I don’t even know what that term means! I guess nowadays a 17 year old girl has sex with an 18 year old man, and it’s child sexual abuse? The term is fake.
It’s not even a good term for child molestation.
This is because women who got molested as girls, when interviewed later as adults, mostly do not ascribe any harm to the molestation, and up to 50% of them object to the question and say, “I don’t consider that abuse.” So if the “victims” themselves don’t consider it abuse, why should we?
Is “rape” a good term for this sort of thing? Probably not if 50% of the “victims” say they don’t consider it abuse. If it’s not abuse, how the Hell is it rape? It’s only rape if you were unwilling, and it was coerced with physical force or the threat of force. This idea that every minor who has sex with anyone gets raped every time they do it is insane.
Furthermore, large percentages of people who got molested as children say that they liked it. Approximately 20% of women who were molested as children say they liked it!
Of gay men who got molested as children, fully 70% of them say they liked it. Only 30% say they disliked it and were harmed.
In the cases of the ones that liked it, the molestation was noncoercive. In other words, the boy went along with it. The other 30% which resulted in harm were where the boy was coerced into it. I still don’t think it should be legal for gay men to molest boys, even pre-gay boys. I don’t care if they like it. I don’t want to live in a society where this sort of thing is legal.
I think “child molestation” is still the best term for sexual relations between adults and children under 13 years old.
3
20
20
20
