West, including most of the Trots, abandoned Communism and turned into Cold War liberals in the 1950’s associated with a CIA publication called Encounter. They were regularly trotted out to show how liberals hated Communism as much as conservatives. My Dad came out of this mold. Fierce liberal who hated Communism.

With the 6-day war in 1967, the group radicalized. They supported Israel, and they got behind the Vietnam War in a big way as a Cold War thing. Also they became these cultural conservative Jews who were sort of waging war on their fellow Jews. They saw the Counterculture as a bunch of traitorous Jews, and they were pissed. So they were pro-Vietnam War, pro-Israel, pro-Cold War and anti-counterculture.

In the 1970’s this movement grew around a few very obscure journals which have since gone under the names of which elude me. The group coalesced around Henry “Scoop” Jackson’s office in the Senate. He was known as the Senator From Boeing. Jackson represented Washington State. He was this “liberal” who was all tied in with the military industrial complex, a hawk on Vietnam in the 1970’s and a Cold Warrior. My father loved him.

He was a Gentile, but the neocons saw him as Israel’s best friend. All of these guys, Perle, Wolfowitz and the rest of them, come out of this environment. They still wanted to be Democrats though because they were still liberal Jews at heart.

When Reagan came in, they saw their opening and joined on board for the pro-Israel Cold War ride. They formed a BS committee called The Committee on the Present Danger. The whole reason for its existence was to say that the CIA was lying in its estimates on Soviet strength and that the Soviets were stronger than we were and about to conquer us.

This was all lies and apparently they knew this, but they pushed it anyway. They got the CIA to revise its estimates of Soviet strength to dramatically overestimate it. This was the Reagan defense spending ramp up thing. Cheney, Rumsfeld, Frank Gaffney, Perle and other scoundrels were all involved in this.

Most of them were turning into Republicans already when Bush Jr came in, and they made a rush to sign up. Most of his administration came out of the CPD and JINSA, the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs. The purpose of JINSA is, through corruption and propaganda, to sort of merge the Israeli military and its MIC with the US military and its MIC. It has sort of worked.

The rest is history.

Trace the trajectory of Norman Podhoretz of Commentary Magazine and Irving Kristol of Public Affairs Magazine (William Kristol’s father). Those were some of the original proto-neocons who are now full-on neocons.

Why Lewontin’s Fallacy is a Fallacy

Richard Lewontin is a Marxist Jew who has dedicated his career to attacking genetics as an explanation for human variation. He co-authored a silly book called Not In Our Genes along with some other nutty Marxist Jew.

According to his fallacy, most genetic variation is within groups and not between groups. 8

Why this is a fallacy can be easily shown. For instance, within Whites, IQ’s in a group of 1000 Whites have IQ’s ranging from 148 to 68 or so. There are 80 points variation within the group.

Now let us look at the average of 1000 Whites versus the average of 1000 Blacks. The 1000 Whites have an average IQ of 103. The 1000 Blacks have an average IQ of 89.8. There are 13.2 points variation between the averages of each group.

According to Lewontin’s Fallacy, the 13.2 point differences between Blacks and Whites is inconsequential to meaningless, since the difference within Whites ranges from geniuses to idiots! Yet that difference has real meaningful consequences at many levels, particularly societal and sociological but also political.

In contrast, the 80 point differences within Whites which Lewontin claims is the real enchilada is just normal variation in any White community, easily handled within the community. The geniuses go on to get advanced degrees, and the idiots get Special Ed, disability checks, easy government subsidized jobs, and state-subsidized group homes to reside in. Everything flows along pretty smoothly.

Pretty dumb analogy huh?

The Multicultural Curriculum at California Universities

A friend of mine is at university now in California. He has to take some BS called the Multicultural Curriculum. It’s a requirement. They might as well call it the White People Are Evil Curriculum. It’s really stupid.

My friend is the only ethnocentric White in his classes. The other Whites are all self-hating idiots. He met one White guy who was going to join the Brown Berets (Hispanic fascists).

Many of the Whites are Armenians, and to a person, they refuse to identify as Whites. They are Armenians, not Whites, and are also rather White-hostile.

The Hispanics are really militant and all have a major grudge against Whitey. Some of the Hispanics are highly agitated and militant, almost revolutionary. The spark of their glorious revolutionary flame? Illegal aliens! The Hispanics are not very good students, and many of them drop out, but they are better students than the Blacks.

There are Blacks in the classes too, but they don’t care about the anti-White stuff for some reason. In general, they don’t even go to class. Most of them are gone before the class is over, having dropped the class or dropped out of school. It seems it’s not so much that they are dumb but more that they just are not interested in class. The smarter Blacks are the females, but some of them are also mouthy, argumentative, ignorant and won’t take no for an answer. They also have a “Let’s wing it,” slacker type attitude.

There are a lot of Asians too, but they don’t care about the anti-White stuff. They are excellent students, and a lot of them are females.

The teachers are generally Jews or non-Whites like Asians or East Indians. They’ve all got a grudge against Whites. He had a Chinese professor who went on and on about the Chinese Exclusion Act as if it were the crime of the century.

The Jewish teachers are some of the worst White-haters of them all. I never cared much about this type of Jew, but I developed an intense dislike of one Jewish sociology professor my friend had just based on his tales of the guy. There can be no doubt about it – this guy is simply an enemy of me and my people. The professor was absolutely animated with anti-White animus. It’s what he was all about.

The professors all promote some weird garbage “Leftism” that is a mixture of globalization with a strong neoliberal and pro-corporate slant on economics (endless praise of “free markets”), and pro-greed consumerist bourgeois ethic, combined with Open Borders for the West –  unlimited immigration of “good” Third Worlders to the “evil” West. It’s basically “free markets and open borders.”

I fail to see anything even slightly progressive about this project.

Why Jews Opposed Reagan

An anti-Semitic commenter is confused about why US Jews did not support Ronald Reagan.

Are you sure Jews voted against Reagan, Rob?

What would they have to lose by voting for this pro-Jewish, ass-kissing plutocratic prick?

I’ve said this over and over. Jews are liberals*.

They don’t like conservatives, especially rightwing Whites, and when it’s combined with hardcore fundamentalist Christianity, the Jews are out the door sprinting.

8

That’s why I love Jews. They’re the most progressive ethnic group in the US, the most consistently liberal, more liberal even than Blacks.

Jews have been an integral part of liberalism and the Left from the French Revolution on. From the man with his hand in his coat himself:

My primary desire was to liberate the Jews and make them full citizens. I wanted to confer upon them all the legal rights of equality, liberty and fraternity as was enjoyed by the Catholics and Protestants. It is my wish that the Jews be treated like brothers as if we were all part of Judaism. As an added benefit, I thought that this would bring to France many riches because the Jews are numerous and they would come in large numbers to our country where they would enjoy more privileges than in any other nation.

Without the events of 1814, most of the Jews of Europe would have come to France where equality, fraternity and liberty awaited them and where they can serve the country like everyone else.

Bonaparte is the spiritual father of every Jew alive today.

The European Right roared and raged at the French Revolution that shook the continent. Some of them are probably still pissed, who knows. The roots of fascism were in De Maistre’s opposition to the storming of the Bastille. The Savoyard philosopher is a fascist icon among learned Browns even today.

That’s why anti-Semitism is typically rightwing and has been for 200 years. This Left anti-Semitism we are seeing now is historically a bit odd.

Conservatives have long memories, stretching back to 1789-1808, and the smart ones have never forgiven Jews for their progressive leanings. Jews are considered to be the leading edge of progress, liberalism, socialism and even Communism in many societies. For this they are hated by the Right the world over. That’s why Hitler called it Judeo-Bolshevism. He wasn’t so far off.

The Left is Jewish!

*Well, outside Israel, Jews are liberals. In Israel, Jews are fascists, since Zionism is Jewish fascism, but that’s another matter.

Was Reagan Popular Because He Was Likeable?

A commenter suggests that Reagan was popular because he was likable. Sure, that’s part of it, but I beg to differ. The comment also exemplifies the basic retardation of US politics.

Tulio: I was pretty young during the Reagan era, this was elementary school for me. I remember liking Reagan as a kid. I didn’t know anything about politics or even care. As a kid though, Reagan just seemed like a likable guy down the street. He just gave off this aura of optimism and charm, and something about him gave me confidence in his leadership.

This is my feeling looking back through the eyes of a 9 year old who didn’t know much about politics. I think though his popularity had much to do with these things. Win people over at the heart, and they’ll follow you to Hell and back like the pied piper.

There was something about the guy that made him hard to hate, even now when I know about the Contras and all that shit. I can’t bring myself to hate the man. I wouldn’t vote for him and don’t retrospectively endorse him, but I just don’t hate him either.

Sure, he was Mr. Optimist, and Carter was Mr. Gloom and Doom. But we on the Left were not fooled. We hated him from Day One; in fact, we hated the guy before he even got elected. We knew this jerk very well.

The ruling classes picked this Smiley Face Mr. Popular in order to push their Class War project under the guise of populism. During the Reagan years, the top 2

Most of those 8

Of course he was  likable, but it went well beyond that. The Whites voted for him; the Blacks, Hispanics, Asians and Jews voted against him every single time. If he were merely likable, everyone would have voted for him. It’s an interesting argument, but in the end, I don’t really buy it. Hell, Obama’s likable.

Instead, Reagan was all about giving US Whites the reactionary stuff that they wanted.

It was uncool to be anti-Reagan in California in that era. Even the anti-Reagan Whites were quiet about it, as if they were ashamed. Plus you were constantly meeting Reaganites everywhere you went in White California. It seemed like 2 out of 3 new people you met were Reaganites. And we are talking rockers, hipsters, dopers, drug dealers, etc. – you know, the sort of lowlifes I normally associate with. One thing in common was everyone was White.

I remember in the 1980’s, I was into the Goth scene. Before that, the punk scene. The Orange County punks all voted for Reagan. The Orange County Goths all voted for Reagan.

The punks drank, smoked, took dope, screwed like crazy, and were generally antisocial societal rejects. Reagan would have put them all in jail if he could have.

Then on to the Goth scene. It seemed like everyone I met on the Goth scene voted for Reagan. These were crazy people who wore all Black and made their faces White like dead people. They took all drugs, especially pot, speed, and acid. I don’t think I ever met one that hadn’t shot speed.

They drank like fish and chain-smoked. The chicks seemed like they were all bisexual. Most of the guys acted like queers, and I think a lot of them were bi too. The whole scene was about as anti-Reagan’s Family Values shit as you can get. Yet it seemed like they voted for Reagan to a man and woman. I forgot to tell you, everyone was White.

As soon as you went into White areas of California in those days, you would start seeing “Reagan Country” signs everywhere.

Someone on Democratic Underground a while back said all US politics has been about race since 1850 or so. That’s a sweeping statement, but I wonder how much of it is true.

PS. Those of us on the Left hate his guts. He’s the bastard that started the ruination of America, ongoing now in 2010.

Typical White American: Ronald Reagan

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irCp9kiLHuI]

Ronald Reagan, more than anything else, is not so much America as he is White America. And he’s not so much bourgeois America as he is White America.

Vast numbers of working class Whites voted for Reagan in 1980, so many that we had to invent a new word, Reagan Democrats. Almost no Blacks, even bourgeois Blacks, voted for Reagan. The number is only 1

Ronald Reagan represents White America, from the 1950’s to the present day, from working class to ruling class. He’s their boy; he’s our boy. In the 1950’s, he worked hand in hand with Joe McCarthy’s fascist goons. As governor of California, he threatened campus protestors and cheered on the idiot Vietnam War.

As President, he committed, said and did one evil act and statement after another. “Trees cause smog.” The fawning media gave him a pass the whole time, never calling him on anything.

In the name of fighting welfare leeches, he ranted about welfare queens driving Cadillacs, while his administration threw thousands of dying cancer patients off disability after condemning them as leeches who refused to work.

Through it all, Shithead White America, from poor to billionaires, could not stop cheering long enough to sit down. He funded death squads in Central America. He cheered on the mass murderers in Guatemala in 1982 while they slaughtered 20,000 people. He started up the Contras, who spent most of their time invading schools, medical clinics and collective farms and massacring all the “Communist” teachers, aides, doctors, nurses and farmers that they found there. Some freedom fighters.

The media, across the board, loved Reagan. Criticism in the press was nearly nonexistent. In White California, critics of Reagan were ostracized as losers and Commies.

The fanatical and irrational hatred of Communism and by extension socialism, the love of the rich and hatred of the poor and working classes, the racism, the contempt and raging hatred for the environment, the insipid and lunatic Christian fundamentalism, the fear of and and contempt for “European” and urban modernity in all its forms, the idiotic love of guns, the seething hatred of unions (even by working class Whites), Ronald Reagan was simply White America personified.

If you go anywhere in White California and say two words against Ronald Reagan, you’re risking a fistfight. He’s revered there as a God to this day. In a poll of Shitheads (Americans), Reagan recently got a 5

When he left office in 1988, the entire Democratic side of the isle stood up and cheered. Even the furthest left of all, Teddy Kennedy, gave a raving speech that sounded like an elegy to the Pope himself. When I read that, I had to pinch myself to remind me that Kennedy was really a Democrat.

I’m lately reading essays about America written in the 1970’s. Some about the general idiocy of the culture, others about the Christian Right types. What’s so depressing about these essays is that they could have been written today. The culture hasn’t changed one bit, (if anything it seems much, much worse) and the fundie fanatics screaming about textbooks in West Virginia in 1975 are simply the Tea Parties, or really, the Republican Party itself.

That we haven’t budged an inch in 35 years implies that America is terminal. We can’t seem to get rid of the essential shitheadedness that is sadly part of character for time immemorial.

I can’t help thinking that we are doomed.

Witch Trials/Lynch Mobs in Modern America

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJONFnhI_cc]

I’m going against the public mood here, but I’m getting seriously tired of this Pedophile Mass Hysteria crap that’s been going around for some time now, particularly in the past five years or so. It seems to be getting worse and worse every year.

I wrote some articles on Pedophile OCD, which is not Pedophilia at all, it’s just an anxiety disorder by harmless normal people who worry that they are the bad people that they most certainly are not.

I get a lot mail from those folks, and I am also getting a lot of mail from people, all men, who are being accused of being pedophiles. In every single case, the person was definitely not a pedophile. All were normal heterosexual males, attracted to females 16+ and minimally if at all to girl children (that’s the normal male pattern). Many of them are older guys who have not married. It’s worse if they never married or if they don’t have kids. It’s worse yet if they are White, since dipshits think “most pedos are White,” although this is not true, as Blacks have a 1.9X elevated rate and Hispanics have the same rate as Whites.

Some of them told me that they are seen as rather strange people, mostly very shy and introverted. Some were nervous or had anxiety issues.

They tell me that they can’t look at kids or even talk to kids at all, otherwise people start staring and talking. Actually, quite a few regular guys who have been accused of nothing have told me this, and many have told me that they now avoiding kids altogether.

I am also hearing of a lot of cases of guys in their 40’s and 50’s who are being accused of being “pedophiles” for checking out or talking to underage teenage girls. And I am also hearing about guys in the same age range being called “perverts” and “pedophiles” for checking out and talking up young women aged 18-24.

Let’s be clear about this madness. First of all, it’s not abnormal for a man of any age to be highly attracted to females aged 15+. In fact, it’s the height of normality. Sure, it’s illegal to have sex with them, but it’s not illegal to look at them or talk to them, or not yet anyway! We also see that the definition of pedophilia is insanely expanding up into the range of adulthood. Now, a 50 year old man who does an 18-24 girl is miraculously transformed into “pedo.”

So in addition to the actual pedos being hounded, we’ve got a mini-epidemic of normal guys who are being accused of this shit on a false basis.

This idiocy is following the trajectory of all mass hysterias – anti-scientific basis, mass emotional response for the swarms of idiotic masses, a lynch mob mindset, persecution of innocent people, and an ever-expanding definition of “witchcraft.”

The guy on the video, Jack McClellan, is an actual pedophile. I felt sorry for him. I saw other videos where he seemed kind of weird, but he looked pretty cool in this one. It’s clear that the guy can’t help it.

Pedophilia strictly defined appears in adolescence. You can’t catch it in adulthood. It’s not contagious. As a good rule, the pedophile is attracted minimally if at all to adults. Pedophiles can be either homosexual, heterosexual or bisexual. All three lack interest in adults of their gender preference.

The guy in the video is a bit interesting in that he has sex with adult females too, specifically prostitutes. I don’t think he’s much turned on by women though. He is probably just doing that to get his rocks off. It’s clear that he prefers girls.

McClellan, who is apparently harmless, has stirred up a hornet’s nest by coming out as a pedophile and running a webpage showing where to go to look at girls in various cities. The site lists whether or not there are cops around and other pertinent information. He also hangs around places where there are lots of girls, and sometimes he takes pictures of them. He’s not on the Sex Offender list and has never been arrested on sex charges. He says he’s never had sex with a child, and he doesn’t intend to under current laws.

The guy has a propensity for publicity, and he’s had to move around all over the West Coast as various lynch mobs chased him from town to town. He’s been banned from bus services. Cops question him all the time, but he never does anything arrestable.

A judge recently issued a constitutionally questionable restraining order against him. The restraining order orders him to stay 30 feet away from groupings of children at all times. He also can’t take pictures of kids. He recently said he was going to defy the order, and a couple of years ago, he was arrested for violating the RO. As he keeps moving around, states and cities keep inventing bizarre new weird-laws to try to deal with the guy and make his behavior illegal.

I am a sexual revolutionary, a libertine and a masculinist. My attitude about sex is, “Do it in the streets,” (not literally but you get the picture). What strikes me about this Mass Hysteria, especially as it expands, is that the roots of it seem to be anti-sexual, as all sexual hysterias are. The whole purpose is to put a damper on sexual expression, even glances and thoughts, in the public space. It feels like a war on male sexuality. And I suspect a lot of it is originating, as all sexual hysterias do, from women and fathers.

As I noted above, Jack McClellan’s harmless. He’s never molested a kid or even come close. He’s violated no sex laws. As far as I’m concerned, assuming that’s all he does, he can look at girls all he wants to.

After all, they are cute. Kids are a trip. Everyone likes to look at girls – parents, teachers, females of all ages, anyone with a soul who is delighted by the spirit of the child. McLellan takes it a bit further into the sexual realm, but his love for girls is not unusual in terms of human behavior.

Frankly, I find these lynch mobs, trials and insane new weird-laws way more creepy than this guy, who’s never hurt a soul  and probably never will.

US Right Wing Populism Proposes Libertarianism: Bad Medicine

A commenter asks if the rightwing populist in this video is a Libertardian.

Yeah he’s a Libertarian, but he’s the most libertarded of all the Libertardians.

I used to read Libertardian sites all the time. I have spent countless hours reading that stuff. Real Libertardians are 10

Their attitude towards the top

Those of us who got ripped off need to get off the dime to work harder to try to earn back some of the $ the rich stole from us. The problem with the state is only in that it tries somewhat to prevent the rich from robbing us even worse than they already do, or that they have Victim Restitution Funds (social programs) for after we got robbed.

So this guy is true LiberTARDian, that is, he doesn’t even understand that Libertardianism by its nature is hostile to all classes but the upper middle class and the rich. He thinks, like so many rightwing populists, that Libertardianism is just the ticket, the proper weapon for middle class White Americans in their class war with the elites who are robbing them blind. Yeah, some weapon. When the middle class aims it at those evil “elites,” it’s going to backfire and blow up right in their faces.

Soviet Anti-Semitism

Exhibit A: Zionology.

Exhibit B: Anti-Zionist Committee of the Soviet Public.

A touchy subject, but it’s clear that Stalin became anti-Semitic at the end of his life. He outright murdered leading Yiddish writers for no legitimate reason that I can think of. There’s controversy about whether or not he was going to purge the Jews to Siberia (population transfer) around the time of his death. There’s also controversy about whether or not there was something to the Robert LindsayPosted on Categories Anti-Racism, Anti-Semitism, Europe, Europeans, Jewish Racism, Jews, Left, Marxism, Poland, Race/Ethnicity, Racism, Regional, USSR, Zionism31 Comments on Soviet Anti-Semitism

Whites Are Going Extinct? Huh?

The main White nationalist trope is that Whites, meaning Europeans, more or less, are going extinct. However, let’s look at some quick figures.

Number of Whites worldwide, 1910: Unknown, but way less than now.

Number of Whites worldwide, 2010: 1 billion+. Way more than in 1910.

Over a century, our numbers have grown dramatically. So we’re going extinct? Huh? The truth is that our numbers are growing, just not nearly as much as the others are. Plus there’s been some interbreeding, but actually not that much.

Anyway, the other races all count half-breeds. Using WN standards, Blacks would have to throw out 9

Asians do the same thing. They count those horrible mongrelized Mongolians, with their disgusting 1

The White nationalists have set themselves up to lose this game by idiotically handicapping themselves with a massive purity setback, while the other races are all getting serious points ahead by blowing it all off and going by majority rules. If White nationalists want so bad to win this race, why are they handicapping themselves so badly that they are almost sure to lose?

Colorblind Racism – A Good Video

This is actually a good video.

It shows a White kid and a Black kid both obviously trying to steal a bike in broad daylight in a park. 100 people walk by the White guy and do nothing until finally someone goes for the cops. The Black kid is immediately surrounded by angry White crowds (Or mobs?) as soon as he is seen. One White person confronts him angrily, and then others swarm around. Some even get quite aggressive with him, trying to steal some of this stuff in return for what he’s doing to the bike.

The Whites who stopped the Black later say that they “did not see color,” or that color didn’t matter, the only thing that mattered was that he was a thief. This is the very definition of colorblind racism, so obviously it exists and it’s not good for Blacks. Colorblind racism is something the Critical Race Theory types like to rail about all the time. It’s the latest flavor of racism. They’re always ranting on and on about it. They have a point, but I’m not sure what Whites are supposed to do about their colorblind racism. Colorblind racism is said to be largely unconscious, so how exactly are we supposed to combat it?

A classic anti-racist line is going to be that this sort of thing is responsible for elevated arrest rates of Blacks in the US, and artificially spikes their crime rate. That is, Whites commit just as much crime as Blacks, they just don’t get caught is all.

Let’s keep in mind here that Blacks commit ~8X more crime than Whites in the US. That’s based on household surveys of crime victims, not on arrests or convictions. If we go by arrests and convictions, the Black rate is actually a lot lower than the White rate. That means that arrests and convictions underestimate Black crime, and that Blacks are less likely to get arrested or convicted for any act of crime than Whites are. That is, for each act of crime, a White is more likely to be arrested and convicted than a Black. If we want to play antiracist games, we can turn the tables on them and say that the criminal justice is biased against Whites and in favor of Blacks.

So much for bias in the criminal justice system, statistically anyway, though supposedly it does still exist (And I think it should be fought). The other implication is that White arrest and conviction rates overestimate White crime.

White Women and Black Men: An Object Lesson

A Black commenter takes issue with my point that White women have a thing for Black men:

Dude, you’re crazy. 9

No way is it 9

Anyway, White women don’t marry Blacks or have kids with them, they just have sex with them.

Let me tell you a story. I used to be friends with this Black guy who had schizophrenia. For about a year or so, I hung out with the guy every single day. He would show up over at my place, and we would go do whatever. Eventually I had to cut it off with the guy because he had too many problems, but I still feel bad about that.

The illness was in the early phases, but it was paranoid schizophrenia, which is milder and preserves the personality more, and he had a great personality and good ego before, so he was yet well-preserved. He was ~28 years old.

We went all over the place in a rural White town, very conservative. Everywhere we went, young White women came right up to the guy and smiled and started talking to him. Or he would walk up to them and talk them up, and they all just loved him to death. Young White chicks were checking him out and smiling everywhere we went. The guy was a chick magnet. He was very goodlooking, but he was also 1/2 Black. OTOH, not one of those young White women would give me the time of day, look at me, smile at me, anything. They all wanted my Black friend. And he had schizophrenia for Chrissake!

I learned something then about the animal appeal that a Black man has for a White woman.

Also, I run a Yahoo group for people who either want to stop or were victims of the burgeoning Internet romance scams. At least half the group are women, mostly middle aged.

A very large

Some of these middle aged White women used to throw “Internet parties” where they would have “Check Out the Big Black Cock” voice conferences. They would invite these young African men into the conferences and get them to whip it out on cam. Supposedly these guys were pretty big. The chicks would sit around and look at the big Black cocks, and I guess ooh and ahh. Now these were nice, respectable, middle class, middle aged White women.

Quite a few of them followed the scammers all the way over to Nigeria to try to marry them. Some even married their scammers.

There’s clearly something going on with White women and Black men.

The Southerners were apparently aware of the Manichean spark that could launch an interracial prairie fire and simply banned Black male-White female sex altogether.

It was cruel, but I see their point.

A race that can’t protect its women anymore is pretty much through. That’s an essential Darwinian imperative.

The Sexual Marketplace for a 50 Year Old Man

I’m 52. At my age, almost everyone is fat. Further, I can’t really get hot chicks anymore like I used to be able to. Maybe the hot ones my age, (Yes! There are some very hot women over 50, and even over 55!) but they are very hard to get, and you’re fighting all the other guys for them anyway so it’s almost not worth it. Plus all the hotties my age all want money bigtime, I mean bigtime. I dated one a while back, and she kindly let me go telling me I didn’t make enough money.

There’s not an incredible amount of competition. Keep in mind at my age 2

A lot of married couples my age, at least the White ones, have simply given up on sex. The typical line is that the White women put up with sex for years until she had her kids, then she pretty much gave it up after 35 or so, and the guys didn’t really complain, just got fat, drank beer, competed in the workplace instead, or watched football, all the while bragging to us single guys how great the married life was and when am I going to take the plunge like they did? How bout never , tools!

The young women who do like me are often at best average, or fat. If you can get an average young woman at my age, you are doing great. Forget all the hotties you got when you were young. That’s over forever. The only guys who have a chance with them are guys who have money and or fame or power. Even then, it might be a bit of a tough sell.

So if you’re going to be picky like you were when you were younger at my age, you are simply getting no sex at all, period.

On Korean Women

A Chinese American or Korean American (Which is it?) commenter, Hacienda, who is also a great writer, discusses the wonder of Korean women:

Korean women can be extremely sexy, to the point of absolute sexiness. I used to hang out in some Korean bars before the LA riots caused the police to crack down on the really seedier (but extremely hot) ones. You’ve not experienced sultry until you had experienced some of the women there. Unfortunately, these places are now mostly closed and ones left are too stiff, too regulated to be interesting. But, for we who know, our loss.BTW, I think white women need to be trained or acculturated to Korean (or East Asian) ways to reclaim the prized hotness they once possessed too. Rap and crap just makes them bulgy and unattractive.

Korean women are very submissive to men. If you treat them right, they treat you like a God to be worshipped. Japanese women can be like that too. They aren’t really bitches at all, though a few have developed a bad attitude towards men, and if you piss them off, some can just go fullon fuckin psycho with no way to turn it off.

They are less bitchy, demanding and castrating than White women by orders of magnitude. They’re also highly intelligent, even just the ordinary working class ones, which is an interesting find in a group of women. An average, uneducated working class Korean-American woman is smarter than an average White American female junior college student.

I don’t know how Korean and Japanese men treat their women, but you always hear that it’s a fullon sexist patriarchal culture. I’ve had a hard time verifying that though, or the extent to which it exists in the US.

These East Asian seem to assume you’re going to be a typical sexist male bastard like all guys, and then when you’re not, but you’re not a pussy either, you’re like God’s gift to women.

To the East Asian guys complaining about how their women are leaving them for White guys,  I feel sorry for them and don’t know what to say.

I would say this though: East Asian guys should try to act like White guys when in the US. The media elevates the White man all over the world. All over the world, women, except US White women, want a White man more than anything else. East Asian guys are in the US, and Whites run the show. I think their women are going for Whites due to media brainwash.

So the best course for Asian guys would be to try to act like us White guys.

A Paean To the Jews

One commenter described the Jews as nation-wreckers, and another commenter responded by saying that Jews were nation-builders, not nation-wreckers.

Nation wrecking? Come on.The Jews are damn smart, and that’s about it. I’ve never met a stupid Jew. They have talent; they’ve got brains. They are influential in some way or another, and they like to run things. Go to most major cities around the world, do a web search for a Jewish youth hostel, and you’ve got a great place to stay with good conversation and good prices overall, except extra charges on towels and pretty much anything else. Hah.

Jews assimilate well and contribute a hell of a lot to their perspective nations. But they’re still hated! No wonder they try to build up defenses not to get torn down in the countries and try to liberalize the people around them.

I realize they take care of their own first, but I don’t buy this crap about them being the “most ethnocentric people on earth.” Not with American Jews at least. They’re pretty damn self-critical and consider themselves Americans before Jews. Hell of a lot more than the American Muslims I’ve met. Most American Jews I’ve met aren’t about marrying into their race, but they might eventually, just to please their parents.

I don’t know how they do it, man, but they’ve just got amazing brains. Every time I hear about some new eminent mathematician or chess-player (or past one), I have to go look up their origins, and only very rarely do I find it’s not a Jew. Like Grigori Perelman. Look up your influential Russians, and you’ll find well over half of them have at least some Jewish heritage. I almost wish it weren’t true, it occurs so often. It seems unfair to all the other groups of people, but that’s just the way things worked out.

Hitler was effectively exterminating the smartest group of people in Europe. He nearly gave that continent a lobotomy. I’m sure Europe is missing those Jews now. I’m sure they just love the Muslims who have grown as large or larger in numbers than the Jews ever were in Europe and contribute only a fraction what the Jews did.

It seems almost impossible how well they do, but it’s true. They’re the ultimate overachievers. They help nation-building more than nation-destroying. They have something even the East Asians have, because they have consistently done well without large numbers.

Of course, they’re not perfect. I don’t really like their religion much and prefer them to be secular. They don’t make very good painters or poets. They’re “NT” left-brain types for the most part. I definitely don’t have a Jewish mind. Bloom is the practical, thinking Jew in Ulysses and I’m skinny, unserviceable Daedalus talking to the sea-rocks. Hell, I don’t even know why I’m still going on about them and trying to defend them. I’m stopping.

I agree with all of this except that I think that the Jews are indeed hyperethnocentric. There are few if any White groups in the US that are as ethnocentric as the Jews. Some maybe used to be, but they are not anymore.

A friend of mine grew up in Chicago in the 1930’s and 1940’s. Whenever something bad happened to a Jew and was written up in the papers, even a Jewish criminal getting caught by the police, all of the Jews at her school would go around saying, “This is a bad day for the Jews…” She said she never heard anyone of any other ethnic group acting this way. “This is a bad day for the Italians….or this is a bad day for the Irish…” Never happened.

Even the secular Jews who are marrying and breeding out are remarkably ethnocentric. I’ve been around them my whole life and have had Jewish girlfriends for a long time. It’s often hidden, but once you bring it out, oh boy! It’s like a thunderstorm that had been hidden for years and never came out. You see it in full force, but with these secular, liberal Jews, they often keep it hidden around their liberal, secular Gentile friends.

One of the reasons people are not wild about Jews is fear of their prowess. I actually agree with this fear. I don’t really want 5 million hyper-competitive, ultra overachieving Jews to move from Israel to the US to compete with me and my White Gentile friends and monopolize our politics even more. We have more than enough Jews here to deal with. I have heard Chinese say much the same thing about not wanting Jews to come to China and I can’t say I blame them. It’s not really anti-Semitism; it’s just fear of a formidable competitor in a capitalist and meritocratic society.

The Position of the Left on Western Culture, Whites, Judeo-Christianity and Islam

A little debate here. The first quote is me defending secularism, the second one is Abiezer Coppe defending the Western Left against my charges. I reiterate after the blockquote with evidence from around the world.

It is sickening the way that the Left is sucking up to Islam. Stop it right now! It’s all because Muslims are fighting European Judeo-Christian “colonizer-imperialist” types in Israel and now in Iraq, Afghanistan and even in Europe. To the Left, European Judeo-Christian civilization is evil, and hence so are all Whites. Jews are considered White. We are all racist colonizer/imperialist slavers.

The dark Muslim noble savages are fighting evil White Euros, and the Left cheers.

The Left hates:

1. Euro Whites 2. Euro Christians 3. Euro Jews 4. The West

The dark Third Worldist oppressed darkies are fighting a holy war against all four, the West can’t get enough of it. I’m not sure if the Zionists ever mention this, but I think they are right. The Left even dislikes the Jews because now they are the ultimate expression of the White Judeo-Christian Western Euro colonizer.

No Robert, stop spreading lies about the Left. The Left aren’t that racial. You’re just spouting.

A sane Left will support Christian values as highly progressive. See Slavoj Zizek on Christianity.

Support for Islamism. The Maoists and Trots do it, and that’s about it. It’s third Worldist Idiotism…if you convert to Islam YOU CANNOT LEAVE. The penalty for leaving the Islamic religion in Pakistan is six months in prison, according to a commentator on Radio 4. Is this true?

Of course it is true. That’s if they don’t kill you.

I am talking about the Western Left.

The real existing Left, the one that matters, is not anti-West or anti-Christian.

The Latin American Left is pro-West and pro-Christian. Many of them are Christians. Even the leadership of Sendero Luminoso were Christians, including Abimael Guzman, who is still a Catholic! The Filipino Left is pro-West and pro-Christian.

This is the Liberation Theology Left, and I love it. Jesus was a Commie! In those countries, priests pray alongside the rebels and in some cases even serve in rebel armies. The Sandinistas had priests in their cabinet. Hugo Chavez is very much a Liberation Theologian; this is the best way to describe him. There is a lot of good theory coming out of Cuba nowadays since believers can join the party. They are calling themselves Christian Marxists. Even Fidel says Christianity is compatible with socialism and Communism.

The Indian and Nepalese Maoists don’t mind the West or Christianity. If there is a beef with anything, it’s Hinduism.

The real existing Left in all Muslim states is not too wild about Islam! The Left in the rest of the world cares nothing at all about Western culture or Christianity.

This anti-West, anti-European, anti-Judeo-Christian, anti-White shit is mostly just rebellion on the part of Western Leftists against their own eeeeeeevil religions and cultures.

Maoists in general are not too wild about Islam. The Iranian and Afghan Maoists are some of the most Islam-hostile groups in the Islamic world. They’ve basically had it up to here with Islam.

The Filipino Left has made alliance with Muslim separatists on a strategic basis and gets along with them well. The Indian Maoists support separatists in Kashmir.

Trots are always pro-Islam anymore, but they are irrelevant outside the West, which means they are irrelevant in the Real World.

LA Is Crap

A commenter who lives in LA, says why he hates Fresno:

First off the weather. It’s very hot in the summer. And then in the winter you have all this fog. I’ve driven though the valley before and been in a continuous blanket of unending gray for 4 hours on end. I mean I couldn’t see more than about half a block in front of me. It really depressed my mood. Fog does that to me.

Secondly, it feels more like rural Texas than California. Both in politics and general way of life.

There are no real attractions anywhere in the valley. Other than escaping to the Sierras. There’s just nothing to see or do whatsoever. The countryside itself isn’t even beautiful, it’s just endless flatness. I don’t think anybody moves to the central valley because they want to. It’s mainly because they are priced out of L.A. and S.F. But I guess if you grow up there or have been there long enough, it’s fine enough.

Yes, the weather is pretty bad, but we get along.

The part about rural Texas is true, but I kind of like these salt of the Earth types around here. I had quite enough of bourgeois SWPL idiots and hard rightwingers in LA and Orange County.

In my comments below, I refer to the entire Los Angeles – Orange County metropolitan area. I don’t know about the Inland Empire. I spent a lot of time there, but I’m not sure how I feel about it. The San Gabriel and San Fernando Valleys are just LA anymore. I did used to love the San Gabriel Mountains though. I often went hiking there, especially around Mount Baldy. 20 years ago, incredibly, you could hike all day and barely see one other human being, 1 1/2 hours out of LA.

The comment about pricing is the classic bourgeois attitude about LA. It’s the land of the rich, baby! Well, whoop tee fuckin doo.

And this was one reason why I left. If you want to date a woman, she needs to know your income and your net worth. Women were trying to fix me up, but they kept telling me I did not make enough money for their grasping bourgeois friends. The Bay Area is much the same. In Orange County in 1990, it seemed like you needed to make ~60,000 a year in my crowd to be taken seriously by women. I was making $20-23 an hour working three different part-time jobs and my friends kept insulting me and telling me I wasn’t making enough money.

This bourgeois life is really frustrating. I’m glad I’ve just dropped out of it forever.

What the fuck is there to see in LA? It’s a gigantic city with millions of humans and their habitations in all directions forever. You call that scenery? What the Hell is so beautiful about that? It’s crap. The countryside in the Valley is a trip, if you don’t mind farms.

Around here though, you start driving east, and in 15 minutes you are out of the farms and into the rolling foothills, ranching lands, small streams, rivers, and vernal pools. There are coyotes, ground squirrels and hawks all over the place. It’s actually a trip. You go just a bit further, and you are into the Sierra foothills. I go through the foothills all the time.

What exactly is there “to see or do” in LA? Can someone enlighten me?

L.A.’s crap. The traffic never even ends now. The morning rush starts at 5 AM and goes until about 11:30 AM. There is a brief break, and then the evening rush starts at 2:30 PM and goes until after 8 PM. To get anywhere, it seems like you need to get on a freeway, and once you get on a freeway, it seems like the trip is going to take 30 minutes.

Plus the rent and housing prices are insane. Rent in Orange County is probably around $1000/month minimum. I know people who pay ~$2000 for a not particularly impressive apartment. That’s simply insane.

You need to be making so much money just to even survive in that region.

There are non-Whites everywhere, and if you are White, you feel like an endangered species.

Orange County now looks frighteningly like a 3rd World city like Lima or Manila. It’s really scary. I was in Garden Grove, and there was this multiracial bourgeois elite at my hotel, working for corporations, mostly yuppie Vietnamese, Koreans, Blacks and Whites with tons, I mean tons of money.

I went outside my hotel and started walking around, and it was depressing. There were some old White bars from the old White working class Garden Grove, but most of it was non-White. I went into store after store where there were no Whites. One store would be all Thais. The next would be all Viets. Another would be all Chinese. Many others would be some kind of Hipsanic. Often a lot of the folks in there didn’t even seem to speak English, and they acted hostile towards me, like I was an alien.

I went to eat in a Denny’s and there was the old Garden Grove working class serving me at my table, looking more wasted, burned out and beaten down than I’ve ever seen them. I don’t even know how they survive.

A drive along Garden Grove Boulevard feels like a teeming and impoverished Third World. A few blocks away is the elite sunning by the pools of their fancy hotels.

We went for a drive to Irvine for a wedding. We passed through Santa Ana along the way, and it was horrible. Nothing but the worst Mexico for miles and miles, all signs in Spanish, poverty, garage sales, clothes on lines.

We made it to the fancy restaurant, and it was full of these yuppie Whites who were positively swimming in money. I mean big bucks upper middle class here, smiling and happy and ordering kill your wallet drinks. The wedding was full of Viets and Whites. A lot of the Whites were physicians. The Viet girls were all trying to marry White physicians and attorneys. No other White men need apply. The wedding could not have been over soon enough.

I got out of LA 20 years ago, and I have not looked back. I went back once in 1992 and again in 2005. Both times I was sorry. I would not mind if I never set foot in LA again.

The project to create this insane gap between the haves and have-nots has been ongoing now for 30 years at least, with the full support of both the Republican and Democratic Parties, including Obama’s Administration.

The opposition to Obama is nuts. He’s not a socialist or Communist at all. He’s actually sort of a rightwinger.

Like the Republicans, Obama is totally controlled by finance capital. Everything for finance capital and their allies and nothing for anybody else. Or better yet, take from the the bottom 8

The only difference is that while continuing the wild wealth redistribution project (as their class benefits), the Obama Democrats to believe in safety net retention or even possibly expansion. That’s at the same time that they are impoverishing us by taking from us to give to them. So they’re really limousine liberals. That’s marginally better than the Democrats, but not much.

The Tea Party loons and the entire Right in the US is for the top 2

After that trip to Orange County five years ago, what I saw reminded me of Jakarta, Mumbai, La Paz, Quito, Rio or Bogota. This isn’t going to work. Long-term, it looks like a revolutionary situation of some sort.

There’s no way around it; history has a logic that cannot be defied or terminated no matter how many Berlin Walls fall.

Fresno Has a Bad Rap

Fresno, 30 miles away from me to the South, has a bad rap. It’s just another large city in California anymore. There are 440,000 people living here now, and it’s not that different from other California big cities, except that in a lot of ways it’s nicer.

There’s nothing particularly unpleasant about it except the weather. The crime rate is not that high. There are few Blacks. The traffic is excellent, and even at rush hour, it is still pretty much doable. There are nice parts of town and not so nice parts of town, but mostly it isn’t terrifying like parts of LA. The gangs mostly prey on their own kind. One thing though: this region has been one of the top cities in the nation for auto theft for some time now.

Many of the Whites here are derived from poor Whites – Arkies and Okies, who came here with the Dust Bowl. They have a working class base, are conservative and many practice fundamentalist Protestantism. They are often very friendly in a small town or Southern kind of way. When I lived in Fresno 20 years ago, it still had kind of a small town feel to it. Even people in stores would treat you like you were their neighbors. Not sure if that has changed.

A few areas have been taken over by Underclass Blacks and are best avoided.

Rents are quite reasonable.

All of the California subcultures are here: hippies, punks, goths, bikers, gays, preppies, emos, you name it, we’ve got it. There are art galleries and rock and roll clubs. There is even at artsy fartsy district called the Tower District.

The White politics is rather conservative, sort of like Reagan Democrats. They were originally Southern Democrats, but they’ve been registering Republican for 30 years now. The Hispanics and Blacks all vote Dem. The politics is divided between conservative White politics (some of the most conservative pols in California) and liberal Hispanic and Black politics.

Big Ag rules the day out here and is deeply conservative. They own most of the press and all of the pols. The whole Central Valley is like a company town with Big Ag as the employer.

The Sierra Nevadas are only an hour or so away, and they’re a total blast if you like mountains, rivers, lakes, forests, etc. A world-famous national park, Yosemite National Park, is 2 hours away.

Clovis is a suburb of Fresno the east. This is “White Fresno.” The Whites have moved here, and White culture is still well and alive in Clovis. Many apartments and new homes around here advertise “Clovis schools.” That’s racist code talk for “White schools.” Get the hint? Clovis schools are very hardass and really try to hold the line academically.

Fresno is just another big city school district full of large numbers of the usual Hispanics dropping out, getting pregnant, joining gangs and getting lousy grades. But serious problems on campus are rare.

Seriously hostile anti-White Aztlan Hispanic culture hasn’t really taken root here, since it’s an outgrowth of liberal politics, and we don’t really have that here.

The Hispanics have lived in the Valley forever and often grow up speaking Spanish as a first language. They learn English in school. They’re almost the majority group around here, so there’s nothing to rebel against. The Hispanics are socially conservative, often have deep roots, and are very family-oriented. Idiot liberal MECHA politics never really took hold here too much. These Hispanics are too conservative for that crap.

The Blacks are not very political either. They’re also mostly conservative working class people. There is an area called Southwest Fresno that is a Black ghetto and is best avoided, but as far as ghettos go, it’s not that bad. The Blacks around here have no numbers, so they don’t cause a lot of trouble, and mostly they hang out with Whites, Hispanics, etc. In lower class areas, Whites, Hispanics and Blacks all hang out and have sort of assimilated to some sort of Hispanic gangster culture, except most folks are not gangsters.

There are few Black gangs here, and some of the worst gangs, like the Bulldogs, are actually multiracial (Black and Hispanic).

There are White Supremacist gangs too. One is called the Peckerwoods. However, like the Aryan Nations, their White Supremacism is mostly for show. White culture is so far gone here that even our White Supremacists have gone Multicult. I understand that the local Peckerwoods mostly have Mexican girlfriends. At the local jails, they are good friends with the local Hispanics.

I was told that the White Supremacist stuff is a bunch of crap and that the whole purpose of the Peckerwoods is “all about drugs.” It’s just a way for Whites to form their own gang, sell dope and get by like everyone else.

The big drug around here is methamphetamine. It used to be manufactured in large quantity in the rural areas around here. It’s a drug of working class Whites, but the Hispanics have started to get into it. Hispanics often smoke it in a form called ice, which is one nasty drug.

There’s also a lot of very good pot around here, but it’s very expensive. The stuff around here almost all comes from the Bay Area, where it is grown in indoor gardens. The stuff is incredibly strong for an old stoner like me. I imagine the THC levels might be 15-2

There isn’t much racism here either for some reason. I think all the hardcore racists just took off for White California or left the state altogether. This area is turning seriously into the Multicult, the new culture of California and maybe the US.

Some Interesting Zionist Propaganda

I cut out some of the more egregious and nonsensical Zionist propaganda here. You have to admit there is a lot of truth is this bit of Zionist propaganda. I don’t like Zionism one bit. It’s a ridiculous settler-colonial project that the civilized world has given up on 100 years ago. The main problem is that the Arabs and Muslims, while obviously the victims of this settler-colonial aggression, often act like such shits that it’s hard to side with them over the Zionists. You really ought to seize the moral high ground in a war.

The mass movement of Muslims into Europe has been a catastrophe all around. Europe needs to start limiting the number of Muslims moving there, imposing some restrictions on them, demanding that they assimilate before being given citizenship, etc. There are all sorts of things that could be done. Main thing is to quit making it worse. If you’re in a hole, quit digging. Many Muslims in Europe seem to be refusing to assimilate to modern Western Europe. This is unacceptable. Immigrants must assimilate.

Furthermore, in general, Europe’s Muslims appear reactionary in the sense that they reject modernism in Europe and wish to turn back the clock. This is unacceptable. Europe is part of the modern, Judeo-Christian secular Western project. Islam seems to reject this project in its entirety. That’s not a problem if they want to sit over in their sandboxes and reject modernism, but if they need to Europe, they need to embrace modernism, grin and bear it and shut up about it, or take off back to their sandboxes.

A lot Left Anti-Zionists are actually anti-Semites. They support Islam in Europe and elsewhere because it’s the front line in the war against the Jews, oh, I’m sorry, I mean the Zionists. This is ridiculous. Talk to the Arabs and Muslim Left about how progressive Islamists are.

A lot of White nationalists are behind the Islamists too for the same reason. They’re the leading edge of the anti-Jewish, I mean anti-Zionist (!) resistance battalions. Nonsense. How would these White nationalists like it if huge numbers of these wonderful Muslims moved in next door to them. Mass Muslim immigration has not proven beneficial to Western White states.

The Nobel Prizes list is most interesting. I so want to be a Jew! Otto Weinberger must have been wrong. It’s not true at all that Jews lack the capacity for genius. That’s ridiculous. I don’t know what was wrong with Weinberger, maybe he was just another self-hating Jew. He wouldn’t have been the first.

All European Life Died at Auschwitz

By Sebastian Vilar Rodrigez

I walked down the street in Barcelona, and suddenly discovered a terrible truth – Europe died in Auschwitz….We killed six million Jews and replaced them with 20 million Muslims. In Auschwitz we burned a culture, thought, creativity, talent. We destroyed the chosen people, truly chosen, because they produced great and wonderful people who changed the world.

The contribution of this people is felt in all areas of life: science, art, international trade, and above all, as the conscience of the world. These are the people we burned.

And under the pretense of tolerance, and because we wanted to prove to ourselves that we were cured of the disease of racism, we opened our gates to 20 million Muslims, who brought us stupidity and ignorance, religious extremism and lack of tolerance and lastly, crime and poverty, due to an unwillingness to work and support their families with pride.

They have blown up our trains and turned our beautiful Spanish cities into the Third World, drowning in filth and crime.

Shut up in the apartments they receive free from the government, they plan the murder and destruction of their naive hosts.

And thus, in our misery, we have exchanged culture for fanatical hatred, creative skill for destructive skill, intelligence for backwardness and superstition.

We have exchanged the pursuit of peace of the Jews of Europe and their talent for a better future for their children, their determined clinging to life because life is holy, for those who pursue death, a people consumed by the desire for death for themselves and others, for our children and theirs.

What a terrible mistake was made by miserable Europe.

Nobel Prizes, Jewish and Muslim

The Global Islamic population is approximately 1.2 billion or 2

Literature: 1988 – Najib Mahfouz

Peace: 1978 – Mohamed Anwar El-Sadat 1990 – Elias James Corey 1994 – Yaser Arafat 1999 – Ahmed Zewai

Economics: (zero)

Physics: (zero)

Medicine: 1960 – Peter Brian Medawar 1998 – Ferid Mourad

TOTAL: 7

The Global Jewish population is approximately 14,000,000; that is 14 million or about 0.

Literature: 1910 – Paul Heyse 1927 – Henri Bergson 1958 – Boris Pasternak 1966 – Shmuel Yosef Agnon 1966 – Nelly Sachs 1976 – Saul Bellow 1978 – Isaac Bashevis Singer 1981 – Elias Canetti 1987 – Joseph Brodsky 1991 – Nadine Gordimer World

Peace: 1911 – Alfred Fried 1911 – Tobias Michael Carel Asser 1968 – Rene Cassin 1973 – Henry Kissinger 1978 – Menachem Begin 1986 – Elie Wiesel 1994 – Shimon Peres 1994 – Yitzhak Rabin

Physics: 1905 – Adolph Von Baeyer 1906 – Henri Moissan 1907 – Albert Abraham Michelson 1908 – Gabriel Lippmann 1910 – Otto Wallach 1915 – Richard Willstaetter 1918 – Fritz Haber 1921 – Albert Einstein 1922 – Niels Bohr 1925 – James Franck 1925 – Gustav Hertz 1943 – Gustav Stern 1943 – George Charles de Hevesy 1944 – Isidor Issac Rabi 1952 – Felix Bloch 1954 – Max Born 1958 – Igor Tamm 1959 – Emilio Segre 1960 – Donald A. Glaser 1961 – Robert Hofstadter 1961 – Melvin Calvin 1962 – Lev Davidovich Landau 1962 – Max Ferdinand Perutz 1965 – Richard Phillips Feynman 1965 – Julian Schwinger 1969 – Murray Gellmann 1971 – Dennis Gabor 1972 – William Howard Stein 1973 – Brian David Josephson 1975 – Benjamin Mottleson 1976 – Burton Richter 1977 – Ilya Prigogine 1978 – Arno Allan Penzias 1978 – Peter L Kapitza 1979 – Stephen Weinberg 1979 – Sheldon Glashow 1979 – Herbert Charles Brown 1980 – Paul Berg 1980 – Walter Gilbert 1981 – Roald Hoffmann 1982 – Aaron Klug 1985 – Albert A. Hauptman 1985 – Jerome Karle 1986 – Dudley R. Herschbach 1988 – Robert Huber 1988 – Leon Lederman 1988 – Melvin Schwartz 1988 – Jack Steinberger 1989 – Sidney Altman 1990 – Jerome Friedman 1992 – Rudolph Marc us 1995 – Martin Perl 2000 – Alan J. Heeger

Economics: 1970 – Paul Anthony Samuelson 1971 – Simon Kuznets 1972 – Kenneth Joseph Arrow 1975 – Leonid Kantorovich 1976 – Milton Friedman 1978 – Herbert A. Simon 1980 – Lawrence Robert Klein 1985 – Franco Modigliani 1987 – Robert M. Solow 1990 – Harry Markowitz 1990 – Merton Miller 1992 – Gary Becker 1993 – Robert Fogel

Medicine: 1908 – Elie Metchnikoff 1908 – Paul Erlich 1914 – Robert Barany 1922 – Otto Meyerhof 1930 – Karl Landsteiner 1931 – Otto Warburg 1936 – Otto Loewi 1944 – Joseph Erlanger 1944 – Herbert Spencer Gasser 1945 – Ernst Boris Chain 1946 – Hermann Joseph Muller 1950 – Tadeus Reichstein 1952 – Selman Abraham Waksman 1953 – Hans Krebs 1953 – Fritz Albert Lipmann 1958 – Joshua Lederberg 1959 – Arthur Kornberg 1964 – Konrad Bloch 1965 – Francois Jacob 1965 – Andre Lwoff 1967 – George Wald 1968 – Marshall W. Nirenberg 1969 – Salvador Luria 1970 – Julius Axelrod 1970 – Sir Bernard Katz 1972 – Gerald Maurice Edelman 1975 – Howard Martin Temin 1976 – Baruch S. Blumberg 1977 – Roselyn Sussman Yalow 1978 – Daniel Nathans 1980 – Baruj Ben Acerraf 1984 – Cesar Milstein 1985 – Michael Stuart Brown 1985 – Joseph L. Goldstein 1986 – Stanley Cohen [& Rita Levi-Montalcini] 1988 – Gertrude Elion 1989 – Harold Varmus 1991 – Erwin Neher 1991 – Bert Sakmann 1993 – Richard J. Roberts 1993 – Phillip Sharp 1994 – Alfred Gilman 1995 – Edward B. Lewis 1996 – Lu Rose Iacovino

TOTAL: 129!

Jews Versus Muslims

The Jews are not brainwashing children in military training camps, teaching them how to blow themselves up and cause maximum deaths of Jews and other non Muslims. The Jews don’t hijack planes, nor kill athletes at the Olympics, or blow themselves up in German restaurants. There is not one single Jew who has destroyed a church. There is not a single Jew who protests by killing people.

The Jews don’t traffic slaves, nor do they have leaders calling for Jihad and death to all the Infidels. Perhaps the world’s Muslims should consider investing more in standard education and less in blaming the Jews for all their problems. Muslims must ask what can they do for humankind before they demand that humankind respect them.

General Eisenhower Warned Us

It is a matter of history that when the Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces, General Dwight Eisenhower, found the victims of the death camps, he ordered all possible photographs to be taken, and for the German people from surrounding villages to be ushered through the camps and even made to bury the dead.

He did this because he said in words to this effect:

Get it all on record now – get the films – get the witnesses -because somewhere down the road of history some bastard will get up and say that this never happened.

Recently, the UK debated whether to remove the Holocaust from its school curriculum because it ‘offends’ the Muslim population which claims it never occurred. It is not removed as yet. However, this is a frightening portent of the fear that is gripping the world and how easily each country is giving into it.

It is now more than 60 years after the Second World War in Europe ended. This e-mail is being sent as a memorial chain, in memory of the 6 million Jews, 27 million Russians, 10 million Christians, and 1,900 Catholic priests who were murdered, raped, burned, starved, beaten, experimented on and humiliated while the German people looked the other way.

Now, more than ever, with Iran, among others, claiming the Holocaust to be a myth, it is imperative to make sure the world never forgets.

How many years will it be before the attack on the World Trade Center never happened because it offends some Muslim in the United States?

Otto Weininger on Women (and Jews)

Here we come to another problematic issue, that is female intelligence and genius. The great but toxic Otto Weininger is especially fascinating on this issue. He holds that women are simply incapable of genius. A Jewish convert to Christianity and suicide at age 23, he had a similar low opinion of Jews.

He rented the home in Vienna where Beethoven had died for the night, told the landlady he was not to be disturbed, and wrote two letters, one to his brother and one to his father. He told them both that he was going to kill himself. Then he put a bullet in his heart. This suicide set off several copycat suicides.

This stone closes the resting place of a young man whose mind never really found peace on earth. And after imparting revelations of his mind and soul he could not bear any longer to be among the living. He searched for the death realm of one of the greatest minds that dwelled in the house in Schwarzspanierhause and put an end to his bodily existence.

His book was praised by Wittgenstein, who nevertheless distanced himself from its views. His contributions to philosophy were around the nature of genius. He held that Jews were essentially feminine, as such had were amoral, without a sense of good or evil, and thus as a consequence were soulless. He also held that women were amoral soulless types. Modern decay was traced to the amoral irreligious Jewish/feminine nature of modern times. Weininger correlated femininity with what he called Jewishness.

The Nazis had mixed feelings about Weininger, but Hitler himself said, “Dietrich Eckart once told me that in all his life he had known just one good Jew: Otto Weininger, and he killed himself…”

Though the Nazis denounced his books, they used parts of his work in their propaganda.

His great work was Sex and Character, which made him famous when he was only 23 years old (Incredible!). Yet the number of our brains cells peaks at age 23, so it should not be surprising that great works of genius would be done by the young and indeed in art, poetry, fiction, music, and mathematics, the genius often peaks young.

An example of Weininger’s views of women can be seen here:

Greatness is absent from the nature of the woman and the Jew, the greatness of morality, or the greatness of evil. In the Aryan man, the good and bad principles of Kant’s religious philosophy are ever present, ever in strife. In the Jew and the woman, good and evil are not distinct from one another … It would not be difficult to make a case for the view that the Jew is more saturated with femininity than the Aryan, to such an extent that the most manly Jew is more feminine than the least manly Aryan.

Weininger argues that all humans are composed of both the male and female substance. The female is is passive, unproductive, unconscious and amoral. The male is active, productive, conscious and moral or logical. Female life is consumed with the sexual prerogative – both the act itself, which he coded as simply “prostitution” in marriage or otherwise, and procreation, as birthing and raising children. This is the nature and duty of woman.

The duty of man, a la Nietzsche (sort of) is to forego sexuality and its life-consuming and distracting passions and to strive to become a genius by searching for the love of the absolute, which he will find in himself. For “male” and “female” also code the male and female aspects of the personality.

Weininger certainly gave off some interesting vibes:

Nobody who had once seen his face could ever forget it. The big dome of his forehead marked it. The face was peculiar looking because of the large eyes; the look in them seemed to surround everything. In spite of his youth, his face was not handsome, it was rather ugly. Never did I see him laugh or smile. His face was always dignified and serious.

Only when he was outdoors in spring did it seem to relax, and then become cheerful and bright. At many concerts he would shine with happiness. In the most wonderful moments we spent together, particularly when he talked about an idea in which he was interested, his eyes were filled with happiness.

Otherwise his face was impenetrable. One could never – except to the last few months – find in his face any hint of what was happening deep within his soul. The taut muscles would often move, and sharp wrinkles would appear on his face, as if they were caused by intolerable pain. I asked for the reason, he controlled himself at once, gave a vague or evasive answer, or talked about other matters, making further questioning impossible.

His manners would occasionally elicit surprise, and often a smile, since he cared little for traditions and prejudices.

The influence of his personality seemed strongest at night. His body seemed to grow; there was something ghostlike in his movements and there would be something demoniac in his manner. An when, as happened at times, his conversation became passionate, when he made a movement in the air with his stick or his umbrella as if he were fighting an invisible ghost, one was always reminded of a person from the imaginary circles of E. Th. A. Hofmann.

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)