Alt Left: The Bullshit about Calling All Sex Crime “Rape”

It’s just nonsense because a lot of the sex in these crimes is consensual! Even with child molestation, it is essential to differentiate between molestation and rape. For instance, idiots want to change all “molestation” language to “rape” language because, you know, under Female Rule as we are now, most if not all sex is rape anyway.

I think “molestation” is an excellent way to describe this sort of sex because in many cases, it’s more or less consensual, and in most cases, the child’s reaction is either neutral or positive.

Even if the kid is neutral or positive, one can still argue that they were “molested” because a “violation” occurred – that is, adults shouldn’t do sexual things with kids. The prohibition against adult-child sex is seen across space and time. And “molestation” or “bothering” is an excellent way of describing such a violation. You’re “bothering” or “pestering” the kid by having sex with them, at the very least.

Serious damage only occurs in ~2

However, we are making this worse by making a big deal out of it. By college age, most girls who got molested are over it. Whether they were harmed previously and if so for how long is not known. This was the finding of the Ritter study which has now been replicated multiple times.

We really do need separate laws for molestation and rape of children.

Every state has two laws:

Child molestation: Basically more or less consensual child molestation. Most child molestation is consensual, but that doesn’t mean it’s not wrong. In fact, much nonconsensual molestation seems to go under this charge also for whatever reason. Child rape charges are rarely filed.

Child rape: This is a completely different crime and has to do with nonconsensual sex with a child via force or the threat of force. The kid has to be resisting too. This is usually done by strangers, and it is much worse than molestation because the kids are sometimes injured, tortured, or even killed. Further, the fact that the child is not willingly going along makes it much more likely to cause long-term harm.

People freak out when you mention “consent” in child molestation. The concept is even more bizarre when you mention “consent” in rape! By definition, that’s not possible.

From the Net:

A: Sex under 13 is almost always called Child Molestation, as it should be.

B: The offense is “rape of a child under 13” which does a far better job of describing the crime than “molestation”

C: How do they define consent in child molestation?? That sounds absurd!

D: There is a difference between the child willingly going along vs being physically forced.

Both are crimes.

The common platitude “children can’t consent to sex” is not a legal statement. They can consent but we don’t hold it to be valid because of their age.

Thus you have two different crimes.

To put it another way, I can consent to you shooting me in the head but you would still be committing a crime.

E: Consent is a legal concept though, hence the legal term “age of consent” below which you cannot legally consent even if you can verbally consent.

About statutory rape, back in the day, no one actually thought this was real rape. People just knew it was only called rape because of the age of the girl but in truth nobody was raping anyone. Of course, in all cases of statutory rape, nobody is raping anyone because the sex is always consensual. If it were not consensual, it would be rape, right? All non-rape sex between adults is consensual, right? After all, if it were not consensual, it would be rape, no?

The problem is that people have decided that statutory rape is real rape when it isn’t. So everybody is calling statutory rape real rape. Guys who commit this crime are being called rapists and are being accused of raping girls. But of course nobody raped anyone.

And the laws themselves are being changed, with a lot of states turning some or all of their statutory rape laws into “sexual assault” (more bullshit because nobody assaulted anyone) and sexual abuse (a term that has no meaning except to refer to child molestation and even there, it’s a bad term), rape of a child (the worst of all).

I prefer to go back to statutory rape for all sex with minors from 13 to the age of consent. And better yet, I prefer the term “illegal intercourse” instead of statutory rape because it covers the essence of the crime – the sex is illegal because society doesn’t like it and for no other reason, but it is not rape.

Don’t expect these changes anytime soon though because we are going in the opposite direction. I’d love to see these sex fascists try to make hay out of the term “illegal intercourse.” They will probably just ignore it and say, “Illegal intercourse, which is pedo-speak for rape of a child.” But it might change the debate somewhat.

Please follow and like us:
error3
fb-share-icon20
20
fb-share-icon20

One thought on “Alt Left: The Bullshit about Calling All Sex Crime “Rape””

  1. Exactly. They can’t be honest and call young teen sex “illegal intercourse” because then no one would really care, just like it was for the entirety of human history and still is for countries outside of the Anglosphere. And if no one really cares, the state loses all the power it gained from using the views of jealous male and female feminists to its advantage.

    Also, regarding your post on “Alphas”, it is definitely possible to learn the behavior, which is essentially dominance at its core. It’s exactly equivalent to a girl getting bigger tits for us, except easier. Turn it on when you want to turn her on and chill out when you want to chill and life becomes pretty easy. If only someone had told me this in high school.

Leave a Reply to ChangeIt Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)