Alt Left: Answer to Some Criticisms of Me

On the deplorable, foul, abominable, and morally decrepit Reddit group Libby and Abby, the following criticism has been leveled at me:

Lindsay says it’s perfectly fine for grown adults to have sex with 13 and 14 year old girls.

This is an old accusation of course, and it’s almost never been true.

What is the truth?

In the US and in most of the world, I do not think that most adults should have sex with 13 year old girls. On the other hand, all minors have a right to have sex in the sense that it should not be illegal for minors to have sex with each other. For instance, it should be legal for 13 year old girls to have sex with 13-17 year old boys. This is the case in much of world, including places like Scotland. Of course, actual sex crimes are excluded.

I think most sex between minors, even very young minors, goes over to childhood sex play and should not be prosecuted. In some cases, teenage boys are having sex with young girls in the family. I do not agree with molesting the teenage boys in these cases. These cases should be referred to social services.

Social services will get involved and work with the family to make sure the boy gets the message that he is not to engage in this behavior anymore. If the boy does not stop having sex with his young sister, he may have to be removed to a foster home. This is a serious solution but I think we have to think about the well-being of the young girl here and she needs to be protected from this sort of behavior on behalf of her brother.

I would not mind if it was legal for 18 year old boys to have sex with 13 year old girls. That would not bother me at all. However, after age 18, I’m not against making it illegal for adults to have sex with 13 year old girls. We just can’t make it legal for most adults to have sex with 13 year old girls. Almost no modern society allows such things.

However, there are Amerindian societies in the Amazon where the men start having sex with girls as young as 12-14 years old. One group is called the Candoshi. Some of these men have been arrested by the Brazilian government, but thankfully a new law went into effect that allows the men of such tribes to have sex with and marry girls that young. I support this law 10

I’m not sure it’s a good idea for men to have sex with girls that young, and if they get pregnant, it can be a serious problem. The vaginas of girls this age are too small to carry a baby, and in quite a few cases, they get torn up inside by pregnancy. Any pregnant 13-14 year old girl should probably get an abortion. It’s just too dangerous to carry a child to term at this age. By age 15 on, it is not physically dangerous in this sense to carry a baby to term. Well, at least you won’t get torn up inside by doing so.

In almost all of Europe, it is legal for any adult to have sex with girls from age 14-15. In fact, much of Europe sets the AOC at 14. Of course in those countries, it’s perfectly fine for any adult to have sex with 14-15 year old girls. Curiously, it doesn’t happen that much. These countries don’t have huge problems with mass numbers of adults having sex with 14-15 year old girls. It’s just not a problem. Probably most girls that age are not interested in sex with an older adult, moral panics about the sexuality of teenage girls aside.

In much of the US, it is perfectly legal for 16 or 17 year old girls to have sex with any adult of any age. Some states set it at 16 and others set it at 17. Of course I have no problem with adults having sex with girls of these ages in these states.

On the other hand, in the US, 13-15 year old girls are completely illegal for any adult. I’m perfectly ok with 14-15 year old girls being illegal in these cases. However, it doesn’t bother me one bit if 18-23 year old men have sex with 14-17 year old girls. In fact, I think it should be legal because I don’t see anything wrong with it at all.

After age 23, sex with 14 and 15 year old girls gets a lot more iffy, and I’m totally ok with it being illegal. Although of course girls this age are not harmed by sex with adults, society really hates it and many people think it is bad, wrong, immoral, evil, disgusting, repulsive, etc. Perhaps it is, I have no idea. Most notions of right and wrong and not provable in a scientific sense. It is simply a matter of subjective opinion.

Society can have any attitude about this sort of thing that it wants to, and it’s ok for society to encode its attitude towards sex between adults and teenage minors in its laws and to make this illegal at various ages. Societies are entitled to their morals and their morally based laws.

Any man who has sex with a 13 year old girl after age 18 is an idiot. Society has extreme hatred for this and many laws erroneously call this Child Molestation. I don’t have sympathy for men going down on these laws. Men need to control themselves and not yield to sexual temptations, no matter how alluring they are.

I don’t have much sympathy for men going down on sex with 14 and 15 year old girls after age 23. As I said, it’s perfectly fine to make this illegal. Society despises this sort of thing in an extreme way, and you are risking incurring the wrath of society if you mess with those girls. They should have known better. They’re idiots.

On the other hand it doesn’t bother me one bit if adults of any age have sex with 16 and 17 year old girls. Bottom line is I think it should be legal in the whole country. Unfortunately, in a number of states either some or all girls in this range are illegal for older adults. I’d advise men to leave these girls alone and not break Statutory Rape laws. Society has gone seriously insane about this, and men need to control themselves and not break the law. They’ll give you years in prison for sex with a 16 year old girls. Even crazy or stupid laws should be obeyed if there are serious consequences for disobeying them.

The problem is that teenage girl minors are horny as Hell and a lot of them love men! And they try to seduce us men. They’ve been trying to seduce me sporadically off and on for most of my life. In fact, a 15 year old girl just propositioned me for sex very recently. I told her no and she started arguing with me and trying to talk me into it. Another 15 year old girl asked me to send her a dick pic. I didn’t do it and she acted very disappointed.

These girls look like women so they are quite tempting for men. Nevertheless, in many cases, if you mess with them, you can go to jail. This where the term jailbait comes from. The “bait” refers to the fact that these girls are very enticing to normal men, but the “jail” part means that if you give into these temptations, you can wind up at the Greybar Hotel.

Due to Pedo Panic, society is engrossed in a sex panic, a moral panic, and a mass hysteria over teenage girl minors having strong sex drives. Most of them masturbate, often on a regular basis, and many of them have sex, especially with people their age. Society hates this and is driven into a raging fury about these girls being sexual beings, as it freaks them out that these girls have adult sex drives.

Society is savagely enraged that these girls masturbate and have sex with other teenage minors. It positively infuriates them because society says these girls are little children, and little children have no sex drive. Society does not distinguish between a 17 year old girl and a 7 year old girl. They’re both little children!

Obviously, I’m completely opposed to a Victorian sex panic about the fact that teenage girls have a raging sex drive that they seek to fulfill. Nevertheless, in modern society, the sex fascists have the floor, and the fact is that the overwhelming majority of American adults are abject sex fascists of the worst sort. That’s just sad.

It’s pathetic, but Americans are pretty pathetic people. We always have been. We’ve been wildly Puritan about sex from day one, and there’s no sign it’s getting better. Pedo Panic about teenage girls having sex is only the latest manifestation of this particularly American insanity. In sexual mores, we aren’t progressing at all. We are going to dramatically backwards in terms of normal sex for normal people. In fact, we’ve been becoming wildly more Puritanical about sex for 30 years now with no end in sight. Every year it seems to get worse than the year before.

On the other hand, sexual weirdness and sexually abnormal people have somehow been elevated into modern secular creeds and gods. Tell me how it all makes sense because it doesn’t!

So the accusation is false. I do not think it is just fine for men to have sex with 13 and 14 year old girls in the US. Other than for the youngest men (either 18 or 18-23 depending on the age of the girl), I am completely opposed to men in the US having sex with girls that age. You can get yourself into a whole lot of trouble all over some young snatch. It’s not worth it!

Of course I support Romeo and Juliet laws that allow some college aged men to have sex with some high school girls. The law in Colorado is a good one. 17 year old girls are completely legal for any adult of any age as they should be. 16 year old girls can have sex with men up to age 22, that is all through college age. 15 year old girls can have sex with men up to age 21, that is most college men. I think 14 year old girls can have sex with men up to age 20, but I would have to check. This is an excellent model for a Romeo and Juliet law, and I’d love to see it implemented all over the US.

I’d love to see the age of consent lowered to 17 or even 16 in the US. If the whole country had an AOC of 16 and had reasonable Romeo and Juliet laws for high school girls and some young men, I’d be very happy. But I would be opposed to lowering the AOC to 13-15. I don’t think American society is ready for that at this time. Obviously Europeans are but we are not. Perhaps at some point in the future we will be more like Europeans and more open to lowering the AOC to 14-15, but honestly, I do not see that happening in my lifetime, which means about the next 20 years.

So, to sum up, what I advocate is something like this:

It should be legal to minors under age 13 to have sex with each other, as in many cases, it is just childhood sex play. This needs to be thrown over to the parents or social services as an absolute last resort.

  • 13 year old girls can have sex with other male minors and possibly 18 year old men. After that it needs to be illegal, sorry.
  • 14 year old girls can have sex with other male minors and men age 18-20. After that, unfortunately, they need to be made illegal. WE can’t have an AOC as low as 14, forget it. I’m a slight hypocrite here, but 40 years ago, this country wasn’t even like a different country compared to today. It was like another planet. I don’t even recognize this shitstorm of a society anymore. It’s like we’ve been taken over by diabolical alien pod people who somehow look at seem exactly like us just like in the movie, The Invasion of the Body Snatchers. But they’re not us. They’re actually evil aliens in disguise!
  • 15 year old girls can have sex with other male minors and men aged 18-21.
  • 16 year old girls should just be legal for all grown men, but that’s probably not realistic right now. Barring that, they can have sex with other male minors and men up to age 21.
  • 17 year old girls should obviously be legal because by that age, it just looks like a flat out woman, period. But that’s probably not possible in this climate as many states will cling to 18, including this so-called Liberal Utopia of California which is actually a dystopian Feminist Dictatorship where the men are oppressed by the women with laws and rules put in by vicious feminist oppressors. We men are literally an oppressed class here. Anyway, barring that, 17 year old girls can have sex with other male minors and men aged 18-23. After that, they need to be made illegal. A lot of states with an AOC of 17 probably don’t want to go lower.
  • Some variation on an AOC of 16 or 17 or at the very least Romeo and Juliet laws for girls age 13-17 and males aged up to six years older.

So there are my views, enemies. Read em and weep or eat them for breakfast or use them to line bird cages, whatever it is you do with my ideas.

Of course my enemies won’t read this and will continue to misrepresent my views and spread lies about me because that’s what they do. I’m not such a morally low, base, depraved, and wicked gutter person as my enemies are. I never make up destructive lies about anyone, even my worst enemies. I’m much too morally elevated and superior of a person to do such a thing.

Game/PUA: Why Isn’t Game Working?, Part 5

Here we continue the Game Failing post by Daniel, which now has five parts. The introduction is here.

But I just didn’t know what to do with the attraction. I didn’t know how to translate that attraction into a relationship of any kind – be it sexual, romantic, or even platonic. Not only could I not have sex or romance, I couldn’t even make friends with girls. By the end of freshman year, I had not hooked up with one single girl, nor did I have any female friends. I didn’t have any male friends either.

I think we should talk here more about how to tell if a female likes you. Well, one is the blank stare of course.

One Way to Tell If a Female Likes You – Her Friends Tell You She Does!

One of the first times I saw it was when I was in high schools. We were ditching school that day and we were at someone’s parents’ house, but the parents were gone for work. I think we were smoking pot because when we went to people’s houses like this, it was always to smoke pot.

I think there were at least a few people there, boys and girls. I was 16. There was this Mexican-American girl there. Back then, they were extremely assimilated and mostly they just tried to act White, which I think is still a very good idea.

I was at a table and she was sitting on the floor with her back to the wall, just like a girl would do. She was kind of hot. She kept staring at me like she locked into some kind of a trance and could not stop looking at me. Like she was an automaton. Someone informed me that she liked to smoke PCP.

I’m not sure if she was on it then or not, I forget, but that drug was fairly widely used sometimes back in those days. I smoked it myself maybe 5-10 times, mostly unwittingly because people used to pass joints like they were pot but they were PCP instead. The “dusters” thought this was some kind of joke. The first time I smoked it, it was like going to outer space. I was literally on Mars and everyone was an alien.

Anyway, at some point, I think I was informed right there by one of the girls that that Mexican girl liked me.

That girl likes you.

Like a moron, I didn’t do anything about it though.

Well, that’s one of the ways you tell!

I think my first date when I was 16 was when one of my friends  told me,

Hey, see that girl over there. She wants you to take her to the football game.

She was a short blond and she was kind of hot. She was 15. We talked a bit and I took her to the game. I’m not sure what happened, but we simply didn’t hit it off for whatever reason, and there were no more dates. I never could figure out why I didn’t hit it off with her. You typically can’t tell in those cases.

I used to drive an ice cream truck and like the old TV shows, of course I sold dope off of the truck. Basically hashish. I did for a long time and then I started seeing police cars following my truck around. Then some kids came up to me and told me to watch out for some ice cream man drug dealer who sold hash out of his truck. Obviously that was me.

One day at near dusk, I stopped in front of some Chicanos who were living a Chicano lifestyle, as in the Mexican-American subculture. There were a few young men and a very shy beautiful young woman about 18-20 years old. They bought some ice cream and then the guys said,

“We’re all brothers. This is our sister. We just wanted to tell you that our sister likes you!”

Just like that! I looked at her and she very shyly looked at the ground. She was so submissive and feminine that she had to have her brothers ask me for her. Like a moron, I didn’t do anything about it. I’m not sure what my stupid reason was. I was always turning women down when I was young for all sorts of lame reasons.

Another time we were over at someone’s house at a small party. I was 20. We were drinking and smoking pot. I was playing darts on the dartboard. There were people our age there, including underage girls, but back then, 18-21 year old young adults and underage girls hung out together all the time. It seemed like one of the girls was looking at me.

Later one of my friends came up to me and said:

Hey there was a girl there at that party who liked you. Her name is T. She wants you to have her phone number and to call her.

