Muslim Migrants Fueling Rape Epidemic in Germany


I so knew this was going to happen.

A growing number of women and young girls housed in refugee shelters in Germany are being raped, sexually assaulted and even forced into prostitution by male asylum seekers, according to German social work organizations with first-hand knowledge of the situation.

Many of the rapes are occurring in mixed-gender shelters, where, due to a lack of space, German authorities are forcing thousands of male and female migrants to share the same sleeping areas and restroom facilities.

Conditions for women and girls at some shelters are so perilous that females are being described as “wild game” fighting off Muslim male predators. But many victims, fearing reprisals, are keeping silent, social workers say.

At the same time, growing numbers of German women in towns and cities across the country are being raped by asylum seekers from Africa, Asia and the Middle East. Many of the crimes are being downplayed by German authorities and the national media, apparently to avoid fueling anti-immigration sentiments.

Wherever Muslims go in Christian Europe, rape is never far behind.

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

34 thoughts on “Muslim Migrants Fueling Rape Epidemic in Germany”

  1. If this is true (which it probably is, given there are many other examples), then one must seriously ask this question.

    Why are Western leaders willing to allow women to be raped for the sake of diversity?

    Sorry if I appear a bit ‘naive’ regarding this issue, but it is perplexing. Is the desire to import these people THAT strong that not even crime, rape and alienation is enough to change policy?

    And if this is the case, what does this say about the White Nationalists who claim that these leaders are hell bent on importing these people? Are they right?

    It is one thing for me to invite people into my home, to be nice and all. That can be explained by altruism, wanting to extend the family, or whatever. But to invite people who rape my daughter, and then cover it up and keep going? This has to be a sign of something else, surely….

    1. Western leaders are traitors and spineless. They either are enabling this demographic upheaval in order to undermine native European communal integrity or they are spineless cowards who are obessed with looking like humanitarians. Though if the later you would think they would lamblast Saudi Arabia for its culture of hate and be opposed to the so called “Moderate” rebels in Syria who are just rebranded Jihadis.

  2. Why is it that the Muslim religion has such barbaric penalties for crime? Is it because it’s the only way “muslim people” can be kept under control?

      1. Ah so what if we have our western culture destroyed? we will have that awesomely sweet finger poppin diversity that elites, Jews & SJWs think we crave so much.

  3. ” Wherever Muslims go in Christian Europe, rape is never far behind.”

    Quoted for truth. I would just add that it is Sunni Muslims that are the problem.

  4. Many if not most of incurable leftoids are very convinced that humans are all equal and they still have greater/overflowing energy to try convince and force people around that its beliefs are totally right.

    Left geographical flow, now in greater centers in Eastern Europe, look like propagation of other semitic irrational/magical belief system, christianism.

    The similarities with fanatical classical religious are enormous. The most important piece that separates truly truth seekers than this ”insane” people is follow and search by real understanding of reality.

    Leftoidism is like a ”jewish mother” and conservatoidism is like a ”cold father”.

    Everyone is equal, everyone is unique, anyone born that way, everyone born with equally great potential, just environmental factors that prevent them the glorious destiny… in the mother heart always fit one more.

    Conservatoidism: hierarchy is right, some people born completely superior than other and society just express this sad and unavoidable/right reality…

    Both wrong of course.

    1. I think everyone is equal to some degree, but all cultures are not equal. The environment can produce some bad people. The problem, however, is that once the environment has done it’s damage, then it’s too late, you have to protect a society against the rabid dog.

      1. In other words, people are more genetically equal, than far right conservatives let on. However, all environments are not the same.

        1. As an example, recently we had to send to the pound a viscous dog who killed some other dogs, to protect kids in our family. However, it’s quite clear the dog became viscous, only because of a bad owner. The owner tied him up too much, and who knows what else.

        2. But people are not genetically equal enough to be behaviourally equal. Of course, environments are not the same, 😉

      2. Why might a Muslim culture, apart from looking at the genetics of the people, produce men who want to rape women? Why might an Indian one do the same?

        1. No necessarily, it’s a gross generalization. Rapers there are in all human populations of course, what is different is the demographic/statistical proportion of them. Populations with less -above-average-sexual-oriented- people will tend to have less % of oversexualized people, extreme cases. In the same population where Don Juan’s are common also will tend to have rapers, because both share this oversexuality trait.

          But most of human cultures had legitimate woman sexual exploitation or at least tolerability.

          ”Alpha men” are winners. Women with exactly the same behavior are treated as slut.

          Biologically speaking it is explainable. But human beings are unique in their capacity to transcend what nature impose for us as ”normal”.

      3. Behavioural disposition explain why some people adhere in bad behavior and others in the same condition don’t adhere. Environment is not ulteriorly superior to behavioural biological or inner dispositions but still have a greater influence, specially among people who are not wise enough to watch its own faults.

        You have a tolerability and/or empathetic reciprocity for virtually every behavior and it explain, in my opinion, almost of all human behavior.

        Tolerate is like support (tolerate 😉 ) ( sometimes, personally understood) exccentric/wrong situations, like is out of your comfort zone. What we dislike we can JUST tolerate like to be a WN and tolerate mixed white-non-white relationships. But circumstances also will be a impact and circumstances generally change over time. All change behavior may be previously expected. Of course, expectations are not certainties, is not exactly inescapable destiny, depend specifically about level of behavioural homogeneity or fluctuation. Tolerability level changes over time too.

        Some people tolerate bad behavior and search by logic-rational explanations.

        Other people are reciprocal or naturally adherent/ attracted for bad behavior.

        ”I think everyone is equal to some degree”

        because we are living beings
        because we belong the same species

  5. There are progressives like Bill Maher, Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris who have been very critical of Islam. I put myself in their camp . But you are right, by and large Progressives have been carrying water for Islamists and Islam and demonize those who are critical of Islam and Muslim cultures as racist/Islamophobes.

    1. Having watched countless hours of Dawkins and Maher, I would definitely say they are progressives.

      I have watched a lot of Sam Harris but he tends to stick close to critiquie of religion and critical examination of Islam. The only thing I disagree with Harris is his view that militant Muslims purely or primarily are motivated by Islam .

  6. Western men love to deflect attention from western rape culture as described by feminists by looking at third worlders. Works every time. No wonder western feminists get frustrated. Learn from white feminists on university gender studies courses about western rape culture.

    Not keen to do that? Hmmm. Why ever not?

  7. Dr. Nicolai Sennels is a Danish psychologist who has done extensive research into a little-known problem in the Muslim world: the disastrous results of Muslim inbreeding brought about by the marriage of first-cousins.

    This practice, which has been prohibited in the Judeo-Christian tradition since the days of Moses, was sanctioned by Muhammad and has been going on now for 50 generations (1,400 years) in the Muslim world.

    This practice of inbreeding will never go away in the Muslim world, since Muhammad is the ultimate example and authority on all matters, including marriage.

    The massive inbreeding in Muslim culture may well have done virtually irreversible damage to the Muslim gene pool, including extensive damage to its intelligence, sanity, and health.

    According to Sennels, close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred. In Pakistan , the numbers approach 70%.

    Even in England , more than half of Pakistani immigrants are married to their first cousins.

    In Denmark the number of inbred Pakistani immigrants is around 40%.

    The numbers are equally devastating in other important Muslim countries:

    67% in Saudi Arabia; 64% in Jordan; and Kuwait; 63% in Sudan; 60% in Iraq; and 54% in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar

    According to the BBC, this Pakistani, Muslim-inspired inbreeding is thought to explain the probability that a British Pakistani family is more than 13 X s as likely to have children with recessive genetic disorders.

    While Pakistanis are responsible for 3% of the births in the UK , they account for 33% of children with genetic birth defects.

    The risk of what are called autosomal recessive disorders such as cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy is 18 times higher and the risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher.

    Other negative consequences of inbreeding include a 100% increase in the risk of stillbirths and a 50% increase in the possibility that a child will die during labor.

    Lowered intellectual capacity is another devastating consequence of Muslim marriage patterns.

    According to Dr. Sennels, research shows that children of consanguineous marriages lose 10-16 points off their IQ and that social abilities develop much slower in inbred babies.

    The risk of having an IQ lower than 70, the official demarcation for being classified as “retarded,” increases by an astonishing 400% among children of cousin marriages.

    (Similar effects were seen in the Pharaonic dynasties in ancient Egypt and in the British royal family, where inbreeding was the norm for a significant period of time.)

    In Denmark , non-Western immigrants are more than 300% more likely to fail the intelligence test required for entrance into the Danish army.

    Dr. Sennels says that “the ability to enjoy and produce knowledge and abstract thinking is simply lower in the Islamic world.”

    He points out that the Arab world translates just 330 books every year, about 20% of what Greece alone does.

    In the last 1,200 years of Islam, just 100,000 books have been translated into Arabic, about what Spain does in a single year.

    Seven out of 10 Turks have never even read a book.

    Dr. Sennels points out the difficulties this creates for Muslims seeking to succeed in the West. “A lower IQ, together with a religion that denounces critical thinking, surely makes it harder for many Muslims to have success in our high-tech knowledge societies.”

    Only nine Muslims have every won the Nobel Prize, and five of those were for the “Peace Prize.” According to Nature magazine, Muslim countries produce just 10% of the world average when it comes to scientific research (measured by articles per million inhabitants).

    In Denmark ,(Dr. Sennels’ native country) Muslim children are grossly over-represented among children with special needs.

    One-third (33%) of the budget for Danish schools is consumed by special education, and anywhere from 51% to 70% of retarded children with physical handicaps in Copenhagen have an immigrant background.

    Learning ability is severely affected as well. Studies indicated that 64% of school children with Arabic parents are still illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system.

    The immigrant drop-out rate in Danish high schools is twice that of the native-born.

    Mental illness is also a product. The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of schizophrenic illness. The increased risk of insanity may explain why more than 40% of the patients in Denmark ‘s biggest ward for clinically insane criminals have an immigrant background.

    The U.S. is not immune. According to Sennels, “One study based on 300,000 Americans shows that the majority of Muslims in the USA have a lower income, are less educated, and have worse jobs than the population as a whole.”

    Dr. Sennels concludes:

    There is no doubt that the wide spread tradition of first cousin marriages among Muslims has harmed the gene pool among Muslims.

    Because Muslims’ religious beliefs prohibit marrying non-Muslims and thus prevents them from adding fresh genetic material to their population, the genetic damage done to their gene pool since their prophet allowed first cousin marriages 1,400 years ago are most likely massive. (This has produced) overwhelming direct and indirect human and societal consequences.

    Bottom line: Islam is not simply a benign and morally equivalent alternative to the Judeo-Christian tradition.

    As Dr. Sennels points out, the first and biggest victims of Islam are Muslims.

    Simple Christian compassion for Muslims and a common-sense desire to protect Western civilization from the ravages of Islam dictate a vigorous opposition to the spread of this dark and dangerous religion.

    These stark realities must be taken into account when we establish public polices dealing with immigration from Muslim countries and the building of mosques in the U.S.

    1. No it is Not false propaganda.

      Arab Christians do not inbreed and they amongst the most brilliant of people.

      But Arab Muslims and other Muslims do and you can see that when they go to western countries they Are unsussesful in gaining power through high income levels.

      The low IQ of Indians is just low hanging fruit, and once, a new diet and a western high tech civilisation is presented the low hanging fruit moves up to the higher branches and we see them becoming captains of industry etc.

      The west makes you smarter;
      but the smartness effect does not translate to inbred groups who are live in a permently mentally damaged genepool. By inbreeding we mean cousin marriage.

      A simple point of comparison can be seen when we see per capita income here in the uk. The Indians consistently out rank their Bangladeshi and Pakistani brethren.

      1. The reason Christian Arabs from Lebanon/Syria/Jordan are smarter than muslim Arabs or why Hindus from places like Bangladesh are smarter than Muslims is because of the Jaziya tax. Dhimmis or non muslims in Islamic lands had to pay a Jaziya tax or they would be killed, only escape from this is conversion to Islam. Thus the poorest low IQ sections of the population who could not pay the tax converted early. The smarter populations (and in the case of South Asia, the higher castes) used money to prevent conversion as much as possible. Thus the muslims in these areas are predominantly low IQ genes while high IQ populations got seperated into a different gene pool. Islam is dysgenic. Even Lew Kyan Yew of Singapore berated Malay muslims for being dysgenic by the tendency of Muslims to marry even if the people involved were erither very stupid of full of genetic diseases.

  8. Didn’t Muslims invent algebra though? 🙄 They also sailed the seas quite a bit, even enslaving white and black people.

      1. I highly doubt Arabs or Muslims were responsible for many or even any mathematical achievements. Check out the link below and it highlights that most Mathematical contributions were from Europeans, Persians, Indians, Chinese or Egyptians. Arabs and Muslims simply translated and transmitted stolen knowledge to Europe.

  9. Please stop calling them “migrants”, they’re INVADERS. The locals don’t want them, and the more they misbehave, the more the locals don’t want them.

    The German Government has actually told Germans to LEAVE if they don’t want to be overrun in their own country. Betrayed much? Do you think the Germans will organize a sort of (ironic) French Resistance against the invaders their Government has bent over for? Or do you think they’ll just bend over too?

    1. Well, what is exactly the difference***

      Turkish workers who were work in Germany in 50’s were immigrants. If 2,5 million of them had immigrated to Germany during 50’s…

      Millions of european immigrants flowed to Americas in the XIX. They immigrated, occupied foreign lands and impose your culture too.

      Race is biology and not space and time. Of course, is important have a safe space, but most important still continue to be biology.

      It is a continuity of globalism, since age of ”discovery”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)