Corporal Punishment in Schools?

I think that people are exaggerating the negative aspects of it. The fact is that, especially among bully-prone kids, the only thing they understand is a whipping!

Anyway, it shouldn’t be used for things like “not doing your homework”.  It should be used in severe cases like for bullies, but maybe for lesser ones, but not sure on that.

https://hosbeg.com/advantages-disadvantages-corporal-punishment/

The advantages of corporal punishment

  • It helps to serve as a deterrent. When children see that someone has been whipped for misbehaving, they try not to do similar things in order to avoid getting whipped.
  • With corporal punishment, parents are able to bring their children under control. There are certain children who can only be controlled through the use of the cane.
  • Corporal punishment helps make children obedient, respectful, polite, etc. In the absence of corporal punishment, children likely go wild.
  • Corporal punishment in school makes students take their studies seriously and also helps keep the students under control.
  • Authorities are able to instill discipline in children through the use of corporal punishment in schools.
  • It makes very recalcitrant and stubborn children submit to authority because they fear that if they don’t do the right thing they just might be whipped.

The disadvantages of corporal punishment

  • It can be very counterproductive in the sense that it can sometimes make children hardened and no longer afraid.

  • It is very hurtful and can cause severe injuries to a child. This is the reason why in so many places it has been banned in schools.

  • Corporal punishment strikes severe fear in the hearts and minds of students and can easily make them to drop out of school. Here, they are so afraid that they would be whipped for the least mistake they do. And this constant fear can make the students drop out of school.

  • Corporal punishment is very painful and it is inhumane or cruel to use whips or canes to lash someone. Simply put, it is a barbaric practice.

  • Human rights organizations and advocates all over the world consider corporal punishment on children to be a form of child abuse.

  • When corporal punishment is used excessively in schools and at homes, it has the tendency to make children very hostile to their teachers or parents. This can lead to some children fighting back – especially when the pain gets too much to take.

  • Corporal punishment can scar children or disfigure them for life – both physically and mentally.

  • Corporal punishment can land the one meting out the physical punishment in big trouble. For example, if, in the course of beating the child, the child suddenly gets severely injured or dies from the beating, then the teacher, parent, or guardian meting out the punishment will face the wrath of the law.

SJW’s – Causing Desensitizing to Real Evil

It’s like “The Boy Cried Wolf” fable. Basically, in that fable, a boy constantly lies about a wolf coming – probably for a joke – but the joke’s on him when the wolf really comes!

Well, SJW’s do the same with their constant policing of things that don’t matter – supposedly to prevent bigotry from arising to begin with – BUT it doesn’t work.  In fact, it’s also, as the tile says, causing desensitizing to real evil.  In fact, when something truly evil comes along – like a cross burning or other harassment, and indeed I have witnessed this where I lived – nobody will care, cause SJW’s have turned oppression into a joke.

In fact, I even tried to tell my brother  (who comes from a liberal area of the country) something bad was happening and he’s like “Yeah, right Jason. Are you the PC police?” 😆

See what I mean!

Abused as a Child – Executed as an Adult

This sounds whiny to some – especially cultural conservatives, but let’s discuss it. Like a lot of sayings, it has some heavy truth to it, hence why it’s a popular saying.

Anyhow, despite the claims of the pro-genetics crowd, the environment is still quite powerful in determining what happens in someone’s life.  Someone with bad genetics given a bad environment will obviously come out worse than someone with bad genetics and a good environment.

In fact, the situation would probably be way worse. Our society, contrary to what some cultural conservatives think, hasn’t really improved the environment (the U.S. one) – at least, not enough!

So what a tragedy is it to see someone fry because they were sexually/physically abused a child despite the fact we grow up with real choices.  Yes, very sad!

No Bodyguards?

For leading White Nationalists or even the local Klan leader that would be a shock!  But apparently these guys are such alpha males that they don’t need one.  But it seems like they’re a moving target for car bombs, snipers, you name it.  I mean, who are we kidding here?  Look at the shit they’re saying!

It could be the case of “living in a bubble” – being surrounded by “yes people” – but honestly, it’s not too tough to find these White Nationalists or even some joker (a average person) on Facebook.

Neo-Confederate “Pet Lie” – Other Thoughts

The Neo-Confederates want to paint the lie that Blacks loved slavery – of course, assuming they were all house slaves, not field slaves (big  comedic lie!).  This is what a new book called “Why the South was Right” seems to be saying this.

But I won’t say that all field slaves or even most of them necessarily had a bad life unless the abuse got out of hand.  In that case, you would have slave rebellions and the seeds of abolitionism.

But what about these freaks now dating Blacks – many I suspect simply want “toy Blacks” (aka. house slaves, Sambos)?  To me, it seems like legalized pedophilia, though not as bad as it would have been had these “oil drillers” (just kidding) lived back in 1840.  But I’m not saying that interracial marriage Black/White is wrong – despite the fact. I’m more open-minded than that, and in fact, interracial mating is what will drive up Black IQ’s!

But seriously, it’s tough having a relationship with a dull person. So it seems to me that women dating Blacks (and also the men dating Blacks, which seems to be way less the case) are just pedophiles – and that’s funny because women aren’t associated generally with pedophilia (or a more appropriate phrase for modern Blacks (with Whites) would be “preteen or young teen with adult sex fantasy”).

Capitalist Exploitation – Given the IQ Gap

The humans of the world on average wallow in a slightly low (formally Low Normal) IQ, therefore racists, most of whom subscribe to an economic/cultural rightwing ideology, love to claim Marxists – or better yet the blowhard Cultural Marxist label – are spreading a lie about human equality.  Well, the sad thing is that human equality is a lie!  Indeed, IQ is mostly genetic but that’s not the end of the story.

Even if the world as a whole is made up of people of a lower IQ – it doesn’t give a green light for abuse (case in point: Third World poverty, New World African slavery, Jim Crow etc..) – that’s simply a Social Darwinist concept.

Well, how can we compromise this dilemma?  Does @Robert Lindsay have an idea?

Why They Were Slaves

Well, with Blacks their IQ in the past was definitely low mostly due to genetics, which made them a prime target for capitalist exploitation. However, to say they would have been treated with respect by a higher IQ group even without slavery is unlikely. What retarded people in the world now are treated with respect? Don’t know any. In fact, the mentally handicapped often have to live in protected environments simply to keep them from bullies, sexual predators, you name it!

Anyway, Blacks in the New World, weren’t the only slaves in the history of man. In fact, ancient societies had slavery since the dawn the time, and the justification may also have often been: “They’re retarded.”

Also, those societies, being unenlightened, had populations that assumed nobody owed anyone anything at all – not even life – so they were grateful for what they got. To a great many slaves in the New World, it was the same deal, but no matter what time in history, abuse will eventually cause the oppressed to rise up. Was abuse the primary cause of abolitionism? Probably.

Now there is a call to reparations for slaves from what is known as “Cultural Marxism” -a dumb concept where Robert Lindsay and I split ways cause I see a lot of Cultural Marxism as simply being basic human rights/decency. But cultural conservatives have turned it into a “blowhard” slogan.

Equality is a hard sell to people convinced IQ is based on genetics because, honestly, the retarded weren’t treated well then, and they still aren’t. The day we treat the slaves as equals will be the day that Down’s Syndrome people will be voted in mayor – or maybe 8-year olds.

So, at a first reading of Benjamin Tillman or Andrew Johnson among the many White Supremacists in those days, their “asshole” attitudes seem remarkably cruel, but they couldn’t see Blacks as being anything but retarded, grown-up children.

But exploitation is exploitation! If they suddenly enslaved retarded people now – or kids – and beat them with cruel instruments (bullwhips or something), I’d say that would abuse, right? But wait, aren’t Blacks very large? How can we say that when “large children” are difficult to control?  But they had no moral right making them slaves to begin with!

Note: the IQ of Blacks before 1860 had to be 70 or below, probably below, mostly due to genetics (The Sambo thing wasn’t even an act!).  What’s amazing is the Radical Republicans were able to give them the vote after the Civil War in revenge for the war. Also, they were able to put in some mulattoes as governing officials just for more humiliation.

What’s wrong with welfare?

Well, it doesn’t conform to liberal race realism for one thing  In that case, non-whites are herded unto reservations where help is simply way less powerful than it should be – but still better than nothing!

However, another thing is the fact union politics have been abandoned – in favor of simply buying out the poorest part of the working class with welfare – but that’s not saying welfare is bad – but only saying it’s not preferable to work.

However, the Republicans have caught wind of this now with Trump – so they’re targeting people who have puked at the idea of voting for  a Democrat in the past.

Amusement Parks Full of Blacks!

Well, full of them (mostly mixed-race) and Mexicans.  Anyway, though, nothing wrong with that.  However, I bet a lot of whites never get close up to these people, in large numbers – except in those places.  In fact, in Tennessee, my home state, a lot of people are so prejudice it makes me wonder if they don’t have a heart attack (even before the roller-coaster) visiting an amusement park!

Anyway, when I visited Dollywood recently, a Tennessee amusement park – it looked like a “colored day” at one of those 50s era segregated parks.

But there’s nothing wrong with that!  In fact, I enjoy other cultures  – but I don’t think a lot of other people do.

O.K., did they lower the prices at amusement parks?  That’s it. All the golf playing whites must be going to the more expensive ones, so that low IQ won’t cause a mass shooting, gang violence, or just getting your wallet taken in line at a ride (This might be sarcasm.).

Should Ben Tillman’s statute be removed?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/07/09/should-this-controversial-s-c-governors-statue-be-included-in-the-debate-over-confederate-symbols-on-statehouse-grounds/?noredirect=on

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Tillman

Although his workers were no longer slaves, Tillman continued to apply the whip to them. By 1876, Tillman was the largest landowner in Edgefield County. He rode through his fields on horseback like an antebellum overseer, and stated at the time that it was necessary that he do so to “drive the slovenly Negroes to work”.[16]

Beginning in 1901, Tillman joined the Chautauqua circuit, giving well-paid speeches throughout the nation. Tillman’s reputation, both for his views and his oratory, attracted large crowds. Tillman informed them that African Americans were inferior to the white man, but were not baboons, though some were “so near akin to the monkey that scientists are yet looking for the missing link”.[145] Given that in Africa, they were an “ignorant and debased and debauched race” with a record of “barbarism, savagery, cannibalism and everything that is low and degrading”, it was the “quintessence of folly” to believe that the black man should be placed on an equal footing with his white counterpart.[145] Tillman “embraced segregation as divinely imperative”.[146]:153

Tillman believed, and often stated as senator, that blacks must submit to either white domination or extermination.[142] He was reluctant to undertake the latter, fearing hundreds of whites would die accomplishing it.[143]

Tillman told the Senate, “as governor of South Carolina, I proclaimed that, although I had taken the oath of office to support the law and enforce it, I would lead a mob to lynch any man, black or white, who ravished a woman, black or white.”[147] He told his colleagues, “I have three daughters, but, so help me God, I had rather find either one of them killed by a tiger or a bear [and die a virgin] than to have her crawl to me and tell me the horrid story that she had been robbed of the jewel of her womanhood by a black fiend.”[148]

Regarding the below quote, it’s amazing after reconstruction blacks were able to be in politics at all:

He campaigned in the violent 1898 North Carolina elections, in which white Democrats were determined to take back control from a biracial Populist-Republican coalition elected in 1894 and 1896 on a fusion ticket. He spoke widely in North Carolina in late 1898, often to crowds wearing red shirts, disheartening his Populist supporters. Terror and intimidation again won the day for the Democrats, who were elected statewide. They failed to win in the coastal city of Wilmington, but white supremacists took it over by force. South Carolina saw violence as well: an effort to register black voters in Phoenix led whites to provoke a confrontation, after which a number of African Americans were murdered. Tillman warned African Americans and those who might combine with them that black political activism would provoke a murderous response from whites.[144]

Freeway – (movie – 1996)

Warning Spoilers:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeway_(1996_film)

Me and a popular commentator on here were making fun of this movie, but seriously – it delves into some serious issues.  Issues on sexual deviancy, creepy therapists, racist gangs, abused women, molested children.  It’s a whole freak show!

The scary and funny thing about this movie, as sort of noted, is that it’s – just so true!   This is a real reflection of a lot of American society.

Now, another movie like this is “Falling Down” – which also deserves a blog post.

Dr. Mengele of the Antebellum South?

https://usslave.blogspot.com/2011/05/dr-j-marion-sims-medical-experiments-on.html

Well, this is a highly biased PC, cultural left blog – but facts are facts – unless this site is lying.

Sims also argued that the movement of the skull bones during a protracted birth contributed to trismus. Clearly designating patients by class and race, Sims began to exercise his freedom to experiment on the enslaved infants. He took custody of them and with a shoemaker’s awl, a pointed tool used for making holes in leather, tried to pry the bones of their skulls into proper alignment. According to his published articles, this procedure was only practiced on enslaved African babies. Because he “owned” these poor, innocent children, he had free access to their bodies for autopsies, which he usually performed immediately after death. Sims routinely blamed “slave mothers and nurses for infant suffering, especially through their ignorance.”

Isn’t the quote below something that hasn’t changed with cultural conservatives?

Sims routinely blamed “slave mothers and nurses for infant suffering, especially through their ignorance.”

Dave Loggins, “Please Come to Boston”

Please come to Boston for the springtime
I’m stayin’ here with some friends
And they’ve got lots of room
You can sell your paintings on the sidewalk
And by a cafe where I hope to be workin’ soon

Please come to Boston
She said, “No, would you come home to me”
And she said, “Hey ramblin’ boy why don’t you settle down?
Boston ain’t your kind of town
There ain’t no gold, and there ain’t nobody like me
I’m the number one fan of the man from Tennessee”

Please come to Denver with the snowfall
Move up into the mountains so far that we can’t be found
And throw I love you echoes down the canyons
And then lie awake at night ’til they come back around

Please come to Denver
She said, “No, boy would you come home to me”
And she said, “Hey ramblin’ boy why don’t you settle down?
Denver ain’t your kind of town
There ain’t no gold and there ain’t nobody like me
I’m the number one fan of the man from Tennessee”

Now this drifter’s world goes round and round
And I doubt if it’s ever gonna stop
And of all the dreams I’ve lost and found
And all that I ain’t got
I need someone to cling to
Somebody I can sing to

Please come to L.A. to live forever
A California life alone is just too hard to fill
I live in a house that looks out over the ocean
And there’s some stars that fell from the sky
Livin’ up on the hill

Please come to L.A.
She said, “Boy you come home to me”
She said, “Hey ramblin’ boy why don’t you settle down?
L.A. can’t be your kind of town
There ain’t no gold and there ain’t nobody like me
Oh no, I’m the number one fan of the man from Tennessee
I’m the number one fan of the man from Tennessee”

This song was at the top of the charts in 1974, but I didn’t think I remembered it until I read the lyrics, and yes, I do remember this awesome tune now. At the time I simply didn’t know what it was called or who sang it. I have been listening to this great song on the radio off and on for 45  years now (it is still played, believe it or not), but I never knew what it was called or who did it.

I had actually never even heard of Dave Loggins until today. I was confusing him with Kenny Loggins of Loggins and Messina, another huge band in the 1970’s which recorded similar music. This is the only song he wrote that I have ever heard of. It’s also been covered by many others, but I am not familiar with any of those covers either.

This is also considered to be country music, but it is also something called soft rock that was very big back then. A lot of that soft rock was actually quite good and of course, women and girls always loved that music, so that was another reason to listen to it, if you know what I mean. Females love it when you love the music that they love, so even if you hate their music, it helps to at least fake it and pretend you love it because it’s such a great seduction technique.

Unfortunately I’m too honest to do that even though I’m a degenerate. Fortunately I do like a lot of the softer music that females like to listen to. Music like laughter loosens females up and gets them in romantic mood and they are always ecstatic if you like that softer music they like. Also music makes women horny, especially softer, romantic type music.

One of the great all-time tearjerkers. How could anyone not like this song? It’s  like not like butterflies or sunny days. I don’t get it.

53 Admitted False Flag Attacks

It’s disgusting how the minute you say the phrase false flag, people grab their foreheads and start groaning. All false flags are automatically conspiracy theories and they’re all pathetic nonsense made up by the tinfoil hat crowd. Granted a lot of so-called false flags never happened and instead were actual attacks carried out by whoever claimed responsibility for them. This is particularly true with Islamist terrorist groups.

Their attacks often terribly brutal and aimed directly at civilians. Many of their attacks in the West have been called false flags, but none of them were. It has also been common for a long time to ascribe most of the worst Palestinian terrorist attacks to Israeli false flags.

The truth is that the Palestinians, like the Islamists, are quite depraved enough to do their own horrific terrorist attacks. Their attacks are depraved enough that Israel has no need to fake depraved attacks to frame the Palestinians.

But as you can see, false flags definitely occur. I never thought that the US government did these attacks very much, but we and the rest of the West (NATO) have been going on a wild false flag spree ever since NATO’s war on Russia started heating up.

It’s been one false flag after another and one attempt to blame Russia and pro-Russians for atrocities willfully committed by the other side. This is different from a false flag. In this case, Party A attacks the enemy, typically enemy civilians, or a shell goes astray and there’s an atrocity. 

Instead of admitting that they did it, they blame the enemy who they are fighting, usually for committing an atrocity against their own supporters, which of course makes no sense.

There were many such attacks like this in the Syrian Civil War when the Free Syrian Army committed massacre after massacre of villagers who supported Assad and then turned around and blamed Assad for each and every one of these crimes. 

As it turns out, Assad did not commit any of these civilian massacres because that’s just not his style. His forces don’t rampage into villages, even of rebel supporters, and slaughter civilians in brutal fashion one by one.

If they think a civilian needs to be dealt with, Assad’s forces simply arrest them and may well put them in a military prison, where they could well be tortured and mistreated until death or executed. I’m not saying Assad is a nice guy; it’s more that his style simply does not include savage massacres of entire villages or chemical weapons attacks for that matter.  When it comes to depravity, Assad has his own style.

I can’t believe that number of attacks falsely blamed on the enemy and out and out false flag and fake attacks that the US did in Ukraine and Syria. We seem to be entering into a new era of warfare where false flags are the normal ways to fight wars.

It’s appalling and terrifying because foolish Americans insist that these attacks never happen. By believing that they give their own government carte blanche to do as many false flags and false blaming of the enemy of allied attacks as they wish. And the government knows that in any fake blames or false flags the US or its allies pull off, they know that they can count on the support of every corporate media outlet in the US to go right along.

In fact, every mainstream media outlet in the West period is on board with any false blaming or false flags the West wishes to pull off. In that sense the entire media of the West is completely controlled by the states of the West, their militaries, state departments and intelligence services. It’s downright terrifying.

53 Admitted False Flag Attacks

Relevant article selected from the GR archive, first published in February 2015.

Not Theory … Admitted Fact

There are many documented false flag attacks where a government carries out a terror attack … and then falsely blames its enemy for political purposes.

In the following 53 instances, officials in the government which carried out the attack (or seriously proposed an attack) admitted to it, either orally or in writing:

(1) Japanese troops set off a small explosion on a train track in 1931 and falsely blamed it on China in order to justify an invasion of Manchuria. This is known as the “Mukden Incident” or the “Manchurian Incident.”

The Tokyo International Military Tribunal found: “Several of the participators in the plan, including Hashimoto [a high-ranking Japanese army officer], have on various occasions admitted their part in the plot and have stated that the object of the ‘Incident’ was to afford an excuse for the occupation of Manchuria by the Kwantung Army ….” And see this.

(2) A major with the Nazi SS admitted at the Nuremberg trials that under orders from the chief of the Gestapo, he and some other Nazi operatives faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles to justify the invasion of Poland.

(3) Nazi General Franz Halder also testified at the Nuremberg trials that Nazi leader Hermann Goering admitted to setting fire to the German parliament building in 1933 and then falsely blaming the communists for the arson.

(4) Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev admitted in writing that the Soviet Union’s Red Army shelled the Russian village of Mainila in 1939 while blaming the attack on Finland as a basis for launching the “Winter War” against Finland. Russian president Boris Yeltsin agreed that Russia had been the aggressor in the Winter War.

(5) The Russian Parliament, current Russian President Putin, and former Soviet leader Gorbachev all admit that Soviet leader Joseph Stalin ordered his secret police to execute 22,000 Polish army officers and civilians in 1940 and falsely blame it on the Nazis.

(6) The British government admits that between 1946 and 1948 it bombed five ships carrying Jews attempting to flee the Holocaust to seek safety in Palestine, set up a fake group called “Defenders of Arab Palestine”, and then had the pseudo-group falsely claim responsibility for the bombings (and see thisthis and this).

(7) Israel admits that in 1954, an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this).

(8) The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950′s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister.

(9) The Turkish Prime Minister admitted that the Turkish government carried out the 1955 bombing on a Turkish consulate in Greece, also damaging the nearby birthplace of the founder of modern Turkey, and blamed it on Greece, for the purpose of inciting and justifying anti-Greek violence.

(10) The British Prime Minister admitted to his defense secretary that he and American president Dwight Eisenhower approved a plan in 1957 to carry out attacks in Syria and blame it on the Syrian government as a way to effect regime change.

(11-21) The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO with the help of the Pentagon and CIA carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s and blamed the communists in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism.

As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security” (and see this).

Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign had joined NATO before the bombings occurred. And watch this BBC special. They also allegedly carried out terror attacks in France, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the UK, and other countries.

False flag attacks carried out pursuant to this program include by way of example only the murder of the Turkish Prime Minister (1960), bombings in Portugal (1966), the Piazza Fontana massacre in Italy (1969), terror attacks in Turkey (1971), the Peteano bombing in Italy (1972), shootings in Brescia, Italy and a bombing on an Italian train (1974), shootings in Istanbul, Turkey (1977), the Atocha massacre in Madrid, Spain (1977), the abduction and murder of the Italian Prime Minister (1978), the bombing of the Bologna railway station in Italy (1980), and shooting and killing 28 shoppers in Brabant county, Belgium (1985).

(22) In 1960, American Senator George Smathers suggested that the U.S. launch “a false attack made on Guantanamo Bay which would give us the excuse of actually fomenting a fight which would then give us the excuse to go in and [overthrow Castro].”

(23) Official State Department documents show that in 1961, the head of the Joint Chiefs and other high-level officials discussed blowing up a consulate in the Dominican Republic in order to justify an invasion of that country. The plans were not carried out, but they were all discussed as serious proposals.

(24) As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in 1962, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes) and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba.

See the following ABC news reportthe official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.

(25) In 1963, the U.S. Department of Defense wrote a paper promoting attacks on nations within the Organization of American States such as Trinidad-Tobago or Jamaica and then falsely blaming them on Cuba.

(26) The U.S. Department of Defense even suggested covertly paying a person in the Castro government to attack the United States: “The only area remaining for consideration then would be to bribe one of Castro’s subordinate commanders to initiate an attack on Guantanamo.”

(27) The NSA admits that it lied about what really happened in the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964… manipulating data to make it look like North Vietnamese boats fired on a U.S. ship so as to create a false justification for the Vietnam war.

(28) A U.S. Congressional committee admitted that as part of its “Cointelpro” campaign, the FBI had used many provocateurs in the 1950s through 1970s to carry out violent acts and falsely blame them on political activists.

(29) A top Turkish general admitted that Turkish forces burned down a mosque on Cyprus in the 1970s and blamed it on their enemy. He explained: “In Special War, certain acts of sabotage are staged and blamed on the enemy to increase public resistance. We did this on Cyprus; we even burnt down a mosque.” In response to the surprised correspondent’s incredulous look, the general said, “I am giving an example.”

(30) The German government admitted (and see this) that in 1978, the German secret service detonated a bomb in the outer wall of a prison and planted “escape tools” on a prisoner – a member of the Red Army Faction – which the secret service wished to frame the bombing on.

(31) A Mossad agent admits that in 1984, Mossad planted a radio transmitter in Gaddaffi’s compound in Tripoli, Libya, which broadcast fake terrorist trasmissions recorded by Mossad in order to frame Gaddaffi as a terrorist supporter. Ronald Reagan bombed Libya immediately thereafter.

(32) The South African Truth and Reconciliation Council found that in 1989, the Civil Cooperation Bureau (a covert branch of the South African Defense Force), approached an explosives expert and asked him “to participate in an operation aimed at discrediting the ANC [the African National Congress] by bombing the police vehicle of the investigating officer into the murder incident,” thus framing the ANC for the bombing.

(33) An Algerian diplomat and several officers in the Algerian army admit that in the 1990s, the Algerian army frequently massacred Algerian civilians and then blamed Islamic militants for the killings (and see this video; and Agence France-Presse, 9/27/2002, “French Court Dismisses Algerian Defamation Suit against Author”).

(34)    The United States Army’s 1994 publication Special Forces Foreign Internal Defense Tactics Techniques and Procedures for Special Forces  updated in 2004 recommends employing terrorists and using false flag operations to destabilize leftist regimes in Latin America. False flag terrorist attacks were carried out in Latin America and other regions as part of the CIA’s “Dirty Wars.” And see this.

(35) An Indonesian fact-finding team investigated violent riots which occurred in 1998 and determined that “elements of the military had been involved in the riots, some of which were deliberately provoked.”

(36) Senior Russian military and intelligence officers admit that the KGB blew up Russian apartment buildings in 1999 and falsely blamed it on Chechens in order to justify an invasion of Chechnya (and see this report and this discussion).

(37) According to the Washington Post, Indonesian police admit that the Indonesian military killed American teachers in Papua in 2002 and blamed the murders on a Papuan separatist group in order to get that group listed as a terrorist organization.

(38) The well-respected former Indonesian president also admits that the government probably had a role in the Bali bombings.

(39) As reported by BBC, the New York Times, and Associated Press, Macedonian officials admit that the government murdered seven innocent immigrants in cold blood and pretended that they were Al Qaeda soldiers attempting to assassinate Macedonian police in order to join the “War on Terror.”

(40) Senior police officials in Genoa, Italy admitted that in July 2001 at the G8 summit in Genoa they planted two Molotov cocktails and faked the stabbing of a police officer in order to justify a violent crackdown against protesters.

(41) The U.S. falsely blamed Iraq for playing a role in the 9/11 attacks as shown by a memo from the defense secretary as one of the main justifications for launching the Iraq War.

Even after the 9/11 Commission admitted that there was no connection, Dick Cheney said that the evidence is “overwhelming” that al Qaeda had a relationship with Saddam Hussein’s regime, that Cheney “probably” had information unavailable to the Commission, and that the media was not ‘doing their homework’ in reporting such ties.

Top U.S. government officials now admit that the Iraq War was really launched for oil…not 9/11 or weapons of mass destruction. Despite previous “lone wolf” claims, many U.S. government officials now say that 9/11 was state-sponsored terror; but Iraq was not the state which backed the hijackers. Many U.S. officials have alleged that 9/11 was a false flag operation by rogue elements of the U.S. government.  

(42) Although the FBI now admits that the 2001 anthrax attacks were carried out by one or more U.S. government scientists, a senior FBI official says that the FBI was actually told to blame the Anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda by White House officials (remember what the anthrax letters looked like). Government officials also confirm that the White House tried to link the anthrax to Iraq as a justification for regime change in that country.

(43) Former Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having “our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaeda’s ranks, causing operatives to doubt others’ identities and to question the validity of communications.”

(44) United Press International reported in June 2005:

U.S. intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92 pistols, but the pistols seem to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers.

Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or terrorist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S. authorities use insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of the illegitimacy of the resistance.

(45) Undercover Israeli soldiers admitted in 2005 to throwing stones at other Israeli soldiers so they could blame it on Palestinians as an excuse to crack down on peaceful protests by the Palestinians.

(46) Quebec police admitted that in 2007, thugs carrying rocks to a peaceful protest were actually undercover Quebec police officers (and see this).

(47) At the G20 protests in London in 2009, a British member of parliament saw plainclothes police officers attempting to incite the crowd to violence.

(48) Egyptian politicians admitted (and see this) that government employees looted priceless museum artifacts in 2011 to try to discredit the protesters.

(49) A Colombian army colonel has admitted that his unit murdered 57 civilians, then dressed them in uniforms and claimed they were rebels killed in combat.

(50) The highly-respected writer for the Telegraph, Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, says that the head of Saudi intelligence Prince Bandar recently admitted that the Saudi government controls “Chechen” terrorists.

(51) High-level American sources admitted that the Turkish government – a fellow NATO country – carried out the chemical weapons attacks blamed on the Syrian government, and high-ranking Turkish government admitted on tape plans to carry out attacks and blame it on the Syrian government.

(52) The former Ukrainian security chief admits that the sniper attacks which started the Ukrainian coup were carried out in order to frame others.

(53) Britain’s spy agency has admitted (and see this) that it carries out “digital false flag” attacks on targets, framing people by writing offensive or unlawful material … and blaming it on the target.

So Common…There’s a Name for It

“False flag terrorism” is defined as a government attacking its own people, then blaming others in order to justify going to war against the people it blames. Or as Wikipedia defines it:

False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear as if they are being carried out by other entities.

The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one’s own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations and have been used in peace-time; for example, during Italy’s Strategy of Tension.

The use of the bully’s trick is so common that it was given a name hundreds of years ago. The term comes from the old days of wooden ships, when one ship would hang the flag of its enemy before attacking another ship. Because the enemy’s flag, instead of the flag of the real country of the attacking ship, was hung, it was called a “false flag” attack.

Indeed, this concept is so well-accepted that rules of engagement for navalair and land warfare all prohibit false flag attacks.

Leaders Throughout History Have Acknowledged False Flags

Leaders throughout history have acknowledged the danger of false flags:

“A history of false flag attacks used to manipulate the minds of the people! In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule.”
― Friedrich Nietzsche

“Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death.”
– Adolph Hitler

“Why of course the people don’t want war… But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship…

Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
– Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.

“The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened.”
– Josef Stalin


Iggy Pop, “Pumpin’ for Jill”

When I’m asleep, you touch my feet
You let me know that I am no creep
Because I love you, you are for real
I’m gonna stay here – pumping for Jill

In the gas station where I work
Everyone treats me just like a jerk
Nobody offers me a tip
I’m gonna stay here – pumping Jill’s hips…

I met you out at the Mardi Gras
On a French Quarter sidewalk
When you kissed me, it was strong
I wonder if you’ll hear this song
La da da da da da, da da da da.

I love this song. It’s a ballad for losers.

The hero is a loser us who’s pumping gas at a gas station.

Everyone treats him like garbage, like a loser, a creep, a nothing, a zero. No one even offers him a tip. He’s so low he doesn’t even deserve their nickels.

But he has one thing those squares will probably never get – a hot babe named Jill. That’s only reason he works at all – for his chick. Sure, he’s a loser. Sure, he hasn’t a dime. Sure, everyone sneers at him. Why not? He hasn’t any money, and that’s all the worth of a man in these benighted states.

But when he goes home, he can still do one thing. He can pump Jill’s hip. He can fuck her into the night, just a bit harder each time he for every snub he got that day. As he bangs away into the dark, he knows that fucking a hot woman his haters will never have.

Who’s the loser now?

They met at the Mardi Gras. Beads and song in the air. Girls lifting up their tops. Entire streets are wasted and reeling with song and cheer. Babes howling on the balconies. Here he met Jill, in a whirl and flash. It was all a drunken She swooped towards him and landed a kiss on his sad face. A kiss full of power, the power of adoration.

Who’s the loser now?

Iggy Pop is one of my all-time favorite artists. This is off of Party, issued in 1981. I saw him at the Palladium in Hollywood in fall of that year. It was too much! Not much was happening on the stage. A band came out and set up their equipment. We were all wondering what was going to happen.

In one fluid movement, this maniac comes running full speed onto the stage, mike in hand, singing. The band in back starts in. He’s dressed in a Spiderman outfit, of all things! Who is it? Spiderman? WTH? I’m confused. I ask my friend, “Who is that? It’s him, right? It’s Iggy! He’s Spiderman!” My friend nods gravely. “Yep, it’s him, all right.”

It was a great show all the way. Lots of really hot young punker babes Iggy Pop chicks. Iggy Pop fans don’t care. They DGAF. They never did. Not from the very start with the Stooges, “Raw Power”,”Searching to Destroy”, “1969”, and especially “No Fun.”

An Iggy Pop chick yelling #metoo? That’s laughable. They’re punkers, not overgrown children. She might knee you in the balls if you get too rude, but she won’t wail like a baby and run to Mommy Cop like these women-children do nowadays.

Besides, Iggy Pop fans love to fuck, both sexes. And they hate authority. They hate cops. They’re basically anarchists. They’re the exact opposite of these prudish, priggish SJW’s who think you need to sign a contract in order to look at a woman or else they haul you off to jail.

Nothing Worse Than a Liberal Democrat

Liberal Democrat sites I am banned from:

I am banned from Democratic Underground. I have been banned from Daily Kos twice. I am usually banned the very first day I register there, typically within 24 hours. I am banned from Mother Jones. I am banned from Media Matters. I got banned from Alternet but got a new name and came back and am now safe for a while. I was banned once from (((Daily Kos))) for attacking Israel. They called me anti-Semite and banned me. All the other places banned me for attacking the Cultural Left.

Suffice to say that these are all liberal Democrat sites except for Alternet, which is more Leftist.

In other words, I am usually very quickly banned from all liberal Democrat sites, usually amidst screams that I am a Republican! Except that I’m not a Republican. I think Democrats are too rightwing. I’m a flaming out and out Leftist.

There are few things more awful than an American liberal Democrat, mostly because there is almost nothing liberal about them.

They all support US foreign policy to the hilt. They all believe every lie the media ever shoved down their throat and every lie the foreign policy wing of the state ever told them. They’re flag waving patriotards.

At the moment, they are frothing with hatred against the evil Russia and the evil Putin. They all supported the Nazi Maidan coup and think Russia shot down that M-17 jet. They all hate Assad and support arming the jihadis and Al Qaeda against him and think think Assad gassed his people. And nowadays they all really hate China.

No matter what lie the state and media shove down their throat, they swallow it right up.

They reject all alternative explanations to US propaganda because it comes from Iran, Russia, etc. And they don’t believe one word those nations say because those countries lie.

You throw evidence at them, like people on videotape confessing their CIA-induced nefarious acts or even actual CIA statements (for instance, half of the CIA says Ukraine shot down that M-1 7 jet), and they shoot it all down. They say that everyone that says anything that goes against the US government/corporate media one party propaganda line is lying.

Anything other evidence is unproven. It’s “state your sources” and then all sources other than the US state and media are not credible. Any theories against US government and media propaganda lies are called conspiracy theories that must be subjected to the “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence,” rubric, evidence which, of course, is never enough.

The Democrats are always right and never wrong. And the Republicans, of course, are never right and always wrong. If you dare to admit that the Republicans might be right once in a blue moon, then that means that you’re a Republican, and they insist that you now support Trump and are voting for him. It’s pure political tribalism of the most insipid kind.

Oh, and I forgot one more thing. One thing they really, really hate, probably even more than they hate Republicans, is the Left. You know, people like me. And the Squad. And Bernie. I’ve always said that the Democratic Party hates the Left more than anything, more than Republicans, Hell, more than out and out fascism.

A liberal Democrat will support a Nazi before he  supports a socialist. Look at how they reacted to Ukraine (supporting Nazis) and Venezuela (attacking socialists).

Bottom line is they will never admit they were wrong. And they will never change their mind, ever, about anything.

Liberal Democrats are some of the most rigid- minded, hopelessly brainwashed people I have ever met.

PUA/Game: Avoid “Whore” Types at all Costs

Watch out for whores. Even if a woman you are dating says she has whored previously or would consider doing it again if she’s real broke, that’s a very big red flag.

And once she starts talking about the sex you might have with her being contingent in just how much money you are going to spend on her or just how much it is going to cost you (like there’s not going to be any sex unless you spend some money), you know you are dealing with a woman who is basically nothing but a Whore and not much else.

She’s going to lighten your wallet, and in a lot of cases you don’t even actually get laid, though you usually get some teasers, like say a titty feel or a makeout session.

Any woman who has the idea that sex = money and that each sex act = money on your part is nothing but a fucking whore. Black women are absolutely notorious for this mindset.

I really don’t know what is wrong with them. Is it genetic? Just to be safe, I will blame their culture. I think there is maybe something terribly wrong with their culture because I am convinced that a lot of Black cultures in the US simply promote the idea to Black women that sex with men is essentially a monetary transaction.

For the record, I understand that sex in urban Black Africa is profoundly transactional to the point where a lot of the “dating” is little more than glorified prostitution. I mean you go to a nightclub in Black Africa and take a woman home, and my understanding is you are paying her for the privilege of coming home with you.

Once again, I’m at a loss for reasons. People will always yell poverty but I wonder if that’s just another tautology. Why are so many Black women prostitutes? Because they’re poor. Why are so many Black women poor? Because they’re prostitutes.

Also they seem to have very little shame about being whores in one way or another. While a lot of White and Hispanic women still think being an out and out whore is pretty damned sleazy, a lot of Black women seem like they could care less, like it’s a perfectly proper and acceptable thing to be.

I always wondered why Black men called Black women bitches and whores, and I think I am starting to get it. Now, a lot of Black men act awful too, especially the ones caught up in that ghetto-type culture. They treat Black women very poorly, and I don’t blame Black women for being mad at their men.

On the other hand, it sounds like a lot of Black women aren’t all that great either. So it’s not oppressed versus oppressors anymore. It’s just a war. A lot of people in both genders of this race act pretty lousy towards the opposite sex, and there’s a lot of anger between Black men and Black women, which I now see makes sense on both ends.

I dated a Black woman for about a year. She was very classy, spiffy and even quite uptight. My brother remarked on how uptight he thought she was. She taught school and that’s where I met her. She was seriously into money like so many Black women are. She had formerly lived in Palos Verdes when she was married to the doctor, so she definitely had expensive tastes.

She was married to a physician at the time, but they were separated, and she refused to speak with him, though they met quite a bit. She had not spoken one word to him in maybe a year! He was always saying, “Why won’t you talk to me?!” And she wouldn’t say a thing. Her reason was that he was “cold.” Like she wasn’t.

This woman made more money than I did, but as usual she couldn’t be bothered to spend a nickel when we went out. My requests that she leave a tip for the $40 meal were met with mewling outraged protests.How dare I ask her to part with a nickel of her hard-earned money.

We didn’t even have that much sex. She pretty much charged me just to go over to her place and speak to her. That, for instance, would cost me a brunch meal. And probably no sex on her end. She was a prim, proper, classy Black woman who was as uptight as a White person. Yet when I described her to my friends, they all just laughed and said she was nothing but a whore.

Any women reading this just take note that we men don’t think much of whores. In fact we have no respect for them whatsoever and I don’t think we ever will. As long as  you are a whore, no man will ever respect you nor should he.

Any Black women reading this, what can I say? If you don’t whore as I assume most of you don’t, good for you! Take note of what I wrote above. No respect at all. Like zero.

As far as why so many of your sisters seem to have such a transactional attitude towards sex, perhaps it’s something you might wish to give some thought to. It’s not appealing. Black women don’t have a stellar reputation as it is, and this behavior just drags down the whole lot of them. It’s good for you or your kind.

Any Black men reading this, ok, I forgive you. I get it, I get it. I don’t know what to say. Why are so many of your women such whores? I’m thinking a lot (not all by any means) of Black cultures are just awful.

There’s not much you can do about that but get together with some high-minded sisters and set a good example. How do you set a good example? You’re not racial ambassadors and you can’t carry the whole weight of your people on your shoulders nor should you. Live your life. Live it well. Your life is your example. Live it well and hope others will follow. Step light and high and keep your eyes to the sky. There’s nothing else you do.

“High Ridin’ Heroes,” by Tanya Tucker

Daylight or midnight
Red eyes and that old hat
Whiskey-bent and busted flat
She’s a credit to her flaws
She’s a bad risk, but a good friend
Small change and loose ends
She only regrets that she might’ve been
A little faster on the draw

Those old high ridin’ heroes
They’re anywhere the wind blows
She’s been to hell and Texas
And she knows how it feels
To be ridin’ that hot streak
And drunk on some back street
Falling off the wagon
And under the wheels

Time was when she was queen
Now the rodeo’s just this old girl’s dream
The highs are few and far between
The lows get the rest
These old hard times ain’t nothin’ new
Once you’ve done the best you can do
You just tip your hat to the wild and blue
And you ride off to the West

[Chorus]
Those old high ridin’ heroes
They’re anywhere the wind blows
She’s been to hell and Texas
And she knows how it feels
To be ridin’ that hot streak
And drunk on some back street
Falling off the wagon
And under the wheels

Those old high ridin’ heroes
They’re anywhere the wind blows
She’s been to hell and Texas
And she knows how it feels
To be ridin’ that hot streak
And drunk on some back street
Falling off the wagon
And under the wheels

Very, very nice.

This is some real country music. I mean the real thing. If you hate country music at all, there’s no way you will like this song.

The singer is Tanya Tucker. She’s a hardcore country artist. I never got into her music too much, but this song is out of this world. It actually sounds like the Flying Burrito Brothers! Even more than that, it sounds like Texan Country Rock. Think Doug Sahm. Or maybe, if you can imagine it, ZZ Top.

Although this album is very Texan and Tucker has a very country voice, she never lived in Texas. She was born in Arizona and her family then moved to Utah. Later they moved to Nevada. None of the people in those places have country accents last time I checked.

This song was written by country singer David Lynn Jones. It was actually written about a female rodeo rider that he knew, but Tucker reinterpreted it to weave it into her own life, quite nicely too.

Waylon Jennings guested on Jones’ album Hard Times on Easy Street. Waylon’s son, Shooter Jennings, via his wife Jessi Colter, is a Southern Rock singer-songwriter who has produced several excellent albums. He has also produced Marylin Manson and Guns n Roses bassist Duff McCagan. Shooter produced Tanya’s new album.

This song is off of Tucker’s latest album While I’m Livin’. Tucker is one of country music’s famous female outlaws, in part for her hard-partying ways. She inspired other female outlaw types like the Dixie Chicks.

Her first album was Delta Dawn in 1972, released when she was only a teenager. Although the cover by Helen Reddy is better known, Tucker’s version is fantastic. She has always had an awesome gritty southern voice, and her storytelling is legendary. Tucker did well through the 70’s and 80’s, and she is a 10-time Grammy winner. But the country scene started leaving her behind already when she adopted a much more country rock sound in 1978.

For the last few decades her star has faded quite a bit. People wonder who she is. Is she still alive or what?

Shockingly, this could well be the best music of her career. And she’s over 60 and has been singing for 40 years. This is odd as rock musicians tend to peak quite early, in the late teens to 20’s. They make great music for 10 years or so, typically burning out by 35-40 just when novelists hit their peak (Gravity’s Rainbow, Ulysses and Moby Dick were all written between ages 32-40).

In this sense, rock musicians are like classical music prodigies, who also peak young and mathematicians, who of course peak young. Perhaps music and math genius are down to fluid IQ, which is frankly a measure of pure brain speed. Fluid IQ peaks at age 23, which is just coincidentally when we have the maximum number of brain cells.

Not that IQ tests measure intelligence or anything like that. It’s mere coincidence that IQ peaks at the very same time we have the most brain cells!

So a singer-songwriter making her best album at age 60 after a 40 year career is a pretty amazing thing.

She lived quite the hard life when young. As a teenager, she was a chart-topper and award-winner who ended up going broke eight years later and moving back in with her parents. She had a wild one year affair with Glen Campbell of Rhinestone Cowboy fame, a tabloid year full of drinking, cocaine and crazy spats.

During the 80’s, Tanya had a blast. She drank like a fish and sniffed up half of Peru. She bragged that she would out-party any man. By 1988, it was all over and she was checking into the Betty Ford Clinic. That’s probably the only reason she’s still alive.

This song harkens back to the time around when she was checking into the Ford Clinic only two years after her chart-topping Girls Like Me album. She was at the top charts of music and at the bottom of the wells of addiction, both at the same time.

The highest of highs and the lowest of lows, dancing off together, gripped sickly tight in hate and love and life and death, across the stage of the fame as it all crashed down around her to the roars of adoring crowds as she fell down drunk in the aisles.

We’re waiting for you, on the edges of our chairs, ears tilted to the anxious sky.

Come on. Come on back home again.

Welcome back, Tanya.

PUA/Game: The Varieties of Whoring Experience: Thieving Whores, Transactional Sex Whores, and Real Whores

SHI: Dude can use his girlfriend/wife as a money minting machine. I wouldn’t mind a stripper for LTR. I am as depraved as they come.

What if she doesn’t hand me over her money? I’ll just be a good pimp and beat her ass till she’s bleeding all over. I’ll fucking kill her if my ATM plans to dump me.

I wish though I were this bad though. Unfortunately I can only talk.

Those are the type of guys stripper types usually end up with, frankly. Their boyfriends are usually glorified pimps (“managers”), criminals, and often hard drug users, often dope shooters who use needles. The women’s relationships with these men are quite tumultuous, and I think they are often accused of taking the women’s money.

I very briefly dated a woman who wanted me to get her into porn and I guess be her manager. She was Black and was also a former call girl and strippogram girl.

I actually picked her up right off the street in Century City amidst the skyscrapers. Not as a whore, more as a secretary on lunch break, which is exactly what she was. She smiled and waved to me, so I pulled over. She said she was just going to get some lunch, and would I like to get some? I said sure and she jumped in. I asked why she waved me down, and she said, “Because you’re cute! I was looking for a cute guy to go to lunch with,” flashing a grin as wide as an LA freeway.

I said ok, and we had lunch on Sunset Boulevard in some place across from the Whiskey A-Go-Go. The waitress was staring at me like a robot the way they always do when you’re with a hot chick. Women are like money. It takes one to get one,  and it takes some to get some. Either way you start at zero and you stay at zero. Then we made a date for later that night.

I met her at some barber shop in South Central where she was getting her hair cut later that afternoon.

There were some old school Black men there. One had an antique Coke machine, and I engaged him about it. He told me all about it and showed me another one. He was acting pretty strange the whole time but not unfriendly at all. Maybe wary and like he couldn’t believe what he was seeing.  I later asked her about it and she told me that he didn’t like White men. He was nice enough to me but he did seem uncomfortable. I guess he couldn’t understand why I was so nice.

I talked to some other Black guy there about his dialect and suggested it sounded like Gulla. He told me that indeed he had come from South Carolina. Both of those Black men were pretty damn nice considering that White people never went there.

We went to her place where she lived with her Mom, but no one was home. She very suspiciously asked me for a contact number, which freaked me out just a bit, but I guess it makes sense, and I’m  well enough used to it anyway.

We men are always being suspected of being raping murderers. I gave her my Mom’s number because she wanted a contact number, I guess in case I murdered her and left her for dead in a ditch somewhere. Now why she cared what happened afterwards if I murdered her and left her in a ditch I have no idea, but perhaps she believed in postmortem justice.

So we took off for her friends’ apartment in the Wilshire District, an extremely mixed Black-White neighborhood at that time. She’s was talking about “rock cocaine” with this weird gleam in her eyes, and wasn’t not quite sure why that was.

We went inside and it quickly unfolded that this was a mixed group of young Blacks and Whites, apparently single and in their 20’s. They said they worked for the phone company. They were all smoking crack. This was very interesting as I’d never tried the stuff before and was curious.

This was 1986 and the first time I had ever tried crack. The drug had just come out and the press was full of all these over the top horror stories.

Well, back then I was a drug dealer myself, and most of the outlaw dregs and lowlifes I ran with didn’t believe any “drug war propaganda,” which we considered to be laughable scare stories. Sadly sometimes these scare stories are true.

This is where the War on Drug squares screwed up. They turned everything into a scare story, so we quit listening to everything they said. It was a Boy Who Cries Wolf scenario, and how did that story end? The wolf ate the lambs, and the dope ate some of us.

They were using glass pipes. One Black guy was on the carpet on his hands and knees, and he was pressing his forehead against the carpet like he was trying to be an ostrich, but he mistook a hardwood floor for a patch of sand. I’ve seen a lot of weird drug stuff, but that was disturbing. I was thinking, “What the Hell kind of drug is this, anyway?” I bought her a rock ($25) and we smoke it.

She sucked on the pipe like a deranged friend who was suffocating and grasping the last desperate breaths out of the pipe. I mean she was sucking on that pipe for dear life. That was downright disturbing right there. I mean if she wanted to suck my dick like that, she’d be a hero, but this was a Goddamned drug pipe!

I mean I had seen people jonesing and fiending before but mostly on pot, which was nothing like this. I had been a cocaine sniffer sporadically for nine years, especially in the last few years when I was running around LA with artists high on coke and weed, but they never jonesed or fiended like that, and I’d seen some fiends. Like out and out addicts.

We finished the rock and it was definitely an excellent high. Got me out of stupid neurotic self for about 15 minutes and then it was over. I was in  the bathroom pissing in a toilet and I saw her watching me in the doorway with lit-up eyes.  I was thinking, “That’s weird,” but that was when I first realized that females actually like to watch guys take a piss. I suppose to cock-watch. I can’t think of any other reason that’s not seriously twisted.

After 15 nice minutes, the drug wore off and I felt like crap. And more than anything else, I really wanted another damn rock to make the bad feeling go away. Which of course is the whole problem here, right? I caught onto the drug’s scam, and decided to just say no.

She was badgering me for another rock, but I was getting suspicious of this game already. She was acting like, “One more rock and then we can fuck,” but I was thinking this game could go on like this all night, and I was later told that it often does just that. And you never get a thing in the end no matter how many rocks you buy the bitch. It’s a heist.

As you might suspect she was the typical Thieving Whore type with a background as a Real Whore (Real Whores often double as Thieving Whores when they are feeling lazy or just more evil than usual), and I caught onto the “Buy me one more 20,” scam and ditched her. I went out to my car and sat there. She was supposed to join me but she never showed up, so I sat there like an idiot for 45 minutes holding my dick in my hand, feeling stupid, and getting increasingly angry.

These other Black people who were at the party showed up and told me that she was up there talking shit about me. I was thinking, “Ok, screw this bitch. She’s not getting a ride home. She can walk if she wants! It’s only ten miles away in the dark LA night! I’m sure she can make it without any problems at all!”

One of the group was a Black woman about 35 years old who looked pretty good. I went out and talked to them. She grabbed me and put her arm around me. “You come with me, baby,” so I went off with her. At one point we were in someone’s car she was shoving her tongue in my ear whispering dirty stuff while this other Black woman with her acted all grossed out.

We went up to their place, and it was another crack party. I bought her one too. The rock went around fast as the speed of light with everyone  hitting it like it was their last breath on Earth. It was creepy, weird, and actually pretty damn scary. By this time I was wise to the drug, and turned it down while I watched these maniacs suck it down like oxygen.

I looked around at the people in  the room. The people in there looked like zombies from a Night of the Living Dead movie, especially one Black man in his  40’s with black holes where his eyes were supposed to be. He has his head back on the couch with a thousand yard stare, looking like someone had suctioned his brains out, which is pretty much what had happened, except a drug did not and not a vacuum tube.

I was sitting there thinking, “This shit is literally the worst drug on Earth.” And this was my very first acquaintance with the drug called crack. As you can see, I’m not only not an idiot but I’m also a quick study.

Well, this other Black chick was all over me telling me it was her birthday and how we were going to get a hotel room and all this dirty stuff she was going to do to me. Then it turned into, “Buy me one more 20, and I get the room.” I had already heard that song before, earlier than night as a matter of fact. I kept shaking my head no.

At some point I was being escorted out of the apartment. The last I saw was a look of utter contempt on this Thieving Whore’s face. I was out $50 and all I got were a couple of makeout sessions. Lessons don’t come cheap in life.

Well, my Mom called me later the next day all freaked out, “Bob! What did you do to that girl!?” I had no idea what in God’s name she was talking about. I was like, “What?!” The woman’s Mom had called my Mom because that bitch never came home that night. Why?

Because I was her ride and I abandoned her halfway through a date and left her ass at an apartment in the Wilshire District when she lived in South Central. So I took her out on a date and stranded her halfway through the date with no ride home. I told you I’m a charmer. I told my Mom what happened, and I guess she called the woman’s Mom back.

I was pretty angry at my Mom for even suspecting that I would rape and murder some woman and leave her in a ditch somewhere. Not that this one particular woman didn’t deserve just that of course, but I don’t have it in me to do that, and of all people, my Mom ought to know for God’s sake. I’ll save that for my next life when I come back as a Serial Killer. Hopefully I can break Bundy’s record. I’m keeping my fingers crossed.

So this is an example of a Thieving Whore. Thieving Whores are the worst women on Earth by far. I think most of them are psychopaths. Whores are pretty much psychopathic women anyway, and 45% of prostitutes are actual diagnosed psychopaths. The personality of The Whore (Histrionic Personality Disorder) is often considered to be nothing less than the female version of male psychopathy itself.

Thieving Whores dangle the sex or implied sex in a dating context, ask for money for something or other in the context of the date, get the money,  buy the stuff, promise the sex some more, and then vanish out the door without fulfilling their end of the bargain.

You’re left holding the bag on one hand and your dick in the other. You are $20-80 poorer and you got little if any sex out of it, or at least not what you were promised – you may have gotten a tit feel or a makeout session, but you were promised real sex, which is why you forked the money in the first place. These are far worse than actual whores who generally at least are not out and out thieves and at least give you something for your money.

These types are ubiquitous and they tend to be deep into ghetto culture. This is pretty much the only type of female who comes out of that culture. Obviously the Whore and Thieving Whore types are present in all races of women, but the Whore types are vastly more common among Black women, and the Thieving Whore types are drastically more common among Black women, with Hispanic women bringing up the rear of the gutter.

Yes, I have recently met a young White woman like this, but she didn’t get any money. As far as Whore types go, obviously there are White women like this, but there are a lot more Hispanic women, at least around here, which I found shocking.

Playing The Whore and the Thieving Whore is a young woman’s game. Young, attractive women play this role simply because they can. Older women do not play this role not because they don’t want to – they’d love to if they could get away with it – but mostly because they can’t. Now I love older women, but who’s going to pay big money for some 47 year old woman’s used up ass? Basically no one.

Not that a few don’t try, but they don’t charge much either. I am talking about the “Transactional Sex” Whores, not the Actual Prostitute Whores, which are another matter altogether.

I am not fond of Transactional Sex Whores because they pretend to be dating you when really they are nothing more than glorified Whores. They are all over dating sites looking to “date men,” but they are really just part-time prostitutes who engage in actual whoring and more commonly transactional dating out of their apartments.

Of the three – Thieving Whores, Transactional Sex Whores and Actual Whores – I actually much prefer the latter, as at least they believe in truth in advertising and give you something for your money. They are generally pretty straight up and honest, too. It’s a rare whore who steals from you.

The former two are thieves by nature, especially the first type. Not only that but these are female criminals who have devoted their entire lives to stealing from us men. To say they are the enemies of all of us men is an understatement. The fact that not only do these wenches exist at all, but more appallingly are everywhere you look makes the lie of the feminist idiocy that says we live in a patriarchy. I assure you that no true patriarchy would tolerate this silly crap for one second.

Language Rights in the USSR and Russia

James Schipper: On the other hand, it can’t be denied that there was some linguistic imperialism within the Soviet Union. There was no systematic attempt to Russify the entire country, but there was an encroachment of the Russian language on the others.

Yes, there were 14 that broke away. Those were republics. The Soviet Constitution was radically progressive in that it gave any republic the right to self-determination and independence if they so chose. That’s why they were allowed to break away, although the first to separate (Azerbaijan) were attacked. But the state soon gave up, and Gorbachev let them all go one by one when they voted to go out.

While the USSR initially started out as radically progressive in terms of mother tongue education and state support for all of the languages of the country (even some very small ones), that soon faded with Stalin’s paranoid crackdown on regional nationalism in the 1930’s, when state support was withdrawn from many of the smaller languages. Language rights retracted further under Khrushchev.

The main areas where there was an attempt at linguistic imperialism were in the Baltics, and even there, they failed pretty badly. The native languages in the Baltics are doing very well. I’m not aware of much linguistic imperialism anywhere else.

Keep in mind that every one of those republics had their non-Russian language as an official language. Government documents, books, newspapers, magazines, and journals were published and radio and TV was broadcasted in those languages.

You could elect to send your kid to school from K-12 in the non-Russian language, and in quite a few of those republics, there was university education in the native language also. Of course you had to learn Russian too, and everyone had to take Russian in grades 1-12.

Look around the world. Look at the US. Who are we to talk about linguistic imperialism? Would we ever allow any non-English language the same extreme rights here in the US? You see any public schools in the US where you get to go to school from K-12 in your non-English language? I don’t see any.

Even with some linguistic imperialism under Khrushchev, the USSR was still radically progressive compared to the rest of the world as far as language rights go.

And to this day, all throughout Russia, there are many official languages other than Russia in titular republics. In fact, almost all titular republics where another language is spoken widely have that language as an official language. In many of those republics, you can still get K-12 education in your native language. There are non-Russian language schools all over Russia.

The only exception is Karelia where for some reason, the Karelian Republic has refused to make Karelian an official language, though there are still ~50,000 speakers of the various Karelian tongues.

And many of the republics that split away to form their own nations have kept their Soviet-era policies, even savage Soviet/Russia-haters like Ukraine, where you can get an education in 5-10 different languages depending on what you speak at home.

Boring Betas at Strip Clubs?

https://www.stripperweb.com/forum/showthread.php?196312-Customers-so-boring-I-want-to-stab-myself

How do you even talk to guys who are dull as a spoon? I have been working during the weekdays, which I don’t do (for this reason), and there are like 1-2 tables that I can sit with usually at a time. 100% of the time, they are SO BORING. I flirt and I entertain them and we do dances and they tip me, which I love, but I get so bored after a while. They are so easily entertained! Are people who come into the strip club just stupid as fuck? I feel like i have to dumb myself down to relate to the people who come in.

I’m thinking of just camming instead of stripping, I have cammed once before and I had fun. Stripping just seems like it attracts a really dumb crowd.

https://www.stripperweb.com/forum/showthread.php?196312-Customers-so-boring-I-want-to-stab-myself&p=2685732&viewfull=1#post2685732

yes, a lot of them are guys who have no “game”, don’t have people skills, and can’t get beautiful female attention without paying for it..and they don’t feel they really have to try and be charming or hold your attention, because like i said before, they’re already paying you to give them attention. if they’re tipping and getting dances, money is enough to hold my interest..i could talk to a rock as long as i’m getting paid haha, maybe you’re just a little burnt out?

https://www.stripperweb.com/forum/showthread.php?196312-Customers-so-boring-I-want-to-stab-myself&p=2685733&viewfull=1#post2685733

Yeah, I feel you. There are alot of boring guys in the club. I think they are just tired/worn-out from the daily grind of their jobs. Some of them just want to sit there and relax and not say much because it is the only time in their lives where they get to do that. But not everyone is boring. Sometimes you just have to try to get them out of their shell. I tend to make most guys feel comfortable enough to spill some funny/ crazy stories. But I try to find the nerdy types anyway, someone to talk nerdy things with.

Strippers as Reliable Mates?

https://www.stripperweb.com/forum/showthread.php?224786-Stripping-While-Having-a-Boyfriend

@Robert Lindsay was advising to avoid the strippers as real partners.

Help please sisters!

I have a wonderful boyfriend who is an entrepreneur but at the phase where money is extremely tight. When we first met I stopped dancing, but now it’s like it’s tough for me because money is so tight, and I know if I just worked even a day or two with him being supportive it wouldn’t be!

Sometimes he’s supportive of the idea of me going back to work again, and other times he’s not. I’m trying to figure out how to convince him that maybe if he changes his mindset about it and can not think about it in the typical way that it won’t be a bad experience for him, for us!

He’s wanting me to get a regular job or not work but I really don’t know if I care to do that… call me crazy, but I feel like I’d rather still dance and be beautiful and in shape and around other gorgeous women having fun and making money at the same time!

For those of you who have successful relationships and dance too can you please give me some tips on how I can help him feel better about the idea of me going back to work or just some tips on how you keep your relationships healthy. I’ve really been itching to go back to work in Vegas (all the lights and high energy!) and I feel like he can just go be in the 24-hour coffee shops while I work lol.

I hope you all have been doing well in your lives and sending all of you love, joy, and happiness!

Stalkers at Strip Clubs

I’ve always wondered about this, but luckily there is this stripper forum I found:

https://www.stripperweb.com/forum/showthread.php?225137-Anyone-else-have-a-stalker-making-their-life-a-nightmare

But aren’t strippers the psychos, lol?

Before dancing, I always considered myself to be a happy-go-lucky, paranoia-free person. I believed all people are good, some just make bad choices. I didn’t care if “the government” knew personal information about me or if my data was posted online. I never really thought about any harm being done to me because I’m pretty much as non-offensive and unassuming as a person can get so no worries there.

A little over 2 years ago I met an older customer (let’s call him Daniel) who would spend hours with me in VIP drinking wine and talking about books he’d gave me. From the beginning I knew something was “off” about him…some things didn’t add up. He proclaimed his extreme wealth was “self-made,” however he never explained what he did to make that money.

He told lots of stories about political corruption in Mexico, yet I got the feeling he was friends with the people involved. He did other odd things as well like declaring he loved me, repeatedly saying we would have genius children, trying to buy me over-the-top gifts like a Tesla and a condo downtown, and overall displaying lots of obsessive behaviors.

But I ignored my gut feeling because the money was too good, and I liked that managers and waitresses started treating me favorably, since he’s one of the top paying customers in our club.

Very quickly he got verbally abusive. He’d tell me I had many “character flaws” and then say I’m not mature enough to hear them. He’d also frequently say I’m getting too old, and no one will want to marry/have kids with me, even though I’m in my early twenties.

Every time I got up to leave after he was rude, he’d beg me to come back and say he only says these things because he wants the best for me. He’d then bombard me with money and praise as a poor apology.

https://www.stripperweb.com/forum/showthread.php?222572-Stalker

Anyone ever have a customer stalk them? If so, how did you handle it?