Emmanuel Macron, Cuck of the Century

Here.
I knew this was going to happen. I happen to think that it should be legal to be an asshole. Obviously women want to make it illegal to be an asshole. Of course the law will only apply to men, women being the equality-minded magnanimous creatures that they are.
I have a feeling it is not going to stop there, and I worry I might get caught up in this latest form of Mass Psychosis.
I think there is a woman I know at a coffeeshop who might think I am stalking her or something. All I’ve done is look at her (Well, she’s a stone fox, how can you not  look at her?) and talked to her a few times, nothing sexual, not really any flirting either. I did get her email address. Emailed her once with some links, got no response, so stopped contact.
She just knows I am interested in her, and I guess that freaks the cunt out and pisses her off.
The other day I was making a very wide u-turn in a street where the U had to go a ways into another street on the curve. Well, I finish the U and get over to turn right in the opposite direction to complete the U. She was coming up the street and ended up right behind me. She’s right there behind me. I think I waved at her maybe. She sees me and throws the car into reverse and starts backing up really fast.
For a while I thought it was nothing, but now I am starting to get worried. Apparently because our cars were in close proximity, I must have been stalking this dumb bitch, right? Hell, I didn’t even know where she lived or that she lived in that area. I knew nothing about her. I had no idea she even had two kids or lived in the city and was not a commuter.
Of course I’m not stalking this dumb cunt. I am barely even talking to her because she’s such a bitch.
I am worried that I could get reported under this bullshit law.
One of the charges against Morgan Freeman was some dumb cunt who said when he was talking to her, he was looking at her tits. She had to tell him, “Hey, my eyes are up here.” This was sexual harassment because the bitch got her panties in a wad over it. This is so stupid. Every straight man on Earth does this routinely or has done it in the past. Why do you think, “Um, my eyes are up here?” is such a popular joke.
Yeah. Now it’s sexual harassment for looking at them.
You just know these laws are going to be abused by stupid, emotional, vindictive, and evil-minded women, of which there are hundreds of millions.
Women are like Jews, Blacks, LGBTQZKPRBF, etc. Just another identity politics group.
One thing about the Jews is they never stopped pushing. I know their history. They would push and push and make the Gentiles more and more angry. Some smart Jews always said,
“Hey, we keep going like this, they’re going to start a pogrom against us.”
Of course that’s an insult to any belligerent Jew, and if you tell him he’s pissing the Gentiles off, the Jew’s response is to get his back up, attack like a psycho, and scream, “The Gentiles don’t like it? Fine! Then we’ll do it 10 times harder!” So what happened after a while. Duh. A pogrom. Another expulsion.
Most sane humans know that if you are really pissing someone off so badly that they are close to their breaking point and may get destructive or dangerous that it’s time to back off on the attack and get away from the person. Many hospital beds have been occupied by idiots who pushed people to their limits, and when people warned them they were pushing people too far, said, “Fine! I’ll do it 10 times as much!” it’s an excellent way to get your ass beat. Which has been happening to the Jews for centuries.
Anyway, my point is all Identity Politics groups do just this. If you tell them they are crazy and they are pissing people off and causing a huge backlash, they all get outraged, get their backs up and scream, “They don’t like it! Fine! Then we will do it 10 X harder. ”
None of these groups ever stop pushing. Blacks will never stop. They will just push, push, push.
The gays get more demanding, weird and radical every year.
The trannies are the same, except they are far weirder than even the gays.
And like all of these other groups, of course feminists never know when to stop either.
To feminists, the patriarchy is as immobile and untouchable as God Himself. It’s a known physical fact of the universe like black holes that will never go away.
Anyway, keeping the patriarchy around even if it doesn’t exist gives feminists something to do and something to yell about. And indeed the feminists keep pushing. The definition of rape expands nearly every year, as does the concept of sexual harassment, at the same time as the definition of consent gets more narrowed. Of course these policies are designed to completely screw men over while leaving women untouched. Hey, I told you women were fair and magnanimous.
Sex Negative Feminism, now the principal kind of feminism that has taken over all of society, keeps getting worse every year.  #Metoo will not just grow but it will expand in definition because angry ideologues with a punishing agenda – especially grievance feminists – never know when to stop.
I figure looking at a woman will at least be sexual assault in 10-20 years, assuming the female snowflake was made uncomfortable by it of course. Asking for a number or asking for a date will be seen as rape if you made the woman uncomfortable.
Feminists will develop a new stupid slogan, “Making Women Uncomfortable Is Rape!”
Feminist men, cucks, white knights and other fags will of course fall all over themselves saying  that uncomfortableness is rape, and they never make woman uncomfortable, or if they do somehow screw up and do so, they immediately get on their knees and kiss the feet of these superior queens called females.
Expect Jessica Valenti to lead the Crazy Brigade. Have you seen her column? A lot of it is Street Harassment Is Evil! but she recently published a piece called, How Come Men Don’t Look at Me Anymore? talking about how much it hurts to lose all that male attention. What a dumb bitch. And women wonder why we call them stupid.
If anyone is wondering if this post is misogynistic, in my view there are two kinds of women, real women and feminists.
I love real women with all my heart and soul as much as I love my wonderful mother.
The feminists? Well, I would not mind if they all met Mark Lepine. After all, he didn’t act alone. Who else pulled the trigger that day, if only in their minds? I sure did.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

34 thoughts on “Emmanuel Macron, Cuck of the Century”

  1. With all due respect Robert, I think you are making the mistake of viewing this not only through a personal lens (based on your recent experiences with women), but also an American one.
    Instead, put yourself in European shoes: your cities are clogged with unemployed immigrants from Islamic and African countries that view unaccompanied women as fair game for persistent, unrelenting harassment — at best — and at worst, rape. It seems pretty weak to tell the females of your nation “just deal with it, it’s part of the culture they immigrated from.”
    Obviously, the native (and well-known) French method of picking up strange girls is the casual, indirect method. A few tries, she either accepts or politely rejects — upon which the French man makes a graceful (gracious!) exit. This is not what we’re dealing with here.
    I have an ex-girlfriend who now lives in Zurich, who complains that Arab and African men cluster around train stations to catcall, harass and follow women who are coming home from work. They’ll do this even when she is accompanied by her husband. Imagine being a European man and having to constantly suppress the violent urge to protect your woman’s honor.
    Ironically, my ex-girlfriend is from Mexico City, which has its own culture of “piropos” (humorous, playful catcalls) that would also offend the western feminazi! But my ex-girlfriend never had a problem with that. So… the kind of harassment going on in Europe must be pretty bad. Even horny gay men get the memo after a while!
    Just to clarify, I’m sure the majority of immigrants to Europe learn and adapt, but unfortunately there is still a large portion that need to be educated by increasingly drastic means. Hence… A law.

      1. That’s pretty much what it’s all about, the worst harassment coming from the Arabs — stuff along the lines of “You stupid whore, how dare you wear that in this neighborhood, showing your hair and your skin above your ankle means you’re a slut who deserves to be raped”.
        The non-Islamic Africans just seem to not be able to take no for an answer. Women with big booty face similar treatment by blacks in New York. I think in these situations we are talking about low-IQ Subsaharan thought patterns — “Gee, if I just keep trying, she has to accept me, and today will be my lucky day!”
        Again, this is not a blanket statement for every member of these minority groups, but rather a subset that showcases these behavioral patterns.
        Hilariously, the libtards have been protesting the French law as targeted against poor minorities… One of those situations where their hypocrisy is exposed..

      2. Nah, I’m from SoCal, but have French friends, and also have been following the global pushback against street harassment which seemed to start ~5 years ago, right in the middle of the 2nd term Obama SJW wave. Remember this video? https://youtu.be/iQBjhZtLtRk
        I’ll be the first to say I like the idea of catcalling and wolf-whistling… Seems like it used to be a playful part of (blue collar) Caucasian culture, but sometime in the late 80’s / 90’s PC wave it was labelled “Not OK”, along with Don’t Be a Skeeze At Work, No Means No, etc. I can see both sides here because it seems like one of those things that falls into a gray area similar to Teasing vs. Bullying, ie it’s dependent on a lot of intangibles between the two people involved. You know — was that a playful compliment from a Nice Man, or a disgusting comment from a Pervy Creep? The crowd decided Not OK…
        The problem in America, showcased by the video, is that since the 90’s Caucasian men have followed the new rules… NAMs to a much lesser extent. I’m not hollering at ghetto black girls, so why should ghetto black guys be allowed to holler at white girls? Within their own communities it’s their business, but when it crosses racial lines, it gets sticky.
        For example, my sister used to live in New York. She is an introverted white girl with a nice figure. Am I OK with black and Puerto Rican dudes harassing her on the subway? An inborn tribal feeling tells me that they should not be getting away with that.
        Transport this scene to Europe and amp it up to extreme misogynist Islamist levels, or African boat people cluelessness, and I’m surprised European whites have not resorted to violence…

        1. You’re wrong. Girls are hardwired into responding to approaches by the opposite sex. As long as it’s done respectfully.
          Most Euro men have become cucks and fags anyway. I have been to Europe thrice. Never saw a native European approach a girl in the street or in nightclubs for that matter. Plenty of Arabs and Africans do it all the time. Go to any nightclub in Berlin and it’s the Black Africans and Turks that get the girls excited. Most White European guys quietly fade into the background with their solitary beverage.
          I am not aggressive at all but Polish girls would flirt and dance with me right near their wimpy boyfriends. Maybe because I was exotic but mostly because they had ZERO RESPECT for their boyfriends.
          European men (except the British) have forgotten their masculinity because of generations of nanny state propaganda. When the State looks after all your needs from cradle to grave, it turns you into a complete pansy.
          It makes you wonder if they have always been that way or did the remaining few ballsy Europeans perish in the second World War. Courage is believed to be a hereditary trait.

        2. European men (except the British) have forgotten their masculinity because of generations of nanny state propaganda. When the State looks after all your needs from cradle to grave, it turns you into a complete pansy.
          Hey SHI, most of your content is not a problem, but you cannot criticize a state that looks after your needs from cradle to grave which is a dig at “cradle to grave socialism” which is something we actually support on here. Criticism of cradle to grave socialism is part of reactionary radical individualist anti-socialist propaganda in the US. It’s also tied into the use of nanny state as a criticism of socialism.
          If you want to use the nanny state to criticize cops and and stupid laws, go ahead and do it. Criticism against cops is always welcome here because I am basically anti-cop. I don’t mind them going after real serious criminals, but they spend far too much time going after regular people going about their everyday business. For instance, pulling ordinary, average people minding their own business over just to harass them is something cops do all the time and is one of the main reasons I am anti-cop.
          Also no supporting radical individualism.
          I ban on anti-socialism and support for radical individualism. Just to let you know.

        3. Hey SHI, most of your content is not a problem, but you cannot criticize a state that looks after your needs from cradle to grave which is a dig at “cradle to grave socialism” which is something we actually support on here. Criticism of cradle to grave socialism is part of reactionary radical individualist anti-socialist propaganda in the US. It’s also tied to the use of nanny state as a criticism of socialism.

          I am sorry, it was unintentional. I was only comparing my own personal experiences. I did not mean to violate the core principle of your blog. I am against 1%ers same as you.
          To be clear, I support a Canadian or Australian welfare model compared to a European one because it stifles innovation. I was a bit pissed about GDPR, a new EU law which became effective on May 25, 2018. This is draconian although it punishes Facebook and Google with lawsuits which I welcome. But it’s anti-small businesses because they cannot comply with GDPR.
          http://www.businessinsider.com/war-brewing-europe-eprivacy-regulation-2018-5

          Also no supporting radical individualism.
          I ban on anti-socialism and support for radical individualism. Just to let you know.

          Noted. Sorry if it came that way.
          I am not a radical individualist but more of an anarchist and anti-State person, an Anonymous and Dark Web supporter.
          I recollect that you do love that strain of thought.
          I will never support anything which is anti-poor. That’s not who I am.

        4. Criticism of cradle to grave socialism is part of reactionary radical individualist anti-socialist propaganda in the US. It’s also tied into the use of nanny state as a criticism of socialism.

          I’m totally with you on this one but just to clarify, the problem you describe here is unique and specific to the US. It does not apply to Asian countries, for example where cradle to grave socialism is seen pejoratively because it’s tied with other baneful ideas — Islamic fascism in Middle-East, India’s Modiphiles,
          EU socialism started out well if you go all the way back to its Fabian origins, and welfare models. Today’s EU is a tyrant regime mostly thanks to the trade protectionism it represents which is resentful of poor people in the third world. That is why I am opposed to their policies.
          Australian and Canadian socialist welfare models do not operate on trade protectionism. The Middle-East countries such as Qatar, UAE, Saudi Arabia have cradle to grave models but again, they do not believe in protectionisms.

        5. All of what you are saying is ok except saying that socialism stifles innovation. Not acceptable.
          All the rest of it is just fine though, and it is ok to go after the EU for being more or less SJW fascists, which is what it seems they are turning into.
          I am not sure about the debate around GDPR. As an American, it seems silly all the fuss that it is causing. I doubt if it will be much of a burden to small business. I mean they just have to publish their privacy rules. How hard is that?
          Of course you are always free to attack the PC Dictatorship in the sense of overreaching government.

        6. All of what you are saying is ok except saying that socialism stifles innovation. Not acceptable.

          No, no. That’s not what I was trying to say. Far from it.
          Some of the most innovative countries in the world are socialist – Norway, Canada, Switzerland. South Korea, Japan, and Singapore look after their citizens with universal health care and right to education, and they are among the most innovative economies in the world.
          If by socialism you mean, universal health care, right to free education and worker’s safety and 40 hours a week and overtime dues, count me in.
          I am only opposed to trade protectionism policies of EU. They have run the course in their stagnant economies by pumping more money into basketcases such as Greece and Spain and now they want to transfer the debt burden on the rest of the world.
          Why should I have to pay for a Frenchman’s 40 day a year vacation? But, with a shady deal on fighter jets that India’s corrupt Modi government has signed with France, that is exactly what I am forced to do. My tax money will subsidize some Frenchman’s hospital bills while his country (under the garb of EU) prevents me from making money online from their consumers through draconian laws such as GDPR. Why should I be happy about this quasi-imperialist deal?
          https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/rafale-deal-india-france-signed-secrecy-pact-this-year-says-minister/articleshow/63518175.cms

          All the rest of it is just fine though, and it is ok to go after the EU for being more or less SJW fascists, which is what it seems they are turning into.
          I am not sure about the debate around GDPR. As an American, it seems silly all the fuss that it is causing. I doubt if it will be much of a burden to small business. I mean they just have to publish their privacy rules. How hard is that?
          Of course you are always free to attack the PC Dictatorship in the sense of overreaching government.

          Yes, that’s what it is. The EU is my new mortal enemy – the multiple-headed Hydra monster.
          GDPR is a very ridiculous law. It fines non-EU companies 4% of their annual revenues if they accidentally collect the data of any EU visitor on their websites. It’s a callous case of extra-territorial overreach by this EU bureaucracy. I will oppose them tooth and nail.
          I do have a few websites and blogs running and the last thing I want is some EU fat cat in Brussels telling me to comply with GDPR. Who the hell are they to impose their worldviews on others?
          It’s gloves off with EU. American companies aren’t happy either- many American news websites blocked access to 500 million Europeans.

  2. Huh, WNs are another entitlement group! More identity politics. in fact, that’s what I was reading on YouTube, how a movement once about defending truth from leftist bias – has become bias. But then again, Nazis and the like have always been out to show they were for white people – even if it’s against logic.

  3. OK, I was thinking today, though, why might computer programmers and other white-collar people (no pun intended) would join with prisoners and rednecks in racism?
    The key is the fact that Indians, Chinese, and Koreans etc. are racist, arrogant pricks! How much can people stand if they’re told to not be racist – when clearly the above groups are un-PC barbarians? I mean, we all know Indians hate blacks, want to take over IT and also basically act like Nazis (hate the disabled, the effeminate, race traitors)! But see, whites cannot act like Indians as they are now with the alt-right.
    But two wrong don’t make an alt-right! But I can see how this stuff has brewed up.

  4. OK, more directly regarding the article, I think a lot of the women getting catcalls are asking for it (maybe revealing clothes). But I wouldn’t say all harassment works out like that. I mean, I’m sure there are innocent people being harassed – especially in regards to racism etc..

  5. Yeah sorry Robert, but the Express is notorious for producing fake and /or misleading news and headlines. I know one has to be wary of all media outlets, but the British newspapers to be extremely wary of the most are: The Express, The Sun, The Daily Mail, The Telegraph. The best newspapers are The Mirror and the Independent.

  6. Oh dear, as you live in a feminist-controlled environment called California, I recommend that you don’t invite anymore trouble with this woman than you already do.
    It could be a misunderstanding but you mustn’t give this girl a second chance. Give her a wide berth instead. Next time you see her at the coffee shop, completely avoid any eye contact. You can pass right by her side and totally avoid looking in her direction. I know it’s a violation of your freedom to look just about anywhere but things have already gone out of hand.
    It will be harder for you when she surrounds herself with a few female friends just to “test” you.
    Fortunately, cunt carriers like this one are 1 in 100 or something. Most girls are OK with men checking them out as long as it’s respectful. Not sure about Cali-femmia though.
    Chances are that if you ignore her continuously she’s bound to attempt a conversation with you in future. That will be your opportunity. Pretend as if you didn’t notice her, and ignore her presence.
    This girl is bound to give you sex if you chat up other females in her presence. Take it from me. 🙂
    But pass it really. She isn’t worth going to prison for. Cast your net wider and fish for some girls with lower self-esteem. You’re a THERAPIST, right?

  7. One of the charges against Morgan Freeman was some dumb cunt who said when he was talking to her, he was looking at her tits. She had to tell him, “Hey, my eyes are up here.” This was sexual harassment because the bitch got her panties in a wad over it. This is so stupid. Every straight man on Earth does this routinely or has done it in the past. Why do you think, “Um, my eyes are up here?” is such a popular joke.

    All guys do this. It’s scientifically proven in experiments. Look on YouTube for the video.

  8. One thing about the Jews is they never stopped pushing. I know their history. They would push and push and make the Gentiles more and more angry. Some smart Jews always said,
    “Hey, we keep going like this, they’re going to start a pogrom against us.”

    http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-arts-and-culture/85945/listless

    Last week, Tablet Magazine published our list of the 100 greatest Jewish films of all time. At the very bottom was Schindler’s List. In a brief blurb, I called it an “astoundingly stupid” movie, which, in turn, inspired some of our readers to call me a “piece of shit” and a “neo-Nazi”—all for casting an aspersion on what, if they are to be believed, is everyone’s favorite Holocaust movie.
    Which makes perfect sense: More than just a regrettable film, Schindler’s List neatly reflects the Manichean mindset of many American Jews, for whom mythology trumps memory and nothing lies beyond good and evil. Those who howled at me weren’t expressing a mere aesthetic judgment; they were defending a worldview.
    To understand this worldview, we need only look at Schindler’s List. The film’s two main characters are Liam Neeson’s Oskar Schindler and Ralph Fiennes’ Nazi officer, Amon Goeth. The first is a philandering and greedy German who sees a little girl in a red coat and has a nearly instantaneous epiphany, realizing that life is precious and that Jews should be saved. The other is a monster; it’s no coincidence that the American Film Institute ranked Goeth at number 15 in its list of the 100 greatest villains of all time, just one spot below the slimy creature who terrorized Sigourney Weaver in Ridley Scott’s Alien. Goeth, too, is an otherworldly sort. He is not, like the real-life murderer on whom he is based, merely a hateful, opportunistic, and cruel young man who relished the chance to play god. He is impenetrable, predatory, inhuman. We have little reason to fear him more than we fear, say, the Nazis in Spielberg’s Raiders of the Lost Ark or the shark from Jaws; all are terrifying, but all are the sort of baddies we’ll only ever see on-screen, not the kind of ordinary and crooked and all-too-human scum living quietly next door and waiting for a stab at power.

    Shindler’s List seemed to have major problems – mainly coming from the Jewish “untouchable” thing.

  9. I love the title of this blog. It really stands out in terms of precision.
    Emmanuel Macron, Cuck of the Century
    The PUA crowd and Reddit/4-chan homeboys hate him with a passion.
    http://www.returnofkings.com/121235/the-french-have-elected-globocuck-emmanuel-macron-and-his-pro-islamic-platform
    https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-65084-newpost.html
    https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/66q8ak/this_is_emmanuel_macron_he_married_his_24_year/
    Macron’s as bad as Suckerberg. Here the two Napoleans are enjoying a moment together. The perfect look which describes their shared contempt for small businesses and manly men.
    http://pictures.reuters.com/Doc/RTR/Media/TR3/3/1/f/c/RTS1SWL2.jpg

    1. I don’t care that he married an older woman. When I was 21, I had a 37 year old gf. That’s not too different from Macron. And of course I dated women who had kids. Those were generally older women but not all of them were. Some were just married women. I might have gotten together with them and helped raise their kids. I don’t see how it’s cuckoldry anyway.
      Besides I have been cucked before. I didn’t like it but I put up with it. I have had women who were determined to cuck me, I think because they thought I lacked masculinity. She told me right to my face that she was going to cuck me with some Black guy over the weekend (an obvious attempt to provoke me to murder her) and I just laughed in her face and told her to go for it. I said, “Send me the pics, baby!” That just infuriated her even more.
      Roosh is a reactionary. Fuck Roosh!
      I doubt if they hate small businesses. Fuckerberg might but only because all big businesses are trying to drive all small businesses out of business. I would not get caught up in the pro small business thing too much. Here in the US, 83% of small businessmen vote Republican. They are actually more rightwing than corporations IMHO.
      Reagan and Thatcher were elected on the backs of small business. Thatcher in particular came from a reactionary British small business background. Here in the US, they all listen to Rush Limbaugh and watch Fox News. Small businessmen are basically reactionaries. They’re worse than corporate capitalists really.

      1. Aside from the Muslim/Latino invasion there’s not much reason to like the alt-right. Generally speaking, they’re hate mongers resorting to lowest gutter insults (cuck) as propaganda.
        Anyway, I cannot believe THIS nation elected such trash.

  10. When I was 21, I had a 37 year old gf.

    A 37 year old woman is in her prime. You never married her so it doesn’t really count. The bigger question is what right-thinking girl would have opted for midget Macron except his own high school teacher? Not even in France where they generally have weird tastes in opposite sex.
    I have seen pics of you in your 20s. Despite the wild oats you sowed in your younger days, you should feel no reason to evaluate yourself against Macron.

    Roosh is a reactionary. Fuck Roosh!

    I was never into the PUA scene and I will never comment on their websites. Very selective reading at best.
    I only enjoy Roosh, Breitbart and 4-chan boards when they bash radical feminists and PC cucks like Macron. These online outlets are cathartic because in real life noone says stuff like that to anyone.

    I doubt if they hate small businesses. Fuckerberg might but only because all big businesses are trying to drive all small businesses out of business. I would not get caught up in the pro small business thing too much. Here in the US, 83% of small businessmen vote Republican. They are actually more rightwing than corporations IMHO.
    Reagan and Thatcher were elected on the backs of small business. Thatcher in particular came from a reactionary British small business background. Here in the US, they all listen to Rush Limbaugh and watch Fox News. Small businessmen are basically reactionaries. They’re worse than corporate capitalists really.

    Maybe in US. Small businesses are not seen as evil in the rest of the world.
    Walmart comes to a country X – it kills all mom n’ pop stores.
    Amazon comes to a country Y – it kills all e-commerce.

  11. Yeah. Now it’s sexual harassment for looking at them.
    You just know these laws are going to be abused by stupid, emotional, vindictive, and evil-minded women, of which there are hundreds of millions.
    Women are like Jews, Blacks, LGBTQZKPRBF, etc. Just another identity politics group.

    So what is the difference between gawking and looking? And yeah, of course, there is a vindictive group of women out to harm men – unless, of course, they’re the ones they specifically like! For instance, if women are showing breast cleavage, then it’s to get attention – but not from retards and nerds – or maybe even blacks.

      1. Hey SHI, this feminist came to my site and said I was paranoid about that woman thinking I was stalking her. According to her, throwing her car into reverse like that was completely normal.
        Ok here’s what happened. I finish my turnaround u-turn and I am ready to turn right again. At exactly the same time, a car pulls in just behind me. As I am approaching the end of my turn, I notice it’s her and smile. Maybe wave. As soon as she gets in behind me, she throws it in reverse hard and backs up very fast for 20-30 yards. For a while that baffled me, but now I am thinking that she is freaked out by me and thinks I am stalking her. Because that area is exactly where she lives, though I had no idea of that. She probably thinks I know where she lives and am creeping around her house.
        The feminist also said, “All because she didn’t return your email…” As usual the feminist sides with the woman against the man.
        Thing is, she said she wanted to see my writing and it wasn’t working to write my email, so I asked for hers so I could email her with links. She gave me the email but the look in her face said it’s over. So I figured pretty soon that she didn’t like me and I was OK with that. I emailed her the links and never got a mail back. Furthermore, she never discussed whether she went to read my stuff or not. For that reason I thought it might be weird to ask her if she went there, so I never even asked her if she checked my stuff out.
        But sometimes I try to talk to her and she ignores me. One time she was standing next to me in line for a few minutes and she would not even acknowledge my presence.
        That’s some cold shit.
        I have no interest in this chick at all since obviously she has no interest in me. But I’m freaked out if she thinks I’m stalking her.
        According to this feminist, I should say everything’s cool and keep talking to her like nothing happened. That sounds like a bad idea because what if I am right about my theory about her thinking I am creeping on her.
        OTOH, I should probably deny this woman’s existence just for pulling shit on me like ignoring me when I talk about acting like I am a ghost when I am standing next to her.
        Give me some advice, sensei SHI.

        1. Tell you what, if you fail to laugh off your present hardship with this lovely lady, things CAN escalate. That’s not necessarily a bad thing, and I for one would be very excited if I were you. I enjoy flirting with public humiliation and have grown immune to women’s put-downs and cold shoulder treatment. It isn’t as bad as it seems. Anyone who wants to play with fire should be able to stand the heat.
          I think you’re way too worried about nothing. The ideal response is just to take a step back and remove yourself from the situation, simple as it seems. We both know that girls are extremely paranoid creatures so let us analyze how much you can push your luck with this femme fatale. See, from your vantage point, things can go either of these ways:
          Outcome 1 –> Public humiliation and embarrassment for being a pervert and a creep. Maybe a RESTRAINING ORDER if she thinks you’re creepy and dangerous enough. I heard they hand over ROs like candies in the USA.
          Outcome 1 may be precipitated by the fact that you’re dealing with entitled American women who have, maybe, a justified fear of random strangers in a country where everyone is allowed to carry guns. I mean she doesn’t know you. You could be an ax murderer, a serial rapist, the next mass shooter. What triggers American women’s panic button responses might just lead to a coy smile from an Arab woman who feels lucky to get any attention from men at all. We’re really looking at a very different kind of beast.
          In short, women from other parts of the world aren’t really worried about their personal safety that much, unlike American women. When the level of paranoia is very high, the responses they generate will be freakier.
          Outcome 2 -> Adult acknowledgment of mutual misunderstandings and moving on with each other’s lives without ruffling feathers. This is the optimal outcome but it really depends on her mental age. Many women have an all take and no give approach to dealing with men.
          Go for Outcome 2 provided that girl is mentally stable. It’s very important to clear the air of any suspicions. Girls like her have a propensity to imagine horrible stuff just because it adds drama to their boring lives. You need a way to excuse yourself from her freaky imaginations.
          All you need is your trademark polite smile and a safe environment such as a coffee shop. Don’t approach this female on the street or near a blind alley under any circumstances. A coffee shop or a supermarket is ideal.
          You need to keep it short and clarify your concerns truthfully. Just bring out your nice, genuine smile at a distance of 1 meter at least. It can go something like this.

          YOU: “Excuse me, I’d like a quick word with you.”
          HER: “I don’t know you.”
          YOU: “I disagree. I think we have run into each other a couple of times and I have a genuine concern which I’d like to discuss. It won’t take long.”
          HER: “OK”
          YOU: “See that day I was passing through X street and you were behind me in your /*Insert car*/. I smiled and waved at you and the way you panicked is something which made me feel very awkward and uneasy. I am just here to clarify that it was a harmless gesture. I smile at strangers all the time. I’m much older and according to my generation, it’s considered good manners. I’m not a bad person and deserve way better treatment from someone like you.”
          HER: “This is still awkward.”
          YOU: “Fair enough. I had tried to have a friendly conversation but you are entitled to your space and privacy. So am I which means I don’t want to deal with a person such as yourself in future. It was a sheer accident that we met a few times before and that’s about it. So, I’m never going to talk to you again and acknowledge your presence in this coffee shop or just about anywhere, I live around the block and chances are we’re going to run into each other more often than we like. But I’m going to make this very clear, I really don’t want to deal with you in future. For the purpose of any future annoyance from your side, I have recorded our conversation on my phone. Thank you very much. Good bye and good luck,”

          I kept the responses curt because you should work on the assumption that you’re dealing with a 100% classic paranoid bitch. Of course, you can finetune your responses if she’s apologetic for her misunderstandings.
          Outcome 3 -> Sparking a healthy romance in future. Maybe true love. (Don’t presume too much.)
          You shouldn’t really pine your hopes on Outcome 3. There is a huge chance that she’d want you to hang out with her in future which can even mean an invitation to her house. Well, do not. Just politely excuse yourself. And it should end here.
          It all boils down to the simple fact that this bitch has DISRESPECTED you. You shouldn’t piss on her if she were on fire.

        2. So that really did mean something when she threw her car into reverse and sped backwards like that, right? There’s no way that was a harmless move. When does anyone ever throw their car into reverse and race backwards?! When was the last time you saw anybody do that for any reason?! No one fucking does that, man. No one ever does, unless there is some kind of problem. And no one ever does it on a public road. They might do it off in the woods or on their own property or in the course of some sort of outdoor work, but no one ever does that on an open street for some innocent reason.
          She disrespected me how? By throwing her car into reverse? By treating me like a ghost and ignoring me when I talk?

        3. She disrespected me how? By throwing her car into reverse? By treating me like a ghost and ignoring me when I talk?

          That car panic attack was the worst. Obviously this bitch is messed up. She probably has a rich inner life in which all kinds of ogres and demons are raping her in her own bed.
          Treating someone like a ghost and ignoring them while they talk is also extremely disrespectful. That should be grounds for never dealing with that person again. Ever.
          I have immediately walked out of casual company with girls who pretend to be with me but only want to peek into their goddamned iPhones and talking to other friends, not even looking in my direction. One possible exception is at nightclubs where there is too much noise and distractions. Everyone’s allowed to be a jerk on the dance floor (I’m a good sport) but you transfer that shitty behavior in a regular place, and I would consider you a very horrible human being and immediately lose all interest in you.
          You don’t treat any human being like a tool, not even with your entitled vagina. Respect is fucking mutual. Always, no exceptions.
          If you’re a girl who doesn’t want to deal with a man, the rule is very simple. Just politely excuse yourself with a smile and he will get the hint. Also, avoid all forms of eye contact. Most decent men get the message and they will give you all the privacy you need.
          The problem really starts when you keep checking this man out while simultaneously wanting to treat him as a ghost. You can’t have it both ways. He’s entitled to his privacy as much as you are.

  12. I guess this would be a good place to tell you guys about what happened to me back in April. Let me give you some background, if you’ll bear me with me: I’ve going to “Geek”, comic conventions, and stuff like that for years. Since the stuff has become mainstream, it’s become expensive and crowded, so I usually go to events that are cheap or free. A few years back, I went to one of these free events and I became interested in cosplay photography (I usually do Action figure/diorama shots). I also got the idea that I could maybe do some cosplay shoots. I had a group that I contacted with my ideas. I mainly wanted to do a kind of parody of some of the sillier aspects of the 70’s Lynda Carter Wonder Woman show (I’ve been watching it again on Me-TV). I did some practice shots with the group in 2016. While we never got to do a full shoot. I did see them at other cons and chatted with them when I did. Honestly, I saw them maybe four or five times year.
    Now bearing in mind, these cosplayers…
    A: are people I’ve worked with before
    B: I have pictures of work with
    C. Never exchanged one hostile word with
    D: I just spoke to at a con a couple of weeks ago.
    E: I first met in 2015 (!)
    Are now accusing me of harassment and just got me barred from one con. The campus police were actually called and I was threatened with arrest (for trespassing) if I didn’t leave. I consulted a lawyer that Monday (he helped my mom evict a bad tenant) and he told me that I should ask for the incident report (which would’t be ready for a few days), but that nothing they’ve done so far is legally “actionable”. I also took screenshots of all the correspondence I had with them on Facebook, including them commenting and liking photos I took of them at various cons. Everything was amicable between me and this group until this year.
    I went to get the incident report from the university a few days later. Apparently, I’m not allowed to take photographs at cons or ask anyone to pose for photos. Taking photos of people at cons and asking women to pose for photographs is “harassment” and makes them uncomfortable. Seriously.
    You can look at the report on my dropbox. Just increase the size if you have trouble reading it.
    https://www.dropbox.com/s/aagvxf95pzxexpl/Stupidest%20Poice%20Report%20Ever%21%20%28edit%29.jpg?dl=0

    1. This is exactly what we are talking about, brother. Welcome to the site and please feel free to make yourself at home. You are with brothers here who support you all the way. I don’t think you did anything wrong at all.
      We HATE this #metoo bullshit and we HATE HATE HATE HATE HATE feminists. Basically, we want them dead, that’s how much we hate them. Why do we want them dead? Because of what they did to you and so many of the rest of us men. We reject the extreme misogyny of the red pill, PUA, MGTOW and incel communities here. We think there are two kinds of women: real women and feminists. We love real women. Feminists can go jump in a lake of fire.
      All this sexual harassment crap is nothing but a load of bullshit. These cunts are waging war on us men, and they can burn for that. They want a war, fine, we’ll give it to them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *