Jews Created Libertarianism

These are the heroes of Libertarianism, and they are all Jews. The thing in the upper left is an entity called Ayn Rand. Supposedly it was human, but I doubt it. I believe the Henry Kissinger looking creature on the lower left is called Murray Rothbard. On the right, I have no idea. They look like a couple of Jews to me. Apparently these are two of the leading lights of Libertarianism,male "midwives" who birthed this monstrosity from the Devil's womb.
Another movement, another bunch of Jews. Yawn. These are the heroes of Libertarianism, and they are all Jews. The thing in the upper left is an entity called Ayn Rand. Supposedly it was human, but I doubt it. I believe the Henry Kissinger looking creature on the lower left is called Murray Rothbard. On the right, I have no idea. They just look like a couple of Jews to me. Apparently these are two of the leading lights of Libertarianism, male “midwives” who birthed this monstrosity from the Devil’s womb.

The rogue’s gallery of the fathers and mothers of Libertarianism. On the right are Ayn Rand and Murray Rothbard. Bonus points for the Juden on the left.

Antisemites like to make a big deal out of this stuff. Jews created Communism. Ok. And then Jews created Libertarianism. Ok. And for that matter, they created a whole lot of other movements that are rather over the map. This is all apparently some part of some big planned out Jew Plot.

Supposedly there’s some sort of “Jewish reason” that Jews created Communism. And another “Jewish reason” that they created Libertarianism. And all these “Jewish reasons” that they created all these other movements. Well, God-damn. These Jews are creating a veritable Rube Goldberg contraption of movements!

Libertarianism is the exact opposite of Communism. Most Communists probably think anarcraps should be shot. I believe I concur. No, actually, I don’t think they should be shot. I just think they should be killed.

Libertarians say Commies are the enemy. And it is certainly an honor to be hated by such people.

True, both movements have attracted a lot of Jews, but Communism attracted more.

I am having a very hard time seeing the Jewy Plots and how they are all connected. It doesn’t seem to make any sense at all. Antisemites say this was all coordinated at Jew Central Control or someplace like that. What sense does that make?

None of this makes much sense. Sure I suppose typically there is something in it for the Jews but if Communism and Libertarianism are both great for the Jews, you have to figure that probably just about anything can be construed as good for the Jews.

I would just say “Jews create movements.” There is something messianic about these people that makes them want to run about and create political movements here and there. I suppose if you want to start a new political movement, just hire a bunch of Jews and pay them to put it together for you and get it off the ground.

Antisemites don’t make a lot of sense. There’s Jews here, Jews there, Jews everywhere. Look out! There’s one over there! He’s flying towards you! Duck, quick! There’s a Jew around the next corner, better watch your step! Whatever you do, don’t look under your bed. There’s a Jew there!

That type of conspiracy theory is just dumb.

Please follow and like us:
error3
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

27 thoughts on “Jews Created Libertarianism”

  1. Jewish Communism and Jewish Capitalism are very similar.
    Both openly praise:
    – control of the economy by a handful of people (state control or big business)
    – subjection of people’s traditional religion (state atheism or value relativism)
    – a unified, cosmopolitan world order (through war mostly, economic wars, infowars running the same ‘narrative’ all over the world – mind you, in the 19th century, three Jewish-owned news agencies, Reuters, Havas and Wolffs, created a cartel, to which AP later took part).

    What the messianic folk doesn’t want is:
    – making the economy essentially the people’s, with free money, ban on usury (which makes you a ‘genocider’), or simply moral limits to the extent of the market
    – state authority being used to crack down on heretics and subvertive movements, worse, state authority being subjected to the spiritual powers
    – a nationalist world order based on win-win partnerships, in which messianic jews would be left over (the odd thing is that jews would still yield a lot of power just from their dispersion, but they keep on turning the world upside down at everyone’s expense, just for Jerusalem).

    1. “in the 19th century, three Jewish-owned news agencies, Reuters, Havas and Wolffs, created a cartel, to which AP later took part).”

      Jews already had Mass Media control in the 19th century, gentile intellectuals knew that the jews were both behind Communism and Capitalism.

  2. Dear Robert

    The guy on the top right is Ludwig von Mises, one of the founders of the Austrian school of economics. Like Friedrich Hayek, the author of The Road to Serfdom, L. von Mises believed that the government could hardly do anything right. There is a Mises Institute in the US. It publishes libertarian books. L. von Mises had to leave Austria after the Nazis took over the country. In my younger years, I read some of the writings of L. von Mises. I thought then, and still think today, that he was a very smart man.

    Regards. James

    1. The guy on the bottom right is Milton Friedman, founder of modern monetarism and a staunch believer in minimal government.

        1. According to Wikipedia:

          “Friedrich August von Hayek was born in Vienna to Jewish parents August von Hayek and Felicitas née von Juraschek. Friedrich’s father, from whom he received his middle name,”

  3. Mises and Milton Friedman. You could have thrown in Hayek if you needed a fifth photo!

    To Frederic’s point above, Heidegger, who was highly critical of both liberalism (i.e. classical liberalism, i.e. libertarianism) and communism, drew out the similarities between capitalism and communism: their materialist nature, their progressive nature, their focus primarily on material well-being. I agree that there are strong connections between the two that have only become apparent over time. Neo-liberalism, which is the dominant paradigm among the elites today, is essentially a combination of capitalism and communism.

  4. I would just say “Jews create movements.” There is something messianic about these people that makes them want to run about and create political movements here and there. I suppose if you want to start a new political movement, just hire a bunch of Jews and pay them to put it together for you and get it off the ground.

    That’s interesting.

    Unlike the Chinese in Southeast Asia, Parsis in India, or other rich minorities – who mostly make money quietly – Jews are always leaving their imprint on their host nations.

    This has yielded many positive results. I have great admiration for myriad Jewish scientists, inventors, pioneers, and comedic legends (love Seinfeld and Curb Your Enthusiasm ). At the same time, this mentality also causes Jews to meddle in the political and cultural affairs of their host nations, which is bound to engender resentment. That, more than anything else, explains anti-Semitism.

    As Dota once told me, even the most aggressive, xenophobic people in Maharashtra have no problem with the Bohras, despite their disproportionate wealth. That’s because the Bohras stay out of politics and enjoy their money in private.

    I wouldn’t want to see Jews become completely apolitical; that would make for a less interesting country. I just wish their elites would be more respectful of white gentile identity and culture.

    1. If Staying out of politics is so good so why does Dota not do the same. He spends his life in politics of the racial and Islamic supremacist kind.

      He lives in a fantasy world much like an artist I counselled at a comics convention on a planet in the andromeda Galaxy. I told him he needs to join my movement which was for saying a big NO to drawing Negro goring unicorns in adult fantasy erotic comics.

      Living in a fantasy world will not help anyone regardless of the planet you live on in labyrinths of your mind. It is as if one joins in fervent prayer for the souls of those poor negroes. Dota’s fervent prayers for Islamic supremacy while pining away because he is not a member of the Ingroup of white peoples is his way of losing himself in the madness of his mind.

      He is an Indian and he will always be a member of this despicable hated simian group of people no matter how hard he tries for acceptance within the minds of the white Ingroup from which he will be forever rejected due to the racial taint being a despised Indian immigrant in a western land.He can never be free of this ignominious taint no matter how earnestly in prayer he looks up to his Arab and western white masters.

  5. I can’t help but think modern Libertarianism is a political manifestation of the sociopathic and psychopathic mind trying in vain to create a highly axiomatic moral system.

    They often are the spergy types, the ones who struggle to understand the human condition, and what makes us human and motivates us, and civilisation. A lot of sociopaths probably cling on because ‘good’ and ‘bad’ are based on impersonal axioms rather than subjective experience. They can’t get that.

    In AnarCap/Libertarian thought, it is ‘good’ to let the market do its thing, even if it means that people will die while the company which sells the deadly product goes out of business due to market forces. It is ‘bad’ to take taxes from the uber-rich to stop little Timmy starving to death on the street, or to regulate said company so that people don’t die.

    I think they don’t quite get the basis of morality, and have reduced it to easy to understand axioms. Then morality can then easily be measured by adherence to those axioms. Simple! Easy!

    One glaring absence is the discussion of suffering and the human conditions. It simply doesn’t matter. It’s not even factored in. They don’t even consider that civilisation is a human enterprise to alleviate suffering and produce a qualitatively better life. Libertarians ignore the very basis for civilisation, hence why truly libertarian societies exist only outside of civilisation.

    Hey, if they don’t like civilisation, they are free to leave.

    1. Libertarians have had the chance to move to the libertarian paradise of Somalia for decades, funny that none of them have.

  6. Jews tend to hate Christianity, so any Jewish movement will hate it in some fashion. Nonetheless, WNs also hate Christian principles of mercy (viewing it as enabling babies (spoiling people contributing to thier laziness), and degenerating the race), as exhibited by this blog’s commenters ep-gah and others, so really, “What’s the difference”?

    1. I can see ittle difference in the WN philosophy and libertarianism, except for the WN emphasis on genetics and race, and sometimes special treatment for whites (exception to the rule). In other words, sometimes humble whites (assuming their physically fit, have no genetic defects etc.) are shown some mercy. (Not so though even for blacks etc.. who show a work ethic etc..)

      Libertarianism, however, is across the board, “no mercy”, “tough shit” 😆 for anyone regardless of background.

    2. The biggest problem with WN philosophy and it’s main weakness vs libertairianism, is at least libertarianism isn’t calling on the murder of the handicapped, and certain races. In other words, the so called “degenerate” are at least given a chance, even though chances are, in a libertarian world, they will be eaten up anyway. 😆

  7. To Bay Area Guy:

    Unlike the Chinese in Southeast Asia, Parsis in India, or other rich minorities – who mostly make money quietly – Jews are always leaving their imprint on their host nations.

    I don’t know about the Parsis in India but ethnic Chinese (or part Chinese) have historically been over represented in high level government positions in both the Philippines and Thailand. However, probably because of Islam, Indonesia and Malaysia have tended to restrain Chinese political power and influence.

  8. Libertarianism is one the most idiotic ways of thinking out there, and such thinking led to to every stock market crash imaginable. Leaving capitalist alone, even from a democratic (US Democratic Party) POV, not even a hardcore Communist one, is insane.

    Also, such a philosophy would lead to a massive Communist backlash, even in the USA (assuming your a person concerned about a communist threat). In other words, bring in the libertarians, make them rule, and you can count on a communists taking over. People can’t take hardcore libertarianism, they will revolt as they did in France in 1799 or many other times.

  9. To Bay Area Guy:

    Unlike the Chinese in Southeast Asia, … who mostly make money quietly

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thai_Chinese

    The Thai Chinese have been deeply ingrained into all elements of Thai society for the past 200 years. The present Thai royal family, the Chakri Dynasty, was founded by King Rama I who himself was partly Chinese. His predecessor, King Taksin of the Thonburi dynasty, was the son of a Chinese immigrant from Guangdong Province and a Thai mother. Many Thai Chinese self-identify solely as Thai. Descendants of Chinese in Thailand are among the leading Thai families today.

    Modern day, Thai Chinese exist at all levels of Thai society but dominate Thai business and politics. They play a leading role in the Thai business and commerce sector.The Thai Chinese business class is also dominant in the Thai finance sector. Thai Chinese also dominate the Thai political scene and most of the Thai Prime Ministers were at least of partial Chinese origin.

    1. Interesting stuff, but the point I was trying to make is that even if groups like the ethnic Chinese were disproportionately elite, they didn’t meddle with the culture of their host nations.

      Minorities are more than capable of lording over the masses while leaving their culture intact. Aside from demanding loyalty haircuts from Han men, the ruling Manchus of the Qing Dynasty let the majority Han Chinese retain their myriad cultural practices.

      1. To Bay Area Guy:

        Interesting stuff, but the point I was trying to make is that even if groups like the ethnic Chinese were disproportionately elite, they didn’t meddle with the culture of their host nations.

        Chinese Filipinos control 80% of the economy of the Philippines but are less than 2% of the population. Inherently any minority group controlling that much wealth will guide the culture. Chinese in Southeast Asia historically wield great influence but generally in a less obvious manner than with Jews in the US, possibly due to the very recent pogroms against ethnic Chinese in Indonesia, Malaysia, and to some extent the Philippines. In that environment any influence exerted by a minority would be somewhat hidden.

        Minorities are more than capable of lording over the masses while leaving their culture intact. Aside from demanding loyalty haircuts from Han men, the ruling Manchus of the Qing Dynasty let the majority Han Chinese retain their myriad cultural practices.

        Do you believe Jews have dramatically altered American culture..? Not necessarily disagreeing with you but I’m also not clear on what you mean. I agree they have outsized influence but they also have a substantial number of willing gentile allies. For example, support for Israel is very high among evangelical Christians and open US borders are heavily supported by old line business which are predominantly gentile such as farming, mining, and construction.

        1. Overseas Chinese typically do not mess with the cultures of the countries where they live. They have not done much to change the basic cultures of Indonesia, Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam, or Thailand. Their attitude is they want to keep out of the culture meddling thing. They just want the money and that’s it. Chinese politicians in those countries do not push a politics different from anyone else’s.

          Jews always meddle in the cultures of the nations of the Diaspora where they live, which causes a shit ton of anti-Semitism.

  10. I’ve heard the name Ayn Rand before, I’ve just read a bit about her and watched a John Oliver video about her, she is a very disgusting human being.

  11. You Robert think that with Jewish Libertarians America has reached the very bottom of the pit : no, you are dead wrong, Libertarians are just at Ground Zero.

    Political attitudes can be dispatched among not two but three main categories in a surprising neat way:

    Some take pretext of the pursuit of the common good or some form of abstract general good to justify their existence. That is the case with most brands of socialism and also of advanced liberalism such as John Stuart Mill’s. Some Jews, actually a great plurarity of the most vocal ones, not only identify with that attitude but go as far as to define the whole Jewish phenomenon as a kind of vanguard of Humanity’s long march towards a better future.

    Some others take pretext of the pursuit of their own personal good only, together with that of a certain limited group they identify with as necessary allies, as the motivation for their existence, at the expense of any others it maybe necessary to destroy or exploit for the advancement of one’s personal good, without any concern for any kind of common good, in the belief that either such a common good doesn’t exist (as Margaret Thatcher loved to state) or that it will care for itself all the better that way, that the greatest common good cannot but result from the unleashing of as many combined egoisms as possible (as the Philosophers of 18th Enlightenment Movement oved to state or more recently Milton Friedman). Some other Jews that have been more conspicuous as cult figures so as to occupy the limelight identify their Jewishness strongly with that attitude, and may go as far as to define the Jewish condition as the the entitlement to use others and the whole world for one’s own personal good.

    The debate seems to have happened only between these two categories, the left and the right, and more and more to the advantage of the egoistical right with the years passing in america, against the backdrop of an external world that is just getting more and more fed up with such a superpower caring only for itself and its holy place Israel.

    But this is leaving a third term out of the equation : many other people, far more numerous than we think, vie for the destruction of others and the pursuit of the degradation of their surrounding world as the one sole proof of their worth in their own eyes, of having any worth as human beings, of their very being alive. They will pursue the defeat of others even at the expense of their own victory, they will kill and make suffer even if it might mean more misery or sure death for themselves, confident as they are that such an attitude guarantees the best survival rate by the very sexual pleasure of crushing as much other beings “for the hell of it”, and makes one capable of developing occult powers stronger than the physical law themselves. They pursue no common good since they believe the Universe is perfect as it is as the battleground of the war of every being against all other beings for the absolute power of life and death over all other beings, a living being being nothing else than a spark of will to destroy other beings to put forth its own genes. Such people believe that the greater good, or better said God’s work creating new forms of life through the agency of warring genes, will result from the synthesis of all malevolences of everyone against everyone and especially against the deserters of the grand game of life, the prideful and deluded socialists that hope for another better universe, and the lazy and lustful libertarians that think the universe to be a hotel they are entitled to. This attitude is prevalent in many cultures. It is prevalent as a rule among Blacks, who seem to be biologically programmed to behave that way or at least to be governed by such an elite of Butt Naked and Idi Amins to the point they will respect none other. It is also prevalent in India especially within the framework of the Shaivite religion that in very coincidental in its formulation with the theses of sociobiology and see in God none other principle than of ruthlessness of everyone against his neighbour as the sole guarantee the cosmic order wil work. But the primitive Jewish religion (not the Talmud, which many consider as decadent as too heavily influenced bu Greek philosophy and Roman law and boy-scout style do-gooder attitudes more generally tempered by just a little dosage of egoism and tribal indifference for the outsiders) had and still has the best, simplest and most mathematical formulation ever, which is to be found among Jewish vitalists as were to be found within the fold of psychoanalysis and sexual liberation based on the unleashing of instincts.

  12. Educated anti-Semites don’t believe there is a giant Jewish conspiracy, just that they look out for their own interests with whatever movement they are involved in or create, hence making them all “good for the Jews” regardless.

    They just have different ideas about what is good for Jews. Always look for the double standard and you’ll see how the Jews are our enemy in whatever they are doing,

    Libertarianism is good for Jews because it pushes individualism for the goyim, while Jews practice racism and tribalism. It’s as simple as that.

    You should read Kevin MacDonald’s Culture of Critique if you haven’t already.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.