Is HIV Nature’s Punishment for Sodomy?

Well, sort of.

Pantheist: Would you say HIV/AIDS is a prime example of Nature’s punishment? It’s peculiar how sodomy is what drove the AIDS epidemic.

It’s not so much sodomy that is being punished as sodomy between men. Nature is much calmer about sodomy between men and women.

HIV is driven by: People who get fucked in the ass (gay men) are fucking other people in the ass (other gay men), who are then fucking other people in the ass (other gay men), and on and on.

With straight sodomy, it’s: People who don’t get fucked in the ass (straight men) are fucking other people in the ass (women).

The distinction is crucial. You get these diseases by getting fucked in the ass. Then you fuck someone else in the ass. Straight men don’t get fucked in the ass, so they hardly have any sodomy-related diseases to give to women in the first place. The only real risk from straight sodomy is HIV. Nothing else seems to be much of a risk beyond PIV sex.

Eating Shit, Figuratively and Literally

The notion that sodomy itself somehow uniquely spreads all these different diseases is pretty much bullshit. It only spreads blood-borne diseases and those are very few. This scare documents also list a lot of diseases as being spread by sodomy that are spread by oral-anal contact (basically eating tiny bits of shit). Sodomy does not involve eating shit.

Anyway, for it to spread diseases, the man who is fucking the woman in the ass would have to be eating bits of the woman’s shit in the process. That’s not something that happens.

For all intents and purposes, sodomy does not spread oral-anal diseases. Those are spread by oral-anal contact like licking anuses, which gay men do with a gusto that has to be seen to be believed.

Oral-anal diseases are quite rare in the straight community, so they can engage in oral-anal contact (licking anuses) all they want and nothing happens.

It’s all about the disease pool. Gay men are dealing with an extremely infected pool for these oral-anal diseases so the chance of getting one is high.

Straights are dealing with a pool where these diseases almost don’t exist, so the chances of getting one of these diseases is low.

Oral-anal contact is only dangerous if someone has a disease. You can eat another person’s shit and nothing will happen if the person doesn’t have a disease. You might vomit because it’s so disgusting, but it’s rather harmless. It also does stress your liver because your putting waste back in your system in pure form to be processed right out again.

Obviously you can eat your own shit all you want. Once again, it stresses your liver, and it might make you vomit, but it’s not really harmful, and you cannot get a disease by eating your own shit because you can’t catch a disease that you already have! If your shit has a disease in it, well guess what? You already have that disease! Not that I recommend eating your own shit.

On the other hand, I’ve pretty much been eating shit figuratively my whole life, and I’m healthy as a horse and have none of the typical oral-anal diseases except now and again when I’m feeling particularly dishonest, I open up my mouth, and I’m simply completely full of shit.

Verdict: There Was No “Bucha Massacre”

SHI: Robert, where do you stand on the massacre at Bucha? This is what Wikipedia says

It says that around 1000 bodies were recovered from the town. Summary executions, civilians shot at point-blank range. Looks like the Russians did a number on the Ukies.

Of course the Russian side of the story is that the Ukies staged a false flag. But I find it difficult to believe that they would kill their own women and children so mercilessly.

Surely Russian troops are capable of mini-genocides like this, just like the troops of any other country are.

Number one, Wikipedia, like everything else in the West, is run by the CIA or the US Deep State or better yet, NATO, NATO intelligence and the NATO Deep State. All of the West is 100% controlled by the Deep States of their individual countries, all deeply allied with the US Deep State, and beyond that, the NATO Deep State and NATO itself.

They aren’t capable of mini-genocides like that, especially not in this war. The Russian Army is one of the most professional armies on Earth. They’re about as capable of doing this stuff as the US Army is, and the US army doesn’t do things like this either. See the end of the piece for more.

There were not 1,000 bodies recovered from that town. 1,000 civilians MAY have died in that entire area north of Kiev. In Bucha, a mass grave was found with 76 bodies in it. There is video of townspeople who were burying them and they are saying that they are all territorial defense who were killed fighting the Russians.

An investigation was done of many of the bodies found in Bucha and it found that most of the civilians were killed by flechettes. Flechettes are used in Ukrainian artillery and Ukraine pounded the living crap out of that town and after the Russians left they leveled it, probably for punishing people for sticking around. Ukraine thinks anyone who stays in those towns is a collaborator.

All artillery deaths in Bucha were due to Ukrainian artillery as Russian troops were in town and they didn’t shell their own city. And Russia absolutely does not use ammunition containing flechettes. Only Ukraine does. So many of those killed were killed by Ukrainian artillery by flechettes. 76 were territorial defense who were killed fighting the Russians.

Everyone else was killed in an MI6/SBU psyop on April 2-3, days after the Russians left town. We know that those people were all killed after the Russians left because they were all alive when Russia left. Russia warned the people in the town that they might be targeted and asked them to leave, but only a few took them up on the offer.

There is footage of Boatman and his Azov Battalion entering into the town for a cleanup of saboteurs and collaborators. In one video, we see a soldier asking if it is OK to kill people who are not wearing a blue armband, and the other man says, “Fuck yeah!” Then we hear a man’s voice screaming, “No! No! Please don’t!” followed by a gunshot ringing out and a dog barking. This video is on the Net.

After this operation, dead people appeared strewn along the street in a regular pattern that makes no sense. The media claimed those bodies had been there for weeks but it is obvious that they had been dead no more than a day. Also we have videos of Ukrainian troops pulling those bodies on pulleys and arranging them on the streets. Every one of those bodies was wearing a white armband.

There is video of executions in a cellar. Everyone there is wearing a white armband too. There is also video of people killed in an alley. All wear white armbands. Many of them have Russian MRE meals next to their bodies. Some civilians wore white armbands to show the Russians that they were friendly so they didn’t get shot accidentally.

A lot of these people helped with the distribution of humanitarian aid and medical aid, a huge amount of which was distributed in town. So a white armband showed to the Ukrainians that you were a collaborator. Indeed they brought a dead man to the cemetery when the cameras were on. He had a white armband on. All of the dead with white armbands had been there no more than a day.

Let’s say the Russians killed all of these people. First of all, those bodies have not been there for 3-4 days. Second, why on Earth does Russia only kill people with white armbands and Russian MRE humanitarian aid. Those are the nice people who cooperated with Russian forces. So just before you leave, you murder all the nice people who collaborated with you, wore friendly armbands, took humanitarian aid, and helped distribute the humanitarian aid? Get out of here! No way!

One more thing. Testimony from a Russian journalist who was in the area north of Kiev the whole month said that not one civilian had been harmed the whole time he was there. A Ukrainian reporter who had been in Bucha the whole month said that there had been no killings by the Russians the whole month he was there.

If the Russians are killing people the whole month they were there, why do the bodies on show up after they leave? Why don’t we have any horror stories of murders during the period when the Russians occupied the site. Russians are murdering people like crazy and no one says a word? Get outa here!

Also, people who were in Bucha said that originally the residents were very wary of the Russians but the Russians were friendly, not hurting anyone, and distributing lots of aid, so during the month that the Russians were there, the people gradually opened up to the Russians.

Over time, the residents got more and more friendly with the Russians, with peak friendliness just as they were leaving. Wait. The Russians are murdering people the whole time, but the residents are getting progressively warmer to the Russians with time? Get outa here! No way!

Also, we have footage of the mayor arriving in town on March 31. Residents come out to greet him and say that the Russians were not that bad. One guy said they took him in for questioning but then they let him go. In this footage, there are no dead bodies to be seen anywhere in town and not one person mentions that whole city is strewn with dead bodies.

Keep in mind that according to the narrative, dead bodies are strewn all over the city when the mayor comes back and chats to cheerful residents. He tours the whole town and is smiling and happy. How come he didn’t see all these dead bodies all over the place? How come these happy residents don’t mention that there are dead bodies all over the city? There are dead bodies all over town but no one sees or mentions them and they are all happy and cheerful? The mayor neither sees nor mentions them and he’s all happy and cheery too.

Then we footage over the next couple of days of Azov coming in to “cleanup the city of collaborators.” All of a sudden, all of these dead bodies turn up all over town, all wearing or carrying signs of collaboration with Russia. Also we can hear the Azov people saying to kill all the people not wearing blue armbands, which means they are wearing white armbands.

Then we hear a man screaming for mercy and a gunshot. It all adds up. The Ukrainians massacred all of their own people with white armbands an MRE’s to make an example of them as “collaborators.” At the same time, they do a false flag blaming Russia for the whole thing.

I would like to point out that one of the highest ranking members of the Ukrainian Rada explicitly accused Ukraine and the UK of carrying out this massacre, specifically the Ukrainian SBU spy agency and the MI6 British intelligence agency.

Based on the available evidence, everyone dead in Bucha were either:

  1. Territorial defense killed fighting Russians.
  2. Civilians killed by flechettes which could only have been fired by Ukrainian artillery.
  3. “Collaborators” murdered by the SBU, Azov, and MI6 as a lesson for cooperating with Russia by wearing friendly armbands and taking MRE’s.

Further, the Russian Army is one of the most professional armies on Earth. Do you have any idea of what the punishment is in the Russian army for murdering civilians like that? It’s a very serious offense and they prosecute these cases all the time. Many Russian soldiers have been courtmartialed and imprisoned on these charges in Afghanistan. Someone would have talked.

There would have been leaks from Russian soldiers or Russian journalists about a war crime committed by the Russians. Some of the Russian prisoners would have confessed. We have a huge number of Ukrainian prisoners who have confessed to participating in or witnessing war crimes. We also have many videos that the Ukrainians took of them committing war crimes or admitting to committing them. There has not been one single prosecution of any Ukrainian soldier or militia member for any war crime during this war or during the Donbass War from 1914 – February 23, 2022.

In addition, to all of the above, Putin intervened in the General Staff’s decision to run the war by issuing a directive to all troops that Ukrainian civilians must be preserved at all costs. This was later modified to “preserve all Ukrainian civilian life except where doing so threatens the lives of Russian soldiers.” He did this, he said, because “after the war, we will live with the Ukrainians.”

So he’s laying the groundwork for relatively friendly relations with Ukraine after the war which would not be possible if Russia massacred civilians. In the beginning, the Russian military even said that they were trying not to kill too many UKrainian soldiers. They were even saving the lives of enemy troops. Incredible!

A statement like this is absolutely remarkable! I have been studying modern wars and I cannot remember a commander in chief ever issuing such an extreme directive to preserve enemy civilian life at all costs. It simply doesn’t happen! Almost all armies now all over the world do horrible things when they fight wars. The US, British, French armies are more civilized, but the US leveled Raqqah, Syria with artillery, killing 4-5,000 people. Then we levelled Mosul in Iraq with artillery and bombs (mostly artillery).

Mostly it was not aimed at all. Instead the intent was to level the city and kill everyone in it. 40,000 civilians were killed by the US and the Iraqis in the conquest of Mosul, Iraq. I told American liberal Democrats about this and they said it was justified because those civilians were supporting ISIS. Problem is once you legalize killing enemy civilians, you have to allow it all the time in every war. You have to allow the Russians to massacre Ukrainian civilians because they’re supporting the army. On and on.

I cannot find one single case of a dead person in Bucha who was killed by the Russians. I have studied this case more than most people you will ever meet and my conclusion is there is not one proven murder of a civilian by Russian troops in Bucha during this war. Perhaps there were some cases elsewhere. There does appear to have been a case north of Kharkiv where a Russian soldier was sentenced to life for the murder of a Ukrainian civilian. He confessed, so I am assume he was guilty. These things are done by most armies in wartime. There’s not unusual about a few cases.

No, Masculinity and Femininity Are Not Made-Up Concepts Social Constructs

Anonymous: Well if mistakes occur in Nature and by nature, then that means that Nature is flawed.

Of course Nature is flawed! Why is that even a question?

Anonymous: But that doesn’t make sense to me.

Why not?

Anonymous: Does that mean that Nature doesn’t have free will of its own?

Of course it doesn’t. It’s a process. It’s not like a creature that’s alive.

Anonymous: Since it recognises these occurrences as flaws then why does it allow them to appear over and over again?

Because it’s a process, and Nature is a system, not something with a mind and free will. It gets set in one way of doing things and then it just keeps on doing them. And Nature is amoral, completely. It could wipe us all off the face of the Earth if we allowed it to. It could care less about us or about much of anything really.

Anonymous: Maybe these flaws are Nature’s way of containing (depopulating) itself.

Not so sure about that part.

Anonymous: One thing is for sure is that Nature does seem to favour diversity. Progress only occurs when attributes are evenly spread. Suppose every single human only wanted to be a bodybuilder. We would get nowhere technologically but Nature has selected diverse people to have different interests.

OK, sure, but that’s just Evolution. Yet Evolution is another way of saying Nature. Nature is Evolution and vice versa. I fail to see any benefit of male or female homosexuality. As it’s apparently not genetic and only occurs when things go wrong in the womb, it’s not being selected for at all and it occurs at a low enough level that women with more stable hormonal flows in the womb are not selected for and the ones with less stable flows selected against.

Apparently the prenatal environment is pretty stable and doesn’t go off a Hell of a lot. Maybe 10% of the time at most and for the most part, all that occurs is lefthandedness which does not handicap offspring hence there’s no reason to select against it.

Anonymous: But why are those necessarily “masculine” characteristics? Just because on an average that males tend to have more of them than females?


Anonymous: But doesn’t Nature also allows women with similar potential to get muscular, big, and strong?


If they were strictly masculine traits, then there would be no girls with muscles.

That’s not so! Didn’t you read the fine print. Weininger says that the Masculine and Feminine Character are present in both sexes. All men have some feminine characteristics and that’s not necessarily a bad thing and vice versa. Some women have some masculine characteristics like being strong, well-built, muscular, and athletic and that’s not generally a problem except when women are at the extreme end of that spectrum, it seems like a lot of them are lesbians, and that’s not adaptive.

For the most part those things in a woman are not pathological, but there was no reason to select for them, hence women ended up much weaker than men. Furthermore, the strongest female bodybuilder is no match for even a middling male bodybuilder.

Anonymous: I like strong women.


Anonymous: I don’t like chubby women


Anonymous: or the very girly girls.

Bad idea.

Anonymous: Strong women like Sandahl Bergman in Conan The Barbarian. The warrior female type of spirit. I find that sexy.

Change your mind. I understand the appeal of a badass chick, but the problem with those violent women who fight people who do them wrong is that sooner or later, all of that righteous anger is going to get turned on you. “Warrior” women are nothing but trouble. They’re bitches. They will fight you!

Controversial Idea: Nature Punishes Those Who Violate Natural Law

Anonymous: I don’t get the Nature part. If a man a acting effeminate is against Nature and nature punishes them for it then why did Nature create them in the first place. I don’t think it is Nature punishing them either but society.

We can’t be objective about these things especially on a deeper philosophical scale. I think everyone should just mind their own business.

Even this whole masculine-feminine thing seems arbitrary. Why is masculine representing everything strong and the feminine everything weak? When without either of them conception would not be possible. So in a way, both need to be strong for a good family.

Women of the Stone Age may also be considered “masculine” by today’s standards because they were stronger, well-built, muscular and athletic.

Are you a heterosexual man? Go ahead and walk around in the world saying there’s no such thing as masculinity an femininity, and you’re going to flaunt the rules and say the Hell with this masculine crap. You see just how far that gets you. Try to be a feminine or effeminate man. You say it’s just fine. So try it and see. Do it for a few years and get back to me. I guarantee you won’t have a fun ride.

It’s against Nature because the only reason effeminate men and masculine women happen in the first place is because something went terribly wrong! Things go terribly wrong in Nature all the time. Nature doesn’t like mistakes and any mistakes that occur get punished by Nature because they go against Natural Law.

The old “society punishes gay people” is an old chestnut. The problem is that we have now found societies that are about as tolerant of gay people as possible, and gay men and lesbians are just as messed up in this places as they are in homophobic places. They also lose 18-20 years off their lifespan just like such folks do in homophobic places.

This got me to thinking that there is something about gay people that is going to cause them to be messed up no matter what. Now I don’t want to believe this because I want them to be just as happy as we are. But I keep getting beaten with the Reality Stick. I’m starting to think that there is just something inherently messed up about them.

Then I realized that wimpy men are typically very unhappy. And if you get them to act more masculine, they get a lot more happy.

Mean, angry, miserable, masculine-acting women (not all of whom are gay – some are just horrendous bitches who haven’t been laid in forever) seem absolutely wretched. And I’ve noticed that when a woman starts acting extremely feminine, it usually means 1. She wants to get fucked right now. 2. She’s a lot happier than when she was not acting so feminine.

So I started thinking that masculinity is the “happy place” for men, and femininity is the “happy place” for women.

Everyone minding their own business is just fine, but there are unanswered questions that demand to be answered whether it pisses off PC types or not. And the purpose of this website is to ask all those questions you are not supposed to ask and to talk about all those things you are not supposed to talk about. And that is what we are going to do no matter how much it pisses off PC fucktards.

Even this whole masculine-feminine thing seems arbitrary.

You’re young, aren’t you? I got some news for you. Stick around this planet for a while, and this time open your eyes and ears instead of shutting them down like you’ve been doing. You will realize that masculinity is a thing, defined in a rather specific way at least in most Western societies and in a lot of other societies too. It’s called the Masculine Principle and it’s one of the universal principles governing the universe or at least our part of it.

If you look around you will notice that femininity is also a “thing” – very similar across most societies. This is because it is something called the Feminine Principleone of the governing principles of the universe.

The Feminine Principle is weaker. The Masculine Principle is stronger.

Some woman wants to be a strong woman, however defined? All the power to her! Good for her! A woman can do anything a man can do in terms of jobs, with a few obvious limitations. Women should reach for the sky! They already hold up half of it.

Look around at the higher mammals, even those dogs and cats running around your house. Notice how the male cats act like human men and the female cats act like human women. There’s a reason for that. Now study elk and elephant seals.

Notice how one alpha elk gets a harem of five elk chicks? Notice how the other four male Beta elk are standing around in the woods jerking off their elk dicks with their hooves?

Notice how that Alpha elephant Seal as fat as Marlon Brando and a pure psychopath as bad as Ted Bundy, has a harem of 50 fat elephant seal chicks and he’s somehow banging all of them? I don’t know how his seal dick doesn’t fall off. Notice offshore towards those offshore rocks called haulouts? See those 49 Beta bachelor male seals hanging out on those rocks with their seal dicks in their flippers because they aren’t getting any seal pussy?

That’s human nature on a smaller scale. When you get rid of enforced marriage, things go back to the jungle. Women form harems with Alphas, most of whom are scumbags on a level of that Alpha elephant seal. Notice how there are now huge numbers of young men getting no sex at all, like 32% of young men did not have sex in the past year or perhaps have never had sex at all? Those guys are like those 49 bachelor seals on those haulouts. They’re not getting any. The state of Nature is a brutal thing.

I will also tell you right now that if you ever meet a woman who proudly calls herself a “strong woman” to get the Hell away from her as quickly as possible because she’ll be nothing but trouble and she’s capable of being one of the worst, most psycho bitches you’ve ever hooked up with. I think it’s OK to be a strong woman in whatever sense. But once they starting owning that title, they turn into the worst bitches you’ve met.

Yes, there are strengths in the Feminine Principle, but it is more yielding and submissive. You know, just like those female cats in your house that sit back and take it when a tomcat humps them?

We don’t know that Stone Age women were stronger, well-built, muscular, and athletic, but what we have learned of women 12,000 years ago in Mexico is that they were under the rule of a horrible Patriarchy that was utterly brutal. The one skeleton they found had been repeatedly beaten with big sticks and rocks. They are thinking that the men of her tribe were vicious maniacs who beat the Hell out of their women all the time. So compared to the men, it looks like the women were not so strong.

Indeed there are strong, well-built, muscular, and athletic women, but how many of them are like that? And incidentally those are masculine characteristics. If you follow Otto Weininger as I do (Otto Weininger is God) you will realize that all males have both Masculine and Feminine Principles. and it’s the same for women. Everyone is a mixture of the two. Pure masculine men and pure feminine women are probably not very common.

Masculinity, Femininity, Natural Law, and “Universal Culture”

SHI: It’s all right to be a soft-spoken man with no hypermasculine aggressive characteristics.

But it was NEVER acceptable to be effeminate.

Yes, effeminacy in straight men just doesn’t work at all. Any man who is like that, I’d suggest he work on it if he could. If I see a man like that, I want to ask him why on Earth, if he is a straight man, he’s acting effeminate. There’s nothing wrong with effeminacy in men as long as it’s a gay man acting that way.

But for a straight man to act that way is weird and ridiculous. It’s like a cat barking. It’s just weird and wrong and messed up. Barking is just fine for dogs, but cats aren’t supposed to bark, and if one does, I’d wager there’s something seriously wrong with it. You want to walk up to the cat and yell at it, “Hey, you’re a cat, dammit! You’re not supposed to bark. That’s what dogs do, dammit! If you’re going to be a cat, you have to meow like the rest of the felines.” Otherwise you’re just a freak, albeit one that might get you record Youtube views if you put it on the web.

You really can’t be too masculine, and a lot of wimpy guys like acting masculine if you give them permission to and bring it out of them. I’ve done this many times and it’s amazing how delightfully they seem to get into it. It’s like they are in their secret happy place that they have denied to themselves for so long. I’m convinced that most wimpy men actually want to be normal and masculine, but something – maybe a psychological issue – is preventing that.

Masculinity is our happy place. Remember how wildly and even cruelly masculine we were as boys? That’s the natural state of a male in nature.

For women, I really think that femininity is their happy place. They seem to feel so good when they are free to act feminine. Plus femininity is all tied into the sex drive. When a woman starts acting like a frilly Southern belle and flipping her wrist like a gay man around you all of a sudden, I can pretty much guarantee she is turned on by you, and in a lot of cases, it means she wants to fuck right now. It means she’s horny! Look how feminine and submissive they often turn into in bed. That’s the natural state of a woman, like a little girl in a way.

Also, I have found that wimpy or feminine men are often not very happy. I don’t know what it is. I think they are violating Nature or Natural Law. They’re supposed to act masculine and they’re not, so Nature is punishing them by making them miserable.

Have you ever noticed how miserable angry, masculine women are? They’re not happy at all, are they? Perhaps Nature is punishing them too. They’re supposed to be feminine and they’re not, so Nature is punishing them for going against Her. And that is a capital H by the way. Nature is God!

By the same token, gay men seem to have some essential unhappiness about them that goes beyond the harm caused by discrimination. And it’s completely analogous with lesbians.

A man is supposed to be masculine and attracted to women. With gay men, it’s the opposite. They are feminine and attracted to men. A woman is supposed to be feminine and attracted to men. Lesbians are masculine and attracted to other women. Both conditions are frankly abnormal in the sense that they go against the default for society, and if everyone were like that, society would collapse and mankind would go extinct.

By the same mechanism that punishes wimpy straight man and angry, masculine straight women, perhaps Nature also punishes effeminate gay men and masculine butch lesbians. Nature is telling them, “You’re doing it wrong!”

Natural Law is a theory popular in Catholic circles, and while I’m not a Catholic, I find Catholicism fascinating, and I think they may be onto something with their Natural Law. Certain things just seem to be flat out wrong across the board with humans. Molesting prepubescent children (say, under age ~13 or before puberty) is one. Almost no society, primitive or modern, accepts that other than the Sambia in New Guinea where it’s actually a manhood ritual to create men out of boys, hence Nature tolerates it. Even back in Roman days, molesting children was completely taboo. Check out Suetonius. He talks about this.

Hence, molesting kids is, in Catholic Natural Law terms, “inherently disordered.” There’s something about humans that, as an almost-perfect general rule, makes us dislike this sort of thing. Incest also seems to be “inherently disordered.” Every tribe they’ve ever found has an incest taboo for obvious reasons.

The fact that certain things are inherently disordered across the board for humans across space and time also implies that there is something called Universal Culture or maybe in Jungian terms, the Collective Unconscious Culture.

I doubt if homosexuality is inherently disordered. Societies seem to dislike it but tolerate in a few oddballs here and there.

In many societies, effeminate men are often given a term that something like “not-men.” That’s the Persian word for a gay man – gay men are “not-men.” In many places, they are allowed to wear women’s clothes, and they stay in the village with the women during the day doing women’s work. They don’t have to go out and hunt with the men. I’m not sure what they are like sexually, but in a number of tribes, they are treated as a substitute for a woman, and it’s perfectly natural for a normal straight man to take one of these effeminate men as a sexual partner, especially if no female available.

Masculine women or lesbians were also tolerated in small numbers by many groups. They wore men’s clothes and went out and hunted with the men, who accepted them as just another man, albeit one with some funny biology. I believe they were allowed to take another such woman as a partner.

It seems to be normal background variation for ~3% of the population to be homosexual in many societies just like it’s natural background variation for a small percentage of the population to be lefthanded.

Most of that is people who are wired up gay – “biological homosexuals” – from birth. I think it is caused by hormonal levels going off during pregnancy, so it’s basically a developmental disorder like lefthandedness, abnormal fingerprints, etc. And indeed those two things are found at much higher levels in gay men. Once again though, all of those both conditions including lefthandedness are caused by something going wrong, in this case in the womb.

I’m absolutely opposed to treating biological homosexuals any different than we treat our fellow straights. But no one should be under the illusion that this is a natural, normal phenomenon.

Remarks on Movements towards Androgyny and Hypermasculinity in Men, with Some Notes on Male Homosexuality

Bomb Roberts: I sort of disagree. I think androgyne can be an effective way to present oneself and interact with the world. However, it is a fairly extreme way of being, and anyone choosing it has to really commit and genuinely achieve an almost God-like lack of fucks to give. Most men just can’t do it.

Only world-historical figures like the ones you mention or super-effeminate gay guys.

That’s another thing: you have to be indifferent to what women think of you. That means one of two things. Either you know you have such a high level of supreme awesomeness that you know they’ll be into you anyway or you just don’t swing that way.

It is for this reason that I admire and respect gay guys and drag queens. They know who and what they are, and they don’t give a fuck.

First of all, I would like to welcome Bomb to the site. I have a feeling he might even like it here.

You are referring to the traditional version of an androgyne, right? Meaning a member of one sex who acts fully like the other sex. Nowadays most such folks have gone over to some subspecies of trans.

How about the other examples I gave from the 1970’s of guys who were actually as tough, hard, and ultra-masculine as street gang members (and a number of them like Thunders and Johansen were just that) but who dressed up like chicks or ran a layer of femininity on top of their hypermasculinity?

That’s the androgyny I grew up with in the 1970’s, and it was pretty boss. The first glitter rock club was opened by Rodney Bingenheimer on the Strip around 1969, and if you went there, you would see a bunch of guys who were practically dressed up like chicks. But if you went and talked to them, all of them would identify as straight males. See, back then you could dress like that, and people would not necessarily think you were homosexual.

How do you feel about what I call “pure androgynes” – very masculine men who also run a layer of femininity on top of the macho vibe? I kind of like that, but I’m not even sure that’s viable anymore.

Part of the problem was gays coming out. Before they came out, everyone was assumed to be straight until proven otherwise. I liked it just fine! Then when the gays came out, all of a sudden people realized that gay men existed, and a lot of us straight men who walked free a few years before were now being tagged, questioned, or accused of being homosexuals.

You might say, “Yeah, well, so what, who cares what people think?”

Sure, but let me tell you, it just doesn’t work being a straight man and having lots of people think you’re gay. It’s not like people learn the truth and blow it off and say, “Oh, OK! Sorry I was mistaken!” It’s nothing but trouble and problems that never end! Sure you can move to a new city to escape these troubles, but then they will just start up all over again in the new place. It’s like running away from your fears. You can run but you can’t hide and eventually it catches up with you.

On the other hand, I will say that I have been meeting some younger bisexual girls and women recently who were disappointed that I was not bisexual like them and who said they would be very happy if I were bi too. I assume they would tolerate more androgyny in men than straight women.

One, a 17 year old girl who I did not have sex with, told me to “Get over it,” meaning get over my “hangup” about having sex with guys.

And I’m getting dumped by young women these days for being “homophobic,” though I’m not really a gay-hater. More that I am quite uncomforable (or phobic as in fearful in the traditional sense of the word) with the whole subject of male homosexuality and have a low opinion of myself and my friends doing such things. We think it’s the worst thing on Earth for us and our friends to do. My friends say things like, “If you offered me a choice between having gay sex and getting shot, I would say, ‘Just shoot me.'” That’s a pretty extreme revulsion!

For the gays, it’s another story. They were wired up that way so they have to engage in gay sex. They have no choice. While we don’t like gay sex, we realize that gay men must engage in it and we can’t hate people over things things they can’t control. So we walk a tightrope of hating it in ourselves, our friends, and in general, while being tolerant of it among actual wired-up gay men.

It’s like cats meow, dogs bark, and gay men screw guys. Hating gay men for screwing guys is like hating your dog for barking. Barking is what dogs do. Screwing guys is what gay men do. And neither can help it anymore than the other.

I fully support gay men coming out of course, but even a lot of good things have a downside.

Also, IMHO perhaps in reaction to mass coming out of gay men (?), we have seen straight men doing an extreme doubling down on hypermasculinity to the point where they are almost parodies of such in order to differentiate themselves from increasingly out gay men.

Back in the 1970’s, a guy covered with tattoos was an ultra-macho scumbag, maybe a sailor or Marine at best but at worst a criminal or a biker, which was often the same thing. He was a scumbag! Women with tattoos were just scum too – mostly biker chicks or lesbians. Also, they were routinely tagged as superwhores.

Now what to us were marks of super-whoredom and extremely dangerous ultra-masculine criminals respectively have become de rigeour for both sexes!

I watched porn from the 1970’s and 1980’s. Male porn stars of that era were flexible in gender presentation, and many of them were rather soft pretty boy types. Some like Paul Thomas even had very soft voices. The men were a lot more androgynous because you could act that way back then and still have women swarming on you. I think you can get away with that anymore, sorry.

Check out the porn nowadays. Many if not most of the men are extreme hypermasculine men, so extreme in their masculinity that they almost seem like parodies. And the sex has gotten a lot rougher, meaner, and more hypermasculine. Add to that the recent fad for men to be Doms (traditionally as ultra-masculine as a man can get) or frankly out and out sexual sadists, and you complete the circle. Mass movements of men toward being BD/SM Doms or sexual sadists is not a good thing. No wonder all these women are dying of choking sex gone bad.

Give me back the 1970’s.

If you are referring to the traditional sense of a man out and out acting like a woman, I don’t think that’s doable at all for a straight man anymore except for guys like Prince, and he actually had a macho layer underneath.

Very few straight men are actually effeminate. Studies show that 70% of gay men are effeminate and only 3% of straight men are. I really do not recommend at all that straight men act effeminate.

Hey, a mannerism or two is OK. A lot of straight men have a faggy mannerism or two. One thing you will notice if you get extremely relaxed is that your limbs started sagging and going limp. Before you know it, you hand is bending backwards. But straight out acting like an effeminate homosexual is just not going to work for a straight man. In that direction lies nothing but trouble.  Effeminacy is for gay men. If you want to be femmy, just move to Frisco and go gay. If you want to stay straight, for God’s sake at least act like a man, dammit.

I Don’t Think Any Sort of Androgyny Works for Men

Soloman: Man you boomers are hella wild with your leaded fuel-filled brains n bones. Lol. Man, did you never hear about The Cure, or the myriad of subcultures where straight men are just fine being their wonderful, androgyne selves? Ya’ll fell out years ago, and now us GenX/Y/Z’s have to pay for all your closeted bigotry and ignorance.

Props for the “leaded fuel-filled brains” line. I just figured that one out right now. +1 for humor. Touche!

We like the Cure just fine. I saw them in concert in 1983. Actually, I came out of the 1970’s when this was all the rage. I’m a lifetime androgyne myself along the Iggy Pop – Mick Jagger – New York Dolls line. But that’s a different kind of androgyny – a combination of extreme psychological or cognitive masculinity with a feminine side layered on.

However, that sort of androgyny was far more popular back then than it is now. We have gone completely backwards on this issue. The whole rage now is hypermasculinity with the tattoos and the whole nine yards. And this is what women demand now. I’m afraid the market for 70’s-style androgyny is rather limited.

I’m thinking now that it just doesn’t work. All that ends up happening is people think you are gay or bi everywhere you go, and this causes all manner of problems, including gaybashing. For instance, I’ve been gaybashed three different times, once with a baseball bat! So that’s where that sort of behavior lands you. And I’m not even effeminate! I’m just a “soft guy” type.

Gay and bi men won’t leave you alone, and this causes all manner of problems too. That’s reason I didn’t go into modeling. I had repeated offers to get into male modeling as a man in my 20’s, but the scene is so full of homosexuals (1/3) that I chickened out. I would have been walking the gauntlet every single day.

Basically, women don’t like androgynes. They think they’re pussies and faggots. They despise the latter even more than the former, assuming that’s even possible. All they want are hypermasculine meatheads. They simply will not tolerate anything else, and we’ve been going backwards every year for decades now.

Keep in mind that this is a lifetime of experience talking at age 64 with a much more cynical mind than I had in my naive 20’s.

Ya’ll fell out years ago, and now us GenX/Y/Z’s have to pay for all your closeted bigotry and ignorance.

Please explain. How did we screw it up for you guys?

We’re not closeted. Pure androgynes are the last men on Earth to be closeted. They’re already pretty liberated as it is. Most of us were not secret gays or bis, at least back then. Most of the glitter rockers were 100% straight.

You really can’t go wrong with acting masculine, nor can you act too masculine.

There’s really no down side to masculinity unless you go overboard and end up incarcerated, injured, diseased, or dead, but even that is probably preferable to having women stomp on your balls your whole life. At least you die with your boots on and your head held high in defiant, rageful male pride takes no prisoners. This is how a man dies! With his back straight and his head held high!

Ukraine War Update June 12, 2022

Manuel Rodriguez: What is your assessment about the current situation on the ground in Ukraine? Advances have been quite slow. It seems things are not quite optimal for the Russians but not necessarily good for the Ukrainians or the West for that matter. As things are going, it seems that the Russians will have to hold on for a few months until the USA/EU collapses economically.

Russia is doing great. They’re not really going slowly at all in the core area of the Northeast Donbass. They are making amazing progress over there. The Ukrainian army is an excellent army, well-run and trained and armed to NATO standards. This is what a real war between two huge armies actually looks like. Remember the German-USSR war in WW2? This is like that. Or like WW1, trench warfare.

The Ukrainians are very well dug in in places like around Donetsk around Adviivka, Nieu York, Slaviansk, Marinka, Nova Bakhmutka, etc. There has been almost no progress on those fronts since the beginning of the war. The Ukrainians had years to dig in very deeply there and once troops are dug in that deeply, it is very hard to get them out! You just have to pound away at them with artillery forever.

If you try to storm their positions, you will get destroyed. Air power doesn’t do much good against them either. Fortifications work very well! The Ukrainians have taken big losses, especially in Adviivka, but they are still holding fast as they keep reinforcing.

On the Zaporozhye, Huilaopoye, Kherson, Khivi Rog, Nikolaev and Kharkiv fronts, not much is happening, just battles for position. Neither side is making much movement either way. Any territory the Ukrainians take is usually quickly lost. But the Russians are not making much if any progress either. Those fronts are frozen right now.

By Izium, Bakhmut, Popasna, Sovierodonetsk, Slavyansk, Kramatorsk, Liman, etc. the Russians are making dramatic gains and the Ukrainians are taking massive casualties. They just keep retreating and Russia keeps taking more and more towns and cities. The Ukrainians are outgunned 20-40-1 and they are outmanned 7-1.

The Ukrainians have probably lost ~55,000 men in this war so much. I don’t have figures for wounded but they must be high also. That figure probably includes missing. Those are incredible losses. Their forces now contain only 20% professional army with the rest untrained conscripts and territorial defense forces who are just meat thrown into the meatgrinder.

A lot are deserting or surrending to the Russians. There have been a number of prosecutions for forces desertion. The separatists are bombarding Ukrainian positions with leaflets asking them to surrender. They are also rarely rotated, whereas Russians on the front lines are rotated literally every single day!

There have been quite a few rebellions of Ukrainian troops laying down their weapons and refusing to fight. In some cases, they have been shot by officers for trying to surrender. There are many complaints of officers abandoning their troops to the wolves. Soldiers complain of lack of food, water, supplies, goggles, bulletproof vests, fuel, armored vehicles and especially artillery. Troops are given an automatic weapon with several rounds and a hand grenade and thrown up against tanks. They don’t stand a chance.

Russia has air supremacy. Ukraine has little air power and their air defenses are not very good. Both sides use drones to great effect. The Ukrainians seem to have better drones and make better use of drones to correct their artillery. Ukrainian artillery and special forces are quite good. The Ukrainians are simply outmanned and outgunned to the extreme.

The Nazi battalions are making noises of overthrowing Zelensky. The UKrainian army is being run by NATO, so really, Russia is fighting this war against all of NATO, with NATO commanders, NATO trained forces, NATO intelligence, and NATO weaponry. So envision this war as Russia versus NATO and it starts to make a lot more sense. Ukraine had their third biggest and best army in Europe! Don’t underestimate the Ukrainians.

At the start of the war, Russia had a lot of officers, generals, etc. who had obtained their positions via nepotism and connections. They performed poorly, using long convoys which were attacked to good effect by the Ukrainians. Putin replaced those commanders with those who were field-tested and had proved themselves in battle. Russia now makes good use of combined arms, which they were not doing at the start.

81% of Russians support Putin. 75% of Russians support the war, and 19% want a negotiated solution. Few Russians just want to pull out of Ukraine – maybe 6% of the population. Many antiwar moderates have gone over to the pro-war camp because they realize that the West wants to completely destroy Russia and return it to the colonial status of the Yeltsin years. Most of the dissidents have left, but about half the people who left have already returned.

There are several parties in the Duma. All of the parties outside of Putin’s party could be considered opposition, but most of the opposition is more or less pro-Putin. The anti-Putin Westernizers only have 2% of the Duma, and they only get 5% of the vote. Navalny, the great white hope of the West, has 1% support in polls.

In downtown Moscow and St. Petersburg there is a anti-Russian, pro-West youth movement, but it is not large nor is it politically active. A lot of the pro-Western Left just left the country.

It’s not true that you can’t oppose the war or Putin. An interviewer recently went out into the streets of Moscow and interviewed people, and a number of the young people were against the war, but they were not very politically active. 19% of the population says they are against the war in surveys. Nothing is going to happen to any of those people!

The openly treasonous pro-West, anti-Putin media was shut down, but that only amounted to a few TV stations. Medea is one of them. Note that they have been in business all this time and were only shut down for the war. In the last decade, this opposition was on Russian TV a few times a week on talk shows. The hosts were pro-government and they put the opposition on to tear up their views.

All Western media is available on the Net to any Russian who can read those languages and the stations like Medea have now set up in Europe and broadcast from there. Twitter is open to Russians and it is full of anti-Russian propaganda. I read Russians all of the time on the Net, and the ones who post are all hip to all of the Western news about Russia, but they simply don’t believe it. But it’s not like they only hear one side of the story!

Putin is probably not killing those oligarchs who are committing suicide and murdering their families. Perhaps this has to do with money. Putin doesn’t really bother those people, but he doesn’t care much about oligarchs either. The Russian people mostly hate them, which is why it is laughable that the West is sanctioning these guys as Russia and Putin already don’t like them as it is.

The Communist Party is the largest opposition party, with 18% of the vote in the last election. Zhirinovsky’s party got 7%. Most Russians just think Zhirinovsky was funny or hilarious, while the West finds him scary or appalling. I think the Russians see him as a troll.

Alt Left: The Alt Left and Race

Problems of Modern Anti-Racism and Critical Race Theory

First of all, few understand how or why this movement even arose. Almost all Left-liberals think the early anti-racism movement of MLK and even post-Hajj Malcolm X is worthy and even exemplary. White nationalists despise this movement. There’s a clash right there.

Anyway, modern antiracism has gone far beyond Rosa Parks and Malcolm. Instead of Rosa Parks, the modern antiracist heroes are nothing but dirty criminals George Floyd and Trayvon Martin. They’re literally the worst people on Earth. That’s absolutely disgusting, but it makes sense.

Because Blacks commit such an extreme amount of crime, it’s inevitable that antiracist Black heroes would extend to the criminals after the initial injustices were rectified. And the extreme Black crime rate leads modern antiracists with no alternative but to oppose police, jails, prisons, judges, prosecutorsm and the justice system itself as a civil rights violation of Blacks. Of course they want to abolish the police and prisons. How else to get “justice” for Blacks? That’s the only way to do it!

Further, modern antiracists have boxed themselves and society into a cage. By insisting that all racial discrepancies are caused by White racism against non-Whites, they open themselves up to all sorts of fallacies:

What about East Indians, Asians, and Jews? Haven’t they suffered just a bit or perhaps much more than Blacks? Why is their response to horrific White racism to succeed beyond Whites while the Black reaction seems to be to fail?

The arguments are circular and non-falsifiable.  A circular argument goes round and round and doesn’t say anything: How do we know the Earth is round? Because it’s shaped like a ball. How do we know the Earth is shaped like a ball? Because it’s round.

Modern antiracism arguments that racism is behind all racial disparities are similar.

How do we know that Blacks commit a lot of crime? Because there is racism against them. How do we know there is racism against Blacks? Because Blacks commit a lot of crime.

These arguments are like dogs chasing their tails in living rooms. And like the dog in your house, the arguments never go anywhere either.

The arguments that “racism causes all disparities” or “if there are disparities, that proves racism exists” are not falsifiable. There’s no way to prove them wrong. No matter how you slice the cake, it always tastes great. Arguments have to have some way to prove them wrong or else they are garbage. It’s not so much that these arguments are wrong, but it’s more that there’s no way to prove that it is either right or wrong. It’s like debating how many angels can stand on a pin.

The problem with CRT is not that it is not true. We can’t tell if it’s true or not true, so that’s not even a question. CRT is such bad theory that it’s not even wrong!

The genesis of modern antiracism, which all takes the form of Critical Race Theory, is via Black legal scholar Derrick Bell. Bell looked around and noticed that Blacks had achieved more or less legal equality. Yet that hadn’t seem to fix the problems of Black people. Huge disparities remained. Since these must obviously be caused by racism, clearly massive racism still existed despite the laws.

Then he looked around and noted that overt, nasty, ugly, in your face racism had similarly declined to the point where it was hard to find an obvious example of it in day to day life anymore. The use of racial slurs fell off the charts. Whatever was in their heads, most Whites were decent enough to Blacks. This sort of racism has continued to decline every year since the 1970’s, which makes the continuing disparities even more puzzling.

Bell’s argument was simple. If only racism could cause the disparities and de jure racism had collapsed and even in your face everyday racism had fallen off the chart or at least gone underground, what explained the discrepancies? Since the argument holds unscientifically that these disparities can only be caused by racism, the absence of legal and everyday racism poses a puzzle.

Clearly Blacks still faced massive racism (their problems proved that this was so), but how can we explain this if visible racism is so diminished?

Bell had a simple explanation. Since clearly Blacks continued to experience horrible racism (because of the disparities), if we couldn’t see it, there could be only one conclusion: Racism had somehow gone invisible and it was now in a form known as structural or institutional racism which could not be measured or studied.

If we can’t see or study something or even prove it’s there somehow with equations, there’s no point discussing it. Once again, antiracists have constructed a tautological and non-falsifiable argument impervious to reason or argument. No matter what, it’s always correct.

Most of society believes this nonsense, and this boxes us in.

Blacks can’t do math? Obviously math is racist. Quit teaching it.

Blacks do poorly on tests and in school? Obviously tests and grades are racist. Throw them both out.

And because meritocracy ends up with huge disparities itself between Blacks and Whites, clearly the idea of meritocracy itself is racist and must be tossed out. That means we can’t hire, promote, admit to universities, or pass in school anyone over anyone else. Forrest Gump is as qualified as Einstein. In this way we arrive at a society that promotes failure over success and hires, admits, and promotes the failed over the successful.

Everyone from the most successful to the worst failure gets the same grade as even the process of figuring out if one human is better than another at anything is racist. It’s clear that this way forward is doomed to fail in the worst way. To see what happens when incompetents are hired for important jobs and placed in charge of making essential decisions, take a look at Africa, where such is the norm. Those are not just failed states. That’s an entire failed continent.

Although the idea of an upside down meritocracy where failure always bests success seems insane, this is the only possible outcome of our present Critical Race Theory view of race. CRT spells the doom of nation, society, culture, and civilization itself. Perhaps we should be careful what we wish for here.

The Alt Left and Race Realism

Although the Alt Left masses themselves itself have officially renounced race realism, I continue to promote a Liberal or Left Race Realist project, as quixotic as it sounds.

It’s as clear as air to me that race is a real thing beyond mere obvious appearances. The behavior of Caucasian, Asian, Black, and Amerindian babies differ dramatically in ways that prefigure the personalities of the adults. I can’t see how that can possibly be due to culture.

The famous “candy bar” tests in the Southern US and Caribbean showed that Black and White children differ on impulsiveness and ability to delay gratification. There’s no way that something that basic was caused by culture. Granted, Black adults can learn to delay gratification when they become adults, but the results on even that question are not particularly encouraging. Witness the Vietnam War style dead and wounded counts inflicted by the Black armies of the night in a mere wink of a weekend in a large city like Chicago.

And even if Blacks do learn to become less impulsive as they age into adulthood, it’s clear that the basic Black personality comes into the world marked with a tendency towards impulsiveness. Sure, it can be curbed, but in order to do that a Black person has to go beyond their basic nature. Obviously this can be done too, but a lot of people are not good at it and tend to slide back towards their basic tendencies if they don’t watch themselves closely enough.

Anyway, if you plug “impulsive” and “poor ability to delay gratification” into the statistics on Black Americans, so many puzzling differences between them and Whites on all sorts of variables become lit up with the bright light of epiphany. The penny drops and we can see clearly now that the rain are gone.

Even more importantly, the debate about race realism is seriously off-base out of the starting gate. The horses are already tripping and we’ve barely started to run. The debate gets lost into a shout-fest about whether differential Black outcomes, which sadly are lower on a lot of good things and higher on a lot of bad things than Whites, are due to culture or genes or both or something in the air.

I point out that it doesn’t matter why Blacks or any other race act the way that they do. If you live in Chicago, does it matter that Blacks shoot up the city every weekend due to their SNP’s or due to their upbringing? What difference does it make? You’re dodging bullets one way or the other.

Instead, a race realism debate should start out on a much more innocent, basic, and hardly controversial basis: that the major races differ phenotypically in most of time and space. A phenotype is simply what results when the genotype (genes) interacts with the environment. The gene + environment = phenotype is the basic model for most human behavior and many human diseases. That the races differ phenotypically is not up for grabs at all. Pull out any chart on racial statistics and look around. The races act different! Duh.

The problem is that we can’t even admit this basic scientific fact on our benighted society. You can’t say, “Blacks commit much more crime than Whites” or “Blacks are less intelligent than Whites.” But these are hard, solid scientific facts that are completely uncontroversial in criminology and psychology.

The intelligence differentials are proven by IQ tests. The debate about whether intelligence exists, whether it can be measured, and how well IQ tests predict intelligence ended decades ago in the journals. Even the hard-line environmentalists have caved in on these issues. But it takes forever for science to make it from the journals and halls of  academe to the popular press, and in everyday society, we are still pitching arguments that were trashed decades ago by the experts who study them.

Further, Blacks are behind in school achievement and have lower rates of high school graduation, college admission, graduation, and all sorts of other obvious markers for intelligence, which proves that the IQ tests are indeed measuring intelligence.

Try to state the obvious fact, “The Black race is on average less intelligent than the White race” in our society. You’ll be cancelled in the blink of an eye. According to the doctrine of “pure” race realism, which merely suggests that the races behave differently in different places in time and space, the only possible reasons for lower Black intelligence, higher crime, lower scores on many positive things and higher values on many negative things are either genes or culture. We can rule out racism. And by culture we mean the culture that they have created for themselves, possibly via their genes. So the culture argument goes circular very quickly.

We know racism is not at fault because Blacks have similar statistics in places that are almost all-Black where no anti-Black racism can be seen anywhere on the horizon. In fact, in these places, Blacks have even lower intelligence and higher crime and pathologies than they do in the US.

A Race Realism Critique: Race Realism Doesn’t Go Far Enough Towards Bettering Our Race Problems

White nationalists, including Brandon Adamson, have been unimpressed by my project, seeing it as too little, too late, and at any rate of little help to Whites. I beg to differ. A society in which the basic minimal premises of race realism – the races behave differently, and it’s not due to racism – would conceivably result in a dramatically different America. One with less self-flagellation and verbal lynching of Whites, with less White guilt and blame, and with fewer declarations of unwinnable wars to close racial gaps, etc.

The Societal Benefits of Adopting a Basic Race Realist View of Race

According to the cause and effect so favored by modern anti-racism, it stands to reason that the racism of US White society has dramatically increased Black intelligence and improved their behavior. I don’t believe that either, but the fact that Blacks act the same or usually worse when they are subject to no racism at all seems to rule out racism as a cause of lower intelligence and behavioral pathologies. Hey, they want to play cause and effect, right?

Yet if this is true, it lifts a weight off of our shoulders.

No more frantically beating our heads into our desks over the achievement gap. No more frantic efforts to close a gap that  probably cannot be closed. No more waging dubious battles against unseen and possibly nonexistent entities like systemic racism. No more dumbing down curricula because school itself is racist because Blacks don’t do as well in it. No more admitting less qualified students over the more qualified. No more handing out graduation degrees barely useful for lining bird cages.

Likewise, it lifts a weighty package of guilt from the minds of Blacks. If Blacks perform less well in school, hey! It’s not their fault! Doesn’t that feel better already? They can quit beating themselves up over it. And the guilt is lifted from us Whites too. Blacks don’t do poorly in school because of we evil Whites and our devilish racism. Turns out our racist dark materials play no role in this at all. It’s not our fault that Blacks do less well in school! Stop beating yourself up, White man!

Once we acknowledge the bare minimum of race realism – that the races in the US behave differently for some unknown reason that is not caused by racism – now we may proceed onto the fraught terrain of the genes versus environment debate.

Granted, this is a minefield too because once society decides that Black statistics are caused by culture, we end up waging endless wars to improve Black culture, wars that typically boil down to charging at windmills with lances and other forms of folly. Indeed, Blacks behave much better and even show better school performance when we better their culture, but the gaps remain and may sadly be insurmountable.

When we acknowledge that Blacks are less intelligent, the urgency of closing the achievement gap fades. If they really are less smart, then the achievement gap is a normal product of such. Same with high school and university graduation rates, university admissions, etc. A less intelligent race would obviously drop out of high school and college more and be admitted to universities less often. So many foggy things become crystal clear.

At any rate, a society that acknowledges minimal race realism should be good for Whites. Once we acknowledge intelligence is a thing, we can start choosing better immigrants for our country. If the average US IQ is 98, I would argue that US immigrants should have a minimum 98 IQ. There’s hardly anything more ridiculous than mass importation of low IQ immigrants resulting in lower national IQ, but this is the project we have signed on to.

I’ve long said that it doesn’t matter much where an immigrant comes from if they are chosen well. Setting a 98 IQ for Black and Hispanic immigrants should reduce a lot of the crime problem we have from poorly controlled immigration. We can even take the best and the brightest from Africa. I have no objection to a Kenyan with a Master’s Degree wanting to call this land his home, and he and his offspring are unlikely to cause problems.

At the moment, our immigration project seems to to import vast numbers of low IQ, poorly educated workers and peasants from the 3rd World. I am baffled at why such folks, useful for little more than the most manual of labor, benefit our advanced industrial nation. Furthermore, this cohort is likely to produce a lot of school failure, crime, gangs, and other social pathologies. We are mass importing crime-prone populations from the 3rd World. It’s little surprise when their proclivities bear fruit in their behaviors.

A race realist society could look askance at affirmative action and other nonsense where less qualified people are promoted over more qualified, something that barely makes sense in most possible universes. In fact, it seems to be either cultural self-flagellation, masochism, or even a death wish on our part. It’s a project that is deliberately designed specifically to fail. Any rational person would scoff at such perversity, yet we are no longer a rational society.

Even the Genetic View of Race Is Not as Pessimistic and Doomed about Race As Everyone Thinks (or As Conservatives Hope)

On the other hand, the genetic explanation is not so doomed as liberals think. We are heading into the era of out and out gene editing. If we can’t create a better Black citizen by social engineering, perhaps we can create one in a test tube.

Once elevated Black levels of testosterone combined with a 2X higher psychopathy score become acknowledged (for these are obvious facts undisputed by science), extremely high rates of Black crime and other pathologies come into clear focus.

Further, once we acknowledge that the races are biologically and behaviorally different (and the reason is irrelevant), we can do one more important thing – we can start tailoring interventions specifically for certain races.

If Blacks have high testosterone, perhaps a pill can lower it. Elevated psychopathy levels may also be treated with a pill of some sort. Of course Black people would have to volunteer to take these pills, but once we point out that Black violence and behavioral pathology damages the perpetrator in addition to his victims, perhaps some Blacks will tire of antisocial behavior ruining their lives and sign up for a pill that keeps them out of jail.

There are other interventions besides medication. There are all sorts of psychological and sociological therapies for all manner of behavioral pathologies, including those that put you behind bars. Once we realize that the different races bring a different phenotypic dish to the plate, we can start tailoring interventions by race. Perhaps therapies that work well on Whites won’t work on Blacks. Perhaps Blacks will need interventions specifically designed to work with their phenotypical material.

Problems of White Nationalism

One form of White advocacy in the face of the coming trials of Whites in America is a movement called White nationalism which advocates a separate White ethnic state in the US. There are many problems with this proposal from the point of view of the Alt Left. First of all, we are a left-liberal movement, and people in that sphere are positively allergic to anything that even remotely smacks of racism.

And White nationalism is not just racist in the fake use of racism that the Cultural Left uses in which 80% of those accused of bigotry are not guilty of such. White nationalism is the real deal, hardcore, ugly, nasty, out and out blatant racism against non-Whites. At least that’s how it appears to everyone on the Left, including those on the Alt Left, as we are after all Left at the end of the day.

White nationalism will never go over with any liberal to Left race realists. It’s too toxic. It’s true that Adamson did start a “left wing of the Alt Right” wing of the Alt Left and that this is one of the original wings, but nevertheless, the Alt Left masses completely rejected this as a sort of “left-wing fascism,” which is probably not a bad way to describe it. Adamson distances himself from the Alt Left now and refers to himself as Dissident Right.

The purpose of the Alt Left is to convince the liberal-Left that race realism is a viable, proper, and decent philosophy. We can’t do that if it’s associated with real ugly racism.

In addition, White nationalism is a White Supremacist movement. That’s the whole purpose of it. They obfuscate this a lot, but face facts: if White nationalists did not consider themselves a superior race (White Supremacism) there would be no desire to “save the race” and promote their separate state, which is after all designed to save the race. Saving the White race or saving any race is ridiculous to me and probably to everyone on the liberal-Left. Races have been changing all down through time.

You have only to go to Silicon Valley to see that a highly diverse multiracial class of individuals can do amazing things. Even if Whites mix with other races, assortative mating will be the norm, with most higher IQ Whites mating with higher IQ non-Whites. In particular, a mixed White-Asian race seems to me to be an upgrade from the present White race as I consider Asians to be superior to Whites. Hence an Asian-White mixed race would simply improve the White stock. What’s wrong with that?

There is also a tendency on the Alt Left towards the view of the British take of things: “Oh well, I suppose we will muddle through this” – towards the “extinction of the White race.” Anyway, pure races have been going “extinct” all down through human history, and we are all still here and thriving. It’s a tempest in a teapot. When it comes to White genocide and White extinction, as Stein said about Oakland, there’s no there there.

White nationalists think that the White race is so superior to any other race that the end of the White race will mean devastation and decline for humanity. This is the down and dirty truth about White nationalism that none of them will admit. I’m not buying it and in particular, I’m not buying that we are superior to Asians.

Another problem with White nationalism is their idea of nation and state. Usually states have been carved up colonially out of many different nations or since the Peace of Hapsburg anyway in 1848, into nation-states made up of discrete groups of people that shared an ethnic heritage, language, religion, culture, and long history.

Obviously the nation-building efforts of nation-states caused all manner of problems, mostly that all of the non-members of the titular ethnicity were ordered to become hyphenated members of the main ethnic group. Or perhaps not even hyphenated. Nation-states have historically been allergic to the idea of minorities within their borders.

White nationalism involves neither a carve-up of colonial lands and arbitrary lines on a map nor a nation-state in the traditional sense. I am sorry, but “American” is not an ethnicity, and “Whites” are not a nation at least in the Leninist sense, which is the one I use. People that are not part of a nation generally have no right to a state.

More particularly, no ethnically race-based state has ever been tried anywhere except maybe in the Americas with Jim Crow laws and in South Africa. Neither one worked very well, and the latter needed continuous tinkering because people just wouldn’t stop interbreeding, not that there wasn’t a lot of that under Jim Crow, but the fallacious one-drop rule was instituted in a poor effort to deal with human nature, that is, the tendency to breed outside of one’s race.

All race-based states or pseudo-states failed and they were known for massive injustices at the same time. That hardly seems like a model anyone on the Left would sign onto.

Most Whites laugh at the idea of a White state. I can’t imagine the non-Whites of the US going along with such an ultra-radical scenario either. It seems preposterous and unworkable.

Further, White nationalists are putting the cart before the horse. They are like athletes who are trying to master a 6 foot high jump when they can’t even get over the 2, 3, 4, and 5 foot bars. They remind me of the Communists in Afghanistan who wanted to bypass the socialist phase of Communism altogether and go straight to Communism. That didn’t work either.

How about first things first? All proper arguments and movements start from the bottom and work up. For God’s sake, we can’t even get Americans to believe that race is real, Whites are more intelligent than Blacks, and Blacks have a very high crime rate. Stating any of these scientific truths will get your career wrecked. How bout we focus on the absolute basics first? Like getting Americans to even agree to those three basic concepts. Then we can talk about what comes next.

Further, the views of White nationalists are extreme. They oppose Brown v. Board of Education, the Civil Rights Act, the Housing Rights Act, and even the 14th Amendment! Many support the South in the Civil War and downplay the horrors of slavery.

Almost all say that Jim Crow and segregation were better than the present state of racial affairs. In fact, one of their main arguments is that we need to allow legal segregation under the dubious grounds of freedom of association. Americans want nothing to do with Jim Crow based segregation. They don’t want to overthrow the Civil Rights laws. They like the Brown decision. And of course they love the 14th Amendment.

Further, in America, we don’t go backwards and deny rights already granted, which is why the anti-abortion argument is un-American. Here we started with a basic set of rights which we have historically continually expanded upon, which is proper and even in accordance with the Left Hegelian view of the March of History. We don’t go backwards and take away rights already given. White nationalists are asking Americans to do something they don’t do.

Other White nationalist views are quite extreme. I regularly see comments on American Renaissance that would not be allowed in even the most un-PC White household. Most Whites have gone beyond that.

White nationalists oppose miscegenation between Whites and non-Whites. First of all, no one uses that word anymore, and uttering it enough to clear most any room full of Whites. They call it race-mixing, which is about as toxic. Only 9% of American Whites oppose miscegenation of Whites with non-Whites.

In 2008, I read that there that 15% of Whites said they would never vote for a Black president. This was considered to be a starting base for White nationalism. The problem is that all views like this – support for segregation and dismantling civil rights, opposition to race-mixing and miscegenation, refusal to vote for a Black for president – are declining. The number of Whites thinking this way probably declines every year for decades now.

In this sense, White nationalists are fighting a war against Time itself. They are like a dog chasing after the runaway train of History. As Abe Lincoln said when he saw a dog doing that, “What do you think that dog will do if he catches up with that train?” But it’s worse than that. For White Nationalists, the train will forever be out of reach.

Sorry, Computer Was in the Shop

That’s why I haven’t been posting all this time.

It’s been ready sine May 28, but I just got it back the other day. Apparently there was some sort of a power surge or hard shutoff possibly while Windows was updating itself. I got most of my data back but I did lose a folder of old uninstalled programs. At first I thought I lost all of my passwords, but then I found them. I never back up my data, but now maybe I need to start doing that.

What about surge protectors? I have a surge protector on there but obviously it didn’t work very well. What about Universal Power Supplies? I used to have one of those too.

Any advice from anyone other than chuck this Windows garbage?

Alt Left: The Cultural Left: A Plague on the Left

The Plague of the Cultural Left Freakshow

When Trump came up with the Alt Left moniker to smear the Left and compare them with White Supremacists, what he meant by the Alt Left was simply the normative Cultural Left, or what we in the Alt Left call the Control Left or CNTRL-Left in reference to the keyboard suggestion in the name Alt Left. In fact, the Alt Left was formed in stark opposition to the Control Left and the Cultural Left, which we differentiate from the actual Left.

Unfortunately, here in the US anyway, the Cultural Left has become synonymous with the Left. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard people say, “I used to be on the Left, but I’m now on the Right” from young White men in the last ten years. You ask around and it turns out that the everything they hate about the Left is in fact the Cultural Left or what we would call the Fake Left.

The term Cultural Left is not a reference to Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory of the Frankfurt School, which is completely ridiculous.

Social Conservatives Make More Sense Than the Cultural Left Freakshow

On all of these matters, cultural conservatives make more sense than cultural liberals. Any time conservatives offer a better position than we do on just about anything, I consider this to be a complete failure of the Left. They’re not supposed to be better on even one important thing.

How the Left Stole the Anti-Science Mantle from the Right

As you will see below, the Right has adopted the views of the Left, while the Left has adopted the views of the Right. That’s appalling right there because our old views were correct and theirs were wrong. Of course.

It is especially disturbing that the Left, which has traditionally relied on science (indeed, Marxism itself is unwaveringly materialistic) has now become the anti-science wing (typically the purview of conservatives) while appallingly, conservatives are now known for a celebration of science, empiricism, reason, and logic, whereas the Left is now the realm of obscurantism, magical thinking, hatred of the empirical method, and a division of truth and facts into “good truths, facts, and science” and “evil truths, facts, and science.” It’s ridiculous.

There’s no such thing as hate truths, hate facts, or hate science, assuming the science is solid. Science cares nothing about morality or right and wrong. We are constantly confronted with uncomfortable truths about ourselves and the world around us. It is not the job of science to run away from the ugly truth towards some magical, feel-good lies.

Conservatives Promote Free Speech, Liberals Support Censorship?

It is equally appalling that the Right, traditionally champions of censorship and opponents of free speech, are now the free speech absolutists, while the Left, traditionally the hard-line free speech crowd, is now the champion of mass censorship, banning, and de-platforming, not to mention firing and career death for those with uncomfortable notions emanating from their free minds.

In the revolutions of the 1960’s, our idea of liberation was never a celebration of Black criminals as saints and heroic figures. Nor was it about emptying the jails and prisons on the basis of, “Hey, let’s try it and see what happens.” On this matter, unfortunately, the conservatives are more right than we are.

But here we are offered two equally insane choices – on the Right, “Lock everyone up for life for spitting on the sidewalk!” and on the Left, “Let’s empty the jails and prisons just for the heck of it!” These are the only two choices one is offered.

The position of the Alt Left would be to say that one is as bad as the other and that the Middle Way (as the Chinese put it) is the best here and on most issues for that matter.

The Cultural Left Are Actually Victorian Prudish Sex-haters!

On the other hand, on cultural issues, it is better to say that the Alt Left is between the Cultural Left Freakshow (this is what we on the Alt Left call the Cultural Left) and what we see as the prigs and prudes of cultural conservatism. It doesn’t help that the Modern Left has itself become culturally conservative, as prudish feminism has now infected that whole sector, and men (but only White men, mind you) are deemed automatically evil for the crime of wanting to have sex with women.

That this is the natural way women think is not at issue. What is at issue is why the distorted values of one sex (and this could apply to men too) should rule society. Instead, the Alt Left feels that sexual mores are best kept away from culture and especially the state into the private sphere.

Alt Left: What Is the Alternative Left?

How It Started

The birth of the movement came from my website via a view that I slowly developed over nine years. My initial political project was called Liberal Race Realism, but I eventually chucked it as a complete failure. The problem was that the only people who flocked to the Left’s premier liberal race realist site were…drum roll…racists! It became obvious over the years that people just can’t talk reasonably about race. Conversations immediately degenerate into slurs and the worst, most ugly racism. This led me to assume that rational discussions about race were impossible, which still may be the case.

One of the things I argued that was that we have two equally insane choices on race here in the US: the utterly lunacy, and increasingly, menace and toxicity of modern anti-racism on one side and hardcore, ugly, nasty, vicious racism on the other. You have to pick one or the other. If you don’t buy the choice on the Left, you are angrily cast out and ordered to go join the Klansmen and Nazis. I did hang out with the racialist White blogosphere for a while, but I always felt out of place there too because I’m simply not a very racist person.

Nevertheless, I and another very early adopter Brandon Adamson who owns the domain, did come out of the Alt Right. We had both been on the fringes of it for years but were both dissatisfied, me by the grotesque racism and Brandon by the Alt Right’s backwards and barbarous social conservatism, which offended him because he’s basically just another liberal, albeit with some unconventional views on race.

In this sense, the birth of the Alt Left was on the Alt Right, and the Alt Left is definitely an Alt Right split. Indeed, Brandon’s site was long titled, “The Alt Left – the left wing of the Alt Right.” In certain respects, this will always be true.

As far as the name goes, I have to hand it to the Nazis for that one. On the website The Right Stuff (Richard Spencer’s site) in the comments section of one article someone asked, “We know what the Alt Right is, but what is the Alt Left?” Someone responded, “The Alt Left is Robert Lindsay,” and linked to me. I saw it and it hit me right there. I had a name. Thank you, Nazis!

Brandon once said something I thought was very important. He said that one good thing about the Alt Right was that everything was up for grabs and nothing was off-topic for discussion. This included the stark truths about race, ethnicity, the sexes, and sexual orientation, and gender identity. On the Alt Right, there’s no policing for Crimethink.

Another early Alt Leftist, Ryan England, noted on Saryon of Arkkad’s show (no, the Alt Left does not claim Saryon, sorry!) that the early Alt Left even included some race realists. Saryon then noted that the Alt Left seemed to be about the search for the truth instead of the pretty lies everyone else wants to believe. If the truth is ugly, so be it. So is life. Move on. Ryan calls this “Renaissance values” meaning the early triumph of the empirical method over obscurantism, magic, religion, superstition, and resulting idiocy, or science over backwardness and barbarism.

Personally, in my writing about issues not related to my personal life, I almost follow the Categorical Imperative. Indeed, White culture itself, perhaps alone out of all other cultures, uniquely values honestly for no other reason than the social peace that results. Hence, it has become part of our White values and morals.

Of course, Whites lie like crazy just like all the other races, but I still think a lot of Whites feel an almost unique pang of guilt when they lie, particularly egregiously. Is this from our Christian values? From Classical culture and the Greeks? Of course there are good lies and bad lies and white lies and black lies, but in general, society seems to go smoother when there’s not a lot of egregious lying.

Hence the almost suicidal addition to the truth in my writing. I’ve always told my readers that I will never lie to them. If the truth looks bad for my side, so be it. If it looks good for the other guys, well, fine, perhaps we should adopt their views. I want to know the truth about what’s going on in the world. The problem is that especially in politics and particularly in geopolitics, truth is almost as uncommon as a rare Earth mineral. The daily news is a barrage lies from the media, political parties, the government, the corporations, Hell, just about everybody.

I look at that with dismay. I see the avalanche of lies and tell myself that I will ferret out the truth there one way or another. I don’t want to have any falsehoods in my head. Why is everyone so keen on believing all sorts of lies and nonsense and untruths? That seems like a yucky way to live. Hence I soldier on, as does the Alt Left. One wonders if Kant is smiling down on us as we tiptoe our way down the perilous trek to the pure truth of the categorical imperative. I like to think he’s wishing us along.

History of the Alt Left

The Alt Left truly took off a few years ago, and soon there were 18,000 members of Alt Left groups on Facebook. Also, following the tradition of Left movements, it quickly split into at least 14 different factions, wings, or splits, many of whom hated each other. I quickly renounced many of them, but movements can’t be patented or copyrighted, and the Alt Left will become whatever the Alt Left masses decide it is to become.

Brandon cheered on the factionalism at one point, and so did I. In fact, I coined an Alt Left saying, “Everyone form your own wing.” I didn’t mean that explicitly but instead meant it more in the sense of “Beyond a few hard lines, everyone mix and match whatever combination of Right, Left and Neither positions you like to form your own unique politics.” Nowadays this is banned in favor of extreme partisanship.

Want to be on the Left? Here is a checklist of 100 positions on issues, and you have to check the right box on each one. You missed one and only got 99 out of 100 correct? You get thrown out and ordered to go join the Right.

It’s apparently the same on the Right. We are now in the era of litmus tests with no end. Most people just pick a side, identify with it, and check every box the correct away without even thinking.

The Alt Left movement soon developed original thinkers, websites, and even a magazine. For a time there was talk of an Alt Left arts movement too.

The Realist Left

The Keynesians became grouped around some very smart folks at Social Democracy for the 21st Century blog.

They were mostly Keynesians with a few Modern Monetary Thinkers (MMT’ers) thrown in too. They were more left than the Alt Left on culture, and they caved early on Zionism. They despised true Left economics as failed.

They did a lot of great work on the intellectual background of the Cultural Left, which of course is postmodernism along with its top thinkers Lacan, Lyotard, Derrida, and especially Foucalt. That these folks are incomprehensible is hardly their only problem.

Much more problematic were their anti-scientific notions that there is no such thing as truth, facts, or science, and everyone’s view of these things is “correct for them,” and apparently therefore correct in general.

This movement decided to split from the Alt Left and become a project called the Realist Left. We are more to the right of them on culture but more left on just about everything else.

Alt Left Positions

Many position statements were put forth, and a lot of my original project was shot down by the Alt Left masses. Race realism was one of the first to go, rejected as too toxic to touch. Instead the movement went “agnostic” on race realism. It is tragic that agnosticism on race realism would now be considered a majestic triumph for us. We can’t even get the most right-wing Republicans to do that.

On foreign policy, my anti-imperialism was chucked in favor of non-interventionism, which is not much of a cave-in.

On economics, the Keynesians seemed to win out against people like Brandon and me. Indeed, the two early founders of the movement are practically Communists! Instead, the movement completely rejected the Hard Left, in particular on the grounds that this is where you find the worst of the Cultural Left types.

The Alt Left and the “Middle Way”

On culture, the Alt Left is in between the sheer insanity and weirdness of the Cultural Left and the stuffy prudes of the Social Conservatives. We think one is as bad as the other, but these are the only two items on the menu. We say they both taste awful and that the truth is instead the golden mean, or as the Chinese Taoists put it, “Everything in moderation.” So our cultural view would be between those extremes.

We do support the Democratic Party, because no matter how loony the Cultural Left is, I’d still rather have them in than Republicans, which are always a bane and are now frankly an openly authoritarian, and, yes, fascist party. Those who scoff should read Trotsky on fascism where he describes the immense appeal it has to the “ordinary man on the street” or “los descamisados” or “shirtless ones” in Peronist terms. It is its potential for extreme popularity with ordinary folks that is precisely what makes fascism so dangerous, he points out.

Borrowing from Ayman al-Zawahari of Al Qaeda, we on the Alt Left say the Republican Party is the “near enemy” and the Cultural Left is the “far enemy.”

In other terms, the Cultural Left is like a mosquito swarm, maybe one in Alaska. Annoying but hardly fatal and there’s always bug spray.

On the other hand the Republican Party is like a grizzly bear in your living room, and open and immediate menace.

Support for Tradition

Obviously we had to compromise on Zionism. Doesn’t everyone somehow? How does that work anyway? One of our best early thinkers was a Keynesian Israeli who was a super Zionist. One of my early principles was anti-Zionism, but we had to go agnostic on that one too. This man did add some good thinking to our project. One view of his that I like was, “Hey, what’s wrong with family values, anyway? History has shown us that this is what works.”

I concur with him. In fact, the Alt Left view on a lot of cultural issues is, “Your grandmother was right,” otherwise known as “the wisdom of the ages.” Every generation thinks it is reinventing the wheel, but they’re mostly rebelling without a cause. I figure that traditions are in place because our ancestors presumably already tried everything else, including most every crazy idea of the “out with the old” new generations, and found that most of this stuff didn’t work.

Through centuries of trial and error, not only did we learn which plants were toxic but we also learned about what works culturally and what doesn’t. What works became known as “our traditions.” Like them or not, they’re there for a reason, in most cases because even if they are lousy, they’re the least bad of the alternatives. We spit at our ancestors at our peril.

The Fake Definition of the Alt Left

I think one thing we ought to get out of the way first is what the Alternative Left, or Alt Left for short, is not.

Most people think the Alt Left is what Donald Trump and his Deporables (yes, the Alt Left considers them Deplorables but we have a unique take on them – see below) has called the Alt Left. After the Alt Right got bad publicity at Charlottesville, Trump tried to equate the Left with the Southern Reconstructionists, racists, and out and out Nazis at Charlottesville by implying that the Left was just as bad.

Personally, I think most at the rally were simply the first of the three above, and I think the lawsuit and conviction of the organizers was an outrageous breach of justice. Nevertheless, this sort of judicial malpractice seems to be happening to Whites in trials around the US wherever racial issues are at stake. Keep in mind that I don’t like the Charlottesville organizers. But fair is fair.

Delphi Murders Update May 4, 2022: A Family Member of a Victim Is a Suspect in the Murders

Sorry I have not been writing much lately, but we haven’t heard much new stuff worth reporting. Warning: Long, runs to 30 pages.

A Few Defenses of Our Group and Our Method

First of all, it is considered basic knowledge among those who follow this case that I have no idea what I am talking about.

First, it is not “I.” These theories are a result of a private group of more than 250 members, which at the moment even includes retired homicide detectives. You read that right. They were so impressed that they actually paid money to join us. Everything I write is a result of the work that my group has done. It’s not down to me at all. It is a result of a collaborative effort of over 250 people. I would also like to ask how many other groups have as many as 250 people all working together to try to solve this crime? I would imagine zero.

Second, it is claimed that I have said I had insider knowledge from Day One. This is not true, although I said many things in the past that I no longer believe. In fact, our main suspect for years turned out to be completely innocent. He’s a terrible person but he’s not a murderer. We have admitted we got it wrong on that, and we are ok with that. Homicide investigations often close in on false suspects.

Furthermore, we now renounce many of the things we have stated in the past. Those were things we used to believe but we no longer believe. We no longer believe these things because we think subsequent information has shown our earlier information to be completely wrong.

In the early days, “inside sources” were simply mostly locals who were close to the investigation. In other words, unverified rumors. We reported only unverified rumors for a long time because that is all we had access to. However, a couple of years into the case, we did obtain information from two police sources who we will not name. We also got data from someone close to a detective on the case.

Starting at the beginning of last year, we were able to cultivate new sources in LE and develop a personal relationship with them. They have given us a tremendous amount of information and have been very helpful.

In addition, we were finally able to obtain official case documents.

We also were able to conduct interviews of two female members of the search party.

As you can see, we reported that the abduction occurred at 2:13 PM on 2/13 and that police were looking for 43 seconds of audiotape, presumably recorded by the killer. About a year later, national media revealed those facts for the first time. But we reported it one full year before national media. So based on that it is clear that we have been publishing correct information about the case that is verified by official sources later on.

Keep in mind also that we are the only Delphi sleuthing group that has actual homicide detectives, working or retired, working closely with us. And they paid to join us. I’m not sure how many others can claim that. That right there implies that maybe people ought to listen to us. So you might want to give us a listen based on that right there. And these officers do not necessarily agree with our take on the case. In fact, they have been quite critical of some of our theories. This is good as these LE professionals are keeping us on our toes and forcing us to do good work.

I assure you that as the details about this crime become known, more and more of what we have said on here will be shown to be true. We were right in the past, and we will be right in the future. You ignore us at your peril.

We have been trashed from here to kingdom come for claiming that we have official case documents. But where do you think the information about 43 seconds of audio and the abduction happening at precisely 2:13 PM came to us? We acquired that directly from a case document that is sitting on the desk next to me right now. That document is signed by the FBI themselves. So you see, it’s now proven that we do have official case documents.

We have been attacked for not noting the role that the Klines played in this case. However, our case documents and the information from our police sources never mentioned either of these men. I’m inclined to believe that therefore they did not play a huge role in the crime, and they certainly were not among the killers. Perhaps police only started looking at these men lately.

We have not been able to contact our police source to see what they have to say about the Klines. However, the absence of news about them for five years implies to me that their role in the case is minimal, and that neither man was involved in the homicide.

I’ve also noticed that our best female sleuths were often older women aged 40-65. Women get a lot more sensible as they age, particularly after age 30, so perhaps a lot of young women are just too unhinged and touchy to do good detective work.

Experience has shown us that sleuths who use logic and have bad intuition skills make terrible sleuths. These are mostly men because men are better in logic and worse in intuition, women being the opposite. Some of our best sleuths have long been women. I finally figured out that it’s due to their intuitive skills.

The “pure logic” type says, “Hey, maybe there was a 1% chance that this (totally unlikely) thing happened instead of the much more likely 99% conclusion!” We have to hold up all of our efforts because some logichead can’t parse theories that don’t pass the smell test. Whereas the intuitive person says, “Wait a minute. That strange thing that has a 1% of chance of being true? Well, that didn’t happen! Instead, what happened was this 99% likely thing.”

Just to give you an example, it’s been painfully obvious since very early in this case that there was a social media connection. Remember what they said early on? “Be careful of what your kids do on social media.” Ever since then, anyone who suggested a social media connection on the case were shouted down in the most belligerent way. Almost all of the shouters were men.

When people asked them why LE officers would say such an odd thing if there was no social media connection, these boneheads came up with one lame excuse after another. These should be called “alternative facts.” In my field of science (I publish in peer-reviewed academic journals) we call these “ad hoc theories.” They’re considered pathetic. In evolutionary biology, this sort of nonsense is called “just-so theories.”

The Latest Charges against Us (Sigh)

They never quit, do they? This one from the toilet/sewer known as LibbyandAbby on Reddit, run by a female sewage plant worker named ATrueLady. There are many an execrable human being on there, and they have been absolutely useless as a source in saying anything intelligent about the case, as just about any theory gets shouted down by ferocious, vicious maniacs with 70 IQ’s. Total waste of time!

Anyway here is the latest. I Know You Are Watching RL, and If This Is True, You Are a Twisted Piece of Shit. Well, I am a twisted POS, that’s not up for debate. Ask anyone who knows me! Especially one of my exes! But the charge is that Julie Melvin sold the photograph from Libby’s funeral of Libby in her casket to me.

Well that’s not true. I have that photo, yes. My group has seen it. I asked my group if I should post it on here, but they shot it down as too offensive. The group makes a lot of the decisions on here, not me. It’s their group.

I have spoken to Julie Melvin on two separate occasions. She is indeed one of the finest local sources for information on this case. And she actually has a brain that works, unlike those subreddit monkeys. I do not recall how I acquired this pic, but I don’t think I got it from Julie. And why would she sell it? And if she sold it, why not keep a copy for herself? They’re not like physical photos, you know.

Of course I did not pay money for that photo. Someone gave it to me. The photo is out there and floating around and has been for some time. Many people have seen it. There’s not much to see. She actually looks rather calm and peaceful in her casket, though it’s sad of course. Have you ever been to an open casket funeral? Did everyone there freak out because they had the eeeeeeevil pleasure of seeing the body? Come on, people.

Here is another:

Presto Magic: He also recently said the dolls rumors and such are false. Acting like he never had them. Yeah I went back to look yesterday and I noticed he acted like the dolls thing wasn’t something he ever stood behind…even though he did

Presto Magic is a sewer rat who paid to join my group but hates me. I can’t block his access, but if anyone know what email or handle he uses on here, I will block any post he tries to make.

For the record, of course I never said that the dolls, etc. rumors are false. None of those rumors about the weird crime scene are false as far as I can tell. Where do people come up with this?

Dudes also a pedo or “hebefile” or whatever the f he calls it-

This crap is just so tiresome. Just for the record, I happen to be a teliophile, like 79% of all men, not that it matters, as there’s no shame in being a pedophile or hebephile, though I’m glad I didn’t get wired up hardcore pedophilic or hebephilic. I guess my attitude about guys like that, “It sucks to be you. Glad it’s not me.” I feel sorry for these men because the only way they can satisfy their sex drive is by breaking the law. How sad! 18% of men are hebephiles and 3% are hebephiles. I’m no more attracted to girls under 12 (pedophilic range) or 12-14 (hebephilic range) than any other man on this Earth.

People need to stop using the words “pedophile” and “hebephile” because 95% of the population are retards and don’t understand what the words mean so they use them incorrectly. For God’s sake, if you’re too dumb to use a word correctly, quit using it! The behavior you are thinking of is child molestation and the people you are thinking of are child molesters. Use those words instead. And condemn it till the cows come home. It won’t bother me.

I have a side practice as a psychological counselor, and one of the areas I specialize in is people who are troubled by thoughts of having sex with children or pubertal individuals. I’m an expert on the subject, and I get clients coming to me from all over the world because I am just that good. So that’s one reason I talk about this BS.

Yes, I talk about it a lot as I am very interested in human sexuality, and I’m also very upset about this insane moral panic and mass hysteria that has overtaken what used to be a rather mundane, so-what, shoulder-shrugging, or even snickering topic.

Sometimes I feel like my planet has been taken over by hysterical morons. It’s like they’re all pod-people. People didn’t have our present attitude towards this all to common behavior when I was growing up in the 70’s and 80’s. It’s like I’ve been projected into a future full of deranged, psychotic, dangerous assholes, which is the majority of idiot humans in the US right now. Moral panics are asinine.

All moral panics and mass hysterias disgust me, and I will post on all of this mass mentally disordered bullshit anytime I want.

This from a petulant, screeching, moon-mad loon named xanaxarita. It’s not just me who hates this cross, tempestuous harpy. No one likes this noisome, truculent, shrewish bird of prey. This battle axe is a drama queen and a prima donna with permanent PMS.

To my knowledge (I am having a difficult time finding the files in my notes – so don’t believe it until I do) he was sued by naming members of a Delphi family as POI’s. This led to the discovery that ‘Robert Lindsay’ is actually the persona of two individuals. His Blogger account was permanently deleted.

This is scurrilous. This is a lie started by an insane person named Eric Alter. He even produced some fake court documents from a court in Michigan. There was no discovery. There was no lawsuit over naming members of a family in Delphi as POI’s because I never named anyone in town as a POI at that time. There was no lawsuit against me filed by anyone involving anyone connected to this case. In fact, I believe I have never been sued at all even one time in my life! If you want to sue me, first you will have to find me and good luck with that! Many have tried and many have failed that quixotic quest.

I still have a Blogger account last time I checked. It has a warning on it, but you can still go there. As far as whether I am one person or two, I am not sure. Sometimes I think I am one person, and other times I think I am two people. Can someone help me out here and help me figure out who I am?

Yes, his attempts to normalize “childrens sex lives” is insidiously disgusting and dangerous.

I hear this garbage all the time, and I suppose I should address it. I’ve never attempted to “normalize children’s sex lives.” I have some opinions on the subject, but I’ve never really discussed them. I suppose the best answer is “children,” a term that applies to minors under age 13, should not have sex lives other than with themselves or childhood sex play because they have no sex drives. Anything other than that is either illegal or should be broken up by the parents. Childhood should be sexless.

I assume this person is referring to teenage girls age 13-17. Yes, I do attempt to normalize the sex drives and lives of teenage girls. They have strong sex drives and they often have sexual lives, either with themselves or with others. I have no problem with teenagers of either sex having sex lives either with themselves or with peers. And it is indeed normal. Teenagers aren’t little children. People who get outraged by minors having sex are Sex Fascists, prudes, prigs, sexhaters, and neo-Puritans. Which is the vast majority of this country by now.

this wasn’t a botched abortion attempt

A botched abortion attempt (except we don’t think it was botched) remains an unverified rumor. But it comes from the very best local sources.

He’s changed his poi a ton last year and there is no way any of them check all the boxes.

That’s not true either. Since the beginning of last year, we decided that the police had a main suspect, and that person was Mr. X. We have not named a single other main suspect since then. Our latest police source, a retired Delphi police officer, just affirmed this for us again a month or two ago.

He’s a sick dude with a history of dishing out defenses of hebephilia

I really prefer not to discuss this matter because the country is afflicted with mass retardation in the course of a moral panic and mass hysteria about this ridiculous issue. The whole country has been taken over by the Sex Fascists.

However, according to the American Psychiatric Association, hebephilia is not a mental disorder. That is, it is not disordered behavior. Even more than that, the APA stated that it is not even abnormal! That is, hebephilia is completely normal at least as a way of thinking. On the other hand, if you act on these feelings, the APA pointed out that you are breaking the law here in the US and you are a criminal.

If you disagree, take it up with the APA!

RL is a messed up individual that posted all sorts of “inside information” from special “sources.”

We tire of this. It is true that in previous years, we did use language like this, though not precisely those. However, we do in fact in have inside information in the form of testimonies from search party members, official case documents, and LE sources who leak to us. We do consider that inside information, and all of those are sources.

However I think that Robert Lindsay has a bad source, and he is very gullible.

We don’t have a bad source (we have very few anyway), and I’m not gullible at all. Quite the opposite.

He was banned from Webslueths in just one day just a few months after the murders.

Correct, there were rumors involving a sexual angle and a lot of rumors about what sort of injuries the girls suffered. I repeated those rumors. The female who runs the place is an unhinged, waspish hysteroid who is constantly screaming and yelling and flying off the handle. Not only that but the site is worse than useless. So I was banned for discussing some of the rumors about the case, rumors which have now been shown to be true, by the way.

I just assumed no one paid attention to that guy anymore after his “crime scene” photo was proven fake.

Those are not my crime scene photos. Those were developed by a physicist. I happen to think that some of his analysis is correct. I think my graphic arts woman just colored in parts of it. And it hasn’t been proven fake, sorry. It’s blown up straight from the helicopter footage.

RL thinking KAK stumbled upon a burner phone stuck in a tree and finds the murders on video and decides to sell it.

We do not say this anywhere below, nor do we believe this is what happened. We think Abby’s phone was probably recovered by LE. The part about hiding it in a tree is an unverified rumor. KAK selling a snuff film of the murders for Bitcoin is also an unverified rumor, but it’s a strong local rumor, and a number of these have panned out. We don’t know if there is a tape of those murders floating around anywhere or if anyone sold it for money. We just think it is an interesting theory to explore.

His main POI has been PB/ Mr. X since the beginning. But now to fit the narrative he has added in others

Nope! We didn’t have one for a long time, then we got hooked on someone I will call Mr. A. He’s clearly one of the worst human beings out there, and I’d be perfectly happy if he took off permanently. That’s if the Earth would not reject his body being placed in it.

On the other hand, this foul creature did not murder those girls, sorry. Mr. A was our main POI for a couple of years, and then the site was shut down. It was shut down for some intemperate comments I made about feminists, by the way, not about anything else. I hate those women so much it scares me.

At one point we realized that Mr. A was not BG. We never once named Mr. A on even a single occasion although everyone claimed we were fingering him. On the other hand, the guy was making videos where he openly claimed to be BG, so perhaps you can forgive us a bit.

Starting at the beginning of last year, we started to think that the police had a main suspect, Mr. X. That’s what we’ve been reporting ever since. We added in three peripheral suspects who may or may not have known or been in on the murder plot because our police source told us that these three young men were suspects in the crime, that’s why. Not to fit some narrative.

Robert Lindsay just likes to make things up.

We don’t make up anything. I have a BA in Journalism, and I’m a published author, as in, published in books and peer-reviewed academic journals. Journalists are not allowed to make stuff up. If you get caught doing that, it’s as bad as scientific fraud. You just ruined your reputation forever. Remember the reporter for the Washington Post who made up a post about some ghetto Black woman and her travails? Logically, she should never be allowed to work again. That’s how serious it is. Not to mention it’s a breach of ethics, and I take journalistic ethnics seriously.

He paints Kline to be a passive choirboy

I never said he was a good person. He was caught distributing some pretty gross CP, the really bad kind. That’s a pretty serious offense. All I said is that I don’t think he has it in him to kill those girls. The personality is completely wrong. There’s no fit. You have to jam a square peg in a round hole, and it’s never going to fit.

He has also a terrible thing about family of the victims. He deleted it after he was attacked by a handful of female readers.

I’m not aware that I’ve dissed these families on this public site in any way, not that they don’t deserve to be dissed. If you want to hear me dish it out about family members and everyone else under the sun, please feel free to join the private site! There’s nothing wrong with saying negative things about these families, and in fact, that’s often all you can say about them if you’re going to be truthful. The half of them who haven’t been in prison make up for it by going to jail.

That said, I can’t remember saying any particular thing about any particular family member. I think Mike and Becky Patty are pretty upstanding people, and I’ve never said anything about Anna Williams. Someone please tell me this terrible thing I said.

The worst part about him is that I think in the beginning he had some type of source. He knew about the 2:13 time stamp and 43 seconds of video way early on….but then I am assuming whoever was giving him info realized how….*different*…. he is and stopped doing it.

Nope. That information comes from an an official FBI case document that we somehow got our hands on. And our police sources come to me by way of one person to another person to another person to me. None of them talk directly to me. We have 250 members, remember?

even though many times he contradicts himself and says the opposite.

I don’t think I contradict myself on here. I don’t like people who do that.

I mean, his theories keep shifting. It’s like the end of the world cults who keep having to amend their apocalypse date when the apocalypse embarrassingly doesn’t happen.

Our theories do change from time to time. That’s called, you know, changing your mind? Detectives change their minds and theories all the time. Our theories changed because police, case documents, and search party members gave us new information that forced us to change our minds.

Main Part of the Article Starts Here

Below, bold text means verified information in some way or another, in many cases via police sources, search party members, and and official case documents we obtained.

The Klines

In our opinion, the roles of Kegan and Tony Kline are a complete red herring. These guys were not involved. However they may be connected to someone involved or being used as bait to find someone involved.

A CP Snuff Film?

The only argument I have heard that made sense about Kline came from a local, said to be a deep rumor in town. These rumors sometimes turn out pretty good! He said that the murders were videotaped and the video was put out somehow. Kline got a hold of it and was selling on his Dropbox site where he had all the CP. He was selling it for Bitcoin and he made a ton of Bitcoin off of this snuff film. The film would be CP probably due to its nature if the girls were unclothed. If not, it would presumably not be CP.

There are rumors that it can be found on the Dark Web. I’m too scared to go down there because of all the CP, but maybe I need to get over it. The problem is that if one of us finds this movie and watches it, we’ve apparently broken the law right there because it’s illegal to even look at this stuff, I guess because it destroys your eyeballs or something.

I can’t think of one other  thing in the whole world that it is illegal to even look at. The very idea that it can be illegal to look at any damn thing in the universe is quite bizarre, but sex fascists have never made sense. What’s the law called? Illegal looking? Anyway, they ought to make an exception in this case at least for those of us investigating this crime.

There has long been a rumor that the crime was videotaped. I have a search warrant here that says that they are looking for film, cameras, videorecorders, videotapes, etc. They would only be looking for that if it played a role in the crime. The only way it could play a role in the crime is if the rumors about it being captured on tape are real. The rumor is that the video was sent to Abby’s phone after the murders.

An argument is that Abby did not have a phone. This comes from her Mom. She had a phone she was hiding from her Mom. It was a burner phone. There’s a rumor that she stuck it in a tree somehow after they were captured. Anyway it was recovered. Both of these girls were lying to their guardians about all sorts of things.

A female accomplice of the murderer Garrett Kirts said she had seen this video.

After the murders, Kline made a hurried trip to Las Vegas. That’s where he was getting his really bad CP from. Presumably that was his connection for the murder tape too.

Kline is a passive guy and in the tapes, the cops say numerous times that they know he didn’t do it. He mostly never even met any of these girls. He just wanted nudes. He met a 12 year old girl in a park a couple of times, but all he did was talk about the weather. I presume that is still legal as the sex fascists haven’t gotten around to banning it yet.

This is not a man of action. This is a passive man, a voyeur, a guy who likes to watch. A masturbator, in other words. That’s his basic relationship to the sexual world, as a watcher and an onanist. Both are very passive activities. No way on Earth does a guy this passive murder two girls.

I’m not saying he was good person. That’s a matter for you to make on your own. I don’t make moral judgements on here. I’m just saying that there’s no way that Kegan Kline murdered those girls.

Plus the body types, heights, and weights of both father and son are way off, too tall and way too fat. Everyone thinking they are BG is trying to put a square peg in a round hole.

It appears that another man also using the anthonyshots profile may be either the killer or linked to him.

Police Played the Entire Murder Tape for Mr. X

First of all, I can now confirm that police played the entire tape of the crime to Mr. X. This tape is presumably from Libby’s phone. They wanted to know if he could identify the voice on the tape. Apparently they think the voice is his own. This is a rumor but it came to us from someone close to Mr. X who strongly defends him. We asked this person if Mr. X could have committed the murders and he said, “You don’t understand! That’s not like him!” In other words the friend’s opinion is that Mr. X didn’t have it in him to commit these crimes.

The friend also said that the murder tape was played for a number of suspects. We don’t believe that is true. However, apparently it was played for Mr. X. We think the fact that the entire murder tape was played for Mr. X to get him to identify the voice on the tape is quite significant.

2:13, 2-13, 2, 13: “The Killer May Have an Unusual Fascination with Numbers”

Remember when the police said that the killer may be fascinated by numbers? We think this is why.

The abduction occurred at exactly 2:13 PM. The search warrant makes a note of that. Obviously this guy is playing games with numbers. The girls were killed on the date 2-13. Two girls were killed, both about 13 years old. Etc., etc. This also implies that he came from the south side of the bridge after passing them to time it that well. The killer appears to be playing games with numbers. We think he’s just messing with us in a similar way that the Zodiac Killer was. We assume he likes toying with the police, presumably for kicks.

One Girl Definitely Died No More Than Three Hours before Being Found

Our recent information is that the rumor of Abby’s body being still warm at the time of discovery is true. If so, presumably she was not attacked at 2:30 PM the previous day. The body loses temperature at 1.5 degrees/hour. A body is only warm up to about 80 degrees. Below that it starts to feel cold to the touch. Therefore, she died no earlier than 10 hours before she was found (2:30 AM) or possibly even earlier than that.

A drone with thermal imaging flew over the dump site and found nothing. Those girls would have shown up if they were there. In addition, searchers swore they searched the dump site. Obviously the girls were not at the dump site that evening.

Both Girls Were Quite Possibly Removed from the Scene and Returned Later, Probably Early AM the Next Day

So where were they? We don’t know, but clearly they were removed from the scene. And taken where? When the FBI was talking to local landowners, they asked about outbuildings and guns. This implies a gun and an outbuilding were both used in the crime. Now Carter’s “shack” comments start to make a lot more sense. Perhaps they were secreted to a shack for some time.

Evidence That a Gun Was Used in the Crime

Also, a gun was clearly used in the crime because in the search warrant we have that is signed by the FBI, it says they are looking for a gun to do ballistics tests on it. The gun is a Sig Sauer 229 from 1991. Yes, our group has a search warrant issued in the case. That’s an older model that may not even be registered. They would only look for that gun if they had a casing from the crime scene. So a gun was clearly discharged at the scene, but neither girl had a gun wound.

Rumor of a Scalpel Being Used in the Crime

There is a rumor that a scalpel was used in the crime. It was said to be left at the scene. For a while there, there was a photo of this scalpel floating around, supposedly recorded at the crime scene. Apparently the photo is genuine. If the photo is genuine, than a scalpel was absolutely used in the crime. An excellent local source, a 50 year old woman, was posting that crime scene photo for a while. We can’t find that photo at the moment.

One Girl May Have Been Disemboweled to Remove Evidence of a Pregnancy

According to a rumor, this was used to, uh, disembowel one of the girls. We are trying to validate if this occurred right now. If this occurred, presumably this was done in an attempt to remove her uterus to remove the evidence of a pregnancy or perhaps as a message to her about the pregnancy, the former theory being more likely. We don’t know that this organ was removed. The entire disembowelment scenario is unverified rumor, but the sources are three of the best locals.

According to our police sources, determination was made at autopsy that one girl was in the early stages of pregnancy. Normally, you want a uterus to make that determination because in the first couple of months of pregnancy, the walls of the uterus thicken. That’s how you tell. However, they may also have done a blood test on her, and pregnancy shows up on a blood test. In addition, based on the levels revealed in the test, one can determine approximately how far along in the pregnancy the female was.

The Key to the Whole Crime Is: A Girl Was Pregnant

According to our police sources, a girl was pregnant by a 20 year old and was refusing to get an abortion. The man who impregnated the girl is not a suspect in the crime, but some of his friends are.

This girl went to “bonfire parties” popular in the area. There are many teenagers and young adults at these nighttime parties with no adult supervision. They occur in fields. There is a lot of drug and alcohol use at these parties and possibly some sex too. This girl also started going to “drug parties,” apparently where adults were present, as early as age 12. Her cousin was taking her to these parties. The girl’s guardian found out about it and forbade the girl from associating with the cousin.

We do not think this girl going to these drug and alcohol parties where adults were present makes her a bad person, though we are sorry she may have started using so young. But this is also extremely common nowadays. The source for this is the 40 year old woman mentioned below.

Both girls were worldly beyond their years. In order for the pregnancy theory to make sense, certain things would have to be true about these girls, for instance, they would have to be sexually active. Hence it was unfortunately necessary for us to make some personal inquiries about these girls. One of our sources, a 40 year old woman and former nurse with a young son, told us that both girls were sexually active in terms of PIV sex. Therefore, a pregnancy was possible with either of them.

These girls were lying to their guardians about all sorts of things. We get all sorts of crap about talking about this from the sex fascists and the neo-Puritans and sex-haters, but we now have it from two separate police sources that a girl was pregnant, and  in fact, this is the key to the whole case. We don’t having sex makes these girls bad people because lots of young teenage girls do this.

Teenage girls have sexual drives (very strong ones) and sexual lives, and it’s not uncommon for  girls to listen to their bodies and act on nature’s prerogative. It may be stupid, but it’s not wrong, and it’s quite normal biologically. Teenage girls are not bad people for having sex with men or with anyone for that matter!

Our police sources told us that the bizarro crime scene was set up before the crime in order to lure the girl out there and terrorize her into getting an abortion. Three young men set up the weird crime scene. All of them are suspects, but their line is they were just trying to scare the girl, not kill her. It is possible that they played only a peripheral role in the crime, possibly a noncriminal one. Keep in mind that when I say suspects, police don’t know if they played a role in the actual crime or not. That’s up in the air. Possibly there were two events, both verified by the police:

  1. The setting up of a weird scary scene in the woods to scare a girl, involving three young men.
  2. The homicide of two girls utilizing in part this scary crime scene, involving at the moment only a single suspect, a middle aged man.

It’s perfectly possible that the three young men in the first event knew nothing about and had nothing to do with the second event. Hence the notion of “Too many people involved; one would have talked by now” is not true. Police only think that one person killed the girls at the moment, hence according to them, there was one person in on the murder plot, not four. You follow?

I assume it’s not against the law to scare someone but the police state fans and cop-lovers are getting around to it, don’t worry. We have a retired police homicide detective in our group, and he agreed that this attempt to scare a girl was probably not against the law.

The police told us that Mr. X then got involved and took it to a completely different level and murdered the girls. But we still don’t know whether these young men were in on the murder plot. Maybe they were, maybe they were not.

A Facebook conversation between two young men along the lines of:

“She was only 14. I only nutted in her once.”

is said to be the key to the whole crime. Perhaps you remember that conversation that took place at 11:30 AM on the day of the crime.

Anyway, if you want the key to the whole crime in one sentence it is this:

A girl was pregnant.

A Family Member of One of the Girls Is a Suspect, Though Not the Main Suspect, in the Murders

I can now reveal that the police have told us that a family member of one of the girls is absolutely a suspect in this crime. We will call him Mr. C. He is not the main suspect, Mr. X, who is definitely thought to have played a role in the murders.

Instead, it is known that he helped set up the creepy crime scene, but it is not known that he had any involvement in the murders. He is only a suspect because police do not know if his involvement was peripheral and non-criminal or if he was involved in the homicide plot. As we have stated a number of times, police only have one suspect, a middle aged male, Mr. X, who they think committed the murders. The involvement of the other three men is completely up in the air.

He was close to one of the victims, so it’s hard to see how he was in on killing her. There are also rumors that he had “an inappropriate relationship” with his relative, one of the victims. You are free to determine for yourself what that might mean.

I can’t tell you their name, but I will say that it is a male and a member of the extended family of one of the girls. I can also say that he is not an older man over 40. So that ought to rule out some people. So rumors of family involvement on some level were not completely off.

The Mysterious Role of Young BG

According to our police sources, one of the young men who set up the weird crime scene is also very close to Mr. X. It is not known if he just set up the weird scene or if he went beyond that and participated in the murders. This man is also said to be “the catfish boy.” I’m not sure how this makes sense because it seems Anthony Shots is the catfish boy.

Young BG is a composite of the catfish boy. Young BG may have been seen at the south side of the bridge at 12:30 PM by a woman who said he had dark and evil eyes.

The murderer or the main suspect is absolutely not Young BG, nor is he 18-40 years old. As noted, he is a middle aged man. Old BG is not a good sketch of the killer either. All people could see was the top of his face, and the artist filled in the rest.

Police Are Lying When They Say the Main Suspect is Young BG, a Male 18-40 Years Old

So neither composite represents the main suspect. I have no idea why police are lying and saying the main suspect is a young man aged 18-40. We think they might be trying to play a trick on the killer.

The Girls May Have Been Returned to the Site Early on the 14th, at 2-3 AM

The killer is said to be very strong because one girl, who was quite heavy, was dragged quite some distance. If the girls were brought back later, perhaps they were brought back after 2 AM on the 14th because Libby’s phone mysteriously turned on and pinged the bridge at that time. Also, shortly after that, people heard terrible screams. The story is “those were kids bouncing on a trampoline,” but that doesn’t pass the smell test for all sorts of reasons.

Two Police Sources Have Now Fingered Mr. X as the Main Suspect

We now have another police source who verified to us that Mr. X is the main suspect in the murders themselves. A team member befriended a retired Delphi police officer. The team member said, “I think Mr. X is the suspect.” The retired officer said, “I’d say that’s a pretty good guess.”

We Believe That Leaker’s Information Is Good

So now we have two officers fingering him in addition to Leaker, who we regard as quite accurate.

By the way, I have spoken to Leaker, and I can vouch for his credibility. His statements came from case documents run off by his wife who worked at a courthouse. She allowed him to release the information shortly before her death. He’s a fundamentalist preacher, very straight-laced and moralistic, and hardly has been known to tell a lie or even do much of anything bad. We don’t think he’s lying. He’s not the type. Further, all of his info that we have been able to test has checked out.

A Large Bladed Weapon Was Used to Kill One Girl

The retired officer also told us that one girl was killed with a “large sharp object,” which he described as either a sword or a machete. We thought it might have been a hatchet because local police chased a couple of hatchet criminals all across the country. Why else chase hatchet criminals?

One girl received a grievous wound to her neck with this object. I can affirm that because I spoke to the girl’s guardian who saw the wound. Also, I have a photo from the funeral of the girl in a casket with a large scarf around her neck, which we will not be releasing for obvious reasons. The guardian told me they put that scarf on the girl.

Serious Problems with Our Police Sources: They Are Afraid to Talk to Us Anymore

We have having a lot of problems getting new information out of our main police sources because they are getting paranoid of talking to us. They have told us that there is an investigation going on into who is leaking to us. They mostly talk to us in riddles now. They only speak in terms of hypotheticals, questions, and theories. They don’t come out and state anything as a fact. Everything is very vague and a bit mysterious.

It is up to us to put this jumbled up mess together and try to make some sort of sense of it. We think we did it right, but for sure they are not being straightforward. In this way perhaps they insulate themselves from leaking charges.

I would like to point something out. If there is an investigation going on into who is leaking to us, two things must be true:

  1. Police read this website and regard at least some of the information here as accurate.
  2. Our police sources are giving us good information because if they were telling us nonsense, LE would not care who was talking to us. They’d only investigate who was leaking to us if our information was good. Think about it.

Alt Left: Happy April 30th

On April 30, we celebrate the Vietnamese people’s victory over US imperialism when the capital of the puppet regime in Saigon, South Vietnam, fell. This was considered a strategic defeat for US imperialism and a victory to the Vietnamese people. Since that time, a people’s government has been in power in Vietnam. It has very wide support.

Alt Left: What the West Represents to the World

It’s not just using Nazis, Al Qaeda, and ISIS as imperial shock troops, it’s that these shock troops are married to complete  cultural degeneration via Woke Culture and Globohomo.

It’s the Globohomo Woketard Headchopper Nazi West! Here to spread fascist coups, massacre the workers, impose austerity and turn your kid gay and tranny! This is what Globohomo is really all about. It’s a two pronged project – one involves the militaries of degenerate NATO, where transvestites win Eurovision contests, to spread fascism and rightwing governments, attack the left everywhere while spreading the worst cultural degeneration and cancer. It’s a two-pronged, Right and Left, attack at the socially conservative Third World.

The Empire of Chaos, as Saint Lavrov noted, creates failed states everywhere it goes. Look at Libya, Syria, Ukraine, Afghanistan, and Iraq. Everywhere the West, the Empire of Chaos with its NATO army, intervenes, nothing is left but piles of bodies, complete destruction, a failed state, and severe regression to the worst savagery.

The Empire of Chaos is also the Empire of Lies, as Saint V. V. Putin pointed out so precisely.

Here’s the agenda, which is now the agenda of both political parties in the US:

  • Nazis and pride parades!
  • ISIS and bisexual chic!
  • Al Qaeda and 135 genders!
  • Imperialism and hormones!
  • Death squads and male castration!
  • Toxic masculinity and fascist coups!
  • Radical feminism and Zionist colonialism!
  • Executing POW’s and transsexual bathhouses for all ages!
  • CRT and Western imperialism!
  • NATO and grooming kindergartners to be gays and trannies!
  • Sanctions and White Privilege!
  • BLM and Nazi war collaborators!
  • Watch your privilege and Holocaust denial!
  • Gay and trans superiority and US hegemony!
  • Low wages and gay bars!
  • Bicycles and homosexuals!
  • Seizing foreign exchange and pregnant men!
  • Overseas military bases and vagina havers!
  • Militarism and men in girls’ bathrooms!
  • Cancel culture and Black slave markets!
  • George Floyd and Lockheed Martin!
  • Wars of choice and “Whites are evil!”
  • Geopolitical imperial threats and Trayvon Martin!
  • Overseas piracy and menstruating men!

If you ask me what the Alt Left is against, it’s this. The US and the depraved, degenerate West takes the worst of the Left (Cultural Left) and marries it with the worst of the Right (neoliberalism and neoconservatism)

Alt Left: More Lies of the West about Ukraine and Russia, April 29, Part 2

This is the fake lie that the biggest liar in the universe, Zelensky, has put out: Russians are stealing washing machines. False. As you can see, there are memes about it below. This is from a video of “Russian soldiers stealing washing machines.” However, the soldiers in the video are Ukrainians.

Russian soldiers leave their dead in the field. Generally false. That’s the Ukrainians who do that. But maybe they don’t have time or cover enough to gather them up. But we have heard that even when the Russians give them time to gather their dead, they still don’t collect them.

Russia has left behind thousands of dead soldiers. They are being stored in refrigerators in Ukraine and Russia has refused to come take back their dead. Dubious. Nothing about this story seems right.

Ukraine has lost a lot of men, but Russia has lost more. False. Ukraine has lost ~25,000 men, and Russia may have lost ~5,000. Russia has lost one man for every five Ukrainians. Around Izyum lately, the casaulties are one Russian for every seven Ukrainians. Ukrainians are losing ~250 men a day in this theater, and Russia is losing ~40.

“Russian” soldiers’ families only get a pittance when their men are killed in war. Partly false. Below we see wives of Donbass men killed in the war posing with their $140 checks they got as compensation. Perhaps the new republics are only paying out that much money, but they are both broke. Russia does not pay these women because the men killed were not Russians. They were citizens of separate countries. Also the separatists are not very well-equipped. The Ukrainians are often better equipped.

But this is because Russia does not equip the separatist soldiers. It has given them some weapons, but not as much as they need. However, it has donated most confiscated weapons to the separatists. These countries are not part of Russia, so Russia does not equip their soldiers or does not equip them with much. So much for the “proxies of Russia” crap! Families of Russian soldiers killed in war get large compensation packages.

The whole world is against Russia. False. Most of Africa, or at least the citizens, are strongly for Russia. Africans hate the West because the West colonized them. On the other hand, the USSR was very good to Africa and helped them develop. Indians and Pakistanis are for Russia. Indians hate the West, especially the British, for colonizing them. Pakistanis have always been pro-Russia. Also they think the West is attacking them.

Many in Latin  America are for Russia. At any rate, the Left in Latin America is very pro-Russia because Russia has helped them a lot. The West has just treated them like neocolonies and supported fascists who killed people, ruined their economies, impoverished their populations, while only enriching a few at the top.

In short, Latin America has been ruined by Western, principally US, imperialism. In contrast, Russia has been quite benevolent to the Left regimes in the region. All of the Latin American media is colonized by the West and they all support US imperialism and fascism at home. But with the people, it’s another story.

Most Bulgarians support Russia. But the government is split and is supporting Ukraine. Another case of a government going against its people. Serbia has voted for Ukraine in the UN, but most Serbs are with Russia. Serbia was threatened with sanctions if they did not go along. Moldavia has recently gone over to the side of Ukraine, perhaps to keep from getting attacked. But most Moldovans are absolutely pro-Russia. Another country going against its people.

The Vietnamese people are pro-Russia. So are the Iranians,  Syrians, and Algerians. Most Omanis are for Russia for some reason. Most other Arab countries are split or are sitting it out. Only a few Arab countries are anti-Russia. Israel is anti-Russia, but many of its Russian citizens are pro-Russia. The Chinese people support Russia by 75% as does the state. 84% of the world with 88% of the population is refusing to sanction Russia. It’s only a few countries with a small population that is trying to cancel Russia.

It is true that the European states and the Anglosphere all support Ukraine and majorities of their people do too. However, 65% of the French do not wish to supply weapons to Ukraine.

Russia wants to expand the war to Transdniestria and has engineered a number of false flag attacks to blame Ukraine to do that. False. The attack on the airport used NATO ammunition. The attacks coincided with a top Ukrainian leader saying that they were going to seize the ammo stockpile there, the largest in Europe. After that, they moved a large troop force to the border.

At the same time, Romania moved a large troop force to its border. You would think that if Russia was behind this, someone would talk, but no one has. Besides, the attack on the airport used NATO ammunition. The attackers of the administration building were caught – they were Ukrainians. Other attackers had their path into and out of the region mapped – they came from Ukraine.

The war expanding to this part of Moldova would be a disaster for Russia. It would open up a whole new front. Also, Romania and Ukraine has moved large forces to their borders to menace the region. And from what I can tell, Russia simply doesn’t do false flags. That’s what NATO, their headchopper and  Nazi buddies, Ukraine, and especially the US and the UK do.

It’s possible Russia may have done false flags some time ago, but that was 22 years ago. If you play by the rules, you don’t need to do dirty stuff like this. And false flags are usually done by losing sides and always to get the West to intervene military  or call a cease fire. Russia’s never on the losing end and they never want to convince the West, or anyone for that matter, to intervene. Most countries in the world don’t do this dirty crap. It’s only dirty countries like the Globohomo Woketard Headchopper Nazi West that does stuff like this.

Alt Left: The Latest Endless Ukraine/US/NATO Lies about the War in Ukraine

Warning: Long, 35 pages.

I have never seen so much lying in my life! This is ridiculous. Vietnam was never anything like this. This is a propaganda blitz on the level of Nazi Germany.

Where to start?

War crimes cases against the Russian Army. Lie. I am very dubious about any of these cases because Putin intervened in the decision to go to war and gave specific instructions to the military not to harm Ukrainian civilians in any way, shape, or form. And for a few weeks there, they were even trying to avoid killing too many Ukrainian troops. I’ve never seen a modern war fought in such a clean way. The bottom line is that all modern armies fight very dirty, including the US military. A few of the Western armies fight cleaner but even they have problems. Massive war crimes are absolutely typical in 90% of modern wars on both sides.

I have never even heard of a commander in chief even giving such a strange order as to not harm enemy civilians in any way! It’s unheard of. But it shows where they are coming from. Putin sees Ukrainians as fellow Russians and says that Ukrainians and Russians are brothers. He also says we can’t treat them badly because “after this war, we will live with the Ukrainians.” That’s unheard of too. Orders to not harm enemy civilians? Huh? No one fights modern wars like this.

Russia is deliberately targeting civilians. Lie. The Pentagon itself said in Newsweek that Russia is not deliberately targeting civilians in this war,  so everything you hear about deliberately harming civilians is a straight up lie. That said, accidents happen in wartime and there are such things as rogue soldiers and commanders.

In Mariupol, by all accounts, it is the Ukrainians who have committed massive human rights violations and in fact, they have done this all over the Donbass for eight years now.

Even all the way up in Kharkiv, the Ukrainian government has arrested, beaten, tortured and killed many people. Hundreds have been killed in that city alone in an SBU base in a basement of a building that was used as a torture chamber.

Torture chambers have also been uncovered at the airport in Mariupol. Many civilians were tortured and murdered there. There is also a rumored “pit” in the steel mill where the Nazis are holed up right now.

In a town to the north, another torture chamber has been uncovered and there were reports that many people were killed there too. These were all civilians suspected of supporting the separatists, but ~85-90% of the people in that region support the separatists, so you have to kill a lot of people.

This is the Ukrainian government and especially the Nazi battalions arresting, beating, harassing, stealing from, vandalizing the property of, torturing and murdering the enemy civilian base of the separatists. Also they have been just bombarding cities and towns with shelling. They don’t even aim for military targets. They just shoot at the cities. Thousands have died from these wanton attacks. Sometimes they just shoot people in their cars and on bikes for fun.

During this seige of Mariupol, we have endless reports about Ukrainian snipers shooting at civilians who dared to go out into the streets. There is video of a street strewn with bodies killed by Ukrainian snipers.

The Ukrainians shelled the maternity hospital to blame the Russians and there were casualties. They mined the theater and blew it up to blame the Russians. There were a many casualties. There is no way the Russians were involved in either of these acts.

Further, all the locals say that the Ukrainians did these to blame the Russians. People have been shot in the street for not being able to pronounce a Ukrainian word that Russian speakers find hard to pronounce and for speaking Russian on the streets of Mariupol. The media blames Russia for the destruction, but the locals blame the Ukrainians and say Russia is their savoir.

Mass graves in Mariupol. Lie. The media says there are three mass graves in Mariupol. A reporter went to a “mass grave” and found that it is just an ordinary graveyard where ordinary workers have been burying the dead from the war.

20,000 dead in Mariupol. Lie. The fake local mayor says 20,000 people were killed in the city. The real mayor says that 5,000 people were killed there, but note that locals say 85% of the destruction was by the Ukrainians. Every time the Ukrainians retreated from an area, they bombarded the buildings in the area. This makes sense if they see these as hostile civilians.

Locals were ordered at gunpoint to bury bodies in Mariupol, otherwise they would get no food. Lie. The locals deny this charge. They have no complaints about the Russians at all.

Russian soldiers shoot at convoys of civilians leaving Mariupol. Lie. On the contrary, locals all say that Ukrainians have been firing on these convoys because they are enemy civilians and because they want to use the civilians as human shields.

Russia would not let people leave Mariupol and would not let humanitarian convoys come in. Lie. On the contrary, the Russians have been allowing everyone to leave and they have brought in vast amounts of humanitarian aid. 99% of the people in Mariupol support Russia! Why would Russia and especially the separatists (the civilians are literally their own people) attack their own civilian loyalists? It makes no sense!

Right now, 120,000 people are “trapped” in Mariupol with no food, water, shelter, or medical care. Lie. They will all die if they cannot evacuate. Anyone who wants to can evacuate anytime they want to. The people staying want to be there. There is food, water, and medical care for everyone. Shelter is an issue but they are working on it. No one is trapped in Mariupol!

Russia is hindering the evacuation of these 120,000 along with 1,000 civilians in the steel mill. Lie. First of all, there are ~200 civilians in the steel mill and they can leave anytime they want to. Russia opens humanitarian corridors every day but no one uses them. The people may not want to leave as they may be the wives and children of the fighters or the fighters may be forcing them to stay to use them as shields.

There are 2,000 Ukrainian soldiers in the mill. 500 are wounded. They will die soon if they are not let out. Lie. They can leave anytime they want to. Problem is that they will have to surrender and they will be taken as POW’s by the Russians. I guess they don’t want to do that.

The Mariupol humanitarian crisis is horrendous and something must be done so the UN and NATO is getting involved! Lie. Supposedly they just want to get the civilians out but (((Zelensky))) the (((biggest liar in the universe))), actually has other plans that he is involving the UN and NATO in. He doesn’t just want those civilians out. He wants those wounded to be given an escape corridor too! Sorry! Russia says all the wounded have to surrender and be taken POW. This is all a big lying scam to get his wounded soldiers out!

Every time (((Zelensky))) opens his (((mouth))), he’s (((lying))). He’s a lying, despicable, little fascist turd and he is a Nazi in a sense.

Understand that Banderist Nazism is mostly anti-Russians. Remember how Hitler felt about Jews? Well, that’s how Banderists feel about Russians. It’s “exterminate the Russians.” This is the political philosophy of Ukrainian society including its ruling elite. There are a number of Jews in the Nazi battalions with swastika tattoos. There is a photo of a Jewish Ukrainian battalion fighter with a yarmulke on preying at the Wailing Wall in Jerusalem. On his upper back you can see a swastika tattoo. Welcome to Ukraine! Where Jews and Nazis work hand in hand!s

Russia keeps foiling the humanitarian corridors in Mariupol. Lie. The Ukrainians will set one up and say, “Everyone go to this place and a bus will come take you to Ukrainian territory.” The Russians say ok. The people come to the spot at the time and the Ukrainians shell the spot where the people are gathered! After they do this, they blame the Russians and say the Russians attacked a gathering place for evacuees. It is in Russia’s advantage to have as few civilians as possible in any of these cities. It is in the Ukrainians to keep the civilians there to use them as shields to hide behind.

In Volnovakha, Ukrainians shelled the whole village when they retreated. Some stayed behind as snipers and shot civilians walking the streets. For a long time they were killing civilians  who tried to leave the city by humanitarian corridors. Everyone in Volnovakha says the Russian soldiers were very kind to them. All of the women in Mariupol are shocked of the allegations of Russian soldiers raping women in places they occupied. Why didn’t Russia commit any war crimes like rape, murder, execution, torture, looting, etc. in the Donbass cities it occupied? Huh?

And old lady and a 14 year old girl were raped by Russian soldiers in a village near Nikolaev. Lie. Reporters went to this city and they said they loved the Russians. They laughed when told about the rapes and said they never happened.

The people in Kerson and surrounding areas hate the Russians and live under the terror of Russian occupation. Lie. Yes, there are some people holding demonstrations sometimes telling the Russians to leave. There are pro-Ukrainians in the south. We went into the reasons for this earlier.

Yes, there is an armed underground in Kerson and surrounding area. Neither has a lot of support. Incidentally, a blogger who murdered by these guerrillas simply for reporting fairly on life under occupation. Russians provided food, water, medical care, you name it, in this area. All of the public works are working again and they are setting up local police forces and militias. They have appointed mayors and city officials in a lot of places and fired the people who won’t go along. The Russians don’t do much about these demonstrations. A few injuries here or there.

The main thing is that most people in the Kerson region are absolutely with Russia. For a long time, the main thing you heard on the street was, “Please don’t leave.” People say this because they think if the Russians leave, the Ukrainians will come back in  and kill everyone who cooperated with the Russians by labeling them collaborators and saboteurs. This is what they did in Bucha and other places.

A mayor was murdered in Lugansk for being pro-Russian. The Ukrainians murdered their very own top government official on the negotiating team with Russia for being open to peace with Russia. The SBU shot him in the head in broad daylight. These are the people we are supporting! They’re a bunch of Nazis!

Anyway, the tone of the people in region has now changed and instead of “please don’t leave,” it is now, “How do I get a Russian passport?” As you can see, the vast majority here are pro-Russian.

Russia bombed Nikolaev and killed some kids. Lie. Russia fired some cruise missiles outside of town. The Ukrainians tried to intercept one with anti-aircraft fire and one of the shells hit a building, causing casualties.

Russia shelled a railway station at Kramatorsk where civilians were lining up to leave. Lie. 85-90% of the people in that town support Russia. Why would Russia kill their own supporters? Russia wants them to leave. It is the Ukrainians who want them to stay to use them as shields. Everyone in that town says that the Ukrainians fired that rocket at the train station in order to blame the Russians.

The missile was a Toschka missile, but only Ukraine uses those. Russia phased them out two years ago and destroyed their stock. They don’t have or use this weapon. Further, the serial number on the missile proved that it was part of a stock of missiles that were in Ukrainian hands. We can tell this by matching it up with other Toschka missiles they have fired from the same batch.

Also the trajectory of the missile shows that it could only have been fired from the southwest, which was Ukrainian territory. Kramatorsk authorities hate the locals for supporting the separatists. They often stop cars at gunpoint and steal them from locals just because they can. Ukraine regards these civilians as hostile, so it makes sense that they would target them.

Some Ukrainian soldiers tried to surrender in Donetsk and instead were shot by Russian soldiers. Unknown. That’s the first we have heard of this. In fact, all of the Ukrainian POW’s say they are being treated very well. In fact, they are shocked at how well they are being treated. They were told that Russians were killing everyone who surrendered so a lot are crying and pissing their pants when they surrender, begging not to be killed. They are completely stunned when they are not killed or even tortured or beaten but instead are treated very well.

If the Russians killed soldiers trying to surrender, that would be very bad, but it would be the first case like this. We have endless reports of Ukrainians killing, beating, torturing, and mutilating Russian POW’s. Many Ukrainian units say that they never take any POW’s. They simply shoot all of them.

A Ukrainian soldier testified that his unit rarely took prisoners and simply shot most of them. A Ukrainian soldier said his unit was ordered to shoot civilians that had been captured and had their hands tied behind their backs. They refused to and were thrown in a pit. They escaped and managed to surrender. There are videos of Ukrainian forces murdering Russian POW’s. The head of the Ukrainian medical service said he issued an order to castrate all Russian POW’s.

This guy is a physician! He’s on video saying that too. We have photographs of Russian POW’s who have had a finger cut off. POW’s returned to the separatists were often missing fingers and sometimes limbs and at times were castrated. This has been going on for eight years now. That doesn’t count the many separatists who were simply executed outright.

We now have reports from hospitals right over the border in Russia that POW’s are coming back missing fingers and castrated. However, they are under strict orders not to report this for some weird reason. There are photos of these POW’s after they have been mutilated being passed around by wives and family of these men. I have not seen one yet. Actually there were reports like this from the start of the war about POW’s being returned missing limbs or castrated.

The Zelensky administration has openly stated that they refuse to follow the Geneva Conventions for treatment of POW’s, and they refuse to follow any of the Geneva Conventions about the laws of war. They stated this in communications to the British government. I’m not surprised.

A missile was fired at Kherson overnight. It is not known who shot the missile. Lie. The missile was shot by Ukraine. They were aiming at the administration building.

Tens of thousands of Ukrainians have been kidnapped and taken to Russia. They were taken against their will. Lie. These people are refugees and they either fled to or asked to be taken to Russia. There they have been put it filtration camps which are like concentration camps. Lie. Some have been taken far east all the way to Siberia. Lie. People have been taken all over Russia, some all the way to Siberia. That is because they are staying with relatives!

Many orphans have been kidnapped and taken to separatist areas or Russia. Lie. Their parents were killed in the war. What to do with the kids? They’re all from separatist areas, so they were placed in separatist zones or in Russia. Where else are they going to put them? Russian families are caring for them.

A child was kidnapped and taken to Russia. He asked to go back to Ukraine to be reunited with his father. True. This was a mix-up. When he asked to go back to Ukraine, this request was granted.

Russians in Kherson are now preventing Ukrainians from fleeing north to Ukrainian held territory. True. But this might not be unusual in an active war zone.

A fake referendum is being planned for Kherson to vote to see if they want to be independent. Lie. The vote will apparently be free and fair. Most people in the region want to go independent. The pro-Ukrainians are a minority.

Russian artillery hit Kharkiv, causing casualties. Afterwards there was a double tap strike to hit the first responders. Probable lie. From our sources in Kharkiv, people in the city say that most if not all of the strikes in the city (at least 90%) are Ukrainian forces shelling their own city!

No one quite knows why they are doing this. Apparently it is mostly being done to blame the Russians. A lot of this is being done by the nationalist battalions. This has been going on in Kharkiv for some time now. Many people in Kharkiv support Russia, so presumably the Ukrainians feel that they are shooting at hostile civilians. Also, Russia doesn’t do double tap strikes.

Russian soldiers are engaging in mass looting in the areas they occupy. Probable lie. We are not getting any reports of this out of the Donbass. Reports are coming from north of Kiev. Uncertain. Looting is a violation of Russian military law and the punishment is pretty serious. No commander would give his troops a command that allowed them to loot an area. For one, he would be defying Putin himself. Also no officer would give his soldiers a command that allowed them to rape and murder Ukrainian civilians.

If he gave any of these orders, Russian soldiers have stated that he would be arrested by his own troops! That’s how professional the army is. Also rape and especially deliberate murder of civilians is against Russian law and I understand that the penalties for this are serious, especially in this war where Putin himself has given an order not to harm civilians.

Instead, the best analysis of looting reports is coming from Ukrainian civilians who say that gangs of ordinary citizens and in particular the terror battalions are engaging in mass looting. And elements of the Ukrainian army are also doing a lot of looting. No one quite knows why they are doing this.

Russian soldiers were photographed carrying washing machines out of a civilian house as they looted it. Lie. Those are Ukrainian soldiers. Why they are looting, I have no idea.

Russian soldiers are engaging in mass looting, and they are sending the stuff in packages to Belarus and Russia where their relatives pick them up. Lie. Apparently there is no way to do this if you are in the Russian army. It’s simply not possible.

An investigation found that most (~85%?) of the people killed in Bucha were killed by Russian artillery. Lie. Small darts called flechettes were found in their bodies. While this nasty weapon is not illegal, its use in populated areas is prohibited, as with phosphorus. The problem here is that Russians don’t use shells with flechettes.

They consider it to be a nasty weapon that should be illegal and they don’t want to use it for that reason. Bucha was occupied by Russians the whole time. All of the artillery that fell on the city was Ukrainian. Russians would not shoot artillery at their own city that they themselves control! Why would they do that? So most of those killed in Bucha were killed by Ukrainian artillery.

Mass graves were found in Bucha containing up to 400 bodies. Lie. No one knows how many bodies are in those graves. The best analysis is that there may be 90 bodies there. 76 of those bodies can be seen being buried in a video from Bucha dated March 12. In the video, the people burying the bodies say that they were local terror battalion forces. Apparently they put up a fight at first but were quickly overwhelmed by the Russians. There is no good evidence that any of those people were killed by Russia!

People in Bucha are terrified of Russia coming back and welcome the Ukrainians. Lie. In fact, we are now in possession of a letter from a Bucha native who fled to Kiev early in the war. He had been in touch with people in town the whole time. The people in town told him that when the Russians left, the Ukrainian army came in and cleaned out whole apartment buildings. The next day, several men were found murdered. They were locksmiths, etc. that the army had hired to break into the apartments and steal stuff. They were murdered to cover up witnesses.

Also Ukrainian forces raided a small village and looted about everything that could not be tied down. A local came out and told them to stop and the Ukrainians shot him dead and left him in his yard! This comes straight from people in Bucha!

There are now 4-5,000 people in Bucha and they are all terrified of the Ukrainian soldiers. They are very deferential in a “don’t kill me, please” way. This man says that the remaining people in Bucha all think that the Ukrainian armed forces killed those people who were murdered in that town.

The argument is that the Ukrainians killed people who were “saboteurs” and “collaborators.” That ended up meaning everyone who wore a white armband to show that they were friendly to the Russians. They also shot people who took food supplies from Russians. And in particular, they killed people who helped organize the relief efforts in the cities.

The remaining residents of Bucha are all terrified of the Ukrainian armed groups, and the letter writer said at the moment, everyone in the city wants Russia to come back and control the town again because things were much safer in Bucha when the Russians were there and at least the Russians did not murder people or steal stuff when they controlled the town.

In addition, a large number of people in Kharkiv aged 25-50 who were soft supporters of the government have now gone over to the side of Russia. After Bucha, most of this group thinks that it was the Ukrainians who executed those people, not the Russians. These people now support Russia and they think it would be better to be ruled by Russia than to be ruled by Ukrainian murderers.

A very large number of women report being raped in the towns north of Kiev. Lie. First of all, the Kiev police say that they can only verify one rape in the Kiev region since the start of the war. That’s out of 100 reported rapes. The rapes are coming from Ukrainian organizations that are themselves suspect. The argument is that 100 women got raped but only one reported it because the rape victims “are afraid to talk to the cops.” Get out of her. That doesn’t pass the smell test.

As we noted above, for a Russian soldier to rape a Ukrainian woman, especially in this war where Putin has ordered civilians to be treated decently, carries some very serious penalties. Any commander allowing his forces to do that would probably be arrested by his own troops.

Given the fact that from Putin to the commanders, no one is sanctioning raping Ukrainian women and all are disallowing it, one wonders how so much of this is going around. Are these rogue soldiers doing all this raping? A Russian journalist spent the first month of the war in the towns around Kiev.

A Ukrainian journalist who is not pro-Russia also spent that period in  those towns. Both reported that they never saw or heard of any civilians being deliberately and seriously harmed by Russian soldiers in any of these towns. Somehow these stories only start up after the Russians leave.

While they are there, we never hear a peep. After they leave there is a flood of allegations. This doesn’t pass the smell test. If this had been happening while the Russians were there, stories would have been leaking out. The fact that the stories only show up after they leave implies that they are concocted after the Russians depart.

None of these rape cases has been corroborated. We do not have names, dates, or details of any raped women. We do not have any names, dates, and details of the alleged Russian rapists. Sure there could have been rogue Russian soldiers, but we would have heard about it while they were occupying the towns. People talk. Basically none of these war crime stories of Kiev can be confirmed at the moment.

A photo of several teenage girl minors who were raped by Russian soldiers has been presented to the media. A few of the girls became pregnant. After a single rape? Wait a minute. Lie. The photo is here. The six women have all been captured by the Russians.

It turns out that they are all Ukrainian spies for the Psychological Operations Unit of the Ukrainian military. As you can see, they are hardly teenagers anymore, and they’re so unattractive they’re hardly worth raping anyway, in my humble opinion. And furthermore, none of them show signs of pregnancy. So we can see that the rapes story is starting to fall apart already with good explanations for what is really going on.

Russia is “stealing Ukrainian grain” by shipping wheat grown in Kherson to Russia. Lie. Actually this is not true at all. This is from an article that appeared on a Russian website. However, the article had been placed there by Ukrainian hackers.

Ukraine has recaptured many towns in the South and near Kharkiv. Lie. In general, those towns were never occupied by Russia in the first place. They were in the twilight zone and not occupied by either force.

Russia has suffered from 10,000 (US) to 15,000 (UK) to God knows how many (Ukraine) deaths in the war. Lie. I would estimate losses at 5,000 men but that could be high.

Putin and his aides are threatening nuclear war. Lie. This is not true. They are just warning that this war could get out of control real fast, which is true.

There is a danger of Russia using nuclear weapons or tactical nuclear weapons. Lie. Russia doesn’t use tactical nuclear weapons. One two countries, the most evil on Earth, use those monstrous weapons: the US and Israel.

There is a danger of Russia using chemical weapons. Lie. Russia doesn’t have any chemical weapons. They destroyed all of their stores in 2017. On the contrary, I believe the US still retains them.

There is a danger of Russia using biological weapons. Lie. Russia doesn’t have any biological weapons and they don’t use them. It’s the US that makes bioweapons at its 330 bioweapons labs around the world, including 28 in Ukraine.

Russia and China are making up a conspiracy theory about the US researching and making bioweapons. Lie. I studied this a long time and it does appear that the US indeed studies and makes bioweapons in these labs. Whether they have deployed any recently is another matter and this to me in uncertain.

Lyme disease was created from a US bioweapon. True. This appears to be the case. The previous versions were not very virulent. The US was studying Lyme at one of its bioweapons labs on the East Coast and one of them got loose and went wild on an island. They thought they could contain it on an island but it somehow made it off the island.

The US has never used bioweapons in wartime. Lie. The US indeed used bioweapons in the first year of the Korean War. There were some casualties, including up to 800 US soldiers killed by one that got away somehow. They were dropped in cages with birds, rodents, and insects.

Areas where they were dropped soon experienced mini-epidemics, but the casualties were not severe. The next year the program was cancelled but the US kept flying missions and dropping these items over North Korea, but now these creatures had no bioweapons in them. It was all a fake-out to scare the North Koreans after they had dropped real bioweapons the year before.

The US has never used bioweapons in peacetime. Lie. The US caused a swine flu epidemic in Cuba’s pig herd in the 1970’s, wiping it out. This is documented.

Russia is running out of weapons and men and will run out in days/weeks/a month. Lie. They’ve been saying this for some time and all of the deadlines have passed. it’s not true.

Russian forces suffer from poor command and control, poor battlefield tactics, and low morale. Lie. Apparently none of these are true.

Russian troops are bombing hospitals, kindergartens, and schools. Lie. All of these facilities are vacant and the Ukrainian army has made a happen of using these empty facilities to house weapons and troops.

Russia fired cluster bomb artillery at Kharkiv. Lie. Only Ukraine uses cluster bombs.

Russia uses cluster bombs on Ukrainian civilians. Lie. Russia doesn’t use these weapons. They think they are nasty and evil and they don’t wish to use them as a result. On the other hand, Ukraine has used cluster bombs many times in this war.

Russia is using white phosphorus in this war, a banned weapon. Lie. It’s only banned in populated areas. Russia doesn’t use it at all, as they think it’s an evil weapon that they want no part of. All of the white phosphorus claims have been Russian illumination flares.

The town of Borodianka near Kiev was destroyed by Russian artillery and in particular, a huge apartment building had the middle of it blown out by Russian shelling. Lie. This town was occupied by Russia the whole time, hence all of the artillery deaths were due to Ukrainian artillery. All of the massive destruction in the town is due to the same thing. The apartment building with the middle of it blown down was hit by Ukrainian MLRS artillery. Few if any deaths in this town can be attributed to Russia; in fact, I would say none.

Russia has supply line problems. Lie. Apparently not true.

Russia is making slow, uneven, and incremental progress in Donbass and has gained very little ground. Lie. On the contrary in the last couple of weeks, Russian troops have gained quite a bit of territory, especially around Izyum. And they just took control of all of Kherson state.

The entire world is against Russia and is sanctioning them. Russia is being cancelled from the world. Lie. 12% of the world’s population is sanctioning or cancelling Russia. That includes the Anglosphere, most of Europe, and occupied Japan and South Korea. 88% of the world is not sanctioning or cancelling Russia. That’s almost the entire world.

Russia has conducted a number of false flag operations in Transdniestria in order to expand the conflict to a new country, Moldavia. Lie. The last thing Russia needs is an expanded conflict. That’s what Ukraine and NATO want. The bigger the conflict the more resources Russia has to expend to stop it. Also there is a huge supply depot of 20,000 tons of ammunition in this area.

It is guarded by 1,500 Russian peacekeepers and another 5,000 soldiers of the Transdniestrian Army. I’m not sure if that ammo is any good anymore, but top Ukrainians have been saying that they want to seize that ammo dump and if that ammo is any good, they could fight for years with it.

In fact, all of the attacks with RPG’s, automatic weapons, drones, and mortars have been done by Ukraine in an effort to expand the conflict. Every time Ukraine does one of these attacks, they and NATO say “Russia just did another false flag.” Also one of the drone attacks on an airport used NATO ammunition.

Ukraine, NATO and the US all insist that Ukraine is winning the war. Lie. They also say that Ukraine can win this war. That’s quite dubious if not an actual falsehood. There’s no way Ukraine can win this war. In the first place, they are getting destroyed on the battlefield and they are running out of bodies.

Russia is making slow progress because of fierce Ukrainian resistance and because Russia is losing the war. Lie. Russia is going very slowly in part because they are trying to save civilian lives, especially in the Donbass and also because they are trying to take as few casualties as possible. When you use a lot of men and try to move very fast, you can take a lot of casualties. In the early part of the war, Russia used long convoys of forces but these were vulnerable to attack. They don’t do that anymore and now they use slow, nimble convoys.

According to Canada, Russia is committing genocide in Ukraine. Lie. That’s just flat out false. They’ve killed a lot of soldiers but only a few civilians. There is no effort to wipe out the Ukrainians and in fact, a lot of infrastructure has been preserved because as Putin says, “After the war, we will live with the Ukrainians.” No one says that when they are in the midst of genociding another people. Forget it.

Russia is isolated in the world and alone due to condemnation, sanctions, and cancelling. Lie. How is it that when 12% of the world is against you and 88% of the world is not, that country is
“isolated in the world” and in danger of being all alone with no friends. That’s absurd.

Poland is no longer buying Russian oil because the idiots refused to pay for it in rubles. Lie. In fact, Poland is continuing to buy Russian oil but they are buying it from Germany! LOL, idiots.

Bulgaria hates Russia and has refused to buys Russian oil and gas with rubles, so Russia cut them off. Partly false. Bulgaria is completely divided. The population is very pro-Russian due to links via the languages, the history of the Slavs, and the Orthodox religion. Half of the government, the Socialists, are pro-Russia and the other half is anti-Russia. But the government doesn’t represent the people anyway.

Europeans support their countries flooding Ukraine with weapons in a doomed war. Lie, in part. In France for instance, 65% of the population opposes giving weapons to Ukraine. Of course, the (((Rothschild’s man))), (((Macron))), is sending a lot of weapons to Ukraine. But he’s going against his people.

Russia is making nuclear threats if Finland and Sweden join NATO. Lie. The Baltic Sea is a nuclear weapons-free zone, which means no submarines with nuclear weapons. Russia says it will end that policy and begin putting nuclear armed submarines in the Sea if they join NATO. This is nothing as there are nuclear-armed submarines,  many of them American, cruising the world’s seas all the time.

Russia committed the Holodomor, when they stole all of Ukraine’s food, deliberately murdering 10-15 million Ukrainians, or 8 million, or however many million. Lie. First of all, this was the Soviet Union and a country run by Communists. That country no longer exists. In its place we have Russia and many new countries, including Ukraine. Russia is a capitalist country and it is not run by Communists, certainly not the same Communists who ran the USSR.

Saying Russia = the USSR is ridiculous and absurd, but that’s what everyone in the West is doing. Also there was no terror famine. There was a harvest collapse for a variety of reasons, but it was not intentional. Most people died in Eastern Ukraine, which was pro-USSR. There were also many deaths in the pro-Stalin Volga region. Hundreds of thousands died in Poland. Did Stalin steal their food and kill them too? Many died in Kazakhstan. Was Stalin trying to murder them? 1 million died in Siberia. Did Stalin hate Siberians. The Holodomor myth is nothing but garbage.

Russia is taking massive losses in the East while making only tiny progress. Lie. Losses have been acceptable, maybe 1/4 of Ukrainian losses. It is Ukraine that is getting massacred by the latest Russian offensive. They have probably lost ~25,000 men.

Russia is sending huge numbers of conscripts to the war zone as it is running out of soldiers. Lie. There were some conscripts present in the early stage of the war, but they were quickly withdrawn when the Russian media got hold of the information.

There is mass opposition in Belarus to the war in Ukraine. Lie. On the contrary, the people strongly support it. Lukashenko won with 80% last election. He usually gets 75-80% in most elections. The figure was corroborated by independent exit polls. The Ukrainian opposition is unpopular.

They only get 20% of the vote and the only support they have is among the young “rich kids” in the capital who want to be “rich like Europeans.” The older people and the rural areas are all with Lukashenko. The opposition’s threats to shut down most state industry is not going over well either because half the country will be out of a job. In addition, as in Ukraine, the opposition is extremely pro-Nazi. All of the heroes of Belarussian nationalism are Nazis from World War 2, once again mirroring Ukraine.

There are only a tiny number of Nazis in Ukraine. Lie. The far right parties only get 1-2% in elections. Yes, but they got 35% in West Ukraine in a recent election when they got 12%, and in Lviv, they got 50%. However, the Ukrainian military consists of 40% members of the national battalions. The nationalist battalions are all Nazis or fascists, 100% of them. So 40% of the Ukrainian military are Nazis or fascists.

And a certain number of the rank and file soldiers are too. However, I think a lot of the more recent converts can be denazified, and maybe even some of the hardcores can be terrorized into giving up the ideology. To be honest though? How long do I think it would take to denazify Ukraine? I would estimate 40-60 years. Believe it or not, that’s about how long it took Germany. I’m not kidding.

We have already discussed how Ukrainian nationalism is pretty much fascism or Nazism anyway, and there doesn’t seem to be any possibility of a sane or non-fascist, non-Nazi Ukrainian nationalism. However, there was such a thing in the USSR, especially under Lenin in the first ten years of the USSR. Later Stalin came in and it was not so good after that.

The USSR and later Russia, via the legacy of the former, destroyed the Ukrainian language in Ukraine. It will take a long time to build it back up. Lie. First of all, Ukrainian is not much spoken in the East. There they speak Russian. They speak an excellent and very pure, if maybe archaic, form of Russian from 200 years ago under Catherine the Great in Crimea, Odessa, and the rest of the south. These were the malarial swamps that were drained and settled with Russian settlers and shipyard workers starting in 1812 with the conquest of the Tatars and the acquisition of Crimea.

I’m not sure what is spoken in the far West, but the people in the Donbass say it is hard to understand them. It’s for all intents and purposes a separate language. It’s probably a heavily Polonized form of Ukrainian.

The purest real Ukrainian is spoken in the center of Ukraine from Dnepropetrovsk north to Kiev. The Russian spoken in the Donbass and north to Kharkiv may be somewhat Ukrainized. However, many Ukrainians can at least understand Russian and most but not all can speak it, even if they prefer Ukrainian.

Since 2014, there has been a purist linguistic project aimed at removing Russianisms from the Ukrainian language and replacing them with “pure” Ukrainian forms, mostly Polish words. I’m not sure how well it is working. However, Ukrainian is now widely spoken across the whole country other than the east and the south. And Ukrainian reigns in printed literature. A Russian speaker who lived in Kiev said that she found it hard to buy Russian-language books there, especially novels, as most such were in Ukrainian.

Russians are mass conscripting military aged men in Melitopol. Uncertain. Probable lie. This makes no sense. Russia is only using half of its contract army and none of its reserves. And that’s not counting the vast army of conscripts it recruits every year. So they have to dragoon people off the streets of Melitopol. Not buying it!

Russians have no support from the locals in Kherson, so they cannot hold their referendum. Lie. I’m not sure what the actual figures are, but I think a good 75-80% of the population in this region is for Russia. The rest are for Ukraine, but as you can see, they are a minority.

New video shows Russian soldiers standing next to dead bodies in Bucha on March 12, proving that Russians killed those people. Lie. First of all, those people were probably killed by Ukrainian artillery. Also many terror battalion forces were killed around this time. This proves nothing. Also the implication is that those are the same bodies lying there on April 2 when the media came back to Bucha. But for that to be true those bodies would have had to have lain there for almost three weeks. Looking at those b bodies, it’s obvious that none have been dead more than a day or so.

A video shows a civilian vehicle proceeding up a road outside Kiev when he sees military vehicles, possibly a Russian column. Probable lie. He turns around and then stops his car when he sees men in black in the road. He gets out of his car to show them he is a civilian, and the men come out of the woods and shoot him dead. I understand that this is a local terrorbat or terrorbatallion. I don’t know why they shot him. Russian troops don’t dress in all black.

Russia deliberately attacked a field hospital at Avostal. Lie. That hospital must have been a ways underground and I don’t think the Russians can see what’s going on down in those catacombs. I doubt if they knew they were hitting a hospital.

Russia stole 2,000 artworks from Mariupol. Doubtful. They probably took them in for safekeeping during the fighting. 99% of the population supports Russia, so why steal their art? In fact, they were simply moved to Donetsk for safekeeping. Also the museum director handed them over herself! However, most of the museum’s collection was destroyed by Ukrainian nationalist battalions. Also the Ukrainian army set up a command post at the museum. Return fire ended up destroying most of the collection.

Russia bombed a theater in Mariupol, burying 1,000 people under the rubble. Lie. We have already posted information showing that this is a fake and instead the Ukrainian Nazis mined the building’s lower floors and detonated the mines when they retreated. Here is an in depth analysis that shows that the damage comes from a blast in the very depths of the building. In contrast, there is little damage to the roof where a bomb obviously would have hit. This proves that there was no Russian bombing of that theater.

The war aims of NATO are changing now that Ukraine has been doing better on the battlefield. NATO now feels that Ukraine can win. Liz Truss says that the UK thinks it can throw Russia out of all of Ukraine. Lithuania says the goal is to remove Russia from Ukraine. Dubious. Ukraine has not been doing better on the battlefield and Russia has not been doing worse. The chances of Russia being thrown out of Ukraine now look quite dim.

There is a substantial threat that Russia may escalate to nuclear war. Lie. This is just not true. There’s no real threat but a NATO-Russia war, which this already is now, would not be a good thing.

Ukraine defeated Russia in the north of the country. Probably not true. Instead, that seemed to be more of a holding action to tie down troops up north while Russia fought in the south and east. On the other hand, there was an insurgency in some parts of the north, and it’s sort of a pain in the ass to hold land where you are being attacked by insurgents.

NATO is not arming Ukraine. Individual NATO governments are arming it, not NATO. Lie. It’s basically a coordinated NATO maneuver.

Ukraine is not being manipulated into fighting Russia. Lie. NATO has decided to fight Russia to the last Ukrainian.

Ukraine captured an intercepted Russian military audio talking about killing all Ukrainians. Uncertain. In the past, these have been shown to have been manipulated. But soldiers sometimes talk like this in wartime. On the other hand, this is not official government policy nor should it be.

Russia attacked a residential building on purpose in Kiev, killing one and wounding 10. Dubious. They were certainly not aiming at a residential building. It appears that the headquarters of a missile manufacturer is located in that building. But the building next to it could have been hit too.

A teenage girl athlete died in Mariupol due to Russian shelling, the city council reported. Uncertain. That city council is not a legal body now that Mariupol has been incorporated into the DNR, which is a new country. The old city council is pro-Nazi and has no power, and nothing they say is true. We do not know whose shells killed those girls. But residents blame Ukraine for 85% of the destruction in the city, regard Ukrainian troops as their enemies and Russian troops as their rescuers, so you do the math.

Russians are attacking green corridors for civilians to leave Mariupol. Lie. People can leave Mariupol anytime they want to for weeks now. However, this man decided to walk from Mariupol to Zaporozhye. Yes, there are land mines along the way and he was also walking through a war zone. Russia has not guaranteed any green corridor for those walking to Zaporozhye.

Russia is colonizing Ukraine. Lie. It’s not colonization unless you are populating it with your own people or exploiting its resources. It’s also not colonization if the people want to be added to the new country. Consent of the occupied proves there is no colonization. Colonization cannot happen with assent. Territories occupied in wartime by a foreign force are not being colonized. They are being occupied. But if you settle them with your own people, now you are colonizing it.

Russians deliberately destroyed the water supply in Nikolaev. Lie. We don’t know what happened here, but Russia doesn’t shut down electricity, water, power, etc. in the towns it occupies or even attacks. The people who have been shutting off all of these essential services in these cities under attack have been the Ukrainians! No one knows why they are doing it but people think it is to create a crisis humanitarian situation that they can blame Russia on.

I know that in Kharkiv the local government was shutting off all the basic services and refusing to provide people with food or water. They were also evicting people from shelters so the army could take over. Actually I believe in this case, it was the mayor of Nikolaev himself who shut the water off and told people to get water from rivers.

Russians are deliberately attacking ambulances in Kharkiv. Lie. The local residents say 90% of the shelling of the city is being done by the Ukrainian government themselves so they can blame the Russians. Also the population is considered rather pro-Russian, so they may be seen as hostile. Ukrainian forces attack civilian populations they think of as hostile.

Security guarantees are not the same thing as NATO membership. Lie. They might as well be and Russia will never agree to this nonsense.

Russians are forcing schools in Kherson to switch to a Russian curriculum. True. But most of the population probably wants to join the republics or Russia anyway, and most people support Russia, so who cares?

Russia bombed a hospital in Makariv near Kiev. Probably not. The town was occupied by Russia the whole time, so all of the artillery damage was due to Ukrainian shelling. No doubt this hospital was hit with Ukrainian shells.

Ukraine has been a Russian colony for 350 years. During that time it has tried to erase Ukrainian nationhood, the Ukrainian language, etc. Not completely true. I am not here to defend Russia’s efforts to deny Ukrainian nationhood and language, which are severely exacerbating this conflict. However, the true historic Ukraine is only in the very center of the country. All of the rest was always just Russia. The south got added to Russia by Catherine the Great in 1812. The west was always just Poland and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. It was only added by Stalin in 1939. The entire east was always just Russia and it was added by Lenin in 1917. Crimea was always Russia and it was added by Khrushchev in 1953 because he was a Ukrainian. The Ukrainian language was not attacked to my knowledge during the USSR. It may have been proscribed before that time. And it has not been attacked since Ukraine went independent. There have been no attacks on the Ukrainian language for a century. Anyway the true historical Ukraine only covers an area in the center, maybe 20-25% of the country. The rest was always just Poland and Russia. Russia refers to Ukraine as Little Russia or Malorussia as an insult. Lie. The word actually carries more the meaning of Central Russia in Russian. But even Little Russia is not meant to be insulting. It only implies that Ukraine is a smaller country that is really just a part of Russia like Belarus.

Ukraine is not a hotbed of woke culture and Globohomo. Lie. As you can see below in the nonsense that could have been written by BLM and CRT idiots, woke culture has taken off in Ukraine, so it’s now a “woke Nazi” country. Most woke SJW types are now strongly pro-Ukraine, so they are actually woke Nazis or SJW Nazis. I know that sounds weird because they call everyone else Nazis, but they are Nazis themselves! As many have been noting, they are quite authoritarian or totalitarian. As you can see, Ukraine went full woketard. As soon as the Nazi revolution happened in 2014, a gay pride parade happened in Kiev very quickly afterwards. So this is a sort of gay Nazism or LGBTQ Nazism or Globohomo Nazism. So we can now see the connections between woke and SJW culture, Globohomo, Western imperialism, ISIS and Al Qaeda headchoppers and out and out Nazism. None of it makes any sense at all, but imperial projects rarely do. They’re all just a means to an end.

Russia has been stealing farmers and ag companies of their equipment and crops, blowing up storage facilities, and trying to starve Ukrainians and halt Ukrainian crop exports. Uncertain. This is certainly a bizarre charge all right, and we do not know enough about whether there is anything to it. This entire area is pro-Russia, so it boggles the mind why Russians would attack the very farmers who support them.

We haven’t been able to verify any reports of theft of crops or equipment. One photo of stolen Ukrainian equipment in Chechnya was a fake. It was just a photo of some equipment in Chechnya. Why would Russia try to starve its own supporters? Why steal from your own supporters? Why try to Ukraine from exporting crops? None of this makes much sense.

Russia blew up an apartment building in Borodyanka. Lie. It was in front of this building that the head of the UN, the Ukrainian agent Antonio Guterres, gave his speech implicitly blaming Russia for the destruction of the building. However, Russia occupied this city the whole time, so all of the artillery damage here is caused by the Ukrainians. This specific damage has been proven to have been caused by Ukrainian MLRS launchers. However, it has been blamed on Russia by the West ever since photos of it emerged.

Alt Left: Happy Birthday, Vladimir Illych


KPRF, Moscow. General Secretary Zyuganov in three of the photos. Wearing a red tie, natch.

Melitopol, Novorussia

Genichesk, Kherson Region, Novorussia. They even put a red flag on city hall!

Minsk, Belarus

Kolkata, India

Hanoi, Vietnam

Alt Left: Why Were the Russians in Bucha?

Anonymous: Any idea why they were in Bucha?

You mean what was with the Kievan thrust, so to speak?

There are two minds about this. One says they tried to conquer Kiev, but there was too much resistance and they failed, so they withdrew.

The other theory was that this feint to the north was just a maneuver to pin down a lot of the Ukrainian Army while the Russians worked on Donbass, Mariupol, south of Kharkiv and the Kerson/Nikolaev region.

Actually, no one is quite sure what they are doing down in the south either. Obviously they want to hold the areas that they currently occupy, but do they want to occupy more land? We don’t really know.

I’m of the second opinion that it was just a maneuver.

Alt Left: In the 19th Century, Was the Assimilation of the Jews Was Part of the Progressive Project

Polar Bear: Roman anti-Semitism sought assimilation.

Then it’s not anti-Semitism, except according to crazy Jews, but crazy Jews think every other thing in the world is anti-Semitism, so who cares what they think!

Actually, when the Jews came out of the ghettos after Napoleon after the Great Liberation in 1815, they were seriously damaged from centuries of totalitarian rule by mystical, obscurantist, and frankly idiotic rabbis. They’d been living in a stupid obscurantist dictatorship for centuries, and they were all screwed up from it.

When they first emerged, most Gentiles were appalled by what they saw. The Jews were not in good shape at all, and they didn’t act very good either. I suppose conservatives just hated them, but progressives took it upon themselves to help these Jews to be cured of the damage from the ghettos.

Hence the progressive cause in Europe during the first half of the 19th Century was the assimilation of the Jews. That was the liberal, Left, and later on socialist project. It wouldn’t be seen that way now, but that’s too bad.

Part of the problem with Israel is that those Jews are too Jewish, as my Judeophilic mother would say. “They’re really really Jewish,” as she put it. Super Jews would call my Mom an antisemite for saying that, but she’s a Judeophile all the way. I’ve heard of American Jews who went to Israel to live and they left soon afterwards. “Too many damn Jews!…That place is just too damned Jewish!” were the complaints.

I think Jews are kind of like spices in a stew. A few of them can have a lot of great qualities and be of immense benefit to society, particularly in terms of the intellectual disciplines and the arts. But too many Jews in one place just doesn’t seem to work. You ever wonder why New Yorkers have the reputation of being rude, belligerent assholes? Because the place is full of Jews, that’s why! Too much spice spoils the stew, as it overwhelms all the other flavors, but a bit of spice can really make a dish into something special. And so it is with the Jews.

In general, the less assimilated the Jews, the worse they act. The more assimilated they are, the better they behave. That’s probably true of a lot of groups, not just them. A lot of “pure” cultures aren’t really that great.

The melting pot is a great idea. It tones down a lot of the nasty elements of the pure cultures which are its ingredients, while at the same time, it allows the good aspects of these cultures to flower. And there is a sort of hybrid vigor that ends up as the main culture – not too extreme, with a cultivation of all the good things and a condemnation of all the bad things and not too much of any one particular element to “spoil the stew.”

Quiet Riot, “Bang Your Head (Metal Health)

I just recently got into this song, but damn, it sure is good! From 1983!

Well, I’m an axegrinder
Mother says that I never never mind her

Got no brains
I’m insane
Teacher says that I’m one big pain

I’m like a laser
6-streamin’ razor
I got a mouth like an alligator

I want it louder
More power
I’m gonna rock ya till it strikes the hour

Bang your head! Metal health’ll drive you mad
Band your head! Metal health’ll drive you mad

Well I’m frustrated
I really want to be over-rated

I’m a finder
And I’m a keeper
I’m not a loser and I ain’t no weeper

I got the boys
To make the noise
Won’t ever let up – hope it annoys you

Join the pack
Fill the crack
Well, now you’re here, there’s no way back

Alt Left: Azmi Bishara, “Ways of Denial”

Repost from the old site. Azmi Bishara, an Israeli Arab Parliamentarian and university professor, published an excellent article in the Egyptian paper Al Ahram Weekly in 2007. It’s dated, but it’s very much worth a read. It’s about Holocaust Denial and Zionism and the way that they intertwine.

If I am not mistaken, Bishara was charged with treason for visiting Syria on some sort of a peace mission during or around the time of the Lebanon War. The charges appear to be trumped up. He fled Israel in order not to be prosecuted, and I think he lives in Syria now.

It deals with some issues that continue to confuse many people to this day. What was the cause of the Holocaust?

Why did the Nazis and other Europeans kill the Jews – what made them so angry? What were the essential components of Nazism, and to a lesser extent fascism? What was the response of the Arab Left to the Holocaust? Why has Holocaust Denial taken such a baffling and disturbing root in the Arab and Muslim World?

This work by Bishara is a bit of a tough read in spots, but if you slow down and think about it as you read it, I think most will be able to glean the gist of it. My comments appear in bold. They deal with ultranationalism, ethnic nationalism and its German expression in Nazism, anti-Semitism, the Holocaust, Zionism and the ways in which these things tangle together.

Ways of Denial

By Azmi Bishara

The Nazi Holocaust aimed to rid Europe of its “Jewish taint”. By this was meant banking capital as opposed to industrial capital and the moral degeneracy, lack of patriotism, scorn for national values, heritage and other such ills caused by the “worm” that ate away at all that was noble and pure in the Germanic people.

That worm was the racial strain that never belonged, that was intrinsically alien and that nevertheless insisted on remaining in order to wreak its pollution; it was European Jewry and its various manifestations including capitalism, communism and liberalism, and its mere presence, according to this diabolical system of thought, that were a scourge to racial purity.

[RL: These lines here are very important. The nationalism that arose in Central and Eastern Europe in the late 1800’s and married itself to emerging racial science was unique. Previously, nationalism had generally not been racial.
Often, anyone could marry into a tribe and become a full-fledged member – in fact, this has been a well-known norm of tribal societies.

The only nations were either tribes or empires, and empires were not racial. A Roman was anyone who lived in the Roman Empire. If you wanted to cross the Mediterranean and move to Rome and speak Latin, you could become a full-fledged Roman. It had nothing to do with any notion of an Italian race of people.

The Persian Empires were made up of individuals of a variety of ethnic groups, only one of which was Persian.
The new nationalism changed all of that. The nation was seen as being only made up of one ethnic group, organically linked to the land through blood, soil and religion, and, tragically, all other groups on the land, including those who had lived there for centuries, were said to be aliens, as they were not part of this organic whole.

The nation was now an area with lines on a map – a territory with borders. Within this area – the nation – a vision formed of the nation as being akin to a human body. Its rivers and lakes were akin to the blood and water in our bodies, and its solid parts were akin to our flesh. The nation had a mind, a soul and emotions, as a human body does.

As we alone – our pure selves – have lived in our human bodies our whole lives, a notion was created that only one ethnic group, a pure ethnic group without outside admixtures, had lived in the national territory for all of recorded history. This people was an organic part of the land, the same as the rivers, rocks and trees.

Indeed, this organic national race was seen, mystically, as almost as much a part of the geological features of the land as the features were likewise seen as a part of the people. A religion and a set of cultural values, always glorious and perfect, was married to this pure people. Their religion and culture was obviously superior to those of their neighbors, if not of everyone else.

The pure people had died and fertilized the soil with their blood, flesh and bones, often in defense of the sacred land. Hence the dirt itself was impregnated with the glorious ancestors of the people.

From this blood-drenched soil sprang the plants and the animals that fed on them. And the soil sprouted crops, and the crops provided food for the animals, and the crops and animals sustained the life of this pure people.

As we prefer our bodies not to be contaminated by poisons, viruses and other unnatural interlopers, so the pure people tended to see the other ethnic groups on the land as akin to viruses coursing through the bloodstream of our bodies.

As we take medicine to rid our bodies of harmful contaminants, so the nation-race suggested “medicine” to rid the “body politic” of those “contaminating” peoples resident on the land who were not part of the pure people.
I have striven to paint a rather elaborate picture here, but if you will try to picture this word-painting in your mind, you will begin to understand the essence of Nazism, and indeed all ultranationalism.

In this way, Jews who had lived in German lands for centuries were still defined as aliens.

The notion of the Jew as representative of banking capital – or “parasitic” capitalism was an old one, but it was married to new organic notions of nationhood that defined industrial capital with “national” capitalists. That is, industrial capital was of the land and the soil; i.e., it was “organic” and “natural” (see above) and was run by true Germans (the pure people).

Industrial capital could not migrate at a whim to other lands, and hence was rooted in the land as a plant is rooted in the soil (this was before outsourcing and offshoring). The Jew was seen as a “rootless cosmopolitan”, having no real (“organic”) ties to the land, and hence, a sort of a suspect traitor by default.

The connection of Jews with lack of patriotism, moral degeneracy, scorn for national values, etc. is another long-standing charge. Diaspora Jews tended to be rebels and were often hostile to their host nations, regarding such nations, often rightly so, as hostile to Jews.
Furthermore, Jews regarded societies with strong national values, especially religious values, as bad for the Jews, again often rightly so.

The connection with Nazism refers to 1920’s Germany, when many liberal Germans were questioning the nation’s values, which they felt had led them into a disastrous war that had ruined the land. Amongst this group were a number of prominent Jewish comedians, actors, filmmakers, play directors, authors, etc.

As Jews were only 1% of the population, Jews could not have dominated this group, but they were prominent enough that the mindset elaborated above, shared by many liberal German Gentiles, became associated with Jewry.

Many German Jews had actually fought bravely for Germany in World War 1, and even in the US, US Jewry largely supported the Germans until the US got into the war, because so many US Jews had German roots, and because Germany was regarded as the cultural center of World Jewry.

Those questioning German values were de facto defined as being unpatriotic. Actually, they were the finest of their generation, and their questioning spirit was right and proper.

Moral degeneracy refers mostly to 1920’s Berlin, teeming with artists, writers, actors, playwrights, directors, drug users, drinkers, prostitutes, and especially homosexuals and bisexuals. Christopher Isherwood comes to mind.
Surely most of these folks were Gentiles, but once again, Jews being prominent in the arts, they were overrepresented among this group, and it came to be associated with Jews. Most Germans were still quite conservative, and the antics of the Berlin crowd outraged a traditional population.

The association of Jews with both capitalism and Communism is one of the mysteries of Nazism. Yet Nazism promised to transcend both capitalism and Communism. The newly emerging capitalism was vicious and brutal and seemed to lack all morals, and traditional people regarded it with alarm.

Communism was regarded by the German middle class as a direct threat. In particular, Communism, being explicitly opposed to ethnic nationalism, was regarded as Enemy Number One by nationalists of every stripe – and still is to this day.

Jews were prominent in both German capitalism and Communism, and in the early development of both systems in general. The rational explanation for this is that “Jews lead movements.”

But the Nazis looked at the Jewish factory owner locked in savage conflict with the radicalized Leftist union currently striking his plant and concluded that the owner and his workers must be in cahoots, part of a conspiracy to tear the land apart in order to seize power for the Jews.]

Late capitalism, as forcefully imposed by the centralized bureaucratic state, converged with a fanatical and rabidly xenophobic and very ideological late nationalism of the “Vesrspaeteten Nationen” with a history of religious anti-Semitism dating back to the Middle Ages and the crusader expeditions that attacked Jewish villages in central Europe en route to Palestine, a religious exclusionism that targeted both Muslims and Jews in Andalusian Spain and that shaped part of European identity in terms of both an external determinant — the Muslims — and an internal determinant — the Jews.

But the Nazis’ obsession with the annihilation of the Jews was also fired by an ideology that incorporated totalitarian social engineering, founded upon social Darwinism and assorted recent biological discoveries that were applied to human beings, together with a populist romantic socialism that was hostile to communism, democratic socialism and liberalism, all regarded as alien to the “Volksgeist”, “the spirit of the people”.

[RL: This explains how Nazism could have espoused a strange fake socialism “rooted in the land” while opposing everything on the Left as being de facto unpatriotic. The fact that the Nazis targeted the entire Left shows how bizarre the notion that Nazism is a leftwing movement really is.]

This form of pseudo-scientifically justified and coldly carried out mass extermination would not have been possible without a strong ability to compartmentalize between the bureaucratic functionary and the duty to obey orders, on the one hand, and the individual and his private moral sphere on the other, a phenomenon that is one of the characteristics of the modern state apparatus.

Nor would it have been possible without all the business of documentation, recording and archiving, which is also a characteristic of the modern state.

The irony of all this pseudo-scientific human taxonomy and the obsessive documentation of the names, addresses, confiscated possessions and physical details of the people who were rounded up and freighted to the concentration camps and from there to the gas chambers is that this paperwork has become the most important primary historical source for the Holocaust and the most important instrument with which to refute the claims of those who deny it occurred or belittle its magnitude.

[RL: Yes, the Nazis, in their bureaucratic zeal and German thoroughness and work ethic, pretty much wrote everything down, even if only in code. Thus making Holocaust Denial an even more trying task and ultimately an exercise in absurdity in the face of the mountain of contrary documentation.]

It is not so much the sheer numbers of victims that distinguishes the Holocaust. As unique as it was in the 20th century, millions of native inhabitants were exterminated en masse in the Americas over the course of previous centuries.

Nor is it just a question of scale: many more millions died in the course of World War II, alone, than in the Nazi gas chambers and these included Russians, Germans, Poles, French, Italians and many other nationalities.

The true horror of the Holocaust resides not only in the deliberate singling out of entire peoples — Jews and Gypsies — for extermination and in the scale of this crime, but also in the totality of the target and the “rational” way in which it was carried out.

[RL: This is apparently accurate, but I am very wary of the typically-Jewish efforts to make the Holocaust into the ultimate massacre of all time, such that we cannot even use words like Holocaust for other genocides. To do so, according to perverse tribal-nationalistic Jews, is somehow…get this – anti-Semitism! Ridiculous.]

Jews were snatched from their homes amid the general silence of their neighbors, a silence interspersed by hatemongering by anti-Semitic groups and by the active complicity of informers. Most of the Jews who died in the concentration camps were not Zionists; in fact, many may not have even heard of Zionism.

[RL: This is an important point, and seeing as it is the case, how is it now that the super-racist Zionist state has appointed itself Ultimate Spokesman for these largely anti-Zionist Jews, anyway?]

Moreover, the role of the Zionist movement in saving Jews, or in conspiring with the Nazis, was very marginal, regardless of the number of studies that have been produced on both cases and regardless of the fact that most of their findings have been corroborated.

[RL: This is a good point. Zionism did collaborate with the Nazis in various ways. For the most part, they were only interested in saving those Jews who were Zionists and all the rest could just die. Zionists actively worked to keep Jews from fleeing to places other than Palestine.

Zionists believed that Jews should be cut off from all escape routes except for Palestine, thereby forcing the European Jewish refugees into Palestine, where they were surely not wanted. This history is almost unknown to the vast majority of Americans. Lenni Brenner’s books are a good place to start your digging into this sordid history.

Such was, and is, the insanity of the doctrine that undergirds the Jewish state. On the other hand, the anti-Israel crowd has made much too much of this collaboration. This group, many of whom are out and out Holocaust Deniers and sadly even Nazi sympathizers, make much of the fact that “evil Zionists worked with the Nazis.”

Worked with the Nazis to do what? Apparently to help kill Jews. Except the Nazi “good guys” never killed any Jews because the “Holohoax” is a gigantic fraud! The wildly ironic discrepancies of these mutually contradictory lines is embarrassingly clear.]

Zionism did, indeed, have two faces; it was the perspectives and aims of the researchers that were and remain at odds.
The Zionist movement began, and had set its sights on Palestine, long before the Holocaust.

[RL: Precisely! Let us chant this over and over, every time some misguided US liberal tells us that “Israel was created due to the Holocaust.” How many times have you heard that line?]

Zionists only used the Holocaust to justify their national project in hindsight, even if that justification is what drove some Arabs to deny the existence of the Holocaust.

Yet, while there are people who have felt that by minimizing or even refuting the Holocaust they undermine Jewish claims to a state in Palestine, the majority of educated and informed Arab opinion has never denied the Holocaust or the existence of anti-Semitism in Europe.

[RL: This would be news to me, but I am not an Arab. Most of the Arabs that I have known were Holocaust Deniers, including, I am ashamed to say, Arab Communists.]

In the anti-Israel, pro-Palestinian and anti-Zionist movement, Holocaust Denial and Revisionism in its various insipid formations is spread out like ivy on an overgrown lawn. As a believer in the traditional Holocaust story, I have often felt like I was odd man out.

Rather, they have argued – correctly – that since this horror took place in Europe the Palestinians should not have to pay the price.

Although it vaguely existed as a blend between the residue of a religious culture and extremist nationalist ideas imported from Europe even in early stages,anti-Semitism in the sense of hostility towards the Jews only began to spread significantly in the Arab world in the form of cultural and intellectual output after 1967.

[RL: I don’t agree that anti-Semitism was a marginal factor in the Arab World before 1967, but I agree that it exploded after 1967. After 1967, also, many previously rather apathetic US Jews finally came around and starting supporting Israel full bore, and it was after that war that the Israeli Lobby in the US really exploded, as it was not really that powerful before.]

Clearly, the rise of this phenomenon coincided with the rise of a metaphysical attitude that sought to explain the overwhelming Arab defeat of that year in terms of the confrontation with an absolute evil bent on a global conspiracy of the nature of the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion”, which has been proven to be an invention of the Russian secret service at the end of the 19th century but which nevertheless found many gullible ears in the Arab world in the wake of the 1967 defeat.

[RL: How tiresome is it to hear the line that The Protocols may indeed be a forgery but they still accurately describe the agenda of the Jews? The curious are urged to read the Protocols. Don’t worry, you won’t catch a disease from reading it. It’s a pretty short document and you can read it quickly online in a number of places.]

Reading it, one is struck by how silly and paranoid this document really is. Nor does it have much relation to reality, except that I agree that various wealthy Jews have indeed conspired to control the media in various Western countries in the 1900’s, more to create an environment that is safe for the Jews in that country than for any nefarious means.

Holocaust denial similarly emerged during this period and in the same spirit of a fantastic conspiracy theory that ascribed to an international Jewish cabal the power to invent and dupe the entire world into believing a stupendous set of lies.

I would like to suggest that there are two types of Holocaust denial. One, espoused by elements of the European traditional right and neo-ultra-right, is to deny it happened. This form has not acquired sufficient roots to become a determinant of the behavior of nations and societies.

The other form of denial is to ignore that the Holocaust occurred within a particular historic context and, hence, to deal with it as some fiendish aberration that somehow occurred outside the bounds of time and place.

[RL: I think this is very important. Jews and their allies have worked very hard at the mystification of the Holocaust, along with the mystification of anti-Semitism. In practice, the two are simply tied together. Why did the Holocaust happen?

According to the Jewish line, it was an outbreak of sheer evil that occurred for no reason at all, other than “pure hatred”. Why were these folks seized by such “pure hatred” anyway? Because they were simply evil.
How do we know they were evil? Because they were anti-Semites. How do we know anti-Semites are evil? Well, because Jews say they are. Starting to get the feel for the inane circularity of this approach?

Did Jews do anything to make any of these anti-Semitic nasties mad? Nope. Well then, why did the ugly little anti-Semite devils hate Jews, other than the fact that the were just lil’ balls of evil in human form and all that? A very typical Jewish response is…get this – no reason! Ok, now please, try to stop laughing. Jews actually believe that millions of folks hate Jews for absolutely no reason whatsoever . Does it make sense? Nope. Does it serve Jewish ego-defensive needs? Sure.

Or, sometimes, the truly ludicrous Jewish chauvinist argument is offered that because Jews represented good (with a capital G), this infuriated the anti-Semitic beasties so much that they tried to wipe out the Jews. This profoundly disturbed way of thinking is actually very common, especially amongst more militant Jews.

Well, other than being evil, why were these folks anti-Semites anyway? The answer given is…they were always that way. Or, is is said about the Poles, “The Poles learn anti-Semitism at their mothers’ breasts.”

This seriously depressing analysis offers us neither hope nor understanding and merely serves Jewish needs for ego-defensive theories about their history.

The truth is that the only fraud about the Holocaust is the Jewish mystification of it. The sad fact is that the Holocaust was rooted in normal human tendencies that lie within all of us, and if we do not work hard to nip these tendencies in the bud, Holocaust-like phenomena can occur over and over again.]

Some regular, ordinary Nazis, people just like you and me, except that they had fallen into the trap of ultranationalist genocidal racism, play with a kitten they found. As you can see, these folks are not the pure evil people Jews make them out to be. Evil people don’t play with kittens – that’s what folks like you and me do. These are just regular folks who took a really, really wrong turn.
Yet they could be you and me, and you and me could be them. If you don’t believe that, toss it around in your head and see if it starts to make sense for a while.
Photo via Robert John, a colleague. John is one of the pre-eminent scholars on the Middle East, especially Palestine.

One major consequence of this approach is that it inhibits the study of the Holocaust as a historical phenomenon and as a sobering primer on the dangers of racism, extremist nationalist chauvinism, and totalitarian social engineering in modern mass societies.

[RL: Exactly. See my comments directly above.]

But Holocaust denial can assume another face, which is to reduce it to an instrument for realizing political ends. The Zionist movement has excelled in this, its rituals and rhetoric in commemoration of Holocaust victims far outstripping its concern for the victims and its activities to combat the phenomenon when it occurred.

[RL: See Norman Finkelstein’s “The Holocaust Industry” for more on the nauseating “Shoah Business” aspect of Jewish politics.]

In fact, the subject was not even on the agenda of the Jewish organized community, the “Yeshov”, in mandate Palestine during the war years, and many Zionists at the time found it embarrassing to hear of Jews being dragged off to be slaughtered without putting up a resistance; it conflicted with the nationalist fighting spirit and the image of the new man they were trying to inculcate.

[RL: Exactly. And Holocaust survivors arriving in Israel were often regarded with open contempt and hostility by the abrasive “Jews with an attitude” Sabras.

To some extent, this line continues to this day, as bad-ass Sabras attack Diaspora Jews, especially those in the US, as some species of traitorous wimps. The friction between Israeli and non-Israeli Jews is little known outside of Jewish circles.]

It was not until the Eichmann trial that the embarrassed silence was broken and emotions suddenly gushed out

In the course of Zionism’s attempts to portray the history of the entire Jewish people as one uninterrupted stream of oppression and persecution that culminated inevitably in the Holocaust, Holocaust history has been transformed into an exclusively Israeli property.

[RL: I refer to this as the “false pogrom and persecution view of Jewish history”. It is extremely deeply rooted, even amongst liberal, secular, assimilated US Jews.
Actually, it is mostly associated with Ashkenazi Jews and was traditionally not part of the worldview of Sephardic and Mizrachi Jews, although many non-Ashkenazim inside Israel have sadly taken this up. Students of ultranationalism will note that there is nothing unique about the Jewish craving to be a victim. It is simply a component of ultranationalism.

There is even a perverse human need to be a victim, which can be observed as a psychopathological symptom in many people, including those you know. On the individual level, ultranationalism is represented as egocentrism, and ultranationalism is simply egocentrism writ large across the face of the nation, with the tribe standing in for the ego.

Students of psychology are aware that egocentrism is associated with feelings of persecution, and grandiosity (manifested as ultranationalism on the tribal level) is associated with paranoia. Hence we can see that psychological processes that work on the ego level also manifest in aggregations of humans, including entire tribes and nations.]

Victims of the Nazi gas chambers have been nationalised and converted in spite of themselves either into an episode in the Zionist struggle to create a state, an instrument for blackmailing others into supporting Zionist aims, or for justifying the crimes the Zionist state perpetrates against others.

It is as though the magnitude of the crime entitles Israel to play the victim par excellence or the victims’ sole proxy, placing it beyond accusations of wrongdoing because it is the victim by definition.

The Zionist casting of all Jews as victims of Nazi atrocities has given rise to two curious phenomena. The first is that any Israeli can speak and act as the victim even if he has more in common ideologically and psychologically with the offender or the “Capo” — the Jews who cooperated with the Nazis in the concentration camps.

In other words, the mere fact of being born to a Jewish mother somehow gives license to represent all victims, including in front of those who actually are more victims than he is and those who are more hostile to Nazism, racism, and its offshoots.

The second phenomenon is the monopoly claimed by the Israeli ruling establishment to speak on behalf of Jews and Jewish history in general, which largely translates into soliciting and pressuring for political and financial support for Israel.

[RL: Feeling bad about the Holocaust? Sure you are. So fork over that donation to the Israeli Lobby today!]

In the first instance, the challenge of truly understanding and learning lessons from the Nazi phenomenon is reduced to something akin to a therapy session in which those in the role of victim help those in the role of perpetrator purge their guilt by satisfying the psychological and material demands of the former.

There is something morally repugnant in this passing of the sins or innocence of the fathers to the sons as opposed to engaging in an objective process of historical investigation with the aim of combating racism in all forms and in all societies. After all, the main victims of European racism today are not Jews, and in Palestine Zionism is not the victim but the perpetrator.

Unfortunately, the Israeli-German therapy sessions ignore such stark realities, and in so doing, offer both the Israelis and the Germans carte blanche to vent their racism on others as though the Holocaust were a purely German-Israeli concern and the greater phenomenon of racism something else entirely.

It is as if through their mutual catharsis with regard to the former they exonerate themselves from responsibility for the latter.
Meanwhile, Zionism’s unwarranted, illogical, and historically unsubstantiated monopoly on the role of Holocaust victims’ spokesperson sits well with Europe. Most of Zionism’s aims and demands do not require Europe to engage in a serious process of introspection in order to uproot the deeper causes that gave rise to the Holocaust.

Contrary to what one may logically expect, this suits Zionism’s purposes because it keeps the monolithic discreteness of the Holocaust intact and diminishes in comparison the significance of Europe’s other crimes. The upshot is to toss the entire Jewish question outside Europe and dump it in the Middle East.
It may come as a relief to European officials to be able to exonerate themselves for the Holocaust by placating Israel with anti-Palestinian, anti-Arab, and even anti-Muslim sympathies.

[RL: Have you ever wondered what is behind the Europeans’ curious support for Israel? This is it – Holocaust guilt, and Jewish Zionists never dare let them forget it.]

If anything, this form of behavior confirms the continuation of the underlying syndrome, a syndrome that is nevertheless glossed over with a fresh bill of moral health, authorized and stamped by Israel after every visit of atonement a European leader makes to the “Yad Vashem” Museum in Jerusalem.

[RL: Surely it is a legitimate question to ask when radical, racist, nationalist and militant Jews will finally cease their never-ending demands for apologies from Europeans for this crime, even though those asked to apologize are typically now not those present at the scene of the crime, but their offspring.]

It is for this reason that all victims of racism across the world should campaign to break the Zionist hold over the role of spokesman for victims of the Holocaust. Conversely, the Arabs and Palestinians who deny the Holocaust offer European and Zionist racism no greater gift than this denial of the occurrence of the Holocaust.

[RL: I have always said that anti-Semites are the greatest gift that Zionists ever received.]

What possible Arab or Islamic interest can it serve to even offer to exonerate Europe of one of the blackest pages in its history?
To do so is not only to absolve Europe of a crime that was in fact committed but also to earn its contempt and to wake up one day to find Europe and Israel joining forces against Arab or Muslim Holocaust deniers with such venom that one might imagine that the Holocaust had occurred in Egypt or Iran and that Holocaust denial is a far graver crime than the perpetration of the Holocaust itself.

Also, Holocaust denial is just plain stupid as a political argument. But Israel will be no less expedient in turning the provocation against its regional adversaries who had nothing to do with the Holocaust.

On the other hand, the Holocaust is a phenomenon that merits proper scholastic study, the purpose of which is to sort fact from fiction and myth form reality. No incident in history lies beyond the realm of historical research.

[RL: Here Bishara delves into the all-too-typical, and silly, line we hear so often these days – that the research into the Holocaust is somehow banned! The many diligent Holocaust scholars toiling for years and decades would be very interested to learn that their studies are forbidden.

In fact, the entire corpus of the Holocaust story is up for grabs, including the incident itself. The fact that Revisionists are reviled is because they are historically illiterate or deliberate historical forgers, not because inquiry is somehow banned.]

This said, Tehran can hardly be said to have a tradition of Holocaust studies; the subject does not rate very high in Iranian academic priorities.

And a conference in Tehran that was proceeded by a political speech denying the Holocaust cannot be said to be an academic conference; it was a political demonstration, one that harms the Arabs and Muslims and serves only the ultra-right and neo-Nazi forces in Europe and the Zionist movement.

During World War II, when some Arabs and other Third World peoples were rooting for Germany because it was fighting the colonial powers France and Britain, the Arab and Third World Left, which had allied with the Soviet Union, argued that it was wrong for the victims of racism to side with the racist Nazi regime. Their position was correct.

Today there is not even a pragmatic immoral justification whatsoever for siding with European racism. Holocaust denial does not undermine the moral justifications for the existence of the state of Israel as some imagine.

What it does however is hand the European Right and Israel a convenient enemy upon which to unload their problems. This enemy comprises Palestinians and Arabs, specifically fundamentalist Muslims, those Bush is fond of calling “Islamic fascists”.

The initial Arab reaction to the Holocaust was simple and straightforward and much more rational. The Holocaust occurred, but it was a tragedy for which the Europeans, not the Arabs, should assume responsibility. This is the opinion that prevailed throughout the 1940s and 1950s, and the sense of normalcy that survived in all of us continues to hold it today.

Poison, “Cry Tough”

From 1986. That’s some fine music! This band was very good. They were probably one of the best metal bands of the 1980’s.

Sounds like 1970’s glam metal. Almost like the New York Dolls. Or Mott the Hoople. Or David Bowie.

I like their outfits, too. And their hair! And the makeup! It sure was cool when you could be that damned androgynous, dress like that, have hair like that, and even wear makeup, and not have anyone think you were anything but straight. I don’t think that would happen anymore. In that sense, gay rights has really taken us backwards.

Alt Left: Video of Doctor at Mariupol Maternity Hospital Proves the Attack Was a False Flag

“The truth about the Hospital attack, where 6 babies were born. You can believe the curated stories from the MS-Western Media or THOSE who were there. At the very least PEOPLE need to tame their outrage before the FACTS.”

Excellent! An interview with a physician, an obstetrician who worked in the maternity hospital where the Ukrainians and NATO did their false flag. He says everyone was thrown out on February 25 and they all went down to the basement where supplies were very short. Azov turned it into a base. At the time of the false flag, the base was abandoned. He says there was no plane or bombing; instead, a Ukrainian tank fired a shell at the hospital, apparently deliberately as part of the false flag. Any casualties such as the pregnant woman and her unborn baby who died, were caused by Ukraine deliberately firing on the hospital as a hoax to blame Russia. The doctor also points out how the Ukrainians looted the hospital and stole just about everything that wasn’t tied down. They also interview other people who were hiding in the basement at the time.

Now there should be no doubt at all that this was a false flag.

At the beginning of the video, a woman shouts that the whole city has been waiting for the Russians to come rescue them. “Thank God you are here!” In other videos, everyone in Mariupol says exactly the same thing and curses the Ukrainians. In fact, a number of them ask, “What took you so long?”

Any urban warfare results in massive damage to the city. Typically, 85% of a city is destroyed in any urban warfare. Interviews with Mariupol survivors blamed the destruction on the Ukrainians. They said 85% of the damage in the city was caused by the Ukrainians. They also said that they set up their artillery next to homes, schools, hospitals, etc. They would fire and then the counterfire would shoot at wherever the fire came from, so a lot of civilian objects got hit that way.

Anyone complaining about what the US did to Rafah in Syria where they fired more artillery than in any engagement in the Vietnam War? They killed 3,500 civilians. They were mostly killed by Trump. Obama had put in strict rules of engagement to protect civilians, but Trump took them off and civilian casualties jumped by 10X. So Trump killed over 3,000 civilians in Rafah.

In Mosul, the US and the Iraqi Army (mostly the Iraqi Army) simply leveled the entire city with artillery. An incredible 40,000 civilians were killed. The US justified it. Liberal Democrats I talked to said it was just fine because “everyone in the city was an ISIS supporter.” Ok, so it’s all right to kill enemy civilians, then, is it? Nice to know! So why so upset about a few civilian deaths in Ukraine? That shows you right there the depravity at the heart of your average US liberal Democrat, who’s basically a monster.

Alt Left: The West Is Hopeless – It Falls for Every False Flag the US Does

Please respond to this Highbrow. It’ll be fun to see.

Look at this clown in the comments. The star of this video comes right out and says the whole thing was a gigantic hoax, and she should know as she was there, and this guy trashes me for being rational and believing her because he still believes the false flag bullshit. For God’s sake, what more do you need? People who were there, including the star of the video, all say it was a big false flag hoax, and that’s not good enough? If it’s not good enough, then what is?

Also there is an obstetrician at the hospital who says the hospital was cleared out on February 25. Everyone was in the basement. Still I guess some folks got hurt.

And I have an interview with a doctor who worked there who said that Azov took the hospital over, turned it into a base and kicked out all the patients and staff, who moved down to the basement. Down there they worked off of a generator with no food or water. Locals came by and helped keep the generator going and brought them food and water and supplies. Six babies were born down there. This doctor said the Ukrainians shot at the hospital with a tank.

A pregnant woman and her baby were said to have died in that attack. I’m not sure how that happened. Everyone in the hospital is emphatic that there was no airstrike as no one heard a plane. All they heard was some shelling. Marianne was injured by flying glass even though she was in the basement. If this woman and her baby died, it was because of the Ukrainian tank that fired at the building.

Alt Left: Why They Do the False Flags

False flags nowadays are almost always to raise outrage against a party in a conflict. They are always done by the side that is losing the conflict, and they are particularly likely during periods in which they have suffered serious setbacks. All false flags I have seen lately were done in Syria and Ukraine in order to try to force the US, the West, or NATO to intervene in the conflict on the side of the losing party.

At worst, they can result in a ceasefire, saving the losing side from annihilation. This is what the M17 false flag airliner shootdown by Ukraine did in 2014. It happened just as they were seriously getting their asses beat by the Russian Army. In particular, they were caught in a cauldron in the South and were soon to be wiped out there.

MSNBC (the most liberal news station on the dial!) here is openly calling for World War 3 solely on the basis of this Bucha fake.

See why people do these things? See how they work? And now that the US media will never question a single false flag done by us or our buddies and the gullible US and Western public has shown that they will fall for any fake attack, no matter how ridiculous or unlikely, the door is left wide open to do false flags and fake attacks to our heart’s content.

As Ukraine falls deeper and deeper into the abyss in recent days, I expect more false flags and I expect Ukraine to even dial up the game all the way to a chemical weapons fake attack along the lines of Syria (perhaps they could recruit the White Helmets) or even an attack on a 3rd party not part of the war either inside Ukraine, possibly at an embassy, or outside the country. Desperation makes a man do many a crazy thing in a Hail Mary attempt to save his drowning ass.

Alt Left: Pregnant Woman in Maternity Hospital Bombing Video in Mariupol Confirms That It was a Hoax


Read further down to see how the glownigger media outlet Associated Press deliberately wrote the article in a deceptive way, editing the comments of witnesses creatively and leaving out the most important information. AP is run by an extremely rich ruling class family in Texas who are incredibly rightwing, like Koch Brothers rightwing. They’ve probably been CIA forever too.

The Ukrainian AP glownigger photographer who mysteriously always seemed to appear right on the scene of many false flags and hoaxes in Syria and Ukraine is named Evgeny Maloletka.

Maloletka, in fact, has managed to place himself in the vicinity of many dramatic events instantly portrayed as titanic Russian war crimes.

Here is the glowie criminal’s Instagram site. Although this lying snake claims to be indifferent to the situation in his country, he is long been known to have been a supporter of the Maidan CIA coup in 2014. He has conspicuously failed to point out how that revolution was riddled with Nazis.


Alt Left: The Bucha Massacre Hoax

The Bucha Massacre False Flag


Exactly. Watch the video.

The Russian Army left on March 30. The mayor of the city says the city was liberated on May 31. There is no mention of bodies on the streets at that time. I have seen videos from this period, and while there is a lot of destruction, there are no bodies on the streets except for one which has clearly been there for some time.

On April 1 and 2, Azov Nazis enter Bucha along with SBU Nazi troops in blue armbands. They spend a day or two cleaning up the city of saboteurs and collaborators.

When the Russian Army was there, they requested that all friendly civilians wear a white armband to show the Russian forces that they were friendly and did not have a gun, so they would not get shot. As you can see in this video, Nazi Azov went through the town shooting everyone who had a white armband on as a collaborator.

You can see at the start of the video Nazi Azov advancing through the streets on April 1 and 2, asking, “They don’t have blue armbands. Is it ok to shoot them?” Notice how the bodies are laid out perfectly along the road as if they were placed there? Notice that the bodies, photographed on April 2, do not display any of the characteristics one would expect bodies to have after being dead for four days. Instead they all appear to have been dead less than 24 hours.

I also think they were killed by the Ukraine troops when they arrived as the bodies are still relatively fresh. If they had been dead for five plus days, I think their condition would be more pronounced.

Further I think the bodies were positioned for the video production which is why a lot of the positioning of the bodies seems off and is why the roadway was clear for the truck to pass in the video.

Early criticisms of these videos claimed that some of the bodies were fakes with live people and they were moving around. This analysis is in error. All of those people are freshly dead.

Russian troops who spent a month stationed in that town affirmed that not a single Ukrainian civilian was harmed the whole time they were there.

Regarding what happened in Bucha, I can insert my five kopecks after Alexander Kotz. From the 2nd to the 31st I was part of the battalion in this direction. In all the settlements occupied by our military, the movement of civilians along the street was carried out with a white bandage on their left arm.

I saw it in Ivankiv, Krasny Rog, Marianovka and other localities where we went on combat missions, ” said the former People’s Governor of the Donetsk region.Pavel Gubarev.

He speculated on what might have happened in Bucha.

After the withdrawal of the Russian Armed Forces from this theater of operations as a result of negotiations in Turkey, the Armed Forces of Ukraine began to enter cities and villages and unintentionally (and I do not exclude that they did it purpose) opened fire on men with white armbands.

This happened en masse. And when they realized that they were killing civilians en masse, it was decided to present this crime as the work of the Russian Armed Forces,” Gubarev said.

He once again pointed out that the Russian military treated civilians well.

I bear witness and I wrote about it above, that we, Russian soldiers, treated civilians well, one might even say with love. We gave part of the dry rations to small (sometimes infant) children: applesauce, jam.

After a trip to the hospital in Gomel, my commander bought diapers and baby food specially for infants with his own money. Parents of children cried tears of joy in response to the kindness of our military. I am convinced that this provocation will be refuted, and its organizers will be punished as they deserve, ” Gubarev concluded.

Keep in mind that Russian troops are under the strictest orders not to harm any Ukrainian civilians or captured Ukrainian troops. Russians have even arrested and captured many members of Nazi battalions. Even these have been treated in accordance with the Geneva Conventions.

If any Russian troops violate these directives, I assume that they are in deep trouble. The Russian military must investigate every one of these charges to see if there is anything to them. If there is, then the soldiers guilty must be seriously punished with prison to discourage this sort of thing. It is mandatory that Russia fight this war as clean as possible.

Any war crimes by Russian troops, always a possibility in wartime, will be shouted from the highest peaks all across the globes. So Russians must fight as cleanly as possible for that very reason. Further, all Russian troops must be informed that if they mistreat Ukrainian civilians or POW’s, they will be seriously punished.

Notice the video of the people with white armbands lined up crouched against the wall? Notice that they have white armbands? Notice that this torture of prisoners video shows up only after Nazi Azov has occupied the village. All of those people lined up against that wall are going to be killed as collaborators.s

Now look at the bodies in the streets? See how they all have white armbands on them.

March 30: Russian troops leave the city. Russian soldiers in units in the city say that no civilians were harmed while they were there.

March 31: Mayor of Bucha returns and says the city is liberated. No mention of dead bodies and 7 minute videos of people walking through the streets show no dead bodies.

April 1-2: The Nazi Azov Battalion and the Nazi SBU appear in town as part of a mission to clear the town of saboteurs and collaborators. A video appears on a Nazi Azov website showing Nazi Azov troops asking if it is ok to kill people who don’t have blue armbands on them. Video also appears on Nazi Azov Telegram sites of people with white armbands crouched against a wall in torture chambers, apparently being prepared for execution.

April 2: Suddenly, three days after Russia leaves, a lot of dead bodies appear on the street. They appear to be freshly killed. According to the narrative, they would have had to have been dead for four days, yet they show no characteristics of being dead that long. People wander around the corpses as if nothing is wrong.

If those bodies were dead for four days, ordinary people would not walk around them as if nothing was wrong. The stench alone would cause them to react. The bodies do not appear to have been killed by artillery, nor do they look like they have been killed on the spot. Instead they look like they were killed elsewhere and moved to the streets, where they were placed in a rather perfect manner as if they had been placed there and not fallen naturally.

Many of the dead in the streets have white armbands, suggesting that they were murdered by Azov Nazis for being collaborators. The incident has great propaganda value: If you cooperate with Russian forces in any way either by taking relief supplies or wearing the armbands they request you wear, you may be killed at any time. Message: Don’t cooperate with Russian troops in any way.

The message: “Collaborators will be shot!”

I have had a quick look at the Bucha massacre. This does not look like a hoax, people were really killed.

There is a simple and obvious explanation to the events. Ukrainians considered all civilians that had stayed behind to be collaborators. The first Ukrainians that entered the area searched every house for “​​saboteurs and accomplices of Russian troops.” If they spoke Russian or did not immediately shout Slava Ukraini! in Ukrainian, they were shot on the spot. This would explain the somewhat even distribution of bodies on the road.

In some cases people were simply shot for being on the road. There are two cases of cyclist dying on bicycles. A fast moving Ukrainian patrol shot at incoming traffic. This would be similar to the Rozsypne Road of Death massacre in Donbass in 2014.

Russia claims they left Bucha on March 30th. Ukrainians officially only entered on April 2nd. This would give the CIA death squads 72 hours or at least two whole days to operate.

The massacre is a serious step in the escalation towards World War 3. The Western public believes the Ukrainian narrative that “Russians did it.” The real audience of the massacre may however be Ukrainians. The message could not be clearer: “All collaborators will be shot!”

Some bodies have their hands tied behind their back. A number of executed Russian POW’s also had their hands tied behind their backs. No cases of Russians executing prisoners with their hands behind their backs have emerged. In fact there is footage of Russian soldiers recognizing notorious Azov Nazi leaders from imminent lynching by crowds in Mariupol. There’s no evidence of torture or mistreatment even of the most notorious prisoners. Ukrainian prisoners on tape have remarked at how well they have been treated in custody. Upon release, many are smiling and happy.

The Mass Grave

The bodies were buried by Bucha civilians on March 13, 20 days before the video surfaced. They had apparently all been killed by artillery strikes on the city. The city had been occupied by Russian forces for the entire month of March. Russian forces are not going to shoot at their own occupied city. The Ukrainians were outside of Bucha shelling the city, and they shelled the Hell out of that place. So it stands to reason that most if not all of those bodies in the mass grave were killed by Ukrainian artillery attacks on the village.


Who has the motivation to do this? What motivation does the Russian Army have to commit such a horrible crime? None whatsoever. What motivation do the Ukrainian Nazis have? Lots. Keep in mind that false flags during wars are usually done by armies that are losing the war. In the modern era they are usually done to create outrage against the winning side. They tend to come at times when the losing side in particularly in danger of being defeated.

The purpose is usually to force a ceasefire or to outrage public opinion in the West so much that it interferes with the losing side. The Ukrainian troops in the East are surrounded with no air cover, little chance of being reinforced, and not much of a way out. Nevertheless, they are deeply dug in and are expected to fight until the end.

So the Ukrainian Nazi government is already losing the war, but now they are forced with what looks like a catastrophic loss of their best troops. They are trying to force NATO to intervene. The purpose of false flags like this is to create so much moral outrage in the West that the West or NATO is forced to intervene on the side of the Nazis.

The US and NATO have a long history of false flags dating back some time. And the Ukrainians have been monsters forever.

For my part i have no doubt a massacre was carried out by the Ukrainians. I think we all remember what they (NATO/US) were willing to try in Syria when their Takfiri cannibals staged massacre after massacre with the collusion (before and or after) of CIA and Turkish and European intelligence agencies. And lets not limit this to just the dirty war schemes..What the US did openly with its regular forces in Iraq occupation was nothing less than an unbroken chain of serial war crimes. Anyone remember Fallujah?

As for the Ukrainians the record of their willing vileness goes back generations and continues to this day.

Its not mistaken to say that Russia and China and their allies – not just governments but all of those who stand up to tell the truth – are in a struggle against fascism. The fascists in power are not in bunkers in Mariupol or Nikolaev – those are the stooges and hired executioners of the fascists.

The fascists are in power in New York, London, Brussels, and Tokyo, and in Austria and Switzerland.The fascists are Kolomoisky and Soros and the rest of that ilk, all the finance sector degenerates. They will become even more vicious as they become more desperate. I believe that Russia’s present leadership (the loyal ones) have finally accepted the fact of this.

It’s correct that China and Russia and other torchbearers of the truth are in a war against World Fascism. And, yes, the fascists are in the West, correct. The West has been fascist for some time now. Well, they’ve been supporting fascism in the 3rd world. If you support fascism, you’re a fascist in a sense. Now real fascism is lifting its head as all across Europe Russian channels are being banned. I understand that enemy TV can be banned in wartime. But NATO isn’t even at war with Russia? Or are they?

I don’t agree that the enemy is the (((finance sector))) epitomized by (((Kolomoisky))), a true monster of a man, a Jew who funds all of the Nazi nationalist battalions in Ukraine while his TV station spouts shouts for the genocide of Russians, and the degenerate schemer Soros, a Jew who was a Nazi collaborator himself and now has adopted the Nazi government in Ukraine as his number one pet project.

Kolomoisky’s just a monster and a fascist and a Nazi of a certain type, but Soros has an ideological motivation and that is the Cold War. Soros grew up in Communist Hungary. He also barely survived in Nazi Hungary, but somehow he never talks about the latter and won’t shut up about the former. Like most victims of Western Cold War ideology, Soros has a hatred of the USSR (now directed towards its modern incarnation, Russia) rooted so deep in his limbic system that it is as impossible to control as a knee after a doctor’s hammer strike.

This is antisemitism and an example of the socialism of fools.

Sure, Soros and Kolomoisky are lousy people, as most billionaires are, Gentile or Jewish. But the enemy is not the Jews of the World. The enemy is the West itself, and it’s not just the finance sector, which isn’t even run by Jews anymore anyway, but the entire corporate system, the ruling class, the entire political spectrum from Right to Left, the media, the state, and even the entertainment industry. They’re all just small sections of the same Western serpent. The real enemy it seems is Western capitalist imperialism and NATO, the army of this grouping.

In fact, I have seen commentators asserting that “we are now in the era of the false flag.”

The Ukrainian Government Itself Is Nazi

The Ukrainian Nazi government has openly stated that it will refuse to abide by the Geneva Conventions of treatment of POW’s. Its top medical officer appeared on TV issuing an order to castrate all Russian POW’s. Other genocidal and cruel speeches have been made on Ukrainian TV, including a call by a Ukrainian Nazi to kill all Russians, including children (as nits become lice), call to exterminate 1.5 million Russians in the Donbass on a CIA-sponsored TV station, on and on.

On national TV the other day, a prominent Ukrainian Nazi said the only good Russian is a dead Russian. As far as all the rest of the live ones, they are bad Russians, and if death is good enough for the good ones, clearly the bad must not be spared either. He also notes that bad Russians are born bad, hence they have an inherent inimical nature towards Ukrainians literally bred in the bone and nurtured at their mothers’ breasts.

(((Zelensky))) himself is the leader of the (((Nazis))). He has praised Azov and the rest of the Nazi militias, defending them and noting that all of the Nazi battalions have now been deeply integrated into the Ukrainian Army. We might as well call them (((Zelensky’s Nazis))) at this point. I never thought I would see Jewish-controlled out and out Nazis, but here they are. I always wondered why anti-Zionists talked about Jew-Nazis and Zionazis, and I always disliked such talk as the real Nazis were orders of magnitude worse, and the comparison itself is grotesque. But now I’m starting to wonder if they were onto something.

After what they’ve been through, you would think that the people on this Earth who hate Nazis and genocide the most of all would be Jews. Instead, we see pro-genocidal Jews (as long as they are genociding Russians) and Jews falling all over themselves to support Nazis.

What can I say? Some people never learn.


Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)