California and White Decline

William Playfair Web writes: It does appear to have a strong economy, at least for some. I would like to see Robert elaborate on this one. I also thought he believed “White genocide” or “White decline” type ideas to be stupid?

It is a strong economy only for some. Rents are sky high. When you figure in the cost of rent, California has the most poverty, the highest poverty rate, of any state except Mississippi. So California is 49th in poverty rates in the US, above only Mississippi. How is that the state that has the second worse poverty rate in the country has a “booming economy?” Screw that. White genocide means Whites are going extinct and that there is some special project to drive Whites extinct. Whites are not going extinct, and there is no project to drive Whites extinct (that I know of). Also the White genocide types think that importing Syrians is part of a project to drive Whites extinct. But Syrians are White themselves. But the And here in the California anyway, when a city or town goes from majority White to majority non-White, there is often a noticeable decline. White -> non-White = decline, generally speaking. It cannot be denied.

Please follow and like us:
error3
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

27 thoughts on “California and White Decline”

  1. but…aren’t non-Whites the victims of it?
    Is it really effecting Whites?
    With Blacks they are very aggressive and it is stereotyped they fuck it up for everyone, but from my observations, not with Hispanics.

  2. “Also the White genocide types think that importing Syrians is part of a project to drive Whites extinct. But Syrians are White themselves.”
    YES!
    Alt-Righters literally lie on impulse/pathologically. If something/the facts don’t fit their mantra, they invent their own facts (TM). Despicable.

    1. I think if you had a neighborhood go gradually from White to NE Asian it would be fine, right?

      1. It usually does not happen. But there are parts of the San Gabriel Valley that are like that. It seemed like you could drive for miles and not see one White person or one sign in English. What’s so good about that? I drove through that area and I didn’t like it. It felt like I was in a foreign country.

    1. True to an extent, but it’s not that simple. If you segregate the lesser intellect people, as you would say, like South Africa did, that is not the case (not that I endorse apartheid- there needs to be some middle ground in that country).

  3. The answer on why California has almost as much poverty as Mississippi is easy to figure out. California has high unemployment and homelessness. I know this for a fact. I used to live in Los Angeles, and I can assure you that the California dream has been dead for a long, long time. People just haven’t begun to realize it.

  4. I will beg to disagree with some comments on here. IQ is exxagerated. A lot of times people are fucking up because they hang with bad crowds. You can take the biggest idiot but raise him in a wholesome environment and I bet he will die with decent or above standard way of life.
    On the other hand, someone with a high IQ, but running with the devil, so to speak has a good chance of falling.

    1. “I will beg to disagree with some comments on here. IQ is exxagerated. A lot of times people are fucking up because they hang with bad crowds. You can take the biggest idiot but raise him in a wholesome environment and I bet he will die with decent or above standard way of life.
      On the other hand, someone with a high IQ, but running with the devil, so to speak has a good chance of falling.”
      You do understand that a demographic that would include the “biggest idiots” would be people clinically retarded, right?
      People like them, while capable to cooperate with help to a degree, will likely not achieve the same type of independence as others with a higher IQ.
      You keep on using these examples yet you have not exactly managed to really prove that on a “by and large” example or explanation.

    2. By independence I mean manage their own responsibility in adulthood without assistance by some medical or psychological institute.

  5. “here in the California anyway, when a city or town goes from majority White to majority non-White, there is often a noticeable decline”
    Monterey Park/Alhambra/San Gabriel Valley and Daly City and San Bruno and Millbrae and Fremont and Milpitas ALL IN CALIFORNIA show that to be false……

  6. Baldwin HIlls begs to differ. Fox Hills begs to differ. Ladara Heights (“the black Beverly HIlls”) begs to differ.
    Ever roll through the Crenshaw area and see all those immaculately kept mid-century homes in those immaculately kept neighborhoods? Try it. There aren’t many whites there, they’re mostly black.

    1. This is a point Robert should address since he’s relatively close to this area. What do you have to say to this, Robert? If you think Chinedu makes an accurate point, how would you explain it? If you don’t think Chinedu makes an accurate point, what is a more realistic assessment of these areas in your opinion?

  7. “…White genocide means Whites are going extinct and that there is some special project to drive Whites extinct…”
    United Nations Genocide Conventions
    “The crime of genocide is defined in international law in the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide.
    Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
    (a) Killing members of the group;
    (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
    (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
    (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
    (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
    Article III: The following acts shall be punishable:
    (a) Genocide;
    (b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
    (c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
    (d) Attempt to commit genocide;
    (e) Complicity in genocide.
    The law protects four groups – national, ethnical, racial or religious groups.
    A national group means a set of individuals whose identity is defined by a common country of nationality or national origin.
    An ethnical group is a set of individuals whose identity is defined by common cultural traditions, language or heritage.
    A racial group means a set of individuals whose identity is defined by physical characteristics.
    A religious group is a set of individuals whose identity is defined by common religious creeds, beliefs, doctrines, practices, or rituals.”
    According to these rules genocide is being practiced against Whites. Jews have openly said they have done everything they can to flood the US with different races, lower the influence of Whites and deplete their numbers. They planned this and funded it from the end of the 19th century.

