Alt Left: Terrorism, a Garbage Word with Absolutely No Meaning Whatsoever

Of course Wars on Terrorism are retarded wars packaged for idiots and dunces. So why do people keep falling for it? Why is the other side always made up of terrorists? Why is your side never made up of terrorists? The word terrorism belongs in a trash can. It literally has no meaning anymore.

This idiot word terrorism is new to us. Before we had other dumb words, not that any come off the top of my head at the moment.

Any non-state guerrilla actor who has taken up arms against you is automatically a terrorist. All armed groups that the US doesn’t like are terrorists. A few countries have been put on the supporters of terrorism list for no conceivable reason at all, as they don’t support any actual terrorists. They might support a few non-state armed groups, but so what? People actually believe that all armed non-state actors are terrorists?

And now even countries are “terrorists.” The IRGC, which is a branch of the Iranian military, has been listed as a terrorist organization by this idiot administration. IRGC is the Iranian government itself, so apparently the Iranian government itself is a terrorist organization!

The groups we don’t like all get called terrorists, and the ones we don’t like don’t get the designation and often get guns instead.

Furthermore, captured rebels are very frequently tortured by state armies.

Nowadays almost all states treat guerrillas as terrorists and try them in civil or military courts under terrorism statutes, mostly because they do not want to abide by the rules of war and treat them as POW’s. That’s if they don’t just out and out execute them. For instance, Syria may have executed 40-50,000 Syrian rebels at military prisons around Syria. And I say that as a supported of Assad.

Even the prisoners at Guantanamo Bay are for the most part POW’s. If they’re not, then charge them with terrorism and try them in civilian courts.

The Bush Administration didn’t want to do that because they thought that civilian courts would let the jihadists go free. Bush also wanted to torture those in Guantanamo, probably to get more information out of them in order to prevent future attacks.

Hence a completely fake bullshit category called “illegal combatants” was created in order to accomplish this goal. I spoke to one of the country’s top experts on this, and he laughed and told me that there is no such thing as an illegal combatant under international law, and it was just some fake category the Bush people made up.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

2 thoughts on “Alt Left: Terrorism, a Garbage Word with Absolutely No Meaning Whatsoever”

  1. Well, taking one example – Apartheid South Africa – obviously what was seen (by western media) as the good guys – were indeed killing by-standards, including children probably. However, though, on the other side, as usual on the other side – the police were using full force, implying some innocents would be hurt/killed, to make a point, thinking a point couldn’t be made otherwise (A few eggs have to be cracked to make an omelette.).

    Well, the thing is – in a war, the bad guys hide among the innocent – and whose to say the innocent are as innocent as it seems? I mean, look at Nazi Germany, how much of that was really brainwashing – and how much was just cowardice in the face of real truth?

    1. I do not think that the police are deliberately targeting those civilians for death.

      Well, the thing is – in a war, the bad guys hide among the innocent – and whose to say the innocent are as innocent as it seems? I mean, look at Nazi Germany, how much of that was really brainwashing – and how much was just cowardice in the face of real truth?

      This is the part I do not agree with. It says that civilians are guilty for having some ideology. Well I do not think it is ok to kill a civilian even if they are supporting Nazism.

      I know liberal Democrats who defended the US and Iraq killing 40,000 people in retaking Mosul as ok because supposedly the civilians were supporting the ISIS. Well I do not think it is ok to kill civilians even if they support ISIS, sorry. Anyway a lot of them probably did not support ISIS.

      They brought up the bombings of Germany and the firebombing of Dresden and the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki as examples. Well I think all of those were terrible and unnecessary things to do. You don’t kill civilians to end the war sooner and save your troops or whatever. It doesn’t work that way.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *