Alt Left: Pakistan: A Muslim Country with a Serious Overlay of Indian and Hindu Culture

SHI: I envy the Pakistanis, they got their own country back in 1947. They don’t have to put up with this shit circus.

I would still say that Pakistan is  messed up. Their statistics are better than India’s but not a whole lot better. If Pakistan was only Islamic culture it would be a lot better off, but it is Islam imposed on a huge Indian and Hindu substrate which is still very much alive, so this has limited how much Pakistan would have been improved vis a vis India due to Islam. Any Hindu country will improve in some ways if it takes up Islam, but Pakistan never got rid of the Hindu layer.

Pakistani culture is somewhat Indian and Hindu too because they inherited Indian and Hindu culture. Granted there was an overlay of Islam which reduces the toxicity of Indian culture by ~50%, but Pakistan is still one of the most dysfunctional countries in the Muslim world.

For instance, this is a Muslim country that actually practices caste, obviously not permitted under Islam.

There are also whores everywhere, unusual for a Muslim country.

Women are terribly mistreated in a manner much worse in some ways than how they are treated in other Muslim countries. For instance, it’s almost legal to rape a Pakistani woman, whereas in other Muslim countries, rapists are in for a real hard time.

Almost all of the land is owned by a few people in semi-feudal system complete with modern versions of lords and serfs. Semi-feudalism was eliminated in the (Arab) Muslim world at least 60-70 years ago, granted it existed prior.

1/3 of Pakistanis don’t have a toilet to shit on. One wonders where they go to shit?

In a sense, Pakistan has the worst of both worlds or both of the two religions that formed its culture. It has Indian and Hindu culture, one of the worst cultures on Earth and Islam in a very toxic version complete with hudud laws unknown in much of the Muslim worlds. Pakistan is the worst of Islam combined with the worst of Hinduism. Not a good combination.

15 thoughts on “Alt Left: Pakistan: A Muslim Country with a Serious Overlay of Indian and Hindu Culture”

  1. In a sense, Pakistan has the worst of both worlds or both of the two religions that formed its culture. It has Indian and Hindu culture, one of the worst cultures on Earth and Islam in a very toxic version complete with hudud laws unknown in much of the Muslim worlds. Pakistan is the worst of Islam combined with the worst of Hinduism. Not a good combination

    Agreed, it’s not a place I should venture into even for a brief vacation. But who knows about the future. I am as fucked up as it gets and given my previous record, it’s perfectly believable that my pussy trail could lead me to that hellhole if someone doesn’t stop me.

    I love Pakistani women, met very few so far but that’s left me hungry for more. I think in general they are hotter than Indian women. Not all of them, of course. There’re the ugly ones too.

  2. There are also whores everywhere, unusual for a Muslim country.

    Tell me more about it. I feel so horny about that thought. I haven’t grabbed one yet!

  3. If we look at the statistics, India doesn’t do badly compared to Pakistan. It usually does a little better.

    …………………………………India………Pakistan
    life expectancy………….68.8………..68.1
    infant mortality………..39.1/1000..52.1/1000
    fertility rate……………….2.43…………2.62
    literacy rate, male……..81.3………….69.5
    literacy rate, female…..60.6…………45.8
    GDP per capita…………..7,200………5,400
    mean age of
    first-time mothers…..19.9……………23.4

    1. Yeah see. Pakistan is even worse than India. How can you be even worse than India? No Muslim country should ever be worse than India. Islam isn’t like that.

    1. I completely agree. Many (even) conservative or ex-muslin pundits, NEVER talk about massive Islamic inbreeding… Not many people want to talk about this elephant in the room. I know a Muslim guy of Pak and Afghani descent who married his mother’s younger cousin (2nd cousin). I felt “Eeww” when he told me that. That is disgusting.

      Good post, Jason…

    2. You are far too concerned about inbreeding. The problem with inbreeding is that it increases the probability of harmful recessive coming together. However, if those genes are very rare to begin with, then the negative consequences of inbreeding will be quite modest.

      Some time ago, the German magazine Der Spiegel had an article about that.

      Its conclusion was that the consequences of cousin marriages among Turks weren’t particularly severe. As an example, it mentioned a debilitating disease caused by a recessive gene.

      This gene has the same frequency among Turks as among Germans, but 1/10,000 of Germans had the disease while 1/4,000 of Turks had it. So the frequency of the disease among Turks is 2.5 times higher than among Germans. However, 1/4,000 is not a huge problem.

      Suppose that x is a recessive gene and that it has a frequency of 1%. If mating is purely random, then 1/10,000 of the population will be xx, (1x + 99X)(1x + 99X) = 1 xx + 198Xx + 9801XX. The more assortative mating becomes, the more it will approach the limiting case of 1xx + 99XX, in which case 1/100 of the population will be xx.

      Contrary to widespread belief, inbreeding does not worsen the gene pool. It may lower the quality of population, yes, but that is something different. If anything, inbreeding may lead to an improvement of the gene pool. This can happen if people with xx are sterile or so undesirable that nobody will mate with them. In such a case, the x gene will gradually disappear as more and more people who are xx will be born.

      All indications are that the predominantly Muslim populations of Northern Africa, West Asia, and South Asia are on average not as intelligent as Europeans. However, neither are the Hindus.

      Ashkenazim Jews, on the other hand, are on average smarter than Gentile Europeans, but consanguineous marriages were common among them as they were among blue-blooded Europeans. European kings or aristocrats who married a cousin were legion. Queen Victoria and William III, for instance, were married to a cousin.

      1. Royal Europeans and Jews in Europe produced intelligent kids via first cousin fucking. Were Europeans and European Jews more selective than Muslims? Jews perhaps benefitted from mixing with Europeans as well.

        1. I heard Jews mostly married second cousins, not first cousins. And there have been plenty of retarded and crazy kings.

  4. Pakistani culture is somewhat Indian and Hindu too because they inherited Indian and Hindu culture. Granted there was an overlay of Islam which reduces the toxicity of Indian culture by ~50%

    I think that’d make sense. The 50% figure is my approximation too. Indian Hindutvadi culture is absolutely toxic and morally repugnant.

    So if you are a Hindu person with a clean conscience and a good heart, you will not thrive well in the toxic environment called India.

    You’re at least 50% better off as a dhimmi in a Muslim country. Your rights to your own religion are protected by the Qur’an, and as long as you don’t proselytize Muslims, no one cares.

    You get the same legal protections and business opportunities, and no one discriminates against you despite your second-class status. Millions of Hindus in Gulf countries are a testimony to that. As long as you pay a nominal Jizya tax which is more symbolic than anything, you can legally become a citizen of a Muslim country.

  5. Well speaking of whores – lots of whores in Indonesia and also Morocco. Those two countries are also Muslim countries. Sex workers from both countries can be found in Malaysia.

    1. Hey you are from the old site, right? How did you find my new site? I need to make a post about that asking all of you how you are finding my new site here.

  6. Not to flame but here’s an interesting article that defends first cousin marriage.

    https://www.inverse.com/article/28971-cross-cousin-marriage-pair-parent-offspring-inbreeding

    “New research flies in the face of a whole host of genetic complications, though. Marriages between cross cousins — cousins whose parents are opposite-sex siblings — might have biological benefits after all..”

    Oh, dear that flies in the face of conventional taboos. 😃

    “Scientists studying the Amazonian Yanomamö tribe found that while individuals’ fitness — biology-speak for how prolific you are reproductively — suffers if they, their parents, or same-sex siblings marry a relative, they benefit if their children or opposite-sex siblings do.”

    What are the benefits? I am all ears.

    “They found that both men and women had more children when their opposite-sex siblings married close kin. Brothers in particular reap the benefits when their sisters pair off with cross-cousins. This means that inbreeding literally benefits the patriarchy, which yes, is a little on the nose.

    Fantastic.

    “Inbreeding is genetically problematic because it can result in too many recessive genes being passed on and can make for a more vulnerable immune system. Cross-cousin marriages still result in inbreeding depression and reduced fertility, though it does mean that parents will have more grandchildren. But the researchers note that there’s actually an “optimal” level of inbreeding where fitness peaks.

    So, there’s an optimal level of inbreeding? Wow. Like all good things in life, you should go for cousin fucking in moderation.

    😮 🤐 😯

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *