Long, 15 pages.
CLAVDIVS AMERICANVS: I will explain in detail later why I think American women prefer aggressive men compared to say European ones, but in short we are a younger, more libertarian, more barbaric and less settled society than Europe. I think, and I could be dead wrong here, but Russia women value brains more than American ones, even though Russians in general are more aggressive.
American culture does not value intelligence. It loves to reap the benefits of high IQ types, but we never glorify them for their intellect, only for their achievements and impact. That is, it values the effect, not the cause. In fact, I dare say American culture and society almost wishes it could have the effect without the cause at all!
This is evidenced in the elite universities’ admissions process. They even make SAT scores optional know. To them a 1550 is just as good as a 1600. Not in the Soviet Academy, it’s not. They take “holistic” approach which means. “How rich are you or how socially adept are you?” Exactly the two things women care about the most.
Women, like the Ivy Leagues, want a man have a minimum degree of intelligence, neither suffer fools after all, but past a certain IQ, they view it as a handicap rather than as a desirable trait.
Cunts.
Bit by bit.
CLAVDIVS AMERICANVS:I will explain in detail later why I think American women prefer aggressive men compared to say European ones, but in short we are a younger, more libertarian, more barbaric, and less settled society than Europe.
I think this must be it. Are Australia, New Zealand, and Canada the same way, though? They’re not. Is it because they never rebelled and stayed connected to the mother ship UK?
It’s not just youth. We are more libertarian and barbaric than either of those places.
I’m not sure about less settled or how much it matters.
Sometimes I think that American Revolution was the stupidest thing we ever did. Just think, if we never had that idiot revolution, we could have ended up halfway civilized like Canada. Instead we had that revolution and it turned us into barbarous, backwards fools, mostly conservatives. Because conservatism itself is barbarous backwards by definition. There’s no other explanation for it.
Of course, the Cultural Left is now just as stupid. It’s not barbarous or backwards, though it’s definitely stupid. It’s too smart and advanced for its own good. The Left is addicted to continuous “progress,” come Hell or high water. Always full speed ahead and more stuff to get liberated. Yet at some point you end up with a sane society that’s about as liberated as it can get. Then you start getting into what Lenin talked about in, “Leftwing” Communism: An Infantile Disorder, change-addicts who start attacking all of the accumulated wisdom of ages on the grounds of
If it’s old, it’s bad.
This is in part the idiocy of the Chinese Cultural Revolution, which actually reached near-conservative levels of backwardsness and barbarism.
These are the models of modern liberal-leftism:
Forward change yesterday, forward change today, and (especially) forward change tomorrow!
And instead of
(Most) everything your grandma said was right.
It’s
Everything your grandma said is wrong.
What your grandma said, assuming she was sensible as mine was, boiled down to the accumulated wisdom of humankind.
So what they are really saying is
The accumulated wisdom of mankind is garbage.
I guess because it’s old, and old = bad.
Which is almost breathtakingly stupid but it’s not not backwards or barbarous as conservatism. People on the Alt Left kept trying to say that Wokesters were “regressive” and called the Regressive Left, mostly because of the support for backwards Islam. I kept arguing with them that they were wrong. One brought up that Woke Culture was against the Enlightenment, and that is true in a sense I suppose. That still doesn’t quite hit the nail. The problem here is literally going too far forwards, not backwardness. How is trannyism backwards and barbarous? Get out.
The liberal-Left has nowhere to take change anymore but into insanity, as most of the oppression has been dealt with.
CLAVDIVS AMERICANVS: I think, I could be dead wrong here, but Russia women value brains more than American ones, even though Russians in general are more aggressive.
I’m not so sure about that. I met a couple of them on the Internet, and they both wanted to fuck me. One said she was going to New York in a year or two and wanted me to meet here in a hotel there for sex. I asked them if they wanted clothed pics or nudes, and in the confusion of their poor English, they ended up saying both. So they got them.
They both acted shocked, but they stuck around. An American woman would have left. I explained and apologized, they both started gushing, verbally and probably bodily, about how huge my cock was and how much they wanted it right the fuck now. It’s bigger than average – 1 1/2 inches bigger, but it’s not that big. One went on about how some American guy came over to see her in Russia, but he had a small dick. She also said he wouldn’t listen, which to her was about on the level of having a small cock.
Presumably to orgasm.
I want a man with a big cock!
