Anti-porn activist Donny Pauling.
Looks like he got a lot of hot young pussy, 16 year old girls. And he fucked one of their moms at the same time! This guy is the Man!
On the other hand, he broke the law. He took pictures of the girls (which idiotically is “child porn”) then like a total fool, uploaded the “child porn” to the Internet. He also kept the “child porn” on his phone like a fool.
All of the girls were completely willing to fuck this guy and they all testified to that effect. Doesn’t matter, he’s going down anyway.
I’m thinking that with men and 16 year old girls, the pigs should only do something if the girl complains. If she’s fine with it, they can go to the parents. If they’re fine with it, carry on and keep the damn pigs out of it! This is how they used to do it back in the 1970’s when cops were cops instead of the pigs they are now. If the girl and her parents are ok with it, where on Earth is the Goddamned crime? The “state has an interest.” No it doesn’t!
I would say that the state has an interest in stopping child molesting even if the girl or, Hell, her parents are ok with it, which is the case more often then you think. I’d say that the state, acting in the interests of society, has a right to arrest adults for having sex with little kids because we don’t want this bullshit in our society. It might even be true with 13 and 14 year old girls. Society might have an interest because they’re so young.
But for 15-17 year old girls, the pigs should get involved only if the girl or her folks complain. Actually, even in those cases, they should tell the man to knock it off or else. I think they used to do that back in the day. Don’t touch that girl again or you’re going to get it. Then if he keeps having illegal intercourse with teenage girls, I’d say it’s ok to take him down, but the sentences are ridiculous. The sentence for illegal intercourse with girls that age should be no more than three years in prison. Anything more than that is absurd and insane.
This idiot also screwed up by threatening to post the girl’s nudes online if she went to the cops. That’s not cool. A cop got involved. The girl told this cop that she wanted to seduce Pauling. She seduced him! The cop set them up and watched them have sex while jerking off. Apparently that’s illegal though I’m not sure it should be.
If the girl is fine with it, I’d say leave him alone. But you can’t be jerking off in front of those girls! You might want to keep that in mind. I think you can’t even sex in full view of them if I’m not mistaken. I guess you can walk around naked around minors, even little girls, because there are nudist families who do just that.
Pauling was arrested Dec. 1 by the Sutter County Sheriff on three felony sex charges, including Unlawful Intercourse (Statutory Rape), after a 16-year-old female told law enforcement that Pauling had ongoing sexual contact with her for the past three years.
Ok, this makes sense. Statutory rape crimes should indeed all be rewritten to say Unlawful Intercourse or Illegal Intercourse because that’s exactly what it is. The idea that girl gets raped when she seduces a man for sex and loves the sex she has with him is insane. How on Earth is that possibly rape?
She told detectives Pauling had told her that if she ever told officers about the relationship, she should tell him first so he could kill himself. She also said Pauling told her he wasn’t like other child molesters because he loved her.
LOL. This guy isn’t a child molester! You have to have sex with someone under 13 to be a molester. He was a perfectly normal man engaging in perfectly normal behavior. He’s also manipulative as Hell by threatening to kill himself if the girl turns him in.
Pauling first made inappropriate comments to the first victim about her lips and bottom. The comments turned into sexual acts, and Pauling first had sex with the girl in the summer of 2014. She said he used a condom until he had a vasectomy…
The girl told him that Pauling bought her lingerie — which detectives discovered in his bedroom — and photographed her in erotic and sexualized poses. She said Pauling uploaded the photos to Reddit.com. Deputy District Attorney Anu Chopra submitted 10 photos of the girl into evidence. Some of the photos included the girl posing topless, exposing her bottom, and some included other minors.
LOL inappropriate comments! Oh noes! Those comments were certainly not inappropriate because the girl appreciated them enough to have sex with the man. He was insane to upload “child porn” to the Net. What an idiot.
According to Brokenbrough, the teen told authorities that Donny Pauling had once video-recorded her in the shower, which she only realized after she discovered the hidden device.
You’re not supposed to do that either. Men do that a lot to girls and maybe women. I’m not sure what law they are breaking but it’s uncool to videotape naked people without their knowledge.
He said a mother of a friend of the girl’s once saw a photo of the girl’s crotch on Pauling’s phone.
He’s got the photos on his phone. Idiot.
On Dec. 17, Pauling claimed in a jailhouse interview that Sutter County Sheriff’s Captain Lewis McElfresh Jr. had urged him to have sex with another 16-year-old girl.
That’s probably not against the law. I assume anyone can “urge” anyone to do just about anything except kill themselves. You can’t go around arresting people for “encouraging” others to break the law. There are laws against it, but they are almost never enforced.
On Dec. 18, the Appeal-Democrat reported, the Sutter County District Attorney pig charged McElfresh with five felonies: two counts of felony child molestation, willful child cruelty, burglary and misdemeanor charges of annoying or molesting a minor and indecent exposure. McElfresh is accused of masturbating while, allegedly, watching a minor being sexually violated by Pauling. McElfresh, is being held with bail set at $5 million.
This is where it gets crazy. Let’s look at these bullshit laws the pigs are charging him with breaking.
Felony Child Molestation: This is bullshit. He jerked off and watched a man have sex with a 16 year old girl. No way on Earth is that “molestation.” Obviously there’s no molestation unless you touch the person. No touching, no molestation. Also men having sex, vicariously or otherwise, with a 16 year old girl isn’t “child molesting.” That’s bullshit! It’s illegal intercourse if it’s anything but here it’s not even that.
Willful Child Cruelty: LOL! How on Earth is it “child cruelty” to watch a 16 year old girl have enthusiastic sex with a man while you jerk off? It is cruel to the girl somehow to jerk off while she’s getting fucked? This is idiocy. I can’t believe the pigs charged him with this.
Burglary: These pigs are insane. Is there something we haven’t been told here? How is it “burglary” to accompany a man and a 16 year old girl into a home and watch them have sex while jerking off? Ridiculous.
Misdemeanor Charges of Annoying or Molesting a Minor: This is a fake pig crime if there ever was one. Number one, it’s vague! All vague laws are unconstitutional, period. You have to know when you are breaking the law and when you are not, otherwise there’s no way to obey the laws! This is California’s bullshit pig “grooming” law.
Well you can’t groom a teenage girl or a woman for that matter. You can only groom a little child.
Does anyone know what “grooming a minor” constitutes? Nope! It means whatever the pigs want it to mean! I assume you could be walking down the street, see a 15 year old girl, and smile, wink, and say “Hello” to her and that’s probably “grooming.”
A man talked to two 15 year old girls in a pet store, and the pigs arrested him on this bullshit law. God knows what they talked about. Last time I checked, talking is legal. You can pretty much talk to anyone about anything really with a few notable exceptions. When we start making “having a conversation with another human” illegal, we’ve really crossed the line.
Indecent Exposure: This is the one that might make sense. But how do you know when you are breaking this law? If you have a nudist household where the adults walk around naked in front of the kids all the time, are they guilty of indecent exposure?
You can go to a nude beach, get naked and look at nude humans of all ages. This isn’t indecent exposure. Why isn’t it? I guess they’re arguing that you can’t be whipping your hard cock out in front of 16 year old girls and jerk off in front of her. That’s indecent exposure. I suppose that’s a reasonable offense for this matter.
Bail was set at $5 million: Ridiculous. For consensual jerking off in front of a 16 year old girl (perfectly legal in most of the world), the pigs set the bail at $5 million? Get out of here! See the Criminal Injustice System has gone nuts. Bail is way too high, people are ridiculously overcharged with offenses, sentences and fines are preposterously high, and as a consequence, logically the jails and prisons are filled to overcrowding. Set it at $50,000.
This story has all the hallmarks of America’s fucked-up relationship with sexual activity, and it only continues to get worse because people are literally retarded. It’s not the politicians. Like George Carlin said, “The public sucks. Fuck hope.”
Several things need to be mentioned.
First, the obvious hypocrisy of the born-again Christian anti-porn feminist crusader throwing other men under the bus and freaking out the moral majority while banging underage girls. This is standard practice for men who are the loudest leaders against normal male attraction to hot teenage girls. In fact, it’s always the case when you look under the hood.
Next, in a normal society, the guy would be a scumbag for extorting the girl with threats to post her nudes publicly and even worse for actually doing it. This would be a crime of misdemeanor extortion. But this is nothing in the context of an abnormal and hysterical society which grants girls enormous negotiating power over men when it comes to sex.
Additionally, the guy is a scumbag for threatening to kill himself and others in order to manipulate the girl to have sex with him, although I believe this is a very widespread phenomenon. Again, in a normal society, men in general would have fewer impediments to sex with attractive young girls, leading to less need for this type of behavior and less positive selection for men who are willing to display this behavior.
Finally, no sex hysteria story would be complete without the state totally destroying the girl mentally by emphasizing her victim status and publicly airing her personal business for everyone to see and judge her.
Then, somehow, everyone is surprised when trannies spring up out of nowhere! Who would’ve thought implementing feminist sexual draconian oppression for years would lead to enormous sexual aberrations?
Speaking of those conservative feminist sex fascists, here’s a story a bit more fresh. It involves a man in his 20’s who “crossed state lines” to marry a teenage girl who was just a bit too young. Those right-wing red state hypermasculine MAGA red-blooded men in Oklahoma decided to show just how anti-woke they are by adopting every single #Metoo feminist catch phrase out there and putting them on steroids, sentencing the man to life in prison!
The Democrats are the real misogynists, once again!
https://okcfox.com/news/local/tulsa-man-sentenced-to-life-in-prison-for-grooming
Yeah, and “grooming” isn’t against the law, although here in California it is. Anyway you can’t “groom” a teenage girl or a woman. The whole concept of grooming was always all about child molesters. Child molesters have to groom little kids to get them to have sex because kids don’t know what sex is. Since kids are naive about the subject itself, the molester has to slowly ingratiate himself to the kid and then ease into the discussion of this confounding thing called sex, possibly with pornography.
Therefore, it’s not possible to “groom” a teenager since all teenagers know what sex is as most of them having the raging sex drives of a full-grown adult. Since they know all about sex, “grooming” them isn’t possible.
I’ve noticed that this bullshit “grooming” verb (which we ought to retire for all time) is now synonymous with seduction. What these men are doing with teenage girls is seducing them although I think in most cases, it’s the girls seducing the men. Likewise, men who “groom” full-grown women are only guilty of seducing them.
Seduction is not grooming! Seduction is seduction. Do these psychos want to make seduction illegal now?
Yes, seduction as practiced by men is often pretty damn sleazy. I’m probably guilty of a bit of that myself, like most men. The truth is that seduction is all about scamming and trickery. We’re basically scamming and tricking you women into having sex with us, except when you’re more than willing, in which case, we don’t have to.
By the way, I’m experienced about this matter and gay men are just as sleazy as straight men in the way they go about seducing guys, especially straight guys. Their favorite tactic is blackmail. Yeah. Gay men try to blackmail young straight men into gay sex!
The feminists say men are like this because we hate women. LOL I hardly meet a man who hates women. Most will vociferously deny it. But the feminists insist every one of us hates women nonetheless. But as you can see this isn’t something men just do with women. Men are sleazy and rapey as Hell (probably a lot worse) with other guys! This is simply the normal sleazy, rapey way that so many men go about seducing partners into bed. It has nothing to do with women or hatred or any of that.
British singer Samantha Fox became a topless model at the age of 16. Just about everyone knew about it after her song “Naughty Girls Need Love Too” became famous. Nobody had a problem with it. I guess Oprah Winfrey eventually turned the United States into a Puritanical black hole after she became active in pushing for tougher sex laws across the nation. She annoys me. I’m glad her talk show went off the air for good.
Interesting.
I guess Oprah Winfrey eventually turned the United States into a Puritanical black hole after she became active in pushing for tougher sex laws across the nation.
Face it, it’s just another idiotic moral panic. I’m old enough to have gone through one over “drugs,” which in practice meant all illegal drugs. It was exactly the same as this “sexual abuse/pedophile” panic. All moral panics are retarded and none of should get sucked into them.
But humans will always fall prey to moral panics. I think we are wired up for them, honestly. An overactive state of fear might help one survive if there are things out there in the world that can end your life real fast. Since fear keeps you alive and allows you to survive, it has evolutionary value.