I’m getting sick and tired of this bullshit that the sex fascists are doing of conflating rape, sexual assault, sexual abuse, etc. with child molestation and statutory rape. I suppose in the case of child molestation it makes sense, but why on Earth should we call child molestation sexual assault, abuse, or rape? Why not just call it molestation? Doesn’t that describe the crime a lot better?
In many cases, molestation is none of these things. The child consents or even likes it and wishes to continue, so it can’t possibly be rape because you can’t rape a consenting person. You can’t assault or abuse a consenting person either, and fully 50
I don’t consider that to be abuse probably because they went along with it and were either neutral or positive about it. How on Earth can you abuse someone who is loving the experience and having a blast? Fun, enjoyment, and pleasure are now abuse? How does that even make sense? What on Earth have we turned into? A society or dour nuns and church ladies? Why don’t we just call our sex fascist culture the no-fun-, pleasure-hating-, Puritan-, Victorian-, party pooper-, turd in the punchbowl-, or sex-hating-culture? Because we are all of those things. So that’s just dumb. Even the people who get molested insist they were not “assaulted” or “abused!” How on Earth can you insist that someone got assaulted or abused when the victim doesn’t even see it that way? It’s ridiculous. However, the term child molestation is excellent. We always used this term for every instance of adult-child (under 13) sex back in the day when I was growing up. The stupid words “pedophile” and “pedophilia,” which ought to be banned as harmful to the human brain, were rarely or never used. Everyone called a “pedophile” nowadays was just called a “child molester.” All acts of “pedophilia” nowadays were called “child molestation.” Dipshit American sex fascists nowadays insist that the verb “molestation” just isn’t eeeeeeeeeeevil enough to describe this horrible crime in which fully 50
This is not thinking. It’s not human cognition. It’s pure emotional reaction on the level of your flaky cat or dog housepet. You’re on the level of a lower mammal when you are thinking like that. You’re basically subhuman. So we are now a society of subhumans. Congratulations, idiots! Contrary to modern hysterical sex fascists, back in the day, just about the worst thing you could be called was a child molester. Not one person thought the description wasn’t eeeeeeeeeevil enough. It was considered the worst of worst. Similarly, the one thing you don’t want to be accused of was child molestation. It was the worst crime on Earth. Not one person thought the description of that crime let the offenders off the hook by not being eeeeeeeeeeeevil enough. But this was back when people were sane and sex fascists hadn’t even been created. Instead we had an antifascist or anti-sex fascist society, and it was very pleasant to live in it. The thing is I want to know what sex crime some guy went down on. I read about sex crimes all the time, and from the insane sex fascist description of the crime, you can’t possibly tell what the Hell even happened. I just saw a Youtube video recently with some stupid sex fascist cop warning residents of a Denver neighborhood that a “sexually violent offender” had moved into their neighborhood. I looked up his record and he was a petty criminal all right with a long rap sheet. As best I could tell, he went down on “Sexual Assault of a Child (15-18 Years Old) by Person in a Position of Authority.” The sex fascists have insanely decided that the “child” in this silly crime is a 15-18 year old person. Yeah. The sex fascists say 18 year olds are little kids. How idiotic is that? This guy apparently had sex with a 15-18 year old girl, possibly when he was working as a schoolteacher or something of the sort. The weird thing is the female may well have been an 18 year old woman! So let’s say this schoolteacher has completely consensual sex with an 18 year old female student of his and somehow the sex fascists say this is “Sexual Assault of (an 18 year old) Child” and the guy who did it is a “Sexually Violent Offender” who is on the stupid sex fascist Sex Offender list for the rest of his life! This bullshit is absurd. How on Earth do the sex fascists figure he is a sexually violent offender for having consensual sex with an 18 year old woman? I’m not getting it. That itself is an abuse of language. The crime is nothing of the sort. Almost every time, this is a thoroughly consensual matter. Now, if you want to call it statutory rape or illegal intercourse, I at least have an idea of what you were talking about. From way the crime was described, I thought this guy was a violent raping maniac. I’m getting sick and tired of that stupid list too. It’s been proven many times that that list does not reduce sex crimes even one bit. So what purpose is it, for God’s sake? Only two other countries bother to have a Sex Offender list. All the rest of the world thinks it’s retarded and has decided to act like people with a brain and not make one. If some guy banged an underage teenage girl consensually, I want to know just that when I read about the crime. I want the crime listed as “statutory rape,” or “intercourse with a minor” as it is in some states. When sex fascists call these crimes “rape,” “assault,” and “abuse,” I get very confused. My mind conjures up a violent rape via force or the threat of force with an unwilling girl. That’s a very different offense than consensual statutory rape, but to the sex fascists, they’re all the same! Also, I want to know if “Sexual Assault of a Child” was of an actual child, in which case it’s child molesting, or if it’s of a fake child, a teenager (teenagers are not children), in which case it’s statutory rape. Don’t you think banging a 17 year old girl is just a slight bit of a different crime as molesting a 7 year old girl child? To my mind, they’re very different, but the sex fascist newspapers throw them all together in one big pile. But now everything is conflated by the sex fascists: The sex fascist concept is “they’re all the same.” Anyone with a brain can see that that’s not true. Sorry, rant of the day is off.
Spot on. The sex fascists throw it all together now under the label of “sexual abuse” because that’s what seems to get attention these days. I think it’s a result of extreme jealousy in the world today. If you’re a man, you hate to see another man get some fresh young pussy while you only have your fat pig wife to pork once in a while, and if you’re a woman, well it’s self-explanatory that the sexy young tart your man drools over is more of a threat to you than anything else in the world.
I can be jealous too, it’s easy. But I try to celebrate the sexual accomplishments of others, just as I do for myself. Low and behold, I’m not a sex fascist.
My jealousy theory also gets more support when you see the sexual abuse hoax narrative get paired with the painting of an outsider exploiting the local women. Now, why would the authorities choose to do that? For the added effect of jealousy of course. They are trying to do this in Latin America now, like this story of this poor guy who attempted to use his wealth to further his personal life, you know, as men have always done throughout history until recently it somehow became evil and illegal:
https://www.semana.com/nacion/justicia/articulo/este-es-orion-el-influencer-gringo-que-aprovechaba-su-fama-y-dinero-para-abusar-de-menores-de-edad-en-antioquia-entro-27-veces-a-colombia/202310/
This guy screwed up though. He banged 14-17 year old girls down in Colombia, which thankfully is totally legal, but he screwed up and banged a girl under 14, probably a 13 year old girl. If you’re a 27 year old man and you banged a 13 year old girl, you screwed up, brother. No sympathy.
He also took videos of them, which is illegal. It is pretty ridiculous that you can fuck a 14-17 year old girl six ways from Sunday for hours a day every day for years on end, but if you happen to snap a photo of her while you’re doing it, you’re going down hard on Child Pornography charges.
If you read the English translation, you will see that it is written in an excessively melodramatic fashion, always seeing the girls as pure innocents and him as a diabolical seducer. “He gave them pot, which destroyed their willpower so he could take advantage of them.” LOL. Oh poor babies! Oh poor girls! Boo hoo!
What if he gave a grown woman pot to destroy her willpower so he could take advantage of her? Would that be ok? I guess so.
Got some news for you ladies! We men are always going to be giving you booze and dope to “destroy your willpower” (but mostly just because we like getting high) in order to have sex with you! Don’t like it? Don’t fall for it, chumps.
Quit being so gullible. Women’s gullibility just enables the sociopathic tendencies so many of us males have. And these tendencies aren’t even necessarily abnormal. Low-level sociopathy with a PCL score below 20 is fairly normal in the human male. A lot of us are sociopathic fucks! Be aware of it and take precautions, dammit!