They both kept saying over and over. Perhaps it is not only in brains that I am gifted.
She was great – beautiful and smart.
She was a cool chick. Once I went to talk to her and said,
Ahhh, I just got through masturbating.
A problem was that her English was so convoluted and bizarre that it was almost impossible to talk to her. There was something about the rhythm and “layout” of her sentences that just seemed bassackwards or completely messed up. Often her sentences seemed to literally circle around themselves. I found my mind going around in circles as I was reading her prose. A lot of it ended up making no sense. Yet she was proud she could speak English.
I do get the impression that Russian women like those hypermasculine men though. There’s a video of a hot Russian woman walking around her dilapidated village with a sign, “Husband wanted.” I saw a video she made, and she said he had to be “masculine.” Russian men are hypermasculine of course, as are Ukrainian men, as Ukrainian culture in some ways is just the culture of Southwestern Russia with some weird add-ons.
Perhaps they do value brains though. I have no idea.
CLAVDIVS AMERICANVS: American culture does not value intelligence. It loves to reap the benefits of high IQ types, but we never glorify them for their intellect, only for their achievements and impact. That is, it values the effect, not the cause. In fact, I dare say American culture and society almost wishes it could have the effect without the cause at all!
Well, of course. This is an extremely anti-intellectual society. Sure it loves the benefits of brainy people, but obviously we never glorify them for their intellect. Though there are a few Americans who value this sort of thing.
Right, achievements are valued but not intellect per se, It is interesting that intellect per se without any achievements was highly valued in the European ghettoes of old. It was a garbage culture, but that’s not to say there was nothing good about it.
Chinese culture is much the same way in valuing intellect. Interestingly in both cultures, the women are some of the most high-IQ women on Earth, and those are two of the rare groups of women who actually value the smartest men as the best men of all. The smartest guy in the village is the man all the girls want to marry in both Jewish and Chinese culture. Which is of course baffling to most of us men.
I’ve had a lot of friends in my life, and a few of them remarked on my brains or knowledge (they’re sort of the same thing, but they’re also different). They acted shocked, stunned, and completely blown away by both. One friend said:
Everyone says that. Everyone I know says they can’t believe how smart you are. They’re all just blown away.
I had an audiologist recently tell me I was the smartest guy he knew.
And that’s a compliment because I know a lot of doctors and lawyers. And you’re smarter than any of them.
I’ve had girlfriends say it too, but I always got the impression that it didn’t make them wet between the legs. It almost seemed like it dried them up or at least their pussies reacted with indifference. I’m not sure how a pussy reacts with indifference, not having one of those convoluted organs, but I suppose it can, since it has a brain of its own just like our cocks.
I dated an 18 year old girl when I was 59 years old though, and often when I started talking, she would tell me how horny she was getting.
She also mixed up the feelings of “horny, my pussy is wet” with “getting emotional” and “falling in love.” I’m not sure how often those feelings get mixed up in women, but I imagine it’s more often than we men think. She would say:
Oh my God! I can’t believe how smart you are! I’m starting to get emotional again.
Which always meant she was
- Starting to fall in love with me.
- Getting physically horny, that is, her pussy was getting wet.
So there’s the definition of a sapiosexual.
I’ve also had a woman who said one reason she had fallen in love with me was because, according to her, I was a genius. I made her really horny too, horny as Hell, all the time.
Now I make zero women horny, 100
Come to think of it, that 18 year old girl was horny all the time too, like every minute of every day. I figure it was because she was in love with me.
And I’ve had other women who fell in love with me suddenly get wildly horny much or all of the time, much more so than usual. So it’s possible that love turns on the female sex drive, or love makes their pussies wet.
Another woman said she wanted to literally fuck my brain or fuck my mind, which meant she wanted to fuck me but in part it was for my mind.
And a 20 year old woman wanted to have my baby a few years ago. She was also absolutely blown away by my mind. She kept saying:
Your mind…Your mind…I can’t believe how smart you are.
At the end she dumped me because somehow she thought I was a pussy, and I have no idea why she thought that. She said I had turned from an exciting, dominant guy into “some old philosopher.” She did acknowledge my mind:
Well there is your mind, but…
See that “but?” In other words my mind was very attractive, but it wasn’t enough to overcome the turnoff of the passivity or lack of masculinity or whatever confounded thing was upsetting her about me and making her think I was a pussy. She said:
I want a dominant man! Let me know when you feel like acting like a man!
