Female Rule (feminist rule) tries to create universal justice in an inherently unjust world.
Obviously that’s a fool’s errand. Female Rule always tries to rewrite and even criminalize human nature (mostly male nature) because women dislike human nature and especially male nature. They think our natural male behavior sucks, and they want to make it against the law.
Whenever women take power in the world, the first few things they usually do is outlaw pornography, gambling, and alcohol. You know, the three things that keep most of us guys from blowing our brains out.
Women tried to outlaw porn in the West and failed badly. Gambling is becoming legal in the West again. And of course, it was idiot women who were behind the utopian Prohibition which failed so miserably.
The attempt to create Utopia and Universal Justice by ignoring or criminalizing basic human and especially male nature is why Female Rule always seems to fail.
3 thoughts on “Alt Left: The Fallacy of Feminism: Trying to Create Utopian Universal Justice in an Inherently Unjust World”
Honestly, it’s religious forces, not women – as an IP group. It was religious forces spurring on the failed prohibition in the US. Also, surely, anti-porn laws, and anti-gambling laws are fueled by religion – and in the case of porn and drinking – possibly racism also (TV, for instance, was banned in South Africa until as late as 1976 I think – because it was thought blacks should never see white women indecently and Prohibition in the US was being supported by anti-immigrant types – since immigrants were stereotyped as drinkers.)
Religion, as noted by many – is often patriarchal – so that shoots down the women thing.
Hey, Sensei Robert:
Need your advice on a dating topic. I just ran into this video. It made me wonder a lot of things.
I know this stuff is staged, but the reactions of the passer-byes seem genuine.
So, do you agree with the “gentlemen” at 6:10? They even offer to pay the meal-digger’s share to get her off the hook?
As far as I’m concerned, if the date is fizzled out, I wouldn’t even broach the prospect of a “second meeting”. I would ask the waiter to split the checks, quietly pay my share and say good-byes.
Hey, I’m all pro-equality. Men and women are equal. And I’m also broke most of the time! Screw this gentleman chivalry.
But yes, if she’s cunning and reacts quickly, I will suck it up and pay it off eventually. But I certainly don’t ever make any offers to split checks with girls.
Fortunately, my life’s been slightly different. Many times I’ve had women buy me food and drinks. Is it something to be ashamed of? I’ve even showed up on dates with empty wallets. The only time I buy women food and drinks is when I hire a prostitute, yes, I owe her all the reasonable expenses. With the rest, I feel no obligation to spend a dime on them unless I like them for some reason.
The thing is, the whole AMERICAN concept of men taking care of women’s needs is so antiquated. Nothing could be more patriarchal than this.
I don’t behave this way with DUDES ever. I have picked the tab and taxi fare while being with a bunch of male friends. Maybe because paying for them doesn’t make me feel like a cuck, LOL.
What are your views?