Privilege Theory and Trigger Warnings

Privilege theory. I am well aware that my race (White, you’re welcome), gender (male, you’re welcome again, and please call me sir next time, thanks), sexual orientation (you’re very welcome, ladies, thank you very much), and gender identity (Homo Superior cis, sorry trannies) offer me certain privileges, thank you. And I am quite all right with that, knowwhatImsayin? Trigger warnings. I don’t do trigger warnings on here. I would, but I can’t keep track of everyone’s triggers. You all are just going to have to tough it out, sorry folks! Actually it is worse than that.r warnings, I am actually trying to trigger you guys. Sucks or what? Nigger warnings. I don’t do those either. Yep, I refuse to use the n-word here, but then I never use the word nigger in a racist sense anyway. All you tough-minded, hardened cynics who almost have a heart attack every time you read the word nigger, remember help is just an ambulance away. Safe spaces. I don’t do safe spaces. This is most definitely not a safe space. Actually it is sort of the opposite, an anti-safe space. But that is the general idea. This space isn’t safe for anyone. Hell it’s not even safe for me. It’s probably not safe for work, and it might not even be safe for life. Abandon all hope, ye who enter here!  

Please follow and like us:
error3
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

69 thoughts on “Privilege Theory and Trigger Warnings”

      1. Did you ever think he might have had rich or otherwise influential parents?
        And what about the PROSECUTOR in the Idaho Rape Case saying that the 5-year-old victim “was asking for it”?
        And what about the Bum saying that the Orlando shooting is somehow a result of OUR “hatred of queers”? America is NOT one of the 10 countries where you can get killed just for being queer, so wouldn’t that be the Moslem Cult’s hatred of queers?
        And of course, the claim that the San Bernadino shootings are a problem with GUNS, not terrorists…
        Is that Terrorist Privilege?
        I notice also noone bitches about Chinese privilege in China or Japanese privilege in Japan–or even Asian privilege here in America, since Asians are treated preferentially over other immigrants, and sometimes even over whites?

        1. Europeans do have privilege: we have an ancient civilization with laws and philosophies existing today.
          Having a reasonably high IQ, a controllable sexual drive (this seems to be the NAM downfall, the constant hard-on that leads to raping 5 year old girls or 85 year old women) and a sense of time and consequence puts you at a privilege.
          We are also arguably the best-looking race. Men of other races covet our females.
          These are privileges.

        2. Iv’e not seen that NAM hardons are such a big deal. I see child molestation or child porn cases among whites in my local paper all the time.

        3. TRASH, those sound more like achievements than privileges.
          And since we do have an ancient civilization with laws and philosophies still existing today, why aren’t they enforced more against rapey NAM scum? Why do we insist on giving our enemies a break? (I am using “enemies” here in the sense that they want to rape and murder us…and give action to these desires. Best definition so far for “enemies”, don’t you think?)
          Up to and including the PROSECUTOR in that 5-year-old case in Idaho saying that the victim was “asking for it”? I’d expect that from the DEFENSE, but the PROSECUTOR?
          As to coveting our females, that’s more a desire to breed us out of existence. Remember, if you take the females of your enemy, you deny their genetics, their ability to pass on. Afrocentrics insist the savage genes are dominant.
          And it works that way no matter which way the breeding goes, via the cruel joke of “Regression To The Mean”!

        4. Sorry for double post, but looks are an opinion. Such statements are as ridiculously racist as anything Sam would say.

        5. Why do they seem to rape whites more than anyone else, then?
          Do you remember when I posted those stats for you about interracial rape?

        6. As to coveting our females, that’s more a desire to breed us out of existence. Remember, if you take the females of your enemy, you deny their genetics, their ability to pass on. Afrocentrics insist the savage genes are dominant.

          That’s a bullshit paranoia theory. In reality, black guys, like the gentle Darrius Rucker types, just like to fuck white women. There is not a political motive.
          EPGAH, is bringing up Afro extremists, and they are outliers, they don’t represent most black people.
          Plus, whites are not being “bred out of existance”. White population decline is ONLY because of declining birth rates. Most whites who do breed, and they don’t breed much, breed with other whites.

        7. WHY do they like to fuck white women instead of their own?
          And you’re right that whites have declining birth rates, but it’s because whites generally go by the “If You Can’t Feed It, Don’t Breed it”.
          Or to be glib, whites–the responsible ones–breed only as much as we can afford, while NAMS ALSO breed as much as WE can afford!
          Having your own kids is optional, paying taxes that ultimately go to funding the NAM Baby Factories is not. So when whites budget, guess which one gets cut?

        8. PS, have you gone grocery shopping, lately? When is that “cheap” food from the illegals going to kick in?

      2. What about all the rioters in Milwaukee, Ferguson, and Baltimore?
        How many of them have been arrested? No charges so they can enjoy more riots in the future?
        Would that be Black Privilege?

        1. EPGAH This might be true but I believe that NAMS perceive an improvement to their own children’s genes by the admixture of European genes.
          Definitely this is true with Latinos.

        2. Improving one’s own genes doesn’t mean they want to destroy the white race, but they just want to have some white in their own blackness or brownness.

        3. I don’t deny it improves their genes, but it drags ours down in the mixture.
          Think of 1+(-1), the -1 is dragged UP to zero, while the 1 is dragged DOWN to zero.
          While Jason admitted that NAMS just like to fuck white women, he doesn’t say WHY? As in WHY not their own?

        4. Who people fuck is their own business. All these WNs, along with Yuppie parents and whoever else are trying to tell everyone how to live, who to fuck, etc… SHUT UP…:lol: Nah Just kidding, but the main idea still is true.
          Blacks screwing us is not lowering our mixture; anyhow they’ve already fucked us anyways, as most blacks are part white. Most whites screw other whites, leaving a pure mixture, and that will go on into eternity based on current stats.

        5. Sorry for double post.
          This whole idea with improving society, eugenics, over-parenting is a very bad thing. Just leaving people, kids, alone would be a better idea. Let them grow wild and do what they want like in nature.

        6. I don’t deny it improves their genes, but it drags ours down in the mixture.
          Think of 1+(-1), the -1 is dragged UP to zero, while the 1 is dragged DOWN to zero.
          While Jason admitted that NAMS just like to fuck white women, he doesn’t say WHY? As in WHY not their own?

          Because they’re not interested in black women. That’s their right. That’s what America is all about, freedom.
          Why are some white guys interested in Oriental women over the regular white ones they see all the time? Why is Asian porn a moneymaker in the US?

      3. No offense to veterans the service they did which we all appreciate, but shouldn’t they have to deal with their own mistakes after they leave the service? How do we know many are homeless due to stuff beyond their control, or was it in their control? For instance, they could have blown all their money on gambling, hookers, investment schemes etc…

      4. Shouldn’t illegals have to deal with THEIR mistakes rather than being housed by us? If they can’t afford housing in a country they’re not supposed to be in in the first place, shouldn’t they be sent home?
        The only “mistake” I can see is joining the military and expecting the Government to keep its promises. You ARE aware, aren’t you, that military pensions were slashed to gain more money to support illegals?
        Don’t veterans DESERVE to be housed by the country they defended more than invaders? I mean Hell, isn’t the military supposed to keep invaders OUT?
        TLDR: Why are we taking care of our enemies better than our own soldiers?

      5. No, illegals have to be dealt with. Perhaps they could jail the contractors. Simply deporting the illegals would cause too much of a scene as it’s reminds people of the Nazi Holocaust or Trail of Tears.
        Note, once the contractors (and others) are jailed, the Mexicans would have to go home on their own free will. They cannot get fast food jobs that I’m aware of, so what are they to do?
        It’s kind of like, and sorry to use a racist metaphor, a bunch of roaches. If you leave food around, then roaches will come. So I say the food is the contractors.

      6. Sorry for double post. Being a US citizen is a big deal. Jobs in fast food, jobs retail etc.. are only for US citizens. They can’t do the shady stuff contractors and the like do. So once the contractors etc.. are snuffed out, then the Mexicans don’t have much of an option in the US.
        It would be interesting to research fast food and retail and see how many illegals work there, cause I’m quite sure they cannot get in those places. Note, in many places in the world being a US citizen is a big deal, cause a lot of legit companies, will not hire an illegal.

      7. They can get on Welfare, though.
        http://freebeacon.com/issues/report-majority-of-illegal-immigrant-households-on-welfare/
        And again, you blame the contractors instead of the illegals themselves.
        How will it remind anyone of the Holocaust? We’re not putting them in ovens or gas chambers.
        As to “Trail Of Tears”, you are aware that name didn’t come about until the 1970s and Noble Savage revisionism, right? The savages got PAID to move, and the soldiers were there to protect them from Americans who might take potshots at savage trespassers across their land.
        Do you think that might work again? Pay savages to leave, if they come back again, just shoot them?
        And well, once again, you put Mexicans as unwitting dupes, while even TRASH agrees their invasion has a certain Level of INTENT.
        They INTEND to break into our country. If they are only acting by instinct, then they reduce themselves to the Level of animals, why not treat them as such?
        And no, the downturn of jobs has not done much to make illegals leave as long as they can get on Welfare. They can steal a Better Life in America than they can EARN in their own country. Even if they trash the place along the way, destroying what they came to steal.

      8. Do you think they’d self-deport if they were suddenly denied access to the American Gravy Train? No more free money, free food, free housing, and subsidizing their Baby Factories? Or would that remind you too much of the Holocaust or whatever?
        We really DO need training for oversensitive idiots!

      9. I saw no indication that the Cherokee were savages. In fact, they were quite civilized, even adopting the white man’s negro slavery. They were only forced to leave cause whites coveted the gold in the region.
        Plus the Cherokee even fought for the Confederacy, and as a result lost more land in Oklahoma afterwards.

      10. It’s not a matter of being an “oversensitive idiot” but rather that a badly planned way to deal wtih illegals will spart a backlash from Mexicans, as one against blacks would do the same.
        Lots of extremist groups would want to spark riots if Trump tried to get tough on illegals in a way that they would take as a personal insult to their race.

  1. It depends on what your talking about. Normal expressions of male sexuality, especially when not a lot of real exploitation is going on shouldn’t be wrong, but sexually harassing people, say at a McDonalds, when it’s not cool to do so, is wrong.

    1. Like this one college professor at one time was commenting to female students on how pretty they were every class, and it sounded dorky, so some female students complained, but can you blame them?

    2. Whites who rape children do so for sick reasons of perversion or to make money…Afros rape 87 year old women because they have a hard on.

  2. You know, if we’re going to have sensitivity training, we should have over-sensitivity training for those who whine.

    1. What’s the definition of being a tough guy? Being able to handle The Daily Stormer’s vile articles on mixed raced children? “Oh that’s not a big deal… Come on. It’s just an article. :lol:”
      How about being able to listen to post after post on Stromfront without puking?

  3. Triggers, I suppose are supposed to be someone being ignorant about their privilege?
    I don’t even understand this stuff………
    that being said, WNs get pretty easily butthurt if you point out part of the rhetoric is false/retarded, too.

    1. their rhetoric
      reminds me of a commenter who said Nordicists have “inferiority complexes” 😉

      1. screaming “Jew” when you point out things like the U.S. had Black people at it’s founding, etc., is an example, if you know who I’m talking about….

        1. The problem with Jews is where ever you see some bad, nasty, shit. Some evil, rip off or vile behavior you will extremely frequently see the Jews hanging around either starting it or a part of it. The Jews say that’s because they are prominent so they are involved in everything. Except you’ll never see a Jew with Sally Struthers begging for orphan children. You’ll never see a Jew with mother Teresa feeding the poor. The only time you see Jews involved in welfare is when they have a racket going and are ripping people off pretending to help people. They won’t actually help anyone.

        2. Ahem, can’t reply directly to Sam J but, feeding the poor to steal their soul & refusing them medicine or aid until they hand it over, is not charity.
          It’s exploitation

        3. The problem with Jews is where ever you see some bad, nasty, shit. Some evil, rip off or vile behavior you will extremely frequently see the Jews hanging around either starting it or a part of it. The Jews say that’s because they are prominent so they are involved in everything. Except you’ll never see a Jew with Sally Struthers begging for orphan children. You’ll never see a Jew with mother Teresa feeding the poor. The only time you see Jews involved in welfare is when they have a racket going and are ripping people off pretending to help people. They won’t actually help anyone.

          Funny that WNs point out Mother Thresa as good, just as they commend every other gallant act of the white race, yet at the same time condemn it as evil because it aids anti-evolutionary thinking. In other words, “Let the 3rd world parasites starve”
          <
          blockquote>Ahem, can’t reply directly to Sam J but, feeding the poor to steal their soul & refusing them medicine or aid until they hand it over, is not charity.
          It’s exploitation<.blockquote>
          She doesn’t force anyone to convert, only gives them a good reason to convert. How is that wrong?

        4. quote by Sam

          Yes the U.S. did have Black people at it’s founding. The Jews brought them here.

          To tell you the truth, I’m glad they brought them here just for the music.

        5. Why don’t we let Third World parasites die? They do nothing for us, and indeed, invade our countries and make our lives worse.
          Can you explain either why we SHOULD help our enemies, or why whites are the only ones who seem to be saddled with this “duty” to help our enemies? Other races either let their enemies die, or accelerate the process, including attacks on whites!
          Why help those who are trying to rape and murder us? Why not let them die, if not accelerate the process?

        6. They’re not our enemies. Only the thugs are. You and Sam don’t get it. Just like all whites are not the enemies of decent society, only the druggies.

        7. And as far as illegals are concerned, stopping the contractors and perhaps a reform of the welfare system would stop that without having to resort to massive racial hatred.

  4. A-grade stuff on problematic Jews [not to be confounded with “the Jews”, and I am not being ironical or anything] today and yesterday.
    The word “nigger”, well, fact is niger meant black in Latin.
    The Italian for black is nero. A black dress is an abito nero.
    So to call a black person a negro is a way to stick with educated terminology, in Italian. Or rather, it was.
    Now it’s become forbidden, like in the Anglosphere.
    Speaking of prohibited knowledge, why did you say nothing on misogyny™?
    Are the non-misogynistic reasonably safe around the pages of this blog?
    I mean, what if some misogynista posts a link to evident facts that science has begun to prove, and the facts are misogynistical, in a particularly bigot-esque fashion at that?
    We’ve gotta be strict on facts, ya know.

    1. The Italian word for black is nero. Hmmmm. Nero was an evil emperor. I tell you these history books were written by the evil white man 😆 Any reference to black in literature, history etc.. it’s always about evil.

      1. of course some women want to be dominated by brutes………..most women.
        but that rape thing is obviously not natural and is some type of mental illness.

  5. The thing with jews is they’re a product of incest & proud of being outcasted by the Aryas.
    They can only understand one thing, like the other abrahamics (A Brahman) or against creation.

  6. DNA of typical Jew would be part Central Asian (Khazar) and part Eastern Mediterranean (Like a Syrian) and Southern European.
    Not incestuous by any means.
    Prior to WWII no Jew was aware what the word “Aryan” meant and only small Armenian/Iranian Jewish communities existed in Calcutta or Mumbai.

    1. I have always known that my ancestors engaged in incestuous behavior. Several sets of my great grandparents and great great grandparents were second or third cousins.

  7. I seem to recall reading on Greg Cochrane’s blog, West Hunter, that Ashkenazi Jews are predominantly a mix of Middle Eastern and Italian, with little Khazar.

  8. East Asians have higher incomes than Gentile Whites. Both George Zimmerman and Elliot Rodger had their respective heritages ignored for painting them as foul White men.

      1. Yes, he looked Hispanic, so they had to invent the “White Hispanic” bullshit to make it look like a white guy was defending himself against a NAM thug, instead of an Hispanic killing a Black thug.
        In either case, he was just protecting himself, and if you believe crime is heritable, he did the Black genepool a favor by ridding it of ONE such trash…Which does approximately all the good of stepping on ONE cockroach, but it’s a start.
        Although he’ll probably deny it, even Jason has come forward with the idea of eliminating violent Blacks to improve Black behavior as a group.

        1. does Egah not understand “White Hispanic”?
          Of course it’s real but Zimmerman was not one, I’ll grant you.

  9. How many of these East Asians complain that Jooooos are controlling their lives and defiling their minds with the Talmud. Japanese-American property developers in Hawaii?

  10. It is funny to me that Egah is completely non cynical about Joos………..
    truly a “Kosher Klansman”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)