Repost: 35,000 White Women A Year Are Raped by Blacks!

This was posted quite some time ago, but it’s getting some new comments, so I thought it might be time for a repost. Feel free to let us know what you think.

White nationalists love to toss this headline around to make it seem like Black criminals go out of their way to preferentially select White women to rape, almost as if they were hunting and White women were their prey. The 35,000 alone is shocking and boils down to 100 rapes of White women a day raped by Black criminals. Just reading that figure is almost enough to set off the latent White nationalist in any White person.

I don’t mean to play down such a crime figure. Any high rape figure is appalling.

But that figure is not nearly as shocking as it seems.

First of all, it looks like Black men may commit 233,000 rapes a year. Of those, yes, 35,000 are White women. But almost all of the rest – 198,000 of them – are Black women. And if there are 100 rapes of White women a day by these men, there are 638 rapes of women period by these same men. So there are 100 rapes of White women a day, but there are 538 rapes of Black women per day.

Which seems to be the greater problem? It looks like a lot of Black criminals just like to rape women period! Any women out there wandering around in society may get raped by them. And if Black men are such a danger to White women that they must be kept away from them, aren’t they an even greater danger to Black women? Shouldn’t Black women be protected from these men too?

The rape of a White woman by a Black man is no worse than the rape of a Black woman by a Black man. You can’t say we have to protect one set of victims while leaving the much larger set of victims to their fate. For better or for worse, we all have to bear the brunt of possible victimhood simply by living in a free and fair society. Anyway even if we protected White women from Black rapists, I assure you that there are plenty of White rapists out there who would gladly take up the slack and rape these women themselves.

For instance, Black women are vastly more likely to be victimized by Black criminals than White women are. Comparing Blacks to Whites, five times as many Black women as White women are raped by Black men. Looking at only those two races, Black women are 85% of the rape victims of Black rapists. White and other non-Black women are 15% of the victims.

If these rapists were simply picking women of these two races at random to rape, 64% of their victims would be White women, and only 13% would be Black women. I don’t know how to do the math here, but it looks like Black women are maybe six times more likely to be raped relative to their population than White women. So Black rapists massively go out of their way to select Black women for rape and go way out of their way to avoid selecting or deselect White women.

But that’s not what you would hear from the White nationalists. Figures don’t lie, but liars sure can figure.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Masculine and Feminine Characters: An Inquiry into Essential Forms

I published this earlier but I may as well republish it. Let me know what you think.

Masculine and Feminine Characters: An Inquiry into Essential Forms

By Robert Lindsay

In June 1903, the Austrian philosopher Otto Weininger published a great book called Sex and Character – A Fundamental Investigation. He was 23 years old, a mere boy. The book did not receive negative reviews, but it caused little interest either.

Weininger was attacked Paul Julius Mobius, who accused Weininger of plagiarism. Depressed, Weininger left for Italy. He returned to his parents’ house in late September and stayed there for five days.

On October 3, 1903, Weininger checked himself into the building where Beethoven had died, now a small inn. At 3 AM the next morning on October 4, Otto Weininger pointed a pistol at his chest and put a bullet in his heart.

Weininger’s dramatic death quickly made him a cause célèbre in Vienna, inspired several imitation suicides and roused quite a bit of interest in the book.

It was roundly praised, even by Sigmund Freud. Freud had met Weininger the year before. Freud stated that Weininger has a striking air of “genius” about him. Ludwig Wittgenstein also praised the book and stated that it was an influence on his early writings. It was also praised by August Strindberg and even James Joyce

Weininger’s book created quite a stir, and Weininger has been accused of being both a misogynist and a Jewish anti-Semite or self-hating Jew. Both characterizations are probably innacurate.

Nearly 100 years later, Weininger’s book still has its champions, while his reputation has suffered in the era of the Political Correctness and the Cultural Left in the West. Nevertheless, Weininger’s place on the canon of great philosophers seems secure.

Weininger felt that there were two essential characters in human beings, the masculine aspect and the feminine aspect. He felt that both aspects were present in all humans.

In the chart below, I lay out scores of human characterological variables and how the Masculine and Feminine Characters represent each one.

The first five variables are by Otto Weininger, but the last 56 are by me. Please note that I don’t necessarily agree with Weininger’s five variables in total, only that it is a good starting place. I have also used the terms Masculine Principle and Feminine Principle to refer to these terms.

Characters         Masculine*           Feminine* 


Principles

Activity             Active                 Passive

Consciousness Conscious           Unconscious 

Thinking           Objective            Subjective

Genius              Yes                      No

Productivity      Productive         Nonproductive

Awareness          Conscious Mind    Unconscious Mind

Energy               Generative           Receptive

Mind                  Thinking               Feeling

Emotion             Stoic                    Moody

Tactile                Callous                Sensitive

Humor               Slapstick              Irony

Weather             Calm                   Unsettled

Temperature       Cold                    Warm

Graph                Linear                  Scatterplot

Empathy            Poor                     Rich

Pain                   Inflict                   Receive

Confrontation     Forward                Withdrawal

Reaction            Contemplative       Reactive

Style                 Deliberative           Unthinking
 
Intensity            Concentration        Distraction

Denial style        Projection              Fantasy

Egotism style      Narcissism            Histrionic

Pathology           Sociopath              Borderline

Defense             Anger                    Denial

Ego desire          Expansion              Dissolution

Destructive         Other                    Self 

Annihilation        Totalizing               Self only

Depression         Projection              Introjection

Survival             Self                       Others

Reliance             Self                       Others

Criminality         Dangerous             Petty thief

Psychopathy      Violent menace       Prostitute

Compassion       Indifference            Mercy

Wakefulness      Aware                     Unaware

Alertness           Wide Awake            Sleepwalking

Planning            Methodical              Conspiring

Morality             Strict                      Contingent

Aggression         Direct                     Subterfuge

Violence             External                  Internal

Warfare              Bully                      Victim

Hierarchy            Dominant               Submissive

Force                  Blunt                      Subtle

Texture               Harsh                     Smooth

Resistance           Extreme                 Yielding

Linear                 Straight                  Jagged

Presentation        Forthright               Devious

Surface               Clear                      Opaque

Understand         Simple                    Complicated
 
Logic                  Linear                      Circular

Analysis              Logic                       Intuition

Strategy             Straightforward         Wily 

Movement          Stiff                          Flowing

Grain                 Coarse                      Fine

Essence             Sky                           Earth

Instrument         Blunt                        Subtle

Transport           Highway                    Stream

Route                A to B                       Roundabout

Tour                  Autobahn                  Scenic route

Flight                Soar                          Flutter

Hobby               Monomania                Dilettante

Truths               Multiple                     Singular

Theory              Branching                  Obsessive

Fact                  Durable                     Momentary

Interpretation    Nonpersonal              Personal

Manichean         Grey area                 Black and White

Systematics       Categorizing             Noncategorizing

Science             Empirical                  Intuitive

Philosophy         Tough                      Dream State

Ubermensch      More common           Less common

Body                 Hard                        Soft

Tissue               Sinewy                     Fatty

Signal               Weathervane            Antenna

Telepathy           Poor                        Mindreader

Broadcast          Subwoofer                Subliminal 

Travel                Itinerary                   Lark  

Decision            Plotted                      Whimsy

Confusion          Certainty                   Perplexed

Party                 Kegger                      Cocktail  

Social                Optional                    Mandatory

Sex                   Compulsion                Choice

Intellectual         Paradise                    Boredom

Bird                   Hawk                        Hummingbird 
 
Birdsong            Crow                         Warbler 

Love                  Auxiliary                    Requirement 

Danger              Physical                     Psychological 

Grudge              Discard                      Retain  

Jealousy            Weak                         Strong

Armistice           Reconciliation             Cold Peace

Storm               Thunderstorm             Spring Shower

Bipolar              Mania                         Depressive
Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

The “Happy Place” for Women is Femininity and Submissiveness

Women really get off sexually on submission, even to the point of enjoying what boils down to degradation and humiliation during sex. One could argue that calling women degrading names is degrading or humiliating behavior, but women sure seem to get off on that. In my experience, it seems to turn them into raving, wild-eyed, half-psychotic, cum-drunk nymphos.

Not to mention the popularity of a lot of sex acts. Sucking cock, getting fucked in the ass (and maybe even getting fucked period), and the popularity of newer acts like slapping, spanking, hair-pulling and especially facials, spitting and choking seem to be obviously degrading and humiliating if not outright misogynistic sex acts. Nevertheless, women are taking to all this new perverted sex like fish to water or at least a lot of them are anyway.

It’s like they hit their sweet spot. Femininity and submission are the sweet spots for women. Once they settle in and get comfortable, they’ve found their happy place. With men, it’s masculinity and dominance. Men who are not very masculine are usually not very happy. Anyone ever noticed that?

As are bitchy, ball-breaking women who domineer sadistically over their cowering husbands. There seems to be an essential unhappiness about them too. There’s also the tendency of the men to rebel and also the idea that they are solidifying the limitation that only wimps will be interested in them, as any real man would just kill the bitch LOL. Besides, even most women like that have an interior submissiveness that they really get off on if they’ll only let themselves succumb to it. Trust me, I’ve met enough of these bitches to know.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Black Women Would Do Well to Act Less Masculine and More Feminine

Alpha Unit: Generally, Black American culture is more accepting of directness and confrontation than middle-class White American culture. Whites seem more conflict-averse. Of course, being confrontational can be self-sabotaging in a lot of situations. Plenty of Black women know this (or find out the hard way).

That excess testosterone they have doesn’t exactly help matters. I wonder if a testosterone-lowering drug came out, would Black women take it? The only benefit it gives women is an increased sex drive, but lowering Black women’s sex drive to the level of White women’s would not be a catastrophe for them, as a lot of White women are slavering insatiable nymphomaniacs. The whole idea of taking a drug for this problem might be insulting to Black women though.

I’ve long thought that the less masculine and more feminine and even submissive that Black women act, the better off they will be.

I can’t see why any human would get off on being submissive. I sure don’t. But it seems to be an essential aspect of the Feminine Character as opposed to the Female Character (notice how many gay men get off on being bottoms as opposed to tops) and especially in terms of sexuality.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

The Drive to Annihilation in the Masculine (Homicidal) and Feminine (Suicidal) Characters

The Annihilatory or Destructive Drive at the Core of the Human Character

Both males and females have a drive to destruction as part of their core Characters. This is obviously a downside of any human’s character, but both the Masculine and Feminine  Characters are probably 50% good and 50% bad. Think of the good side as the bright side of the moon you see at night. The bad side of the Character is like the dark side of the moon and hopefully it acts like it. You know full well it’s there even though you never see it.

At other times you see it in spades, and many people, especially as they get older, turn the mirror around and only show the back side of it to people. All you see is the bad aspects of the Character. The good side is probably still there in most of them, and you may even see it peek out some of the time.

Both males and females have a drive to destruction as part of their core Characters. This is obviously a downside of any human’s character, but both the Masculine and Feminine  Characters are probably 50% good and 50% bad.

Think of the good side as the bright side of the moon you see at night. The bad side of the Character/Gender is like the dark side of the moon and hopefully it acts like it. You know full well it’s there even there even though you never see it.

The Annihilatory or Destructive Component in  the Masculine Character

In the male the drive to destruction is projected outwards, which is what males do with most destructive emotions. Sending negative emotions inside of yourself is considered to be pussy, weak, female, acting like a bitch, etc. “Manning up” usually means nothing more than projecting your crap outwards as opposed to inwards.

The Masculine Character has a destructive aspect, and it is dark indeed. It is frankly homicidal and most men are homicidal either consciously or consciously or at least they were as boys, when they projected their murderousness onto non-human creatures and converted it to fistfights with the males they are around.

However, it is very hard for a boy to be truly homicidal and murder another human being, either another boy or a man. Something stops them. This is odd because they spend a lot of time killing non-human things like bugs, and they physically fight each other regularly. Yet the fights seldom end in serious damage and always stop short of homicide.

So in the boy, the homicidal impulse is there most of the time, but it is transformed into playing with army men and toy guns, berry and dirt clod wars with other teams of boys (this mirrors small-scale tribal warfare), physical fighting which causes little damage, and murder of non-human lower-level creatures.

Yet as a boy grows into a man he is supposed to abandon this overt destruction and sadism of boyhood, as retaining is seen as acting like a boy, not a man. Such a young man will be told to “Grow up!” by other men. The sadistic boyhood monster begins being berated in adolescence, and at some point the blows may become physical. In this way, the core destructive sadism of the boy is transformed into the calm and controlled man.

Nevertheless, I don’t think the homicidality ever goes away. I spent most of my young adulthood in a homicidal frame of mind, directed at my enemies of course, always other men. Yet I scarcely harmed a soul and only acted on it once when I tried to kill a man who was trying, frankly, to kill me! And that was not fun. It was the worst experience of my life.

So even younger men who feel homicidal most of the time, which is practically normal, will almost never act on it, and if they ever do, they are quickly transported to the 9th circle of Hell. The homicidality is meant to be fantasy only. It’s supposed to go away in middle age, but I suspect that it just goes into hiding. I know my Killer Maniac is in me, as I feel him regularly. Yet he’s locked in a maximum security prison in my gut, and like Hell he will ever feel the light of day.

At its worst, the other-destructive aspect of the Masculine Character is truly black and horrible and actually manifests as a desire to destroy on a significant basis either objects, animals, or other humans. It’s an “obliterating” tendency. At its core, this black desire seems to be a desire to destroy the entire world and everything in it. Truly awful, but no man will come close to realizing it.

Radical feminists have done a good job of portraying the bad side of men, and the best of them have commented precisely about this homicidal character and in particular about its totalizing obliterative tendency. I’ve seen it described as a desire to obliterate the entire universe. That is when I knew that this particular radfem truly had her finger on the male pulse.

The Annihilatory or Destructive Component in  the Feminine Character

Men project their pain outwards onto others, and women push it inwards into the self. This manifests in all sorts of ways that I assume the reader is more than familiar with.

Freud even suggested that the female, at her core, is essentially a masochist. This may be true that the aspect of her destructive character is masochistic. This follows from the description above describing the male, at his core, is essentially a sadist.

Indeed, many women behave in variations of a masochistic manner in bed, and masochism is deeply tied into female sexuality. It’s usually milder than the truly hardcore masochism seem in female submissives, sex slaves, etc. involved in sick relationships with sadistic male dominants or doms, but the BD/SM dynamic is simply the basic male/female human dynamic taken to its logical extreme. Most folks are not BD/SM’ers, but a mild form of it is virtually normal in the sexuality of both genders.

This destructive nature in the female is pushed inwards, hence women are rarely homicidal, and they are terrible killers anyway due to their physical weakness. Further, women seem to have an almost genetic aversion to engaging in physical violence, probably evolved for good reasons.

A woman can and will kill you psychologically, spiritually, and verbally and the results are often severe. But she will probably not kill you.

Whereas another man can murder you at just about any time and place. Most men understand this, hence their cautious, excessively friendly, and solicitous attitude towards other men. The message behind this groveling is usually something like, “Please don’t punch me in the face! Place don’t murder me, sir!” Any man who has not developed a healthy terror of other men will surely die young and will often meet a violent end.

The landscape of love is littered with the broken souls of men who have been frankly destroyed by females in this manner in the course of a relationship. One of the most important things to learn as a man is to toughen up enough so much that it is difficult if not impossible for a woman to commit soul-murder against you, since if you have any success with women at all, some will attempt this.

The more women you get involved with, the more attempts at soul murder are launched against you, hence Chads and Alphas are often quite cynical about women, having seen the bad side of the female in spades (in addition to ample heaps of the good side too). The player simply thinks that the punishments are the price you pay for the considerable rewards. Most players have had quite a few women launch elaborate, often long-term and severe attempts at soul murder against them.

If they can’t tough it out and take it, these men simply stop the playboy game, marry up, and go more or less monogamous. Those still in the game have been targeted many times and have plenty of war stories to tell.

The destructive aspect of the female character then is self-destructive. We see this in elevated rates of depression, eating disorders, self-harm including cutting, and the high rate of suicide attempts. Females attempt suicide five times more than men, but are usually unsuccessful and most attempts are theatrical and not intended to succeed. It’s more of a cry for attention to her pain from others.

But I am convinced that the drive to suicidality is at the core of the Feminine Character. I’ve seen far too many women, even those very close to me, become suicidal at some point in their lives. My own mother was for a while.

At one time very recently, every woman I had dated recently, which added up to four or five, were all either actively suicidal or had recently attempted (usually theatrical) suicide. The attempters were older women age ~50, and the fantasists were younger ones, 18 and 19 year old teenage girls and a 27 year old woman.

I assume the suicidality acquires a more serious and lethal character as the woman ages. Notably, all three of the older women had never had children. Having living children is one thing that keeps many or most women from ending their lives. They are literally staying alive for their children. If a female has no children, she literally has no reason to be on this Earth, such is the intensity of the maternal instinct.

Furthermore, in the women above, I noticed that there seemed to be an actual love of suicidality as if they were in a love affair with this feeling. Hence I came to see it as an “essential drive” in women’s lives. Most women never suicide but the drive is probably there off and on throughout life.

Lesser forms of this include the extreme forms of self-sacrifice women engage in for others which is related to this remora-like attachment they form with others. The extreme attachment may not be for a husband or boyfriend alone but may instead be of the  mother in the case of a teenage girl or for her children in the case of an mother.

The female of many mammal will literally sacrifice her life to save others, most particularly her children. You see this same suicidal destructiveness to defend the offspring from threats in many lower mammals. It is especially prominent and can even be lethal in bears.

It’s even present in lower life forms such as birds. A section of trail in the Sierra Nevada had to be closed because the trail went by a Cooper’s Hawk’s nest, and the female kept dive-bombing hikers and aiming the talons at their heads.

Once I was fishing on the Eel River in California near Dos Rios where they Middle Fork enters the stream. If you ever want to o to a truly beautiful part of the US, go there. Across from me on the other side of the river was a large bird that looked like an eagle. It was extremely agitated the whole time I was there, flying haphazardly in small circles and squawking incessantly. I later figured out that this was a nesting female Osprey. Apparently I was too close to her nest, and this was making her agitated.

The self-destructive nature of the Feminine Character can be tied into the intense attachment they form for others. There are many cases on record in warfare of women avenging the deaths of their men in suicidal charges. A notable one occurred among Taiwanese aborigines when 100 women of a tribe suicidally attacked a Japanese contingent that had killed their men. As they charged, they yelled, “You have killed all of our men, now you will have to kill all of us!” All of the women died, but there may have been some Japanese casualties.

As we see above the female will give her life for others, especially her children or even her husband. Most human mothers will sacrifice themselves for their children or at least they say they will. And they have no fear of the death that will result.

I recently dated an 18 year old girl who had formed a severe attachment to her mother, whom she worshiped with reverence. One time she told me of this elaborate, bizarre fantasy of hers, which involved killing herself, except that the suicide would be done somehow to protect her mother. She seemed to be a state of rapture when she described this plan to me. She was in love with this plan. This desire to kill herself to protect her mother seemed to be one of the most important and beloved themes in her life.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

A Core Aspect of the Female Character: Solipsism and Strong Attachment to a Loved Other

Joe Bob: So if females are basically solipsistic, does this mean their natural tendency is to objectify men or see them as mere objects and not as subjects too?

The solipsism at the core of the Female Character is simply the  human drive for self-love or self-centeredness that we all have. Solipsism is the female form of this variable and narcissism is the male form. I think I’d rather deal with a solipsistic female than a narcissitic male though.

In response to the question though, hmm, I’m not sure. They do love us though, I’ll give them that much. They attach to us like remoras and they call this love. This is the most important thing in a woman’s life and in the Female Character. Men can take love or leave it, but for the woman, love is nearly as important as air or water. A woman without love can survive but she is a shell of herself.

The solipsism of the female just means she is all wrapped up in herself. It’s associated with vanity in the sense of staring in front of the mirror for long periods of time, but on the other hand, they also often hate themselves. Look at all the selfies women take and put up on Facebook. Look at how many of them are vainglorious sorts of poses almost like a model or an actress. Women often make faces in these selfies too – sometimes funny faces, but they often display a variety of different emotions in these faces, so these are “emotional portraits” in a way.

This same vanity and vaingloriousness is seen in women’s utter obsession with appearances, particularly their own. They spend huge amounts of time making themselves up, doing their hair in this way or that, adorning themselves with jewelry and wearing all manner of outfits. This sort of obsession with personal appearance is absolutely an aspect of the Female Character.

Females decorate themselves elaborately in every society that has ever been studied. In a way, they are “painting themselves” – they serve as walking painted pictures or portraits and the often see themselves as actual paintings on a wall except that they are moving around and conscious.

They compare themselves obsessively to other women and take what seems to men a near-psychotic obsession for the personal appearance of other women, of which they are more often critical than complimentary – “That hair looks awful!…Why is she wearing that dress?!…Boy she really botched that plastic surgery job, didn’t she?…She’s really let herself fall to pieces – look at how fat she is!”

The obsession comparison with other, combined with commenting on their features in an often harshly critical way, seems to be a way of competing with female rivals. The rivals are for men’s attention because no other sort of rivalry exists in women.

Women compete over men and little else and their competition over men can be absolutely vicious. They specialize and often delight in stealing men away from other men, and frequently do not trust other women around their men because they understand that all women are man-thieves.

Hence if they think they have a prize man (Chad) a woman will become fiercely jealous and protective of him to the point where she doesn’t even want to hear about past women in his life as even some woman from 20 years ago is still somehow fighting her and trying to steal her man away from her. A lot of fighting between women and hatred of women for other women derives directly from this competition for men.

When was the last time you saw a woman point to a picture of a woman and point out how beautiful and perfect she looked? When a woman sees a beautiful woman in a photo, she often gets angry and sees her as a competitor who might better her.

How many times have you had a (young) woman show you a beautiful woman’s photograph and then ask you who is more beautiful, the woman in the picture or the one talking to you?

Don’t fall for it! She will always only be satisfied with being a 10 on a 1-10 scale as anything less than a 10 feels may as well be a 1 to her. There is no possibility of any other woman on Earth being more beautiful than she is and pointing this out is a supreme insult! How dare you say she looks better than I do! Tears or rage may result. There’s no such thing as “Well, you’re both beautiful but she’s a bit moreso is all.” Nope. It’s either win the gold or nothing.

Solipsism is not narcissism. The solipsist cares about other people and the narcissist does not. It’s just that the solipsist simply does not have the time and energy to think (or care much) about others because they are too busy doing the equivalent of staring in the mirror. It’s not that they don’t care about others. It’s more that they have no time or energy to think about it!

A lot of women’s focus is absolutely other-oriented and women often live their lives through others to the point of almost taking on their personalities. A teenage girl may strongly identify with her such that you wonder where the girl ends and the mother begins. And you better not talk shit about her Mom! She will never forgive you.

More traditional women attach themselves to the men they fall in love (in a near-remoralike manner as discussed above). They’re not parasitical as in a remora and their not sucking energy out of the man, although he may feel that she is due to the strength of her attachment. I’ve called girlfriends “Klingons” and “remoras” before.

This hurts their feelings a lot, but if you have a woman like this, you’re in love. She has literally attached herself to you. You’re Chad or you’re Alpha or you’re her dream man in any case and you are experiencing something that many men may never experience.

This often results in “stand by your man” behavior, which is absolutely a core characteristic of the female character, not a patriarchal perversion as feminists insist. Call yourself lucky if you have a stand by your man woman. Rest assured that she adores you. Cherish that moment. It may not come again for some time, as in years.

This also results in “living her life through you” or being “the woman behind the man,” as the traditional woman wishes to be.

A traditional woman will get you up in the morning, fix you up in front of the mirror, direct you to the closet to pick out your clothes for you and maybe even try them on you. She will gladly fix your breakfast and it’s for you, not her.

When you come home, she will sit, fascinated, as you tell her about your day at work. If you talk to her about your work at all, she stops all other functions and listens raptly as if her life depended on it. She will even research your work interests even if she has no understanding of them. That doesn’t matter at all. It will just leave her in awe. Not only does she have Chad, but Chad’s a goddamned genius to boot.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: Birth of the Cultural Left Analysis: Did the Black Panthers Hate Whites?

I think the Panthers are still around, but they are not very active. I actually don’t mind them. They did a lot of really cool things like free breakfasts and lunches for school children. They have been superseded by the New Black Panther Party, an explicitly racist organization that actively promotes hatred of Whites. The real Panthers recently criticized the NBP for hating Whites, saying that the original Panthers were never about hating Whites; instead they just wanted equal rights for Blacks.

The rightwing recently has published some articles suggesting that the Panthers hated Whites. To my recollection, they did not. They helped the Weathermen break Tim Leary out of prison, and they visited him in Algeria, where some of them (Kwame Ture nee Eldridge Cleaver of Soul on Ice fame) had also taken refuge. A lot of radical Whites worked hand in hand with the Panthers.

The Panthers were Marxists (actually Maoists) of that particular er, which would coincide with the Cultural Revolution period in China. Think of how culturally conservatives the Chinese Communist Party was at this time. That’s what the Panthers were like.

They were strongly against degeneracy of any type as most Communist parties (CP’s) were at that time. Some Panthers were openly homophobic, saying homosexuality was a bourgeois vice, a popular view among CP’s of that time (See the Cuban leadership’s position on this subject in the 1960’s). They certainly didn’t promote Black crime, drug use, or even irresponsible behavior.

I will say that Farrakhan’s (whom I very much dislike) people are huge on social responsibility too, and I appreciate them for that. They are very much into clean living and non-degeneracy, and they despise Black crime.

I came out of the cultural revolutions of the 1960’s, which is why probably why some people are shocked at how leftwing I am. They’re blown away when they figure that out about me. “Wow, I didn’t realize he was so leftwing!” Well, I am. I’m race realist though and hate the Cultural Left. I’m a “conservative socialist.”

Hell, I was on the mailing list for the Weatherman at one point not even long ago! Well, their above ground organization that is (the Prairie Fire Organizing Committee), which frankly has strong links to this BLM movement right now. So, yes, the present Weathermen (now given up arms as a peaceful organization) are very much behind BLM.

My friends were drug dealers who hung out with Tim Leary and the Brotherhood of Eternal Love in Laguna Canyon in Laguna Beach where the BEL made and distributed millions of tabs of Orange Sunshine LSD.I remember my friends telling me about going to parties in the canyon and how they had lookouts high up in the eucalyptus trees to watch out for cops. I did go to a party in the Canyon once, a real hippie party with real hippie chicks and lots of pot smoking. Love was definitely in the air.

I have supported Latin American guerrilla groups. I actually gave to the “weapons fund” for the Salvadoran guerrillas for some time. So I’m actually a real dyed in the wool terrorist supporter or even financier if you will, although I stopped giving them money long ago.

If I did that now, I would be violating the Patriot Act by giving Material Support for Terrorism (Whatever the Hell that means!), and I could be looking at 10 years. But alas, those were different times. Even the 80’s were far more laid back, relaxed, and anti-authoritarian compared to now when we seem to be on some weird authoritarian trip due to fears over “terrorism” which is about nonexistent in the US.

Anyway, this was a time of peace, love, dope and all that. Everyone was very much into nonviolence to the point of near-passivity. Any aggressive behavior was “uncool.” Every hippie man was your brother, and every hippie woman was your sister. There was magic in the air. And Yoko brought her walrus, don’t forget that.

Plus there was lots of “free love.” I still have fond memories of hippie chicks. I will say it was a lot more loving and friendly than things are nowadays with all this weirdness, antisociality, fear of strangers and single men, “pedophile” hysteria, #metoo insanity, and general fear or even terror of men – and this at a time when major crimes like rape have crashed 63% since  1993.

Sometimes I think the lower the crime rate goes, the more paranoid people get about crime. Don’t ask me to figure it out. I have no idea why humans do whatever irrational thing du jour they happen to be doing.

Bottom line is that humans are basically irrational and illogical at their core and we tend to be driven around all through life by our emotional needs and beliefs, which often seem to be pulling us through life blindly on a leash like a dog ownder, not even why we do or feel certain things.

I can’t tell you how many of my female clients have asked me, “Why do I feel this way?”  The answer was not readily apparent. Obviously it’s happening for a reason, probably an  unconscious one. Then they ask me, “How do I stop feeling  this way (getting dragged through life with their emotions like a dog an a leash)?” It’s hard to answer questions like that. The solutions are there no doubt, but they are more tangled up in the forbidding jungle of the psyche than we want  to admit.

The only answer I would have to taht question would be to develop some “emotional literacy,” to try to develop and cultivate at least some  emotional control. My emotions don’t drag me through life blindly, baffled at why I am doing or feeling  this or that. I

t’s more the opposite. Whereas with many people, including  most women for sure, their emotions are dragging through them through their lives blindly, with me it’s the other way around. I have my emotions on a leash and I drag them around. I’d rather drag my emotions through life in my own leash than the other way around. Control gets a bad rap, but a lot of forms of it

Anyway, the Panthers were just Black hippies. They hung out with the White hippies. Black hippies were “brothers,” or “soul brothers,” if you will. There were some problems with them of course (they are Blacks after all), but most of them were quite well-behaved or at least much  better behaved than they are now. I suspect the demand for nonviolence in the hippie movement weeded out the bad ones. There may have been some self-selection going  on.

Bottom line is I really disagree that the Panthers were White-haters. It’s BS.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: Miserable? Find Your Gendered “Happy Place”

Femininity is Woman’s “happy place.”

I think women who act masculine do not seem very happy. That is why so many feminists seem so angry and miserable. And why ball-breaking dominatrices who deliberately seek out weak men to beat up(Talk to me about that!) don’t seem very happy. They are sadists who seek out weak male victims to beat up on because no real man will put up with their shit for one minute. Any real man would just kill the bitch.

Like so many misled folks, they think they are getting what they want but really they aren’t. First because they are mistaken about what they want. What they think they want and what makes them happy actually makes them miserable. They can’t see it because the defensive blinders go up and blind them to this truth.

But unlike male sadists, who are reveling in the ultimate Woodstock mud puddle of Masculinity because masculinity is normal for men, the ball-breaking harridan is not happy, probably because masculinity is just not normal for straight women and never will be. She hates her milquetoast husband. And I think she secretly hates having to be an emasculating harpy. The real men that she craves will smack her ass in a New York minute. She’s locked herself into a prison of her own making.

The only men who put up with them are, yeah, wimpy. To which I do throw my former self, sadly. But we’re also pussy-whipped.

For the flip side, ever seen a happy wimpy man who gets his balls busted all the time by his psychobitch wife? Me either.

I also think masculinity is Man’s “happy place.” When you get back into it after having been out of it for quite some time, damn it just feels so right.

Ever seen a cat curled up in some object like this pillows with the round holes in the middle that fit the cat’s body perfectly. That’s what these “happy places” are. They plug right in with our biology and both our minds and Nature Herself see it and think “two thumbs up.”

Just to be fair to the homosexuals out here, I will say that gay men and lesbians and their extreme forms called transsexuals probably do indeed have a similar happy place. For gay men, that happy place may indeed be femininity. I have no idea. For lesbians that happy place may indeed be masculinity. And that’s perfectly normal, natural, correct and maybe even biological with them. It’s obviously not normal, but in a way, if it’s biologically mediated, it’s certainly “normal for them,” and at the end of the day, that’s all that matters: what’s normal for you.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: Why the Treat Em Like Shit” Advice for Men to Deal with Women is Both True and Not True

I was once, long ago in another world, a pussy-whipped idiot. I put up with the occasional abuse to keep the Pussy River flowing. I figured as soon as I started fighting back,  she’d just leave (and some do just that), and then…no more pussy. The river runs dry and now you’re in the desert without a canteen. Good luck with that. Even for a Chad like me, pussy, like money, never grew on trees. It’s actually a lot harder to get than most people think. I mean a good-loooking, sane, halfway intelligent woman.

The line that Chad can get laid any time he wants has never been my experience. Yeah, we do all right, but that’s only because your AFC’s typical single life is nightmare in the desert.

It’s a relative thing, like most everything anyway. Success and failure are not pure concepts any more than any value judgement is. They’re both just continua and based on relative judgement, and hence tend to resist any good definition. What’s success? The opposite of failure. What’s failure? The opposite of success. And so the tautological circle chases its tail.

Funny thing is when I stopped being pussy-whipped and started ripping the Hell out of girlfriends who bitched me out and were totally out of line about it, a funny thing happened. They didn’t leave. They actually stuck around. Some shut up right away, became very feminine, and even started whimpering like whipped dogs and apologizing. Not a few became suddenly very horny.

And I had the wildest, most passionate love affairs of my  entire life. With women who called me “mean,” “a mean, cruel, asshole,” “psycho, scary, dangerous,” etc.

I don’t agree with the “just treat em like shit” philosophy of how to deal with women. Maybe it works, but it never did for me, plus I don’t have it in me to be that evil. I’d have to plug back into my “evil little boy self” again, and he’s safely locked up in maximum security in my gut where he belongs and only let out on extremely rare occasions where he’s absolutely needed.

I’ve thought about this a lot. It’s not that women like assholes or bad or evil men. Sure, maybe 1/3 do, as a former girlfriend said. But the rest don’t. But I think deep down inside, most women want a man who is pretty damned mean and scary now and then, or on occasion, or who shows he can at least be that way and he has it in him.

He can be nice most of the rest of the time, a stereotypical nice guy. But she has to know that he can get real scary real quick, and more importantly, that he’s willing to put some fences around her and not let her get away with murder.

I hate to quote Schopenhauer, but of course women are like children. In a sense.

Ever notice that a kid is always trying to see what he can get away with and he will delightfully get away with murder if you are stupid enough to let him? Well, of course. But ever also notice that at the same time, the kid who screams when you build a “do not cross” fence around him with severe penalties for breaches secretly seems to appreciate the fact that you put some limits on him.

I am convinced that women are the same. She actually wants you to put some limits on her. She expects it. And if you don’t, she may well just run wild for the same reason a child does. And when you throw her in a corral and threaten her if she breaches it, she might throw a fit, just like a child once again. But then again, like the child, she secretly appreciates and respects the fact that you were man enough to put some limits on her wayward ass.

Not only that, but putting limits on them turns them on. Much more than that, I think it triggers the love impulse – the wild, passionate, Hollywood movie, fireworks infatuation, “crazy love” initial phase of passionate love. Which then probably cements into a nice form of mature love 1-2 years later.

Women want to fall madly in love with caveman who may well be nice most of the time but are also willing to put some limits on them and even scare the Hell out of them or terrorize them if they push the limits. And this makes her horny because being ravished by a brute is the core nature of female sexuality.

Women came from cavewomen and 60% of cavemen never bred. The Alpha psychopaths terrorized those men like the Alpha elephant seal terrorizes any men who encroach on his harem. These psychopaths formed harems with the women. So most women come from a collective unconscious and genetic background of being part of a dangerous, scary psychopathic man’s harem – basically a serial killer’s harem. The residue of that, the weight of 40,000 years, echoes with us down through the canyons of time and resounds with us to this day.

Treat em like shit? All the time? I doubt it. It’s never worked for me but supposedly it works for others. As I don’t have it in me to be that evil, I can’t comment on that.

But treat em like shit? Some of the time, every now and then, once in a blue moon, show that you have the extreme capability to do so? At age 62, very late in the game, too late to matter, I conclude that this is indeed true.

Once again, YMMV. I’m not a guru you know. You do you. I’ll do me. I’m not here to tell you what to do. I’m here to throw out ideas and see if they resonate with you. Maybe they will. Maybe they won’t.

But mostly just want you to at least think about what I’m saying and decide what you might think of it. I’m here to give you new stuff to think about. Adopt it, reject it, neither, or anything ion between? It’s all up to you. As a free human with agency, the world is your oyster. Go forth and bake as nice a pearl as  you can out of it.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

People Commonly Love Their Opposite Sex Parent but Hate Their Same Sex Parent

Mothers love their sons no matter what. Every prison inmate has Mom tattooed on his shoulder, and you better not say shit about her or else. And when they get out, they get $200 and a bus ticket. Guess where they go, even the worst inmates of all? Yep, right back to Mom’s house.

But not if Dad’s there, because all prison inmates, no matter their love for their mothers, still want to murder their fathers. A recent survey found that 37% of all adult men said they hated their fathers. I’m surprised it’s that low.

Fathers and sons often don’t get along. Mothers and daughters often fight a lot.

But men are supposed to love their mothers and vice versa. Stupid women, especially in this Clown Land, think every man who is close to his mother is a Momma’s boy. That’s bullshit. Sure there are some men who are too tied to their mothers and this is not a good thing. If you are like this you need to cut the apron strings and quit being such a huge pussy.

Similarly, fathers and daughters are supposed to get along. Women who didn’t get along with their fathers as girls tend to grow up with “Daddy issues.” Some Daddy issues are fairly harmless such as a fetish for older men as substitute father figures to give her the love she never got from Daddy.

Others are out and out worse, where women with abusive fathers deliberately seek out abusive men who remind them of their fathers. This strikes me as particularly idiotic unless you are a masochist. And frankly, this is masochistic behavior. Every woman who is doing this is acting like a masochist. The reason given is “this is all she knows.” Well, fine, but it’s still a very self-destructive and stupid way to walk through life.

In parallel, man’s most important relationship is with his mother, not with his father. If a man doesn’t get along with his mother, he may have problems with women in adulthood unless he works this stuff out.

As you can see, the parent and child of the same sex commonly commonly fight each other, and if they have a bad relationship, it’s usually no big deal. Most men don’t get screwed up because of their fathers. Most women don’t get screwed up by their mothers. If you’re a man and you have Daddy issues, I must say that’s pretty damn pussy and you need to knock it off.

Very bad abusive fathers tend to leave a lot of bodies in their wake of both sons and daughters. A lot of the kids come out of it with something that looks like PTSD.

Very bad mothers have been known to damage girls and the damage can extend into adulthood. A common sequel of a seriously abusive mother is low self-esteem. Her mother told her all through childhood that she was no good, and in adulthood she remains damaged and hates herself and thinks she’s worthless.

Let’s go back to the prison we left behind.

A few inmates hate their mothers most of all, and those can be the worst inmates of all. These are your woman-beaters, and rapists, assaulters, torturers, and killers of women.

This is because the mind is primitive. Quite a few men who hate their mothers come to hate all women because every woman they get involved with turns into their mother. These serial killers running around killing woman are often simply killing Mom over and over.

You would think the human brain could figure out that all the other women in the world are not your Mom, and no matter how bad she was, every other women is usually not as bad as your Mom, and there are plenty of woman who on balance are quite warm, kind, friendly, loving, and even devoted. I’ve run into quite of few of them in my life, which is why I will never hate women no matter how bad they treat me from now forward. And they’re really treating me pretty bad these days.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: Just Banned from Reddit Again

I got banned from Reddit, so I went and got a new name and signed up under that one. I got banned almost immediately. So now I’ve been banned twice. But now I have a new name, ha ha. A Satanic feminist sub reported me to Mommy Reddit because I wrote a comment asking why it was wrong for adult men to fantasize about teenage girls. After all, 100% of all straight men are attracted, typically maximally, to teenage girls. There is some other data suggesting that attraction declines with each declining year, but all men are maximally aroused by 16 and 17 year old girls.

One study found that for 15 year old girls, it was 90%, for 14 year old girls, it was 80%, and for 13 year old girls, it was 70%. Fairly high levels of attraction from 10-60% remained even in the pedophilic range – for 12 year old girls, it was 60%, for 11 year old girls, it was 50%, for 10 year old girls, it was 40%, for 9 year old girls, it was 30%, for 8 year old girls, it was 20%, and for 7 year old girls, it was 10%. Below that there was no attraction, thank God.

When females are lumped into a group called 13+, 100% of
normal straight men react maximally to this group.

Since men generally react maximally to teenage girls, what would be wrong with men fantasizing about the things that maximally arouse them? Isn’t that normal human behavior to fantasize about things that maximally arouse you?

For this the feminists banned me, wrote me a scathing email with orders not to contact them, and reported me to Mommy Reddit. The cucks and faggots at Reddit then banned me for something gay called “child sexualization” for stating some basic scientific facts along with a scientifically uncontroversial opinion.

Today I just banned again from another gay subreddit. I attacked feminists in the thread, and I accused people in the thread of being carceral liberals and police state liberals, which is exactly what almost every liberal in the US is. I’d argue that that’s what almost all US Communists are too. US Communists are so cucked and gay it’s pathetic. I doubt if there’s no real man among them.

Anyway, I got banned for “hate speech” for attacking feminists. According to Reddit homos, hate speech is:

No racist or sexist speech in comments or submissions. Also no abusive speech based on religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. These are not rules against swearing; they’re not rules against expressing political opinions.

I went back and looked at my comment. Nothing in there was racist or sexist at all or attacked any of their pet protected groups. In fact, I didn’t even mention anything having to do with race or sex and their protected groups anywhere in the post. The only thing I could figure out is that I attacked feminists.

Somehow feminists, a political formation in the form of a hate movement against men, is somehow in the category of race, sex, gender, religion, or sexual orientation. Obviously feminism is none of these things. The only thing I could figure out is that the mods on his sub are such faggots that they think attacking feminists is the same as attacking women.

Which brings me to another question. All liberal and left women  are feminists. 100%. No exceptions ever for any reason. And worse, close to 100% of liberal and Left men are utterly cucked male feminists. Face it boys, there’s nothing more pathetic than a male feminist. The only real men and real women are found on the Right, which is disgusting. If you’re on the left and you’re a real man, you will get tossed off just like that, with extreme prejudice too. They will order to go over to the conservatives.

Which makes me think: How many rightwing men are conservatives mostly because they are sick and tired of faggotized and pussified left and liberal politics? How many of them are Republicans because the Republican Party is the party of the real men? That’s a dumb reason to vote Republican (What have Republicans ever done for us men?) but most people vote based on the most retarded reasons imaginable that have little or nothing to do with their lives.

How many women have gone rightwing because they like to act feminine? They’re girly girls who love being girly, feminine, and womanish? I’ve talked to many women who told me that the main thing they hate about feminism is how much feminists hate femininity.

It’s true. Feminists do hate femininity.  Of course they do.
They’re dykes and manhaters or both, and they love nothing more than women with short hair wearing pants who are nearly indistinguishable from men. This is how women are supposed to look according to feminists. Like a goddamned butch bull dyke. I’m thinking maybe quite a few real women are voting right simply because they’re disgusted that leftwing women have turned into a bunch of man-hating dykes. They won’t throw you out of the left for being a feminine woman. But you better believe they will throw you out for not being a feminist.

By the way, what in the Hell’s the matter with straight men nowadays? I can’t believe how gay they are. If you’re going to be that gay, why don’t you just quit lying, move to Frisco, and stick a cock in your mouth? Are there any real men at all amongst these Millennials and Gen Z’ers? Almost all of them seem like complete faggots.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: Sex Trafficking: What Is It?

What are the sex trafficking laws all about. You realize that when that term was first invented it referred to people who were prostituted by basically a pimp or a procurer who they work for? Bottom line is they are not free to leave at any point. The employer is keeping them there by threats of violent harm or death if they ever try to leave. They’re basically “sex slaves” in that sense. It’s fairly common.

Girls and women tricked and sent to countries like the US and Israel from Korea, Russia, Ukraine, and Eastern Europe after being promised a legitimate job like waitressing are also being trafficked. Once there, their passports are confiscated, and they are told that there is no waitress job and that they now work in a brothel until they pay off the transport fee. Typically Organized Crime and often has strong links to law enforcement who are presumably paid off.

There is way too much of this bullshit in the prostitution industry, and this is one reason by some feminists have taken up prohibition.

However, there has been gradual language rape concerning the term “sex trafficking” which now cover all sorts of nonsense that the original definition never covered. Some feminists grotesquely abuse this term to say that all prostitutes are “trafficked.” The FBI seems to have been involved in this language abuse. God knows what the Feds or anyone means when they talk about “sex trafficking” these days.

Bottom line: if you are free to leave at any time, you are not being “trafficked.” Lots of prostitutes have pimps who move them around the country, but as they can take off any time they want, they’re not being “trafficked.”

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

PUA/Game: Some Great PUA Wisdom from a Commenter

Excellent comment here

Claudius: I learned this lesson the hard way. Saying or even slightly acting desperate will get you cock-blocked. However, I too am handsome, so maybe that’s why when I play chill, it works. I’ve learned that if I, the man, think and set up the logistics of the hunt, I get laid. If I choose a date spot that’s fun, has booze, and is convenient located near a place where we can comfortably fuck, and the weather is good, all I have to do is bring her to that place.

If I let her, the woman, feel things out, I don’t necessarily get laid. 50/50 shot.

This is interesting. If you think it out, it works. If you let her feel it out, it doesn’t work. Maybe I am wrong letting the woman take charge or at least say so explicitly. I used to not say so explicitly. Instead I did something called “leaving the door open.” That’s an invitation for her to go for it and especially an invitation for her to be a slut. Slut-shaming is disastrous. I don’t know why men hope to have sex by slut-shaming women.

Claudius: Now, if she does fuck you, and you later ignore her, she will get offended, hurt, and then pull away for good. If a non-slut or a trying-to-reform slut fucks you, and you leave her, she wants to validate her thinking and believe  she hasn’t been duped by a player. Hence the annoying calls and clinginess. Now, the smarter the girl, the less annoying she’ll be because she’s aware men don’t like this.

If she has gotten to the point where she is calling you all the time and not the other way around, she’s hooked. I hate to say it but you need to get to the point where you don’t call her that much. You need to get to the point where she asks, “Why don’t you call me?” in her plaintive voice and then sadly calls you a male chauvinist pig.

It sounds insane but women actually want you to ignore them and not call them and be a bit of a bastard in that sense. Perhaps it gives off an abundance mentality. All I know is you calling her day and night as a devoted madly in love man might do probably doesn’t work. She might even leave you! You’re being too nice!

And then when she calls all the time, every now and then insult her and call her a “cling-on” or a “remora” (it’s a fish; look it up). She will get insulted and hurt but then she will back off. Once again you are being a dick, but bizarrely, she actually wants you to be a dick. She wants you to tell her she’s being too clingy and then feel sad afterwards.

Women are crazy. In some ways, they sort of want you to mistreat them somewhat. Not mistreat them a lot or too much, just enough. Perhaps it shows her you are a badass Alpha bastard and not a clingy little Beta bitch. I have no idea. Female psychology is opaque on the best of days. At worst, any roadmap you try to her psyche fails and you are stranded with your hands in the air frustrated at her unfathomable behavior.

I have learned that there is actually a method to women’s madness. People think that people do things for no reason. I used to think this. Actually almost everything people do is for a reason. Put that idea into your head and walk around and see how the world lights up for you now. They might do things for bad reasons, yes. If they’re crazy, they seem to do senseless things. But even crazy people are usually doing their crazy stuff for a reason. It’s just that they’re doing it for a crazy reason, that’s all!

Women aren’t actually insane, even if they seem to be so. The average “crazy” woman often has no diagnosable DSM disorder, so she’s not mentally ill or crazy. And most women’s craziness is not even abnormal! It’s simply completely normal for women to be a little nutty like this. They are wired up this way. Perhaps if we men had that infernal hormonal stew boiling in our bodies, we might act pretty nutty too.

I have heard of MtF transsexuals, some of them hard stoics, who turned into complete basket cases on female hormones. They were emotionally out of control most of the  time, had crying jags for no reason, and felt nonfunctional.

Considering that this is probably what’s going on in most women’s minds, I think women do a commendable job of keeping their shit together most of the time. Apparently they have learned to navigate this emotional hurricane and probably even control it most of the time.

The only reason they do this is because society and especially we men demand that they do. Where women are told that it is unladylike, dirty, slutty, or acting like “a woman of the streets” to be a basket case, women are quite stable. My Mom’s generation and class was very stable. Society simply demanded that they be this way. In return, their husbands were quite kind to them and supported them. It was a deal. You act sane and turn off your hurricane in your head and I support you, love you, and treat you well. Plus you get some self-respect for keeping your shit together.

Claudius: This has happened to me all the time. I screw girl once or twice. Then don’t talk to her for over a month because I really don’t give a fuck, and then crickets. There’s some maintenance work that has to be done in any relationship with a woman, even if all you want is a fuck buddy. Why? Because non-hooker women don’t have fuck buddies, only men do.

This is perfect. I’ve been meaning to say this for a long time. I don’t think women can really have sex without love. My Mom says they can’t or at least it’s very hard to. These new generations of women think they can act like men and do this, but they seem to be fooling themselves. I know a woman in her 30’s who’s had sex without love her whole life. She’s now over 100 men. She told me the other day that she’s never enjoyed sex one time. Masturbation is more fun. Why? Because for women, sex without love is often unfulfilling.

I believe that women may be able to handle a FWB thing for 2-3 months. Most sources say that after that, she’s simply going to start falling in love with you. Sugar daddies warn other men not to get too close to their sugar babies because they often fall in love with you when you do so.

And in my life, I’ve been shocked at how many times women I am dating seem to be falling in love with me. I think women fall in love all the time, but it ranges from falling a bit in love to falling crazy in love. “Love” as a word has no definition anyway.

I thought I must be some Alpha, but maybe it’s down to my purported good looks. Maybe women have a hard time fucking Chad without falling at least a bit in love. In fact, I have had women who had short relationships and broke it off with me apparently to keep from falling in love with me. I think this is what a lot of women’s one night stands are all about.

On the other hand, maybe it’s not down to looks, and it’s just a female tendency with most any man.

Claudius: If a woman fucks you more than once, she’s trying to marry you even if he’s not consciously aware of it. Hookers and one-night-stand girls have high sex drives. Don’t go looking for a wife there.

Yes. I am amazed at how quickly women fall in love with me. Often within a week or two of talking or even a day or even 15 minutes (!), they are asking me to come stay with them or move in with them.

So yes, a lot of women do act like they want to marry me in a sense. That’s what a woman in love looks and talks like. She acts like she wants to marry you. She usually wants to move in or for you to move in with her. I have no idea why they do this “I want to marry you” thing so quickly with me. It may be down supposed handsome looks once again. Maybe a lot of women want to marry Chad. That’s the idea, right? Prince in shining armor. The theme of most romance novels. I don’t know if women fall in love this fast with average or unattractive men.

Claudius: But the average chick has to go through a long self-brainwashing process to be willing to jump in the sack with a man.

Like Robert said in an earlier post, even if they want to fuck you, it doesn’t mean they will. They have to submit a 300-page long document to their Internal Statue Bureaucracy in their minds and get a dozen stamps of approval before those panties come off. Hence the need for men to ignore all soft “No”s from a woman. That’s just some low-level bureaucrat in her mind trying to disqualify you.

Well, of course, but we men also don’t understand. Don’t you men realize that women like to fantasize too, just like men? A woman might meet 10,000 guys who turn her on like Hell in a lifetime. Her horny brain probably fantasizes about having sex with them or at least wonders what it would be like. Now how many women fuck 10,000 men in a lifetime? And even if she thinks you’re hot as Hell, she might not want to have sex. I have had young women recently gushing over how handsome I am. Did they want to have sex? Not really. Or only for money. Money or dope. They were basically whores and meth addicts.

I learned long ago while still a teenager that the trick of getting women into bed is to shut off that damned brain of hers. The bureaucracy above is the Hamster Wheel. And boy, that does wheel spin and spin when a woman is thinking whether or not to have sex with a new person. Once you shut off her brain, she will go into purely emotional mode, and her body will probably get horny as Hell and tell her to have sex. With her brain shut off, she’s more likely to have sex. The more she thinks about it, the less likely she is to do it.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: Women Deal with Loneliness and Lack of Sex Better Than Men

Women can definitely deal with loneliness and lack of sex better than men can, and it’s all down to that unfathomable entity known as the female sex drive.

The thing is that while women have an extremely strong sex drive in a sense (provided someone turned it on in the first place – preferably Chad!), it differs from the male in that women can simply take sex or leave it if so desired. We are now starting to see some women say:

Damn, I need some cock!

You didn’t hear that so much in the past, but I had 18 year old girls telling me things along those lines back in 1975:

Damn I am getting so horny these days, I swear I’m going to have to shove a bottle up there.

But she had a very strong sex drive in addition to being an extreme slut, bless her whorish heart.

In men, sex is quite different. It’s like an itch that you can’t scratch when you do without it. Sure, we can always jerk off to deal with the physical problem, but that’s often not satisfactory, and it’s hard to do if you live with other people. Furthermore, masturbation doesn’t take care of the urge.

Of course, in the Current Year, women also masturbate like crazy, while it seems they didn’t so much back in the day – we have created a society of female masturbating maniacs! God bless my depraved generation!

They masturbate but they need sex too, just like men. I had a female best friend who used to tell me things like:

Damn, I am so horny these days, I’m just going to have to grab some guy and rape him!

And she masturbated all the time. I would be texting her and she would say:

Excuse me, I’m going to go masturbate.

Can you imagine a woman saying such a thing?!

She’d come back in 45 minutes and say:

Damn, that was good!

On a sex subreddit called Stupid Sluts Club (highly recommended!) a young woman described how she was horny as Hell. She was masturbating all the time, but that wasn’t cutting it, so she started having sex with her female roommate, though she was basically straight.

And while things are changing somewhat, women are sadly not turning into men. Women can still take sex or leave it without a lot of pain or damage.

The sex drive is not so much physical in men, though the physical aspect is undeniable. For instance, a young man who does not ejaculate for a few days starts to experience actual pain in his testicles (blue balls).

Women don’t seem to experience such a thing, though there have been reports of women feeling some sort of a “female blue balls” in their abdomen above the pubic area if they go without orgasm for too long.

But at least back in the day, many women were non-orgasmic or rarely orgasmic. Back then it was ~30% of women. I’d say it’s a lot less now, but there are probably still non-orgasmic women. That 30% of women at any time can be unable to reach orgasm while remaining that way for years on end implies that female blue balls is probably not a serious problem.

Almost no males are non-orgasmic. There’s virtually no such thing.

Much more important than the physical aspect of sex is the psychological one. A man without sex has a huge hole in his life psychologically and perhaps even more importantly socially. The longer it goes on, the more they deteriorate. We see the logical result of this in the incel phenomenon. The incels are not evil like the cucks and soyboys say. Incel behavior is simply the natural and normal consequence of what happens to large groups of men who are denied sex over a long period.

Many become depressed and withdrawn, quite a few become very angry in a seething sort of way, and a few of those become explosively violent, often resulting in serious massacres. To show it is not a unique Western problem, long-term incel Chinese men have been going on murderous rampages for a long time now, even massacring large numbers of kindergartners!

So, tl/dr: Women love sex but ultimately a lot can take it or leave it. Men have a much more insistent sex drive and cannot take or leave sex. They have to have it and if they don’t, serious psychopathology results.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: After Menopause, All Women Are Born-Again Virgins

As she ages, my Mom is turning into a worse and worse feminist every year. I hardly even knew she was one before.

This is happening in tandem with her increasing puritanism. Same thing: every year, she gets more and more puritanical and weird about sex. She was always like that a bit, but at least you could talk to her about it, and to some extent she was always proud of me in a sort of “my son, the stud” sort of way. She always thought my playboy ways were hilarious and she would almost fall on the floor laughing at my latest exploits. That makes sense as most women, and humans in general (even some little kids) think players are funny as Hell for some reason.

And of course, feminism is intimately tied in with puritanism and has been from day one. It makes sense as feminism is simply female thinking empowered, reified and increasingly legislated to become the ruling force in society. Feminist Rule is nothing but Female Thought in Power. And puritanism, along with, oddly enough, nymphomania, is part of the Female Character.

Her increasing puritanism got me to thinking. Menopause nukes your sex drive. Women with no or low sex drives tend to become puritanical anyway,  and the longer they stay that way, the worse they get. So my theory now is that increasing puritanism is something all postmenopausal women experience. It may well get worse with time too, as so many miserable things do.

Postmenopausal women for all intents and purposes turn into complete prudes and born-again virgins. I’ve seen complete whore to nun conversions, just like that! Snap of the fingers.

Postmenopausal women a few years out of menopause (they stay horny for a couple of years for some reason) are basically insufferable, and I don’t want anything to do with them. I’ve been battling puritanical shitwads my whole life. I’m sick and tired of them and their crap.

Postmenopausal women don’t fuck anyway, so what’s the point? Why even be with a woman if she doesn’t fuck? That’s pretty much the only reason to be with her anyway, right?

I’ve got my porn and my hand, and neither one ever turns me down.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

PUA/Game: The Primary Goal of a Woman’s Life Is To Achieve and Be in Love

Good point. Women always talk about wanting “commitment.” But women are hardly honest about a single thing they say in the Gender Wars. There’s too much at stake. Dated a lot of women and I’ve hardly met one who cared about commitment. Don’t think it was ever mentioned to me once. But one thing I noticed over and over was that the most important thing in the relationship to the woman was love – that she was in love with me.

Beyond that and interacting with many women over the years, it’s obvious that the primary female drive is for love. They often idealize this is preposterous ways that make any sense but boil down to them not liking it being trivialized.

Woman: “That’s not true love…that’s not real love…that’s not love, that’s infatuation, etc.”

Me: “What’s not true love?”

Woman: 100 million completely arbitrary, idiotic and completely unscientific notions. “True love is for life,” and other nonsense.

There’s a good reason for most of women’s ridiculous and irrational behavior, and the good reason behind this is that they dislike the idea of love being trivialized.

Why? Because several decades of studying women have shown me that the primary female drive is for love. In a sense, this is what their whole life is wrapped up in. Sure, they have all these other things, career and whatnot going on, but all of that pales compared to the primary drive or goal of a woman’s life: to achieve love and to be in love.

Even with women who say they don’t know what love is or they’ve never experienced love, the primary drive for love is there. These often young women are confused because they think they have not experienced real love yet.

Having been involved with some young women like that who were obviously crazy in love with me for a while (but then of course denied it later), it was clear that they simply had not developed a schema of what love was that they could plug their feelings into.

Also, I think they were looking for the fireworks, sparks, and “Hollywood love affair of the century” notion of love, and most love isn’t really that intense. They fall in love, but it’s not the explosions and fireworks kind they expect, so they say it’s not love. Or if they are a young woman, they fall in love, are ashamed of it, so they deny it later on.

I had a couple of young women do this but it was obviously that they fell out of love with me at some point, and then felt terribly ashamed of themselves for falling in love with a man 30-40 years older than they were, so they denied it.  In one case, I was 58 and she was 27 (31 year age gap),  and in the other case, I was 59 and she was 18 (41 year age gap).

These women were wrong of course, but women are wrong about a million things, and this bothers them not.

Some seek refuge in a ridiculous concept called Aromanticism. I had a female best friend who insisted she was aromantic. Studying the concept, I decided she could not possibly be one, plus they whole concept was a bit silly they way it was laid out.

Supposedly there are all these folks out there who desperately want love, but they have a genetic or biological inability to fall in love which prevents them from doing so. That’s nonsense. There are no such people. Real aromantics are just cold fish who have chosen to not experience love because, well, because they’re cold fish! It’s a disorder of choice like so of these stupid new Millennial identities, most of which don’t even exist in any real way.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

PUA/Game: Women Are Not Irrational – They Are Just Employing a Different Kind of Logic

To women, being wrong or right is not important. What is important is that they feel that certain things are right or wrong. Whether they really are or not is of no consequence. She’s not trying to be right at all costs. She’s trying to feel good, avoid painful confusion and cognitive dissonance and probably to keep from falling into depression or killing herself. If women do this to keep from killing themselves and to keep on trucking in life with a happy smile, I’m not going to fault them.

Female Emotional Logic:

Is this idea true or false?

Does it make me feel good,  calm, comfortable and at ease? Does it line up with the way I think the world should be, not how it is? It is true.

Does it make me feel bad, depressed, confused, suicidal, or anxious? Does it conflict with the way I think the world should be (not how it actually is, as this is of little importance to women)? It is false.

In other words, to women, there’s no such thing as the ugly truth. If it’s ugly, it’s untrue. Real simple.

And to some extent, there are no such thing as pretty lies, though they definitely grow more cynical and less utopian as they grow older. If it’s pretty, it’s true.

Women are utopians. If you understand one thing about women, understand this. And pretty lies are the very definition of utopia.

It’s not that it’s irrational logic so much as it’s what I call emotional logic – the logic is emotionally driven and it is logical in an emotional sense. When men say women are irrational what they are really saying is that women are using emotional logic instead of the logic of pure, cold, objective thought.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: Of Course I’m Not a Misogynist

Polar Bear: He’s pro-woman at his core but is suffering a bit of racial ageism.

Of course. I’ve always liked women better than men. If I had my way, I’d just be around women all the time or as much of the time as possible. I love being around guys too, but women are better in a way.As you can see, if I like women better than men, I’m obviously a misogynist, right? Feminists are so full of shit.

But in a way it’s a circular argument because no matter what, you will be around men.

You don’t like women much? Ok, you will be around men.

You like women as much as men? Ok, you will be around men half the time at least.

You like women better than men? The weird thing is that even there you will have men around a lot because if you are around women all the time, pretty soon you will have guys hanging around because “I want to hang out with the guy who has all the chicks around him.” Get the picture?

I’m almost like a gay man in that sense. In fact, I used to think I was like “one of women’s gay friends, except I’m straight.”

I agree that I am “one of the girls” in a sense. But I’m not really. I’m just pretending to be one of the girls. I’m really an evil spy pretending to be one of the girls except I’m secretly a guy infiltrating them in order to deviously trick, fool, and scam them into having sex with me.

Part of my brain is like a woman’s brain, so in a way, I think like a woman. That’s why I understand women pretty well. Most women’s conversation seems insipid to us men – hot guys, makeup, clothes, gossip, bla bla, lot of silly giggling and verbal hugging. It’s just pure idiocy. They seem like children.

But I’ve heard that women think the same of us when we get together with fart jokes, sports, and arguing politics. Men are insipid to them.

So I can sit around with a bunch of women being women and doing their girl chat, completely idiotic and senseless, like chirping birds fighting for no reason at your feeder, and I’m right at home amidst all this silliness and idiocy. Sure it is silly and idiotic, but I love it because I even love women when they are being idiotic. Because I’m sort of one myself.

Now mind you I am not a tranny at all. I love being a man and I respect any man, especially a gay man, who loves being a man. I’m also as masculine as any man that ever lived in a sense, and that’s my primary self-image. So I don’t hate being a man and wish I was a woman.

Women weren’t being very nice to me a while ago, but I completely changed my looks. I have long hair now, look like a 1970’s glam rock star, and now women are being way, way nicer. See how shallow women are? Pathetic, isn’t it?

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: Permanent Ban from r/Communism

On Reddit. Oh well. I am starting to think I am not much of a Commie anyway. Western Commies are the most insane feminists and SJW’s of them all. They’re almost all full-blown radical feminists of the worst kind, and most Western Communist groups are flooded with non-heterosexuals and nonbinary gender types, and they have the worst of those two also.

I was reading one forum and ~half of the posters were non-heterosexual and gender nonbinary. Recommended reading was some radical feminist lesbian manhating psycho on “mandatory heterosexuality,” or some crap. I said I’m out and quit reading and let them have their pervert misandrist jerk-off session.

The group I got banned from recently posted saying that all Communist countries had banned porn and that porn would be banned in their future dream society. Every Communist guerrilla group that forms local rule puts the women in charge. It causes the usual chaos that Female Rule always does anywhere. Guess what the first thing they do is? Ban booze, gambling, and porn. The three things that keep most of us guys from blowing our brains out. Brilliant!

I made ~two posts there and then I was banned. I didn’t say anything bad at all. I asked why I got banned and got a response:

No misogynists.

I guess he read through my posting history. I told my partial roommate about this, and he gave me this puzzled look like:

You? A misogynist? WTF! That’s total bullshit LOL!

I said I know and we laughed about it. Then we talked about how Western Communists sucked. He said:

It’s nothing but a bunch of niggers and Mexicans and fags. They hate Whites and men. That’s why I never wanted any part of it.

I basically agreed with him, without the slurs that is.

I also find it laughable that I am a misogynist. When I see hardcore misogyny online, a lot of times, it makes me throw my head back in shock and disgust. I dislike it on a visceral level. Obviously with reactions like that, I must be a horrible misogynist, huh?

My feelings towards women do range from love all the way to hate and everything in between though, I agree. But they’re mostly on the positive side. I don’t want to be a woman-hater. It doesn’t feel good.

Also women were so good to me when I was young that I really can’t hate them. I will love them forever for the kindness that they showed to me then. And yes, kindness is the right word. They treated me like a was a prince or a cool new toy to play with and pass around to their friends for them to play with. But that’s ok. I didn’t mind being a meat puppet. That was obviously for a completely shallow reason called Looks, but hey, humans are shallow.

Women from 18-55 pretty much treat me like dirt now (but not always). I must say that if they had treated me my whole life they way they treat me now, I would definitely hate women. I mean you hit a man enough times, he might start hitting back. Those poor incels have been treated like human garbage by females their whole pitiful lives. I don’t blame them for hating women. Who wouldn’t?

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: We Men in the West Lost Control of Our Women and Let Them Run Wild

Pantheist: What if you convince women to stop acting like children the same way we convinced some Blacks to “Whiten up”. Transcend their nature.

Sure, they did it in my Mom’s time, but that time is over. All women are feminists now, and most of them are feral.

We’ve let our women run loose by not controlling them like we should have. The results are not pretty and are all around us.

The new generations of women do not want to transcend their nature. Feminism has told them that it’s cool to act crazy and attack, fight, scream at, hate, humiliate, and emasculate men.

Modern women like to do all of these things, and feminism has even encouraged them to act crazy because when they act crazy, it’s never their fault. It’s all the fault of men. So women have permission to go completely crazy, fall apart, act wild, and wage war on men. Modern women actually enjoy doing all of these things because female nature wants to act like this.

Women in my Mom’s generation were taught that you didn’t do these things unless you had a damned good reason.

In answer to the commenter’s question about women acting like children, women wish to act like children because this is their nature. Also, feminism completely infantalizes women and treats them like children who lack agency and can be convinced by evil men to do just about anything.

How many times have we heard “that’s not consent?” We say that teenage girls are too young to consent to sex because they are not mature enough (which is bullshit), but we treat grown women in the exact same way.

Feminism says women lack agency and are just puppets or marionettes that can be manipulted by evil men into doing things they don’t want to do even though they say they do because these nonhuman muppets are incapable of saying no or stopping sexual advances.

That’s why we have crazy new cases where

  • where we men have to read woman’s minds to figure out if she wants to have sex or not
  • where women consent but they didn’t really “mean it,” so it’s not consent
  • where women can be talked or pressured into sex despite their consent which means that they lack agency and it’s not consent
  • where drunk or loaded women are not responsible for anything they do, so any sexual decisions they make are not consent
  • where women consent to sex but then regret it the next morning so that’s not consent retroactively
  • where women get to decide 10-20 after they consented to a sex act whether they really and truly and for real consented and they can decide that it wasn’t really consent

and all sort of other crazy nonsense.

In all of these cases, women are being treated like children who are too immature to consent to sex and hence lack agency.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: Face It, Men: Your Girlfriend or Wife Is Your Surrogate Mother

Sometimes if you want to role-play with your girlfriend, you can go into “little boy” mode where you’re the little boy, and your gf is your Mom. You talk like a little boy and to some extent act like one but not too much. It’s not serious or real. It’s just a big joke.

I’ve done that with a few childless girlfriends aged 29 to 49, and they all loved it. I was their son! You would think they would make fun of and ridicule me, but they really got into it. Some women hate it though, think it’s stupid, and won’t play the game.

Anyway, your girlfriend really is your mother. Face it, your girlfriend or your wife replaces your Mom. We men go from Mom to girlfriend or wife, and really nothing changes.

A few men are ridiculous about it. I could give you examples, but the wife actually didn’t mind and still loved the guy to death, though frankly he was a huge pussy.

Men are too macho to admit that their girlfriends or wives become not only our lovers, yes, but also our Moms. When men become elderly, this idea of the wife turning into the Mom becomes much more obvious, often glaringly so. Some men don’t even try to hide it much.

We men are not good at taking care of ourselves. A lot of divorced men can’t even fend for their own. They fall apart quickly when they live alone, and quite a few get sick or die fairly quickly. These guys are like little boys without a Mom living on their own. How long would a boy last in the woods without Mom? These men literally need a wife or girlfriend to stay alive. We men like to think we are self-reliant, but we need to think about that.

Actually bachelors fend a lot better on their own than divorced men. And the longer they have been bachelors, the better they get at it. Most of the long-term bachelors I know are fairly decent cooks. Most can do their own laundry. Most are good about going to the doctor, and they are almost female about it.

And I know bachelors who keep in contact with their mothers regularly, so even though they don’t have the surrogate mother in terms of wife or girlfriend, they still keep the real thing around on some level anyway.

Some even talk to Mom almost every day. They usually live away from her, but they’re on the phone to her a lot, or she’s on the phone to them. The mother doesn’t usually run the guy’s life if he’s a real man – he’ll tell her to piss off if she does, and most mothers will back off because instinctively they know that being party to a Momma’s boy is not cool.

So most bachelors more or less do whatever they want, especially sexually with regard to women, and their mothers have no say in the matter. My Mom’s been my playboy cheerleader most of her life. She’s like:

Go get em, stud! I’m so proud of my playboy son ha ha.

She even used to fix me up with her friends.

Mom: Hey Bob, you know my friend XXXXX?

Me: Yeah?

Mom: She wants to go out with you.

Now she’s turning into a prude in her old age (80’s), and I have been told she does not want to hear about my exploits anymore. In particular, she doesn’t want to hear about me being with teenage girls and young women. That pisses her off.

But these bachelors are still in a way being mothered by their Moms. Some still bring their clothing over to do laundry if they live close. Others have Moms that give them food or help them out with money if they need it. More typically, they have their Moms call them and remind them of stuff they need to do, like doctor’s appointments or important affairs that they tend to blow off.

I actually do all of these things, and I am not embarrassed to say so. Why should I be? She doesn’t tell me what to do. I live my own life. She’s not my Mommy anymore in that sense.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: Women Are “Forever Children” Because They Evolved That Way to Raise Children

Polar Bear: Women are “forever children” as has been said here, perhaps to better raise children.

Exactly! Perfect.

I was thinking this just the other day. I was discussing it with my Mom carefully (she’s a feminist), and she agreed with you and me on this issue! We both agreed that in order to raise kids best, a woman has to think like a child or relate to a child on a child’s level. Most men see an infant and think, “Like Hell I’m taking care of that little shit. At the very least it’s boring. At worst it will puke, piss, or shit on me. Plus it won’t stop crying.”

I had a girlfriend once who was a married woman. She talked to me about when she had her first kid. She would actually climb in the playpen with that kid and play goo-goo gaga with it all day long. She told  me:

That was a very special time for me. Just me and the baby.

Face it, no human can do that unless they think like a child on some very basic level.

I could not imagine myself spending all day in the crib with some idiotic infant making faces at it. I’d be bored out of my skull, and I’m sure most men feel the same. But for women, they’re in their happy place.

On an instinctive level, women love kids. If they don’t have kids, they develop surrogate children with pets and such. Or they become foster mothers. I dated a woman who had never had kids but had been a foster mother to maybe five kids.

I can’t tell you how many times I have seen  a woman with a baby in a public place. Look around at how the other women look at the baby. I have seen huge smiles burst onto the faces of even older women in their 50’s.

When my sister was very little, my Mom took her to the toy store. She saw the dolls and she grabbed one and cradled it to her chest. She said, “Daaaa!”

It’s a damned instinct.

I had two long-term girlfriends recently, one 48 and the other 51. Neither had had kids, though one lost a kid via a miscarriage. They both had dogs which were essentially surrogate children, especially for one of the women. He was her baby! She also talked all the time about this little boy she had taken care of for a long time. She couldn’t stop talking about him.

Get it?

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

PUA/Game: The Lowdown on Dating Much Younger Women If You Are a Middle Aged Man

Even though I am over 60, I still date young women at times, all the way down to their 20’s or even 18 or 19. But it’s is extremely hard, with like a 98+% rejection rate. It’s like climbing a mountain. Yeah, you can do it, but most guys won’t bother because it’s so hard. It also gets harder every year, and most guys definitely cannot pull this off. Vast majority of young women are not into men 20-40 years older, but there are a few, that’s for sure.

I have to fight a tsunami of rejection and even anger and hatred to get those few with Daddy issues who will go out with me for free. I’ve been banned from establishments for merely talking to young women, not even flirting with them or asking them out.

Nevertheless, I have young women age 18-29 coming to me almost every day asking to be my sugar baby. They want me to be their sugar daddy. I’m as broke as they are though.

Woman on the Net who is opposed to these relationships: You can maybe get away with it if you are already very attractive or you have a lot of money.

Supposedly, when I was young I was very handsome. I lived Chad’s life for many years. People kept saying this about me into my 50’s, and even at my age, I hear it all the time.
Even women age 18-23 tell me all the time that I am handsome, very handsome, cute, sexy, or hot. I don’t get it, as I think my looks are shot. So I guess in my case it’s looks.

How to Pull It Off

It helps to be in the top 10-20% of looks for your age, not be overweight, be well-spoken, well-groomed, hygienic, and very polite or even classy, and dress halfway decently. It absolutely helps to have any kind of status at all, be it Power, Fame, Money, or Status, in any dose at all but the more the better.

It also helps to be wise and intelligent, as these young women are looking for a mentor to be “the adult in my life” as a 20 year old hottie with model good looks recently told me.

You definitely need great Game, helpfully honed over a lifetime. And you need to not be creepy in the rational sense of the word that even most men would agree is creeptastic. Anyway if you are that creepy, you automatically have shit Game anyway.

Woman on the Net who is opposed to these relationships: Women are not attracted to receding hairlines, wrinkles, or a flat tire around the waist.

I don’t have a receding hairline. Not even 1%.

I have few wrinkles, some around my belly that you never see.

I do not have a beer belly or at least not much of one. I was in bed with a 19 year old recently and I complained that I had a belly and she said, “No way! Most men your age are overweight, some by a lot!”

Problems

There are problems.

Potency and sexual ability issues. At my age, tragically, there are potency problems. I’m not impotent but it’s touch and go if you catch my drift. Yes, you don’t need a cock to please a woman, but a lot of young women want to be fucked and even get creampies. They’re disappointed if it’s not working. Also a lot of young women are cumsluts nowadays (ha ha), and they want huge loads. Loads that we cannot supply.

We can’t fuck as long as when we were young. I used to be able to keep it up for 3-4 hours at a time. Not nowadays and I often get off quick too.

Sex drive mismatch. Most young women have raging sex drives, especially nowadays with all this online porn. They’re almost all masturbating, often every day. Some watch a lot of porn or even have their own porn blogs! Her sex drive will be way stronger than yours. That’s a problem.

The relationships are highly unstable, characterized by a lot of wild love/hate fluctuation. She’s basically a huge drama queen. The relationships tend to blow up, often very quickly, and  after that, she’s just about your worst enemy.

The young women who go for older men are often not right in the head. 75% of the ones I have been with were actively suicidal, at least at times.

Peer pressure is a problem. I was with an 18 year old girl who fell crazy in love with me at age 59 (believe it not), but her friends saw her with me and openly ridiculed her. Relationship over.

Prepare to get called “pedophile” a lot, especially by young men. Of course you’re not, as you are adults, but still, steel yourself for a lot of name-calling.

Prepare to lose friends. I had a good friend, a physician, dump me when I told him I was dating a 19 year old girl at 60.

Prepare for hate from older women. And it will be really bad too. They really hate us cradle robbers.

You will never meet her parents because her Dad might punch you or try to kill you.

You will never meet her siblings because she will be too embarrassed to introduce them to you.

Prepare for possible legal consequences. A 19 year old girl I was dating had a 17 year old friend (total knockout) who also wanted me and kept trying to send me dirty pics I had to delete. She  kept bugging me:

I want you to eat my pussy! Pleeeease!

It was rather hard to keep turning her down. Part of me really wanted to do it. They both wanted a threeway. That’s probably every man’s dream: to have a threeway with two hotties, one 19 and the other 17, when you are 60 fucking years old!  How many guys  get to do that?

I said no and the 19 year old really pestered me about it. A weak man would have given in.

You have to be strong not to mess with an underage girl. You can be friends with them, but you can’t do anything sexual. I met an 18 year old girl two weeks shy of her 18th birthday and she wanted in. We hung out a lot, held hands, hugged, put our arms around each other, and kissed on the cheek.

She had never been kissed and of course was a virgin. Both of these things are way more common at that age than you think. She kept pestering me for a makeout session or at least a tongue kiss, and it took all I could muster not to cave and do it.

The Good Side

As you can see there are a mountain of problems with these relationships.

But there is a great bright side. Most middle aged men will never fuck a teenage girl or woman in their 20’s again. Maybe 10% can pull it off. And all men that age want to do it. So if you pull it off, you are living the life of Riley that most men only ever dream about.

Other men will treat you like a hero. If you are not arrogant about it, the praise feels damn good.

Quite a few women are turned on by the fact that you can pull this off.

Quite a few women are turned on by the fact that you can pull this off. Of all ages. Even older men. I’ve had women in their 40’s hear that I do this and start addressing me as “hey stud.” You get a lot of this.

You can be her father and her lover. Get over it. You’re her Daddy figure. She will call you Daddy in bed all the time, and this time she means it.

A lot want to do weird age-play where they are younger than they are – teenage girls down to 12-17. If you are creeped out by incest play this is not for you.

You are her mentor if you are a good man. You can teach her all about life! She doesn’t know shit really so you will be teaching her basic life skills every single day.

If you are highly intelligent, that’s good because now you are her teacher, and her head is getting filled with new facts all the time.

You can be her counselor and play therapist with her if that’s your thing. She’ll need it anyway. So a lot of psychological self-help.

You are imparting a lot of wisdom to her. Like every day, more wisdom and aphorisms. She may fall in love with your mind if you are intelligent, and tell you she’s fucking you for your mind. She will also saw in awe that you are very wise.

I used to be a teacher, so I love this. You will never see a young person learn more than this. Every day she gets her head full of all these new things and it’s cool because you can watch another human learn at a monumental pace.

If you are good, she will actually end up smarter and will be life and social skills than most of her peers so it’s good for her in that sense. You are teaching her all about sex too. Most are pretty inexperienced.

You are her cheerleader. She has a ton of insecurities and typically with the Daddy issues comes serious low self esteem. So you are always trying to boost her up and get her to feel better about herself.

Is it worth it? Do you like to live dangerously? If you like to live dangerously and have all sorts of bad things happen to get the good things (like a hike in the jungle), then it’s worth it. But a lot of older men probably don’t want all the typical drama and chaos that comes with your typical young women. They probably get enough of that crap with women their own age, and it’s way worse with young women because so many are quite unstable.

I still date women my age and women in their 30’s-50’s, and honestly they are superior to young things in a lot of ways!

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: Tammy Wynette, “Stand by Your Man”

Tammy Wynette, “Stand by Your Man,” from 1968! One of the greatest country songs ever written!

Lyrics, simple but just perfect:

Sometimes it’s hard to be a woman
Giving all your love to just one man
You’ll have bad times
And he’ll have good times
Doin’ things that you don’t understand
But if you love him you’ll forgive him
Even though he’s hard to understand
And if you love him oh be proud of him
‘Cause after all he’s just a man

Stand by your man
Give him two arms to cling to
And something warm to come to
When nights are cold and lonely

Stand by your man
And show the world you love him
Keep giving all the love you can
Stand by your man

Stand by your man
And show the world you love him
Keep giving all the love you can
Stand by your man

Tammy Wynette,  “Stand by Your Man” Live. A bit later in her career.

She wasn’t very famous before this, but after this, she was a superstar.

Tammy once said:

I spent 15 minutes writing this song and an entire lifetime defending it.

Exactly.

And isn’t that why this song is just so great?

In 2010, this song was selected by the Library of Congress to add to the National Recording Registry, for songs that “culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant.” In other words, that Registry is for the greatest songs ever written in America!

The Alt Left officially endorses this song, by the way. After all, we are the “Conservative Left” – liberals and Leftists who are at least somewhat conservative on social issues. I’m sure feminists hate the idea of this song, but they can go pound sand! I never knew how great this song was before.

Like most Leftists, I hated this song because it was anti-feminist and oppressed women and all that crap. It was a song for Republican social conservatives. Except it’s not and it wasn’t.

But that was before I had a few girlfriends who actually, literally, stood by their man, meaning me, that is. One was Jewish! Would you expect a Jewish woman to do that? Well, who knows?

The feeling of having a woman who will stand by your side through thick and thin and especially to live her life through yours is one of the greatest highs a man can experience in this life. Better than sex. Better than love. Well, it’s love with an extra helping of chocolate syrup on top, let’s put it that way. But what a syrup that is!

The strange thing is that a woman who truly loves you actually wants to be like this. She wants to stand by her man. She wants to live her life through you. She wants to be dead jealous of you.

I had one girlfriend who was so jealous of me that she used to say, “I will cut a bitch! No woman is getting near my man!” Stand by your man!

She told me she had a tattoo on her ankle, and I told her I didn’t like tattoos. She immediately resolved to remove the tattoo! If my man wants my tattoo off, it’s coming off! Stand by your man!

Hey, I like that! She wants to dress you in the morning, pick your clothes and cologne, watch you shave, iron your shirts, and listen intently to how your day went when you come home. Stand by your man!

I think most of you men on here really do want a “stand by your man” woman. Trust me, there’s no better kind.

This must be a deep-rooted need in women, in tandem with femininity, submission, a need to be dominated, ferocious jealousy in keeping other women away from her prized man. It’s got to be genetic.

If you have ever seen a woman dissolve into femininity (often because she is madly in love with you or very turned on by you sexually) you will see that she seems to melt in place right there. You can tell that she’s in her special place; she’s hitting her sweet spot. Deep down inside, this is where most women truly long to be.

Feminism is a lie. It tells women that femininity is evil and oppressive. Like Hell it is. It’s the life blood of womankind. Take it away and they go nuts. Look at modern women. Look at how nuts they are. They’re having their femininity taken away from them. Of course they’re going nuts. How else would they act? They think this is what they want because feminism lied to them and told them that and believed and fell for it. Of course it was a lie.

Once again, the Cultural Left goes to bat against Nature and the weight of 200,000 years. And once again, Mother Nature on the mound mows down another row of the Left’s pathetic pinch-hitters.

Mother Nature 200,000,  Cultural Left 0.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: The “Older Men Who Go for Young Women Are Losers Who Go for Easy Pickings Because Can’t Get a Woman Their Own Age” Lie

I’ve dated women this age off and on since I was in my early 40’s ( a lot at the beginning of the period, much fewer lately), and trust me when I say it’s not so easy to get them into bed. Hell, it’s like pulling hen’s teeth to even get them to go out with you because 99% of them think you’re a gross old man.

There’s only a few young women that age who even want to go for an older guy.

Girls that age are also extremely moody, temperamental, and nutty, so I’d say that they call you out on your bullshit all the time. The last two I dated were both suicidal. Older women are so much more stable.

The girls I dated got angry at me many times when I was with them, usually over ridiculous nonsense. It’s not like they’re going to go along with everything you suggest.

When I was 18-21, quite a few of my friends were dating underage girls 14-17. The men were not immature as everyone thinks. They were Alphas who were bedding women of all ages. The jailbaits made a beeline straight for the best men of all my age and bypassed everyone else. I never heard any of these guys say these girls were easy prey. They said it was not so easy to get them into bed, a lot were still wary virgins, etc.

Nothing changes are men age. Young women and teenage girls still head straight for the Alphas. Look a the women prominent JB’s have ended up with: movie stars, rock stars, billionaires, movie directors. They head straight for the top. They’re worse than the women our age!

This “older men who go for teenage girls or young women because they are losers and women their age won’t tolerate their crap” is nonsense. I’ve never met an older man who was too immature for women his age, so he went for young women because they were easy targets. I think it’s a fairy tale or urban legend, frankly.

First of all, almost any older man who can land a girl that age is usually doing great with women his age. Hell, why do you think the girl went for him in the first place? Anyway, those girls complain a lot and are very easily annoyed by all sorts of things.

I would not say they call you out on your bullshit less than older women do. But they see right through you just like an older woman does. An 18 or 19 year old will figure you out real quick and expose your true self to you, good and bad, gifts and flaws, better than your therapist, just like any woman, really.

All females will tend to call you on your shit. But if you are older man with very young women, they will get angry a lot, and when they do, they will insult you horribly. Typically they will call you an old man, which, even if it is true, hurts. They will attack your looks and practically say you are ugly or at least you are not as hot as men her age.

Now about this BS about older men who go for young women being losers who can’t get a woman their own age…

Haha. Guess who made up this stupid lie? Women! Especially, guess who? Ding! Right! Older women. Why, of course, what did you expect? Why?

Because a lot of older men chase younger women, and this really burns older women up basically because they know they can’t compete with young hotties. So they resort to making up lies about older men who chase younger women in order to try to shame these men and make them stop and to make these older women themselves feel better about losing some high-quality older man dick.

Women are so transparent. Their lies are so obvious and pathetic that’s it’s laughable the way so many of them actually believe this BS.

But then, women live in a fairy tale world, a fantasy land. They don’t live in the real world because it’s cruel and evil and women, being sensitive and basically good-hearted souls, can’t handle such a cold and vicious world. So they make up lies to say the world is not really like this and instead of the world being as it is, it is as women  imagine or fantasize that is.

I don’t blame women for being sensitive and kind-hearted souls who long for defenses against the arbitrary cruelty and even evil of life. I don’t mind denial as a defense. As an introvert, of course fantasy is where I live most of the time.

But I know the difference between reality and fantasy. I know I’m BSing myself but I don’t care. I know I’m denying all the failures and fuckups of my life, but I don’t care. And I can brainwash myself into believing that my denial and fantasy defenses are the truth.

But deep down inside, of course I know they are not. Women are not so enlightened. They actually believe that the world works according to how women think it should work. If they ever figure out the truth, boy are they in for a rude surprise.

One of the fantasy lies that women, typically older women, believe is that older men who chase young women go for young, vulnerable, stupid, easy pickings females. But they’re not.

I’ve dated women this age off and on since I was in my early 40’s, and trust me when I say it’s not so easy to get them into bed. Hell, it’s like pulling hen’s teeth to even get them to go out with you because 99% of them think you’re a gross old man.

Even when I was young, it was not that easy getting teenage girls into bed. A lot of them held out on you or would only kiss and make out with you and stop it there.

A lot were puritanical. Refusing to suck cock was very common. I had young women who wouldn’t let me eat their pussies because they thought is was gross. Pain during sex is not uncommon and they sometimes ask for lube of some sort due to this.

A lot are virgins who don’t want to give it up. Some will fuck you once or twice and then just make out and refuse to go further after that. One 18 year old girl did that because I wasn’t rapey enough. She said her other guys just blew past her when she said no and basically forced her to have sex. So some of these girls even force you to be a rapist if you want to get laid. Some are virgins and want to stay that way.

Girls that age are also extremely moody, temperamental, and nutty. The last two I dated were both suicidal. Older women are so much more stable.

The girls got angry at me many times when I was with them, usually over ridiculous nonsense. It’s not like they’re going to go along with everything you suggest.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Sponsored Post: Types of Women Men Are Looking For 

Types of Women Men Are Looking For 

 A Housewife 

A man who wants his wife like this appreciates coziness and comfort the most. Cleanliness and order in the house, things neatly laid out in their places, starched sheets, and a hot three-course dinner are important to him. A quiet homely atmosphere, a delicious smell in the kitchen, evening hours for two together in front of the TV, and a freshly-ironed shirt for work in the morning are the things a man wants.

Those men work hard just need an island of calm and care at home to relax their body and soul from difficult everyday life. Such a man doesn’t care how long your legs are and how you dress – the main thing is that you know how to care for him and your house. If you cook well and are not afraid of being a housewife, then you will stick quite well together with a man that is looking for one. 

A Mother 

Such a wife is sought for by infantile men, men spoiled by maternal affection, or men who have not received enough of it. Representatives of this type of men expect from their future wife the role of the mother: to care, support, pamper, and love him no matter what. By being with such a man, you will have to solve all his problems, large and small, do almost everything for him, and hold his hand if he, God forbid, catches a cold.

Get ready to give a lot, but in return, do not expect anything. Unlike men who prefer housewives, who, in response to your efforts at home and caring for your husband, will give you their love and gratitude, infantile types are just boys – they only want to receive, and they consider this entitlement natural and taken for granted.

Be careful not to confuse these two completely different men. You can recognize a “boy” by the way he is overly attached to his mother, idealizes her, and often repeats that his chosen one should be a copy of his mother. In general, such men are not very independent and indecisive in life, so it is not difficult to recognize them. 

A Mother of His Children 

A man who wants to start a strong family with lots of children is interested in finding a good mother for his kids. For them, the continuation of their genes is important; therefore, a potential wife is evaluated in terms of her talents when it comes to motherhood.

This implies not only the ability to conceive and endure healthy offspring but also a strong desire to have a child (maybe more than one), the ability to get along with children, and a willingness to devote herself to the family.

Such men are not looking for incubators – it’s just that they value you as a reliable partner that is capable of producing offspring; love comes second. He will honor and respect you, no doubt. If the family is the main thing for you and you want to have and raise children, then you will create a wonderful union with this person. 

A Mistress 

This is quite a simple one, if a man wants a short-term relationship with a lot of sex, he will be interested in finding a mistress. In a woman, they value attractiveness, gentleness, and the ability to get them hooked. Men that are interested in mistresses know exactly what they want.

They are not interested in knowing how to find a girl to marry; they want something with less commitment and more fun. With such a macho man, you will feel like a real woman, always charming. The question is whether there will be enough romance and unforgettable sex for the development of a serious and lasting relationship with the possibility of further marriage. 

A Friend 

Some men seek a faithful companion in a woman, a partner whom they can rely on. By dating such a woman, he is looking for qualities such as devotion, an ability to support, an agile mind, a calm disposition, and patience. He tries to figure out a woman’s personality; he wants a reliable person with whom he can create a strong family that is built on respect.

Maybe there won’t be that much passion, but men who want a friend with to have guarantees of stability and confidence in the future. Their priorities are as follows: to achieve everything together, relate to each other with mutual understanding, and spend long evenings in meaningful, interesting conversations.

This is a great option for a woman who knows how to be a friend and needs a strong shoulder and support from her husband without him shutting her down or dominating her.

Let’s summarize everything that’s been said above. It should be noted that there are no truly correct or incorrect male ideas about women, just as there are no bad or good types of women. And of course, only you know what is right for you, what kind of a woman or a man you are, and what you want in a relationship. 

 

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: One Sex Has to Dominate the Other

…we either have male dominance and violence, or gentle female dominance.

First of all,  you’re going to have male violence (and female violence too for that matter) in either one. Actually the men might be more violent if they were being dominated by women because being dominated by women is one thing that pisses real men off more than anything else.

First of all, female dominance of men will never be gentle. Women are never gentle with the men that they dominate, in relationships or otherwise. It just doesn’t work that way. I think it is not possible for a woman to dominate a man in a gentle way. Women will always be cruel, vicious, and even evil with the men they are dominating.

On the other hand, I think we men can dominate women in a civilized manner. First of all, we men evolved to be dominant, to dominate women and children, and to fight for dominance with other men. The fact that dominance was bred right into us means that we can choose to implement our inborn trait either nicely or cruelly. It is certainly possible for men to dominate women in a non-harmful way. I’ve done it in most of my relationships.

Sadly, one gender has to dominate the other. The reality for most men is that most women expect the man to dominate. Women come into the relationship specifically expecting to be dominated by the man. Now, in their minds this is not a bad thing, as they like being submissive, and their view of male dominance often does not involve harm.

Men realize that if we don’t dominate our woman, she is going to take those pants right off of us and dominate you! It’s like someone has to dominate – it’s either him or her, take your pick.

I used to believe that full equality between the sexes was possible, but after 45 years of experience with women, I no longer believe this. Complete equality between men and women is simply not possible – it’s folly, a fool’s errand, an unwinnable war.

Gay male relationships are full of dominance and submission, tops and bottoms, bears and twinks, in full imitation of heterosexuality.

Lesbians like to think they are beyond this, but how many times you have seen a lesbian couple where one was butch (the man) and the other was more femme (obviously the woman)? So they’re imitating heterosexuality too. And you can’t tell me there’s no dominance-submission stuff going on in that butch-femme relationship either.

From the lesbians I read on the web, I have learned that there is quite a bit of dom-sub type sex going on with them as a matter of course, especially with the young ones, 18-30. I hate BD/SM but I know a lot about it. The number of female subs who have dom “mistresses” is very high, and the setup is about the same as with male dom-female sub relationships.

If you look at mammals, it is quite typical for male mammals to not only be much more aggressive but also to keep harems, fight over females, etc. And in mammalian sex the male often acts quite dominant, and the female acts…you guessed it – submissive.

I am reading a book about grizzly bears, and the author witnesses a rare mating. Yes, the male bear is acting very aggressive and dominant, and believe it or not, the female grizzly bear of all things is acting…yep – submissive!

Ape sex is often about rape. In chimps and baboons, a male will literally terrorize a female ape for some time, chasing her, hitting her, scaring the living crap out of her. He acts extremely mean towards her. And guess which male she picks to mate with come mating time? Yep, the rapey, female-beating, stalking, creepy, abusive male ape, the same one who terrorized her her before.

I think the best we could hope for would be one sex dominating the other, but in the mildest and kindest way possible that does the least harm to the more submissive partner. And we should hope for submissive partners who don’t like to be hurt or abused.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Game/PUA: “All Bitches Are Crazy,” Part 2

Roy: Perhaps most all women are crazy, my own mother is far better than most women but still crazier than most men.

All women are nuts, pretty much. My Mom is pretty stable though. But she is still a lot more emotional than I am.

I have a female relative with a severe mood disorder that she has had most of her life. Major Depression. At first I thought she was faking it and was just lazy in order to get out of working and being independent, but recently I saw her crash far downwards for a couple of years.

Trigger? Her cat got out of her house and ran away and disappeared. No big deal, right? Nope, it put her out of commission for two years, or it set off an episode that lasted two years. In that episode I finally saw that there is something terribly wrong with my relative. She really is disabled when she is like that. There’s no way she could work. She can barely even talk, for Chrissake.

It’s pretty hard to describe severe Major Depression but once you have seen it, it seems so weird and bizarre that it almost seems in the category of schizophrenia and acute mania. They’re crazy. Yep, you can be so depressed that you are frankly completely nuts.

When I saw her like that, I realized that she was completely pitiful, and I no longer thought she was faking her illness. Thing is when she is not having an episode, she seems pretty normal, and you get mad at her and think she is faking her illness. Supposedly even in these times she is ill, but you really can’t see it.

She is bizarrely moody though, even for a flaky female. You are walking on eggshells the whole time you around her. She gets upset by any little thing and blows up into huge tantrums. You have to watch your words extremely carefully and try not to insult her or bring up any of her trigger issues.

I finally figured out that you can’t criticize feminism because she is a full-blown feminazi. My Mom is also a hardcore feminist, but I could not figure it out until she was ~75 years old. Or maybe she got worse.

You also cannot criticize or say anything remotely negative about women in any way, shape, or form with my Mom or this relative. Women are perfect and men are all seriously flawed.

All feminists believe exactly that, and it took me until a few years ago to finally figure that out. In fact that is one of the core hard beliefs of feminism: Women are perfect; men are anywhere from seriously flawed to pure evil. The only women they hate are the “traitors” who side with the men against the feminists on some of their issues.

Of course this proves that feminism is just another form of Identity Politics idiocy.

I think women are just sensitive. Sensitivity means emotionality and to us men that seems crazy or flaky because a highly emo man is seen as crazy/flaky.

I have seen comments about men describing them as having “almost female levels of flake.” These guys were PUA’s who probably had some Cluster B stuff going on at some level like most players.

There is a site on the Manosphere which is too misogynistic for my tastes, but nevertheless had some of the finest insights on women that I have ever seen. One guy who writes for the site said:

LOL All bitches are crazy. Don’t even try to figure them out!

That’s actually excellent advice. I don’t agree with referring to all women as bitches, but from the male point of view, most women definitely seem crazy to us. This craziness is seen in its full extent if you get involved with them sexually or as a close friend. As a close friend you will see how unstable she is, and as a lover she will direct a lot of her pent-up instability towards you.

On the other hand if you only know a woman informally as a landlord, relative, store owner, worker, or coworker, you may never see much instability. Women have an amazing ability to compartmentalize their instability.

I never found that the women I knew as casual acquaintances were unstable. I have never found my female coworkers to be unstable in any job. Hell, the men were more unstable at some jobs. Gay men in particular can be dramatically unstable and flaky at work, sometimes far worse than women.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Alt Left: My Actual Position on Sexual Harassment and #metoo

SHI: 2- I think I’m more pro-feminism in Identity Politics mold. Robert’s more of a pro-masculinist I believe, which is fine. My Dad is like that and many others. I think it’s a generation thing.

For example, I support #MeToo although it’s slightly hypocritical of me, as I have violated many women while accosting them for sex. Why do I do it? I think a lot of powerful men exploit women, which I find very disturbing. The world is already masculinist (maybe California isn’t). I like to cede some more political and social space to women.

Essentially, if you’re a broke man and making a move on a hot woman, I would look the other way. I’ll even buy you a beer later because I admire your guts.

But if you’re a rich businessman exploiting a prostitute just because you paid for her services, I’ll stand with the prostitute and protect her. And I have done that before. I was in a resort in Goa, and in the next room, a businessman was abusing a female escort. She was begging him to stop and go gentle on her, but he seemed a perverted BDSM freak.

I alerted the hotel staff and knocked on his door telling him to stop what he was doing. He yelled back at me to “mind my own business”. Soon the hotel staff came and opened the door. The girl was half-naked and chained to a window sill. He apparently wanted to use some blunt instruments on her.

Apparently the businessman had paid a lot of money for that suite, and he was shameless enough to scream at the hotel manager that he would “complain” and whatever he was doing to the poor girl was “consensual”. After they unchained her, she immediately ran towards me, and I hugged her.

Of course he wasn’t arrested or anything. That hotel was well-known for attracting perverted guests like him. At least that girl left. She even refused to take money, but I convinced her that she needs to take the money, as she deserved it for harassment.

I also asked her to file a police complaint. The businessman just laughed: he was on good terms with the corrupt cops and knew a prostitute never stood a chance with her.

I saw how vulnerable the poor girl really was. She immediately bolted and left. Unfortunately, she has to be back on the streets someday and will meet more such sadist clients.

This is an extreme example but good way to highlight that #MeToo is justified in many such instances where powerful men exploit girls.

I actually support the girl in this case, so maybe Shi and I are not different at all. I even support the notion of sexual harassment. I just think the new definition of it is insane. The official US government definition is reasonable: Sexual harassment that is so severe, persistent, and repeated that the person is unable to function at work or school.

I absolutely support a notion of sexual harassment along those lines! Not to mention I support the notion of quid pro quo sexual harassment.

It’s just that the #metoo psychos have taken this to mean “any unwanted sexual advance is sexual harassment.” I’m sorry but that’s completely insane! No it isn’t! See those words “severe”, “persistent”, and “repeated”? Sexual harassment is when she communicates to the guy to knock it off and he keeps on keeping on. It’s fine to go after chumps like this for sexual harassment in my book.

But other than that, I agree with the French actress Katharine Deneuve: “Men have a right to hit on women.” Damn right we do. My own mother objected to that comment, so you can see how deep this feminist insanity goes.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20