How Many Major Races?

Problem is that Pygmies and Capoids are not extremely far genetically from the rest of the Africans. That’s the major problem as I see it. I am wondering if there is some distance on some charts though.
Geovan wrote:

My main question at the moment is can you go ahead and expand the 4 major races to 6 by including Capoids, Congoids (I think that is better than “Africans”) and Pygmies??!!!

Africans, Caucasians, Asians and Oceanians (Papuans and Aborigines) are the four major races.

One thing you might be able to do is split the Horners. They are indeed about halfway between Africans and Arab/North African Caucasoids.

You could also split off the South Indians. They are about halfway between Caucasoids and Asians on some charts.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

12 thoughts on “How Many Major Races?”

  1. Khoisan people are very distinct and are thought to have split from the common sapiens root earliest and are the most divergent of modern groups.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khoisan#Biology_and_genetic_studies

    Pygmies could also be their own race.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pygmy_peoples#Relationship_with_other_Africans
    Andaman islanders and the major groups of Negritos have been in their respective islands/island groups for at least 20-30,000 Years each, perhaps much longer in some cases and are are genetically differentiated.

    http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/07/asian-negritos-are-not-one-population/#.VjqT0LqwI5Q

    1. You might to a lesser degree, also be able to split East African( the region where mostly nilosaharan speakers live e.g. S. Sudan, not the horn) from West Africans, who are mostly Niger-Congo speakers.

      1. Scientifically, Australoids are Asians. They are a part of the Major Asian Race. They are not Black and they are not Caucasoid. So Indians are part between Caucasoids and Australoids for most part I would think. Up in the northwest, they have some Mongoloid in them. Punjabis are 14% Mongoloid. You can see it in their eyes.

        1. Colonial British studies on Australian Aborigines revealed they are good at the more visual and spatial tests, mirroring what they say about Mongoloid intelligence. Australoids are the precursor to Mongoloids and perhaps 2/3 of Caucasians.

          The African 1/3 is what makes Whites different than Asians and closer to Blacks. Something like Ainu are Whites’ great wall that leads to Asians. Perhaps something like Khoisans are Whites tattered rope with wooden planks (some missing or lose) bridge to Blacks.

  2. Scientifically, Australoids are Asians. They are a part of the Major Asian Race. They are not Black and they are not Caucasoid. So Indians are part between Caucasoids and Australoids for most part I would think. Up in the northwest, they have some Mongoloid in them. Punjabis are 14% Mongoloid. You can see it in their eyes.

    Some of the so called Whites, too, seem to have Mongoloid eyes. Small eyes themselves do not make a person Mongoloid.

  3. The Jats and Gurjars of North India are probably the descendants of the Central Asian Nomads but the other North Indians ain’t even remotely Mongoloid, they are mostly Caucasoid in varying degrees. The Mongols never really ventured into the Indian Heartland.

    1. No one particular group within South Asia has some special foreign origin. All castes and ethnicities have light and dark skinned people, and these farmer and pastoral tribes you are talking about are mostly dark skinned and monkey looking, but they love to spread lies on the internet because they wish to be White so bad.

      They aren’t the only Indians guilty of this though, as many other tribes too have this same try hard wanting to be related to some lighter skinned ethnic group.

      Not only that but these people are filthy savages. They commit a very high number of rapes and gang rapes and live in the most filthy, subhuman conditions imaginable. They are nothing but a bunch of savage monkey rapists. They have entire gangs on highways who do nothing but rob the people passing through and rape the women.

      These gujars were labelled a criminal tribe during the British period, and they still are very much the same way today. They committed the most awful crimes in ’84 against the Sikhs. Dozens of Sikh women were kidnapped and taken to Chilla village, where they were raped for many days by these animals.

      They raped hundreds of women during Muzaffarnagar riots and even bit their breasts. They are ugly, filthy, illiterate, uncivilized animals.

      They have not contributed anything either in literature, science, medicine or any other field. Bunch of monkey subhumans who love to lie on the internet because they wish to be Central Asian so bad. Same type of mentality exists among some Brahmins and many other groups. Even though Brahmins and all other castes are mostly dark skinned.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *