Game/PUA: The Pussy Market: Basic Supply and Demand

Manuel Rodriguez: I just wanted to mention briefly how i was studying about Game and mating systems for a while and share some of my findings.

In summary, since men have youthfulness as an significant part on how they score attractiveness on a mate, some feminists are trying harshly to outlaw men from being able to have sex with young women (sometimes reaching ridiculousness), which would eliminate them (those girls) as competitors, increasing their own chances in the mating game. Under the logic of sexual market economy/mating market, women “sell” sex to men.

Much like oil producing OPEC countries have in their best interest to make oil as expensive as possible, is in the interest of women to make sexual access as expensive as they can. Under this logic, banning pornography serves to increase the price of sex. That’s not to say that some of their arguments and demands are invalid, like sex trafficking and enslavement in pornography. Still, one can’t deny that this might be a reason too.

I figured out that the people that attempt to ban prostitution, putting aside religious fundamentalists, are mostly upper middle and high class women, and they do it when they manage to get a majority political control.

Sure, but why do upper middle and upper class women wish to ban prostitution. A lot of them are basically the biggest whores of them all. How do you think they got all that money? You think they earned it on their own? LOL. A lot of them earned it on their backs by getting with rich men!

Yes, banning porn does increase the price of sex, or Pussy as I call it.

This is a perfect comment. I call it the Pussy Market. That’s crude, but that’s what it is. It’s in women’s interest to keep the price of Pussy as high as possible and furthermore to restrict the supply of Pussy as much as possible. As there is a chronic Pussy shortage, shortages of products always drive up prices.

Therefore, the more women restrict the supply of Pussy, the more the price goes up. That’s one of the main reasons they want to keep teenage girls, even 16 and 17 year old girls, off the market. Those girls compete with women and they go straight for the best of the best men in my experience. It’s hard for a woman to compete with a jailbait hottie, and hundreds of millions of men will fuck these girls if they get a chance.

In Sweden, feminists are trying to outlaw men taking mail order brides simply to dry up the Pussy supply and drive up the price of Pussy. Swedish women are such horrendous feminists now that Swedish men are just bailing on these bitches altogether. They are going over to Thailand to pick up traditional Thai women, who incidentally do make very good wives. Instead of quitting being such awful bitches so there men might like them more, they are outlawing the competition.

Feminists are also trying very hard to outlaw sex dolls. I don’t really care about these dolls and I’ve never used one. But it’s obvious that these things are used as Pussy substitutes, and men using them drives down demand for Pussy, which drives down the price. Men also use porn instead of having sex with women, so this also drives down demand for Pussy. Declining demand means declining prices. I’m not sure about prostitution.

I suppose if prostitution exists, men can buy prostitutes instead of dating ordinary women, so that might drive down the demand for Pussy. But on the other hand, that prostitution exists at all shows most women that they can get money for Pussy. If women find out you have even bought a prostitute, a lot of them will narrow their eyes, knowing that they have a sucker who pays for pussy. Women find allegiance with prostitutes. After all, prostitutes are doing what all the rest of them are doing, which is charging for pussy.

I had a Black girlfriend once whose eyes lit up when I told her I had bought a few prostitutes in my day. To her that meant I was a sucker idiot who paid for Pussy, and now she felt even more motivated to charge me than she already did. And boy did charge me. By the way, no race of women has a more whorish attitude towards sex than Black women.

As long as all these whores are out there charging top dollar for Pussy, a lot of women look at that and say, “Hmmmm, I should charge too, just like them.” It sets an example. I’m not sure if outlawing prostitution would affect the Pussy market in any way. Obviously it increases the Pussy shortage and increases the demand for Pussy, therefore, it probably drives up the price of Pussy. But I’m not sure if it works out that way in real life.

Please follow and like us:
error3
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

6 thoughts on “Game/PUA: The Pussy Market: Basic Supply and Demand”

  1. Yup, Sweden and Iceland, and those Nordic “viking” countries was what I had in mind when I mentioned about middle-high class women having control of a country and its politics.

    I didn’t comment about the prostitution banning because I wasn’t completely sure if it was about making sex more expensive for men. I think it has more to do with class struggle. I don’t know if you know this, but men are “intimidated” by women that have higher status or intelligence than them. Since there are not a whole lot of rich or middle class people in general, men that are of a higher status than those women would be exceedingly scarce, leaving them in a very poor position in the mating game.

    Women with a lot of status, resources, and education get the opposite effects on the mating game than men (this is worsened due to the fact that women’s mating standards for status or resources scale with theirs). They still would expect suitors to be above them, even if they are fine with what they have, or else the amount of status and resources required would be very difficult for local males to realistically attain.

    Banning prostitution would be more of a matter of intrasexual competition. Women and girls of the more popular classes would essentially outcompete high-class women by offering men sex at a more accessible price, all because women fit it hard to lower their standards for dating. It would be an attempt to take the popular class girls out of the game to “force” men to date the higher-class women, including their nigh-unreachable standards.

    It’s worth mentioning that “sex price” or selling doesn’t literally mean prostitution or a short-term exchange of resources for sex. It also means ensuring commitment and faithfulness that men in marriage will invest and protect the woman and their children. It also means having certain exigences, like beauty or fitness. To have sex with an hottie, you will either need to be rich or be a Chad.

    You complain that in your old age, young women don’t give you sexual access to them unless you give them resources. This is not an unique case. Just look at rich men and celebrities to see that the older the man is compared to his partner, the more resources he needs. This is also something that I observed about psychopaths.

    From my observations and anecdotes about psychopaths, their strategies change completely as they age. They are still promiscuous, but now have to invest resources in their young lovers and the women and his children he had by them. They usually use “stolen” money for their affairs. Old men are ugly, so not even their infamous social and Game skills wont cut it anymore.

    Males in the animal kingdom have to display one of three either things so females give them the privilege of mating.

      Good health and physical beauty (peacocks and Chads).

      Physical fitness and being able to beat other males in competition and protect the female and their children.

      Resources (species where males invest highly on their spawn are rare, but there are analogies like birds making nests or insects giving nuptial gifts.)

    The expectations of males to be able to mate can be defined as these three things.

    Besides being showing sufficient mental stability and social skills, you have to complete either of three requirements to have sex with a woman:

    Being beautiful ensures good genes and health – their children will inherit their looks, assisting them in genetic propagation in the long run.

    Good fitness and physical capability, also related to good genes and health, which should in theory protect the woman and his children from danger, tend to have high social status, however, this benefit is rather unreliable, so it’s more suitable for short-term liaisons.

    High resources, obviously have enough to ensure that the woman and their children live comfortably. This includes not just resources but personality factors that drive them to get more resources like ambition.

    In short, you need to either have goods genes from being beautiful, having good fitness, and/or manliness. Or be a provider.

    You didn’t have much requirements besides having some mental stability to get girls into bed, because in their brains, they are getting “pregnant” with good genetic material that will have find it easier to propagate themselves in the future.

    Young men that are not so lucky are forced to either have an exceptionally good Game (even “ugly” young psychopaths usually can drown themselves in pussy without having to invest) or they must achieve high social status in something respectable like sports or something risky like a gang membership to be able to have such liaisons.

    1. Also wanted to mention that these rich women are not the wife of rich husband type, but women that earn that money themselves. They are usually high executives or business owners.

  2. Nordic women are a handful. I think they may have highest gender confusion for Whites. Is that a young boy or a girl? I can tell it’s gender right away, but perhaps young Nordics blur the line. A little later the Eurasian mestizo. After the Brazilian hits her/his wall, it’s the well-aging Asian. The biggest Karens I know are Scandinavian or Prussian.

    American Black women more of a handful. Then Black African women are the biggest bitches. All these groups can be wide bodied and physically strong. North Germanic women and Black women are also quite different from each other, but they share a larger size.

    1. I’m shifting towards being softer on Blacks. Wokeness is overtaking pro-Blackness. Even though it’s still in our face, Jews aren’t just poking us with a Black stick anymore. Blacks are more like “candy now” kids than our enemy. Some Blacks are attractive; Foxy Brown is better than all the fake-haired Black hoes I see. A hair-filled comb marinating in a shit puddle on a dirty Indian street ends up on some Black beauty queen’s head.

      I believe Spain and other European countries have had trannies win their national pageants, like Miss Switzerland. They probably started with Blacks.

      For a good example of the bigger Northern Germanic woman I’m talking, check out Blondie Bombshell. You can have a strong build and be quite attractive.

  3. It is all just prostitution. We can sugar-coat it all we want, but it does not change the fundamental exchange mechanism for getting Pussy. Whether it is resources, protection, tingles, or cold, hard cash; you must give something in order to get some.

    Feminists bitch and cry about cash for Pussy because they are fragile, frigid, fugly cunts that can’t handle reality and therefore choose to live in and subsequently impose their delusional fairy tale world on everyone else. Quite insufferably.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.