Muslims Continue to Persecute Christians Even in the West

Here.

I figured this would happen. I think they need to house the refugees separately. Separate the Christians from the Muslims.Separate the unaccompanied women and girls who are being sexually harassed from the men.

So much for the “traditional Muslim tolerance towards non-Muslims.” It pretty much never existed in the past and it certainly does not now. When it comes to non-Muslims, Islam does not play well with others.

Sometimes, “Islamophobia” is a valid concern.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

28 thoughts on “Muslims Continue to Persecute Christians Even in the West”

  1. One must first understand what ISlam is. I’ve ponder the question for a while and my conclusion: sunni ISLAM is the only major vehicle of arab civilization/nationalism/tribalism arabs can’t do without. Outside the middle east, islam is pan-arab cultural movement
    I first thought Allah delivered the Holy Koran to the Holy Prophet Muhamet عليه السلام‎ through telepathy. How wrong I’m. Now it seems arabic is a holy language created by Allah and Allah speaks arabic
    http://muslimvoices.org/arabic-language/
    The Arabic language
    Rosemary Pennington Posted March 18, 2009
    “Muslims believe Arabic words have holy power and a special relationship with Allah. Because of this, Muslims pray and read the Qur’an in Arabic, no matter what their native language. Of course, not all Muslims become fluent in Arabic – many only know enough to understand the Qur’an and prayers.”
    To members of other faiths this may seem odd. Christians have translated the Bible into hundreds of languages – very few Christians feel the need to read it in its original languages. And, although many Jews learn the Torah in Hebrew, the language is not essential to Judaism. But in Islam, Arabic is considered a sacred language because Allah recited the Qur’an to Muhammad in Arabic. Arabic is the language of God and is untranslatable.
    Just speaking the words is a religious act. In some cultures, even Arabic newspapers or fiction novels are considered sacred.

    Arabs were minor tribes before islam and through islam they got organised, conquered vast lands and formed a major civilisation. Islam is their single most potent civilisational force , Prophet Maohamet is their greatest ever national hero and subsequently they attempt to sanctify their culture through a religion. As arab civilisation got into trouble, sunni arabs fall back on their old formula of success and try to revive islam, hence all the islamisation movement. The above are wat I try to point out and explain that islam is more a vehicle of sunni arab nationalism/tribalism than a religion.

    Another point is the sunni-shiite conflict, basically it was a contest between 2 camp, one camp led by Son-in-law Ali who wanted to form a mohamed dynasty and the camp led by ather-in-law Abu bakr who happened to be chief of prophet mohamed’s tribe. Sunni triumph is triumph of arab tribal power. Its so obvious

    One of the way a non-arab muslim to look pious or religious is to put on an arab scarf and grab and dress up like an arab

    Arab nationalism doesn’t concern me as much and I’m neither pro or against islam though in its extreme form ISIS islam = IS is islam = ‘IS’lam

    1. Inshallah Allah will guide you.

      Allah can speak all languages but his favourite language is Finnish. He spoke to Arabs in Finnish but they did not understand, so reluctantly he spoke in arabic and the non Arab Muslims started to consider Arabic sacred. He delivered a superior Koran in Finnish but an inferior Arabic one for the Arabs. Snippets of the superior Finnish Koran can be found on this blog.

      One can see the moral superiority of the Finns due to the excellent care Allah takes of them. The Finns have have the most stable and least corrupt country in the world. Compare them to the Arabs.

      You are right that Muslims consider Arabic sacred. If you put a “no pissing sign” in Arabic in Malaysia people obey it because they do not want to piss on the street, next the holy signs, even if they do not understand it.

  2. I think Hungary should open its borders now, fast. Finland,Belgium,Netherlands,Austria and specially Germany(birth rate of 8.2!!!) should take as much refugees as they can because their population is aging rapidly and in need of fresh blood. Europe is doomed, everyone knows that, sooner or later Europe’s population will be majority composed by outsiders, their bunch of children,grandchildren, great-grandchildren.. and everyone will be just happy.

  3. I think Hungary should open its borders now, fast. Finland, Belgium, Netherlands these countries should take as much refugees as they can because their population is aging rapidly and in need of fresh blood. Europe is doomed, everyone knows that, sooner or later Europe’s population will be majority composed by outsiders, their children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren…and everyone will be just happy.

    1. Europe is not aging rapidly. Europe is aging in accordance with time unwinding. It’s such a myth that Europe needs immigrants in irder not to die out. Europe is not dying out. Europe can manage even with a half of its current population. What is the big fuss about the diminishing population?

    2. Finland already has the Finnish Koran. They are Already guided well. No wonder they have the most stable and least country in the world. As regard birth rate robots are coming and will take up the slack and their economy will go from stregnth to stregnth.

      The Finnish Koran

      My people the Finns will be a nation that rides
      Upon the snowstorm
      They will be tossed about in the storm
      But in the midst of the tumult,
      metal hands
      Will gently guide them to safety.
      The glow in the eyes of their friends will be warm
      And they will obey my
      People all the days of their lives.

      Chapter: The prophecy.

      So that prophecy will help them in the future.

  4. So much for the “traditional Muslim tolerance towards non-Muslims.” It pretty much never existed in the past and it certainly does not now.

    Indeed, and the common claim that Muslims were once tolerant towards non-Muslims says more about the low moral standards to which leftists hold non-whites – not actual Muslim tolerance.

    Muslims “tolerated” non-Muslims in the sense that so long as minorities paid their special taxes, knew their place, and didn’t make waves, they were allowed to practice their religion. There also wasn’t much in terms of pogroms.

    Nevertheless, Muslim societies were very much Muslim supremacist. Even in Islamic Spain – often cited as representative of Muslim tolerance – leaders of the Christian and Jewish communities had to present themselves before the local Muslim ruler and submit themselves to a humiliation.

    There were no university departments specializing in deconstructing “Muslim privilege”; there wasn’t a prominent non-Muslim Ta-Nehisi Coates who enjoyed countless accolades from Muslim elites for writing a scathing critique of the majority; there certainly weren’t large numbers of influential Muslims celebrating their impending minority status.

    So in conclusion, Muslims were tolerant in a “mind your place and we won’t actively persecute you” sense. However, they were certainly not tolerant by modern Western multicultural standards. Not that that’s a bad thing, as Western multiculturalism is loony.

    Nevertheless, it just goes to show you how much leftists let non-whites get away with.

    1. Leftists are excellent people and they let non whites like me get away with nothing.

      I met this leftist professionally once, and as non white raiding a leftie’s flat I thought I could get away with a spot of burglary. He locked me up, gagged and tied and called the police. When I left prison I visited him a second time, but this time I was armed with foreknowledge and was able to make off with his copy of days kapital, via the window, just as he came into the flat. It was the only thing I could steal, but it was the one precious thing that changed my life. And that dear friend is how I became a leftie myself. I naturally retuned it to him and now we go on marches together;a pitch black Hindu and a red as a tomato communist, linked arm in arm, attempting to usher in the communist revolution in our sex fuelled jaunts across the USA.

    2. That’s just silly. The claim for Muslim tolerance was about comparison. Muslim Spain and the Muslim middle east during the middle ages were more tolerant of differing religious views than Christendom (or at least Catholic Christendom) was at the time. It doesn’t mean that they would pass the modern western notion of tolerance, although both are more tolerant than the modern Wahhabi sect.

      1. I doubt they would pass a tolerance test compared to many other regions of the world , in the same era. Just because parts of Christian Europe were less tolerant does not Islamic dominant regions were more tolerant than many other non European regions of the world.

        Muslim ruled regions were still pretty intolerant to to other faiths, they just were slightly more accomadating than some areas of Europe.

      2. That’s just silly. The claim for Muslim tolerance was about comparison.

        Not buying it. If that were really the case, then you would see leftists give the modern West credit for being tolerant. After all, today’s Western countries are easily more tolerant than any non-Western country.

        And yet they don’t. Just goes to show you that non-whites are held to lower moral standards.

        1. Just goes to show you that non-whites are held to lower moral standards.

          I would slightly disagree with this statement. As a white person in America, you can ignore the fact that being white entitles you to a sense of economic privilege, and a world of opportunities that isn’t readily accessible to non-Americans and non-whites. I’m talking of college alumni associations, cliques in a corporate environment and mentor networks. I’m not saying that just because you’re white, you would automatically benefit from these associations but being white does help you “blend in” more easily, remain invisible and not attract unwanted attention. The best part is, even if you “screw up”, you’ll be blamed as an individual. There is no such enormous burden on your shoulders that all white people are to be judged for your actions.

          Non-whites in the US, especially if they’re immigrants DO NOT get this benefit of doubt. Take Obama’s example, being the first black President came with its own set of unnerving situations. He was constantly asked to prove his birth status and even after showing a birth certificate, for some skeptics, it wasn’t good enough. Likewise for Satya Nadella, the Indian CEO of Microsoft, well the shareholders love him right now since the company has shown massive profits quarter after quarter. Imagine if he does do something incredibly stupid, the “entire Indian community” would be taking the flak. Just as it happened in the case of Vikram Pandit, another Indian who is greatly blamed for the financial crisis. I don’t think there will be another Indian CEO at Citi Group for a very very long time even if he’s adequately qualified for the job – Vikram Pandit has kinda ruined the chances of future aspirants from the subcontinent.

          The “burden of expectations” scenario plays out in almost every aspect of life: cinema, corporate environment, sports, dating nightclubs – everywhere. I recently spent a lot of time backpacking around Europe and frequented a lot of nightclubs across the continent. While most places let me in without trouble, since I’m always well-behaved and polite, for some reason I was turned away for being Indian at all the clubs in Rotterdam, Netherlands. I later found out that apparently, years back, some drunken Indian lads got into trouble with the club bouncers and local police and word quickly spread out….now everyone’s turned away at the door just for being Indian. I did find a way around it though at one of the last clubs, since I speak some Spanish, I claimed to be from Mexico and they let me in without trouble.

          One could argue that since America was founded by white people and whites are the biggest demographic, it’s only fair that the majority ethnic group retain these privileges. After all it’s their birthright. Of course, the same thing holds true across every nations.

          Except that I stand to lose. While globalization has its share of critics, it has worked out to my advantage. Ever since the advent of the internet, i have been freelancing my skills online. I’m kinda a social media pioneer and was one of the early proponents of viral marketing. Between 2006-2009, as a freelancer, I had helped a lot of clients gain visibility and mindshare among their end user seegments – all for PEANUTS. My rates were fixed between $75 to $200 which while it helped me earn enough to spend my money on travelling to Thailand, Uzbekistan, Singapore etc., women and alcohol binges, I was really short-selling myself. It’s not a joke, increasing a company’s followers/fans in social media organically – that too in 2008-09. That was a big deal. Nowadays, it doesn’t matter much though since all social media follower lists are MANIPULATED and organic growth is dead.

          Had I been in America and a white person, I could have sold my skills to real corporations. Not for my lack of efforts though, but I did realize if I have to make money based on my skills, I need to work for some white guys in the front end, these were the mediators – agencies that helped me get work. I had something new and innovative to offer and was only in need of a few professional contacts who would BELIEVE in my abilities.

        2. I think you and I are talking about different things. When I say non-whites are held to lower moral standards, what I mean is that white people are expected to accommodate minorities and surrender majority status to a degree not expected of other groups.

          For example, Europeans are frequently condemned for not rolling out the welcome mat to Syrian refugees. Any desire to seal the borders and preserve current demographics is derided as racist.

          Meanwhile, Japan, which has only accepted a microscopic number of refugees, is barely taken to task at all. I also think it’s safe to say that the plight of the Rohingya in Burma is even worse than that of Syrians.

          You seem to be discussing how whites and non-whites are held to different standards as it pertains to their behavior and performances within Western nations.

          I can certainly understand why you would object to white majoritarianism, as it goes against your interests. And I have no problem with that. However, as a white person, I have every reason to support white majoritarianism. Know that I do not bear you or any other non-whites ill will; I’m simply supporting my peoples’ best interests, and by extension my own. In a cutthroat, dog-eat-dog society like the US, one would have to be insane to relinquish power and resources to other groups in the name of “diversity” or “equality.”

          I’ll just say one more thing. Only in the US and other Western countries are your grievances even given much of a hearing. In fact, only in countries like the US could immigrants/minorities like Satya Nadella or Vikram Pandit enjoy as much success as they have; it would be almost unthinkable for immigrants or minorities to reach the status of CEO in Japan – as documented by James Fallows in his article “What’s an Economy For?” – or other Asian countries.

          On another note, Pandit sounds like an awfully Brahmin name. Just by virtue of that, I would say that he’s more privileged in absolute terms than the vast majority of white Americans.

      3. Hey, let’s make the Moslem invaders pay a Terrorist Tax to show their contrition. Since they want to make non-Moslems pay Jizya, I’m sure they’d understand, right?

    3. A lot of liberals/Leftists are braindead , ignorant and immune to critical analysis when it comes to Islam. There are few like Bill Maher and Richard Dawkins who take Islam to task but they are the exception.

    4. Actually there were the equivalent of Muslim departments in deconstructing Muslim privilege to questioning Islam itself which was before the Mongol invasions. Many so called Islamic scholars like Ibn Khaldun to many Islamic golden age scholars DID INFACT question and were critical of Islam and there have been attempts to question or curtail the role of Islam in society by past Muslim theologians.

      You are lumping the entire Muslim world into a single monolithic entity and disregarding the socio-cultural and racial fabrics that differentiate them which is the very the mistake that many people who aren’t that knowledgeable about Islamic societies or Muslim countries make. There have been civil wars between Muslims of the same religion in Muslim countries while the non-Muslims were spared. Many Muslims have attacked other Muslims based on race or culture rather then faith and have spared non-Muslims of their same race or culture in the process.

      Many Muslim countries have allied with Christians due to circumstances, such as when foreigners tried to attack Horn African countries or when the Seljuk Turks tried to take over the Levant and Anatolia, and Christians from Europe and Muslims from Arabia helped each other to repel and fight Muslim Turks. Also Iran, believed to be a mostly Muslim country has had one of the oldest Jewish communities in the world as well as Zoroastrian communities in their countries, live there in Iran even with a huge numbers of Muslims being the majority.

      BAG doesn’t seem to understand the complexity and multi-faceted history of many Muslim countries and makes sweeping one-sided one-dimensional ignorant assumptions out of thin air, as is typical of narrow-minded and arrogant Westerners. Then he pretends to be an expert and assumes he knows more then other people, even people who actually know the place.

      1. Actually there were the equivalent of Muslim departments in deconstructing Muslim privilege to questioning Islam itself which was before the Mongol invasions. Many so called Islamic scholars like Ibn Khaldun to many Islamic golden age scholars DID INFACT question and were critical of Islam and there have been attempts to question or curtail the role of Islam in society by past Muslim theologians.

        There’s a world’s worth of difference between being critical of Islam and promoting equality for non-Muslims. Do you have any evidence that these views represented more than a minority strain of thought? Did they have any noticeable impact on Muslim societies as a whole?

        If you have a source regarding the widespread deconstruction of Muslim privilege, I would sure as hell like to see it.

        There have been civil wars between Muslims of the same religion in Muslim countries while the non-Muslims were spared. Many Muslims have attacked other Muslims based on race or culture rather then faith and have spared non-Muslims of their same race or culture in the process.

        Absolutely irrelevant. Those wars you speak of were political or ethnic in nature, and doesn’t change the fact that there was a clear ethos of Muslim supremacy within the Muslim world. There were likewise myriad quarrels between various European Christian kingdoms and sects, but that doesn’t mean that Christianity wasn’t overall privileged over other religions in the grand scheme of things.

        BAG doesn’t seem to understand the complexity and multi-faceted history of many Muslim countries and makes sweeping one-sided one-dimensional ignorant assumptions out of thin air, as is typical of narrow-minded and arrogant Westerners.

        I actually have studied the Muslim world and Middle East. While I’m hardly an “expert,” I do know a thing or two. The general point I was trying to make is that the Muslim world was only “tolerant” if you apply laxer standards of “tolerance” to non-Westerners than you do the West.

        I likewise place a much higher stock on race, ethnicity, and culture than religion. I recognize that the problem for Western countries isn’t Islam but rather certain kinds of Muslims (ie. Arabs and Pakis).

        I’m just sick and tired of fruity Western liberals constantly heaping praise on medieval Islamic societies on account of their “tolerance,” even while they bash white people over the tiniest of “microaggressions.”

  5. Isn’t it funny and sad so many black Americans want to convert to Islam? Who in the hell would want to do that, 🙄 given the inbreeding info? Definitely, it’s the devil’s trick fooling blacks, as well as white liberals, and other unknowing people.

    1. I just had a thought. Maybe the reason so many pedo marriages and pedophila exists in the Muslim world, because Muslim adults are little more than children themselves? 🙄 Think about it.

      1. We could make the same argument about Blacks. The problem is, disciplining these “children” given our own self-destructive guilt about being “racist”, and even more when they have more and more dangerous “toys”–LIKE NUKES!

        DEFINITELY a “KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN” — But Russia is helping Iran nuke up!

        Is Russia the irresponsible “cool” adult then?

  6. I don’t know if you accept Breitbart as a valid news source, but:
    http://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/2015/11/29/poll-most-palestinians-support-intifada-of-stabbings-car-rammings/

    72% of Palestinians believe that it’s OK to ram Israeli cars and stab Israeli citizens…But when they fight back, it’s an abomination, right?
    I wonder if they’ll pretend to be “unarmed” and therefore “harmless” when shot by Israel’s police, like the domestic terrorists of America?

    Even their treatment of their OWN deaths is somewhat “uneven”. Thousands of terrorists killed by or IN Syria gets a great big shrug, ONE Israeli defending himself against terrorist attack is FRONT-PAGE NEWS!

    Plus, they have the lowest IQ on the planet, so they’re basically living Drone attacks. BUILDING a Drone costs a quarter million, much easier to BREED a litter of them, right?

  7. However, SJWs FAR surpass even THAT stupidity, calling for an “enlightened” terrorist-free Moslem Cult, and BBC is even claiming that Moslems who give up the Cult are “Islamophobic”!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *