Who Is Behind Pedophile Mass Hysteria (Criminalization of Teenage Female Sexuality)?

Hasbrudal writes:

Good point. Parents are the primary reason for a lot of these laws. Parents don’t want their 16 year old daughters having sex with anyone. Parents more than feminists are why a 24 year old gets convicted for having sex with a 16 year old.

Sure but if parents have always opposed such things why are we seeing such a crazed breakout of Pedophile Mass Hysteria, which boils down to little more than the criminalization of the sexuality of teenage girls? So why the sudden explosion in this? Society was actually saner on this question in the past, even in the 70’s and 80’s when I was growing up.

What’s different now is feminism. There was hardly any feminist movement before, so these laws were relatively sane. My articles get linked fairly often to feminist forums, and male and female feminists both are absolutely insane on the subject of Jailbait sexuality, especially Jailbaits having sex with adult men. Nothing drives them more bonkers.

Feminism is Puritanism. Both male and female feminists are flat out Puritans.

And it’s not “parents.” Generally speaking, it is the father and the father only who is trying to protect his daughter from the evil men and boys out to molest his special little snowflake. I have no idea why fathers are so bonkers on this question. It’s like the girl is their property or something.

The mothers, on the other hand, were all teenage girls themselves so know how insanely horny most teenage girls are. Mothers get it. Usually the daughter will start having sex, confide in the mother, and Mom will help keep daughter supplied with birth control pills and whatnot. Then the girl and Mom make a silence pact to keep the dirty little secret from Dad.

Source: I have known many women with teenage daughters, and they pretty much all had this attitude. Also I knew a lot of teenage girls back in the day, and generally the mother was hip to the girl’s sexual activity and silently supporting her in some way or another while also urging her to be cautious.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

25 thoughts on “Who Is Behind Pedophile Mass Hysteria (Criminalization of Teenage Female Sexuality)?”

  1. Because fathers know what dirty bastards they are. They might not want to have sex with their own daughter, but when she brings her friends around dirty thoughts abound. They know her friends fathers have the same thoughts about their daughter. They feel guilty and angry. Rinse repeat.

  2. Parents weren’t always opposed to these things. Like adolescence it’s a relatively new development post Industrial revolution. Prior to that a person went from child to adult, there was no middle ground. In many ways parents still have the same responsibilities for an 7 year old as they do a 17 year old so they view them as children. While many mothers may be at least understanding if their 16 year old dated a 20 year old most would also be opposed to their daughter dating a 30 year old and at least uncomfortable with anyone of legal drinking age dating their daughter.

  3. While teenage girls as young as 13 are ready for sex, their consent is not entirely “volunteery” even if they give themselves up 100% out of their free will.

    Reason, these 13 years old girls are too inexperience and could be easily seduce by a much older men hanging a candy in front.

    As girls get older and see the world, getting her laid tends to be more difficult.

    That is what sexual grooming is all about. In Europe white man land, Pakistani pedophille have been grooming teenage girls, making friends with them, start raping them after a while, and even force them into prostitution.

    And once girls got groom for sex, life can never be normal for them again. The men who groomed them destroy their life.

    Trust me, I was a high school teacher/

    It make for a statutory rape law. Else everyone will be grooming teenage girls.

  4. I have seen teenage girls, after having sex early, proceed to have many sexual partners. Then this girl get a reputation of slut.

    She can never socialize in school without being despised. She drop out.

    Also boys tends to brag among buddies about their sexual conquest. And they may even share the girls with their buddies often under some form coercion.

    A slut teenage girls will felt used, She get suicidal.

    It make sense to have a law of statutory rape criminalizing sex under 16. Even Mr Robert Lindsay despise white slut (especially those who like got fuck by black), in his writing.

    Without love, sex is all about fiddling with pee hole, kissing some stink mouth, if you think deeper.

    You despise a women for all her dirt if you visualize her being a toilet bowl of 100 men, with cum in her face, her mouth and her vagina, doing all degenerated act.

    It is good to go back to Judeo-Christian principal and lead a righteous life.

    1. You despise a women for all her dirt if you visualize her being a toilet bowl of 100 men, with cum in her face, her mouth and her vagina, doing all degenerated act.

      Dude stop! You making me so horny!

  5. Anyhow, men don’t really dig the new scene. Websites with jailbait girls in bikinis etc.. (non-nude) are high traffic websites. Of course, it is kind of creepy to see ads with real porn on the websites. But these certain jailbait sites are 100 percent legal in the USA.

  6. Girls and women are disgusting horny creatures. They’re just as horny as the guys, and they’re that way as soon as they reach puberty. If some of them throw sex allegations etc.. it’s just a few of them being bitches.

  7. Often white supremacists are the biggest puritanical douchebags out there, It just goes a long with their intolerant “police” kind of mindset. They want to re-enslave the blacks, make the blacks and latinos work for their pay, or get the hell out, mock and persecute the homos etc.., and they also like to enforce moral puritanism cause it makes them feel more alpha.

    1. And what about the intolerant/forced-tolerance mindset of Liberals?
      Did you read about that new book for third graders promoting transsexuals?

      Or lawsuits against photographers/bakers who don’t want to participate in the perversion?

      Or that Germany is actually considering canceling Octoberfest, because it “offends” Moslem terrorists! (You know, for “refugees”, they’re not very grateful!)

      Or tolerating Urban Decay, and ever-increasing violent atmosphere, in the Holy Name of Diversity?

      And of course, crimping scientific research if it says ANYTHING OTHER THAN that we’re all equal!

      Scratch the surface of any “Liberal” and you’ll find a Totalitarian underneath!

      Or do you have a reason enforcing moral decay is more noble than enforcing more puritanical? What is the SJW movement if not ABASING themselves and their former moral code to prove how “Alpha” they are in this World of Lowered Expectations?

    2. Really? White supremacists are the problem to you?

      The truth is that while White nationalism is ludicrous joke in the US, the PC Nazis in the SPLC have essentially colonized American thought with their Cultural Marxist poison. It’s spread to the entire White West.
      The SPLC’s line is that some ghost-like White racists threaten the US. That’s hilarious. The truth is that assholes like the SPLC and their Identity Politics buddies are more dangerous to, and have done more harm to, this nation that the White nationalists could in countless centuries.

      Also, check out the ACLU’s jihad on behalf of criminal invaders: http://www.aclu.org/immigrants/index.html
      There’s a reason people nickname it the American CRIMINAL Liberties Union now…Except maybe they need to take out that “American” part, it could be racist!

    3. Actually, about that “More Alpha”, could it be considered a kind of overcompensation for the emotional beatdown whites suffer constantly?

      Why can’t Whites just say, “I love you,” to that White face in the mirror without turning into total racist assholes? Or at least being CALLED such?

      We Whites were and are not allowed to feel good about ourselves in any way whatsoever and all statements to that effect were and are seriously punished. As in, you lost your job, your career was over. Stuff like that. In its place was substituted White apathy and White self-abasement. Whites were expected to say, “I don’t care about being White.” Or, better, they would say, “I’m White. I’m inferior. Haha,” while listening to Lou Reed singing “I Want to Be Black.”

      The net effect was that all the sane White people dropped their ethnocentrism. The only Whites left with the balls or craziness to say they were ethnocentric were the true racist crazies who just didn’t care. Just like when they say, “When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.”

      If you are an African, Asian, Arab, Indian, Jew, Gypsy, Mexican, or Eskimo and you fight for your peoples’ freedom and heritage, that shows how much LOVE? you have for your people. It makes you beautiful.
      If you belong to a European people and you fight for your peoples’ freedom and heritage, that shows how much you HATE other peoples and secretly want to exterminate them. It makes you ugly.
      Isn’t that the current narrative? Savages actually TRY to exterminate their hosts, but are oddly never called on it! Why are the negative connotations ONLY attached to white groups, when the nonwhite groups have done far worse, far more recently?

  8. Would you say that sex is “permissible” with an under 18 year old child IF the adult can insert his penis inside the female’s body without causing structural damage?
    Usually, by the age of 9, a girl is sufficiently developed that she can engage in consistent sex without damaging her body.

    In orphanages, many sex abuse begins at the age of 9. Of course, no compulsion or duress shout be used against anyone to compel them to have sex. But if the person voluntarily engages in sex, what is the lowest age you find permissible?

  9. Laying it all at the feet of feminists is at best too narrow a focus. There are a number of things converging.
    First is just a shift in the view of what constitutes childhood today people are expected to attend school till at least 17/18 and even after are often referred to as “kids” till their early 20’s watch college football where the players are typically between 18-24, but coaches and announcers call them kids.

    The rise of the religious right who make up a majority or near majority of GOP voters. This was a group that largely remained apolitical until the late 1970’s this group has often found common cause with feminists on issues of sexual morality. Jerry Falwell and Andrea Dworkin were on the same side when AG Ed Meese was going after porn in the early 80’s.

    One of the easiest way to get legislation passed is to say it’s to protect children from predators. Who wants to stand up for pedophiles against children. For AG’s and DA’s pedo’s are great criminals to go after they aren’t that dangerous to arresting officers have no constituency and putting x number of pedophiles behind bars looks great for an election/re-election campaign who is gonna point out that a large number of those pedos are hebephiles or ebephiles?
    I don’t disagree that feminism plays a role in these stupid laws, but over protective parents and the religious right (who would like to make any sex outside of missionary position between married couples for the sole purpose of procreation illegal) are as big if not a bigger factor.

    1. Christians are leading a march against pedophiles along with feminists. It’s pretty much a no-brainer to suggest southern USA states will never legalize weed, or lower the consent age to 14 or so.

    2. Politicians are leading the fight against pedos, as a strong stand against them is necessary for re-election. Of course, when going against pedos, they go overboard, also attacking normal adult desire for teenage girls.

  10. Robert, I think you’re missing the point. In the old days girls got married young, presumably to older males who could support and create a family with them.

    If a guy is just going to hit and quit your young daughter, would you appreciate this?

    How is she going to be a virgin when she gets married if she has sexuality as a teen and more than one partner?

    A girl definitely has to be a virgin in order to be marriage material.

  11. It should be illegal to have relations (including dating) with a girl under 18. It is just not right. You wouldn’t let a 17 year old give themselves the right to vote. No voting, no porking.

    1. What is your point? This is already the law here in California and in a number of other states. Other states have lower AOC’s down to age 16 I believe.

      Should it be illegal for someone under 18 to have sex with a girl under 18?

      1. It shouldn’t be illegal for an older person to marry someone under 18, but just to have sex without marrying them is wrong.

        Actually premarital sex should be outlawed, with marital sex being allowed at any age

  12. Yeah, I’d pretty much put the blame on politicians, above parents or feminists. Politicians have to look tough on pedos to get re-elected. Not looking so, means “curtains” for them. Also, pedos are the only “OK” group to hate and crucify these days, considering the PC world we live in.

    1. Pedos, including guys with normal desires for teenage girls, are society’s new “scapegoat” or “whipping boy”. Society can let out their hateful frustration on them, as in they did in the past with blacks or Jews.

  13. 15 year old girls weren’t having rampant premarital sex 100 years ago – they were getting married young. The only reason these age of consent laws are needed is because morals have been thrown out the window thanks to ….well, guys who hold philosophical believes that are in line with the Democratic Party: Feminism’s fight against “slut-shaming” for example.
    Gay push to lower age of consent laws. Sexualization of young girls on TV.
    You guys think this is a good thing I guess but it leads to kids growing up without dads.

    Sex as a means to create children inside a family – sex for sport leads to problems.

    It would be interesting to look at cultures, IQs, achievements, etc.. and compare that to sexual impulse control. Take a wiling and beautiful 15 year old girl and put her in a room with various men from various cultures. I guarantee the 30 year old man from Somalia would have sex with her. I wouldn’t. What about you guys?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *