Places like Stromfront are swathing with bullies – very much like what you’d find on an SJW site. In fact, there is no attention given to opposing views – even though they allow them in one section. In fact the section of “Opposing Views” – is simply a “bully pulpit” of the most true variety.
But is this surprising? Where else would you find so many sociopaths in one place – outside of a prison? But of course, the opponent is the stupid one, right? I don’t even know of a good comeback on a site like that. What do you call them? White Trash? 😆
Please follow and like us:
8 thoughts on “Intolerance – as much on the racist-right as the left”
From what I remember, that was the most popular section of Stormfront. The only place non-white posters were allowed to post in (it felt like Apartheid South Africa: this washroom is for the Coloreds).
Still, a lot of WN posters would show up on the opposing threads because it was their opportunity to abuse non-Whites online. Something they wanted to do in real life. To say it was vile would be an understatement. I don’t know why I even suffered them: maybe because I wanted to get into the minds of the racists.
It was acceptable to call non-Whites “mongrels” apparently, a reference to only Whites being the pure race. Other choice terms that they used for me:
Racially-challenged (I found that the funniest. I still like to describe myself with that term as a joke.)
I don’t think they did not seriously believe in what they said. They were 100% into White Nationalism. Most posters were members of skinhead outfits but there were many garden-variety racists.
They often had polls where they would polled the question of, If it was possible to genocide all non-White races and inhabit the earth with only pinkskins, would you support that? Everyone would vote in favor of a genocide.
We called them “retards”, “fuck-ups”, “online bullies”, “muttonheads”, “morons”…anything that questions their mental sanity gets them riled up. They think they’re a superior race, but when you expose them for their mental handicaps (using their own arguments), it hits the spot.
“Online bully” ouch… I seen a thread years ago about debunking WN, the person they ended up pointing to was a Jew percieved as White. This Jew was just an anti-White hypocrite. WNs have human flaws but at least they are not anti-White. A really hot Eurocentric non-White is good for me personally, yet I don’t want this selfhate for her people. A lot of non-White men lack this basic respect for White people.
Why would someone assume that a white opposed to hardcore WN beliefs is a Jew or a cuck (white chump)? There are plenty that aren’t. In fact, most whites don’t support the hardcore agenda – and many probably aren’t racist at all.
I don’t want to give anti-White leaders but they are Jews. Jews are effectively anti-White and generally JN; they don’t need Dayton Hypernova’s help.
What does that mean?
What does JN mean?
I don’t want to give ineffective anti-Whites leaders by naming effective anti-Whites. Jews are not the only anti-Whites but they have been the most effective.
Jewish Nationalist. Jews are for Jews more than Whites are for Whites, Blacks for Blacks, Mexis for Mexis, ect.
Bully is a classic “snowflake”word like”Nazi” – but in this case, very true. Anyway, WNs constantly want respect – but their own people, unless it’s inside-job saboteurs, are constantly running their mouth! Well, it’s not just being a bully- but actually being retarded – and in some weird way – able to do it – while making opponents appear stupid.
Well, as mentioned this personality type – the personality B – prick – isn’t limited to white nationalism – but it fits like hand in glove. Basically these are just really judgmental, preachy (bitchy) people – who think they’re superior. Well, one source of this is bad parenting – notably domineering mothers.