Misleading BS Rightwing Cultural Conservative Headlines


Referenced from here.

Just to show you once more how the media lies with words. In this case, they are not explicitly lying; it is more that they are stating half-truths.

The original headline is this:

Through the LGBTQ and Transgender Agenda, Pedophilia Is Being Normalized, Popularized, and Defended

Rightwingers are absolutely hysterical about this. Never mind that anyone who abuses the word “pedophilia” in this way is clearly mentally retarded. Pedophilia is a way of thinking characterized by an extreme sexual attraction to small children and a lesser or nonexistent attraction to mature persons. It is incurable and cannot be acquired in adulthood or probably even in the lifespan.

The best evidence seems to be that these people get wired up this way in the womb, although childhood experiences may have something to do with it. Nevertheless, most children who get molested do not become pedophiles. Hence, pedophilia is an inborn condition or disorder that cannot be helped or changed any more than one can change their race, eye color, or height.

Does it make sense to say tall people are becoming normalized, popularized, and defended? Of course not. You cannot “popularize” pedophilia because it’s acquired before birth. No one turns into a pedophile. And what difference does it make if we “defend” pedophiles or not. Suppose I “defend” them? What consequence is this? Suppose I ferociously refuse to “defend” them? What will be the upshot of this?

One cannot defend or refuse to defend an inborn and incurable disorder. Those so afflicted will remain afflicted no matter what we think of them. I’m not sure what normalizing pedophilia means. It’s obviously a disorder, a paraphilia or sexual disorder. Everyone knows it’s not normal. Who on Earth is trying to “normalize” it?

What every one of these morons is getting it is that every single time they say this stupid word “pedophilia,” they really mean “child molestation.” Now of course we can normalize, defend, and popularize child molestation or we can choose not to.

That said there is no movement to do this aside from a few pedophiles who have no power whatsoever. The Woke crowd is not pushing child molestation. If anything, they are fanatical puritans who hate men for having a completely natural and normal very high attraction to teenage girls.

Ages of consent are rocketing upwards. It’s now “pedophilia” for an 18 year old to have sex with a 17 year old. People are universally opposed to teenage minors having sex. Adults are being infantalized and sex between two adults now often gets called pedophilia. We’re going backwards, 100 miles an hour.

Furthermore, the LGBTQI+ whatevers are not promoting pedophilia as a sexual orientation, though perhaps they ought to, as pedophilia is absolutely a sexual orientation. In fact, they are running scared from the very idea. People who are working with pedophiles to try to get them to offend less or not at all are being crucified and having their careers ruined by being called “pedophiles.”

At this point, every leading sexologist in the US is having a politics of personal destruction mob sicked on them. They’re all being called “pedophiles” and there are efforts under way to try to destroy all of these men. This is simply because being scientists, they take a sane view on the subject of pedophilia without caving in to the witchhunters and lynch mobs.

The “Left” is not trying to normalize child molestation. Neither is the Right. Neither are the LGBTQI’s. In fact, people are not even trying to loosen up laws about adults having sex with perfectly willing teenagers. This has all been looped in with “pedophilia” and “child molestation” and everyone, Left to Right though to their credit probably not the LGBTQI’s has fallen into this ludicrous moral panic about teen sex.

The article has to do with a publication by an international body regarding human sexuality.

Published on International Women’s Day, the report is titled, “The 8 March Principles for a Human Rights-Based Approach to Criminal Law Proscribing Conduct Associated with Sex, Reproduction, Drug Use, HIV, Homelessness and Poverty.”

The report was written by the International Committee of Jurists (ICJ), the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) in order to consider the “application of international human rights law to criminal law.”

The article goes on:

The report makes this very clear. First, they begin by making an entirely “consent-based” moral argument for the permissibility of sexual activity, writing, “Consensual sexual conduct, irrespective of the type of sexual activity, the sex/gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression of the people involved or their marital status, may not be criminalized in any circumstances.”

This sets the stage for their attempt to justify pedophilia. How? Because if you argue that the only thing that matters when it comes to sex is “consent,” then they can argue that a minor can, in fact, consent to sex with an adult.

Ok, look, this is just false. Obviously the group is referring to relationships between consenting adults or perhaps between consenting teenage minors, which should also be legal. I think it’s pretty clear that this commission is not even going to deal with the hot potato of adult-teen sex.

Which is exactly what they do next, explaining:

“Moreover, sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual in fact, if not in law. In this context, the enforcement of criminal law should reflect the rights and capacity of persons under 18 years of age to make decisions about engaging in consensual sexual conduct and their right to be heard in matters concerning them.”

Now we know what the “+” stands for – legalizing pedophilia. The “+” should be a “P,” as that would be far more honest.

Ok, this is more BS. I think it’s pretty clear that they are saying minor teens shouldn’t be put in jail for having sex with other minor teens. They aren’t talking about adult-teen sex at all.

The + doesn’t stand for “pedophilia.” We’ve already been over this. The LGBTQI folks want nothing to do with the pedophiles. The pedophiles truly have no friends, which is a bit sad, assuming they are not offending.

Anyway, these idiots ought to be able to figure out that pedophilia is absolutely legal everywhere on Earth. Last time I checked, thought crimes weren’t illegal, but don’t worry, the feminists are working on it right now!

The honest truth is that legalized pedophilia – among other forms of sexual immorality – is where the sexual revolution has been heading for decades now. Because once you sever sex from marriage, procreation, biology, and any foundation of morality other than mere consent, there can be no stopping that train. The brakes are cut. The “+” stands for pedophilia, yes, but also much, much more.

Well, no it hasn’t. This is cultural conservatism. The Sexual Revolution, which was a great thing by the way, is not destined to legalize child molesting. Getting away from marriage, procreation or old-fashioned morality does not lead inevitably to legalizing child molesting. That’s the slippery slope argument, and it’s a logical fallacy.

Furthermore, the Sexual Revolution has not been trending towards legal child molestation for decades now. Sure there was a bit of a trend that way in the 1970’s, but that was quickly reversed and we’ve since lapsed into utter Reaction, backwardsness, prudishness, Puritanism, and out and out sex hatred. Of course the feminists and even the Woke crowd are leading the pack of the sex-haters. The Woke only hate the idea of straight men having sex.

Everyone else gets to do it all they want. This is because Woke gets its agenda from feminism and if feminism hates anything at all, it’s the idea that straight men have even the slightest sex drive and that we have even the tiniest bit of sex at all. To put it another way, an essential corollary of feminism is a vicious hatred for the normal, natural sexuality of heterosexual men.

And on the child molesting question, we’ve gone completely backwards and absurdly equated statutory rape with child molestation when the two things have nothing whatsoever to do with each other.

This is what gender theorists want, after all. Critical gender and queer theorists have, for years, been arguing that the “oppressive” structures of religion and the modern family prevent children from fully exploring their sexuality in all the various, sundry, and sinful ways that they should be free to pursue.

That’s a really devious paragraph. It makes it seem that these folks are encouraging little kids to have sex. No one is doing that. Instead they are talking to kids about trannies and asking little kids to question if they might be trannies themselves. I know. Deplorable. But it’s not the same thing as telling little kids to go out and have sex.

In fact, the “Godfather of Queer Theory,” Michel Foucault, “argued in favor of pedophilia because the traditionally patriarchal society establishes oppressive sexual norms based upon heterosexual dominance. Therefore, children are able to give consent to sexual relations, and both children and pedophiles are only denied sexual experiences by the oppressive heterosexual oppressors.”

This is true, however, Foucault actually had a functioning brain, unlike just about everyone who writes about this subject nowadays, so he never would have used a stupid word like pedophilia. He made these statements back in the 1970’s. I was around then and, trust me, that word pedophilia was almost never used. Instead we used the compound word child molestation. Foucault would have called it adult-child sex or something along those lines. Keep in mind that at the time he said that, lots of folks were saying things like that.

And Foucault practiced what he preached — he was known for repeatedly raping young boys in Tunisia.

This has got to be bullshit. Never mind that Oscar Wilde, William Burroughs and Paul Bowles all did the same thing. He probably went down there to commit pederasty with teenage boys. Whatever that is, whether it’s legal or not, it’s not “rape.” It’s either legal sex or illegal sex. At worst it’s illegal sex. But consensual sex is never rape, ever.

Along with this shocking report, you will have spotted, if you pay attention to the news, an uptick in both stories about pedophiles caught in the act…

The New York Post reported, “At least 6 female teachers arrested for sexual misconduct with students over two days across US.”

All right, look you Puritan freaks, those women are not “pedophiles.” They’re perfectly normal heterosexual women engaging in perfectly normal sexual behavior with teenage boys. However, we’ve made this illegal now, so these women are going to jail.

The headline in the Fox News piece discusses this report:

Gates Funds Millions to NGO Claiming Kids Born Sexual, 10-year-olds Should Learn about ‘Commercial Sex Work’

That headline really caught my eye, so obviously I had to go see what it was all about.

A toolkit released in 2017 showed an insight into how the NGO teaches sex education to children around the globe.

“Sexual activity may be part of different types of relationships, including dating, marriage or commercial sex work, among others,” IPPF said about children under 10 should be taught, which was first flagged by Nicole Solas of the Independent Women’s Forum.

Ok, what’s really going on here is sex education. I think my Mom gave me the “talk” when I was 9 or 11, I forget which. It’s pretty normal to talk to kids around 10 about sex education, though I think it ought to wait until age 12 or 13. They’re simply advocating a basic sex education for kids around that age covering dating, marriage, and prostitution, apparently with said education being doled out by the parents. I don’t think there’s anything particularly shocking about that, although I’d wait until 12-13.

Children under 10 should also be told “As you grow up, you might start to be interested in people with diverse gender identities,” the toolkit said.

That seems a little extreme but this is just the tranny cult throwing its weight around. I don’t understand why 10 year olds need to hear about trannies. Hell, I’m 65 and I still don’t want to hear about them.

The IPPF suggested in multiple instances that children are born sexual.

Children under 10 should be taught that “Sexuality is a part of you from the moment you are born. Your sexuality develops and changes throughout your life.”

“[S]ex positivity acknowledges that human beings, including adolescents and young people, are autonomous sexual beings.”

Sex educators, according to the NGO, should have an “understanding of young people as sexual beings.

Sexuality is not a part of you when you are born. That’s BS. All people are not born sexual because children have no sex drive. Instead, all people are born with the potential to become sexual if they live long enough. Of course adolescents are autonomous sexual beings and of course we shouldn’t be putting minor teens in jail for having sex.

This crap is just rightwing hysteria. Nothing freaks Americans out more than sex and kids. We are still a wildly Puritanical people, and and nothing gets people going more than, “What about the children?” I’m sick and tired of hearing, “What about the children?” We heard that crap 100,000 times when we were growing up and it echoed through our ears every time we lit up a joint.

The best way to curtail adults’ basic rights is to scream, “What about the children?” Then we can ban adults from having certain rights on the grounds that if adults have access to these rights, it’s going filter down to kids somehow. Most people flip out and start pulling their hair out and shrieking if you yell, “What about the children?” Not me. It makes me want to vomit on the ground.

Now of course if we combine these two psychotically emotional issues – kids and sex – in one explosive package, it’s going to pack one Hell of a bang. Which is why we are in the midst of these Pedo Mass Hysteria nonsense in the first place.

[A]ll people are sexual beings with sexual rights, regardless of their age,” the NGO said.

It went on to say that “Sexual rights include… the right to say yes or no to sex; the right to express sexuality, including the right to seek pleasure; the right to enjoy bodily autonomy…”

It’s phrased in a weird way, but I think they mean minor teens should have a right to have sex with each other. Little children will engage in curiosity-based childhood sex play and it’s not the end of the world. Almost all teenagers masturbate especially nowadays and of course they have a right to do that. Even some little girls masturbate and I suppose they have a right to do that too. I’m assuming that’s all they are talking about here.

Despite the fact that IPPF defined a child as under the age of 18, per the UN’s Convention of the Rights of a Child, the toolkit excluded weighing on the approximate age of a child’s ability to consent with an adult.

It stated, “Member Associations are encouraged to use existing evidence to assess the best age parameters for their local context.”

Oh noes! Teen Sex Moral Panic! Those teenagers are having sex again! Someone call the cops, right now! Ring the fire alarm! Five alarm fire, teens having sex!

I assume what they are saying here is that different countries set different ages of consent for sexual behavior and that countries should refer to their own legal codes when it comes to this.

The curriculum said that kids under 10 should be aware of a general rule that “No one can touch you if you don’t want them to.”

“During childhood, children should learn about the basic social conventions of privacy, nudity and respect for others in relationships, so they can identify situations where their right to safety is being violated.

Aaaand…this is a problem? Sounds like good advice to me.

The IPPF organization was originally created by a eugenicist and Planned Parenthood’s original founder, Margaret Sanger, in the 1950s.

Currently, the organization appeared to function independently of the U.S.-based organization, but continues to work with the Planned Parenthood Federation of America to advocate for issues occasion. The U.S. abortion advocacy nonprofit is listed as one of IPPF’s member associates.

Sigh. Here we get the usual dig at Planned Parenthood, along with the near-libel that she was a eugenicist, except that almost all liberals and Lefties were eugenicists back in those days, so the charge is meaningless. We get it though. Cultural conservative jerkoffs hate Planned Parenthood. I don’t. I like Planned Parenthood.

And of course, we get one more dig from the throwbacks at Fox. We are told once again that Planned Parenthood is an abortion advocacy organization. The horrors! I’m pro-choice by the way. I’d like to encourage the Republican Party to please keep pushing hard for abortion bans, preferably the most extreme bans that ban it in all or almost all cases. The more you pricks do this, the more you’re going to lose elections, or at least I hope you will.

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)