So I did it. She was 16. So I ended up having a wild extremely sexual relationship with this girl for a few months. She was in love with me too, and she even wanted to marry me. How do I know this. One time I was over at her house in her bedroom and had written on a piece of paper with ink her own name spelled different ways, except she always had my last name attached to it. She probably left it out there for me to see. If you ever see that, you’re damn right that chick wants to marry you!

It ended for reasons I still don’t understand.She said, “You’re insecure, Bob.” Idiotically, I said, “Let’s break up.” She agreed. I still don’t know why I did that but I was sort of a big chicken and coward back then about all sorts of things. Plus I was sort of a huge idiot in some other ways. Basically, looking back on it, I was simply immature, that’s all there is to it.

My Mom was not pleased that we were involved. I was 20 and she was 16. Everybody did this back then, but you still might get in trouble. I’d already met her father and he didn’t give a damn, though he gave me a rather concerned look.

Mom: (Furiously) Where were you last night? At T.’s!?

Me: Um, yeah? What, you don’t like it?

Mom: (Angrily) She’s too young!

In other words, she was underage as in illegal, as in jailbait. Really 20 and 16 just out to be legal under Romeo and Juliet exceptions to statutory rape. I shrugged my shoulders but my feelings were hurt. I was always getting my feelings hurt back then. My Mom was a prude though, she made it known that she didn’t believe in premarital sex (she thought it was immoral), and she didn’t even like me having sex with girls over 18. The whole reason was pregnancy.

Mom: (Hissing) You’re going to get one of them pregnant!

Me: No I won’t.

Mom: (Enraged) Well, you might! And then what are you going to do?!

What If You Get Her Pregnant?

I’m still not sure how single men should deal with the conundrum of “Maybe you will get her pregnant.” I wouldn’t recommend staying a virgin for this reason, but unplanned pregnancies are terrifying for a single man. I get it. Date females who use birth control is all I can say.

We still don’t have a good male birth control device other than a condom and those don’t work great. There is supposedly a supplement from India that works well but I forget the name of it. Of course there still is no male birth control pill.

In part this is due to feminists. A chemist was working on one in Brazil in the early 60’s and Betty Friedan got involved and raised a stink and stopped it. She said feminism was opposed to a male pill because it “took away the woman’s decision about whether to have a baby or not.” I’m still mad at feminists over that.

My attitude to men has always been go ahead and have sex with them anyway but figure out if she’s on birth control. Most females back then were on the pill, even high school girls. Others used diaphragms. I saw young women put them in before sex. Others used spermicide foam. I saw women spray it on their pussies before sex. And at one point, I had a girlfriend who used condoms all the time. For some reason, they didn’t interfere with sensation.

The diaphragm was popular back then. My Mom used it. Neither the diaphragm nor foam work all that great, nor do condoms. Now they’re all on the pill or the shot (I recently had sex with a 19 year old girl who went and got a six month shot before our first date). Some are on IUD’s. Both work great.

More Introductions

Often others will come and tell you, “Hey, that girl likes you. Here’s her number. She wants you to call her.”

The “Delighted Smile” + Stare

When I was 20, my 14 year old brother had a friend who had an 18 year old sister. I met the sister one weekend night outside of a party. She was smiling at me and looking at me with reverence. Females often look at men they like that way. They also smile this particular sort of delighted smile while they look at you. It looks something like,

“Ohhh man! Goddamn! I surrrrrre like him! He’s fucking hot!”

Or maybe,

“Damn, what a character! I can’t believe this guy! He looks like such an asshole, but then I think, ‘Hey, that turns me on!'”

It almost looks like they are going to laugh, but it’s not like they are going to make fun of you. I think females think a lot of males they like are funny for some reason. Somehow strong sexual attraction is funny. Maybe it’s a positive peak emotional experience. I guess I would describe the look as “delighted” or “delightful.” It’s the sort of look you have when you really, really like someone and also find them entertaining, like you are watching an actor perform. There’s also an element of outrage to it, but the observer likes the outrage.

If you are getting a look like that, you might want to do something about it. But she might just be looking. One of the last looks I got like that was from this totally hot woman in her 30’s who ran a coffeeshop with her husband, a very goodlooking man. They were off into some fundamentalist Christian crap, but they were also sort of super-hip. You see a lot of this weirdness nowadays. They had five kids already. She was leaning up against the law looking at me like I was the best thing she’d seen in years, with that delighted look on her face like she was going to laugh.

What was I supposed to do? Ask the couple if they would invite me over to their house? Maybe she was just looking and fantasizing. Women do that a lot. Just because that woman looks at you like you’re a roast beef sandwich doesn’t mean she really wants to have sex with you. Maybe you’re just nice to look at and she’s fantasizing about you. Women daydream too you know.

Anyway, my brother came to me and said that his friend’s sister liked me and she wanted me to take her to the prom. This happened but it broke up after a while. I’m still not sure why.

Oh sure, I had acquaintances. I did extracurricular activities and clubs, mostly having to do with politics. Washington DC is a large, diverse city, and there was always something to do. I went to events, rallies, art exhibits. The students I interacted with thought I was a cool dude and would approach and say hi to me on campus.

People gladly sat next to me in the dining hall and ate with me. But they were only into my persona – my David D persona – they weren’t into me. They didn’t even know me. Nobody did.

All I had was my DYD persona, which, like any shiny object, is highly captivating at first but after a while gets old. After a whole year in college, I had not explored friendship, intimacy, or sex. At all. I was a loner – even though nobody knew it!

I’m not getting this at all. He’s attractive and social enough that people seek him to eat with them in the dining hall. They walk up to him and say hi to him on campus. Presumably males and females both were like this. So why doesn’t anyone want to date him?

Why don’t guys even want to befriend him? If this was happening to me, and it used to a lot in junior college at least, guys would be befriending me and we would be hanging out outside of school. Girls would be befriending me and I would be dating them. I would become part of several different social circles that I fluttered around between. This was exactly what junior college was like for me. So why isn’t it happening to this guy? Because he’s 5’2.

He has this David D persona, but it doesn’t last. I don’t understand that at all. By this time, I had developed a persona: the cool guy. And something like, the cool guy who gets chicks. Guys would automatically assume that I was getting women even when I wasn’t. My dentist used to say, “How many girlfriends do you have now? Three?” He said that just based on how I acted I guess. But at that time, I might have had zero. I always lied and said one or two even if I wasn’t with anyone.

So what’s the difference between his David D persona and my “player cool guy” persona? With me, it was not artificial but instead it was an integral part of my identity. It didn’t feel fake or like a costume I put on. It was just me. Even if it wasn’t really me, I brainwashed myself into thinking it was and went through life like that. Is it because his David D persona was fake and ill-fitting? Is it because he was 5’2.

And I was extremely jealous of everyone who was doing those things. I would walk around campus, watching all the couples, wondering how they did it. How could they be so successful when they don’t even know any Game? WTF?

Back in the day, there was no such thing as Game, but some guys knew how to get chicks and others didn’t. There wasn’t any kind of thought-out process involved. There was a sleazy book called How to Pick Up Girls or something around then, and it was more or less just Game + “be an asshole,” you know, the usual advice. But almost nobody read it. You just figured it out as you went along. You observed your friends who were very good at this stuff and watched how they did and observed and took mental notes.

Getting jealous at romantically or sexually successful people is not a good state to be in. I suppose I’ve experienced that but it seemed pathological at the time and I was always trying to get rid of the feeling. Basically envy is crap. The less envious you are in life, the better off you are. And trust me, a lot of horrible people, like narcissists, are consumed with envy.

I’ve never experienced this guy’s “How do they do it?” vibe, so I can’t comment on it. People were always asking me that question! I know how guys get women. This is no mystery to me. That sounds like a bad place for your head to be in though. I imagine he’s baffled and frustrated as Hell.

When school was over, I went on an all-expense paid trip to Israel, courtesy of the Jews.

The guy was Jewish. We learn that earlier.

For 10 days I rode around on a bus with 50 other college freshmen and sophomores from various schools around the US. We stayed in 5-star hotels, ate banquet meals, had all of our activities planned out for us, and all we had to do was enjoy ourselves.

That sounds perfect. I used to go on school-sponsored trips like this like with the Ski Club. Once I went skiing with some friends in Utah. Another time I went to Aspen, Colorado with the Ski Club. I did great on the Colorado trip (got two different women in a week), but I didn’t get anything on the Utah trip. I was 18 in Utah and 20 in Colorado and the maturity difference between myself at those ages was insane. On the Colorado trip, I had the “cool guy” thing down pat. The more success you have, the better this sort of persona gets. Success is fuel for its gas tank.

I was told by previous participants that these types of trips are prime opportunities to hook up with girls. I used everything at my disposal. I built up my skills, took chances, and tried my very best to connect with girls.

This is all good.

It all came to a climax one night while we were staying in a Bedouin tent in the middle of the desert. On this particular night, I felt so confident that I just walked up to a girl who was eating, sat down across the table from her and just looked at her without saying a word.

She immediately started smiling and giggling and asking me about myself. We made deep, sensual eye contact. I was feeling like this was it – the girlfriend I’ve been waiting for all this time! I invited her for a walk around the camp, and she happily agreed. I was sure this was it.

And in the middle of the walk, a guy came up to us and introduced himself. He was her boyfriend. They embraced. I didn’t give up, though!

I’ve had this happen to me before. I went to Yosemite once by myself. The first day there, I rented a bike and rode it around. I saw this hot blonde walking and stopped to talk to her. She had a bikini on and some of her pussy hair was visible outside of her bikini. I looked right at it of course and she just giggled and put her bikini back over the pussy hair. I didn’t say anything. I’m not sure if it would be ok to say something in that case or not.

The fact that she giggled is a great sign and might mean you can comment about it. You would have to think of a really cool comment to make about it and it would have to be some sort of a joke.

This has happened to me quite a few times but I never said anything about it. Some of the times, I was sure the girls were flashing me with their bikinis and shorts. It took me a while to figure out that when a female is across from you sitting down and you can see her pussy, her pussy hair, or her panties, 10

This chick told me her campground number and said they were having a party that night and invited me. I thought I had it made. I walked over to the party that night. The party was a pretty wild one and at one point we were smoking pot and then this hippie guy came out of a tent and embraced the girl and it was clear that this was her boyfriend. So why did she invite me to the party?! But it was cool. I was in a very good mood and so were they are everyone was smiling and laughing and the warmest vibes were in the air. I didn’t get mad at her for having a boyfriend or for inviting me when she had a guy. That seemed stupid.

I hung around, hoping to find out that they were just kidding and she was really single.

All right, this part is just stupid. He’s obviously her boyfriend. They wouldn’t tell you if he wasn’t.

But after a while, I figured out that they were a happy couple, and I wasn’t getting any.

Duh.

At the end of the trip, most people who wanted to hook up had done so, even the shy, quiet, nerdy kid. You know the type – every trip has one. The kid who everyone thinks is sexually hopeless – even he hooked up!

Ok, I’m still not getting it. Is it because he’s 5’2? Is he homely or unattractive? I’m not figuring this guy out.

Alt Left: The Motto of the Fascist Right: “Murder the Left!”

Manuel Rodriguez: Robert, you mentioned in the past how your grandmother had some memories about WWII propaganda, with a particular note about cartoons depicting Stalin and Hitler greeting each other with knives in their backs, representing how the non-aggression pact was a 10 year “ceasefire” of sorts before the fights.

That was actually my mother! She would have been only seven years old at the time too! She said her father showed her the cartoon, and she actually remembered it from all that time.

Do you have more anecdotes to share?

No, not really.

I ask mostly because I wondering how you would compare WWII-era propaganda with the current propaganda we are seeing from Westenistan.

It is so much more all-encompassing now.

I would say that modern propaganda is far worse, considering how Big Data, modern media systems, and more advanced psychological techniques along with almost 10

Yes, I agree. It’s like a system of Hyperautomated Thought Control.

I think we are seeing a pretty funny twist of events. One of the stereotypes they establish about countries that don’t vow to their wills is that of “the dictatorship.” Those rogue regimes have 10

This is said to be true about Venezuela. Yet the Opposition is very loud in Venezuela and nobody does a thing to them. They even have riots and the government doesn’t even do much. Often they just stand there and let them riot away. A while back, 7

A woman went there on a trip a while back and she said that in her hotel room, the only channels she could get were Opposition channels. I think at one time they had most of the TV channels tool. The Opposition papers are like Fox News on steroids. They lie about the government all the time in the worst ways, including ways that have led to actual loss of life. They used to issue regular calls to kill Chavez a while back. I’m not sure if they still do that.

All of the Opposition media outlets are complete traitors as they all supported a few violent coup attempts to overthrow the government. In any reasonable country, they’d be shut down for that treason right there. A man has declared that the completely free and fair last election was somehow invalid due to some fraud no one saw. He struts around the country, a complete traitor if there even was one, and the government doesn’t lift one finger against him!

The Opposition’s constant claims that Venezuela’s elections are rigged, fraudulent, and stolen are an exact mirror of Trump’s lies about how he really won the election. The allegations of rigging and fraud in Venezuela are about as fact-based as those of Trump. Yet every American liberal who screams that Trump is a threat to democracy and tried to steal an election insists that when the Venezuelan fascists say the same thing and steal the election that way, they are somehow correct.

The main thing I get out of Venezuela is how extreme, insane, and dangerous the Opposition is, yet the Chavistas pretty much let them run wild and say whatever the Hell they want to. That’s the opposite of a dictatorship. That’s like the most democratic country on Earth! You should know by now that every country that the US opposes is a dictatorship. Especially all Left populist states are somehow dictatorships because they are often very popular, winning 70-9

American liberals always support fascism, Nazism, and Al Qaeda and ISIS-type militants overseas. Those are really the death squads of the American imperialist far Globohomo Empire. It’s weird because we are pushing total social depravity on the world and then we sick these ultra-Right fascist-Nazi-ISIS death squads on you! The Globohomo part is extreme Left and then they enforce their Globohomo Imperialism with fascists and Nazis. It’s weird. It’s like

  • Death squads and gay bars!
  • ISIS and pride parades!
  • Nazis and transsexual bathhouses for all ages!

