Alt Left: Nazi Girl, Hero of the Nazi-Loving West

In the midst of what I believe is a fake battle scene, a hot young woman, fashionably dressed, walks onto the scene with a Kalashnikov. People all over the West, including countless liberals and Leftists, are falling all over themselves praising this brave woman to the skies. No doubt the Nazi-supporting Western feminist movement will make a hero of her, a feminist hero.

Problem? She’s a Nazi!

Above, the West’s hero, the Nazi girl.

America’s Nazi heroine!

Nothing like a badass Nazi chick do get Americans drooling!

Note the Nazi patch on her shoulder.

This is her. I told you she’s a Nazi. Keep cheering for your Nazi girl hero, Americans!

This woman is named Vita Zaveruha “The Nazi Pussy Riot Girl”, a Nazi who murdered two policemen during a robbery, attacked LGBT people, and participated in burning alive 46 Communists and the injury of 200 others in the Trade Union building in Odessa in 2014. She’s a real piece of work.

The Nazi-loving Westerners are falling all over themselves saying that the photos are not of the same woman. However, if you check Vita’s Instragram, she’s been posting photos for weeks now of her serving in the exact same battalion featured in that video.

Check out how many Western liberals and Leftists can’t get enough of their LGBT pets, non-Whites, and women who are so superior to us boring hets, evil men, and born-evil Whites. And here these clowns are, cheering for literal Nazis!

Cultural Left Freakshow + open borders and unlimited immigration + hatred for Whites, men, straights, and cis people + worship of non-Whites, women, gays and lesbians and trannies + support for Nazis + US imperialism + ravenous warmongering + attacks on all Left countries in the Third World = support for Third World fascists + killing antifascists. That’s the modern Western Left in a nutshell. The Green Party in the West is like this almost everywhere.

Here’s the typical liberal Democrat (and also an increasing portion of the actual Western Left:

  • Low wages and gay pride parades!
  • Fascists death squads and transsexual bathhouses for all ages!
  • Deregulation and critical race theory!
  • Bicycles and homosexuals!
  • Open borders and $800 billion defense budgets!
  • Treehugging and theft of countries foreign reserves!
  • NATO and non-binary people!
  • Sanctions and gay and tranny sex ed for third graders!
  • Third world fascism and drag queen story hour!
  • Unaffordable rents and transvestite singers!
  • Nazis and mandatory homosexuality!
  • Union-busting and radical feminism!

Western liberalism and the Western “Left” literally combines the worst of the Left combine with the worst of the Right. Hell, Republicans are better than these idiots. Republicans only offer up the worst of the Right! That’s only half the shit sandwich.

Also, the video appears to be staged. I’m aware of the circumstances around the shooting of this video. This is from a couple of videos put out by Nazi-supporting American volunteers who enlisted in the Ukrainian Army to fight the Russian Antifascist Army. The RFA invaded Ukraine to try to wipe out the Nazi investigation that had infected the land. The entire West united against the antifascists in wild, ecstatic support of the Nazis.

Keep in mind that the King of the UK was a Nazi. He was forced to resign in 1936 due to his Nazi leanings. Churchill himself supported the Nazis until they attacked the UK. Many US corporations supported the Nazi regime in Germany. (((Time Magazine))) put Hitler on the cover in 1939 as Man of the Year. The (((New York Times))) lauded Hitler all through the 1930’s. The Zionist movement supported Hitler all through the 1930’s and even worked with him sometimes. They liked the fact that he was persecuting and even killing Jews in Germany because to them that would make more Jews flee Europe for Palestine. The more persecution of Jews in Europe the better according to the Zionists, as more persecution just meant more Jews heading to Palestine.

The Zionists support for Hitler is obviously the usual amoral Machiavellianism characteristic of these people. All that matters to them is getting what they want. How you get what you want doesn’t matter. All that matters is that you get it; the means are not important. They’ll do anything or ally with anyone, even genocidal antisemites like Nazis and ISIS/Al Qaeda if it helps them get what they want. No morals, no values, no rules, all lying, cheating and stealing allowed when it comes to getting what they want.

I would add that Jewish Machiavellianism is generally limited to matters of the Jews themselves or possibly to power and money. Most sleazy Jewish Machiavellianism comes down to Jewish paranoia and attempts to protect the Jews. Basically whatever it takes, lying, cheating, stealing, no rules fighting, no limits warfare, when it comes to “protecting the Jews.” Problem is they are paranoid and see enemies everywhere, including under their bed and in their closet, so this protective behavior becomes rather all-encompassing.

Whether Jews as a people are Machiavellian in general outside protecting the group, I’m not sure. Obviously quite a few are. But a lot aren’t. I’ve known a lot of Jews who were the most honest people you’d ever meet. I used to say that I could take $100,000 and drive over to their house and ask them to hold it for me and I would come back in three months and pay them $10,000 for the privilege as long as I assured you that they were not doing anything illegal. Not only would they do it but they wouldn’t ask me where I got it as most nosy goody-good Gentiles would. I could come back in three months, and they would give me back the whole thing, not missing $1, or even a dime, a nickel, or a penny. Actually there were a number of Jews who I would say that about.

Anyway it wasn’t just Jews who supported Hitler, and when he started killing them, very if any of them kept supporting him. Generally support for Nazism was common across the West, particularly among the rich and upper middle class. This was the case in the UK and Sweden, I know that for sure.

I keep leaving out the Finns because I suspected they were Nazis but I was never sure. And sure enough, there was extreme support for Nazism in Finland during WW2, just as much as in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Ukraine. I believe their Nazis are still heroes to this day. I never thought much of the Finns anyway. Their name sounds like a fish, and they always seemed like they were Finnish before they even started.

Apparently Finnish Nazis are still very prevalent. They’re all over the Ukrainian War threads cheering on their Nazi brethren.

By the way, the Ukrainian Rada passed a law giving amnesty to all of the murderers who participated in that attack. It was never reported correctly in the US press, who reported it as some sort of Right versus Left battle. Of course, as always, the US media was supporting the Right, not the Left.

The UK and the US both strongly supported the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union at least at the start. Their secret hope was that Hitler would wipe out Stalin’s USSR from the map.

The reason the West supported Hitler for so long was not because the West was evil but because the West has always supported every fascist government that came into existence. Fascists and rightwing dicatorships are loved by capitalists because they are great for business and keep the Left down. Fascists and Nazis are also loved by the West because nobody hated Communists more than they did. And they were the greatest Communist-fighters and Communist-killers the world had ever seen.

So it was more of a covergence of interests than an actual ideological connection. The world of geopolitics is full of all sorts of sleazy marriages of convenience like this.

I saw this and another video that seems to go together with it. The man who walks into the frame is, I believe, one of the US volunteers. He and another American man are seen in another video in what looks like this same area standing in front of a burning armored weapon saying they just killed a Russian tank. Problem is that’s not a tank, and it’s not even Russian. The burning vehicle is Ukrainian. If that burning vehicle is Ukrainian, I am thinking all the rest of these videos are too.

Here’s the American volunteer who claims they took out five Russian tanks, but in a video in the same area, he is standing in front of a burned Ukrainian vehicle.

Keep supporting your Nazi girls, Americans!

Please follow and like us:
error3
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

12 thoughts on “Alt Left: Nazi Girl, Hero of the Nazi-Loving West”

  1. Dear Bob, I tend to agree with you on many things, including the war in the Ukraine.

    Just one little comment. You said “Fascists and Nazis are also loved by the West because nobody hated Communists more than they did. And they were the greatest Communist-fighters and Communist-killers the world had ever seen.”

    That’s exaggerated. The “greatest Communist-killers the world has ever seen” are the Communist themselves, undoubtedly, from Stalin to Pol Pot through Mao Zedong. Many of their dozens of millions of victims were Communists.

    1. LOL so did the US and the West hire Stalin, Pol Pot, and Mao to kill Communists and wage war on and destroy World Communism? Get real, man. The West needed a force to fight Communists on their home turf and to keep it from spreading to other places. Fascists were the best Communist fighters and killers of all. They fought Communism everywhere on Earth for many decades. The Nazis were first and foremost anti-Communists. Their project was the “extermination of Bolshevism.”

      Did the enemies of the USSR hire Stalin to kill Communists, wage war on the USSR, and destroy the USSR?

      Did the enemies of Maoist China hire Mao to wage war on China and destroy Communism in China?

      Did the enemies of the Khmer Rogue hire the Khmer Rogue to exterminate Communism in Cambodia?

      I appreciate the compliment, but I think your politics might need a bit of work. We all got brainwashed to hate Communism by the Cold War. You’ve obviously been affected. I have tried to resist and my politics makes a lot more sense now.

      1. I was not saying that fascists love Communists, just that the biggest Communist-killers in history have been other Communists. But I did not count them myself, so they may only be *some of* the biggest Communist-killers if you prefer. A

        And Communists also have been among the biggest Fascist-killers, so perhaps one should discount a Communist killed for every two fascists killed, I dunno.

        Regarding my brainwashing, I know it will seem weird in the US, but it was precisely more Communist than not, which used to be a rather common story in post-WWII France because many Résistants betrayed by the Allies – 600 hundred dead in the Vercors only, all bonafide Gaullist FFIs (Forces Françaises de L’intérieur), abandoned without arms nor ammo to the Nazi assault troops, many of them Ukrainian, so the story goes (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Vercors) – turned to Uncle Joe Stalin, and raised their children, including your servant, in more or less orthodox Marxism.

        It took me quite a few rinse-repeat cycles to get out this other machine, not without some damage done to the packaging.

        Again, this is not to deny the regular anti-Communist brainwashing, of course.

        1. I was not saying that Fascists love Communists, just that the biggest Communist-killers in history have been other Communists.

          Yeah but that doesn’t count and it doesn’t matter. It’s really irrelevant. The reason that fascists and Nazis were so favored by Western capitalists is that no one was better at fighting and killing Commmunists and fighting Communism than fascists and Nazis.

          What’s the point of pointing out your comment? I would say that the biggest killers of capitalists have been other capitalists. Most people are probably killed by their own state, not in some foreign war.

          Yes, Communists have been some of the biggest fighters of fascism ever, in fact, they’re pretty much the only group that has fought against fascism.

          Yeah ok, but you sound like a reactionary. We are talking about who were the best fighters against Communism. The West was interested in people waging war against Communist states and fighting, imprisoning, killing, etc. Communists in non-Communist countries. The West could care less how many Stalin or Mao or Pol Pot killed because that did nothing in the war against Communism.

          Also your case is dubious.

          Stalin killed 2.5 million in peacetime.
          Hitler killed 27 million Russians.

          Mao killed a few people but I’d gather that the Nationalists killed more.

          Don’t fall into petty anti-Communist silliness. It’s ridiculous. It’s simple to oppose Communism in all sorts of ways without falling into the trap of the anti-Communist fanatic.

          A famous Russian said, “The only thing worse than Communists are anti-Communists.”

          I’d add, “The only thing worse than Super Jews are hardcore conspiratorial antisemites.”

          I like DeGaulle by the way. A real French nationalist and a neutralist who refused to be controlled by anyone. The French have been poodles ever since. Chirac was the last independent neutralist French president. The last two have been horrible. I’d honestly rather have Marie Le Pen!

          What is public opinion like on the French street about this war? How many support Russia? I’m thinking only a few.

          1. “Mao killed a few people”

            Well, by Chinese demographic metrics perhaps, but the Great Leap Forward is variously estimated to have sent to their ancestors between 30 and 50 million people, mostly by starvation. True, none of them died “as a Communist” per se, only as a human being. Apparently it doesn’t count on the final bill?

          2. Well, there were some deaths during the Great Leap, maybe 15 million. But if you out into the countryside, you will find nothing but praise for Mao. And those are hardly deliberate murders, so it’s dubious that they should be called homicides. Famines happen. And in every year of the Great Leap but one, the death rate was lower than it was in 1949. So, yes, people were dying, but many more were dying before. That is, every year after 1949, Mao’s China was saving lives. Even when people were dying, he was saving lives. In fact, Mao saved more lives and lengthened life expectancy more than any other man before or since. He set a record by doubling life expectancy in the shortest period of time.

