Alt Left: Some of My Positions on Conservative and Liberal US Foreign Policy

Is it ok for me to believe in Leftist economics yet still agree on many points with the neocons when it comes (rhyme, hah) to foreign policy?
Conservative opinions I like:

  • Occupation of Palestine.
  • bombing of Yemen.
  • Invasion of Iraq.
  • Invasion of Lybia.
  • Anti Hamas and Hezbollah sentiment.
  • Pre-coup Erdogan (he has one of the rails now).
  • France´s colonization of Algeria.

Now these things aren’t perfect, but optimal compared to the other alternatives.

  • Aggression against Russia regarding Ukraine, I’d prefer to have an referendum in Ukraine about EU membership, to give NATO aggression legitimacy. The issue with this is that the European Commission isn’t clear on whether it wants Ukraine in the EU. I want to replace all of the non-White subsidies/investing (welfare for children, loans for adults) with EU subsidies and troops in Eastern Europe, LEBENSRAUM!!!.
    https://themoscowtimes.com/articles/more-than-half-of-ukrainians-want-to-join-eu-poll-shows-32735

The liberal foreign policies I agree with are:
-Legalization of drugs (affecting Latin america).
-Diplomacy with Iran (I’m a big fan of Obama s negotiations about the nuke thing.).
-Ok with leaving Crimea and parts of eastern Ukraine to Russia (Ukraine would already be losing an shit ton of people to Russia anyway through emigration) as long as it leads to EU membership of Ukraine,

Sure, the fact you like my economics is amazing enough to keep you around.
My positions:
Conservative opinions I like:
– Occupation of Palestine. NOPE
– Bombing of Yemen. NOPE
– Invasion of Iraq. NOPE
– Invasion of Libya. NOPE
– Anti-Hamas and Hezbollah sentiment. NO on Hezbollah because I love Hezbollah. I don’t like Hamas too much, but the Hamas-haters are worse, and anyway they are pragmatic for Islamists.
– Pre-coup Erdogan (he has one of the rails now). NOPE. Rails?
– France´s colonization of Algeria. NOPE.
Aggression against Russia regarding Ukraine, id prefer to have an referendum in Ukraine about EU membership, to give NATO aggression legitimacy. The issue with this is that the European commission isn’t clear on whether it wants Ukraine in the EU. I want to replace all of the non-white subsidies/investing (welfare for children, loans for adults) with EU subsidies and troops in Eastern Europe, LEBENSRAUM!!!
NOPE. Not sure if I want Ukraine in the EU. Anyway, I hate the EU. Mostly I don’t want them in NATO, Hell no. Also I do not want more North American Terrorist Organization troops in Eastern Europe. Not sure about cutting the safety net either, especially racially like that.
See? Look above. Conservatives are always wrong on foreign policy. Period.
The liberal foreign policies I agree with are:
– Legalization of drugs (affecting Latin America). OF COURSE.
– Diplomacy with Iran (I’m a big fan of Obama’s negotiations about the nuke thing.). SURE.
– Ok with leaving Crimea and parts of eastern Ukraine to Russia (Ukraine would already be losing an shit ton of people to Russia anyway through emigration) as long as it leads to membership of Ukraine.
ABSOLUTELY, I support the annexation of Crimea and I support the Donbass fighters. I wish Russia would just annex the Donbass. It would solve so many problems. Not sure about Ukraine and EU membershit. Anyway, I hate the EU too. EU is the economic arm of the North American Terrorist Organization.
See? Liberal foreign policy is always right.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

7 thoughts on “Alt Left: Some of My Positions on Conservative and Liberal US Foreign Policy”

  1. “– Occupation of Palestine. NOPE”
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1c-DSZ_l9Q
    If palestine had more power, i think it would be an threat. Anti semitism was and still is pretty large in the middle east and i dont see Iran stopping without any financial incentives to do so.
    The issue with Netanyahus vission here is that Israel wouldnt be israel with an majority muslim population. So what will really happen is that the orthodox jews who breed like flees will outbreed the palestinians in the west bank and become like 40% of the population, where their settlements will be in Jerusalem and eastern west bank, and become an majoritiy in rural palestine. This will make Palestine reside in the Judeen mountain range, where deporting them would be too costy. The dead sea and golan heights are soon going to be part of Israel.
    The first oslo accord is an lie, the second Oslo accord is more like it.
    https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Francisco_Manzano-Agugliaro/publication/305845159/figure/fig1/AS:614266361085959@1523463921313/Map-of-Palestine-Oslo-II-Accord-1995-Administrative-Divisions-Areas-A-B-and-C.png
    http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/downloads/maps/grump-v1/grump-v1-population-density/psedens.jpg
    https://www.btselem.org/download/settlements_map_eng.jpg
    Coincidence? no 🙂
    There is no pragmatic way to stop this, all the rich and smart people are zionists, resistance is futile 🙂 .
    Maybe all the arabs will be forced to not be palestinians one day, idk but not for now.
    The palestinians already have Jordan if they want islam. Jordan is recognized by the UN.
    – Bombing of Yemen. NOPE
    We dont want non-americans controling parts of the red sea.
    – Invasion of Iraq. NOPE
    We need to control Iraq to weaken Iran and China, and its oil could make it an Saudi arabia, so poverty is not an concern. Can we trust Saddam to be with us after the conflicts he caused in Kuwait? He might have very well brought Iraq to not cooperate with NATO.
    – Invasion of Libya. NOPE
    It wasnt that big of an involvement and controling Lybia with its vast natural gas reserves would benefit Italy and south eastern europe.
    “NO on Hezbollah because I love Hezbollah”
    Hezbollah are anti Israel and therefore bad (i will explain why anti israeli sentiment is bad later on). Lebanon should have been an Christian zionist ally that focuses on poverty with wealth comming from american arms subsidies/bases like the French colonists intended, but now it faces refugees and internal religious strife, wasted potencial.
    “– Pre-coup Erdogan (he has one of the rails now). NOPE. Rails?”
    I meant to say “he has gone of the rails now”.
    https://www.google.com/search?ei=7x2ZW_DVH4uKmgWizKXQDQ&q=turkey+gdp
    Look at the GDP, its experiencing another 2008.
    https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/05/25/erdogan-is-a-mad-economist-and-turkey-is-his-laboratory/
    “– France´s colonization of Algeria. NOPE.”
    Algeria lost a shit ton of human capital and its secular institutions. France is pretty liberal, and having algeria be part of the republic would give France the responsibility to fix Algeria in the same way its giving out cash to its african/caribean territories. The alternative is France just taking Algerias natural gas supply and not caring about the health of the nation. With this wealth, demand for workers would increase, tourism as well, which would help relieve poverty. Another example of failed nationalism.
    ” Not sure if I want Ukraine in the EU. Anyway, I hate the EU. Mostly I don’t want them in NATO, Hell no. Also I do not want more North American Terrorist Organization troops in Eastern Europe. Not sure about cutting the safety net either, especially racially like that.”
    I like the EU as it expands French and German buissness culture, intra european immigration is also rather important and healthy. An unified fisical and (perhaps in the future) monetary policy seems interesting. Europe trades so much it might just be one country to make things easier.
    To have european nations independent is an interesting scenario, ill think about it.
    You call NATO terrorists, i call them efficient, all factions would become like america with the right incentives, having america weaken china would leave no competitors, meaning less proxy wars, look at how peacefull the world was before WW1. Look at how Putin treats Georgia, look at how China treats Tibet and Xinjiang. Its all buissness. Who in their right mind would kill people (decrease popularity), destroy infranstructure (opportunity cost) and spend money (short term loss) if it didnt lead anywhere?
    I wasnt talking about racist discrimination, but discrimination based on class and nationality, but you could of course frase it as racist as it kinda is when all the allowed nations are white, i did it jokingly as upper class non-whites will fit in fine, aswell as western europe becoming like 24-28% non-white since most of the immigrants are in the younger age brackets.
    “SURE”
    ???
    Back to Israel. I like it becuase its modern, smart/educated, rich, has conections to america, good army, relies on america, rising population, has efficient beurocracy. Netanyahu is chad, is reliable/docile (like when they ceeded the suez and sinai, when they pulled backinthe suez crisis), are threatend by musims, have access to the red sea. Its NATOS child, baby boy 🙂

    1. ” and anyway they are pragmatic for Islamists”
      Islamists are weak dogs. Saudies, Egyptians and Pakistanies are the only really powerfull Islamists, but they know better to not mess with Israel.

    2. Are you Jewish by any chance. The way you talk, you could well be Jewish.
      Yep, the Israeli Tumor on the Heart of Humanity is definitely the baby of the North American Terrorist Organization. As far as Israel, burn it to the ground. I don’t care about it anymore. Get rid of it. Israel is a tumor. What do you do with a tumor? You douse it with chemotherapy and radiation or you cut it out with a knife. I have the same attitude about the Israeli Cancer.

      1. Im not jewish. I did notice that i sounded very jewish considering my verbal acuity and repeating the talkingpoints, as well as My eclectic marxism and pronnness to accept certain forms of corruption/discrimination.
        As i said, Israel would Never go to war withought our assitance, so its not an cancer, but an extra limb or America. Saddam went to crazy wars, we cant trust most middle eastern nations.

  2. The alt-right is massively in favor of a huge drug war with even more viscous penalties – kind of like with Duterte.
    I find this funny cause it shows the new movement certainly isn’t libertarian by any means, socially or economically.
    Anyway, see how the alt-right continually spews racist garbage while ignoring the drug war’s influence and wanting to expand it!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *