Alt Left: Permanent Ban from r/Communism

On Reddit. Oh well. I am starting to think I am not much of a Commie anyway. Western Commies are the most insane feminists and SJW’s of them all. They’re almost all full-blown radical feminists of the worst kind, and most Western Communist groups are flooded with non-heterosexuals and nonbinary gender types, and they have the worst of those two also.

I was reading one forum and ~half of the posters were non-heterosexual and gender nonbinary. Recommended reading was some radical feminist lesbian manhating psycho on “mandatory heterosexuality,” or some crap. I said I’m out and quit reading and let them have their pervert misandrist jerk-off session.

The group I got banned from recently posted saying that all Communist countries had banned porn and that porn would be banned in their future dream society. Every Communist guerrilla group that forms local rule puts the women in charge. It causes the usual chaos that Female Rule always does anywhere. Guess what the first thing they do is? Ban booze, gambling, and porn. The three things that keep most of us guys from blowing our brains out. Brilliant!

I made ~two posts there and then I was banned. I didn’t say anything bad at all. I asked why I got banned and got a response:

No misogynists.

I guess he read through my posting history. I told my partial roommate about this, and he gave me this puzzled look like:

You? A misogynist? WTF! That’s total bullshit LOL!

I said I know and we laughed about it. Then we talked about how Western Communists sucked. He said:

It’s nothing but a bunch of niggers and Mexicans and fags. They hate Whites and men. That’s why I never wanted any part of it.

I basically agreed with him, without the slurs that is.

I also find it laughable that I am a misogynist. When I see hardcore misogyny online, a lot of times, it makes me throw my head back in shock and disgust. I dislike it on a visceral level. Obviously with reactions like that, I must be a horrible misogynist, huh?

My feelings towards women do range from love all the way to hate and everything in between though, I agree. But they’re mostly on the positive side. I don’t want to be a woman-hater. It doesn’t feel good.

Also women were so good to me when I was young that I really can’t hate them. I will love them forever for the kindness that they showed to me then. And yes, kindness is the right word. They treated me like a was a prince or a cool new toy to play with and pass around to their friends for them to play with. But that’s ok. I didn’t mind being a meat puppet. That was obviously for a completely shallow reason called Looks, but hey, humans are shallow.

Women from 18-55 pretty much treat me like dirt now (but not always). I must say that if they had treated me my whole life they way they treat me now, I would definitely hate women. I mean you hit a man enough times, he might start hitting back. Those poor incels have been treated like human garbage by females their whole pitiful lives. I don’t blame them for hating women. Who wouldn’t?

Alt Left: We Men in the West Lost Control of Our Women and Let Them Run Wild

Pantheist: What if you convince women to stop acting like children the same way we convinced some Blacks to “Whiten up”. Transcend their nature.

Sure, they did it in my Mom’s time, but that time is over. All women are feminists now, and most of them are feral.

We’ve let our women run loose by not controlling them like we should have. The results are not pretty and are all around us.

The new generations of women do not want to transcend their nature. Feminism has told them that it’s cool to act crazy and attack, fight, scream at, hate, humiliate, and emasculate men.

Modern women like to do all of these things, and feminism has even encouraged them to act crazy because when they act crazy, it’s never their fault. It’s all the fault of men. So women have permission to go completely crazy, fall apart, act wild, and wage war on men. Modern women actually enjoy doing all of these things because female nature wants to act like this.

Women in my Mom’s generation were taught that you didn’t do these things unless you had a damned good reason.

In answer to the commenter’s question about women acting like children, women wish to act like children because this is their nature. Also, feminism completely infantalizes women and treats them like children who lack agency and can be convinced by evil men to do just about anything.

How many times have we heard “that’s not consent?” We say that teenage girls are too young to consent to sex because they are not mature enough (which is bullshit), but we treat grown women in the exact same way.

Feminism says women lack agency and are just puppets or marionettes that can be manipulted by evil men into doing things they don’t want to do even though they say they do because these nonhuman muppets are incapable of saying no or stopping sexual advances.

That’s why we have crazy new cases where

  • where we men have to read woman’s minds to figure out if she wants to have sex or not
  • where women consent but they didn’t really “mean it,” so it’s not consent
  • where women can be talked or pressured into sex despite their consent which means that they lack agency and it’s not consent
  • where drunk or loaded women are not responsible for anything they do, so any sexual decisions they make are not consent
  • where women consent to sex but then regret it the next morning so that’s not consent retroactively
  • where women get to decide 10-20 after they consented to a sex act whether they really and truly and for real consented and they can decide that it wasn’t really consent

and all sort of other crazy nonsense.

In all of these cases, women are being treated like children who are too immature to consent to sex and hence lack agency.

Alt Left: Face It, Men: Your Girlfriend or Wife Is Your Surrogate Mother

Sometimes if you want to role-play with your girlfriend, you can go into “little boy” mode where you’re the little boy, and your gf is your Mom. You talk like a little boy and to some extent act like one but not too much. It’s not serious or real. It’s just a big joke.

I’ve done that with a few childless girlfriends aged 29 to 49, and they all loved it. I was their son! You would think they would make fun of and ridicule me, but they really got into it. Some women hate it though, think it’s stupid, and won’t play the game.

Anyway, your girlfriend really is your mother. Face it, your girlfriend or your wife replaces your Mom. We men go from Mom to girlfriend or wife, and really nothing changes.

A few men are ridiculous about it. I could give you examples, but the wife actually didn’t mind and still loved the guy to death, though frankly he was a huge pussy.

Men are too macho to admit that their girlfriends or wives become not only our lovers, yes, but also our Moms. When men become elderly, this idea of the wife turning into the Mom becomes much more obvious, often glaringly so. Some men don’t even try to hide it much.

We men are not good at taking care of ourselves. A lot of divorced men can’t even fend for their own. They fall apart quickly when they live alone, and quite a few get sick or die fairly quickly. These guys are like little boys without a Mom living on their own. How long would a boy last in the woods without Mom? These men literally need a wife or girlfriend to stay alive. We men like to think we are self-reliant, but we need to think about that.

Actually bachelors fend a lot better on their own than divorced men. And the longer they have been bachelors, the better they get at it. Most of the long-term bachelors I know are fairly decent cooks. Most can do their own laundry. Most are good about going to the doctor, and they are almost female about it.

And I know bachelors who keep in contact with their mothers regularly, so even though they don’t have the surrogate mother in terms of wife or girlfriend, they still keep the real thing around on some level anyway.

Some even talk to Mom almost every day. They usually live away from her, but they’re on the phone to her a lot, or she’s on the phone to them. The mother doesn’t usually run the guy’s life if he’s a real man – he’ll tell her to piss off if she does, and most mothers will back off because instinctively they know that being party to a Momma’s boy is not cool.

So most bachelors more or less do whatever they want, especially sexually with regard to women, and their mothers have no say in the matter. My Mom’s been my playboy cheerleader most of her life. She’s like:

Go get em, stud! I’m so proud of my playboy son ha ha.

She even used to fix me up with her friends.

Mom: Hey Bob, you know my friend XXXXX?

Me: Yeah?

Mom: She wants to go out with you.

Now she’s turning into a prude in her old age (80’s), and I have been told she does not want to hear about my exploits anymore. In particular, she doesn’t want to hear about me being with teenage girls and young women. That pisses her off.

But these bachelors are still in a way being mothered by their Moms. Some still bring their clothing over to do laundry if they live close. Others have Moms that give them food or help them out with money if they need it. More typically, they have their Moms call them and remind them of stuff they need to do, like doctor’s appointments or important affairs that they tend to blow off.

I actually do all of these things, and I am not embarrassed to say so. Why should I be? She doesn’t tell me what to do. I live my own life. She’s not my Mommy anymore in that sense.

Alt Left: Women Are “Forever Children” Because They Evolved That Way to Raise Children

Polar Bear: Women are “forever children” as has been said here, perhaps to better raise children.

Exactly! Perfect.

I was thinking this just the other day. I was discussing it with my Mom carefully (she’s a feminist), and she agreed with you and me on this issue! We both agreed that in order to raise kids best, a woman has to think like a child or relate to a child on a child’s level. Most men see an infant and think, “Like Hell I’m taking care of that little shit. At the very least it’s boring. At worst it will puke, piss, or shit on me. Plus it won’t stop crying.”

I had a girlfriend once who was a married woman. She talked to me about when she had her first kid. She would actually climb in the playpen with that kid and play goo-goo gaga with it all day long. She told  me:

That was a very special time for me. Just me and the baby.

Face it, no human can do that unless they think like a child on some very basic level.

I could not imagine myself spending all day in the crib with some idiotic infant making faces at it. I’d be bored out of my skull, and I’m sure most men feel the same. But for women, they’re in their happy place.

On an instinctive level, women love kids. If they don’t have kids, they develop surrogate children with pets and such. Or they become foster mothers. I dated a woman who had never had kids but had been a foster mother to maybe five kids.

I can’t tell you how many times I have seen  a woman with a baby in a public place. Look around at how the other women look at the baby. I have seen huge smiles burst onto the faces of even older women in their 50’s.

When my sister was very little, my Mom took her to the toy store. She saw the dolls and she grabbed one and cradled it to her chest. She said, “Daaaa!”

It’s a damned instinct.

I had two long-term girlfriends recently, one 48 and the other 51. Neither had had kids, though one lost a kid via a miscarriage. They both had dogs which were essentially surrogate children, especially for one of the women. He was her baby! She also talked all the time about this little boy she had taken care of for a long time. She couldn’t stop talking about him.

Get it?

PUA/Game: The Lowdown on Dating Much Younger Women If You Are a Middle Aged Man

Even though I am over 60, I still date young women at times, all the way down to their 20’s or even 18 or 19. But it’s is extremely hard, with like a 98+% rejection rate. It’s like climbing a mountain. Yeah, you can do it, but most guys won’t bother because it’s so hard. It also gets harder every year, and most guys definitely cannot pull this off. Vast majority of young women are not into men 20-40 years older, but there are a few, that’s for sure.

I have to fight a tsunami of rejection and even anger and hatred to get those few with Daddy issues who will go out with me for free. I’ve been banned from establishments for merely talking to young women, not even flirting with them or asking them out.

Nevertheless, I have young women age 18-29 coming to me almost every day asking to be my sugar baby. They want me to be their sugar daddy. I’m as broke as they are though.

Woman on the Net who is opposed to these relationships: You can maybe get away with it if you are already very attractive or you have a lot of money.

Supposedly, when I was young I was very handsome. I lived Chad’s life for many years. People kept saying this about me into my 50’s, and even at my age, I hear it all the time.
Even women age 18-23 tell me all the time that I am handsome, very handsome, cute, sexy, or hot. I don’t get it, as I think my looks are shot. So I guess in my case it’s looks.

How to Pull It Off

It helps to be in the top 10-20% of looks for your age, not be overweight, be well-spoken, well-groomed, hygienic, and very polite or even classy, and dress halfway decently. It absolutely helps to have any kind of status at all, be it Power, Fame, Money, or Status, in any dose at all but the more the better.

It also helps to be wise and intelligent, as these young women are looking for a mentor to be “the adult in my life” as a 20 year old hottie with model good looks recently told me.

You definitely need great Game, helpfully honed over a lifetime. And you need to not be creepy in the rational sense of the word that even most men would agree is creeptastic. Anyway if you are that creepy, you automatically have shit Game anyway.

Woman on the Net who is opposed to these relationships: Women are not attracted to receding hairlines, wrinkles, or a flat tire around the waist.

I don’t have a receding hairline. Not even 1%.

I have few wrinkles, some around my belly that you never see.

I do not have a beer belly or at least not much of one. I was in bed with a 19 year old recently and I complained that I had a belly and she said, “No way! Most men your age are overweight, some by a lot!”

Problems

There are problems.

Potency and sexual ability issues. At my age, tragically, there are potency problems. I’m not impotent but it’s touch and go if you catch my drift. Yes, you don’t need a cock to please a woman, but a lot of young women want to be fucked and even get creampies. They’re disappointed if it’s not working. Also a lot of young women are cumsluts nowadays (ha ha), and they want huge loads. Loads that we cannot supply.

We can’t fuck as long as when we were young. I used to be able to keep it up for 3-4 hours at a time. Not nowadays and I often get off quick too.

Sex drive mismatch. Most young women have raging sex drives, especially nowadays with all this online porn. They’re almost all masturbating, often every day. Some watch a lot of porn or even have their own porn blogs! Her sex drive will be way stronger than yours. That’s a problem.

The relationships are highly unstable, characterized by a lot of wild love/hate fluctuation. She’s basically a huge drama queen. The relationships tend to blow up, often very quickly, and  after that, she’s just about your worst enemy.

The young women who go for older men are often not right in the head. 75% of the ones I have been with were actively suicidal, at least at times.

Peer pressure is a problem. I was with an 18 year old girl who fell crazy in love with me at age 59 (believe it not), but her friends saw her with me and openly ridiculed her. Relationship over.

Prepare to get called “pedophile” a lot, especially by young men. Of course you’re not, as you are adults, but still, steel yourself for a lot of name-calling.

Prepare to lose friends. I had a good friend, a physician, dump me when I told him I was dating a 19 year old girl at 60.

Prepare for hate from older women. And it will be really bad too. They really hate us cradle robbers.

You will never meet her parents because her Dad might punch you or try to kill you.

You will never meet her siblings because she will be too embarrassed to introduce them to you.

Prepare for possible legal consequences. A 19 year old girl I was dating had a 17 year old friend (total knockout) who also wanted me and kept trying to send me dirty pics I had to delete. She  kept bugging me:

I want you to eat my pussy! Pleeeease!

It was rather hard to keep turning her down. Part of me really wanted to do it. They both wanted a threeway. That’s probably every man’s dream: to have a threeway with two hotties, one 19 and the other 17, when you are 60 fucking years old!  How many guys  get to do that?

I said no and the 19 year old really pestered me about it. A weak man would have given in.

You have to be strong not to mess with an underage girl. You can be friends with them, but you can’t do anything sexual. I met an 18 year old girl two weeks shy of her 18th birthday and she wanted in. We hung out a lot, held hands, hugged, put our arms around each other, and kissed on the cheek.

She had never been kissed and of course was a virgin. Both of these things are way more common at that age than you think. She kept pestering me for a makeout session or at least a tongue kiss, and it took all I could muster not to cave and do it.

The Good Side

As you can see there are a mountain of problems with these relationships.

But there is a great bright side. Most middle aged men will never fuck a teenage girl or woman in their 20’s again. Maybe 10% can pull it off. And all men that age want to do it. So if you pull it off, you are living the life of Riley that most men only ever dream about.

Other men will treat you like a hero. If you are not arrogant about it, the praise feels damn good.

Quite a few women are turned on by the fact that you can pull this off.

Quite a few women are turned on by the fact that you can pull this off. Of all ages. Even older men. I’ve had women in their 40’s hear that I do this and start addressing me as “hey stud.” You get a lot of this.

You can be her father and her lover. Get over it. You’re her Daddy figure. She will call you Daddy in bed all the time, and this time she means it.

A lot want to do weird age-play where they are younger than they are – teenage girls down to 12-17. If you are creeped out by incest play this is not for you.

You are her mentor if you are a good man. You can teach her all about life! She doesn’t know shit really so you will be teaching her basic life skills every single day.

If you are highly intelligent, that’s good because now you are her teacher, and her head is getting filled with new facts all the time.

You can be her counselor and play therapist with her if that’s your thing. She’ll need it anyway. So a lot of psychological self-help.

You are imparting a lot of wisdom to her. Like every day, more wisdom and aphorisms. She may fall in love with your mind if you are intelligent, and tell you she’s fucking you for your mind. She will also saw in awe that you are very wise.

I used to be a teacher, so I love this. You will never see a young person learn more than this. Every day she gets her head full of all these new things and it’s cool because you can watch another human learn at a monumental pace.

If you are good, she will actually end up smarter and will be life and social skills than most of her peers so it’s good for her in that sense. You are teaching her all about sex too. Most are pretty inexperienced.

You are her cheerleader. She has a ton of insecurities and typically with the Daddy issues comes serious low self esteem. So you are always trying to boost her up and get her to feel better about herself.

Is it worth it? Do you like to live dangerously? If you like to live dangerously and have all sorts of bad things happen to get the good things (like a hike in the jungle), then it’s worth it. But a lot of older men probably don’t want all the typical drama and chaos that comes with your typical young women. They probably get enough of that crap with women their own age, and it’s way worse with young women because so many are quite unstable.

I still date women my age and women in their 30’s-50’s, and honestly they are superior to young things in a lot of ways!

Alt Left: Tammy Wynette, “Stand by Your Man”

Tammy Wynette, “Stand by Your Man,” from 1968! One of the greatest country songs ever written!

Lyrics, simple but just perfect:

Sometimes it’s hard to be a woman
Giving all your love to just one man
You’ll have bad times
And he’ll have good times
Doin’ things that you don’t understand
But if you love him you’ll forgive him
Even though he’s hard to understand
And if you love him oh be proud of him
‘Cause after all he’s just a man

Stand by your man
Give him two arms to cling to
And something warm to come to
When nights are cold and lonely

Stand by your man
And show the world you love him
Keep giving all the love you can
Stand by your man

Stand by your man
And show the world you love him
Keep giving all the love you can
Stand by your man

Tammy Wynette,  “Stand by Your Man” Live. A bit later in her career.

She wasn’t very famous before this, but after this, she was a superstar.

Tammy once said:

I spent 15 minutes writing this song and an entire lifetime defending it.

Exactly.

And isn’t that why this song is just so great?

In 2010, this song was selected by the Library of Congress to add to the National Recording Registry, for songs that “culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant.” In other words, that Registry is for the greatest songs ever written in America!

The Alt Left officially endorses this song, by the way. After all, we are the “Conservative Left” – liberals and Leftists who are at least somewhat conservative on social issues. I’m sure feminists hate the idea of this song, but they can go pound sand! I never knew how great this song was before.

Like most Leftists, I hated this song because it was anti-feminist and oppressed women and all that crap. It was a song for Republican social conservatives. Except it’s not and it wasn’t.

But that was before I had a few girlfriends who actually, literally, stood by their man, meaning me, that is. One was Jewish! Would you expect a Jewish woman to do that? Well, who knows?

The feeling of having a woman who will stand by your side through thick and thin and especially to live her life through yours is one of the greatest highs a man can experience in this life. Better than sex. Better than love. Well, it’s love with an extra helping of chocolate syrup on top, let’s put it that way. But what a syrup that is!

The strange thing is that a woman who truly loves you actually wants to be like this. She wants to stand by her man. She wants to live her life through you. She wants to be dead jealous of you.

I had one girlfriend who was so jealous of me that she used to say, “I will cut a bitch! No woman is getting near my man!” Stand by your man!

She told me she had a tattoo on her ankle, and I told her I didn’t like tattoos. She immediately resolved to remove the tattoo! If my man wants my tattoo off, it’s coming off! Stand by your man!

Hey, I like that! She wants to dress you in the morning, pick your clothes and cologne, watch you shave, iron your shirts, and listen intently to how your day went when you come home. Stand by your man!

I think most of you men on here really do want a “stand by your man” woman. Trust me, there’s no better kind.

This must be a deep-rooted need in women, in tandem with femininity, submission, a need to be dominated, ferocious jealousy in keeping other women away from her prized man. It’s got to be genetic.

If you have ever seen a woman dissolve into femininity (often because she is madly in love with you or very turned on by you sexually) you will see that she seems to melt in place right there. You can tell that she’s in her special place; she’s hitting her sweet spot. Deep down inside, this is where most women truly long to be.

Feminism is a lie. It tells women that femininity is evil and oppressive. Like Hell it is. It’s the life blood of womankind. Take it away and they go nuts. Look at modern women. Look at how nuts they are. They’re having their femininity taken away from them. Of course they’re going nuts. How else would they act? They think this is what they want because feminism lied to them and told them that and believed and fell for it. Of course it was a lie.

Once again, the Cultural Left goes to bat against Nature and the weight of 200,000 years. And once again, Mother Nature on the mound mows down another row of the Left’s pathetic pinch-hitters.

Mother Nature 200,000,  Cultural Left 0.

Game/PUA: The “Older Men Who Go for Young Women Are Losers Who Go for Easy Pickings Because Can’t Get a Woman Their Own Age” Lie

I’ve dated women this age off and on since I was in my early 40’s ( a lot at the beginning of the period, much fewer lately), and trust me when I say it’s not so easy to get them into bed. Hell, it’s like pulling hen’s teeth to even get them to go out with you because 99% of them think you’re a gross old man.

There’s only a few young women that age who even want to go for an older guy.

Girls that age are also extremely moody, temperamental, and nutty, so I’d say that they call you out on your bullshit all the time. The last two I dated were both suicidal. Older women are so much more stable.

The girls I dated got angry at me many times when I was with them, usually over ridiculous nonsense. It’s not like they’re going to go along with everything you suggest.

When I was 18-21, quite a few of my friends were dating underage girls 14-17. The men were not immature as everyone thinks. They were Alphas who were bedding women of all ages. The jailbaits made a beeline straight for the best men of all my age and bypassed everyone else. I never heard any of these guys say these girls were easy prey. They said it was not so easy to get them into bed, a lot were still wary virgins, etc.

Nothing changes are men age. Young women and teenage girls still head straight for the Alphas. Look a the women prominent JB’s have ended up with: movie stars, rock stars, billionaires, movie directors. They head straight for the top. They’re worse than the women our age!

This “older men who go for teenage girls or young women because they are losers and women their age won’t tolerate their crap” is nonsense. I’ve never met an older man who was too immature for women his age, so he went for young women because they were easy targets. I think it’s a fairy tale or urban legend, frankly.

First of all, almost any older man who can land a girl that age is usually doing great with women his age. Hell, why do you think the girl went for him in the first place? Anyway, those girls complain a lot and are very easily annoyed by all sorts of things.

I would not say they call you out on your bullshit less than older women do. But they see right through you just like an older woman does. An 18 or 19 year old will figure you out real quick and expose your true self to you, good and bad, gifts and flaws, better than your therapist, just like any woman, really.

All females will tend to call you on your shit. But if you are older man with very young women, they will get angry a lot, and when they do, they will insult you horribly. Typically they will call you an old man, which, even if it is true, hurts. They will attack your looks and practically say you are ugly or at least you are not as hot as men her age.

Now about this BS about older men who go for young women being losers who can’t get a woman their own age…

Haha. Guess who made up this stupid lie? Women! Especially, guess who? Ding! Right! Older women. Why, of course, what did you expect? Why?

Because a lot of older men chase younger women, and this really burns older women up basically because they know they can’t compete with young hotties. So they resort to making up lies about older men who chase younger women in order to try to shame these men and make them stop and to make these older women themselves feel better about losing some high-quality older man dick.

Women are so transparent. Their lies are so obvious and pathetic that’s it’s laughable the way so many of them actually believe this BS.

But then, women live in a fairy tale world, a fantasy land. They don’t live in the real world because it’s cruel and evil and women, being sensitive and basically good-hearted souls, can’t handle such a cold and vicious world. So they make up lies to say the world is not really like this and instead of the world being as it is, it is as women  imagine or fantasize that is.

I don’t blame women for being sensitive and kind-hearted souls who long for defenses against the arbitrary cruelty and even evil of life. I don’t mind denial as a defense. As an introvert, of course fantasy is where I live most of the time.

But I know the difference between reality and fantasy. I know I’m BSing myself but I don’t care. I know I’m denying all the failures and fuckups of my life, but I don’t care. And I can brainwash myself into believing that my denial and fantasy defenses are the truth.

But deep down inside, of course I know they are not. Women are not so enlightened. They actually believe that the world works according to how women think it should work. If they ever figure out the truth, boy are they in for a rude surprise.

One of the fantasy lies that women, typically older women, believe is that older men who chase young women go for young, vulnerable, stupid, easy pickings females. But they’re not.

I’ve dated women this age off and on since I was in my early 40’s, and trust me when I say it’s not so easy to get them into bed. Hell, it’s like pulling hen’s teeth to even get them to go out with you because 99% of them think you’re a gross old man.

Even when I was young, it was not that easy getting teenage girls into bed. A lot of them held out on you or would only kiss and make out with you and stop it there.

A lot were puritanical. Refusing to suck cock was very common. I had young women who wouldn’t let me eat their pussies because they thought is was gross. Pain during sex is not uncommon and they sometimes ask for lube of some sort due to this.

A lot are virgins who don’t want to give it up. Some will fuck you once or twice and then just make out and refuse to go further after that. One 18 year old girl did that because I wasn’t rapey enough. She said her other guys just blew past her when she said no and basically forced her to have sex. So some of these girls even force you to be a rapist if you want to get laid. Some are virgins and want to stay that way.

Girls that age are also extremely moody, temperamental, and nutty. The last two I dated were both suicidal. Older women are so much more stable.

The girls got angry at me many times when I was with them, usually over ridiculous nonsense. It’s not like they’re going to go along with everything you suggest.

Sponsored Post: Types of Women Men Are Looking For 

Types of Women Men Are Looking For 

 A Housewife 

A man who wants his wife like this appreciates coziness and comfort the most. Cleanliness and order in the house, things neatly laid out in their places, starched sheets, and a hot three-course dinner are important to him. A quiet homely atmosphere, a delicious smell in the kitchen, evening hours for two together in front of the TV, and a freshly-ironed shirt for work in the morning are the things a man wants.

Those men work hard just need an island of calm and care at home to relax their body and soul from difficult everyday life. Such a man doesn’t care how long your legs are and how you dress – the main thing is that you know how to care for him and your house. If you cook well and are not afraid of being a housewife, then you will stick quite well together with a man that is looking for one. 

A Mother 

Such a wife is sought for by infantile men, men spoiled by maternal affection, or men who have not received enough of it. Representatives of this type of men expect from their future wife the role of the mother: to care, support, pamper, and love him no matter what. By being with such a man, you will have to solve all his problems, large and small, do almost everything for him, and hold his hand if he, God forbid, catches a cold.

Get ready to give a lot, but in return, do not expect anything. Unlike men who prefer housewives, who, in response to your efforts at home and caring for your husband, will give you their love and gratitude, infantile types are just boys – they only want to receive, and they consider this entitlement natural and taken for granted.

Be careful not to confuse these two completely different men. You can recognize a “boy” by the way he is overly attached to his mother, idealizes her, and often repeats that his chosen one should be a copy of his mother. In general, such men are not very independent and indecisive in life, so it is not difficult to recognize them. 

A Mother of His Children 

A man who wants to start a strong family with lots of children is interested in finding a good mother for his kids. For them, the continuation of their genes is important; therefore, a potential wife is evaluated in terms of her talents when it comes to motherhood.

This implies not only the ability to conceive and endure healthy offspring but also a strong desire to have a child (maybe more than one), the ability to get along with children, and a willingness to devote herself to the family.

Such men are not looking for incubators – it’s just that they value you as a reliable partner that is capable of producing offspring; love comes second. He will honor and respect you, no doubt. If the family is the main thing for you and you want to have and raise children, then you will create a wonderful union with this person. 

A Mistress 

This is quite a simple one, if a man wants a short-term relationship with a lot of sex, he will be interested in finding a mistress. In a woman, they value attractiveness, gentleness, and the ability to get them hooked. Men that are interested in mistresses know exactly what they want.

They are not interested in knowing how to find a girl to marry; they want something with less commitment and more fun. With such a macho man, you will feel like a real woman, always charming. The question is whether there will be enough romance and unforgettable sex for the development of a serious and lasting relationship with the possibility of further marriage. 

A Friend 

Some men seek a faithful companion in a woman, a partner whom they can rely on. By dating such a woman, he is looking for qualities such as devotion, an ability to support, an agile mind, a calm disposition, and patience. He tries to figure out a woman’s personality; he wants a reliable person with whom he can create a strong family that is built on respect.

Maybe there won’t be that much passion, but men who want a friend with to have guarantees of stability and confidence in the future. Their priorities are as follows: to achieve everything together, relate to each other with mutual understanding, and spend long evenings in meaningful, interesting conversations.

This is a great option for a woman who knows how to be a friend and needs a strong shoulder and support from her husband without him shutting her down or dominating her.

Let’s summarize everything that’s been said above. It should be noted that there are no truly correct or incorrect male ideas about women, just as there are no bad or good types of women. And of course, only you know what is right for you, what kind of a woman or a man you are, and what you want in a relationship. 

 

Game/PUA: One Sex Has to Dominate the Other

…we either have male dominance and violence, or gentle female dominance.

First of all,  you’re going to have male violence (and female violence too for that matter) in either one. Actually the men might be more violent if they were being dominated by women because being dominated by women is one thing that pisses real men off more than anything else.

First of all, female dominance of men will never be gentle. Women are never gentle with the men that they dominate, in relationships or otherwise. It just doesn’t work that way. I think it is not possible for a woman to dominate a man in a gentle way. Women will always be cruel, vicious, and even evil with the men they are dominating.

On the other hand, I think we men can dominate women in a civilized manner. First of all, we men evolved to be dominant, to dominate women and children, and to fight for dominance with other men. The fact that dominance was bred right into us means that we can choose to implement our inborn trait either nicely or cruelly. It is certainly possible for men to dominate women in a non-harmful way. I’ve done it in most of my relationships.

Sadly, one gender has to dominate the other. The reality for most men is that most women expect the man to dominate. Women come into the relationship specifically expecting to be dominated by the man. Now, in their minds this is not a bad thing, as they like being submissive, and their view of male dominance often does not involve harm.

Men realize that if we don’t dominate our woman, she is going to take those pants right off of us and dominate you! It’s like someone has to dominate – it’s either him or her, take your pick.

I used to believe that full equality between the sexes was possible, but after 45 years of experience with women, I no longer believe this. Complete equality between men and women is simply not possible – it’s folly, a fool’s errand, an unwinnable war.

Gay male relationships are full of dominance and submission, tops and bottoms, bears and twinks, in full imitation of heterosexuality.

Lesbians like to think they are beyond this, but how many times you have seen a lesbian couple where one was butch (the man) and the other was more femme (obviously the woman)? So they’re imitating heterosexuality too. And you can’t tell me there’s no dominance-submission stuff going on in that butch-femme relationship either.

From the lesbians I read on the web, I have learned that there is quite a bit of dom-sub type sex going on with them as a matter of course, especially with the young ones, 18-30. I hate BD/SM but I know a lot about it. The number of female subs who have dom “mistresses” is very high, and the setup is about the same as with male dom-female sub relationships.

If you look at mammals, it is quite typical for male mammals to not only be much more aggressive but also to keep harems, fight over females, etc. And in mammalian sex the male often acts quite dominant, and the female acts…you guessed it – submissive.

I am reading a book about grizzly bears, and the author witnesses a rare mating. Yes, the male bear is acting very aggressive and dominant, and believe it or not, the female grizzly bear of all things is acting…yep – submissive!

Ape sex is often about rape. In chimps and baboons, a male will literally terrorize a female ape for some time, chasing her, hitting her, scaring the living crap out of her. He acts extremely mean towards her. And guess which male she picks to mate with come mating time? Yep, the rapey, female-beating, stalking, creepy, abusive male ape, the same one who terrorized her her before.

I think the best we could hope for would be one sex dominating the other, but in the mildest and kindest way possible that does the least harm to the more submissive partner. And we should hope for submissive partners who don’t like to be hurt or abused.

Game/PUA: “All Bitches Are Crazy,” Part 2

Roy: Perhaps most all women are crazy, my own mother is far better than most women but still crazier than most men.

All women are nuts, pretty much. My Mom is pretty stable though. But she is still a lot more emotional than I am.

I have a female relative with a severe mood disorder that she has had most of her life. Major Depression. At first I thought she was faking it and was just lazy in order to get out of working and being independent, but recently I saw her crash far downwards for a couple of years.

Trigger? Her cat got out of her house and ran away and disappeared. No big deal, right? Nope, it put her out of commission for two years, or it set off an episode that lasted two years. In that episode I finally saw that there is something terribly wrong with my relative. She really is disabled when she is like that. There’s no way she could work. She can barely even talk, for Chrissake.

It’s pretty hard to describe severe Major Depression but once you have seen it, it seems so weird and bizarre that it almost seems in the category of schizophrenia and acute mania. They’re crazy. Yep, you can be so depressed that you are frankly completely nuts.

When I saw her like that, I realized that she was completely pitiful, and I no longer thought she was faking her illness. Thing is when she is not having an episode, she seems pretty normal, and you get mad at her and think she is faking her illness. Supposedly even in these times she is ill, but you really can’t see it.

She is bizarrely moody though, even for a flaky female. You are walking on eggshells the whole time you around her. She gets upset by any little thing and blows up into huge tantrums. You have to watch your words extremely carefully and try not to insult her or bring up any of her trigger issues.

I finally figured out that you can’t criticize feminism because she is a full-blown feminazi. My Mom is also a hardcore feminist, but I could not figure it out until she was ~75 years old. Or maybe she got worse.

You also cannot criticize or say anything remotely negative about women in any way, shape, or form with my Mom or this relative. Women are perfect and men are all seriously flawed.

All feminists believe exactly that, and it took me until a few years ago to finally figure that out. In fact that is one of the core hard beliefs of feminism: Women are perfect; men are anywhere from seriously flawed to pure evil. The only women they hate are the “traitors” who side with the men against the feminists on some of their issues.

Of course this proves that feminism is just another form of Identity Politics idiocy.

I think women are just sensitive. Sensitivity means emotionality and to us men that seems crazy or flaky because a highly emo man is seen as crazy/flaky.

I have seen comments about men describing them as having “almost female levels of flake.” These guys were PUA’s who probably had some Cluster B stuff going on at some level like most players.

There is a site on the Manosphere which is too misogynistic for my tastes, but nevertheless had some of the finest insights on women that I have ever seen. One guy who writes for the site said:

LOL All bitches are crazy. Don’t even try to figure them out!

That’s actually excellent advice. I don’t agree with referring to all women as bitches, but from the male point of view, most women definitely seem crazy to us. This craziness is seen in its full extent if you get involved with them sexually or as a close friend. As a close friend you will see how unstable she is, and as a lover she will direct a lot of her pent-up instability towards you.

On the other hand if you only know a woman informally as a landlord, relative, store owner, worker, or coworker, you may never see much instability. Women have an amazing ability to compartmentalize their instability.

I never found that the women I knew as casual acquaintances were unstable. I have never found my female coworkers to be unstable in any job. Hell, the men were more unstable at some jobs. Gay men in particular can be dramatically unstable and flaky at work, sometimes far worse than women.

Alt Left: My Actual Position on Sexual Harassment and #metoo

SHI: 2- I think I’m more pro-feminism in Identity Politics mold. Robert’s more of a pro-masculinist I believe, which is fine. My Dad is like that and many others. I think it’s a generation thing.

For example, I support #MeToo although it’s slightly hypocritical of me, as I have violated many women while accosting them for sex. Why do I do it? I think a lot of powerful men exploit women, which I find very disturbing. The world is already masculinist (maybe California isn’t). I like to cede some more political and social space to women.

Essentially, if you’re a broke man and making a move on a hot woman, I would look the other way. I’ll even buy you a beer later because I admire your guts.

But if you’re a rich businessman exploiting a prostitute just because you paid for her services, I’ll stand with the prostitute and protect her. And I have done that before. I was in a resort in Goa, and in the next room, a businessman was abusing a female escort. She was begging him to stop and go gentle on her, but he seemed a perverted BDSM freak.

I alerted the hotel staff and knocked on his door telling him to stop what he was doing. He yelled back at me to “mind my own business”. Soon the hotel staff came and opened the door. The girl was half-naked and chained to a window sill. He apparently wanted to use some blunt instruments on her.

Apparently the businessman had paid a lot of money for that suite, and he was shameless enough to scream at the hotel manager that he would “complain” and whatever he was doing to the poor girl was “consensual”. After they unchained her, she immediately ran towards me, and I hugged her.

Of course he wasn’t arrested or anything. That hotel was well-known for attracting perverted guests like him. At least that girl left. She even refused to take money, but I convinced her that she needs to take the money, as she deserved it for harassment.

I also asked her to file a police complaint. The businessman just laughed: he was on good terms with the corrupt cops and knew a prostitute never stood a chance with her.

I saw how vulnerable the poor girl really was. She immediately bolted and left. Unfortunately, she has to be back on the streets someday and will meet more such sadist clients.

This is an extreme example but good way to highlight that #MeToo is justified in many such instances where powerful men exploit girls.

I actually support the girl in this case, so maybe Shi and I are not different at all. I even support the notion of sexual harassment. I just think the new definition of it is insane. The official US government definition is reasonable: Sexual harassment that is so severe, persistent, and repeated that the person is unable to function at work or school.

I absolutely support a notion of sexual harassment along those lines! Not to mention I support the notion of quid pro quo sexual harassment.

It’s just that the #metoo psychos have taken this to mean “any unwanted sexual advance is sexual harassment.” I’m sorry but that’s completely insane! No it isn’t! See those words “severe”, “persistent”, and “repeated”? Sexual harassment is when she communicates to the guy to knock it off and he keeps on keeping on. It’s fine to go after chumps like this for sexual harassment in my book.

But other than that, I agree with the French actress Katharine Deneuve: “Men have a right to hit on women.” Damn right we do. My own mother objected to that comment, so you can see how deep this feminist insanity goes.

Game/PUA: The Natural Tendency of Women Is to Act Like Children or Adolescents

“The woman is always the most responsible teenager in the house.”

– Arthur Schopenhauer

First, a couple of definitions. Female Rule is effectively Feminism in Power, or Feminist Rule. You can have women in the high positions of society, even the highest, and as long as they do not  impose feminism, you don’t have Female Rule. Instead you just have women in high positions ruling on the basis of logic and reason. Women can think and rule on this basis if they are forced to (by men).

Women just don’t like objective thinking because they think it is cold and cruel. But they are capable of thinking that way as long as men say that this is the only thinking we will put up with from women.

My mother graduated second in her class at Hastings Law School in Berkeley. She is certainly capable of seeing the world through the keen, cold eye of pure objective reason. I think she just prefers not to think that way because she thinks it leads to unfairness, particularly for women.

Women are utopians. They are out to cure all the unfairness in the world. My Mom, as smart as she is (150 IQ), still believes that we can have a world where rape and woman beating will be completely eliminated. That’s not a position based on reason. That position is based purely on feels.

My Mom’s emotions tell her that this is the only just society, so she thinks it is possible. Women resent men’s notion that dream worlds and utopias are not possible. They think it is vicious, cold, and pessimistic.

Women are starry-eyed dreamers, and the utopias that women imagine are indeed often very nice places. It’s just that they’re not possible to achieve. Anyone with a logical mind can see that. That’s pretty depressing, but that’s just how life is. Life sucks. Life’s a bitch and then you die.

RL: What do you mean that women are not punished for being wusses? Explain.

Jason: Girls are not encouraged to outgrow childishness. Maybe they’re also put on a pedestal by their parents.

That’s feminism. Feminism promotes the idea that women should be terminal adolescents til the day they die. Feminism treats women like little children. The problem with that is that a lot of women like to act like children or adolescents. It’s sort of their natural tendency.

One of the tasks of society is to reign in this natural tendency of women. Patriarchy, while it was often cruel, told women that their childishness and adolescent behavior would not be tolerated while it threatened them if they disobeyed. Further, there was extreme pressure on women to act like grownups or else.

When you have societal strictures like this in place, women’s natural tendency towards childishness and adolescent behavior will be restrained as it was in my mother’s generation. Women in her generation were expected to be grownups, so they did just that.

I know that Alpha does not act like a child or an adolescent. She acts like a grownup. She has no patience will this feminist craziness. I figure Alpha acts this way because she got it drummed  into her head at an early age as a girl that women were expected to be grownups and not act like children their whole lives. Probably most of the women in her extended family got the same message. Black men don’t seem like they will put up with much foolishness from their women.

Game/PUA: Natural Law Wants Males to Be Masculine and Females to Be Feminine

Polar Bear and I are both suggesting that Nature wants men and women to be a certain way, and when we decide to act in a way contrary to the way Nature wants us to act, the result is unhappiness. Mother Nature bats last.  She always gets the last laugh too. And you can’t fool her either. She’s always got that winning card hidden up her sleeve somewhere.

I have noticed that feminine (not effeminate) straight men are not very happy. Sometimes I get around these guys, and they start acting a lot more masculine, apparently riffing off me. While I’m not the most masculine guy around, I’m positively macho compared to a lot of feminine men.

I have noticed that these men often jump at the opportunity to act macho and embrace their masculinity. It’s like it was hiding in there all along, and it was just waiting for a signal to break out. And they seem very happy while they are acting masculine. Like they finally found their groove.

I have also noticed that when females are really horny and definitely want to fuck, their behavior changes, and they start acting a lot more feminine. I have seen pretty bitchy women convert into fluttery Southern belles simply because I made them horny or they were in love with me.

The two things – female horniness and “love” – have a lot more in common than you think, guys. When they’re madly in love, women often get insatiably horny. It’s like love turns on the female sex drive.

I have also noticed that when women get into this extreme feminine or submissive behavior around me, they truly seem to be in their special happy place. Deep down inside, this is where they all want to be, submissive and feminine.

Hence butch women or domineering bitches often seem miserable. Domineering bitches are being turned that way by their wimpy male partners, and while they seem to enjoy tormenting these guys; in reality, I think they are resentful at these men for not acting more masculine and forcing the woman to wear the pants.

They don’t really enjoy beating up on these guys. If you look closely, a lot of these bitches don’t look very happy. They deliberately seek out wimpy men to dominate and beat up on, but these are not happy relationships for either party.

Obviously the man is miserable by being dominated by a bitchy women, and the bitches themselves seem to resent being forced into this role as I suggested above.

Like all women, even domineering bitches probably long for a masculine man to dominate them, boss them around, and maybe even put them in their place.

You know how many women have specifically requested me to dominate them in bed? More than a few.

And a woman once told me to come over to her place for the weekend:

“I really need a man to boss me around. I haven’t been laid in forever.”

That freaked me out. What? She wants to be bossed around? Afraid so. And she ain’t the only one, guys.

If you study the mating habits of mammals, the female tends to act quite submissive and “feminine” when she is mating. The male often acts with exaggerated masculinity when he is mating.

The same thing happens in humans. Go to a bar some time and watch a couple pick each other up. I saw a couple at a bar near me do this. They were both Hispanic, so they believe in traditional sex roles. As they got more and more into each other, the man got increasingly masculine. It seemed that he was almost growing taller in front of my eyes. And the woman got more feminine as she got more into the guy. On the contrary, she seemed to almost shrink in his presence.

I am reading a book about grizzly bears now, and the author is witnessing a pair of bears mating. Yep, the male exaggerates his swagger, and the female almost cowers in front of the male, to the extent that a male grizzly can actually act more tough and to the degree that a female grizzly can get submissive at all, anyway.

It’s the heterosexual dance, and we humans are all mammals. I have long said that I didn’t really start to understand male and female humans in a sexual sense until I started studying higher mammals and comparing them to us humans.

Want to know how human females act in a sexual sense? Study those female elk, those female elephant seals.

Want to know how human males act in a sexual sense? Same thing. Study male cats, elk, or seals.

Mammals are like us in surprising ways,  all the way down to the Alphas with their harems, and the females taking a number and waiting in line to fuck the Alpha. Mammals even have legions of incels cast aside, Darwinian losers and dead ends.

The incel seals, the bachelors who aren’t getting any lady seal pussy, are stranded on these rock formations they call haul-outs, while the psychopathic monster elephant seal has his harem of 50 seal babes. I have no idea what those poor incel seals are doing there on their haul-outs other than barking. Holding their seal dicks in their flippers, I guess.

Alt Left: Janice Fiamengo, “The Monstrous Male Gaze”

This male gaze nonsense is truly idiotic. I am a Leftist, but once again, why should the men of the Left or anyone on the Left have to go along with this rank nonsense? It doesn’t even make sense, and that’s aside from the blatant pathological man hatred from which it springs.

I never knew much about where this silliness came from. The originator of this theory is a woman named Mulvey, a film theorist, who came up with this in the mid-70’s. I had had no idea where this batty idea came from.

Janice has some photos of her here, and all I could tell is that she was quite homely. Of course there’s nothing wrong with that, but have you ever noticed how many feminists are homely, fat, or both? Think that’s a coincidence? Think again.

I invite you to come up with your own explanations – mine are obvious: they’re homely and/or fat, so men are rejecting and not very nice to them, so they start hating men and move into feminism as a logical destination from the man-hating highway.

Mulvey is also – surprise! A lesbian! How did you guess? The percentage of major feminist figures who are out and out man-hating dykes is shocking. Lesbians are only 1% of women, but lesbians or one type or another are ~1/3-1/2 of major feminist figures.

That shows you right there that feminism is a completely abnormal movement and it doesn’t represent most women at all and therefore it has no right to bear the banner of the women’s rights movement. Any proper women’s rights movements would mirror the female population. In other words, in a sane women’s rights movement, 1% of activists would be lesbians. Right?

Anyway this Mulroney came up with this theory not because it is such a profound theoretical truth. Instead as with most things, its origins are quite mundane if not insipid. Mulvey was sick and tired of being triggered every time she saw straight couples making out in the films she watched ans studied.

And this lies at the heart of another painful truth about feminism: feminism has always been about hatred for heterosexual relations, especially heterosexual male sexuality. Straight women get off the hook as feminists just say they are brainwashed, but in general, feminists think that heterosexuality is crap at best and nearly demonic at worst. So feminism has in a sense been a jihad against heterosexual sex.

Some prominent feminists have actually come right out and admitted that. See Andrea Dworkin. And she’s not the only one.

We see this hatred of heterosexual sex again in the insane #metoo movement which has now potentially outlawed all straight flirting. Its corollary in the anti-sexual assault movement has now potentially outlawed all touching between straights and all straight dating. The corresponding rape hysteria movement, ongoing for decades in feminism dating back to Brownmiller and her ilk, potentially makes all heterosexual sex rape.

I doubt if this is accidental. It’s part of feminism’s war on heterosexual sex. If you notice that ~40% of major feminist theorists have been man-hating lesbians with an extreme hatred of heterosexual sex, the #metoo nonsense starts to make sense – they are trying to drive men and women apart and make it more difficult for heterosexual sex to occur. Obviously if you hate heterosexual sex, this is a great thing.

I also notice an awful lot of lesbians are fat and/or homely. I have no idea why this is either, as many gay men are quite handsome if not extremely handsome. So whatever it is, it’s not related to homosexuality per se.

In fact there’s probably not a lot of things that male and female homosexuality have in common. They’re like ducks and geese, similar but also completely different. The only thing they have in common is a lack of interest in the opposite sex, a strong interest in their own sex, and I would add, a tendency to imitate heterosexual sexual relations (which they supposedly despise) in their relationships.

Alt Left: The Fiamengo File, “The TERF War”

I watched this one recently too. I recall a bit of what it is about. Mostly that radical feminists are perfectly correct in their critique of transsexualism, but they’re right for all the wrong reasons. As usual.

Every one of her videos I have ever watched is a masterpiece.

Janice gives us an excellent reason to reject modern feminism – it’s completely irrational and doesn’t even make one bit of sense! Why should we on the Left support a nonsensical project that consists of nothing but hate and lies?

I mean I support women’s rights (and so does Janice) but modern feminism goes way beyond that. Anyway you can support women’s rights without being a feminist idiot. Just call yourself a humanist or an equalist. There. Wa-la! Now you can support women’s rights while rejecting hateful, insane feminism.

Game/PUA: Does She Hate You or Love/Hate You?

Women often hate the men who turn them on.

If a woman really hates you, she will ignore you. When I see a woman who acts like she really hates me, sometimes I think, “I should get her number.”

Sometimes she simply hates you, and you really ought to return her hatred with the same, even in a store. I do this to hostile cunts even in public in stores to the point where I become “the belligerent asshole customer.”

Thing is, I don’t care. This stupid cunt hates me for no reason and acts contemptuously towards me. Cunts who behave that way towards me get the full on hostile treatment. Sometimes they get angry and try to grab things away from me, and we have tug of wars with some object and a big scene unfolds. I laugh at this. They often say, “Sir! You really need to calm down!” I refuse to and I laugh at that too.

If she gets civilized, I stop the anger and return her decency. When I leave, I say, “Have a nice day!” in a sarcastic, snide way. A lot of times when I walk out the other employees look at me and smile as if to say, “Thumbs up!” What that means is, “Everyone hear hates that mean cunt too! Thank you for putting that bitch in her place, sir!”

If she hates you/wants you sexually, you get a mixture of contempt, rage, a fighting mode like she wants to punch you, and then it’s mixed with an extremely friendliness and seductiveness. There’s often a lot of nervousness thrown in.

Thing is this female has intense feelings towards you. I can’t tell you how many women who were in love with me, often wildly, alternated between profound love and extreme hatred. You see, she cares about you. When a woman cares about someone, she has intense feelings towards them. Like I said, women who really hate you will just act like you do not exist. That’s what real contempt looks like.

Dirty little secret is a lot of women sort of hate the men who they have sexual relationships with. If you are involved, even sexually, with a woman, and she acts extremely angry, hateful, or rageful towards you at times, it’s just normal crazy female behavior.

Sex is an extremely strong emotion in females, and it throws them into all sorts of weird and often insane moods and behaviors. She doesn’t really hate you. She just “hates you for fucking her.”

Or there are other things involved, like intensity. She simply has intense feelings for you. Her like for you is intense. It’s love affair of the century. When she’s mad at you, it’s intense. You are literally Satan and she is going to murder you and ruin your life. Then a few days later, you are the man she’s waited her whole life for.

Men are driven completely insane by this rollercoaster lunacy, and this is why most men say that women are all insane. They’re not really crazy. They are just very sensitive and emotional creatures, and when she is in love with you or sexually involved, this brings out the profound love and hate switching back and forth.

This is why wise men say, “Love and hate are very close, Bob.” Normie idiots usually use denial and say that’s not true. They’re either lying or they don’t get it. Most people don’t want to agree that love and hate are as close as they are because it seems nuts, and it shatters all of our myths about what love and hate, attraction and revulsion, kindness and cruelty, really mean. We think they are opposites, but not so fast now.

PUA/Game: Women Are a Wild Ride

Rep: Nowadays I love doing the psychologist. I have a lot of knowledge about this. When I do, inevitably some subconscious stuff in the  women’s psyche projects onto me, so it’s a dangerous and wild fluctuating game for sure. But it can give you crazy sex at the peaks.

If the male mind is Logos, then the female mind is something like Magic or Aleister Crowley’s Chaos Magic. Order and logic and forward progress may be the rule of logic-minded Logos, but the world of the female mind is ruled by entropy, which after all is one the principles of the universe, and one that has a lot more scientific basis than Logos, which is still quite theoretical despite being created by Hegel and affirmed by Marx, two great minds.

“Woman” is a wild ride. Always has been, always will be. Ever been on a rollercoaster? Get a rush? Then maybe you can handle women without getting  broken for good.

Yes, the female psyche is a dark and dangerous place, wild like the wilderness or jungle and brutal and glorious like both, like a wild thunderstorm with lightning and thunder, a jungle cruise, a mountain climbing expedition, a jungle trek, a rollercoaster ride, a deep-sea fishing trip.

She will fling you to the highest of peaks where your mind swims with the stars and then hurl you down to the bottom of the Marianas Trench, where she will crush you like a bug when you are down there, turning her heels contemptuously and stomping away. You lie there at the bottom of the fucking ocean, literally lower than whale shit, wondering if it was all worth it.

The world of women is a wild emotional ride of what I call “emotional peak experiences.”  If women live for anything at all, it is this. They even crave the lows if they are wild and crazy lows. With women, everything is straight from the gut, every time. I am woman, hear me roar! Woman, intensity is thy middle name.

Men, do you like to live dangerously? If you do, you may have fun with that wild ride called the human female. For the more sedate and sensitive types though, her wild energy straight from the bowels of Earth and the tangles and tussles of Nature may prove to be simply too much.

There are an awful lot of broken men out there. And the culprit was womanhood.*

+And to be fair to women, vice versa too.

Alt Left: Feminism, Defined, and the Proper Response to It

Feminism is simply a marker of “hostility/rage/vengeance towards men. The extent to which a woman is a feminist is simply the extent to which she has anger, rage, hatred, desire for vengeance,  etc. towards men. That’s all  feminism is: a hate movement against men.

As such, I don’t see why on Earth the Alt Left, as a progressive movement, should support a hate movement against men.  Why should any man on the Left support a hate movement against men? I mean unless you are a cuck or a little bitch who’s gone over to the enemy and is a traitor to his brothers.

However, the Alt Left absolutely supports equal rights for women. I mean why not? The problem with the MRA or anti-feminist movement is that in general it is opposed to equal rights for women. That’s no good. That’s a hate movement against women.

The proper response to a hate movement against men is not a hate movement against women. All you’ve done now is start a war. The proper response is a peace movement that opposes both the feminists’ War on Men and the anti-feminists’ War on Women. In that sense, the Alt Left is a Gender Peace movement.

Game/PUA: “All Bitches Are Crazy”

Roy: Perhaps most all women are crazy, my own mother is far better than most women but still crazier than most men.

All women are nuts, pretty much. My Mom is pretty stable though. But she is still a lot more emotional than I am. I think women are just sensitive. Sensitivity means emotionality and to us men that seems crazy or flaky because a highly emo man is seen as crazy/flaky.

I have seen comments about men describing them as having “almost female levels of flake.” These guys were PUA’s who probably had some sort of Cluster B stuff going on at some level like most players.

There is a site in the manosphere which is too misogynistic for my tastes, but nevertheless had some of the finest insight on women that I have ever seen. One guy who writes for the site said

LOL ALL bitches are crazy. Don’t even try to figure them out!

That’s actually excellent advice. I don’t agree with referring to all women as bitches, but from the male point of view, most women definitely seem crazy to us. This craziness is seen in its full extent if you get involved with them sexually or as a close friend. As a close friend you will see how unstable she is, and as a lover she will direct a lot of her pent-up instability towards you.

On the other hand if you only know a woman informally as a landlord, relative, store owner or worker, or coworker, you may never see much instability. Women have an amazing ability to compartmentalize their instability. I never found that the women I knew as casual acquaintances were unstable. I have never found my female coworkers to be unstable in any job. Hell, the men were more unstable at some jobs. Gay men in particular can be dramatically unstable and flaky at work, often far worse than women.

The reason this is important is that realizing that women are unstable no matter how much a saint you are is essential for getting along with women. Otherwise you will be feeling guilty and miserable all the time because the various females in your life will be emo-ing out on you and having regular flipouts and rage-outs.

I was raised that a proper couple never fought. My father would always proudly say, “Do you ever see your mother and I fight?” My mother would nod her head as if this was the most reasonable concept in the world. We would dubiously say no. As it turned out, the last 30 years of my parents’ marriage was basically a warzone, so they were lying – if not then, then later for sure.

No matter how hard you try, no matter how good, kind, saintly, decent, sane, and mature you try to be, your woman is still going to be flipping on you and getting upset and mad at you.

Once you realize that women do these flipouts as a matter of course as natural and normal behavior and it’s not your fault, you can stop feeling guilty every time one of your women has a flip-out and tries to guilt trip you.

The latter is because many to most female flipouts are her getting annoyed, angry, or upset at you for some reason and consequently guilt-tripping you into thinking  you made her feel that way  by something you said or did. But it’s often not your fault.

When your woman does this, stop and think if what you did or said was really all that bad or if she was just being typical flaky female. If you acted bad or said something bad, just apologize and hope she gets over it. If she doesn’t get over it, just keep apologizing.

A lot of Game theorists say

Never apologize to your woman for anything, ever.

I get why they say that but I cannot get down with it. If apologizing makes me look pathetic, fine. I’ve been apologizing to females my whole life, and I’ve dated and had as girlfriends many beautiful girls and women. I’ve been in love many times and many women have been in love with me. I’ve had 20 lifetimes worth of sex. And I’ve been apologizing they whole way.

So you can still have a rich life full of women and sex even if you apologize to them all the time. Maybe it doesn’t work but it’s not really going to hobble you.

There was an instructive post on the Red Pill Reddit group, which I despise. But those pricks still have a lot of good advice. Go ahead and read them for advice while recognizing what jerks and assholes they are. It’s not hard to do.

This was from a transwoman or transsexual man. This is a man who thinks he is a woman. He may or may not have had surgery. He’s not a woman, but the hormones he is taking can make him think like one.

Histories from these men are very interesting because they have a unique perspective on womanhood. They have been men so they have been there and done that.

And after they take the hormones, they start thinking and acting like a woman in a lot of ways. Because this is all new to them and contrary to their male life, many are shocked at the difference. From this we can learn about what women are really like.

One transwoman said he became extremely emotional after taking hormones. His emotions went all over the place – up, down, and all around, and he had a hard time controlling them and was frequently at their mercy. He often had no idea why he was feeling some emotion or other. New emotions would come over him out of nowhere with no clue about what set them off. He would start crying and would even go on long crying jags without any good reason.

He had previously been a very unemotional or stoic man, so this was all new to him and it makes his extreme emotionality on the hormones even more shocking.

He also said one more thing that fascinated me – he said for the first time in his life he started giggling. Giggling! Teenage girls and women do that! How many men giggle? Maybe a gay man. We don’t really do that. Who knew that women’s giggling was probably biological? Fascinating.

The man at Red Pill said that on the hormones for the first time he felt very alone, unprotected, and vulnerable. The world seemed like a very frightening place and he was afraid of many things and people – especially men who seemed particularly scary. He also felt helpless and like he could or would not be able to defend himself if attacked.

He felt himself longing for a strong, protective person, often a strong man, to protect him. He was drawn to strong men and clung to them like a buoy in the churning seas.

His emotions also became wild and changed all the time for little or no reason. He had boyfriends. One night he was with a boyfriend, and he got upset at the boyfriend about something that upon retrospect was quite trivial and probably didn’t even deserve a reaction at all. He got angry and upset at the boyfriend and even started crying.

Then he noticed something. The boyfriend acted alarmed and upset for a bit, but then he calmed down and simply seemed to be mostly ignoring the transwoman. The transwoman was thinking, “Here I am. Having an emotional crisis, and he’s ignoring me!” He was very upset. But then he thought some more. He realized that what he was upset about was something that was so trivial it didn’t even deserve much thinking about, much less a mini-breakdown.

Then he realized why men treat women like this. He realized that women’s hyperemotionality leads them to make mountains out of molehills and blow up or freak out over all sorts of minor things.

And he realized that men had figured this out and men had realized that it wasn’t worth it to get upset or feel guilty every time your woman is having a mini-breakdown. Instead, most men figure out that women are just like this by nature, they can’t help it, and many of their mini-crises are really about nothing consequential at all.

Hence, men decide that the best thing to do when your woman is having her crisis du jour about not much of anything is simply to more or less ignore her. And that’s not cruel or mean. It’s simply sensible.

You see a child throwing a tantrum about something stupid. What do you do? Lose your head? Of course not. You realize it’s just a kid having a crisis over nothing at all, so you more or less ignore the kid. If it was something important it would warrant attention, but it’s not.

And if a woman is getting upset about nothing much as they are so often wont to do, the only sensible and rational thing to do is more or less ignore her. It’s no more cruel and evil than ignoring the kid with the tantrum.

Alt Left: Male Rule and Female Rule: Some Misunderstandings

According to my theory, you could have a government composed of 100% women who chose to impose Male Rule. You could have a government of 100% men who chose to impose Female Rule. Do you follow? You can fill the whole government up with women for all I care as long as they are sensible and don’t impose Feminism. It’s unlikely but it’s certainly possible in the right culture.

Male Rule means ruling according to the norms, values, and laws of men. It has nothing to do with the number or percentage of males actually in power in the state.

Female Rule means ruling according to the norms, values, and laws of women. This also has nothing to do with the numbers or percentages of women in actual ruling positions in government.

Alt Left: The Truth Is That Even Women Would Rather Be Ruled by Men

Everywhere on Earth you allow women to take power, they will always, without fail, impose Female Rule or Feminist Rule.

I don’t just blame women for this. This is simply the way that women and naturally and normally are. But that doesn’t mean it’s a good idea.

Just as women will always impose Female Rule without fail, likewise, everywhere on Earth, it will be the same catastrophic clusterfuck of chaos and drama, which are the handmaidens of the Feminine Spirit.

So women think like women and that happens to be messed up in some ways, but under Patriarchy, men maintained enough control over women to keep women out of power. There was a recognition that women in power would impose female mores and that this would royally screw up everything, which is exactly what it does.

So patriarchy saved men from women’s nonsense and it saved women from themselves because…get this…even women, deep down inside, do not want to live under the constant drama, turmoil, chaos and irrationality of a culture of rules and laws that are based on people’s feelings (Female Rule) instead of logic, reason, and sense (Male Rule).

Even women hate Female Rule or Feminist Rule, but they are too dense to do anything about it.

I think most women just assume we men will at some point say we’ve had enough of the idiocy of Female Rule and simply take back power. Women will scream and yell and carry on like the grown up children they are, but deep down inside, I think most of them will welcome the an order and reason based society instead of one based on the violent mood swings of women.

Yes.

Women secretly want us men to save them from themselves because they know deep down inside that there are a lot of things that are simply better done by a man.

The problem is that under Female Rule you start to get all these rules, laws and mores that have pretty much no definition whatsoever. Or no reasonable definition. Often the definition, if interpreted rationally, makes no sense at all and is simply an insane rule, law, or more.

More and more of society starts being taken over by, “How does it make women feel?” Under Female Rule, if a man makes a woman feel bad, he is arrested or punished outside of the penal system, for instance by firing.

The definitions of Sexual Harassment, Sexual Assault and Rape if read by the pure intent of their words themselves would outlaw all flirting, dating and probably most sex.

Most flirting would be considered harassment (and it currently is), most dating would be considered sexual assault (this is the current status of dating) and quite a bit of regular sex would go over to rape.

Flirting would be harassment if it made a women feel bad.

Touching would be sexual assault if it made a woman feel bad.

And of course any sex that made a woman feel bad would obviously be rape. Katharine McKinnon, of the most vicious manhaters of the 20th Century, has actually stated that any time a woman has sex when she doesn’t want to, it’s rape. And she and her lunatic ilk have actually tried to put codes and even laws along more or these lines in effect.

Well, if it’s rape every time she does it but she doesn’t want to, you just made about half of marital sex rape.

Alt Left: Female Rule Always Fails – the Best Society Is a Benign Patriarchy

There are two different types of Masculism, a sort of male version of feminism without all the baggage and misogyny of the MRA’s.

From Wikipedia:

Christensen differentiates between “progressive masculism” and an “extremist version”. The former welcomes many of the societal changes promoted by feminists, while regretting that some measures reducing sexism against women have increased it against men.

The extremist version promotes male supremacy to some degree and is generally based on a belief in women’s inferiority. Nicholas Davidson, in his book The Failure of Feminism, describes an extremist version of masculism which he termed “virism”: “What ails society is ‘effeminacy’. The improvement of society requires that the influence of female values be decreased and the influence of male values increased….”

I do not like the extreme version’s belief in female inferiority, as I refuse to see women as inferior. I do not think the problem with society is effeminacy.

It is just that the Female Imperative has taken over, and women are imposing their feminized society and their Female Rule on us via laws and courts. That’s not acceptable at all. Women or at least their female values, rules, and mores cannot rule countries.

Women can serve as President, in Congress, anywhere in society and help us men run society, but society should not privilege the views, values, and mores of women over those of men. Female Rule imposes female emotionalism and irrationalism on society. This is how females work and that’s ok, as their brains work this way, and they can’t help it. But they shouldn’t impose their emotionally-driven, irrational female views on society via rules and laws.

Men believe in objectivity, hard rules, and cold logic. This is the best way to run society in terms of its laws, rules, and mores, especially in terms of courts and laws. We can call this Male Rule or Patriarchy.

A Benign Patriarchy, the only good kind, would emphasize logic, common sense, objectivity, un-emotionalism, and rationalism as the basis for the rules, mores, and especially laws of society. If imposed by good men in a benign way so as not to privilege men and oppress women, this is the best form of society.

We’ve already seen what happens in Female Rule. We are living it right now. What do you think all this PC and SJW madness is. It’s nothing less than Female Rule itself. This is what it looks like.

With Female Rule, you just get endless chaos, and eventually people will start clamoring for order and saneness to rule society again. They will clamor to bring back a form of Patriarchy, hopefully a benign one which would not resemble the type of Patriarchy that feminists complain about (an Oppressive Patriarchy).

Good, fair minded women can certainly help us men to implement this Benign Patriarchy and in fact the presence of many women at the upper rungs of this society will assure that the rule of logic and sense does not turn into men lording it over and oppressing women, which it often does.

Alt Left: Humans Seem Most Happy When They Adhere to “Traditional” Sex Roles and Orientation

I live amongst first and second generation Hispanics. Spanish is spoken everywhere hereabouts, and this is in the US!

These Hispanics have very strict gender roles, although there is much less misogyny here in the US, which the women seem to appreciate, as they have more freedom.

But the men are unashamedly masculine in almost a caricature way. And the women are quite feminine.

Most of the men really love women and are sort of super-heterosexuals. The women are the same way.

The sexes openly flirt. Men openly flirt with women in public and no one much cares. If she doesn’t like it, she will just walk away.

The women seem to have the attitude that this is just the way men are, and there’s nothing you can do about it, so just accept it. Instead of screaming #metoo and making a fuss, which they would see as absurd and idiotic, these women just become cold to the man or totally ignore him and walk away.

I have noticed one thing though. They are happy! The men are very happy being hypermasculine, and the women are very happy being these super-feminine things. And everyone is straight – there’s pretty much zero homosexuality among men or women.

It’s like being straight and masculine is the “sweet spot” for men, and being straight and feminine is the “comfortable place” for women. This is considered “normal” behavior for humans (heterosexual and traditional gender roles), and maybe humans are most happy behaving in the ways that they always have. I mean tradition is tradition for a reason – mostly it is because tradition is what works, tried and tested by time.

PUA/Game: Nice Guys and Bad Boys: The Final World

RL: LOL I dunno man. Women say they hate liars but they themselves lie their fool heads off all day long. And they love to hook up with extremely dishonest bad boys who cheat on them all the time.

Jason: But why are these guys stuck with “bad girls”? It’s because they have no integrity! And now the bad girls are hypocritically demanding integrity from these “losers in life”(sarcasm).

Bad boys can get any woman they want, pretty much. They get the hottest women of all. And they don’t care if they get bad girls or nice girls for the most part. Why would they care about that? They’re jerks. Why would jerks care about the integrity of the women they are with? Only decent men care about things like that. Bad boys probably like bad girls because they realize that bad girls are somewhat sociopathic just like they are. Peas in a pod.

Honestly, I think women are sick. There’s something wrong with them. They’re masochists. They actually want to be treated like crap by bad boys.

I don’t necessarily blame them for this, as I think that they can’t help it. Actually I do not blame women for most of the things I complain about them because I think they can’t help being bad like this. I think the badness is hardwired in.

Women are too decent to go out of their way and choose to be wicked. I mean sure, there are females who are anywhere from somewhat to completely psychopathic, and I do blame them for being pond scum. But face it. Women are the gentle sex, the sensitive sex. They’re basically kind-hearted and compassionate, and we men sure as Hell are not.

Instead I think it’s got to be wired in from caveman days. If you think about it, only 40% of men bred back in those days. So 60% of men had no kids. And almost all women bred. So back then there were harems just like in tribal Sub-Saharan Africa.

These arrangements typically mean that the worst, baddest, cruelest, and most evil men defeat all the other guys and rule over the defeated by terror while keeping as many women as possible for themselves. The rest of the guys are standing around with their dicks in their hands saying, “Duhhhh.”

So back then, the mean and sociopathic cavemen had these harems of women, and they were so mean and nasty that the rest of the men, possibly being less aggressive, were kept from taking these guys’ women by sheer force.

Look at Elephant Seals for an analogy in the animal world. Actually in much of the animal world, only a subset of males breed, and most males do not breed.

You can see that a setup like this might not only select for sociopathy and bad boys in men, but it might also select for the women liking these cavemen bad boy sociopaths and even putting up with being mistreated, as these caveman psychos were probably pretty mean to their women. So women who were not into being treated like crap by some maniac simply never bred and died out. It’s a just-so story but it’s as good as any.

Anyone got a better theory?

There isn’t any better theory.

The only alternate theory is the feminist theory. The feminist theory as usual is a complete lie because everything feminists say is a lie. Feminists simply say that it is a big lie that women prefer bad boys, are basically masochists, and hate nice guys.

Instead they say that women hate nice guys because deep down inside, nice guys aren’t very nice! They’re actually mean! As usual this makes no sense at all, since why would women pass up the nice guys for being hidden mean guys while flocking to the jerks who by all measures are not only openly vicious but are dramatically more mean and bad than any nice guy.

Feminist liars also say that women reject nice guys because nice guys are just being nice and hanging around women pretending to be their friends in hopes that the woman will eventually have sex with them. Oh noes! That’s terrible! Those evil men! How dare they try to get laid! Those poor virginal damsels in distress! Feminists come rescue them!

So nice guys are actually evil harassing, assaulting, raping scum! #Metoo! And the bad boys who are far more harassing, assaulting, and even raping than any nice guy are the ones they pick! That makes no sense at all, like anything any feminist ever said about anything.

It’s pretty simple. Women like masculine man. They go for bad boys because bad boys are masculine. The caveman residue alluded to above might also factor in. Nice guys? Well, they seem like wimps, and women hate wimps because they’re not masculine. Wimps are too feminine and most straight women are not into dating male lesbians, except the ones who go out with me.

And this is coming from a guy who has dated maybe 200 females in my life, so I’m not some loser whining, “Women only like bad boys! They don’t like nice guys like me!”

Plus I am a bit of a bad boy myself. But why do you think I do this? Part of it is I am just a rebellious motherfucker who doesn’t believe in fathers, bosses, rules, or laws (especially the first and all the subsequent ones follow from that one). But also I have been running Bad Boy Game my whole life because I know women love it. It’s all just a way to get women.

Women don’t like nice guys because they think they are wimps, pussies, and fags! That’s the truth of it. However, when they grab a Beta Provider to settle down, marry, and have a kid, it seems like a lot of the time they want a nice guy for a husband and father as long as he is not too much of a pussy.

It seems like back in the Day I was a pretty nice guy though, although I have always been a hardcore inveterate cheater. But I have usually had open relationships with women. I used to just lay it out right away that this was an open relationship, and I would say, “I don’t care what you do. I don’t care if you date other guys. I just don’t want to hear about it. What I don’t know won’t hurt me. And vice versa.”

This was back in the 70’s and 80’s when people were promiscuous, and crabs was about the worst STD you could get. It was groovy and cool to be polyamorous although no one ever called it that. A lot of the women and girls back then seemed like they liked being in open relationships because it made them groovy, cool, hip people.

I had girls who would go around bragging to our friends that we had an open relationship. I had a girlfriend recently put on her Facebook page that she was in an Open Relationship (with me). She acted like she was proud of it.

A lot of females want to be bad girls and break the rules, so to speak. A man granting them the status of an open relationship on their end is very empowering, and females love to be empowered because typically they are not allowed to have much power or agency in this world where they have to spend most of their time fending off the advances of annoying and uninteresting men.

They especially like being given power over the Sex Game because like I said, they are always playing defense, and it gets old after a bit.

But back when I supposedly had the Looks, being a nice guy was not much of a hindrance because I figure Chad can be a nice guy, and no one really cares.

I mean sometimes women would bitch me out right to my face, insult my masculinity, etc. I would just sit there and take it like an idiot and feel terribly hurt, whereas nowadays I would probably throw an object across the room at any woman who talked like that to me.

But soon enough they would go back to fucking me four, five, or six hours a day, so obviously they weren’t too disgusted by my lack of manliness. Looks pretty much trumps everything else when it comes to women. Chad breaks all the rules because the rules simply don’t apply to Chad.

Alt Left: Hey Feminists: Men Don’t Actually Hate Women

It is a feminist article of faith that all or most all men hate women. This statement is repeated endlessly and has been stated over and over by all of their biggest heroes and scholars. On feminist sites, the notion that most all men hate women is repeated ad nauseum on a daily basis.

I always found this view odd because I know men pretty well. And over six decades, I have not commonly met men who objectively hate women.

On the other hand, I have met many sexist females who think that men are quite inferior to women. In fact, this is exactly what almost all feminists believe. Feminism is simply female sexism against men. They’re female chauvinist pigs, they’ve been this way from the start, and they’re this way to this very day. I don’t think they’ll ever change because the very notion of feminism is predicated on notions like all men hating women and men being quite inferior to women.

If we men really hated women, you would hear it all the time. I would have been hearing it my whole life. I know this because men don’t hide things like this. If men hate hate something or someone or some group, they just come right out and say it. Men are not embarrassed or ashamed to admit that they hate this or that person(s) or thing(s).

In fact, hating is a very masculine behavior and it is quite encouraged in male society, provided you hate the right things. Men who are incapable of hate are regarded as wimps and pussies who will not stand up and fight for themselves. Cowards, in other words. We think they are pathetic.

Most men absolutely do not hate women. I should know. I’m a man. Now whether we treat them as we should is another matter.

Of course, there are men who hate women, and I have met some of them. It’s not cool in male society to say you hate women. People will call you gay if you do that. In other words, straight men are supposed to love women. If you hate them instead, this means you must be homosexual.

What you do hear is men saying they are done with women, they are over them, women are too much trouble, etc. But that’s not hate. And most of them are not serious because you meet the same guy later on and he’s dating or he’s got a girlfriend or wife. And many women say the same thing about men. You often hear this from members of both sexes after the age of 40. You don’t hear it much before that.

What many men are though is sexist. Sexism is not hate. It’s completely different.

It’s this idea that women are a somewhat inferior form of human. They’re not really on our level. Sure, you love them, but they’re just not on the same level as we are. Sort of like how we feel about kids and our pets. Your cat and your young child are in a sense below you, right? They’re just not on the same level. And in a lot of ways, they your cat and your kid are inferior, at least at the moment. But that’s not hate.

All of these feminist women who insist that men hate women are completely out of their minds. It’s been a mass delusion of feminists ever since day one that men hate women. Feminists want to believe this. They want to believe that we hate them because it’s necessary for their crazy, victim-addicted point of view. It’s the biggest lie of them all.

Another big fat lie is Patriarchy. Yes, men have lorded it over women and kept them down for thousands of years, and even for most of American history. But that’s lifting now. Feminism has succeeded in more or less dismantling patriarchy in the US, and they have instead assembled a Matriarchy in its place which of course oppresses men.

There are still some of the remains of the fortress of Patriarchy left, but a lot of the fortifications have been destroyed by the feminists, to their credit. Get off the paranoid “Patriarchy is out to get you” trip, women! It’s crazy nonsense.

These are just two of the insane lies that feminism peddles. Go study feminism sometime. It’s constructed on a house of cards made up of mostly flat out, straight up lies. Feminists are hostile to science, truth, and facts because it doesn’t back up their stupid lies that they have constructed their entire ideology on.

Say no to feminism. If you’re a woman and you love men, it’s time to stand up and say no to feminism.

Come November, You Go, Girls!

DpG_iI5UcAAT66D.jpg large
Go for it, ladies! Get out there and kick some ass. Women have good reason to be upset. I mean from what I can tell, Kavanaugh was simply a rapist as a young man. Whatever that means legally, there’s no way he should be on the Supreme Court. This is no #metoo crap with women freaking out over men flirting with them, asking for their number or asking them for date, or freaking out and screaming sexual assault when some man is testing the waters on a date. This is the real deal, real, legal rape. Not the bullshit feminist rape that has 1,000 different definitions and now has a meaning as wide as the Atlantic Ocean. Not the nonsense that no one even knows what it is. Not the nonsense that says you raped her because you couldn’t read her mind. Not the BS that says every time a woman has sex when she doesn’t really want to, it’s rape. None of that feminist manhating lunacy. We are talking about the real deal here. Real, criminal rape, violations of the law against rape, the kind that can get you arrested and thrown in in jail or prison. Kavanaugh and the Original Night Stalker have a lot more in common than you think.

Incredible 30 Point Gender Gap In Generic Congressional Race

Unbelievable. A 30 point gender gap! I have never seen anything like that in my entire life. The New York Times has a story about individual races and a lot of them are showing ~20 point gender gaps. That right there is incredible.

Other findings for Congress race:
51-42 for Democrats
Men   50-42 for Republicans
Women 63-33 for Democrats
Whites     48-42 for Republicans
Non-Whites 69-27 for Democrats
Trump approve    85-8 for Republicans
Trump disapprove 89-6 for Democrats

That level of polarization is remarkable on a number of levels.
There’s a lot of anecdotal evidence from women reporting all over the country that both they and the women they know are absolutely hopping mad, stark raving furious over this Kavanaugh matter. I can’t say I blame them. Even an anti-feminist like me says, “You go, girls!”

Sexual Misconduct Charges against Trump: The Run-Down

I believe that Trump did act inappropriately towards women a number of times. He sure pissed off a lot of women with his forward behaviors. I can’t recall most of the cases, but I can comment on a few.
He absolutely beat up and violently raped his ex-wife. There’s no doubt in my mind about that. He definitely broke the following laws: assault (he assaulted her so badly that he actually yanked some of the hair out of her head) and rape (the threw her down to the floor and violently raped her against her will). The ex-wife was paid off and part of the payoff was that she could not talk about the episode.
I also think that he beat and raped a 13 year old girl and a 12 year old girl at Jeffrey Epstein’s apartment in the 1990’s. The victim was named and highly credible. Trump threatened the 13 year old that if she talked, she would end up like Maria, the 12 year old. At the time he said that, Maria had not been seen in some time. The implication was that Trump and/or Epstein had had Maria killed. I feel that he broke the following laws: assault (he punched her in the head), rape (he violently raped her against her will), and laws against sex with a minor (she was 13 years old).
The 13 year old, now in her early 30’s, sued Trump in civil court. The woman finally dropped the case because she was getting a lot of death threats. The case was settled out of court when Trump apparently paid the woman off. As part of the settlement, she was not allowed to talk about the case.
His behavior in going into the locker room where underage teenage girls were changing for his pageants. There were naked 15-17 year old girls in there. He was running the pageant and there was nothing they could do to stop him. He broke no laws here, but this is creepy behavior. I mean come on, people.
I would have to go back over the other charges to see what to make of them, but few if any of them actually rise to the level of criminal sexual assaults. Most are under the murky rubric of sexual misconduct, and no one even knows what that is. Technically they were all sexual assaults, but this sort of thing happens constantly, and police never even arrest on hokey charges like this because if they did, 10 million men would be imprisoned in the first year. Cops have better things to do than cuffing some guy for copping a feel in a bar.
I will say that Trump has left a whole string of women pissed off, even years later, over his excessively aggressive sexual behavior. Trump’s been acting excessively sexually aggro with females for a long time now.

Alt Left: How the Feminist Cult Brainwashes Its Adherents

Absolutely superb article by a woman showing exactly what feminism has become – a cult no different from Scientology or the rest of them that brainwashes its members into believing a whole stack of lies and seeing the world in a brand new bizarre way. Women leaving feminism nearly need deprogramming to undo the brainwashing that feminism did to them.
And incidentally, being a Gender Egalitarian is a great thing to be. The problem I have with women calling themselves feminists is that feminism is all about women. It’s not about us men at all. In fact, many feminists say they could care less what happens to any of us men. So the feminist cult member ends up walking around the world constantly asking, “What about the women? What about the women?”
But that’s no way to look at life.
That’s no different from the White nationalists running around saying, “What about the Whites? What about the Whites?” White nationalists are always going on about Black crime against Whites, especially White women. After a while, I realized that this was very offensive. Why should I only care about Whites or White women victimized by Black criminals? Why should I care more if a White woman is attacked by a Black criminal than if a Black woman was attacked by the same type of person. I thought about this a while. Of course it should not matter who to me who got violated by the Black criminal. It was incredibly offensive that I should only care about the White victim and not about the Black victim. The victimization of either was equally bad! 
We’re all human, dammit. The only sensible way a concerned and progressive person should look at the world is, “What about the humans? What about the humans?”
[From Spiked, 10 February 2016, by Catherine Johnson, writer and student] Originally published in Spiked as How I Became a Feminist Victim. An Oxford Student Explains Why Feminism Fails Women.

How I Became a Feminist Victim: An Oxford Student Explains Why Feminism Fails Women

As a female student in a nightclub, I expected to get some unwanted attention. What I didn’t expect was for feminism to turn me into someone so terrified of unwanted attention I stopped going out. In the past, someone groping me would only annoy me for a minute – that would be the extent of it. If they were being really pushy, I’d go to my male friends and stay with them because they’d enjoy making it clear that the guy’s attentions were unwelcome. And yes, other men were more likely to listen to my tall, imposing male friends than me – a shy, skinny 18-year-old. You could call it male privilege, I’d call it the benefit of self-confidence.
And that was all fine. No harm, no foul. That was, until I discovered the (now-infamous) Oxford feminist group Cuntry Living. It was a big thing in Oxford; everyone was talking about it and, curious, I joined. I read the posts, I contributed, and I engaged in discussion about everything from rape culture to misogyny in our curriculum. I learned a lot, and slowly, I transitioned from a nervous, desperate-to-please ‘gender egalitarian’ to a proud, full-blown feminist.
Along with all of this, my view of women changed. I stopped thinking about empowerment and started to see women as vulnerable, mistreated victims. I came to see women as physically fragile, delicate, butterfly-like creatures struggling in the cruel net of patriarchy. I began to see male entitlement everywhere.
The experience also changed my attitude to going out. I would dress more cautiously and opt to stick with female friends in clubs. And, if the usual creeps started bothering me, I became positively terrified. I saw them, not as drunk men with a poor grasp of boundaries and certainly not as misguided optimists who might have misread my behavior but as aggressive probable rapists.
If I was groped by someone, I didn’t give them a scathing look or slap away their hand, and I certainly didn’t tell them to fuck off. Instead, I was scared into inaction. How could I countenance such a violation? How could I possibly process something so awful? After the event, I would go outside and cry.
And then I would leave – feeling traumatized. I saw the incident, not as some idiot being a bit too handsy, but as sexual assault – something scarring to dwell upon. It was something to whisper to friends in a small, hushed voice – something to preface with a trigger warning. And the appropriate action of friends, upon hearing this, was never to question how upsetting the incident had really been. It was to sympathize, express shock and horror, and say things like ‘I don’t know how you coped’. Not support, but pity – anything else would be tantamount to victim-blaming. Any suggestion that such incidents weren’t really that big a deal (and shouldn’t be treated as trauma) was repellent to me.
Victim feminism taught me to see my body as inviolable – any action visited upon it was violence. Eventually, I stopped going out. It wasn’t worth the risk. It took me a long time to realize what had happened. Feminism had not empowered me to take on the world – it had not made me stronger, fiercer or tougher. Irony of ironies, it had turned me into someone who wore long skirts and stayed at home with her girlfriends. Even leaving the house became a minefield. What if a man whistled at me? What if someone looked me up and down? How was I supposed to deal with that? This fearmongering had turned me into a timid, stay-at-home, emotionally fragile bore.
Thankfully, I learned a lot from the experience. Teaching women that we exist as probable victims (to the probable attacks of men) is not freeing or empowering. Modern feminism trains us to see sexism and victimhood in everything – it makes us weaker. It is also anathema to gender equality. How are we to reconcile with our male ‘oppressors’ when we view them as primitive, aggressive beasts? How are we to advance female agency when everything from dancing to dating is deemed traumatic?
The answer to the problems we face as women is not to submit to the embrace of victim feminism but to stand up for ourselves. We must throw off the soft, damp blanket of Safe Space culture and face the world bravely. If we do not do so now, we will consign any prospect of real equality to the ash heap of history.
Catherine Johnson is a student at the University of Oxford.
 

Alt Left: SJW Politics Is All Based on Black and White Thinking

Thomas K.: What my comment was getting at is that, at least among the younger generations, there is a feeling that Feminism is an un-serious ideology and that those promoting it are a little bit “out there.” At least, that’s what I gather from observation of internet-discourse.
But perhaps I just don’t spend a whole lot of time on the Left. On the right, Feminism has come to be seen as a bad joke. The Left obviously sees that differently. The reason is clear:
The Left holds Egalitarianism as a sacred value, and Feminism claims (falsely, but that’s not really the issue) to be an Egalitarian ideology; therefore, Leftists find it much harder to dispose of it than Rightists do.
Am I correct?

These very young kids nowadays, Generation Z, are the craziest and most feministed, SJW’d kooks you have ever met.
Of course I support equal rights for women, even to this day. I have my whole life. I support equal legal rights for women, and I don’t have a high opinion of outright misogyny or chauvinism.
I actually support a whole long list of feminist ideas and goals. But I stop at some point, and therefore I am evil scum who must be killed, I am not a feminist, and I am a diabolical misogynist with deep, extreme hatred for women. This last is a new one to me, perhaps it is unconscious?
If you don’t go along with 100% of their crazy project (and different feminist trends have different party lines, and each will bash you for not going along with theirs), follow the party line in entirety with no exceptions, and support the democratic centralism, etc. then you are not a feminist, and instead you are one of the Satanic MRA demons who needs to be lynched on the spot.
So I am not opposed to the the cause of equal rights for women, but feminists went way beyond that a long time ago, and every year they get crazier and crazier and stand making more and more extreme demands. At some point, some of us on the Left got off the Crazy Train. I got off the Cultural Left crazy train in the mid 1990’s.
The problem is that the Right always attacks equal rights and egalitarianism as a concept whenever they attack SJWism because conservatives on the basis of their very philosophy oppose equal rights. So the feminists and the rest of the SJW loons are all idiots, but on the other hand, their critics on the Right are reactionary scumbags. If you disagree with whatever Kook Camp, Left or Right, they shove you out of the camp and throw you over in the other one. You have to be with either one group of kooks and idiots or the other one. There’s no ground in between to stand on.
SJW’s black and white everything.
Let’s face it. Misogyny is probably scalar like almost everything else in life. There’s probably a Misogyny Scale of 0-100, with the ultimate male radfem cucked fag at 0 and Ted Bundy at 100. Few men will be complete misogynists, and few men will be completely free of angry or dismissive feelings towards women. But for every feminist, all males must be 0’s, no exception. And if you’re not a 0, you’re a 100. You’re Ted Fucking Bundy, a walking rapist killer waiting to strike.
There’s no grey area with feminists. There never has been. It’s been nothing but “you’re with us or against us” from the very start. You can’t be a little bit of a feminist. You’re either whole hog or you need to go to prison.
All of the rest of the SJW bullshit is exactly the same. Modern anti-racism is complete crap. I mean they got away from John Brown, CLR James, MLK and even late Malcolm a long time ago. They might even be beyond the Panthers for Chrissake. They’re not even attacking real racism anymore because there’s not much left, so they are looking around for things to get mad about. Every year they ban more words, thoughts and behaviors you’ve been saying, thinking and doing your whole life, every year they make a number of new humiliating demands of Whites which we must grovel abjectly at the feet of the smiling Blacks to agree to.
And we don’t go along,  we are exactly the same as David Duke. Honestly racism is probably scalar too, say 0-100, with few at the low end and not a whole lot a the high end. Non-Whites are just as racist as Whites, and in fact, they are typically more so. It’s been proven that Blacks are actually more racist than White people.
So by the standards of modern lunatic anti-racism, most people are somewhere from 1-99 on the scale. I mean their rules are so crazy now. You say, “Boy, Black people sure commit a lot of crime,” and you immediately go to 100 on the damn scale, you get fired from your job, you career is ruined, and your life is shot. All for one sentence that is 100% true and even proven by science. But no matter. The truth is racist. The truth is sexist. The truth is homophobic and transphobic and all the other crazy prejudices they can dream up. No modern anti-racists believe in grey areas.
It’s all “you’re with us or you’re against us,” and as a White, you get treated like the enemy anyway even if you go completely submissive and cave in to all the increasingly nutty demands of your Black masters. If you veer off the party line, sorry, you’re Richard Spencer, and you need a punch in the face.
We on the anti-SJW Left say, “I signed up for liberation and equal rights, not insanity.” But you can’t say that anymore. If you say that, you are an evil bigot scum who needs to be hung.