Alt Left: The Right Are Now the Free Love Sexual Liberationists, and the Left are the Sex-hating Puritanical Prudes

Pathetic!
It is truly pitiful that the only people protesting these sex-hating, sex-banning, Neo-Victorian, man-hating dyke prudes called feminists are the reactionaries. Isn’t that pitiful? Who’s standing up for the Sexual Revolution against the Left’s attempt to bring us back to the Comstock Era. The reactionaries! Who’s standing up for free love? The reactionaries! Who’s standing up for guilt-free flirting, dating, sex and love? The reactionaries!
Since when did reactionary scum ever become sexual liberationists? And what happened to the Left. I am straight out of the free love Sexual Revolution. The Sexual Revolution was one of the great liberation movements of the great 1960’s. And now the Left, the very people who kicked off this revolution in the first place, have become extreme sex-hating Puritans who threaten to get men fired, get their careers destroyed, and arrest, try and imprison them for the crime of flirting with, dating, and having sex with females! Incredible!
The Right are now the great freewheeling sexual liberationists and the Left are the frigid, impotent, sex-hating Puritanical prudes! How sad is that?

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

10 thoughts on “Alt Left: The Right Are Now the Free Love Sexual Liberationists, and the Left are the Sex-hating Puritanical Prudes”

  1. The Right in this case are libertarians whereas the Left are authoritarians. The latter has always been the case. ‘Scratch a Labour man, a Trot bleeds’ in UK terms. There remain plenty of right-wing authoritarians, what has happened is that the hysterical extreme Left (which is all the Left today) has distorted the political spectrum such that economically centrist, socially conservative (in that we believe in things like ‘children should be brought up in supportive nuclear families’ ) free-thinking Libertarians, now appear to be Right-Wing. I never considered myself right of anything until 2015 and then I discovered that the goal-posts had been moved. Nobody asked me if that was OK. At the same time, Feminism, which has always been sex-negative, has reached unprecedented levels of influence because of the way that Postmodernist Feminism has infiltrated and corrupted the education system.
    Rabidfems (Essentially, Postmodernist Feminists who have replaced Marx’s scapegoat, the bourgeoisie, with men, especially white men), want to absolutely control the supply of sex, even to the point of policing women’s sexual behaviour, because 1) they loathe men and think they can hurt us by stopping us having sex (good luck with that one, hit me up if you want the names of some good bars in Angeles, boys) and 2) they think that if they can absolutely monopolise and then control the supply of sex, they can control society. That is why they have conducted sequential hate campaigns against any men who refuse to conform to their ideas of ‘appropriate’ sexual behaviour. I mean, these are people who want to ban SEX DOLLS because they ‘demean women’s bodies). They torpedoed Milo because he refused to condemn the man who seduced him when he was 13. Think about that a while. The ‘victim’ was hung out to dry because he refused to swallow the rabidfem shilling. The totalitarian insanity of Feminism has gone beast-mode.
    Marx always insisted that for his Communist Utopia to work, it would have to be global. No alternative, anywhere, was to be allowed (which should tell you something about his confidence in the system) because, inevitably, people living under Communism would look at the freedoms others had, elsewhere, and want to be like that. So Rabidfems, for whom sex, not wealth, is the currency, need the entire world to accept their sick, Puritanical, bluestocking ideas about sex. That would be bad enough, but then we have Rag, Tag and Bob-tail, the Omega-males snuffling round the skirts of the rabidfems, hoping that by backing them up and betraying their brothers, they can pick up some sympathy sex. That right there is the lowest form of human life, of all.

    1. We don’t have any rightwing libertarians here in the US. All of our rightwingers, and they are the worst humans on Earth, are authoritarians, and in general, they are part of the anti-male war on sex too. There is an alliance between American conservatives and feminists to stick it to American heterosexual men.
      But yes, the rightwingers who are standing up to #metoo garbage are the libertarian sort, like on Spiked.
      “economically centrist, socially conservative (in that we believe in things like ‘children should be brought up in supportive nuclear families’ ) free-thinking Libertarians,”
      Someone like this would not be a libertarian in US culture. All US Libertarians are ultra-right on economics, no exceptions. This person you describe for all intents and purposes does not exist in US politics. There’s no such thing.
      But you are correct. They would be driven out of every liberal and Left forum and pilloried as Republicans. I am banned from many liberal and Left forums on the Net on the grounds that I am a: fascist, racist, sexist, Republican. In fact, I am none of these things! I am practically a Communist!
      I am still not on the Right. This leftwing shitheads keep screaming that I am on the Right, so I took them at their word and wandered around every rightwing movement I could find. I hate every single one of them. I am basically a liberal deep down inside. I despise the conservative way of thinking.
      At the same time, Feminism, which has always been sex-negative, has reached unprecedented levels of influence because of the way that Postmodernist Feminism has infiltrated and corrupted the education system.
      What about Third Wave sex-positive feminism? My feeling is that it’s not all that sex-positive!
      Rabidfems (Essentially, Postmodernist Feminists who have replaced Marx’s scapegoat, the bourgeoisie, with men, especially white men),
      More true of radical feminists. Sort of true about Third Wavers, except most do not have Marxist roots.
      want to absolutely control the supply of sex, even to the point of policing women’s sexual behaviour, because 1) they loathe men and think they can hurt us by stopping us having sex (good luck with that one, hit me up if you want the names of some good bars in Angeles, boys)
      I am convinced that modern feminism wants to stop STRAIGHT men from having sex. Gay men can fuck all the men and boys they want. In fact, many feminists would prefer if most or all of us straight men were gay because then we would leave them alone. Many feminists hate men looking at them, flirting with them, and asking them out, and if we were all gay, that would end. The theoretical roots of both 2nd and 3rd Wave feminism lie in the worst man-hating feminism of all – radical feminism via Andrea Dworkin, Katharine McKinnon and the rest. They were all quite open about wanting to more or less make heterosexual sex impossible or illegal and this is exactly what they are doing with #metoo bullshit and rape hysteria.
      they think that if they can absolutely monopolise and then control the supply of sex, they can control society.
      This I am not sure of. The want control over society so they can stick it to us men good and hard, that’s what they want.
      I mean, these are people who want to ban SEX DOLLS because they ‘demean women’s bodies).
      Radical feminists hate those stupid dolls, but how to 3rd Wavers feel about them?
      They torpedoed Milo because he refused to condemn the man who seduced him when he was 13.
      Yes, those scum called Milo a pedophile because an older man fucked Milo when Milo was 13! If anything, Milo was a victim of a molester. He wasn’t one himself! Why can’t we call all kids who get molested child molesters then?
      “That would be bad enough, but then we have Rag, Tag and Bob-tail, the Omega-males snuffling round the skirts of the rabidfems, hoping that by backing them up and betraying their brothers, they can pick up some sympathy sex. That right there is the lowest form of human life, of all.”
      There is something particularly horrific and pathetic about the creature called the Male Feminist, a traitorous cuck to the Brotherhood if there ever was one.

    2. A couple of things.
      I really love your comments, but I do disagree with some of your theory. But some of your theory is also quite correct.
      You can’t attack Marx from the Right on here. This is a socialist website.
      And you can’t say that feminism came from Marxism. It’s not really true.

      1. Hmmm…Gloria Steinem took most of her political thinking straight from Marx, and Steinem is at the root of modern feminism, along with Dworkin, another disgrace to the species and the most overtly sex-negative of the credible 20th-C authors. There were other prominent socialist thinkers than Marx who are also reflected in Steinem but the identitarianism inherent in modern feminism seems to come from Marx. We can argue as to whether their interpretation of Marx was accurate or not, but it’s clear that they are reflecting his influence.
        Essentially, Marx depends on identities — proletariat, bourgeoisie –and identities are obviously the core of modern Identitarian or ‘Intersectional’ feminist thinking.
        Marx, along with Engels and later Lenin, of course, was a Jew who had left Germany because of antisemitism (specifically, the problems over Jewish emancipation) there. I think it’s likely that the experience of actually being a scapegoat did have an influence on his thinking and the progress of Marxist political philosophy generally. It’s probably not possible to be a Jewish author and not think in identitarian terms, since it is impossible to think outside the Logos and the Jewish Logos is conceived on the notion of an essential and heritable Jewish identity that is independent of belief.
        (That is why atheist Jews are still Jews; being Jewish is not about theology but about an unimpeachable sense of identity that exists through blood. An interesting sidelight is found in the US, where people whose families, for generations, were born in the US and who are themselves indistinguishable from any other modern white American, still claim to be Scots, even though they would understand hardly a word of any Scottish dialect, archaic or modern and have not a scoobie about Scottish culture. I have never, ever, encountered a person of US birth who claimed to be English. Identitarianism is much deeper than one might think.)
        Whatever, identitarianism, repackaged by feminists as ‘intersectionality’ is the curse of modern life in the West.

  2. The cultural left has embraced sexual puritanical views because you simply cannot defend against injustice while also holding John Belushi Animal House morals.
    I mean, how can you defend the green planet, raise non-racist kids, practice health overkill – and also tolerate porn?
    Anyway, I’m not totally defending the cultural left, though. They have certainly went overkill – but I can see how in trying to be idealists – they simply are gravitating toward that direction.
    Note, these idealists are incredibly bossy motherfuckers, in general, as sort of noted. It’s beyond “clean up your room”, to where they’re commenting even on stuff like drinking sodas 😆 I mean, come on!
    OK, and then later their kids rebel by turning into the Nazi alt-right. That’s a great thing (sarcasm)!

      1. Telling a total slob to clean his/her room is fine – but they can’t stop there. They turn into total assholes commenting on every single thing you do! I mean, I would never do that. I don’t go to strangers homes and make snooty comments on how things aren’t up to par.
        Anyway, a lot of this stuff is confined to families – cause only in a family, can such bullying be gotten away with. However, it seems like there are really rad fem activists etc. who actually go out and comment on stuff – to total strangers (shaming etc..).

  3. Rad fems want to control the world – cause sure as hell men are going to stay away from them and their rules as much as possible – and who can blame them?
    Anyway, as of now, they cannot stop net porn, they can’t stop strip clubs. In that case, they’re a joke mostly confined to college campuses. Of course, some guys on college campus have went alt-right or something similar and now are engaging in guerrilla warfare with them – but honestly, it’s not worth the time, possibly they just enjoy stirring up drama.

    1. The trouble is, they’ve infested academia, and the schools of education and social work were the very first to fall. Essentially, all teachers now are Postmodern, ‘intersectional’ feminists and all social workers believe the nuclear family is an abomination and the State is the only body capable of raising children. In other words, that they know better than parents do, how to bring up their own kids.
      This is not new; the creeping infestation has been going on for decades. It’s just that the reaction to Trump’s election threw it at the fan and the secret is out. Google the Orkney child-abuse scandal.

      1. Yes, they have infested the academy. They are mostly in the Women’s Studies program, although my field of Linguistics got taken over by the worst SJW’s a long time. Really all of the social sciences have gone SJW all the way, and all universities are hotbeds of SJWism.
        I dated a social worker recently and when she wasn’t sending me pussy shots, she wanted me to play-act raping her. So she wasn’t all that feminist.
        Wait, Rod.
        Your Reaction gets in the way of a lot of your otherwise decent theory.
        3rd wave intersectional feminists do not want to get rid of the nuclear family. Some 2nd wave radical and other feminists talked about that. These were usually coming from a Hard Left Marxist POV.
        You would be hard-pressed to find an abolish the nuclear family feminist anywhere now. They don’t exist anymore. And I don’t know anyone, no matter how leftwing, who thinks the state does a better job of raising kids than the family does. They didn’t even believe that in the USSR.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *