Alt Left: Of Course I’m Not a Racist

Polar Bear: I consider Robert antiracist with a soft spot for US Blacks.

Of course I am! I am a pretty mild anti (old school) but I am still an anti at my core (MLK style). How come these White Nationalist types are the only ones who get me right? They all say exactly this. All of the White nationalists say, “Hey look, man! You’re not one of us, ok? You’re an anti.” They often add that I’m anti-White. Wouldn’t you think if I were one of them, they would just come right out and say it?

I tell modern SJW scum this, and they start twisting themselves around in all sorts of weird human pretzels trying to make sense. Typically they say that racism goes beyond the Mighty Whitey types and White nationalists. Ok, fine, but isn’t there a bit of a continuum when it comes to this sort of thing? The guy next door who muses, “Boy, Blacks sure commit a lot of crime, don’t they?” is the same as Richard Spencer and Stormfront.

“Of course,” SJW’s say, “It’s all the same.” But do you see how insane that is? Jews think like this too. People around the watercooler laughingly comment that Jews are loud, rude, and obnoxious. Half of them are Judeophiles, but every Judeophile I ever knew said precisely this about Jews. The Jew sees that and according to this insane Jewish lunatic, those Judeophiles standing around the watercooler are exactly the same as the maniacs who threw his ancestors in the fire.

And of course the WN view is true because this is how I see myself. I assume that I see myself in a proper light. I would hate to think that others understand me better than I understand myself. I’m much too self-aware for that.

Really racism is a continuum of 0-100 I think. 0 is absolutely nonracist or antiracist. 100 would be completely racist, at least towards some particular group.I am thinking that there are not a lot of 0’s out there, but there are obviously some.

According to SJW’s, we all have to be zero’s on the scale! But why? It’s human nature to be somewhere on a continuum when it comes to most anything. This isn’t a purity contest or is it? SJW’s demand that people be 10

On that 0-100, WN’s would be racist towards most other groups so they would be close to 100’s; Nordicists are racist towards nearly everyone on the planet so they would be even closer to 100’s.

 

Alt Left: Of Course I’m Not a Misogynist

Polar Bear: He’s pro-woman at his core but is suffering a bit of racial ageism.

Of course. I’ve always liked women better than men. If I had my way, I’d just be around women all the time or as much of the time as possible. I love being around guys too, but women are better in a way.As you can see, if I like women better than men, I’m obviously a misogynist, right? Feminists are so full of shit.

But in a way it’s a circular argument because no matter what, you will be around men.

You don’t like women much? Ok, you will be around men.

You like women as much as men? Ok, you will be around men half the time at least.

You like women better than men? The weird thing is that even there you will have men around a lot because if you are around women all the time, pretty soon you will have guys hanging around because “I want to hang out with the guy who has all the chicks around him.” Get the picture?

I’m almost like a gay man in that sense. In fact, I used to think I was like “one of women’s gay friends, except I’m straight.”

I agree that I am “one of the girls” in a sense. But I’m not really. I’m just pretending to be one of the girls. I’m really an evil spy pretending to be one of the girls except I’m secretly a guy infiltrating them in order to deviously trick, fool, and scam them into having sex with me.

Part of my brain is like a woman’s brain, so in a way, I think like a woman. That’s why I understand women pretty well. Most women’s conversation seems insipid to us men – hot guys, makeup, clothes, gossip, bla bla, lot of silly giggling and verbal hugging. It’s just pure idiocy. They seem like children.

But I’ve heard that women think the same of us when we get together with fart jokes, sports, and arguing politics. Men are insipid to them.

So I can sit around with a bunch of women being women and doing their girl chat, completely idiotic and senseless, like chirping birds fighting for no reason at your feeder, and I’m right at home amidst all this silliness and idiocy. Sure it is silly and idiotic, but I love it because I even love women when they are being idiotic. Because I’m sort of one myself.

Now mind you I am not a tranny at all. I love being a man and I respect any man, especially a gay man, who loves being a man. I’m also as masculine as any man that ever lived in a sense, and that’s my primary self-image. So I don’t hate being a man and wish I was a woman.

Women weren’t being very nice to me a while ago, but I completely changed my looks. I have long hair now, look like a 1970’s glam rock star, and now women are being way, way nicer. See how shallow women are? Pathetic, isn’t it?

Why Prudish Christian Morality?

This has always been a problem with me, as I can’t see why people would want to submit to morality when being immoral is so much fun! However, looking at this deeper, we can see that even in the Christian realm, sex is more allowed than we think. For instance, Mormons practice polygamy and King Solomon had many wives. We don’t even know what the next world is for the faithful, and there might be a relaxation on sex restrictions in Heaven.

So what’s the point of Christian sex rules?

Well, the end-times nanotech “Satan wants to kill us” meme has got me thinking that the fun out there is only a mechanism to herd animals to slaughter. Now at a lower level, nobody is aware this is true, but higher up, it’s exactly the plan.

Of course, throughout history, the idea is that if you’re bad, you got to hell. But Hell doesn’t scare people, so it makes me wonder if Satan made that up! But the actual end-times truth of population reduction/genocide is definitely showing the true colors with all that’s going on.

The White Nationalist Hoax

It’s one because, even though what the two groups each believe is hideous, the elite believes the same thing as the White Nationalists, but they hide behind pink and lavender shirts, dorky glasses – whatever.

Who has the real power? White Nationalists are used as a distraction so nobody can look at the Satanic Elite – one that has a population/genocide goal now in full force once the Covid-19 vaccine comes in.

This leads me to another thought. Maybe Hitler was brought here and allowed to do his horror so the Satanic Elite can have a distraction. In other words, the idea behind Satan’s relationship to the common people of whatever race is “I’m your friend. I’m concerned about you. I’m not a mean Nazi who bullies people.”

Another Thought

The idea of the Jewish elite trying to destroy humanity is another distraction, one that discredits the notion of  human extermination because, well, again, people associate bigots with being bullies/mean. Also, the elite isn’t Jewish. It has some Jews but Gates isn’t Jewish. The eugenicist elite who are leading the way in wanting to lower the population, and oddly enough, Nazis love eugenics!

All in all, it’s a disturbing scenario as convoluted as a spy movie, and in the end, the true evil is obfuscated from the people as usual.

End-Game: Humanity Exterminated

https://banned.video/watch?id=5ec2a9c6244ac5001d2a12e0

Christians are taught that the Anti-Christ wants to kill them. Indeed, Satan wants to kill not just Christians but humanity in general, probably even the people like Gates and other elites.

The idea is “bait and switch.” Give people what they want – like  giving cows grass – and then it’s slaughter time!

From my study of eugenics acquired by reading White Nationalist sites, I could certainly see that it was an evil thing, and it’s so ironic that it’s the liberal elites who are actually pushing it the strongest, and they are the ones able to carry it out! Interesting!

The idea here would be that we pretend to be the friend of the downtrodden only to lure them into extermination.

Note the non-threatening Bill Gates lavender shirt – LOL.

 

This is Very Creepy and Horrifyingly True

https://www.infowars.com/bill-gates-plan-to-chip-the-world-explained-watch-live/

I’m at a loss for words, lol. But I totally believe it in the case of Bill Gates, Oprah, and Ted Turner (Is he still alive?).

These are power-hungry creeps who were never elected as the Greek gods they fancy themselves to be. Well, we did buy their products, but that doesn’t give them the right to be Big Brother.

White Nationalists Are Not Libertarians but They Often Appeal to That Crowd

Nope, WNs are statists on the level of Communists. However, in besieged USA where PC is in overkill, both Libertarians and Nazis feel persecuted, and the WN movement is adopting “freedom deception” as propaganda. For instance, their new line is:

Real men need guns and non-PC speech.

It shouldn’t be uprising that Alex Jones, for instance, disagrees with David Duke because at their core, Nazis are not for Libertarian freedom.

Useful Idiots

That would apply.

Is Alex Jones a Racist?

Not all these types are racists in the sense of hardcore White Nationalists. In fact, Jones had a debate with David Duke, and I believe his disagreements with Duke were heartfelt. Likewise, it’s highly unlikely the Fox News crowd – despite all the insults from the Left – are hardcore White Nationalists. In fact, Bill O Reilly also had a debate with David Duke and similarly defended conservative politics while refusing to accept Duke’s racism.

However

The line is often murky with supporters of these talking heads. In fact, a good number of them seem as if they are on the verge of falling into the White Nationalist pit. Nonetheless, to judge regular people’s morality comes across as being the Thought Police, and of course, blaming the talking heads for racism just because some supporters are racist is off the mark.

Vitamin D Stops Covid-19

Those dumb Chinese  – couldn’t they even build a weapon that could withstand a vitamin supplement – LOL?

https://www.infowars.com/vitamin-d-deficiency-associated-with-covid-19-severity-mortality/

Anyway, this is testimony that Americans are not taking care of their health very well, and I don’t mean drowning themselves with medicine but just basic holistic health.

Homeschooling Protecting Kids from Bullying

Not sure if this is a good thing or not. Well, @Robert Lindsay certainty wouldn’t agree.

https://www.infowars.com/thanks-to-shutdowns-many-will-learn-that-public-schooling-isnt-all-that-essential-after-all/

Although public schools may be “safe spaces” for politically correct curricula, they do not guarantee safe environments for students’ physical and mental health.

According to a study from the US Department of Health and Human Services, 49 percent of school children in grades 4–12 reported being subjected to bullying by other students on a monthly basis, while 30.8 percent reported that they themselves engaged in bullying. How’s that for constructive socialization?

The reason though is because it all boils down to the parents raising a stronger kid before they get to school. It’s funny when these types talk about bullying because – LOL – due to their views (Be a man, Stand up for the Whites etc.), they’re the ones doing/defending the bullying. But of course we can’t forget Latino and Black bullying of Whites.

Yankee Smart-asses

Yankee as in Northerner, not American – lol.

This reminds me of that scene on Crocodile Dundee.

Crocodile Dundee Spoiler

Dundee is getting verbally harassed by the lady reporter’s boyfriend who suggests Dundee was experiencing the novelty of “eating something without killing it first.” Despite Dundee’s tough demeanor, he can’t ignore it and punches the man in the face – LOL.

[collapse]

I encountered a Canadian radical atheist in South Korea when I first went there. He threw all sorts of insults at me – unprovoked, mind you – but they was more comical than insulting, reminding me of the Crocodile Dundee scene.

But that man made me wonder how anyone could be that seriously arrogant, especially considering that he  wasn’t even drunk. That boggled my mind. You get plenty of jackasses in the South, but it was interesting to finally see one from the liberal camp.

What’s Worse – The COVID Virus or the Bad Side Effects from a Shut-Down Economy?

It’s the goal of society to protect health from the initial threat, not the secondary ones that follow. I mean, what are they supposed to do? Ignore the Coronavirus? Even if they did, imagine all the lawsuits when the ignoring leads to deaths. That alone is one big reason the government and everyone else is going along with the agenda.

Some Thoughts

Bad things as side effects from protecting one’s health are just part of life. People need to “adult up” or as the un-PC term has it “man up.” I’m sorry there is domestic abuse and suicide, but how is society supposed to allow the first threat to exist just to stop the secondary ones?

O.K., who wants to argue this on the blog?

Alt Left: Libertarian Topics It’s Ok to Discuss On Here

If you want to talk about Libertarians on metoo, custody courts, affirmative action, and reparations, ok.

These are all areas of government (and corporate) overreach. I would particularly like to see critiques of the carceral system and carceral state, everybody calling the cops for every little problem, and the fact that about half of the things we want to do in life are now actually or effectively illegal. Every year I look at the new laws, and more things I have been doing my whole life are illegal.

Look at speech codes and hate speech codes. Every week I wake up and another word I’ve been using my whole life is banned. Every other sentence is now some sort of bigotry, offense, or insult needing an apology else your career is over.

It’s not the state that’s doing this. It’s our Sanctimonious Nanny State (a word I hate) Culture or Nanny State Culture that’s firing all these guys. Our culture is now run by Church Ladies (Church Lady Culture) and Stern Nuns with Rulers. No fun allowed! Fun is bigotry! Fun is hate! If you’re having fun, you must be hating, preying up, exploiting or hurting some poor vulnerable soul.

How about the increasingly Puritan Left, Comstock Left, Victorian  Left, or Sex-hating Left. Of course all of this is coming right out  of Sex-Negative Feminism. I came out of the revolutions of the 1960’s. One of our mottoes was, “Do it in the streets!” So my whole life, I’ve been a Do it in the streets type guy. A Hugh Hefner liberal.

The Left is now as sex-hating as the Christian Right. Hell, the only sex-positive politics these days is on the Right! Pathetic! I didn’t sign up for this shit, this prudery. The Left is now championing everything we were opposed and fought against.

The whole carceral state (Mommy Cop) is out of control. I want to see it reigned in. Probably half of our laws should be flushed down the toilet. People can pretty easily solve most of their problems themselves without getting Mommy Cop (the Police State).

Any problem nowadays, snowflakes go yelling for Mommy Cop to come rescue them. “Mommy Cop! He hurt me! He called me a name!” Mommy Cop whips out her ticket book and writes a ticket for yet another of a growing list of citation offenses.

If you want to talk any of these things, go for it:

    • Our invasion of privacy or the fact that we have no privacy at all anymore.
    • #metoo, sexual assault and raaaaaaaaape bullshit.
    • The travesty of custody courts.
    • Affirmative action.
    • Reparations.
    • The carceral system or carceral state (Mommy Cop).
    • Legal reform, eliminating many stupid, intrusive, anti-freedom, and sanctimonious laws about personal behavior.
    • The fact that people can probably solve a lot of issues now dealt with by Mommy Cop amongst themselves without crying for Mommy Cop.
    • Hate speech and speech codes.
    • Cancel Culture or the Left’s war on free speech and increasingly even free thought.
    • Various sanctimonious party-pooper, no fun, turd in the punchbowl modern Left cultures that could be called such things as Nanny State Culture, Church Lady Culture, or Nuns with Rulers Culture, in other words the punitive aspects of the Cultural Left.
    • The prudish, anti-sex Left cultures variously described the Puritan Left, Comstock Left, Victorian Left, or Sex-hating Left. Also Sex-Negative Feminism.
    • Anti-freedom, Carceral State Feminism.
    • Pedophile Mass Hysteria, the insane abuse of age of consent and statutory rape laws, and the moral panic around the sexuality of teenage girls.
    • The increasing infantilization of society where childhood is dragged out to the day before the 18th birthday and beyond.
    • Females demanding to be permanent infants when it benefits them and then permanent adults when that benefits them.
    • The notion that females are Forever Children who lack agency their entire lives.

Libertarians have excellent views on all this, which is really civil libertarianism. I am a civil libertarian, as in an ACLU-type liberal. Libertarians are with the old ACLU on civil liberties.

The ACLU is now a cucked, fagged-out Cultural Left Shitshow characterized by dishonest legal theory and the abandonment of (male) reason and logic in favor of (female) emotion and bias when it comes to legal matters. But the old ACLU was great, and the Libertarians line right up with the old liberal civil libertarians. So that’s a great commonality with Libertarians that we can talk about.

Yes – Medical Science isn’t Stupid – Covid-19 is Not a Conspiracy

https://www.infowars.com/it-wasnt-the-virus-that-crashed-the-economy-it-was-the-people-who-obeyed/

The virus didn’t give any orders. It was the people who obeyed the commands of tyrants that crashed the economy and ruined the livelihoods of others.

Most human beings still think like slaves. 

Instead of asking questions or using critical thinking skills to ask if something is right before doing it, they simply obey perceived “authority”.  The truth is, this lockdown is the fault of everyone who complied and everyone who used forced to exact revenge on those who disobeyed.  It was the same in all tyrannical takeovers in history.

This is what you call conspiracy-paranoia-overkill – LOL

O.K., maybe people are given to herd thinking.  Nonetheless, herd thinking was the exact most safe response to a killer virus – but is Info Wars saying that the virus isn’t as deadly as claimed.   That’s a laugh!

Well, it is sad that Americans have turned into slaves – but American aborts nearly a million babies a year – so this is some kind of Babylonian Exile for Americans, it’s a very tough chastisement to take.

What if people hadn’t obeyed?

Well, medical science would say that perhaps a million, not 100,000 would have died.  Anyway, sadly even with obeying, experts claim this will strongly come back – and again, the only way to lower numbers – is more slavery, more quarantine.

What in the crap are these Info Wars people thinking?  I mean, I can understand the hatred of big government intrusion – but this is anti-science stupidity.   Do the readers really believe this?

Disaster Prone Areas – Cannot Handle Libertarianism

Fact of the matter, too much bad stuff is happening to the USA.  In fact, if people wanted government off their back, they’d better off to become religious fundamentalists.

I  mean, the US does abort nearly one-million babies a year.  So, given that fact, are these disasters karma?

However, though, libertarians are still whining over rights – and honestly, I’m glad they are – cause stuff needs to be criticized.  Nonetheless, though, you can’t get a good life for nothing.  I mean, if karma is not on your side – you might as well fold the tent and go home.

What’s the future for the USA?

Well, things aren’t going to bonce back – cause viruses like come back more than likely – and you can expect that China will continue to use bio-war – because it works.     It’s accomplishing all the goals they want.

In this case, to help the public – the police and nanny state are necessary – but, obviously, shit that annoys and oppresses people.

Hope for Libertarianism in the Past

Under a more normie America – like after World II – 2019, it could be said that government overreach wasn’t necessary.

Running a Business These Days Is Hugely Expensive

Not only is it expensive to open and run a business in normal times, but Covid-19 is making things even worse. One of the bigger, more popular businesses in a city near me – the IHOP – closed down! That place seemed invincible!

Anyone running a business like a restaurant, shop, etc. these days has to have a huge amount of money set aside to weather disease shutdowns. They need to have 2-3+ months of rent – which is often probably outrageous – saved up for if and when no revenue is coming in.

Some local businesses here are trying to go take-out to save themselves, but it’s not always working. This local IHOP tried to go that route, but obviously it failed.

The price to start a business like a restaurant nowadays is over-the-top ($100,000-1 million in capital), and even with that, they couldn’t weather a disease shutdown.

But You Live a Soft Life – Who Are You To Criticize My Thinking?

This is an excuse from one I know very well. His rejoinder would be that I’m some hermit hiding from real life while he’s out busting his gut trying to make money.

But that isn’t whole story. He’s one of the ne’er-do-wells I was mentioning earlier who ruined his own life and is now living with the fallout from that.

The racism he displays is an excuse for his failed life, and it’s also a product of him being a shitty person. If he’d get over that attitude, I’d say things would change.

 

Victimization Syndrome is Far Worse Among Hardcore Nationalists than Democrat or Republican Ones

No, doubt if it’s some Marcus Garvey follower, you’re going to get more preachy shit than from some Democrat. Also, Republicans have their share of White victimization thinking, but only Republican activists – probably Whites who work in prison (I have a relative like that) – are going to be massively obnoxious.

Anyway, I think removal from being around the “bad Other” mellows people out and also making more money. I mean, no doubt poverty does contribute to non-White racism against Whites and also White racism against non-Whites. The fact is these people live miserable lives full of resentment.

Now it is true Jews are pushing “everyone coming together,” and people living soft lives away from any real trouble are more likely to buy into it.  Well, of course. However, it would surprise you the amount of White racists in areas where there are no non-Whites. I take this is Whites who have had bad experiences with non-Whites outside of the White neighborhood.

Creepy 1984-esque Covid Announcements

Yeah, we’re in it together  – bro – lol.

Uh, thanks, but no thanks.  I don’t know you.  You’re not my bro.

Of course, it’s especially comical when rich people are at home, they try to cheer us up – like they’re one of us.  Sure..

But, this was all expected – the police state and all. It was inevitable – especially since China  has resorted to bio-war.  Anyway, some don’t believe this is Bio-war – but let’s look at the facts:

Trump stands up to China.  Now who has ever stood up to a strong Asian nation on trade without hell to pay?  Do you seriously think they would bow down to Trump – without doing nothing?   However, they can’t resort to a real war – because that would be nuclear.  In that case, we have a proxy war – but not Vietnam, but rather just throwing decayed corpses over enemy lines.

They Still Dwell on an Excuse

No, a person’s worth isn’t measured by their job.  Nonetheless, the pursuit of vocational license or a college degree is something I think highly of, and so-called “nationalists” of many races aren’t interested in going to school to obtain one.

For instance, the Black guys in the movie Higher Learning calling the Black professor and the college track runner (“Run, nigger, run!”) Uncle Toms. Or the typical good ole boy pothead working at a supermarket dwelling on Jews and the Illuminati.

But This Isn’t Saying

That there aren’t plenty of high-paid blue collar tradesmen who aren’t into racism.

However, I feel the organized racist movements of any race are generally made up of people who feel that others have cheated them in life, when in reality they have only cheated themselves.

 

People Who Bitch at Minimum Wage Workers

I can’t stand them. I did make a comment about grumbling losers who work minimum wage jobs because they haven’t tried harder in life. Yet that doesn’t mean Is excuse people being harsh on minimum wage workers in general.

Nonetheless…

Some minimum wage workers are lousy people. They’re either deliberately mean or they’re whiny babies. Discipline has a place in this world. Shall we should go easy on military recruits?

Isn’t doesn’t this site have an anti-soft point of view? Isn’t that one the important themes of this site?

Oh no! We can’t avoid using racist slurs – that would be soft – lol.

/s

Alt Left: Libertarianism and the Alt Left: Prospects for an Alliance?

CLAVDIVS AMERICANVS: Peronismo definitely won’t fly in Libertarian circles. Argentina is used as a case study for a failed nationalized protectionist economy.

That’s probably not even true. They did great during the Peron years.

I think that the Trump years in general and this COVID-19 response in particular, both of which have been characterized by neoliberal or Libertarian policy and a Libertarian response to a crisis, respectively, has proven the abject failure of the neoliberal or Libertarian model. As if it had not been proven failed by the 2008 crash, which was caused wholly by this model.

CLAVDIVS AMERICANVS: To unify all the nomadic tribes of the Alternative Steppe, three things are need. First, a rejection of central economic planning would have to be declared by right and left wingers. Second, constitutional or legislative limitations on the power of government to regulate. Essentially, castrate the FDA, FCC, FAA etc.* and legalize drugs

I absolutely will not go for either of those. Central planning is working great in China. Even South Korea, Japan, and Germany engage in central planning.

And we will never go along with gutting regulations. Alt Leftists are regulators. We are really Big Government types in a lot of ways.

CLAVDIVS AMERICANVS: And third, a solution to the immigration problem.

There is no solution to this problem.

CLAVDIVS AMERICANVS: The social-economic model, even if never explicitly stated as such, would be capitalism for corporations, socialism for individuals, and tyranny at the border, which is the inverse of what we have now. Warren Buffett agrees.

It’s the capitalism for corporations part that we are going to object to. That’s the whole problem right there.

CLAVDIVS AMERICANVS: The Democrats will stay hopelessly in shambles for the next few elections until minority GDP and population both over take that of whites.

I wouldn’t count on that if I were you.

CLAVDIVS AMERICANVS: Deregulation is hard for leftists to accept because of the strong tendency to falsely conflate wealth redistribution with government regulation.

It is in fact that only thing that redistributes income at all. Absent that you just have never-ending growth of inequality until you pretty much have feudalism. Neoliberalism (or Libertarian economics) has failed everywhere it’s been tried. It’s only success stories are when it’s mixed with socialism. Most of the world rejects neoliberal economics. The US is a holdout. There aren’t many others.

CLAVDIVS AMERICANVS: I suggest aptitude AND loyalty testing for immigrants to keep the stupids or anti-westerns out.

That’s fine.

CLAVDIVS AMERICANVS: No explicit racism, but it would effectively bring in only Christian Caucasians from Europe, Africa and the Middle-East, liberal East Asians and light-skinned Hispanics.

We would object to this part. Of course we want mostly high-quality immigrants, but they don’t have to be any particular race. High-quality immigrants of any race should be just fine.

CLAVDIVS AMERICANVS: Currently, strong regulation of consumer goods & services exists because, ex post fact, individuals can’t afford to sue companies for the damages their products may have caused. As IQ’s, automation, access to on-line information, and personal income increase worldwide, people could rely less on byzantine jurisprudence.

I don’t understand any of this.

CLAVDIVS AMERICANVS: But as I see the tsunami of technology and globalization approaching to totally demolish the justification for our current system, I can’t help but take preparations for the utopia. We must agree on which anarchist utopia to usher in, lest our system turn into a Blade Runner dystopia.

The future will not be any type of anarchism. In fact the future will see a greater role for the state.

Alt Left: A Rundown of the “Conservative Left”

Here is a rundown on the “conservative Left” – liberal to Left on economics and centrist to Right on social issues.

Nazbols or National Bolsheviks– The classic socially conservative and economically Leftist group. Founded in Russia by Limonov, a writer. They never had much of an ideology other than some extreme nationalism, albeit not ethnic nationalism but instead “Russian Empire nationalism” -see below. Mostly they were just permanent rebels, almost perverse in that sense. They seemed to automatically oppose anything or anyone in power reflexively. Often tarred by the Cultural Left as fascists, Nazis, etc. However, Limonov himself was neither a Nazi nor a fash. His movement united people from the left, right and center in a populist nationalism similar to Peronism. More of a Third Positionist. Arkan’s Serbian Tigers of the Serbian National Party could be seen as Nazbol. Horribly marred by racism and even genocidism. They were guilty of genocide of non-Serbs in the Balkans. Milosevic may have been similar – a racist Communist (see below).

The Alternative Left or Alt Left – more Centrist than conservative on social stuff. Already splintered to Hell and split into 13 different wings, including a moderate sort of liberal-Left White Nationalist wing rejected by the others but nevertheless one of the founding factions. Movement was originally race realist, now dropped from program. Agnostic and silent – no comment – on race realism. Brocialist Left (Brocialists), also Partyboy Left, Fratboy Left, Trollblogger Left, Shitlord Left, or Asshole Left, sometimes very irreverent and offensive but mostly just trolls. Shitlord, shitposting and trolling tendencies. Some are “trollbloggers” like Max

The Realist Left. More liberal than left on culture and more between the Cultural Left and the Alt Left on social stuff. Their beef is more intellectual – opposition to postmodernism. They are also anti-Marxist though. Basically Keynesians with safety net.

The Old Left. Hard Left on economics. Quite conservative on culture. Think KPRF or the Russian Communist Party.

Dirtbag Left, etc. Left economics. Other groups think the are too SJW. Basically brocialists. Jimmy Dore, Kyle Kuklinski, Cenk Uyghur, etc. Anti-SJW, irreverent. Partyboy Left, Fratboy Left, Asshole Left. Brocialists.

leftypol -longstanding 4chan sub. Marxist on economics but somewhat anti-Identity Politics (Idpol), nevertheless quite left on culture but not nearly as far as the Cultural Left. Sort of Cultural Left 1995, if you will.

Third Positionists. All sorts of groupings. Vary a lot but tend to be nationalists but not ethnic nationalists – anyone can come to the nation, assimilate, and be a national – French post-Revolution nationalism or Russian nationalism. Russian nationalism like French nationalism is assimilationist nationalist and typically not ethnic nationalist, accepts many minorities into the “empire” of the Russian state, Orthodox but warm towards moderate Islam and assimilating Jews, very pragmatic.

Peronism – longstanding socialist nationalism of the “common man” or shirtless ones and populist in that sense. Somewhat socially conservative. Like Nazbols in uniting right, left, and center around a populist nationalism. Also contained both Marxist and fash wings!

International Socialist Movement –  runs International Socialist Review website. Trotskyist but pragmatic, longstanding anti-Idpol on  a Marxist theoretical basis.

“Conservative Left” – There are others that are part of existing states. However they are marred by ethnic chauvinism, racism, fash tendencies, authoritarianism, brutality, or even genocidism. Erdogans in Turkey, Orban in Hungary, Arab nationalists like Baath Party people in Syria and Iraq, Burmese regime, Qaddafi’s green socialism in Libya, Iranian Revolutionary Left or even the existing state, Putin in Russia, Lukashenko in Belarus, Duterte in Philippines, Sandinistas, ETA in Basque Country (dissolved), and even Hamas &  Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood to some extent. All former Communist countries were conservative on social stuff with left economics.

Red Tories – Canadian group. Liberal-left on economics, a bit conservative on social stuff but not too much. Moderate heterodox movement.

George Wallace supporters – left populism marred by racism.

Strasserists – “White Nationalist Left” or worse Nazi Left or Racist Left in the original incarnation. Heimbach’s Traditionalist Workers Party, Tom Metzger, etc. I appreciate Metzger’s populist support for workers – albeit White workers – and ferocious anti-bossism, anti-rich rhetoric. Both are Strasserists, but they are terribly marred by racism- Metzger’s followers have murdered minorities and Heimbach’s movement was very racist. Original Strasserists disliked Jews on an economic instead of racial basis and rejected Nazi scientific racism. Nevertheless, modern Strasserists have committed racist murders against Jews, so I don’t see why the reason for their antisemitism is important. They are extremely marred if not discredited by racism. Basically Nazi Communists, if that term even makes sense. Strasserists were very pro worker and anti-capitalist, I’ll give them that. There is a huge Strasserist wing on Stormfront. Most people don’t know that.

“Economic reductionists” – slur directed by mainstream Left towards the conservative left. Also often called fascists, rightists, conservatives, racists, sexists, homophobes, transphobes, bigots, etc. probably falsely because conservative Left types are not even as bigoted as conservative Republicans, instead more centrist on minority and women’s issues, and in general most conservative Left groups support equal rights based on race, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, and gender identity.

We can go on and on here. Jack London was a sort of Racist Left akin to the WN wing of the Alt Left. The US Left was like this pre-Kennedy. Many US working class and union members are still like this, now scandalously abandoned by the Democrats and US Left as Deplorables, and hence voting Trump and Republican in vast numbers. I think the Democrats need to let these folks back into the fold, but we’re too busy screaming at them and calling them bigots and rednecks. Hence we have Trump as President and a Republican Congress. Way to go Cultural Left! Keep electing Republicans!

Bipolar Disorder: Manics Are Literally the Worst People on Earth

Bipolar Disorder is a mental illness formerly called Manic Depression. Bipolar people alternate between episodes of mania, characterized by high energy, little sleep, elation, excessive or frantic activity, wild spending, promiscuity, heavy alcohol and drug use along with aggression, rage, hostility, menacing behavior, extreme irritability, wild rages and temper tantrums, and even crimes, at times even violent crimes, as we shall see below.

The other periods are the down periods characterized by Depression. You all know what that entails so I won’t go into details.

In between, the manic is typically fine or at least goes back to their premorbid personality,  whatever that was like. It’s as if the illness has vanished altogether.

The episodes can may occur within a day or be up to three years apart.

If untreated, there is a tendency to worsen over time. This is because untreated mania actually causes physical damage to your brain. Every time you have a manic episode, your brain gets damaged. Then when you have another one, it’s gets more damaged, and on and on, accumulating over time.

Then the illness worsens. The manic episodes last longer and seem to worsen in quality. The time between episodes shortens. Finally, they reach the point where they are no longer normal between episodes and instead they are mildly manic or hypomanic between episodes.

In my family’s case, the person went from 5 to 3 to 1 1/2 to now where they come only 6 months apart. 9-10 months of mania, 6 months of hypomania, and then another 9-10 months of mania. So they are literally spending  a majority of their existence now in major manic episodes.

The drugs used are mood stabilizers between episodes, which seem to calm them down and prevent new major episodes, and antipsychotics for a Major Manic Episode because they’re so nuts that that’s the only thing that will bring them down.

The Angry, Aggressive, Irritable, and Violent Manic

Although the stereotype is of the happy manic on top of the world, that may not be typical. I heard a psychiatrist speak once and she said that among her male Bipolar patients, there were about 10 angry, irritable,  etc. manics for every happy one. The women may be more of the happy manics.

I’m living with one of these monsters right now, and it’s pure Hell. When he goes manic he’s basically Charles Manson. Pure evil. It’s like paranoid schizophrenia in the sense that they’re not just nuts, but they’re also aggressive and dangerous. They’re angry, hostile, hateful, abusive, aggressive, menacing, destructive, and even violent assholes from Hell.

And of course when they go manic, they lose all insight. If you confront them and tell them they’re having an episode, they flip out, scream and yell like a maniac, throw things, and get very menacing like they’re going to hit you. And they may indeed hit you.

In addition, because of stigma, there is often a lot of resistance to accepting the fact that they are ill. Our family member denied that he was ill for 38 years, from age 17 to age 55. Even now, in the midst of an episode, I guarantee he will deny being ill. That’s just how the illness works and also this person has one of the most extreme Denial defenses I’ve ever seen built up.

We have a family member with this illness and he has had many manic episodes over the years. Every time he has an episode, I’ve always been around. And every time, we got into at least one fist fight. Plus I usually get into a fistfight a year or so even when he’s not manic, except he’s never not manic.

When he’s not having an episode, he’s hypomanic, or a little bit manic. He’s literally been manic all the time, either hypomanic or manic, for ~15 years now. This is not a pleasant person to be around.

If you criticize, correct, or attempt to enforce any rules on them, you get met with a wild, screaming, violent tantrum and possible violence of some sort.

Angry, irritable manics are the literally worst human beings on Earth. When they go manic they turn into narcissistic psychopaths.

Of course in our case, his worthless therapist and psychiatrist won’t listen to me to up his meds. I contacted them and told them that he’d gone into a major manic episode, and they blew me off, said I was incapable of diagnosing mental illness, called me paranoid, denied that he was ill, and made me out to be the bad guy.

They’re so stupid and incompetent they can’t even figure out he’s nuts, and they refuse to believe me.

This is a typical scenario. The therapist has little or no understanding of the illness –  I know the disorder far better than he does (very common) – which is typical. The psychiatrist does worthless telemedicine, so I guarantee she won’t be able to diagnose him. Plus I’m not allowed to talk to her due to some crazy misinterpretation of the HIPAA law that was passed  recently.

If you have this diabolical illness, for God’s sake, accept your illness, and get on meds right now. And listen to your loved ones when we tell you you’re going nuts because you won’t be able to tell. The worst thing about these satanic illnesses is not just that they make people dangerously insane, but they blind the sufferer to that fact.

Manics are dangerous as Hell. They often commit crimes in episodes, and they are commonly arrested and jailed, often many times, typically at least once per episode.

They are also extremely aggressive and, yes, violent.

They have a very high rate of being arrested for violent crimes, like 2

Alt Left: Complete Deterioration of Literary Criticism in the Last 40 Years

I like to read literary criticism sometimes because it’s some of the hardest stuff out there to understand, at least for me. Forget philosophy. Don’t even go there. Lit Crit is different. With Lit Crit it’s hard as hell to understand and it’s incredibly smart and dense, but you can pretty much understand most if not all of it, so it’s worth it. I call it giving my brain a workout, and to me it’s similar to going to the gym for your body.

I recently read a couple of Hemingway’s best short stories. Then I found and read two Lit Crit articles about them. Lit Crit is very useful this way. If you haven’t already read the work, I’m not quite sure how useful it is or how much you would get out it. But if you’ve read it, Crit is often great for explicating the work and explaining deeper meanings, themes, etc. hidden in the text.

One was in a journal called Journal of College Literature from 1980. It was remarkably down to earth for a Lit Crit journal, especially the issues around published around that time. So I started going through a few decades worth of the journal.

I noticed that the Lit Crit from ~40 years ago was much different and frankly much superior to the gobbledygook out nowadays. It then focused on individual books and was fairly straightforward, simply looking for explications of the events, characters, plots, and themes in the book.

As I moved forward a couple of decades, everything changed. Now it was all postmodernism. Lit Crit about individual works were less common. The crit became ridiculously politicized with SJW and PC Leftist slants towards everything. Now I am a Leftist myself (albeit a weird one) but for the life of me, I do not understand why we need to litter our Lit Crit with Leftist political theory.

In addition to Marxism, there was also inordinate focus on women (feminism, mostly a joke field called Women’s Studies), gays and lesbians (from the lens of a ridiculous and bizarre field called Queer Studies), Blacks, Hispanics, Asians and other non-Whites (same thing- focus on non-fields like Black and Hispanic Studies), on and on.

Pretty much all they wrote about were these “oppressed minorities.” Cringey Queer Studies essays searched for and discovering non-existing homosexuality in perfectly straight stories (Did you know Moby Dick is a gay novel?) and secret homosexuality in completely straight authors (Did you know Shakespeare was gay?). It’s weird and stupid.

There was also a strange attempt to find some silly “woman angle” in novels where women were not particularly important to the story. There was also a focus on older books written by women and minorities which are apparently good books merely because they were written by a minority or woman and not for any other reason.

Why Lit Crit has to be all about oppressed minorities is beyond me. Fine, some minorities are oppressed. We need a politics to address that. But why trash up Lit Crit with leftwing obsessions with minority groups? Last time I checked, straights, Whites, and men also existed. Can we maybe keep the politics out of our Crit and just talk about the books without turning everything into a political rally?

Another worse problem went along with this. The essays became dominated by postmodernism and were much harder to understand. There were references to philosophy scattered all through everything (particularly unintelligible Continentals like Sartre, Derrida, Lacan, Cixous, Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Foucalt, Frankfurt School, DeLueze and Guattari).

That’s all fine and dandy but why can’t we keep unintelligible philosophers out of our Lit Crit? What do incomprehensible Frenchmen spouting nonsense have to do with the novels we read?

It is true that the essays became much more demanding, but there was also a lot of silly talk about things like the Body (?), the Male Gaze (!?), the Text, the Author, the Reader (Barthes), on and on with weird, silly postmodern concepts.

In addition, somehow they became strangely repetitive in that they obsessed over the same postmodernist tropes and views in essay after essay. After a while, it seemed like I was reading the same essay again and again and learning little about the actual books being discussed. Finally, it became quite boring as a result of this repetition.

tl/dr: Lit Crit has completely deteriorated over the past 40 years. It’s now a swamp of barely comprehensible postmodernism and obsessions with women, gays and minorities. Leftist politics and incoherent Continental philosophers litter every essay, turning it from a brain workout into muddy slow trod up a mountain in the rain without boots or a poncho.

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)