The Ahmad Arbery Case

I’m not sure if I have written about this case before, but in case I haven’t, this pretty much sums up my views about the case precisely. I feel that these good White men got railroaded. I watched the entire video and these White men were playing it by the book the whole time. They almost seemed like police officers in how closely they were following procedure.

The man in the back of the pickup truck had his gun pointed down at the ground. They simply said that they wanted to question him as he obviously had been caught in the midst of a crime.

If someone has a gun pointed at me and wants to question me, I think I’m going to stop and answer his questions lest he murder me! You have to obey the man with the gun! Otherwise you are a dead man. Arbery turned around, backtracked in a completely unnecessary way. He had been running past the truck and the White men didn’t do anything to stop him. They would have just followed him some more in their truck. So what?

Instead he backtracks, runs back to where he was before, and then confronts the man with the shotgun, who is playing it by the book entirely. He has his shotgun pointed at the ground the whole time! He never once lifts it up and points it at Arbery. Arbery charges the man with the shotgun and tries to wrestle the gun away from him. Look if I have a gun and you try to take that gun away from me, I believe I have a right to fire that gun in order to protect myself. If you take my gun away from me, you can murder me with it. No thanks.

But the White man didn’t even do that! Instead as Arbery was trying to wrestle the gun away from him, the White man was trying to keep it pointed at the ground the whole time. They got into a wrestling match over the gun and the gun discharged.

It looks like an accidental discharge but even if it were intentional, it would still be legal as the White man had a right to protect his life from the man taking his gun away from him which Arbery can then use to murder the White man. So it doesn’t matter if the White man killed him intentionally or not. When two people wrestle over a gun, the gun often goes off for one reason or another and the person trying to wrestle the gun away from the man with the gun often gets shot.

The other man was simply following in the car. They weren’t following this Black criminal to murder him with their guns as the media made it out.

Anyway, for all the rest of my views, just read below. If I were President, I would pardon all three of those White man. They got badly railroaded and the judge was totally prejudiced against the defendants and the trial was quite unfair as a result.

The whole idea of shopping around for prosecutors outside of you jurisdiction because the  one in your jurisdiction won’t take the case seems very dubious to me! If the prosecutor in your district won’t take the case, then you’re SOL. I guess maybe the state can take the case? Yes or no? The federal government may be able to take the case if they think it’s a civil rights violation, but I doubt it. Generally speaking, retrying a case under any new venue is double jeopardy and prosecutor shopping ought to be illegal.

The only thing I disagree with is the part where he says Whites should avoid Blacks as much as possible. I would say to avoid ghetto Blacks because nothing good ever happens once you get involved with them. I’ve gotten involved with them a number of times and in general, within one or two days, they stole from me in some way or other. You’re just going to get harmed if you get involved with those people.

From the Net:

Actually the case of the Satilla (Brunswick) Three is more deserving of not only intense scrutiny, but outright outrage over the selective prosecution, kangaroo court, compromised jury and race-baiting sideshow atmosphere with “civil-rights” types threatening violence if the Satilla (Brunswick) Three were not convicted.

The case of Amhad Arbery and the three (white) Satilla residents who are presently doing “hard time” for defending themselves is a prime example of prosecutorial misconduct and double jeopardy, which MUST be addressed and outlawed.

Arbery was a criminal POS who was casing construction sites for tools and other materials that he could steal and sell. He was observed at the same site previously on video as well. As there were break-ins and increased criminal activity, the three men were merely defending their neighborhood.

Arbery refused to be questioned which was within his right.

Arbery felt “disrespected” by being questioned and “doubled backed”, attacking the man with the shotgun.

Arbery attacked the man by pulling on the barrel of the shotgun causing it to fire. Anyone familiar with firearms knows that pulling on a barrel of a shotgun can cause it to fire. Arbery has that one fatal “flaw” that is present in all black DNA, the misperceived “shame” of being “disrespected” (even if no “disrespect” occurred) and the need to immediately “do something about it” (instant gratification).

The Satilla (Brunswick) Three did not pursue Arbery…Arbery pursued the Satilla (Brunswick) Three. In fact, they videoed the entire confrontation, proving that Arbery was the aggressor.

Arbery could (and should) have run off in any other direction, would not have been pursued, and would still be alive today. He chose to confront the man with the shotgun. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

The original prosecutor refused to indict. The powers-that-be had to “shop” for a prosecutor who would take the case. It took three tries before they found one who would indict.

This is prosecutorial “double jeopardy” which must be addressed and outlawed nationwide. The way it stands now, what is stopping a prosecutor from one jurisdiction from indicting someone from another jurisdiction when a local prosecutor having legal jurisdiction refuses to indict? We are all in trouble if this is allowed to stand.

Also, the court was stacked against the White men just because they are White.

So-called “civil-rights icons”, Antifa and BLM types were in the courtroom, threatening violence if the “correct verdict” was not rendered.

The jury was also warned that there would be violence if they did not convict.

The “judge” was weak, went along with the threats and refused to run a proper court proceeding.

The judge would not allow Arbery’s past extensive criminal record or more recent trespassing at the same site into evidence. The mainstream media fanned the flames of racial hatred against whites, making Arbery out to be a mere “jogger”, (yeah, right). Who in their right mind jogs 20 miles from home in work boots?

The “mainstream media” stated that Arbery “was studying to be an electrician” and was merely observing construction sites…yeah, right. Arbery was looking for tools, copper wire or anything else of value to steal, that being his stock in trade as an “electrician”.

I pray that any appeals that the Satilla (Brunswick) Three place will be successful. Their prosecutorial double jeopardy and kangaroo court “trial” were both shitshow railroad jobs from the outset.

This is one case that is truly deserving of real “justice”.

I don’t blame ANY White person for not wanting to be around or deal with blacks.

As far as I am concerned, the Satilla (Brunswick) Three did society a favor by “taking out the garbage”. It’s a god-damned shame that they are paying for their self-defense with long prison sentences.

Summed it up very nicely.

Please follow and like us:
error3
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)