Evil Women Forcing Men to Have Children They Don’t Want

I am aware of at least three cases:

Case 1: A woman had oral sex with a man. The man ejaculated in her mouth. She held it in her mouth and then apparently spat it into her hand and shoved it up her vagina. She became pregnant and admitted what she had done. The male slave protested and said he had to right to support that kid, but the feminist courts ruled that he had to support the kid anyway.

Case 2: A woman actually raped a man after he passed out on the couch. How a guy who is passed out gets an erection is beyond me but oh well. She became pregnant. The woman admitted that she had raped the man and that’s how she became pregnant. The man argued that he did not have to support the child because he was raped. The feminist court ordered the man to support the kid that was born because he was raped.

Case 3: A man had sex with a woman with a condom. Then he threw the condom in the trash when he was done. The woman somehow removed the condom from the trash and then managed to empty the sperm into her vagina. She became pregnant. She admitted how she tricked the man into pregnancy. The feminist court ruled that the man had to support the kid anyway.

Wow! I wonder how many other cases like that there. That’s really frightening.

College Girl Wants to Have Sex with Her Professor

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNmF6hvGFMk

I realize that professors are not supposed to have sex with their students, and I am not opposed to rules forbidding them from doing so. There are also rules forbidding schoolteachers from having sex with their students even if the girls is over 18, and I am ok with those rules too.

What I object to is the Feminist Scum argument that if a schoolteacher has sex with his 18 year old student, he “took advantage” of her. Bullshit. These girls throw themselves at teachers. They want to do this. Nobody’s taking advantage of anybody a lot of the time.

Similar with college professors. As you can see in this video, this college girl is dying to screw her professor. I don’t think he should do that, and I would not object to rules forbidding him from doing so. But the idea that the professor would be “taking advantage” of this poor adult female is insane. She’s throwing herself at this guy. She wants to do it. If it happened, no one would be taking advantage of anyone.

However, one good argument you could make would be that it would not be fair to the other female students if this girl had sex with her professor. She would more or less be fucking herself to an automatic A no matter the quality of her work, while the other females in the class would have to be judged on their work alone, not on their work + their sexual skills. If the feminists would like to make that argument, I would agree with them.

Feminists go on and on about power differentials. Guess what, feminist retards? Power differentials are an essential aspect of sex in our modern world. They have probably also been an essential aspect of sex in the premodern world. Females are power-fuckers. They like to have sex with powerful males. Obviously, every time they do so, there is a “power differential,” you feminist idiots. You morons going to ban sex every time there’s a power differential?

In fact this aspect of females is so common that I would even advise men to take advantage of the power differential anytime you can legally do so. I have done this. At my age, any time I date a woman in her mid to late 20’s (which I have done in the past several years) I can assure you that there is a massive power differential going on there, if only because of my age. That may well be part of the reason she is going for me. So what? Is there something awful about this?

Feminists don’t live in the real world. They live in some bullshit fantasy world that doesn’t even exist.

Fuck the feminists.

Decline of the West Part 2: “Men”

Then and now.
Then and now.

The Cultural Left’s already gotten rid of race, and it is definitely part of the Cultural Left’s agenda to get rid of gender, as they put it. Why? Because Gay Identity Politics is an essential aspect of the Cultural Left. The Cultural Left just can’t get enough of their pet homosexuals. And I assure you that Political Homosexuality has a long-term goal of “getting rid of gender” because after all, homosexuals hate gender. Gay men mostly hate being men and want to be women. Lesbians for all their going on and on about how wonderful women are and how horrible men are don’t like being women and instead want to be men.

Yes, Political Homosexuality does have an agenda, and you could indeed call it a “Gay Agenda.” The Gay Agenda is simply the long-term and short-term goals of Political Homosexuality. What’s so controversial about that? All Identity Politics groups have short- and long-term goals, so all Identity Politics groups have “agendas.” So of course there’s a “gay agenda.” Why is it some vile homophobic reactionary insult to mention that obvious fact?

Someone Want to Tell Me One Conservative Position I Should Take on Anything Whatsoever?

Tad writes:

Man, socialist?

I can’t believe that for a second.

Do you realize that 9

In the new American socialist utopia – you can’t talk about race, DNA etc. The ‘truth’ there whatever it may be may contradict the social view of equality, and it can’t be spoken of. There are no differences between us, by definition. If you were to bring any of this stuff up at a Leftist’s dinner table, you’d be immediately banned from the group.

You realize Janet Napolitano, former Head of Homeland Security is now Dean at Cali UC system has banned the phrases: “The job should go to the best candidate” and “America is a place where anyone can get ahead” – because of the perceived slights against visible minorities who ostensibly have had the same choice? This is the new Orwellian socialism. To even declare that “the job should go the best candidate” will get you fired. Now at UC Cali, coming to Corporate America very soon.

And the PUA stuff? Ok – I get it – it’s extremely interesting from an intellectual point of view, isn’t it – but 9

Also – I do agree that PUA is very interesting because it’s ‘what works’ (i.e. what women like instead of what they say they like) and it’s frankly a little hypocritical that they say they don’t like it (your bits about womanizers alludes to this). It’s 10

Anyhow – it’s funny that you think that you’re a socialist, because 9

FYI – I was Googling about the new ‘human species’ discovered in S. America a few days ago, and links to your site popped up among a pile of Stormfront links. Yes: Stormfront. That’s how ‘leftwing’ your stuff is? 🙂

Anyhow – this is a really great blog, a lot of truth-bombs here, the world needs this, please keep it up.

I keep hearing this endlessly. I am a socialist mostly on economics. And frankly, when I go down the line of positions where it lists Democrats on one side and Republicans on another, I line up with Democrats almost 9

If I am a rightwinger, how come I never vote Republican? If I am a rightwinger, how come I never support any rightwing political project anywhere – and I have seen a lot of them. Republican Party conservatism is not the only kind out there. There are all sort of other varieties of rightwing projects – I have been exposed to many of them.

Most conservatives are evangelistic and I have some commenters to this site who keep trying to convert me to conservatism, giving me papers and books to read. They show me all sorts of weird conservative hybrid stuff, syncretic stuff, Third Positionist stuff, and I despise all of it. It’s all horrible because…well, because it’s conservatism, and conservatism frankly sucks.

One thing I notice about all of these hybrids is that they mostly smell sort of fascistic in some way or another. Another thing I notice over and over is that conservatism is utterly hostile to democracy and popular role. All of these hybrid forms of rightwing politics promote aristocratic rule in one way or another. And really that is what conservatism boils down to. Conservatism is rule by the aristocracy. Always has been, is now, always will be. Liberalism is rule by democracy, or the popular rabble if you will.

Another thing I notice is that all of these rightwing hybrids promote some sort of worship or hierarchy. Yes, humans practice hierarchy. We have to. But that is more to be lamented than anything else. Liberals are dubious about hierarchy and recognize that while some of it is inevitable, it’s hardly an altar to be worshiped at.

I also notice some sort of fetishization of violence often for its own sake. I assume that is where the fascist angle comes in. Often these rightwingers explicitly disavow peace as even a goal to be fought for and believe that mankind much wage wars apparently as part of the human project.

Yes conservatives hate feminism, but what do they replace it with. The rightwing forms I have all seen are explicitly misogynistic, state openly that women are inferior to men and often with to roll back many of women’s hard fought rights. There are more rightwingers who want to revoke women’s right to vote that you would ever believe out there. Sure, feminism blows, but this reactionary nuttiness is some sort of an alternative? How about none of the above?

Conservatives typically promote traditional values and wish to go back to traditional marriage. There are good reasons for this and indeed, society would probably be better off if we did this. But what’s the likelihood that this is going to happen?

The cat’s out of the bag here. Women have been unleashed. They’re not going back to the cages and prisons we kept them in for 2,000 years. Might be nice if they did, but they aren’t going to do it. They’re roaming free, and it’s causing all sorts of problems, yes, but what are you going to do about it? Women seem to like to roam around free like this, and they don’t want to go back to the old ways. So we are stuck with this modernist feminist world in that sense. Life gives you lemons, make lemonade. Deal with it. Adjust to it.

Yes the growth in single Moms and one parent families is causing all sorts of problems, but what are you going to do about it? What possible political proposal could you put forth that would ameliorate the single motherhood problem. The Right goes on and on how terrible single Moms are for society, but what sort of proposals does the Right offer to deal with the issues of single motherhood? Do they offer anything? What are they going to do about single Moms? Line them up and shoot them? Force them to marry men? Once again, the Right bitches but offers nothing in the way of concrete proposal.

Conservative solutions to the traditional morality issue make no sense.

Get rid of no-fault divorce? No.

Get rid of abortion on demand? No.

Prioritize parents rights over schools and social workers? No.

Once again, conservatives off no workable solutions. Abortion isn’t going to become illegal again. The old divorce laws are not coming back. Parents’ will is not going to trump that of society or the schools. All of these cats are out of the bag and the changes look permanent because no one really wants rollback. Is there a downside to all of this modernism? Sure there is. But people seem to like it anyway, they want to keep these changes in place and they don’t want to go back to the old days.

Sure, the Left is insane about race as it is about most social issues, but what does the Right offer about race? The more radical sections of the Right offer only segregation and a return to legal discrimination. Allow counties, cities and towns to determine their racial makeup. That means maybe a Black couple could not move to Podunkville if Podunkville decided that they had already fulfilled their share of Blacks. I should support this?

Roll back the Civil Rights Acts, the Housing Rights Acts and the Voting Rights Acts. Overturn Roe v. Wade. I am supposed to support this?

Other than the conservative position on illegal immigration, which I support, can someone please point to one single conservative position, project or proposal anywhere in the US that I ought to support? Come on. Throw them at me. I am probably going to oppose every single one of them. Give me your best shot.

PUA/Game: The Enigma of the Womanizer

This is another old one that fits in well with the current theme of the site. It was quite popular.

From the article:

I am convinced that in most females of all ages, even in the coldest and hardest of broken of hardened female hearts, there is a tiny section set aside for The Man with the Golden Sperm.

Yes! Well, of course. You can’t hate these guys too much. There’s no compromising success. I haven’t noticed in my life that these types are hated very much. Most people think they’re hilarious. When we were growing up, even grandmas and grandpas used to laugh their asses off at the Olympian antics of the local womanizers. Even little girls, 10 and 11 years old, thought there was something amazing about them. And they’re more popular with women than you think.

Supposedly all women hate these guys as users or predators, but in my life, all I ever noticed is that they have females around them all the time, and that they seem to be much loved by women.These are the men that the women love. Women don’t seem to be bothered by their antics either. If you bring up their womanizing, most women just bust out laughing and almost fall on the floor from laughing so hard. What is there about the Champion Womanizer that makes him so hilarious?

The womanizer, or, as I call him in his most notorious formation, The Man with the Golden Sperm, is a strange fellow. Much of what you hear about him are lies, and he is poorly understood. It’s said that he hates women and is secretly gay, but I am convinced that this is nonsense.

Womanizers love women. They really, really, really love women. I think most guys don’t really like women that much. Well, they like them, but not like the womanizer does. When it comes down to it, your man’s man would rather hang out with the guys. A lot of other guys are sort of scared of women or never got that comfortable around them, including married men.

Further, the more masculine a guy is, the more alienated and disturbed he is by typical feminine behavior, and the more he finds it offensive in men and silly and nonsensical in women. So in highly machismo cultures like Latin America and Arabia you also find a lot of misogyny, and when the guys want to hang out, they hang out with guys. When the girls want to hang out, they hang out with girls.

In order for a guy to hang out with the ladies, he has to respect femininity and the female nature on some basic level. Machismo is all about contempt for femininity in oneself, other males and frankly in general.

The womanizer on the other hand, while definitely a masculine guy in a way, likes women so much that most of his friends are women.

The most notorious ones I knew had women coming and going all the time, seemingly all day and all night, like some kind of weird sexual revolving door. The phone was always ringing, and there was often a woman on the end of the line. I would go out with these guys, and females would go into hypnotized stares just being in the presence of this guy, this Man With the Golden Sperm.

Many of their friends were females, and their female friends were always vicariously fucking the womanizer via fixing their friends up with him.

So let us put to rest once and for all the notion that the womanizer hates women. Quite the opposite. He’s addicted to them, in some ways the way an addict is to dope. He can’t get enough of them. He’s drowning in a sea of females. It’s true that womanizers don’t treat women very well, but I would argue that that doesn’t mean that they hate them. They don’t treat them well, but they still really love them. Does that make sense?

Most of the most notorious womanizers I have ever known, including yours truly back in the day (Not so much these days, unfortunately!), were somewhat androgynous guys. They were not full-on macho man’s man types.

I think part of the success of the womanizer is that he likes women so much because he has so much in common with them. And strangely, it is the fact that the womanizer is “in touch with his female side” that makes women so attracted to him.

No, they are not having lesbian sex with a girl with a dick. But he is sort of one of the girls in a bit of a strange way, but then he’s not either, he really is a man, and you better believe it. He’s definitely a sexual threat since he has a cock and knows how to use it, but then again he’s not because he’s so approachable.

The most notorious ones I knew were always being approached by females. Females were always touching them, walking up to them and sitting on their laps, walking close to them, grabbing them, teasing them. If you asked them why they did that, they would say, “He’s just so…approachable.” Other guys would watch with their mouths open and ask, “How the Hell do you do it, man?”

Some womanizers are even soft, sensitive and androgynous in bed, and females actually like this. Females who had sex with these guys tell me that it was a weird experience, and sometimes they almost felt like they were having sex with another woman! But nevertheless they loved it anyway.

And some of these guys have confessed to me that when they had sex with females, they felt like a woman having sex with another woman, like a lesbian with a dick. They said it was a weird feeling, but if the chick is young and beautiful, hey, the sex is still great anyway.

As far as whether the womanizer is an “asshole who uses women” as the line goes, it’s hard to say.

Most of the real notorious ones I knew had it made. Women basically approached them all the time. They barely even had to try, and when they did, their approaches were quite welcome. It isn’t so much that these guys are chasing women, but that in many cases, females are chasing them.

Sure he goes through women like underwear, and I’m sure there is some resentment on the part of the women, but not as much as you think. A lot of the females seemed to be delighted to play along and put a notch in their belt by bagging The Man with the Golden Sperm.

Although resentment was evident in former girlfriends of these guys, you could tell that the females still sort of loved them in a way. How could they not?

I am convinced that in most females of all ages, even in the coldest and hardest of broken of hardened female hearts, there is a tiny section set aside for The Man with the Golden Sperm.

If you think this website is valuable to you, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site.

The Man with the Golden Sperm

This is a repost of an older piece that was very popular that fits in with a lot of the Game articles I have been writing lately. It also allow a lot of you to meet Sexmaniacman for the first time. He’s quite a character. Enjoy.

All hail Sexmaniacman!

Sexmaniacman showed up the other day, and we had an interesting talk about womanizers. Sexguy calls a womanizer, “The Man with the Golden Sperm.” I think he’s onto something!

“Hi Bob, thanks for letting me write on here. I used to be a PUA, but I haven’t been for some time now. Bachelor life is feast or famine, but the feasts were never so much fun.

My hero was this guy I knew in my teens, Steve. I knew him best when he was around 18-21 years old. This guy always had three girlfriends at any one time, and he juggled all three of them. He also had as many other women as possible who were not in the top three and constantly shifted somehow. The top three also changed on a regular basis too. Nowadays, you would about need an Excel spreadsheet to keep up with his antics.

On a typical day, he had three or four dates. He had a morning date, an afternoon date, an evening date, and then around midnight, he would climb in some girl’s room at her parents house, and that would be the midnight date. He had sex with all of them, and they were all quite willing.

This was in the 1970’s, and it was before most STD’s, herpes, AIDS, etc. I never heard of anyone catching anything more than crabs.

In the summers he and his buddies would rent a house on the beach and surf all day. The house had a keg of beer continuously refilled and about a pound of Thai weed, continuously resupplied also. They would have sex with about three women and girls on any given days. Whether the females were always new, I have no idea. The females were always very willing. It’s conceivable that he could go through up to 100 females in a summer.

This guy was this ultimate bitchin’ surfer dude who lived at the beach with all the rest of us. Despite his endless conquests, no one hated him, and females gladly lined up to take a number and wait in line to have sex with him, I guess for a notch on their belts too.

I figure he was “The Man with the Golden Sperm“. I think evolutionarily, this guy is seen as having the most awesome genes of all, and a good number of young females subconsciously want to bear his kids and perpetuate his awesome line. There’s no other explanation that makes sense for this behavior.

He was a very good friend of mine, but you had to watch out when you hung around with him. Everywhere you went with him, strange women would start staring at him like they were hypnotized.

Also, whenever you were with him more than a few hours, there were always going to be some good looking females popping up out of nowhere, mostly ones you had never seen before. They always wanted to have sex. First with him, next, as second choice, with any of the Men with the Semi-Golden Sperm who were accompanying him.

So if you were worried about having sex with strange women on a moment’s notice, you couldn’t even hang around the guy.

One thing that I noticed was his life was quite hectic! Juggling all these women is pretty much a full time job. The phone was always ringing, he was always going here or there, you were always meeting different people, or new people were showing up and leaving. He was “hypersocial.”

He finally got married and moved to San Francisco with his wife and a couple of friends. I saw him a year or so later (30 years ago). He called me, and I showed up at a hotel room on the beach around noon (I was a working college student at the time). As I entered the room, a beautiful young blonde was leaving with a satisfied smile on her face. He swore he was going to be faithful to his wife, but I guess not!

He opened up a suitcase on the bed, and there were several pounds of pot in there all neatly bagged into one ounce bags. I looked and started laughing. We both started laughing really hard and almost fell onto the floor. Heavy drug scenes like that were always funny, because it was totally illegal, and you could get busted anytime, but that just made it even more exciting, daring and ultra-macho.

I bought an ounce from him and saw him later that evening. I never saw him again.

Five years later (25 years ago), I heard he was still in San Francisco. At age 25, he now owned two or three homes in SF, not cheap real estate. He was a major cocaine dealer. He lived in one house and kept his stuff in another one. He was described as “so hot you don’t want to go near him.” That means he’s a huge dealer, and he’s dangerous in that he can be busted big-time at any time, and if you are with him, you’re going to jail too.

Six years later, I heard he was still around and out of jail somehow.

Last year, I saw him on the Internet. He had landed on his feet and was back in Orange County and selling real estate. I called him up, told him I was a ghost from his past and asked him to figure out who I was. I couldn’t stop laughing. He kept saying, “Who is this?” but I never told him. Then he hung up.

Even when he was doing the ultimate womanizer thing, he wasn’t an ass, and almost everyone liked him. Even females who had been with him didn’t resent him and most seemed to be pleased to have his notch on their belts.

I never lived like anything close to this guy, but he was my idol for a while, and I was always trying to emulate him when I was young. At one time though, very long ago, I regularly had three girlfriends at once, and there were as many casuals as I could manage in between.

Females were always dumping me and screaming at me, people were always telling me what a scum I was, but in between, the fun never stopped. I was lying to everyone all the time, but I didn’t care. People see what you are doing and can’t believe it. As word gets around, instead of being repulsed, all these new strange females start showing up acting awfully friendly, asking to take a number and stand in line. You’re The Man with the Golden Sperm.

But more than anything else, my life was totally hectic and insane. People have no idea how much work this is!

I remember once I went to visit my cousins in another state. They lived there with my aunts and grandparents. A while before, I had had sex with my hot female cousin, but that ended, and we were just best friends. I would go up there, and she would get out her phone book and start calling all her female friends. The Man with the Golden Sperm is in town! Any takers?

She took me around to her friends, introducing me to them. Some said forget it, but one liked me, N, a Russian girl. My cousin fixed me up with her.

“Sexdude,” my cousin said, whispering in my ear. “When you go out with her, make sure you fuck her.”

“Why?” I asked incredulously.

“I don’t think she’s ever been laid,” my cuz said, “and you’re a great place for her to start. After all,” she said with a sly wink in her eye, “You’re the Man with the Golden Sperm.”

I dated her friend, and there was lots of fun.

Later my younger cousin came around. She was 14. She saw that my older cousin, age 18, was fixing her friends up with me. She got jealous.

She called me aside.

“Sexman,” she said. “I want you to go out with my friend.”

“Huh?” I was incredulous.

We had spent the day riding skateboards and smoking dope.

“She’s 14. And I’m 21. I could go to jail,” I pointed out.

“So? What does that matter to the Man with the Golden Sperm?” She said with a hurt look on her face.

She was right. So date her I did, that very night.

I was staying at my cousins, and the phone kept ringing when I was gone. My aunt kept answering it and taking the messages. She would rattle them off when I got home.

In a single day, Female Cousin One called, Female Cousin Two called, Strange Girl One called, Strange Girl Two called. My aunt was standing there, wobbling a bit, unable to believe this was really happening. She was shaking her head incredulously. I had just shown up from another state yesterday, and half the girls in town were already calling for me. How could she not admire The Man with the Golden Sperm?

My aunt’s best friend M, a Greek woman, was 40 years old and single. She caught wind of my antics. Of course, instead of being disgusted, she wanted a piece of the action herself. I met the older woman, and she was hot for me all right, but nothing ever came of it.

I always laugh whenever I hear people (especially women) say how much women hate womanizers. That’s not been my experience.

Even my Mom, a deeply traditional woman born in the 1930’s, chuckled and shook her head with a hint of admiration and incredulity when I told her of Steve’s incredible sexual accomplishments. How many men could pull off what he did? Truth is almost none. Even my own Mom found a tiny place in her heart for the Man with the Golden Sperm.

Later I told her how he was running around being a huge cocaine dealer, and she chuckled and shook her head again with that same look of incredulity and a hint of admiration. She’s never done an illegal drug in her life, and she doesn’t think much of dopers.

Recently I told her who he had landed on his feet and was selling real estate in Orange County. She stopped in her tracks and stared at me.

“So he never got caught. He never got caught from all that coke dealing.” She was chuckling again and shaking her head with that same look.

“Guess not,” I said. “He always seemed to land on his feet.”

There’s a moral to the story, Bob. Everyone talks about how evil womanizers are, but deep down inside, a lot of us love The Man with the Golden Sperm. How could we not?

What Women Look for in a Man

Juliette writes:

Sadly, other guys at the college took what I believe to be the “alpha” approach (the anecdotes I could bring out are copious), and it had nothing to do with how “attractive” the guy was.Women look for more in a guy than just physical attractiveness. I daresay personality and intellectual prowess as well as economic factors come into play, but that’s just what I’ve observed…

Alpha has nothing to do with coming onto women everywhere you see them and pissing a lot of them off. Most of the Alphas I have known surely did not do that. If those guys with their lame lines were really Alpha, they would not have turned her off. If a real Alpha would have approached her, she would probably be flattered. The fact that their lines went over like lead balloons implies that these guys were not Alpha at all.

Alpha, Beta and Omega boil down to this:

Alpha: Attractive to most of the females most of the time. No more than 2

Beta: Attractive to some of the women some of the time. Your average, regular, everyday guy. Could be your father, brother, cousin or uncle. 6

Omega: Attractive to almost none of the women almost all of the time. Nobody or almost nobody wants these men. There is something about them that turns off almost all women, but it’s often not clear what it is. The incels, rejects, etc.

Women care about looks just as much as men do if not more. Good-looking men can do so well with women that you would not even believe it. Sure, maybe some women don’t care about looks, but most do.

This is what women want:

1. A good-looking to very goodlooking guy (essential), 2. Game or some attractive type of personality (because just looks won’t cut it). 3. Status, power, money or fame. Any one of these added to the first two would be excellent.

What is Game?

Game is simply that style that you utilize in order to attract women.

If you’re not actively trying to attract women, you’re not running any sort of Game. Men with money are often running Money Game. There’s probably even Power Game, Status Game and Fame Game. It’s not necessarily phony or fake or anything like that.

A group of women are at a table whispering, “Wow! Look at him! Isn’t he sexy? He’s sexy as Hell, isn’t he?” What they are saying is that he has good to great Game. With this man, being sexy is more than just having pretty face. He also has Game, which is the sum total of all parts of himself other than sheer looks that make him sexy or attractive to women. Game isn’t necessarily dishonest at all. If you are very attractive to women despite being a very honest fellow, then you have great Game. Everyone thinks Game is about fakery, lines, and manipulation, but that’s not necessarily true at all.

A man with zero Game simply has no ability to attract women at all. He can’t be sexy no matter how hard he tries for some reason.

Talking about personality, a woman would want a guy with possibly 3 of the above, and then it sure would be great if he had a great personality and even intelligence. But a “great personality” is really probably just part of great Game because Game ideally is simply your basic personality and nothing else.

Some women demand brains. I know a woman with a 156 IQ and she demands a high-IQ man or she would certainly prefer one.

Money would sure help, but it’s not essential. I can’t even pay my bills and I still get beautiful women.

The Best Game of All Is “Natural Game”

I do not want to brag but a commenter just called me an MPUA (Master PUA). I would rather not call myself a PUA at all. Seducer feels much better to my ears. Anyway, an MPUA is simply a natural PUA. He simply acts natural and normal and that’s pretty much the Game he runs. He’s running Natural Game for lack of a better word.

He tends to avoid PUA lingo, scripted routines and the tendency to turn seduction into sales pitches or sporting matches where you need precise strategy every step of the way. He doesn’t even consciously analyze his relationships or even his seduction style. He simply does all of these things naturally and normally because his Game has gotten so good that he has no need for lines, scripts, games, and a lot of the manipulative nonsense that goes along with it. Honestly most of this sort of thing should not be analyzed to death, and you won’t believe how much sex you can get with a “Whatever happens, happens,” type of super casual attitude towards women.

If someone wants to call me a PUA (a term I do not like) then ok, I would be a natural. I am a natural. But I was not born that way. It took me a long time to get to this point. But I am a natural in the sense that I do not use any of that scripted bullshit. I do not care about set, frame, escalation, closing, day Game, negging, peacocking, wings, plates or any of that bullshit. I use few if any lines and I never use scripted lines as openers.

When I introduce myself to women, I say whatever they Hell I want to, not some scripted line. You want to know what to say on your “approach?” Just walk up to her and start talking. Say something funny, intelligent or relevant. That’s the only advice I can offer.

Even being Friendzoned is not the end of the world. There is even something called Friendzone Game that you can run.

I suppose I have always “escalated,” but I never really thought of it that way. It’s simply a normal part of seduction. I would hate to think, “Ok now I am escalating.”

You do not have to do endless “approaches” on women. I never care if I do an approach or not. I could go weeks with making an approach. Why should I care whether I am making approaches or not? I would hate to have a mindset like, “Wow, I am not having much sex. I have to go and make a lot of approaches now!” I would hate to live like that. My philosophy has always been if it happens, it happens, and if it doesn’t, it doesn’t.

Friendzone Game and How It Works

Friendzone Game is very hard to run and you have to be very skilled to run it. When I was a much younger man, say around 18, I was getting friendzoned all the time and usually staying there, and it was very painful for me, so I sympathize with men who get friendzoned. It can be quite humiliating especially if you have nothing else going on. It’s like dangling food in front of a starving man and telling him he can’t eat it.

Friendzone Game works like this. You either make a play on the women or you don’t. This depends on a lot of things. Marital status is one. I had a Lit class at university. On about the 3rd class session, I made friends with three of the best looking women in the class. The class was almost all women with only a few guys and as you might expect, the guys were pretty wimpy and lame. I cam out of class and saw those three walking together and came up to them. They said to each other, “Who’s he? Hey, let’s make friends with this guy!” So I made friends with them and after every class, we would go have lunch. I was 22. They were 27, 28, and 35. The 27 and 35 year old were married and the 28 year old was in a long term relationship with a man she lived with. Since they were all married or cohabiting, I pretty much left them alone from the start. Why pester them? They’re married women! Leave them the Hell alone! If they want to have affairs, let them, but it’s pretty sleazy to try to pick up on married women or try to convince them to cheat on their husbands. A lot of them will cheat all right, you better believe it, but they will cheat when they want to, not when you want them to. Just leave it in their hands is the best way to do it.

Well there was a lot of sexual energy at the table of course but there was not a lot of overt sexual talk. One woman kept grabbing my body. She said I made her feel so relaxed and comfortable that she just wanted to grab me. I put up with it for a while, but then I started getting mad because it was just bullshit teasing. Don’t tease me if you don’t want to follow through. I would grab her back and she would try to stop me. One time she said, “Well you sure are skinny…” in a contemptuous, emasculating sort of way. If you are a thin guy, you are just going to have to deal with this because you are going to hear this from time to time from women. I said, “Shut up cunt!” She flinched back and started whimpering like a puppy, “You macho pig,” she whimpered. The other women looked at me like, “Whoa! I can’t believe you just called her that!” They acted sort of outraged but they also acted like they liked.

This was I just let all three of these women go ahead and friendzone me. They all had partners anyway. Why be a dick and pressure partnered women to cheat on their partners? What for? So I just laid back, let them take charge and acted like I could care less that I was friendzoned and I could give a damn whether I ever had sex with any of them. This seems to make women very intrigued and I suppose it is abundance mentality. What is interesting is that  quite a bit of the time if you act like you could care less you just got friendzoned and you could give a damn whether you have sex with a woman or not, this really peeks her interest because you are not a desperate, horny pathetic idiot like most guys. You display high value by acting aloof about what happens between you two.

Anyway, by the end of the semester, I had had sex with both of the married women. With one it was an ongoing thing (I wrote papers for her and she paid me with sex) and with the other one, it was a one-time deal. But we still played tennis a lot. I didn’t have sex with the cohabiting one, but I don’t think she wanted to cheat on him anyway. But we did do a huge drug deal with 1,000 Quaaludes.

This has happened to me a few times recently. I had made friends with some women and I became friends with them again after long splits. The first thing I said was, “Hey look, I know you just want to be friends ok, so don’t think I am trying for anything sexual from you, ok? I don’t want to make you angry like that.” They both said, “Oh no, don’t worry about that. It’s fine. Then I pretty much laid off both of them. I talked about sex with them but only in a detached, clinical way. I never implied that I wanted to do it with her. I did complement them on their beauty a few times because they were beautiful and deserved it. I was a great friend to both of them and listened to all of their trials and tribulations without asking for or implying a desire for anything in return.

Within 1-2 months, both of them started openly propostioning me for sex.

So there’s Friendzone Game. Act like you don’t care. If she says let’s just be friends, maybe laugh at her. Or respect it very earnestly. Mostly act like you could care less whether you stay friends or whether you have sex. You don’t care. You’re above all of that. You don’t even need sex, at least not with her. The implication is maybe you are getting all you need elsewhere which implies abundance mentality. Also women are fascinated by men who in a non-wimpy way act like they could care less if they have sex with them or not. You’re not desperate like most men. You’re not pestering her like most men. You have the power and strength to stay aloof and it seems like you are laughing at her ability to attract you sexually because you act like it has no effect on you.

I am not sure how it works, but I think quite a few women see these men as seduction challenges. They are also mysterious, intriguing, and fascinating and they are actually projecting a tremendous amount of strength – the strength to rise above her sexual powers ensnare most men.

I am still trying to figure out how I do this. Anyway, I really don’t mind being Friendzoned because quite a few times anywhere from months to even years later, the woman who friendzoned me tries to seduce me.

I am not sure how Friendzone Game works if you are not Chad. Apparently I am Chad or at least used to be. And I am not sure how it works if you lack Game. But if you are Chad with great Game, it can work quite well. Chad + Game + Money/Power/Status/Fame would probably be even better.

Sometimes a Stare Is Just a Stare

Tulio writes in response to an article about The Meaning of the Female Blank, Frozen, Hypnotized, Robotic Stare:

This almost never happens to me. Though it has happened before. It’s just extremely rare. Especially now that I’m getting older. Even though I’m not a bad looking guy per se.

It’s one of the best things that can ever happen to a man, no?

It seems like this never happens to me anymore while I am older, but for sure it happened sometimes when I was younger. But even then, it wasn’t common.

I am wondering if there is a difference between this and other types of female stares.

I had this hot young bank teller, 20 years old, who used to look at me all the time like I was lunch, but then when I would go up to the counter, she was a bit cold and hostile. But didn’t have that same almost creepy look where they lock eyes with you and act like they can’t let go.

I had some young woman friends who were around college age who had friendzoned me with the explanation, “I can’t, Bob! It would be like doing it with my Dad!”, but at my age, I expect to be friendzoned by women that age and that’s a very good reason they gave for friendzoning me.

Whenever I had woman troubles I would check in with my young friends and unlike most females, they would actually try to help me get laid!

Most women not only will not try to help you in this area, but they will actively discourage you with pessimism, lies, self-delusion, denial, guilt-tripping, discouragement, and even disgust.

But my coed friends were baffled by some of my problems. They would often say, “I don’t know, Bob. I can’t figure this out. Women are really weird. I can’t understand them myself. Even women find women baffling and incomprehensible!

I finally decided that the bank teller liked to look at me, maybe because I was nice to look at. Maybe she was fantasizing about me. I have no idea, but women fantasize as much as men do. On the other hand, she had no desire to go out with me whatsoever. So I was in the “nice to look at but wouldn’t touch him” category. This was the first time I had even gotten such a bizarre message but once I figured out what it looked like, I saw it other times.

I started getting some similar weirdness from some other cute young women around the same age. Some of them, on first meeting me, their bodies would actually sort of lurch forwards a bit in an almost involuntary way. Totally primal mammalian behavior. Then they would always stop themselves a few seconds later and pull back. Another one, when I had my shirt buttoned down a bit, looked at my hairy chest for few seconds and it was like she saw a filet mignon. But then she sort of pulled back too. And of those women subsequently were not even very friendly to me. I assure you that none of them wanted to go out with in any way, shape or form.

I think on some basic raw level, they were attracted to me, but then their frontal cortex kicks in, and they’re like WAIT. This guy is 50! He is 30 years older than you! He is old enough to be your Dad! Forget it!”

Women are not total animals and slaves to their animal desires. Maybe it would be better if they were. These women were human enough to check their raw animal instricts with their brains a few seconds later and their cortex kicked and said, “Forget this plan. This makes no sense. He’s an old man!”

I guess the moral to the story is that just because some woman signals that she likes you on some primal animal level or keeps staring at you, sadly this doesn’t mean she wants any romantic or sexual involvement. She might not even want to be friends. You might just be eye candy, nice to look, but she has no intention of dealing with you on anything more advanced than that. Just enjoy being a sex object and move on with your life.

Some men might get mad at women who do this to them and accuse them of false advertising, I think this is the wrong idea. Men like to fantasize, right? Well, women like to fantasize too. If all she wants to do is look at you and fantasize about you, what’s wrong with that? Why is that a bad thing? It’s pretty flattering, right?

I must say though that this is one of the weirdest and most complicated nonverbal communications a man is ever going to get from women, and most men have no idea what it is and they wouldn’t understand it even if a woman was doing it right in front of their face. Nonverbal communication is incredibly complex and getting very good at it is almost like getting a PhD in a very difficult subject. Not only that, but the learning goes on forever. Even the finest social actors are still learning new things every day of their lives into middle and late age.

No one ever “gets it” in life. Education is optimally ongoing until death but probably rarely if ever complete even though your average idiotic human thinks he graduated Magna Cum Laude form Life University at a very early age. In a situation like this, vanity breeds apathy, an unproductive mindset, and stasis. It’s always a bad idea to stop learning about life. It’s not only arrogant but it’s also stupid.

Why An Understanding of Female Sexuality and Sexual Strategy Can Reduce Male Misogynistic Attidudes

Luna Rose writes:

Were you hacked by Beast Ganon?

Beast Ganon is a disturbed, profoundly misogynistic young man who has a highly irrational and one-sided view of females. He doesn’t get it. His views don’t resonate with me at all because I am actually the complete opposite of him. I am the opposite of a misogynist.

Female sexuality and female sexual strategy operate on an extremely primitive level.

Much of the weird, bizarre, stupid, self-defeating, masochistic, ridiculous, baffling, counterintuitive, irrational, cruel, wicked, and seemingly insane behavior of females derive from the fact that she is behaving according to her very primitive sexual programming, which is really on the level of a lower animal.

On the other hand, not everything a woman does is all about sex. Probably much of a female’s life has little to nothing to do with sex. This is outside the realm of our discussion. and females can be as advanced as any other humans when it comes to this sort of thing.

I have a strong feeling that male sexuality may also operate on a similar primitive animalistic level akin to the lower animals. In fact, male sexuality and sexual strategy is probably just as primitive and base as women’s, if not worse.

I think male sexuality is much worse than female sexuality because it is so wrapped up in sadism, domination, abuse, cruelty, violence, aggression, meanness, humiliation, degradation, destruction, desire to hurt and even downright evil. Male sexuality is probably 20 times worse than female sexuality when you get down to it.

I would like to have some discussions on this about whether readers think male sexuality is as primitive and base as female sexuality.

I am not a misogynist. I am the opposite. I actually love females and prefer to spend most of my time around them because I can’t stand males. And believe it or not, females love me and it’s been this way for most of my life. I sort of grew up with females via my cousins and by teenage years was best friends with my female cousins. After age 18, I had countless female friends, acquaintances and even lovers.

However, I know females very, very well. I understand them better than they understand themselves, which admittedly is not saying much.

That you read this and could not figure out what I was talking about and instead thought it was a bizarre sexist misogynistic screed shows that like most women you don’t have the slightest clue about female sexuality and sexual strategy yourself even if you engage in it yourself which you may well do.

This is because you probably have blinded yourself via self-delusion to the true nature of these parts of yourself. When it comes to sex and sexual strategy, most females could not give you the slightest reason why they do whatever they do, although the reasons are obvious if you study them enough. When you point out to a woman why she is engaging in the sexual strategy she is, she typically angrily denies it.

This is because female nature blinds the female herself to the rather rude, nasty, amoral and even cruel nature of female sexuality and sexual strategy.

Female defenses are fantasy and denial, especially denial. The capacity of women to blind themselves to unpleasant facts is truly stunning.

Now I happen to believe female sexuality can be a lot of fun. I have dated maybe 200 women and girls in my life, and I know females better than most of them even know their own gender at least when it comes to some things.

You can have a Hell of a lot of fun with women when it comes to sex. Sexual activities with women are a blast and can be very rewarding in so many ways.

Another part of female sexuality is love and deep emotional relationships. This is how the female bonds to her male of choice, through this very deep, wildly passionate, almost slave-like worship of the male she loves and dedicates her life too. A woman in love is a wonderful thing and there are few more wonderful things in this world. I have seen this creature many times and even experienced her quite a few times myself such that I can spot a woman in love half a mile away blindfolded.

Once you understand the rather base and raw mammalian nature of female sexual strategy, so much of their bizarre, infuriating, exasperating. trying, incomprehensible, stressing, chaotic and dramatic behaviors finally make sense in an often strange but somehow logical way. Believe it or hot, females are engaging in a lot of this weird and puzzling behavior for some solid reasons that are rooted in evolutionary biology and psychology.

Once you understand what drives females, you lose a lot of your anger or even hatred (misogyny) towards them because now a lot of contemptible and nutty female behaviors can be seen as quite rational in their own often odd way. Believe it or not, women are doing almost all of these things for deep-seated reasons that often make perfect sense in an evolutionary way sense.

Understanding the raw mammalian base level on which female sexual strategy operates does not lead to increased misogyny, contrary to popular lie. Instead this understanding can actually lessen misogyny by making the insensible sensible.

With understanding comes liberation, acceptance and even love and appreciation.

Some Opinions on the PUA Acronyms

I do not think of myself as a PUA mostly because I cannot stand most of those guys. They make me want to vomit. I hate all their stupid fake lingo.

I hate when they talk to a woman they call it a “set.” I hate when they get a # or a date, they call it a “close.” I even hate that if a man has more than one woman at once, you refer to them as “plates.” I hate that they have concepts like “escalation,” and I hate that they call your male friends “wings.”

I hate terms like “day game” and “cold approach.”

They make it seem like football scrimmaging strategy, wargaming or board game strategy. It’s disgusting.

I am not really opposed to what these guys are doing. I just dislike the sleazy terms that they use.

It’s not a set when you talk to a woman, and you shouldn’t treat it like it is a scripted routine. That’s disgusting. She is a human being, believe it or not. Try to talk to her as one human being to another, not as part of some acting script. Why are you reading off of a stupid script? Are you in a movie?

It’s not a close when you get a number, a date or even if she goes home with you. What happened was you got a number or a date with a woman or you got a woman to come home with you. It makes me sick to call that a “close.”

If you have more than one woman, they are not called plates. They are called women. These women are actual human beings, not eating utensils.

I really dislike concepts like escalation. I suppose I have always been doing it anyway, but I don’t think about it very much or even analyze it. Instead I just do it naturally and not in some disgusting scripted manner.

And I never think strategically like these guys advocate. I never think, “If I don’t escalate now, I will lose this woman,” or, “Now is the time to escalate!” That’s just absurd. Instead just act normal.

I start grabbing women pretty fast anyway, but it seems sickening to call that “escalation.” Even “busting a move” sounds a lot better than that because that is pretty much what you are really doing.

My male friend by my side is not my wing. I’m not even sure if he’s my wingman. I don’t know if I like that word either. He’s not a part of a bird’s body. He’s a male friend, a real human who happens to be hanging out with me at the moment.

I hate the idea of day Game. It’s ridiculous. Yes, there are some women about in the daytime. Yes, you can go up to them, talk to them and whatnot, and who knows what else. Granted they are not quite as approachable as they are at nighttime, but I have met lots of females in the daytime.

But it’s not “day game.” It’s just going about your life in daytime and taking advantage of whichever females are acting interested. There’s nothing special about, it, and believe me, the techniques you use in the daytime are not that different from those used in the nighttime. “Day game” is an absurdity.

I hate the idea of cold approach. Mostly this sounds moronic but also sounds rude and disgusting.

Wait a minute. Cold approach is when you walk up to a woman who shows no interest in you whatsoever and try to strike up her interest. How preposterous. See that woman over there who acts completely uninterested in me? You know why she is acting that way? Because she really is totally uninterested in me.

I doubt if I am going to convert her by invading her space and bothering her by talking to her. Perhaps it might work, but more often than that, I am just going to make her mad, and I have a lot of up close and personal experience to prove that will probably be the result. And if you keep bothering her after she gives you “get lost” messages, that is getting towards immoral behavior.

Please try not to keep talking to people who act like they do not want to talk to you. I do sometimes do this, not because I am a douchebag but because I find it very insulting that this person does not want to talk to me, and a part of me wants to think it is not true, so I keep talking to them. Usually it doesn’t work, and they just continue to give off messages indicating they don’t want to talk.

However, I need to be stronger and not get insulted when someone does not want to talk to me. If you keep trying to talk to someone who has indicated that they do not want to talk to you, you are almost violating their rights. I would almost go so far as to say that you are violating their human rights, one of which is the right to be left alone if you so wish.

I do very much like the term IOI or indication of interest because this is one of most important elements of seduction. I rarely approach women who act like they do not want to talk to me. If no woman in the room acts interested in me, that’s just too bad. I don’t have the right to go bothering any of them! I need to swallow my pride and go home. If I’m horny, I can jerk off. It’s better than pestering someone who shows no interest in you.

However, I will say that one thing I look for very much is this IOI. This is solid gold, what you really want to see.

Most IOI’s are not “Move or now!” type things, but more are than you might think. A lot of times you just need to jump on it pretty damn fast (but longer than 15 seconds) and if you don’t, you blew it.

If you get a good IOI from a woman, you really might want to go over and talk to her or engage her somehow to see what’s up. This is no time to be shy.

In general, IOI’s do not last forever, and if you do not bust a move after a certain length of time (minutes, hours, days, weeks, or possibly months), her IOI is simply going to expire and she will consider you LMV or low market value, another term I like.

The terms SMV (sexual market value), HMV (high market value) and LMV above are a bit ugly, but they are solid truth.

The brutal truth is that human female sexuality is about as cruel, vicious and unforgiving as the sexual strategy of many other female mammals. When it comes to female sexuality, women are often simply acting like lower animals and not like evolved 21st Century self-actualized Homo sapiens who has transcended animalism.

The Meaning of the Female Blank, Frozen, Hypnotized, Robotic Stare

Once you get IOI or indication of interest from a woman, a lot of times you need to do something about it right then.

I remember once I was at this concert, and this relatively famous female rock star was walking away from the set. She was a punker dressed in all black leather. As soon as she saw me, she stopped dead in her tracks and froze like a zombie, gave me a blank robotic stare and appeared to be hypnotized. That is one of the most powerful signals any woman will ever give you. When you get it, it means “fuck me.” She wants you. She has a strong sexual or romantic interest that she wants to fulfill with you.

My friend said, “Hey Bob!” I just stood there like a moron and didn’t do anything. I think I was completely freaked out and almost frightened that this relatively famous female rock star was throwing herself at me like that.

She gave me maybe 10-15 seconds of freeze, and then she blew me off and started walking again, avoiding my gaze and ignoring me with an attitude of contempt. I kept looking at her all night and she never looked at me for one second the rest of the night.

This is not the first time that has happened, and I could give you some more examples. It’s almost always hotties or very goodlooking women who do this. Why the less attractive ones don’t do this, I have no idea. They open the window a bit, give you a chance, and if you don’t go for it somehow right then, you are gone, and they just blow you off permanently.

I think this is almost a shit test. She freezes and goes zombie for a bit, and if you are really Alpha, you will go right up to her immediately and engage her, preferably pretty aggressively. If you make no move, then you are a pussy wimp Beta, and she just blows you off.

You Will Never Understand Women Until You See Them As the Lower Animals That They Are

You have to realize that female sexuality itself is ugly, brutal, utterly amoral, and frequently cruel and even evil. That’s just Mother Nature speaking. Female sexuality operates on a very primitive, low and base level, and it is not a whole lot different from the behavior of lower animals, especially mammals. And that’s when females are acting civilized. When their behavior becomes particularly degraded, a human female isn’t even acting like a mammal anymore, more like something as low as a bird.

A human female’s sexual strategy is not that different from a female elephant seal or a female elk. It sounds sexist to say that, but it’s just true. And you will never understand female sexuality until you throw them off the pedestal and see them for the base mammals that they really are. I tell people that in order to understand female sexuality, you need to start thinking of human women as if they are female seals or female deer. If you put that raw mammalian lens on her and view her like that, suddenly all sorts of baffling, infuriating, irrational, bizarre and even vicious female behavior starts to make perfect sense.

Tinder Dates Passe, Abortion Dates the Latest Rage

Here.

Slayer Justin Colby, 33, called Crystal Noordhuizen, 32, and asked, “Are you ready for your abortion date?” moments before slamming…her.

Damn did you read that? “Ready for your abortion date?” Killer opener or what? Then moments later he slams her. This guy works fast. He needs to set up some PUA boot camps now.

Trendsetter Justin Colby, slayer, founder of new abortion dating fad.
Trendsetter Justin Colby, slayer, founder of new abortion dating fad.

Damn, look at him. Does he slay or what? I’m in awe.

Women Love Cucking Men

Woman enjoying cucking a man.
Woman enjoying cucking a man.

To be honest, we do not really know the dynamics involved here. I would assume that the AFC pathetically holding the woman on his shoulders is some friendzoned guy named Cuck or something. She is reaching down, perched on Cucky’s shoulders, leaning down into Chad’s luscious lips. Chad is on his tiptoes, reaching up to the woman and kissing her on the lips. His sense of conquest is total. Look at the expression of Cucky, the guy with the girl on his shoulders. Look at how sad that expression is! Damn that is sad, man!

I think Cucky actually thought he had a chance with this chick, but she has just been leading him on and friendzoning him. In other words, this is not a happy sort of consensual friendzoning. This is the painful nonconsensual friendzoning with the nice guy pursuing this woman puppy-dog like as a love/sex interest and the woman dragging or leading him along, putting him off, aggressively friendzoning him, etc. Hence Cucky’s abject humiliation in this heartwrenching photo.

This woman is utterly delighted in this act. I am assuming that 8

She is being a typical hypergamous female by making males compete for her affection. Chad is for all intents and purposes putting down Cucky here, and the fact that he is in effect openly insulting Cucky actually makes this woman  like Chad a lot more. She loves to see Chad humiliate this other poor sod!

Women actually enjoy seeing men fight over them.

To be fair, men love seeing women fight over them too, but most men will live their entire lives without being fought over by women because women only fight over the top 2

In every fight, there’s a winner and a loser. The winner has nothing to celebrate without the existence of the loser. In days of yore, men probably fought each other to the death over princesses. Now men fight over women, and when Cucky gets friendzoned while Chad wins her affection, Cucky’s tragic loss actually increases Chad’s status in the eyes of the woman.

Evolutionary Psychology 101.

Human nature is cruel!

And we have one more bitter difference between Alpha and Beta men:

Betas fight other men (You pussy! You bitch!) and get bloodied to obtain access to women who sit back and enjoy the show passing the popcorn and cheering on the gladiators.

and

Women fight other women (Mrow!) and get scratched up to obtain access to Alphas, while Chad sits back and enjoys the view, chuckling to himself and stirring his drink.

Get it?

When and How Should You Lie to Women?

Tata wrote:

I think we can’t criminalize a man every time he lies to a woman to have sex. That would be too complicated and difficult to prove. But in a moral point a view, this is not a gray area: If the woman would have known the truth, she would not have consented to have sex, so it’s not true consent. It’s a form of abuse, and it’s how many women feel when it happens to them. Also it’s very insulting for us.

In our society, people blame always the women and laugh at this, but it’s not funny at all. The men are proud to do that. Usually I’m not a feminist, but to make fun of women and obtain false consent is grave. If a little asshole did that to my daughter, my husband and me will become bad. I saw too much women devastated to believe that it’s “normal”.

The most common lie that I had was the man who claims to be single, but he is married or living with a woman or has 2-3 girlfriends, a fiancee or a single mother in their country. Maybe the wife consented to be in a “open relationship,” but in Catholic Hispanic culture, this is very not common, and anyway, I need to know if the man is polygamous before to give a consent.

Two men lied about the place they lived. The place where they invited me was not their true place of residence because at his true residence lived his wife and children. It’ sociopathic and evil.

The most common were the guys who say they want a serious relationship because he know that this is what the girl wants to hear, but that’s not true. He could go see a girl who just wants a sex friend or pay a professional. Why waste my time? They do this  because very few young women want only a sex friend. Maybe those who want that are old, fat and ugly. We are all looking for a boyfriend and love.

The thing I find correct in your womanizer testimony is that you avoid marrying and remain single. But tell them the truth please.

Being completely truthful with women or with any human being for that matter is the stupidest thing I can think of. 10

The most common lie that I had was the man claims to be single, but he is married or living with a woman,

Yes, I never do this, but then I do not marry or live with a woman either. I would hate to be married and lying to women and pretending to be single. I don’t think I could even do it.

or have 2-3 girlfriends

I suppose I do this sometimes. But more likely I just say I want an open relationship for now until we get serious. I usually demand open relationships, and they almost always agree for some reason. Why do they agree? I don’t get it.

Mostly I do not tell them they are the only one because they never ask that question, so it never comes up. I just have Woman A and never tell Woman B about her (lie of omission), but then Woman A usually never asks anyway.

a fiancee or a single mother in their country

Of course I do not do that because I have no fiancees or ex-wives on other countries. Why hide an ex-wife? Let’s see. You are engaged to get married, so you go to a new country and cheat on your soon to be wife. Yuck. I’m not sure I could do it.

and anyway, I need to know If the man is polygamous before to give consent).

I guess in my case, they never ask. We are always adults, and everyone is just dating anyway, so if you are just dating around, it is assumed that maybe you are dating other people. Most women do not ask to get exclusive with me. But with some others, I think we had an undiscussed agreement that I was not supposed to be with other women.

I think I blew up a 4 1/2 year relationship (my longest ever) several years back because she thought I was faithful, and it is true I was with other women maybe half that time.

Sometimes she would say, “You are cheating on me! You have other women!” Of course, faced with an accusation like that, you have no choice but to lie and put on a big act: “No way! I’ve only been with you the whole time!”

Really they usually never ask if I have other women, and they usually don’t accuse me of these things. The idea of an open relationship is “don’t ask, don’t tell”:

You can do whatever you want, but don’t tell me about it! I don’t want to hear about it! What I don’t know won’t hurt me. And vice versa.

That is the rule. So questions like, “Are you dating anyone else?” are not even supposed to be asked because that breaks the rule.

Two men lied about the place where they lived.

Yes of course I never do that. That sounds so horrible. How could I lie to a woman about where I lived, take her to some other place and claim it was my house. Eek, that sounds terrible.

The most common are the guys who say they want a serious relationship because he knows that this is what the girl wants to hear, but that’s not true.

I suppose I do that too but in a different way. If I like her enough, I often do want to have a serious relationship! Just not a monogamous one is all! I have actually been monogamous in relationships for up to 2 1/2 years, but it was more because I didn’t get lucky than by choice. I could do it for longer if I didn’t get lucky. When I get a girlfriend, I often get complacent and lazy and don’t chase women much anymore, so it’s certainly possible

We were all looking for a boyfriend and love.

I much prefer having a real girlfriend over a fuckbuddy; it is so much more fun and rewarding. Having as woman crazy in love with you is one of the best feelings a man can ever have! And I would prefer to be in love too honestly because it feels so good to be in love! But not necessarily monogamously! The only part I might lie on is on the monogamy part.

and anyway, I need to know If the man is polygamous BEFORE giving consent.

The thing is this is suicidal. You simply never bring it up. You never meet a woman and say, “I am looking for polygamy. I am polygamous. I already have a girlfriend, but I am looking for someone new on the side.” She will leave you, immediately. So don’t be an idiot. No matter what you want to relationship-wise, don’t open relationships by delcaring yourself non-monogamous. It’s a suicide act. If you want monogamy, go ahead and say it!

Dirty little secret: most women are actually not the hypergamous whores the Manosphere makes them out to be. Most women are at their core monogamous. That’s simply the way they are. And they get even more so as they get older.

If you are on a dating site, you never put, “I am polygamous. I am into polyamory,” on your profile. If I check “non-monogamous or mostly non-monogamous, no woman will come to me. Not even one. That’s just suicidal. If you want monogamy, check it on your dating profile. Now you match 9

At my age, if I put “I am polyamorous” on my dating profile, no woman would ever respond to me because at my age, most if not all women are looking for love, serious relationships, and even marriage.

In fact, at my age, I go out with women, and on the first date, they say, “I am looking for a man to stay with me for the rest of my life. You want to stay with me forever?”

What?! On the first date.

Or they say, “Well, look. If you get together with me, you will have to stay with me for the rest of my life!” Huh?

Five years ago, a woman said that to me on the first date, and I laughed right in her face! I said, “LOL! I have to stay with you for the rest of your life? That’s stupid! Why don’t you just marry me then? Forget that! Hahahahahahaha!”

She moved away from me a bit and then started going on about how she was better than all the other women: “You know, you really should think about being with just me because I am better than all those other women out there. They can’t compete with me at all. I’m better.”

Then she started going on about how she gives the best deep throat around: “I can do something with my mouth and throat that 9

Jesus!

Women nowadays actually try to outwhore each other to get men!

God I love my generation so much. Look what we did to women!

You can mention that you have other women at certain times, maybe if you are friendzoned.

I met a woman recently and I came onto her pretty hard, but she rubuked me and friendzoned me after not too long. Nothing happened between us. We were just friends from the start. So we would just be friends and talk about anything in our lives with a lot of honestly. One time she asked me if I had a girlfriend, and I laughed and said, “Yep. Actually I have 3 girlfriends right now. LOL!”

She freaked out. “All at once? Three!? What the Hell!? How? How do you do that?”

I said, “Yep, three at once. This is so much fun. I love to live this way, haha.”

Well, it was not too much longer during the same conversation that she said, “Hey, you know what? Come visit me, stay at my place, and you can stay as long as you want. Weeks, months, I don’t care.”

“Do I have to pay for anything?”

“No, don’t worry. I pay for everything.” Wtf?

I wasn’t sure if I was still friendzoned, so I asked, “Where do I sleep? The couch? You have a separate room for me?”

She says, “No you stay with me in my room. You sleep with me. In my bed.”

WTH! As soon as I tell this chick I have three girlfriends, she unfriendzones me immediately and tries to get me to move in with her!

What kind of sense does that make?

Women are crazy.

WE Are the Greatest Generation!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9k3OHECX1Y

White men just give up already. All your women have left you. Coalburner is a compliment. The future is Brazil.

We tried everything. Insults, shaming, ostracization, “Once you go Black, we don’t want you back.”

And none of it’s worked, not any of it. Keeping the White women racially pure is the biggest failed project around. We can’t even control our own women. How pathetic. Now wonder cuckolding in the latest fad.

Time to abandon ship. White men, grab yourself an Oriental girl leave the West before it’s too late.

On a side note, can you believe what whores White girls are nowadays? Good God.

Most people complain, but actually this is a positive development, and my generation, the Baby Boomers, needs to take credit for the Slutification of females aged 18-60.

I mean look at the World War 2 Generation. They call themselves the Greatest Generation! The nerve of them! And what did they do to deserve that? Defeated Germany and Japan? That’s nothing. How weak can you get?

That is so nothing compared to what we Boomers did.

God I love my generation!

Look what we did. We turned all our women into total whores!

We are the greatest generation!

Must Seducers be Hypermasculine?

Jason Y writes:

If you want to be a player, then being hyper-masculine is the way to go. Otherwise, it really isn’t necessary. Some masculinity is needed though.

I think Tata is right. After all, she is a woman. She said you only need to be just “masculine enough,” and that is all that matters. Beyond that, Alpha is all about being Chad and not much more. And I was shocked at some of the men she thought were “masculine enough” because it seemed the bar was rather low.

I honestly do not think hypermasculinity has much to do with it although there are various types of Hypermasculinity Game you can run – Thug Game, Rapper Game, Dealer Game, Delinquent Game, Bad Boy Game. I think there are also some types of non-criminal minded hypermasculine Game styles out there. But I think hypermasculinity is very much overrated.

The craziest players I ever knew were practically androgynes. They had a very strong masculine essence, but they also had this sort of feminine thing going at the same time. And some of the most notorious players I have ever known got called gay almost constantly. They weren’t effeminate or faggoty at all. They were more like “soft men.” Actually I think “soft men” are way more notorious than super-masculine hard men. A lot of women go nuts over “soft men” as long as they are Chad, have great Game and are really sexy.

Some players hate women, and most are cynical of them because these guys have figured out what females are really like, and the truth about females is pretty ugly, just like the truth about males is nasty too. Once you strip aside all the PC lies and Society bullshit and illusions, both genders are pretty damn ugly.

The truth is ugly. Lies are pretty. People want pretty lies. Problem is people figure out that the pretty lies they believed are just that, lies, and a lot of times they start hating – Jews, Blacks, women, men, whatever. People learn the ugly truth about some group, and it’s so at odds with the PC Dream World Lie about the group that they react with contempt. “You mean these precious female snowflakes I have been worshiping my whole life are really that awful? Ugh! That stinks! I hate women!”

In fact, I think hypermasculinity is a hindrance to being a good seducer. The hypermasculine man usually does not understand females very well, and he often doesn’t really like them too much either. He doesn’t understand them because he has too little Feminine Essence. Unfortunately, you can’t understand women very well unless you have some Feminine Essence yourself. That way you can connect with them on a very basic level.

Also hypermasculinity is the complete opposite of femininity, and hypermasculinity is all about, frankly, the hatred of the feminine. Ok, macho guys hate the feminine. They sure aren’t fags, no siree sir! Well, how are they supposed to feel about women then? See? If you hate the feminine in men, you tend to hate it in women too. Women are feminine. You hate femininity, you hate women on some level – there’s no way around it.

When I watch TV, I often watch all-female TV (not soaps, those are gay), even stupid stuff like women’s talk shows, cooking shows and fashion shows where women act about as stupid and inane as the stereotype says. Thing is though, I like to see women like that. I like to see women sitting around being insipid, catty, gossiping, giggling and talking about clothes or makeup or whatever. That’s because I like to watch women no matter what they are doing. I even love to watch them when they are being completely empty-headed and moronic because to me they are delightful even then.

Statement on MRA’s

Frizzled writes:

The whole tranny thing of forcing women to accept you’re one of them, blackmailing them into fucking you as a “lesbian” and declaring Jihad on any dissent seems to be close to Men’s Rights Activism, another cause dear to Robert’s heart.

Are you male or female, frizzled?

I don’t like almost all MRA assholes. However, men are in need of equal rights these days because they are systematically oppressed by feminists. I would say that women are also in need of equal rights too. Equal rights feminism is still a great idea which I support very much. Just not real keen on man-hating bitches who hate heterosexual sex, eh? The more you think about it, they are the enemies of all of us men. However, if a woman told me that MRA’s are the enemies of all of us women so she hated them, I would not argue with her. I think if I were a woman, I would hate MRA’s myself and consider them my enemies.

I support pro-women MRA. I support pro-male feminism.

Both genders need equal rights and hating the opposite sex is just wrong.

Tranny Chaos

Here.

This is too much. You just knew this was coming, didn’t you? How could you not. That said, I think this thing is onto something. I hope it is heterosexual.

Actually I am would almost go tranny myself fraudulently just to do this. That would be such a kick.

I hate to confess that one of my biggest fantasies all through high school was finding a peephole to spy into the girls’ locker room or else turning invisible (Invisible Man style) so I could sneak into the girls’ locker room undetected. When you invisible, can people still hear you? If so, you have to be quiet. When you are invisible, can people still bump into you if you are in their way? Then you need to get out of the way all the time.

I have been wondering about these things my whole life.

How to Get Females: My Story

I am not going to debate whether I was good-looking or not as a young man. Obviously I have my own opinion, but my opinion of my looks is worthless. The only thing that matters looks-wise is how others see you.

It’s not something to be endlessly debated with yourself and others: “Am I good-looking or not?” It is not something for you to decide. It is something for others to decide. If you are, lots of females, gay and bisexual men and even straight men will let you know right to your face, trust me.

I was told at the time that I looked like Tom Hanks and Rick Springfield.

As far as slaying or being a PUA, I started to get a pretty big ego with regard to females when I was about 18. And then I started having a lot of success somehow. I am not even sure how it happened.

We would be sitting at a table in the library studying at junior college, and women at the table would look at me, sort of freeze, put down their work, get up from their seat, walk right over to me, give me a big smile and sit right down in my lap! Guys at the table would freeze in shock, look at me, shake their heads and say, “How do you do it? “How do you do it? I will never understand this.”

Thing is I don’t even know how I did it myself! I am not sure why women were always sitting on my lap, but possibly I was “approachable” and “open.” If you want advice, I would just say, “Be approachable.” I would also say “open yourself up” to females. You can either “close your  body off” or “open your body up” to other humans, and I am not even sure how that is done! It is almost metaphysical. You just have to try to do it and see what happens.

More good advice would be: “make females feel comfortable around you.”

I have had women say, “You make me feel so comfortable to be around you! You make me relax so much. And you are open too. I just want to grab you every time I see you.”

Well, with increased success came more success. It was like every new female I slayed just made this Stud or Slayer or whatever persona even greater.

I haven’t the faintest idea if I am Alpha or not, and I could care less if I am or was at any time. Whether or not you are Alpha is best seen as “not an important question.”

I never use the word Alpha to refer to myself, and I think most men in general should not call themselves Alphas. I think it is tacky. Alpha is like good-looking. You’re only good-looking if others think you are. If people think you are Alpha, then you’re Alpha.

I think most real true Alphas would rarely if ever say, “I’m an Alpha!” Someone might ask them, “Are you Alpha?” and the real pure Alpha would shrug his shoulders and ask back, “I dunno. Do you think I’m Alpha?” The questioner says, “Hell yeah, Chad! You are the Alphamost of the Alphiest of the Alpha Alpha Alphas!”

And then the pure Alpha would laugh and shrug his shoulders and say, “Ok, well I guess I am an Alpha then. If you say so.”

All these guys running around on PUA forums yelling, “I am Alpha!” are the biggest dickwads. I have no idea if they are Alphas or not, but if they are, they are not very good ones.

I reiterate that the real pure Alpha would rarely if ever say something stupid like, “I am Alpha.” He might just figure it was obvious and need not be said. Some things are best demonstrated by showing, not telling.

Anyway, it was like an expanding head. And with each new female, as that head expands a bit more, you start attracting a few more females.

There are Slayer levels like levels in videogames, ok? I know that sounds nuts, but I am serious. For instance say your head is at Slayer +5. Ok, you are attracting some women. So then you slay some more, now you are at Slayer +10. And now you attract even more females than you did at Slayer +5. And with each new step from +5 to +10, you attract a few more females. Well, this process just builds and builds, and I am not even sure there is any end to it. It is almost frightening the way it just keeps expanding with no end in sight.

Pretty soon your head or Slayer Persona is so huge it almost has its own orbit, and now you are attracting females almost everywhere you go. I mean the gas station, the liquor store, driving down the street, at school, at work – everywhere – you literally cannot escape them. It is like you are walking honey, and females are bees or like you are a giving off some magic scent that attracts them. You become actually a literal chick magnet. It almost gets scary or annoying sometimes, and sometimes you want to hide inside just to avoid females.

As you get a Slayer reputation, of course you accumulate a lot of exes saying you’re the scum of the Earth and despising you, but even they usually do not hate you 10

But also you get a good reputation, and now you have these new females who incredibly enough want to get in on the action with the Slayer dude, even though he’s not boyfriend material, it’s obvious that it won’t lead anywhere, and he’s totally unreliable. They don’t even really care if they get pump and dumped! They could care less! It never got to the point where they were lining up and literally taking numbers to have sex with me, but it was like that for some of my friends.

Let us take one guy named SP. I mean they were practically lining up and taking numbers just to get pump and dumped by SP. And after getting pump and dumped, they would walk out with this huge smile on their face like, “Wow I just had sex with the Biggest Slayer in Town, SP!” Like they got a medal or something. You had to see it to believe it, it was incredible.

So I guess all this boils down to Game. The Game idiots are complete tards because they think they have invented some new thing.

Game has been around forever. There is a famous book in Latin called On Love, and really it should be called How to Pick up Girls n Rome AD 100. Men have been perfecting this stuff forever.

We were all running Game in the 1970’s and 1980’s even though we did not call it that or realize it. I idolized some Ultra-Slayers and became best friends with them. These dudes like SP would literally date like 3-4 females every day. A morning date, an afternoon date, an evening date and then a midnight date. And SP would have sex with every single one of them! He was simply incredible.

So I made these guys like SP my gurus, and I actually become very good friends with SP, and when you hang out with SP, the pussy literally drops in your lap. I studied these guys very carefully.

All of these guys had systems. For instance, SP had the craziest, most elaborate Game systems I have ever seen in my entire life. He probably had like 100 different Game systems, they were all quite complex, and frequently he seemed to be running multiple systems at once almost like it was a big game to him, which I suppose it was.

This SP guy was literally the most calculating fucker I have ever known. He calculated every single thing he said and did. He was not spontaneous at all. I think spontaneity is idiocy, personally. If you are spontaneous, and you are just going to say and do the wrong thing too many times. It’s not worth it to be “free.”

All these guys have systems. Casanova and Don Juan had systems. You can’t even slay unless you have a system. So really all slayers are running Game because you have to run Game to slay.

Well, with SP, I studied him so carefully that I would try to literally become SP. I would go into “SP mode,” and I would seem to turn into him and channel his personality. I had his voice down pat, and I would use it on females. I would call up some chick I just met using my SP voice, and she would say, “Hey, my roommate says you have a sexy voice…”

The voice I used was usually pretty soft. A lot of people could hardly hear me, and I had to repeat stuff a lot. You do not need a strong, masculine, powerful voice at all.

Also you do not have to be built. I was never built. I was always pretty skinny. Women say they hate skinny guys, but if you are Skinny Chad, they could care less. Women would complain or ever ridicule me for being skinny, but those same ones would usually have sex with me anyway. So this whole “you can’t be skinny” or “you have to have a great built body” thing is nonsense.

So I ran Game. We had different systems of Game.

I ran Surfer Game, Skiier Game, Doper Game, Drug Dealer Game (this one is really good), Delinquent Game (Thug Game?), Criminal Game, Cool Guy Game, Rocker Game, Writer (Artist) Game, Punker Game, Hippie Game, on and on. There is even Slayer Game itself where you simply sit back and let your slayer reputation drive more and more females to you.

I still run Game to this very day. I probably run maybe 5-10 different kinds of Game and often different types at once. It gets to be entertainment after a while, and you can create these new Game types and invent these new personas just for shits and giggles, and then you really have to become almost a method actor and literally turn into that persona, and now you are running the Game of that persona. If you don’t melt completely into the new role like an actor, lose yourself and turn into a new person, you are not really running that particular Game optimally. A skilled guy who has 15 different types of Game he runs is literally becoming 15 completely new human beings with each new Game type he runs.

Unfortunately my Game is worthless now as I am -Looks or Minus Looks. My looks are pretty much gone, and young women in general want nothing to do with me, and probably a lot of older ones do too. But I run Game anyway because now it is just the natural and normal way to be. Even when I am alone, I am off into some other Game persona playing a role like an actor. So I run Game even when I am all alone. In fact, Alone Time is a good time to really work on perfecting whatever Game system you have like an actor practicing a new role.

My basic opinion on this sort of thing?

Looks is worthless without Game, and Game is worthless without Looks. Anyone who says PUA (Game) doesn’t work is a complete tool and moron.

All Slayers run Game! The best Slayers run the finest Game of them all!

I don’t see how you can slay at all without Game. How are you going to slay -Game? I have known guys who had MM looks but zero Game, and they would go years with sex. MM looks -Game is almost worthless.

The Whole Purpose of Redpill, Game, PUA, etc.

Swank writes:

A 48 year old woman cheated on him.

Oh no.

Who cares?

Why would he possibly care?

For 18 years of marriage, his wife was a cold fish in bed and refused to do anything even slightly kinky, either oral sex (giving or receiving).

A RETARD.

And he didn’t always have status. The article states that he struggled financially for years.

But sure, the exception disproves the general rule I guess.

Hang on a second. Swank says all a man has to do is get some status, gain 20 pounds, gain 10 pounds of muscle and find someone with similar interests and then it’s home free and he can say and do whatever the Hell you want to.

Swank say this guy had no status.

He was a millionaire. He owned his own tech company. He lived in million dollar home. How is it that a millionaire living in a million dollar home is struggling financially? And he wasn’t struggling financially his whole life. His sex life sucked from the start. He simply did not turn on his wife. Why? She was turned on by other men instead, other than her husband. Why?

She was in league with a bunch of other cheating wives who were all cheating on their “lame husbands” with “studs.” Why did these women see their husbands as lame? What was wrong with them? What did the studs they were cheating on have that their husbands lacked? Why did these women see their harems of studs to cheat with as Alpha fucks and their husbands as Beta bucks? Here the dynamic is obviously working.

Swank cannot answer any of these questions.

Liberals cannot answer any of these questions.

Feminists cannot answer any of these questions.

All of them just mouth stupid platitudes.

Feminists say nice guys aren’t nice (not true), and that’s why women hate them. This is a flat-out lie and is an example of classic female self-deception that they have deceived themselves into believing is true.

Feminists say, hey incels, all you have to do is get some clean clothes, shower and bathe regularly, brush your teeth, practice good hygiene and have some halfway decent social skills and you are home free! The babes are just going to fall right into your damn lap. You think that’s going to work?

The whole purpose of Redpill, Game, PUA and all the other more or less evil bullshit is to try to figure out why the Hell this is happening. Why are the husbands seen as lame? What makes them lame? Why are these women not turned on by their husbands? What are the husbands lacking? What could the husbands do to make themselves more attractive? What did the studs they were cheating on have these these husband cucks did not have? What was it about their boytoys that turned these women on?

Are there other groups out there that offer men relationship advise on how to maximally meet their needs and desires in relationships with women while keeping things on as much of an even keel as possible much of the time and having a minimum amount of stress, drama, chaos, negativity and relationship downtime and crisis as possible that are maybe not as evil as the Game, PUA and Redpill? If so, fine, bring them on. A morally grounded relationship guide for men would be a great thing.

One problem is that the typical groups you go to about this stuff are full of women and feminist men and they give flat out horrible advise to men who are having relationship troubles.

Let me give you an example. In Reddit/relationships, a husband walks in on his wife down on her knees sucking two men’s cocks. The guy goes to R/relationships. What advise do the women and feminist men have? Get therapy.

Get therapy!

Does that sound like good advice in the circumstances? Come on.

I am having a hard time seeing why these movements are so evil. Why do the feminists hate them so much? Because it means we men are catching on to women’s bullshit and games and trying to outsmart them so they can’t con us, manipulate us and screw us over so much? Is that why? Because men are wising up, learning women’s tricks and how to beat them at their own game? Feminists are furious that we are catching on to women’s scammy manipulating bullshit, figuring out how to deal with it and coming up with a bunch of scammy manipulative bullshit of our own to throw their way so as to confuse them.

That’s really what it’s all about, isn’t it?

Oh no! The men are catching on! We can’t have that!

Before we women were fighting a ridiculous one-sided war against unarmed men who declared unilateral ceasefire. It was a massacre. The men were getting creamed. It was all good.

Now the men have walked away from the table, stockpiled weapons, broken all of our codes, completely infiltrated our forces with spies and double agents, and are now fighting back with some weapons that are so brand new we women can’t even figure out how they work!

Oh no! A fair fight!  A woman’s worst nightmare!

Sexual Orientation Ratios among Men, with a Discussion and Look to the Future

The only other sexual orientation survey I am aware of was done on medical students in Australia by a famous sexologist. An anonymous questionnaire was used, but later testing in the lab showed that people’s responses lined up very well with how they rated themselves. Using this scale:

100-0: Maximum heterosexual, minimum homosexual 90-10: Maximum heterosexual, incidental homosexual 80-20: Maximum heterosexual, significant homosexual 70-30: Maximum heterosexual, strong homosexual 60-40: Maximum heterosexual, very strong strong homosexual 50-50: Maximum heterosexual, maximal homosexual 40-60: Maximum homosexual, very strong heterosexual 30-70: Maximum homosexual, strong heterosexual 20-80: Maximum homosexual, significant heterosexual 10-90: Maximum homosexual, incidental heterosexual 0-100: Maximum homosexual, minimal heterosexual

The Australian survey showed that 6

50-50: Maximum heterosexual, maximal homosexual: 40-60: Maximum homosexual, very strong heterosexual: 30-70: Maximum homosexual, strong heterosexual: 20-80: Maximum homosexual, significant heterosexual: 10-90: Maximum homosexual, incidental heterosexual: 0-100: Maximum homosexual, minimal heterosexual:

Fully 9

100-0: Maximum heterosexual, minimum homosexual: 6 90-10: Maximum heterosexual, incidental homosexual: 1 80-20: Maximum heterosexual, significant homosexual: 1 70-30: Maximum heterosexual, strong homosexual: 60-40: Maximum heterosexual, very strong strong homosexual: 50-50: Maximum heterosexual, maximal homosexual:

Amazingly, only

This goes with reports we get out of the gay community that there are not many male full bisexuals. The same reports say that many young men in their 20’s identify as bisexual and may have a wife or a girlfriend, but they spend most of their socializing time in gay hangouts. The same people say that when they watch men in their 20’s who identify as bisexual over time, after several years, quite a few of them convert over to completely gay.

This stands to reason, as I have met some obviously bisexual men in their 20’s with girlfriends who struck me as completely gay.

Every time I was around them, there was a very strong sexual vibe (Arthur), and in one case (KL), the guy was constantly making weird gay insinuations (he was pretty much trying to fuck me 10

This is also typical of gay men – their insane persistence. The gay men that I have known who liked me pretty much never stopped trying to screw me the whole time I knew them. If they started out coming onto me, they simply never gave up no matter how many times I told them no or got mad at them. I think there is something wrong with these people. The only way to stop this behavior is to get very aggressive, threaten or menace them, and especially end the friendship altogether.

I have also heard from some of my straight friends that the gay men they befriended pretty much never quit after they started coming onto them. Once they start it up, they just can’t seem to knock it off. They don’t seem to have an off switch.

I wonder if this is behind a lot of gay-bashings? I am not advocating beating people up, but a gay man who can’t stop pestering a straight man is seriously asking for a knuckle sandwich. There was a commenter on here who insisted that attempted seductions were behind a lot of gay-bashings. What often happened was a gay man came on hard to a straight man, and the straight man took offense and assaulted the gay man. I don’t like to blame the victim, but…

I worked with Arthur, and I never saw him look at a woman once the whole time I worked there. We would be eating lunch in the lunchroom, a beautiful woman would walk in, and Arthur would not even look up at her. It was as if a ghost had walked into the room. She was simply not there at all.

My mother said that before she got married, she worked in San Fransisco, and there was a man in the office that no one could figure out. Finally the woman got it. My mother said, “He never looked at a woman, not even one time, ever.”

This follows.

I have known and worked with a number of gay men, and one surefire way to spot them is that they never look at women, ever. Women are either ghosts, or in the case of one gay boss, part of the furniture, carpet or ceiling.

With KL, I must say that I never heard him talk about women even one time for even one second, and he was constantly insinuating creepy upsetting gay bullshit. I used to go out on drives with him in his van and he never looked at a woman even one time.

Lessons? How to spot a gay man:

Gay men never look at women.

and

Gay men never talk about women.

Based on this, these two “bisexual” men in their late 20’s were simply closeted gay men with beard girlfriends. Which goes along with gay common wisdom above that many bisexual young men are simply closeted gay men who are afraid to come out all the way and are frankly just lying to themselves.

It is also interesting that the overwhelming majority of men who have sexual interest in men or who have some bisexual attraction lean straight, often very heavily straight.

100-0: Maximum heterosexual, minimum homosexual: 6 90-10: Maximum heterosexual, incidental homosexual: 1 80-20: Maximum heterosexual, significant homosexual: 1 70-30: Maximum heterosexual, strong homosexual: 60-40: Maximum heterosexual, very strong strong homosexual: 50-50: Maximum heterosexual, maximal homosexual:

What this shows is that men who lean gay are not common at all. No more than

Probably the vast majority of the 3

As you can see, 3

I honestly do not see what is so groovy about all of this. The gay and gay-leaning men who truly cannot help their orientation should be supported completely at least as far as their orientation goes. You can hardly hate a man for something he can’t help.

Nevertheless, homosexuality is bad for society, male homosexuality particularly so. If it’s kept to a minimum, society can easily cope with the dysfunctions, issues and costs of this group and really it is no big problem. Society can absorb it and move along. Encouraging and promoting homosexual behavior is encouraging and promoting something that is bad for society. What’s the point? Why do it? What’s the upside? The Cultural Left doesn’t make sense. Why are they trying to harm society?

“My Wife Was Addicted to Ashley Madison”

Here.

This man had good looks, very high status (owned his own tech company), a high income ($1 million/year), a great deal of wealth (millionaire, lived in $1 million home), much in common with his wife, and his marriage still turned to shit.

This guy needs Redpill or some sort of male self-help group’s advise. Actually, he did show up on Reddit Redpill soon after this story broke. A lot of the guys completely ripped him a new one, which I thought was pretty lousy. The man blames the whole thing on the (Jewish?) scumbag who ran Ashley Madison, who he calls a sociopath. Well, he is a sociopath. Of course he is. He also blames his wife’s mental illness for her behavior. She is either a Borderline or what Beatrix calls a “high-conflict woman” Cluster B type who displays Borderline traits but functions too well to be a Borderline.

The guys on Redpill thought it was stupid to blame the sociopathic website owner and his Borderline wife for the behavior. I do not know what to say to that.

For 18 years of marriage, his wife was a cold fish in bed and refused to do anything even slightly kinky, either oral sex (giving or receiving). She posted a dirty profile on Ashley Madison as a wild bitch down for all sorts of kinky fun (that she was denying her husband). He found her conversations on her cellphone with her group of married female friends who were all either cheating on their husbands or encouraging and egging on the others to cheat. One woman was passing around a photo of a huge cock of the guy she was cheating on her husband with, saying, “You girls could be having this right now instead of your lame husbands. Come join the fun!”

He caught her cheating previously last year and then when the scandal broke, he found her profile in the leaked data and caught her again. He has two boys who don’t know what their mother did. Apparently they are divorcing. When husbands catch wives cheating without permission, 9

There were 30 million male profiles on Ashley Madison and 5 million female profiles. A very close examination revealed only 1,500 real active females among that 5 million. 30 million men competing for 1,500 men. World’s biggest sausage fest?

The site was very sleazy. The very large number of the female profiles on the site were fakes created by Ashley Madison.When you join the site for free, you soon get profile visits, chat requests and mails from hot, horny looking babes. Usually of these women are either fakes being run by employees or computer programs, that is, not even real female humans at all. The purpose of this is to get you to pay to join the site. After you pay, all of the visits, mails and chat requests vanish. Attempts to respond to the female visitors, mailers and chat requesters all fail because the women are not even real. This is typical and most dating sites do this. There were a very few real women on the site, and apparently a few guys did well.

I do not have much at all to say about this matter. Feel free to comment.

25 Ways Feminists Systematically Oppress Men

Tulio writes:

Not that I’m saying you’re wrong per se, but can you list concrete examples of how men are systematically oppressed? While I don’t like feminism, I also don’t feel oppressed in any way as a man. I find feminists to be more of an annoyance than a threat.

Here is a list of 20. See if you can come up with more.

  1. Conflation of statutory rape and pedophilia created by feminists is causing a lot of harm to teenage boys and especially young men.
  2. Insane anti-rape laws in Sweden and the UK written by feminists that including rape definition creep expanding towards more and more traditional non-rapes.
  3. Anti-rape inquisitions created by feminists on campuses where a woman can file rape charges against you months to years after the fact, the man is considered guilty until proven innocent and the prosecution and judges are completely rigged against the man. For instance, a man was recently thrown out of a university back East on “rape” charges. What happened? The man was blacked out drunk, lying on his back on a bed, and a female student gave him a blowjob. She sucked his cock while he was blacked out. If anyone got raped, it might have been him. She feared for her reputation after the incident and the feminist dorm adviser suggested she file rape charges to preserve her reputation. Another man was thrown out of school for raping his own girlfriend. Charges were filed many months after they broke up and the court was a Kangaroo Court stacked with feminists.
  4. Rape rules on campus created by feminists requiring assent for each escalation of sex acts undertaken.
  5. Crazy campus rape rules created by feminists whereby a man can be accused of rape even if the woman never said no if she “thought no in her head.” In this case, the man can be accused of rape because he’s not a mindreader.
  6. Crazy rape law in Washington State written by feminists whereby a teacher was convicted of rape of a female student who was 18 years old, an adult, when it happened. The sex was 10
  7. Crazy rape laws written by feminists where sex with a drunken woman is “rape.”
  8. Fake campus rape crisis created by feminists whereby feminists make up lies like 2
  9. Fake “rape culture” crisis US created by feminists in the US, probably the most anti-rape culture on Earth, where all men are seen as potential rapists.
  10. Insane rape laws in the UK written by feminists whereby apparently there is no statute of limitations for rape, sexual assault and “pedophilia” whereby men are going down for grabbing a grown woman’s tits 45 years ago, feeling up a 14 year old girl’s ass 35 years ago and other lunacy.
  11. Feminists making up lies like “fake rape charges are very rare.” The figure of
  12. Insane sexual harassment rules in most employment locations whereby feminists are apparently trying to outlaw all heterosexual conduct in the workplace. I worked at a workplace where I was told that dating between coworkers was banned by the company’s sexual harassment policies.
  13. Sexual harassment madness on university campuses created by feminists whereby female students constantly file Title 9 complaints against male professions for every fake infraction in the book. One of the crimes is criticizing feminism or Women’s Studies Departments. Male teachers have had Title 9 complaints filed against them for doing just that.
  14. New laws in France and Germany created by feminists whereby men are forbidden from paternity testing their own babies.
  15. Pedophile Mass Hysteria promoted by feminists whereby any man who looks at a teenage girl is a “pedophile” and a “predator,” and men can’t even talk to any children of either sex anymore. Single men are particularly victimized by this. I have had single men tell me that all single White men past a certain age are automatically considered “pedophiles.” They also tell me how terrified they are of girls and how they take off every time they see one.
  16. Pedophile Mass Hysteria created by feminists causing men to be arrested for merely talking to teenage girls. A man was recently arrested and charged with “grooming” for talking to two 15 year old girls, apparently runaways, in a pet store in California. In California, this “anti-grooming” law is called “annoying or molesting a child.” Under this extremely vague offense, you can be charged with “grooming” for merely talking to a teenage girl.
  17. Pedophile Mass Hysteria caused by feminists resulting in men getting convicted of “child molesting” for having sex with underage girls who lied about their age and said they were 18-19, created Facebook pages with fake ages on them, and openly seduced older men. When people found out about it, the girls’ parents filed child molesting charges. The men had no idea the girls were underage. They were convicted and go on the Sex Offender Registry for life because a girl lied to them and they naively believed her lie.
  18. Pedophile Mass Hysteria caused by feminists expanding to adults -> a man recently told me online that if he saw a 50 year old man talking to a 20 year old woman, he would punch the man in the face. Recall how many women called Clinton a “pedophile” for having sex with 23 year old Monica.
  19. Pedophile Mass Hysteria created by feminists whereby evil girls mostly aged 9-13 are mass charging male teachers with child molesting under blatantly fake charges. A friend of mine had an entire classroom of evil 9 years old girls charge him with molesting them in a single day (!). The charge went into his record, parents threatened to beat him up, and he was not allowed to teach at that district ever again. My own father was charged with molesting a 13 year old Black girl for breaking up a fight between her and some other girl.
  20. Feminists making up lies like “children never lie about being molested” which result in mass fake molesting charges against men.
  21. Creep shaming created by feminists and women whereby many men are terrified to even approach females anywhere for fear of being called a creep.
  22. Crazy fake “street harassment” crisis created by feminists whereby selling hello to a woman on the street or trying to talk to a woman on a train is apparently “harassment.”
  23. Insane domestic violence laws written by feminists in the 1990’s whereby the woman gets to hit the man as much as she wants, but if the man hits back one time, he’s going to jail -> men are not allowed to fight back against women.
  24. Crazy domestic violence law written by feminists whereby if you hit a woman (even if you hit her back) in your own home which you own and she stays in as a perma-guest, even after you get out of jail, the woman can file a restraining order against you, continue to live in your home (!), and you will be homeless and banned from living in your own home while some leech lives there for free. You will have to find temporary lodging or go homeless.
  25. Crazy alimony laws written by feminists whereby the woman gets half your paycheck for years, maybe forever, no matter how high your check is and how much she really needs, even if she initiates the divorce.

Time of the Evilboys!

Jason Y writes:

RL: I dunno, I think we were just boys, age 9-13. Boys are EVIL, especially at a certain age. Didn’t you know that?

Jason Y: Boys and girls at that age are equally evil. At least that’s how it was in Korea, my experience in America wasn’t much different either. There are a few that are kind, but a lot of them aren’t. If you get on their bad side, they’ll crucify you. 😆

I enjoyed being an evil little boy. We were nice a lot too. We had friends, and we mostly treated them well.

Smear the Queer is just a game. You play it with your friends. It was the same as Kill the Man on the Hoppityhop. One guy gets on the hoppityhop and starts bouncing all around the yard, and he’s automatically the Queer. Everyone yells, “Look, he’s a queer! Smear the queer! Smear the queer! Hahahahaahahahaha!” Because, you know, queers have to be destroyed on sight, right?

The other guys jump on him and try to pull him off the hoppityhop, and he tries to throw them off and bounce away to escape. You climb on his back and hit him. You try to waste the guy on the hoppityhop and dislodge him from the ball. No one ever got hurt. We were 9 or 10 years old, and we engaged in continuous physical fighting. Boys that age can’t even hurt each other.

We had some designated victims who we relentlessly teased to try to provoke them into attacking us so we could have an excuse to waste them. They performed right on cue. But those designated victims were also our some of our friends. It all depended on the dynamics.

We also had Olive Wars and Dirt Clod Wars. We would split into two armies, and both sides would arm themselves with dirt clods or unripe olives. Then it would be a war. You would throw olives or clods at the other side and try to hit them. The olives were hard, and they hurt like Hell if they hit you.

Quite a few times, these wars would get seriously out of hand and people would get mad. I remember one time we went up to see our cousins, and we ended up in this huge evil Berry War, and the last thing I remember before driving off to the plane was them chasing after us at the airport screaming that they were going to kill us. Other times at home it was similar. The Olive War would disintegrate into a great big real fight, guys screaming at each other, calling names, trying to hit each other, running home.

There was this kid named RSJ, and he was called Dickie. His real name was Richard. He was on crutches for some birth defect. Nothing wrong with that, but he was mean as a snake for some reason. His older brother tormented him mercilessly, and even his own mother joined him and creamed him emotionally. They spoke to him in the most mocking, humiliating, degrading tones, ridiculed him with voices full of derision and contempt.

I am not sure what the dynamics were, but his family was mean and cruel to him, and then he was a vicious little shit himself. Both processes were driving each other somehow, but I am not sure who started it.

We called him Dogdoo Dickie and he hated that name so much! He saw red if you called him that! So of course we called him that constantly, and we tormented him mercilessly like mosquitoes on your skin. We would provoke him to get him to react and try to fight us. After we provoked him, he would come chasing after us with his crutches flying. He would try to hit you with his crutches! We would run away from him trying to avoid getting hit by his crutches and yelling names at him and laughing. He would come after us with his crutches swinging with the meanest, evillest look on his face. He was nasty!

Mostly we just got along though. Except for some designated victims who everyone bullied or other people bullied depending on the dynamics, all the rest of us got along and had all sorts of fun.

We did kill animals though. We started out killing insects like all boys. We would take magnifying glasses and set insects on fire on the sidewalk. We had garden pests, and instead of just killing them, we would slowly torture them to death. Like tomato worms. We hated those things, and when we caught them we would put them in this little “bullring” and they would be the “bull.” We would have “bullfights” with them. We would take big nails and throw them at the tomato worms yelling, “Picadors! Picadors!” and we would try to spear the tomato worms with the nails.

Also we had pillbugs, and they were serious pests. We soon tired of killing them in the ordinary way so we started devising all these new experimental ways of industrial pillbug murder. It was Pillbug Holocaust, and we were like Nazis. We tried every method under the sun to murder those bugs in all these new and experimental ways. We even did “surgery” on them where we would take them apart and examine their insides like scientists. We were Mengele!

My parents found out about our Pillbug Concentration Camps, and my father was disturbed. He said it was evil and ordered us to stop. He thought we were on the road to being serial killers.

We also killed snails in experimental ways. Salt is great. You pour salt on the snail, and it kills it in a horrible way. We also conducted biology experiments on snails where we would paint them with paint, release them and try to find them later to see how far they traveled.

We also killed fish, and I have to admit that was pretty damn evil. We fished at this place called The Smelt Place which was maybe 200 yards away from the beach. You could go there and catch maybe 100 smelt in a day. It got boring after a while, endlessly catching these moronic fish who were obviously too stupid to not get caught.

After a while, we would reel in a smelt and then cast the line with the smelt still on it onto some nearby rocks on the rocky shoreline. When we did this we would yell, “Acapulco cliff divers!” The smelt would land on the rocks and we would reel it in over the rocks. Pretty awful torture for the smelt, and the smelt would get killed pretty quickly. Then one time TM caught a smelt, kept it alive somehow and tied it to a rope on the back of his bike and dragged it on the way home for a bit until it died. That was hilarious!

Some of our girl cousins came to live with us for one year. Their family was falling apart badly, their mother was dying, diabolical divorce underway, and their father was an evil actual Nazi from Germany who we hated. Anyway, my mother’s side took those girls and shuttled them around to our relatives on their side of the family to keep them out of the father’s hands because we hated him so much. Those girls were 5, 7 and 9, and they were pure evil. They were driven crazy by all the family dynamics. They lived with us for a while when I was 10, and there were Boys Versus Girls fighting all the time. It was a kick!

My little brother went to kindergarten with one of my girl cousins. The first day, he came home and there had been some Black kids in the class somehow, don’t ask me how. My brother came home disgusted and said, “Black people sure are stupid! They’re dumb and loud!” 5 year old race realist! He had been exposed to almost no serious racism at home because my father was a liberal. I remember one time someone said nigger at the dinner table, and my Dad flipped and turned the whole dinner into an Antiracist Inquisition. We were not allowed to use that word around him.

We were also evil little thieves. I personally did not steal too much. Mostly we stole from the workmen who were working on new houses in the back. We would sneak back there at night and rip off nails, chisels, all sorts of construction materials. I have to admit thievery was pretty damn fun. I didn’t steal much other than from the workmen. I think my father found out we were thieving from the workmen, and once again he got disturbed and thought we were going to turn into criminals. I think he ordered us to take the stuff back. We lied and told him we returned everything, but really we never did, and even worse, we kept stealing more stuff!

The backyard was undeveloped, just bare ground, and we built these huge forts all over the yard. Then we had highways going all over the yard connecting one fort to the other. And we would drive trucks over these highways. We would fill the trucks up with the stolen construction materials and trade them with each other. I think a certain type of nail become “money” at some point and could be used to purchase things. There was a low spot in the yard where water collected from rain, and we called it Mud River. We built all these bridges over Mud River so you could walk across it on boards, but it was always this mysterious place with evil and frightening overtones. Mud River was sort of like Hell or Land of Evil.

We had army men, and we used to mess around with them. We took some of the army men and made them into POW’s and kept them in a “prisoner of war camp.” Then we took objects and totally mutilated these poor army men, wounded them all over their bodies, cut off arms and legs, decapitated them, and took red paint and painted blood all over them. It was ghoulish and brutal!

We did this because the POW camp was evil, and it was place where POW’s were tortured to death, not kept in safety. After we killed these poor guys, we called them “The Spooks,” because they were dead now. Then we buried them down under some dirt and leaves, apparently because they were dead and needed to be buried. But we kept digging them up so we could torture them some more even after death.

At one point we found some dogshit, and we smeared dogshit all over them just to make them even more evil. Then we reburied them. They symbolized Evil or Terror somehow. We were actually very scared of the Spooks because after we were done mutilating them and covering them with blood and dogshit, honestly they were pretty frightening looking.

I honestly really enjoyed being an aggressive, violent, diabolical and evil little boy. It was a barrel of ticks!

All the other boys were exactly the same as I was, and we all ended up OK. None of us turned into serial killers or even victimizing criminals, and we all stayed out of jail for the most part. A lot of us got arrested, but most of us no more than a handful of times, and we only served a few days here and there. Typical crimes were burglary, breaking and entering, possession of a deadly weapon, drug use, drug possession, possession of drugs for sale, resisting arrest, assaulting an officer, disturbing the peace, drunk driving, etc. I committed a number of these crimes myself and was arrested for five of those offenses and threatened with arrest for two more.

Amazon Is Evil

I have been hating Amazon.com for a very long time now, and for some very good reasons. Be assured that they deserve every microgram of my hatred. They earned it well.

Anyway, I always knew that Amazon sucked. It’s a prime example of just how shitty your typical dot.com capitalist enterprise is. There’s nothing hip or groovy about tech or net capitalists. Actually the sad truth is that most of them are much worse capitalists than typical brick and mortar businesses which at least tend to have very well done and arranged stores, excellent customer service, a fair returns policy and products that are not blatant ripoffs or scams. Further, most brick and mortar joints are not actual criminal enterprises.

The sad truth is that tech and net businesses tend to have shit products, zero return policy, either zero or horrific customer service, and catastrophically arranged stores that look like they were put together by little children. As if that were not enough, a lot of them (dating sites for example) are simply out and out organized crime.

The number of dot.com businesses that are actually criminal enterprises is simply stunning. The fault of this lies 10

So next time you get fleeced by some dot.com crook, thank the nearest Tech Scum Libertard hipster! Aren’t techy hipsters cool? They’re helping criminals loot your bank account! Is that groovy and hip and tats and piercings or what?!

Anyway, Amazon has always sucked, mostly because their store is complete and utter shit, and they can’t be bothered to even fix the damn thing so it functions at all because, you know, if they had a functioning and working store, then they wouldn’t be able to sell to you so cheap! Nothing illustrates the depravity and sleaze of that mindset better than Amazon.

Welcome to Future Shit, where store owners won’t even bother to arrange their stores for you and you won’t be able to find anything! But hey, having a non-functioning store will be so hipster and groovy and techy and future because you will get your products really cheap dude! That is if you can find them!

So anyway, I have always known that Amazon blows, to put it mildly. But it’s actually much worse than that.

It turns out that Amazon is much worse than shitty.

They are actually stone evil.

Welcome to the Workplace of the Future, brought to you by your nearest groovy hipster, where cubicle farms resemble the factories of the 1890’s! Back to the Future!

Really, Amazon is to business as Roosh is to PUA. Roosh is Amazon. Amazon is Roosh. They’re both sociopathic. They both suck. They’re both evil. They are both widely loved by fools who worship psychopaths as the rock stars of the new millennium.

They’re the Future.

Roosh is the Future of Dating.

And…

Amazon is the Future of Business.

I don’t have much more to say except maybe pray you don’t live long enough to see much of this World O’Shit. I’ll be checking out in 30 years if I’m lucky, and I’ll see you all later then. I won’t be missing this damn planet for one second, thank you very much!

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)