On Korean Women

A Chinese American or Korean American (Which is it?) commenter, Hacienda, who is also a great writer, discusses the wonder of Korean women:

Korean women can be extremely sexy, to the point of absolute sexiness. I used to hang out in some Korean bars before the LA riots caused the police to crack down on the really seedier (but extremely hot) ones. You’ve not experienced sultry until you had experienced some of the women there. Unfortunately, these places are now mostly closed and ones left are too stiff, too regulated to be interesting. But, for we who know, our loss.BTW, I think white women need to be trained or acculturated to Korean (or East Asian) ways to reclaim the prized hotness they once possessed too. Rap and crap just makes them bulgy and unattractive.

Korean women are very submissive to men. If you treat them right, they treat you like a God to be worshipped. Japanese women can be like that too. They aren’t really bitches at all, though a few have developed a bad attitude towards men, and if you piss them off, some can just go fullon fuckin psycho with no way to turn it off.

They are less bitchy, demanding and castrating than White women by orders of magnitude. They’re also highly intelligent, even just the ordinary working class ones, which is an interesting find in a group of women. An average, uneducated working class Korean-American woman is smarter than an average White American female junior college student.

I don’t know how Korean and Japanese men treat their women, but you always hear that it’s a fullon sexist patriarchal culture. I’ve had a hard time verifying that though, or the extent to which it exists in the US.

These East Asian seem to assume you’re going to be a typical sexist male bastard like all guys, and then when you’re not, but you’re not a pussy either, you’re like God’s gift to women.

To the East Asian guys complaining about how their women are leaving them for White guys,  I feel sorry for them and don’t know what to say.

I would say this though: East Asian guys should try to act like White guys when in the US. The media elevates the White man all over the world. All over the world, women, except US White women, want a White man more than anything else. East Asian guys are in the US, and Whites run the show. I think their women are going for Whites due to media brainwash.

So the best course for Asian guys would be to try to act like us White guys.

A Paean To the Jews

One commenter described the Jews as nation-wreckers, and another commenter responded by saying that Jews were nation-builders, not nation-wreckers.

Nation wrecking? Come on.The Jews are damn smart, and that’s about it. I’ve never met a stupid Jew. They have talent; they’ve got brains. They are influential in some way or another, and they like to run things. Go to most major cities around the world, do a web search for a Jewish youth hostel, and you’ve got a great place to stay with good conversation and good prices overall, except extra charges on towels and pretty much anything else. Hah.

Jews assimilate well and contribute a hell of a lot to their perspective nations. But they’re still hated! No wonder they try to build up defenses not to get torn down in the countries and try to liberalize the people around them.

I realize they take care of their own first, but I don’t buy this crap about them being the “most ethnocentric people on earth.” Not with American Jews at least. They’re pretty damn self-critical and consider themselves Americans before Jews. Hell of a lot more than the American Muslims I’ve met. Most American Jews I’ve met aren’t about marrying into their race, but they might eventually, just to please their parents.

I don’t know how they do it, man, but they’ve just got amazing brains. Every time I hear about some new eminent mathematician or chess-player (or past one), I have to go look up their origins, and only very rarely do I find it’s not a Jew. Like Grigori Perelman. Look up your influential Russians, and you’ll find well over half of them have at least some Jewish heritage. I almost wish it weren’t true, it occurs so often. It seems unfair to all the other groups of people, but that’s just the way things worked out.

Hitler was effectively exterminating the smartest group of people in Europe. He nearly gave that continent a lobotomy. I’m sure Europe is missing those Jews now. I’m sure they just love the Muslims who have grown as large or larger in numbers than the Jews ever were in Europe and contribute only a fraction what the Jews did.

It seems almost impossible how well they do, but it’s true. They’re the ultimate overachievers. They help nation-building more than nation-destroying. They have something even the East Asians have, because they have consistently done well without large numbers.

Of course, they’re not perfect. I don’t really like their religion much and prefer them to be secular. They don’t make very good painters or poets. They’re “NT” left-brain types for the most part. I definitely don’t have a Jewish mind. Bloom is the practical, thinking Jew in Ulysses and I’m skinny, unserviceable Daedalus talking to the sea-rocks. Hell, I don’t even know why I’m still going on about them and trying to defend them. I’m stopping.

I agree with all of this except that I think that the Jews are indeed hyperethnocentric. There are few if any White groups in the US that are as ethnocentric as the Jews. Some maybe used to be, but they are not anymore.

A friend of mine grew up in Chicago in the 1930’s and 1940’s. Whenever something bad happened to a Jew and was written up in the papers, even a Jewish criminal getting caught by the police, all of the Jews at her school would go around saying, “This is a bad day for the Jews…” She said she never heard anyone of any other ethnic group acting this way. “This is a bad day for the Italians….or this is a bad day for the Irish…” Never happened.

Even the secular Jews who are marrying and breeding out are remarkably ethnocentric. I’ve been around them my whole life and have had Jewish girlfriends for a long time. It’s often hidden, but once you bring it out, oh boy! It’s like a thunderstorm that had been hidden for years and never came out. You see it in full force, but with these secular, liberal Jews, they often keep it hidden around their liberal, secular Gentile friends.

One of the reasons people are not wild about Jews is fear of their prowess. I actually agree with this fear. I don’t really want 5 million hyper-competitive, ultra overachieving Jews to move from Israel to the US to compete with me and my White Gentile friends and monopolize our politics even more. We have more than enough Jews here to deal with. I have heard Chinese say much the same thing about not wanting Jews to come to China and I can’t say I blame them. It’s not really anti-Semitism; it’s just fear of a formidable competitor in a capitalist and meritocratic society.

The Position of the Left on Western Culture, Whites, Judeo-Christianity and Islam

A little debate here. The first quote is me defending secularism, the second one is Abiezer Coppe defending the Western Left against my charges. I reiterate after the blockquote with evidence from around the world.

It is sickening the way that the Left is sucking up to Islam. Stop it right now! It’s all because Muslims are fighting European Judeo-Christian “colonizer-imperialist” types in Israel and now in Iraq, Afghanistan and even in Europe. To the Left, European Judeo-Christian civilization is evil, and hence so are all Whites. Jews are considered White. We are all racist colonizer/imperialist slavers.

The dark Muslim noble savages are fighting evil White Euros, and the Left cheers.

The Left hates:

1. Euro Whites 2. Euro Christians 3. Euro Jews 4. The West

The dark Third Worldist oppressed darkies are fighting a holy war against all four, the West can’t get enough of it. I’m not sure if the Zionists ever mention this, but I think they are right. The Left even dislikes the Jews because now they are the ultimate expression of the White Judeo-Christian Western Euro colonizer.

No Robert, stop spreading lies about the Left. The Left aren’t that racial. You’re just spouting.

A sane Left will support Christian values as highly progressive. See Slavoj Zizek on Christianity.

Support for Islamism. The Maoists and Trots do it, and that’s about it. It’s third Worldist Idiotism…if you convert to Islam YOU CANNOT LEAVE. The penalty for leaving the Islamic religion in Pakistan is six months in prison, according to a commentator on Radio 4. Is this true?

Of course it is true. That’s if they don’t kill you.

I am talking about the Western Left.

The real existing Left, the one that matters, is not anti-West or anti-Christian.

The Latin American Left is pro-West and pro-Christian. Many of them are Christians. Even the leadership of Sendero Luminoso were Christians, including Abimael Guzman, who is still a Catholic! The Filipino Left is pro-West and pro-Christian.

This is the Liberation Theology Left, and I love it. Jesus was a Commie! In those countries, priests pray alongside the rebels and in some cases even serve in rebel armies. The Sandinistas had priests in their cabinet. Hugo Chavez is very much a Liberation Theologian; this is the best way to describe him. There is a lot of good theory coming out of Cuba nowadays since believers can join the party. They are calling themselves Christian Marxists. Even Fidel says Christianity is compatible with socialism and Communism.

The Indian and Nepalese Maoists don’t mind the West or Christianity. If there is a beef with anything, it’s Hinduism.

The real existing Left in all Muslim states is not too wild about Islam! The Left in the rest of the world cares nothing at all about Western culture or Christianity.

This anti-West, anti-European, anti-Judeo-Christian, anti-White shit is mostly just rebellion on the part of Western Leftists against their own eeeeeeevil religions and cultures.

Maoists in general are not too wild about Islam. The Iranian and Afghan Maoists are some of the most Islam-hostile groups in the Islamic world. They’ve basically had it up to here with Islam.

The Filipino Left has made alliance with Muslim separatists on a strategic basis and gets along with them well. The Indian Maoists support separatists in Kashmir.

Trots are always pro-Islam anymore, but they are irrelevant outside the West, which means they are irrelevant in the Real World.

Writing Is Like Music, Cinema, Painting or Photography

I recently complemented a commenter on the site by telling him he’s a genius. By that, I mean he’s a great writer. He’s also a fine thinker, but the two go together. We have lots of fine thinkers on the board, but not all are great writers too. He’s Korean, and Koreans don’t seem to write English spectacularly. I don’t know why, but they are better in visuospatial than in verbal IQ:

Thanks. I found one of the secrets to writing that is engaging is having a musical awareness. Walk down a street and run a tune through your head. Preferably one that you made up. Then just play with it. Volume, pacing, accelerate, decelerate. And volume is key. Change in volume completely changes the tune. Try it. Try Beethoven’s 5th bahm, bahm, bahm, baaahmm.

Quietly. Done quietly it’s nothing. LOL. So here’s the dramatic conclusion to why Koreans don’t write spectacularly. They are raised to be quiet. It shows in their writing.

And we are not even getting into poetry yet. Sure the best poetry is musical, always has been. That’s why it’s so hard to translate. But so is the best prose. We are talking strictly prose here. How do you translate Finnegans Wake into any language other than English? Where do you even begin?

So when you write, your prose is music. Well, it should be, if your aim is artistic. Or at least that’s one way to write

Of course, the best prose is both music and even visual art like painting. I don’t know if it’s cinematic. And the best prose sings like poetry too. It’s all about the rhythm.

I write musically too, and I also write cinematically or like paintings. I get little pictures in my mind when I writing. They just pop up. Then I look for words to describe the paintings or scenes. Sometimes they are pictures like storyboards for a movie or just a painting or picture or frameshot or photo or other visual image. In other cases, it’s like a scene from a movie. Then I search around for the words to describe the scene I just saw in my mind.

When I was 22, a could of friends read my fiction and said it was like Joyce, “painting pictures with words.” My junior college journalism teacher threw me off the paper for “hallucinating with words.”

More on the Male Genius Versus the Female Genius

People seem to be misunderstanding these latest posts of mine.

I am getting pretty abstract and heavy duty here, so try to bear with me. Most people are going to miss the point. I am attempting to make a philosophical point, along the lines of say a Nietzsche essay.

Suffice to say that when I discuss the Female Genius, I do not necessarily refer to very smart or talented women at all. I refer only to the brilliance of a particular type of thinking that can be present in either men or women, but is better done by women.

My position is that there are two types of minds, the Female Mind and the Male Mind. Both are present in both sexes. I also say that genius is present to some extent in everyone, though that might seem hard to believe.

It follows then that the Female Mind often produces in its best form the Female Genius. The male mind often produces in its best form the Male Genius. However, great female minds nowadays often display the Male Genius, and I suppose it’s possible that great male minds might display the Female Genius, though I can’t think of any off the top of my head.

A lot of the really smart women running around pontificating and making everyone think they are really smart nowadays are really using the male part of their mind. People like the Male Genius because it gets right to the point and it’s easy to follow (it is rational and nonemotional). Logical, rational, point 1, 2, 3, 4, it follows that 5, 6, 7, 8, conclusion. The Male Genius is active, rational, conscious, and seeks to rise about sex and relationship stuff (quotidian everyday life). Most really smart men and women nowadays are often utilizing the Male Genius, because it’s more respected and tends to get to the point more.

The Female Genius is more confusing because it tends to wander around a lot, and it’s often hard to tell exactly what’s being communicated, as the message is largely irrational (emotional). The message is often more of a general feeling than something you can summarize with a Powerpoint demo.

I say that the Female Genius is completely different from this. The Female Genius is passive, irrational (emotional), unconscious and wrapped up in sex, love and relationship stuff (quotidian life). It’s all about the Emotional Mind and the World of Relationships. To the extent that a woman is explaining this to us well, it’s an example of the Female Genius.

LA Is Crap

A commenter who lives in LA, says why he hates Fresno:

First off the weather. It’s very hot in the summer. And then in the winter you have all this fog. I’ve driven though the valley before and been in a continuous blanket of unending gray for 4 hours on end. I mean I couldn’t see more than about half a block in front of me. It really depressed my mood. Fog does that to me.

Secondly, it feels more like rural Texas than California. Both in politics and general way of life.

There are no real attractions anywhere in the valley. Other than escaping to the Sierras. There’s just nothing to see or do whatsoever. The countryside itself isn’t even beautiful, it’s just endless flatness. I don’t think anybody moves to the central valley because they want to. It’s mainly because they are priced out of L.A. and S.F. But I guess if you grow up there or have been there long enough, it’s fine enough.

Yes, the weather is pretty bad, but we get along.

The part about rural Texas is true, but I kind of like these salt of the Earth types around here. I had quite enough of bourgeois SWPL idiots and hard rightwingers in LA and Orange County.

In my comments below, I refer to the entire Los Angeles – Orange County metropolitan area. I don’t know about the Inland Empire. I spent a lot of time there, but I’m not sure how I feel about it. The San Gabriel and San Fernando Valleys are just LA anymore. I did used to love the San Gabriel Mountains though. I often went hiking there, especially around Mount Baldy. 20 years ago, incredibly, you could hike all day and barely see one other human being, 1 1/2 hours out of LA.

The comment about pricing is the classic bourgeois attitude about LA. It’s the land of the rich, baby! Well, whoop tee fuckin doo.

And this was one reason why I left. If you want to date a woman, she needs to know your income and your net worth. Women were trying to fix me up, but they kept telling me I did not make enough money for their grasping bourgeois friends. The Bay Area is much the same. In Orange County in 1990, it seemed like you needed to make ~60,000 a year in my crowd to be taken seriously by women. I was making $20-23 an hour working three different part-time jobs and my friends kept insulting me and telling me I wasn’t making enough money.

This bourgeois life is really frustrating. I’m glad I’ve just dropped out of it forever.

What the fuck is there to see in LA? It’s a gigantic city with millions of humans and their habitations in all directions forever. You call that scenery? What the Hell is so beautiful about that? It’s crap. The countryside in the Valley is a trip, if you don’t mind farms.

Around here though, you start driving east, and in 15 minutes you are out of the farms and into the rolling foothills, ranching lands, small streams, rivers, and vernal pools. There are coyotes, ground squirrels and hawks all over the place. It’s actually a trip. You go just a bit further, and you are into the Sierra foothills. I go through the foothills all the time.

What exactly is there “to see or do” in LA? Can someone enlighten me?

L.A.’s crap. The traffic never even ends now. The morning rush starts at 5 AM and goes until about 11:30 AM. There is a brief break, and then the evening rush starts at 2:30 PM and goes until after 8 PM. To get anywhere, it seems like you need to get on a freeway, and once you get on a freeway, it seems like the trip is going to take 30 minutes.

Plus the rent and housing prices are insane. Rent in Orange County is probably around $1000/month minimum. I know people who pay ~$2000 for a not particularly impressive apartment. That’s simply insane.

You need to be making so much money just to even survive in that region.

There are non-Whites everywhere, and if you are White, you feel like an endangered species.

Orange County now looks frighteningly like a 3rd World city like Lima or Manila. It’s really scary. I was in Garden Grove, and there was this multiracial bourgeois elite at my hotel, working for corporations, mostly yuppie Vietnamese, Koreans, Blacks and Whites with tons, I mean tons of money.

I went outside my hotel and started walking around, and it was depressing. There were some old White bars from the old White working class Garden Grove, but most of it was non-White. I went into store after store where there were no Whites. One store would be all Thais. The next would be all Viets. Another would be all Chinese. Many others would be some kind of Hipsanic. Often a lot of the folks in there didn’t even seem to speak English, and they acted hostile towards me, like I was an alien.

I went to eat in a Denny’s and there was the old Garden Grove working class serving me at my table, looking more wasted, burned out and beaten down than I’ve ever seen them. I don’t even know how they survive.

A drive along Garden Grove Boulevard feels like a teeming and impoverished Third World. A few blocks away is the elite sunning by the pools of their fancy hotels.

We went for a drive to Irvine for a wedding. We passed through Santa Ana along the way, and it was horrible. Nothing but the worst Mexico for miles and miles, all signs in Spanish, poverty, garage sales, clothes on lines.

We made it to the fancy restaurant, and it was full of these yuppie Whites who were positively swimming in money. I mean big bucks upper middle class here, smiling and happy and ordering kill your wallet drinks. The wedding was full of Viets and Whites. A lot of the Whites were physicians. The Viet girls were all trying to marry White physicians and attorneys. No other White men need apply. The wedding could not have been over soon enough.

I got out of LA 20 years ago, and I have not looked back. I went back once in 1992 and again in 2005. Both times I was sorry. I would not mind if I never set foot in LA again.

The project to create this insane gap between the haves and have-nots has been ongoing now for 30 years at least, with the full support of both the Republican and Democratic Parties, including Obama’s Administration.

The opposition to Obama is nuts. He’s not a socialist or Communist at all. He’s actually sort of a rightwinger.

Like the Republicans, Obama is totally controlled by finance capital. Everything for finance capital and their allies and nothing for anybody else. Or better yet, take from the the bottom 8

The only difference is that while continuing the wild wealth redistribution project (as their class benefits), the Obama Democrats to believe in safety net retention or even possibly expansion. That’s at the same time that they are impoverishing us by taking from us to give to them. So they’re really limousine liberals. That’s marginally better than the Democrats, but not much.

The Tea Party loons and the entire Right in the US is for the top 2

After that trip to Orange County five years ago, what I saw reminded me of Jakarta, Mumbai, La Paz, Quito, Rio or Bogota. This isn’t going to work. Long-term, it looks like a revolutionary situation of some sort.

There’s no way around it; history has a logic that cannot be defied or terminated no matter how many Berlin Walls fall.

Confusion About Brilliant Women and the Female Genius

A commenter dislikes an earlier post, The Female Genius – Some Examples, but fails to understand it because I speak allegorically and not logically. The Female Genius means not what we think logically, the genius in the body of a female, but allegorically, as a specific type of genius different from something called the Male Genius.

In this vision, both the male and female principles will exist inside all males and females. I also think that genius exists to some extent in all humans, though admittedly, that’s a hard sell. Hence, both the Male Genius and the Female Genius exist in all humans to one degree or the other.

Good god, man. Of all the serious examples of female genius and eloquence you have at your disposal on Youtube… Arundhati Roy, Maya Angelou, Camille Paglia, Toni Morrison, Wangari Maathai, Nadine Gordimer, Meredith Monk, Nina Simone, Sylvia Plath…

You end up choosing a washed-out astrologist and a ditzy pop singer?

Are you trying to make women look bad, or are these honestly the most representative examples of female genius that first popped into your head?

I mean damn, I would have even preferred some Starhawk chatter to these two.

First of all, Caroline Casey is brilliant, whether she’s nuts or not. Maybe people should listen to her more. She’s quite entrancing. And Marianne Faithfull is a true artistic genius, not a ditzy pop singer. Sure, female entertainers make a lot of crap, but I honestly feel that Faithfull rises above all of that.

More importantly, I distinguish here between brilliant women the Female Genius.

I am also using Weininger’s theory that the Male Mind and the Female Mind are two completely different things.

Weininger says that women are incapable of genius. The only women who will be capable of genius are those who, copying Whiteness Studies here for a bit, “abandon femaleness.” In other words, those women who think like men can surely be geniuses of the Male type. I understand why he says this, and I agree with him.

However, I believe that there is a specific Female Genius that he missed. It’s often overlooked in the world, because the world is, well, male-oriented and dominated! It’s also sort of trashed, because it seems silly and ditzy like most women, just as the commenter’s reaction here indicates. Faithfull’s perfect portrayal of the Female Genius, as great artistically as Beethoven or Melville, was attacked by the commenter as “ditzy.”

The Male Genius is logical, one, two, three, four, conclusion, bam. It generally lacks emotion or has controlled emotion. The Male Genius is seen as the life of the mind since the only way we can see the mind alive is in the unemotional and logical encapsulation of a male skull. It’s true that the Male Genius explicates the logical and rational life of the mind well.

But we are human. There is another life of the mind, the Emotional Mind. This is the mind that I speak of when I speak of the Female Genius. The Emotional Mind is irrational, since emotions are irrational at their base. However, they are an essential part of human existence, and women are the best at explaining them to us.

The Female Genius exists to explicate the Life of the Emotional Mind. Sure, it’s trivialized, as I said, emotion is trivialized in male, rational, logical, modern industrial society. But we are not Spocks, at least not yet. And until then, the Female Genius, in all its passivity, pettiness, calculation, unconsciousness and irrationality, will talk to us about the dark side of the moon in our heads, if only we care to listen.

Arundhati Roy, Maya Angelou, Camille Paglia, Toni Morrison, Wangari Maathai, Nadine Gordimer, Meredith Monk, Nina Simone, Sylvia Plath

Of these, I only know Paglia and Roy well. They seem to be two regular women of the Male Genius type (especially Paglia). The rest I can’t really speak to.

Some other good examples of the specific Female Genius would be actresses Bette Davis, Greta Garbo and Judy Garland in the Wizard of Oz. The Wizard of Oz shows the girl genius or young woman genius. Bette Davis in What Ever Happened to Baby Jane shows us the Female Genius in late life.

I May Have My Own TV Show Soon

Still looking into it.

I have a good connection with some folks who are doing this now. They used to live in Brentwood, near West Los Angeles. That’s Ground Zero for the Entertainment Industry in LA, and I suppose that’s where they picked up these skills and contacts. They have just now moved up to Fresno near me. I understand that a lot of folks are leaving LA for the Central Valley. When I lived in LA, that would be considered a joke, but I guess LA is starting to suck so hard now that a lot of folks are just taking off.

My friend is already doing shows. I need my own video camera, and I don’t have one, and they cost at least $800, which I don’t have. However, I think I can use my friend’s video camera instead. They already have a studio set up in Fresno. The shows will be like that radio show, mostly politics and sociology stuff. They may be just me talking, or me with guests, or possibly call-in. The shows will originally be on Internet TV, but we be moving to Cable TV or maybe even radio after that.

Let me know if you have any ideas about this.

I’m actually totally terrified about this, but maybe I should not be.

Fresno Has a Bad Rap

Fresno, 30 miles away from me to the South, has a bad rap. It’s just another large city in California anymore. There are 440,000 people living here now, and it’s not that different from other California big cities, except that in a lot of ways it’s nicer.

There’s nothing particularly unpleasant about it except the weather. The crime rate is not that high. There are few Blacks. The traffic is excellent, and even at rush hour, it is still pretty much doable. There are nice parts of town and not so nice parts of town, but mostly it isn’t terrifying like parts of LA. The gangs mostly prey on their own kind. One thing though: this region has been one of the top cities in the nation for auto theft for some time now.

Many of the Whites here are derived from poor Whites – Arkies and Okies, who came here with the Dust Bowl. They have a working class base, are conservative and many practice fundamentalist Protestantism. They are often very friendly in a small town or Southern kind of way. When I lived in Fresno 20 years ago, it still had kind of a small town feel to it. Even people in stores would treat you like you were their neighbors. Not sure if that has changed.

A few areas have been taken over by Underclass Blacks and are best avoided.

Rents are quite reasonable.

All of the California subcultures are here: hippies, punks, goths, bikers, gays, preppies, emos, you name it, we’ve got it. There are art galleries and rock and roll clubs. There is even at artsy fartsy district called the Tower District.

The White politics is rather conservative, sort of like Reagan Democrats. They were originally Southern Democrats, but they’ve been registering Republican for 30 years now. The Hispanics and Blacks all vote Dem. The politics is divided between conservative White politics (some of the most conservative pols in California) and liberal Hispanic and Black politics.

Big Ag rules the day out here and is deeply conservative. They own most of the press and all of the pols. The whole Central Valley is like a company town with Big Ag as the employer.

The Sierra Nevadas are only an hour or so away, and they’re a total blast if you like mountains, rivers, lakes, forests, etc. A world-famous national park, Yosemite National Park, is 2 hours away.

Clovis is a suburb of Fresno the east. This is “White Fresno.” The Whites have moved here, and White culture is still well and alive in Clovis. Many apartments and new homes around here advertise “Clovis schools.” That’s racist code talk for “White schools.” Get the hint? Clovis schools are very hardass and really try to hold the line academically.

Fresno is just another big city school district full of large numbers of the usual Hispanics dropping out, getting pregnant, joining gangs and getting lousy grades. But serious problems on campus are rare.

Seriously hostile anti-White Aztlan Hispanic culture hasn’t really taken root here, since it’s an outgrowth of liberal politics, and we don’t really have that here.

The Hispanics have lived in the Valley forever and often grow up speaking Spanish as a first language. They learn English in school. They’re almost the majority group around here, so there’s nothing to rebel against. The Hispanics are socially conservative, often have deep roots, and are very family-oriented. Idiot liberal MECHA politics never really took hold here too much. These Hispanics are too conservative for that crap.

The Blacks are not very political either. They’re also mostly conservative working class people. There is an area called Southwest Fresno that is a Black ghetto and is best avoided, but as far as ghettos go, it’s not that bad. The Blacks around here have no numbers, so they don’t cause a lot of trouble, and mostly they hang out with Whites, Hispanics, etc. In lower class areas, Whites, Hispanics and Blacks all hang out and have sort of assimilated to some sort of Hispanic gangster culture, except most folks are not gangsters.

There are few Black gangs here, and some of the worst gangs, like the Bulldogs, are actually multiracial (Black and Hispanic).

There are White Supremacist gangs too. One is called the Peckerwoods. However, like the Aryan Nations, their White Supremacism is mostly for show. White culture is so far gone here that even our White Supremacists have gone Multicult. I understand that the local Peckerwoods mostly have Mexican girlfriends. At the local jails, they are good friends with the local Hispanics.

I was told that the White Supremacist stuff is a bunch of crap and that the whole purpose of the Peckerwoods is “all about drugs.” It’s just a way for Whites to form their own gang, sell dope and get by like everyone else.

The big drug around here is methamphetamine. It used to be manufactured in large quantity in the rural areas around here. It’s a drug of working class Whites, but the Hispanics have started to get into it. Hispanics often smoke it in a form called ice, which is one nasty drug.

There’s also a lot of very good pot around here, but it’s very expensive. The stuff around here almost all comes from the Bay Area, where it is grown in indoor gardens. The stuff is incredibly strong for an old stoner like me. I imagine the THC levels might be 15-2

There isn’t much racism here either for some reason. I think all the hardcore racists just took off for White California or left the state altogether. This area is turning seriously into the Multicult, the new culture of California and maybe the US.

Some Interesting Zionist Propaganda

I cut out some of the more egregious and nonsensical Zionist propaganda here. You have to admit there is a lot of truth is this bit of Zionist propaganda. I don’t like Zionism one bit. It’s a ridiculous settler-colonial project that the civilized world has given up on 100 years ago. The main problem is that the Arabs and Muslims, while obviously the victims of this settler-colonial aggression, often act like such shits that it’s hard to side with them over the Zionists. You really ought to seize the moral high ground in a war.

The mass movement of Muslims into Europe has been a catastrophe all around. Europe needs to start limiting the number of Muslims moving there, imposing some restrictions on them, demanding that they assimilate before being given citizenship, etc. There are all sorts of things that could be done. Main thing is to quit making it worse. If you’re in a hole, quit digging. Many Muslims in Europe seem to be refusing to assimilate to modern Western Europe. This is unacceptable. Immigrants must assimilate.

Furthermore, in general, Europe’s Muslims appear reactionary in the sense that they reject modernism in Europe and wish to turn back the clock. This is unacceptable. Europe is part of the modern, Judeo-Christian secular Western project. Islam seems to reject this project in its entirety. That’s not a problem if they want to sit over in their sandboxes and reject modernism, but if they need to Europe, they need to embrace modernism, grin and bear it and shut up about it, or take off back to their sandboxes.

A lot Left Anti-Zionists are actually anti-Semites. They support Islam in Europe and elsewhere because it’s the front line in the war against the Jews, oh, I’m sorry, I mean the Zionists. This is ridiculous. Talk to the Arabs and Muslim Left about how progressive Islamists are.

A lot of White nationalists are behind the Islamists too for the same reason. They’re the leading edge of the anti-Jewish, I mean anti-Zionist (!) resistance battalions. Nonsense. How would these White nationalists like it if huge numbers of these wonderful Muslims moved in next door to them. Mass Muslim immigration has not proven beneficial to Western White states.

The Nobel Prizes list is most interesting. I so want to be a Jew! Otto Weinberger must have been wrong. It’s not true at all that Jews lack the capacity for genius. That’s ridiculous. I don’t know what was wrong with Weinberger, maybe he was just another self-hating Jew. He wouldn’t have been the first.

All European Life Died at Auschwitz

By Sebastian Vilar Rodrigez

I walked down the street in Barcelona, and suddenly discovered a terrible truth – Europe died in Auschwitz….We killed six million Jews and replaced them with 20 million Muslims. In Auschwitz we burned a culture, thought, creativity, talent. We destroyed the chosen people, truly chosen, because they produced great and wonderful people who changed the world.

The contribution of this people is felt in all areas of life: science, art, international trade, and above all, as the conscience of the world. These are the people we burned.

And under the pretense of tolerance, and because we wanted to prove to ourselves that we were cured of the disease of racism, we opened our gates to 20 million Muslims, who brought us stupidity and ignorance, religious extremism and lack of tolerance and lastly, crime and poverty, due to an unwillingness to work and support their families with pride.

They have blown up our trains and turned our beautiful Spanish cities into the Third World, drowning in filth and crime.

Shut up in the apartments they receive free from the government, they plan the murder and destruction of their naive hosts.

And thus, in our misery, we have exchanged culture for fanatical hatred, creative skill for destructive skill, intelligence for backwardness and superstition.

We have exchanged the pursuit of peace of the Jews of Europe and their talent for a better future for their children, their determined clinging to life because life is holy, for those who pursue death, a people consumed by the desire for death for themselves and others, for our children and theirs.

What a terrible mistake was made by miserable Europe.

Nobel Prizes, Jewish and Muslim

The Global Islamic population is approximately 1.2 billion or 2

Literature: 1988 – Najib Mahfouz

Peace: 1978 – Mohamed Anwar El-Sadat 1990 – Elias James Corey 1994 – Yaser Arafat 1999 – Ahmed Zewai

Economics: (zero)

Physics: (zero)

Medicine: 1960 – Peter Brian Medawar 1998 – Ferid Mourad

TOTAL: 7

The Global Jewish population is approximately 14,000,000; that is 14 million or about 0.

Literature: 1910 – Paul Heyse 1927 – Henri Bergson 1958 – Boris Pasternak 1966 – Shmuel Yosef Agnon 1966 – Nelly Sachs 1976 – Saul Bellow 1978 – Isaac Bashevis Singer 1981 – Elias Canetti 1987 – Joseph Brodsky 1991 – Nadine Gordimer World

Peace: 1911 – Alfred Fried 1911 – Tobias Michael Carel Asser 1968 – Rene Cassin 1973 – Henry Kissinger 1978 – Menachem Begin 1986 – Elie Wiesel 1994 – Shimon Peres 1994 – Yitzhak Rabin

Physics: 1905 – Adolph Von Baeyer 1906 – Henri Moissan 1907 – Albert Abraham Michelson 1908 – Gabriel Lippmann 1910 – Otto Wallach 1915 – Richard Willstaetter 1918 – Fritz Haber 1921 – Albert Einstein 1922 – Niels Bohr 1925 – James Franck 1925 – Gustav Hertz 1943 – Gustav Stern 1943 – George Charles de Hevesy 1944 – Isidor Issac Rabi 1952 – Felix Bloch 1954 – Max Born 1958 – Igor Tamm 1959 – Emilio Segre 1960 – Donald A. Glaser 1961 – Robert Hofstadter 1961 – Melvin Calvin 1962 – Lev Davidovich Landau 1962 – Max Ferdinand Perutz 1965 – Richard Phillips Feynman 1965 – Julian Schwinger 1969 – Murray Gellmann 1971 – Dennis Gabor 1972 – William Howard Stein 1973 – Brian David Josephson 1975 – Benjamin Mottleson 1976 – Burton Richter 1977 – Ilya Prigogine 1978 – Arno Allan Penzias 1978 – Peter L Kapitza 1979 – Stephen Weinberg 1979 – Sheldon Glashow 1979 – Herbert Charles Brown 1980 – Paul Berg 1980 – Walter Gilbert 1981 – Roald Hoffmann 1982 – Aaron Klug 1985 – Albert A. Hauptman 1985 – Jerome Karle 1986 – Dudley R. Herschbach 1988 – Robert Huber 1988 – Leon Lederman 1988 – Melvin Schwartz 1988 – Jack Steinberger 1989 – Sidney Altman 1990 – Jerome Friedman 1992 – Rudolph Marc us 1995 – Martin Perl 2000 – Alan J. Heeger

Economics: 1970 – Paul Anthony Samuelson 1971 – Simon Kuznets 1972 – Kenneth Joseph Arrow 1975 – Leonid Kantorovich 1976 – Milton Friedman 1978 – Herbert A. Simon 1980 – Lawrence Robert Klein 1985 – Franco Modigliani 1987 – Robert M. Solow 1990 – Harry Markowitz 1990 – Merton Miller 1992 – Gary Becker 1993 – Robert Fogel

Medicine: 1908 – Elie Metchnikoff 1908 – Paul Erlich 1914 – Robert Barany 1922 – Otto Meyerhof 1930 – Karl Landsteiner 1931 – Otto Warburg 1936 – Otto Loewi 1944 – Joseph Erlanger 1944 – Herbert Spencer Gasser 1945 – Ernst Boris Chain 1946 – Hermann Joseph Muller 1950 – Tadeus Reichstein 1952 – Selman Abraham Waksman 1953 – Hans Krebs 1953 – Fritz Albert Lipmann 1958 – Joshua Lederberg 1959 – Arthur Kornberg 1964 – Konrad Bloch 1965 – Francois Jacob 1965 – Andre Lwoff 1967 – George Wald 1968 – Marshall W. Nirenberg 1969 – Salvador Luria 1970 – Julius Axelrod 1970 – Sir Bernard Katz 1972 – Gerald Maurice Edelman 1975 – Howard Martin Temin 1976 – Baruch S. Blumberg 1977 – Roselyn Sussman Yalow 1978 – Daniel Nathans 1980 – Baruj Ben Acerraf 1984 – Cesar Milstein 1985 – Michael Stuart Brown 1985 – Joseph L. Goldstein 1986 – Stanley Cohen [& Rita Levi-Montalcini] 1988 – Gertrude Elion 1989 – Harold Varmus 1991 – Erwin Neher 1991 – Bert Sakmann 1993 – Richard J. Roberts 1993 – Phillip Sharp 1994 – Alfred Gilman 1995 – Edward B. Lewis 1996 – Lu Rose Iacovino

TOTAL: 129!

Jews Versus Muslims

The Jews are not brainwashing children in military training camps, teaching them how to blow themselves up and cause maximum deaths of Jews and other non Muslims. The Jews don’t hijack planes, nor kill athletes at the Olympics, or blow themselves up in German restaurants. There is not one single Jew who has destroyed a church. There is not a single Jew who protests by killing people.

The Jews don’t traffic slaves, nor do they have leaders calling for Jihad and death to all the Infidels. Perhaps the world’s Muslims should consider investing more in standard education and less in blaming the Jews for all their problems. Muslims must ask what can they do for humankind before they demand that humankind respect them.

General Eisenhower Warned Us

It is a matter of history that when the Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces, General Dwight Eisenhower, found the victims of the death camps, he ordered all possible photographs to be taken, and for the German people from surrounding villages to be ushered through the camps and even made to bury the dead.

He did this because he said in words to this effect:

Get it all on record now – get the films – get the witnesses -because somewhere down the road of history some bastard will get up and say that this never happened.

Recently, the UK debated whether to remove the Holocaust from its school curriculum because it ‘offends’ the Muslim population which claims it never occurred. It is not removed as yet. However, this is a frightening portent of the fear that is gripping the world and how easily each country is giving into it.

It is now more than 60 years after the Second World War in Europe ended. This e-mail is being sent as a memorial chain, in memory of the 6 million Jews, 27 million Russians, 10 million Christians, and 1,900 Catholic priests who were murdered, raped, burned, starved, beaten, experimented on and humiliated while the German people looked the other way.

Now, more than ever, with Iran, among others, claiming the Holocaust to be a myth, it is imperative to make sure the world never forgets.

How many years will it be before the attack on the World Trade Center never happened because it offends some Muslim in the United States?

Great Movie Directors List

Not listed in any particular order. Feel free to add or subtract from the list. I should have listed their good movies after their names, but making the list took up enough time as it was. Feel free to add movies to the list if you wish. I’m obviously favoring Hollywood here, and I don’t know much about foreign films, so I’m obviously shorting those guys. There’s also an emphasis on the modern, so I probably gave short shrift to directors of the earlier era.

Anyone who made at least one damn good, and I mean damn good, movie, in any country, during any era, is on the list. That’s all it takes.

Feel free to discuss…You can add Youtube video clips in the comments if you wish to make your points.

  1. Oliver Stone
  2. Stanley Kubrick
  3. Francis Ford Coppola
  4. Orson Welles
  5. Bernardo Bertolucci
  6. Alfred Hitchcock
  7. Wes Craven
  8. George A. Romero
  9. John Malkovich
  10. Spike Jonze
  11. Frank Darabont
  12. Sam Mendes
  13. David Fincher
  14. Miloš Forman
  15. Paul Newman
  16. George Roy Hill
  17. Anthony Harvey
  18. Franklin Schaffner
  19. Mike Nichols
  20. Paul Schrader
  21. Sidney Lumet
  22. Brian De Palma
  23. David O. Selznick
  24. Victor Fleming
  25. Nicholas Ray
  26. William Friedkin
  27. Billy Wilder
  28. Dennis Hopper
  29. Alan Parker
  30. David Lynch
  31. Stuart Rosenberg
  32. Ron Howard
  33. Mel Brooks
  34. Woody Allen
  35. Alan Arkin
  36. Hal Ashby
  37. Roman Polanski
  38. Sidney Pollack
  39. Alan J. Pakula
  40. Carl Reiner
  41. Rob Reiner
  42. The Coen Brothers
  43. Fritz Lang
  44. Mike Nichols
  45. Warren Beatty
  46. Robert Aldrich
  47. Elia Kazan
  48. László Benedek
  49. James Brooks
  50. William Wyler
  51. Barry Levinson
  52. Ridley Scott
  53. Quentin Tarantino
  54. Arthur Penn
  55. Sean S. Cunningham
  56. Martin Scorsese
  57. Peter Weir
  58. Robert Altman
  59. Hal Ashby
  60. Tim Burton
  61. Peter Bogdanovich
  62. George Lucas
  63. William Friedkin
  64. Neal Israel
  65. Michael Cimino
  66. Frank Capra
  67. Gus Van Sant
  68. Robinson Devor
  69. Werner Herzog
  70. Terrence Malick
  71. Don Siegel
  72. Steven Soderbergh
  73. Jonathan Demme
  74. Roland Joffé
  75. Neil Jordan
  76. Alan Parker
  77. Amy Heckerling
  78. Tim Hunter
  79. Robert Zemeckis
  80. Wim Wenders
  81. Michelangelo Antonioni
  82. John Hughes
  83. Peter Shaffer
  84. Volker Schlöndorff
  85. Bill Duke
  86. Ingmar Bergman
  87. Sam Wood
  88. Michael Curtiz
  89. Steven Spielberg
  90. Luc Jacquet
  91. Alexander Payne
  92. Paul Thomas Anderson
  93. Andy Wachowski
  94. Larry Wachowski
  95. James Cameron
  96. Kevin Reynolds
  97. Michael Mann
  98. Blake Edwards
  99. Jon Favreau
  100. John Lasseter
  101. Cecil B. DeMille
  102. Joseph L. Mankiewicz
  103. Mel Gibson
  104. Vicky Jenson
  105. Andrew Adamson
  106. Danny Boyle
  107. Roberto Benigni
  108. Jean-Pierre Jeunet
  109. Aaron Schneider
  110. Ben Affleck
  111. Alex Cox
  112. Bud Townsend
  113. Gerard Damiano
  114. Radley Metzger
  115. Sam Peckinpah
  116. Samuel Fuller
  117. Jim Jarmusch
  118. Jean-Luc Godard
  119. François Truffaut
  120. Jacques Demy
  121. Agnès Varda
  122. Alain Resnais
  123. Jacques Rivette
  124. Claude Chabrol
  125. Éric Rohmer
  126. John Schlesinger
  127. Rainer Werner Fassbinder
  128. Alexander Kluge
  129. Margarethe von Trotta
  130. Hans-Jürgen Syberberg
  131. Ken Loach
  132. Peter Yates
  133. Peter Watkins
  134. Ken Russell
  135. Tony Richardson
  136. Nicholas Roeg
  137. Karel Reisz
  138. Joseph Losey
  139. Richard Lester
  140. Bryan Forbes
  141. Clive Donner
  142. Basil Dearden
  143. Jack Clayton
  144. John Boorman
  145. Jiří Menzel
  146. Ján Kadár
  147. Satyajit Ray
  148. Mani Ratnam
  149. Ritwik Ghatak
  150. Guru Dutt
  151. Akira Kurosawa
  152. Vittorio De Sica
  153. Jean Renoir
  154. Leni Riefenstahl
  155. Peter Jackson
  156. Kenji Mizoguchi
  157. Yasujirō Ozu
  158. Ernst Lubitsch
  159. Sergio Leone
  160. Stanley Donen
  161. Buster Keaton
  162. Andrew Stanton
  163. Nagisa Oshima
  164. Hiroshi Teshigahara
  165. Seijun Suzuki
  166. Shohei Imamura
  167. Yasujiro Ozu
  168. Susumu Hani
  169. Federico Fellini
  170. Roberto Rossellini
  171. Cesare Zavattini
  172. Luchino Visconti
  173. Giuseppe De Santis
  174. Suso Cecchi d’Amico
  175. Sergei Eisenstein
  176. Otto Preminger
  177. Gregg Araki
  178. Luis Buñuel
  179. Salvador Dalí
  180. Guy Debord
  181. Michael Haneke
  182. Georges Franju
  183. Henri-Georges Clouzot
  184. Andrzej Zulawski
  185. Jean Eustache
  186. Man Ray
  187. Jean Cocteau
  188. Tex Avery
  189. Robert Clampett
  190. Kenneth Anger
  191. Ralph Bakshi
  192. Terry Gilliam
  193. Alejandro Jodorowsky
  194. René Clair
  195. Just Jaeckin
  196. Wakefield Poole
  197. Artie Mitchell
  198. Jim Mitchell
  199. Jim Clark
  200. Jerry Gerard
  201. Herschell Gordon Lewis
  202. Sam Raimi
  203. Meir Zarchi
  204. Eduardo Sánchez
  205. Daniel Myrick
  206. Eli Roth
  207. James Wan
  208. Takashi Miike
  209. Rob Zombie
  210. Greg McLean
  211. Robert Rodriguez
  212. Tobe Hooper
  213. John Carpenter
  214. Robert Houston
  215. Terence Fisher
  216. Tod Browning
  217. David Cronenberg
  218. Oren Peli
  219. Richard Donner
  220. Tom Holland
  221. Jack Arnold
  222. Howard Hawks
  223. Val Lewton
  224. Rouben Mamoulian
  225. George Waggner
  226. James Whale
  227. Gaston Leroux
  228. Paul Wegener
  229. Robert Wiene
  230. F. W. Murnau
  231. Paul Leni
  232. Wallace Worsley
  233. Roland West
  234. Alice Guy
  235. Georges Méliès
  236. J. Searle Dawley
  237. Sylvester Stallone
  238. Michael Wadleigh
  239. John Landis
  240. Joe Dante
  241. Gene Fowler Jr.
  242. Richard Brooks
  243. Kevin Connor
  244. Joel M. Reed
  245. Pier Paolo Pasolini
  246. Charles Laughton
  247. Douglas Hickox
  248. Jonathan Demme
  249. John McNaughton
  250. Armand Mastroianni
  251. Robert Moore
  252. Jim Sharman
  253. John Jordon
  254. John De Bello
  255. Leo McCarey
  256. Alfred E. Green
  257. George Cukor
  258. Marcel Carné
  259. Wong Kar Wai
  260. Charles Chaplin
  261. Kátia Lund
  262. Fernando Meirelles
  263. King Vidor
  264. Krzysztof Kieslowski
  265. Edgar G. Ulmer
  266. Chia-Liang Liu
  267. Jackie Chan
  268. Kaige Chen
  269. Lee Unkrich
  270. Norman Z. McLeod
  271. Mohsen Makmalbaf
  272. Robert Hamer
  273. Merian C. Cooper
  274. Ernest B. Schoedsack
  275. Preston Sturges
  276. Josef von Sternberg
  277. David Lean
  278. Jean-Claude Lauzon
  279. Dziga Vertov
  280. John Frankenheimer
  281. Vincente Minelli
  282. Robert Bresson
  283. Jacques Tourneur
  284. Hamilton Luske
  285. Ben Sharpsteen
  286. Robert Pulcini
  287. Shari Springer Berman
  288. John Ford
  289. Gene Kelly
  290. Jon Amiel
  291. Alexander Mackendrick
  292. George Stevens
  293. Pedro Almodóvar
  294. King Hu
  295. Theo Angelopoulos
  296. Clint Eastwood
  297. Raoul Walsh
  298. Raj Kapoor
  299. Harold Ramis
  300. Tsui Hark
  301. Paul Gerber
  302. Peter Farrelly
  303. Roy Rowland
  304. Joseph H. Lewis
  305. John Patrick Shanley
  306. Jacques Doniol-Valcroze
  307. Philippe De Broca
  308. Bryan Singer
  309. Frank Darabont
  310. Terry Jones
  311. Robert Wise
  312. Franklin J. Schaffner
  313. Irvin Kershner
  314. Arthur Hiller
  315. Richard Fleischer
  316. Fred Zinnemann
  317. Robert Mulligan
  318. Jamie Uys
  319. Louis Malle
  320. Walter Hill
  321. Hiroshi Inagaki
  322. Norman Jewison
  323. Albert Hughes
  324. Allen Hughes
  325. Delmer Daves
  326. Michael Gordon
  327. Sydney Pollack
  328. Charlie Chaplin
  329. John D. Hancock
  330. Rob Minkoff
  331. Roger Allers
  332. Kevin Costner
  333. Byron Haskin
  334. Christopher Nolan
  335. Darren Aronofsky
  336. Bill Forsyth
  337. Philippe Parreno
  338. Douglas Gordon
  339. Stephen Chow
  340. Paul Crowder
  341. John Dower
  342. Gurinder Chadha
  343. Jafar Panahi
  344. Tom Hooper
  345. John Huston
  346. Robert Riger
  347. David Evans
  348. Ang Lee
  349. Baz Luhrmann
  350. Kathryn Bigelow
  351. Michael Moore
  352. D.A. Pennebaker
  353. Prince
  354. Charlotte Zwerin
  355. Albert Maysles
  356. David Maysles
  357. Adam Yauch
  358. Michael John Warren
  359. Nick Cassavetes
  360. John Cassavetes
  361. Stephen Frears
  362. Sofia Coppola
  363. Richard Linklater
  364. Jean-Jacques Beineix
  365. Scott Hicks
  366. Ed Harris
  367. Jodie Foster
  368. Todd Holland
  369. Wes Anderson
  370. Robert Altman
  371. Joel Schumacher
  372. Zalman King
  373. Robert Riskin
  374. Alan J. Pakula
  375. Michael Winterbottom
  376. Cecil B. De Mille
  377. David Greene
  378. Robert Elfstrom
  379. Carl Theodor Dreyer
  380. Victor Nuñez
  381. Alan Rudolph
  382. Barbet Schroeder
  383. Michael Cimino
  384. Stephen Daldry
  385. Isabel Coixet
  386. Richard Attenborough
  387. Mike Leigh
  388. Mabrouk El Mechri
  389. Gina Prince-Bythewood
  390. Oscar Micheaux
  391. John M. Stahl
  392. William Nolte
  393. Spencer Williams, Jr.
  394. Pierre Chenal
  395. Stanley Kramer
  396. Melvin Van Peebles
  397. Sidney J. Furie
  398. Mark Robson
  399. Russ Meyer
  400. Bill Condon
  401. Michael Schultz
  402. Charles Burnett
  403. Jeff Margolis
  404. Joe Layton
  405. John Singleton
  406. Kasi Lemmons
  407. John Boorman
  408. Adrian Lyne
  409. Jean Vigo
  410. D. W. Griffith
  411. Chantal Akerman
  412. Max Ophüls
  413. Erich von Stroheim
  414. Carol Reed
  415. Charles Reisner
  416. George Kuchar
  417. Kon Ichikawa
  418. Abbas Kiarostami
  419. Chris Marker
  420. Donald Cammell
  421. Claude Lanzmann
  422. Philippe Garrel
  423. Louis Feuillade
  424. Douglas Sirk
  425. Michael Snow
  426. Andrzej Wajda
  427. Marco Bellocchio
  428. Einar Hansen
  429. Alessandro Blasetti
  430. Marcel L’Herbier
  431. Clyde Bruckman
  432. W. C. Fields
  433. Alexander Hammid
  434. Maya Deren
  435. Abel Gance
  436. Leonid Trauberg
  437. Grigori Kozintsev
  438. Franco Zeffirelli
  439. Michael Powell
  440. Vsevolod Pudovkin
  441. Hou Hsiao-Hsien
  442. Joseph Cornell
  443. Todd Haynes
  444. Sam Taylor
  445. Fred C. Newmeyer
  446. Béla Tarr
  447. Terry Zwigoff
  448. Frank Oz
  449. Roger Corman
  450. Andrei Tarkovsky
  451. Frank Pierson
  452. Ken Jacobs
  453. Yuan Muzhi
  454. Frank Borzage
  455. Glauber Rocha
  456. Ousmane Sembène
  457. Kinji Fukasaku
  458. Hollis Frampton
  459. Larisa Shepitko
  460. Katsuhiro Otomo
  461. John Mackenzie
  462. Paul Bartel
  463. George Miller
  464. Tim Kincaid
  465. Robert Drew
  466. Joshua Logan
  467. David Mamet
  468. Freddie Francis
  469. William Wellman
  470. Ken Annakin
  471. Toshio Masuda
  472. Kinji Fukasaku
  473. Richard Fleischer
  474. Silvio Narizzano
  475. Slatan Dudow
  476. Jane Campion
  477. Bong Joon-Ho
  478. Mehboob Khan
  479. Zhang Yimou
  480. Sanjay Leela Bhansali
  481. Rolf de Heer
  482. Peter Djigirr
  483. John Woo
  484. Hideo Nakata
  485. George Sluizer
  486. Jacques Audiard
  487. Claude Berri
  488. Edgar Reitz
  489. Marjane Satrapi
  490. Vincent Paronnaud
  491. Walter Salles
  492. Ashutosh Gowariker
  493. Thomas Vinterberg
  494. Djibril Diop Mambéty
  495. Jiri Menzel
  496. Jacques Tati
  497. Oliver Hirschbiegel
  498. Jean-Paul Rappeneau
  499. Wong Kar-wai
  500. Hayao Miyazaki
  501. Jean-Pierre Melville
  502. Ari Folman
  503. Mathieu Kassovitz
  504. Ishiro Honda
  505. Lau Wai-keung
  506. Giuseppe Tornatore
  507. Michael Radford
  508. Wolfgang Petersen
  509. Elem Klimov
  510. Victor Erice
  511. Alfonso Cuarón
  512. Lewis John Carlino
  513. Park Chan-wook
  514. Tomas Alfredson
  515. Gillo Pontecorvo
  516. Guillermo del Toro
  517. Timur Bekmambetov
  518. Yuen Woo-ping
  519. Chen Kaige
  520. Marc Caro
  521. Bruce Lee
  522. Souleymane Cisse
  523. Paul Verhoeven
  524. Mamoru Oshii
  525. Wolfgang Becker
  526. Jules Dassin
  527. Aki Kaurismäki
  528. Tom Tykwer
  529. Christophe Gans
  530. Kim Ki-duk
  531. Juan Antonio Bayona
  532. Patrice Chéreau
  533. Susanne Bier
  534. Ben Sombogaart
  535. Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck
  536. Gaspar Noé
  537. Rémy Belvaux
  538. Bimal Roy
  539. Bille August
  540. Jacques Becker
  541. Masaki Kobayashi
  542. Luc Besson
  543. Sylvain Chomet
  544. John Carney
  545. Vincent Cassel
  546. André Génovès
  547. Julian Schnabel
  548. Andrey Zvyagintsev
  549. Matteo Garrone
  550. Alejandro González Iñárritu
  551. James Marsh
  552. Auguste Lumière
  553. Louis Lumière
  554. Jack Gold
  555. Aleksandr Dovzhenko
  556. Maurice Pialat
  557. Jean Rouch
  558. Edgar Morin
  559. Tomás Gutiérrez Alea
  560. Geoff Murphy
  561. Barry Peak
  562. Cameron Crowe
  563. Philip Kaufman
  564. René Laloux
  565. David Elfick
  566. Christopher Guest
  567. Jean-Jacques Annaud
  568. Ivo Caprino
  569. Sergio Corbucci
  570. Kevin Smith
  571. Wong Fei Huing
  572. Steve James
  573. George Hickenlooper
  574. Fax Bahr
  575. Louise Pepe
  576. Keith Fulton
  577. Neal Israel
  578. Alfred Cheung
  579. Jake Kasdan
  580. Roland Joffe
  581. Jim Abrahams
  582. Jerry Zucker
  583. David Zucker
  584. Giulio Questi
  585. Kevin Macdonald
  586. Mike Judge
  587. Bob Balaban
  588. George Roy Hill
  589. Trey Parker
  590. James Mangold
  591. Ted Kotcheff
  592. Blake Edwards
  593. Bud Yorkin
  594. Takeshi Kitano
  595. J. Lee Thompson
  596. Carroll Ballard
  597. Gene Saks
  598. Mike Hodges
  599. Robert Harmon
  600. Edgar Wright
  601. Liu Chia-Liang
  602. Ivan Reitman
  603. Joe Carnahan
  604. Franklin J. Schaffner
  605. Rob Reiner
  606. David Miller
  607. Fred Schepisi
  608. Robert Frank
  609. Ringo Lam
  610. Joseph Sargent
  611. Les Blank
  612. Jeremiah Chechik
  613. Ermanno Olmi
  614. Edward Norton
  615. Peter Griffin
  616. Mark Waters
  617. Michael Lehmann
  618. Donald Petrie
  619. Ted Kotcheff
  620. Javier Fesser
  621. Jimmy Murakami
  622. Paolo Sorrentino
  623. Sergio Garrone
  624. Haskell Wexler
  625. Peter Watkins
  626. Wolfgang Reitherman
  627. Rudolph Mate
  628. John Farrow
  629. Benjamin Christensen
  630. G. W. Pabst
  631. Marco Ferreri
  632. Peter Greenaway
  633. Bigas Luna
  634. Juzo Itami
  635. Tinto Brass
  636. Ed Wood
  637. David Worth
  638. Stewart Raffill
  639. John Badham
  640. Stan Dragoti
  641. Frederick Wiseman
  642. Jim Muro
  643. Guy Hamilton
  644. Val Guest
  645. Ken Hughes
  646. Joseph McGrath
  647. Robert Parrish
  648. Peter R. Hunt
  649. Alberto De Martino
  650. Garson Kanin
  651. Emeric Pressburger
  652. Albert Lamorisse
  653. Alberto Cavalcanti
  654. Frank Launder
  655. Sidney Gilliat
  656. Bob Rafelson
  657. Edward Dmytryk
  658. George W. Hill
  659. Ramon Menendez
  660. Edward James Olmos
  661. William Castle
  662. Harold S. Bucquet
  663. Ben Holmes
  664. William Nigh
  665. Sean Penn
  666. Robert Flaherty
  667. Jason Reitman
  668. Allison Anders
  669. Lindsay Anderson
  670. R. G. Springsteen
  671. Kaneto Shindo
  672. Martin Ritt
  673. Robert Rossen
  674. Fred Coe
  675. Charles M. Jones
  676. Zoltan Korda
  677. Don Weis
  678. Henry Koster
  679. Edward Yang
  680. Atom Egoyan
  681. Lodge Kerrigan
  682. Aleksei Balabanov
  683. Pen-ek Ratanaruang
  684. Lars von Trier
  685. Shinya Tsukamoto
  686. Ron Fricke
  687. George Sidney
  688. Charles Walters
  689. Busby Berkeley
  690. David Butler
  691. W.S. Van Dyke II
  692. Edward Buzzell
  693. Edwin L. Marin
  694. Mark Sandrich
  695. Gregory La Cava
  696. David Leland
  697. Sidney Lanfield
  698. William A. Seiter
  699. Dick Richards
  700. Ivan Passer
  701. John Dahl
  702. Matthew Vaughn
  703. William Cameron Menzies
  704. William Dieterle
  705. Otto Brower
  706. Robert Z. Leonard
  707. Roy Del Ruth
  708. Edgar Selwyn
  709. Gregory LaCava
  710. Edward Sedgwick
  711. Arthur Dreifuss
  712. Vincent Gallo
  713. Nancy Savoca
  714. Henry King
  715. R.G. Springsteen
  716. André de Toth
  717. Louis King
  718. Kurt Neumann
  719. Jack Starrett
  720. John C. Champion
  721. Edward Ludwig
  722. Irving Reis
  723. H.C. Potter
  724. Norman Foster
  725. Mark Rydell
  726. Paolo Sorrentino
  727. Howard Deutch
  728. Mitchell Leisen
  729. Nicolas Philibert
  730. Alexander Korda
  731. George Fitzmaurice
  732. Victor Saville
  733. Ian Dalrymple
  734. David Hand
  735. Pete Docter
  736. Lee Unkrich
  737. David Silverman
  738. William Keighley
  739. John Busker
  740. Ron Clements
  741. Lewis Milestone
  742. Chris Smith
  743. Anatole Litvak
  744. Guy Green
  745. John Cromwell
  746. Clarence Brown
  747. Jacques Feyder
  748. Robert Florey
  749. Leo McCarey
  750. Gabriel Axel
  751. Frank Marshall
  752. Ginette Leclerc
  753. Charles Moulin
  754. Fernand Charpin
  755. Robert Vattier
  756. Diane Wood
  757. Jasmin Dizdar
  758. Eric Rohmer
  759. Edward F. Cline
  760. Milcho Manchevski
  761. Nic Gaster
  762. Kirk Wise
  763. Gary Trousdale
  764. Mario Monicelli
  765. Lawrence Kasdan
  766. Martin Brest
  767. Yakima Canutt
  768. Andrew Marton
  769. Marcel Camus
  770. Campbell Scott
  771. Stanley Tucci
  772. Paul Mazursky
  773. Paul Greengrass
  774. Bruce Beresford
  775. Luigi Comencini
  776. Kimberly Peirce
  777. Steve Rash
  778. Joe Berlinger
  779. Bruce Sinofsky
  780. Kristoffer Nyholm
  781. Carlos Diegues
  782. Ron Shelton
  783. Eugene Corr
  784. Bob Fosse
  785. Fernando Trueba
  786. Herbert Ross
  787. Hugh Hudson
  788. Wayne Wang
  789. Frank Lloyd
  790. Lasse Hallström
  791. Claire Denis
  792. Nick Park
  793. Peter Lord
  794. Rob Marshall
  795. George Lowe
  796. Daniel Mann
  797. Michael Apted
  798. Bertrand Tavernier
  799. Mikhail Kalatozov
  800. George Seaton
  801. Rowland V. Lee
  802. Edmund Goulding
  803. Nikita Mikhalkov
  804. Mike Newell
  805. George Abbott
  806. Tim Robbins
  807. Phillip Noyce
  808. Vincent Monton
  809. Jacob Brackman
  810. Jim McBride
  811. George Marshall
  812. Susan Seidelman
  813. Jerzy Skolimowski
  814. Laslo Benedek
  815. Charles Crichton
  816. Beau Marks
  817. John McTiernan
  818. Roy Rossotti
  819. Pietro Germi
  820. Erick Zonca
  821. William Hobbs
  822. Agnieszka Holland
  823. Diane Kurys
  824. Peter Markham
  825. Anthony Minghella
  826. Zacharias Kunuk
  827. Yoshimitsu Morita
  828. Nick Abdo
  829. Garry Marshall
  830. Rene Clement
  831. Abraham Polonsky
  832. Peter Cattaneo
  833. Teinosuke Kinugasa
  834. Frank Tashlin
  835. Bertrand Blier
  836. Henry Cornelius
  837. Agnes Varda
  838. Valerio Zurlini
  839. Jose Ferrer
  840. Joseph Reidy
  841. Sidney Franklin
  842. Gustav Machaty
  843. Barbara Kopple
  844. Todd Solondz
  845. Alan Oxman
  846. Michael Almereyda
  847. Laurence Olivier
  848. Gerald Cotts
  849. James Ivory
  850. Eleanor Coppola
  851. Richard Pearce
  852. Elaine May
  853. Hal Hartley
  854. Kenneth Branagh
  855. Vic Armstrong
  856. Lisa Cholodenko
  857. Jean Negulesco
  858. Marcel Ophuls
  859. Michael Dryhurst
  860. Peter Hall
  861. Ken Burns
  862. Todd Field
  863. John Boulting
  864. Mike Figgis
  865. Alan Crosland
  866. Richard Thorpe
  867. Frank Kowalski
  868. Yang Fengliang
  869. Robert Siodmak
  870. Robert Benton
  871. Hector Babenco
  872. Peter Brook
  873. Walter Lang
  874. Lamont Johnson
  875. Gianni Amelio
  876. Curtis Hanson
  877. Noel Howard
  878. Andre Smagghe
  879. Roger Vadim
  880. Penny Marshall
  881. Mervyn LeRoy
  882. Alfonso Arau
  883. Henry Hathaway
  884. Tom DiCillo
  885. Gillian Armstrong
  886. Mark Lewis
  887. Vassili Pitchul
  888. Philip Leacock
  889. Ray Ashley
  890. Morris Engel
  891. Ruth Orkin
  892. Dennis Stock
  893. Albert Brooks
  894. Karoly Makk
  895. Bernhard Wicki
  896. Delbert Mann
  897. Nicole Holofcener
  898. Patrick Carey
  899. Nicholas Hytner
  900. Tariq Anwar
  901. Gabriel Pascal
  902. Aki Kaurismaki
  903. Robert Stevenson
  904. Harry Horner
  905. Whit Stillman
  906. Evelyn Purcell
  907. Constantin Costa-Gavras
  908. Richard Boleslawski
  909. Ann Petrie
  910. James Flood
  911. Elliott Nugent
  912. Ildiko Enyedi
  913. Jim Sheridan
  914. Roy Ward Baker
  915. Gary McLarty
  916. Conrad Palmisano
  917. Sam Zebba
  918. Ettore Scola
  919. Irving Rapper
  920. Larry Peerce
  921. Carl Franklin
  922. Victor Schertzinger
  923. Harry Watt
  924. Robert Redford
  925. Donald Roos
  926. Michael Anderson
  927. Daryl Duke
  928. Roger Michell
  929. Bill Roberts
  930. Colin Englert
  931. Tay Garnett
  932. Jacques Doillon
  933. Leslie Howard
  934. Anthony Asquith
  935. Peter Glenville
  936. Stuart Gordon
  937. Michael Tolkin
  938. Michael D. Moore
  939. Franc Roddam
  940. Craig R. Baxley
  941. Paul Brickman
  942. Robert Ellis Miller
  943. Daniel Vigne
  944. Peter Medak
  945. Mira Nair
  946. Charles MacArthur
  947. Ben Hecht
  948. Roy Boulting
  949. Lina Wertmuller
  950. John Madden
  951. Gordon Parks
  952. Jonathan Glazer
  953. Alan Bridges
  954. Ross McElwee
  955. Jacques-Yves Cousteau
  956. Elmar Klos
  957. Arthur Wooster
  958. Perce Pearce
  959. Larry Morey
  960. Michael Ritchie
  961. Roger Donaldson
  962. Lloyd Bacon
  963. Joe Alves
  964. Nicholas Meyer
  965. Robert Enders
  966. Lew Ayres
  967. Janet Gaynor
  968. Ulu Grosbard
  969. Mariangela Melato
  970. Giancarlo Giannini
  971. Alexander Mackendrick
  972. Serge Bourguignon
  973. Bobby Bass
  974. Hercules Bellville
  975. Gary Capo
  976. Tim Whelan
  977. Ludwig Berger
  978. François Girard
  979. Herbert Coleman
  980. Peter Masterson
  981. Ronald Neame
  982. Danny DeVito
  983. Herman Shumlin
  984. Bob Ziembicki
  985. Michael Steinberg
  986. Ian Sharp
  987. Neal Jimenez
  988. Jerome Robbins
  989. Marcel Pagnol
  990. Andre Techine
  991. Kenneth Lonergan
  992. Chen Huai-En
  993. George Dunning
  994. Alfonso Cuaron
  995. James Young Deer
  996. Lois Weber
  997. Phillips Smalley
  998. Chuck Jones
  999. Elaine Bass
  1000. Saul Bass
  1001. John Emerson
  1002. Victor Sjöström
  1003. George Pal
  1004. Joseph Kane
  1005. Charles Lamont
  1006. Pat O’Neill
  1007. G. W. Bitzer
  1008. Dave Tatsuno
  1009. George Loane Tucker
  1010. Gregory Bateson
  1011. Margaret Mead
  1012. William C. Jersey
  1013. Denis Sanders
  1014. Jim Freeman
  1015. Greg MacGillivray
  1016. Theodore Case
  1017. Harold L. Muller
  1018. Christian Nyby
  1019. George Ingmire
  1020. Mike Todd, Jr.
  1021. Robert L. Bendick
  1022. Burt Gillett
  1023. Budd Boetticher
  1024. Cedric Gibbons
  1025. Jack Conway
  1026. Ted Parmelee
  1027. Edwin S. Porter
  1028. Maurice Schwartz
  1029. Steve Binder
  1030. Karl Brown
  1031. Walt Disney
  1032. Andrew L. Stone
  1033. Miriam Bennett
  1034. Dudley Murphy
  1035. Dave Fleischer
  1036. Wilfred Jackson
  1037. William Cottrell
  1038. Perce Pearce
  1039. F.S. Armitage
  1040. Julien Bryan
  1041. Lynn Reynolds
  1042. Helen Hill
  1043. Ernie Gehr
  1044. Thomas Chalmers
  1045. Lowell Sherman
  1046. Charles Bryant
  1047. Herbert J. Biberman
  1048. Pare Lorentz
  1049. Daniel Petrie
  1050. Janie Geiser
  1051. Jonas Mekas
  1052. Alfred Leslie
  1053. Lou Breslow
  1054. Robert F. McGowan
  1055. Sally Cruikshank
  1056. J. Stuart Blackton
  1057. Chuck Workman
  1058. Ray Eames
  1059. Charles Eames
  1060. Thomas Edison
  1061. Arthur P. Jacobs
  1062. David Hand
  1063. Norman Ferguson
  1064. T. Hee
  1065. Jack Kinney
  1066. Herbert Brenon
  1067. Randal Kleiser
  1068. Wallace Kelly
  1069. Fred Guiol
  1070. Emilio Fernández
  1071. Mitchell Block
  1072. Lionel Rogosin
  1073. Scott Bartlett
  1074. Jerry Lewis
  1075. Michael Roemer
  1076. Anthony Mann
  1077. James Parrott
  1078. Morton DaCosta
  1079. James Frawley
  1080. Benjamin Doniger
  1081. William Beaudine
  1082. Oskar Fischinger
  1083. Bruce Conner
  1084. Sid Laverents
  1085. Alice Guy-Blaché
  1086. Joseph Santley
  1087. James Blue
  1088. George B. Seitz
  1089. Alexander Hall
  1090. Mabel Normand
  1091. James Algar
  1092. Fred M. Wilcox
  1093. Sidney Peterson
  1094. Connie Field
  1095. Slavko Vorkapich
  1096. H. Lee Waters
  1097. William Heise
  1098. Godfrey Reggio
  1099. Reginald Barker
  1100. Harold M. Shaw
  1101. Bert Stern
  1102. Gjon Mili
  1103. Edward S. Curtis
  1104. Helen Levitt
  1105. James Agee
  1106. Janice Loeb
  1107. Clarence G. Badger
  1108. Robert Gardner
  1109. John Marshall
  1110. Martin Brest
  1111. Ida Lupino
  1112. Ralph Steiner
  1113. William S. Hart
  1114. Charles Swickard
  1115. Clifford Smith
  1116. Marie Menken
  1117. Sidney Olcott
  1118. Alfred Ames
  1119. Winsor McCay
  1120. Robert Cannon
  1121. Robert Breer
  1122. Frank Mouris
  1123. Marvin Breckinridge Patterson
  1124. Rex Ingram
  1125. Len Lye
  1126. Lawrence Marston
  1127. Edwin Thanhouser
  1128. Fatty Arbuckle
  1129. Jerome Hill
  1130. Ray Taylor
  1131. Frederick Stephani
  1132. Gregory Nava
  1133. Bruce Brown
  1134. Robert Clouse
  1135. Anthony Rizzo
  1136. Harry Smith
  1137. William Dickson
  1138. Meg Barstow
  1139. Robbins Barstow
  1140. Leonard Kamerling
  1141. Sarah Elder
  1142. Dorothy Arzner
  1143. Marion Wong
  1144. Kent MacKenzie
  1145. Melvin Frank
  1146. Norman Panama
  1147. Leopold Wharton
  1148. Louis J. Gasnier
  1149. Melville Webber
  1150. James Sibley Watson
  1151. Julie Dash
  1152. Shirley Clarke
  1153. Bruce Baillie
  1154. Lewis H. Moomaw
  1155. Jay Leyda
  1156. Mimi Pickering
  1157. James W. Horne
  1158. Albert Parker
  1159. Charles Brabin
  1160. Fred Niblo
  1161. Robert M. Fresco
  1162. Thomas H. Ince
  1163. Raymond B. West
  1164. Raymond Dowidat
  1165. Esther Dowidat
  1166. Judy Collins
  1167. Jill Godmilow
  1168. George C. Stoney
  1169. Charles Barton
  1170. Nathan H. Juran
  1171. Ruggero Deodato
  1172. Isao Takahata

The Breakup of the USSR as a Major Progressive Milestone

A commenter questions how I can say that the breakup of the USSR was a progressive moment in history. But it was…

Rob, you once wrote that the breakup of the USSR was a progressive moment in 20th century history? How can you call yourself a leftist after such a statement? You do realize what happened in Russia and around the world after 1990, don’t you? Gorbachev was a traitorous, cowardly, slimebag on the CIA payroll.

I don’t think so. The breakup was not a progressive event due to the abandonment of socialism, though many seem to think that the project was not working out very well, so maybe the abandonment of socialism was proper after all.

The real way that it was progressive was in terms of the liberation of the official nationalities of the republics of the USSR. After all, nations want liberation. This is a longstanding Left position and demand from the anti-colonial movement on.

From the very start, the USSR gave the nationalities the right to secession. That was way back around 1920 or so. How many other states allowed such a thing back then? None.

So when those Republics seceded, that was allowed under the Soviet Constitution. How many states will allow their minority regions the right to self-determination in that way? Almost none. Almost all states ban the self-determination of the nations amidst their borders. If these nations decide to secede and exercise that right, the states react with fascist aggression. So almost all states on Earth are fascist in that sense.

Only the USSR and a few other states are or were truly non-fascist or anti-fascist on this most important question.

Other antifa states: Great Britain, Canada, the former Czechoslovakia. That’s about it, right? Can you think of even one more?

It’s unfortunate that the new republics went in a capitalist direction, but that was their choice. Russia also went in a capitalist direction, apparently a choice of the people. This was right and proper, true people’s rule and popular decision-making.

The Female Genius at Different Life Stages

Discussion of the nature of the female genius can be found in previous posts.

Let us look at the female genius at different phases of life. Probably not so pronounced in the male, the female genius changes in different stages of the female life. The young female genius is full of light and bright things and probably love and sex. To pound a cliche, it’s “innocent.” There is pain, but there is pain and light with energy and hope.

Pain is always there, because it’s painful to be a woman. I was stunned in my life to learn intimately how many women like pain, physical, mental, etc. or enslavement, domination, etc. One would think that sexually women are sick masochist fucks. One time I called a female friend and asked her why all these women I knew wanted pain with me in bed. She thought for a bit and said, “Well, being a woman is painful, physically and emotionally. As a woman, you either learn to love pain or you don’t have much fun.”

Here we see the archetypal complex female genius, Nico of the Velvet Underground.

First interview is at age 34 after the Velvets split up, so she is a bit older than the girl genius Faithfull in the other videos. She has taken up with experimental French filmmaker Philippe Garrel. We see the typical unconscious (life of the emotional mind) and amoral (calculating and petty) female nature that Weininger spoke of.

Interview is in French, but it doesn’t matter, because you can feel the genius anyway. Here is a rundown of the French, but I don’t understand French very well:

Before speaking about her new movie, the journalist says that other than the albums, Vu, C.Girls and two others, she has not recorded anything else since the Velvets, so he asked her if she was going to release another album. She responds, “You don’t think I’ve recorded enough already?”  She says that she would like to play in the opera some time and that when she makes music, she thinks about theater and cinema, and she thinks her music is very visual.

She explains how one the day she met Lou Reed and John Cale, she was really impressed, and it was the most beautiful day of her entire life until then. Then she met Andy Warhol at Castel where they went dancing. She then says something about Marquis de Sade dancing and perverted dances. I’m not sure what she means there.

I’d say her French is very good for a German first language speaker.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EM7sMHXQM08&feature=related]

Ten years later at age 44, apparently high on heroin, and ten years before her death falling off a bike at Ibiza, things are a lot of different. Nico was the archetype of the blase, ultra-cultured, world-weary European continental.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkEylc1-18M]

Here we have Marianne Faithfull again in a reprise from the earlier post. This is from the same sessions in the 1965 for As Tears Go By. She was 17 years old. It’s great! You almost wish you could preserve folks at a certain age and keep them there forever, and I guess you can, on video and audio, but it might be nice to clone a forever 17 year old Faithfull too. She has such a natural beauty about her, unlike these moderns with layers of makeup pancaked on.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHUQuD7ZzYg&feature=related]

She recut the song much later in life and released it, her voice shot by decades of cigarettes, booze and cocaine, it speaks of quiet resignation, or the female genius in later life, this one around age 50+. Curiously, if you look at her facial expressions as she sings, she looks and feels similar to how she did at age 17. Perhaps one’s soul does not change much through life?

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkEylc1-18M]

The female genius is the same the world over, as the female brain is pretty much the same vis a vis the male brain regardless of race. This is a great version by a totally beautiful Japanese singer, Keiko Terada, singing with a session band on Japanese TV.

Keiko was formerly the lead singer for an all-woman hard rock and heavy metal band called Show-Ya, since broken up. She has a great voice and has been compared to Bette Midler. Might be nice to find out when this was done. She’s 47, and she was recording this song as long ago as 1994 at age 31. She’s looks closer to 31 than to 47 in this cut, but who knows?

She sings very well in English. It’s too much! Damn this chick is beautiful! That’s why I’m a rice king. Simply a Japanese version of the female genius.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvzZ8j2R8wI&feature=related]

The Female Genius – Some Examples

In the previous post we saw Otto Weininger’s startling position that women lack souls, are amoral, and hence lack the capacity for genius. For Weininger, genius must understand the nature of good and evil and choose one or the other. So we have the evil geniuses and the good geniuses.

But the potential for genius is lacking in the usual unproductive sort of unconscious conniving and subservience to baser sorts of quotidian live of the body Id stuff revolving around the body and the family. The male template achieves genius a la Nietzsche when it removes itself somewhat from this base maneuvering for survival and parenthood searches for God within oneself. When one finds that, one finds morality, and hence genius.

I have a feeling that Weininger simply misunderstood the nature of female genius. In the emotional world of sex and motherhood, and emotional world of relationships with lovers and offspring, there is a possibility for the female genius. It’s an important part of our life, so we need geniuses to comment on them.

In an earlier post I described the female genius as a meandering sort of thing. Imagine a great river. That is the Human Mind.

As it spreads into its delta, it explodes into a swamp of never-explored regions, backwaters, byways, channels, islands, bypasses, and bayous. You can barely find your way with a map and without one, you’re just lost. From the air, it’s a maze. If you’re in a boat it doesn’t seem to be going anywhere in any straight line, but it’s a great ride anyway, with lots of truths along with the way if you can slow down enough to take the time to figure them out.

Caroline Casey on KPFA Pacifica Radio is an excellent example of the classic female genius. Men see that and they may just see it as nuttiness, but it’s a real genius. She’s talking about astrology here, but just forget about that, that’s one of her kooky things.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17joTRgaW-Y]

Another one can be found on KPFA’s Stone’s Throw with Jennifer Stone. She seems to be an older Jewish woman. Other than that, I know nothing about her. A lot of meandering, a little bit world-weary, life of the emotion stuff, but you have to admit it’s great stuff.

http://www.kpfa.org/archive/id/62855

A lot of people think that girls and young women are completely stupid, as a man who really likes women, and who actually likes them more than men, I think that young female has a sort of brilliance, beauty, charm and even genius that is not given its due. The female genius, in class form, or better yet in the rarely seen, “girl genius” form, can be seen here in Marianne Faithful’s “As Tears Go By.” The video was shot when she was only 17 years old. As you can see, it is much consumed with the emotions, but as we are emotional beings, a genius look at this vast aspect of our being is indeed a form of genius, if a neglected one in male-dominated society where male ways of thinking are elevated and the female genius is somewhat devalued.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhPPJ5dolxU]

She seems like a child in that video, so insecure and frightened, but that is the young girl in a nutshell, the source of her wonder and charm.

Here is another one a year later, when she was only 18, from the great Jean – Luc Godard film Made in the USA. It’s popular to bash these avant-garde Europeans like Godard these days, but think about it, without Godard, there is no David Lynch, no?

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPKL3KHE–I&feature=related]

She seems like a completely different person. The other actress, the brunette, is Anna Karina (Anna Karenina?). By her distracted and somewhat annoyed typical vain young woman attitude, you can see why Weininger felt that the female nature was not only amoral but also unconscious.

That the female nature is unconscious is why we males call them airheaded. But they aren’t really airheads at all, they are just living in the World of the Woman. It’s looks stupid and solipsistic to males because we can’t imagine it very well. We have that nature in ourselves, but most straight guys had this distracted pettiness (amorality and calculation) beaten out of us as boys and young men as “being a fag” in the forging process whereby the male-female duality in the iron yet imperfect boy is smelted into the perfect and pure maleness of the steel man.

Marianne Faithful again at age 40, doing the incredible bittersweet Broken English, the song of a middle aged woman who has seen and done it all, singing in a whiskey, cigarettes and cocaine voice. Good counterpart to the young girl innocence of the former. She was using a lot of cocaine during all of these performances in 1979.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-H55V_oma0&feature=related]

Interesting that both songs deal with emotional pain and tears, the first literally, the second by implication.

Otto Weininger on Women (and Jews)

Here we come to another problematic issue, that is female intelligence and genius. The great but toxic Otto Weininger is especially fascinating on this issue. He holds that women are simply incapable of genius. A Jewish convert to Christianity and suicide at age 23, he had a similar low opinion of Jews.

He rented the home in Vienna where Beethoven had died for the night, told the landlady he was not to be disturbed, and wrote two letters, one to his brother and one to his father. He told them both that he was going to kill himself. Then he put a bullet in his heart. This suicide set off several copycat suicides.

This stone closes the resting place of a young man whose mind never really found peace on earth. And after imparting revelations of his mind and soul he could not bear any longer to be among the living. He searched for the death realm of one of the greatest minds that dwelled in the house in Schwarzspanierhause and put an end to his bodily existence.

His book was praised by Wittgenstein, who nevertheless distanced himself from its views. His contributions to philosophy were around the nature of genius. He held that Jews were essentially feminine, as such had were amoral, without a sense of good or evil, and thus as a consequence were soulless. He also held that women were amoral soulless types. Modern decay was traced to the amoral irreligious Jewish/feminine nature of modern times. Weininger correlated femininity with what he called Jewishness.

The Nazis had mixed feelings about Weininger, but Hitler himself said, “Dietrich Eckart once told me that in all his life he had known just one good Jew: Otto Weininger, and he killed himself…”

Though the Nazis denounced his books, they used parts of his work in their propaganda.

His great work was Sex and Character, which made him famous when he was only 23 years old (Incredible!). Yet the number of our brains cells peaks at age 23, so it should not be surprising that great works of genius would be done by the young and indeed in art, poetry, fiction, music, and mathematics, the genius often peaks young.

An example of Weininger’s views of women can be seen here:

Greatness is absent from the nature of the woman and the Jew, the greatness of morality, or the greatness of evil. In the Aryan man, the good and bad principles of Kant’s religious philosophy are ever present, ever in strife. In the Jew and the woman, good and evil are not distinct from one another … It would not be difficult to make a case for the view that the Jew is more saturated with femininity than the Aryan, to such an extent that the most manly Jew is more feminine than the least manly Aryan.

Weininger argues that all humans are composed of both the male and female substance. The female is is passive, unproductive, unconscious and amoral. The male is active, productive, conscious and moral or logical. Female life is consumed with the sexual prerogative – both the act itself, which he coded as simply “prostitution” in marriage or otherwise, and procreation, as birthing and raising children. This is the nature and duty of woman.

The duty of man, a la Nietzsche (sort of) is to forego sexuality and its life-consuming and distracting passions and to strive to become a genius by searching for the love of the absolute, which he will find in himself. For “male” and “female” also code the male and female aspects of the personality.

Weininger certainly gave off some interesting vibes:

Nobody who had once seen his face could ever forget it. The big dome of his forehead marked it. The face was peculiar looking because of the large eyes; the look in them seemed to surround everything. In spite of his youth, his face was not handsome, it was rather ugly. Never did I see him laugh or smile. His face was always dignified and serious.

Only when he was outdoors in spring did it seem to relax, and then become cheerful and bright. At many concerts he would shine with happiness. In the most wonderful moments we spent together, particularly when he talked about an idea in which he was interested, his eyes were filled with happiness.

Otherwise his face was impenetrable. One could never – except to the last few months – find in his face any hint of what was happening deep within his soul. The taut muscles would often move, and sharp wrinkles would appear on his face, as if they were caused by intolerable pain. I asked for the reason, he controlled himself at once, gave a vague or evasive answer, or talked about other matters, making further questioning impossible.

His manners would occasionally elicit surprise, and often a smile, since he cared little for traditions and prejudices.

The influence of his personality seemed strongest at night. His body seemed to grow; there was something ghostlike in his movements and there would be something demoniac in his manner. An when, as happened at times, his conversation became passionate, when he made a movement in the air with his stick or his umbrella as if he were fighting an invisible ghost, one was always reminded of a person from the imaginary circles of E. Th. A. Hofmann.

The Black Genius – Some Thoughts and Examples

There are a few things progressive people can do with regard to differential IQ results. The current results* show US White IQ = 103 and US Black IQ = 89.8. That’s being somewhat generous with Black IQ, as I am wont to do. Others might peg it a couple of points lower, but whatever. There’s about 1 Standard Deviation separating the two scores. I have a feeling that a lot of what people call Black pathology flows right from this I STD.

For instance, when Black and White IQ’s are held constant, Blacks have 2 times the crime rate of Whites. That’s a 10

That right there implies that there is more than IQ causing Black crime. One of the projects of this blog is to quit fucking around with fake liberal/Left BS explanations for Black pathology and to figure out what is really driving this stuff, come Hell or high water.

One problem with the current White nationalist line about Black IQ is that there are way too many smart Blacks. The White nationalist line goes that Blacks are semi-retarded with a IQ of 89.8 (when 88 was the former retarded line and then PC people changed it to 88 and changed retardation to 73, throwing 1/3 of all Blacks out of retardation.

So the line is Blacks Are a Bunch of Retards. We’ve heard this line forever coming out of the Black IQ scores in Africa, which, at average IQ of 70, are in fact retarded. 5

The problem is that when you take these attitudes out into the real world, they don’t really pass the smell test. There are way too many smart Blacks. This is the first problem. So the scores in a way don’t make sense. It’s quite clear to me that Blacks are currently less intelligent than Whites in the US at 1 STD. Whether that’s permanent or not is up is another matter. But to listen to White nationalists, smart Blacks are few and far between.

In Africa, extrapolating from the tests, there might be

The problem is that when you look around at Black Africans, there are quite a few who are very, very smart. I know a fellow from Togo who has a Masters in Computer Science. He used to work for me, and he had that kind of sloppy Black genius, but he’s very smart.

Last I talked to him, he was in France involved with some super-brains at MIT doing cutting edge graduate IT theory work in stuff that I could barely even understand. He was thinking of going for a PhD in Computer Science. I’ve spoken to him, and he’s smart as Hell in all sorts of other ways too. I don’t know what his IQ was, but I was worried it was higher than mine, and I’m smarter than 999/1000 Americans.

I have also heard White nationalists make fancy arguments that because Blacks are so stupid, they have never created any “geniuses on the level of US Whites” and apparently never will. This bothers me.

Suffice to say that while clearly US Blacks are much less intelligent than US Whites, and clearly African Blacks are way too stupid for their own good and we must try to raise their IQ’s as a public emergency issue, in some way, the tests still seem to be underestimating Black intelligence.

Africa is an obvious case. Most Whites with IQ’s below 73 can’t drive a car, work, marry or live independently. They live in group homes and have very limited lives.

Black Africans, with an average IQ 3 points below the retardation level in the US, can drive, marry, have normal friendships, live independently, have children, etc. In short, they are able to function in a normal African society and do not need to be institutionalized, nor should they be institutionalized.

I talked to a lot of these characters when I did anti-scamming work. In some ways they were dumb as rocks, but in other ways they were smart as whips. In one case, we had an American with an IQ of about 76. She was sent in wild circles for months by these 70 IQ Africans with their wild schemes, games, stories and lies such that she was nearly driven nuts. They took for stupid and were running rings around her dumbass brain. Yet the tests say she was smarter than they were. Bullshit.

Long story short, yes, Africans have frighteningly low IQ’s, and many African problems surely flow directly from that. On the other hand, in some weird way, the tests are yet underestimating Black African IQ.

In the US, yes, Blacks are 1 STD lower in IQ than So many things, obviously, first of all, the achievement gap, flow directly from this fact. On the other hand, extrapolating out from these scores, we realize that there are should not be that many smart Blacks.

Yet, curiously, there seem to be way too many smart Blacks around than the stats would suggest. Alpha Unit, Car Guy and tulio types (commenters and writers on the site) should be quite rare, in fact, once you start looking around, it seems like they are everywhere, even in the Abagondsphere. Turn on Pacifica, and it’s full of smart Blacks. Way too many.

Something doesn’t make sense. Maybe it’s the Flynn Effect. According to the Flynn Effect of rising IQ’s in the US, your average Black today has the same IQ as the average White in 1960. That’s stunning, and doesn’t seem to make sense on so many levels, but the facts are true. In fact, James Flynn himself has verified that truth to me.

If Blacks are as smart as 1960 Whites, why are they so fucked up, and why can’t they create the 1960 White America? Once again, things don’t make sense. My conclusion is that it’s possible that US Blacks are perfectly capable of creating 1960 White America, it’s just that they are fucking up. Why, I have no idea, but you’ve seen the figures. Whatever reasons for them, lack of brains is not one of them. The conclusion is that Blacks are screwing up and need to get off the dime and get their shit together.

That Blacks have the same as 1960 Whites makes sense to me looking at my blog, at the blogosphere, and tuning in to Pacifica. There are way too many smart Blacks for the scores to make sense. But the intuitive reality makes sense if the entire scale has been flying upward with time. The old low is the new average. The old average is the new bright. We’re getting smarter, though Idiot Culture would seem to argue against that.

So we finally work our way back to the Black genius. if Black brains really are different on average (I say they are) then the Black genius will look different from the White genius. We may see this in a WN way of the Black genius is not even a genius, just a mediocrity, but that doesn’t seem to add up.

Black ideologues have long had the rather racist notion that Blacks have some particular thinking style that is not picked up on IQ tests and hence the tests are biased. I think this is nonsense in a way that it denies the realities of intelligence differences, but in a weird way, they may be onto something. As a race realist, I would go further and say that in fact Black brains are different on average from White brains. So Black intelligence and Black genius looks somewhat different from White genius.

To Whites, even some very smart Blacks seem sort of stupid due to sloppiness.

Their brain is going like a wild pinball machines, analogies, puns and references bouncing off each other like wild, but then there are spelling and punctuation errors and other fuckups. You call them on it, and the Black genius doesn’t seem to care. His brain’s going a mile a minute, all this genius stuff is pouring out like water over a broken dam, and Hell with the small stuff, errors and bullshit.

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is a good example of the Black genius. Here is his webpage. I wrote him a while back, offering to copy-edit his stuff, but in that Black either too proud of don’t give a fuck way, he never wrote back.

Here are two videos of two other Black geniuses.

One is Cornel West, the stunningly brilliant Black academic. The other is Micheal Eric Dyson, another incredible Black academic. This is where WN’s infuriate me. Both of these guys, especially West, are flat out top notch thinkers. I think West is up there with Tolstoy, Dante and Plato as a thinker.

Modern White philosophers leave me cold because I can’t understand them. West breaks all that BS down into street lingo that almost the average Black on the street could sort of figure it out. Watching his mind is facscinating. It’s like watchign a Coltrane jazz solo. It’s got to be the Black genius. Furthermore, think about.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1Q6v1xsvcI&feature=related]

The other is Michael Eric Dyson. Once again, the archetypal Black genius, brain as a pinball machine thing. He’s more like a great rapper than great Black jazz musician, but it’s more or less the same thing.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhrRrlbiVRA]

How many Whites think like these guys? Not many.

Many very smart Blacks do not display the typical Black genius. Acculturated in White society, they don’t sound a lot different from Whites.

*Setting US IQ at 100.

Great Decision on Gay Marriage

A federal court recently ruled that California’s gay marriage Proposition 8 is unconstitutional. That’s the right decision. However, I’m worried that by pushing this right now, all gay rights folks are doing is making working class and middle class Whites vote Republican.

I support gay marriage 10

Bisexuality is different, but if there are guys who are as turned on by guys as they are by women, wow, I would have a hard time turning that down myself. I don’t do that stuff not so much due to moral reasons, but mostly because I’m simply barely interested and mostly disgusted by the idea.

Lesbians, who cares? I actual support gay campaigns, mostly around this gay marriage thing. I used to give money for AIDS research. I support the normative gay political agenda, pretty much in its entirety.

Where I part company with them is on situational homosexuality, normalization of situational homosexuality, gay pride parades which are public displays of depravity, sex in public and public restrooms, and other outrages.

Plus I don’t really want these guys around me, though I do have one friend who is gay. I don’t like them around me because they won’t stop trying to have sex with me, and they are continuing to do this to this very day. A very good looking 26 year old man was recently after me. I wish beautiful 26 year old women were as available at my age!

I used to know this guy named Al Renner. We worked for California NORML on the pot campaign back in the 1980’s. He was gay, but he totally respected me for being straight (I guess he assumed I was) and he never made moves on me or anything. I have the utmost respect for that man. Plus he was totally committed to pot, so I respected him for that. A real committed political activist. We never discussed his gay shit. We just talked about pot and dope.

Three Types of Genius, Male, Female and Black

New commenter LaFleur, a great combination of a Leftist working class person who has had it with anti-White crap, Cultural Marxism and illegal immigration, had everyone fooled.

I was worst of all. I was sure she was a man. I still almost can’t believe it’s a woman, though I think I should, since she just said she is. She does have a masculine writing and even thinking style, which is good, since I’m a chauvinist. I think there is a male genius and a female genius. LaFleur tends to show more of the male genius in her interesting mind. The classical female genius is like a couple of women who are hosts on the radio show I listen to. One is named Caroline Casey. I forget the other one. They both sort of wander about as they talk, but their brilliant. As they wander, there is a lot of talk about emotions, a lot of tangential stuff. It’s awesome, it’s genius, but it’s not male style. Male style is boom boom boom point 1 point 2 point 3 conclusion. Onto the next! It’s much more logical in a scientific or Socratic kind of way, not as tangential. I’m not really sure one is better than the other. They’re just different.

I also think there is a Black genius. You see it in Michael Eric Dyson and especially in Cornel West. It’s almost like intellectual rapping. Cornel West is an utter flat out genius, but it’s not a White way of thinking. It jumps around a lot too, like a jazz solo or a great rapper, and it can be sort of sloppy, but it’s also sort of male in its logic and power. Bam bam bam bam ba-boom!

The female genius kind of wanders around like this great river spreading out into this 100 mile, no round estuary where you can’t even find your way. It’s brilliant, but it meanders about in a jaunty or even loopy way.

Just some of my piggy and race realist feelings.

Women, Men and Racial Loyalty

tulio asks:

Here’s another question. Is the stigma just as strong amongst White females? It’d be best to hear an answer from one of them, but I don’t think too many White females post in here. Do they ostracize one of their own the same way White men do? Like would a White woman who is married to a White man refuse to make friends with a White woman who is married to a Black man? I’m sure some do, but how widespread is it, I wonder? Is there a White sisterhood that also expels White women who like the brothas?

I think a lot of this stuff comes from the men. White men consider themselves superior to Black men across the board. It’s always been that way and still is. So the ultimate slap in the face to him is to see one of his own women prefer not only a guy he considers inferior, but from the race he considers MOST inferior. It’s totally a male ego thing I believe, and if it’s true that this sentiment is much less pronounced amongst White females, then that makes the case even more plausible.

I don’t think women do this stuff to their sisters, but I could be wrong. With women, it’s all about who you love. If her friend falls in love with a Black guy, well, hey, it’s wonderful, and you support her. If it didn’t work out, well, it’s sad, but he was bad, and she was just following her heart.

Women simply don’t have racial loyalty like men do. Men don’t really either, but they often at least won’t breed with the other races. They will just have fun with them. I actually know some insanely racist WN Nazis who are sex maniacs, and they have actually told me that they would bed a non-White hottie, just never marry or have kids with one. But women will actually marry out of our race and stir up the nice clean White gene pool. That’s why we need to police them and keep them in line.

Even White women who would never touch a Black will support her friend’s decision to go with a Black guy. It’s all about the sisterhood. It’s about finding a guy and breeding with him during her reproductive years. If your BFF found and bred with a Black guy who then left her, well, that’s sad, but it’s her decision, and she was following her heart and her biological clock. With women, it’s all about whoever you fall in love with (chance – could be different race or even either gender).

Ordinarily, it’s about finding a man, mating, and breeding in that short time span. A woman doesn’t have much time, and her options are limited. If she found a Black guy, hey, it was meant to be.

Men are much more into this racial loyalty/ethnic nationalism stuff than women. They’ve always punished women for sleeping outside the race while letting the men do it if they wanted to.

In Medieval Spain, if a Jewish woman had sex with a Gentile man and was caught, the rabbinical courts (who had jurisdiction over this matter) would sentence her to having her nose cut off. In this way, Jewish women were kept in line. Jewish men would have sex with Gentile women. Any children were lost to the Jews anyway.

But the Jewish women had to breed pure and true with Jewish men. That’s why the line was judged matrilineally. You always know who your mother is, but you might not know who your father is. If your mother was a Jew, you’re a Jew.

Ethnocentrism Yes, Ethnic Nationalism No?

A commenter asks how one can be ethnocentric whilst rejecting the ethnic nationalism that seems to naturally grow out of it as a branch from a trunk:

Ethnocentrism seems to walk a fine line with Ethnic Nationalism IMO; how have you been navigating this line?

All humans are naturally ethnocentric. Just Whites have had it beaten out of us lately. I was a race-denying White self-hater PC posturing Whiteness Studies “Whites are inferior LOL” type for decades. I thought it was cool and hip. Then I moved to an Hispanic city and felt what it’s like to be a minority. I started waking up every morning thinking, “Thank GOD for making me White!” It sure feels better!

Ethnic nationalism is a bunch of shit, obviously. I still hate it. But as a natural outgrowth of perfectly human ethnocentrism, it’s unfortunately a phase of normal. But then so’s fascism. Read the original Left theorists on fascism from the 1930’s. The menace of fascism is that it taps into such basic human needs and roots. The fascist is simply the “ordinary man.” The “shirtless ones” under Peron. This is what makes it so dangerous, it’s potential popularity.

Same with ethnic nationalism. It’s like crime and wife-beating. Normal for humans (part of our natural behavior), but you have to fight it anyway.

I don’t begrudge these White nationalists, for instance, as some kind of freaks. They’re engaging in a quite normal human project for any race. I oppose it because I’m against it, not because it’s abnormal. It’s not abnormal at all, and that’s why it’s a bit scary. If anything’s abnormal, it’s race denial and self-hatred.

The Scarlet Letter of Modern White Society

It’s not a red A but a red B that many White women must wear in White society. It means she dates Blacks, and to many White men, she’s no longer White. If you look White and you act White, you’re White. These women have broken the second rule. Though they look perfectly White, they no longer act White, so they have been expelled from Whiteness.

An Asian commenter who is upset about Asian women dating White men and abandoning their race was somewhat comforted when I told him that we White guys, to a lesser extent, deal with the same silliness from our women:

Rob, so you’re saying that a white woman will, if she’s going to outmarry, choose an unemployed ghetto hoodlum over an Asian guy who makes good money from a software engineering company?

Of course. But mostly she won’t marry him, she’ll just date and sleep with him. But she won’t give the Asian guy the time of day.

Don’t lose any sleep over it. Why do women do this? Because they basically suck. Just recognize that women suck, accept it, accept that there is nothing you can do about it, and then you will be happier and start to feel a lot more peaceful.

What much of White society does, even White racial liberals, White liberals and White Leftists, is draw the line at White women who date Blacks. For a lot of White men, that’s a supreme violation, and White women who do that are excised from the White race. I know many White men who tell me that they will not touch a White women who they know has a thing for Blacks. In this way, even liberal White society is still quite racist.

I actually don’t mind this too much, but I don’t practice it myself. It’s OK because it disciplines our women. I think we should allow them to date tulio and Car Guy (commenters on the site) type Blacks no problem, but when it comes to the ubiquitous more or less Black thug/semi-thug type, the shunning is a great idea.

Most of these White guys don’t lose any sleep over the issue. They tell me, “I don’t care about White women who go with Blacks. It’s only a certain type, and most don’t do that. To me, those women are simply lost to us, and I won’t touch them, so they don’t worry me one bit.”

These guys simply expel these White women from the White race, move on, and don’t get all upset it. Maybe it’s something Asian guys should consider?

Truth is it’s a certain type of White women who likes Blacks. Obviously, she’s the polar opposite of the Jewish/Asian women selecting for Einsteins. The White woman who likes Blacks likes jock type guys. A lot of women like jocks. Blacks are the ultimate jocks. But a lot of White women don’t go for the jock type, so this interracial dating is somewhat limited.

Black guys go on and on about how much better they are in bed than White women and how they treat White women better. I think that’s a bunch of shit. How many different ways are there to penetrate a vagina? What’s involved? Is it some sort of an Olympic sport?

So I won’t grant them that one, plus for sure they don’t treat White women better. In general, they’re abusive, controlling, possessive, and super-aggro. Lot of sick chicks like that. That’s called a masochistic woman. Leave the sickos to their neuroses.

In deference to Black men’s egos, I will say that they are better than Whites in a couple of ways:

1. Sports! Yes, they’re the ultimate jocks, and if there were as many jobs in sports as there are in White collar jobs, Blacks guys would be cleaning up and living large, that is if they didn’t blow every paycheck as soon as it hit their palms. But give credit where it’s due.

2. Rap! Yep, Black men are the ultimate talkers and the world’s premier charmers and bullshitters. Women are pretty stupid (as in gullible), and they are always falling for charming liars and sweet-talkers. Black men probably tell White women what they want to hear. They talk the talk. Women like that. They fall for the talk, even if the guy’s an abusive semi-thug.

Also, a White woman is a jackpot for a Black man. Even an unattractive or fat one will be treated like a queen because he’s so happy to have her. Homely and fat White women are everywhere in White society.

Most White women in their teens and 20’s are going for the Alphas. The Alphas are ~1

Plus no matter how fat or homely they are, like all women, they want to be worshiped like Jackie Onassis. Most White guys, if they get with a fat or homely woman like this, will say, “Hey, you’re ugly! LOL! To make things even worse, you’re fat! LMAO! Now get over on that bed right now.” This is the painful and crushing truth, and if you are a fat or homely woman, you should expect to be treated this way. But being treated like this makes these women angry.

A Black guy will treat even fat and homely White women like they are angels fallen from Heaven.

Another thing going on here is revenge. I have a Yahoo group that is full of single adults. Many are middle aged.

At one point, the group was full of angry single middle-aged White women. They were furious at White men, livid with rage, and like most women, they didn’t make sense.

They particularly hated macho White guys, and they took an ultra-feminist stance. They belittled, attacked, and castrated the White men in the group. Whole mobs of them engaged in regular episodes of what they called “ball-busting” of White men. They were also furious that White men were macho pigs who did not treat women right. Later I found out that a huge number of these women were dating Black men. Who, of course, treat them much worse than we do.

None of this female behavior makes much sense, but women are unfathomable in the best of times.

The 13% Solution: A Modest Proposal?

In the comments, Abiezer Coppe proposes a unique solution to the “Black problem” in US society:

I’m a White integrationist. I’m for integration to the extent that I feel whites in White countries should marry blacks to the extent that the blacks die out as a separate entity. That’s a very blunt way of putting it. Whites would also die out as a separate entity. we’d have “mixité”, a genuinely mixed race society.

If I went to live in Senegal I would expect to learn Wolof and integrate, live by the values if the majority Black society, not hang out in a ghetto of ex-colonial White French people, marry a Senegalese Black girl, and have lovely coffee coloured children. Egalité, Fraternité, Mixité….

Of course in reality this racial mixing is totally impractical. I wouldn’t force it on anyone. A milder version on the integrationist approach is that Blacks integrate with the values of the majority. For this reason I accept the French position on making the wearing of the hijab in public illegal. Black French Muslim women have to abide by the secular values of the French White majority.

Black intermarriage would enrich the white gene pool. Imagine if the USA was mostly White people, but instead of 1

We would benefit from Black genes. Pure white people would also disappear. The more racial mixing the better. Mixed race people benefit from the strengths of both racial groups. That always been my view. So we’d all end a light shade of khaki, or slightly olive skinned. So what?

Black ghettos are a terrible thing in White countries. Any kind of racial segregation is. Brixton is partly Black ghetto. It can breed hatred, envy. To be honest I don’t really like living in all White city either. I’d prefer a mixture.

Leicester is a great city. I really like going there. It’s very vibrant culturally, and racial conflict seems to be minimal. But then it”s 3

On the question of differential and lower Black intellectual ability, and its inheritability, I remain agnostic because I haven’t seen the evidence.

The Blacks I’ve met have all been very bright – PhD types – with the exception of the Trinidadian woman friend I know, who isn’t intellectual at all. She’s affectionate and sexy as hell though. I would. She always has white boyfriends. She’s figured it out. She goes for White men because in her experience they (we) are more civilised and treat her better than her own kind.

She had two Black (one from Ghana, one from Trinidad) husbands before that. They both abused her and were violent. Anecdotal, I know…

Korean, Japanese and Chinese IQ is all ~108. Highest for any major racial group. Vietnamese IQ is quite high – ~102.5, probably due to Chinese admixture. (Both figures setting US White IQ at 103).

I’m not sure what to say about this except that it’s already been done in the Arab World in places like Libya, Tunisia and Algeria. The Berbers are precisely 1

Mexico and Argentina adopted a

Mexico also had a significant number of Blacks, mostly on the Caribbean Coast. Mexicans will tell you that they mysteriously vanished into thin air, but the truth is that the average Mexican nowadays is

White nationalists go ballistic at proposals like this, calling them White genocide. I’m not sure it matters. They also say that the breeding in would not be across the board, and that Colorism a la Brazil would replace racism.

Other WN’s would talk about severe damage to the White gene pool, especially the White IQ. It’s hard to say what the effects on White genes would be. I suspect that there might be a ~

Radical Blacks like the Abagond*-Ankheson Mie types would probably be furious and see this as Black genocide, but it would solve a lot of Black problems, albeit by making the group pretty much vanish.

*I hate to keep bringing up this guy’s name. Maybe I should call it the Abagondsphere. Suffice to say he’s not alone. There is a gigantic section of the Black blogosphere, including bloggers, commenters and readers, all linking to each other continuously, who sound just like this guy. Their whole playbook comes out of  Tim Wise Whiteness Studies Critical Race Theory stuff.

It’s hard to characterize them, but in general, these are educated, intelligent Blacks, often with good incomes. They often have a college education, and it’s not unusual for them to even have advanced degrees like Masters and PhD’s. They often make very good money. It’s almost like the more degrees they have and the more money they make, the angrier, whinier and more grudge-like and CRT-pitching they get.

As a good rule, you don’t hear regular Black people talk like this. I have Black neighbors all around me, and they know nothing of this nonsense. Your average working class type or even Underclass Black doesn’t think much about Whites. Here, they all hang out with Hispanics and Whites. If you’re nice to them, they’re nice to you. They hardly ever talk about White people. They see me wearing my Obama tshirt with my Obama bumper sticker and they run up to me and hug me.

Or they come up to me and talk about Tea Partiers. “You see these racist Tea Partiers? Can you believe that?” I’ll imitate Paul Mooney and say something like, “Yeah, fuck those crackers. Hell with those honkies. Those silly White people. They hatin’ on Obama. It’s all because he’s Black.” And they give me a high five.

They aren’t ingrates at all.

East Germans Getting Nostalgic For Socialism

Repost from the old site.

Although there were reportedly some serious problems with East German socialism (the Trabant, the ubiquitous vehicle, was a piece of junk), with the recent chaos in world capitalism, many East Germans are now saying that they would rather have socialism than capitalism. A recent survey found that 5

Sales of Marx’s Das Kapital have tripled since last year and increased 100X since 1990, although sales as a whole remain low. The publisher expressed amazement and said that he never thought the book would sell well again. He said that even bankers and managers are reading it to try to figure out what’s going in with the turmoil in capitalist economics.

The switch from socialism to capitalism has not worked out very well in the East. Unemployment and poverty are very high. The outskirts of Berlin, Leipzig and the Baltic shore and doing well, but the rest of the region is doing poorly. It’s actually suffering depopulation.

One of the problems with East Germany was that the factories were really not competitive by Western standards. After reunification, they were bought by Western competitors and shut down. That seems devious. The Left Party, a genuine Leftist party, now has 3

One serious problem with Communism has been that, although in general it got rid of poverty, it was unable to provide more than a low standard of living. Nowadays, for better or worse, people want stuff. They don’t want empty stores, lines, shortages and crappy products. Social capital only goes so far with people. This is going to be a real challenge for modern socialists.

In addition, there was often great economic growth for decades, but then it all bogged down into bureaucracy. Another vexing problem to be dealt with.

James Flynn on America

Repost from the old site.

James Flynn is an Emeritus Professor of Political Studies at the University of Otago in New Zealand. He has also done a lot of work on the Flynn Effect, which shows IQ’s rising all over the world in the past 80 years for unknown reasons. We’ve written about at a lot on this blog.

For reasons that remain unknown to me, White nationalists (almost all of whom are just White racists really) are driven into a frenzy by the mention of Flynn’s name. I find this very mystifying.

First of all, White nationalists insist that Blacks are defective, and present a lot of evidence indicating that Blacks as a group do have a lot of problems and that this group does do a disproportionate amount of damage to society. All of this is noncontroversial to anyone whose brain has not been turned to mush by political correctness.

Low IQ is frequently cited by White nationalists as one of the reasons for Black dysfunction and the resulting serious problems inflicted on society.

Other reasons are given too, but all of these are chalked up to genetics for some odd reason. It’s an odd White nationalist who thinks culture or environment is behind Black pathologies. Fair enough.

But when someone like Flynn comes forward and notes that Blacks have gotten dramatically more intelligent in the past 80 years, White nationalists for the most part just go ballistic and see red. Why?

If Black dysfunction really is caused by low IQ, and these problems cause massive damage to society, would it not be better for Blacks, White racists and everyone else for the Black IQ to go up, and problems resulting from the low IQ to diminish? Sure, right?

Think again. White nationalists are furious at the notion that the Black IQ is rising. Almost nothing sends them battier.

This is very strange. It implies, despite all of their rhetoric, that White nationalists really do not have the best interests of Blacks at heart. They don’t want Blacks to get smarter, better, or less dysfunctional. The more fucked up, stupid, violent and criminal Black people are, the more joyous White nationalists are.

Wow.

Excuse me, but what a bunch of cruel, perverse assholes White nationalists are! You bitch that Blacks are incompetent, violent idiots, but that’s just the way you want them to be. If that’s the case, then maybe you just deserve to live with them and their messes after all?

There must be some other motivation here. The only thing that makes sense is a hoary cliche that I usually don’t consider.

White nationalists want Blacks to be stupid, dumb and fucked up because that way White nationalists can feel superior to Blacks.

White nationalists are the insecure punks from high school rejoicing in the failures of their rivals. White nationalists have an emotional investment in feeling superior to other races, and anything that suggests that the folks they dislike are gaining some ground in the footrace sends them into conniptions.

Sheesh. How petty and childish can you get? As long as this is what really motivates White nationalists, I’d say they have no right to diss Blacks for being pathological. Looks like White nationalists are plenty pathological themselves. We need to feel better than others because we’re a bunch of insecure weenies! Waaa waaa!

Grow up.

Anyway, Flynn has a very good article on the stupidity and uselessness of US liberalism from a sane First World point of view. He points out quite well what a bunch of political morons we are. But if the Democrats took up Flynn’s philosophy, they would get massacred. America is a center-right to conservative society at best, and liberal pikers like Obama are the best we can do.

Flynn also talks about US Blacks. He points out that between the ages of 25-45, there are only 57 Black men likely to be permanent (or even semi-permanent) partners for every 100 Black women. Sure, Black women could marry out, but few non-Black men want them. If you’re a Black female, you either have a kid out of wedlock with some Black loser, or you forego now and forever your chance to have a kid.

I think that most people have a right to have kids. As such, it’s reasonable that Black women are going to figure out a way to become mothers one way or another. That’s reasonable. I’ve made this argument to some White “liberal” Americans and they frowned. “Having kids isn’t all it’s cracked up to be,” a mother of four (!) grimaced. Hmm.

Flynn points out that for every 100 Hispanic women, there are 96 promising males, hence their single parenthood rate is 5

Niggers* and Beaners* Wrecked the Economy

Repost from the old site.

White nationalists have advanced the extremely racist argument that Blacks and Hispanics are responsible for blowing up the economy with the latest subprime mortgage meltdown, which has taken out titans in the insurance and brokerage industry. Lehman Brothers, the 3rd largest brokerage firm on Earth, was allowed to implode.

AIG, one of the world’s largest insurance companies, was about to go bankrupt until socialism stepped in, as the Bush Administration bought an 8

AIG went down because they insured the subprime securities that investors bought against going bad. Yes, you can buy insurance on your stocks, bonds, derivatives and other financial crap. Amazing, huh?

It remains to be seen whether an $85 billion bailout of AIG is a good bargain for taxpayers. It seems that we are investing public money in this mountain of AIG’s losses, no? How is the public supposed to benefit from this?

AIG investors are now scrambling around trying to figure out a way to pay back that debt in order to ward off a government socialist buyout of 8

Meanwhile, even after the bailout, AIG’s stock is still being pounded into the dirt. I guess that bailout didn’t make anyone happier about AIG stock. Everyone exposed to AIG stock in the form of pensions and other funds is scrambling to get out from under the avalanche. Pension funds are suing AIG for wiping out their holdings.

Do you own an AIG insurance policy? That’s not worth much, if you ask me. States are now “reassuring” policyholders. I’d be canceling that toxic policy in a New York minute.

I do not agree with the White Nationalist racist argument that niggers* and beaners* blew up the economy.

They apparently got this argument for articles like this Village Voice piece. However, if you read the piece carefully, it does not support the WN argument at all.

Under the cover of anti-racism, Andrew Cuomo and the rest of the Clinton criminals gave the industry what it wanted – loosened regulations on whom they could loan to. “It is also worth remembering that the motive for this bipartisan ownership expansion probably had more to do with the legion of lobbyists working for lenders, brokers, and Wall Street than an effort to walk in MLK’s footsteps”, as the article notes.

Note that the Bush Republicans did not overturn a single one of Cuomo’s “anti-racist” loosening of standards. Furthermore, as I read the article, there was no federal “mandate to loan to more Black and Brown poor people.”

This argument makes it seem like Evil Big Government liberals forced prudent bankers to make loans to non-White deadbeats that they knew would go bad, loans that they themselves did not want to make. This is not the case.

The debt was already being sold and resold all over the place, and, as the article notes, even if the borrower defaulted, that was no big deal either, as they would just resell the home. Lots of money to be made all around on every step of the chain, even if the borrower defaults.

The latest insanity, where Joe Public gets to bail out a bunch of gambler criminals, is truly horrible. Basically, you and me will be forced to buy up all this bad debt from a bunch of white collar crooks, debt that is nearly worthless. For this worthless debt, we will fork over $1 trillion for a pile of stinking garbage.

Further, the crooks are absolved of all of their losses at the Mortgage Casino and free to go gamble away again. This means we are setting ourselves for this situation to recur over and over, and as long as the public bails out all losses and guarantees all gains, there is zero motivation to be prudent. Wow, isn’t neoliberal capitalism a great system!

Incredibly, both parties, from the most liberal of Democrats to the most conservative of Republicans, got in on this bullshit. A particularly horrible feature of the plan that the “liberals” went along with is that there are to be no new regulations whatsoever on the financial industry. Gotta love those liberal Dems!

In this way, corporate criminals get to make all of the money they can with this sort of gambling, but then when they start losing money, you and me have to bail them out. What a bunch of fucking shit!

That’s like giving me a credit card to go to the casino and I get to keep all of my winnings and any time I lose money, you all get to pay me back so I can go to the casino tomorrow. I like that deal! Let’s set it up now!

*Used sardonically

Evolution of High IQ’s in Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese

A commenter asks the reason for the high IQ’s of Ashkenazi Jews:

What accounts for the higher Ashkenazi IQ? Is it from living in a cold climate in eastern Europe instead of in their original sunny Mediterranean homeland? Or perhaps Slavic genes?

Apparently selection. When the Ashkenazim went to Europe, Talmudic Judaism unfolded around 1000 CE or so, and in order to be a Jew, a man had to read the Talmud and the Torah in full and study it all the time. That’s hard to do, and a lot of men couldn’t hack it. If you could not hack it, you left the community and converted to Christianity. The only ones that stayed were the smart ones.

After a while, they developed a preference for brains like the Chinese have. The Jewish girls would all fight each other to marry the smartest boy in the village, as he was seen as the best catch. Rabbis would have contests where they would invite all the young men around and ask them these convoluted Talmudic questions that might take a day or so to figure out. After a day, he comes back, and all the guys compete to answer the question. Whoever has the best answer (the smartest guy) gets the rabbi’s hottie daughter.

One reason I’m a Judeophile is because I like Jewish chicks. They often like me too, because I’m a brain. Another reason anti-Semitism is stupid is because Jews obviously have a better culture than we do. Jews value brains and possibly even sexually select for it via their women (their women sexually select for the brightest men). American women value near-retardation, tattoos, and monosyllabic, double digit IQ brutes. Conclusion? Jews are superior to White Gentiles.

Chinese society may be similar. I was reading a lot about China for a recent article, and I came across a couple of stunning anecdotes.

The first was about a creative writing class for adults that was held in some rural city. There were all women in the class and only a few guys. One of the men was clearly the best writer in the class. So naturally, all the single Chinese women were fighting over him!

He would go back to his room to read and write, and all the Chinese female students would make up these BS excuses to come to his room and ask him fake “student questions.” By the end of the class, one woman finally landed the guy, and she was the envy of all the others. The women were competing for the smartest man!

Another anecdote told of a village in rural Southern China. One young man was said to be the smartest guy in the whole village. I don’t know what he looked like. Anyway, every hot young Chinese chick in the village wanted him. He was the prize man of the village, and they were all fighting over him. Once again, all the women fighting over the smartest guy!

This is one reason I’m a Rice King. Asian chicks love smart guys. I remember one time I got involved with this Chinese woman. She was always saying, in awe, “You’re so smaaaart.” She was a typical Chinese, no dummy at all. I listened to her say that, and I thought, “You know, no White woman would ever say that to me, especially in that tone.”

Apparently centuries of this sort of thing has resulted in very high IQ’s for both the Chinese  and the Ashkenazi Jews. The Chinese IQ is 108, and the Ashkenazi Jewish IQ is ~119. In Zhejiang Province on the Chinese coast, the average IQ is 118.5, as high as the Ashkenazi Jewish IQ.

Total opposite of this idiot society we have now where the smarter you are, the less likely you are to get a date, and the more women hate you. The dumber you are, the more women want you. We have truly evolved a retarded society nowadays.

In White society, the more tattoo-covered and monosyllabic you are, and bigger your Harley is, the more stupid White women want you. In Hispanic society, tattoos, gang membership, criminal behavior, sociopathy and a prison record gets you the hottest chicks. In Black society, rims, grills, tats, a Cadillac, gang membership, a drug dealing enterprise and a rap label contract lands you the best women.

You could excuse young women for this nonsense, because young people in general are stupid, but unfortunately, there’s evidence that this continues through life, even into middle age from what I can tell. American women and American society are quite hopeless. Tarded to the depths.

If you think this website is valuable to you, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site.

The Role of Jews in the Left and Communism in the 20th Century

A commenter asks why there are so many Jews in the Communist Party USA. When I was getting their newspaper in 1998, it was stacked with Jews from top to bottom.

Don’t they know the the USSR effectively turned anti-Jewish starting from 1948? And being the most privileged elite group in America, what do they have to gain by being in the CPUSA?

Jews are very leftwing people. A lot of them are liberals, socialists, Leftists or out and out Communists. As far as why this is, much ink has been expended. You are urged to look into it yourself, and see what you can come up with. This is one of the Fascist Right’s main arguments against Jews – that they are a bunch of Commies. That’s why Hitler and the other fascists killed 6 million Jews in the Holocaust, to wipe out Judeo-Bolshevism.

The White nationalist Right and the Kevin MacDonald types continue to recycle this meme about Commie Jews who hate Whites and kill Whites. They go on and on about Bolshevik Jews who murdered 20-110 million Russian Christians, or some shit like that. This is the Czarist and fascist Solzhenitzen’s beef against Jews – they’re a bunch of Commies. Or they bring up Bela Kun. Or the German Communists in 1919-1920. Or the Polish Communists. Or on and on.

That’s one of the reasons I am a Judeophile. Jews are my comrades. They are one of the most Leftist ethnic groups that ever lived, and they played a great role in the development of the Left from 1850-on, a role that continues to this day.

There’s nothing great about Stalin turning anti-Jewish at the end, just more Stalinist paranoia and murder. The Jews built the Bolshevik state up from nothing. They created the state that Stalin ruled.

Most modern-day Stalinists and Communists are actually pro-Jewish, especially the ones in the Russia nowadays. Remember that Stalin made anti-Semitism illegal in 1926, and made the punishment the death penalty. I’m glad he did that! Plus he married some Jewish women and had some Jewish mistresses. He didn’t hate Jews at all; it’s a bunch of anti-Semitic wishful thinking shit.

Ilya Ehrenberg, a Jew, was Stalin’s chief propagandist in WW2. He wrote, “You’re either an anti-Semite or anti-Nazi, there is no middle ground.” He drew the line in the sand, and I still agree with that line.

The fascists still hate Ehrenberg with a passion so hot it could smelt iron. Go over to Stormfront and praise Ilya Ehrenberg, and they will probably try to lynch you on the spot.

OCD Versus Sexual Sadism, Pedophilia and Sociopathy

I’m not sure if I should post a link to this topic, because I don’t want people flooding over to the OCD forums to bother these people. These folks are suffering from a form of OCD that focuses on worrying that they are a pedophile. I will quote the site later on in the post after some expository material.

I wrote some articles about the subject, so I get a lot of emails from these folks, and I do a lot of counseling with them.

Not bragging, but they often tell me I’ve done a better job than their licensed therapists.

One guy was a millionaire who had been hiring the best psychologists and psychiatrists in the country. He was paying some guy $500/hour 3 times a week for a year or so. A couple of hours with me on the phone, and he got better than he had with the super-priced therapist in a year. Also, the psychiatrists had dx’d him as psychotic and put him on antipsychotics. I quickly figured out he was psychotic and told him so. All I saw was OCD plus some depression.

He had developed a particularly nasty form of OCD called “Harm OCD” where they worry that they are going to commit an act of violence. I don’t know if they ever act on it. Maybe there was a case or two, but I’ve never heard of a real case. So I just assume that they are harmless. Most folks are seriously freaked out about this OCD form too and think these folks are dangerous. The statistics show that actually people with OCD are the least likely to commit any act of criminal violence.

I just treat them like they are harmless and let it go at that. I even laugh at them when they tell me they are afraid they’re going to kill someone. It’s ridiculous. The millionaire, after two hours with me on the phone, finally got out of his house for the first time in four years. Actually, that’s an exaggeration, but you get the picture. I simply told him he was harmless, was never going to act on it, and to quit worrying.

I think I also gave him the Knife Therapy. I told him to put a legal knife in his pocket and go into a bunch of stores and whatnot, walking all around town with the knife. After a while, you’re not whipping out the knife and killing anyone, so you start to get over the fear.

I had one guy with Harm OCD who was a dwarf. I used to make fun of him and say, “What are you going to do, reach up and stab someone in the knee?” It’s good to ridicule the disorder and make fun of them because most people, including therapists, are freaking out on these people, and that just makes them worse.

This guy was also starting to get sadistic and pedophilic fantasies and imagery interfering with his masturbatory fantasies. He didn’t have a partner, so he masturbated. As he did so, fantasies of murder, torture, pedophilia, etc. intruded as intrusive thoughts.

Unfortunately, this is a pretty common complication, especially in young men. The main thing is that the OCD stuff is intrusive, that’s how you can tell it’s not normal. But they get upset about it because now the weird stuff is getting tied in with sexual arousal, and they can’t figure out if it turns them on or not.

There are lots of folks who get off on sadistic stuff. We call them Sexual Sadists. They’re quite common, especially in the gay male community. For straights, sexual sadism, like all paraphilias, begins in adolescence. They enjoy it and get off on it, the same way normal guys get off Raquel Welch or whoever. It feels natural, normal, like it’s a regular part of themselves. The fantasies are not intrusive. They feel just like any guy’s normal sexual fantasies. Do you try to stop those?

They like it! They don’t really want to stop thinking about it, because it’s too much fun. Sexual Sadism is a problem of desire. OCD is a problem of fear.

That’s the difference. Most sexual sadists are not dangerous, but a few of them are. Sometimes it escalates, and the sadist might start worrying that it’s getting out of control and he’s really going to hurt someone one of these times.

The differential diagnosis between Harm OCD and sociopathy is quite simple.

The sociopath loves to think about hurting or killing people. Serial killer types go around all day long thinking about little else. They don’t feel bad about the thoughts, and they never try to stop them. If they are out around the town all day, and if they like to kill say young women, they will be looking at every young woman they see and fantasizing about how they are going to capture, torture, rape and kill her.

They may not carry the acts out, mostly because they’re afraid that they might get caught. But they can’t see anything wrong torturing, raping and murdering people for fun. It’s simply their idea of a good time. Since they don’t see anything wrong with mayhem, they never show up in therapy and never ask for help. Sociopathy is a problem of lack of morality. OCD is a problem of fear.

Pedophilia is a tough case because it’s so confusing. Most child molesters are true pedophiles, that is, they prefer sex with children over sex with adults. Most of them don’t like sex with adults at all or at least not much.

There’s a website that profiles pedophiles here. It’s clear, looking through those histories, that this once again is a problem of desire. Pedophilia is a problem of desire. OCD is a problem of fear.

These guys have almost all gotten off preferentially on kid stuff since adolescence. They’re interested in adults only a little, or not at all.

They are almost all extremely happy to be pedophiles – that is, they love it! It’s what gets them off. I have no objection to their orientation, and I realize that they can’t help it, and there’s no cure for it. However, they do have to be celibate. This is going to be a problem, because how many of us are good at being celibate? So we need to watch these people all the time to make sure that they don’t act on their orientation. As long as they don’t act on their orientation, I think we need to respect them.

I don’t really know what to do with pedophiles. Maybe we should throw them on islands where everyone is over 18.

To the pedophile, pedophilic fantasies feel natural, normal, healthy, right, a part of you. They’re not really bothered by them, and they don’t try to stop them.

A lot of these POCD types start going round and round because there are some pedophiles who are not happy with their orientation. That’s not really the best way to put it. More that they are not happy with the way that society treats their orientation.

I tell people to imagine this: If you are heterosexual and repulsed by the idea of homosexuality, try this fantasy. Suppose that homosexuality was the same as heterosexuality is now. Suppose it was just normal to be gay. Suppose heterosexuality was treated the same way as pedophilia is now. Suppose straights were treated as evil, sick fucks who need to be tortured in prison forever.

Straight sex was illegal, and even straight porn was illegal. Revealing that you were straight meant you might get your ass kicked or even killed; or at any rate, massive societal rejection would ensue. I ask them how they would feel? This is how the pedophile feels.

Most straights would refuse to engage in gay sex and would continue to fantasize about straight sex. They would masturbate to it and enjoy it. Despite all the societal propaganda, they would collect straight porn even though it was illegal. They would form networks with other persecuted straights. They would campaign for changes in the laws to make straight sex legal.

Societal propaganda would try to say that straight sex caused serious emotional harm, but the straights would refuse to believe that. And in spite of severe legal penalties, they would probably try to engage in straight sex. They would not feel bad about being straights, but would only be mad at society for persecuting them.

With this analogy, you can imagine what it’s like to be a pedophile in straight society.

If you go to Wikisposure, you can see that almost all pedophiles are utterly unapologetic about their orientation, believe that kids are sexual and have sex drives (dubious), and think that adults having sex with kids is good, fun and helpful to both the kid and the pedophile.

There’s a lot of evidence now that this is not the case. For whatever reason, a lot of kids who get molested have problems later on. Why they have problems is not known, but I don’t think it’s relevant. It’s a great reason not to do something like that – chances are, you’re going to hurt the kid.

Things get complicated when some of the POCD types start testing out their POCD by masturbating to pedo fantasies. They usually just masturbate to fantasies, as child porn is illegal. They are often seriously freaked out when they find that often it’s pleasurable. This opens up a serious dx difficulty. If the person enjoys it, they’re a pedo, right? Well, not really.

At least 2

This is a pretty typical case that I deal with below. As you can see, he is complicating matters by masturbating to pedo fantasies as some kind of “testing,” but that’s only going to make him even more crazy.

At any rate, recent research shows that all normal straight males react to females all the way down to age 7. Maximal response it at age 16+. Below age 16, the response curve rapidly descends down to age 7 where it extinguishes. So really any normal male has a reaction even to prepubescent girls. It’s just not very strong is all, and it’s easily ignored.

Just spent a relaxing couple of days at a friend’s house, and started to feel ok, decided maybe I did have POCD after all and it was all in my mind, then started spiking really bad in the afternoon about various paedophilia-related things, including feeling a sudden surge of arousal when testing to see if I was aroused by paedophilia, when I had trouble getting off to normal pornographic fantasies, though managed to eventually.

I started feeling better later on after writing down my worries but then at the end of a walk in the park two young (pre-pubescent) girls walked close to me, and I thought one was cute and felt a vague groinal response, maybe a partial erection.

Then I thought, it must just be the anxiety, but then I couldn’t dismiss the feeling of finding the girl cute, and thought, ‘I never find young girls cute’, it must be sexual attraction, and ‘I must be sexually attracted to young girls’, and at this I felt a sudden intense arousal, and I couldn’t stop thinking about this, my arousal growing, then I thought, ‘If I give in and get myself off to this, it proves I’m a paedophile and I’ll end up looking up pictures of children on the internet to get off to and then that’ll lead to me molesting a child’, and horribly these thoughts made me even more intensely aroused, but I don’t think these thoughts were due to my OCD making me think of the progression of actions, it was maybe more a series of escalating sexual urges.

At the time of these thoughts, to make it even worse, I was only resisting slightly, but my anxiety grew, and I started worrying about these thoughts, but the arousal was still there strongly, and when I got home, despite my anxiety and decreased arousal, I gave in to the arousal, unable to resist, and ended up getting off to images of the two young girls ‘together’ if you know what I mean, though not in a particularly explicit way, which I think makes it even worse that the arousal and orgasm were so intense.

Immediately after, I felt shame and deep depression, realizing I must almost certainly be a paedophile, with OCD, rather than someone with POCD as all these events fit the symptoms of paraphilias and not POCD at all.

I only post here in the vague hope this can be explained as POCD, but the fact that even now in my depression and anxiety I still feel the arousal combined with the events described means there isn’t really any hope of it being POCD rather than paedophilia.

I guess now I need to work out how to fix this, if that’s even possible. For past details, see my previous post. Very depressed…

UPDATE: I now seem to be blocking out this incident as I have great trouble accepting that it happened and this blocking out serves further to convince me that I am a paedophile in denial as someone in denial would block things out like this, things which show they are a paedophile (and the omission of the word might when I wrote this seems to confirm I’m blocking this out due to denial and deep down believe I am a paedophile) whereas I think someone with OCD would not block these things out, especially not so easily (denial=easy to block out OCD=hard and thoughts recur from past experience) but would worry about them constantly and their implications.

FURTHER UPDATE: I now remember there was anxiety ‘during’ the arousal after the initial intense arousal, which like the later anxiety decreased my feelings of arousal I think, which suggests the intense arousal was not caused by anxiety, maybe just from the thought of acceptance, which as I typed just caused a feeling of arousal, but now when very anxious I only have mild feelings of arousal, though not thinking paedophilic thoughts.

This is really messing me up…I also now remember at the conclusion of the thoughts thinking ‘I’m a paedophile’ and getting a rush of excitement and arousal rather than disgust like I do now at the thought. Anxiety might have come straight after this but I’m really not sure…

Other than the run-on sentences, I can’t see anything wrong with this guy, besides the anxiety issues that he is torturing himself with. As you can see, this person is going round and round about anxieties in his head, and his mind is chasing its tail. He’s trying to think his way to a correct solution of this problem, but that’s not going to be possible.

A concise picture emerges from this case study. Although there are some variations, this is the classic picture that I see in most every case. I tell them that it seems like they are reading off the same script.

The OCD preys on whatever you are most afraid of. There’s ridiculous and insane mass hysteria about child molesters nowadays, and being a child molester is about the worst thing that you could be. OCD tells you your worst fears are going to come true. Since people are terrified of pedophilia, we are seeing a lot of OCD playing into this fear. A while back, there was a wave of AIDS OCD. It plays up whatever fears are floating around in society.

If you think this website is valuable to you, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site. Donations are the only thing that keep the site operating.

Very High Traffic Returning to Robert Lindsay

Traffic to the site was extremely high today, mostly coming in for this expository Spanish language post – Bestias Humanas – Masacre en un Bosque Ruso (Human Beasts – Massacre in a Russian Forest) about a particularly nasty gore video that is floating around the Net. The video is not in the post, because WordPress won’t allow it. But maybe there is a link to the video in the post, who knows?

I have to ask you, if you wish to view this video, to please be very careful. This is one of the most fucked up, evil, diabolical, horrible videos on the whole Internet. I don’t even know why it’s even legal. So if you watch it and get traumatized, don’t come crying to me.

Traffic was ~23,000 hits today (normal is ~7,500), and about 15,000 were Spanish language speakers, mostly from Chile, coming to read that multilingual post. Interesting. Translating high traffic posts into the native languages of many of your visitors is a good idea, and can really bring in the hits. Funny that almost no one does it.

Blacks and Rape: A Vignette from the Bay Area

Erranter is a new commenter on the site. He’s very smart and he’s a great writer. In fact, he’s a genius, like authors of this site (Especially the owner!) Talking about the casual attitude that many Blacks have towards rape, he writes:

The rape thing sickens me.During the second to last year they had Halloween in the Castro District in San Francisco (before they were shut down due to shootings and stabbings by people who mostly came from Oakland) I was walking with this extremely drunk friend of mine, a girl who was rather hot, when I stopped to make out with some random chick I recognized from my class.

When I looked back at my friend she was puking up a storm, and I had to abandon the other girl and start to walk my friend back to the Muni-tram. She started to lean into me to support herself with puke running all over costume. Well, the Munis were closed because people had been pissing in them, and I ended up wandering around with her, trying to keep her from talking to people and acting too drunk.

Somehow, looking for a bus or a cab, we found ourselves in a less crowded place when several large groups of Black people walked up. Suddenly they started to surround her and me and, men and women alike, they started to shout at me and say that I should rape her because she deserved it for getting so fucked up. They laughed. Then a group slowed to stop and take a closer look at us and cornered us against a shop window.

When I made a move the large men just said, “What you gonna do, huh?” and I stayed put. Then ugly women came up from behind, thrust their fingers out and opened their mouths with their gold teeth and said in raspy voices, “Rape that bitch, rape her.” I feared they they were going to force me to do it. They all thought this was hilarious. All I could really do was look disgusted and try to walk on.

But the men kept blocking me out. I was drunk enough to try to talk and found them laughing at my faces when I did so, such an arrogant laugh, the laugh of a bully or a torturer. Luckily, the crowd started to move. Something was going on, probably a shooting up the road (there were many that night). I got out of the shop window and into a more lighted area. Eventually we caught a ride from some nice Irish people and we all lived happily ever . . .

The relevance is basically this. I grew up in a nice, mostly white town. This was my first major experience with large groups of Black people, and it wasn’t very endearing. How could the men and women alike be encouraging me to rape her?

Then I heard about the ridiculous rates of rape in Africa – I mean it’s almost ubiquitous. Then I heard about a couple of white women I knew getting raped, or date-raped, by Black guys. I’ve never wanted to be racist, like most White liberals, but I just get pissed and can’t handle it anymore.

First of all, let’s be clear that these are Underclass ghetto Blacks from Oakland.

I am frankly shocked at this episode, but I guess it does not surprise me. The rape rates in Africa and the Caribbean are off the charts. I understand that nearly 10

In African countries with HIV rates still off the charts, Black men often refuse to use condoms, and 100,000’s of women get infected. The South African rape rate is the highest on Earth.

I know six White women who got raped. Three were by Whites; three were by Blacks. Blacks and Hispanics commit rape at about 6 times the rate of White men. That’s 50

There is not much I can say about this, as a liberal who is committed to integration and civil rights. But this kind of amplifies my belief that there is something horribly wrong with US Black culture, especially Underclass ghetto culture.

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)