That’s basically American Democratic Party liberalism (shitlibs) nowadays and it’s been that way for some time now (at least the fascist-Islamist death enforcers). And for that matter, it is absolutely all of the parties in Europe, including the Greens and the social democrats. The European Left is now shitlib too even though they are farther left than US liberals. The only people there who make sense are some rightwing governments like Hungary and Serbia and of course, the real Left, the communists and Leftists.

Then behind the whole thing is the typical exploitative US imperialism which is out to rape and ruin every country on Earth so we can steal their stuff, loot, and booty.

It’s like the worst of the Left combined with the worst of the Right.

The worst part about the situation in Argentine is not that there was an attempted assassination on Cristina Fernandez, but how their media handled it. The best friend of the would-be assassin (who was not directly implicated, but more or less was aware and approved of his doing it) was interviewed after the event.

The friend lamented how he failed to kill her, and said he should have practiced some more, with the reporter only doing a slight “You shouldn’t say those things, that’s bad,” to the friend.

To show how irresponsible Argentinian and Spanish media are, they started posting infographs showing with text and pictures how to properly operate this sort of firearm so that it fires properly. Y’know, so the next murderer doesn’t make the same mistake. This was done almost as soon as it was reported that the gun didn’t fire due to a failure.

Yes, they sow open calls to murder. The slogan of the Latin American Right – an objectively fascist project – is “murder the Left.” Also, “The Left has no right to rule, and if they do somehow come into power, they are communists and all communists need to be killed or overthrown in a coup.

You also see that the Spanish Right (I assume these papers are the Spanish Right or does the Spanish Left act this way too) is just as fascist as the Latin American Left. It’s no surprise as the Spanish Right is still Franocist. After Franco, they drifted into rightwing political parties, but they never gave up the ideology or went away. Much of the Spanish Right is now made up of rather hidden but unreconstructed Francoist fascists.

This is the modus operandi of the Far Right. I think you’re familiar with it from watching Trump. First, the politicians and media of the Right start demonizing a certain person/group on the Left, fomenting non-stop hate.

Once one or a group of their followers attempt something act of political violence against the Left, successful or not, they immediately backtrack and cover themselves by saying that the attacker was just some crazy acting on their own committing spontaneous lone wolf acts that weren’t influenced by the people on the Right.

In other words, hate is freedom of speech.

Yes, sow endless calls to violence and then when someone acts on these provocations, say he was just crazy and acting on his own and the incitement had nothing to do with it.

The More You Learn, the Less You Know

Sometimes I think the more we learn, the more questions we have.

You know, this is true with so many things. For a variety of reasons, I became an expert on marijuana. I was involved with NORML back in the days when it was a real subversive and uncool thing to be into. In fact, I was deeply involved with Orange County, California NORML. I went to a few California NORML parties and I met the head of national NORML.

Later I became close to Dale, head of California NORML. I was very interested in the research side of things. I was still deep into it in the early 1990’s when I hardly even smoked the stuff anymore. One time I was talking to Dale, and he said he’d only met one other layperson who knew more about pot than I did (as in the research side of the question). That was some regular guy like me up in Alaska who just decided to become an expert in it for whatever reason.

The weird thing was the more I learned about pot, the less I knew! As in, the more things that I thought added up didn’t add up at all.

When you hardly know anything about a subject, you think you’ve figured it out because you only have bare facts, and they seem to make sense. But then when you dig real deep into that same subject, you start to realize that all that stuff you thought was settled and made sense wasn’t really settled at all, and the more you study, the more you see things that don’t add up and don’t make sense. As in, the more you study, the more inexplicable mysteries seem to pop up.

Scientists would call these unresolved questions rather than mysteries, but it’s the same thing.

I did a huge paper on Turkish languages. At the start I knew almost nothing about them, but I thought I had it figured out. I did this massive paper on them (a project that went on for years), and I kept running into stuff that didn’t add up or didn’t make sense over and over.

It was actually pretty fun because it was a challenge to have all these cool mysteries to solve. I’d solve one, and then three new ones would pop up. The whole process was just discovering one mystery or conundrum or another and then making some sense of it after a while.

But even when I was done, I still had a lot of unresolved questions, and I assure you that some people will strongly disagree with some of my conclusions. In fact, some already have. Another journal wanted me to write up some of my findings about their little section of Turkic, and I got blown away by the reviewers in peer review who told me I was full of it and weren’t very nice about it either.

It’s sort of like the more you learn, the less you know (for sure).

Game/PUA: Why Isn’t Game Working? Part 4

But I just didn’t know what to do with the attraction. I didn’t know how to translate that attraction into a relationship of any kind – be it sexual, romantic, or even platonic. Not only could I not have sex or romance, I couldn’t even make friends with girls. By the end of freshman year, I had not hooked up with one single girl, nor did I have any female friends. I didn’t have any male friends either.

Back to the women I was eating lunch with. The 35 year old was a conservative Republican who lived in the suburbs. She wanted me to write papers for her. I asked her about payment and she always winked and said, “We’ll work something out.” I always thought it was some “blowjobs for writing papers for me” deal on her part, but like a moron, I got mad that it seemed like she wasn’t going to pay me, so I never wrote any papers for her. I should have written one paper, given it to her, and then coyly asked how she was going to pay me back for it. Not how she was going to pay me. How she was going to pay me back.

The 26 hear old was living with a former cocaine dealer who had done eight years in prison. He was still dealing and they were living in a mansion in Palos Verdes, a wealthy neighborhood. She did 1/3 to 1/2 a gram of coke every night. One night one of the guys from Linda Rondstadt’s band was over there and he was “freebasing” as she called it. She said he was really skinny and he looked like death warmed over.

Back then we called crack “freebasing” and most people thought it was a very bad idea. Instead we just sniffed the stuff sometimes and as long as you didn’t too it too much, it wasn’t very harmful. I went on for 13 years like that and suffered little if any harm.

One day she asked me if I could get her 1,000 Quaaludes, and I tried to do the deal for her, but it never went through. That would have been a great deal for me because I loved doing quantities. It was so criminal and risky and badass! You don’t want to do them all the time but quantity deals are fun now and then if you don’t get caught. Later I bought some Dexedrine from her. It was the first time I had ever done prescription Dexedrine and I didn’t like it that much. Just seemed to make me jittery for about five hours.

Now, how to shift a friendship into a sexual or romantic thing. Well generally, sexual/romantic things start out that way more or less and platonic friendships start out that way and just stay that way. I will say that I have had many female friends and I was glad I did. You learn a lot about women, and in my case, they usually ended up fixing me up with their friends or roommates. That may be down to Looks too though. So in my case, being Friendzoned wasn’t that bad as I usually got involved with their friends or roommates.

You start out shifting out of friendship to romance/sex very quickly  by making those phony “dates.” Like a “study date.” A “date to make tapes of some of her albums.” These are all just fake excuses because for God’s sake you don’t really want to study with her or record her damn albums (though the latter sounds fun). Instead you just want to have sex with her! But she wants you to go through all this fakery that you both know is nonsense before she gets to that point.

You simply translate attraction into platonic friendship by being extremely friendly. I never found that being an asshole was good for making female friends. If she wants to take it further, she will throw out all these hints in that direction, and it’s up to you to pick up on them and do something about them.

Also, don’t be afraid to throw out a sexual dimension in any new friendship with any woman. Just don’t go too fast. By sexual dimension I mean just put your brain and body in a sexual mood and just throw that out there for her to see and think about. She will pick up on it and do whatever it is she wants to do with that. But at least you put your cards on the table!

You can usually tell pretty quickly if she likes you in a romantic or sexual way, and then you just act accordingly.

For friendship, I’m not sure! She will just act real friendly towards you and you just take it from there I think. I can’t remember how any of my female friendships ever started!

How To Tell If a Woman Is In Love with You

Romance? That doesn’t usually happen before sex, but you can tell if a woman is really into you or in love with you.

One thing you might hear is,

I want to know all about you!

or you hear that she met and then she asked your friend, “I want to know all about him!” That definitely means she is in love with you or has strong feelings for you. She might even want to marry you!

Another one is feeling like a girl or feeling out of control. I met this Turkish woman once and we started talking a lot. It wasn’t long before she asked me,

Bob, what’s wrong with me? I feel like I’m 15 years old again!

Ok she’s going out of control like she’s been captured by some external entity that is now controlling her movements almost against her will, except she doesn’t really want to stop it because it’s fun for women to be “out of control” in this way. It’s a “peak emotional experience” and this is what women live for.

Why does she feel like she’s 15? Because when women fall in love, in particular “wild love,” they often feel like girls again, specifically teenagers because that’s when women first start to experience the feeling of being in love. S

he’s feeling like a girl again! And when a woman is in love with you, she may start acting like a girl again! Either a teenage girl or even a little girl! There’s a woman in every girl and a girl in every woman. Except a lot of women have killed their inner girl, much to their loss.

Women like to feel and act like teenage girls and even little girls again. Girlhood was fun! Adulthood is a drag!

If she’s acting girlish and silly and repeating dumb jokes or routines over and over (what this means is she is “giddy”), she’s in love. Period.

Another is when she’s out of control in a way. I met this Thai women and we were spending a lot of time together. She would get giddy and start laughing and never really stop. Then she would start singing songs and never stop doing that either. I told me female friend about it and she said, “Oh, she’s just nervous.” No she’s not! She’s in love! See how even women don’t even understand women? Want to understand women? Ask a man. Want to understand men? Ask a woman.

Once again, she’s out of control, smiling, laughing, and singing. Like a girl, basically. A schoolgirl. She’s only going to do that if she’s in love.

Another one is,

I feel like I’ve known you all my life!

That means she’s really into you, and she’s falling in love to some extent.

In my case, it’s often been,

I love your writing!

Women who fell for me often fell for my writing starting all the way back in high school. They thought I was some sort of artistic genius. Women like to fuck writers, artists, musicians, and artsy men. That’s because art and creativity is romantic and it leads to peak emotional experiences. Good writing is creative and romantic. Women fall in love with good writers literally over their “beautiful prose.”

In my first year at university, I took a Journalism class called The Feature Article. We were assigned partners and I got assigned to this woman. She looked good but she wasn’t exactly hot. Very quickly I saw that she was obsessed with me.

We had to go interview some coach for an article for the school paper and she acted like she was in a trance the whole time we were interviewing the coach. The coach picked up on it and and he kept looking at me and then looking at her and then looking at both of us together like he was figuring out something was going on. He probably did this by reading her behavior because mine doesn’t change all that much. He made a big deal of shaking my hand afterwards like,

Good job, stud. You got a woman to fall in love with you. You’re a man now! Total respect.

Anyhow, somehow I ended up making one of those fake dates with this woman. A “study date” maybe or some nonsense like that.

We ended up in a park in Long Beach towards evening. I don’t know what happened but I just leaned over and started kissing her real soft and slow. I didn’t ask for permission for it!

She totally went for it and next thing I knew she was on the ground on her back looking up at me with dreamy eyes like she was in a happy and peaceful trance. She’d gone totally submissive and her vibe was, “Take me.” This is the reality of female sexuality. They pretty much get “taken” when they have sex and penetration itself makes women feel submissive. Submission is the essence of female sexuality and frankly, domination is the essence of male sexuality. People will bring up all sorts of exceptions, but there’s no way this is not true.

Ok, on her back like that, totally given up and basically enslaved, she was saying, “Fuck me.” That’s exactly what that behavior means. I couldn’t exactly fuck her in the park, and I didn’t completely figure out the vibe, but there did seem to be this “Fuck me” vibe with it. This chick was in love with me!

She stayed that way for the next three years and I could tell every time I stopped and talked her. I never dated her again because I thought she wasn’t hot enough, but I’m certain that she actually wanted to marry me. Every time she saw me she made bedroom eyes at me.

What Are Bedroom Eyes?

Ok, do this. Lower your head down. Now look up with your eyes. There you go. Bedroom eyes.

If a girl or woman is attracted to you or you’re making her horny, you get the bedroom eyes. And you damn well better do something about it!

I don’t really get them anymore but I did get one from a young woman at a coffee shop recently. But then I somehow blew it with her and she quit looking at me. When she first saw me, she stopped walking towards me and just froze like a robot or a statue. Then she gave me those bedroom eyes. Then she came to her senses and moved on.

Any time a female freezes like that when she sees you and acts like a robot and can’t stop staring at you, basically, she wants to fuck. Or you’re making her horny.

I believe that feeling a strong sexual attraction as a female is something like falling into some sort of a trance. Of course when you are in a trance, you are out of control again, so here we circle back around to the theme of being out of control.

Anyway, back to the college girl. Every time she saw me she gave me those bedroom eyes and got real serious and said my name, “Robert” with absolute reverence. That’s another weird thing. Females who fell in love with me (and there have been more of them than I can count) often started calling me “Robert” instead of “Bob.” One said recently,

I’d rather call you Robert than Bob because Robert sounds more regal. It sounds like you’re a king.

That’s another signal. If a female is in love with you, she might address you with reverence. I suppose it’s almost a religious experience for them. And what are religious or spiritual experiences but peak emotional experiences? And seeing as they want to be dommed, they may well want to fall in love with some sort of “human God” or “king” of a man.

And a lot of women do like to worship their man like he’s a God or serve him like he’s a king, at least in the early phases of love. This is the relationship they want – dominance to submission – the attitude of a believer towards their God or a subject towards their king and and the attitude towards a God or king towards his subject.

They actually like this. Anyway, I figured something was up with the way she acted around me and I assumed she was in love with me. But back then at university, I thought the bedroom eyes were due to insecurity! She was indeed the sort of woman who might suffer from that. One day I said, “When a woman looks at you like that,” and I imitated her, “It means she’s insecure.” She agreed with me, “Yes, maybe it does.”

As you can see, at 23 I was a dumbshit and thought bedroom eyes meant female insecurity! I was an idiot! Live and learn!

Game/PUA: Why Isn’t Game Working? Part 3

The introduction is here.

Eventually, this process played out with every single prospect, and eventually the novelty of “Mr. Cool” faded, and they saw me as just another guy. I kept meeting new girls of course. Every day I met a new girl, struck up conversations, and built up the attraction.

Here’s the problem. The Joe Cool thing, if you are running Joe Cool Game that is, which I’ve been doing most of my life, is never supposed to wear off! Think about it. If you’re really Joe Cool, why would you ever at some point stop being Joe Cool? You’re either Joe Cool or you’re not. At some point you’re not Joe Cool anymore because you never were in the first place! And that’s a problem.

I suppose I still come off as Joe Cool. It doesn’t really work for crap anymore except maybe with women my age, but I’ve never stopped running that sort of Game. By now it’s just gone automatic. I don’t even have to really think about, or better yet, I can go into that mode anytime I want to just by making my brain go in that direction. I’m basically “calling up the past,” so I’m going into the mindset I had when I was in my early 20’s. When I do this, I actually am 23 years old in my mind. No matter that I’m really 64.

That’s not important. You might think it might make me act immature for my age, but that’s not really a problem that I run into.

I can also crank up that Game really high so it’s on max, but that’s an unnatural state and it takes up a lot of energy. In fact, it’s exhausting. 5 years ago, I used to be able to crank this up really high for days on end and it worked very well. I absolutely attracted more women.

I even attracted girls! I went to a Boy Scouts celebration for my cousin and a hot 16 year old girl was staring at me the whole night. I was looking at her back, but the attitude was mutual. Her Dad was there and after a while, he was not happy at all, but it took me a while to figure that out. To tell the truth, I don’t think that girl really wanted to have sex with me. I think she just wanted to look at me. But I was absolutely making her horny, I guarantee you that. And I really doubt if I would have done anything with her anyway. I haven’t touched a jailbait since I was 21, and I hope I never do it again. It’s too much of a bust.

It also seems to work better if you get yourself into this frame of mind that you develop as close to full confidence as possible. That is, you actually believe you are hottest man on Earth or you could fuck every one of these young women behind the counter right now, just like that. It’s not that easy because it’s basically a fake attitude that’s not even true! You’re just an actor playing a role.

Perhaps I am wrong, but it seems like if you don’t fully believe in the role, it doesn’t work as well. It seems like the only way that playing a role works is when you have brainwashed yourself into thinking that you are not even playing a role anymore! And anything less that 10

On the other hand, none of this may be valuable if you don’t have Looks to back it up. I can’t speak to that because supposedly I’ve been handsome most of my life. I can’t speak to the life experience of average and homely men.

But I just didn’t know what to do with the attraction. I didn’t know how to translate that attraction into a relationship of any kind – be it sexual, romantic, or even platonic. Not only could I not have sex or romance, I couldn’t even make friends with girls. By the end of freshman year, I had not hooked up with one single girl, nor did I have any female friends. I didn’t have any male friends either.

All right, I’m sorry, but this is a massive failure. I’m not sure, but you have to do something. Women often just made friends with me. I don’t know how it happened, whether they made friends with me or I made friends with them. I suppose it was both or even mutual at times. I never really thought about how it happened. I just noticed that it did. I would to just be very friendly and playful with a sexual undercurrent and vibe that’s not necessarily too prominent but it’s there just the same.

Hell, whole groups of women used to make friends with me! That may have been Looks. I remember I had this class on D. H. Lawrence, a Literature class at university. The class was all women and there were few if any guys in the class. It was Paradise. After class one day, these three women, ages 35, 37, and 26 were always going to lunch.

I don’t know what happened, but one day they saw me and they all said, “Hey, look at him. Let’s invite him to lunch with us.” So it happened and I ended up having lunch with those three women a couple of times a week for the whole semester. It was great. I was so calm and cool and relaxed with them! I was in Heaven. And they were very kind to me. There were few if any bad vibes. And I didn’t screw up or blow it with my conversation. These were some of the best times of my life: just me and the women, having lunch together a few times a week. Perfect.

The 27 year old was always grabbing at my body for some reason. She would say, “You’re so open! Your body is so open. You make me feel so free! Like I’m free to grab you at any time!” and then she would grab at me with her hands. There might be a point to make here. I always “leave my body open” for the woman to grab at any time she wants to. Just put the idea in your head that you have an “open and free body” that is  “free for the grabbing anytime she feels like it.” And don’t make her feel like a slut for doing it. Support total sexual freedom for women!

She was married so nothing was going to happen, so after a while it started bugging me a bit. I think at one point I said, “Look if you’re going to anything about it, quit grabbing at me, dammit,” and the 26 year old looked over at her as if to say, “Yeah, no shit. Back it up or quit teasing him, dammit!”

One day she burned me by calling me skinny in a very insulting way.

I looked at her and I said, “Shut up, cunt!” just like that! The other women looked at me like, “Whoa, I can’t believe you said that!” She got this hurt look on her face and she had tears in her eyes, “You macho pig!” she said. But it seemed like she sort of liked it. Anyway, I made her go submissive.

Women actually like that and they even like it if you reduce them to tears once in a while. Most of the time, when you reduce her to tears, you may well have done a bad thing if they are not inclined that way and you should be ashamed of yourself. But if you didn’t really do anything bad, it’s actually a good thing that you dommed her so hard that you reduced her to tears because in a sense, women want a macho pig who does just that now and again.

I remember a girlfriend got into a physical fight with me one night and I hit her! I hit the bitch! Not very hard. I punched her in the shoulder! Not hard enough to hurt her. She said, “Ow! That hurt!” then she spent the rest of the evening going on and on and on about, “You hit me! You hit me!” I apologized a lot but it was worthless.

Later we went to bed and we usually pretty much had sex for a good part of the night, like for hours. And I was 56 years old and she was 48! So you see, us oldsters do have sex sometimes.

I kept grabbing at her all night long because that’s how I am when I sleep with a woman. I’m an asshole and a human octopus. She kept saying, “Nooooo. You hit me!” Nothing sexual happened that night because she kept pushing me away. She went on crying and saying, “You hit me!” for half the night. She never got seriously angry or I would have stopped grabbing at her. But as long as she’s crying like a baby, I’ma keep grabbing at her. Don’t like it? Call the cops!

Anyway, I think she actually liked that I hit her and especially that I reduced her to tears for hours on end. That’s the weird thing. Like I stood up to her crap. Women literally want a guy who makes them cry once in a while. Emphasis on the once in a while. It could be once in ten years, but still, I think it’s something they want. When you do that, you put a fence around her, showed her who’s boss, and put in her in her damn place. And sadly, these are three things that women want or even demand from their men!

I think you are just totally domming them when you do that, and they like to be dommed and made to go submissive and they also like a man who puts some limits on their crap because they want a man to put limits on them! If he doesn’t put limits on her, just like a child, she will test the limits and start violating them just to rouse an attitude out of him.

And women deserve to be treated like the children they behave like sometimes. She literally wants you to put a fence around her behavior and enforce it with aggression and even threat and menace. Kids want you to do the same thing. Kids don’t respect you if you don’t put limits on them and women don’t either.

Later I had a “tennis and lunch date” with the 27 year old. Most of these dates are fakes. You don’t really want to play tennis with her, for God’s sake! That’s all just an excuse to get in her damn pants!

Thing is, women know this and they want you to be coy like this. “I’m not a slut. We’re just going to play tennis! Totally innocent!” While in their minds they know that it might not end up so innocent. Sex is all about lying and fraudulence, about setting up BS innocent meetings that both sides know may well turn into sex but that look innocent enough so the woman is comfortable and she’s not being too much of a whore.

That’s another way that dating is basically fraudulent or at least a great big fake game.

Later we had a “study date” at the library, obviously another fake because this was at night. She dropped me off at my house and I don’t know what happened but she said, Let’s get some towels and go to the beach!” Ok, when a woman wants to “go to the beach” at 9 PM, in my town, that only one means one thing. That means she wants to fuck. You’re going to the beach to have sex on the beach at night and there will be many other couples around you doing the same thing.

Then she immediately said, “No, no, let’s not do that.” See, there is the Anti-Slut Defense showing up! Not only that but she was married, so that was another problem. Like a moron, I let her Anti-Slut Defense have the last word, and we never went to the beach.

When they do this, you need to really press them on their offer, in this case, going to the beach. Just get persistent about going to the beach and see if you can talk her into it. Women now call this “coercion” but so what! If you get rid of “talk her into it” type “coercion,” people are going to be having a whole lot less sex.

Smile and laugh the whole time you’re doing it and make jokes. Call her a prude if she tries to back out and laugh about it. This may go on for a bit, but it probably won’t last that long. If she gets angry, it’s over, and you’re not going to the beach. If you win, go in, grab the towels and go back to the car and make sure she goes to the damn beach because the Anti-Slut Defense may rear up again, and she will probably try to back out of it on the way to the beach, so you have to keep her on target.

In fact, the Defense may rear up at any time once you are at the beach, so you have to keep her on target. I wouldn’t tell her that you’re going to the beach to have sex. That’ll make her back out! As I said, dating is based on deception.

You might say something like, “Gee, I wonder what we are going to do at the beach…” To which she might say, “Hmmm, I’m not sure, maybe we should go there and find out.”

Even once you get to the beach, don’t say anything about sex. Just lay out your towels and say something dumb like, “Let’s just lie her and listen to the waves.” If you don’t bust a move on her after a while, she’s going to get mad and probably say something like, “So are you going to fuck me or what!?” Girls and women have been saying stuff like that to me my whole life. They get frustrated because sometimes I’m way too slow. Or she might start grabbing at you. Then you have to go for it.

I’d probably say, “Let’s just lie here and look at the waves,” and then at some point, I’d reach over and start feeling her body very slowly and softly, and then I’d just lean over and start kissing her, maybe very slowly and softly at first. Don’t ask permission for any of this stuff ever. Just do it and she either likes it or she doesn’t.

If she’s made it all the way to the beach with you, there’s probably going to be some sex, but you still don’t ask her,  for Chrissake.

The whole idea of sex with women is to get them to turn off their Goddamned hamster wheel brains and stop thinking! Shut off her brain! All her brain is ever going to do is to tell her not to do it. So you shut it off to where she’s only listening to her body, and her body’s often telling her to have sex. If you ask permission, she stops listening to her body and starts listening to her idiot hamster brain and all it tends to do is throw up Anti-Slut Defenses and try not to have sex. Sex: the less you talk about it, the better!

Game/PUA: Introduction to the “Why Hasn’t Game Worked?” Article

This is the introduction to the Why Hasn’t Game Worked? article. My responses are now broken up into a number of response articles. Use this as a primer to get some background on the basic situation.

From here. Very interesting article. What did he do wrong?

Why Hasn’t Game Worked?

Hello everyone. I’m in a unique situation. My purpose in writing this thread is to identify the problem so I can solve it. It’s not to whine or complain. It might seem that way, and if it does, then forgive me, I’m really sincerely trying to solve the issues here.

My situation is that I’ve been practicing Game (not just learning or ‘studying’, but actively going out and doing) for the past ten years. I first found the red pill in the form of David D at the age of 17, and I’m 28 now. For that entire time, I’ve been doing everything I’m supposed to do: I’ve done astronomical amounts of approaches on a consistent basis in all sorts of settings both daytime and nighttime.

I’ve read up on different schools of Game, tried many out, kept a journal of my interactions, reviewed what I did right and what I could improve on, and generally conquered every woman-related fear that I could identify.

My philosophy on Game and life in general could pretty much be summed up as follows: “If you’re afraid of it, all the more reason to go and do it.” I feel that whatever’s blocking me from getting laid inevitably has to do with fear – and so if I keep noticing fears and promptly taking the courage to overcome them, then eventually all of that fear-conquering will lead to improvement in my life.

And as a result, I have almost no approach anxiety. I overcame approach anxiety years ago. I can approach just about any girl in just about any place.

It’s no longer an issue for me. I even used to have friends and wingmen point out the most difficult sets, and I’d approach them just to prove to myself that I wasn’t afraid and to prove that hesitation and fear weren’t the reasons for why I wasn’t getting female affection.

But despite all of the work I’ve put in, I have nothing to show. I’m a virgin with the exception of times I hired prostitutes, which comes out to a grand total of 5 times. I haven’t had sex with any girl who wasn’t ‘working’.

I am not a troll. I am a man who has put in the time and work and courage to improve my life. It just hasn’t worked. And I’m trying to figure out why.

When I heard about Elliot Rodger, something in me changed. Things are serious now. I can see myself turning into him eventually if this problem isn’t solved. I’ve read the first 90 pages of the manifesto, and it’s like reading my own autobiography.

The way he describes the utter hopelessness he feels and the jealousy was like hearing my own story told back to me. The only difference between me and him is that I always believed in the possibility of success, and I went out and took the active steps necessary to achieve it. I put in the work, and I took the risks.

Oh, and I’m not a racist. And I never had any interest in guns. And I played AOE instead of WOW…But everything else, it’s like we had the same life.

I’m currently applying for English teaching jobs overseas, so I can get a girlfriend based on the Murr’kin factor, i.e. socioeconomic status. But I’m concerned that this might not work as well as I expect it to.

I’m concerned that whatever the “issue” is with my Game is going to follow me wherever I go. In another country I’m sure I’ll get dates. I may get hookups. I might even get sex. But it’ll be based on money, status, and nationality – and how long will it be before the girl starts to play me, use me, dig for gold, etc? How long before my lack of skill with women catches up to me?

I want to figure out what the #

So I’ve written a story about my life from the beginning up until the present with a focus on girls and Game. I’m sure there’s a pattern in there which one of you experts can pick out and be like “I found your problem!” At least I’m hoping for that.

My story is both inspiring and heartbreaking, hopeful and hopeless, and enraging and comical all at the same time. It will elicit mad props in one sentence, pity in the next, and raucous laughter not far behind. I think you will enjoy it.

So without further ado, here it is. Tell me what you think.

Repost: Face Split Diving Accident Video

People are flooding in from all over the world to see this old post of mine from 13 years ago! I’m also getting swamped with requests from translators. If you are thinking about watching this video and have not seen it yet, let me warn you. It’s really bad. I was traumatized for almost a week after I saw it, and usually nothing much affects me at all. I thought I was unshockable. I guess not. Don’t come complaining to me if you’re traumatized or upset after watching this. Remember that I warned you ahead of time.

For those of you who are daring and think you can handle it, go ahead and dive right in, so to speak. It’s freaky as Hell though. I’m warning you.

The video itself is now stored on my old Blogspot site. I will keep it there until I transfer it over here. Click here to watch the actual video.

I am looking for translators to translate this post into Arabic, Hebrew, Greek, Maltese, Romanian, Macedonian, Bulgarian, Slovenian, Hungarian, Ukrainian, Lithuanian, Estonian, Russian, Swedish, Malay, Indonesian, Tagalog, Vietnamese, Japanese, Chinese and Wolof. Email me if you are interested.

This post has been translated into:

French: Visage Fendu dans Accident de Plongeon (en Français).

Portuguese: as Video Acidente de Mergulho Rostro Dividida Ao Meio (em Português )

Spanish: Video Accidente de Clavadista con Cara Partida (en Español)

Finnish: Sukellusonnettomuus (on Suomen)

Serbo-Croatian: Ronilačkih Nezgoda Sa Licem Podijeljen U Dva (u Srpsko-hrvatski )

Italian: as Incidente Di Tuffo Che Divide Il Viso In Due (traduzione in Italiano).

Bad reactions to the video including nausea, vomiting, dry heaves, paleness, shivering, shaking, spinal chills, headache, rapid heartbeat, nightmares, inability to stop thinking of the video and pain in the face, have been reported. Adverse reactions have lasted up to three days. Please exercise caution in viewing the video.

This is one of the latest viral videos going around. It actually appeared on the Net around the third week of July 2009, but it only started going viral in a huge way around the second week of September 2009. It first appeared on Arabic and Turkish sites, and finally found its way around the Net. In general, it never has a name.

It’s just referred to by some description of the event like, Horrible Diving Accident, Bridge Fail, Worst Diving Accident, Horrific Diving AccidentAwesome Diving Accident, Disgusting Diving Accident, Jump Accident, Cellphone Horrific Diving Accident , and Diving Accident. I named it Dive Fail since I could not think of anything better. Later I changed the name to Face Split Diving Accident.

There’s really no “violence” in this video. It’s just a video of a horrible accident.

A teenager, a 16 year old boy, dives off the seaside promenade in Beirut, Lebanon and slips before the dive. The slip causes him to miss the ocean and instead hit the concrete slab below where fishermen fish. He hits the concrete face first, then goes into the ocean. In a short while, the ocean for yards around has turned red with blood. There are people in the water and boats trying to help the guy, and girls are screaming all over the place.

The scene then shifts to a hospital where the poor guy is being overseen by a team of doctors and nurses. His face has been split clear in two down the middle vertically!

He is still alive, conscious, and, and his tongue is still moving around. He appears terrified. A couple of times, the doctor takes the sides of his face and pushes them together to make a whole face again. The doctor says, “Where do I begin?” a few times in Arabic. We know this is an operating room in Lebanon because the doctors and nurses are speaking Lebanese Arabic.

People are wondering how he could survive such an injury. The front part of his brain may have been injured, but others are saying that it appears to be intact. At any rate, basic things like breathing are done by the brain stem. The brain stem appears to be intact. People are also wondering about pain. The brain has no pain receptors. On the other hand, the damage to his face must be very painful.

There are a lot of rumors saying that this video is fake, but apparently it is a real video. We know this because people in Lebanon are reporting it. Some had friends who were at the Promenade that day, others said it was reported in the Lebanese press, and others say that they were aware of stories on the street about the video. There is an article in Arabic from the Lebanese press online proving that this event occurred, but it’s in the archives, and looking through the archives costs money.

This event occurred in Beirut in the second week of June 2009. The teenager and his brother were showing off their diving skills by diving off the Manara Promenade ( supposedly proves that this video is fake. In the other video, the hospital footage is said to be of a failed 9mm suicide. However, no way can a 9mm do that kind of damage to your face. Furthermore, in a longer video version of the ER scene, the two doctors are discussing in Lebanese Arabic how he landed “on a rock” when he jumped into the water. This dialogue would not exist in a gun suicide video.

In addition, some are saying that the victim in the failed gun suicide video had a similar injury that differed from this one in certain ways; in particular, this one has a dichotomy of the jaw at the chin, and the other did not.

There are claims that instead of a 9mm failed suicide, this is a shotgun failed suicide. However, there are many photos of shotgun suicides on the Web, for instance, at Rotten.com. In general, shotgun failed suicides do not neatly clove one’s face in two in the way that this injury did. If it’s really a failed gun suicide, why are they speaking Lebanese Arabic just like they are speaking during the dive accident?

Sources in Lebanon who were there at the promenade and witnessed the dive accident claim that the word on the street in Lebanon is that the second half was shot in the hospital and is footage of aftermath of the diving accident. In addition, the young man in the hospital at the end is wearing swim trunks, just as the diver wore. What are the chances that a video of a failed shotgun suicide by a young man wearing a bathing suit occurred and was filmed in Lebanon around the same time of this accident?

Many people have questioned the nature of the wound. It does not seem to be possible to hit a concrete slab and split your face vertically like he did. However, if you look at the dive footage, there is steel casing around the concrete slab that he hits. The concrete slab has worn away and a lot of the steel casing is exposed. The steel casing runs parallel to the shoreline. Even then, hitting the steel casing would seem to be a horizontal hit.

However, look at the way that the boy is flailing wildly in the air. In his dive, he is twisting and turning like the wind. With such a flailing dive and while probably curving to try to avoid the concrete, it’s possible for him to him to turn the 90 degrees he needs to turn to hit the sharp edge of the steel casing vertically instead of horizontally, which would result in the injury we see later.

There is another theory suggesting that the hospital footage is not even real – it’s faked using special effects. I find this dubious. Looking at the cheap quality of the video especially and the fact that faking something like this is the terrain of motion picture studios with huge budgets, I think it is clear that the guy in the hospital suit is not “some rubber thing.” One problem is that the hospital guy is quite pale, while the jumper is a typical brown-skinned Arab. This is possible if the diver lost a lot of blood.

Another suggestion, perhaps not as odd as it sounds, is that he is already dead on the ER table. The body can make a few involuntary movements after death, there are such things as death rattles, and the breathing is said to have been artificially forced by the tube. But why tube a dead man? And if you look closely, you can see that his tongue is moving, and his chest is going up and down. He appears to be gasping for breath. A funeral director on the Web felt that he was still very much alive. She also said gun suicide injuries never cleave the head so perfectly. Only accidents can do that.

At the end of the day, it really doesn’t matter if the video is “fake” or not, because it isn’t. When we watch a scary Hollywood movie, do we all scream, “Fake!”? Of course not. What matters is if a movie is scary. And this video is downright terrifying.  It’s scary like Saw or Hostel is scary. At the end of the day, that’s all that matters.

There is something really creepy about this video that I can’t quite put a finger on.

From the very amateurish trilingual warning at the beginning (Arabic, French and English, suggesting once again it was made in Lebanon) to the horrible screams after he hits, to the blood-red ocean spreading in a large area around the 20-30 people gathered in the water to help him, to the absolutely terrifying scene in the hospital where the poor kid, incredibly, has a face split clear in two. The labored, terrified breathing of the victim combined with what appears to be a the look of horror on what’s left of his face is something that really stays with you.

Throughout the video, there is some weird, cheesy, hard to describe instrumental music going in the background that for some strange reason that really adds to the fear. This music is actually the soundtrack to a medical show on US TV that may or may not be on anymore. It’s either the soundtrack to ER or Chicago Hope. The amateurish cellphone footage that jumps around jerkily also in some way makes the video even scarier. I think maybe the frightening thing about all this amateurishness of the video is that it makes it seem so real (i.e. – it’s not just a Hollywood movie!)

I was traumatized for several days after watching this thing, and I’ve watched a lot of nasty stuff.

If you think this website is valuable to you, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site.

Alt Left: US/NATO Lies of the Russia-Ukraine War September 4, 2022

Warning: Long, 21 pages.

Russia has suffered 40-70,000 soldiers killed in action and many more wounded. Lie. This is repeated almost verbatim across all of the Western media and not one person has ever questioned it. In fact, the US Defense Department claims that 40,000 Russian troops have been killed. Well, it’s about time we Americans stop listening to anything the Pentagon says because the Pentagon lies like a rug. The 70,000 figure is from the Ukrainian Nazis.

The truth is to be found in two surveys that counted obituaries published in Russian newspapers, and every death will certainly get an obituary. If we average to the two together, we get ~5,300 combat deaths for Russian soldiers in this war. The number of wounded may be up to 3X higher, so there may be 15,000 wounded so far.

Russia has taken more casualties lately, in particular with Ukraine’s large counteroffensive in the South, so the number is now higher. But the figure of 40-70,000 that the Western media is peddling is a flat out lie.

The Ukrainian Nazis have suffered 9,000 soldiers killed in action in this war. Lie. This figure is repeated verbatim by the lying Western media. It is from the Ukrainian government. Not one single media outlet in the West has bothered to challenge that figure! There is no free speech whatsoever in the West! The West may as well be Russia in terms of press freedom.

The truth is that via statements of the Ukrainian government and leaks from the Ukrainian Defense Ministry, Ukraine has definitely lost at least 80,000 soldiers so far, and the true figure may be up to 120,000. Furthermore, a large unknown number have been listed as missing so the Ukrainian government doesn’t have to pay survivors’ benefits to their loved ones! And a fair number have been taken prisoner too.

The number of wounded is generally 3X higher than the KIA figure, so Ukraine has suffered 240-360,000 wounded. This adds up to 400,000 of their original 600,000 man force, which has since been expanded via territorial defense to 1 million. At any rate, this is a staggering figure.

Ukraine’s counteroffensive has been a success. Lie. It is true that the Nazis have taken a few towns, but the cost has been huge. They have lost at least 3,000 men, and the number of wounded is very high, with convoys of ambulances heading to Odessa and Mykolaiv. In general, the offensive has been a massive failure, which is why there is a news blackout on it in Ukraine.

Nevertheless, the Western media is portraying it as a success! Zelensky went ahead with the offensive against the wishes of his generals. The offensive was apparently pushed by the US and UK. Officers of both countries planned the offensive and even wargamed it. It looks like the US and UK pushed this disastrous offensive on Ukraine for some unknown reason, perhaps to keep the weapons sales and supplies flowing.

Russia would not allow the UN nuclear inspectors to visit the Enerhodar nuclear power plant for a long time. Lie. This has been repeated verbatim by all of the Western media without being refuted by one single organ. Actually this is not true.

Russia has been saying that the inspectors could come anytime they wanted to for months now. All of the delays were from the Ukrainian Nazis, including a 3-hour delay for no apparent reason on the way to the site. Furthermore, Ukraine shelled the plant and the city while the inspectors were there!

Russian helicopters circled the city of Enerhodar while the nuclear inspectors were there, firing all over the city in an effort to terrorize the inspectors. Lie. The truth was that the Ukrainian Nazis organized a wild plan to dress up like Russians, raid the nuclear facility while the inspectors were there, take the inspectors hostage, all the while blaming it on the Russians. Of course the lying Western media would have played along all the way.

Special forces, possibly assisted by British SAS commandos, crossed the Dnipro River in barges and made it to the other side of the river. The Russians found them and destroyed most of the group. Casualties were huge. A couple of the barges were sunk in the river. The helicopters people saw flying over the area were attacking these Ukrainian invaders trying to take over the plan.

The word is that this mad plan was cooked up by Boris Johnson, the former Prime Minister of the UK. The commandos were trained in the UK for this purpose. So we can lay the failure of this mad move at the feet of the British. As with so many horrible things in our modern society, it all points back to Downing Street.

The US government cannot figure out if the Russians or the Ukrainian Nazis have been shooting at the plant. Lie. For God’s sake, the Russians are occupying the plant! Why would they be shooting at their own people? Why would they be shooting at an area that they occupy themselves? Come on. Nobody fires on their own troops.

Of course the CIA or even the Pentagon knows that the Ukrainians are shelling the plant in order to create a fake crisis. The US government is just lying and saying they can’t figure it out. The useless lying Western media is all saying “both sides blame each other for the attacks.” They say this every time the Nazis do something horrible because whenever these base acts are revealed, the Ukrainians always say that the Russians did it, not them.

The nuclear plant is at serious risk of a Chernobyl style meltdown, putting all of Europe and to a lesser extent the world at risk. Lie. This is simply a manufactured or fake crisis and every idiot in the West is falling for it like the fools that they are. The truth is that you would have to drop a bomb on that reactor to damage it and even then, the damage would be dubious. You could fly a 747 jet into that reactor and there would be no radiation leak.

The design of the reactor is completely different from the one at Chernobyl, so there is no risk of a Chernobyl-style meltdown. There is a risk that some of the shelling could hit the stored nuclear waste, but even then, the radiation leak would be minor and would at most effect the surrounding city of Enerhodar and possibly the Ukrainian city of Nikopol across the river.

Yet the Ukrainian Nazi government has been delivering iodine tablets and protective gear for radiation to its citizens simply in order to sow needless panic and for no other reason. The lying Western governments and media are playing along with this fake crisis in order to keep Ukraine in the news and to get their citizens behind the effort to support the Nazi government.

This is needed because support for Western aid to the Nazis has dropped in the West. Majorities in France and Italy do not want to arm Ukraine. A majority in Austria opposes sanctions on Russia. Large sections of the population in Spain, Bulgaria, Moldova, and Serbia oppose their government’s siding with the Nazis against Russia.

Prices on many items, especially energy, are skyrocketing upwards, and it is starting to have a very bad effect on businesses in Europe and will soon have a bad effect on consumers. There was recently a rally in Czechia of 70,000 people advocating that their government go neutral on the war.

Russian soldiers castrated a Ukrainian Nazi soldier in a video that was distributed online. Lie. There was quite an uproar about this for a bit, but then it all died down and went away. It turns out that close analysis showed that the soldiers were wearing Ukrainian uniforms, boots, sneakers, and medic gloves. The “Russian soldier” who supposedly castrated the man was identified as a Tuvan soldier, but that was a misidentification.

Of course the video shows the Nazis castrating a Russian POW, which is something they have been doing for a long time now. Many of the separatist troops captured by the Ukrainians during the 8-year war were castrated or came back missing limbs. And a number of Russian soldiers who have been returned as POW’s have been beaten, tortured, and mutilated.

Many have been returned missing digits such as fingers of even limbs. And quite a few have been returned castrated. Of course it figures because they’re Nazis, and Nazis do things like this. The Russian government has put a blackout on this information for fear of stirring up their populations too much.

I suspected there was something fake about this castration video from the start. That’s not the sort of thing that the Russians do. Is it the sort of thing that the Nazis do? Of course! Would you doubt that a Nazi would do such a thing?

Russia shelled a prison holding Azov Battalion Nazi militants in the DPR separatist republic. Lie. The Ukrainian Nazis did it. It’s been conclusively proven. Yet another Nazi false flag in a seemingly endless list of Nazi false flags. Here is what happened. It’s now been proven that this was a Ukrainian shelling.

In fact, it was done with the much-lauded US-delivered HIMAARS artillery system. We know this because parts of HIMAARS shells were found all over the attack site. The West claims that Russia gathered up HIMAARS fragments from the battlefield and scattered them all over the attack site, but that doesn’t pass the smell test.

Why would Ukraine shell their own people who were POW’s of the Russians? The answer is simple. A few days before, Azov prisoners had started testifying on camera about how they had committed atrocities and war crimes on explicit orders from the Ukrainian government and President Zelensky.

So in order to shut them up, Zelensky ordered the prison where Azov was held to be shelled. Real simple. The number of killed and wounded prisoners from this attack was very large.

Russia does false flags all the time in this war. Lie. I’d like to point something out here. The US, the West, and NATO have become the masters of the false flag. They’re the biggest and worst false flaggers around. Who do they false flag for? Oh, only for their buddies like ISIS, Al Qaeda, and the Nazis! That’s what the West is today: ISIS, Al Qaeda, Nazis, and at home, Globohomo and social liberalism to social democracy.

Russia rarely does false flags and hasn’t done one in a while. False flags are the technique of the loser and also of imperialism. The West controls the world’s media which repeats whatever lie the West is putting out at the moment without bothering to ever check if it is true or not.

So as long as you have a media so compliant as the 10

False flags are typically involved a depraved attack and are calculated to arouse outrage against the party that is being falsely accused of the crime. With our 24 hour television media that the West’s eyes are glued to and to which they believe every word out of the presstitutes’ mouths, I think that this is a factor in the increase in false flags nowadays.

Back in the day before 24-7 media bombardment, what good did a false flag do? Just about nothing. I predict that as media becomes more all-encompassing and controlled in the West (and the media in the West is 10

One more thing: notice that all of this wild false flagging is happening everywhere you see the demonic NATO? That’s because NATO is becoming the false flagger par excellance in the world today. If there was ever any reason to hate NATO as the demoniacal alliance of the devils that is, that would fit the bill right there.

However, recently, the West has admitted that false flags exist, but they say that only Russians do them. They’ve claimed that Russians have done all sorts of false flags in this war, but I’ve looked into all of them, and not one accusation is true. The West has also started saying, “Intelligence says that Russia is planning to do some false flags in X location!”

Ok, now whenever you hear that, what that means is that Ukrainian or Western intelligence agencies are planning a bunch of dirty and unacknowledged attacks.

They said this right before the war started, and soon afterwards, Ukrainian Nazi intelligence staged raids in the DNR, bombing a television station, blowing up a gas pipeline, and setting off a car bomb. In addition, the Nazis deliberately shelled Russian territory.

Plus an expeditionary Ukrainian force of armored vehicles invaded Russian territory but was quickly taken out by the Russians. There’s even a video of this incident. The West claimed that all of these were false flags and that the shelling incident was made up.

Also note that shelling in the separatist areas increased by 10X up to 1,500 shells a day in the week before Russia invaded. So you could say that Ukraine started the war right there.

And the deliberate shelling and especially the invasion of Russian territory before the invasion means that the Russian was not unprovoked or a war of aggression and that instead, Ukraine had literally started the war and Russia was just fighting back. So the next time you hear about the “unprovoked Russian invasion of aggression” realize that nothing in that phrase is true.

Russia shelled a train station in Kramatorsk, killing and wounding scores of civilians who were waiting for a train to take them out of the city. Lie. It’s now been conclusively proven that the Ukrainian Nazis shelled this station in order to blame the Russians. Yep, false flag.

They even wrote, “For the children” on the shell to insult the Russians even more as if the Russians would shell a group of civilians and write “For the children” on the shell they used to do it with. How cruel can you get!

The trajectory of the shell has been calculated and everyone at the station said the shell came from Nazi territory. Why would Ukraine shell its own people? Because Ukraine hates those people. 85-9

They live under a brutal Ukrainian occupation and they are arrested or have their cars commandeered at a whim at any time. You can be just driving your car down the street when soldiers pull you over, yank you out of your car, and steal your car. You will never see or own it again.

So to Ukraine, these are enemy civilians. To Russia, these are civilians that support Russia. Why on Earth would Russia shell their own civilian supporters?

Russia bombed the arts theater in Mariupol. Lie. New recordings have come out supposedly of survivors blaming Russia for bombing the theater. However, Russia had reported three days earlier that the Azov Nazis had mined the theater and herded 1,000 citizens in there and were threatening to blow it up. It was taken off the target list because of the risk of harming civilians.

There were no Russian planes in the air over Mariupol at that time and in fact, aircraft were not used in this battle because Russia doesn’t use aircraft and artillery in street fighting due to the risk of harming their own troops. I don’t know why these people are saying Russia bombed them.

After the Nazis blew up the theater, everyone interviewed said that Azov had retreated, blowing up the theater as they left. Video of people leaving the building after the blast is consistent with the mining of the building and a blast at lower levels and not at all with the bombing by an aircraft.

Russia is having serious problems with morale and all sorts of other things such as supply lines, procurement, soldiers disobeying orders, chain of command, on and on. Lies. The Western media has been repeating these things since the first days of the war and I’ve never been able to find any evidence proving them.

It is true that there are some morale problems with the LDPR forces, but those are draftees. Many of the males in the region were simply drafted to fight and many had had little or no combat training. Further, they have taken serious casualties. They have issued videos asking to be rotated out for rest and another one saying that they didn’t want to fight in Kherson outside of their home region.

The Western media reports these problems as “Russian,” but these people are fighting for the LDPR, and Russia has no control over those areas which are now separate countries.

Russia has sentenced some foreign volunteer soldiers who fought for the Ukrainian Nazis to death. Lie. This is not true. They were sentenced to death by the LDPR courts. The LDPR has the death penalty, and Russia got rid of it a while back. Russia has no control over the LDPR and Russia can’t tell them not to give these men the death penalty. They get to do whatever they want.

“Russia” beat and tortured Azov Battalion prisoners at the prison where that was shelled by the Ukrainian Nazis. Lie. It does appear that many of these Nazi prisoners were badly mistreated. But they were mistreated by the LDPR, not by Russia, as the prison is on LDPR territory, not Russian territory. Russia has no control over the LDPR and can’t tell them to treat prisoners well. Russia can only tell her own soldiers to do that.

The majority or vast majority of people in the Zaporozhye and Kherson regions hate Russian occupation and want their areas to be taken over by the Ukrainian Nazis. Lie. The truth is that of all of the areas of Novorussia, support for Russia was lowest in this region. It was higher in Mykolaiv, Odessa, Donetsk, Lugansk, and Kharkiv.

However, I estimate that ~7

In Donetsk and Lugansk, I estimate that 85-9

I don’t have good figures for Mykolaiv, Odessa, or Kharkiv.

At one time, 10

Eight years of nonstop propaganda works wonders. However, the number supporting Russia has now risen and I am sure it is a majority. Beyond that, I can’t give you a figure other than that it’s well known that the city is a hotbed of pro-Russian sentiment. The majority of the people in the villages north of Kharkiv also support Russia, however there is a significant base of Ukrainian support in some towns.

Russia invaded Georgia in 2008. Lie. This one keeps popping up again. When this war started, the entire Western media started ranting that Russia had attacked and invaded Georgia. When things calmed down, rational observers looked at the situation and realized that fascist Georgia had started the war by attacking Russian peacekeepers in South Ossetia. The matter is now settled, although the lying Western media keeps ranting that Russia invaded Georgia and the charge has resurfaced, with most in the West seeing it as gospel.

The Crimean referendum was unfair. Lie. There were observers from many different countries present at the election to make sure they were clean. 9

The lying Estonian Nazi Prime Minister said that Russia had gained territories via aggression in Crimea, the Donbass, and Georgia. Lie. However, the Donbass region consists of two independent countries that have not, or at least not yet, joined Russia. The Georgian region of South Ossetia broke away on its own because they did not want to be part of the Georgian fascist state. Russia had nothing to do with it. South Ossetia is still an independent country. It is not a part of Russia.

The USSR and Germany were allies during WW2. Lie. It’s hard to believe that this one has come back, but it never really went away in the US even though historians debunked it long ago. This nonaggression pact was between two enemies and was done by Stalin in order to buy some time before the inevitable German invasion of the USSR, which Stalin knew the Nazis had been planning since the early 1930’s.

And indeed, Stalin had been planning for it all this time. Keep in mind that the British negotiated three nonaggression pacts with the USSR! Other countries with nonaggression pacts with the Nazis include France, Poland, Finland, and the Baltic states.

Russia committed a massive war crime in Bucha. Lie. This has been debunked endlessly, including by me in a long article. However, recently a French journalist was on the scene right before the “massacre” was unveiled to the public. The area was packed with Western journalists. Ukrainian Nazi trucks were coming in from surrounding cities with dead bodies of civilians. It was not known how the civilians died.

The Nazis unloaded them from trucks and began positioning them on the streets. There is an actual video of the Ukrainians tying ropes to the bodies in order to position them properly on the streets. He said that brand new white armbands were being tied on the bodies and contrast between the old, dirty, and ragged clothing and the brand new armband was striking.

This was being done to intimidate people who had been friendly to the Russian army and had worn a white armband to show they were not hostile. He said that the whole scene was obviously being staged but that all of the Western journalist whores were quite aware of the staged atrocity but were waiting for it to be completed.

Every reporter there then filed a story reporting that Russia had killed those people, even though all of those journalists had seen Ukraine setting up the fake scene. It’s appalling how deeply involved the Western press is down the individual journalist level in these crimes.

In addition, a day or two before, there is video of “Boatman” from the Nazi Kraken Battalion entering Bucha along with SBU officers. One asks if they can kill the people with white armbands and another says, “Go ahead.” You then hear a man scream for mercy and a single shot followed by a dog barking. It’s clear that the Nazis have just executed a civilian for wearing a white armband.

It’s unclear what exactly happened here. The bodies found in “mass graves” have been traced to a burial in the city on March 12th. Videos at the time said the bodies were territorial defense people who had fought against the Russians.

There is also a scene in a basement on video of several people with white armbands lined up against the wall. Blood is flowing from each body. These appear to be people with white armbands executed as “collaborators.” In addition, many of the bodies on the street have blood flowing out of them, often near their heads. So they were shot in the head?

It seems that some of the people in Bucha were territorial defense killed fighting Russians weeks before, others were people with white armbands executed as collaborators, and others were bodies brought in from other towns and staged alongside the road for the media show.

A British newspaper did an analysis of the bodies at Bucha and found that most had died of “flechette” wounds. The paper then blamed Russian artillery for the deaths. But anyone killed in Bucha by artillery was killed by Ukrainian artillery because Russia occupied the city the whole time and Russia doesn’t shell cities that it occupies itself. Also only Ukraine uses artillery with flechettes. Russia has no such artillery.

Polls in Russia are unreliable. Lie. This is not true. The polling is done by Levada out of an American university. It is considered to be good. Levada doesn’t know who they are calling and no one knows who answered Levada’s calls. No Russian has ever been punished for simply stating that they against the war or for participating in any poll about anything. Keep in mind that 2

If Russia beats, jails, tortures, or murders everyone who opposes the war, they will have to beat, jail, torture, or kill 30 million people. Any sign of that happening?

Furthermore, the Kremlin has nothing against polling and could care less how anyone answers any poll. In fact, Putin conducts internal polls of his own population incessantly as he wants to know what the people want and wear their minds are at. This is a president who is doing everything he can to give the people want they want and to remain popular. Dictators don’t do that.

Putin steals elections or Putin has stolen every election he ran in. Lie. Russian elections are observed by many observers from all over the world. No evidence of massive election fraud has ever been found. Even the occasional honest US media outlet acknowledges that Putin has won a majority of the vote every time he ran.

And the results of Russia’s elections line up very well with pre-election polling and polling about the support level for Putin. For instance, in the last election, Putin’s popularity was 7

Putin beats, jails, tortures, and murders all of the opposition. Lie. As you can see, 30 million Russians oppose the war. In the last election, 3

And in fact, the hardcore pro-West opposition ran 13 different candidates against Putin. All together, they got

There have been some curious incidents regarding some opposition figures, but I’m not aware that Putin has killed a single opposition figure or journalist in his entire tenure. Many more journalists were killed under Yeltsin than under Putin. Most of these reporters were killed in the context of the Chechen War.

Russia is finding it hard to come up with enough soldiers for its war. Lie. Keep in mind that Russia began this war with 200,000 soldiers. The Russian Army is made up of 1 million soldiers and 500,000 reserves. The active duty force has just been raised by 133,000 by Putin. To this is added the forces of the LPR (20,000?) and DPR (20,000?), the Chechen National Guard, and the Wagner Group, who are Russian contract soldiers in this war.

Russia’s active duty army is an all-volunteer army. There is a draft and there are conscripts. Conscripts serve for two years, go through basic and extended training and are then free to go. However, many re-up as volunteers, often enticed by good salaries. Russia has added increased salary enticements during this war. In the beginning there were some conscripts fighting in the war, but they were quickly removed.

At any given time, there are 200,000 Russian troops in Ukraine and 800,000 outside of the country. Many of the outside troops have been rotated in over time. In addition, there are 500,000 reserves. Russia may now be using some of its reserves. So including active forces and reserves, Russia has 200,000 men in Ukraine and 1.3 million soldiers outside of Ukraine during this war. Does this sound like an army with a manpower shortage?

How about losses? There have been 5,000 dead and possibly 15,000 wounded in this war. That’s 20,000 casualties out of a 1.5 million man force. Russia has lost only a bit over

One reason Putin does not want to commit more troops to the war is that more troops means more casualties. Also the army is going very slowly not only to conserve civilian lives but also to preserve the lives of its own soldiers. Russia knows that a lot of casualties can quickly turn the population against the war.

It is also for this reason that Russia has relied on the Chechens, the LDPR armies, and the Wagner Group contract soldiers. Casualties among the LDPR and Wagner will presumably not be counted among the Russian military’s war dead.

Russia plans to disconnect the Enerhodar reactor from Ukraine and hook it up to the territories it controls in Kherson, Zaporozhye, and Crimea. Lie. This would leave Nazi Ukraine without 1/3 of its power. However,  this would also be a dangerous move because you would have to shut down the plant to do this. The truth is that Russia has absolutely no plans to do this.

Russia has been shelling the territory of the DPR with artillery. Lie. Why on Earth would Russia shell the territory of its own ally, the DPR? That makes no sense at all. In fact, it is Nazi Ukraine that is doing this, obviously. And they don’t even aim usually. They just shoot at cities and towns willy-nilly. For the most part, they are just aiming at the cities without targeting anything, so these are terror attacks designed to attack civilians only.

And they are using US HIMAARS to do it too. Every week, there are killed and wounded, mostly in the DPR but also to some extent in the LPR, due to this terrorist shelling. If you wonder why they are doing this, well, number one, they’re Nazis, and you do you think this would be too low for Nazis?

Second, the Nazis regard the vast majority of the civilians in the LDPR republics as enemies, traitors, and separatists. Ukraine has no problem with killing enemy civilians, unlike Russia, which goes to great lengths to avoid hitting any civilians, whether allied or enemy.

Russia is shelling Donetsk city using anti-personnel “petal” mines that look like tree leaves. Lie. The Ukrainian Nazis are obviously shelling Donetsk with these mines. These are US mines. Russia and Ukraine both signed a treaty to stop using these terrible mines, and Russia got rid of all of hers, but Ukraine, while destroying most of hers, still had many left over.

This is just pure terrorism. They are shooting these antipersonnel mines at cities full of civilians. It is very easy to step on one of these mines and if you do, you can get a very serious injury to your foot or even lose it. Why shell this city with mines? As I noted earlier, the Nazis hate most people in Donetsk, who they see as enemy civilians and since the Ukrainians are Nazis, they have little problem killing enemy civilians.

Repost: Alt Left: Arabs or Hispanics, Which Do You Pick?

An old post that is still getting comments. I read it over and I rather like it. There were a lot of great comments at the end, too. Interesting concepts anyway.

I pick Hispanics any day.

FG writes: Many are concerned about the demographic and cultural Hispanicization of the US. It’s a big change that surely carries major costs and benefits. Who knows what the future holds? But I have to say that the future of the US seems brighter than that of Europe.

Most Latinos do not fit the traditional American definition of White, but they are a quasi-Western people. From my perspective, that’s preferable to being demographically swamped by Muslims with their affinity for Shariah Law, as is happening with France, Holland, and other Western European states.

I don’t lose a lot of sleep over Hispanicization, but keep in mind that I’m a native Californian who grew up with Mexicans, took Spanish lessons at age 6, was raised on Mexican food, had Mexican-American friends and girlfriends in high school and spent many vacations down in Old Mexico.

If you spend a lot of time around these 2nd generation and up Hispanics (especially the 3rd generation ones), you realize that they are so much like us Whites. For instance, just about every White teen cult has been replicated by Hispanics. There are Mexican bikers, hippies, punks, heavy metalers, skaters, emos, Goths – you name it, they have replicated it.

On the other hand, Blacks have not replicated our cults like this. You don’t see a lot of Black bikers, hippies, punks, heavy metalers, skaters, emos, Goths, etc. It’s like Black people have this totally different culture that’s not like White culture at all.

The only reason that I can think of why these Hispanics are replicating our movements is because they are like us culturally and possibly genetically. Blacks may not be so much like us culturally, and they are not like us genetically.

Last night I spent some time at the local market discussing honor killings with the local Yemeni (born in the US by the way). He defended them, and said that if a married woman cheated on her husband, she had to be put to death! He then said that Islam mandated this. It’s not true, and I argued with him about this, but he didn’t buy it. He also said that if an unmarried woman had sex, 1

Alt Left: Scratch a Liberal, Find a Fascist

Excellent comment by the always great Francis Miville. I never believed the Commies about this line. Recall that the KPD (Communist Party of Germany) called the Social Democrats “social fascists in the 1920’s and 1930’s, but the more I see of “Democratic Party liberal” types in the US (and their more social democratic brethren in the Canadian and Australian Liberal Parties and the Labor Party of the UK), the more I am starting to think they are onto something.

I think it’s all down to capitalist imperialism. Once you become a capitalist imperialist country as all of the West is now, you will try to destroy every bit of communism, socialism, and even liberalism in the Third World.

Why? Because it’s bad for your corporations, which is what your state capitalist imperialism works for. All social democracies now work for their capitalist imperialist corporation which demand low wages and advantageous looting rights in the Third World. Social democracy refuses to make a full break with the corporations which undergirds itself, hence it will always be susceptible to supporting fascism over any threat to from the Left.

On the contrary, Russia, China, and a number of others are not capitalist-imperialist countries. The Russians and Chinese don’t care what kind of economic system you have. They figure they can make money and do all right under any economic system. Furthermore, Russia and China are both based on the socialist theory of solidarity instead of the capitalist theory of imperialism and exploitation.

Also both Russia and China are very much mixed economies. Most people don’t understand that the Russian government has at least a 4

China wants its capitalists to make widgets and do nothing but make widgets. It does not allow its capitalists to control its politics and it has banned them from its media. Shockingly, there are no capitalist or corporate lobbies in China. The capitalists can lobby the party all they want to, but it won’t do a lick of good. They’re not able to bribe the politicians via a US system of money-based elections (which will always be inherently undemocratic), so they have to follow the state and not bark orders at it as they do in the West.

The shitlibs are about the best we could expect any Left to be under US-style capitalism. American socialists have sucked forever. And the notion of “progressive at home, mass exploitation and fascism overseas” is indeed exactly the National Socialism that most Germans thought they were voting for. One could argue that such a “National Socialist” form of political economy is probably the natural and normal outcome under any capitalist-imperialist economy. It ought to be not a theory but a law of political economy. There doesn’t seem to be any way to not end up with this.

Francis Miville: Robert, you are disappointing me a little bit. Haven’t I told you that there hasn’t been any such thing in the US as a left-winger nor even as a humanistic liberal since 1980 and that these are extinct species like the Passenger Pigeon and the Californian Grizzly?

What you call a shitlib is what France up to not so long ago used to call a Muscadin: namely, a young extreme right-winger (named as such for the strong muscade scented-powder they sprayed their nose with all the time not to be infected by the commoners’ stench in the street) of the kind that abstained of one reactionary thing only, wishing for the return of the King, and even then, out of contempt for the common people among whom too many still had nostalgia for the King, and for the King himself who had been way too bleeding-hearted to deserve to have been so rich.

Likewise the only thing reactionary these American Muscadin abstain from is wishing for the Queen of England to take back over the US (though if Trump were to make a comeback, they would consider for their home state to join Canada).

These people are fascists pure and simple. Being in favour of impoverishing puppet dictatorships throughout the world that would guarantee the supply of raw materials and cheap-labour-made goods to their country and for progressive measures at home (and even then, conditionally, only for the “deserving” ones) was in essence the reason for most Nazi Germans to join the Nazi party. All they lack in the US is a Duce to identify with, a kind of Trump that would have hired them as the “best and brightest” instead of firing them.

On the Russian question the American shitlibs as you call them do espouse wholesale the official erstwhile Nazi doctrine regarding Slavs. Even when they are liberals fleeing Putin’s regime mostly in the hope of getting a better computer or scientific job than can be gotten by in Russia, Russians together with most Slavs remain racial inferiors never to be hired but at lower level assembly jobs in the Rust Belt where most of their racial brethren migrated and still live for the most part.

They are bears essentially. Putin’s accusation of Western ideology being Nazi and Ukraine being a country in need of denazification is 10

Up to now a kind of ideological Maginot line of Political Correctness defense bulwarks had been holding against full-brown fascistic ideologies. Now they have found in Ukraine (like they did using Belgium in 1940) a way to work around that line right into the capital. Once you have admitted at last that slave races do exist such as the Slavs and that the reason for them to support evil characters such as Putin are to be searched for in the DNA, your whole ideological Maginot Line is turned around and its defenders made into prisoners in record time.

All the strongholds of left-justified Political Correctness fall at once, with ecology doing the rest. Once you admit one aspect of racism to be legitimate, and one chapter of Nazis in Ukraine are doing a good job for the Jews, you are forced to admit the whole of racism as mainstream and Nazism as a globally positive ideology. I predict that within two years at most the US Democratic Party will have gone back full circle full Jim Crow: demons have been admitted in, and if you admit one regiment of them you admit them all: you will start thinking like a Nazi on every topic.

Repost: Alt Left: The Muslim World Is for the Most Part Virtually Socialist

Another cool old post still getting comments. Most people don’t know this about the Arab and Islamic World, and that’s why idiots keep screwing up. Remember how the (((neoconservatives))) under Paul Bremer dismantled Ba’ath socialism and tried to install US-style neoliberalism or laissez-faire capitalism? Remember how it didn’t work?

These neocon morons didn’t understand one damned thing about Arab and Muslim culture. Odd because they had spent so much time studying it. Instead they were so enamored of getting rid of Saddam Hussein to eliminate an enemy of Israel that they simply brainwashed themselves into believing that a lot of things that they wanted to be true were in fact true.

This is a terrible flaw of human beings. Just because you want it to be true doesn’t mean it is true, dammit! This mindset of people causes untold damage and even deaths all over the world every single year. If you can get rid of this idea in your personal politics, your politics will make a lot more sense. And I think in a lot of other areas of your life, thinking this way can cause quite a few problems. Can you imagine running a business on the basis of “If I want it to be true, it is true”? I can’t think of a worse way to run a business than via delusion.

Semi-feudalism was eliminated in the (Arab) Muslim world at least 60-70 years ago; granted, it existed prior.

It was fairly easy to take out semi-feudalism in the Arab World because it is very hard to justify such a system under Islam. The semi-feudalists had used distorted readings of the Koran to justify their oppression. For instance, the fact that Mohammad said that some are rich and some are poor and that this is a normal thing was given as an excuse for semi-feudalism.

Most Muslims knew intuitively that this excuse didn’t fly well in an Islamic sense, so the new Arab nationalist (mostly socialist) regimes found it easy to dismantle semi-feudalism.

I know that Palestine was semi-feudal in the 1930’s, and Iraq and Egypt were in the 1940’s. Massive land reforms in 1950’s Egypt and Iraq took out semi-feudalism. But it lingered elsewhere. In the early 60’s, your average peasant in Yemen had a picture of Nasser on his wall. Nasser was seen as a great hero of the Arab working and peasant classes.

When the Arab nationalist and socialist Ba’ath Party came into power in Syria and Iraq, one of the first things they did was a land reform. It was easy to do as the semi-feudal system was hard to justify Islamically, and a more equitable or socialist economics was very easy to sell in an Islamic sense.

This is because if you read the Koran, you can see the Mohammad, for all his flaws, was basically a socialist. This is why even hardline Islamist organizations like Hamas are virtually socialist. When the PLO ran Gaza, Hamas ran the social services that should have been but were not run by the state. Now that Hamas is in power, they have a huge social safety net.

Semi-feudalism will be seen as very un-Islamic nowadays, except in the case of Pakistan, where a huge substrate of Indian and Hindu culture virtually neuters whatever socialist advantages Islam may bring.

Repost: On the Phrase “Jerry Rigging” (And a More Racist Equivalent Phrase)

This is kind of a cool old post. It seems racist but I don’t think it’s racist at all. In fact it is a paean to the adaptability of Black people. And if Black people are anything, they’re adaptive!

Polar Bear: There’s such a thing as Black stability. I went to college with a postal worker and had multiple black coworkers that remind me of the same black guy. Simple men that were easy to get along with.

More like Black practicality to me rather than stability. But practicality itself is rather stabilizing, no? Black people are pragmatic. They have common sense. That’s one thing I really like about Black people.

You know that phrase called jerry-rigging? Well, another name for that is nigger-rigging. I know, racist. But people around me (My peers, not my parents and their friends – are you kidding?!) have been using that word in my presence my whole life in reference to their own actions, so I’m not even sure if it’s an insult. “I nigger-rigged it,” says my White friend about how he did a half-assed, cheap, and temporary fix to a problem.

Is it really a racist insult? A White person says he nigger-rigged something. Ok? That means…what? It means he’s acting like a nigger, right? That’s why I’m not even sure it’s all that racist. It’s sort of Whites calling themselves niggers, which doesn’t seem all that racist. Why would a White man call himself a nigger? And why would it be racist if a White man called himself a nigger? He’d only say that in a complimentary way, wouldn’t he? How is it racist for Whites to call each other niggers? That doesn’t make sense. Nigger is only an insult if you call a Black person a nigger. If you call a White person a nigger, it doesn’t even make sense!

Incidentally, we Whites do call ourselves and each other niggers. It’s a lot more acceptable than calling Black people that word.

It’s like straight guys calling each other fags, which is a lot more common nowadays than calling gay men that. How is that hatred of gays? I just called my friend a fag as a joke. That means I hate gay guys? Come on.

Anyway, back to the subject.

Even people who almost never called Black people niggers would use that phrase nigger-rigging.

“How did you fix it?”

“Oh, I just kinda nigger-rigged it. It’s good for now at least anyway.”

Usually chuckles follow because that word is always sort of funny for some reason.

To nigger-rig or to jerry-rig (let’s switch to jerry-rigging – enough with uncomfortable words) something means a cheap, adaptive, half-assed, yet workable and ultimately ingenious sort of a half-fix that is “good for now” but is not a long-term solution for the problem. It’s just a cheap, temporary fix.

It’s not a half-assed fix because you are lazy. It’s half-assed because you don’t have the materials or money on hand to fix it properly. But it’s a temporary fix that “works for now.” There is also a hint of ingenuity, inventiveness, cleverness, and adaptability in it. Which is why, despite the racism, the phrase is ultimately a compliment to Blacks.

Black people perhaps historically being often short on the money and materials needed to do a proper fix of something would then master the art of jerry-rigging (hence the version with the slur) not out of laziness but out of the necessity of the moment. Necessity being the mother of invention after all. Why do it? Because you don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good, that’s why.

What I like about the idea of associating Blacks with jerry-rigging is that it suggests that Blacks are inventive, clever, adaptive, and ingenious (in a practical, not world-class inventor) way. And if you know Black people well, you know that is indeed a characteristic of them. Jerry-rigging isn’t good for long-term fixes. What’s it good for? Short-term fixes which are needed for…what? How about survival?

Black people know how to survive. I’ll give them that.

Alt Left: Repost: Microsoft – A Debacle for Humanity: How One Corporation Caused Untold Damage to the World Economy, Cost Society Untold $Billions, Severely Damaged Human Productivity, and Even Significantly Set Back Human Progress

An old post that is still getting comments. I stand by what I wrote here. I’m now on Windows 10, but it still has the same old problems. It’s odd how defensive people are about this garbage operating system. Of course, Windows developers all insist that it’s the bee’s knees. People who sell computers and put Windows on them all insist it’s great. Of course, Windows is what’s filling their wallets, so of course they think it’s wonderful.

All of what I wrote here is still true, and things haven’t gotten much better. Linux still has a small presence on the desktop. Microsoft bought Skype (so of course Skype fails with my new install). People don’t understand how monopolies work and why they are crap. People don’t understand that no matter how good any of Microsoft’s competitors were, none of them ever stood a chance. These concepts are too complex for most people.

Microsoft was and is still an abusive monopoly which ripped off society for billions of dollars, caused vast losses to the world economy, and even set back technological progress for all of mankind by a significant amount. You had to buy Microsoft Windows, and Microsoft Windows was always a piece of crap.

Think of how much this worthless to lousy to dysfunctional OS cost consumers, business, and society due to its crappy nature. You are always hearing that “the system is down” right, whenever you go anywhere? The ATM is down half the time you go there. Call random businesses and 10-2

Windows’ endless dysfunction and crashing caused a tremendous amount of damage to the US military who moronically decided to use Windows all through our country’s fighting forces for just about everything. Great. A computer-based military where the system always crashes. I’m sure they’re going to win every war they fight.

Basically, all of humanity was forced to use a glaringly obviously inferior product for all of its computing needs. This inferior product had constant problems which drove a spike through the heart of productivity at the individual, business, nonprofit, and government level. All of humanity was using inferior computer systems that barely worked and failed all the time.

All of this time, there were much superior systems out there which could have beaten Windows if they only had a chance. Amiga OS was always one of finest ever developed. BeOS was an outstanding OS, amazingly great. OS/2 was an out of the world OS. All of these OS’s were fantastic at multitasking and even multithreading. People routinely ran up to 80 applications at a time on OS/2 with little or no slowdown. BeOS was about that good and may have even been faster. But with a monopoly on the desktop where everyone was forced to use Windows, all of these other OS’s died a sad death.

Unix has long ruled at the university and corporate level, and much of the Net runs of Unix. Larger server systems have always run on Unix at the level of the large enterprise, be it government, corporate, or nonprofit. But Unix has never really broken in on the desktop where Windows still reigns. Windows is much better now than it was in the Windows 95 era (Remember how horrible that OS was?). I am currently running Windows 7, which is the best Windows I ever run, but it’s still crap. It suffers from unfixable file corruption and sometimes needs a hard reboot or goes down altogether.

Unix on the other hand is virtually uncrashable. It is very hard to take down a Unix system. They are nearly resistant to crashing. File corruption is virtually nonexistent on Unix because of Journaling File Systems and text files instead the idiotic and flawed Registry of Windows. The Registry is so flawed that it can probably never be fixed. As long as the Registry exists, Windows will continue to be slow, hog memory and hard drive, be awful at multitasking, crash your applications, suffer irreparable file corruption, and go down hard and need hard reboots.

Mac OS is an excellent OS now that it runs on a Unix core. Mac OS is almost uncrashable now, and it never or almost never needs to be reinstalled. Plug and Play is as easy as plugging in any electronic device in your house, whereas Windows plug and play has always been horrible, and it still is here at Windows 7. Windows also harmed the world economy by forcing us to shell out untold billions for OS’s, word processors, browsers, databases, spreadsheets, and presentation programs.

Microsoft of course leveraged its OS monopoly to create browser, database, spreadsheet, and presentation monopolies. All of these products were quite expensive. In the process, many excellent word processors (remember Wordperfect 5.1?), spreadsheets, databases, and presentation products were all destroyed. It didn’t matter how good they were. It didn’t matter if they were better or even vastly better than their Microsoft competitors (Access was always junk) because due to the OS monopoly, none of the competitors in this other software stood a chance.

The truth is that all of this stuff could have been had for free all along. Linux is free and open source, and that is one of the reasons why it is so great. Firefox and Opera are also free now, and Firefox is also open source and has been taken over by Sun. Free online email programs like Gmail have cut significantly into the market share of Outlook Express (always awful – Eudora was so much better) and Outlook.

Open Office, now taken over by Sun, is free and is starting to give Word, Access, Excel, and Powerpoint a run for their money. I use Word Writer all the time, and it’s just as good as Word by now. If the world moves to free browsers, OS’s, word processors, chat software (Skype), spreadsheets, databases, and presentation software, think of how much money can be saved at the individual, business, nonprofit, education, and government level! It will be a great step forward for humanity.

There is no way for Microsoft to compete with a free product of course, so we will hopefully begin to slowly destroy this diabolical corporation, one of the worst ones that ever existed.

Repost: My Latest Cholesterol Reading = 156

An old post that’s getting new comments. A commenter noted that it was hilarious, and it is actually pretty funny now that I reread it.

Well, I must say, it’s never been that low in my life!

At one time it was over 200, and I was put on cholesterol-lowering medication called Zocor. I’ve had a great experience with this drug. My last reading was around 190 or so, but the 156 number just blew me away. I’m not sure what’s going on. I’m cooking for myself all the time, I rarely eat out, don’t eat any fast food, eat little if any junk food or sweets and in general I eat only one meal a day (dinner).

People who know me well keep insisting that I’m going to die since “I don’t eat,” but that’s more observational than factual. Anyway, the thinnest lab rats live the longest and caloric restriction of lab rats doubled life expectancy. Sort of the like the revenge of the Skinny Beach Guy in the Charles Atlas ads (bit of time-worn Americana here for you extra-North Americans).

My caloric intake is somewhere around 1,700 calories a day, or possibly a bit more or less. Consider that your average American consumes an incredible 3,800 calories a day.

I don’t exercise that much, but I rode 35 minutes on my exercise bike last night.

My diet is excellent. I’ve nearly cut out dairy. For my cereal, I use soy milk. I eat lots and lots of fiber, because I have diverticulosis, but fiber may lower cholesterol too. And when I’m doing great, I go on long fasts where I more or less consume nothing but fruit juice, vegetable juice, coffee and wine (the last two being necessary for life). People say I look 5-10 years younger than I am.

I doing all of this mostly for a shitty reason: I’m somewhat narcissistic, and like all narcissists, aging is tough. As the Buddhists say, when you bet on the body, you bet on a losing horse. All of us narcissist types are doubling down on that loser mare. She’s nobody’s pick, and all the tip sheets say avoid, but we keep plunking it all down anyway, results be damned. We know it’s nuts but we can’t help ourselves. In our heart of hearts, we’re all 22 years old for the rest of our lives.

The even more shitty reason I do this is so I can get young chicks! LOL, I know, quit laughing. At my age, with each passing year, the young women look at you less and less. For us narcissists, this is quite a blow, especially those of us who won Player of the Year a few years straight when we were young.

Anyway, narcissistic delusions, to the extent that they foster health, are a good thing. There are people my age who look terrible and are near death. I know people my age who are falling, breaking bones, in wheelchairs or on canes, unable to work or do much of anything. Some are on oxygen tanks. About nine years ago, friends my age started dying. Some were really overweight, most were heavy drinkers or dopers, some were both, and a few lived well and crapped out at the Dice Table of Life.

I’m 52, and 2

With each new year, droop dick disease strikes more and more of my brothers. The best way to keep a stiff upper dick is a good diet, good weight, blood pressure and cholesterol control and even exercise. Overweight, diabetes, hypertension, high cholesterol, inactivity are bad for your arteries, and your dick’s all about the arteries and the blood flow. Traffic jams or roadblocks on Dick Highway turn the essence of all of your manhood – the one root power – into a Robert LindsayPosted on Categories Uncategorized3 Comments on Repost: My Latest Cholesterol Reading = 156

Game/PUA: Commenter on the Psychopathic Women Type or “The Whore”

CLAVDIVS AMERICANVS: The Borderline or Histrionic Personality Disordered women, aka psychowhores, are the best and worst to have a relationship with. I think they survive for evolutionary reason to give emotional highs to Alphas that can handle them. And then they get their wedlock bastards financially supported by Betas.

I love dating these cunts. Well, for a few weeks then they drain your soul, and you must dump them. Sort of like if you have a hangover so bad that you can’t drink until next weekend. But like alcohol, heroin, or cocaine, occasional use if you can handle it only makes life more fun. Those that can’t handle the drugs (Betas) either OD or become hooked for life (married) and have the life sucked out of them by the drugs (psychowhores).

A toast to these cunts!

If you think about it, these skanks reproduce quite easily since they sleep around a lot. Alas, wide-spread abortion may make this subspecies of whore go extinct! Another reason to be pro-life (or pro-choice depending on how you feel). Are there any studies comparing the fertility of borderline, histrionic or psychopathic women to other women?

Are there any studies comparing the fertility of borderline, histrionic or psychopathic women to other women?

This is an excellent question! I’d love to see a study on it. On the downside, they might kill their men or even their children, so that’s not adaptive at all. Even more of a problem is that these psychobitches are the most likely women of all to be beaten and even killed by their men for obvious reasons. I call much of these women’s behavior, “Trying to get murdered.” I never took them up on the offer, but a lot of men are less cowardly and more aggressive than I am, and they may well accept the offer with gusto.

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)