            If the death rate is lower (fewer people are dying), it doesn’t particularly matter what deaths are happening. All that matters is that the state has lowered the death rate and fewer people are dying than before. That’s why if you go out into the countryside and meet older people who lived through that period, you find nothing but praise.

            India and China had the exact same statistics in 1949. By 1979, there had been 200 million excess deaths in India as compared to China. Every year 4 million excess people were dying in India who would not have died if they went the Chinese way. So you can argue that Mao saved 200 million lives and by lenghtening life expectancy

          1. My politics are rather shabby, if not bare-naked. Don’t even really know who I’m going to vote next Sunday. If I vote at all. Blank, perhaps. Or not.

            In the same vein as your Soviet saying, there’s that (also Soviet) one: “Capitalism is the exploitation of man by man. Communism is the exact reverse.”

            Or, two old friends meet on the Nevsky Prospekt.

            “Wow, that’s you, Ivan! How long didn’t we meet?

            — Twenty years, Nikolay.

            — Where have you been all this time?

            — In the Kolyma Gulag.

            — What had you done?

            — Well, nothing.

            — You liar! Those who haven’t done anything get only ten years!”

            Frankly, I’m desperate. The third chimp did wonderful things, but he’s spent his time I think. Will either disappear or transition to transchimpism. Might well miss the latter by a few seconds, not sure if it would be a pity.

          2. In the same vein as your Soviet saying, there’s that (also Soviet) one: “Capitalism is the exploitation of man by man. Communism is the exact reverse.”

            Yeah, I don’t agree with that at all. Communism isn’t the exploitation of one man by another at all. It’s the complete opposite of that. On the other hand, the problem seems to be that although it is morally correct, it just doesn’t work very well. So maybe we have to go with the more immoral system of interhuman exploitation.

            You turned into a rightwing anti-Communist. What the Hell happened?

  2. The SA were more blue collar but the elitist SS replaced them, right?

    LOL, you nailed the Western Left.

    Most Ukraine nationalists here seem to be Normie Leftists.

    I believe Finns did good in battle during WWII. Maybe they don’t want to let go of that repute.

    The East of Europe seems more like “fuck your neighbor” instead of “love your neighbor”. Maybe more romantic about themselves and no romance towards the nearest countries. We are Aryan Gods but our neighbors are Mongols, Turks, Gypsies, etc.

    A comedian has noted this about Africa.

    It may be more complex in the West, a French or English may be romantic about a neighbor. German philosophers believe they are one with Persians. I really like Leftist Arab women, really attractive without the bullshit brainwashing Western cunts have, nor hiding under the hijab. Pretty women justify everything: look at all the pretty Israeli soldier girls threads. That’s where we’ve seen this before. I think the devil even took the form of a woman at times.

    1. (reply to Rob Lindsay above, his last post lacks the “reply” button)

      “What the Hell happened?”

      History happened, simple as that. You nailed it yourself, even if rather euphemistically: “Although it is morally correct, it just doesn’t work very well.” If you don’t grab power by violence, they will crush you a thousand ways. If you grab it by violence, the most violent and evil elements on your side will take it for their own sake, and will crush you again. Think Stalin, (your beloved?!) Mao, Pol Pot, even the Castro Bros, though to a somewhat lesser degree it seems.

      Witness also Algeria, for instance, where the most corrupt and brutal elements of the Front de Libération Nationale (FLN) seized power shortly after independence and are still clinging to it after nearly sixty years. In the meantime they did not even hesitate to wage a savage “civil” war in the 90’s against their own population, killing over 200,000 people often in the most barbarous fashion (look for Bentalha massacre), and today are still busy killing the Kabyle minority even though Kabyles were at the forefront of the Independence War and paid a heavy price for that.

      Disgusting.

      However, it is quite unrealistic to dub me “a rightwing anti-Communist.”

      I certainly turned conservative in the sense that I regret the time when children could play in the street without fearing to be kidnapped for their organs or worse or simply overrun by a stoned teen doing rear-wheeling with his motorbike, when cows grazed in the meadows watched by a boy or girl with the family shepherd dog, and when unions were meant to defend the right of hard-working people to live decently instead of having turned to corrupt bureaucracies defending the right of a minority to work as little as possible.

      Nothing more.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)