Alt Left: Repost: Down with Colin Flaherty

This is a nice old post about Colin Flaherty. I like it and I think it’s worth a repost.

The problem is that Colin Flaherty’s whole shtick is that he is not racist at all in any way whatsoever! No, really. That’s exactly what he says. And that’s how he comes across, endlessly, in article after article and video after video. And that is exactly why this man is so dangerous.

Mr. Flaherty is a journalist and a good one at that. But in his middle age, he has decided to branch out into the area of Black crime, except that his focus has a twist – it’s all about Black crime against Whites. The subtext of every Flaherty article or video is that Black people are deliberately singling out Whites to attack as hunters single out prey. Nothing could be more nonsensical. Blacks do not preferentially prey on Whites. It’s nonsense.

8

The principal one was symbolized by the noted theory of Le Griffe du Lion, a very racist White professor of…get this…sociology! He did some fancy mathematics showing that Black people mostly see other Black people all day long and don’t see many White people. So of course they prey mostly on their own kind. That’s who they are around all the time! If Blacks were around Whites just as much as they were around Blacks, their propensity to hunt Whites preferentially as a predator hunts its prey (Le Griffe’s exact words) would come out.

But the other side can play that game too. There are 6X more Whites than Blacks. If Blacks displayed no preference at all in victims, they would kill 6X more Whites than Blacks, right? This argument spouts the rejoinder, “But they are only around their own kind all day…” which is probably a tautology and is certainly not falsifiable, so it fails as theory on its face.

Flaherty wrote a book called White Girl Bleed a Lot. It’s all about Black crime against Whites. Yes, Blacks commit some very bad crimes against Whites. But they commit just as bad or worse crimes against their own kind. So only writing about Black crime against Whites is lying in a sense, and worse, you are selling a form of poison to the masses. Racist poison. A really nasty racist poison.

Because nothing drives Whites up the wall more than the idea that Blacks preferentially prey on them as victims. Some of these theorists even go as far as to say that Blacks are waging a low-level guerrilla war against Whites. Oh, what nonsense.

If you study ethnic conflicts all over the world, one of the things that sets off massacres and ethnic cleansings is the notion that Group B, the out-group or the other guys, is trying to kill us, Group A.

Hitler set off the genocide by saying the Jews were trying to exterminate Germans.

The Rwandan genocide was set off in the same way.

The Sunni-Shia wars start off in exactly the same way. ISIS propaganda goes to great lengths to show how the Shia are preferentially singling out and slaughtering the Sunni. “They’re trying to kill us all,” is the message.

This was the line that the Young Turks used to kill 1.7 million Armenians. “The Armenians were starting a war against the Turks, and they were trying to kill all the Turks.”

The genocide against Muslims in Bosnia was set off by Serbian lies that “The Muslims were trying to kill the Serbs.”

Even the anti-Communist slaughters of the last century which the US fully participated in, each and every one of them, were all predicated on the idea that the Communist killers were going to seize power and kill lots of people. Hitler justified his genocide against the Jews by saying that they were Communists and that the Communists were mass murderers who were “killing millions of Christians” in the Ukraine. Yes, the fake Holodomor, the terror famine that never even happened, was used as a pretext for the Holocaust.

Remember that the next time any of you wants to rant about “Stalin’s terror famine.” Every time you say that, you are repeating Nazi propaganda. Does it make you feel good to parrot Hitler?

Many of the massacres of Indians were predicated on the notion that the Indians “were coming to kill us all.” In the original wording of the Declaration of Independence, there is language about how savage the Indians fought, knowing none of the rules of decency in wartime. “They’re savages, so we need to kill them all.” See how that works?

In Indonesia in 1965, there was supposedly a Communist coup to take over the government. All the world’s media reported it exactly that way. Except that it never happened. There was a fake Communist coup to take over the government. “The Communists tried to take over, and they are going to kill millions of people” lie was then used as an excuse to kill 1 million Communists all over Indonesia in only a few months. Most were hacked to death with machetes. Islamic fundamentalists were used by the US and Indonesia in this slaughter. Remind you of anything? Afghanistan, anyone?

The CIA was on the scene immediately and they supplied the new government with lists of known Communists. These lists were then used to single out people for killing. The US media then lied about the whole affair, with the execrable New York Times leading the charge. Later there was an attempt to bury this mass slaughter as “unfortunate but necessary and a good idea in the long run.”

It was only years or even decades later that we learned the truth about the fake coup and the mass slaughter. The Left was devastated in Indonesia and has remained in a meager state to this day. Obviously people in Indonesia have gotten the message about what happens to Leftists, which is always the general message of anti-Communist slaughters.

Hence it follows that once White people get it in their heads that “the Blacks are trying to kill us,” we can set ourselves up for some serious persecutions of Blacks based on that narrative. I doubt if we will start massacring Blacks, but “the Blacks are trying to rape and kill Whites” was always the excuse for lynchings and Jim Crow.

It’s an ugly narrative, and it’s a lie.

I could write articles about this sort of thing too, you know. I see articles all the time about Black people acting terrible, killing each other, killing White people, you name it. 9

Yes, we know that Black men kill many White people – but they kill far more Black people, and by and large, they prey mostly on their own kind.

Looking at the larger picture, Black criminals simply prey on other humans. They rob, rape, and kill Hispanics, Asians, Whites and Blacks. They attack everyone. They are not real particular.

And the evidence shows that if anything, they by far preferentially select their own kind for violence, and they preferentially select against White victims. So if anything, Blacks prefer to prey on their own kind and it looks like Blacks actively avoid preying on Whites. If that’s the reality, then it’s quite a poisonous stew to cook up to sell the lie that Blacks preferentially attack Whites. “They’re coming to kill us! The Blacks are trying to kill us White people!” It’s not only a lie, but it’s a very dangerous lie, a mental poison with grave effects.

Just to see what sort of vibes Flaherty is churning up, look at the commenters. Looks like Niggermania, Chimpout, American Renaissance, and Stormfront. There are all sorts of very vicious and ugly remarks against Black people as a race on there. So even if Flaherty really is a non-racist as he insists, look at all the wild racism that his irresponsible (or worse) videos and articles sprout. He’s fertilizing the land with poison, watching the weeds he watered grow and take over the land and choke out all the good and decent crops, all the while protesting that he had nothing to do with it, he was just some innocent farmer trying to grow crops. Yeah. Crops of weeds.

Whenever I see that language, I think, “This person is promoting hatred against Greg and Alpha.” I think that’s unacceptable. None of these Black people do much of anything wrong. They live like good, law abiding citizens, and in short, they are good people. Selling hate propaganda against good people just because they are Black is wrong.

And that is why you, Mr. Flaherty, are wrong.

And that is why you, Mr. Flaherty, are promoting a very dangerous lie.

Please follow and like us:
error3
fb-share-icon20
20
fb-share-icon20

3 thoughts on “Alt Left: Repost: Down with Colin Flaherty”

  1. There is instrumental murder and there is expressive murder. Blacks commit a lot of expressive murder. The main motives are anger and hatred. Blacks can be quite angry at another Black individual or hate another Black individual, but in the case of Whites, their anger or hatred is more likely to be racial. If a Black hates another Black and kills him, it is a specific murder, but if he kills another White out of hatred, it is sometimes random murder because the hatred is directed at the entire White race.

    Before Black Lives Matter, there were about 15,000 murders in the US. Let’s assume that Blacks committed half of them and that in 80% of the cases, the victim were Blacks. Then there are 1,500 Black-on-White murders in a year in the US. Let’s assume that Whites are about 60% of the American population. Then there are about 200 million Whites. If 1,500 of them are killed by a Black in a year, then the annual probability that a White American is killed by a Black American is 1,500/200,000,000, which is 1/133,333. That is not what I would call a high probability.

    As you correctly pointed, when people feel threatened, they become radicalized. Many Whites in the US feel threatened because of notions like White genocide and the Great Replacement. What is happening is that Whites are becoming a minority, but minoritization is something quite different from genocide or replacement.

    It is better to think in terms of light-skinned, brown-skinned, and dark-skinned. Well, the light-skinned are still a large majority in the US, since many Latin Americans, most West Asians and Northern Africans, all East Asians, and some South Asians are light-skinned.

    In Hawaii, Whites have already become a minority. They are not even near 50%. Well, when was the last time that you read about a race riot in Hawaii? The truth of the matter is that the US does not have a race problem; it has a Black problem. However, the Black share of the population is more or less constant at 12-13%. Whites can relax. They are not about to be exterminated by Blacks, and they can get along with the Browns.

  2. The devil that was Colin Flaherty has brought untold misery to many people with his poison pen. Good riddance.

    1. I doubt he hurt Blacks as much as they hurt themselves. Blacks in the know are harder on Black thugs than some cop that knelt on a Black that deserved to be offed anyway. Colin didn’t give a shit about Black women getting raped by Black men and neither does the “snitches get stitches” Black community. Blacks owe more to Blacks. Maybe Colin was good for Blacks in a tough love sense. Did he terrorize Blacks or is he another White scapegoat?

      Someone that rapes five Blacks for every White is no saint. Robert has a soft spot for Blacks, and I could see him as a kind slave owner that the media never depicts. Of course like many White slavers, he’d be against slavery and eventually free them. Black students took that kindness and broke him down. For all their focus on not getting their own feelings hurt, your average Black “don’t give a solitary fuck”, their mantra, about the feelings of others. It seems rare for Blacks to free themselves from their own shackles. Whites aren’t holding Blacks back in any way at this point.

Leave a Reply to Reynagirl14 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)