  8. Please stop with the white genocide nonsense. It’s actually whites that are engaged in genociding others. Whites today continue to rape countries, obliterate native languages and decimate indigenous cultures.
    If you mean genocide via immigration, well some of the most racially homogeneous countries on earth are in Europe. Moreover, the immigrants don’t invade and conquer as the whites did. They come in through a legal process approved by the whites themselves. The whites allow immigration out of their own self-interest since someone has to do the dirty work they don’t want to do themselves.

    1. You have to understand, Chinedu, that your average WN/Alt-Reicher, is a low IQ psychopathic pathological liar.
      Syrians are White, as Robert says, yet they are killing Whites in Europe and the Ashkenazi Jews (also White) are behind it.
      Anybody who is basically fluent in reading data and not socially retarded realizes how much of a joke it is.

    2. “Whites today continue to rape countries, obliterate native languages and decimate indigenous cultures.”
      While economically speaking white involvement can be argued, how is it that they continue to replace indigenous cultures and languages?

      1. Phil,
        For one thing the ubiquity of the English language is displacing and even eliminating indigenous languages around the world. Even when people speak their native language, it’s frequently sprinkled with English words and phrases. Sure, no one is forcing them to do this, but to do business and communicate globally one needs English. Even the French complain about this.
        Western culture is also steamrolling indigenous cultures. American culture in particular is crushing native cultures everywhere. Increasingly, you can forget about getting away from Americana to some quaint, rustic village somewhere because, increasingly, what you’ll find there is just more Americana. People wearing baseball caps and basketball jerseys and listening to hip-hop. Globalization is actually an imposed white/European hegemony that is causing cultural and linguistic extinction everywhere. Just look up all the indigenous languages that are going extinct. We should preserve them like we try to preserve endangered species or cultural artifacts.

        1. Okay, can you also add some data to elaborate the magnitude of you’re assertion?
          It’s not that what you’re saying isn’t true to an extent, but the problem is that globalization has a trade off. Number one you would need a common language to communicate on multinational matters. That means you would just have to learn English for that sake, not to eliminate the use of the native tongue.
          Second in regards to native cultures, what you are describing are Western fads spreading which might change the culture, it doesn’t sense of how that would alter the language. Yes, it will highly influence the youth but exactly HOW many of the younger generation general grasp and what is the actual likelihood this will actually replace their language?
          Are we talking about communities or nations that have been influenced by by Europeans already? Because in that case, it would be white specifically rather than the already present western links in those nations.
          For example, English would be the OFFICAL language of many African Countries, and yes that would mean by default a decrease in learning African Languages but that doesn’t consider how many would balance both?
          I agree that crude Western fashions shouldn’t be forced, but some form of assimilation is necessary for advancement.
          However, then we get into America’s “diversity”. Here’s the issues, while you gave examples of successful rich neighborhoods of Blacks that doesn’t reveal the entirety of Race and economics.
          http://web.stanford.edu/dept/csre/reports/report_12.pdf
          “Though race and poverty rates will be examined more closely later in this report, Figure 3 illustrates overall poverty rates for each group in California and the U.S.. As shown, poverty rates are highest for American Indians, Blacks, Latinos, and people identified on the census as Some Other Race (ranging from 21.9 to 24 percent in the state), lowest for Whites and
          Asians/Pacific Islanders (7.8 and 12.9 percent, respectively), and intermediate for people identified with Two or More Races (16.8 percent).”
          I’m not saying that this info justifies discrimination or mistreatment, but rather this information should be acknowledge at least as a reality if not as proof of racial disparities.
          In addition, as solutions I don’t necessarily promote involuntary eugenics. If anything, my research on HBD and Africans would actually be more on social institutions that are adaptable based on successful ones in Precolonial Africa.
          https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2015/10/27/a-look-at-precontact-igbo-society/
          Basically this ties back to my beliefs, that if these situations are to be alleviated then it would require black intuition and self judgment. Others say such a thing doesn’t exists, but I’m not convinced.
          Basically what I feel is the situation here is similar to those who expanded west and built knew settlements. The community population had relatively weak enforcement of order so solidarity was needed. In order to improve, I believe solidarity that is long standing would be required. At the same time though it would need to be honest in vices amongst the community.

        2. “For example, English would be the OFFICAL language of many African Countries, and yes that would mean by default a decrease in learning African Languages but that doesn’t consider how many would balance both?”
          What I meant was that for many African nations, English is the official language. As globalization grows English’s necessity grows as well automatically causing a decline in African Language’s use.
          However, does such a decline reflect how many individuals how use both languages?

        3. You’re several centuries and a couple of millennia too late to save the indigenous languages of my ancestors in Hibernia and Gaul.

  9. Why didnt you mention indians? Isn’t there a huge indian population in california, is it true that towns decline ? Where I live, my neighborhood became near 100% indian in the mid 2000s as white flight happened in the 90s, except it stayed middle class/wealthy; now ironically all the white families are trying to move in because it’s still a secure, homely neighborhood compared to others

    1. Indians are more or less White people. Punjabis are anyway. White -> White doesn’t lead to decline. It’s a rare town that goes from White -> Indian anyway. Doesn’t happen much.

Leave a Reply to Fernando Lipschitz (@FerdieLipschitz) Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)