Delphi Murders Update April 13, 2021: Stunning Rumors about the Murders and Related Matters Now Officially Proven!

Long, 53 pages. Deals with gruesome matters concerning the brutal sex murders of four female minors – two little girls aged 8 and 10 and two young teenage girls aged 13 and 14. If you can’t handle such material, don’t read.

The first sections deal with somewhat extraneous material that you may or may not find interesting. If you want to get to the real meat of the post, scroll down to Clearing up Some Recent Attacks on These Theories.

On Accuracy

In the past, I estimated that 95% of what I said here in the past has been shown to be false over time, particularly when followed over years. I’m not sure if it’s that high. One problem was we went down the rabbit hole chasing the wrong guy for a couple of years. Turned out he was just some troll who wanted people to think he committed these murders instead of being the person who actually did them. Perhaps 80-80% is a better figure following rumors from 2017-present.

Thing is over time your information tends to get better. You learn which rumors have promise and which have not panned out. Also you develop better sources. We now have search party members who saw the actual crime scene, official case document(s) in our very own hands, the testimony of Leigh Kerr, a man who claims to have seen official case documents, the most accurate crime scene photos we have ever seen, and the best LE sources we have ever had. In the first four years of this case, LE only affirmed two rumors from us, one each from each LE source. And then they went away. And those sources were a couple of years ago. But now we have excellent LE sources, the best we’ve ever had.

Bottom line is the quality of our sources has increased dramatically over time. Consequently, the accuracy of our statements should go up a lot too. 80-90% is far too high of an error rate at this time. Our error rate at the moment is probably under 50% and quite possibly even lower.

Qualification of Claims

You will see below where we regard certain things as Proven. That is because we got these statements either directly from LE, official case documents, or same conclusions reached independently by two different sources (for this to be false, both sources would have had to make up the exact same lie). These are the only claims that people can hold us to because with all the rest, we openly admit that the claims are Unverified, so we should not be held to any of those claims.

The category below that is usually called Unverified with Different Qualifications. Keep in mind that we are not claiming that anything listed below as Unverified is true, although some it has a good chance of being true. The only things we regard as true are listed under Proven.

Unverified but Likely. In these cases, we have 4-5 separate sources, usually vaguely referred to as inside sources, testifying to the truth of something. Because of the number of people saying this rumor is true, it goes into the likely category.

Unverified with Some Likelihood of Being True is a common qualification. Most of Leigh Kerr’s and the search party member’s testimony has gone into this bracket because unfortunately, while we think they are right, we cannot regard their testimony as probative.

Unverified. Some claims are simply listed as unverified. These are simply unverified rumors.

Unverified and Probably Not True. This claims are quite dubious and we don’t suggest anyone put any weight into them.

The Utter Uselessness of Almost all Delphi Murders Podcasters and Reddit Groups

None of these illustrious Delphi Murders Youtubers has touched it, probably because they are all narcissists who hate each other and hate anyone stealing their thunder. Remember how all these Youtubers trashed Leigh Kerr? That’s because he was competition. See? These guys are mostly narcissists and they don’t believe in cooperation. It’s all about zero-sum game. One person wins and everyone else loses. Their Youtube recordings are pretty useless, though I like some of these guys.

John Kelly is a class act. Indiana Cold Cases is similar and so is True Crime Jesus. The rest are not bad people but they are showboats, loudmouths, and boasters with egos the size of small planets. Every podcast is all about them! Obviously this is the only type of personality that is capable of podcasting – an egomaniac – on the other hand, their personality pathology limits the usefulness of their shows.

I tune in to their broadcasts and it’s all just these narcissists collecting narcissistic supply, which is being doled out by their worshipful audience. Furthermore, almost nothing of consequence is being said, and it reminds you of a night with your friends drinking, and no one says one thing of importance for hours. The things discussed on the podcasts are unimportant and go on and on forever.

The podcasts are all silly speculation or talk about POI’s who are all basically ruled out as BG by now. There is also endless silly speculation in the comments about BG – “I think BG was a teenager…What if BG escaped on a hand glider?…What if BG is dead?…What if BG escaped to a deserted island where he now renamed himself Lord Jim and is now king of the savages?…What if BG is really a transman and he’s not even a man at all and in fact he’s a woman?…What if BG is Mafia hitman?…Bla bla bla bla.”

I’m sure it’s very interesting to posit your wandering speculation about what if this or that or maybe something or something or possibly why or what, but at the end of the day, it’s mostly just writing words in the air with water vapor to be blown away with the next wind. Idle speculation at its finest. Apparently there is a human need to wonder and guess and posit and whatnot. Otherwise why do we have religions? Why do kids play make-believe?

I guess this need continues into adulthood, but I’m a guy who like a little more meat on my bone.

This case is over. LE has a suspect. If you think they’ve got the wrong guy, keep tossing your POI’s into the mix. If you think someone helped BG, keep throwing out those POI’s you think helped him. But otherwise, let’s just follow the cops, ok? I’m going to follow the guy who is their principal suspect.

Likewise about this crime. We already have the basics of this crime nailed down, some by the police talking directly to us, some by official case documents sitting right in our hands, some by independent conclusions arrived at simultaneously by more than one sleuther, and a whole lot of unconfirmed rumor not yet proven that may well be correct. The scope of this investigation in terms of who the police think did it and how it unfolded has been dramatically narrowed. We have the basic outlines of the crime sketched, and we’ve even filled in a lot of the blanks.

Questions Regarding My Credibility and Professionalism

Answers to questions about my credibility. I am creating a special article about this to link to in order to deal with the constant hate comments in this regard so I don’t have to keep going over this stuff in every update. It also deals with employment and other matters in which I have held important positions of some stature requiring degrees and responsibility. In addition, I have a background in some pretty important unpaid work.

You Will All Be Proven Wrong – You Just Wait and See

I noted around the Net today on all of the big and worthless Reddits about this murder, this article, which is the most important article ever written about the Delphi Murders to date, is being trashed as completely worthless and nothing but a pack of lies.

The truth is that every single one of you are going to be shown to be wrong if and when the facts of this case ever come to light. Many things I am saying in these articles will be shown to be correct. I will be right and you will be wrong, sitting there with egg on your face. None of you will admit that I was right and you were wrong because you’re not decent enough to do that. You will continue to say I am completely discredited and that nothing I say has ever been correct. You will wage wars of personal destruction around the Net to try to stop people from linking to me, going to my website, or discussing my theories, which you will all try to shut down by saying I’m completely discredited.

Keep in mind my enemies have been doing this for 15 years now, and they’ve been wrong and I’ve been right so many times I can’t count them. They’ve never admitted I was right and they were wrong. and every time that was shown to them, they just went right back to saying I was discredited and nothing I had ever said was true. And this will happen once again in this Delphi Murders case just as it happened in the other cases above, assuming the truth ever comes to light.

People Should Listen to Me But They Never Do

Over and over in my life, I end up looking people straight in the eye, wagging my finger at them, and saying, “You should listen to me!” None of them ever do, even though I end up being right most of the time, and they end up being wrong, but they never admit that even when it is shown to them. People should listen to me because I am often correct. No one can figure this out or will admit that it is true.

Finally, after Four Years, Acquisition of Good LE Sources

It turns out that we have acquired a sleuth who is a former detective. He’s bored and has nothing to do, so we recruited him to sleuth for us. He is happy to do so. He has connections with current LE officers in Indiana. We are not sure if we should say where, but they are not in the town of Delphi or in Carroll County. Yes, insane discredited liars like us have former detectives as part of our team.

We sent him off to dig into Mr. X. He went away for a bit and came back a while later with proof from LE that some of the things we have been reporting as rumors here are absolute fact. We do not believe his Indiana LE connection(s) are working on this case that we are aware of. Instead they are LE street officers. But they have learned a number of things via the LE grapevine.

We would like to point out that now that we finally have some very good sources (you can’t do better than LE) and have acquired case documents we have been looking for four years, many more of the things we say in our articles are going to be shown to be true because our sources have gotten so much better, and hence the speculations and rumors will rest on a more solid and factual basis. As time goes by, we get more and more correct on here as we start filling in the blanks of the jigsaw puzzle.

We have worked closely with LE in the past. A few years ago, a Indiana State Police detective contacted us and asked for everything we had on a suspect they were looking into. We went down the rabbit hole about this man for 2-3 years, but we finally decided that while he’s an awful person, he didn’t kill those girls.

In the past, a local sheriff’s deputy in a county near Delphi was one of our most active members, particularly with graphics. He was hiding incognito.

Mr. X Is Innocent Until Proven Guilty

I am not revealing the name of the main suspect here and will only refer to him as Mr. X. I also request all commenters to also refer to him as Mr. X. I do this as a simple measure to try to protect his identity. I do not feel comfortable using his initials or certainly his name. I do not want to see this man or his family harassed in any way. Do not harass or bother this man or his family in any way, shape, or form! No one knows if he did this crime or not. Maybe he did, maybe he didn’t.

Yes, this man is the prime suspect at the moment, but that doesn’t mean a whole lot. Twice in the the Evansdale Murders, LE thought they were certain that they had the right man. Twice they were wrong. They have thought they had the right guy several times in the Zodiac case, but all of the suspects fell through.

Mr. X has is not even at the Person of Interest stage in this case. Person of Interest is a much higher standard than unnamed suspect, and he hasn’t even risen to that level yet. No one knows if Mr. X is guilty or not. I happen to think he probably did it, but what do I know?

LE doesn’t have much in the way of good, solid evidence against Mr. X at this time. They have enough suggestive evidence to make them think he did it, but if you look a the nature of their actual evidence, it’s awfully thin. In fact, the rumor – and a longstanding one at that – is that LE simply does not have enough evidence against Mr. X to take the case to court. DA’s require a very high standard of evidence to bring a homicide charge against someone. If the DA does not think he has enough evidence in a homicide case to win in court, they won’t take it to trial. At this point, they don’t even have enough for an arrest.

Say for instance LE arrested Mr. X and charged him with the double homicides of these two girls. If they tried to take it to court, I am almost certain that the judge would throw it out before it even got to the trial stage. The judge would say you don’t even have enough evidence against this man to take this case to court and throw it out of court. That’s very embarrassing.

Furthermore, homicide is the most serious thing you can charge anyone with. The judicial system likes to make sure that they get it right, if only to protect the due process rights of the accused. There are cases like this all over the country.

A famous one is the Lewiston Killer in Lewiston, Idaho in the late 1970’s. He killed at least five people, specializing in young women. The police chief says he is 99% sure that the main suspect, who is named, committed the crimes. He has since moved back to North Carolina, and young women have begun to disappear from the trials there now.

There is a suspected child killer in the Bay Area who is responsible for 5-10 child murders. They don’t have enough on him to take him to trial. A book has been published accusing him of this crime. He is brazen, openly admits to being a pedophile, goes to the victims’ graves and leaves flowers, and visits the victims’ families to offer “solace for their losses.” See the sort of games these guys play? A police chief in a town over there accused the man of committing these crimes, and the man sued the city and won $50,000. This is why you don’t hear LE coming out and openly accusing people of committing serious crimes like homicide unless they are sure they did it and they have enough evidence to take them to trial.

And those are just the suspected serials running around free. There are many cases of homicides or attempted homicides where LE feels that they know who did it but don’t have enough evidence to take them to trial.

If Mr. X Were on Trial for These Murders Today and I Were in the Jury, I Would Vote to Acquit Him

Yes, I think Mr. X did this crime. But my opinion isn’t worth anything. And if Mr. X was being tried today, and I was on the jury, I would certainly vote to acquit. Because it doesn’t matter whether I think he’s guilty or not. The state has to prove it. If I were on the jury, the only thing I would care about was whether the state had proved that Mr. X committed this crime. And with the evidence they currently have, they haven’t proven it. So I would definitely hang the jury and let Mr. X walk, and in all probability, BG would be free to walk the streets again. That’s the price you pay to live in a free society.

Time to Give up on All These POI’s

This is just getting ridiculous. No one has to believe me when I tell them that LE has a suspect who they think committed the Delphi Murders. Maybe he did it, maybe he didn’t. Maybe LE is wrong. They’ve been wrong many times before in cases like this, particularly in sex murders of little children. They often have their eye on one suspect for a long time until it turns out he’s no good. Anyway, I think there are number of suspects that ought to be put to rest.

Ron Logan: Enough already. Give it a rest, dammit! How many times has he been cleared? 242? Maybe we need to clear him a 243rd time then just to make sure! However, we believe that an interesting theory is that BG may have attempted to frame Ron Logan with this crime for obscure reasons. BG was dressed in clothes similar to what Ron wore, and he took the girls to Ron’s land and killed them there.

Mike Patty: Just stop, ok? Stop. He’s innocent. Leave this poor man alone, for God’s sake. Hasn’t’ he suffered enough? No, he didn’t kill his own granddaughter, dammit. Come on, people.

Becky Patty: Obviously they’re not accusing her of the homicides! The accusation is that she “knows something” or “knows way too much” and is covering for someone, presumably the killer. I doubt it. No one’s been hurt by this case more than Becky Patty. It’s as if she took the grief of a whole town under her breast and pledged to suffer for them all, Jesus-like. Not quite sainthood, but getting there. I heard that at the 2019 conference, she burst into tears. Well, of course she did. It’s no surprise. She still hasn’t been able to process this, assuming such a thing can ever be processed. She has channeled her pain into grief and sadness.

Others close to the victims, who I will not name, have channeled their grief into rage and lashing out at everyone around them. It’s an understandable reaction, but they’re still not pleasant to be around. This person is externalizing their pain into rage and projecting it outwards, pretty much at the world. I won’t reveal who I am talking about here though it should be obvious. I will say that Libby’s birth mother has also dealt with her loss by turning rageful. Both of these people were probably ragers before so it’s not like they did a U-turn. Of course, we empathize with their losses, but sympathy wears thin when someone is screaming in your face. Let’s hope they find some peace.

Becky Patty is internalizing her pain and putting it inwards, which is at least more prosocial. Someone like Mike Patty may be dealing with this pain by disassociating as we men do. People think we are stoic but really we are dissociating. The feelings are there. You push them, shove them out at others or disassociate them into the ether or better yet your subconcsious. Everyone’s got their style. Whatever gets you through the  night. The last person on Earth to “protect the killer” is poor Becky Patty, God bless her mortal soul.

Derrick German: Libby’s father, meth dealer, convict who served time in prison and supposedly ratted people out to get a lower sentence. He has dealt with his grief with silence and hiding himself away. I don’t know this man very well, but he wasn’t in on this crime.

Kelsi German: Sister of Libby. Kelsi’s DNA was the only DNA found on the bodies. Kelsi has been investigated quite a bit, and she has been interviewed a few times by the FBI, including a couple of times at her school. For whatever reason, she confuses facts all the time and can’t keep her stories straight. I have no idea why she’s doing this, but it’s not because she killer her own sister for God’s sake. Kelsi German has been cleared.

FSG, or DMC: Probably shouldn’t use his real name, but he’s on everybody’s suspect list. He was one of the original witnesses who saw BG and gave a description. Now he says he never saw BG at all. I guess he can’t make up his mind. He’s also thoroughly lawyered up, and he’s not saying a word. I get it. He’s a greedy businessman with dollar signs in fluttering eyes that sound like clanging cash registers every time he blinks. His favorite color is green: like the woods, like the loot. Hey, it’s a capitalist country, right? The theory is that he was in on these murders for mercenary reasons, such as a malign desire to purchase Ron Logan’s land. Sure he’s a greedy businessman, but I doubt if he’s that greedy.

I’ve seen quite a few photos of this guy, no doubt part of the (lousy) good old boy network so much in evidence in this blighted town. Just looking at him, I can’t see him being in on this, but I had the same feeling when I saw a photo of mild-mannered, middle-aged, frumpy, beer-bellied Mr. X, family man and loving father extraordinaire. FSG along with others present at the bridge have been investigated as possible lookouts for BG. Not because there’s any evidence that they were lookouts, but more because everyone in that situation at the time of the murders is being looked at that way. I’d be surprised if he were in on this, but stranger things have happened.

Paul Etter: A 55 year old local man of many interests. One of his many interesting hobbies was abducting and raping young women. But alas, he raped one lass too many, and the law closed in on him holed up in his home, which now resembled Dodge City. He saved society a lot of money by eating a bullet, freeing up some fresh air and making the world the tiniest bit of a better place. He raped women, not young teenage girls. He was the right age, but he doesn’t look like BG. LE has already looked into him quite a bit, and I assume he’s cleared. And one last thing: He’s dead, Jim. Move along.

CM: Not even going to bother to reveal his name. Local professor at Purdue, known for the geocaching theory. Some connection with Libby via geocaching. I was never aware that anyone had anything against this harmless-looking fellow. Lawyered up, not talking. He’s afraid he’s going to be framed with these murders, a not unreasonable fear.

CN: Middle aged man, resident of Delphi. Well, he’s the right age anyway. Never knew what the case was against this man other than that he had property near the bridge and he and his wife’s alibi of being out of town and state traveling got a bit mangled. We all stumble over our words sometimes. He’s a local executive of a government function or perhaps better yet a nonprofit of some sort. Possibly works with kids. I’ve looked this man over and I can’t think of anyone less likely to commit this crime. His wife has taken to social media lately, pleading with people to stop harassing them and insisting he had nothing to do with this crime. Good advice. How bout taking it to heed, everyone?

Garrett Kirts: Local man, all around run of the mill bad person. He killed a woman. I’m not sure why but I doubt it was for a good reason. So he’s a murderer. A murderer of young women at that. But not of young teenage girls. He’s in prison where he belongs. I never knew what evidence anyone had against this guy except, “He kills chicks! So that means he killed these girls because they’re chicks too!” Doesn’t sound like a logical progression of thought to me. Empiricism is a thing, folks. Besides, he’s the wrong age, 27-28. BG is a 50 year old man. Repeat after me: BG is a 50 year old man. Repeat as often as necessary until you get it through your head. Give it a rest, everyone.

Clearing Up Some Recent Attacks on Our Theories

It is being said that we are claiming all sorts of odd things about this crime, what happened, and the crime scene. Actually we are only claiming some of these things are true. The rest we openly admit are unverified rumors. See below for which rumors we believe are proven and which are unverified.

Furthermore, when people say that I, Robert Lindsay, have no sources, no documents, on and on, please keep something in mind. “Robert Lindsay” isn’t just one guy. “Robert Lindsay” is the leader of a sleuthing group that formerly had 200 paid members, including active duty LE personnel from nearby counties. The group has shrunk quite a bit. We now have ~20 people on our team. They all go off and do their own work. They have their own sources. On and on. These people are from all over the country and have expertise in all sorts of different areas. We had therapists, physicians, and cops in our group.

So when you are saying, “No way does Lindsay have inside sources or official documents,” do you think it’s possible that a team of 200 or 20 sleuths all working together could have come up such things? Something to think about.

Specifically, we are getting much of the the following information straight from the cops themselves. Got it? Instead of bashing us, why don’t you ask why the cops are telling us this stuff? Are they deliberately lying to us? If so, why? Are we making up lies about getting information from police when we actually have no contacts with them? Why would we do that? We don’t do that on here and never have. For one, it’s a gross violation of journalistic ethics, and I was trained to be a journalist, among other things.

Blowup of a photo of a CSI worker searching the scene. The object is near his arm where he is wearing a blue uniform. We do not know what this object is. It looks like it could be a doll to me, but I am not sure. Others say it is a stuffed animal. It could also be a wadded up small paper bag or some dried leaves. I am just putting this up there to see what people think of this object. I’m not saying it’s a doll. But perhaps it is.

This Case Is Over – There’s No Need to Speculate about Many Relevant Facts about BG or about What Happened During This Crime

For the moment at least, LE definitely has a prime suspect who they think committed this crime and they now suspect he committed other murders. There is only one correct POI and his name is Mr. X. Why not follow what LE has determined? All of your other POI’s and endless silly speculation are junk. Really none of it is true. There’s no need to speculate anymore. We know that LE has a suspect, so there’s only one person people should be suspecting.

We also now know a number of proven facts about what happened in this crime, including the behavior of Mr. X in relation to the crime and why LE suspects him. The motive is apparently lust murder motivated by sexual sadism combined with psychopathy, the classic formulation almost all serial killers have. The motive was sexual. This was a sex crime, a sex homicide.

We now know a lot of things about the main suspect, including the name, age, height, weight, marital status, possible offspring, address, names of wife and children, and history of his life.

These are the facts about the man LE suspects is BG:

Items known to be carried or worn by BG at the time of crime:

Loaded handgun in right jacket pocket, type unknown.

Members Only jacket, blue.

Old style 501 blue jeans from the 1980s – Dad jeans.

Indiana Packers boots.

Camouflage hunting cap on head.

Go Pro camera on waist.

Deer kit on waist with five hunting knives in it.

White scarf around his face, covering the lower half of his face.

Bottle of toilet bowl cleaner in left pocket.

Binoculars.

Known facts about the personal life of the main suspect, Mr. X.:

Birthplace: Illinois.

Residence history: Unknown for first 18 years, possibly Illinois. Delphi, Indiana and several other small towns in Indiana from at least 1984-2021. Resident of Delphi in 1984-85 at minimum.

Important residence periods: Moved to Evansdale, Iowa in 2011-2012 to work at a slaughterhouse aligned with Tyson Foods there. Was present when the Evansdale Murders occurred. Homeless for a period in the 2000’s, where he resided at a homeless shelter.

Education history: Primary and junior high unknown.

Senior high school: First years unknown but graduated from Delphi High School in 1984-85.

Age at time of crime: 49-50 (uncertain).

Present age: 53-54 (uncertain).

Race: White.

Hair color: Dark brown.

Facial hair: Goatee or trimmed beard.

Height: Approximately 5’8.

Weight: Approximately 180.

Sexual age orientation: Pedohebephilia, nonexclusive, AOA 8-14.

Sexual object orientation: Heterosexual.

Residence at time of crime: Delphi, Indiana since 2011. Recently moved to Monticello, possibly due to the heat of being a suspect in the crime. Lists a manufacturing business or factory as place of residence.

Employment history: Unknown prior to 2011. Worked at Tyson Foods slaughterhouse in Logansport, Indiana and sister facility in Waterloo, Iowa in 2011-2012. Afterwards possible owner-operator of trucking business.

Occupation: Possible owner-operator of long-haul trucking business in recent past. Present occupation unknown, but recently raised goats on his property.

Distance of residence from crime scene: Less than 2 miles.

Familiarity with crime location: Extreme. He was friends with Ron Logan on whose property the crime occurred. Frequently hunted deer on Ron’s land. He was clearly very familiar with the area of the crime and perhaps knew it as well as the back of his hand.

Marital status: Married, rocky and tumultuous marriage with breakups where they go live on their own and later get back together.

Children: Two daughters, one aged ~s22, another aged ~30. Ages approximate.

Relationship with younger daughter: Excellent, very close, she is very fond of him.

Relationship with older daughter: Unknown.

Important friendships: Very casual friend of Mike Patty, father of one of the girl victims. Possible Harley buddies (friends who ride Harley-Davidson motorcycles), as Mike is an avid Harley rider. There is a rumor of a falling out between the two men at some time before the crime. What that has to do with anything is not known. Hunting partner of Anthony Greeno, podcaster who has reported on the case avidly.

Hobbies: Raising goats, riding and fixing up Harley-Davidson motorcycles, very avid deer hunter.

Specific Information about the Crime Confirmed to Us by the Police

Doll thrown in with flowers at the memorial at the bridge. This is about a year after the crime, and you can see some of the flowers deteriorating. As you can see, a doll has been thrown into the mix. I don’t know what that means, but perhaps it is odd? Did BG put that doll there? He scattered dolls all over the crime scene, we know that much.

That said, the following very controversial information about the Delphi Murders was given to us directly by the police.

Numbers 1-4 were told to us by an Indiana detective, but we don’t want to say where he’s located. He didn’t work on the case, but he has a particular interest in crimes against minors, especially violent crimes against minors.

Number 5 was told to us by an Indiana detective who worked in Narcotics based on crime scene photos he had seen. We also heard it from someone very close to a detective who was working on the case who had confided in them.

Number 6, an extremely controversial statement, was told to us by a sheriff in a nearby county.

Closeup of the doll at the crime scene. Maybe it’s something. Maybe it’s nothing.
  1. Both girls were posed. Keep in mind that they did not say how they were posed, if they were posed in a sexual manner, etc.
  2. Dolls were scattered about the crime scene. There were quite a few of them. Our police source told us, “There were so many dolls scattered around that it looked like he had gone to the Goodwill store and bought a bunch of dolls.” This also answers questions about why the cops have been using phrases like “odd,” “peculiar,” “strange,” not your average crime scene,” “many signatures,” etc. It fits right in with all of that.
  3. A bottle of toilet cleaner was found at the crime scene. Presumably it was used to throw bleach over everything, which solves the riddle of why no usable DNA was collected in this case.
  4. The girls were “violated with inanimate objects.”
  5. Sticks, twigs, and branches were jammed into the girls’ vaginas and anuses. Presumably this is what the “violated with inanimate objects” statement above refers to this. Sources: A narcotics detective in Indiana and a close associate of a detective working on the case.
  6. One girl was pregnant, just barely pregnant. This is one very old rumor that started up within a few weeks of the murder. The first person who told me that was a middle aged woman who lived in the area. Just saying that for everyone who accuses me of making this up. This rumor just would not die. It kept popping up over and over, so I had to keep reporting it. We were never sure if it was true or not, so it was always just another unverified rumor.
    I didn’t want to bring this rumor up because I’ve caught so much crap for it but I felt I had to because an Indiana LE officer affirmed to us that this rumor was true. If police had not verified this rumor for us, I wouldn’t be bothering with it because it’s brought me nothing but trouble. But when we get information straight from the police, we feel we must report it. This is not a rumor I relish reporting. Trust me.
    His exact quote was, “One of the girls was in the early stages of pregnancy.” He did not state which girl it was, and we are not sure ourselves. We have an idea which girl it might be, but until we can get a good source on that, we are not going to upset people even more by naming the girl. We think that if this rumor is true, one of the girls was 6-8 weeks pregnant, when pregnancy is hard to diagnose but can be confirmed on autopsy. Specifically, there will be a thickening of the walls of the uterus that can be determined at this time.
    All guardians of the girls seem to think this would be impossible based on these girls having almost no experience with males. Well, they need to disabuse themselves of that notion. Our information is that at least one girl was sexually active, and one of the girls was 13-14 going on 20, if you get the picture. Let’s just say she was growing up awful fast. We will not say which girl or girls is being discussed above.
    People are furious with us over this rumor because they say we are sullying these girls’ reputations, thereby disqualifying them for posthumous sainthood. We do not feel that inexperienced 13-14 year old girls have some sort of purity that can be dirtied, nor do we feel that a girl this age sullies her reputation by engaging in PIV sex. People who think like this are prudes and Puritans. We do not feel that it is immoral for 13-14 year old girls to have PIV sex or to get pregnant. It’s stupid for them to get pregnant, but it’s not immoral. ~15% of girls that age, and probably more, are already having PIV sex. Source: A sheriff’s officer in a nearby county.

Specific Information about the Crime Confirmed to Us Via Official Case Document(s) in Our Possession

For more information on these document(s), see the special section below where their nature and provenance is explained. Although we only have photocopy(s) of these document(s), we believe they are genuine. The document(s) list a number of items that LE is looking for in this case.

A pair of binoculars. This lines up nicely with Leigh Kerr’s testimony where he said that BG used binoculars in this crime.

Photos, videos, cameras, videocameras, and film. In other words, LE are convinced that BG filmed or videotaped his crime. The only way they could know this is if the rumors about BG sending photos or video of the crime to one of the girls’ phones after the crime occurred are true. So the rumor that he filmed the crime and sent the film to a victim’s phone is proven. This proves more of Leigh Kerr’s testimony where he said BG sent photos or video to one of the girl’s phones after the crime.

43 seconds of audio. It is interesting that they are looking for precisely 43 seconds of audio. LE must know that BG recorded 43 seconds of audio, presumably of his crime. But how could they possibly know this? Only if he had sent this much audio to one of the girls’ phones after the crime.

A handgun, in order to do ballistics tests on it. This means that they have at least one fired cartridge. BG must have fired his gun at some point in this crime. The rumor that there was a spent cartridge at the scene is therefore confirmed.

Knives. He is wearing a deer kit, which contains five different types of knives.

Clothing soaked in blood, seen and unseen. This blood will probably will not come out with the wash. The document(s) state that the wound to Libby was so brutal that the blood splatter would have been dramatic, drenching the killer’s clothes in blood.

Specific mention is made that the girls were abducted at exactly 2:13 PM. The crime occurred on February 13, or 2/13. As you can see, the numbers are the same. People are saying this is a coincidence, but apparently LE does not believe it is coincidental.

Some Aspects of the Crime Scene Not Verified by LE But Instead Verified by Two People Working Independently and Coming to the Same Conclusion, One Sleuth and One Witness

Those aspects of the crime are the following:

  1. Both girls were posed unclothed below the waist with their legs spread wide in a sexual posing.
  2. There is a knife sticking out of either Libby’s shoulder or the log next to her.
  3. There is some sort of a large object, apparently some sort of toy, at the crime scene that was too large for BG to have had it with him on the bridge. That is the statement from the woman on the search time. While I see a giant plush bear, that’s insane, so I will defer to the search party lady and agree with her statement in the first sentence.

We feel that these rumors are validated because we saw these things in the crime scene photos, and at the same time, a woman who was a member of the search team also reported these same things. Neither of us knew about each other’s research. Instead we arrived at our conclusions independently. What are the odds that we both made up these very specific lies on our own? Almost zero. That’s good enough for us to be probative.

Interpretations of Some Aspects of the Crime Scene Photos Now Proven (Crime Scene Now Proven to Be Actually That)

The crime scene photos have been widely trashed as paraedolia. Nevertheless, two things that we spotted in the crime scene photos have now been completely proven (see the section above), so the fact that these are crime scene photos and part of our interpretation of them is at  least partially proven correct.

Rumors That Are Now Confirmed Via Indiana LE

LE Believes Mr. X is BG

Via our detective source in Indiana, LE has a main suspect in the Delphi Murders, Mr. X, and the case is focused on him. All other POI’s are pretty much dropped or cleared. However, it is still not clear that Mr. X did this on his own or if someone helped him. LE would also be interested in anyone who may have helped Mr. X after the crime, perhaps burning evidence or whatever.

It is important to note that you are under no obligation to tell the police anything. I could know that some guy was a serial killer with 10 victims, and I don’t have to go to the police. He could have even confessed to me, but I am still not under obligation to tell the cops. The one thing I cannot do is help him get away with his crimes, that is, be an accessory

Anyway, LE believes that Bridge Guy is Mr. X. They’re not looking at anyone else. They think he did it. End of story.

LE Believes that Bridge Guy (Mr. X) Is a Serial Killer and Was Also Responsible for the Evansdale Murders

Via our detective source, we learned that LE has only recently started to believe that BG (Mr. X) is also responsible for the Evansdale Murders. We believe he is currently the main LE suspect in the Evansdale Murders. Much more on that below.

LE Believes There Are Similarities Between the Evansdale and Delphi Double Homicides

Via our detective source in Indiana, we have learned that in both crimes:

  1. There was posing. So, yes, although the Evansdale girls were mere skeletons when found, LE continues to believe that they were posed.
  2. Girls in the pedohebephilic age range (8-14 years old) were brazenly abducted two at once from trails in busy parks in rural Midwestern towns in the middle of daytime with many people around.
  3. The bodies were dumped near water.
  4. A number of strange objects were found around the Evansdale girls similar to the bizarre images decorating the Delphi crime scene.

LE Says the Delphi Crime Scene Had Many Dolls Scattered Around

Via our detective source in Indiana, are now able to verify that dolls were scattered around on the ground at the crime scene of the Delphi Murders. And not just one, two, or three dolls. More than that. Like a number of them. Our detective source said, “It was like he went to Goodwill and bought a bunch of dolls there.” The dolls were of all types and are dressed in all sorts of different ways. We assume they were barbie doll size and type. However, they did not mention dolls hanging from trees, so this part of the rumor is not confirmed, with some suggestive evidence it is true.

LE Says Both Girls Were Posed in Delphi

Via this detective in Indiana, we also learned that both girls in the Delphi Murders were posed. However, they said nothing more than that, and they did not say that they were posed sexually, just that they were posed.

LE Says BG Used a Bleaching Agent, Specifically Toilet Cleaner, and Threw It Over Everything at the Crime Scene

In addition, this detective in Indiana told us that a bleaching agent was used at the scene. The detective felt it is not bleach per se but toilet bowl cleaner. They said he sprayed it all over everything important at the scene. You can see what appears to be a bottle of toilet bowl cleaner in BG’s left pocket in a blowup image. We believe that is a bottle of toilet bowl cleaner, and some of us have believed this for a long time, particularly a physician who is a member of our team. Yes, insane discredited liars like us have physicians as part of our team.

LE Says Both Delphi Victims Were Sexually Assaulted or “Violated with Inanimate Objects”

In addition, this detective in Indiana told us that both girls in Delphi were “violated with inanimate objects.” Those were their exact words. We now have seven sources telling us that sticks, twigs, etc. shoved into the girls’ vaginas and anuses. While our detective source did not specifically talk about twigs, etc., they did say that there were sexually abused by some objects or other. So it’s fact that the girls were violated with inanimate objects, and it’s probably also true that these objects were specifically sticks, twigs, and branches is apparently true, with two affirmations from LE detectives or people very close to LE detectives.

Unconfirmed Rumors Not Validated by the Police

However, other objections say we are claiming a lot of other things about this crime scene. Actually, these below are mostly unverified rumors with some probability of being true. The police did not verify any of the rumors below for us:

Not verified by police and hence mostly unconfirmed rumors:

  1. Dolls hanging from trees at the crime scene. Source: A female member of the search team.
  2. A sheet with a smiley face on it at the crime scene, possibly hung from a tree. Source: A female member of the search team.
  3. A large stuffed bear or animal at the crime scene. Source: A female member of the search team. Also, many people say that they can see one clearly on blowups of crime scene photos.
  4. Any cause of death or injury to either girl. Sources: Variety of unverified sources. Sources for cause of death of one victim: A conversation with one girl’s guardian and a photograph of this victim’s funeral, which we have chosen not to release, backing up the guardian’s statement.
  5. Girls posed in a sexual manner at the crime scene, specifically with open legs. Sources: A female member of the search team and we were able to clearly see it on crime scene photos. This rumor is considered verified.
  6. Phallic objects placed next and perpendicular to the genitals of both girls at the crime scene, specifically a log and a doll, to give the impression that they were being sexually penetrated by these objects. Source: A female member of the search team.
  7. A knife plunged into either Libby’s neck or the log next to her. Libby’s hand wrapped around the knife to make it appear that she is stabbing herself. Sources for first part of rumor: A female member of the search team. Also, we were able to clearly see it on crime scene photos. This part of the rumor is considered verified. Source for second part of rumor: A female member of the search team.
Assuming that there is a goddamned giant stuffed bear at the scene – a big if – it would be one of these here critters, for sale in a…toy store? They do look rather cuddly. I’m getting tired of sleeping alone these days. Maybe I need to invest in one of these damned bears.

Rumors About the Crime Scene Not Verified by Indiana LE and Hence Still Mostly Unconfirmed, with Varying Confidence Levels

Indiana LE did not validate the rumors about some aspects of the crime scene such as:

Everybody keeps asking where the Goddamned giant stuffed bear is. Well, here it is. Straight from the crime scene photo from the helicopter. And that looks like, to me, um, a giant stuffed bear. It’s next to Abby’s body and via measurements, I concluded that the damned thing must be 5 feet tall. On the other hand, even though I can see this damned lifesize bear with my own eyes, I am still refusing to believe in it and will chalk it up to pixellization or whatever. Why? Because positing a giant stuffed bear at the scene is just too insane, even for me. And I’m as crazy as they come. So, dear readers! What say you all? Dost though seest a gigantic stuffed bear toy over yonder in said crime scene? Raise your hand and say “Aye” if you see a bear. Raise your hand and say, “Nay” if you don’t see a stuffed bear. Also, if you don’t see a bear, you need to get your eyes checked. Go to it, oh readers!
  1. The presence of a giant stuffed bear. Source: A female member of the search party.
  2. Presence of a crucifix. Source: A female member of the search party.
  3. Presence of a white sheet with a smiley face on it that may or may not be hanging from a tree. Source: A female member of the search party.
  4. Dolls hanging from trees. Source: A female member of the search party.
  5. Girls being posed in a sort of sexual tableau. Source: Leigh Kerr.
  6. Specifically, girls legs being spread as a sexual posing. Source: A female member of the search party.
  7. A knife plunged into Libby’s shoulder or the log next to her with her hand wrapped around the knife so it looks like she is stabbing herself. Source: A female member of the search party.
  8. Phallic objects, in this case a log and a doll, being placed between the girls open legs perpendicular to their genitals to create the impression of being penetrated by these objects. Source: A female member of the search party.
  9. A series of events where Abby screamed and then was quickly hit on the head with a blunt object, which we believe is a gun butt. Source: Leigh Kerr.
  10. Stabbing of Abby in the neck artery at some point after the above events. Source: Leigh Kerr.
Here’s another of those stupid bears, well, actually it’s a whole herd or troop or pack or, well, whatever you call a bunch of bears! Mixed in with said bear herd are a bunch of humans, lounging about with the bears, communing with nature, plush toy version.

But to be fair, they never said that any of these things were not were not at the crime scene or that those events did not happen. Instead they simply didn’t mention them because we never asked about them. So LE didn’t say that these rumors were true, but they did not say that they were not true either. These rumors are simply inconclusive at the moment, with some suggestion that 1-8 may be true due to testimony from a female member of the search team.

One wonders, how the Hell does one cart a five foot bear to a crime scene. Inquiring minds want to know. Future killers are avidly taking notes. Everyone wants to know! Well, here’s how you do it. The bear comes in a totally flattened out and easily transported package when you first get it. Perfect carrying it downstairs to the Christmas tree, placing it at your favorite crime scene, or whatever other occasion you choose! These bears are great for so many occasions. Use your imagination!

More Weirdness Abounds: 2/13, 2:13, and 2-13

This is probably one of the flat-out weirdest aspects of the case of all. The crime was committed in February 13 or 2/13. In the document(s) we have, it is openly stated that BG abducted the girls at precisely 2:13 PM. Some insist that this is merely a coincidence, but apparently LE do not think it is coincidental. If so, this proves that this crime was planned nearly down to the minute. The date of the crime and the time of the abduction are both 2-13. Apparently he planned this abduction to occur at precisely this time, which is shocking. In addition, note that he abducted two girls on the 13th, 2-13.

2/13, 2:13, 2-13. What is this guy, another Zodiac? Is he into numerology? Is there any meaning to these numbers or is he just playing sneaky, tricky games with us like these guys often do. These crimes are often a great big game to these guys, and they often try to insert clever little coincidences into their crimes, probably just to freak people out and make themselves seem diabolically clever, evil geniuses.

It is interesting to note that the Evansdale girls were also abducted on the 13th. And two girls were abducted there also. 2-13 again.

The DNA and Fingerprint Questions

As we noted, LE already has a principal suspect in the crime. And his DNA is found in the forest all around the crime scene. However, he was one of the searchers who found the bodies, and he was also known to have searched the area in the dark the previous evening.

Conceivably, he could have missed the girls while searching the night before, in which case his DNA would be in the area.

His DNA in the forest could also be a result of his being part of the search team that found the girls.

Hence, none of his DNA from the forest around the girls is usable.

We keep hearing over and over, “DNA, DNA, DNA.” We think this is a whole lot about nothing. As noted above, BG threw toilet cleaner over the girls and every object at the crime scene. Well, there goes your DNA. The only DNA found on the girls was that of Kelsi, sister of Libby. Kelsi has been cleared.

There is a rumor that LE has a partial DNA sample from an unknown male from one of the girls. Problem is they only have nine markers on that partial sample. That’s not very many. Conceivably, perhaps ~10% of men might have those nine markers.

These partial DNA samples are useful to LE. For instance, if LE have a suspect, and they have a partial present in 10% of the population, this is one more bit of evidence that might point towards them having the right guy. On the other hand, a sample with only nine markers is absolutely not usable in court.

In other words, the whole DNA question seems to be a gigantic red herring if the rumors are true. LE are being coy about whether they have DNA or not, but that’s probably just another ruse. They don’t want to show their hand to the killer and let him know if they have DNA or not. I think people need to stop talking about DNA in this case. It’s a dead end.

About those fingerprints.

LE themselves have admitted that they have one smudged fingerprint. They don’t say where they collected it from, but that’s an important question. Also, smudged prints are of very dubious value. They’re generally unusable. I wish people would stop talking about fingerprints.

The Lady Walking Her Dogs at the Bridge at 12:30 PM on the Day of the Murders

This is a rumor that a woman walking her dogs on the bridge at 12:30 PM on the day of the murders, a full hour before BG probably appeared on the trails at 1:30 PM, met BG somewhere, possibly on the south side of the bridge, and even had a brief conversation with BG. However, this information does not seem to be coming from LE.

Instead it is coming from Delphi podcaster Anthony Greeno, a dubious man and apparent con artist with a rap sheet so long it fades into the horizon when you try to read it. That doesn’t mean he’s wrong. It means to consider information coming from him with a lot of caution.

This woman was apparently a discovery of Greeno’s. Ok, wait. Greeno finds this woman but LE never did? She approached Greeno but she didn’t approach LE? My smellometer is registering stinky.

Furthermore the woman has since gone into hiding, possibly because of people bothering her, or maybe because she is afraid BG is going to kill her. Anyway, she’s not talking. Before she departed us though, she did inform us that she could not identify what the man she met looked like. Except she was sure he was BG. Now wait a minute. I’m kind of thinking this eyewitness account ain’t making it to the witness stand, ya know?

Obviously this is very much an unconfirmed rumor though everyone is treating it as if it’s the word of God. I beg to differ. If anyone has any more information on this odd rumor, please let me know in the comments or in my email. Obviously if we can place BG at the bridge at 12:30 PM, that changes everything.

Quit Referencing LE’s Statements at the 2019 Press Conference (The “Fakeference”) As Factual

Although we do not have any evidence that this is true, we believe that the 2019 Press Conference was a gigantic ruse. We believe they already had a main suspect at the time and they thought he was going to be at the meeting. So the meeting was designed to trick him. The entire meeting was meant for the consumption of one person, Mr. X.

Notice that LE told the public to stop focusing on the old BG and to focus on the New BG instead. The new BG was said to be the man who carried out the murders – he was BG. They also said that BG was 18-40 years old. Anyone with any sense can see, intuitively, that BG cannot possibly be the young man in the sketch, nor can he be 18-40 years old.

BG is obviously a middle-aged man around 50. You can tell by many things – gait, body shape, manner of walking, voice, etc. LE actually believes BG is 49-50 years old. If LE actually believes that BG is 50 years old, why did they put out this statement that he looks like this ridiculous sketch of a very young man or even an 18-40 year old man. Why would they deliberately contradict their own beliefs? Easy, they were lying!

LE also brought up the unknown vehicle (possibly a white truck?) seen at the CPS building. The message here to Mr. X is clear – LE has gone off on a completely different tangent and is not looking at you at all anymore. Instead these idiot cops think some kid in a white truck did it. What a bunch of idiots!

Not the first sketch, which looks like a middle aged man, Mr. X. Some kid.

Not BG. Nope, nope, nope. How could anyone on Earth believe this is BG. Because the cops told you so? LOL. Quit listening to the police. They tell all sorts of lies as dirty strategy in extremely important homicides like this.

Not the orange truck of the main suspect. Of course not! Instead, a probably nonexistent white truck at the CPS building.

You’ve thrown the cops off your tail, Mr. X! Good job!

And at the end, Carter says, “He may even be in this room right now,” and then looks in the complete opposite direction of Mr. X. The cops are wrong again. They think some fool on the other side of the room did it! Idiots!

The truth is that some of the things LE said in that conference are true. The sketch of the younger man appears to have been the catfish of the 19 year old boy used to lure in Libby from Snapchat.

And Mr. X or BG is the one who used that catfish to bring Libby in. So when LE said the younger sketch is the one who committed the crime, they were correct! He did commit the crime because the younger sketch is just BG in catfish form, his other younger personality that he uses to snare victims.

And when they said BG was actually better described as a combination of both sketches, they were correct too. BG himself is both the catfish young man and the older man who is the actual killer, so he is “both sketches at once,” obviously.

Also note that LE are now acting like they think the young catfish did the crime, not the older BG. This was done to get Mr. X to think, “LOL they don’t think I did it. They think this stupid catfish boy did it ha ha. Let them go on a wild goosechase after someone who doesn’t exist!” Once again, this was done to get Mr. X to think that they had lost his tail and were running off in the wrong direction against a completely different suspect.

Granted, we don’t have any evidence that this is true other than Leigh Kerr’s statements. We regard Leaker as credible, but we now demand sources beyond his level to be considered probative. Hence, formally, everything Leaker said has gone into unconfirmed rumors other than the things we were able to confirm from other sources such as LE statements to us, official case documents, two sources arriving at the same conclusion independently (a near impossibility if they were both making up the same lie. Nevertheless, we do feel that Leaker’s notion that this was all a big ruse rang true for us and sent us off on on our investigation, with the help of the notorious Godsey I might add.

We currently feel that this is the best explanation of the facts. Can we prove it? Nope. But all theories must be judged against their competitors (Occam’s). Put the competing theory to the logic test. Is there any way on Earth that BG could look like the young man in that sketch or even an 18-40 year old? Get real. When we line the two theories against each other, ours wins hands down. Hence, following Occam’s, our theory is the best explanation of the facts.

Mr. X’s Employment at a Packing Plant in Indiana and Possible Connection to the Evansdale Murders Verified by Article in the Indiana Star

Via the Indiana Star (in an undated article that we cannot find  at the moment but nevertheless believe exists), Mr. X ‘s roommate in 2011-2012 in Delphi told LE that BG was absolutely Mr. X. The voice was a good match, the clothes looked “familiar,” and the walk was dead on. The roommate also said he suspected Mr. X of the Evansdale Murders because during the time of the Evansdale Murders, Mr. X and the roommate were both over in Evansdale being put up in hotels for months while they worked on the packing plant there.

Many people from the Delphi area went over to Evansdale to work on this project. They appear to have been working at the Tyson plant in Logansport, Indiana and were shipped to the sister Tyson plant in Waterloo, Iowa.

If this roommate is correct, it looks like Mr. X worked in 2011-2012 at Tyson Foods in Logansport, and he was moved to near Evansdale, Iowa for a period during these two years to work on a sister plant in Waterloo, near Evansdale.

We don’t know what his job was there, but if it was slitting the throats of screaming, squealing pigs on ropes swinging towards him with a knife so huge that it looks like a sword as is done at some slaughterhouses, we would say a job like that would be right up BG’s alley. BG made a deep cut to the throat of one victim that resembles the deep cuts made to the throats of pigs at some slaughterhouses. Notice that BG committed his crime with large knives, his preferred weapon. Mr. X also cuts up a lot of deer that he shoots for food. So it looks like Mr. X is using to cutting up dead and possibly living animals with large knives. And humans are animals too.

The Mystery of BG’s Indiana Packers Boots

There was an early raid on the Indiana Packers plant in Delphi that was done by LE, who faked a bomb threat in order to raid the place. Remember that they came out with a pair of boots. They showed the boots in an evidence bag to the media later on that night, and they said, “Oh, this is nothing. Don’t pay any attention to that.”

It turns out that BG’s shoes are dead perfect matches for Indiana Packers workboots. If he is wearing Indiana Packers workboots, this solves one more question. How did BG get across that knee-high stream in the middle of winter without nearly getting hypothermia and needing a change of clothes? Indiana Packers workboots go up to knee-high, and they are waterproof. So if he wore Packers boots to do his crime, he would have been able to cross that cold stream where the water is knee-deep. He could have worn those boots over his jeans, and he wouldn’t have gotten wet at all.

However, we presently lack evidence that Mr. X worked at Indiana Packers. There is evidence that he worked at a Tyson packing plant in Logansport during that period.

Which begs the question of if Mr. X is BG, how on Earth did BG come to acquire a pair of Indiana Packers boots, which is what he may well be wearing during his crime?

Weird Behavior of Mr. X Surrounding His Truck at the Crime Scene

We now have a better time frame for Mr. X’s truck being parked at the cemetery. Note that it was parked in head first. We believe he staged the crime with these elaborate props either before or after the crime from this exact location. We don’t know why he asked permission to search Ron Logan’s land at 6:30 PM, but this is also a huge red flag because he asked to search the land a full half hour before the fire department had even announced the formation of a search team.

Not only that, but Mr. X’s alibi is that he was in another town from 2:15-3:15 PM on the day of the crime. That would mean he would have had to drive back to Delphi by at least 3:45 and possibly later, depending on what town he was in and when he left. The problem here is that before 5:30 PM, no one knew the girls were missing other than the families and a few friends.

He could have called his wife, who was friends with Becky Patty, and the wife could have told him about the girls going missing. But that would mean that Becky Patty would have to say that she called the wife. We doubt if she did contact his wife. They weren’t that close.

After 5:30 PM, news of the girls going missing went out over the police scanner. We suppose if was listening to a police scanner, he could have known that early, but what’s the likelihood of Mr. X listening to a police scanner between 5:30-6:30 PM on the day of the crime? We would say it is low.

He parked 1,000 feet away from Ron’s door, almost a quarter mile away. Why didn’t he pull up to his front door? We don’t know about you all, but when we go visit our friends, we generally don’t park a quarter mile away and hike in. We park right at the front door.

We also don’t know what he was doing searching down there that night. We also do not know why out of all of the places to search, he happened to pick the exact location where the girls were killed. However, this early searching meant that he could use his “lost my keys” excuse as a reason why his car just happened to be parked for 18 straight hours soon after the crime and right above where the girls were found because he could say the next day that he lost them during the previous evening’s search.

It is interesting that Mr. X appears to have stayed with his truck from 6:30 PM to on Monday, February 13, to 12:30 PM Tuesday, February 14 when the girls were found. That’s a full 18 hours. Why on Earth would someone stay next to their truck all through one evening and night through the next early AM and morning into the afternoon? It doesn’t seem like a normal person would stay at that location for all that time.

We believe he could have been staging that elaborate crime scene during that time. Where his truck was parked was a five minute walk to the crime scene. If he had those objects found at the crime scene in his truck, he could have easily carried them down to the crime scene and used them to stage it with the objects.

Mr. X needed the lost his keys excuse to explain how he stayed in that spot for 18 hours. If he didn’t have his keys, he could not move his truck. He could have gone home, but for some reason he stayed with his truck. Did he eat? Where did he get the food and what was the food? Did he sleep? If so, where and when? Urinating is no problem, but what if he had to defecate? That would have been quite a problem. It doesn’t seem reasonable to stay out there all that time for no good reason.

But it’s even worse than that.

Even after the girls were recovered, Mr. X stayed around through all of the media and police hubbub for the next eight hours, from 12:30 PM to 8:30 PM, so his truck was out at the crime scene for 26 full hours, with Mr X presumably with it the entire time. Why on Earth would anyone hang around near their vehicle for a full day just because they lost their keys? Were they are waiting for God Himself to come bring the keys?

We believe Mr. X stayed with the truck all that time in order to watch it. If he left, LE might tow it or search it. He stayed to guard his truck. We believe he did this because there may have been incriminating evidence in there.

Another reason he stayed is we believe that he enjoyed the drama. Everyone was crowding around to look at the crime he had committed. He was right in the middle of all the police and media, and no one suspected him. I’m sure that was a LOL feeling for him. “These idiot cops. They’re swarming all over this crime scene, and the killer is standing right here under their noses in the midst of the chaos for hours, and these coptards can’t figure this out.” We think he likes to fool and troll LE. “I’m fooling the cops, ha ha!” is the thinking.

Why did Mr. X not drive his truck away when it was in the way of all of the police cars? He had his keys with him, so why didn’t he move his truck when they asked him to instead of lying and saying he couldn’t because he had lost his keys? LE asked him to move the vehicle. He said he had lost his keys and was going to call his wife to bring a spare set of keys to him.

Three problems with that story:

  1. He never lost his keys.
  2. He never called the wife to ask her to bring a spare set.
  3. There was no spare set in the first place.

At 8:20 PM, the police scanner said that A., Mr. X’s wife, was coming to bring Mr. X a spare set of keys. This has been misrepresented by doubters as the scanner saying to let Mrs. X into the sealed off area because she’s bringing Mr. X his keys. We believe he just told LE she was coming, it went out over the scanner, and she never showed up.

LE must have been getting exasperated with Mr. X by this time. Someone, probably LE, called to have Mr. X’s truck towed. Mr. X just stood there and let them tow his truck away. He probably went back to retrieve it later on with his “spare set” (actually the real set he never lost) and drove it back home. Unfortunately, Mr. X’s truck was never searched. We believe there may have been incriminating evidence in there.

After all of this, a fake cover story was put out that Mr. X never lost his keys in the first place. Actually, that is correct because they were sitting in his pocket the whole time! But our critics think this means the story about him losing his keys is fake. Mr. X’s younger daughter insists that he never lost his keys. His wife now echoes in. As far as she is concerned, he never lost his keys. Becky Patty is also saying he never lost his keys.

However, Becky is saying two different things – first that he lost his keys and later that he didn’t lose his keys. We have a screenshot of Becky Patty texting Mrs. X to ask why she said he never lost his keys when he did. So another story is going out that he did lose his keys.

See what is going on here? Multiple stories are floating around, probably not purposely. Some are contradictory. But the effect is to cause confusion. The more confused people are, the more someone can get away with a crime.

As far as validation of the rumors of Mr. X being parked at the cemetery at 6:30 PM, asking Ron Logan for permission to search his land, searching his land that evening with two other men, and leaving his truck sitting there for 18 hours until the next day when the bodies were found and another eight hours afterwards, we can’t. This is simply what we have been told, and we are sticking by it.

We have also been told that LE caught Mr. X in the lies about losing his keys, calling his wife to bring him a spare, and a spare even existing in the first place. LE doesn’t like being lied to, especially when they are investigating a double homicide. We have been told that this is what made LE suspicious of Mr. X in the first place.

We are even being challenged on our reporting that Mr. X’s truck was boxed in by police at the time of the discovery of the bodies. But we have a photograph of his truck surrounded by police cars.

The story about his truck getting towed is also being challenged. We were told that his truck had been towed.

The rejoinders also say that either he never lost his keys or he did and he called the wife to bring a spare, and she did, evidence being the police scanner. But the scanner doesn’t say she came to bring the keys. It said  she was coming to deliver the keys. We believe she never showed up, he never called the wife, never lost his keys in the first place, and there was no spare set. We believe this because this is what we were told.

Mr. X’s Traumatic Reaction upon Discovering the Bodies Appears Staged and Fake

Mr. X not only discovered the bodies, but he ran away in terror afterwards. Like a coward, we would add. Then he needed 2-3 months of therapy to work through this traumatic experience. We believe that those reactions were overblown. No one else reacted that way. Not even Becky Patty and she was probably more devastated than anyone and probably still is.

So Mr. X was more traumatized by this crime than anyone else, including the victim’s grandmother who was hurt more than anyone. We believe that the running away and months of therapy were also “staged.” In other words, they were faked. Faked to make it look like he could not possibly have committed the crime because he was more devastated than anyone else.

We Don’t Have a Copy of the Gag Order Supposedly Issued about the Towing of a Truck from the CPS Building on Either February 13 and 14

People are saying that we have a copy of the gag order that was issued on the towing of the truck at the CPS building. We believe that this happened in the first place because a photo exists of a truck being towed from the CPS building around February 13-14. We do not have a copy of that gag order, but we were told that one had been issued by the courts. We have no idea why the order was issued.

Nature of Case Document(s) in My Possession

We do indeed have document(s) from the case. A man was a suspect in this crime, and the document(s) are from LE’s investigation of him. The docs are his property. He ran them off for us and sent them to us in the mail. So it is true that we only have photocopies of these docs, not the real thing. But we believe our source, a man who lives in Delphi not far from the crime scene, sent us copies of the actual documents. He got turned in because two brothers for some reason were saying that he was BG.

There are signature(s) on the document(s). The sigs are from either LE, the judicial system, or both. We are not going to tell you what sort of document(s) we have. If you’re smart enough you should be able to figure it out by these bomb-sized hints we keep dropping.

The man who owns the documents is not happy with us going public with these docs. He doesn’t care that much about it in theory, but he doesn’t want to get uncovered revealing official case document(s) to the media. That’s why we’ve had to muddy up the nature of the document(s) themselves, how we obtained them, and how we received them. It’s an attempt to protect our source from being revealed. We confess that we do make up stuff about sensitive sources and documents. It’s all about protecting our sources. But we’ve never made up one single fact about this case in four years, despite what most of the Internet believes.

Nature of Mr. X’s “Sex Offense” from the 1980’s

Earlier we said that Mr. X had a conviction for a sex offense in the 1980’s when he was 16-26. On the other hand, other sleuths have come back and told us that Mr. X’s record is clean. That’s misleading. He has a conviction for statutory rape from 1982 in Illinois. He was 18 and the girl was 14.

The reason this offense is not seen on his record is because we believe he had it expunged. Expunged just means taken out of public records. LE still has access to the conviction. As far as how we obtained this information, we were told by a detective that Mr. X had this conviction. He told us it was in 1982. This is why we believe it occurred.

The idea that he was a “sex offender” in the 1980’s is a nothingburger. It’s just run of the mill statutory rape (which isn’t even rape) or as we prefer to call it, “illegal intercourse,” with a barely legal man and a teenage girl jailbait, which probably ought to be covered by Romeo and Juliet laws anyway.

Please follow and like us:
error3
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

32 thoughts on “Delphi Murders Update April 13, 2021: Stunning Rumors about the Murders and Related Matters Now Officially Proven!”

  1. Then there is always the question of his occupation. If he is a poser, which is the worst of the worst, and he has a transport company, that gives him carte blanche to move around in committing more crimes of this nature in different parts of the country as he travels. Point is that he may have never had ceased offending.

      1. By that I mean that he probably has offended many times but being transient affords one the luxury of not getting caught. He could offend today in say, Ohio and offend in Illinois and be in his journey back home to commit more offenses. Logistical occupations, Construction workers etc who travel have free reign.

        1. Ok he has committed some sort of sex crimes or other or weird crimes like peeping and whatnot. And possibly even other rapes and homicides.

  2. I’m limited in my sleuthing skills. My background is nowhere near close to any qualifications for this. In fact just based on what I have going on, researching this case is the absolute last thing I should be doing, but its drawing me in, and I cant help it.

    I want to be respectful to someone who is innocent until proven guilty also. I am trying to be vague.

    So yeah, if you type in Mr X’s real govt registered name into the old YT, you get a handful of cryptic videos, slideshows with creepy music typical for this sort of thing. BTW whats up with all the psychic stuff? I realize unsolved would be a magnet for that but wow. Anyhow on YT one of the titles says “former cheerleader.” Not that that’s necessarily relevant to the case, just that one of your pics above makes more sense now lol.

    Another one of the videos had what I’m assuming is a LinkedIn profile of some sort spliced into the slide show for a brief moment. You had mentioned in one of your blogs not being sure what he did for a living. It says at one point apparently Machine Operator as a title, but then the vid definitely makes it a point to focus on “Christian Teen Club.” Not sure what the implication is there, but one can certainly imagine.

      1. Oh they’re not made by him. I didn’t mean to imply that, sorry. They’re Delphi related videos comparing his appearance to BG.

        1. Paul, I know exactly what videos you are talking about on YouTube. The guy that is making those videos about Mr X, and the guy by the name of Derek godsey. He uses all kinds of weird aliases. But it’s definitely him! And Mr X was involved in a Christian teen club! He was like a manager there or something, in Delphi!!!

    1. You don’t have to join. A lot of my friends didn’t join. It’s $20. I can’t demand that my friends give me money!

  3. If one of the girls was pregnant, was the pregnancy a result of intercourse with Mr X? If so, wouldn’t the coroner be able to obtain DNA from the fetus? Was Mr X aware of the pregnancy and the murder was to hide that fact?

      1. Correct. Probably at least 6 weeks pregnant if the rumors are true. I’m not sure if pregnancy can be confirmed via autopsy before 6 weeks.

        Thank you for stopping by the site!

    1. Mr. X did not have PIV sex with either girl. Instead they were penetrated with inanimate objects, which, last time I checked, do not cause pregnancy. Anyway, even if there was PIV sex, the victim would have died soon after the sex and the tiniest speck of a fetus, the size of a pencil dot on a sheet of paper, along with it.

      If so, wouldn’t the coroner be able to obtain DNA from the fetus?

      Good question and we have no answer to it. If the father was an underage boy, I’m not sure anyone cares. If it was an adult male, that changes things considerably.

      Was Mr X aware of the pregnancy and the murder was to hide that fact?

      It is certainly an interesting question, is it not?

      Thank you for stopping by the site!

      1. Robert,

        Great to see you “back on the case”! I’ve followed your articles over the past four years and find your insight quite interesting!

        You mentioned a pic of CSI workers with a “doll” a couple of days ago – did anything come of this?

        Keep up the great work.

        J in Indy

        1. Thank you so much! At least some people like me.

          I still have the pic. You want me to put it up? Thing is, we can’t figure out if it is a crumpled piece of paper, dried leaves, a stuffed toy, or a doll. I tend to think it’s a doll. Want me to put it up anyway? Were you a member of the private group?

