“The Very Good German,” by Alpha Unit

This is Alpha Unit’s first try at writing more of a magazine-type feature article. She’s been writing Maureen Dowd-type opinion columns, often with a moralizing or universalizing message underneath. Her work is excellent as far as it goes, but I am encouraging her to break out of formula and try different kinds of writing. Most writers, even good to excellent writers, have one style and write one type of work, similar to how some very good actors always “play themselves.” However, in my opinion, the very best writers of all are the equivalent of character actors who play a different character in every movie. As character acting is the hardest kind of acting, “character” writing is the hardest kind of writing. To me, a superb writer ought to be able to write poetry and prose. The prose should cover both short and long fiction. For non-fiction, he could be capable of opinion pieces, analytic work, humor, journalistic stuff, magazine type feature articles, scholarly academic work, on and on. And his style should differ as he takes on these various roles. I originally started to work on this piece, but after it sat dead for a long time (for some reason, I could never quite figure out the rather simple story of Sabac al Cher), I handed it off to Alpha Unit and encouraged her to run with it. I think she did a nice job on her first feature piece. Alpha Unit is a Black female. “He was a Prussian through and through, proudly wore the uniform, his medals, and his beard like Kaiser Wilhelm.” This statement, in boldface, introduces an article in Der Tagesspiegel, written this past January by Andreas Austilat. And it describes the son of a Black African.

A Black officer in the German Army in the late 1800's.
A photo of Gustav Chabac al Cher in his Prussian Army in the late 1800's.
This African was brought to Germany as a seven-year-old boy, a “gift” from the Viceroy of Egypt to Prince Albrecht of Prussia. The only Arabic the Prince supposedly knew was “Sabac el Cher,” which means “Good morning.” This became the little boy’s name. The story of Sabac el Cher and his Afro-German family has been the subject of a book, a documentary, and numerous articles. His story only came to the attention of his German descendants in 1999. Sabac el Cher – later christened August Sabac el Cher – was a personal servant to Prince Albrecht and even accompanied the Prince on military campaigns. In 1867 he married a young White German woman and had two children, including the “through and through” Prussian described in Austilat’s article – Gustav Sabac el Cher. There is a widely circulated photograph of Gustav Sabac el Cher in military regalia. It turns out that he was also the subject of a painting by Emil Doerstling entitled Preussiches Liebesgluck, which has been translated as Prussian Happy Love. The painting, dated 1890, depicts a black man in a Prussian Guard uniform, in a loving embrace with a reddish-blonde young woman. Who was this Black Prussian? The credit for tracking down Gustav Sabac el Cher goes largely to art historian Gorch Pieken, a consultant for the German Historical Museum. He and his colleague Cornelia Kruse published his findings in the book Prussian Bliss: A German Family from Africa . Doerstling’s painting is on the cover. The young White German woman embracing Gustav is typically identified as his fiancee, Gertrud Perlig.
Gustav Sabac el Cher and Gertrud Perlig. Gustav Sabac was a German soldier in the late 1800's, and Gertrud Perlig was his redheaded German wife.
Gustav Sabac el Cher and Gertrud Perlig. Gustav Sabac was a German soldier in the late 1800
Like his father before him, Gustav Sabac el Cher was devoted to his country and to its military; he was a Prussian army officer and a member of the Stahlhelm Association, described as “reactionary front fighters.” He also served as a bandmaster for a Prussian regiment and later was a civilian conductor. And like his father before him, he married a White German woman and led his life as a good German. He is said to have been pro-Hitler. What made him most German, perhaps? Maybe it was the fact that a good and decent German girl, from a good and respectable German family, openly embraced him, married him, and had her children with him. How much more affirmation could any man have?

References

Austilat, Andreas. January 18, 2009. “Gustav, der Kapellmeister.” Tagesspiegel (online edition). Krampitz, Dirk. November 4, 2007. “Wie ein Afrikaner zu einer preussischen Gardeuniform kam.” Welt Online.

"Woman's Choice, Man's World," by Alpha Unit

New post by Alpha Unit, our female guest poster. Great stuff. The late Godfather of Soul, the inimitable James Brown, sang from his heart and gut that this is a man’s world. Rhythm and blues was always about the truth. The singer makes it known that the world would be nothing without a woman or a girl. But women and children live in a world that men rule. And whoever rules gets to call the shots. You got that, women? Men know freedoms that women, for the most part, never can. We are slaves to our bodies, and to the offspring of our bodies, in ways they will never be. And so they have been free to go out and make the world the way it is. And the rules that apply are of their making. There are places on this earth where this is explicit, and unapologetically enforced. Sometimes brutally enforced. (I have no interest in being in any of these places, either.) But quite often it gets quietly enforced in nice, well-developed, Western communities where it is completely unexpected. Civilized men will protect those weaker than themselves. But the sexual impulse exists beyond notions of propriety. If people are going to behave themselves sexually, then they are going to need the strongest of incentives to do so. Where there is no pressure to do what’s “right” or where there is the opportunity to disregard what’s “right” then people do whatever they feel like. And in this arena men have the upper hand. I remember a case in which a young woman was making out with a guy and had started to have sex with him–and right in the middle of the sex act, she decided she didn’t want to do it anymore. Ha. It became a legal matter, of course. And I’m sure you can guess why. The young man had introduced her, probably to his lasting regret, to one of the rules: Thou shalt not make out with a guy, get naked, open the pearly gates, and then, while he is bringing this encounter to its natural conclusion, proclaim, “On second thought, I don’t feel like it.” Already I can see The Outraged Liberal Woman raising herself up like a cat and hissing at me. “Alpha Unit, you are suggesting that a man has a right to force himself on a woman even after she has clearly told him No. This is not only disgusting, but outrageous.” Actually, I’m not. What I’m stating is that the young woman’s act was not only selfish and inconsiderate; it was dumb. It doesn’t matter if the guy in question is the dearest, politest, most sensitive guy on earth. It doesn’t matter if the guy would immediately jump up and ask in the nicest way if everything is all right and if there’s anything he can do for you. It’s a really dumb thing to do. Why? Because unless you know for a fact that a guy will stop, there is a very good chance that he won’t. There is an excellent chance that he’ll feel that you are jerking him around. A smart woman knows that you don’t summon up this kind of feeling in a guy – especially if you are alone with him. What’s disheartening is that there are young women out there who can’t fathom why the scenario above is so dangerous. They are the same type who’ll say, “I think I should be able to go out drinking until three a.m. and walk around by myself in the neighborhood without anyone bothering me. This is a free country, damn it, and women have the right to do whatever they want.” Since when? There are a lot of guys out there who would be happy to school you in the way things really work. There are guys out there who would have no problem physically overpowering you. Some of them enjoy it. In fact, there are guys who would enjoy hurting you, period. Don’t you know that? That there are people for whom lust and female vulnerability are a favorite combination? These types are outnumbered, I think it’s fair to say, by the civilized, decent guys. But even a civilized, decent guy can be pushed over the line. Under certain circumstances, civilized and decent guys have been known to do things they never would have imagined themselves to be capable of. A lot of times this happens during wars. You should thank God for the civilized, decent guys. They are really the only thing standing between you and that other type. They are the ones who give women and children safe passage in a world in which they could easily be – and sometimes continually are – at the mercy of men. The last thing you would ever want to do is bring out the worst in a civilized, decent guy. It’s incredibly stupid. Either the civilized, decent guys are going to be running things, or those other guys will. But one thing is for sure: women won’t be running things at all. Don’t kid yourself. If you jerk around bad guys, you lose. But if you jerk around good guys, you really lose.

"Some Civilized People Get Pissed Off," by Alpha Unit

Latest by Alpha Unit, guest poster on the site. Alpha Unit is a Black woman. Good stuff. Enjoy. Malia Obama is ghetto trash. This is the assessment of some upstanding conservative Americans who frequent a certain website. It’s not the first time an upstanding conservative has used this kind of language to describe someone in the First Family. Some time ago a talk radio host proclaimed that Michelle Obama is trash. “We have trash in the White House,” she told her listeners, with relish. What is the evidence that Michelle Obama is trash? And what is the evidence that her 11-year-old daughter is ghetto trash, besides the fact that she wore a T-shirt with a peace symbol on it? The Obama daughters could have been decked out like the finest of White royalty, and it wouldn’t have stopped these people from savaging them. That’s because two little Black kids shouldn’t be in the position they’re in. Only little White kids are supposed to be feted in world capitals and treated as if they’re something special. These kids might grow up thinking they’re deserving of this treatment. And a lot of other Black kids might, too. It especially won’t do to have Black women thinking they can get anywhere near that pedestal with White women. And yet there they are. Representing the whole United States of America. It’s just churning the innards of these conservative, White Real Americans, pissing off these Civilized People. And there’s not a damned thing they can do about it except weep and wail and gnash their teeth. And slam little girls. Like the class act they are.

"You Can't Have All of Him," by Alpha Unit

Yet another fantastic post by guest poster Alpha Unit. Alpha Unit is a woman. Yet again in America we are subject to the “confessions” of an adulterous husband, this time the governor of South Carolina. Not long ago it was a Senator from Nevada. And who was it before that? The governor of New York? It isn’t important. If anything is assured, it is that some prominent man is going to be exposed as an adulterer or philanderer–something other than the loyal and loving husband he held himself out to be. Why can’t a man be true, for heaven’s sake? Where does it begin–with the eyes? If he really loved his wife, his eyes would be for her alone. He wouldn’t pay the slightest attention to that woman over there, no matter how much she jiggles ever so slightly as she walks. Once he has seen his wife’s bosom, he is stricken blind to the charms of anyone else’s. Because love does that to a man. If he even notices another woman’s cleavage, no matter how much it is sitting up and begging for attention, it means his devotion to his wife is suspect. Everybody knows this. His gaze would never, ever again be cast upon images of lovely women, particularly lovely women in varying states of undress. Because love does that to a man. Once he’s all yours, he couldn’t care less what any other woman looks like without her clothes on. Your exquisite gorgeousness is all that could ever satisfy him now. And if he is ever caught looking at such images, a display of horror and outrage on your part should be sufficient to ensure that it never happens again. Female horror and outrage have always kept men in line. (As a last resort, female tears have proven to be effective.) And a devoted husband never has the slightest inclination, ever, to have sex with another woman. That’s because no other woman can compare to you. He married you, didn’t he? He wouldn’t have done that if he were still capable of finding other women desirable. Once he set eyes, and hands, on you, you rendered him incapable of acting upon the same impulse he acted upon when he saw you. Because that’s what love does to a man. On the other hand, there is occasionally the woman who recognizes her husband’s devotion in his truthfulness, his insistence on keeping his word, his exercise of discipline in his actions, his unwillingness to do anything that he knows will cause her harm. I’ve heard that such a woman can actually be quite happy, and could care less if her husband’s eyes linger a little bit over the physique of some other woman. Perhaps she figures that if she has his loyalty, she’s gotten one of the best things he could ever have given her. The body can be devout. But the eyes? Unlikely. And the imagination? Never.

"Human By Nature," by Alpha Unit

Another fine post by guest author Alpha Unit. Alpha Unit is a Black woman. It is an old notion that Black people can never truly be Westernized. Western civilization itself, some suggest, is a by-product of Caucasoid genes. If this is true, then how can Blacks ever get along in White societies? Are they to create a perpetual “Negro problem” for those who uprooted them? Part of the mythology surrounding Black people is the notion that Whites have taken us out of Africa but Africa can never be taken out of us. We are therefore not to be trusted and will revert to savagery under the right conditions. This fear of the Black Savage, with his bestial impulses simmering right beneath the surface, has served racists conveniently, allowing them to engage in everything from restricting where Blacks could live to outright murder of Blacks on the flimsiest allegation that the purity of some White damsel is under attack. What such people either don’t know or won’t accept is that there is no such thing as “White” nature or “Black” nature. As one anthropologist stated a long time ago, “Human nature remains fundamentally primitive.” Racial characteristics provide only a veneer for what human beings really are. The anthropologist cited above was quoted by another, the pioneering and eminently accessible Bronislaw Malinowski. Malinowski was an academic with the gift of being able to take a potentially dry subject like anthropology and making it engaging to ordinary people. Malinowski is famous not only for his field work in Papua New Guinea but for being a founder of the “functional school” of anthropology, which arose from his desire to put anthropology on a more scientific footing. His view was that every aspect of a culture served some genuine purpose, having the function of addressing some fundamental need within the group. Primitive peoples (or “savages,” to use the term of his day) were every bit as rational as “civilized’ Western man, no matter how much certain of their behaviors mystified or repulsed  outsiders. In a talk titled “Science and Reason” that he gave to the BBC which was later published in as part of a book in 1930, Malinowski states :

Now here the most important thing to realise is that primitive man makes full use of his knowledge whenever he can. You must discard the notion that the savage is a child or a fool, a mystic or a nincompoop. I have seen the savage hunter at work: he knows his animals and their habits; he is familiar with the properties of his weapons, the strength of his spear and the flight of his boomerang.

I have trusted myself to savage sailors on their frail craft over dangerous seas and under trying conditions. They understand wind and weather, stability and tides, in a truly reliable, that is, in a scientific way. It is only because he is able to observe correctly and to think clearly, that, with his simple tools and limited cooperation, that primitive man can master nature as well and as effectively as he can.

Malinowski pointed out the error in the idea that the “savage” has a mind that is essentially different from that of civilized people. I am convinced, as Malinowski is, that human nature is the same everywhere, regardless of DNA. Malinowski acknowledged that this idea was hard for many Westerners to grasp. And due to what they “know” to be true, many people today cannot see that Blacks have the same basic nature that they do. When not the result of simple ignorance, the belief that Black people are by their very nature “different” from Whites (or anyone else) is a self-soothing conceit, a teething ring for those with the compulsion to assert their own superiority. Such people love pointing out the sins of Blacks, disregarding the fact that the same sins are found in every group on earth. To them, any behavior exhibited disproportionately by a group belongs to that group. Whites have engaged in violence both individually and collectively (like all other groups) throughout history and on nearly every continent–including violence of the magnitude made possible by advanced technologies. Yet no one says that Whites are violent “by nature.” Asians–again, like everyone else–have inflicted violence on their fellow human beings. But who in their right mind would show footage of the Rape of Nanking and assert that it illustrates the “true nature of the Japanese?” Blacks are no different from other human beings. When they know they have a stake in the societies in which they live, they tend that investment as much as anybody else. They do everything they can to maintain and develop it. Black people absolutely can and do respect and adopt “Western” values. Unfortunately, there are still too many of us for whom there is nothing to lose by rejecting them.

References

Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1962. Sex, Culture, and Myth. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

“No Honor Among Thieves, No Solidarity Among Women," by Alpha Unit

Another great piece by Alpha Unit, a female guest poster. She takes her time on these posts and it shows. There is hardly a wasted sentence in what she writes. This goes with EB White’s dictum about writing in the masterpiece, The Art of Style, which, in a nutshell, is KISS (Keep it simple, stupid.) Another one of my favorites is Gustave Flaubert, the famous French novelist. Flaubert coined the perfectionist notion of the le mot juste, in English, literally “the good word”, but really “the perfect word.” What he was trying to do was to make the perfect sentence every time he wrote. Not only was he trying not to waste a sentence; he was also trying not to waste a word. I got into this for a while 20 years ago when I used to write some fiction. I would go on long drives in my Volkswagen squareback and I would end up after eight hours or so with maybe a paragraph or two. I would endlessly work over sentences to try to make them absolutely perfect in every way. It sounds dumb, the some of my friends read the final product and were freaked out. They said it read like “James Joyce or Shakespeare.” I don’t necessarily agree with that, but it goes to show what you can do with an extreme attention to detail. I suggested to Alpha Unit that females had no solidarity with other females when I recently saw a man verbally attack some females for no reason. I chastised the guy, and a bunch of women rushed up to defend the charismatic jerk who was picking on the women! I told Alpha Unit that the feminists have it wrong. The worst enemies of women are not men but other women. She agreed with me, and that’s the genesis of this post.

No Honor Among Thieves, No Solidarity Among Women

by Alpha Unit

A woman takes a vicious beating from her boyfriend. It isn’t the first time, and it won’t be the last. Her family members warn her to leave the guy before he kills her. But she won’t. When asked why, she says she loves him. A woman suspects that her husband is having sex with their daughter. It eventually becomes clear that he is. But she does nothing. Years later when confronted, she admits that she felt helpless to stop it. Why? She didn’t want to “disrupt the family.” A woman observes her husband punching her teenaged son, this time because the son came home later than he was supposed to. The blows have been coming since the boy was about 13. At least the boy has a roof over his head, she tells herself; his own biological father won’t do anything for him. She remains silent. A woman has gotten pregnant by a man she decides she doesn’t like very much. There is another man she is involved with. She decides to tell him that HE is the father. The man believes her. Inwardly, the woman breathes a sigh of relief. Each of these human beings is intent on one thing: procuring, and keeping, the resources of a particular male. For them, it is the highest moral good. Feminists have fostered the illusion that women are complete without men. That men are beneath women, even, in some ways. And every day, women go about the business of undermining feminists, the way women always have. Deep inside, women know that they are not complete without men. Women have high regard for men. They have little regard for each other. There is no such thing as solidarity among women. There are no bounds to what women will sacrifice in order to have the attention of a man, once they have decided that the man’s attention is worth something. History is full of examples like the ones above of women enduring and inflicting all kinds of misery and chaos in pursuit of a man’s favors. And the biggest obstacles in this pursuit are other women. As girls we learn our place in the pecking order, at the hands of mothers, grandmothers, sisters, and other female rivals. Male attention, along with access to male resources, is a precious commodity, and women are dead serious about getting it and keeping it. Feminism, which casts women in the role of victim, has glossed over these truths about them, preferring to absolve women of their depravity by blaming it on external pressures. She drowned the kids in the bathtub? She didn’t mean it; her postpartum depression is to blame. She shot her old man in the back while he was asleep? It was self-defense; she was a battered woman. She sat by and did nothing while her husband had his way with the kids? It wasn’t her fault; she was probably abused herself. But women know the truth about themselves and each other. Men are probably more shocked at hearing about the wickedness of some woman than women could ever be. Is there any question that the kind of human being who would offer up her own offspring to a degenerate could betray the trust of a female friend? There shouldn’t be.

"Thanks for Caring," by Alpha Unit

Another guest post by Alpha Unit, a black female guest poster. I think she is onto something here. No way do the vast majority of these White nationalists really care about what’s best for Blacks. Almost all of them don’t even like Blacks. That’s what their whole movement is all about. It’s the whole, sick, parental thing where the parent’s cruelty towards the child is masked with love. The parent beating the child mercilessly, all the while self-righteously proclaiming, “This is hurting me more than it’s hurting you!”

Thanks for Caring

by Alpha Unit

Could it be that some White nationalists don’t actually hate Black people after all? A lot of them do say some awful things about Black people. But I’m starting to notice a pattern in a lot of the things they say about us. I keep noticing how concerned they seem to be about the well-being of Black people. I have seen people suggesting that Black people would be happier, or used to be happier, living in certain conditions. I have seen suggestions that being back in Africa would be in the best interest of Black people. I have seen suggestions that keeping us with our own would make us happier. The “happiness” of Black people seems to be of some importance to those who say such things. Only it isn’t. What these people mean is that getting rid of Blacks would make them happier. It would be in their best interest. What they mean is that Whites were happier in the old days when Blacks were content out in the sticks somewhere. More of the same projecting on the part of Whites. When are White people ever going to start carrying their own psychic baggage? When are they ever going to stop attributing to “Racial Others” that which exists within themselves? Why don’t you just state that the happiness of White people is the only thing that matters on earth? That’s honest, at least. Everyone else is supposed to contribute to that happiness, right? Any group that thwarts White happiness deserves White wrath. And just like White happiness, White wrath must not be ignored. Black wrath is pathological. White wrath is justifiable. Well, guess what? Your justifiable wrath needs to be aimed right where it belongs: at yourselves. You’re always railing against Black irresponsibility. Why don’t you take responsibility for the predicament you find yourselves in? You wanted what you thought you could get out of Black people, and you got it. What – you thought you could have it for free? Didn’t anybody ever tell you that there’s no such thing as a free lunch? Well, your ancestors ate rotten stew. And you got stuck with the bellyache. That’s too bad. In the meantime, do me a favor and leave my “happiness” out of it. You don’t give a rat’s ass about that.

"You're On Your Own," by Alpha Unit

Another great post by Alpha Unit. This post touches on White nationalism, White separatism and the notion that the White race is an endangered species similar to lower animals that needs to be preserved like environmentalists preserve plants and lower animals. I’ve shopped this idea around to the Whites that I know too. I told them that White nationalists are worried about Whites going extinct and that this is one of their driving forces. One person, a Communist believe it or not, actually agreed that this was a serious problem. On the other hand, this guy, like many White Californians, has friends of all races and has dated women who are part-Japanese and American Indian. Interracial dating is epidemic here in California, especially since so many Californians are not so much non-Whites as mixed races. I grew up with, was friends and best friends with, and dated 1/2 Mexicans, Mexicans, 1/2 Cubans, 1/2 Navajo Indians, 1/4 Mexicans, 1/4 Chinese, Puerto Ricans, 1/2 Blacks, 1/4 Cherokees, 1/2 Panamanians, Japanese, 1/2 Japanese, Filipinos, Chinese, Blacks, all Californians. Back in those days, all these people pretty much acted White, that is they assimilated to the dominant White culture, so their race was pretty much irrelevant unless you were a racist dick. The other people who I tell that too act like it’s a semi-disturbing idea and typically start shaking their heads and laughing. Ideas about White preservation just do not go over here.

You’re On Your Own

by Alpha Unit

I believe the natural impulses of human beings reveal who they really are.  They tell me how the natural world really is beneath the cloak of civilization. As far as Nature itself is concerned, a human individual is an insignificant speck.  And “race” is meaningless against the backdrop of Nature, which couldn’t care less if there were a White race. Human beings have an innate drive toward species preservation, and species preservation trumps “race” preservation, which will get no assistance from Nature whatsoever.  Genetically, “Whiteness” is easily subsumed by “Darkness,” so evidently Nature doesn’t put too high a premium on it. Some Whites may think they’re the shit, but Nature doesn’t, and neither do many non-Whites.  Non-Whites have gotten to know the good, the bad, and the ugly of interacting with Whites, and even a non-White with a blonde dye job and blue contacts has no difficulty denouncing Whites for the sins of the past. In the past, Whites have been able to use force to “preserve” themselves, but are non-Whites going to quietly get with any program for White self-preservation now or in the future?  I doubt it–not if these non-Whites think it’s going to happen at their expense. Nature has also given each individual a will.  People are not going to be herded like animals into special racial “preserves” without some serious incentives for doing so–and for toeing the line once they’re in.  The idea of any kind of separatist state has deeply totalitarian implications, and I wonder if those who push such ideas are willing to be upfront about it.

“A Plea to True Believers Everywhere," by Alpha Unit

This is the latest piece by our bad ass Black female guest author Alpha Unit. In it, she seems to be noting that White racists are surprisingly cowardly for all their tough talk. They talk pretty hard on the Internet, but when they come face to face with real Blacks, they are bafflingly meek. Alpha says if you’re gonna talk the talk, you need to walk the walk. Throw it down, tough talking White boys!

A Plea to True Believers Everywhere

by Alpha Unit

Evidently there are hardcore, bad-ass White racists out there who drip with contempt for Black people and yet are somehow able to stop dripping when they are in the presence of actual Blacks. But why? Any hardcore, bad-ass racist worth his salt should be willing to be perpetually hardcore and bad-ass, especially in the presence of Blacks. And yet, if you go into any public place, you seldom see Black people in altercations with hardcore, bad-ass racists. I guess it’s because hardcore, bad-ass racists have an astounding ability to conceal their toughness. Except on the Internet. I tell you, if any Black person anywhere on earth were to read what is being said about him on the Internet, he would be terrified to leave his room. If he were to know just how deeply he is despised, he would be panic-stricken at the sight of a White man. Because, you see, that White man minding his own business in public may not be as harmless as he seems. He might be a member of a secret society of hardcore, bad-ass racists who are going on the Internet and being really mean to Black people. It’s easy to be deceived by these Clark Kents. They can be civil, friendly, and even kind to Black people. But if you could see what they become once they are home, relaxed, and in front of their keyboards, you would shudder at what emerges. A White-Race Superman reveals himself, coming to the rescue of Whites everywhere who are sick and fucking tired of these lowlife, menacing Blacks and their brainwashed White enablers. I would appeal to these heroes to come out of the closet. I don’t think they should shy away in the least from making their case to the actual bad guys. What they should do is go to the nearest Black neighborhood or to any place they see a gathering of Blacks–preferably a gathering of big, dark-skinned Black males. They should then proceed to inform these Black people of how wretched the Black race is, how utterly stupid and oversexed and irresponsible Blacks are. They mustn’t hesitate to use racial epithets. (After all, Black people call themselves the n-word, don’t they?) I promise you, these Black people will be so horrified at what they are hearing, so ashamed at coming face to face with the truth about their condition, that they will lower their heads and slink off to plan their one-way trips back to Africa. I strongly urge any hardcore, bad-ass racist out there to try it. He needn’t worry about the one or two in the group who might try to argue with him. The mean IQ for Blacks is an entire standard deviation below the White mean. So it is unlikely that their response will be coherent. It is likely to be nonverbal in its entirety.

“White Lust, Black Tail," by Alpha Unit

This is the latest from Alpha Unit. I almost could not believe it when I read it. I knew she was a good writer, but I did not think she was this good. She surprised me again. Once you give folks a chance, they can show you all sorts of unlocked potential bottled up inside. On another note, this post is directly in line with some of the central themes of this blog. One of which is the inevitability of miscegenation and the fact that guys will screw anything, especially if it’s good looking. And Africa has some of the finest looking women around. And beauty is, after all, in the eyes of the beholder. If you go and ask this to any primitive tribe or any foreign wise man or shaman, Hindu, Buddhist, Amerindian, or any sort of spiritualist, they will fall over laughing and say of course beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. This is an item of basic human knowledge that all wise human cultures (and most cultures are inherently wise about some things) have managed to figure out. Tribes often perpetrate various lies about the tribes around them, mostly along the lines that we are better and they are inferior. Tribal supremacists often try to force lies onto the males of the tribe along the lines that all females of the other tribes are inherently ugly or whatnot. But since this lie goes against the basic facts of human nature, it generally doesn’t work very well. The histories of India, Arabia, North Africa, Latin America, the Caribbean, Vietnam, Japan, Siberia and the Jews probably most folks in most places give the lie to that. And it was always the men outbreeding the enemy females. Arab men bred with Black slavewomen. White Latin American men bred with Indian and to a lesser extent Black women. In the Caribbean, Whites bred with Black women and in Puerto Rico, Amerindians were added to the blend. White North Africans bred with Blacks incessantly. In India, the upper castes have been getting darker and darker over the centuries. How? Breeding with lower caste women. In Vietnam, the Chinese invaded 2,200 years ago and never left. While they have always been hated many wars were fought against them by Vietnamese nationalists (Some led by women! So much for sexist Asians.) In Japan, the Koreans and Ainu are despised. Modern Japan was created when de facto Koreans came over from Korea 2,300 years ago. They say themselves as superior to the Ainu, and they drove them all the way to Hokkaido, and then overwhelmed them even there, fighting periodic wars against them. The Ainu were despised as the ultimate inferiors. Yet over 2 millenia, Japanese (probably males) had bred in so much with the Ainu (probably females) that the Japanese genome is now 4 In Siberia, White men bred with Siberian women. In the case of the Altai, the result was an almost 50-50 mixture. In the Sakha, they are only The Jews are an interesting case. The laws were in place, as usual, to protect the purity of the Jewish race by restricting outbreeding by Jewish women with Gentile men. In Spain, for a Jewish woman who had sex with a Gentile man, the penalty was having her nose chopped off. These same lies did not apply to men, and of course, Jewish males continued to screw around with Gentile women to some extent. However, the offspring were lost to the Jews, so the genetic line remained pretty pure. You always know who your mother is, but you don’t always know who your father is. That’s why the law about in order to be a Jew, you had to have a Jewish mother was put in. It had the side effect of maintaining tribal purity since Jewish women were sleeping pretty much only with Jewish men. In many cases laws and regulations were set up to try to stop nature. Casta was prevalent all over Latin America but no matter, even the viciousness of this system could not stop mass miscegenation. In India, there were very strict rules about Brahmins marrying non-Brahmins, including threat of loss of caste privileges, but look at how well they worked. It seems that some things just cannot be stopped. While male members of a dominant tribe are often able to protect their women from the subordinated tribe, the fuckers can’t seem to keep their hands off those lowly, subordinated and supposedly ugly women. You can’t fight Mother Nature. Miscegenation, especially of majority or dominant tribe males and minority or subordinated tribe females, is inevitable. So just lie back and enjoy it.

White Lust, Black Tail

by Alpha Unit

Human intellect and endeavor are remarkable things. But Nature’s designs are overarching. And its sole response to those within its web? Indifference. Once the earth begins to shift under your feet, it knows nothing of the destruction it causes. Flood, fire, pathogen, animals killing their prey: all indifferent. Human nature doesn’t care about your beliefs. Your beliefs are sort of like microscopic bugs crawling around in the vicinity of your nature. Barely recognized, if at all. There is race. And then there is human nature. If Human Nature squints really hard, it might make out the blurry outlines of Race. Probably wouldn’t, though. I know of a male blogger, distinctly pro-White and unambiguously anti-Semitic, who liked to post photos (some frankly pornographic) of comely lasses for the enjoyment of his readers. He had no problem, even, with putting up a photo of a black woman, and after one such posting, he noted a complaint from one of his readers. The reader objected bitterly to the idea of this dusky female being presented as an object of white male desire–especially on a site dedicated to White preservation. I imagine repeating this to the oldest women in my family–those who lived through the days of Jim Crow and were well-versed in the prerogatives of Southern “gentlemen.” And I can see them laughing. Your own nature will make a fool out of you, with all your pretensions to purity, no matter who you are. Your loins always get the last laugh. They know something about a good-looking woman, no matter how sub-Saharan African her ancestors might have been, that your mind may not want you to admit. And what is that? “Mercy. That is some fine baby-making material there.” Of course, this is the language of the loins. As it gets translated upward, maybe the message becomes “What a rack.” Or “That is one hell of an ass.” Doesn’t matter. Your body approves. That means YOU approve. Yes, you. All kinds of things can be denied, ignored, foregone, decided against. Not Nature. Nature keeps you and me honest.

“To People Who Hate Blacks – And Love Quoting Scriptures," by Alpha Unit

This is the latest offering from Alpha Unit. At first it seems a proud and ethnocentric Black woman is arguing that Whites should take up the White Man’s burden, but actually, she’s being sarcastic.

To People Who Hate Blacks–And Love Quoting Scriptures

by Alpha Unit

For years assorted Black Nationalists and Afrocentrists have complained about the depictions of Jesus so many of us grew up with: Christ as a blue-eyed blond. But there couldn’t be a more fitting portrayal, actually. In this temporal realm, isn’t the White Man the closest thing we have to Our Lord and Savior? He is Christ if ever Christ existed. But unlike the Christ of the New Testament, the White Man is not resigned to his fate. Nor is he very gracious about his God-given mission, or toward those meant to benefit from it. He could learn a thing or two from Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus of Nazareth acknowledged, when he stood up and spoke at the synagogue (the story told in Luke chapter 4), that He had been sent to the Jews, in fulfillment of the prophecy of Isaiah. But He knew that His mission was not confined to the Jews. He knew that He had been sent to save the entire world. That anyone could come to the Father through Him, provided they believed in Him. Well, as enlightened white men, you were not put on earth to be of benefit solely to yourselves. You were put on earth to benefit humanity. You cannot “separate,” any more than Jesus of Nazareth could have separated from those around Him. It is your fate, your burden, and your mission to serve your fellow man. You see, without the unique gifts you bring to humankind, civilization as it is taken for granted in the West would not exist. Indeed, you are the one thing separating your darker companions from barbarism. Remember New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina? As you noted at the time, this is what happens when these benighted souls are left to their own devices. And long before Katrina, their incompetence and corruption was on glaring display, whether in American cities or in African ones. It happens wherever they congregate. You shudder to think of what would happen to Western Europe  and its offshoot societies if the brown hordes and black masses were left in charge, and rightfully so. The principles of individual autonomy, private property, the rule of law, democracy–these are your legacy to the world, not trinkets for your own adornment. And so, like Christ Himself, you must take up your cross and endure what you must to maintain them for all. “Nationalism” and “separatism”? These are beneath you. You are too magnanimous for this. You have been imitated and envied in every continent you have set foot on. You mustn’t abandon the world. Your work isn’t finished. Temptation is, no doubt, overwhelming for you. These ungrateful and rebellious non-whites have no idea what they cast aside when they spurn your values, your principles, and, in some cases, your leadership. Blacks offend most egregiously, with their constant hectoring over every slight, both real and imagined. Not ever (with the exception of Keith Richburg) do they express gratitude for the wealth of opportunity and freedom the White Man has provided them, wealth they would still be waiting for had they been left in Africa. But take heart. You have been provided a great example in Jesus Christ. In the garden of Gethsemane He prayed that God would take that Cup of sacrifice from Him; but in the end He said to God, “Not my will, but yours be done.” Your will is to separate; God’s will is for you to continue to light the way for those still in darkness. The thorny crown placed upon the head of Jesus is now yours.

"In The Name of Love," by Alpha Unit

This is an excellent piece by Alpha Unit, who is a Black woman. When I asked her to contribute to the site, I told her that I wanted pieces that in which the author was saying something completely new and different, not the same old stuff everyone else writes about. I also prefer stuff that is disturbing and provocative. Something that really makes you think. I don’t know if she normally writes that way, but pretty soon, she started producing exactly those kind of pieces. In this piece, she has moved a long way along the road to liberation – she has learned exactly how her enemies think, and she has been able to put herself in their shoes. Most humans never reach such a high state of internal development. May she continue to grow and learn.

In The Name of Love

In the spring of 1961, I was assisted into the world by a black midwife, in a town in Mississippi known for its antebellum mansions and for a cemetery with rolling tracts of crosses marking the final resting place of scores of Confederate soldiers. In 1961 not only was Mississippi the poorest state in the country; it was probably the worst place in America to be black. Men like my father and grandfather had no rights that any white man was bound to uphold. For crossing a white man you could end up dead. And no white person would give a shit if you did. A few years later, in the summer of 1964, three young men ran afoul of white rule in Mississippi–as others had before them. They didn’t make it out of Neshoba County alive. James Chaney was black; his companions, Andrew Goodman and Michael Schwerner, were Jewish. James Chaney had been born and raised in Mississippi. These three young men were there to help local blacks organize in defense of their constitutional rights, including the right to vote. They came to Neshoba County to investigate the arson of a church that had been used as a meeting place for civil rights activists. And in 1964 Mississippi, this was an attempt to subvert the natural order of things and put blacks on equal footing with whites. This was, therefore, a threat to whites. And the blood of Chaney, Goodman, and Schwerner would have to be shed that white blood could remain pure. This made perfect sense to some. In order to demonstrate my love and loyalty to my Family, don’t I have to make sure that your Family never catches a break? Don’t I have to make sure that your Family suffers unrelenting humiliation and abuse? Grinding your face into the dirt on an ongoing basis is my way of protecting my loved ones. This had to have been what deputy sheriff Cecil Price was thinking as he ordered the three men out of their car and into his own. The carloads of other men were, likewise, thinking of their parents, siblings, and children. Olen Burrage, who offered his farm as the ideal burial place for the bodies, was also defending his own. As they beat James Chaney within an inch of his life and shot him, they did it with the full knowledge that they were protecting themselves and their families. And as they shot Andrew Goodman and Michael Schwerner point-blank through the heart, they knew it was for the common good. What these men sought was to cleanse the state of Mississippi of this pollution being brought in by outsiders, this challenge to what was self-evident: that in no way was a black man as good as a white. They were upstanding Christian men. Love guided their actions. Love of God, of country, of family. Love of their people and their race. Who among us would have acted differently?

"Barack Obama Wants To Cut Off Your Balls, White Man!" by Alpha Unit

This is another guest post by Alpha Unit, a Black female guest poster. Biographical information for Alpha Unit can be found here. Barack Obama is a menace. People on TV keep saying so. He’s going around making nice with dictators and Europeans. He’s apologizing all over the place for the imagined sins of America, when everybody knows that America doesn’t sin. He’s endangering us all by releasing highly classified Justice Department documents, when no matter what America does and no matter how many times in a month it does it, it isn’t torture. The damage Obama has wreaked on the international stage must give way, nevertheless, to the damage he has done to the best and brightest of America. With scalpel (or hatchet) in hand, Obama has the White Man by the scrotum. The worst fears of Thomas Dixon, “Pitchfork” Ben Tillman, and other grave-ridden defenders of white sovereignty have been realized: the primacy of The Black Phallus is nearing its apogee. And once The Black Phallus has stood aloft, the shadow it casts will cover over half the country and even parts of central America and Canada. The nation is in crisis. The Washington Monument, a proper and venerable salute to the alabaster manhood of The Real America, stands forsaken as Lady Liberty, much in the way of a certain president’s mother, lifts her skirts to be at the receiving end of the dreaded instrument of white annihilation. And how do I know this? Why, I read it. On the Internet. If the White nationalists and race realists are to be believed, America as we know and love it, is dead. And the demise of the White race is not far behind. After the election all the weeping and gnashing of teeth was on full display. “Whites in America just volunteered to be slaves for a few years, providing for Blacks and Mexicans,” one typed fervidly. “After that, it’s a trip to the gas chambers.” Another looked in horror at images of “young people of all races on college campuses and bars all over the nation yelling, screaming, shouting and hugging and kissing one another when it was announced that Barack Obama had won the presidency,” concluding that “we are done as a nation.” One especially stricken soul even suggested that many White women voted for Obama out of fear of the hordes of raping Black males that would be unleashed upon them if Obama lost! Yet another, sounding as if he had materialized out of the Reconstruction-era South, declared balefully that he now looked upon the White House as if it were a daughter, girlfriend, or ex-wife who had slept with a Black. “No matter the contrition, the apologies, the expressions of guilt, they are forever stained and cannot be restored.” But two gentlemen summed it up most vividly: “I feel wounded.” “I feel emasculated.” Not just upset. Not just angry or appalled. EMASCULATED. Each of them apparently feeling that someone had taken a knife and swiftly severed his balls, leaving a bloody, gaping and ultimately mortal wound. Who knew the Creator and Guardian of Western Civilization was so…vulnerable? Forget socialism, communism, fascism, and Islamoterrorism. What wakes The Superior Male in the middle of the night, gasping and clutching his chest, is the specter of The Black Phallus plunging into receptive white crevices. And now that Obama is in charge, the specter looms. Never mind that White women overwhelmingly prefer White men and probably always will. The crisis of confidence in the White male, unleashed by Obama, will inflict performance anxiety on untold numbers of them. Those who CAN get it up will be infertile. Out of frustration, White women will abandon their White boyfriends and husbands, scouring the inner cities for sub-Saharan DNA. They’ll be popping out brown babies by the boatload. And let’s not get started about what this is going to do the White man’s morale. His demoralization will reach critical levels, to the point where he will only be able to sit helplessly by while White America is overrun by these traitorous White women, their mulatto progeny, and the uncles, aunts, and cousins of their mulatto progeny. Once quiet suburbs will be rattled by the migraine-inducing sound of blasting car stereos. Gathered on previously pristine porches and steps all over his neighborhood will be loud-talking women with frightening hair, guzzling from 40-ounce bottles and screaming “Get over here ‘fo I whup yo’ ass!” at infants. To get from his car to the house, he’ll have to run a gauntlet of leering parolees. “We in the White House now, BITCH. Don’t go nowhere tonight. I’m-a be over there to tap that ass.” The Real America will be unrecognizable. Yes, the White Man evolved in harsh northern climates to be resourceful and intelligent, the race realists are more than happy to point out to us. He has had the fortitude to survive in a world where he is in the minority. His Caucasoid genetic heritage has lifted him–and the rest of mankind with him–to social and technological heights once undreamed of. And yet…it’s not enough. None of it can stand in the face of Barack Obama. A Black guy (with Caucasoid genes) hemmed in, checked, and balanced by White guys. Doesn’t matter, though. That Negroid DNA is powerful enough to wipe out everything the White Man–over millennia–has established. Oh, the humanity.

"What Women Want," by Alpha Unit

This is a guest post by Alpha Unit. Alpha Unit is a Black woman who is a supporter of the Black Women’s Empowerment Movement that can be seen in many Black women’s blogs on the Net. The movement is difficult to sum up. My understanding of this movement is that is it in opposition to many of the stereotypes about Blacks and Black females in particular. They align themselves with the more assimilated population of Blacks and take offense to the notion that Blacks are rude, uncivilized, ghetto, loud, belligerent and unmannered. To put it another way, they are opposed to the Ghetto variety of Blacks. I have noted many times on this blog that the Black community is splitting into a Ghetto Underclass style and an Assimilated or Middle Class style. The assimilated ones increasingly want little to do with the ghetto crowd. Ghetto is more of a style than an economic space – many wealthy rappers are still very ghetto, and many poor Blacks are assimilated. In particular, this group is opposed to the notion that Black females are seen as too aggressive. Instead of just belligerently using psychological defenses to deny the issue, some Black women in this movement are investigating it with the notion towards creating what I would call a New Black Femininity. This group of women has also been proposing that Black women open themselves up to interracial relationships, in particular with White men. This issue itself needs some examination. First of all, Black women are the most racially loyal of any ethnic females in the US. They are much more racially loyal than Black males to boot. The reasons are diverse, but many Black females have bad feelings about White males stemming from slavery and all. Further, Black females are simply attracted to Black males. Black males are the most masculine of any males, and Black females also have high testosterone levels. It follows that they find extremely masculine Black males very attractive on a number of levels. White females are also attracted to the hypermasculinity of Black males. White racists say that Blacks are inherently aesthetically ugly, but Black females don’t seem to think so. Black males also think that Black females are quite attractive. Both groups grow up with each other, get used to each other, and probably find their own race most attractive, which I figure most ethnic groups do, leaving White racist lies aside for now. Why should Black females open themselves up to the possibility of relationships with White males? Simply mathematics. Black males are increasingly scarce and there are many more available Black females than Black males. Black males are scarce due to high rates of imprisonment, probation, drug and alcohol addiction, disability, unemployment and early death. Most of the decent ones are already married, and there are quite a few gay Black men. Deep down inside, most Black females really prefer a Black guy, no matter what the White racists say. But there’s not enough to go around. Lesbianism is not attractive to most of these women. “Man-sharing” is a new phenomenon that probably works quite well for the men but pretty poorly for the women. A lot of Black women are either going to be alone for the rest of their lives or they are going to have to branch out. Opening up to White men is a purely pragmatic decision. There are issues between White men and Black women other than history. Many White males find Black women to be scary and too aggressive. Many Black women probably find White males to be too wimpy. Black women often complain that White penises are too small compared to the Black penises that they are used to. White men hear about these things and want to run for the door. Personally, if I suspect a woman thinks I’m too small or too wimpy, I’m setting a new 100 yard dash record out of here. Nevertheless, the movement shows promise, and the number of Black females dating and even marrying White males is rising. Young Black females are increasingly adventurous. Young White guys are a lot less racist than their elders and Black women are potentially part of the game plan. This essay stems from an Internet debate I had with Alpha Unit on submissiveness and femininity. What would it take for you to submit–freely–to another person? What would it take for you to love it? I don’t think anybody comes into the world “submissive.” We all arrive here needy, self-centered, and demanding. Children are unreserved tyrants. An infant wants what he wants, and he wants it NOW. His will is to live, and his will is paramount. Every human being comes into the world with the will to further his own ends. This means every female human being as well. There is nothing inherently “submissive” in being female. And female is not the same as feminine. “Femininity” and “submissiveness” are cultural imperatives, not innate ones. A woman is different from you, but she certainly is not LESS THAN you. She’s not naturally inclined to set aside her own will to satisfy somebody else. No one is. Like anyone else, female human beings respond to incentives. They tend to do what they are rewarded for doing. They tend to avoid what they are penalized for doing. So when a man says he wants a “submissive” woman, what exactly does he want? For a person to set aside her own will, she has to be highly motivated to do so. She needs to know that it would be in her best interest to set aside her will. And why would a woman subordinate her will to yours? You’re going to have to persuade her. Actually, you’re going to have to SHOW her. She has to see for herself that she is better off subordinating her will to yours. Or, even better, that she’s going to LOVE subordinating her will to yours. In spite of what some people think, this isn’t something that can be done by force. You might be able to compel obedience, but you can’t force someone to respect or trust you. And if a woman doesn’t respect or trust you, she won’t submit to you. She might do as she’s told. But she’s not a fool. She’ll know you don’t deserve her respect or trust. And you won’t get it. The odds are that she’s looking for ways to undermine you. You’ve probably made an enemy of her–and you’ll be the last one to find out. The motivation for women to be subordinate varies across cultures. Where women are almost entirely dependent on men, they must submit to male prerogatives in order to survive. If, in order to survive, a girl must be married, then she must do whatever it takes to get and keep a husband. (For example, if, in order to survive a girl must have a husband, and in order to have a husband she must be “circumcised,” then she’s going to be, no matter how personally brutal and incapacitating it is. The older women will see to it.) Similarly, if a woman lives in an environment where in order to be secure she has to attach herself to a man that other men fear and submit to, then she will. And she’ll put up with whatever she needs to (You would be amazed at women will subject themselves to, and subject their children to, in order to feel secure.) I don’t believe this says anything about whether she’s inherently “submissive,” or whether she’s “naturally attracted to thugs.” What it says is that, like any other human being, she is dedicated to her self-preservation, and that if the benefits of being in a situation outweigh the costs, then she’s there to stay. But in a culture where the women don’t need to marry in order to survive, why would there be any premium on submissiveness? If I don’t need to attach myself to a man in order to feel safe, why would I submit to one? In this situation the man would have to persuade me to submit. I would have to know that if I completely let my guard down and let myself be vulnerable, that you’re going to “catch” me. That you wouldn’t let me get hurt for anything in the world. That I’m going to like it. (And it might even be hot.) Because women want, more than anything else, to feel safe.

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)