But, yeah. Americans are anti-intellectual.
I’m probably one of the most interesting people in this whole damn city you could possibly talk to. Not only am I smarter than anyone but 50-60 people in town, but I also know more stuff about general knowledge than most people will meet here. You would think people would want to talk to such an interesting guy who’s smarter than and knows more stuff than about anyone in the city, but nope! Literally nobody wants to talk to me.
Well, a few do. Usually men from 30-60. Some people place extreme value on brains, knowledge, and what you achieved with them. As a rule, as people get higher in IQ, the more interesting they find an intelligent and especially knowledgeable person.
Most people here are what I consider borderline idiots. The problem is when you’re saddled with a stratospheric IQ like I am, even a lot of people with normal intelligence (Which is just fine!) seem like morons. I figure the average IQ here is ~92? Supposedly that’s enough to make a civilized society, but if you drive around here for a while, you might question that.
Most people in the 90-110 IQ range have no use for intellectuals at all. They see them as useless, boring, and annoying. Below 90, intellectualism is probably a liability.
I suppose some ego-defense kicks in there too, because if you’re average intelligence, every time some high IQ type opens up his mouth, he’s making you look like a total idiot, and the obvious ego-defensive reaction to that is going to be hostility. The deep meaning is:
How dare you make me feel like an idiot!
with the corollary of:
I know I’m an idiot but I’m blinding myself to that fact.
This sort of internal thinking is poison to the ego, obviously, so what’s going to come out is:
High IQ people are totally useless and annoying!
They’re always putting on airs and bragging about how smart they are!
Who cares about your damned IQ score!
It’s considered a social error to even mention anything mildly indicative of essential intelligence. What’s valued is knowledge of a practical sort, money, and prestige.
I hate your guts for suggesting that you’re smarter than any of the rest of us!
You trying to act like you’re better than me?
Brains and non-utilitarian knowledge are completely useless and in fact they are a sign of marked inferiority. Being slow and stupid is cool, and it’s the hip way to be. Plus it gets you laid because women love morons.
Beyond the few who think brains and knowledge per se have any value, everyone else reacts with hostility, bafflement, apathy, disinterest or some combination like annoyance, hostility and indifference, to such things, probably to defend themselves against feelings of inferiority. And other cultures are not like this at all, especially European ones.
CLAVDIVS AMERICANVS: This is evidenced in the elite universities’ admissions process. They even make SAT scores optional know. To them a 1550 is just as good as a 1600. Not in the Soviet Academy, it wasn’t.
That’s not what’s going on here. This is all a result of Woke Culture, Political Correctness, SJWism and Identity Politics.
The problem here is that the races differ markedly in intelligence. Of course as a liberal, I’m very unhappy with this state of affairs as it makes society almost impossible for govern and make work.
Basically no one believes this obvious, endlessly proven fact. It’s barely controversial in the field anymore, and I was acquainted with some of the top names in the field like Jim Flynn. And if you mention it, your job, career, and name will be ruined. So this is one more of society’s insane phobias and taboos where if you speak science, truth, or facts, your job, career, and name get cancelled for all of time.
Modern antiracist insanity is predicated on the notion of equity. “Equity” means literally that all races should be present at equivalent rates in every prestigious profession or admissions to all universities.
It’s interesting that they don’t demand that this be the case for ordinary or unprestigious positions.
By equivalent rates, I mean if Blacks are 4
I say if possible, because if Blacks are fewer than 13
There are many reasons for this, but most of them boil down to the fact that Blacks as a group are far less intelligent than Whites; in fact, they are almost a full standard deviation lower.
This one fact (a ~13 point difference in intelligence) is probably behind a lot if not most of the racial disparities in our country. In order to figure out the extent to which intelligence factors play a role in racial disparities, you’d have to do a factor analysis and factor out everything else that might be causing any given disparity. Or take a group of Blacks and Whites with equivalent IQ’s – say 100 IQ – and compare their achievements.
It’s illegal to state this obvious or similar social fact for that matter such as the extremely high crime rate, high rates of all sorts of dysfunctions, and terrible anti-intellectual ghetto culture among Blacks as a group, all of which obviously play a role in these other disparities. On the other hand, to what extent does the lower intelligence differential literally cause the high rates of crime, other dysfunctions, and the idiotic, anti-civilizational ghetto culture?
However, in our insane modern society, all differentials between races can always and only be caused by only one thing: racism. No other cause is entertained and indeed the mere thought that there may be another cause is grounds for cancellation right there. The fact that “racism is the cause of the racial disparities” is utterly unfalsifiable and beyond that, probably a tautology, is of no matter.
Consider the tautological snake eating its tail below:
Why are Blacks dysfunctional? Because of racism.
What is there racism? Because Blacks are dysfunctional.
This is starting to look suspiciously like an dog of an argument chasing its tail around the living room, sorry.
Hence if admissions or hiring were done on pure merit, Whites and Asians would be admitted and hired at far greater than their percentages in the population and Blacks would be represented at far lower percentages than their population. According to modern anti-racist theory, the over-representation would not be due to merit but i but instead because of Whites and Asians being preferentially preferred due to “White Supremacy” for both Whites and Asians.
The only way to even this up, ever, is to weight the scale in favor of in favor of Blacks as a group and hire less qualified Blacks over more qualified Whites and Asians. Logically, this is an injustice if we follow Locke, Rawls, and Rorty (Rawls in particular) and the general tradition here in the West that evolved from that thinking, but since Whites and Asians are oppressors, injustice against them is well deserved and even required.
Note that Asians are now themselves “White Supremacist” because, since they are high achievers, they are automatically like Whites, and all Whites are White Supremacist. Hence, Asians are Whites Supremacist-adjacent or White-adjacent. Apparently any group that starts achieving a lot becomes White Supremacist and White-adjacent by default so God forbid any of you other minorities do well for yourselves.
I know it makes no sense. Don’t blame me. I didn’t make up this idiot bullshit.
Since merit will always result in “racist” outcomes or outcomes with serious racial disparities, according to modern antiracism, this somehow means that merit itself is racist. You see a lot of articles saying just this right now.
Of course that can’t possibly make sense, but never let reason get in the way or a Wokester’s brain. This is the common Woke knowledge that everyone must subscribe to now. The reason is that everything that causes racial disparities is objectively racist, including IQ tests, SAT scores, and merit-based university admissions and prestigious job positions.
CLAVDIVS AMERICANVS: They take a “holistic” approach which means, “How rich or socially adept are you?” Exactly the two things women care about the most. Women, like the Ivy Leagues, want a man have a minimum degree of intelligence. Neither suffer fools after all but past a certain IQ, they view it as a handicap rather than as a desirable trait.
Women may indeed care about social adeptness. It’s been a long time since I’ve been socially adept, probably due to a mental disorder, so I have no way of knowing. And the Ivies are still indeed hiring “legacy admissions,” shorthand for rich offspring of graduates.
Women don’t suffer fools? One thing to watch out for is lying to a woman. Women are the masters of the universe when it comes to lying, sort of like Jews I suppose, so the principle is that you can’t fool an expert. Even Schopenhauer remarked on this. Women are therefore always uncovering our lies except those they don’t want to believe. Of course we men lie to you women all the time because if we don’t, we’ll probably never get laid, but never mind, and let’s change the subject, ok?
I would say women have contempt for a man they can fool. Of course at my age that’s the only kind I attract (psychopathic women out to cheat, steal from, and fool men), so I should getting more misogynistic in my old age, but I’m not probably because I had so many great experiences with females.
As a man, you’re supposed to act like
No woman can fool me.
or
You can’t fool me, woman. Don’t even try.
I’m not sure if women actually view my brains as a handicap. Of course some do but those are all dumb working class women. Possibly the most common reaction I’ve gotten other than utter indifference (I think most women are simply indifferent-to-annoyed or a mixture of annoyance and indifference by brainy men) is
Your brains blow me away but they sure don’t make my pussy wet.
Something along those lines. Not quite a handicap but definitely not something that’s going to get you laid, except, as noted above, in some cases. Yes, there are female brainfuckers and mindfuckers out there, but I think there are not so many of them, though I’ve definitely run into a few.
The news stations all have a huge fit about this. Even the White House chimed in that this was an evil thing for him to say. It’s being referred to as one of the worst and most toxic antisemitic conspiracy theories floating around nowadays. Musk is being compared repeatedly to Henry Ford. I know a bit about Ford’s antisemitism, but I don’t know a lot about it.
Some say she survived and was taken to a hospital where she survived a few days and then died while Hamas doctors tried to save her life. Another says she was already dead in the pickup truck. Neither story can be confirmed but she is presently deceased.
