Racist Post of the Day

From this post:

Ms: Same for niggardly or tar baby. You still have dindu, though.

Yes. Waiter: “These Blacks always leave niggardly tips!” Boss: “Racist! You’re fired!” Waiter: No! You don’t understand! Not niggerly tips, niggardly tips! Boss: I’m calling the SPLC! Waiter: “WTF did you flunk English 10?” Interesting tidbit: The word “niggardly” apparently comes from the Old English word, nig, “stingy”, 1300, Middle English. Possibly borrowed from Scandinavian nygg, “stingy”, which may be from Old Norse nigla, “to make a fuss about small matters. -ard, Middle English “pejorative”. So nig + ard,  “stingy” + “lowlife”. Niggard, “stingy lowlife,” niggardly, “acting like a stingy lowlife, miserly, tight, cheap, stingy, etc.” I didn’t know nig meant stingy. I always thought it meant something else.

Men, Women, Sex and Love

Beatrix: This was a wtf for me – A demisexual is a person who does not experience sexual attraction unless they form a strong emotional connection with someone. It’s more commonly seen in but by no means confined to romantic relationships. The term demisexual comes from the orientation being “halfway between” sexual and asexual. RL: Actually I think demisexual is the natural state of the human female in a way. Bernardista: Wow! Cool! So you think women who seem to experience sexual attraction to most anyone with a shlong are faking it to be PC? I always thought I was missing out.

My response: No, women can enjoy sex for sex sake, and they are doing it more nowadays. But my mother always said that men can have sex without love with no problems, but women can’t. They need love to have sex. What she says is not 10 Some women enjoy being a slut more than others. Some women are just horny and want to get laid to satisfy their sex drive. However, women have a long tradition of finding sex without love to be somewhat to completely unsatisfying. They often feel empty afterwards. This seems to be the normal mode of female thinking, but nowadays, women are encouraged to have sex for fun, and a lot of them are doing it so there is some social learning and behavioral modification going on. It’s not that they cannot do it, but it’s harder for women to have sex without love than it is for men. And speaking from personal experience, even among women who have had quite a bit of sex without love, once they fall madly in love with a man, their sex drive often goes through the roof. Yes, women can be turned on by a sexy guy, but when sex is combined with love is when you really see the female sex drive go crazy. I would say that women need love to turn on the sex drive, but that is not completely true. But love sure revs it up into overdrive more than anything else that I have ever experienced.

Confirmatory Bias: The Normative Mode of Human Thinking

I have noticed something funny. Back when some polls showed Humphrey Trumpey ahead, the Alt Right was going berserk. They were all insisting that Drumpf was 10 Now that recent polls show Hitlery beating Drumpf by double digits, suddenly the polls can never be trusted because polls are wrong, polls don’t mean anything and polls cannot be trusted. In other words, when Drumpf was ahead, the polls were all correct, but when he is behind, the polls are suddenly all wrong. I think this is called confirmatory bias. Confirmatory bias is the basic mode of human thinking. People’s minds are pretty funny. People don’t believe what is true. People could care less what is true. To most people, “truth” means “whatever statements make me feel good or support my ideology.” These feel-good statements become “facts.” Falsehood or lies means “whatever statements make me feel bad or contradict my ideology.” These feel-bad statements become “lies.” This is really the way that the human mind operates. Most people I know think this way. People can’t handle cognitive dissonance. My guy is always 10 And their attitude about Republicans is that Republicans are 10 Most people use this tactic in arguments. I often “lose” arguments because I freely admit that my side does bad things. My opponent then jumps up and seizes on this as, “Hah! Even you admit that your team is the bad guys!” And of course they never concede one point about their side. Their side is always 10 You see, they can’t handle the idea that their side is even 9 Same thing holds for the opposing side. The opposing side cannot be given any credit. Once you say they are I infuriate people because I break through this all good versus all bad thinking. I just pour cold water all over that concept. That is why people say my ideology is “incoherent.” It’s “incoherent” because I am more rightwing on some things and more leftwing on others and maybe more centrist on other stuff. That boils down to “incoherence.” If you’re Left, you’re all Left. If you’re Centrist, you’re all Centrist. If you’re Right, you’re all Right. This is the only way to be non-contradictory and coherent. Most humans think this way. This is the way humans think. Just get used to it. I have known people who have gifted to genius IQ’s from 130-150, and they thought this way as much as anyone. I do not really think that smart people are any more open-minded than anyone else. Smart people are prone to the same bullshit thinking that everyone else is. Humans just can’t deal with ambiguity and grey areas. It causes anxiety and makes them wonder if their views are really correct. Are the good guys really the good guys? Are the bad guys really the bad guys? Am I rooting for the right team? These thoughts are confusing and cause anxiety, so most people don’t want to think them. So they do the Manichean thing and avoid all of the confusing uncertainty.

Straight Men and Gay Men: Some Real Talk

You don’t think gay sex is disgusting? I would say that all straight men think gay sex is disgusting and sickening. 10 That revulsion is caused by homophobia. So in that sense, I would say that a bit of homophobia is a good thing. Once you take the controls off, and you tell men that they can just go fuck guys anytime they want to, lots of guys who would not have ordinarily have done such a thing are going to start doing just that. The only reason most guys won’t touch that behavior with a 10 foot pole is due to a bit of homophobia. It is the natural homophobia of straight men that keeps them from doing that stuff. My experience with gay men has been almost uniformly negative. Generally, you can’t make friends with them or get close to them. However, I do have one very good gay friend now and we talk a lot. But he is a super intellectual guy (he is a published writer), and he’s not a base, low personality like so many gay men. He also happens to agree with everything I say about gay men. Some might call him a self hating gay, but I think he is just realistic. Generally straight men and gay men cannot be friends. It just doesn’t work. The reason is because they won’t stop trying to fuck you. They will try to fuck you, you say no, and then as long as you hang around with them, they will never stop trying. After a while, you seriously start wanting to kill them. I am convinced that this is behind a lot of gay bashings or at least a lot of gay men getting punched in the face. With some exceptions, this has been my experience with gay men. I know two men who were hired or given jobs by gay men who were their bosses. Both were sexually harassed, and both were fired for not fucking their gay bosses. One of those men was me. I would be very careful taking a job offer from a gay man. I know two men who rented rooms from gay men. Both were blackmailed. Everything was fine for a while, and then the hammer came down and you have to fuck them, or it’s out on the street. I would say any straight man renting a room from a gay man as a roommate is out of his mind. I know a few straight guys who were like, “Gay men are wonderful. They’re so cool! I’m straight, but gay men are the greatest thing since sliced bread!” One straight guy, one of my best friends, went on for a few years like that, and last I heard of him, he was taking cock up the ass in West Hollywood on a regular basis. I guess he wasn’t so straight anymore. So I am a bit worried about straight men who think homosexuality is the greatest thing since radial tires. My friends experienced the same thing. One made friends with a gay man, and the gay man tried to fuck him. My friend said no, but the gay man would never stop and eventually started pressuring my friend very hard. My friend told me he was “this far” from punching the gay man in the face. This same friend met some “really nice guys” one night after after the bar closed. He told me they were straight acting and seemed like regular guys. “Come on over to our place for drinks,” they said.The guys seemed totally cool. He got there, and after a while, he started figuring out that there was something very weird going on. The guys kept making all these weird insinuating remarks, and I think they finally put on some gay porn on DVD. My friend told them no thanks, but they never quit trying to fuck him. It went on all night like that, for several hours. If they give you a job, they might sexually harass you and fire you for not fucking them. If they give you a room to rent as roommates, they might throw the hammer down after a while and say, “Sex or the street.” Incidentally, remember my recruited and converted friend in West Hollywood above? This is how he got initiated into homosexuality – blackmail. I am actually 10 I just think that friendships between gay men and straight men simply don’t work. But you can be acquainted with them on a casual basis. And rooming with gay men seems like a very bad idea. Accepting a job from a gay boss is pretty worrisome too. Society has gone too far in the other direction. Homophobia was bad, but now we are on the other extreme to where we worship gay men like some sort of gods or kings. It’s bizarre. There’s a whole downside to male homosexuality that you only figure out if you spend a lot of time around them like I did. It’s not all peace and roses and everything bright.

Sexually Transmitted Parasitical Infections

Concerned Assman writes:

Robert, You mentioned in an earlier post on this general subject that something like 6

The figure is incorrect. It is not 6 Gay men get that from licking asses, which is something they really love to do. They really go to town when they do it too. I have seen a few videos and photos. They go for it like a man who hasn’t eaten in 30 days. It is quite a sight to behold. I do not think that gay men commonly drink evacuated enema water. Or I certainly hope they don’t. There are probably a few that may do such a thing. I have never in my life heard of gay men engaging in this activity. Neither have I heard of any straight people doing this either, thank God. The thing is that the gay male population is totally saturated with these parasites, so you are dealing with a disease base or reservoir that is unbelievably infected with these critters. However, your average straight man has zero parasites in his gut. The same study found both zero parasites in straight men and 60 different species in gay men. It was a health clinic, not sure what kind. There are only a few of these that are going to get you sick: Giradiasis or Giardia, Ameobiasis or Amoebic dysyntery, and shigella or shigellosis. There is also Hepatitis A. Gay men at least in the past experienced frequent big outbreaks of Hepatitis A in some of our big cities. Almost no straight men get Hepatitis A heterosexually. I have never heard of Hepatitis A being transmitted heterosexually, but anything is possible. The problem once again is that the gay male pool is or was heavily infected with Hepatitis A. Further, many to most people who contract it never get it and just become carriers who can infect others. Straight people do not get Hepatitis A heterosexually probably just because the reservoir  is so clean. Few heterosexual people have Hepatitis A, so the reservoir is clean enough that your risk of getting it heterosexually is very low. There are a few other diseases that can be transmitted this way like typhoid fever. Yes, there have been a few cases of Typhoid fever among gay men, but maybe only ~5 cases in the whole literature. Most of the other things that can be transmitted this way are more or less harmless and are only a problem for the very young, the very old and the immunosuppressed such as people with HIV. I did a huge lit search on parasites being transmitted sexually and only came up with 5-10 cases. However, those did occur in recent years. I think it was giardiasis. I still have the notes on that and I can turn it into a good post if I want to but I was afraid to do the post because I was afraid people would attack me for writing about this subject. If you were going to get something this way from your girlfriend, you would have already gotten it by now due to all the exposure you already had to her. And it’s doubtful that she is a carrier of giardiasis, shigellosis or amoebiasis. After six months of living together, peoples gut bacteria tend to harmonize. What is really happening here is that after six months of living closely together, everyone has eaten enough of each other’s shit (in tiny miniscule amounts) so they all now have the same gut bacteria. Really you are eating shit all the time, and not just figuratively like with me in my life. I mean literally. Even if you live alone, you are eating your own shit. Surely you are consuming tiny bits of your own shit on a regular basis. It is sort of like life. The thing that your own shit is not a problem. It’s other people’s shit that is a problem. In other words, the problem is not you, it’s other people, which is my favorite saying. As in life, so in the human gut. You can probably even eat your own shit, though I would not recommend it. You might vomit, but you cannot catch a disease. The reason is simple and that is that you cannot catch a disease that you already have. I will leave you to think about that brainteaser a bit. People like to go on and on about the horrible toxic deadly E. Coli that is found in our guts and our shit. The thing is that this E. Coli strain is pretty much harmless. Just keep it our of your vagina, your urinary tract and especially your blood. As I said, you can even eat shit that has E. Coli in it and nothing will happen except you might puke because it is so disgusting. The problem here is confusion about strains. The E. Coli strain that causes this nasty outbreaks in humans, sickening and even killing some very young and very old, comes from cows. That’s the nasty strain. You get it from a cow. On farms, cows shit all over the place, so cow shit can get in irrigation water and then on crops, so this is how you might get it from food. Some of these outbreaks are coming from Mexico where farms are not so hygienic. On the other hand though you can certainly catch a disease from eating other people’s shit but in most cases you probably will not, although I do not recommend going around eating other folks’ shit. It is not such a great idea. Besides it’s gross. I mean really people, come on now. I suppose if the commenter is going to lick his girlfriend’s ass, I would have her wash that area with soap and hot water well beforehand.

No Generalizations! Gay Men, Checking People Out and Cunnilingus

A gay SJW writes:

Hey! Just wanted to let you know that u r wrong! I’m gay, and I’ve never “checked out” a man or women when going into a room, so does that mean I’m not sexually attracted to people? No, haha, Guess what, I’m gay and I have PLENTY of friends who are bi/pan (Don’t know what that is, look it up), and they DO exist. My friends have “eaten pussies” and had sexual encounters with men before. Also, although I am a guy man, I am not afraid of nor would I kill myself over “eating a pussy.” Next time, please try to be a little less ignorant when offending a large group of humans.

A couple of things here. This post is more of the typical PC stuff we get all the time.

Newsflash: Gay Men Don’t Check out Women!

First of all, I find it hard to believe that this gay man has never walked into a room anywhere and checked out anyone, male or female but especially male. If Justin Beiber is in the room, this guy won’t check him out? Get real. I would wager that most human beings with a normal sex drive have walked into a room where there were attractive post-pubescents present and checked them out, males or females, depending on the orientation of the person doing the checking out. A person that has gone through their whole lives never doing this is either lying or strange, sorry. My mother told me that gay men never look at women. She said she had a job once in college in San Fransisco in a big office. There was one man there who they always wondered about. Finally people decided that he was gay. But she said, “One thing. He never looked at women, ever. Not even once.” Since then I have noticed other gay men who did the same thing. I had a gay boss once. The secretaries were always coming around to my desk for some reason, maybe for business or maybe just to flirt with me, I am not sure. But it was pretty fun. So there were these hot women sort of circulating around my desk off and on every day. Well the whole time, I worked there, my fag boss never once looked at any of those women. It was if there were not even there, like they were furniture, desks, carpet. They might as well have been nonhuman office furnishings to him for all he cared. And once I caught him looking at me like I was a T-bone steak. The next job I had was in another office. Offices are often full of gay men and I was working in publishing and there are lots of gay men in publishing. There was a man there named Arthur who was definitely gay but who was not out at all. In fact he was seriously closeted. But he was gay as Hell, and I figured this out from almost the moment I met him due the way he acted when he first met me. He acted towards me the same way a man acts towards a hot woman, let’s put it that way. He had a hot girlfriend, but other than that, he seemed to have no interest in women. He was 28 years old. I now feel he was a closeted gay man pretending to be straight (out) or bisexual (covert). I have now met a number of other young men just like this, married or with girlfriends and in their 20’s. Nowadays many of these men identify as bisexual, however they spend most of their time hanging around with gay men and in gay venues. It’s pretty clear where their real interest lies. Usually by their early 30’s,most of these men have come out as gay. The “bisexual” thing is some fake phase that they undertake while young because they cannot accept the fact that they may be gay. I used to eat lunch in the lunch room sometimes with Arthur across from me. We had a lot of hot women working for us, and they would come into the lunch room all the time. The whole time I was there I saw women come into that room many times while Arthur was sitting there eating his lunch. He never even looked up once. It was as if they were ghosts. I have since seen many more cases like this. Also I have some gay counseling clients and some of these men have affirmed to me that they pretty much never check out women when they are out and about. They are only looking at the men. My mother also told me something else. She said when a beautiful woman walks into a room, all of the males in the room, “from nine to 90” will turn around and look. Even the 90 year old guys who can’t get it up anymore. I mean, they may be old, but they’re not dead, right? She said that is what straight men do, they all do it, and it’s a good way to tell if a man is straight or not because it is such universal behavior. She also said that if there is a gay man in the room, he won’t notice the beautiful woman at all. This sort of thing is called “the wisdom of the ages.” It just so happens that the wisdom of the elders contradicts just about every insane thing that the Cultural Left believes. So who is right and who is wrong? If I were a betting man, I would put my money on the wisdom of ages, sorry. So despite Mr. SJW’s “What about the exceptions?” objection, it looks like we are onto something here.

Gay Men and Cunnilingus

Next Mr. Gay SJW says that he knows many bisexual and pansexual men who like to eat pussy. Well that’s nice to know. Always nice to hear about more men taking up this enjoyable activity. I never argued that bisexual men don’t eat pussy. Maybe they do, maybe they don’t. I would say that the more straight-leaning they are, the more they will want to do this, and the more gay-leaning they are, the more they would just as soon pass. I have now spoken to a few women who were married to gay men or men that they suspected were gay. Every single one of these women told me, “He didn’t like to eat pussy.” Incidentally, they all also said that all of these men preferred doggy style from behind, presumably so they could fantasize that they were with a man when they were having sex with the woman. It’s well known that gay married men often fantasize that their wife is a man when they have sex with her so they can get through the act which otherwise they haven’t much interest in. I have also read quite a few women who have husbands or boyfriends who are or are suspected to be gay or having sex with men surreptitiously. It is very common when reading these reports to notice that these women often say that the man in question didn’t like to eat pussy. One more thing. I had a friend who was a haircutter. He went to beauty school. Although he and his brother mostly got in on haircutting to get women I think, they told me that there were a lot of gay men in hairdressing and hair styling. Sometimes I would be hanging out with my haircutter friend in Hollywood at the home of one of his gay hair stylist friends. There were often a number of other gay men in the room. My friend and I used to torment these poor guys. We would start talking about sexual exploits in detail. We would say, “Oh man last weekend I fucked this beautiful chick. She had the nicest pussy. Nice and red and juicy,” and then we would hold our hands up like we were opening a clam and flicker out tongues at it. We would say this very dramatically with a lot of hand gestures and exclamations. The gay men would flip out when we did this. A lot of times they would start yelling at us. “Shut up! Oh gross! Ew disgusting! I think I’m going to be sick! Make them leave, make them leave now! If you are going to talk about that gross stuff then just leave ok?” We thought this was absolutely, hilariously, side-splittingly funny. So there’s a case of a room full of gay men reacting to tales of cunnilingus as if it were the most disgusting thing on Earth. So once again this idea that cunnilingus is probably gay men’s least favorite sex act looks pretty accurate. It’s once again looking like we are onto something here.

What In the Hell is a Pansexual?

First of all, what in God’s name is a pansexual? Up until maybe a decade ago, I never once heard this idiotic word pansexual. I guess they must have all been leading horribly closeted lives. Oh poor pansexuals! Poor babies! So much prejudice! All those panphobes out there! All the anti-pan discrimination and bigotry! My heart weeps for them! Despite the fact that I never heard this moronic term pansexual until maybe 2005, I must say that the world was none the worse for the lack of such a category. The world seemed to go quite smoothly without any pan folks around. I really doubt if these pansexuals are necessary for advanced human civilization. It’s because of idiot insanity like this that I abandoned the Cultural Left a while back. I rode the Cultural Left train for a while, but at some point, it seemed to be going way past where I wanted to go, so I had to get off. Since then it’s gone so far into the horizon that I can’t even see it anymore. It could have fallen off the edge of the Earth for all I knew. Come to think of it, that’s exactly what it did do!

I Make Generalizations Every Minute of Every Day of My Life

Barack Thatcher writes:

I see. Generalizations can be useful but are not the Gold standard for getting by in day to day life. There are other indicators of, say, as you referenced, that you are about to be conned. You could go through life never talking to a Gypsy (stereotypical con people), and still get ripped off multiple times by others. Yeah, generalizations work sometimes, but in some cases, statistically speaking, it’s just not viable to work towards such a goal. Especially if societal perception is wrong, then the statistics don’t bear out your “thoughts”. For instance, the Afrocentrist equivalent of Robert Lindsay could also be saying generalizations are true about how, ‘YT is inherently amoral, a rapist, and murderer’, and because the perception is that it is true, everyone will go along with it. Generalizations can work, if they are grounded in data. The probably is your average person (oops, generalizations again) is often times very illiterate with regards to such things, and CAN’T effectively do it. Would you go after a Black person in a suit brusquely walking down the street in a bad neighborhood at 3 A.M., or a Wigger loitering about under a place with shoes hung on the wires? There are behavorial indicators that simply work better than gross inherent generalizations.

My generalization would that the Black guy in the suit might be ok and that the wigger might be bad news. The only data that I would ground my generalizations in is my own experiences and memories. That would be my “data” that would back up my generalizations. In some cases, I might reference things I have read and try to map the person onto other people I have read about. But generally the data for my generalizations would not be things I saw on TV or movies, heard on the radio or read in books, magazines, papers or the web because using non-direct experiences of people as data for generalizations about real people in your life is not as reliable as simply relying on your own experiences and memories. I am making generalizations every minute of every day of my life. Especially when I am out with other humans. I don’t do retarded generalizations like “all Blacks are nigger dindus,” or “All Mexicans suck.” I don’t do that. I look at each and every person no matter their race, ethnicity, sexual orientation or whatnot and I try to figure out what they are up to. I do this by analyzing their behavior. I think match what I see in their behavior with my entire life of experiences examining and analyzing people’s behaviors. I then try to make some sort of predictions about that person based on that vast set of data, being my prior experiences. A Black man would not be evaluated based on, “he’s Black,” but instead on what type of human being he is. Unfortunately, I am going to have to plug his race into it. First I am going to try to get a basic handle on what he is up to. Then I am going to make some general predictions about what sort of a person this guy is. Then I will make some predictions about how this guy lives his life. And I will plug race into it somewhere. I will try to examine the entire set of Black men I have seen in my life. I am looking for other Black men who looked or acted like this guy does. What were they like? What were they up to? What sort of person were they? What were their lives like? I will look at him and think, “Based on all of the Black men you have seen in your life, what sort of a Black man is this guy? What is up to, what sort of a person is he, what is his life like, based on other Blacks like him I have seen in my life.” So I am going to try to fit him into a subset of Black men who I have met in the past who looked and acted like he does. Based on how those Black men acted, what sort of person they were, what their lives were like, I am going to try to map him onto other Black men who I met in the past who resembled him and use that mapping to make some predictions about him, who he is, what sort of a guy he is, what his life is like, etc. So first, what sort of a man he is, etc. etc? Then unfortunately, ok, but what sort of a Black man is he? Sad that I have to do that, but all I have to say is Black people are different.

No Generalizations: The Core Philosophy behind the Cultural Left

PC, SJWism and Cultural Left  can be summed up as:

  • No generalizations!
  • All generalizations are false!
  • What about the exceptions?
  • The exceptions prove that the theory is false!

In fact, we have a liberal commenter on here who engages in all of the above forms of sophistry and logical fallacy all the time. The Cultural Left underlying argument is that generalizations lead to stereotypes which lead to bigotry, racism, sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia, transphobia and whatever else the Phobia of the Day happens to be. So by declaring that all generalizations are false, we can strike a blow against bigotry. But this attitude is not only false but also idiotic. Anyone who tries to go through life without making generalizations or even stereotypes will fail in life in the worst possible way. Sure, you will be free of bigotry, but you will also be one of the stupidest people on Earth. You will be gullible, continuously conned and victimized and a complete social failure, and that’s if you survive long at all before a criminal takes you out. Your social skills will be abysmal. Most of your relationships will fail because you will be unable to manage them effectively. You will get fired from most jobs. You could always go live in a cabin in the woods, but even there you would probably not survive. I assume you would be killed by some wild animal because you would probably refuse to make generalizations about the poor critters around you. I guess that would be animalism (anti-animal racism or animalphobia or some other form of anthropocentric bigotry). If you are out in the woods all the time, and you refuse to make generalizations about those wild animals all around you, you will probably be target practice or dinner sooner or later.

Aryan Invasion Again and Why Narcissism Is the Core Indian Personality

Nelly (note fake British female name) an Indian nationalist, writes:

I personally find it so funny that so many people hold onto the Aryan Invasion theory with such tenacity. This theory was made popular by Hitler, which is really funny because he was also the same person who said that the superior people were those with blonde hair and blue eyes, and also went around claiming that Jewish people were evil and should be exterminated. Today, the majority of people know that those with blonde hair and blue eyes are not superior to any other people nor are Jewish people evil and should be eliminated. That being said, why do so many people still believe the Aryan invasion theory even though it came from a man who did nothing but spread lies in an effort to brainwash people? Why are you guys so selective in what you want to believe as being true? Why does Hitler’s credibility suddenly increase for the entire Aryan theory? I don’t usually get involved in these debates because I realize that everyone is entitled to his or her opinion and I respect that. But, there is a difference between what is an opinion and what is a fact. And the fact is that the word “Arya” is Sanskrit for “noble.” Max Mueller, who came up with the idea of two Aryan races, used this discovery as a means of showing the common ancestry between the Indians and Europeans, not as a form of racism (Esleben, 2008, F. Max Müller, Biographies of Words and the Home of the Aryas (1888), Kessinger Publishing reprint, 2004, p.120; Dorothy Matilda Figueira, Aryans, Jews, Brahmins: Theorizing Authority Through Myths of Identity, SUNY Press, 2002, p.45). There is also a mountain of evidence that debunks the idea of there ever having been an invasion. Archeologists and researchers have never found any indication that an invasion occurred as the skeletons discovered never suggested that an invasion ever occurred  (Gregory L. Possehl, 2002, The Indus Civilization: A Contemporary Perspective, Rowman Altamira, p. 238, ISBN 9780759101722). The majority of Western scholars don’t refer to it as an “invasion” because they are educated enough to know that it isn’t. Those who still call it an invasion are not viewed as being credible by the rest of Western scholars, but are rather seen as racist. (Witzel, Michael, 2005, “Indocentrism”, in Bryant, Edwin; Patton, Laurie L., The Indo-Aryan Controversy. Evidence and Inference in Indian History (PDF), Routledge). Again, I’m not expressing any opinions in the last three paragraphs. I’m literally just stating facts. That is, information that has been proven to be true by people who are experts in this topic. So, if you choose to attack me, then I don’t know what to say except go hash it out with the experts who, after years and years of research, came up with these theories instead of me.

My remarks: The Aryan Invasion Theory was not created by Hitler. The Indians called themselves Aryans. They didn’t need Mueller or Hitler to make it up. Iran means “Aryan.” Almost all Western scholars agree that the theory is true. Only a few crackpots and nuts disagree, and they are very isolated and cannot even publish in peer reviewed journals because their theories are so antiscientific. It is not a fringe theory. It is cutting-edge modern social science. Further, I believe that there is excellent evidence of an actual Aryan Invasion that resulted in a vicious war that left many dead and entire cities in the Indus Valley razed to the ground. And you won’t get called racist for calling it the Aryan Invasion Theory either. You might be called that by some idiot Indian, but who cares what Indians think about this or much of anything really? This response is also interesting. First of all, in order to show how well read they are, this Indian nationalist peppers her comment with a lot of nice references. I admit that the references are nicely done, and I commend the commenter for her scholarship. However, I must painfully point out to this apparently blind commenter that every single one of those quotes that she quoted actually supports the Aryan Invasion Theory instead of opposing it. So her references do not support her thesis; instead they disprove it! I see so many Indian nationalists and Hindutvadis come here adopting European-sounding names, both first names and surnames. We even had an extreme Indian nationalist here posting under “Snow is fun.” Snow is white. It’s white and cold, and there’s not much of it in most of inhabited India. To me, giving himself that name meant that he secretly wanted to be Scandinavian. And in fact, he was an Indian expat posting from Sweden. Others post under names like “Arya” and then proceed to rip the Aryan invasion theory to shreds. And note how many of the wildest Indian nationalists have long bailed out of Shithole India for the hated White Man’s Land, where they paradoxically live so much better than they do in glorious Bharat Mata. They hate Whites, but they disguise their identities under White first names and last names. They hate Whites and consider them inferior to superior Indians, yet they left superior India for inferior White man land where they somehow live much better than in Mother India. They call themselves Arya yet viciously attack the Aryan Invasion Theory. They hate Whites but post from Sweden. They hate Whites but call themselves Arya. They hate Whites but come from a society that worships White skin like a God. They hate Whites but give themselves names describing white things like snow that are only found in cold climates were Whites are common. They hate Whites but call themselves “Snow is fun,” which to me means “I love Whiteness.” In other words, almost all of these Indian nationalists are absolutely crazy. The cognitive dissonance here would deafen you. Furthermore, obvious psychological complexes such as inferiority complex, envy, reaction formation, projection, denial, narcissism, false confidence, etc. are painfully evident here. The “Indian complex” seems to be characterized by hatred and envy for their “inferiors” who they secretly ape, emulate and live among. The painful recognition that their “inferiors” are actually superior to their falsely “superior” selves is blatantly on display. Hatred, envy, false and fragile overconfidence, an inferiority complex and especially the subconscious knowledge that their “inferior” rival is actually better than their “superior” selves and the resulting shame and rage that this engenders is almost a textbook definition of the narcissist. I suggest that narcissism is the base personality of many Indians, especially the nationalists, ultranationalists and Hindutvadis.

The Narrative Is the Answer

Kareem, a Black commenter, writes:

Ultra Cool: Why are there racially motivated  riots like these in the U.S? Kareem: It’s all about narrative. It has become increasingly common that whenever a Black person is shot by a cop, it becomes national news. Blacks in this country, regardless of where and why, feel like they are being are treated worse in situations because they are Black. Now, this sparks a narrative that Blacks are mistreated and that there is a systemic effort to keep them down. Now, the number of Blacks killed by the police effectively supports this narrative, which confirms the belief of it. Now that the narrative exists, it becomes hard to dispel. The people who attack it have their motivations questioned. It doesn’t matter who you are either. A White man who attacks it is a Klansman. Even a Black person who attacks is merely suffering from internalized racism. These problems are exacerbated by the fact that the actual racists will make the same points as average people who are merely questioning the narrative, but they actually have more negative motives. For this reason, it becomes easier to ascribe these motives onto them. Because you’ll have someone will say, “Blacks aren’t killed in out of proportion numbers”, but also say, “Niggers don’t deserve any rights!” in the same breath. At the end of the day, it is extremely difficult to dispel narratives, and there is little hope for full integration as long as the narrative exists. It will take a long time for the Michael Brown shooting (from the facts at hand) to be seen as anything other than an extrajudicial execution in the eyes of a lot of Black people because supporting the narrative is the most important thing. Politics. Race. Feminism. Religion. All of these things are built on narratives.

This comment is absolutely brilliant. If you want to know what is behind these police riots, race riots, cop shootings, police brutality protests, Black Lives Matter movements, etc., this is where you are going to find the answers. Kareem’s answer is much better than the standard liberal narrative (which I must admit is idiotic and preposterous). It is better than the stupid conservative narrative: welfare, the state, and Democratic mayors created all Black problems in the US. And it is surely better than the racist narrative: Blacks are a bunch of violent savage niggers who are incompatible with any form of modern advanced civilization. Further, Blacks and Whites cannot live together – Lincoln was right. Race war or RAHOWA is coming soon, and the end of civilization is near. All of these are the standard narratives that 9 I would say Kareem’s theory is also in line with Information Theory, which I would define as “He who controls information, controls the world.” Ask the CIA, Bill Gates, Google and Rupert Murdock about that. We take media for granted, but it is so important in our modern world. We don’t live on little house in the prairie anymore. Smart cameras, street cams, security cams, dash cams, body cams and smart phones are everywhere. Facebook and social media are omnipresent. Everything is or will be televised, not just the revolution. Much of what we take as received knowledge nowadays, stuff we ignorantly think we thought up on our own, was actually filtered for us via a media narrative.

Ugly Race Riot in Milwaukee

I am just hearing about this right now, but it has been going on for a couple of days now ever since Saturday night, August 13. There was more rioting on Sunday night on August 14 and early this Monday morning on August 15. This is a very ugly race riot. It reminds me of the Watts Riots and the LA Riots in 1993. The things that remind me of those riots:

  • Ongoing rioting for more than a day. A riot lasting more than a day is always an ugly riot.
  • Multiple buildings looted and seven businesses set ablaze or destroyed.
  • Eight police wounded. That’s a lot.
  • Heavy gunfire through much of the rioting. During the very bad LA riots mentioned above, there was usually a lot of gunfire such that police were often pinned down and unable to respond.
  • People wounded by gunfire. People getting shot is always bad news. A lot of people got shot in the Watts Riots.
  • Attacks on fire trucks and firemen. When they start attacking the fire trucks and firemen, you know it’s a bad riot. There were a lot of attacks on firefighters in both LA riots. The Watts Riots were especially bad in that regard.
  • Attempts to pull White motorists out of their cars so they can assault them. This is how the famous assault on Reginald Denny occurred in the LA riots. This sort of thing was also going on in the Watts riots. When a bad race riot like this breaks out, all Whites really need to stay the Hell away and not go lookie-looing at it.
  • Two police cars set ablaze and several more damaged. When they start setting police cars on fire, it’s always a bad riot.

When things like that start happening, it is more than just a police riot. Now you have an out and out race riot similar to the ones we had so many of back in the 1960’s.

August 13, Night

Several cars, including one police car, set on fire. BP gas station, O’Reilly auto parts store, beauty supply store and BMO Harris branch bank set on fire. The gas station was looted before it was burned. Supermarket and liquor store destroyed. Metro PCS along with other stores looted. When police arrived, gunshots were heard. Firefighters could not put out gas station fire at first due to gunshots but eventually got the fire under control. Rioters attacked fire trucks with bricks. One fireman injured when hit with a brick. Reporters and photographers attacked. One shoved to the ground and assaulted. Four police wounded. 17 rioters arrested.

August 14, Night

Crowd threw objects at police. White man shot and wounded near the rioting, apparently by Black rioters. Possibly targeted due to his race. Police needed armored car to retrieve him. Rioters attempted to pull White motorists out of their cars in order to assault them them. Gunfire reported. 30 shots fired during the rioting.

August 15, early AM

Three police cars and one BearCat vehicle damaged. One vehicle and one dumpster set on fire. Windows broken on store. Four police wounded. 14 rioters arrested.

Why Is It That Many Gay Males Sound Different from Other Males?

I answered this question on Quora below. Let me know what you think of my answer.

Why is that many gay males sound different from other males? Not always, but often I can tell that a person is gay from the way they speak, particularly from pitch and by the way they pronounce the ‘s’ sounds (also d, t, and z). For example, in a documentary I was just watching, the interviewees at ~ 5:10 & 11:45, sounded gay to me (and in fact are gay). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Runw1mxz7KU

Most of these answers are simply going to be wrong in that particular PC, Gay Identity Politics way which is sadly so common among gay men these days. It is sad that gay men have taken up Gay Identity Politics because like all IP, it is based on lies. Gays take up IP like any other group does- to protect themselves. With most IP groups, there are negative things about that group that are flat out factual. The purpose of IP for gays or anyone is to exalt their identity, blow up all the great things about themselves and play down or usually to flat out lie about all of the bad things about the group. The purpose of this is simple: the IP group feels that the truth is dangerous, and if the truth about the negative things about the group get out, that could lead to prejudice. This is not a completely irrational fear. Because the IP group fears more prejudice, they lie and deny all the negative things about the group. Sadly, in most IP groups, this leads to near incessant lying, sophistry, logical fallacies and all sorts of lawyerese, diplomat-speech, half- truths and all manner of bullshit. The Gay IP claim is that gay men are no more likely to be effeminate than anyone else. Yes, some gay men are effeminate, but some straight men are effeminate too, they say. This is factually correct, but like most sophistry it is a form of lying and deliberately obscures the truth. I have been around gay men for much of my life. I hung out in Hollywood for years and Hollywood is gay as Hell, maybe even gayer than San Francisco. After about 10 years there, I had a crash course in homosexuality. Also, I have known a fair number of homosexuals. In addition, for some reason, I am gaybait for gay men, countless numbers of whom have hit on me over the years. I have no idea why they love me so much. You tell me. Anyway, after all that, I feel I could write an encyclopedia entry on male homosexuality. The truth is this: 7 7 Gay men as boys seem to sit out this whole process. The effeminate boys did not play with us, and we taunted, teased and ridiculed them mercilessly. Effeminate boys were not welcome in our boy circle, and I fear for any effeminate boy who might have tried to join and I am glad none did because we would have tormented them mercilessly. My understanding is that while most straight boys are going through Camp Pendleton for Boys, pre-gay or gay boys are in the kitchen with Mom baking muffins. Now I could be wrong. But this is my perception. I do not blame gay boys for bailing out of Boy Boot Camp, as it is one Hell of a savage and mean place. But by never having their masculinity questioned much, perhaps the feminine behaviors in gay boys get stuck. I have no idea. Now why so many gay men were sissy boys is not known. It is probably biological, and the effeminate behavior probably goes along with the homosexuality. Perhaps gay men have brains that are like women’s brains. After all, the female brain wants to have sex with a man. And the gay male brain wants to have sex with a man also. In order to attract a man for sex, women act feminine and fluttery. When a woman wants sex, she often turns up the feminine behaviors to where she is almost a Southern belle. By the way, this is one way to tell if a woman wants to have sex with you! Women do this because feminine behaviors turn on men and make men want to have sex with the feminine female object. It’s all sexual signaling. So when gay men want to have sex with a man, they act feminine just as straight women do in order to turn on the man. Perhaps gay men, still being men, are turned on by feminine behavior as all men are. Hence gay men are turned on by effeminate behavior in other gay men. Also, when gay men hit on you, they dramatically increase their effeminate behavior for some reason. I know this because it has happened to me many times. I am not sure what they are doing. Sexual signaling? Anyway, many or really most gay men are at least somewhat effeminate in behavior. Often the most noticeable behavior is voice. Gay men themselves note this many times as in the common saying, “I didn’t know he was gay until he opened his mouth, and a purse fell out.” Also there is pressure in the gay community to act effeminate, as straight-acting men can be treated badly. I recall one straight-acting gay man was a bartender in a gay bar and dealt with constant comments of, “Fire the straight guy,” “What’s this straight guy doing here? “Since when do you hire straight guys?” “Why does this bar have a straight bartender?” etc. In fact, effeminate behavior, especially voice, in a man is a pretty good way to out a homosexual man. The problem here is that many conflate feminine men with effeminate men. Many heterosexual men could be called feminine. They have soft voices, are sensitive, pretty, soft, wimpy, passive, or kind and often are just not very masculine or certainly not hypermasculine or macho. However, most of these soft straight men do have a certain “soft” masculinity about them. A gay men pointed this out to me for the first time and a light went off. I do think that gay men understand the nature of masculine – feminine – effeminate men much more than any other humans. And they have an excellent understanding of masculinity itself, often better than straight men. The men in my life who understood masculinity best of all were gay men, which is odd if you think about it. If you can ever learn to tell the feminine men (who are mostly straight) from the effeminate men (who are mostly gay), then you are halfway there already. It is often said that there are effeminate straight men. Technically this is true, but once again this is sophistry. Yes, I have met a few effeminate straight men in my life, and more commonly you see straight men who are effeminate sometimes and not at other times. In other words, they turn it on and off. Some straight men who are feminine, passive, and wimpy can become defeated by life and essentially run up the white flag and surrender. At these times of low self-esteem, the passivity, wimpiness, helplessness, etc. gets an effeminate component added to it. Straight effeminate men can easily be mistaken for being gay because, well, to act effeminate is to act like a gay man. There are some straight married men, often with 3–5 kids, who are absolutely, flamingly effeminate to the point where you notice them. They always baffle people, who shake their heads and somehow accept them anyway. Such a man will be very accepted in straight society, even though people will say, “He acts like a faggot!” Others will quickly point out the wife and four kids, and then the name-callers  will quiet down. In straight society, the wife and kids are enough to get accepted, albeit reluctantly, as a heterosexual. It’s not how you act, it’s what you do. However a gay man I know said he has followed these married flamers over a period of time ranging from 5–20 years, and he said that all of these married flamers had come out as gay and left their wives and kids during that time frame. So if you meet one of these flaming straight men who are married with children, a bit of skepticism may be in order. While effeminate straight men are maybe Those that are not are commonly not so much masculine as wimpy (commonly extremely wimpy, much more wimpy than a straight man) or soft like the feminine straight men described above. This may be ~1 Some gay men do indeed act out and out straight. They look and act no different from any “regular guy.” However, I think that they are not common. The There are even some gay men who are not just straight acting but are actually hypermasculine to macho in the exaggerated manner of many straight men. Jack Donovan is an extremely masculine gay men. He is one of the most masculine men out there, and he is totally gay. I saw another hypermasculine gay man in a movie about bugchasing. This was one of the most masculine men of any orientation that I have ever seen (he reminded me of a longshoreman, sailor or merchant marine). I almost fell out of my chair when I saw that he was gay. Hypermasculine or macho gay men are extremely uncommon. Less than So, like everything else, the continuum of hypermasculine – masculine – feminine – effeminate behaviors among gay men exists as it does among straight men. However, the graphs will look dramatically different when we plot them out, and effeminate men will be dramatically more common among gay men, and hypermasculine men will be profoundly more common among straight men. So gay men do tend to be more effeminate than straight men, but it is just a tendency, not a hard law. And straight men do tend to be more macho than gay men, but once again this is a tendency and not a law. If true male homosexuality is biological as it seems, then the effeminate type behavior seems to be part of the package that results from this biological mechanism. In other words, the homosexual orientation and the effeminate behavior are bound hand in hand. And if the effeminate behavior is caused by the same biological mechanism as the homosexuality, then it might be hard to change. Anyway, after years of effeminate behavior, many gay men will develop a behavior pattern that becomes ingrained and second nature and is extremely difficult to change. If the effeminacy is as biological as the homosexuality, maybe we ought to give effeminate gay men some slack on the grounds that they can’t help it. If we are to accept their orientation, perhaps we should accept the effeminate behavior that rides along with it.

Baby Metal and Rob Halford Live, "Painkiller, Breaking the Law"

Lob Harufoludu of Judas Pliest makes an onstage appearance with Baby Metal performing two Judas Pliest classics, Painkirrer and Bleaking the Raw. I love Bleaking the Raw. That was always one of my favorite songs. In 1979, I did an interview with this band in Century City at their record company offices. They were pretty fun to interview, albeit somewhat caustic. I also saw them live and Cal State University Long Beach in 1979. It was a very small venue in the auditorium but they filled it up. They were great! This video is excellent. Lob is 64 years old and he still can’t be beat. I can’t believe what a great voice he still has. There are not too many singers in metal who can match his voice. And I hate to say it, but this 64 year old guy sings better than those Baby Metal chicks. For Bleaking the Raw, two of the Baby Metal chicks come out and play guitar! I love it! Sexy Jap chicks play heavy metal guitar! Incredible. The world is turning into a sci-fi novel. Here they are again playing the same song, Breaking the Law, before a huge crowd at some unknown festival. There must be 100,000 people in that audience! I am not sure when this was but it was probably the early 1980’s because that is what Rob Halford looked like back then. The lead guitarist and the blond bass player are the same guys that I interviewed Here is Motorhead covering the same song. I almost like this cover better than the original! At least I can hear the lyrics on this one.

Headobangu!

Where’s the band? All I see are the Nip chicks (pronounced Nippochikko). So who’s playing the music? God? The Emperor? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfuKc066Hao Ok here’s the band below. It’s pretty of hard to play music without a band. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfuKc066Hao The lead singer chick’s name is Moa. She’s hot! Gimme Moa! God I love Nip chicks! Those have got to be the sexiest women on Earth. Don’t you find the sexiness of them rather disturbing though? I mean they look like little girls? Neoteny. And then they act like little girls too. And that is apparently why we find them so sexy*. Good God. We are all pedophiles now! *However, it has been shown throughout the world that women tend to have a a more neotenous look than men, and this is apparently why men find them so attractive. Not because men are naturally pedos (though that is possible) but more because neoteny implies youth.

The Dangers of Headbanging

Found on the Net:

In 2005, Terry Balsamo, Evanescence guitarist, incurred a stroke which doctors postulated may have been caused by frequent headbanging. In 2007, Irish singer and former Moloko vocalist Roisin Murphy suffered an eye injury during a performance of her song “Primitive” when she headbanged into a chair on stage. In 2009, Slayer bassist/vocalist Tom Araya began experiencing spinal problems due to his aggressive form of headbanging, and had to undergo anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. In 2011, Megadeth guitarist Dave Mustaine said that his neck and spine condition, known as stenosis, was caused by many years of headbanging. Slipknot Sampler Craig Jones once suffered from whiplash after an extended case of powerful headbanging.

Headbangers of the world unite! You have nothing to lose but your brains!

Sluthate, Incels, Etc.

From the Net, a commenter opines on Sluthate and related sites and the incel phenomenon in general:

Chasing women around like dogs and failing at it hundreds of times before one or two say yes – that’s what traditional masculinity thinks being a “real” man is all about. I feel sorry for these angry Omega males. Come to think of it, White Nationalists are some of the biggest Beta males ever, angry too.

Actually I rather like Sluthate. It’s like a PUA site without all the cocky arrogant, strutting roosters, tools, dicks, jerks and especially douchebags who ruin those sites. You can get the same advice on Sluthate as you can on the PUA sites, and actually these poor angry Omegas are much less offensive to me than the jerkoffs strutting around on your average PUA site, who I usually feel like punching in the face. These Omegas are sad, but hey, life is sad. So I can relate. Life’s not supposed to be easy, and it’s isn’t. I feel sorry for those angry Omegas myself. I have had a lot of success with women but there have also been dry spells where I couldn’t get date with God’s help, so I can sort of relate to what these guys are going through. Anyway, most single men are incel periodically anyway. How many single men can get sex anytime they want without paying for it, year in and year out, every day of the year? Hell, a lot of married men can’t even do that. I would say that the natural state of man, at least single man, is Periodic Incel. After all, that’s why men get married. You are supposed to get married in order to get steady sex. If you ask a lot of men and they answer honestly, this is what they will tell you. This is why there is so much pressure on single men to get married: it is seen as the road to lots of sex. Single life is seen as idiotic loserdom: bachelor life = no pussy. That’s not necessarily true, but it does seem to be true that it is hard to get a regular and steady supply of sex year in and year out without buying it if you are a single man.

LSD, Flashbacks and HPPD

Man with OCD here. I’m taking medication for it. I will take LSD for the first time in a few weeks. What are the possibilities of having HPPD? You’ve said you got visual disruptions, what does it feels like? Is it the same thing which is called “flashbacks”?

I am not even sure what flashbacks even are, and I am not sure if I have experienced them. After I first took LSD at age 16, my marijuana trips changed dramatically. It was like the LSD had altered my brain and changed the pot trips. The pot trips became way weirder, more colorful and rather frightening, but I sort of enjoyed them anyway in the way that you enjoy the very scary rides at the amusement park. They scare the crap out of you, but you love it. Plus it was like journeying to another planet every time I smoked pot. About six months after I had taken LSD, I went to look in the mirror. To my shock and horror, my entire face was deep, dark blue almost like someone who has had a heart attack. I flipped out and ran upstairs to my parents room and looked in their mirror. Now my face had changed and it had a slight reddish tinge to it. I ran down to the downstairs bathroom again and looked in the mirror again and all that was left was a faint greenish tinge over my face. I think I ran back to my parents’ bathroom instead and looked in the mirror again. I have no idea why I was running from mirror to mirror, but my instinct just old me that there must be something wrong with the mirror. Thinking about it now, it seems so idiotic, but that is what I felt at the time. This time all of the colors were gone. The whole thing could not have taken more than a minute or two. I happened one more time a few months later in the same mirror. This time it was a very deep dark red, as deep and dark as the blue-purple had been. I did the same thing of running from bathroom to bathroom and mirror to mirror, and after a minute or two, it went away. I always thought for some reason that thee were LSD flashbacks, though I never had those colored faces on LSD. I do not know why I thought it was an acid flashback. I suppose I could not think of any other reason. It never happened again, and to this day, I have no idea what caused it. I never worried about it although it was a hallucination. I never worried that those hallucinations meant that I was mentally ill or brain damaged somehow. I simply shrugged them off. Non-mentally ill people can hallucinate and even hear voices at times. The occasional hallucination is not big deal and nothing to fret over. You guys can call me insane all you want to because I had couple of hallucinations. See if I care. I doubt if many people get HPPD from one use of LSD, but perhaps it is possible. I have dated some women lately who are or were LSD users. One ~50 year old woman had taken LSD 350 times. Another much younger woman had taken it maybe 30 times and was definitely a current user. These are only two heavy users that I have met in recent years. Neither woman had any HPPD symptoms at all. I know many people who have taken LSD, including folks who have taken it many times, and I never met anyone who had HPPD. I think it is not common. However, a recent survey of university students found that of those who had taken LSD 50 times or more, 4 I took LSD nine times and other psychedelics (mescaline, peyote, LSA, Hawaiian baby woodrose seeds, psilocybin) about another 20-30 times, so maybe ~30-40 trips total. I have not taken psychedelics since an acid trip in 1987, 29 years ago. I am a bit worried about doing psychedelics now. I figure I am nuts enough as it is, so why take psychedelics and risk making myself even crazier than I already am? I am not sure when the HPPD hit, but it is not very bad. On some occasions, I get very bright colors. I rarely get them anymore, but sometimes if I have taken a lot of caffeine or the drug Benadryl, I get the colors again. Actually the world looks much better all lit up Technicolor like that. It’s not necessarily a bad thing. It only bothers me if I start freaking on it and thinking, “Why is the world all lit up this? Is there something wrong with my brain?” If I just relax and accept it, it’s not a problem and actually is rather fun. I called up an eye doctor once and complained about my symptoms, and he busted out laughing over the phone. “Oh! The colors are getting better, huh? Well that’s great! Hope you enjoy it! We only care when the colors are getting worse. What you have is not a problem.” Apparently he was referring to loss of color vision.

What Race Were the Windover People?

Sam writes:

Oh, so we’re going to go the old, “They were here first” trick huh? Ok. Here’s a story on the 8,000 year old Windover Skeletons and these people were Caucasians. That’s right White people. The Indians came from Siberia and murdered my ancestors. So they need to get the fuck out (if we’re going by the “I got here fist rule”). Windover Skeletons http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/964408/posts http://greaterancestors.com/the-windover-pond-giants/ If you think I’m kidding or trolling about them being Europeans, I’m not. Europeans have a very distinct facial structure and are totally different from other races. A decent anthropologist can easily tell what race a person is from looking at their skull.

The DNA of the Windover People is Asian. The Caucasian appearance may be similar to Kennowick Man who comes from about that same time frame (Kennowick Man  9,000 YBP Windover People 7,500 YBP), however Kennowick Man only appears Caucasoid because he is sort of an Ainuid. Kennowick Man’s skull plots most closely with the Ainu and the Moiriori, an extinct Melanesianized Polynesian people from the Chatham Islands. The Ainu are Australoid and the Moriori were a heavily Australoid Polynesian type. Hence the Windover People are probably Australoids. When you cross an Australoid with a Mongoloid, sometimes you end up with a pseudo “Caucasoid” phenotype. These people are not really Caucasoids; they just look like them. This is possibly because the number of possible endpoints for human phenotypes is small, and “Caucasoid is one of the few possible endpoints.

How to Be Cool

They way to be cool is to act like this people. These…men…er…women…heshes…er…its…um…things…ugh…whatever the Hell they are. Whatever the Hell these freaks are, one thing is for sure. They’re all nonbinary! Yay! Let’s hear it for being nonbinary. This is the new way. The future. No more men! No more women! We have finally gotten rid of gender once and for all! Hip hip for gay! Hip hip hurr gay! Hip hip we’re gay!

Why Mass Sexual License and Depravity Should Not Be Promoted to the Masses

Ryan England: I think that the pertinent question in matters of sexual politics is: to what extent does “promoting” such-and-such a sexual behavior actually result in increased participation in said behavior on a societal level? The way I see it, if people have it in them to do gang-bangs, threesomes, sex with two hundred women or the like, they will.

Oh, I know that the promotion of this stuff leads to more of it. I have dated many women. I also have female friends who have many young woman friends. A female friend told me that all her young woman friends are under pressure from their lovers to engage in anal sex and to have threeways with another woman. So all these young women are taking it up the ass and eating pussy due to cultural pressure, whereas they probably would not be ordinarily doing so. My friend told me that all of this is happening because of porn. I would agree with that. I have dated a lot of women, and I also have noted that the sex has gotten a lot more pornified in recent years, even among older women. I mean 50 years old. I mean in recent years I could not believe the crazy sex I was having. It was like I was living in a porno movie. I go on dating sites, and the women say pretty quickly, “Ok here is what I do.” And then they proceed to list all their kinks, and by age 50, they’ve accumulated a few. They are actually trying to outwhore each other! I’m serious. I am on a dating site, and I meet a woman and pretty soon it’s, “Ok, well do deep throat, I take it up the ass but only sometimes, you can tie me up, blindfold me and handcuff me, and I like it sort of rough.” It’s like they are having a contest to see who can be the most kinky and whorish so they can get the hot guy, and the sluttiest woman gets the sexy guy. This is a recent thing. Women were not like this 30 years ago. Not that I object. But it’s obviously all coming from porn or faddism or peer pressure. People are immensely susceptible to fads and peer pressure when it comes to sexuality. You think all those Romans having wild orgies all the time “had it in them already?” Hell no, but they were born into a society where this was the cool thing to do, so they did it. Same thing with fucking guys. In Rome and Greece, fucking other men and boys was the groovy thing to do, and in some cases up to 9 I am absolutely certain that articles on Slate or Alternet lead to more and more people doing this stuff. Plus it’s disgusting that they are promoting degeneracy to the masses in the first place. Recent articles include a man who likes to get pegged (his girlfriend straps on a dildo and fucks him in the ass). I guess all us guys need to go out there and get women to strap on dildos and fuck us in the ass! Nothing gay about that! Men: How To Get in Touch with Your Bisexual Side. Ok all us men need to get out there and suck a cock! I want to see all my male commenters going to a gay bar and ordering a Penis Colada before the month is over. That’s an order! Other articles promote on having 3-ways, cuckolding (a big favorite), where idiot men enjoy seeing their wives fuck other men while they watch and get humiliated, and a similar major movement of White men who love being “cucks” to Black men called “Bulls” who they bring in to fuck their White wives. The White guys like to be humiliated and often enjoy having their wives or her Black lover degrade them by comparing them unfavorably to the Black man. The White wives even lock up the White men’s genitals in little cages at night before bed. Then they deny the White men sex for weeks to months. These articles were actually promoting this activity to White men as the latest groovy trend. And by the way, gay male culture is an excellent example of a culture that promotes mass sexual license and depravity. Look at the result:

  • A horrific HIV epidemic that’s killed hundreds of thousands of gay men. 2
  • Regular outbreaks of Hepatitis A and B and parasites. Most gay men have 60 different types of parasites in their gut, whereas the average straight man has zero.
  • Regular outbreaks of syphilis and gonorrhea. Gay men are 1.

3 1 By age 30, almost all gay men have had group sex, and many to most of them have been to orgies with 8 or more men at once. The result of all of this unbridled sexual license is a seriously messed up culture psychologically and medically with regular disease outbreaks and a drastically shortened lifespan by ~20 years. Yes, being gay knocks 29 years off a man’s life expectancy.

Alan Greenspan the Libertarian Ayn Rand Acolyte Who Wrecked America

And for all you anti-Semites out there who like to see Jews as society wreckers, yes, Alan Greenspan is a Jew. Sort of a Murray Rothbard (Jew), Frederick Hayek (Jew), Ludwig Von Mises (Jew), Ayn Rand (Jew), Milton Freedman (Jew), Jeffrey Sacks (Jew) type, but a Jew nonetheless. What that has to do with anything, I have no idea, but I know that Libertarianism, like Neoconservatism, is a largely Jewish philosophy or at least a movement that was birthed by Jews, like a number of other 20th Century movements. Now what Libertarianism has to do with the Jews or how it benefits the Jews, I have no idea. I do know that Jews are radicals. They are always trying to upset the apple cart or redraw the circle no matter where they are on Earth. They’re sort of “born revolutionaries” people with “fanaticism in their hearts” as both Cicero and Voltaire noted. Kevin MacDonald also noted that Jews tended to be attracted to extreme, radical, or revolutionary movements and that Jewish politics tended to be characterized by a sort of fanaticism. This was noted over a century ago in the ghettos of Galicia. Those Jews were dirt poor, but they were still susceptible to fanatical politics usually cooked up by rabbis and then driven to greater and greater extremes by people fanning the flames. There was also a tremendous amount of “totalitarian” peer pressure applied (calling people self-haters) such that most Jews, even those leery of the Fanaticism Du Jour, eventually were brought into line. Jews are also sort of born rebels, which may be the same thing as born revolutionaries. As a Jewish girlfriend told me when I suggested that,

Yes, we are always rebelling. We rebel, the rebellion gets crushed, lots of us get killed, we don’t learn our lesson and then later we do it again, and the cycle repeats.

Jews were staging revolutions as far back as 2,000 years ago with the wild and fanatical Maccabee Revolt and the even more fanatical, suicidal vicious and brutal Bar Khokba Revolt. From the Net:

The Warning” – Alan Greenspan’s deployment of Ayn Rand’s version of Austrian School objectivism, libertarianism, and its catastrophic moving aside of regulation. Very few people wanted to take him on because he knew so much more than they did and if he didn’t he certainly appeared to. Alan Greenspan was looked-upon as the great Wizard – nobody understood what he said, but he said it in such a way that everybody bought it. It started back in the Ford Administration. Alan Greenspan was a financial consultant who was hired by Gerald Ford, first to be head of his council on economic advisors in the 1970’s …he had made himself rich on Wall Street and embraced an unusual guru…Any Rand. Greenspan is a disciple. She is the great champion of government as a destructive force that just gets in the way. Rand, “I am opposed to all forms of control, I am for laissez-faire, I am for a completely free unregulated economy…let me put it briefly, I am for the separation of state and economics.” He had a very clear ideology. His philosophy was in the form of what would be called “libertarianism” Those who do well prosper, those who do not fail and the market clears the transactions. It was a philosophy made to order for Ronald Reagan. “Government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem.” – Reagan in 1987, Reagan made Greenspan the most powerful banker in the world. Greenspan was a believer in Ayn Rand, a believer in free market, a little bit curious for a central banker because what is central banking? It’s a massive intervention in the market, setting interest rates. Greenspan worried about the contradiction, he knew that he was sworn to abide many laws of the land which he believed to be wrong…“I had long since made up my mind to engage in reforms of capitalism as an insider, rather than as a critical pamphleteer.” He intended to do as little as he could in terms of regulation and he proceeded to do just that. …The Chairman of The Federal Reserve (a regulatory body that now had at its head a Chairman opening its gates) When Clinton was elected, he asked Alan Greenspan to stay-on. Clinton also announced that he would “ask Robert Rubin to serve as the assistant to the President for economic policy.” Rubin was the best known financier at that point because he had run the legendary Goldman-Sachs. Bob Rubin was Clinton’s emissary to Wall street and Clinton placed a great deal of trust in Bob Rubin’s knowledge of financial markets and financial regulation. He had an enormous amount of credibility because he was a business success; and Democratic administrations always seemed to worship people who could excel in business. And at the White House and as Treasury Secretary, Rubin found an “unlikely” ally. Bob Rubin and Alan Greenspan had very similar views on Wall Street: it boiled-down to ‘the less regulation the better’ Rubin populated the White House with a network of free market true believers; including Timothy Geitner and Larry Summers. “The market will take care of everything and regulation will be counter productive.” Brooksley Born, regulatory interventionist: Clinton was presented with the opportunity to hire market interventionist Brooksley Born as Attorney General of The US but hired Janet Reno instead. He is said not to have hired Born because he found her “boring.” Born was given a role of running the obscure CFTC (Commodities and Futures Trading Commission) …. from there she remained a representative of regulation and was invited by Greenspan to lunch. It didn’t take long for Born to realize that she and Chairman Greenspan were not going to see eye to eye. He said something to the effect of, “Brooksley, we are never going to agree on fraud.” She said, “well what do you mean?” He said, “You probably think there should be rules against it.” She said, “Well, yes, I do.” He said, “You know, I think the market will figure it out, and take care of the fraudsters.” Brooksely Born, as a derivatives expert, saw the catastrophe ahead and tried to challenge this and Rubin told her that she “didn’t understand the law” SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt had been personally lobbied to shut Born down in her challenge to this. And then it was Alan Greenspan’s turn: He was adamant that this was a serious mistake, that it would cause significant damage to the financial services market and that she should stop. Rubin, Greenspan, Levitt attack.. They were believed by Congress, 9 Born responds, “we’re trying to protect the money of the American public, which is at risk in these markets.” She had no support anywhere. They banish her powers. In the aftermath of the 2008 crisis it would be hoped that people would see what went wrong and say, “let’s fix it”…but…it may well be that we’ve passed that critical moment and the necessary reforms will be much more difficult to come by. Born concludes, “I think we will have continuing dangers from these markets and we will have repeats of the financial crisis of 2008 ..they may differ in details but there will be significant financial downturns and disasters attributed to this regulatory gap, over and over until we learn from experience.

Clarification on My Thoughts about Alt Left Sexual Issues

Eoin O’Keefe: Some of the bits about sex sound like he turned into a conservative christian in mid paragraph. ‘Don’t encourage orgies, would you want your mothers or daughters doing that?’ S’their feckin’ business, lad. Agent Commie: Funny thing is that the guy who wrote this is extremely libertine where one man-one woman heterosex is concerned, but seems distrustful of everything else. Kind of like a perfect mirror image of contemporary progressivism.

I do not even care about orgies, group sex and all of that. I have friends who have done that stuff.I have thought about, but I am not really into it. I could care less if people do that stuff, but we should not be promoting threeways and orgies to the masses! That’s bullshit! I mean there are hipster articles now, “Everyone Go Have a Threeway!” I know Cultural Left guys who say, “Everyone should go to an orgy.” And there are now hipster articles on “How To Get in Touch with Your Bisexual Side.” And I have heard Cultural Left guys say that all men should go fuck a guy at least once. The same guy said every man should try to live like a woman for a week. I mean one of my best friends is an ex-porno star, ok? I know a guy who is a stud. He has had sex with over 200 females. He has a reputation and married men call him up sometimes wanting him to fuck their wives. So he goes over there and does it, but he does tell the guy to leave the room. And I had another friend who was into group scenes and kept inviting me, but I think it is just not my bag. And I am on the mailing list of some group that stages orgies regularly. I’ve just never been to one. Maybe I am chicken. I don’t think you guys understand. I don’t care if people do that stuff. I have had very deep relationships, wild love affairs with women who have done 3-ways fucking two guys at once. I asked her if she had taken videotapes of photos of any of her 3-ways. I don’t care! As you can see, I am a degenerate myself. But I do not think I should be telling everyone else to go out and be as degenerate as I am. I just think we as a society should not be promoting mass sexual degeneracy to the masses. I happen to think that is fucked up. I mean would you want it to be normal to tell your Mom, “Hey Mom, you really need to go out and get gangbanged. God I would love to see you in a bukkake Mom! Film it! I want to jerk off and watch my Mom getting gangfucked!” I mean the promotion of mass sexual degeneracy to the masses has gotten to the point where this sort of insanity will soon be a reality. And if I object to this, I must be a conservative Christian! Look how insane we are getting about sex. Lots of people, not just conservative Christians would be uncomfortable about the situation described in the above paragraph. The idea that everyone in society ought to be ok with that scenario and if you’re not, you’re some uptight conservative Christian prude is sheer madness. Also this stuff reminds me societal collapse. The societies decline and collapse, this is what happens to them. Mass sexual degeneracy and license. Study history. And in response to the above poster, no I would not want my Mom going to sex orgies. She’s never been to one, I am quite sure, and I am quite happy with that. She’s my Mom for Chrissake. You think I want to see pornos of my Mom all over the Internet? What the Hell man?

Ryan England on the Alt Left

A comment from Ryan England who has set up his own Alt Left page. He is pretty much coming from the same place I am, except his wing or tendency wants nothing to do with race realism, racialism, HBD or any of that. He wants to stay out of the race question altogether and says the Alt Left should be neutral on race, which is probably a good idea. I believe he thinks that race is indeed real, but he does not see the point in talking about it, as all it will do is increase racism against NAM’s and empower the Right. I guess his attitude is that this type of theory can lead to no good, so why should we even talk about it? Let’s not talk about that, he seems to be saying. He also says that if we are race realists we will be completely destroyed in public opinion, which may well be true. I believe Ryan said that racialism is a risk of any Alt Left but that it is a trap that the Alt Left should not fall into. That is probably true also. I think he has good points, but I still want an Alt Left tendency that is race realist but still nonracist and against White nationalism. Ryan’s Alternative Left Facebook page.

Cool list. An alternative left has been needed for quite some time now. I started a Facebook page to promote the idea. I’ll submit as a defining characteristic of the alternative left vs. the more mainstream progressives is that the alt-left is much more skeptical of the transcendentalist underpinnings of a lot of leftist thought, especially post 1960s. We are, at heart, a push to bring enlightenment rationalism back to the center of leftist thought and activism. Transcendentalism – the kind originating back in 19th century New England, had its roots in European Romanticism, and is marked by a kind of idealistic utopianism. Religion and scientific alike were distrusted, in favor of subjective personal intuition and creativity. Nature and people considered “closer to the earth” (indigenous peoples and women) tended to be idealized. Emotion and intuition were extolled as being a kind of liberation from the bonds of strict empiricism. People were thought of as naturally good but corrupted by overly rationalized institutions and belief systems, against which struggle was seen in idealized terms. I suspect that the alt left’s appeal is to people with liberal sensibilities but who are off-put by romanticist elements in mainstream progressivism. This is marked by the progressive’s tendency to go beyond mere equal rights for “marginalized” peoples and into flagrant idealization of them. Women, immigrants, people of color, indigenous people, Muslims, Buddhists, LGBT people and so on are not necessarily viewed as superior to white Christian (or atheist) males (although they can be) but as being less corrupted by the soul destroying rationalism of capitalism, objectivism and/or Christian theology, which is thought to instill in the white male an oppressive, dominating mentality. I find this kind of thinking to absolutely pervade post modern progressive thought. It is anathema to me, and I think the rise of the as yet embryonic alt-left is kind of rationalist and realist reaction to the romanticist conquest of materialism on the left.

 

What Is Social Liberalism?

Robert said:

RL: You have to at the very least support Social Liberalism. Tulio: Do you mean Liberalism? Did you mean Fiscal Liberalism?

I do not mean fiscal liberalism at all. The heck with that. In most of the world, classic liberalism means neoliberalism or laissez faire economics. However, here in the US the left wing of the Democratic Party somehow ended up getting called liberals. Somehow out of all of this, the term Social Liberalism arose as an economic system. Bottom line is that Liberalism means something different in the US than it does in most of the rest of the world. Social Liberalism is a confusing term, but this is what the liberals in the US push. In terms of economics, it means ideally the sort of economics and politics that liberal Democrats push – the New Deal, the Great Society and all of that. Pretty much Keynesian regulated capitalism with a good safety net. They just happen to call that economic system Social Liberalism. There is a similar system in Canada called something else but it is more leftwing. Both of them are headed away from the center towards Social Democracy, but Social Liberalism is nowhere near Social Democracy, it’s just headed in that direction. Social Democracy is a lot more Left than Social Liberalism.

Some Comments on Shortages and Price Controls in the Venezuelan Economy

Sam: If you buy rice in Venezuela the smartest thing to do, not necessarily the most honest, is to immediately move it over the border and resell it for a huge profit. Then smuggle it back for another huge profit.

Of course that is exactly what is going on. Also an unbelievable amount of hoarding. The stores in the middle and upper class areas are full, stocked to the rafters, so the business community is supplying them just fine. It’s just the poor areas that they are not supplying. The price controls were put in after the first time the Opposition tried to blow up the economy. They had a lockout strike where businesses all over the country simply closed their doors. Factories too. A lot of employees tried to invade businesses and factories to run them themselves, but it was hard. This so ruined the economy and caused such horrendous inflation that price controls were put in as a necessity to stop the inflation. So it’s the Opposition that created the conditions for the price controls. The price controls worked just fine for many years. They were put in in 1993. It’s only when the oil price crashed that they became a problem.

Sam: Why don’t they try just subsidizing just the poor with enough money to buy basic rice and oil?

There are Bolivarians who are saying to get rid of the price controls. I agree with them.

Sam: Blaming the US for this not working is just stupid as I can easily see a way to game the system in seconds.

There is also a plot to blow up the economy. This would be the third such plot. The first two were defeated – lockout strike and oil strike – but this one is working very well. There is a ton of hoarding going on. The US has been behind all of these plots to blow up the economy.

Sam: Blaming the US for this not working is just stupid as I can easily see a way to game the system in seconds. Surely the people in Venezuela are not so stupid that they can’t see a way to game it also.

Yes, the business sector is just gaming the system. I cannot really blame them. Capital will just go wherever the profits are highest. It also makes everyone into a criminal. If the only way you can get food is to game the system or deal with black marketeers then everyone will become complicit making everyone a criminal. It’s not the only way to get food. The stores in the middle and upper class areas are full. And the stores in the poor areas are full too. Non price controlled stuff is often quite available. Perhaps it is expensive though. It is the cheap staples that are hard to get.

Reuters: But obtaining goods at those prices requires waiting in long lines that are increasingly the site of robberies or lootings.

The looting is exaggerated, and there are police guarding most of the lines. You realize that every piece on Venezuela in the Western press is part of a propaganda war, right?

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)