That’s a myth, beauty for both males and females have clearly been defined and there is a clear scientific method.
People don’t randomly cast males for chick flicks. It’s always a white guy, over 6 foot tall, with low body fat, symmetrical face, chiseled facial features.
Ok how am I doing it then?
Ok, so how do I get hot women, even hot young women? I even get models in their mid-20’s. How the Hell do I do that if I am only a 5? According to the theory, there’s no way I could do that.
Either 4 or 5 guys can get hot chicks, or their whole “scientific” Looks Theory is shot to shit.
Bottom line is beauty is in the eye of the beholder. There is no “scientific” way to determine if a male or female is attractive or not. Anyone who thinks there is is out of their heads.
For instance, those guys on that site and also the people on Lookism said that I am a 5 at best. That’s just fine. They both also said I have been a 5 all of my life. If I have been a 5 my whole life, why did I get 4-5 offers from modeling companies to be a male model. They simply approached me on the street, said, ” You look like a male model. Want to come work for us?” Do modeling companies hire male 5’s to be models?
They said my nose and my mouth both look very bad. That makes two bad features and that makes me a 5 right there. And the yellow teeth may make me a 4.
Ok so do I do it, or how have I been doing it my whole life? Also how do you explain that there are women nowadays who insist that I am a 9 or a 10? Are they delusional? And even if they are crazy, does it matter? If a woman thinks you are a 9 or a 10 and treats you like one even if she’s being antiscientific about it, what difference does it make?
Also how can you explain that quite a few women and girls since I was 17 would strongly disagree that I was a scientific 5. If humans strongly disagree with the “science” then what good is the science? It’s worthless. How do you know if you are attractive? Because people say you are? How about that?
Also on those sites they say to never go by what people tell you, instead go by the “science.” They insist that ugly men get told all the time that they are handsome? Really? I’ve never seen this in my life. Does this really happen? I have apparently been goodlooking most of my life, so I don’t know what life is like for an unattractive man. But before age 16, I was not known to be goodlooking. I do not think anyone, female or male, ever told me I was handsome or attractive. Something changed at age 16 and I started hearing girls say I was cute.
I would say that if you are a man and females and even gay men are constantly going on about how great you look, then there’s your factual evidence right there. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and the only determination of attractiveness is the opinions of others. Your own opinion is crap because it’s biased and apparently the “science” is completely wrong.
One more thing: for decades, women have been insisting that Mick Jagger is the sexiest man alive. According to this chart, Jagger is only a 6 in looks because he has “big lips.” Big lips are supposedly ugly and only thin lips are attractive. Yet many of the females who are hot for Jagger love this great big fat sexy lips. So these females are being completely anti-scientific then.
I would say that anyone believing this Scientific Looks Theory BS is overthinking this whole thing. If you’re goodlooking, you’ll know soon enough because if you look good enough, people won’t stop gushing about how good you look. If people are not going on and on about your looks or if they are telling you you look average, then you may just be average. If you look in the mirror, you should see an average looking guy. I have no idea what homely men get told. Do they get told they are homely? I’ve never lived that life, so I am not sure what they get told about their looks. But if you are a male and you look in the mirror and see a homely man, you may just be onto something.
Bottom line is they need to take this Looks “science” and put it in the trash where it belongs.