I also took two other pics but I think I’m grimacing too much in those pics so I didn’t put them up. This seemed to be the best of the three. What do you think? I don’t mind guys’ opinions, but if I still have any female readers I haven’t scared off yet, it might be interesting to get their opinions. I used to have quite a few female readers on the old site, but most of them took off when I went to the new site. My female readers were always telling that a lot more women read my site than I thought.
I actually like this pic. I can’t believe because I always hate my photos. I think I need better lighting. As you can see, this is my new haircut. I’m rocking a 1970’s glam rockstar look. What do you think? I thought my looks were shot but women keep telling me that I look great. Even young women aged 18-25. Even a few underage girls, 17 years old. Don’t worry, I didn’t touch them. I’m sure one day I will be old and ugly if I make it that long. Time gets us all in the end and that’s if we luck out!
I guess the moral to the story though is Chad never dies. Not that Looks do much good at this age. I could be the best looking man my age on Earth and it wouldn’t do me one damned bit of good. Well, it would work for women my age, but it would be useless for young women. The only thing that works at this age is money. That’s especially important for young women. You want a young woman at my age, you’ll have to shell out the cash.
I definitely need to smile more.
Ok, which one looks better, this one or the one at the top?
7 thoughts on “New Photo, Age 63”
Like a college professor.
A university professor lol.
If you’re fine with saying- which is your birth year? 1957 or 58?
Which pic is better.
2nd one obviously. 1st one isnt very clear.
Bottom one. Top one looks like the Raggedy Ann lady from the L.A. county health department giving Corona updates.
The bottom one is nice.
The top pic makes you look like a stoner Bernie Sanders who’s moved on to the wetter pastures of alcoholism.