  4. It has been said there were dolls and stuffed animals around the girls. Wouldn’t 13-14 year old girls be past dolls and stuffed animals? What would be Mr X reason for leaving them there? Besides being psycho.

    1. Haven’t the faintest idea except this:

      Besides being psycho.

      That’s probably your answer. Thank you for stopping by the site.

  5. The case for Mr. X is as solid as ever. The dots connecting back to Iowa with the Tyson plant etc is great investigative work.

    I saw the local Delphi News footage from the week of the murders where they interview Ron Logan while they are actually searching his property. He states when he got home that night (13th) one of his neighbors had came over to ask if he could search his property, looking for the girls. So Mr. X did not ask him to search for his keys, he was officially asking to search for the girls according to ol’ Ronny boy.

    As you’ve pointed out Mr. X did this before the search party had even assembled, right at the EXACT parcel of land that the girls bodies would be found the next day. This just doesn’t bode well for him, I mean ESPECIALLY if you consider that he asked to search the Logan property and came up empty-handed.

    I almost have to wonder if that’s why he later concocted the story about the keys, perhaps as an afterthought when he realized it would be hard to explain why he asked to search for the girls but then didn’t find them somehow, “Uhh I was more focused on finding my keys, I must have overlooked the two dead girls I was looking for in the first place.”

    I am running into one issue with Mr. X. I was wondering if there might be a different thought on this. Some people are very insistent that Ron Logan is the killer. There is no doubt in my mind or anyone who is in possession of an IQ higher than double digit range that Ron Logan is not the killer. Drunkard perhaps. Killer? No, at least not in this case.

    I saw this being explained in some YT comments to a bunch of brainlets. It finally started to sink in to these geniuses when the case was made “look one of the eye witnesses who contributed to the 1st BG sketch is a lady who lives right behind Ron Logan, don’t you think if the Killer was Ron that she would say, simply yeah the guy I saw that day lives right behind me?” Not that anyone who has half a brain needs to be convinced Ron Logan is not the killer lol.

    However, shouldn’t that same exact principle/logic apply to Mr. X? Didn’t he at the time live down the street from Logan? Even if somehow she didn’t know about some surrounding neighbors, couldn’t LE just show her (or FSG or the bickering couple in the park etc,) a pic of Mr. X and get verification that way?

    1. He wasn’t searching for his keys early on. He was searching for the girls. It was dark. To be fair, two other men were also searching Ron’s land that night and they didn’t find anything either, so it looks like those girls were pretty hard to miss.

      No, he came up with the “lost my keys” gambit to explain why his car sat at the cemetery from 6:30 PM the day of the crime to 12:30 PM the next day when the girls’ bodies were found, a period of 18 full hours.

      Of course Ron Logan didn’t do it. Was he set up to take the fall? Maybe.

      BG was very well disguised that day with a white scarf covering the lower half of his face. It’s certainly possible that she may well have not recognized Mr. X, even though he was apparently a neighbor. FSG didn’t recognize him either, and I’m sure that FSG and Mr. X knew each other. FSG knew everyone in town.

  6. How do they know he sent audio/video to one of the girls’ phones? They recovered Libby’s phone, so they wouldn’t still be “looking” for the audio/video. If it was Abby’s phone this would imply she had a phone, he somehow got her number, he connected to a cell tower to send media, and then he took the phone.

    1. We don’t know. It’s a rumor.

      But answer me this. I have an official case document here in my hand. It says they are looking for photos, videos, cameras, videocameras, film, etc.

      That can only mean one thing. That’s a GoPro on BG’s waist and he filmed his crime.

      Also there’s only one way for LE to know that BG filmed his crime – if the rumors about sending video of the crime to the girls’ phones afterwards is true. It’s true by process of elimination.

      Can you explain to me how LE would know that BG filmed his crime if he didn’t send that crime footage to the girls’ phones?

      Also how about this? They are looking for exactly 43 seconds of audio that BG recorded. Ok how on Earth do they know that BG shot 43 seconds of audio unless that rumor about sending the crime film to the phones is true?

      Several LE officials have said that Abby had a phone, whether with her or not is not known. Maybe he sent it to Libby’s phone. The catfish had been catfishing those girls for four months. Plenty of time to get numbers, etc.

      Yes, they would be looking for it, because if you know computers etc. when you send someone a file, you retain a copy for yourself. So he obviously kept a copy of that for himself.

      What’s your theory? You got one?

      1. Wait so the part about him recording the crime is some search warrant given to someone where the cops wanted to check media files? Why would they NOT want to look for those types of things in a child murder with likely sa involved? Of course they would look for that. 43 sec is probably the time they have of the man on the girls phone recording.

        1. Wait so the part about him recording the crime is some search warrant given to someone where the cops wanted to check media files

          I do not feel comfortable answering that question right now.

          Why would they NOT want to look for those types of things in a child murder with likely sa involved?

          Are you serious? How often to killers, of children or otherwise, take fucking photos and videos of their goddamned crimes? How about never? So every time a kid gets killed in a sexual murder, LE goes looking for photos and videos of the murder because obviously everyone who kills a kid takes pics of it and videotapes it. It’s very rare for killers to take photos or videos of their crimes. The only case I am familiar with is the Bittaker-Norris Murders in Southern California. Yes, they did record audio of themselves torturing those girls.

          43 sec is probably the time they have of the man on the girls phone recording.

          This makes absolutely no sense at all. Libby’s phone did not record him for 43 seconds. She recorded them for a good six minutes and definitely longer. And if it was 43 seconds, it would be on Libby’s phone! Why on Earth would the killer have a copy of an audio file from Libby’s phone! Makes no sense at all.

          Your critiques are not even making sense. Try harder.

    2. You made a mistake my friend. You came over here after sitting over of that hate Reddit, LibbyandAbby where you’ve been hating on me. You think I’m stupid? I’m not stupid. I read most of those posts over there and of course I read any post about me.

      By the way, what’s a “legitimate journalist?” What’s a “illegitimate journalist?” There’s no such thing as either. There’s just journalists. Good ones and bad ones, perhaps, but there’s no such thing as legitimate versus illegitimate. You don’t need a degree, credential, and a license to do this job, you know. Literally anyone can be a journalist. And I happen to be trained as a Journalist. BA, Journalism, Cal State University Long Beach, 1981. How many journalists do you know who actually went to J-school and have J-degrees? They’re not that common.

      Oh and one more thing.

      HAVE A NICE DAY!

  7. I guess one thought about the cops searching for videos, and I don’t know the specific wording but could it be they are looking for businesses or residences that have security cameras?

    Robert, have you heard that Mr X had a deer blind on the Mears property?

    I’ve seen some FB exchanges from BP where like you say, she appears to be defending Mr X or at least in denial that he could be a suspect. She mentions how the search parties on the 13th had a hard time finding the girls because they didn’t think the were looking for bodies but alive girls and she says additionally, “also they were partially covered.” What does that mean? I’m not sure I understand what “covered” means. Only thing I can come up with if we go with the rumors is that he draped them with the sheet that had the smiley face on it perhaps?

    Also, I don’t know what to make of this. That mod who runs the Libby/Abby Subreddit where LK hosted his Q&A and whom he specifically references (and per himself has given her proof of his real identity) seems to be indicating that LK is not who he claims to be. She feels he is a current POI who is working OT to divert attention away from himself and mislead the public. I don’t get that vibe at all with everything I know, but then again I know very little lol. Just thought I would draw your attention to it.

    1. Oh one more thing. Mr X’s alibi… is it true that the person who is now deceased is a police officer who committed suicide?

      1. The rumor is that his alibi is a Delphi police officer, Nate Allen, who committed suicide in December. Apparently claimed that he saw Mr. X in another town around the time of the murders. I get the impression that LE thought that this officer was lying and were trying to offer him some protection.

    2. No, they are obviously looking for photos and videos that the killer took as part of this crime.

      He may well have had a deer blind on the Mears property. He hunted deer on RL’s land all the time.

      Partially covered with leaves probably.

      No, LK is the real deal. I hope he doesn’t read here but I knew a Facebook group mod who was in contact with him and she felt he was either gay, an effeminate man, or a Beta, as she put it. He was very fearful and it really hit him hard how he got treated on that Reddit sub. He was also scared to join her group because I was in there and he was afraid of me. He’s a straight man with a wife, but maybe he’s wimpy like a lot of straight men are.

      Anyway, pastor in a Pentecostal church would be a perfect place for a man like that because those religious people don’t care much about Alpha, Beta, and all that stuff. They just accept everyone as long as you say you’re straight. They even try to cure effeminate gay men and let them back in the churches as long as they say they’re cured of homosexuality. They also acknowledge that SSA, or same sex attraction is a logical process for a lot of men. They just think it’s a sin that needs to be overcome. They also think you get that way from your upbringing, especially with your father.

      Also his personality is nothing like “Scott Alexander,” some sock who is claiming to be LK on Facebook groups. And I seriously doubt that any of those POI’s have access to all of those sensitive case documents or that any of them have a personality like that.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *