Alt Left: Beirut Attack Was Done a Tactical Nuclear Missile Attack by Israel against a Hezbollah Missile Depot – All Other Stories Are Lies

The stories about the “preventable accident” at the port of Beirut involving fireworks or ammonium nitrate fertilizer or whatever lie they are pushing now are all lies. The truth is that the warehouse that blew up was a Hezbollah missile depot. Israel fired two missiles from jets at the warehouse area. The first was an anti-ship missile and caused the first explosion in warehouse six. The second caused by a missile, probably a tactical nuclear weapon, fired from an Israeli jet at the Hezbollah depot in warehouse 12.

Via Syrian intelligence.

Syrian intelligence says an unknown new weapon, probably a tactical nuclear weapon, was used in this attack. Israel apparently tested this weapon earlier on a plain in Syria. A video of that explosion is available and it looks exactly like this explosion. Russian experts went to the site afterwards and confirmed radiation.

Modern tactical nukes hardly have any fallout and radiation returns to normal levels in a few days.

That is why the US and Israel are using them. These are “safe” nukes. Only Veterans Today and Global Research are publicizing the use of these tactical nukes, which date back to the first Iraq War, when the US military dropped its first nuclear weapon since Hiroshimi in the desert 13 miles west of Basra, possibly as an experiment.

Lebanon is made of solid rock. All explosives will blow upwards on solid rock. Miners would very much like an explosive that blows downwards. It would make their jobs a lot easier. That way they would not have to drill holes into the ground to put their explosives in. Only a nuclear weapon can blow downwards into solid rock.

And that is why all of the American and Israeli bunker buster weapons such as the BMU series are essentially nuclear weapons. The MOAB recently used in Kunar, Afghanistan, also seems to be some sort of a nuclear weapon. At some point you run into the upper limits of conventional explosives due to size considerations if nothing else. At that point you need to go nuclear or chemical, and the US has done both.

Chemical or nuclear weapons were used three times against the Taliban in the initial phase of the Afghan. The US warned Afghanistan that they were going to use fuel-air weapons, which ought to be made illegal anyway as a weapon of mass destruction, but they never used them. Instead we used nuclear or chemical weapons on three separate occasions. More on that later. It’s proven too. The Afghan source is immaculate.

Israel has been itching to blow up the Beirut port forever. Lebanon is an enemy state and Israel sees Beirut as a competitor that it needs to destroy. Lebanon tried to build a rapid highway from the mountains down to the port. This would have massively expanded the port’s capability and the Lebanese economy.

The US ambassador shot it down and said the US would not allow it as long as Israel’s enemies Iraq and Syria existed. Also the US would not approve it until Lebanon signed a peace treaty with Israel. Lebanon and Israel are still officially at war. An armistice was never signed and every Lebanese government has said that they will never sign a peace treaty with Israel.

There is a video presentation from a couple of years ago with Netanyahu circling the warehouse that was hit in red and describing it as a Hezbollah missile depot. So Israel thought it was a Hezbollah missile depot even two years ago.

It’s worth considering that the only enemy of Lebanon promised to attack Lebanese civilian infrastructure just prior to the explosion, and lo and behold that’s what happened.

Exactly. One week prior, Israel said that if Hezbollah ever attacks us again, we will attack Lebanese civilian infrastructure. For years now, Israel has been warning that if there is another war, Lebanon is going to be about wiped off the map. All civilian infrastructure will be targeted.

On the very date of the attack, Netanyahu tweeted that Hezbollah better watch it, if they make one move, Israel will destroy them. Immediately after the attack, Netanyahu tweeted that we got the bombers, now we got the people who sent them.

A top Israeli politician cheered on the attack, calling it a mitzva. He also said it was no accident and he alluded that Israel had done it. He also implied that it had been a nuclear blast, which he said was a good thing. So he was saying the quiet part out loud.

Gideon Levy, one of the bravest journalists in the press-censored Israeli state, wrote an article after the blast appearing to dance as close as possible to admitting that Israel did the attack without running afoul of military censors. An Israeli general reportedly tweeted that Israel had attacked Beirut, but I have been unable to find the tweet. Additionally, one Israeli paper after another has been running articles threatening Hezbollah and the Lebanese people, saying, “Look, now you really better watch it, ok?”

Multiple sources inside the Lebanese military and intelligence are saying that Israel fired a missile at a Hezbollah missile depot.

A Saudi source, using cautious words, said that Israel had attacked a Hezbollah missile depot, but something had gone wrong and the explosion was much larger than they had predicted. He said that Israel felt chagrined and felt that they had made a severe error.

Al Arabiya, a Saudi newspaper, said that the site that blew up was a Hezbollah missile depot.

A UAE source said that Israel had attacked a Hezbollah missile depot, but that something had gone seriously wrong.

Three separate Pentagon sources all stated that they thought the explosion was due to an attack.

A separate Pentagon source said the explosion was caused by “the sabotage of an arms depot.”

An Italian weapons expert disagreed with the analysis that ammonium nitrate had caused the explosion. No one even knows if there was any ammonium nitrate in that warehouse. There were no fireworks anywhere. Also AN needs to have fuel oil added to it in exact measurements otherwise it will not explode. Whether shooting a missile at a pile of AN is enough to set it off is not known.

Anyway, there were much less than 2,700 tons of AN in that warehouse, as people had been stealing from that supply for many years. Also the weapons expert said that an AN explosion causes a huge yellow cloud. See any yellow cloud in that blast? Of course not. Instead we see a brick red blast followed by a bright red column. This is typical of lithium. Lithium is a component used in rocket fuel and a lithium explosion would be typical if a missile warehouse was blown up.

In addition, the type of AN was heavy AN because that is what was marked on the crates. Heavy AN is not used for explosives. It is used only for fertilizers. It is light AN that is used for explosives and even then, it has to be mixed with fuel oil in precise proportions or it won’t blow up.

Further, the AN was stored in a warehouse marked for typical materials, not for hazardous material. There are now many theories that the AN was on top of the missiles or was being used to hide the missiles. There are also different stories about the missiles. Some say it was a Hezbollah missile depot. Others say it was a stash of missiles that had been seized for some reason by port authorities.

The essentials of this attack are beyond dispute. The only controversial question is now is whether it was a nuclear missile or not, but it may well have been. These are the legendary artillery or suitcase nukes that everyone said didn’t exist. Well they did. And they do. They’re the also legendary tactical nukes or mini nukes.

They hardly cause any fallout now, and the radiation goes down to normal levels in a few days. So the US and Israel think they are real groovy! Usable nuclear weapons that don’t kill too many people or cause radiation sickness! Cool! I always wanted a usable nuke! How bout you all, readers? Didn’t you always want to get a real safe, not too deadly nuclear weapon for your birthday or for Christmas? Could of come in handy, huh?

Richard Silverstein, a very righteous Jew, is the great source for this. Interested readers should head to his site, Tikkun Olam. He’s one Hell of a mensch.

Although I hate Veterans Today because they are kooks and fools, they appear to have hit this one on the head, with a few errors here and there. Go there. They have everything you need to make the nuke case. But they say nukes have been used lots of other times though, so be careful. But this time they hit it. They also have incredible infrared videos from Lebanon, shot by regular folks, that show the precise missile coming in.

There are two separate videos shot by regular folks who did not know each other from different cameras in different places at different angles. The MSM is saying the videos are faked, but I don’t think so. For one there are two videos from two people. The people have names and you can go talk to them. All their friends are vouching for them and saying they didn’t fake anything. They are saying they wouldn’t know how to fake it anyway.

Also both videos show the exact outline of an Israeli Delilah tactical nuclear missile down to the last detail. How would they know what one would look like? No one knows what that weapon looks like. Most don’t even know it exists. Also both videos show a white hot glow on the warhead. This is very important. The Delilah has a nuclear tipped warhead and yes it would glow white hot. How would they know to both put that detail in their videos? Nobody knows that. No one even knows what the weapon even is. Deliliah is a guess. Syrian intel doesn’t even know what a Delilah is and they call it an “unknown weapon.”

The first strike was from an anti-ship missile, the second was the nuke, probably by air.

Additional evidence in favor a nuclear missile comes from the UN itself, the International Atomic Energy Association of which recorded a massive radiation event in the Eastern Mediterranean at the exact time as the missile strike.

After this missile strike, many people reported a “melting” feeling on their face. This is characteristic of a nuclear attack. Also most cellphones stopped working. This is probably due to the EMF pulse radiating from the nuclear blast.

Most particularly, look at that characteristic mushroom cloud. I’ve never in my life seen an explosion that looked anything like that, with that white-hot heat and circular rings. That was in photos of the Hiroshima and Bikini Atoll nuclear blasts and of tests in Alamogordo in the New Mexico desert. The Veteran’s Today people say that only a nuclear weapon gives off that characteristic blast cloud.

Trump was told that it was an Israeli attack and he blabbed that it was an attack. Israel got very mad at him afterwards, and pro-Israel media has been blasting him ever since he said that.

Immediately Hezbollah was blamed for the explosion by the usual suspects, the Saudis, the Saudi-controlled Hariris, the Breitbart American Alt Lite Right, Fox News, (((Kenneth Roth))) at the execrable Human Rights Watch.

Note also that Israel is promising aid to the victims. Israel has never offered aid to any Arab victims of anything ever. They say they are shipping aid to Lebanon but they are leaving Hebrew markings on the aid packages. Not only is that almost demanding that Lebanon reject the aid, but it also seems like they are really rubbing it in to the Lebanese.

That’s a giveaway too. This is the first time Israel’s ever offered aid? Why is that now?

The Lebanese government is in on the fake fertilizer story. Problems with this story are that no one would ever allow fertilizer to be stored in any port for any period of time, certainly not six years. The storage costs alone would prevent that.

The Moldovan flagged ship was barely seaworthy and did not seem capable of carrying its load. The customer in Mozambique where the fertilizer was said to be shipped does not exist. The mysterious Russian captain of the ship, supposedly living in Lebanon, cannot be found. The more you look at the fertilizer ship story, the less sense any of it makes. Some say that the only proof of the existence of the fertilizer is entries in an accounting ledger. Other than that, it may not have existed.

Iran, Lebanon and Hezbollah are not publicizing this, probably for fear of rendering the Lebanese people powerless and terrified of Israel’s capabilities. Also both Hezbollah and Lebanon fear that this revelation will force Hezbollah to retaliate, which could cause a larger war that neither wants. Also Hezbollah does not want it to get out that they were using the port to store explosives. Israel has their own reasons for covering this attack up, obviously.

There is also a report that Israel used this same nuclear weapon on an Iranian ship in the Gulf recently, though I have no info on that.

Michel Chussodovsky of Global Research has written articles about the use of tactical nuclear weapons by the US and Israel in recent years. Much of this reporting was reprinted by Veterans Today.

He wrote an article noting US use of these tactical nukes at Tora Bora. The MOAB dropped on Kunar is for all intents and purposes a nuclear weapon. It needs to be outlawed. He also wrote that Israel used a tactical nuke in the war against Hezbollah om 2006. I agree.

Israel Assassinated Hariri in a False Flag to Frame Hezbollah

I also now believe that Israel absolutely killed Hariri, and it looks like some sort of a tactical nuclear weapon was used in that attack too, fired from an Israeli drone known to be overhead. The US and Israel had footage of the drone that fired the weapon, but they refused to release it. The explosives that were said to have been used do not have the effect seen in the explosion and could not possibly have caused the effects seen.

Also no attack could have taken place with a car bomb without disabling the very sophisticated anti-attack technology in Hariri’s car. That technology was made in Israel and only the Israelis knew how to dismantle it. So if there was a car bomb, the Israeli anti-car bomb tech had to have been dismantled and only Israel could have done that. So Israel ends up guilty either way.

Israeli drones had been following Hariri’s every movement for months and on the day of his assassination, all converged on the exact site of the attack several hours before, and they took pictures of the attack. The drones’ footage was hacked by Hezbollah, and this information was released to the public to no avail.

Hezbollah and the Lebanese military officials were framed by the German investigator, who is long-time CIA and German intel. The weapon itself was an experimental weapon invented in Germany and given to Israel by Israel after Germany adopted the posture that “Germany’s army will now fight to defend Israel.” This prompted a wave of angry letters and resignations from German officers.

The German investigator was very sleazy, ignored most evidence, faked evidence, and used very dirty techniques in interviews, including trying to set family members against each other with lies about infidelity. All of the four Lebanese generals imprisoned were framed and were innocent. The people who subsequently were said to have named Assad and other Syrians as responsible recanted via their lawyers and said they had never made such allegations.

The purpose of framing Hezbollah and Syria for the Hariri assassination was to start a new civil war in Lebanon and also to drive a stake into the heart of Hezbollah once and for all by framing them for this crime (16 of Hezbollah’s top officers were named in the indictment). This was supposed to be the end of Hezbollah, but it did not work. Note that this nuke attack comes just four days before the major judicial finding on the Hariri attack which is expected to completely condemn Hezbollah as the actors of the attack.

Since the Hariri false flag did not work, this false flag was intended to be the coup de grace for Hezbollah. It’s also intended to start a civil war in Lebanon, which Israel has been trying to do for 15 years now.

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

Alt Left: Wikipedia, Ziopedia, Saffronpedia, or CIApedia?

Wikipedia Is Run by the CIA (among Other Groups)

Wikipedia (which I refer to as CIApedia), is now  partly run by the CIA (among other groups and states such as Israel and Hindu nationalists which also run their respective areas of interest to them) such as, still accuses Libya of the crime and says that the Iran theory is a crazy conspiracy theory. CIApedia has covered up all of the assassinations above, helped frame the patsies, and trashes the truth as “conspiracy theory.”

I know that the top levels of CIApedia administrators are completely infiltrated by pro-Israel Zionists and Indian Hindu nationalists. That’s been proven to me for nearly 15 years now.  I now believe that the US Deep State and the CIA have also seriously infiltrated these same upper levels of admins, although I admit that I can’t prove it. You know, Bellingcat types (Bellingcat is Deep State and CIA)

I swear every time I go to CIApedia to read about US foreign policy, it seems like that website is simply “the history of the world according to the CIA.” I think the CIA has infiltrated the leadership of CIApedia as noted above and has agents and assets who alter articles to promote whatever fake version of reality that the CIA is promoting in whichever US foreign policy event.

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

Alt Left: US Top Leaders Have Teams of Private Thugs to Carry Out Assassinations, Etc. (1963-2004 and Possibly Beyond)

US Top Leaders Have Teams of Private Thugs to Carry Out Assassinations, Etc. (1963-2004 and Possibly Beyond)

Note that these assassinations are often carried out by teams of thugs that high ranking US politicians like president and vice presidents have at their disposal to carry out murders of the politican’s enemies if need be.

I’m not sure who these people are, but they’re not CIA for sure because they mostly work overseas and I don’t think they are FBI either. They are just private teams of assassins that some US Presidents and Vice Presidents have.

The FBI doesn’t usually kill people in the US (but I believe they killed an investigative reporter in LA during the Bush Administration by messing with his car engine so he crashed. I am forgetting his name now too.

But they do tamper with evidence in trials of the patsy who gets framed for the murder or mass killing. The also ignore and cover up the Deep State and CIA’s assassinations on US soil.

The CIA does carry out some assassinations on US soil. For instance the CIA murdered quite a few Americans for some time after the JFK assassination and the FBI covered up for them every time.

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

Alt Left: The Assassination on US Government Soil That Changed Everything

This is the first of a series of post showing that the US Deep State can have you killed on US soil or framed for a crime you did not do. The Deep State has killed and framed a number of people from 1963 to 2004 and possibly beyond

You don’t mess with the Deep State. You might not live to tell about it.

The Assassination of John F. Kennedy (1963)

If you do, you get the Kennedy Treatment. That was in 1963. Kennedy was murdered by “the foreign policy establishment of the United States,” according to Lyndon Johnson’s former lawyer. Incidentally, another former Johnson lawyer said that Johnson himself was in on the plot to kill Kennedy and he used some of his personal thugs to help do it.

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

Alt Left: The Lockerbie Jetliner Mass Murder (1988)

The Lockerbie Jetliner Mass Murder (1988)

The FBI also tampered with evidence to frame Libya and Ghaddafi in the shooting down of the jet in Lockerbie, Scotland in 1989. The plane was actually shot down by Iran via Syria via a pro-Syrian Palestinian armed group called the PFLP-GC. PFLP-GC cadres in Germany, particularly in Frankfurt, carried out the murder by smuggling a bomb onto the plane. The group was paid $10 million by Iran for the deed.

Ghaddafi and the two Libyan intelligence officers had nothing to do with it-  they were just the patsies who got framed for the mass murder. The main judge of the Lockerbie investigation in Scotland now believes that Libya was framed by the US and that the assassination was actually carried out by Iran. He has called for the two Libyan intelligence officers to be acquitted, one of them posthumously, as he died shortly before Ghaddafi was overthrown.

Libya and the two Libyan intelligence agents were framed by the US Deep State. As you can see, the FBI is part of the US Deep State and gets involved in various shenanigans from time to time. In my opinion, the FBI is no good. You know how I feel about the CIA, which of course is one of the linchpins of the Deep State.

However, the CIA is quite honest as far as their internal reports go because they want to know what really happened and don’t want to believe a bunch of lies about various events overseas of interest to the US. So the CIA tells the truth in their internal reports because they don’t want to believe a bunch of crap, but they put out another, often completely different disinformation view of the event in the story that they leak to the media.

And the CIA’s own official internal report about the Lockerbie shootdown said it was done by Iran and that Ghaddafi and the two patsies were innocent. That report is an historical fact, but has CIApedia and the media changed their Lockerbie story to reflect the truth?

Incidentally there is now a consensus among all Lockerbie investigators around the world that Iran blew up the plane and that Libya and the agents were just patsies who got framed.  Have the media and CIApedia changed their story? Of course not. Once the US media participates in some fake news about an historical event, they never change the CIA disinfo version of the event no matter how much the disinfo has been proven wrong and the truth lies elsewhere.

Iran did this as retaliation for the shootdown of an Iranian jetliner by a US Navy vessel named the Vincennes in 1968. The vessel was in the Persian Gulf during the Iran-Iraq War for some reason and our forces destroyed most of Saddam’s navy for some reason near the end of the war.

The US shot down that plane in error, not on purpose and the ultimate responsibility  for the shootdown was the ship’s captain who thought the jet was an Iranian fighter jet coming to attack the ship, so he ordered his gunners to shoot a missile at it.

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

Alt Left: The Murder of Karen Silkwood (1979)

The Murder of Karen Silkwood (1979)

Karen Silkwood was a worker at the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant who blew the whistle on the incompetence at the plant that led to the famous Three Mile Island nuclear plant meltdown. She was murdered by putting plutonium in the food in her refrigerator. She died soon after the meltdown of radiation poisoning. But it was the Deep State who murdered her by tainting her food.

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

Alt Left: Martin Luther King Was Killed by the US Government

The Assasination of Martin Luther King (1968)

In 1968, Martin Luther King was absolutely murdered by the Memphis police, the FBI and most importantly the Deep State. The reason the latter had for killing MLK was his opposition to the Vietnam War. Once again the foreign policy establishment of the US had a man murdered.

The man the Deep State framed for Martin’s assassination was a two-bit racist loser named James Earl Ray. Ray always insisted on his innocence up until his deathbed.  Ray’s motive was supposedly racism. Another crazed lone gunmen patsy murdered a prominent US liberal Democrat for a barely credible motive. One crazy lone gunman nutcase here guys, nothing more, nothing to see here, move along.

I never thought MLK was murdered until I did some research on the case and discovered that he was absolutely murdered  by the US Deep State. The King family have always said that Ray was a patsy and accused the US government of having the pastor killed. They even sued the US government for killing the patriarch and a federal judge ruled that the Kings had one their case that the government killed King and that Ray was nothing but a patsy.

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

Alt Left: The Assassination of Democratic Congressman Paul Wellstone (2002)

The Assassination of Democratic Congressman Paul Wellstone (2002)

Or you get Wellstoned, the treatment given to progressive Minnesota Congressman Paul Wellstone,who was murdered by during the Bush Administration by Dick Cheney’s Deep State thugs who tampered with his airplane, causing it to crash. Former California senator Barbara Boxer admitted to people privately that she thinks Cheney had Wellstone killed.

This crap goes on more often than you think. We don’t have any kind of democracy here as long as the Deep State and the Oligarchs run things.

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

Alt Left: The Deep State of the US Is All-Encompassing and Surrounds US All of Our Lives

What is the Deep State? Everyone talks about it but no one seems to know what it is. A lot of people say it doesn’t exist. They’re wrong. And I know they’re wrong. I’ve been studying this for decades, and my answer to the question of what the Deep State is, which is both maddeningly complex and ridiculously simple, is the answer I have arrived at after many years of deep study

Most of the US Executive Branch dealing with foreign policy is Deep State.

All of the many intelligence agencies with their $30 billion black budgets are Deep State.

The Pentagon is completely Deep State.

Most all of Congress is Deep State, with a few bright new exceptions.

And most importantly, all of the large corporations of America are part of the Deep State. If you have worked for the CIA, you can walk in the door of almost any corporation in the US and get hired for a serious position. CIA and other intelligence and foreign policy types cycle in and out of the corporate sector and vice versa all the time. It’s all connected, dammit.

In fact, the intelligence agencies are simply the hired intelligence agencies of the rich and the corporations. The Pentagon is simply the hired military of the rich and the corporations. The foreign policy establishment in the Executive and Legislative branches are simply the state structures of the rich and the corporations.

Obviously all of the US MSM is Deep State. Most large US media outlets have long been infiltrated by the CIA. It’s a good guess that many of the top editors in the US media are on the CIA payroll. It was revealed recently that many of the top journalists in the US were actually on the CIA payroll.

This is a result of the CIA’s Operation Mockingbird initiated in the 1960’s. It resulted in the infiltration of most if not all of the US MSM by the CIA. The reforms of the Church Committee in the mid-70’s were said to put a stop to that, but the truth is that Operation Mockingbird was never shut down and continues to this very day. It just went underground is all.

By this view the Deep State is all around us all the time. It’s omnipresent in this country. You can’t escape it.

The Deep State is nothing other than the Foreign Policy Establishment of the United States. 

As such, it includes:

  • All of the MSM
  • The foreign policy aspects of the Executive Branch
  • The foreign policy aspects of the Legislative Branch
  • The Pentagon.
  • The three letter agencies and the US intelligence agency complex, much of which is “black” or underground and unaccountable
  • All of the large corporations of the US, including all of the Silicon Valley “cool” corporations
  • Most of the rich of the US
  • Most but not all of Hollywood
  • Wall Street

I believe that this theory of an all-encompassing Deep State that surrounds us every minute of our lives is the best definition of the Deep State. Think about it if it doesn’t make sense. If you find the question interesting, keep on thinking about it. After you think for a while, I believe you might just come around to a definition of the Deep State that is not far from mine.

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

Alt Left: The Ghaddafi Shot Down the Lockerbie Jet Bullshit

You know the truth about the downing of the Lockerbie jet in Scotland in 1988, right? Everyone knows that Ghaddafi did it and that he used two Libyan intelligence agents to commit the crime.

Well, you are wrong. That whole story is a massive lie made up by the US government itself, mostly by the our wonderful FBI that we all love so much, in which an innocent state was said to do a crime actually done by two other states.

The jet was downed by Syria via Iran and yet  Ghaddafi was framed for it by the US government.

Yes, the glorious FBI itself who framed Ghaddafi and two of his men for the Lockerbie bombing when we knew full that the plane was downed by a Palestinian group close to Syria called the PFLP-GC. This group was hired by Iran to down the Lockerbie jet and paid $10 million for the job.

Now do you see why I hate the FBI and federal agents in general? They’re not heroes. Actually they’re just pigs like all cops, and they’re actually the worst pigs of them all.

The US knew all of this but went ahead about Iran being behind the crime, but we went ahead and framed Ghaddafi and two of his intelligence agents anyway. A few years later the CIA issued an official report saying that Libya was innocent downing the Lockerbie jet and that the ones who  did it were the PFLP-GC, who were paid by Iran.

There is now a consensus among researchers that Iran downed the plane via the Syrian proxy group and that Libya was framed for the crime. We even know exactly how Libya was framed. The FBI deliberately altered the circuit board of the bomb recovered in the crime to make it look like the circuit boards that were made in Libya by Qaddafi’s government.

In fact the circuit board and bomb were manufactured  by PFLP-GC Palestinians operating out of Germany. We  even know the names of some of the PFLP-GC operatives who did it, and one of them is in prison for some reason.

Yet if you go to CIApedia, I mean Wikipedia, you will see the official US lie that Ghaddafi downed the Lockerbie jet. The true story, that is the real history that Iran did it via the Syrian guerrilla group, is listed as  a loony-tunes conspiracy theory for which there is no evidence.

100% of US media outlets that write about Lockerbie continue to push the lie that Libya did it. The Lockerbie crime was much in the news around the time we attacked Ghaddafi to try to regime change him in 2014.

Shortly before then, Ghaddafi had paid a $4 million fine for the Lockerbie incident even though both he and we knew that he didn’t do it. Unfortunately the fact that he paid the fine is used as evidence of Qaddafi’s guilt. You can see here an example of the fact that innocent people confess to crimes all the time for all sorts of reasons.

Ghaddafi simply paid the money to get the West to shut up about the crime and to hopefully get the sanctions lifted against him, as we made paying a vast amount of money for a crime he never committed as a prerequisite for removing the sanctions.

It’s disgusting that we know the truth about this  incident now, but the US government and the entire US media continue to repeat the lie that Libya did even though we know they were framed.

It’s things like this that sicken me about this country. With all of the false flags, provocations, framings, and other nonsense concocted by the CIA offered as the true actual history for past events, we can  see that the US is waging a war against history itself.

Furthermore, modern historians are completely failing in their job of recording the past by repeating the endless lies of the US government as the truth behind all sorts of famous incidents in the past.

The job of the historian is to search for the unbiased truth. We can see here that historians are participating in a vast effort by the US to destroy and rewrite history itself simply because historians are allergic to the notion that conspiracy theory in some cases is the actual truth about what really happened.

We made a big fuss about how the USSR attacked, destroyed, and altered history in its textbooks, including writing famous people completely out of the picture as if they never existed. The US for the last 20 years minimum is doing the exact same thing that Stalin did in the 1930’s. So in that sense the US government and media is as bad as Stalin.

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

Alt Left: 53 Admitted False Flag Attacks

It’s disgusting how the minute you say the phrase false flag, people grab their foreheads and start groaning. All false flags are automatically conspiracy theories and they’re all pathetic nonsense made up by the tinfoil hat crowd. Granted a lot of so-called false flags never happened and instead were actual attacks carried out by whoever claimed responsibility for them. This is particularly true with Islamist terrorist groups.

Their attacks often terribly brutal and aimed directly at civilians. Many of their attacks in the West have been called false flags, but none of them were. It has also been common for a long time to ascribe most of the worst Palestinian terrorist attacks to Israeli false flags.

The truth is that the Palestinians, like the Islamists, are quite depraved enough to do their own horrific terrorist attacks. Their attacks are depraved enough that Israel has no need to fake depraved attacks to frame the Palestinians.

But as you can see, false flags definitely occur. I never thought that the US government did these attacks very much, but we and the rest of the West (NATO) have been going on a wild false flag spree ever since NATO’s war on Russia started heating up.

It’s been one false flag after another and one attempt to blame Russia and pro-Russians for atrocities willfully committed by the other side. This is different from a false flag. In this case, Party A attacks the enemy, typically enemy civilians, or a shell goes astray and there’s an atrocity. 

Instead of admitting that they did it, they blame the enemy who they are fighting, usually for committing an atrocity against their own supporters, which of course makes no sense.

There were many such attacks like this in the Syrian Civil War when the Free Syrian Army committed massacre after massacre of villagers who supported Assad and then turned around and blamed Assad for each and every one of these crimes. 

As it turns out, Assad did not commit any of these civilian massacres because that’s just not his style. His forces don’t rampage into villages, even of rebel supporters, and slaughter civilians in brutal fashion one by one.

If they think a civilian needs to be dealt with, Assad’s forces simply arrest them and may well put them in a military prison, where they could well be tortured and mistreated until death or executed. I’m not saying Assad is a nice guy; it’s more that his style simply does not include savage massacres of entire villages or chemical weapons attacks for that matter.  When it comes to depravity, Assad has his own style.

I can’t believe that number of attacks falsely blamed on the enemy and out and out false flag and fake attacks that the US did in Ukraine and Syria. We seem to be entering into a new era of warfare where false flags are the normal ways to fight wars.

It’s appalling and terrifying because foolish Americans insist that these attacks never happen. By believing that they give their own government carte blanche to do as many false flags and false blaming of the enemy of allied attacks as they wish. And the government knows that in any fake blames or false flags the US or its allies pull off, they know that they can count on the support of every corporate media outlet in the US to go right along.

In fact, every mainstream media outlet in the West period is on board with any false blaming or false flags the West wishes to pull off. In that sense the entire media of the West is completely controlled by the states of the West, their militaries, state departments and intelligence services. It’s downright terrifying.

53 Admitted False Flag Attacks

Relevant article selected from the GR archive, first published in February 2015.

Not Theory … Admitted Fact

There are many documented false flag attacks where a government carries out a terror attack … and then falsely blames its enemy for political purposes.

In the following 53 instances, officials in the government which carried out the attack (or seriously proposed an attack) admitted to it, either orally or in writing:

(1) Japanese troops set off a small explosion on a train track in 1931 and falsely blamed it on China in order to justify an invasion of Manchuria. This is known as the “Mukden Incident” or the “Manchurian Incident.”

The Tokyo International Military Tribunal found: “Several of the participators in the plan, including Hashimoto [a high-ranking Japanese army officer], have on various occasions admitted their part in the plot and have stated that the object of the ‘Incident’ was to afford an excuse for the occupation of Manchuria by the Kwantung Army ….” And see this.

(2) A major with the Nazi SS admitted at the Nuremberg trials that under orders from the chief of the Gestapo, he and some other Nazi operatives faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles to justify the invasion of Poland.

(3) Nazi General Franz Halder also testified at the Nuremberg trials that Nazi leader Hermann Goering admitted to setting fire to the German parliament building in 1933 and then falsely blaming the communists for the arson.

(4) Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev admitted in writing that the Soviet Union’s Red Army shelled the Russian village of Mainila in 1939 while blaming the attack on Finland as a basis for launching the “Winter War” against Finland. Russian president Boris Yeltsin agreed that Russia had been the aggressor in the Winter War.

(5) The Russian Parliament, current Russian President Putin, and former Soviet leader Gorbachev all admit that Soviet leader Joseph Stalin ordered his secret police to execute 22,000 Polish army officers and civilians in 1940 and falsely blame it on the Nazis.

(6) The British government admits that between 1946 and 1948 it bombed five ships carrying Jews attempting to flee the Holocaust to seek safety in Palestine, set up a fake group called “Defenders of Arab Palestine”, and then had the pseudo-group falsely claim responsibility for the bombings (and see thisthis and this).

(7) Israel admits that in 1954, an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this).

(8) The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950′s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister.

(9) The Turkish Prime Minister admitted that the Turkish government carried out the 1955 bombing on a Turkish consulate in Greece, also damaging the nearby birthplace of the founder of modern Turkey, and blamed it on Greece, for the purpose of inciting and justifying anti-Greek violence.

(10) The British Prime Minister admitted to his defense secretary that he and American president Dwight Eisenhower approved a plan in 1957 to carry out attacks in Syria and blame it on the Syrian government as a way to effect regime change.

(11-21) The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO with the help of the Pentagon and CIA carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s and blamed the communists in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism.

As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security” (and see this).

Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign had joined NATO before the bombings occurred. And watch this BBC special. They also allegedly carried out terror attacks in France, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the UK, and other countries.

False flag attacks carried out pursuant to this program include by way of example only the murder of the Turkish Prime Minister (1960), bombings in Portugal (1966), the Piazza Fontana massacre in Italy (1969), terror attacks in Turkey (1971), the Peteano bombing in Italy (1972), shootings in Brescia, Italy and a bombing on an Italian train (1974), shootings in Istanbul, Turkey (1977), the Atocha massacre in Madrid, Spain (1977), the abduction and murder of the Italian Prime Minister (1978), the bombing of the Bologna railway station in Italy (1980), and shooting and killing 28 shoppers in Brabant county, Belgium (1985).

(22) In 1960, American Senator George Smathers suggested that the U.S. launch “a false attack made on Guantanamo Bay which would give us the excuse of actually fomenting a fight which would then give us the excuse to go in and [overthrow Castro].”

(23) Official State Department documents show that in 1961, the head of the Joint Chiefs and other high-level officials discussed blowing up a consulate in the Dominican Republic in order to justify an invasion of that country. The plans were not carried out, but they were all discussed as serious proposals.

(24) As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in 1962, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes) and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba.

See the following ABC news reportthe official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.

(25) In 1963, the U.S. Department of Defense wrote a paper promoting attacks on nations within the Organization of American States such as Trinidad-Tobago or Jamaica and then falsely blaming them on Cuba.

(26) The U.S. Department of Defense even suggested covertly paying a person in the Castro government to attack the United States: “The only area remaining for consideration then would be to bribe one of Castro’s subordinate commanders to initiate an attack on Guantanamo.”

(27) The NSA admits that it lied about what really happened in the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964… manipulating data to make it look like North Vietnamese boats fired on a U.S. ship so as to create a false justification for the Vietnam war.

(28) A U.S. Congressional committee admitted that as part of its “Cointelpro” campaign, the FBI had used many provocateurs in the 1950s through 1970s to carry out violent acts and falsely blame them on political activists.

(29) A top Turkish general admitted that Turkish forces burned down a mosque on Cyprus in the 1970s and blamed it on their enemy. He explained: “In Special War, certain acts of sabotage are staged and blamed on the enemy to increase public resistance. We did this on Cyprus; we even burnt down a mosque.” In response to the surprised correspondent’s incredulous look, the general said, “I am giving an example.”

(30) The German government admitted (and see this) that in 1978, the German secret service detonated a bomb in the outer wall of a prison and planted “escape tools” on a prisoner – a member of the Red Army Faction – which the secret service wished to frame the bombing on.

(31) A Mossad agent admits that in 1984, Mossad planted a radio transmitter in Gaddaffi’s compound in Tripoli, Libya, which broadcast fake terrorist trasmissions recorded by Mossad in order to frame Gaddaffi as a terrorist supporter. Ronald Reagan bombed Libya immediately thereafter.

(32) The South African Truth and Reconciliation Council found that in 1989, the Civil Cooperation Bureau (a covert branch of the South African Defense Force), approached an explosives expert and asked him “to participate in an operation aimed at discrediting the ANC [the African National Congress] by bombing the police vehicle of the investigating officer into the murder incident,” thus framing the ANC for the bombing.

(33) An Algerian diplomat and several officers in the Algerian army admit that in the 1990s, the Algerian army frequently massacred Algerian civilians and then blamed Islamic militants for the killings (and see this video; and Agence France-Presse, 9/27/2002, “French Court Dismisses Algerian Defamation Suit against Author”).

(34)    The United States Army’s 1994 publication Special Forces Foreign Internal Defense Tactics Techniques and Procedures for Special Forces  updated in 2004 recommends employing terrorists and using false flag operations to destabilize leftist regimes in Latin America. False flag terrorist attacks were carried out in Latin America and other regions as part of the CIA’s “Dirty Wars.” And see this.

(35) An Indonesian fact-finding team investigated violent riots which occurred in 1998 and determined that “elements of the military had been involved in the riots, some of which were deliberately provoked.”

(36) Senior Russian military and intelligence officers admit that the KGB blew up Russian apartment buildings in 1999 and falsely blamed it on Chechens in order to justify an invasion of Chechnya (and see this report and this discussion).

(37) According to the Washington Post, Indonesian police admit that the Indonesian military killed American teachers in Papua in 2002 and blamed the murders on a Papuan separatist group in order to get that group listed as a terrorist organization.

(38) The well-respected former Indonesian president also admits that the government probably had a role in the Bali bombings.

(39) As reported by BBC, the New York Times, and Associated Press, Macedonian officials admit that the government murdered seven innocent immigrants in cold blood and pretended that they were Al Qaeda soldiers attempting to assassinate Macedonian police in order to join the “War on Terror.”

(40) Senior police officials in Genoa, Italy admitted that in July 2001 at the G8 summit in Genoa they planted two Molotov cocktails and faked the stabbing of a police officer in order to justify a violent crackdown against protesters.

(41) The U.S. falsely blamed Iraq for playing a role in the 9/11 attacks as shown by a memo from the defense secretary as one of the main justifications for launching the Iraq War.

Even after the 9/11 Commission admitted that there was no connection, Dick Cheney said that the evidence is “overwhelming” that al Qaeda had a relationship with Saddam Hussein’s regime, that Cheney “probably” had information unavailable to the Commission, and that the media was not ‘doing their homework’ in reporting such ties.

Top U.S. government officials now admit that the Iraq War was really launched for oil…not 9/11 or weapons of mass destruction. Despite previous “lone wolf” claims, many U.S. government officials now say that 9/11 was state-sponsored terror; but Iraq was not the state which backed the hijackers. Many U.S. officials have alleged that 9/11 was a false flag operation by rogue elements of the U.S. government.  

(42) Although the FBI now admits that the 2001 anthrax attacks were carried out by one or more U.S. government scientists, a senior FBI official says that the FBI was actually told to blame the Anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda by White House officials (remember what the anthrax letters looked like). Government officials also confirm that the White House tried to link the anthrax to Iraq as a justification for regime change in that country.

(43) Former Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having “our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaeda’s ranks, causing operatives to doubt others’ identities and to question the validity of communications.”

(44) United Press International reported in June 2005:

U.S. intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92 pistols, but the pistols seem to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers.

Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or terrorist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S. authorities use insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of the illegitimacy of the resistance.

(45) Undercover Israeli soldiers admitted in 2005 to throwing stones at other Israeli soldiers so they could blame it on Palestinians as an excuse to crack down on peaceful protests by the Palestinians.

(46) Quebec police admitted that in 2007, thugs carrying rocks to a peaceful protest were actually undercover Quebec police officers (and see this).

(47) At the G20 protests in London in 2009, a British member of parliament saw plainclothes police officers attempting to incite the crowd to violence.

(48) Egyptian politicians admitted (and see this) that government employees looted priceless museum artifacts in 2011 to try to discredit the protesters.

(49) A Colombian army colonel has admitted that his unit murdered 57 civilians, then dressed them in uniforms and claimed they were rebels killed in combat.

(50) The highly-respected writer for the Telegraph, Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, says that the head of Saudi intelligence Prince Bandar recently admitted that the Saudi government controls “Chechen” terrorists.

(51) High-level American sources admitted that the Turkish government – a fellow NATO country – carried out the chemical weapons attacks blamed on the Syrian government, and high-ranking Turkish government admitted on tape plans to carry out attacks and blame it on the Syrian government.

(52) The former Ukrainian security chief admits that the sniper attacks which started the Ukrainian coup were carried out in order to frame others.

(53) Britain’s spy agency has admitted (and see this) that it carries out “digital false flag” attacks on targets, framing people by writing offensive or unlawful material … and blaming it on the target.

So Common…There’s a Name for It

“False flag terrorism” is defined as a government attacking its own people, then blaming others in order to justify going to war against the people it blames. Or as Wikipedia defines it:

False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear as if they are being carried out by other entities.

The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one’s own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations and have been used in peace-time; for example, during Italy’s Strategy of Tension.

The use of the bully’s trick is so common that it was given a name hundreds of years ago. The term comes from the old days of wooden ships, when one ship would hang the flag of its enemy before attacking another ship. Because the enemy’s flag, instead of the flag of the real country of the attacking ship, was hung, it was called a “false flag” attack.

Indeed, this concept is so well-accepted that rules of engagement for navalair and land warfare all prohibit false flag attacks.

Leaders Throughout History Have Acknowledged False Flags

Leaders throughout history have acknowledged the danger of false flags:

“A history of false flag attacks used to manipulate the minds of the people! In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule.”
― Friedrich Nietzsche

“Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death.”
– Adolph Hitler

“Why of course the people don’t want war… But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship…

Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
– Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.

“The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened.”
– Josef Stalin

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

False Flags Operations – How They Work

I actually hate to believe in conspiracy theories because I think most of them are nonsense. But sometimes, they are just true. This is particularly true in geopolitics, politics and war when conspiracies are hatched continuously and dishonestly is the order of the day.
During wartime, one thing you see a fair amount of is something called false flag operations. They do not happen nearly as often as conspiracy nuts say they do, but false flag operations definitely occur some of the time during warfare. This is considered to be an exceptionally dirty way of fighting, and only the dirtiest nations of all utilize the malign false flag operation.
In a false flag operation, the perpetrator either kills their own people or kills innocent people. The attack is structured in such a way as to blame the opposition for killing the perpetrator’s supporters or innocent people. In this way, the enemy is framed and convicted of committing a grave crime during wartime.
There is quite a history of such things. The Gulf of Tonkin incident has now been shown to be a complete frame-up. In fact, the recordings that were used to frame the North Vietnamese were recorded by the US one day before the incident even happened. This incident was then used as a casus belli for the US to enter the war with the justification that “North Vietnam attacked us!”
Hitler used false flags regularly. The invasion of Poland was preceded by a false flag operation in which Nazis dressed up like Polish forces attacked their own troops and then blamed Poland for the attack. This was used as justification for Germany to invade Poland.
The burning of the Reichstag was another false flag. An amateur, bumbling Communist was framed with setting the Reichstag on fire when in fact the Nazis set fire to their own building in order to have justification to institute martial law.
Israel has done a number of false flag operations.
After the 1948 War, most of the Iraqi Jews stayed in Iraq and refused to go to Israel. There were hundreds of thousands of Jews in Iraq. Israeli agents went to Iraq and did things like throw grenades into meetings of Iraqi Jews. A number of Iraqi Jews were killed and wounded in this way. Israel then blamed the Arab Iraqi government and began an international campaign agitating for the Iraqi Jews to leave Iraq and come to the US. Almost all of the Iraqi Jews fled Iraq and headed to Israel.
Later, in 1954, Israeli agents ran around Cairo bombing movie theaters and American institutions and blamed the attacks on the Egyptian government. The attempt here was to show that the Egyptian government was depraved and to drive a wedge between the US and Egypt.
Later in the 1973 War, the Israelis deliberately attacked a US vessel called the USS Liberty that was offshore of Israel. The Israelis claimed it was a terrible accident but actually it was deliberate. The reason was because the ship was spying on the war between the Egyptians and Israel and US sig intel had picked up signals that Israel was getting ready to murder 6,000 Egyptian POW’s in the Sinai Desert. Israel did indeed kill all those POW’s, and they did not have a good excuse for it.
The Jewish-controlled US have never properly investigated the incident and the US government has basically said it is cool for Israel to kill Americans or US troops any time they feel like it. We covered up for them.
After the bombing of a US army dance in Berlin that casualties among US forces, Israel placed a receiver on the coastline of Libya with recordings that were used as evidence that Libya set the bomb. Libya may indeed have set off that bomb, and on the other hand, maybe they did not. Know one knows. But the recordings were fake.
The downing of the Lockerbie flight over Scotland resulted in two competing theories. One said that Libya did it as revenge for trying to kill Qaddafi. The other said that Iran did it via their ally Syria. There was as much evidence for one as for the other, in fact, promoters of the Iran-Syria theory say there was never any evidence of Libyan involvement.
Nevertheless, Libya was tried and convicted of a crime they may not have committed, a vast monetary settlement was extorted from Libya and the crime was used as an excuse to overthrow the Qaddafi government with Al Qaeda type Islamists who then murdered Qaddafi after they captured him.
During the Years of Lead in Italy, the Italian state, possibly with CIA assistance, used fascist agents to set off numerous bombs in crowded public places which killed a number of Italian civilians. The state then blamed these attacks on the Italian Left in an attempt to destroy them.
In 1980, a deranged Turkish gunman named Agta tried to assassinate the Pope in Bulgaria. For a very long time, the Deep State and their controlled media tried to frame the KGB of the USSR for this crime. In fact, they were utterly innocent of this crime and all of the US evidence was simply fabricated.
Right before the first Iraq War, part of the propaganda for the war was the false flag lie that Iraq was killing Kuwaiti babies by unplugging their incubators. This was proven to be a lie, but it helped set off a war.
Later, before the 2003 War, the US did it again by concocting with deep Israeli assistance an elaborate lie that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction when a cursory look at the evidence showed that he did not. This fake evidence was used to launch a huge war.
A British special forces unit was caught with a bomb-rigged car that they were apparently driving somewhere to set off. Although they were let go, it was never adequately explained what they were doing with a bomb car, where they were going to blow it up, who were they trying to kill and for what purpose.
There are interesting accusations that the blowing up of the Al Askari Mosque in Iraq in 2006 was the work of Iraqi security forces in league with US special forces. The purpose was supposedly to set off civil war to take the heat off US casualties during a hot political season by redirecting the war from Iraqis kill Americans to Iraqis killing Iraqis. It is an interesting theory, but I regard it as unproven.
Turkish intelligence was recently caught planning a huge terrorist attack at the Turkish-Syrian border that killed Turks and Syrians, mostly civilians, as a plot to frame Syria in order to use that as a casus belli for Turkish entry into the war.
There were many accusations of false flag attacks during the Algerian Civil War. The government seemed to be allowing terrorists to invade the villages of their own supporters and massacre them in horrible ways. Military bases were often close by, many calls for help were made to them, but the soldiers never moved from their barracks. They sat back and watched while the terrorists massacred their own people.
During the US-planned Venezuelan coup of 2002, the coup forces opened fire on both Chavez supporters and their own people in an attempt to blame Chavez’ police for a depraved crime. They were caught, but the false flag was wildly played up in the corrupt US media.
False flag attacks are very dirty and most governments who do these attacks are fascist or fascist like states or imperialist states with deep fascist sympathies. False flag attacks are pretty much a part of the fascist playbook. For example, Nazi Germany and Israel were both fascist states, the Venezuelan opposition is a fascist movement, the Italian state in the 1970’s was ruled by rightwing governments, and the Algerian and Kuwait states were deeply authoritarian governments.
The justification for false flags is the greater good. If we blow an airplane full of innocent people out of the air and it helps us to get the world against Russia and evaporate support for our rebel enemies, then the false flag was the lesser of two evils. False flag attacks operate on an ends justifies the means basis.
There have been many accusations that the 911 attacks were false flag attacks by the US, Israelis or both. Despite quite a bit of evidence being offered, I have not seen any convincing evidence that any group other than Al Qaeda was involved. However, I do believe that there were deep Saudi links to this attack both at the private and state levels.
Many assassinations and “accidents” are in a sense false flags. A helicopter crashes with the head of state of Panama, Trujillo, on board. It was just an accident! No it wasn’t. The CIA rigged his copter to crash. The CIA has been involved in a number of killings made to look like accidents. Plane and car crashes are especially popular.
The US Deep State often kills people and makes it look like a suicide. The Mossad engages in these “fake suicides” also. In a case associated with the Kennedy Assassination, three prominent witnesses all “committed suicide” by carbon monoxide poisoning in their vehicles at around the same time. The best conclusion is that the National Security Establishment (The Deep State) killed these men.
We will probably never know the truth about the Kennedy Assassination, but he was probably killed by the Deep State with a major role for the CIA because he angered the National Security Establishment. The lone gunman theory appears to be a ruse and if anything, Oswald was used as a convincing fall guy. Oswald may indeed have killed Kennedy, but that does not prove that he acted alone. Oswald could have killed Kennedy as part of a Deep State plot.
Karen Silkwood was murdered by US law enforcement by putting plutonium in her food. This was then made to look like an accident because she worked with such material, it was assumed she brought it home with her. This was to stop her from blowing the whistle on the nuclear power industry to make her serve as a warning to others who may think of doing something similar.
A number of cases of “single car accidents” where the vehicle veers off the road into a ditch killing the driver are actually Deep State or law enforcement homicides. These vehicles are probably run off the road.
The best false flags use a controlled media and a corrupted state and intelligence service in order to create a huge propaganda event to further geopolitical goals, often during armed conflicts.
Right around the time of the Kennedy Assassination, the CIA waged a massive campaign centered around “conspiracy theory.” They planted the idea in Americans’ minds that conspiracies and false flags never occur, that murders are never made to look like accidents or suicides and that anyone who suggests such a thing is an unhinged lunatic. The controlled media was 100% cooperative in propagating this false theory. 
However, it was very successful. Most Americans refuse to believe that any deadly state conspiracies of any kind ever occur anywhere at any time, and that everyone who suggests this is a mental case, a crank or a kook. A ranting, raving, unstable nutball who should be either laughed at or ignored.
Once the American people were convinced that deadly state conspiracies never occur, they and their fascist allies were then free to conduct all of the conspiracy theories that they wanted to with no consequences whatsoever! You see how that works?
The problem with false flag theories is that for every 50 false flag cases the conspiracy crowd claims to uncover, perhaps one of them is a real false flag and the rest are either demonstrably not false flags or are lacking in probative evidence and hence cannot be proven one way or the other.
Now that we know what false flags are, it will be much easier to imagine that the Ukrainian government may have committed a false flag attack when it deliberately shot down Malaysian Air Lines Flight 17 recently in Ukraine. I believe that the odds are that this is the best explanation for the attack.
And following the theory laid out above, the framers of the Russians and Novorussians are accusing those who blew the whistle on the false flag of “conspiracy theory”, opening them to ridicule and dismissal. A completely captive and controlled media has gone along with all of the US and Ukie lies being used to frame innocent Russia and Novorussia with scarcely a single voice in dissent to be heard.
The Modern Era is a field day for the conspirator. Modern Man likes to fashion himself as scientific, logical, and sane. He is someone who will not believe wild theories easily. This is useful, but the vast majority of folks playing the Scientific Logical Sane Secular Role are dupes because they refuse to believe that deadly conspiracies ever occur.
Hence conspirators can operate with free reign and few hindrances in hatching and carrying out their conspiracies. They also know they will never get caught and their conspiracies will never be proven because they are committing acts which have been proven to never exist.
In such an environment, all things are possible.

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

The Neo-Nazi Junta in Kiev Dramatically Increases Its Efforts to Provoke Russian into an Intervention

A new article by the Saker. As I write this, Kramatorsk is being flattened. The civilian casualties will be in the hundreds if not the thousands. As I am monitoring the Western news now, I am seeing absolutely no word whatsoever about this full-scale war.
That is because 100% of the media not just in the West, but also in all of Europe is 100% for the US and Ukraine and 100% against Russia. So we do not only have a controlled media in the US. In most of Europe, sadly, the media is also hopelessly controlled. The British media is particularly outrageous in its over the top propaganda. The German media is completely controlled.
The media in Sweden and Norway is also totally controlled. As one might expect, this gets the population all riled up, and at the moment, Norwegians are in an anti-Russian frenzy and people who side with Russia are called traitors and there are threats to beat them up. The Polish media is one of the worst of all. I assume that the media in Baltics – Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia, is 100% anti-Russian. The French media is very bad. From Left to Right, they are all lined up against Russia.
I have no word on the Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Dutch, Danish, Finnish, Czech, Slovak, Hungarian, Slovenia, Austria, Swiss, Romanian or Bulgarian media. I would assume that the Romanian, Czech and especially Finnish media would be very anti-Russian. The Croats, Slovenes and Hungarians are Catholic, and the Catholics seem to be lining up against Russia in this war.

The only friends that Russia has in Europe are probably some of the Orthodox countries in the Balkans – Bosnia, Serbia, Macedonia, Montenegro and and Greece.
It’s pretty stunning how completely people pushing one point of view can completely capture the media in a Western “democracy” (TM) with “free of the press” (TM).
As you can see below, Russia has told the Ukraine no more gas. For quite some time now, Ukraine has been stealing Russian gas. Now that Russia is cutting off the flow, the Ukrainians are stealing European gas, that is, gas that the Europeans bought from Russia. Are the Europeans really so supine that they are going to sit back and let the Ukies steal gas from them?
Of course, the US and also Ukraine are trying to force Russia to intervene in Ukraine for a variety of reasons. I understand the US reasons, but I do not understand the Ukie reasons that much. It’s a trap, but geopolitics is a very dirty game and war is even dirtier. Nations law traps for each other all the time. You either take the bait or you don’t. In addition, geopolitics is generally based on conspiracy.
Nations conspire against each other, hatch conspiracies against each other, etc. all the time. This is normal brutal diplomacy. Of course the Western media never reports on any of this because the MSM and the US elite want Americans to believe there is no such thing as conspiracy. All conspiracy theory is lies. And indeed, a very large % of Americans believe just that. “All conspiracy theory is lies.”
The “all conspiracy theory is lies” is a itself a plot. The CIA hatched this project in the early 1960’s. For 60 years now, the CIA has been running a disinformation campaign in the US that says, “all conspiracy theory is lies.” The reason they do this, of course, is because the CIA itself engages in constant conspiracy, and the actions of the CIA can usually only be explained by a conspiracy theory of some sort.
The campaign has been very successful. Now that vast numbers of Americans insist that “all conspiracy theory is lies, the US government, the State Department, the CIA, and the US military can engage plot and hatch conspiracies to their hearts content. Which is exactly what they do. Of course we catch these scums all the time in their conspiracy games and blow the whistle on them, but every time we do, people scream, “Conspiracy theory!”
I know this because it has happened to me many times. For the last 25 years, I have actually figured out what is going on US domestic and foreign policy along with the ways of the rest of the world’s states. Once you figure out the truth, you realize that much of the truth is simply “conspiracy theory.” And when I try to tell people the truth, they usually start yelling, “Conspiracy theory!” and shut me down.
You see: now that the elite has convinced as all that all conspiracy theory is lies, now they can conspire to their hearts content! People will catch them in the act and blow the whistle on them all the time, but every time they do, the elite will yell, “Conspiracy theory!” and vast numbers of Americans will immediately tune out.
By now you have all already probably heard it. The CEO of Gazprom, Alexei Miller, has announced that Russia was now implementing a “prepayment only” gas delivery plan for the Ukraine and Lavrov has announced that he has “nothing to talk about” with the Ukie clown currently impersonating a Foreign Minister, Andrii Deshchytsia, and that he “would not meet with him”. Unlike the always calm and impeccably diplomatic Lavrov, Miller made no effort to show his complete disgust with, and contempt for, the junta in Kiev whom he clearly sees as blackmailing and stealing mobsters.
This was especially evident when he said that the amount of gas the Ukies had set aside in their reserves was exactly the amount of gas which they were now refusing to pay for. To put it in plain English: the Ukies stole gas from Russia to fill up their reserves and they are about to begin stealing gas bought by the Europeans. Nice folks indeed. Very “Euro-compatible” I suppose…
So my first reaction was to rejoice that Lavrov and Miller and finally expressed their total disgust and treated the junta leader with the disgust and contempt they deserve. But then a very unpleasant thought crept up into my mind: is that not exactly what the Ukies wanted?
As I have written a million times now – the junta in power in Kiev is doomed, Banderastan is not viable, the rump-Ukraine is in ruins and terminally broke and there is nobody in the West who can do anything about it. And I bet you that the Ukies know that. This is why from their point of view involving the Russians is vital as Russia is the *only* possible scapegoat on which they can blame it all. So now Russia has “cut off gas” and the Russian Foreign Minister has announced that he will “refuse to meet” with his “Ukrainian counterpart”. You know how the Ukie propaganda machine will present that? It will be something along these lines:
For all our efforts to negotiate in good faith with the Moskals who are occupying our land and sending in terrorists to kill our people, the Kremlin imperialists have decided to use the “gas weapon” against our people.
Worse, instead of thanking our Minister of Foreign affairs who, at a great personal risk for himself, confronted a justifiably outraged crowed and calmed them down with some manly humor and thereby saved the Russian “diplomats” (who are really all FSB spies) from the righteous wrath of the people, they have now announced that they will refuse to meet with him. Yet again, the Moskals have shown that they belong to steppes of Asia and not into the community of civilized European nations. Etc. etc. etc.
And, of course, the Ukies will get yet another standing ovation from the western politicians and corporate media. This is so predictable that it is not even funny anymore. But there is something which worries me much more: the Ukie tactic is a sound one. Why?
Well, think of it. If one side is truly desperate to provoke the other side, what are the chances that it will fail? If you and I met somewhere and I would put all my energy and creativity towards the sole goal of getting your attention and force you to respond – how long do you think it will take me to get what I want?
The same applies here. All the Ukies need to do is escalate, escalate and escalate even further, and since no matter what they do the Psakis in the West will always whitewash it, approve it or even praise it, there is nothing holding the neo-Nazi junta back. This is a small except of what Juan wrote to me today:

Kramatorsk as I write is being flattened, the entire city is under intense bombardment including Grad and Hurricane MLR’s. Everything, industrial areas, shopping areas, infrastructure areas, living areas, is being flattened. We’re going to have I think hundreds if not a thousand dead civilians. Is this the atrocity needed to bring in Russia? I don’t know. Yet.

Two cities in Europe are turned into new Oradour-sur-Glane and nobody in the West gives a damn. Germany and France pass laws basically forbidding the honest historical research of the Nazi atrocities in WWII while at the same time not only denying, but pro-actively supporting Nazi atrocities in a country which they claim is part of Europe. How crazy can this get?!
It get’s better. Everybody, and I mean everybody, was fully aware that the Ukies would sooner or later begin to siphon-off European gas. It was therefore quite evident that the sound solution was to have a North Stream and a South Stream bypassing Banderastan to make sure that *European* gas (it’s theirs from the moment they buy it!) would get delivered. But no, the EU criticizes Bulgaria, McCain takes a trip to Sophia and, voilà, the Bulgarians are stopping the construction of South Stream which, of course, will end up hurting only the EU (not Russia or the USA!).
So let’s sum it up:

  • The neo-Nazi junta in Kiev cannot survive, and it knows it
  • Uncle Sam is desperate to pull Russia into a military intervention
  • The EU is what is delicately called a “punk ass bitch” in US jails

So what are the Russian chances to not be provoked in this context?
Pretty close to zero I think.
What Lavrov and Miller did today or, should I say, were forced to today is just a first step. In essence, even though Miller and Lavrov did the right thing, they still gave the Ukies exactly what they wanted. And this scary. Because this “success” will breed more attempts to force Russia to react. What can come next?
As I wrote yesterday

“I would not put it past them to try an air or missile strike on, say, a kindergarten in Crimea or even in Belgorod. They could also kidnap a delivery man for a Russian company still operating in Kiev or heroically massacre of minibus with an Aeroflot crew on the way to the airport”.

They can also attack a Russian border post, bomb a Russian vessel in the Black Sea, or even blow up a church belonging to the Moscow Patriarchate. And then what? Will Russia still only verbally protest?
I am not making these up. There has been already at least one case when a Ukrainian Su-25 penetrated into Russian airspace to attack a border post controlled by the NDF. The Russian could have *easily* shot it down (they have the technology needed to shut down pretty much all of the Novorussian airspace without having to move a single missile batteries or radar across the border).
But they chose not to simply because by the time they would need to prove that the intruder was in Russian airspace the Ukie version (a Russian aggression, of course) would have made all the front page news. Remember how long it took the West to eventually and most reluctantly admit that “yeah, okay, it was the Georgian side which attacked first”? How many people today even heard about this admission anyway?
I am pretty darn sure that the folks in the Kremlin are fully aware of all that and, judging by what some people close to the Kremlin are saying, the decision has been made in Moscow to wait as long as possible simply to get a justification for the inevitable Russian intervention which would be as clear cut as possible. Please understand that Russia does not need to make any specific preparatory move to intervene in Novorossia. All that NATO nonsense about Russian troop movement and concentrations along the border is just propaganda for civilians.
The fact is that Putin can give the order and in the next 30 minutes the entire airspace of Donbass will become a no-fly zone, within the next 60 minutes most Ukrainian artillery positions and command posts will be destroyed by missile strikes after which the NDF (backed by a few more volunteers) will be basically sufficient to take full control of the Donbass. As for the Ukie death-squads they will run for their lives as fast as they can. The only problem is timing.
The Kremlin is desperately waiting for a sign that the Europeans are slowly coming to realize the monster which they have unleashed in the Ukraine. I personally do not believe that the Europeans will suddenly grow a conscience or a spine and considering the mass murder taking place today in Novorossia I continue to believe that a Russian intervention is inevitable.
In the meantime, the provocations will continue. I just saw footage of the two journalists of the Russian TV channel Zvezda News which had been kidnapped by a Ukrainian death-squad and for which the Ukies had wanted a $200’000 ransom. Though neither did go into any details, both had been severely beaten, one had a glorious shiner under his eye while the other could not hear from his left ear. I have also heard news there had been an attempt to bomb the Russian consulate in Odessa and that somebody had prevented it (local cops?) and that it all ended in a huge brawl. And, of course, bomb and shells are raining down on Kramatorsk and Slaviansk right now – the terror operation is clearly in full swing.
The Ukies will “win” in the sense that they will succeed in triggering a Russian intervention which they will try hard to turn into a war. If they do, it will be a short one, but the political damage will be immense. So I suppose a final rationale for Putin to wait for as long as possible is to get as high a percentage of the Russian population truly outraged before moving in so as to make this not a “Putin decision” but a “Russian people demand”.
I thus fully concur with Juan: it will get a lot worse before it gets better and lots of people will die. But at the end, Russia, and the rest of us, will prevail. Of that I am sure.
The Saker

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

More on Government Coverup Conspiracies

I believe that there has been a conspiracy by the state to coverup the Bigfoots’ existence, but I don’t believe it is permanent. They won’t stop the publication of the groundbreaking Bigfoot DNA study which will probably be published soon, at least I don’t think so. But this study will not be enough to prove the existence of the Bigfoots.

The government people and the skeptics will simply attack and poo poo the study and the related videos. The majority of Americans and scientists will continue to reject the Bigfoots’ existence, but we will get some more folks on our side. And I think the state will to continue to disappear Bigfoot bodies.

I do not think this is a permanent conspiracy. It’s simply a conspiracy to delay the discovery as long as possible. At some point, there will be so much evidence that there will be nothing that the state can do, and the Bigfoots will just be discovered. At that point, the coverup will end, the state will deny that there ever was one, and they will try to figure out how to deal with the Bigfoots’ existence.

Most of these coverups are just “delay it as long as possible” games.

I think the same thing is going on with UFO’s. UFO’s clearly exist, but so far, the state has been able to cover up their existence. If decent evidence ever comes forward, the state will just pull out all the stops to poo poo the evidence and say it’s all lies.

This is what they did in the Roswell case, where a UFO definitely crashed in the New Mexico desert in 1947, and two dead aliens were confiscated by the Air Force. Those aliens were sequestered away, and my understanding is that the US government is continuing to study the bodies. If Roswell happened, then it was probably not the only one. There must have been other UFO cases out there. Roswell was excellent proof of UFO’s, but the state just ridiculed it.

The UFO coverup, like the Bigfoot coverup, is only expected to be a longterm delaying tactic. At some point, the evidence for UFO’s may be so overwhelming that the state can’t cover it up anymore. At that point, they may just allow the evidence to go forward and then try their best to deal with the fallout.

Coverups are excellent conspiracies for state elites to engage in. All they do is put off or delay, hopefully as long as possible, the truth about this or that reality. When the reality is finally discovered, the state just acts surprised as if they are seeing the reality for the first time.

They deny that there was ever a coverup, and the media goes along. The media, also run by the same elites who run the state and corporations, has bashed into our heads for decades now that conspiracies simply do not exist and furthermore, that they are scientifically impossible. The notion that conspiracies are not possible and that all conspiracy theorists are nuts is part of the game of the elites who practice conspiracy.

Suppose I was a member of an elite practicing a conspiracy. The first thing I would do is put out the idea that conspiracy is not possible and that all conspiracy theorists are insane. Then I would enlist the media to promote these notions. Now I am free to conspire at will! See how this works? If any of my conspiracies is uncovered, I will scream, “Conspiracy theory!” and “Tin foil hat!” Now matter how much evidence there was for the conspiracy, it would never be uncovered because the media has already decided that conspiracies are not possible.

One rejoinder to conspiracy theory is, “Why doesn’t someone blow cover?” But people are blowing cover all the time. The number of people, all the way up to generals, who blew cover, often on their death beds, about Roswell, is very large. But since conspiracies “don’t exist,” an unlimited number of people can blow cover, and it won’t matter because we will just call them all liars.

Another thing to note is that conspiracy is an aspect of daily life. Trust me when I say that the rich have been conspiring to get money and especially to keep money for millenia. Once you enter into the realms of the super rich, you enter into the Conspiracy Theory Zone. They are continually conspiring to obtain and especially to keep their millions.

That the rich would conspire for money and power but the state would not is ridiculous. After all, in the US, the state is of the rich, by the rich and for the rich. Why would the same rich would conspire fulltime outside the state suddenly stop conspiring once they start to work for the state? It makes no sense.

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

If You Believe in Bigfoots, You Must Believe in a Government Coverup

But if you believe in Bigfoot, you must believe in a government conspiracy to cover up their existence.

Obviously, people shoot at these things all the time. Sometimes they even kill them.

Bigfoots get hit by cars on a regular basis. Sometimes, they are killed by cars.

Obviously, Bigfoots die in the woods on a regular basis. Surely, humans come upon the bodies of dead Bigfoots from time to time.

Bigfoots shot by hunters or cops, Bigfoots killed by cars, Bigfoots found dead in the woods are clearly all reported to authorities.

Since 1968, we have many reports of the government hauling these dead bodies away after they are reported. Before 1968, we have no such cases. The evidence implies a conspiracy.

Otherwise, you have to believe in crazy things.

  • Bigfoots are never roadkilled. Nuts. Of course they are.
  • Bigfoots are never shot dead by hunters or cops. Surely they are.
  • Bigfoots are never injured or killed in natural disasters. Sure they are.
  • Bigfoots are never found dead in the woods. But of course they must be.

In order not to believe these things, you must invent magical theories:

  • Bigfoot bodies disappear magically into the woods.
  • Bigfoots are so special that they cannot be hit by cars.
  • For some odd reason, Bigfoots cannot be killed by bullets.
Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

Wikipedia on Mao

Repost from the old site.
Granted, he’s a controversial fellow all right, but this hit piece is just an outrageous travesty of anti-Communist propaganda. The discussion page shows the details of the travesty, including the banning of anyone promoting an opposite point of view (a typical smarmy Wikipedia “Neutral Point of View” practice).
My 1990 World Book article on China< and my Time-Life book, China, from 1962 (height of the Cold War) are vastly more fair than this. World Book is hardly pro-Communist and Time-Life was always fanatically anti-Communist.
Fact is, Wikipedia is run by a bunch of little libertarian shits. Jimmy Wales is a wild-eyed, fanatical libertarian crazy person, and he’s using his evil website to try to poison the mind of a planet in favor of his libertarian nightmare.
That’s his right, but the US “free press” (there is no free press in the US) really ought to call him on it. I’ve seen all sorts of MSM bullshit about Jimmy and his jerk-off webcyclopedia, and every single one of them has been a fawning valentine (as we call such pieces in the journalism field).
Never once has even one article hinted that Wikipedia is grossly unfair, or that it is run by various cabals that are all tied in with the super-cabal of ultra-right libertarian Hindutva-Zionists around Wales. It might be nice to let the world know exactly what the politics of him and his creepy followers really are.
Let them know that Wales was furious that the federal government had done anything whatsoever to help the victims of Hurricane Katrina before, during and after the storm in any way whatsoever. Can you imagine?
In Wales World, there is no role for a government to play in a world-class hurricane. Need to be rescued? Call your friend who obviously has a helicopter, or pay $1000’s for some Israeli-cum-Halliburton mercenaries to come rescue your ass.
No government help to put up victims afterwards, to clean up the mess, or even to collect the fucking bodies. Let the epidemics come. No government help to rebuild the city afterwards. Let it stay underwater oozing gators, toxic waste, mold, decaying flesh and ruined structures. All of this is the proper domain of the private sector! Can you imagine how many people would have died?
I mean, this is what we got anyway under Libertarian Lite George Bush, but in Jimmy World, things would have been incalculably worse.
Look. If that’s Jimmy’s worldview, no problem. Hell, there are still dedicated Pol Potists out there. But the world really ought to know what Jimmy Wales’ fanatical ultra political views are so they can decide whether or not they agree. They should also be told how he uses his fake unbiased Webcyclopedia like Rupert Murdoch uses his media empire, to push reactionary politics in the name of “fair and balanced” bullshit.
That the “liberal media” MSM refuses to do this is worrying. It makes me wonder how reactionary they really are. Is the MSM as ultra-right as Wales, or are they just scared to talk about it? What’s up?


1. Here is some text from my World Book article on China. Note how the very rightwing World Book encyclopedia is able to acknowledge that Mao did many great things:
The Communist government has achieved an impressive record of economic growth. The Communists have provided widespread job opportunities, job security and a more even income distribution to the workers…China’s farm output has expanded greatly under the Communists…Production of chickens and livestock has improved significantly since 1950…
Under the Communists, industrial production has grown at an average rate of 12% per year…Since 1950, China has made great progress in educating its children. The number of children in both elementary and secondary school has increased sharply…Communist have conducted mass literacy campaigns so that now 75% of the population is literate…
All of the Communists’ health programs have resulted in a population that is much healthier than before. The Communists have almost wiped out cholera, typhoid and many other horrible diseases that used to kill millions of Chinese every year.

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

My Wikipedia User Page

As you can see, I have a permanent “community ban” from Wikipedia. Reason? “Hatemonger.” LOL, “hatemonger” means anyone that the Wikipedia Jews don’t like. The banner was Super-Jew jpgordon, one of the biggest assholes on all of Wikipedia and one of the leaders of the Wikipedia Jews, a small cabal of super-Jews and hasbara types who run amok on Wikipedia, policing it day and night for “anti-Semites,” “hatemongers,” and “Nazis.” All you have to do to get a ban on those grounds is edit pages in a pro-Palestinian manner.
As you can see jpgordon is still slaving away, chasing down dirty anti-Semite wabbits and keeping Wikipedia safe for Jewish Demogogueracy.
One more thing. Before I got banned, I was very surprised to find myself on a “Wikipedia Neo-Nazi List.” This is some pitiful list the Wikipedia Jews keep all the time. To get on the “Neo-Nazi List” is pretty easy: all you need to do is piss off the Wikipedia Jews. Wa-la!
Here’s a list of my contributions. See any hatemongering in there? Didn’t think so. I spent a number of hours working very hard on those contribs, then those scumbag Wikipedia Jews went through and reversed all of my changes for no reason. Then they went back over my old stuff on things like rock music, languages, ethnic groups, geography, uncontroversial stuff, and reversed all of those changes too. Quite a few hours of hard work totally down the drain.
The problem with the Wikipedia Jews is that they are such assholes that many non-bigoted folks, after having been abused by these clowns, might just want to go join a Nazi party!
I wouldn’t advise anyone to go work on Dikipedia. So many better ways to waste your time. Listen to music. Read a book. Meditate. Do some yoga. Or whatever. Anything but that.

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

Anti-Semitism in the US a Century Ago

A commenter asks why any American would be anti-Semitic 100 years ago.

A hundred years ago Jews were holed up in the ghettos of the Northeast and Eastern Europe, they had no influence whatsoever. What were the antisemites’ excuses back then?

100 years ago, there was lots of anti-Semitism in the US. That was the reason why the Ochs family bought up the New York Times and the other Galician Jews bought up Hollywood from 1890-1920. Hollywood and the US press was in the hands of virulently racist Whites, and the Jews thought that was frightening, so they conspired to buy up the media and Hollywood, monopolies which exist to this very day.
Jews don’t dig racist Whites. They figure they are going to turn on the Jews sooner or later. Recall that by 1920, the Dearborn Independent was publishing away. Ford documents how several actual Jewish conspiracies to take over Wall Street, commercial banks and investment banking were stopped dead in the water by “anti-Semitic” White Christians.
I dare say Whites were much more anti-Semitic back in those days than they are now.
100 years ago, European Jews were flooding into the US via Ellis Island. And they weren’t behaving very well either!
Anti-Semitism follows Jews like day follows night.

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

Judeopedia Redux

Repost from the old site.

Via Philip Weiss, who gets the scoop from Electronic Intifada, and thence to Joachim Martillo for final comment, it seems the paranoid and delusional world that I revealed in Wikipedia, Ziopedia or Judeopedia fully two years ago is finally starting to be proven true. But of course. I saw it with my very eyes.

I saw the Jewish Nationalist cabal on there and got nailed, run up by admins and then banned by them. Then I wrote about it. I don’t see how anyone could spend much time on Wikipedia and not notice these wicked little toads running amok all over that precious online encyclopedia.

The Electronic Intifada piece reveals a concerted effort by CAMERA, a rightwing Zionist lobby in the US, to infiltrate Wikipedia surreptitiously, ingratiate themselves with editors, get all pro-Palestinian editors run up on fake charges and hopefully run out, and to eventually move on up into the ranks of administrators. So my paranoid delusions about Jewish conspiracies on Wikipedia were proven true after all.

I can tell you flat out that the Administrators are already chock full of either members of this Jewish Cabal or rightwing libertarians allied with them. Jimmy Wales himself is a rightwing libertarian who has strong pro-Zionist views that he does not hide. The administrators are chosen well to carry out a specific agenda.

No one has ever run up these cackling criminal Heckles and Jeckles in this Jewish Cabal on anything yet, and anyone who mentions a peep about it gets put on their creepy neo-Nazi list (I made it on) which I guess has hundreds of names on it, in typical Jewish paranoid fashion.

Not only that, but the Jewish Cabal runs around crowing and bragging about their very project all the time; they call themselves The Cabal, The Jewish Cabal, and other names, so they are totally blatant about what they are doing. But if anyone dares to notice this and points it out, onto the Neo-Nazi list you go, and soon you will be run up to Administrators on totally faked charges and then run out of Wikipedia.

I don’t think I have ever seen a Jewish-critical or pro-Palestinian editor who lasted long there. It’s been two years since I wrote that post, and I keep hoping things have changed, but I keep getting emails from pro-Palestinian folks who just got run out of Wikipedia.

On Phil’s post, the truly disgusting Richard Witty, “Peace Now Zionist – Jewish nationalist – defender of the Jews” who seems to inhabit all of Phil’s threads is squirming around as usual. One gets the impression he is writing on a pincushion. This crap is getting harder and harder for the Richard Witty’s of the world to deny.

The usual rejoinders are employed by Witty – this happens all over the web, this is the problem with open source editing, there are cabals all over the place in our world, including the Internet.

Sure, I saw plenty of cabals trying to form on Wikipedia, usually on nationalistic or political issues. And they were crushed, one by one, but conscientious editors. However, curiously, the sickening little Jewish cabal was allowed not only to survive but to run amok across all of Wikipedia! Riddle me that!

And recently, a particularly vile and scummy Hindutva – Hindu Nationalist – Indian Nationalist Cabal has formed and this cabal has also been allowed to run wild all over all of the India and Pakistan articles on Wikipedia. The result is that most of the articles on India and Pakistan have been totally destroyed by stinking fascist Hindutva worms.

The Hindutva Cabal, of course, has formed an alliance with the Jewish Cabal, Jewish fascist dogs with Indian fascist dogs, all in one kennel, crapping on the floor, humping each others’ legs and yip-yapping away, just like in real life.

One Jayg is mentioned in the article as not a member of the CAMERA cabal, but instead a sympathetic outsider. Actually, Jayg is one of the leading members of the Jewish Cabal on Wikipedia. He’s one of the worst Jewish POV-pushers of them all.

Zeq, the leader of the CAMERA cabal, is also a well-known member of the Jewish Cabal on Wikipedia. The reason Zeq speaks poor English, I believe, is because he is an Israeli.

I am familiar with both of these sociopathic runts.

I believe they are both admins too, but I may be wrong.

Repeat after yourself: cabals exist, cabals exist, cabals exist.

Anyway, over and out. Writing this is starting to make me really angry all over again.

P. S. I would like to point out that a huge percentage of White Nationalists support Zionism (Jewish nationalism). That right there ought to stop anyone in their tracks and make them wonder why. When you finally figure it out, if you have any decency, you will realize even more than ever that WN is bad news.

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

The Wikipedia Jews

Repost from the old site.

More stuff on the Wikipedia Jewish Cabal, from a recent commenter:

Looks like the same old gang is back at it. Here is the link, from a Wikipedia history page, showing actual edits being done to a page. This project is being managed by notorious Jewish POV-pushers Jayjg and SlimVirgin. Those two were notorious when I was editing two years ago and it appears that they are still at it.I had heard a year or two ago that some of the Cabal had adopted the cause of trying to block the famous Jews pages, though that seemed odd at the time.

Apparently, being classic cases of Jewish paranoid-masochistic character*, they are trying to stonewall these articles, especially the ones about wealthy Jews in the US, because they can be used by the evil anti-Semites to insinuate some of those “classic canards about Jewish wealth”, as the ADL loves to phrase it.

So, due to their paranoia about anti-Semites, folks are being prevented from learning some interesting information about Jews in the US who have done quite well for themselves in business. Hey, what’s so bad about that? This is a capitalist country after all, right? And the Jews sure do know how to make money, got to hand it to a sharp businessman.

It’s strange that this stupid project is still ongoing, as I think I heard about it maybe 1-2 years ago.

SlimVirgin is a young Jewish female. Jayjg is a young Jewish male. I believe that they may both be administrators. Both are passionate Jewish nationalists. As you can see from the history page, they have shut almost all of these obviously Jewish prominent businesspeople from the page unless and until actual urls can be tracked down that conclusively prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they are in fact Jewish.

Never mind everyone knows Larry Ellison, Sergey Brin and Steve Ballmer are Jews. We gots to prove it.

Strange the obsessions some of these Jewish nationalists get hot for. A casual reader of the Jewish press quickly becomes aware that the Jewish press loves the idea of Jewish business success and is not shy at all about singing the praises of these folks every chance it gets. As well they should in a capitalist society. Hell, gimme some of dat money.

In anticipation of the usual rejoinders:

My experience on Wikipedia showed me clearly that there is some sort of a Jewish Cabal running amok on there unobstructed, and they have seriously damaged most articles dealing with Judaica and Israel – Palestine. I got run out of Wikipedia on faked charges after I blew the whistle on em.

Yes, there are many other folks attempting to form cabals on Wikipedia. None have been allowed any power other than the Jewish Cabal and a Hindutva Cabal from India. What’s up with that, Jimbo Wales?

It was clear to me editing Wikipedia that Wiki is swarming with Jews all over the encyclopedia. Jews are our smartest humans, and their cumulative knowledge is encyclopedic and often polymathic. Most Jews do not have a permanent hardon for Judaica. I assume that most Jews on Wikipedia are just editing stuff on linguistics, computers, butterflies or this or that.

A small group of Jews are heavily involved in editing Judaica and Israel-related stuff. They may number no more than 20-30. It has not been shown that they meet together, but they don’t need to. They came there for a common purpose, and that is what they are each doing – Jewish POV-pushing. They don’t need to hold secret meetings to do that.

That’s probably the way most cabals, and surely Jewish cabals, work in the world. I doubt most hold secret meetings. A lot of media Jews are just Jewish POV-pushers, wittingly or not. They know the line and they push, one after the other. No need for consultation.

Cabals are not automatically conspiracy theory. It is via cabals that any wealth and power is accumulated in any complex human society. The rich and powerful conspire and conspire to make their money and then again to keep from losing it to continuous challengers.

The rest of us conspire too. I and millions of other guys conspire to get women into bed, sometimes successfully, sometimes not. Life’s not necessarily on the up and up all the time, you know.

It’s cool that these punks are finally getting outed. Let’s shine the light on them more and more and maybe the Wikipedia admins will appeal to their best impulses and rope these wild horses into the corral.

Got tips for me on the last crap of the Wikipedia Jews, especially with links like this? Keep em coming! Email is on the upper right, or use the comments.

*I do not mean to imply that all Jews have this salient character, however prominent Jewish psychologist Stanley Rothman feels it is prominent amongst Jews. A worthy project of any progressive Jew would be try to wiggle out of this psychopathological suit of armor, I would think.

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

More Wikipedia Jews Stuff

Repost from the old site.

This came to me from an anti-Semitic commenter who commented on the blog.

This post is an anti-Semitic rant, and it is not something I would publish myself. However, it was quite funny, and that was one reason I thought to publish it. I had to add sentence case and do some editing, as it was sent to me troll-style in all lower case. It also included a vast amount of evidence against jayjg, known below as jewjg.

I am not taking any position on the material below, other than to say that I mostly don’t agree with it when it goes on and on about Communist Jews.

The rest of it is just kind of funny and interesting – a Jewish culture of conspiracy, Jewish smart businessmen, Jewish white collar criminals, Communist Jews – all of this interesting information is being kept out of the preying eyes of the Gentiles as in, “What are you trying to do – start a pogrom?”

Don’t freak out about the anti-Semitism; there’s nothing really in back of it on this end. If Jews wish to engage, well, they are pretty funny too. We normally don’t run anti-Semitism on here, and two guest authors have already been banned for continuous addictive anti-Semitism. But since this is so funny, we are going to let it run for now.

The author is a White racist of the White Nationalist type. The usual WN beef with Jews is evident – that Jews screwed it up for White people’s racial project in the 1950’s. Well, I don’t think much of that whole beef, especially in its strong form – Jews brought integration!

Anyway, anthropologically interesting and also humorous.

Great Wikipedia Jews article from Encyclopedia Dramatica. Looks like jayjg is AIPAC’s point man on Wikipedia, and it also looks like the main member of the Wikipedia Jews do coordinate their activities via email, IM and IRC. The only ones that I remember from two years ago are Isarig, Humus sapiens, Zeq, IZAK and SlimVirgin.

Looks like a whole new crew has taken over. Idiotically, SlimVirgin is not even Jewish; she is just a Gentile who is obsessed with Jews in a philo-Semitic way.

The ‘Wikipedia Jews,’ ah yes. Cabals and the like are endemic to Eastern European Jewish culture, you soon find out – a ‘culture of conspiracy’ with these people – as history has shown.

This noteworthy ‘Wikipedia Jews’ episode already well known, of course, thanks to you and others – thanks Mr. Lindsay and others – for those links you have on your blog now, plus these. And don’t forget this user either.

Who they think they foolin’ with that whole Commie world revolution thing here in Amurica then, back when we Murican whites still had a strong sense of racial and ethnic conscience? All that Jew info just deleted too.

For that big American Jew businesspeople list, already been deleted multiple times by jewjg and SlimVirgin & quadell and other entrenched Zionist admins.

So many of them brilliant Occioriental Jew capitalist billionaire names – just wiped right clean away from there. Why? Really, you think they world’s smartest people? Or just world’s most greedy people? Commie materialist worldview possibly affecting your judgment here?

Nope, Jews don’t really like Gentiles messin’ in their many business affairs. They are liable to murder some Gentile folk for all of that gold, like violent & revolutionary white-collar crime maybe? You mean like both here in Amurica and in Bolsheevik Russkiiland too, at the same time?

Boy that jewjg sure does delete a lot. One time a nice and good and fair and very revelatory website existed called, but it was shut down real soon like by a bunch of Wikipedia’s big Jew San Fran lawyers or somethin’.

But on that Wikiabuse website they did post a lot of evidence, like, a lot. Remember when I said that jewjg liked to delete stuff? Well…I guess I saved some of it that I saw there on the Wikiabuse website and saved it just to humiliate these Jew Wikipedia editors later on. Gosh, I hope all of it fits on your blog?!

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

Wikipedia Jews Again

Repost from the old site.

Looks like some of the Wikipedia Jews are operating out of Israeli government computers and the Israeli Embassy in Washington DC. Well, I guess Wikipedia has really hit the bigtime when the diplomats and spy-types start trying to write it.

This blog has obtained a secret copy of emblem of the Wikipedia Jews, used by them in internal communications via instant messenger and email to ward off spies and infiltration attempts. They make sly references to this motif throughout their communications with each other. This is the first publication of the cabal’s secret sign, and hopefully it will stimulate further research into the workings of this very secret and devious cabal.

Even read Thomas Pynchon’s book The Crying of Lot 49? It’s quite difficult to read, but if you’re smart, you can handle it.

I feel it deals with Information Theory. Supposedly Information Theory is this, but my take on that is, “He who controls information, controls the world”. Right?

Well, that’s what’s up with the Israeli government rewriting Wikipedia. Supposedly other governments are doing this too. Only problem: it’s against Wikipedia’s mission and policy of being an unbiased (LOL!) encyclopedia. So, really, it’s not ok. Wikipedia’s not ok either, but neither is government encyclopedia manipulation.

The comments are really interesting too. Lots of Zionist Jews chiming in with the usual crap, excuses and lines.

Everyone does it.

That’s one of their favorites, from murder to spying to this or that or anything.

The Palestinian propaganda network is just as bad, if not worse.


I used to hear this one all the time in the Middle East Usenet groups. Zionist Jews have this peculiar notion that there is this vast worldwide Palestinian or pro-Palestinian network that almost controls the world’s press. Sort of like the Protocols of the Elders of Palestine or something.

It’s complete crap.

The Palestinians have nothing, just some terrorists ramming dozers into pedestrian vehicles – the latest attack – 3 dead, 70 wounded – is another Hezbollah revenge attack for the Mossad killing Mughniyeh. I knew Hez would make Israel pay for that. And crappy rockets that don’t even shoot straight.

I’ve been on Wikipedia and edited articles on Israel and Palestine in a completely fair manner, usually using the Israeli government’s own statistics to rewrite articles. I was more or less alone in this endeavor. All who went before me were thrown off Wikipedia.

For this crime, I was put on a neo-Nazi list by the Wikipedia Jews and their buddies like this twit Chip Berlet, had 100% of my edits reversed, including all the stuff I got from the Israeli government, and in addition, all the edits I made to articles completely unrelated to anything Jewish or Middle Eastern, and was eventually thrown off Wikipedia and banned forever.

That Berlet twerp is in very tight with the top Wikipedia leadership, and seems to work very closely with Ape Foxman, I mean Abe Foxman, of the spies and thugs of the ADL.

Berlet seems to specialize in finding “rightwing” movements where none can be seen for miles, and in finding all manner of “anti-Semitism” that often never seems to exist either. The man’s got quite an imagination. Lately, he’s been working on the Jewish Lobby or Israeli Lobby thingie. There is no such thing, you know, sez Chip. And if you mention it, you’re an anti-Semite. Neener neener.

Chip also insists that the US is in the midst of some sort of White nationalist and anti-Semitic seizure exemplified by fascist White racist thugs running amok on the streets destroying everything gay and non-White. There’s a few of these guys around, but if I were a gay or non-White, I’d rather worry about lightning, heart disease or car accidents. US neo-Nazism is a comically minor movement with almost no support.

Since these Wikipedia toads banned me, I have received repeated letters from editors who tried to put a bit of fairness into articles on the Middle East conflict on Wikipedia. Everyone I talked to was in the process of being taken out by the Wikipedia Jews. Last time I checked, the Wikipedia Jews and their buds were in firm control over anything Jewish or Israeli-related on Wikipedia.

Yeah, Wikipedia’s a hotbed of pro-Palestinian propaganda. Snark.

Amazing the crap some folks believe. Almost like they live in some Matrix reality.

Article written by Charles Levinson, an Jewish American journalist based in Cairo and Baghdad since 2002 and in Jerusalem since 2006. Charles did a great job here. Shout out!

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

Wikipedia Jews Redux

Repost from the old site.

I’ve been informed that the Wikipedia Jews (click the Wikipedia Jews category at the end of the post for more) have been successful, incredibly, at eliminating an entire Wikipedia category called Jewish Businesspeople. The list had 550 names on until a while ago, and now it has zero. The Wikipedia Jews win again. The crusade to get rid of it was led by Jayjg, one of the Wikipedia Jews’ top henchmen.

Now the Wikipedia Jews are going after the list of Jewish Sportspeople. For what reason, I haven’t the faintest idea.

A little background. The Jewish Businessmen category was eliminated by the Wikipedia Jews in order to hide the truth about Jewish success in the US. Jews have been very successful in this country, and reportedly 50% of the richest Americans are Jewish. The Wikipedia Jews are trying to hide the story of Jewish success in America because it is common fodder for anti-Semites.

All through the centuries in the ghettos of Europe, wanted Jewish criminals were always hidden by the Jews. Why? Probably in part due to fear that a Jew accused of a crime would set off a pogrom. The same mindset is afoot here with the Wikipedia. Knowledge of Jewish business success in the US, it is feared, may feed anti-Semitism in the US. Letting this information get out is like “trying to start a pogrom”.

When I was on Usenet, every time a Jew would relate something uncomplimentary about Jews, for instance, the blatant racism of Hasidim they knew, the others would actually scream that: “What are you trying to do? Start a pogrom?”

Jews can talk about this stuff behind closed doors, but please, not when the Gentiles are listening. This is why the Israeli press is much more critical about Jews and Israel than the US press is. The Hebrew language press is the most uninhibited of all, because they assume that no Gentiles are reading it.

My mother went to school on the South Side of Chicago in a mostly Jewish school, apparently one of the same ones that Barack Obama now sends his kids to. Whenever a Jewish criminal was captured, the Jewish kids, many of whom still spoke Yiddish at home, would always say, “Oh, this is a bad day for the Jews!” She never heard of any other ethnic group saying such a thing.

What she describes is what Kevin MacDonald calls Jewish hyperethnocentrism. Understanding Jewish ultratribalism and hyperethnocentrism is one of the keys to the riddle of Jewish Question.

The deletion of the Jewish Sportspeople category is much stranger. The stereotype of the Jew is that he is a wimpy intellectual, he’s not much of an athlete, and he would rather run than fight.

Israel’s bristling, in-your-face, land-working, salt of the Earth, fight-to-the-death Sabras were supposed to put an end to all of that. On Usenet, Jewish ultranationalists loved to wave the few Jewish athletes in everyone’s faces. “See? We’re not all neurotic, myopic bookworms!” they seemed to shout.

The recent Wikipedia article on Samir Kuntar is another example of the Wikipedia Jews and their allies running amok. Kuntar is a Lebanese guerrilla formerly with Abu Abbas’ notorious Palestine Liberation Front (PLF) who has been in an Israeli prison for the past 29 years. He participated in a raid on Nahariya, Israel in 1979 that went down as one of the more grotesque and criminal Palestinian terror attacks.

I won’t go into the lurid details of this attack, although, after extensive reading about the incident, I finally learned that the purpose of the attack was not to wantonly murder Jewish parents and their toddlers, but to capture some Israelis as hostages to trade for Palestinian prisoners.

When their getaway was thwarted, yes, Kuntar killed Danny and Einat Haran. The description of the killings is pretty horrible, but one wonders exactly how the Israelis were able to figure out down to the last detail every word uttered and motion undertaken by Kuntar and his victims, since the two Israeli hostages were killed, two of the terrorists were killed, and only Kuntar and another terrorist were captured.

Kuntar has always maintained that the killings did not go down as described, and that the Harans were killed by Israeli bullets in the shootout on the beach.

The Wikipedia article on Kuntar is a wreck. There are long, windy passages describing the Israeli account (They figured this out how?) of the killings, complete with emotional and heartrending prose.

A look at the Discussion page shows there was a huge fight over whether to call Kuntar a terrorist. Wikipedia is not supposed to use the word terrorist to describe anyone.

AnonMoos, a notorious US neoconservative, wildly pro-Israel, Gentile Democrat I know from Usenet, has apparently landed on Wikipedia, is now part of the Wikipedia Jews team (some of the worst of the Wikipedia Jews are Gentiles, so the name is somewhat misleading).

The wreckers of the article are mostly Jewish and/or Israelis.

Kuntar has become famous again since he was just part of a prisoner swap between Hezbollah and Israel.

Much is made of Hezbollah wanting child-killer Kuntar back, but the truth is that their focus on Kuntar is because he is Lebanese, not because he’s a child-killer. Hezbollah is a Lebanese nationalist organization, Kuntar is a Lebanese prisoner, so they want him back for nationalist reasons.

The problem on Wikipedia is not that there are a bunch of little Jewish shits running around on any article remotely Jewish-related, censoring and POV-pushing. There are little cabals all over Wikipedia, including many ethnic cabals. In most cases, sober administrators stop the cabals cold, and the articles end up pretty fair.

But the Wikipedia Jews have been running amok from Day One, due to deep connections with a little shit named Jimmy Wales, an ultra-rightwing libertarian who runs the place. Why do the Jews get away with murder on Wikipedia while all the other cabals are put in their place? In this way, the Wikipedia Jews are a microcosm of America, for all intents and purposes now a Jewish country.

For more on that theory, see Yuri Slezkine’s The Jewish Century and Alfred Lindemann’s Esau’s Tears, the 20th Century and the Rise of the Jews. Jews help man the commanding heights of America, just as they are in with the top dogs on Wikipedia, and the Gentiles are all de facto “Jewish”.

Nobody can say shit about them in America or on Wikipedia, and their critics in both the US and Wikipedia are destroyed mercilessly. The story here is the familiar one of the corruption of power, along with the testy paranoia of a tiny ethnic group.

Chip Berlet is also a top Wikipedian who is in very, very deep with the ADL, the Wikipedia Jews and the upper echelons of Wikipedia leadership. A commenter posted comments on here recently implying that Chip Berlet works for either the CIA or the FBI or both. The hero-worship of Berlet on Wikipedia makes no sense unless he is some kind of agent.

Wikipedia is run by a far-right crowd of super-libertarians. Communism and socialism are trashed in most places, and radical freemarket economics of the sort that is now devastating America are pushed relentlessly.

Most articles on Communism and socialism are grossly unfair. Hard-right fascist Jewish nationalists and hard-right fascist Hindu nationalists have formed an alliance and destroyed most articles relating to India, Israel or Jews.

Chip Berlet is supposed to be some kind of a Leftist. He’s reportedly even a hardline Communist. Ok, so why is he the hero of and hobnobbing with some of the most extreme anti-Communists and radical Right types around? Furthermore, Berlet helped the ADL spy on many Left and even Communist groups in the US on the grounds that they were anti-Semites (anti-Israel). What kind of a Communist spies on the Left?

An agent.

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

The Wikipedia Jews, 2010 Update

A commenter disputes my notion that Wikipedia is still seriously Jew-fucked by the Wikipedia Jewish Cabal.

Here is my original, and actually now famous, article on the subject: Wikipedia, Ziopedia or Judeopedia?. The wildly anti-Semitic site Ziopedia actually was inspired to take its name from that article.

Your experiences on Wikipedia sound like they sucked, but I think you are too hasty on exiting the battleground and dismissing Wikipedia as impossibly Jew-corrupted.The fact is, for heavily trafficked articles subject to heavily ideological warfare from all sides, over 99% of edits are reverted regardless of the political affiliation of the edit.

As you know, fights in Wikipedia are long and slow battles of attrition fought mainly on talk pages and through committees. You have to play the game and compromise to get anything done (sort of like real-life politics).

Maybe things have gotten better since I wrote that in April 2006, 4 1/2 years ago. But I doubt it. It’s not true that most articles are huge edit-wars. Most of Wikipedia is fair. There are tons of cabals always trying to get formed, and there actually exist all sorts of cabals, usually nationalist ones, on Wikipedia. But most don’t get anywhere because the admins stop them dead in their tracks via fairness. But for some reason, the Libertardian, Jew and Hindutva Cabals have been able to run amok, probably because Jimbo and his admin pals sympathize with them.

Everyone who was in my boat also got thrown off Wikipedia and banned by the Wiki Jews. I looked into it. It’s a tight cabal, but the group is not large, only 25-30. Also the Wiki Jews deviously sneaked some of their own people into the top echelons of Wikipedia, like admins, etc. Those admins would always side with the Jews on the bans. Also, the Gentiles on Wiki are mostly insanely Judeophilic. Jimbo himself is wildly Zionist and gives speeches before big Jewish groups. He should just convert already. Also, there were a few Gentiles in the Wiki Jew Cabal. One is called Slim Virgin.

I checked back a couple years later and they were still in firm control. Also they had thrown off almost all of the strong pro-Pallie types.

The reverts those shits do was just flat out fuckin vandalism. I changed a lot of their fucked up lie data, using the IDF’s own surveys. This was on pages called Terrorism Against Israelis. Their figures were all lies. I contradicted them via the IDF’s own stuff. I spent hours and hours doing it, and it was all reverted instantly with no debate. I tried to comment, but my comments were immediately deleted or no one would respond to me. Soon after, I was put on a Wikipedia Neo-Nazi List, and soon I was indicted on fake charges and all of my edits were stopped.

I did factual edits on many other subjects before the Jew thing, and they all stayed. Then the evil Wiki Jew Scum went back to all my non-Jewish shit that I worked on for months and reverted all of it out of sheer vandalism. Next they launched fake charges against me to run me up against one of their Wiki Jew Kangaroo Courts. That’s when I posted my Fuck You commentary on my homepage and then life-banned me.

Some concerned Wiki editors said the life-ban was unfair and done for ideological reasons, but the Wiki Jews overruled them.

The Wiki Jew thing is an excellent example of a Jewish conspiracy in real life, how it operates.

I now do edits anonymously on grammar, and 100% of it stays.

I ain’t a masochist. I am not getting a new account and going back to Judeopedia or Ziopedia or whatever the fuck it’s called.

Note that the only Jew-corrupted stuff is Judaic, about Jews or Israel. They leave the entire rest of Wikipedia alone. And 98% of Wiki Jews are not part of the cabal. They are just doing edits on Sudanic languages or butterflies or something like that.

There is also a Hindutva Indian nationalist Cabal on there that is just as evil as the Jews. My friends are Pakistani nationalists, and they said all the articles about India and Pakistan have been destroyed by Hindutvas. Plus all Pakistani nationalists are very quickly banned by the Hindutvas, usually Wiki Jew Cabal techniques. The Hindutvas, like the Jews, have wormed into the top Wiki echelons. The top tier of Wikipedia are non-Indian Gentiles who love Hindutvas and Jews. Most of them are “libertarians.” Jimbo Dickwad himself is a libertardian.

Wikipedia is fucked. Jew-fucked, Hindutva-fucked, Libertardian-fucked.

I’m done.

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

This Does Not Exist

This suitcase nuke does not exist.

See this fake picture of a suitcase nuke? The pic is fake. Fake, fake, fake, fake. How do we know it’s fake? Because not only do suitcase nukes not exist, but even if they did, they could never fit into this suitcase here.

A footlocker from 1943, used by the US military in WW2. Think you might attract attention carting this down the street? Yeah.

They would need to fit into a gigantic footlocker. Not only is it so huge that it was attract much attention, but the nuke, even if it could be compressed down to the size so small to fit into this locker, would have to be so heavy that it could hardly be carted around. With a 40-kiloton yield, I assume that it would have to weigh around 10 tons or 2,000 pounds. You’d probably need at least a forklift to even pick the thing up.

As you can see with this disgusting piece, the terrorist nukes meme has been picked up by of all people, the Palestinian nationalist movement.

The suitcase nukes were always held to be developed by the USSR, but in the latest mutation of the lie, they are now held but the new version of the “Soviet Menace,” the land everyone loves to hate…drum roll…Israel! The evil Israelis either made them themselves or they got them from the equally evil Americans. Anyway, the diabolical Jews are set to set off one of these suitcase nukes in the US in one of their infamous false flag operations.

Sure, Israel’s done a few false flags, mostly long ago. But the False Flag crowd is really nutty. Every time some Arab commits some atrocious terrorist attack (an Arab specialty since Arabs specialize in terrorism), guess what? It’s not really Ay-rabs that done it! It was really those darn sneaky Jews! Damn those devious Jews get around!

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

Jews Don't Run the Banks Anymore

Repost from the old site.
For Chrissake people, even David Duke says the Jews don’t run the banks anymore. What more of an authority do you need?
Unfortunately, anti-Semitismphobia (irrational fear of anti-Semitism) has kept scholars from researching this question. I’ve done some research on my own. Jews largely ran the banking system of Europe from the late 1800’s into the 1900’s. Their dominance of this profession seems to have come to an end in the 1930’s and 1940’s. I guess that means that they got taken out by the Holocaust.
According to Henry Ford’s The International Jew, Jews made a run for US investment banking and consumer banking in the early part of the 1900’s in the US. Ford describes how Jews during this time made a play for investment banking in the US. They worked together to try to buy up as many investment banks as they could for the tribe.
That’s how Jews were back then – they worked together to acquire Jewish monopolies. They made significant penetration until the whistle was blown on them and Gentiles quit selling investment banks to the Jews. Smart move!
Ford says they then made a play for commercial banking in the US, but the whistle was blown early, and they were stopped in their tracks, as commercial bankers refused to sell to Jews. Jewish ethnic warfare is no good. The only way to fight it is anti-Semitism, and that’s not good for Jews or Gentiles.
The International Jew is actually a pretty good book if you can ignore some of the bullshit about The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. I don’t think that Ford, at the time he wrote that book, was an anti-Semite at all. Those who are not convinced maybe ought to actually read the book?
US Jews at that time were extremely tribal, clannish and ethnocentric, and were waging ethnic warfare in order to corner and control various US professions. Jews have assimilated dramatically since then, and it’s not appropriate to compare the clannish Jews of 1908 with US Jews of today.
It was during this period that Jewish dominance of the US media and Hollywood occurred. The Jewish impetus for acquiring these assets originally was not to give more power and money to the Jews, but to fight anti-Semitism.
Many large US papers were in the hands of White Gentile anti-Semites and so was Hollywood. Large Jewish financiers met with concerned Jewish leaders, and plots were hatched to buy out large US papers. This is apparently the genesis of Jewish control of the New York Times.
It’s all pretty much water under the dam now. Jews do wield quite a bit of power in US media and Hollywood.
In addition to being due to extremely high Jewish verbal IQ (Possibly as high as 125!) and the extra-IQ factors that result directly and indirectly from that, Jewish power in the media and Hollywood is largely a legacy of hypertribal US Jews from the dog eat dog world of Eastern Europe in the early part of the 1900’s.
I think Jewish power in Hollywood is on the decline. Looking over a large section of movie ads recently, of course I saw Jewish names, but I saw a Hell of a lot of Gentile names too, in particular Italians. In some cases, those at the very top were Jews, but not always. It’s no secret that Italians have moved into Wall Street, Las Vegas and the movies bigtime. Are Scorsese and Coppola Jewish? Come on.
It’s also important to note that some of the biggest Hollywood Jews were awfully detribalized. Stanley Kubrick was a great director, but for all intents and purposes, he had left the Jews behind. He barely considered himself Jewish anymore. It seems unfair to deviously make up lists of Jews and include the deracinated ones right alongside the SuperJews.
Looking at the credits on a typical TV show is much more instructive. The list of Jewish names, in particular the all-important names of the ultimate producers and directors running the show, is stunning to behold. It seems that Jewish power is much greater in TV than in the movies these days.
Jewish media power is a tough one. The Los Angeles Times is one of the biggest papers in the country, and for decades was run by an ultrarich Whitebread WASP family named the Chandlers. They weren’t anti-Semites, but the Times was their baby. Where were the Jewish hands secretly running the Times?
One of my Jewish commenters noted that the Ochs Sulzbergers (owners of the New York Times) have been marrying Gentiles for a while now and are considered by ethnocentric Jews to have “left the tribe.” I don’t know what to make of such comments, but perhaps we should take them into consideration.
Anti-Semites say the Washington Post is “run by Jews”, but it’s run by a woman named Katharine Graham. Her father was a Jew. She’s not even Jewish by Jewish law! Since when is she some kind of secret Jew? Since when is everyone with some Jewish ancestry a secret part of the tribe? That’s getting pretty silly, people.

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

Ahmadinejad Wins Fair and Square in Iran – Imperialist/Zionist Green "Color Revolution" Smashed By the Iranian People

If you are looking at the news, you may note that there is rioting all over Iran now, especially in Tehran, Shiraz and some other places. Mirhoseyn Mousavi was the guy handpicked by US imperialism and International Zionism to overthrow Ahmadinejad, who has gotten the ire of the West, since his regime and Syria are the last two Arab or Islamic regimes who are standing up to Zionism. For an overview of why the steadfast Iranian regime is so hated by the West and Israel, see my overview here.
Juan Cole lays out the arguments for why the election must have been stolen, including the excellent showing of Ahmadinejad in Iranian Azerbaijan, where Mousavi hails.
However, there was a poll done shortly before the election by a Western firm, apparently an anti-Iranian regime firm at that (its name is Terror Free Tomorrow,  so I assume they are pro-West and anti-Iranian regime). The poll (poll link here) showed Ahmadinejad winning by 2.4-1 over Mousavi. In Iranian Azerbaijan, he was winning by 2-1. The poll actually overpredicted Ahmadinejad’s support, yet the poll results line up quite well with the approximately 2-1 victory for Ahmadinejad.
The West has been lying to you about this election. This was just another Western “color revolution” like the ones in Georgia and Ukraine. This one was colored green instead of rose or orange.
Even Al Jazeera, keep in mind, is run by Sunnis from the Gulf who absolutely despise the Shia. This is why Al Jazeera showed us nothing but nonstop Mousavi Green in the run-up to the election. All of the news reports from the West, along with Arab TV, focused on relatively wealthy and middle class areas of Iran.
They completely ignored the poor and the countryside. No one went to South Tehran, where almost everyone supports Ahmadinejad. However, the evidence seems to be that the poor poured out overwhelmingly for Ahmadinejad.
The characters you see rioting in the streets of Tehran are young people. They are also largely bourgeois. The rich and middle classes hate Ahmadinejad, because Iran has suffered economic problems under his rule. However, most of these problems are due to Western sanctions.
The Western media has failed to point out that Ahmadinejad is a populist. Indeed, he is a bit of a socialist. He has significantly improved the lives of poor and rural Iranians, and he has also significantly reduced the dramatic income inequality in Iran. For this, the bourgeois types hate him, but the man in the street loves him.
The election seems to have been fair. What the young hate is clerical rule. That’s understandable, but the problem is that the cleric-haters are probably 1/3 of the country and the cleric-supporters are about 2/3 of the country.
The Iranian people are much more conservative than the photos of the chic young upper middle classes of Tehran would have you believe. A recent poll showed that only 15% of Iranians want the regime to further liberalize social mores in Iran. Much larger numbers thought the clerical social policing was fine, and big numbers even wanted an even more conservative society enforced.

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

Why Russians Are Anti-Semites

Repost from the old site. You antisemites should love this one too. Damn, red meat today or what?
Nowadays, anyway.
The Russian Mafia.
The Oligarchs.
Names like Mikhail Khodorkovsky, Boris Berezovsky, Mikhail Chernoy, Vladimir Gusinsky, Roman Abramovich, Alex Goldfarb, Mikhail Brudno and Vladimir Dubov, Leonid Nevzlin, Jacob Rothschild, David and Simon Reuben, Mikhail Fridman, Pyotr Aven and Alexander Abramov.
What did they do? Read it and weep.
All they did was bleed the country dry, steal every nickel of wealth Russia had, then send all the money to their Jewish friends and partners in crime in Israel and the US.
In other words, there was a concerted effort on the part of a small group of Russian Jews to bleed the country dry and steal from the anti-Semitic Russians that they hated so much. A plot steal the money for the Jews and keep it for themselves, or, when some patriot tried to get a hold of it, to ship it to some other rich Jews in Israel, New York or London – at any rate, to keep the money in the hands of the Jews.
At one time, there were said to be seven oligarchs in Russia, and six of them were Jews – these seven were said to own 70% of Russia’s national resources.
This is age-old Jewish economic warfare, but we don’t see it so often in the US anymore. It was really bad at the turn of the century and until 1925 or so. Henry Ford, an unduly criticized man, wrote, in The International Jew (an unduly criticized book) about Jewish economic warfare in the US during this period. He documented it in this book and in a column in the Dearborn Independent.
He uncovered a Jewish plot to take control over the New York Stock Exchange. Gentiles would sell their seats to anyone with the cash, but the Jews would either hold onto their seats, or, if they sold them, only sell them to other Jews.
Thus, gradually, the Jewish percentage of the NYSE rose and rose. Ford, a US patriot, blew the whistle on this ethnic warfare, and Gentiles on the NYSE started to refuse to sell their seats to Jews. This was the right and proper thing for them to do.
He also uncovered a similar Jewish plot to take over US investment banking. They pretty much got control over it, but I’m not sure if that is still the case. Anyway, he blew the whistle a little late on that one.
Then he noticed a similar plot underway to seize the nation’s commercial banks. He blew the whistle on that one just in time, and the banks just quit selling to Jews altogether. In this way, the NYSE and our nation’s commercial banks were saved from being controlled by a tiny minority that often does not have our national interests in mind.
Around the same time, similar Jewish plots were hatched to take control over the nation’s largest papers. This was mostly because these papers were being run by racist White Americans (most US Whites were racists back in those days).
The papers were anti-Black and anti-Semitic at the very least. So a number of wealthy Jews held some meetings with businesspeople and plotted to buy out the papers. This is how Jewish control over the New York Times was established, and it remains under Jewish control to this day. Do you think the Sulzbergers will ever let it slip into the hands of the Gentiles? Don’t bet on it.
At the same time, these same Jews noticed that the budding Hollywood film industry was also under the control of White racists hostile to Blacks and Jews. Birth of a Nation was a real wake-up call for these Jews. The same thing happened. Some big money Jews met with Jews who were interested in film.
Within 10-20 years, Hollywood was in the hands of the Jews, mainly about four or five Jews who all grew up in Galicia about 100 miles from one another. Hollywood is much more Gentile now, especially at the lower levels, and the Gentiles have been breaking into even directing and production for some time now.
But a select group of Jews still has some pretty significant control over the place, especially at the upper levels. It’s so bad that Gentile aspiring actors actually wear Jewish stars of David to interviews in order to pretend to be Jewish to increase their chances of getting hired. I wonder if these Jews will ever give up the highest reins of this industry?
That’s the problem when an ethnocentric group like this grabs an industry – they want to keep it in the hands of the tribe, and they often refuse to sell out to non-tribals.
Jewish apologists like to say that this is all normal and ok in capitalism. I don’t like any kind of ethnic warfare. On what legal basis to Jews have a right to practice – let’s face it – discrimination, in order to hire their own, promote their own, and keep their property in the hands of their own?
Whites did this for decades in this country, and all of this discriminatory crap has been made illegal. Further, it’s a downright obsession of the heavily-Jewish media.
But if it’s wrong for Whites to discriminate to hire, promote and even hold onto their wealth, surely it is for Jews too. It’s well-known in Hollywood that many Jews hire and promote their own. To this day, not one soul has ever called them on it.
Ford’s writings make another disturbing fact clear. When you are dealing with an ethnic group that is waging ethnic warfare against you, the only way to fight them is to become racist yourselves. The only way to fight Jewish ethnic warfare was for Gentiles to be anti-Semites.
If they had not given in to racism, they would have been steamrolled. This is disturbing because if one chooses anti-racism in this circumstance, you will be destroyed. Becoming racist is the only sane and logical thing to do.
What would happen if something similar happened in today’s America, where Whites at least have been stripped of all ethnic identity, shamed of racism, and for the most part had their capacities for racism stripped right out of them? While at the same time, Blacks and Hispanics at least seem to have retained the capacity for racism (see the Black-Hispanic gang warfare in Los Angeles these days)?
It is true that Catholics in New York still retain the potential for waging ethnic warfare, in this case against New York Jews, who retain ferocious ethnic warfare to this very day. This is why the New York mayorship shifts from Catholic to Jew from time to time. These Catholics are often Italian and Irish, but they now have some allies in Dominicans at least.
If these Catholics did not wage anti-Semitic warfare against ethnic warfare-engaging New York Jews, they would be creamed, and the Jews would hold all the power and much of the money in New York. Because these Catholics are still capable of being just a ruthlessly racist as New York Jews, they are able to hold onto a semblance of power.
I used to know this Dominican fellow on the Net. You can ridicule this relationship all you want, but he and I spent many hours talking together, sometimes hours a night. How many married couples even do that?
He used to be a teenage criminal, roaming the streets with a Dominican gang and even sticking people up. Along the way, he had smoked a lot of PCP. Now he lived, I think alone, in a building with Orthodox Jewish landlords whom he despised. He had spent a long time, maybe years, carefully researching the New York real estate market.
It appears that there are city-owned properties that are leased out to private landlords for a period of years, and then taken back by the city. There is a vast amount of real estate involved here, and there are fortunes to be made.
This guy determined that whenever there was a Jewish mayor in office, about 70% of the NYC RE property was “locked up” in closed bids that, the guy finally determined after long and difficult study, went 100% to Jews and Jews only, and not to anyone else. For the most part, they went to Orthodox Jews. There was no way on fucking Earth for a non-Jew to ever get a hold of even one of these properties.
These were also the best properties to own. The research was difficult because most of the evidence was covered up by massive lying on the part of the Jews involved. The bids themselves were closed and the records were sealed.
This guy was not really an anti-Semitic nut, and he think he didn’t really have that much against Jews, and I don’t think he was making all this stuff up. In fact, we used to sit around at night trying to figure Jews out. We finally decided that they were running sort of a Masonic-style private club for wealth.
We decided that even though it was evil, the best way to make a bundle in this world was to form our own little Jewish-Masonic secret wealth society, keep all the money in our hands, hire and promote our own, and shut everyone else the fuck out. So in a way, we both really wanted to ape the Jews and emulate them. We used to laugh like mad over the cleverness of Jews.
Our plan was totally evil and probably even racist. For sure it was discriminatory. But it never came to fruition, and I still live barely above the poverty line.
The guy vanished and I never heard from him again. He had found me through my legendary posts on Usenet in the Israeli and Middle East group. I was posting under a pro-Palestine name and making tons of deadly enemies and a few devoted fans.
We started dwelling more and more on evil cabal stuff in our conversations, and then we started talking about spying.
I don’t know what got that started, maybe because the Usenet Jews had these really creepy and evil Jewish Spy Networks they were operating on us pro-Palestinians. They had weird dossiers on us and were always threatening to uncover who we really were and make it sure that we never held a good job in America again. Oh, how these powerless Jews loved to toss their weight around!
Anyway, after a while, I started implying to the guy that maybe I was a spy who worked for the CIA or the Mossad, or maybe I was a double agent.
Plus at the time, I was communicating with these weird Palestinians who were actually undercover members of the PFLP and were living these creepy, is-it-illegal-or-what type lives in the US.
We only knew each other according to code names, and if anyone tried to ask for anyone’s number, or try to find out where anyone lived, there could be Hell to pay. Everyone suspected everyone else of being an agent (especially they suspected me) and there were always rumors that so and so was a spy.
So it was really a barrel of fun and laughs. This Palestinian dude would just take off for weeks at a time and tell no one. He would come back and say he had been in the Middle East. He had a PhD, spoke fluent Russian from his time in the USSR, and was definitely a member of the PFLP, which is an officially designated US terrorist organization. Eventually I got tossed out of their PFLP circle on grounds of being a Zionist agent. Oh well.
Well, with all this weird drama around, I started telling the guy I was really a spy, or maybe I wasn’t, and all these agencies maybe I did or did not work for. And I implied that he was probably a spy too. Then I would laugh and say it’s all joke, or was it really?
Eventually the guy started totally spinning and saying he couldn’t handle talking to me anymore because I was freaking him the Hell out. Anyway, if you ever want to destroy a friendship just for the sheer Hell of it, this is a great way to do it.
He also told me another interesting story. As soon as Catholic mayor came in (in this case, it was Italian Catholic Giuliani), the city called back its RE properties, and then the process was taken over by an evil Catholic cabal, who promptly sold about 70% of NYC RE to Catholics. Paybacks are a bitch, and the Jews got theirs. It was Catholics versus Jews, just like back in Europe for hundreds of years.
Now, a lot of people reading this think I am making this up. I say I’m not, but I don’t have any real proof of this one way or another. But if it is true, it points up some of the difficult questions above. In order to deal with Jewish ethnic warfare, Catholics had to engage in some of their own. They had to become anti-Semites. And Jews can’t wage Jewish ethnic warfare of their own without being racists too.
The guy also said that Jews were rude, tight, and treated non-Jews like crap. He said this held true for Orthodox Jews in New York, in particular his Jewish landlords, who were little more than slumlords.
Getting back to our Russian oligarchs, there’s a long history of hatred between Russians and Jews. We hear a lot about Russians being horrible anti-Semites, but we don’t hear much about Russian Jews being horrible Russian-haters. Who started it? Who the Hell knows? Who cares? That’s like two 6-year old boys fighting and screaming, “He started it!” after being pulled apart.
From the Internet, we find some confessions of Russian Jews, this one named “Alexandr Ukrainsky”. He notes that Russian Jews have a habit of making a Bloody Mary and claim to be drinking Christian blood. Just like the blood libel! Great, way to perpetuate a stereotype!
Furthermore, they have some of the worst anti-Jewish stereotypical behaviors of any group. Cheapness, greediness, you name it, these are some of the “Jewiest” Jews out there outside of Israel. Or, to put it more politely, as my brilliant Mom would deftly put it, they are really, really Jewish.
These behaviors are tied in with them seeing themselves as the most Zionist, proudest Jews out there. Here again we see the tie-in with the worst anti-Semitic stereotypes of Jews (the Jewiest Jews of them all) and Zionism.
Zionism is nothing more than the European ghetto, reconstructed in the minds of Jews everywhere, and on the ground in a large piece of real estate in Palestine. Zionists are the worst Jews of them all, the ones who gave and give Jews a bad name. They really are against everything secular, liberating, and assimilating about the Jewish project, because Israel is the biggest damn ghetto that’s ever existed.
The Orthodox Jews themselves recreate mental ghettos the world over, and physical ones in upstate New York. Zionism gives their tribal way a home made of Earth in the Mediterranean if they ever need to escape from their crimes.
As long as Orthodoxy and Zionism exist, the Jew will never achieve liberation. By the way, Marx makes a very similar point in his famous On The Jewish Question. Quite hard to read but you may want to check it out. If you can figure it out, pat yourself on the back.
With the return of capitalism to Russia, Organized Crime, including many Russian Jews and Jews in the US, Israel and the UK, bled the country dry and stole just about everything that wasn’t locked down. Russia was turned into a complete sewer, and is now one of the Organized Crime capitals of the world.
Russian law enforcement did used to crack down on Russian oligarchs sometimes, but the criminals were very powerful and often used to kill cops (and the existing ones still do). In the case of the Jewish criminals (the so-called oligarchs) they had the entire weight of World Organized Jewry behind them.
For instance, when Putin tossed Jewish super-criminal Mikhail Khodorkovsky behind bars, Richard Perle and other top US Jewish neocons virtually threatened to declare war on Russia.
No wonder Russians are so anti-Semitic.


I am indebted to a conversation I had with Kevin MacDonald in formulating some of the ideas that I developed in this piece. I do not necessarily subscribe to MacDonald’s views on the Jews in toto, but I think he is unjustly maligned. In my conversation with him, I did not get the impression that MacDonald was anti-Semitic at all; in fact, I felt that he admired Jews and wished that Gentile Whites acted more like them.
Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

A Meeting With an Executive of Jewish Central Control, Inc.

I recently met a multimillionaire Canadian who is an heir to a Jewish media fortune (mostly radio). He shall remain nameless. His family also has close connections with the Bronfmans (another huge name in International Jewry due to the Seagrams fortune).
For all intents and purposes, the guy is an embodiment of World Jewry, Jewry, the Jew Mafia as commenter heg calls it, or whatever euphemism you want. I spoke with the guy for a while and I felt he was a good, progressive, liberal, anti-racist type guy. He had a great personality and he was a really nice guy. He didn’t hate Gentiles or even Arabs at all. He was confused over Zionism and agreed that it was racism and apartheid, but he still sort of thought Jews might need it. He had read my blog (which many Jews call anti-Semitic) extensively, and he said it was fascinating.
He laughed and agreed with me that the Jewish-Israeli Lobby had the US government by the balls. He also said that the US media was heavily Jewish. The Canadian media is too (Israel Asper has grabbed 60% of it). He was worried about multiculturalism in Canada and was worried about Canadian Muslims. He had concerns about their antisemitism, which I agreed is considerable.
About money, he mentioned that his empire was starting to get into porn in the hotels (showing porn movies on closed circuit TV in the hotel rooms) they had an interest in. He didn’t care about porn himself, but he said it was a big seller and people really wanted it. He didn’t seem to be promoting porn in order to dissolve the White West. He was just a guy trying to make a buck.
I’ve been reading critiques of the Jews for ages. Some try to hedge their bets and say they don’t hate all Jews, they only hate this Jewish elite, Jewry, Organized Jewry, International Jewry, the Jew mafia or whatever. This guy was obviously a prime specimen of all of those things. He didn’t seem to embody any of the charges against this group of people.
The guy was just really normal. He was just like me, even politically. Other than the fact that he was a multimillionaire, he was practically a Commie. If that’s what this horrible World Jewry thing looks like, I don’t understand why people are so worried.

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20